12/11/1995 - 4890�
OFFICIAL CITY COtJffiCIL AGBNDA
COIINCIL l[EETINa
DBCEMH$it 11, 1995
.�
'� FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING
unror
F���' ATTENDENCE SHEET
Manday, �ecembelc 11, 1995
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY)
� r`
�
�_ . {_,�.
,q i i �.�zi�� � �'"c..c-l�
� � � ti�1� �i �—=� ��1
��
�
ADDRESS
3 � � 7 � v,� ��' s-��� ��.
� `� � S � S'� S� � � � � iJ i�' � %� LS y� � �� Lit7
��
���� �t�� ��} ��� � /��,.r� �rt�G�e ���s �
;, /� � �� � .�a���t��
�
'�' , lj/=�
ITEM
NUMBER
/V OY! �UC�U
�
� �_,�,-��
;7, v/-,
�.i i%�-�i
�
�
arY oF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
DECEMBER 11, 1995
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment,
or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request,
accommodarion will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services,
programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities
who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance.
(TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of November 27, 1995
Speciai City Councii Meeting of December 5, 1995
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
OLD BUSINES :
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Recodifying the Fridley City Code,
Chapter 216, Entitled "Storm Water
Drainage Utility" by Amending
Section 216.04 � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 - 1.02
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETlNG OF DECEMBER 11, 1995 Page 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
First Reading of an Ordinance Under
Section 12.07 of the City Charter to
Vacate Streets and Alleys and to
Amend Appendix C of the City Code
(Vacation Request, SAV #94-04, by
Gary Hedman) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . .
First Reading of an Ordinance Under
Section 12.07 of the City Charter to
Vacate Streets and Alleys and to
Amend Appendix C of the City Code
(Vacation Request, SAV #95-05, by
Industrial Equities) (Ward 9 ) . . . . .
............ 2.01-2.03
............ 3.01 -3.04
Variance Request, VAR #95-32, by
Industrial Equities, to Allow Loading
Docks in the Front Yard Facing Northco �
Drive, to Allow Construction of an .
87,600 Square Foot Multi-Tenant
Office/VVarehouse Industriaf Building,
Generally Located at the Southwest
Corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco
Drive (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.07
Resolution Approving the Creation
of Tax Increment District No. 14 and
Adopting a Tax Increment Financing
Plan Related Thereto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0'I - 5.20
�
#� :_
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETlNG OF DECEMBER 11,1995 Page 3
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSfNESS (CONTINUED�
Approve Comprehensive Sign Plan
Amendment for 7570 Highway 65 N.E.
{Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.04
Resolution Authorizing Changes in
Appropriations for the General Fund �
for the Year 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.03
Resolution Authorizing the Transfer
of up to $190,000 from the Closed
Bond Fund to the Solid Waste
Abatement Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.03
Resolution Providing for a Storm
Water Drainage Rate Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.01 - 9.03
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 1995 Page 4
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED C�NSENT AGENDA•
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED.�•
Resolution Approving the Final
Agreement Between the City of
Fridley, Ramsey County and the
Rice Creek Watershed District
Resolving the Litigation Over the
Locke Lake Improvement Project
.............. 10.01-10.14
Resolution Authorizing an Increase
in Compensaiion for Fridley City
Employees for the 1996 Calendar
Year ..................................... 11.01-11.02
Appointment: City Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01
Claims ................................... 13.01
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.01 - 14.03
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 - 15.07
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 1995 Page 5
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORUM�VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
On-Sale License to Gourmet Village,
Generally Located at 7890 University
Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.0'f -16.08
Establish Stonybrook Creek Special �
Tax District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 -17.08
OLD BUSINESS:
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Recodifying the Fridley City Code, �
Chapter 31, Entitled "Pawn Shops,"
by Amending Sections 31.06, 31.11,
31.12, 31.13, and Adding New Section
31.14, and Renumbering the Remaining
Sections Consecutiveiy, and Amending
Chapter 11, "General Provisions and �
Fees" ....................................
\�__
18.01 - 18.12
�
�
t
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETtNG OF DECEMBER 11, 1995 Page 6
NEW BUSINESS:
Resolution Adopting a Budget
for the Fiscal Year 1996 . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.01 - 19.03
Resolution Declaring the Necessity to
Levy a Tax Which Appears to be in
Excess of 16 Mills and Certifying Tax
Levy Requirements for 1996 to the
County of Anoka for Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.03
Variance Request, VAR #95-34,
by Erickson Oil Products, to lncrease
the Maximum Size of a Free-Standing
Sign from 80 Square Feet to 126
Square Feet, Generally Located at
7600 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 3)
.............. 21.01 -21.19
Informa! Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.0'!
ADJOURN:
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMgER 11, 1995
1"
.
C7TY OF
FRIDLEY
��,�,,��
The City of Fridiey will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or
employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, nationat origin, sex, disability,
age, marital status, sexual orientation or status:with cegard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be
provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing
impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact
Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANGE:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of November 27, 1995
l�-��2��.�-t r-(' l,�-� . �� �%'�-�.—
/
Special City Council Meeting of December 5, 1995
.. ��y���C..� �1�,,.�-t.c—�.c...-� .t���
`%� L "
�
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
OLD BUSINESS:
Secon� Readir+� ef an Ordinance
Recodifying the Fridley Ciry Code,
Chapter 216, Entitled "Storm Water
Drainage Utility" by Amending
Section 216.04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 - 1.02
��,� Y�. Gr.c.--si t�-� /�/G���L�G�/�GG,��%
� � ��
�
� �''C..� � '� --` ,
NEW BUSINESS:
First Reading of an Ordinance Under
Section 12.07 of the City Charter to
Vacate Streets and Alleys and to
Amend Appendix C of the City Code
(Vacation Request, SAV #94-04, by
Gary Hedman) (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . 2.01 - 2.03
�,��---��
��
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI:
First Reading of an Ordinance Under
Section 12.07 of the City Charter to
Vacate Streets and Alleys and to
Amend Appendix C of the City Code
(Vacation Request, SAV #95-05, by
Industrial Equities) (Ward 1) . . : . . . . 3.01 - 3.04
/,�-���.
Variance Request, VAR #95-32, by
Industrial Equities, to Allow Loading
Docks in the Front Yard Facing Northco
Drive, to Allow Construction of an
87,600 Square Foot Multi=Tenant
OfficelVllarehouse Industrial Building,
Generally Located at the Southwest
Comer of 73rd Avenue and Northco
Drive (Ward 1 j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.07
��-�`��' ,2�ti.��
(��� ����`z �
Resolution Approving the Creation
af Tax Increment District No. 14 and
Adopting a Tax Increment Financing
Plan Related Thereto . . . . . . . . . . 5.01 - 5.20
��_�L���� �� _
Approve Comprehensive Sign Plan
Amendment for 7570 Highway 65 N.E.
(Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.04
�/i���,_..�..%L. .
uthorizin Chan es in �`iy�
Resolution A g 9 G�� �
Appropriations for the General Fund
for the Year 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.03
� _
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA•
NEW BUSINESS�CONTINUEDL
Resolution Authorizing the Transfer
of up to $990,Q00 from the Closed
Bond Fund to the Solid Waste
Abatement Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.03
G7��--r-� .... .5�� ��� � -�.�-�` � �z��
. l�� �, �-��v.--�.
Resolution Providing for a Storm
Water Drainage Rate Change ...... 9.01 - 9.03
<,� � �iY�� ��--
Resolution Approving the Final
Agreement Between the City of
Fridley, Ramsey County and the
Rice Creek Watershed District
Resolving the Litigation Over the
Locke Lake Improvemenf Project
����c �� .
. . . 10.01 -10.14
Resolution Authorizing an Increase
in Compensation for Fridley City
Employees for the 1996 Calendar
Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 -11.02
1���
• +-s` ,. , �� ,
Appointm� t: City Employees ...... 12.01
L'-
�.
Claims , . .����:`'``.'. . . ... . . . .. . 13.01
Licenses . . �'.�.�.��:`''�� . . . 14.01 -14.03
�
Estimates . . . .G.��. . . . . . 15.01 -15.07
�� ;�, : �.������` ,�.�_,,�_ J ��
�
�-r-�����
ADOPTION OF AGENDA, � � � 3�
�
�.
`'�;JBLIC HEARINGS:
On-Sale License to Gourmet Village,
Generally Located at 7890 University
Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.01 - 16.08
���� ����
.�% J �
Establish Stonybrook Creek Special
Tax District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 -17.08'
�Q -- � , ,�' =�
, _
�' �;' Lo
OLD BUStNESS:
Second Reading of an Ordinance •
Recodifying the Fridley City Code,
Chapter 31, Entitled `Pawn Shops,"
by Amending Sections 31.06, 31.11,
31.12, 31.13, and Adding New Section
31.14, and Renumbering the Remaining
Sections Consecutively, and Amending
Chapter 11, "General Provisions and
Fees'�e{� , ��-�� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.01 - 18.12
� ,�,e.,� _ ,,���-�-�., •�-�� .��� .��`, a-.�
�� � l�, /o
NEW BUSINESS: ��� �( a�j�.,t...�-'� ,,��µ�
�---
Resolution Adopting a Budget i 5���1�---
.-
for the Fiscal Year 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . �. . . 19.01 - 19.Q�
�. .t.-
�-��.-�--� 4�� : �� l.y-�-,
� �
Resolution Declaring the Necessity to �" �✓
Levy a Tax Which Appears to be in �� '
Excess of 16 Mills and Certify�ng Tax
Levy Requirements for 1996 to the
County of Anoka for Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.03
�..t,�� f✓ � �� .�—
�y ��--' �'. � � I�' v�-�( . �'`�p��'i-.��
anance Request, �R # 5-34, /1��
by Erickson Oil Products, to Increase '��
the Maximum Size of a Free-Standing
Sign from 80 Square Feet to 126
Squa�e Feet, Generally Located at �
7600 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 3) .. .. 21.01 - 21.19
_?_'�� �� �� �� �,���.,�.�. ,�
�-�� �ti�� ,��,=�' . � �=„r.�-- j y �� �,�- � , �,.��.�
OP�N FORUM. VISITORS: i � � // Informal Status Re o s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.01
�--� � � --�- �-=� G i�i� - �-�� ��
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda 1�� 5 Minutes) ��,�_,� �
��
G� Z� �,G_� AJ�JOURN:
� ! , ��
t�
THB l[INDT88 OB T88 F'RZDLI�Y CITY COLNCIL l[ELTIII�i OF
�
s
NOVBMS$R 27, 1995
TH$ MINOTES OF THE REGQLAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
NOVEMBER 27. 1995
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to tY�e Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayo� Nee, Councilman Billings and Councilman
Schneider
MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Jorgenson and Councilwoman Bolkcom
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETiNG, NOVEMBER 13. 1995:
MOTION by Councilman Schaieider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
Mr. �urns, City Manager, reviewed the proposed consent agenda
items.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. A�PROVE PARK NAME FOR PARK PROPERTY SOUTH OF RICE CREEK
TOWNHOUSES: .
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the Parks and Recreation
Commission recommended that the park be named Creek View Park.
Iie stated that the neighborhood has been polled, and nut of
the eight persons responding, seven indicated that they liked
the na�ne Creek View Park fnr the park property south of the
Rice Creek Townhouses. He stated that it is recommended that
Council approve this name for the park and authorize the in-
stallation of a park sign in early spring.
APPROVBD THS NAME OF CREER VIBW PARIt FOR TH8 PARH PROPERTY
SOIITH OF THE RICE CREER TOWNAOIISES AND AIITHORIZBD T8S IN-
8'1'ALLATION OF A PARR BIGN.
2. APPROVE HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT FOR THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE
COMMUNITIES ACTz
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that at the October 23, 1995
meeting, Council electesi to participate in the housinq
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 27, 199s P31GE 2
incentives program and agreed to sup��rt th� six �rinciples
of the Act. He reviewed the benchmarlcs and stated that the
City agrees to use benchmarks esta�lished for this area
regarding affordability, life-cycle, ar�3 density. He stated
that the City is now within these benctxmarks.
APPROVED TH8 HOIISING _GOALS AGREEMEN�' FOR TtiE METROPOLITAN
LIVEABLB COMMIINITIES ACT AND AIITHORIZED TH� MAYOR TO SIGN
SAMF.
3. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODI�YING THE FRaDLEY CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 31, ENTITLED "PAWN SHOPS," BY AMENDING SECTIONS
31.06. 31.11. 31.12. 31.13, AND ADDING NEW SECTION 31.14, AND
RENUMBERING THE REMAINING SECTIONS CONSECUTIVELY. AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 1Z. "GENERAL PROVISIONS AND FEES:"
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated tha� the Public Safety
Director, David Sallman, is recommending seven changes to
Chapter 31 of the City Code. He stated tha� these changes
would: (1) limit the number of pawn shop licenses in the City
to three; (2) require that record keeping conform with re-
quirements af automated record �Ceeping software being de-
veloped by the Minneapolis Police Department; (3) provide
changes in customer identificatio�; (4) require that the
pawned items be stored on the premises; (5) limit the
conditions under which property may be received by the
licensee; (6) limit the conduct of persons on the licensed
premises; and (7) raise the annual pawn shop license from
$8,000 to $15,000 a year to cover the cost of eniorcement and
monitoring.
WAIVED THE READIN(3 AND APPROVED THE ORDINANCTs ON FIRST
READING.
4. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE CHAPTER 216. ENTITLED "STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY" BY
AMENDING SEC'�ION 2i6.04:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this amendment would
allow storm water drainage fees to be set by Council
resolution.
WAIVED T8E READIIJG AND APPROVED THS ORDINANCl3 ON FIRST
READING.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 89-1995 CONFIRMING THE AMOUNTS HELD IN CHANGE
FUNDS WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND AND MUNICIPAL LI4UOR FUND•
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this resolution consoli-
dates all of Council's previous actions on change funds, as
well as approves an increase of $100 in tY�e change fund at the
front counter. He stated that the front counter change fund
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 2�, 1995 PAGB 3
needs to be increased to allow for a second cash drawer that
will be used on Tuesday nights when City offices are open
until 7:00 p.m.
ADOPTBD REBOLIITION NO. 89-1995.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 90-1995 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT TO SPRING LAKE PARK
LIONS {LONGHORN GRILL & BAR� LWARD 3'e
Mr. Burns, City Manger, stated that this is a request to allow
a lawful gambling premises permit at Longhorn Grill and Bar
by the Spring Lake Park Lions.
ADOPTED RESOLIITION NO. 90-1995.
7. CLAIMS'
AIITHQRIZED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NOB. 65190 THROiJGH 65414.
8. LICENSES•
APPROVLD THL LZC8NSB8 AS BIIBMITTTsD AND AS ON FII.$ IN THS
LICE11fSL CLERR' 8 OFFICL.
No persons in the audience commented on the consent agenda items.
MoTION by Councilma� Scttneider to approve the consent aqenda items .
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as
5econded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote,
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
submitted.
all voting
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS�
9. PUBLIC HEARTNG TO AMENB REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1. AND
CREATE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 14:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
7:52 p.m.
FRIDLEY CITY COiJNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBl3R 2�, 1995 PAGE 4
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that the subject
parcel is located at the southeast corner of 73rd Avenue and the
University Avenue Service Drive. She stated that the project is
to be known as the Fridley Business Center and will consist of a
one-story 88,000 square foot building for use as office/warehouse.
She stated that the parcel is in an M-2 zoning district, and it is
anticipated that companies involved in printing, electronics, and
high technology would occupy the space. She stated that there are
vacation and variance requests associated with this project. She
stated that the developer has indicated they have tentatively iden-
tified a tenant for about half the space and nee3 occupancy in the
spring of next year.
Ms. Dacy stated that tax increment financing assistance is re-
quested for this project, and the site is already in a redevelop-
ment project area. She stated that there has been conceptual
approval by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for assistance
in the form of a loan and a grant for soil correction and reloca-
tion of the storm sewer on this site. She stated that the soil
reports indicate that there are a number of areas where peat and
organic clays need to be removed and silty sand needs to be
replaced. She stated that approximately 27,000 cubic yards of fill
is needed on the site after removaZ of the poor soils.
Ms. Dacy stated that this would be Tax Increment Financing District
No. 14, but there will only be eleven active tax increment finan-
cing distric�s, as two districts, No. 4 and 5, were decertified in
1994 �nd 1995, and District �To. 8 will be decertified in 1996. She
stated that this new district would expire in the year 2006. She
stated that the LGA/HACA penalty can be avoided by paying a Iocal
contribution equal to ten percent of the annual tax increment. She
stated that by paying the local contribution from unrestricted
revenue from the HRA, a savings of $129,815 would be realized.
Ms. Dacy stated that after the public hearing this evening, a reso-
lution to create this district will be submitted to the Council on
December 11. The HRA will consider the development contract for
assistance on December 14.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding the creation of this tax
increment financing district.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion ca�riecl unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 7:58 p.m.
10. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION RE4UEST, SAV #95-04 BY GARY
-LIEDMAN, TO VACATE A UTILITY EASEMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT
60-70TH WAY N.E. (WARD 3j:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilraan
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 27. 1995 PAGE 5
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
7:58 p.m.
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this request is to
vacate a utility easement at 60 ?Oth Way N.E. He stated that the
petitioner's home was constructed over the eas�ment, and this en-
croachment was revealed at a recent sale of the home. He stated
that the title company is requesting this easement be vacated.
Mr. Hickok stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval
of this vacation with two stipulations: (1) the petitioner dedi-
cate a new utility easement adjacent to the westerly lot line of
the subject parcel; and (2) a verifying survey shall be submitted
by the petitioner, which shall determine the width of the new
easement between the dwelling and the westerly lot line. In all
other areas along the west lot line, the easement shall be ten feet
and shall be indicated on said survey and, in no case, will the
easement be required to be wider than ten feet �n this property.
He stated that staff concurs with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed vacation
request.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:01 p.m.
11. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION REQUEST. SAV #95-05, BY INDUSTRIAL
EQUITIES. TO VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ORIGINALLY
DEDICATED ON THE RECORDED PLATS OF NORTHCO BUS�NESS PARK AND
NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 73t'2D AVENUE AND NORTHCO DRIVE LWARD ):
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all vot�ing aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
8:01 p.m.
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for
vacation of a 20 foot drainage and utility easement to allow the
construction of an office/warehouse industrial building. He stated
that the 24 inch storm water line will be relocated.
Mr. Iiickok stated that this request has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission, and staff concurs with the recommendation for
approval with two stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall maintain
the storm water drainage system from the manhole located in the
southeast corner of the parking lot and the outlet located at the
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIN(i OF NOVEMBBR 27, 1995 PAGL 6
intersection of 73rd Avenue and the East University Avenue Service
Road; and (2) the petitioner shall execute and recard against the
property a storm water pond maintenance agreement.
Mr. Al Quam, 399 73rd Avenue N.E., statec� that he would like
Council to withhold approval of this vacation until such time that
an acceptable landscaping plan can be developed. He suggested
landscaping in the 73rd Avenue median to screen this property from
the neighborhood to the north.
Mr. Hickok stated that ail the setbacks have been met, and the
amount of Iandscaping is based on the building dimensions. He
stated that he believed the landscaping plan can be designed to
meet code requirements and enhance the site.
Councilman Schneider stated that landscaping in the boulevard area
would have to be maintained, and asked Mr. Quam if the residents
would be willing to pay extra taxes for this maintenance.
Mr. Quam stated that he would be willing to pay for the
maintenance. He also suggested that if some landscaping could be
placed in the median, it would spare the residents from looking at
the development.
Councilman Schneider fe�t that was is a planning issue, and the
item before Council at this time is a public hearing for the
vacation of an easement.
Councilman Billings stated that as he understands, Mr. Quam is
requesting that the petitioner or the City pay for some land-
scaping, and he did not feel the issue of the vacation and land-
scaping are connected.
Mr. A11en, the petitioner, stated that he felt the landscaping
could be worked out. Fie stated that there is not a great deal that
would be required but perhaps some majestic spruce. He assured
Council that this project is not something Mr. Quam would object
to looking at and would be a credit to the neighborhood.
Mayor Nee stated that he takes this as an offer to work out the
landscaping and keep in contact with the residents on the plans.
MOTION by Counciiman Billings to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:17 p.m.
12. PUBLIC HEARING ON STONYBROOK CREEK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 246:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public
hearinq notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF NOVEMB$R 2i. 1995 PAG$ 7
Billings. Upon a voiae vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
8:17 p.m.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this public hearing
is necessary to initiate the project for the improvement of Stony-
brook Creek. He stated that Petition Nwaber 6A-1995 was received
signed by eleven property owners agreeing to the $2,000 assessment
and waiving the right to a public hearing. He stated that a
petition has now been received from seven property owners
supportinq this improvement, the $2,000 assessment, and waiving the
right to a public hearing. He stated that these two petitions
incorporate all of the properties on the Stonybrook Creek portion
of the project.
Mr. Flora recommended that the petition be received and the public
hearing be closed.
No persons in the audience spoke reqarding this improvement proj ect
for Stonybrook Creek.
Councilman Schneider stated that a letter�was received regarding
the easements.
Mr. Flora stated that easements have been executed except for two
properties, and the majority are pe�manent easements. He stated
that the Netzs and Martins ind�cated that they wili sign the
construction easements after they are changed to inelicate a
temporary easement and a final drainage utility easement. He
stated that ths Sombrios indicated that they will sign a release
agreement once the project has been completed. He stated that once
work is completed the easements will allow for maintenance on the
pipe and ditch systems.
MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to receive Petition No. 12-1995.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:23 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS•
13. VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #95-31, BY ANTHONY AND JOYCE SWANSON,
TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
�RO�I _�7.5 FEET TO .5 FEET TO ALIAW RECONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE,
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6601 LUCIA LANE N.E. (WARD 2):
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request to
allow a variance from the required setback of 17.5 feet to .5 feet
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF NOVSMBER 2i, 1995 PAGE 8
for a side yard on a corner lot adjacent to a public right-of-way.
He stated that the variance is requested to allow the reconstruc-
tion of a garage.
Mr. Hickok stated that the Planning Commission and staff reviewed
this variance request and determined that there are really three
alternatives. He stated that these alternatives are: (1) to
vacate the 66th Avenue right-of-way between Lucia Lane and Pierce
Street; (2) locate the garage behind the house 17.5 feet from the
property line; and (3j locate the garag� behind the dwelling facing
the south property �ine and 25 feet from the rear property line and
acquire an easement from the City to drive on the 66th Avenue
right-of-way to access the garage.
Mayor Nee asked if 66th Avenue was closed if it wouid adversely
affect the traffic in the neighborhood.
Mr. Hickok stated that the potential for a street is debatable.
He stated that, at this time, it is landscaped property that is
being enjoyed by the property owners.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the right-of-way for
66th Avenue has been acquired to provide access between Lucia Lane
and Pierce Street. He stated that this provides the City
possibilities for future development.
Councilman Schneider stated that the only reason for the variance
is because of the platted riqht-of-�way. He felt that if a street
has not been constructed in the last thirty years, it should
probably be determined if there is a need for the right-of-way.
He stated that he can see the need to continue Pierce Street in
order to open up possible development of lots in the future, but
he questioned if the 66th Avenue right-of-way was really needed.
Mr. Flora stated that the 66th Avenue right-of-way is another way
of distributing traffic if Pierce Street is opened. He stated that
if this right-of-way is vacated, it eliminates an option.
Mr. Hickok stated that if 66th Avenue was vacated the land would
be added to the four adjacent properties. This would increase the
value of these properties from $2, 000 to $3, 900, and increase taxes
in a range of $44 to $86 per year. He stated that for this
particular site, the value would increase by $2,700, and taxes
would be increased by $59 per year.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this variance request and
request staff to submit a report on thp pros and cons of vacating
the 66th Avenue right-of-way. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Councilman Schneider stated that he did not feel the variance is
very significant. He proposed to grant the variance and, if the
City vacates the easement, the petitioner would accept it. He
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF NOVEMB$R 27, 1995 PAGB 9
stated that this right-of-way is being used now by all the adjacent
property owners, and it seems the right-of-way should be vacated
and added to the tax rolls.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Variance Request, VAR
#95-31, with the stipulation that should the 66th Avenue right-of-
way be vacated by the City, the petitioner agrees to accept this
parcel, maintain it, and pay taxes on it. Further, to direct staff
to report on the pros and cons of vacating 66th Avenue. Seconded
by Councilman Billings.
Councilman Billinqs stated that he has a problem of approving a
variance that is within six inches of the right-of-way. He stated
that a variance has already been granted for 14-1/2 feet. He felt
that this would be setting a danqerous precedent. He stated that
it seems highly unlikely that the street will ever by constructed.
If the street is vacated, the variance would not be necessary. He
stated that if, in fact, the street is needed, a variance would
have been approved which is greater than any in the history of the
City when there really is not a hardship involved. This would be
in violation of the spirit and intent af the State statute. He
stated that he would vote against the variance because if the
street is not vacated and constructed at some future date, the
garaqe would be too close to the street.
Councilman Schneider stated that the garage has been there for 25
years, and the street has not been constructed. He stated that the
alternate location for tMe gar_aqe places it immediately behind the
house, and the driveway would have to be much longer. He stated
that the options are not very practical, and he did not feel there
would be a pressing need to construct this street.
Mr. Swanson, the petitioner, stated that if he built the garaqe in
the back, his neighbors would only have a view of the garage
instead of the trees. He stated that if he rebuilds the qarage
where it is now located, he is still twelve feet from the right-
of-way. For the two foot variance, he would be ten feet from the
right-of-way. He did not feel that there would be that much of a
difference between ten or twelve feet.
Mrs. Swanson stated that these buildings have been in existence on
Lucia Lane over thirty years, and they wanted to improve their
property and construct a new garage.
Councilman Schneider asked if all four property owners must agree
to a vacation.
Mr. Hickok stated that the vacation policy for alleys has been to
have one hundred percent in support for a vacation. He stated that
staff viewed this as being similar to an alley vacation.
Councilman Billings stated that the most important question is
whether adjacent property owners are in favor or opposed, but the
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQrOF NOVEMB$R 27. 1995 PAGL 10
vacation is at Council's discretion. He stated that the policy,
in particular to vacation of alleys, is that the City wanted one
hundred percent participation because that is an access to a
particular property. He stated that in this particular instance,
it is not that critical because access to these properties would
not be affected.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table Variance Request, VAR �95-31
until the Council meeting on January 8, 1996. Seconded by Council-
man Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, l�ayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to direct staff to prepare an
analysis of the pros and cons of vacating 6bth Avenue and to
present a report to the Council prior to thQ Council meetinq of
January 8, 1996. Seconded by.Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
14. RESOLUTION NO. 91-1995 ADOPTING A DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY
IMPLEMENTING THE FEDERAL OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE
TESTiNG ACT AND RELATED REGULATIONS:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manaqer, stated that in 1988, the
Federal government passed a Drug Free Workplace Act that led to a
policy for all City employees that was approved by Council in May,
1993. He stated that in February, 1994, a new set of regulations
were initiated for the Transportation Safety Act that included
municipalities. He stated this means that employees who drive
large trucks, drivers of buses which transport sixteen or more
passengers, or drivers of trucks of any size that transport
hazardous materials are subject to these requlations. He stated
that the City is,required by law to have a policy covering these
kinds of occasions. He reviewed the six different kinds of tests.
Mr. Hunt stated that cities can choose to implement the regulations
individually or join a consortium aclministered by a third party.
He stated that he is recommending that the City enter into a
service agreement with Kerr Transportation Services, Inc. doing
busiriess as Metro-Test to administer the City�s-participation in
their consortium. He stated that the City Attorney has reviewed
the aqreement with Kerr Transportation Services, Inc. and
recommends that a provision be added that specifies this service
agreement is connected to our policy. He stated that there is no
reference as to how much insurance Kerr Transportation should carry
which should probably be included. He stated that there also is
some language that is apparently omitted under Item 10, Indemnifi-
cation, which should be inserted. He recommended that the resolu-
tion be adopted to approve the aqreeme�t and that the City Attorney
work out the details with Kerr Transportation.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 91-1995.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF NOVSI�B�R 2i. 1995 PAGB 11
MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend the last paragraph in
Resolution No. 91-1995 by deletinq the words "the attachedn and
substituting the word "a." Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
• � • �•I �"• � �_ �
�s •' �i�_ :�_ � • •�� ='�• � ,e_'�• �_��_
-� •
Mr. Burns, City Manaqer, stated that there will be another public
hearing process for the ad valorem levy for this project. He
stated that if this resolution is adopted, the City is authorizing
proceeding prior to the ad valorem levy hearing. He stated that
the Public Works Director feels it is important to beqin this
proj ect .
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 92-1995.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
16. RECEIVE PROPOSAL AND APPROVE CONTRACT WITH MAIER_STEWART &
ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF WELL NO. 12 FILTRATION PLANT
�,WARD 2 ) :
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that Maier Stewart &
Associates conducted a preliminary study of filtering the City's
water system. Iie stated that by installing a new filter at Well
No. 12, it would satisfy the City's demand for the removal of
manganese and iron by filtering eight millions gallons of water
per day. He stated that Maier Stewart & Associates has submitted
plans and specifications for a filter plant at Well No. 12, and it
is recommended that they be contracted to provide the design and
construction inspection of the filtration plant for Well No. 12 at
a cost of $125,465.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to enter into a contract with Maier Stewart & Associates
for the design and construction inspection of Well No. 12
filtration plant at a cost not to exceed $125,465. Seconded by
Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
17. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there were no informal status
reports.
FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MELTINti OF NOVSMBLR 27, 1995 PAG$ 12
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of November 27, 1995 adjourned at
9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
TSE MIDiUTBB 08 THS 8$PCIAL BRIDI.BY CITY COQNCIL
ILEBTING OF DFCBMBLR 5, 1995
SP$CIAL ME$TING OF TH$ FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL OF D$CEMB$R 5, 1995
The Special Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:32 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Schneider.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider led the Council and audience in the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Schneider, Councilman Billings
and Councilwoman Bolkcom
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Nee and Councilwoman Jorgenson
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider stated that Mayor Nee has been havinq some
difficulty with his leg and was recently hospitalized. He stated
that Mayor Nee is doing well and should be out of the hospital
soon.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilman Billings.
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider stated that the City Attorney's staff has
advised Council that action cannot be taken on Item 2 as a four-
fifths affirmative vote is needed. He stated that since there are
not four members present, the item should be deleted from the
agenda.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to delete Item 2 from the agenda.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion carried
unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF THE 1996 CITY OF FRIDLEY
BUDGET:
ND
PUBLIC HEARING TO LEVY A TAX WHICH APPEARS TO BE IN EXCESS OF
16 MILLS:
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider stated that this meeting is mandated by the
state legislature, and official notice of this special meeting has
been published.
SPECIAL CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF DECEMBBR 5. 1995 PAQE 2
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Council-
woman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro Tem
Schneider declared the motion carried unanimously and the public
hearing opened at 7:37 p.m.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this public hearing is the
last of a series of multi-faceted issues involved in preparing the
1996 budget. He stated that four factors were identified: (ij
threats at the State level to reduce funding; (2) Council�s goals;
(3) departmental goals and objectives; and (4j cash flow analysis.
Mr. Burns stated that the effect on Fridley from state cuts was
minimal, but revenue did not grow. He stated that Council's goals
emphasized reduction of crime, improvement of housing and programs
that stimulate community and neighborhood pride. He stated that
the Community Development Department initiated housinq programs in
the Hyde Park area. He stated that the Police Department initiated
programs such as Proj ect Safety Net for the youth in the community,
and police officers are involved in neighborhood crime watch
programs.
Mr. Burns stated that another factor that had an impact on the
budgeting process was a cash flow analysis. He stated that it was
projected that the City would run out of General Fund bal.ances in
the year 1999 if immediate action was not taken. He stated that
the question arose if the City should continue the property tax
assessing function or if this should be done by the County. He
stated that after further review it was agreed that the City should
continue this function.
Mr. Burns stated that there were a number of capital improvement
issues for garage renovation, filtering of Well No. 12, reconstruc-
tion of Riverview Terrace, and construction of a community activity
center. He stated that Council agreed to proceed with the filter-
ing of Well No. 12, and a decision has not been made on the recon-
struction of Riverview Terrace. He stated that while funds were
not budgeted for a community activity center, funds have been
budgeted for a study.
Mr. Burns stated that Council determined that water and sewer rates
would increase in 1996. He stated that the last major issue in the
budgeting process was to close the $1.5 miilion gap in the General
Fund between revenues and expenditures. He stated that approxi-
mately $800,000 was cut from the General Fund by eliminating five
positions, closing warming houses and skating areas, reducing hours
at Springbrook Nature Center, replacing the senior transportation
program, and eliminating of mowing on University Avenue. Mr. Burns
stated that in addition to these adjustments, it is proposed that
$300,000 will be raised from fees and interfund charge increases,
$181,000 from property tax increase, and $400,000 from fund
balances.
SPECIAL CITY COt1NCIL ME$TINQ OF DECEMBBR Se 1995 PAG$ 3
Mr. Burns stated that the total budget for all funds is $11.9
million or a one-half percent increase from 1995. He stated that
the General Fund has decreased 1.6 percen� and is $9.8 million.
He stated that this decrease is due to the elimination of
personnel, not hiring a new police officer, cutbacks or elimination
of overtime, reduction of the cost of living increase from three
percent to two percent, and avoidance of additional costs for
employee health insurance. Mr. Burns statecl that there are slight
increases in supplies and contractual services and a small reduc-
tion in capital outlay items.
Mr. Burns stated that, overall, the Special Revenue Funds have
decreased slightly from last year; however, there are small
increases in the Cable Television Fund and Grant Management Fund.
He stated that the Grant Management Fund includes the Community
Development Block Grant programs for housing rehabilitation, human
services, Section 8 housing assistance, and chore services.
Mr. Burns stated that the Solid Waste Abatement Fund has decreased
for 1996; however, no money has been budgeted for a neighborhood
cleanup in 1996. He stated that the City is in the process of
conducting a citizen survey to determine what parts of the city-
wide cleanup program the citizens wish to retain. l�ir. Burns stated
that the budget also increased $250,000 for acquisition of blighted
properties.
Mr. Burns stated that the Capital Projects Fund budget has
increased in the areas of buildings and lands and includes $50,000
for a feasibility study for a community activity center. He stated
that the streets portion of the budget has. increased, which
includes street reconstruction, sealcoating, overlays, emergency
vehicle signal improvements, and the improvement of Old Central
Avenue north of 73rd Avenue.
Mr. Burns stated that the Parks Department budget increased and
includes ADA improvements, court resurfacing, and playground
equipment upgrades. He stated that funds are also budqeted for
improvements at the Riverview Heights Park, Springbrook Nature
Center, and for carpet replacement at Community Park.
Mr. Burns stated that the overall increases in the Enterprise
Funds, which include the water, sewer, storm water, and liquor
funds, are about 25 percent. He stated that the water fund will
increase by $236,298; the sewer fund will increase by $332,172; and
the storm water fund will increase $113,612. He stated that the
liquor fund increase is $1,420,321 or 48 percent.
Mr. Burns stated that the 1996 levy increased by four percent, the
first increase in six years. He stated that this means the City's
estimated portion of taxes on an average $80,000 Fridley home will
increase from $142 to $145. He stated that taxes for any household
will vary depending on the school district in which it is located
SPECIAL CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF DBCEMBER 5. 1995 PAG$ 4
and the extent to which the assessed market value of the home has
increased or decreased. He stated that the average increase in
market value is 3.5 percent or $2,800 on a home valued at $80,000.
Mr. Burns stated that there are internal and external indicators
that are used in determining the.City's financial health. He
stated that in regard to external revenues versus expenditures,
until 1992, the City was not relying on internal sources of
revenue. He stated that beginning in 1993, the City began to use
the fund balances. He stated that the City is depending less on
transfers and more on property taxes and charges than in previous
years.
Mr. Burns stated that new construction through November of 1995 was
valued at $22,199,524 and included many new projects for Target,
Agro K, Northco, Murphy Warehouse, Supreme Tool, Minco Products,
and Home Depot. He stated that unemployment was down from 3.4
percent to 3 percent. He stated that property values have
increased by $30,388,163 between September, 1994 and September,
1995, and the value of rental property has increased by $3,000,000
or 17 percent in one year's time.
Mr. Burns stated that the crime rate is about the same as last year
with a 5.6 percent decrease in less serious crimes, but an li
percent increase in more serious crimes. He stated that the number
of children receiving assisted meals at School District 14 has
increased by 5 percent, but the number of families receiving cash
assistance and food stamps has decreased by 4.3 percent.
Mr. Burns stated that the 1996 budgeting process was marked by
coming to grips with the growing gap between revenues and
expenditures. He stated that the budget reflects an $800,000
cutback. He said that spending outside the General Fund has stayed
the same or increased, but there are considerable increases in the
Enterprise Funds.
Mr. Burns stated that both internal and external indicators of the
City's financial health are positive. He stated that the local
economy is growing as reflected in new construction, jobs, retail
sales, unemployment and property values. He stated that while
indications of financial health are positive, the City should
continue to be cautious in expenditure decisions as taxes from
property appreciation are not likely to keep pace with inflation.
He stated that there is a continued threat for state sources of
revenue and an increasing burden from Federal abandonment of
programs. He stated that the likelihood of heavy reliance on fund
balances as a source of operating income will continue.
Mr. Burns stated that the City can be very proud of what has been
accomplished in 1995, as there are not very many cities that would
have contemplated doing the number of projects the City has
accomplished. He stated that it is with great pride that he
presents the 1996 budget for Council's consideration.
SPECIAL CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF DECEMBSR 5. 1995 PAQS 5
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider asked Mr. Burns to explain the cash flow
projections.
Mr. Burns stated that, in general, the Cityos General Fund balances
would disappear by 1999. He stated that the utility fund balances
were running low and would run out in 1996 if Council had not taken
action.
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider stated that it has been the City's policy
to hold the tax levy constant. He stated that while property
values have gone up somewhat, there have been changes in the
formulas. The revenue generated from property taxes is less than
the rate of inflation, and the gap continues to widen between
revenues and expenditures.
Mr. Burns stated that another factor is the funding received by the
state, which is about 32 percent of the General Fund revenue. He
stated that when inflation is considered; however, this percentage
is actually reduced.
Ms. Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street, stated that it bothers her
that the City is laying off employees but there are funds for a
public cleanup. She stated that she is concerned the City will
have another Lake Pointe in the southwest quadrant at University
Avenue and Mississippi Street with no development occurring.
Ms. Olson stated she felt that City governYnent�s primary purpose
is to provide police and fire protection, utilities, and streets
and everything else is secondary. She felt that the City should
hire a new police officer and that something else could be set
aside.
Mr. Burns stated that the southwest quadrant development was moving
at a rapid pace; however, there was a problem with the issue of
land use and improvements. He stated that the City plans to submit
a recommendation to solve these problems to the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority next week and looks for development to
occur in the spring of 1996.
Mr. Burns stated that in regard to the Lake Pointe site, the office
market is recovering and, hopefully, there will be construction of
corporate offices on this site in the next year, as the City is
currently working with a developer.
Ms. Olson stated that she is not complaining about the tax
increase, but she wants to make sure the more important issues are
considered first.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that as far as the additional police
officer, the City would have received a grant for this position,
and the number of police officers is not being decreased.
SPECIAL CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF D$CBMB$R 5, 1995 pAG$ 6
Ms. Olson stated that she would like to see the police officers
have the best equipment, and she does not disagree with having more
officers.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that the decrease in the Police Depart-
ment was for clerical personnel during the night time hours. She
stated that the records have shown there are not many persons
cominq to the Police Department at these hours.
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider stated that crime has been Council's number
one priority, and everything the Public Safety Director requested
was included in this budget.
Councilman Billings stated that as far as the budget cuts, the City
has eliminated some of the warming houses. He asked how this
impacts the budget and how many warming houses were eliminated.
Mr. Burns stated that the warming houses at Madsen, Sylvan, Hayes
and Stevenson were eliminated, as they needed replacement. He
stated that this results in a$15,000 to $20,000 savings.
Councilman Billings asked if any rinks or hockey surfaces have been
eliminated for the 1995-96 season.
Mr. Burns stated that seven skating areas were eliminated out of
a total of 24. He stated that the City will maintain all the rinks
and will pay for any necessary overtime to maintain the rinks where
there is league play or lessons.
Councilman Billings asked if the warming houses to be eliminated
were the ones that were located at the rinks that had less use.
Mr. Burns stated that the rinks at Hayes and Madsen were used the
most and Sylvan the least, with Stevenson somewhere in the middle.
Councilman Billings asked if the City has spent the funds for
computers that were budgeted for 1995.
Mr. Burns stated that these funds have not been spent. He stated
that he wished to discuss this issue with Council at the first•
meeting in January. '
Councilman Billings asked if these funds would be part.of the 1995
or 1996 budget.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this is an internal
service fund and those funds are actually encwnbered from 1995 and
become encumbered for 1996 and will become part of the 1996 budget.
Councilman Billings stated that it is his understanding, then, that
even if those funds were in the 1995 budget and would not be spent
until 1996, Council would not need to make any changes in the
budget.
BPECIAL CITY COQNCIL MEETINa OF DECEMB$R So 1995 PAaS 7
Councilman Billinqs stated that a two percent cost of living
increase is included for City employees. He asked Mr. Burns if he
knew how much the cost of living has increased for 1995.
Mr. Burns stated that he has not heard a recent figure, but earlier
the projectiori was three percent.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed 1996
budget and the proposal to levy a tax which appears to be in excess
of 16 mills.
Mr. Pribyl stated that the 16 mill issue is an old Charter require-
ment that requires Council to pass a resolution if it appears that
the tax levy will be in excess of 16 mills. He stated that because
the Charter has not been changed to the newer tax terms, the City
still needs to enact a resolution for a levy that may exceed 16
mills.
Councilman Billings stated that Council does not really know at
this point if the 16 mills will be exceeded. He stated that the
Charter is not updated with the new language and felt that perhaps
this should be reviewed.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion carried
unanimously and the public hearinq closed at 8:17 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Schneider stated that the adoption of the 1996 budget
would be at the next Council meeting on December 11, 1995 which
begins at 7:30 p.m. •
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Pro
Tem Schneider declared the motion carried unanimously and the
Special Meetinq of the Fridley City Council of December 5, 1995
adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad Dennis L. Schneider
Secretary to the City Council Mayor Pro Tem
TO WILLIAM W. BURNS, CTTY MANAGER �� ��
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJEGT: 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE TO CHANGE STORM
WATER RATE
DATE: December 5, 1995
Attached is the Ordinance to recodify the Fridley City Code Chapter 216, Entitled
"Storm Water Drainage Utility" by amending Section 216.04.
RDP/me
Attachment
1.01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY
CITY CODE CHAPTER 216, ENTITLED "STORM
WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY" BY AMENDING
SECTION 216.04.
The City Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows:
216.04. STORM WATER DRAINAGE FEE
For the purpose of calculating storm water drainage fees, all developed one family and
duplex parcels shall be considered to have an acreage of one-tlurd (1/3) acre. The
quarterly storm water drainage rate shall be set by Council Resolution.
PASSED AN ADOPT'ED BY THE CTTY COUNCIL FOR THE CTTY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995.
ATTFST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CI'TY CLERK
Public Hearing: November 13, 1995
First reading: November 27, 1995
Second Reading:
Publication:
1.02
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
� _
�
.
Community Development Department
PI.ANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: December 5, 1995
W'lliam Burns Cit Mana er �°�
TO : 1 , y q �,
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planninq Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Vacation
Request, SAV �95-04, by Gary Hedman, Generally
Located at 60 - 70th Way NE
The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the
vacation request at its November 27, 1995 meeting. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request
to the City Council. The City Charter requires the City Council
to approve an ordinance for the vacation of all streets, alleys,
and easements. Staff recommends that the City Council approve
the attached ordinance vacating the easement at 60 - 70th Way NE.
MM/dw
M-95-603
2.01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY
CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO
AMEND APPENDI% C OF THE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. To vacate the East 10 feet, except the Southerly 5
feet, of a utility easement located on Lot 9, Block
4, Ostman's Third Addition, generally located at 60
- 70th Way N.E.
Al1 lying in the South Half of Section 10, T-30, R-
24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota.
Be and is hereby vacated subject to the
stipulations adopted at the City Council meeting of
, 1995.
SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with
Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of
the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code
shall be so amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: November 27, 1995
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
2.�2
inousTwui.
BUG�NL�B
cm �o�rs
TOrOORAPHIC MAPP(N6
N
SCAtE ��" :30'
� SAV 4�95-04
C. E. C O U L T E R � Gary Hedman
LAND SUF2VEYOR
REC3ISTEREO UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
LIGENSED pV 011DINANGH O� CITY OP MINNEAP06IC
3300 LYi�1DALE AVE. SO. MINNEAPOLIS 9. MINN.
TAYLOR 4-037a
S U FZVE Y �ar O TTO � S�'MAN
�urnrgur's Lrrtifr�tr
rurrit+a
rwnw sunvars
uKCSHORe
JUDICIAL
�
�iQ �`—" \1`/ AY l�. E ,
- • �-- �2o.az - - - - . - -- -.i4O . . . . — — - :-1
�; --� — — — — 2 . n . ba _ -- — —.-ao . . . -
� �. �s .__..Sa _ . . . . - ; �
, •� o
, �
+ ��o � LOT � .�
I , _ I
_ ; _ _ �� �
I�3.35 — —� — — — — — — — — — — — — W
i-S-F - � ' t?
` � Q
1 . �' .
, N°'�� � -� ( J
l= _,3. �o � a �7 � I o�-
� �� � d � : L ��
j�� � ro / ' --- -- --- --- `
� ; - w — — -- ._ ___ —= �r �'— �� }
° asement to be Vacat d - � p�
f �' • � ; _ o
:i.�. _ ._ •
_ � Y i
�
. C� � � � L. �-T 3 . � 1 �
i � '
� = i
�. �
\ . �, — — Eastliae Qi LQt — — — -- — — — — —I ,
!" . . _
l• � ; �
L.' �`-- — �" _ . -°.21� _ �
• . . .� .,zo.�3 - � � `L O T �" d°� 1 ,
N ' I
, . . ....�p,.. . . . _ _ -_ 80_.. � —..� _I
' - - 14p .. . • "
I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct plat of a survey of:
'�he Easterly 20 feet of Lot 9 as measured=at right angles to the Easterly
line thereaf, Block 4, OSTMAN'S THIRD ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota,
`together with the Westerly 60 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3.and 4 as measured`along
the North and Soutn lines thereof, B1ock 14, Camp Howard and Hush's lst.
Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka County.,, Minnesota.<
As surveyed by me this 3rd day of June 1960 A: D. �
�! d 1 =� �z I It�G,
c a �-ned .i'�O• (n • �, "�� .L,. .
,Z.�3 Ni�.nnesota Registration No . 2584
__ ;
. �.:. ,
� _
�
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: December 5, 1995
TO: William Burns Cit Mana er ��
, Y g �
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Vacation
Request, SAV #95-05, by Industrial Equities,
Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of 73rd
Avenue and Northco Drive
The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the
vacation request at its November 27, 1995 meeting. The Planning
Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council approve
the vacation request. The City Charter requires the publication
of an ordinance vacating all streets, alleys, and easements.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached
ordinance for first reading vacating the drainage and utility
easement for Northco Addition.
MM/dw
M-95-602
3.01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE IINDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY
CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO
AMEND APPENDI% C OF THE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. To vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and
utility easements originally dedicated on the
recorded plats of Northco Business Park and Northco
Business Park 2nd Addition and now to be vacated
which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Block l, in said
Northco Business Park and Lot 2, Block 1, said
Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lying
southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots.
The centerline of said 20.00 foot easement is
described as follows: Commencing at the most
southerly corner of said Lot 1; thence
northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said
Lot 1, a distance of 62.51 feet, to the
intersection with the westerly line of said Lot 1
(said intersection hereinafter referred to as
"Point A"); thence southeasterly, along a line
passing through a point on a southeasterly line of
said Lot 2, Block l, Northco Business Park distant
29.00 feet southwesterly from said most souther].y
corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of
beginning of the centerline to be described; thence
northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the
above referenced "Point A"; thence northerly, along
the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of
379.40 feet and said centerline there terminating,
generally located at the southwest corner of 73rd
Avenue and Northco Drive.
All lying in the South Half of Section il, T-30, R-
24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota.
Be and is hereby vacated subject to the
stipulations adopted at the City Council meeting of
, 1995.
SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with
Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of
the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code
shall be so amended.
3.02
Page 2 - Ordinance No.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: November 27, 1995
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
3.03
�� � - �.,
�::.;::. �
c � � F `'J a � ^ �
�� + \�
_ - � 00'b� �I�,Op � J
� t _
LJ C` �
� � t�
t�,; � _ , � _
3 �;:a:. � � ;-- �..� i
� ,
J .� �
��' �� � �
� � �,
� u � .
� 1 � � . ( , .
`� �� J
G� i Lt_ . " . . . �—
i• t • � � � . . .
� � � " . . . . . .
SAV ��95-05
Industrial Equitie
t�� M �f .- .� .��-=
Q Y7M !p �11 � i1�l� MM� i1Y �O ]INT
J � F
• ��oi• LSIQ ' .
�.�j%� � � - M'77�lOMpiYlO711111tt7
� `t -11'N� ;H.�EM
. � "' IO7� �A • . -
� �` Ir� 9fO
�" , � � �� li ��
� 9 ��
� �� i' , �— •� � . ... • . , � ..
�� � •
LJ ' `1 �. . a � �
\ .
� `,� � . � l� . ._ '
l
�� �' � J�� - � L� .
1 r� s ' � ! a �
�'0131 ,� ,.
'.'73.f t�-,! � � "� � �
� c ,-� •w } � v'�.y ^
r .�
' 1 � c� � � ' ., y .y�4� J .
� T ,y �
1
/ r � � � . J � t���•� �_ _ �T��� �'°0��
� K•�
' � ' � ���� , �
� ,. ."
� �
_i � • I • � �� � �►�; �
K
7 T I� . � , � � �ti� �r�'
3.t . a �
__� a A � � � � O . - -.
�
E k� -' �' � M
� � G �
�, � � � - : � �a ���
a.
�� "; > �,`� .
l�- ' /��
� � W CI
,
^ � r ;, - �� m ��_ �.�
�s � �f � y� s � • '- - "'•'°•"
�.;ss ` _� �, 0 �
� A �" \ '
►
._ � � �� . � \ . .
1 � , �., . �,
�, �.! � . .
� ` .. ~ .
� 9
� �y
1 . � j
� \��f�� . A
> � � J � � \•+� �a• �
� � � . � �� Y
� � . �'"� W �• --- __ � �"
� . ��
` �. ��� � 9 w
�
w� . •
p1M ;IRO�i
�
�
J
O`
_ -sroN / �a.so.�
�;� �
��.
��vr �
J� �
S
�M M
���s �
� ��
�_ � �
�� �
b� � �
�� �J
�i �y�� �
� !�S � !!
o.
1
' `�
� r �
�
1 �
I � .
b!!
� �
s
� ��
•
� � e
<
�� . . I�- . .
� M � .
S� I (
. - •
..�. ra. .�..a«w.
li Y ..
,» I � a
�� N �
I „� �
�. �.,.�.
? � - ��
!{ � � � w�� — �
tf �A�40I1�A � M� �
�l4 n�l �/ ���ON iM1111q a
a ' .. i l
'r �•-�•�� -�-•��-��� � i ��,��-�•� iniii
- ,. _7 /V -71 /,V_7/i� /:J_/..���_7/�//Vi i % -
/ -�� Y� � i i I-� 4? � / L� / � � `, / � / /� i / / -1 / �--i i ��
�_� .��v .:�i✓�r;.J�rr ��iv, i�1_ =�1 ✓ i .;
, •
,
3.04
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The petitioner requests that a variance be granted to allow loading docks to face the public right of way
in order to allow const�uction of an 87,000 square foot multi-tenant office/wazehouse industrial building.
The request is generally located at the intersection of the East University Avenue Service Road and 73rd
Avenue.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
Section 205.18.OS.D.(6).(a) of the City Code requires all loading docks to be located in the rear or side
yard and be screened from the public right of way.
Public Purpose served by this requirement is to limit loading activities in the rear and side yards in order
to reduce traffic conflicts and aesthetic impacts.
The subject parcel is bounded on three sides by public streets, therefore it has three front yards. The
loading docks face the interior of the industrial development, therefore the impact to the general public
is minimized.
HARDSHII': See attached letter.
RECOI��V�NDED ACTTONS:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the variance request to allow loading docks in the front
yard with the following stipulations:
1. Submission of landscaping plan adequately screening the loading docks.
2. Installation of underground irrigation.
APPEALS COMIVIISSION ACTION:
The Appeals Corrunission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council.
4.01
Staff Report
VAR #95-32, by Industrial Equities
Page 2
Petition For:
Location
of Property:
Legal Description
of Property:
Size:
Topography:
Eaisting
Vegetation:
Eaisting
Zoning/Platting
Availability
of Municipal
Utitities:
Vehicular
Access:
Pedestrian
Access:
Engineering
Tssues:
Site Planning
issues:
PROJECT DETAILS
Variance to allow loading docks in the front yard.
East University Avenue Service Road and 73rd Avenue.
0
Lot 1, Block 1, Northco Business Park and Lot 2, Btock 1, Northco
Business Park Second Addition
298,627 square feet 6.85 acres
Flat
Some trees, vegetation of tall grass
M 2, Heavy Industrial; Northco Business Park First and Second
Addi6on (18988 and 1990 r�vely)
73rd Avenue� Northco Drive
73rd Avenue, Northco Drive, East University Avenue Service Road
Bikeway along 73rd Avenue; south side
Stormwater flow relocation
None
4.02
r
Staff Report
VAR #95-32, by Industrial Equities
Page 3
DEVELOPMENT SITE
PropeMy History
The subject parcel was originally platted as part of the Northco Business Pazk First Addition in
1988. The parcel is comprised of two legally described lots. The petitioner is also processing a
vacation request to vacate a 20 foot drainage and utility easement which bisects the lot in a north-
south direction.
Analysis
Section 205.18.OS.D.(5).(b) of the City Code requires loading docks to be located in the rear or
side yazd and be screened &om the public right of wa.y.
Public Purpose served by this requirement is to limit loading activities in the rear or side yards in
order to reduce traffic con8icts and aesthetic impacts.
The subject parcel is bounded on three sides by public stree�ts: East University Avenue Seivice
Drive on the west, 73rd Avenue on the north, and Northco Drive on the east/sou�. The
proposed building will be constiucted parallel to 73rd Avenue, with that being its "frotrt" side. The
loading docks are proposed to be located on the opposite side facing the urterior of the indust�ial
development.
There is adequate room to provide screening and landscaping along the public right of way (a 20
foot hardsurface setback is provided as required by code). At the writing of this report, the
petitioner had not submitted a landscape plan. The petitioner will be requirerl to submit a
landscape plan which complies with the requirements of the M 2, Heavy Industrial District
requirements.
4.03
Staff Report
VAR #95-32, by Industrial Equities
Page 4
RECOMN�NDATION/STIPULATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend approval of the variance request, to
allow loading docks in the front yards with the following stipulations:
WEST:
SOUTH:
EAST:
NORTH:
ADJACENT SITES
Zoning: M 2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: M 2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling
Comprehensive
Planning Issues:
Land Use: Vacant
Land Use: Vacant
Land Use: Manufacturing,
research, and
development
Land Use: Residential
The property is zoned and guided on the Comprehensive Plan as an industcial site. This proposal
is consistent with the City's plans.
Public Hearing
Comments:
While the hearing has not been held, questions regarding the setback requirements adjacent to 73rd
Avenue may be raised by the public at the meeting. Section 205.18.03.D.(4).(a) requires the
building to be setback from the street right of way abutting a residential distrid 100 fcet. It dces,
however, allow pazking and drive areas to be located within this 100 foot setback The code dces
not require this azea to be fully vegetated.
4.�4
, .. .
VAR ��95-32
� Industrial Equities
._ . _... _. w.__ __._ __ _ _ ;
, �
. _ �I'd AYCIlllC N.L''. . . r
' R1.f11 1 �Ci :.a i ri _ _.�. ., ii.`"�iu .�v�ii. �v4—��98 UCL .L4 � `9J 1L �JU i .:.-.�'
��� .�.�.��..�.��.�.� ..r..- - - - — �r .�����.w.w�w.iwi�
�� � � "" M __ ..+.� �� ��
1rq•r �"�•�w7f��I •w
� VAR �i95-32
In�ustrial F.�ti� _i
0
, - .�
�.n.a� a � ae� b
� �o,���o
i
��
�'C.� • �
`7�
/
� ��
; ,.
� �
� �` `.
� �`��
�
,�'.�'
.
i
1
.
.�
�
�
. �
� ` ...
�
� �
� �
.
�
�
�
�
�#�,�,'��� :
.� � :
� j� �
�a
t �
�f � � Y�:
�� � .
� � �;
#�� ��
w � �
� �� � �� �; �
� ;� . � �
� � ��
� �
�
i� � • �� � �
��r� 11 � 1�� ;i�
�� � f �
'"y�
INDUSTRIAL EQUITIES L.L.P.
D e v e 1 o p m e n t a n d I n v e s t m e n t s
TEL 612 591 0892 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 536W, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 FAX 612 591 1383
November 3, 1995
Mr. Scott Hickok
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55435
RE: �idley Busine.ss Center - 73rd and University
Dear Scott:
Please let me take this opportunity to outline for you the rationale behind the necessity of
requiring a variance on the truck loading issue. First and foremost, unlike most properties this
site is sunounded by Northco Drive, 73rd and Universiry Service Drive. Accordingly, it is
impossible to develop this property without having some visibility of the truck court. I believe
our plan has done an outstanding job of sheltering the trucks from 73rd Avenue and the
landscaping on the back of the property will mitigate the views of the truck court. Secondly,
the narrow site requires saw tooth docks on the east end of the property.
Scott, should you, the City Council or the Planning Commission have any questions on this
issue, kindly do not hesitate to advise. We certainly appreciate your assistance on this matter
and look forwazd to developing the Fridley Business Center in the city of Fridley.
Yours very truly,
!�� /1% G���
John N. Allen
Managing Partner
JNA/gw
4.07
r _
�
.
Community Development Department
G DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: December 5, 1995 �
TO: William Burns, City Manager ���
FROM:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution Amending
1, and Creating Tax
No. 14
Request
Redevelopment Project Area No.
Increment Financing District
John Allen of Industrial Equities Development Investments is
proposing to develop a multi-tenant, 88,000 square foot, one-
story industrial business center in the Northco Business Park
adjacent to 73rd Avenue. Allen has applied for tax increment
financing to assist with soil correction and utility relocation
costs. In order to provide the assistance, an economic
development district is proposed to be created. The site already
lies in the redevelopment project area.
The proposed project will cost approximately $3,500,000, and will
generate approximately $120,000 in taxes per year. The one-story
building is for office/warehouse and manufacturing uses.
Anticipated uses include printing companies, electronic and high-
tech industries, and those industries that need storage space.
Allen believes that the community needs "upgraded" multi-tenant
industrial space for industrial expansion.
Tax Increment Financina Assistance
The initial assistance package discussed with Northco and the HRA
was approximately $350,000 of assistance, of which one-half would
be a loan and the remaining amount would be a grant (very similar
to the Agro-K project). The developer will relocate the storm
sewer and will remove peat and organic clays in various
locations on the property. Other types of existing soil need to
be replaced with fill for better compaction. Allen has advised
us that at least 27,000 cubic yards of fill must be imported to
the site.
Because one-half of the assistance will be provided through a
loan, the grant amount can be recovered by tax increment by 2001.
5.01
Tax Increment District #14
December 5, 1995
Page 2
Therefore, the district could be retired early, or the City may
want to keep the district until 2006 because an additional
$100,000 of tax increment could be qenerated for other Authority
expenses. The HRA not only receives tax increment from the
project, but also receives the interest amount on the loan
repayment.
Because this is an Economic Development District, the amount of
captured increment decreases as the district ages. State law
requires that the "base amount" increases each year. This means
that an increasing amount of taxes will be returned to the County
and school district beginning in 1999.
Process
In order to create a tax increment district, the City Council
must pass a resolution authorizing creation of the district after
holding a public hearing. Of what would be 14 districts, two
districts have expired (#4 and #5; the Johnson and Paschke
districtsj, and District #8, the Shorewood district, will be
retired in 1996.
"But For" Test
Site preparation costs like soil correction and utility
relocation costs are eligible expenses for TIF assistance.
Because of the site's unusual soil conditions, extensive work is
needed to make the site buildable. These types of projects have
been completed in the-�iorth industrial area (TIF #3) for Sam's
Club, the Agro-K project, and some of the Paschke
office/industrial developments.
LGA/HACA Loss?
Under the recent amendment to the TIF statutes, the City may
elect to avoid the LGA/HACA loss by electing to make a"local
contribution" of 10� of the tax increment. The LGA/HACA loss is
predicted to be $182,468 over the life of the district. The
local contribution amount equals $52,653 over the life of the
district for a savings of $129,815. The local contribution may
come from unrestricted revenue of the City or the HRA. In this
case, the HRA has adequate non-restricted revenue sources to act
as the source for the contribution so that the City's resources
will not be affected.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached
resolution.
BD/dw
M-95-604
5.02
KESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE RLDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THL TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10,
11, 12 AI�TD 13 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT
COSTS WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, AND
CREATTNG TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.
14 AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
RELATING THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of
Fridley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows;
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. It has been proposed by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (the "Authority") that the Council modify, approve and
adopt a Modified Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment
Project No. 1 to reflect increased project costs, pursuant to and
in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047,
inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time.
1.02. It has been further proposed by the Authority that the
Council modify, approve and adopt Modified Tax Increment Financing
Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6,7, 9,
10, 11, 12 and 13 (the "Existing TIF Districts") to reflect
increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. l,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179,
inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time.
1.03. It has been further proposed by the Authority that the
Council create proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 and
approve and adopt a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating
thereto, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469,174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented
from time to time.
1.04. The Authority has caused to be prepared, and this Council
has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a Modified
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and Modified Tax
Increment Financing Plans for the Existing TIF Districts to reflect
increased project costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and a
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment
Financing District No. 14, defining more precisely the property to
be included, the public costs to be incurred, and other matters
relating thereto.
1.05. The Council has performed all actions required by law to be
performed prior to the modification, approval and adoption of the
Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing
Plans and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan.
5.03
�
Page 2 - Resolution No.
1.06. The Council hereby determines that it is necessary and in
the best interests of the City and the Authority at this time to
modify, approve and adopt the Modified Redevelopment Plan and the
Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans to reflect increased project
costs within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to create proposed Tax
Increment Financing district No. 14 and to approve and adopt the
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto.
Section 2. Findinas.
2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
assistance to be provided through the adoption and implementation
of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan are
necessary to assure the development and redevelopment of
Redevelopment Project No. 1.
2.02. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans
and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan conform to the general
plan for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole
in that they are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
2.03. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans
and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan afford maximum
ogportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole
for the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No.
1 by private enterprise and it is contemplated that the development
and redevelopment thereof will be carried out pursuant to
redevelopment contracts with private developers.
2.04. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1, the Modified Tax Increment Financing
Plans for the Existing TIF Districts and the proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No.
14, by the City is intended and, in the judgement of this Council,
its effect will be to promote the purposes and objectives specified
in this Section 2 and otherwise promote certain public purposes and
accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified
Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan.
2.05. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that
proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 constitutes a"tax
increment financing district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, Subdivision 9, and further constitutes a type of
"economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12.
5.04
Page 3 - Resolution No.
2.06. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
proposed development or redevelopment in proposed Tax Increment
Financing District No. 14, in the opinion of the Council, would not
occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment
financing is deemed necessary.
2.07. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
City made the above findings stated in this Section 2 and has set
forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in
the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans, the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan and
Exhibit A of this Resolution.
Section 3. Modification, Approval and Adoption of Modified
Redevelopment Plan.
3.01. The modification to the Redevelopment Plan relating to
Redevelopment Project No. 1 reflecting increased project costs is
hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley.
Section 4. Modification, Approval and Adoption of Modified Tax
Increment Financing Plans.
4.01. The modifications to the Tax Increment Financing Plans for
the Existing TIF Districts reflecting increased project costs
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 are hereby approved and adopted
by the Council of the City of Fridley.
Section 5. Creation of Tax Increment Financing district and
Adoption of Tax Increment Financina Plan.
5.01. The creation of proposed Tax Increment Financing District
No. 14 within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan relating thereto are hereby approved and
adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley.
Section 6. Election of Citv Contribution.
6.01. The Council hereby elects to make a qualitying local
contribution equal to 10.00% of the tax increment generated from
Tax Increment Financing District No. 14, pursuant to 1995 Minnesota
Laws, Chapter 264, Article 5, Section 6, Subdivision 6(d).
Section 7. Filina of Plans.
7.01. Upon approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment
Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan (collectively the "Plans"), the City shall
cause said Plans to be filed with the Commissioner of Revenue.
5.05
Page 4 - Resolution No.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS DAY OF
, 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
5.06
Page 6 - Resolution No.
I.
IIe
SCHEDULE 1 TO EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
REDEVELOPMENT WITHOUT TIF ASSISTANCE:
Estimated Market Value * $ 674,260
Original Market Value $ 223,200
Increased Market Value $ 451,060
* 20,000 square feet of building only �$22.553/square foot
plus current market value of land
REDEVELOPMENT WITH TIF ASSISTANCE:
Construction of an office/manufacturing/warehouse facility
Estimated Market Value *
Original Market Value
Increased Market Value
Less Tax Increment Present Value
8.50%, 11.5 years
Net Increased Market Value
$ 2,521,564
$ 536,900
$ 1,984,664
$ 351,639
$ 1,633,025
** 88,000 square feet of building only Q$22.553/sguare foot
plus current market value of land
5.08
��
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
FRIDLEY BUSINESS CENTER
Estimated P. V. Analysis
TaX 8.500%
Date Increment 06/01 /96
12/01 /95
06/01 /96
12/01 /96
06/01 /97
12/01 /97
Q6/01/98
i 2/01 /98
06/01 /99
12/01 /99
06/01 /2000
12/01 /2000
06/01/2001
12/01 /2001
06/01 /2002
12/01 /2002
06/01 /2003
12/01 /2003
06/Of /2004
12/01 /2004
06/01 /2005
12/01 /2005
06/01 /2006
12/01 /2006
�,�„ � � , - _,� - �
"�.;��°"�' ., "
0
0
0
0
0
47,099
47,099
44,080
44,080
40,579
40,579
36,5i 8
36,518
31,809
31,809
26,347
26,347
20,014
20,014
12,668
12,668
4,149
4,149
526,527
0
0
0
0
0
39,876
38,250
34,339
32,939
29,086
27,901
24,085
23,103
19,303
18,517
14,712
14,112
10,283
9,864
5,989
5,745
1,805
1,731
351,639
ALLEN2 PREPARED BY CASSERLSMOOJ�ZAHN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 13-Nov-95
. y
INDUSTRIAL EQUITIES L.L.P.
Deaeloyment and Innestments
TEL 612 591 0892 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 536W, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 FAX 612 591 1383
October 19, 1995
Ms. Barb Dacy
CommLnity Development Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Barb:
As you know, Industrial Equities has a preliminary interest in developing the 6.8 acre Northco
Business Center site that is located at 73rd and University with a speculative multi tenant 88,000
squaze foot business center. Because this site has significant soil conection and utility relocation
issues our current and future interests must be contingent upon establishing a reasonable tax
increment and financing district that is consistent with the plans that have been discussed
between Northco, James Casserly and the City. Without soil conection and utiliry relocation
assistance this project, like others considered before it, cannot proceed, and the future
development is quite unlikely.
Based on our discussions and your previous discussions with Northco, it appears that the HRA
and the City Council will favorably consider establishing a tax increment finance district for this
site. Accordingly, I have developed preliminary project designs and made the required
appli�atiens to the City and Rice Street Watershed District to allow for the sites preparation and
� i conection. As I understand it, the District cannot be formally established prior to December
! 12, 1995. However, assuming the City would support this proposal, Industrial Equities would
I,
;� like to do preliminary site preparation prior to that date so as to allow for construction through
i j the winter. This site preparation would include onlv tree removal and general site grading that
would allow for specific soil correction and preparadon for the importing of the required select
� material to conect and raise the elevation of the site after the approval is granted.
j' Unfortunately, if this early access is not possible, site grading must be delayed until late April
, of 1996, and construction completion will be delayed by over five months.
� Barb, if T.I.F. is not going to be available on this project we clearly do not want to get out in �;
front of the headlights and invest any more time or money. However, if the City supports this ; j
,' project, we would like to take the allowable steps which would bring this project on line in the � j
Spring of 1996. � ?
1
;
5.10
Ms. Barb Dacy
October 19, 1995
Page 2
Industrial Equities is enthusiastic about the possibility of developing this project in Fridley
because businesses like doing business in Fridley. The City works for both the employees and
the employers. You have virtually no vacancy but you have no expansion space to expand your
exisdng companies much less attract desirable new employers. Industrial Equities believes a
high quality energy efficient business center could fill this void for both Fridley and businesses
in the City. I look forward to discussing in greater detail with you the HRA and City Council's
response to this request.
If ;�o�: �:���e �.�� ;�aPs±iors, tiin�l; d� net hesil?te ±� ���iss.
Yours very truly,
�� � �.��j
�
John N. Allen
7NA/gw
5.11
SECTION XV
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 14
(FRIDLEY BUSINESS CENTER)
Subsection 15.1. Statement of Objectives. See Section I,
Subsection 1.5. Statement of Objectives.
Subsection 15.2. Modified Redevelopment Plan. See Section
I, Subsections 1.2. through 1.15.
Subsection 15.3. Parcels to be Included. The boundaries of
Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 are described on the
attached Exhibit XV-A and illustrated on Exhibit XV-B.
Subsection 15.4. Parcels in Acquisition. The Authority may
publicly acquire and reconvey any or a11 of the parcels in Tax
Increment Financing District No. 14 identified on the attached
Exhibit XV-A.
The following are conditions under which properties not
designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date:
(1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication,
condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to
achieve the objectives of the Tax Increment Financing Plan; and
(2) Such acquisition will be undertaken only when there is
assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related
costs.
Subsection 15.5. Development Activitv for which Contracts
have been Signed. As of the date of adoption of the Tax
Increment Financing Plan, the City intends to enter into a
Development Agreement with Industrial Equities L.L.P. for the
activities discussed below.
Subsection 15.6. Sbecific Development Expected to Occur.
At this time it is anticipated that an approximate 88,000 square
foot office/manufacturing/warehouse facility with an estimated
market value of $2,521,564 will be constructed in 1996.
Subsection 15.7. Prior Planned Improvements. The Authority
shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for
certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district
enlargement with a listing of all properties within Tax Increment
Financing District No. 14 for which building permits have been
issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding
15 - 1
5.12
approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the Authority.
The county Auditor shall increase the original tax capacity of
Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 by the tax capacity of
each improvement for which the building permit was issued. If
said listing does not accompany the aforementioned request or
notice, the absence of such listing shall indicate to the County
Auditor that no building permits were issued in the eighteen (18)
months prior to the Authority's approval of the Tax Increment
Financing Plan..
Subsection 15.8. Fiscal Disparities. The Council hereby
elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, clause (a) if
and when commercial/industrial development occurs with Tax
Increment Financing District No. 14. .
Subsection 15.9. Estimated Public Improvement Costs. The
estimated costs associated with Redevelopment Project No. 1 are
listed in Section I, Subsections 1.9 and 1.10.
Subsection 15.10. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness.
It is anticipated that $900,000 of bonded indebtedness could be
incurred with respect to this portion of Redevelopment Project
No. 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178,
Subdivision 1, General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds may be used
as required to amortize the costs identified in Section I,
Subsections 1.9 and 1.10. The City reserves the right to pay for
all or part of the activities listed in Section I, Subsections
1.9. and 1.10. relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1 as tax
increments are generated and become available.
Subsection 15.11. Sources of Revenue. The costs outlined
in Section I, Subsection 1.9. will be financed through the annual
collection of tax increments.
Subsection 15.12. Estimated Original and Captured Tax
Capacities. The tax capacity of all taxable property in Tax
Increment Financing District No. 14, as most recently certified
by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota on
January 2, 1994, is estimated to be $24,697.
The estimated captured tax capacity of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 14 upon completion of the proposed
improvements on January 2, 1997 is estimated to be $82,775.
Subsection 15.14. Tax Increment. Tax increment has been
calculated at approximately $94,198 upon completion of the
improvements assuming a static tax capacity rate and a valuation
increase of zero percent (0%) compounded annually.
Subsection 15.13. Tax Capacity Rate. The current total tax
capacity rate is 113.8010.
15 - 2
5.13
Subsection 15.15. Type of Tax Increment Financina District.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 is, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.174, an Economic Development District.
Subsection 15.16. Duration of Tax Increment Financinq
District. The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No.
14 is expected to be nine (9) years from receipt of the first tax
increment or eleven (11) years from date of approval, whichever
is less. The date of receipt of the first tax increment is
estimated to be July, 1998. Thus, it is estimated that Tax
Increment Financing District No. 14, including any modifications
for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in the
year 2006.
Subsection 15.17. Estimated Impact on Other Taxinq
Jurisdictions. The estimated impact on other taxing
jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without
the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 14. If the
construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact
is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the
fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the
fact that the financing would not have occurred without the
assistance of the City, the attached Exhibit XV-E reflects the
estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 if
the "but for" test was not met.
Subsection 15.18. Election of Citv Contribution. The
Council hereby elects a qualifying local contribution equal to
ten percent (10.00%) of the tax increment generated from Tax
Increment Financing District No. 14, as set forth in 1995
Minnesota Laws, Chapter 264, Article 5, Section 6, Subdivision
6 (d) .
Subsection 15.19. Modification of Tax Increment Financinct
District and or Tax Increment Financina Plan. As of December 11,
1995, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 14
or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore has been made, said
date being the date of initial approval and adoption thereof by
the City Council.
15 - 3
5.14
EXHIBIT XV-A
PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 14
AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED DECEMBER 11, 1995
PIN 11.-30-24-31-0008
PIN 11-30-24-31-0018
XV-A-1
5.y5
EXHIBIT XV-B
Boundary Map
Univcrsity Avenue N.E.
�
;
i
�
;
XV - B - 1
5.16
�,
EXHIBIT XV - C
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
Original Estimated Captured Estimated Less Available
Period Tax Tax Tax Tax Admin Tax
Ending Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment Fees Increment
12/01 /95
06/01 /96
12/01 /96
06/01 /97
12/01 /97
06/01 /98
12/01 /98
06/01 /99
12/01 /99
06/01 /2000
12/01 /2000
06/01 /2001
12/01 /2001
06/01 /2002
12/01 /2002
06/01 /2003
12/01 /2003
06/01 /2004
12/01 /2004
06/01 /2005
12/01 /2005
06/01 /2006
12/01 /2006
24,697
28,642
28,642
33,217
33,217
38,523
38,523
44,677
44,677
51,813
51,813
60,089
60,089
69,687
69,687
80,819
80,819
93,728
93,728
108,700
108,700
126,062
126,062
24,697
28,642
28,642
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115, 992
115,992
115, 992
115, 992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115,992
115, 992
115,992
0
0
0
0
0
82,774
82,774
77,469
77,469
71,315
71,315
64,179
64,179
55,903
55,903
46,304
46,304
35,173
35,173
22,264
22,264
7,292
7,292
XV-C-1
5.17
0
0
0
0
0
47,099
47,099
44,080
44,080
40,579
40, 579
36,518
36,518
31,809
31,809
26,347
26,347
20,014
20,014
12,668
12,668
4,149
4,149
0
0
0
0
0
9,420
9,420
8,816
8,816
8,116
8,116
7,304
7,304
6,362
6,362
5,269
5,269
4,003
4,003
2,534
2,534
830
830
0
0
0
0
0
37,679
37,679
35,264
35,264
32,463
32,463
29,214
29,214
25,447
25,447
21,078
21,078.
16,011
16,011
10,135
•10,135
3,320
3,320
526,527 105,305 421,222
PAY 1990 MARKET VALUE
11-30-24-31-0008
11-30-24-31-0018
PAY 1995 MARKET VALUE
11-30-24-31-0008
11-30-24-31-0018
ESTIMATED ECONOMIC FACTOR
ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY
ESTIMATED TAXES
PAY 1995 TAX RATE
1996 CONSTRUCTION
1997 VALUATION
1998 TAXES PAYABLE
ADMIN/PROGRAM FEES
PV RATE
INFLATION
EXHIBIT XV - C
ALLEN DEVELOPMENT
ASSUMPTIONS
88,000 SF
88,000 SF
06/01 /96
�.1 �- 2
@
@
135,200
163,300
223,200
313,700
4.600%
28.65 JSF
4.600%
1.50 /SF
1.13801
20.000%
8.500%
0.000%
298,500
536,900
1.160
24,697
2,521,564
115,992
132,000
EXHIBIT XV-D
"BU'T FOR" ANALYSIS
The two parcels located within the proposed Tax Increment
Financing District are located in an area the City has been
attempting to redevelop for the past several years. Previous
efforts to redevelop this area have been unsuccessful, however,
due to the significant soil correction and utility relocation
costs required to render the parcels buildable. The City feels
that because these parcels have not developed in the past due to
the significant soils correction and preparation costs, the use
of TIF Assistance is necessary to help the proposed project
proceed. In addition to creating between 80 and 150 additional
employment opportunities, this redevelopment will provide an
additional $1,984,664 in market value to the City's tax base.
XV-D-1
5.19
EXHIBIT XV—E
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 14
IMPACT ON TAX BASE
ORIGINAL ESTIMATED CAPTURED DISTRICT
TAX TAX TAX TAX AS %
ENTITY BASE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY OF TOTAL
City of Fridley 27,329,921 24,697 115,992 91,295 0.334%
County of Anoka 146,471,588 24,697 115,992 91,295 0.062%
ISD #16 11,514,810 24,697 115,992 91,295 0.793%
IMPACT ON TAX RATE
TAX % OF TAX TAX RATE
ENTITY RATE TOTAL INCREMENT INCREASE
City of Fridley 0.16098 14.15% 14,697 0.054%
County of Anoka 0.32765 28.79% 29,913 0.020%
ISD #14 0.58566 51.46% 53,468 0.468%.
Other 0.06372 5.60% 5,817
1.13801 100.00% 103,895
* Assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District.
If constrtuction is a result of Tax Increment Financing, the impact is $0.
XV—E-1
5.20
� _
�
Community Development Department
PI,��]VNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: December 4, 1995
TO: William Bums, City Manager h
�
c��
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott H'ickok, Planning Coordinator
1Vlichele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: � Approve Comprehensive Sign Plan for 7570 H'ighway 65
The property owner at 7570 H'ighway 65 is in the process of renovating the froirt facade of the
building. As part of this renovation, the owner has applied for pernuts to install new signs for
each tenant. As the building includes more than three tenants, Chapter 214 of the sign code
requires the Council to approve a comprehensive sign plan for the building.
The property owner has submitted the attached comprehensive sign plan criteria for the subject
property. The criteria includes sign size, color, material, and location. This criteria also requ'ves
all signs to be approved by both tbe building owner and the City prior to installation.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached sign criteria.
M-95-601
11rIlVi/
6.01
,
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
7570 INC.
7570 HIGHWAY 65 NE
FRIDLEY MN 55432
784-1268
November 30 1995
This document shall establish the exterior sign program for the tenants of the
property located at 7570 Highway 65 in Fridley, Minnesota.
All exterior signage will be assigned by a square foot ratio of leased or rented
spaces. All letters, numbers and logos, are to be of viayl. The maximum size is not to
exceed 24 inches. Multiple lines of copy aze allowed.
In keeping with uniformity all letters, numbers and logos are to be one color. This
color code shall not be enforced for any FOR LEASE or FOR RENT signage.
All signage on front building to be attached to white Lucabond facing. This facing
is approximately 4 feet by 130 feet.
There will be no signage allowed on overhead doors.
Signage will be allowed on entrance doors and mailboxes. (approval of owner
required).
All signs, variances or deviations from this criteria must be approved by both the
building owner and the City of Fridley.
7570 Inc.
���%o��.�
Michael Obraske
secretaty,treasurer
Highway 65 NE
Fridley Mn 55432
784-1268
6.�2
�
.�
v-
Q
�
�l
�
�
�
�
�
.
�
�
��
` V'
_�
..�
� `
r, , . .
� �
�
r
0
�
��
�
U
�
._
�
O
O
-
tl.
�
0
0
:�
��
�
�
.
�
�
��
�
N
�
�
�
� �
�
�
�
w
�
z
W
�U
t�
,��
�O
.
V
�
�
�
J
J � �!
Q �' Q
�
� �
. >'
OC - >-
Q
w � OC
OC
� ,
_ a. �
z
�
�
z�
�
6.03
L
�
�, �
. �
`� �
� �
I �
',,� N
� N
,,
�
,
M
__
� �
�
�
�
��
0
:,
�
`
�
�
�
0
d
,,
� -
� -,
Q �,
� �
�
o .�
�
00
.�
�
,
�
� ,,,
>
n
O
V
�
�
�
�
�
�
�1
1
,:
;
;
. �
�
�
0
o�
I � �
�
L 1
,
�'v
�
1
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
6.04
�
W
.J �
Q
C� c�
� .�
-
� O =
L
� Q �
0 0 C�
� W �
�
0 � �
Q �
� �
o �
� �
Q �
� �
� �
�
�
�
j ` ! �
�
- � �� �
�. � �
�
�'�
.�
�
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER /M �
�
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYI., FINANCE DIRECTOR
PAUL S. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT
SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO THE 1995 BUDGET
DATE: " December 6, 1995
Attached you will find a resolution amending appropriations to the 1995 Budget in
accordance with the City Charter.
The adjustments listed have arisen as a result of donations, unforeseen expenditures, and
items budgeted in the wrong categories. All adjustments have been informally approved by
you through the Budget Reappropriation Form. We request that Council approve the
amendment of the attached budgets.
RDP/ph
Attachment
7.01
RESOLIITION # - 1995
A RESOLOTION AOTHORIZING CHANGSS IN
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENSRAL FUND FOR THE
YEAR 1995.
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has involved itself in initiatives
that provide for future charges and modifications that will allow
for a better delivery of service, and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley had not incorporated these and other
necessary changes into the adopted budget for 1995.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the General Fund budget for the
following divisions be amended as follows:
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
DONATION - RECREATION
DONATION - RECREATION
DONATION - RECREATION
DONATION - NATURAUST
TOTAL REVENUE ADJUSTMEM'S
APPROPHIATION ADJUSTMENTS
GENERAL MANAGEMENT SUPPUES/CNARGES
POLICE
FlRE
RENTAL INSPECTIONS
ENGINEERING
PARK MAINTENANCE
PERSONAL SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
SUPPUES/CHARGES
PERSONAL SERVICES
SUPPLIES/CHARGES
CAPITAL OUTIAY
PERSONAI SEFNICES
SUPPLIES/CHARGES
GENERAL FUND
5,000 FRIOLEY UONS CLUB - 49ER DAYS
2,000 FRIDLEY LIONS CLUB - PARK SHELTER AT COMMUNtTY PARK
1,000 FRIDLEY IJONS ClUB - CITY PARADE FLOAT
150 FRIDLEY UONS ClU6 -`WELLNESS WALIC'
58.150
2,700 OUTPLACEMENT SERVICES FOR JIM FROEHLE
49,744 PROJECT SAFETY NET
(509) TRANSCRIBING MACHINE
2.700 OUTPLACEMENT SERVICES FOR DEBBI O'NEILL
3,675 PAID ON-CALL FIREFlGHTER'S UFE INSUFtANCE
4,055 TRANSFER OF APPROVED BUDGET TOTAL FROM CAPITAL TO
SUPPUES DUE TO UNIT COSTS OF PURCHASE (�405 EACI-�
(4,0557
67,277 SET-UP 1995 BUDGET
9,555 SET-UP 1995 BUDGET
SUPPIIES/CHARGES 2,700 OUTPLACEMENT SERVICES FOR CLYDE MOREVEfZ
CAPITAL OUTIAY 4,129 PORTABLE WELDEH TRAILEH
SUPPLIES/CHARGES 4,000 REMOVED A-FRAME BUIIDiNG
SUPPLIES/CHARGES 3,381 EMERGENCY REPAIR OF THE BOAROWAIK
IN THE SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER
CAPITALOUTLAY 1,582 RADIALARMSAW
CAPITAL OUTtAY 2,247 TWO BASKETBALL STANDARD&CHARGED TO CAPITAL
OUTLAY DUE TO UNIT COSTS OF PURCHASE (>$50� EACI-�
SUPPUES/CHARGES (2,24�
CAPITAI OUTLAY 564 HAND LAWN MOWER
7.02
STREET MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY (4,129) POFiTABLE WELDER TRAILER
CAPITAL OUTLAY (1,58� RADIAL ARM SAW
CAPITAL OUTLAY (564) HAND IAWN MOWER
RECREATION
NATURALIST
EMERGENCY RESERVE
SUPPLIES/CHARGES 5,000 FR�OLEY UONS CLUBS - 49ER DAYS
CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,000 CONSTRUCTI�N OF PARK SHELTER AT COMMUNITY PARK
SUPPUES/CHARGES 1,000 LION'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARD REBUILDING CITY
PARADE FLOAT
SUPPUES/CHARGES 150 SPRINGB�i00K NATURE CENTER'WELLNESS WALK'
CAPITAL OUTLAY 9,000 FiIDING IAWN MOWER
SUPPUES�CHARGES 2.700 OUTPLAC9�AENT SERVICES FOR DAWN FUNN
(49�744)
(3,67�
(67,277)
(9,555j
(4��)
(3.381)
(3.�)
509
(2.700)
(2.700)
(2.700)
(2.��)
TOTAL APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 58.150
PROJECT SAFEIIf NET
PAID ON-CALL FlREFlGHTER'S LIFE INSURANCE
SET-UP 1995 BUDGET
SET-UP 1995 BUDGET
HENAOVE A-FRAME BUILDING
BuIERGENCY REPAIR OF THE BOARDWALK tN
THE SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER
RIDING LAWN MOWER
TAANSCRIBING MACHINE
OUTPLACBNENTSERVICES FOR DEBBI O'NEILL
OUTPIACEMENT SERVICES FOR CLYDE MORAVER
OUTPIACEMENT SERYICES FOR DAWN FLINN
OUTPLACEMENT SERVICES FOR JIM FROEHLE
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
_TH DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
7.03
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
e
TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRECTOR
HOWARD D. ROOLICR, ASBISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
SIIBJECT: RFSOLIITION TO TRANSFER FIINDS FOR FRIDLLY PRIDE CITY
WIDE EBPENSES
DATE: December 6, 1995
Attached you will find a resolution authorizing the transfer of up
to $190,000 from the Closed Bond Fund to the Solid Waste Abatement
Fund to fund the unbudgeted portion of the Fridley Pride City Wide
activities.
Total costs to date for Fridley Pride City Wide, as detailed on
Exhibit A, are $204,952.77. The City received cash donations
totaling $1,275 to offset costs. Since $16,000 was budgeted in the
Solid Waste Abatement Fund, the unfunded portion totals
$187,677.77.
By authorizing a transfer of up to $190,000, Council will have
approved funding for any minor bills that may have not been
received yet, although we are not aware of any at this time.
�: 1
R880I�UTION # - 1995
A RESOLIITION AIIT$ORIZING THE TRANBFLR OF IIP TO
$190, 000 FROM THE CLOSBD BOND FIIND TO THI3 SOLID
WASTE ABATEMENT FOND.
WHEREAS, the City undertook a citywide clean up and neighborhood
pride project entitled Fridley Pride City Wide; and
WHEREAS, the 1995 budget included $16,000 for the administration
of this project since the final size and scope were not known at
the time the budget was adopted; and cash controls, '
WHEREAS, the final cost for Fridley Pride City Wide exceeds the
budgeted amount by approximately $190,000.
NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Fridley hereby authorized transferring up to $190,000 from the
Closed Bond Fund to the Solid Waste Abatement Fund.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
: 1 �
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
EXHIBIT A
FRIDLEY PRIDE CITY WIDE COSTS
As of December 11, 1995
ADMINISTRATION
Consultant Fees
Printing
Postage
Signs
Entertainment
Clothing
Food
Rentals
Paper Products
Copies
Security
Mileage
Logo
Advertising
Contest Winner
Phone
Insurance
Misc. Supplies
Total Administration
CURBSIDE
Tree, Brush and Branch Removal
Appliance Removal
Usab(e Fumiture Removal
General Refuse
Total Curbside
DROP-OFF CENTER
Tire Removal
Flourecent Lamp
Used Oil and Filters
Demolition, Concrete, Asphalf
Total Drop-off Center
Costs as of Costs Ye#
11-30-95 to be Paid Total Costs
19, 508.81 195.00 19, 703.81
4,406.13 4,406.13
2,846.40 4.80 2,851.20
2,092.19 2,092.19
1,750.00 1,750.00
2,161. 50 2,161.50
904.74 904.74
271.58 271.58
245.14 245.14
218.09 218.09
213.00 213.00
174.58 3.77 178.35
161.48 161.48
86.80 86.80
50.00 50.00
13.69 13.69
1,631.00 1,631.00
149.96 4.32 154.28
36,885.09 207.89 37,092.98
68,986.50 68,986.50
11,533.00 11,533.00
2,663.46 2,663.46
69,264.93 1,091.55 70,356.48
152,447.89 1,091.55 153,539.44
2,098.20 2,098.20
1,493.87 1,493.87
948.00 948.00
8,759.72 8,759.72
13,299.79 13,299.79
BUSINESS BEAUTIFICATION AWARDS 2,320.00 2,320.00
fFy�';i.u�•.r,r:{ti{!: 'SitCJRtY.iv r+FU�t��ye.x{F� �y:� y..{rx xr •. y L S ii '. i+I :+C ^. j
f .:..M1 v�'^ff.!:+t.•::�.v. . . . .t . `4/ S`� S
.•::: • . ; . .
�{#� '`� � r�%�'}� ' • • . S ' �
.' . . . x
�``� ��# % : :::;� .n - . � .-..- . � � .:::.:.
...,....... ... .,,� ..k..w�..,. � � ,�.. ,., .,�.. ::.. �-.::..:.:�::....� : . ��..- ... �:,:.,,�.; . ,
8.03
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FIN.ANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION INCREASING THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE FEE
DATE: Decem6er 6, 1995
Attached you will find a Resolution that increases the storm water drainage fee from $5.25
per quarter per REF-acre to $8.40 per quarter per REF-acre. An REF acre by definition,
in Ordinance #216, is the ratio of the average volume of runoff generated by one acre of
a given land use to the average volume of runoff generated by one acre of typical single
family residential land use during a standard one year rainfall event. To calculate the
residential cost per quarter Section 216.04 provides that both single and duplex parceLs be
considered to have an acreage of one-third (1/3) acre. Therefore, the $8.40 per REF-acre
shouid be divided by 3 to get $2.80 per quarter per single family parcel.
The increase of this fee was discus.sed a great deal during the recent 1996 Budget Work
Sessions. I have attached the projections that were provided by the Finance Department
during those sessions. The 1996 projected loss amounted to approximately ($116,000) if no
increase in fees were to take place.
Staff is recommending that this Resolution be passed io eliminate ihe erosion of capital
from this fund by running it at a loss.
RDP/me
Attachment
9,01
O
N
C
m
�
�
m
�
rn
I
m
Q
�
�
000 ONOO�p�:�:���0 O '0'0�:.:-:::06� ....`
�:�� M ;C7� 07 :�N� ::n0::
y O�{� ':�� N 11� n O�::FD N N � M;: � r OD ::t0: V' �:�- ::dQi
: �:
" O C7 'ct tf) :�:Si: O e{ 10 N ?:x? 'V' W .: � W OD :�:W: 1�1 ::N-. �:�.r.!:;
�O ;il>; et
V O CD ^ 2�: �(A N H N:�:.: � � M :;C?: N�P9 ::�D: r+ :ip ::�::
.�..0 � NT fA � �" {y �y: N O ::r: f0 `C0 ;AQ::
O N in � ip?:>:=:: N :,.. '� �D E:1y E;tG:
1
a :;fN� fN ;K �:;�.:
:ili:
O O O �:�::i; N.r O 1q:5.���� M 07 N O'.�t�. C7 fp �`i;; iii;� '�;>:i
O O p `�: ch t� � f0:;. �:�: h `� `#7f.::
� f� h T(N.;e+S. N �p
m O �qi IA ;g:: � M O) S O/::,'...��. CO 0'� O N:�o- >ai, .r .�zer ::xa�:
o :�ra: v
a� ;c�: � :;ui u�,::
��I a�0 � � '��: � H � � N;:� � m M <y Ol f0 :;b►: N ';i�± ;�l::
� :: f0 h y :?�� N ?.r!: et :<Oi :;!C::
p r-{ �N " iA:[:s:::<: N '�? [�i9: 1q ::t0 iE�.E
a �+P �► ;�li :;N:
:Vi:
O O O >:;:: �!' �q o N';`�`��Ol W tA 0;... �:::i: ����� '>:�:;
::?�: �� O <�i�± m 'fY: : fCf;:
� O O O iCk? 1� a' � f0;:. -. N N O fA:; 'eh i?L'�i �' ;iE :iiQ:
O� c+lN�S01. � :.�:�
'�" 00 ri v� ''�' �[i v�i N :''., � a O O� ;ri O :;r ::pi:
V�I OD � �'�� t0 H N fA N:: � � N N `�� N� �:'�- N %?Lf)
.� W .- ^ W tH �:. <O 1� p ::�: 0� ;;N: N �p :�':
O�' N H::?:i: N t�.r :rs � :'{F!� ::Q9:;
:i?i W ;iN
a :::>::> >; �:
0 0 0 ��� v o o�`>v in � r� o'<#�� N >:<: ='' ::>:<'::
>�' ?tis: o� :r:
0 0 o ao � io o co>. ao ao m w:vx: co .r ::m: u�
o+n� � ao v o o�.,: c co �>� :�:
� t� M et � ?�: N et � N . O 1Q ;�: .. :;�: N ::� i�;::
CD �::�i: N
m Of t0 � p� ';d!: CD f9 N K N:::��' f� Of :;:dy�: N N :�� r ::N :'t0::
.� w T w �a :, in m �y ::,rw. a ::s� c ::t�! ::us::
N
O � � K:`.>::::: N %'� ::�: Q� ::V ;.'�:
a ::� a ::iNr :'iy:
::�A
.::.:.::C1:�,::: _;
r�:�>�: :
:•:>::�:y�.:•::::::. �:: :•::�;���f �:.:: �::';:;:::
?';:?i�D'-'�'`W: °:.,..:::..:;:i:'::i:�:.';:�i:�i;: ... i;�r::::;;i:"""2. . _:
�.
UI. . .�-
::::::.::.:: :.::. .
:.:;;:;i:;.;r.;>:
:.:,::::::.:::.�::...::
;;::::::i:i:>:::::::::::'<:ii::?:i: .. .;,a::..:.>:_::.:: ......!w .........:.iiT..:1Q.:. ,: _ ::i>:::? '' ij:i:: ii:.>:.: ::::i:::::: :::ir'�• � :::::
Q..:...:......... qp
.:: �.:::�;:. ; ..�.»:�.:a::.>::ui.>:;::.r:Qi i:i:;:i�?
� :::i:::::::�i%.-.'i:Ri'
. .. . ..............
;�Ac::::t:::::;:::::::i;:::::.� ?;::. ��. t. i:::::i::iii::i[o::..."_ :. ... .::: ..: ..:.' 'n.',c'c ;x::c::i$;::. �.i:[V1:�:i�? :' i:i:%i:i:i:.' . n:2i- .:>::: .:::::. ...:::. .:::::....,
i7�:.�: .. �..:';::�:';�:::.:-;::: �.;;:::::.::.»: ::.:>:.;:.: ;: �:; �:::::;:>�...:::.::;.r:-::�:.r:.:�:::�.V.';?�::_:�i7:.;;;>;t.—....
° .. ........ .�... � "i'i�:::ii:�i::�:::::�::�:�:�i:::i:;.� � ............ . l!!.i!! ...... . :.. ....... ...:...
:>m:>:<:z_>:>:s»>:;>::=::. :: •t:;: �:;h�::�;?'=.::: :iD.:;:-;:�:�;.;;.::.�:::..�.'��.;:�;;;;;:r.: ..
. .,.:.. ; :,. :;:;;a;;;:�:�;:�:;�»:�:a;;r �:: � �;., ;; ��:: .:: �.�.;:. ;• ::::... ... :.:.::.:.�:::::._:: �: .::. �i;::;.;:�..- f;:�; �::?;?;�'::;i:ti:�;::�;::;•:
�>.fd ::::Y•:SSii::N3.;�F.:. . :::;E3t::?�l'.::�•.�6>Gh�> :a::.�::..:.:. :•::.+t::::::::: >i�<::�ii�
�>. ............... . � o:_:>: �'' '>:�:�o::- ... ....ftk:;:N :: . .:::.:r •
: ::17} ::�::=i:�::::�?�!i i +j
�::::.% ::�.'•:r.x::r : .:::::: .
�: :::::::::::::::::.... , ..�: ...::::......
.,-
�• ..... . C6::3N�:�fA1.;3N%::0::5:. ; � �:. ..
, :.. ;:r:::o::::::>::a::>r:� �� . •� C�ls•:.>xc :: . . :.;:'i'.... i::t:; :.::::%�!i:`�:::�`iitl.'•:3::3:�:3� :$r>::�k'
.. ,: .:::: �::.�::... :;;;;:::.;r;:�rz�o;:ao-: --_:::. �. •:: :•::::.::.
:�>:.:�r.>o-»>r.... ;�:. �::o>. �.: �.;?. �::: " :t0 :;<.:;: .. o: ..?PI _
.....:... .x:.; ;.:,':.;; �:_c__;:j;; �>:::: ...,
`�:CW.. :::::�;?�;:..:: �:: ......�:�::::i: i9i�:i`t�:�>:'r-'::�: . ..:.. lf! �:::::�::1fl: .:. C :�;:.:::. .:
.. ......
:::;::1!! :::::::Si:;::::ifi:aw::::;.:;:.�._.:�>: :::::::: �
R:�;:�N:;;?'t::f/��' . . .7R'
�::::
,.: �:._:: � .
:�::: u�.
?> >;w:s:;�:?�»:i:��.:� .... ..........................:.:::...:.::::... >;"::a:iN?i:x>. �:::�.;:•:.:� -.:.: :;;.:.;:?..:::::=:x•::•;: ....... :.:::::
�.;�..:::: �....::.� ::........:::. .....itl::.... � :.;��:N:;:;fi;;:;11�:::.:�:::Il� ;:�;:�i��»:i
:.>4�:::::::::::::::i:�;::.>:.::;.i. :::::;:::::;:i :::::::::.:::::::>:i:i::::k:i:::::::::;:::::::::.>ii:<::::i:: ::::::::"._.i.:`::::::::�:::ikt:i:::::`::::::?:::::::::..:.:::::::Y ' ::::::: `ii:�'� �::>:::' '.:ii::.:' ' :.:Ti?:::�r-
�:::. ::.:::. .>::.:>:;�:�:.:.::.:. ::::.� �:
::�:::;::::;::i::::::::::::::;::;::i::2:::::::;;::;::s::;:::;::i:;:;:;:�:`;:`::;::::::;:::::::; ::::::::::::::::::;:::;:::;:::;:;:�i::;`::;:::;:::;`:;`:i:::;:::;:::::::;:`::::;r::::::;::::::::;;:::::�::::::::::::�:�::::::::::.. . :.;:.:: ::.;:-;�.74e:::: :.::::::.:�:. �:: .:.;:�:;N;
:�:::; �:'V%:
..................... .. ........... ... "". .......... ....... .... :>`�:�::;�::�::::;:i::i:?:::::::::;:;:; '''''''"::;:�:�:
. ..... .... .
......................:::. � ..::::::::::::::::::.;:::....::::::: ::�::�::.y::.;:�:a>:�»:�:_:>:.>:�::�::<:.:::.;�:::::;::a::•:::-:::�>;::::::;;•::.::�::::::;::::�::�iii!:�:i<•::�::::;fi�:: :
0 0 0 aD O�0 0 �A 0i Of � � 0 0 N �:f� N ::fA 's�:
��O ��OOtOfH110 �p f�ipiHN� p� :�:
r O t0 � CD �.- O W p � 1n . h�. � QO :`•YV ::,1!*::
� tnI M�^ Ol f� M � �p ::�� � iilf ;AD�:
� 1 � � � � W � N � a N N � � :;� �
� �, � 'u�� '::�:
m' �� � � � :'r :.;:.:
: � a :;w :;:�.:
;�:
rn o rn rn o a�� o.- ao � �n � >a0: ,p >:�>: :`i�:
N�� ��M�'7�f0 CE N�� W � ::fJ: :W i�::
�� N(O � ODN ��A � � 0117tDO� ;� � ::� �:`�::
� �7 Of t0 �� N W N O! � � N N H N IA :;�.': �p�h :;:�Opf ;1tY:;
Q 01I � � K W � W �II iH iN �'' N ::�' t(f "(p :A�J::
:;il1i K :i� ::�::
:�:3�: <IN
:'r
::!7')
� >:5�: ;:>
;.-.m ' �:
� : � :'�:
.�. �p `'w`
.:::::: YJ ''':': � ::'� i'C?..�%,:.i
:::::: p, ': C: C :;� :;N�:
:�: M� � ::Y:.
10 M .:;:y:: y X ::<b: �1 :�
� Oi ::;taE dl v �'i�: 10 �y i:�;i
� 7 :i:QY M y y :.» �.. {:
p C :� Gk W C y C �t'C :�:�C;:
LL CI :i V: � p A1 7 :%;;�;; 41 :: dl :� C:::
o m ::::e �c .. a c >: m: o >. W :a::
a m rr '::ur: d v � w m O >� a �<� �� a..
><m: ��::
v �� a ?': w v m ao 0 0� +-: W :'� :::,p�.,:
7 m� C z'[F: m�W �� o�..C-, E Ol a �� :::d1:
` m c`�n � � ``m: x � m a � � w � � � ;� � ::� ::A''
m � m c m g. W m �.a c v o C � p o ::;9►: at .;:�<
w a a> a �!� �_ Z a m a .. � �� o >�a: o::� :>ai::
c� m� c a a m o c a0 c ac '� � � � •;,....
3 ¢ � o v� a m m o ;�� �:>� �:�+d'
" a� w � � p 0 m � N% v ��v ss :�:�I1 :.'�:
� � � � � �
£ mor° ?:E: m�a�'�a3o � I m��m c >:� r::� �:�:
o �� h ;;:: m� �a m m H m c... m a a :::a <��::
•. a" :�► aav�Ssoz a o c�o0 � >�4 �>:�:.
v� O iu: O O z— z ::z t� ;� �'�
>�d::
m
O
m
�
V
�
m
a
a
a
v
c
0
�
.�
�
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A STORM WATER
DRAINAGE RATE CHANGE
WHEREAS, Section 216.04 of the City code provides that the City Council shall have the
authority to set the storm water drainage fee by resolution, and
Wheceas, the City has not increased this rate since 1985, and
Whereas, the City has indicated a desire to provide for proper maintenance and
improvements to the storm water drainage system, and
Whereas, both the maintenance and improvements have been outlined in the City's
Budget and Capital Improvement Program, and
WHEREAS, the new rate is to be effective with the January, 1996 billing.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the storm water drainage rate for all
customers shall be $8.40 per quarter per REF-acre
PASSED AND ADOP'TED BY TI� CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF FRIDLEY
THIS ______ DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CTTY CLERK
9.03
20RERT A. GUZI'
Rf:RNAR[� 6. STEFFEN
FICHARD A. MERRti_L
DARRELL A. JENSEN
JEFFREY S. JOHNSON
RUSSELL H. CROWDER
jON ['. ERICKSON
LAWRENCER.JOHNSON
DAVID A. COSSI
TIiOM.AS P. MALONE
MICHAEL F. HURLEY
VIRGILC. HERRICK
HERMAN L. TALLE
.�l \ �
1
�� � �
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
ATT'ORNEYS AT LAW
400 Northtown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids B�ulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55433-5894
(612)780-8500
TO: FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SCOTT LEPAK
FAX (612) 780-1777
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1995
RE: FINAL AGREEMENT ON LOCKE LAKE LITIGATION
CHARLES M.SEYKORA
WILLIAM M. HANSEN
IIANIEL D. GANTER, JR.
REVERLY K. l�[X;E
CRAIG M. AYERS
GREGG V. HERRICK
JAMES D. HOEFT
JOAN M. QUADE
SCOTT M. LHPAK
ELIZABETH A. SCHAnING
WILLIAM F. HUEFNER
JONATHAN K. REPPE
ROBERT C. HYNES
1935-1993
On November 8, 1995, representatives from the City of Fridley,
Ramsey County and the Rice Creek Watershed District met in a second
mediation session to discuss possible settlement of the pending
litigation surrounding the Locke Lake improvement project. Pub].ic
Works Director John Flora and I attended the mediation on behalf of
the City of Fridley. At the mediation session, the matter was
tentatively settled. This �tentative settlement was previously
presented to the City Council and was approved at that time. The
t�ntative settlement was also subsequently approved by the Ramsey
County Board of Commissioners. The representatives from the Rice
Creek Watershed District who were present at the mediation,
including three of the board members and their attorneys, have also
indicated that they will approve the tentative settlement.
Following the ratification of the tentative agreement by the three
parties, the attorneys have been working on the language of the
final settlement agreement and joint powers agreement. That
language has now been finalized. The language is attached for your
review. The substantive provisions are as follows:
Fridley will make a monetary contribution of $54,000.00 and
will remove $52,000.00 worth of material from Locke Lake to
reduce the costs to be allocated to Ramsey County. As a
result of Fridley's contributions outlined above, Ramsey
County shall contribute $282,734 as its share of the cost of
the Locke Lake Tmprovement project.
Fridley will provide, at its cost, any maintenance required
for the non-sediment basin portion of the Locke Lake Project.
The Watershed District will provide, at its cost, the
maintenance required for the sediment basin portion of the
Locke Lake Project.
� �.� �
An Equal Opporcunity Employer
Ramsey County has already given its attorney authority to execute
these documents. Following execution by the City of Fridley, the
documents will be submitted to the Watershed District for the
appropriate signatures.
A motion authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign these
documents is attached to this memorandum for your review and
approval.
fridley\lockelak\setmemo
113095s1
2
10.02
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
RESOLIITION APPROVING THE FINAL AGREEMLNT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, RAMSEY COUNTY AND THE RICE CREER
WATERSIiED DISTRICT RESOLVING THE LITIGATION OVER TIiE
LOCRE LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Fridley, Ramsey County and the Rice
Creek Watershed District have reached a tentative settlement of the pending
litigation, Ramsey County district court file no. C9-93-9419; and,
WHEREAS, the tentative settlement was previously submitted to the Fridley City
Council and was approved; and,
WHEREAS, the tentative settlement has now been reduced to final written form;
and,
WHEREAS, the attached documents entitled Settlement Agreement and Release,
Joint Powers Agreement between the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City
of Fridley, and the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice represent the
entire settlement between the parties
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves the final
agreement and that the Mayor and any other appropriate elected or appointed
officials are authorized and directed to execute originals of the attached
documents.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
10.03
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
C1�6y�984�
M j u TEL PJn . F,126�99845 Iie c 01 , 95 10 : 28 P. 02
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ANb �ET,$ASE
This settlemen� Agreement �thd Release (Agreement) is made
� 1995 between Ct]A YZiCE� Crae�k Wa�er�hed D1.tlttrict
{F�CWD),.the City oP Fridley (Fridley) and the County oP Ramsey
(R€�m�ey Caunty) .
WHEREAS, RCWU on �uly 14, 1993 �s�ued Findings Gf Fac�,
Canalusions and Order to �mglement the Locke La�ke Improvemelnt
project upon certain condi.tion� s�at �orth in the Canclusian� and
Oxde�r f t�nd �
WH�ttEA�, On AUgu�tt 13, 1993 Ramsey County ap ealed in Rama�y
Caunty Distriat Caur� the RGWD�B July 14, �.��3 F�t�dings a�' Fac�,
conc�.us�,ons and orQer, an �h� fallowing qrounds: RCwTI�� � failure ta
Pa�lQw prQper gracadurea in the adoptfvn v� the� w��sz�sh�d
management plan amandment relat�nq to the Lock� lake Capitdl
Impravement Projectf �ailure ta �ddress comments submitted into the
pubiic hearing record by the Metropoli�an Counoii and the Minnesota
Department af Natt�re�l Re�aurae�; and fa��ure ta determ�ne �ri
equitable method of �und�ng af th� Lo�ke Lrxk� Capi��i �mpravement
P�ra j ect ; r�ryd
WHEREAS, Frie��ey intervened as m�Arty ta the appealf and
WHEREA&� tha pertiaa ha�ve �ean invalved in litigatian an thi�
mat�er Bince Au�u�t i�, Y���t �nd
WH�&�Afi, tha parti�� �gr�a it ia now in their mutual b�gt
in�eres�s ta eettle the litiqation reqarding thia pro�ea�. arid
appeal pending in ltamsey County Di�triot court, Ffie No. cg-43-
&419 f tzrid
NOW, THEREFORE, i� is aqread between the pa��ies�
1. In coneideratian for the pt�Yrments, perfpx'm�tnce �nd
pramises sgt for�h be,].ow, Rams�ey Caunty shaYl dit�misa with
pr�jnd�ee �h� �ppe�►1 oP the RGWD'e Ju1p �.4, 1993 �'indinga ot Faot,
conciusions and orAer pending in T�a�m�ey caunty pistri�ct Court, File
Na. C�-93-9419. Ail parties wil]. execute a stipulatian af
Diami�eal with Prejudiae in the fo�n attaoh�d ae Exhibit A.
2- A�.�. p�.�tie� t�gree th�t, excegt as provided in this
Agree�men�, the i,a�ke Lak� rmprovement Pro�eat shail be implemented
an �ha eama �erm� and conditfans contained in �he R�wO�g �u1y �4,
�.�93 Fl.nding� o� Faat, canciu�ions and arder. The RCWp �nd k'r�d2ey
will uge �heir be�r ���ort� ta award contracts tor th� praja�t by
tht3 ia�.� o� 1SiS16.
3. ]Cn partial oanaidceration af Remgey cauntiy agreeinq ta
diBmiss fts appeal end the RCWD �greeS.ng to pr[�ceed with tha
pra j ect set garth in ite Ju�y 14 , 1993 Findirtg� af k'etCt,
10.04
E12b559�45
P•1ju TEL t••10.h125999845 D�c 01,95 10�29 P.03
Conclus�.ans and Oraer, Fri.diey shail G�ntri.bu�s the a►mount af
$54,000.00 to reduce the cost to be dllocated ta Ramgey CoUrity es
outlin�d in paraqraph ib of the RCWD�s July ].4, �993 Coaclusiona�
and order. �'ridley shall pay the $5,4,000.00 to RCWD an ar betore
the date vn whiah Ramsey County submit� i.ts payment to th� RCWD for
Ramsey County'a ahare of the prvjec� cogt as outlined in �his
Agreement.
4. In partial aon��deratian a� Ramsey Coutity a�gre�inq to
di�miss i�g t�ppeal dnd the IrCWD agreeinq tp praceed with the
praject se� farth itt �ts July 14, ].993 Findinqs af Faot,
conaivaiong and Order, Fridley ghall contribut� labor and materidls
to rr�raave materia�l fram Laake Lake, iri accordance with the pidns
and gpaai�iaations far the Looke La�ke Improveme�nt Prajeat, in the
amaunt of at least $S2,OOO.00 ta reduae tihe approximate aost to be
a�located to x�msey caunty as outl�.nad in paragraph 14 af �he
RCWD'� July 14, 1.993 Conalug�ona and Order. The Yalus of the la�bar
and materia�s provided by Fridley sha�� be medsured by �pplying the
same unit cost� ag those cont�ained in th� successfui b�dder's
aoritaraat far the Lacka Lake Impraveme�nt Project. For sxemple, in
the event that the suco��sful bidder �or the sediment r�moval
portion aP the Locke L�ke Improvement Project indicates in its bid
that it will charge $1.00 per CUb�G �oot ta xemove sediment �rom
I,ocke Lake, Fridley wili aqree ta remove at la�st lifty-two
thousand (52,OOOj cub�c fest of scedi:ment ($�a2,�0� divided by $1.00
per cuhic faot) . Fridley may da�enaine where this matwxial will be
xemoved �ram Lacke Lake, provided t.hat the removal 1s consiatent
with the plens and gpeo�.Picntians �a�r tne r�ocKe Laxe improvem�ent
praject, and ie appravad by the RCWD Engine�r. Fridley ahall �].so
hatre �he xigh� �.o re�eil or atherwise reuse the materit�� it remaves
from tha grajeat eite.
5. As a result oP Fridxey's contribu�ion� a� out�lined in
p�ragraphs 3 and 4 �►bov�, Ramse� County sha�ll aontribu�a
$2$Zi734.U0 t�s its �hare o� the cast a� the Locke �k� Improvement
Pro�e�ct contained in the 12CWD•� Ju]�y 14, 1993 Findingg ot Fact,
�ono�uaforsa �xnd O�dor. Th�.g amount w�� abta�ined by reducinq R�meey
County'� arig�nal aagt allocatian �� $388,734.Od out��.ried in
paragraph 10 af the RCWD�s� Ju�y 14, 1993 Canclu��.ons and Order, by
the monetary and �abor and mAte�ria7. contrfbutians from Fridley
($�4,000.ao �nd $52,ob0.QO).
6. Fridley agreea to pravide a� it� cas� any mnintenance
requirad �ar the nc�n-sediment basin portiort of the I.ocke Lak�
Impx'oV�m�n� Proj�Ct i2'� accorde�ilCe With the Jo�nt PowerB Agreemetit
between RCwD end Fridley, A oopy of which is attached ae� Exhibit 8.
Nothing in thi� Aqreement alterg the RCWD�� re�pane�bility �a
mt�intein the sedfinent bae�in partion �f th�a Y.ocke Lake Improvement
Pra j ect �as� provided in the Joint Fowers Agreement, a cc+py of which
�s �►ttached a�s �xhibit B. Ramsey County may ent'oXr�e the Joint
Pawere Agreement �B a valid thira-►pa�r�y neneYiciary gu�e;uniil. 1.v
this Agre�menc.
2
10.05
6126999845
Mju TEL N0.�126999845 Dec 01,95 10�30 P.04
7. Ra��ey county, FriQ2ey and the Rcw� mu�ually, tully end
forever re�ease and di�oharge eaah ather, eaah party'8 BucceBSar�
and asaigrts, fram �all claim� and causes of ac�ion, past, pre�ent or
�uture, anfl c9emanae f�r dam�►qes, arising �ram �he� Locke Lak�
ImpravemenG �ra�eCt arc�er�d by the �t�WU �in i�g July �4, 1��3
FinQings v� �'act, Conc�usions and Order, specifically including all
Clafms� s�et �arth in kam$ey County�s Notic� o� Appae►1 from the
RG"WD's �uly 14, 1993 Findings af Fact, Conclusians and Order, and
in�ludfng, but nat 13.mited ta, al�ims far breacsh af wrif�en e�z ox��
aontraat, statuto�ry vioit�tic�r��, ��r,it�l o� du� �r�c�,��r �r �tri�r
federal, state, ar �acal 1aws�, pramigsary egtoppel, ne�gliq�nce and
any ather cl�►ima.
8. Nothing in this Agr��ment i� fnt�tt�ed ta be an admission
of ].iabfiity b� �rr� c�f �ha pa�rtie�a �hat it hx�e 'v�olat�d �ny
e�4eot4u4�� s:ul�� ].u�:a� v�.alivaiiues� Ytiiii„�fyXa vt is�:rti�lltiCi�i 1laW� �1 lYaa
ariqage�d irt ax�y� Wrertqdeitig. �
9. The parties fuz�ther deciare and represent that no promiee,
inducement or aareement other than as expressed in this Aqrre�m�n�
hae b�en made to �►ny party and thet this Aqreement oont�in� �he
en�i�� �►gxeement between the parties reqardinq the Locka Lake
zmpravemen� �roject ord�r�d by �ne �tcwn in ita Jaly 14, �.993
Finding� �f F$at, Conalusions and Order and that th� telm� og the
Aqreement are cantractual and not a mere recitA]..
zo. Z'h� partiee deciare
2�een comp�etely read end are
aCCepted far t�is purpase oi
�d jus�me��� and settXeia�nt o�
ImproVerilerit Px'o j ec� end that
to df�oussg �his� ma�ter fu].].y
attarnsys.
that th� ternaa. of this Agr�ement have
fully underetood r�nd are vo�untarily.
making a ful l a�nd f inal aomprami.ge,
all clai�s related to the Lo�ke I,�k�
ail parties have had the opgartunity
a�d ta �he�r aa���s�action with �heir
�.1. Thi� Aqre�mant supara�de� a�li priar agre�emar�ts ar�d
under��andi.nqs between the parties �relating to th� i.��k� LErk+�
Improve�merit Projec� and. �t may not be aha»ged or tei^minated arall,y.
Na modif�.cation, termination ar attempt�d waivar of any of the
prauf�siaris� af thic rigra�amant ahall ba valid unl�s� in writing
signed by ali parties.
lz. Thi� Ag��em�►nt and an� Euhibito may ba aignad k�* tha
p�brtt�a in ca�unte��.-part.
13. The tralidity, anfora�ability, oonatruct�.on and
in��rpxeta�ti�n of this Aqreemant shall be govern�d by �he ].awg of
the� S�at� oE Minneeatia.
�
10.06
Mju
6126999845
TEL td0.E126999845 Dec 01,95 10�31 P.05
lFa�uaay Cov���y
By
It� Ch�tir, Gounty So�rd
af CoYamiaQio�►ers
And By
�te Chief Clerk
�,pprvvaa aa ba Form
Ramsey Caunty Attarnay
Sy
Aaa�atant Caunt�r A��orn4�
STA�� OF MINNESQTA )
�BS.=
G`a►UN�X l7F RAMBEY )
The abvve dacuntent was �ubecribed and swo�tt ta before me th�s
day of , �.995, by .
and , the Ght��.r end Chief Clerk o� the
Ramsey county Bo��.^d af Commiasianers, on behalf af the County of
Rameay.
n
�
10.07
6126�99845
Mju TEL PJ0.6126999�45 Dec 01,95 1Q=31 P.06
City ot Fridley
�y
Itg Maya�
And B�r
Y�a Ci,�y Manager
ETATE dF MINNS84TA)
)SS-t
COUNTY QF �ANOKA j
The� above document was subacribad and s�war» ta befcre me this
day of , �995, by r
and ,�he Mayo� and city Manager o� the
Cit� of F�ridl�y, n municigal aarpor�tian, oh behalf of the City �i
Fridl�y.
5
10.08
Mju
6126999845
TEL N0.6126999845
RiC� Cxeek iPntershed Diatrfat
By
Preaid�nt af the Rfoe Cz�aek
waterghed Distriot Baard
of Manegerg
STATE QF MINNESOTAj
}ss.:
COUNTY GF ��)
Dec 01,95 10=32 P.07
The �Dov� documen� was subecribed and sworn to bsPar� me this
C�ay at , 1995, by ,.
President of the Rice Creek Watershed Distrivt Bo�rd of Managers�
on taehalf of the Rice creek wa�ershed Distriat.
d
10.09
Mju.
TEL hd0.F12E9���45
Der 01,95 10��2 P.O�
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE RICE CREEK WA',�ERSHED DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF FitIDLEX
This a�oin� Fowers Aqreement is made , 1995 between
the Ria� Gree�k Water�hed Di.gtr�ct (RCWb) and the Cfty of Fridley
( t�rid].ay) .
WHEREAS, Fridl.ey and the RCWD are qovernman�al units as
defined fn Milrtn��att� statutes seation 471.59 (1) (1994) ; And
W'�IEREAB, purauent to Minnesota 8tatutes seation 471.��(i)
(1994) Fridley a.nd the RCWD have the authority to jc�in�ly or
cooperatively �xarcis�e any pawer COl�illl�ri to the partfe�e; and
wHEREAS, pure�uant to rllnneaata statuCes �9�zxcn 4�il.�v�iu�
(19�4j �he qovern�nq bQdies of Fridley and the RCWD may ent�r inta
agreementa wi�h each ather to pexform an behalf of th� other any
service or functfon which th+� governmenta�. unit providing the
�erv�.ce or fun�tion i� autiharizad ta provida for itse�.�; and
wHEREAB, Fridley end the RGWQ dee�ire ko �nter into such a
join� exerai�� af powers aqreement; and
WY.EREAS � th� RCWD on Suly 14 � 19�3 i�csued Findinqa af Fae�,
Gortclusior►a dnd Ordar �� impl�n�an� tMe Le�cke Laka Impz�ovwmont
Projec� upcn certr�irt aanditions se� farth in th� Canalusions and
Oxder; and
wHEREAS, an Auqu�t �3, 1993 Ramsey County app�aled in Rtimaey
Caunty District court the RCW'D�s+ �uly 14, 1993 FfnditsqB of �aat,
Conclu�iona and Ord�ri end
wx��AS, Fr�diay interven�c� as a party ta the a►ppeai; and
WHEREAS, the parties to th� appeal have settled th� litig$�ian
regardinq this project and �cubs��quent agpeal as set foxt� in �he
Settleme�t Agreemen� and R�lea��� and
WHE�tEAS, as part of the settZement af the litigatian, Fridley
haa agreed ta be respon�ible for maintenance o� the non-sedimen�
basin porti�an of the Locke La�ke zmprov�men� Proj�at.
NOW, THEREFORE, it �.s� aqrQ�d betwe�e�n the �artie� s
1. Fridiey, during �h� iife o� the Lacka I.ake Impravement
Froject, shall asauma the respcnsibility �o p�rfox-m and pay nny
t 4 laain�en�►nce of the non-sedimant b�sin portion of the Lo�k� Lake
Improvement Pz�o�ect ordered puX�uant to the RCWd�s July 14, 1993
10.10
Mju
6126959845
TEL hd� . 51259y9�45
Dec 01,95 7�55 P.10
Findings of Fact, Canclus�ion� and Order. F4r purpose� af thi�
paragraph, th� terra non-sadiment ba�ain ,�ha].� be de�fined as ths
portion af the Locke Lake Improvement Projeot that does not �.21Clude
��e in--lake ba�in areated by overexae�v�ting a portion o� the►
na�theast ha�.f of tha b�sin a�g de�axibed in Find�.ttgs o! Faat
paragraph� thirty through thirty-faur, a£ the RCWD�s July 14, 1993
Fittdings af Fact, Conclusions and Order, a aapy of which i�
ntt�ched as Exhfbit �.
2. Nothinq in thie agr�ementi altar� the RCWD'� reaponsi.b�litiy
to maintain �he sediment bagin portian aP the Locke Lak�
improvement projeot ardered pursuant to tho RCWp�s July 14, 1993
F�.ndings� of Faat, Ganalugions and 4rder. For purpagea a! this
p�ragraph, the term eediment basin �hall be defin�d•ag th� in-l�tke
basin oreated by ovar�xoevatinq a portian a� th� northeas� ha�lf ot
�h� baein e��s describod in Findinqe of F�at paragraphe� thirty
throuqh thirty-four, of the� RCWb's July 14, 1999 Findinq� of Fact,
GoriClLis�.ons and 4rdsr, a capy of which is attaahed as Exhibit 1.
CITY �F �'RZpLEY
By -
�tXCE CREEK WATERBHED OISTRICT
By ..�
It� President o� the Riae Creek
watershed Dietrict Soard oP
M�►nagar�
BTATE OF M�NNESOTA)
�ss..
COUNTY OF ANOICA j
The above document wa�s aubsoribed and e��arn tia ba�or� me thie
day of , 1995, by �
af the C�ty of Fridley, on behalf of the City o�
Fridley.
STA�`fi a� IdINN$SOTA)
)SS.:
COUNTY OF _ _.)
The above docu�nent wa►s aubacribed
day of � , 1995,
president of the Rice Creek Watersshed
on behalf of the Rice Creel� Watershed
�
10.11
and awartt to befare me th�Ls
by ,
D�et�ic� Board of Man�gers,
Di�xtr�.at.
61269�9845
Mju TEL N0.6126999845 Dec 01,95 10�34 P.10
Rice creek w�ter�had �i�trivt
By
Fresident a� the Rice creek
watierehad aistriat �a�rd
at Men�qers
STATE OF MINNEBa�A�
j�$.i
C�UNTY OF ,�j
The above aocum�nt was �ub�crib�fl end e�warn to be�4re me this
dAy of , ��95, by
Prea�c�ent of the Rice creek Water�hed aistriot Boa►r� of Manag�rs,
an behalf r�� the Rice Cr�ek Wa��rah�d Di�ttriCt.
3
10.12
Mju
6126999845
TEL N0.6126999845
gTATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
IN THE MATTER OF PROI'USED
I�OCICE L+AK� �ROJEC'�
FRIDLEY, MINNES�TA
Dec 01,95 10�34 P.11
DI�TRICT COURT
SECOND �UDiCIAL DISTRICT
GASE TYPE3 aT�IER CxVxL
COURT FILE NO. C9-93-9419
8'�'xpQLi1TIO�i OS DIeI[Ie8�1L
1���H PADISppICH
Th.� abovo�antitl4d ��tior�, h�vistig b�an fully rcmpromiaad �rtd
gettled,
IT TS STTPULATED AND AGRSED by the parties through their
r�sF�ctiv� �aun�e�l tha� the above-entitled aation ia dismi�sed �rith
prejudfae �nd on the merf�a, withcut costa to any of the parties.
iT iS FURTHSR STSgtTLAT$D AND AGRESD �ha� any o� the part�.es,
without natioe ta the othere, may aause judgment o� di.emiesal w�.th
prejudice and an th� me�it� to be ��C�►r�d ih thig matti�r.
Dated:
10.13
SMI7`H, GENDL�R, SITY�LL, SHL�'F
& FORD, P.A.
Sy
H�►rold H. ShOff #100018
Mi�helle J. Ulrich #111673
3350 Firat Bank Place
60]. Seo4nQ Avenue south
MinnempoXlB, MtQ bS4��
��i2� 3sa-ioao
A��orn�Y� Lvr Ri�a Gre�k
W�terslted p�striot
b126559845
Mju TEL fd0.6126999845 Dec 01,95 10�35 P.12
pated:
patad:
SU�AN GAERTN�R
�SEY COUNTY ATTORN�Y
Hy- - ---
St�pheri P. McLauqhlin �255002
Speaial Astrf�tant County
At�orney
560 Gavernmen� Canter Wegt
50 West Kellagg Bauiavard
sbin� paui, Mx 551a2
��ia) a��-3054
Attorney for County af Rt�m�ey
SAR�TA� GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD.
By
SCOtt M. Lepak �184��3
40p Narthtowri Pla�z�►
20o Cc�arl Rapids �ou��vard
Minneapaiia, i�ll�i 55433�5894
{612) 780-8500
ACtorney� tor Ci�y of Frid�ey
QRD�R
Par6uc�r,b �a the faragoinq Etipulatian, tha ��OVO�"Q17��il+at�
�atiori ie dismissed with prejudic�e, withaut costs to nny party, and
judgui�»t shnll be entered ��ca�dingly.
Datad:
E
10.14
BY �HE COU�tT :
�ud�}R nf n! �at r i at C�urt
MEMORANDUM
S Municipai Center
_ 6431 University Ave�ue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
CI7YOF �6� 2� 572-3507
FRIDLEY FAX: (612) 571-1287
William C. Hunt
Assistant to the City Manager
Memo to: William W. Burns, City Manager �/
��From: William C. Hnnt, Assistant to the City Manager �
Subjec�
Dat�
Compensation Adjustments
December 7, 1995
In order to prepare the final figures for the Personal Services portion of the 1996
budget it will be necessary for the City Council to approve a resolution adjusting
salaries, benefits, and other forms of compensation for 1996. �
I recommend the following for employees who are not members of a bargaining
unit. _
1.
�
A general increase of 2.0 percent in salaries.
An increase of 2.0 percent in automobile allowances, where applicable.
3. A one cent increase in the mileage reimbursement rate from $0.29 per mile .
to $0.30 per mile (the current federal Internal Revenue Service rate) for
employees who use their own velucles for City business.
4. Supplemental Holiday Pay for Sergeants equivalent to one-half of their regular
rate of pay for work on City designated holidays.
These recommendations have been incorporated into the attached resolution. I
request that you present this resolution to the Fridley City Council for acrion at
their meeting of December 11, 1995.
WCH/jb
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN INCREAS F TN COMPENSATION
FOR FRIDLEY CITY EMPLOYEES FUtt THE 1996
CALENDAR YEAR
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Fridley City Council to provide fair and
equitable compensation to Fridley City Employees witlun budgetary constraints; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley intends to comply with the Minnesota Local
Government Pay Equity Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and City Staff have reviewed the City's financial
position as well as economic indicators and compensation adjustments by
comparable employers; and
WHEREAS, an adjustment of employee salaries and benefits is wananted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley that the following adjustments be authorized for employees of the City of
Fridley, with the exception of employees who are members of a bargaining unit,
effective January 1, 1996:
1. A general increase of 2.0 percent in employee salaries.
2. An increase of 2.0 percent in automobile allowances, where applicable.
3. Mileage reimbursement at the rate of $0.30 per mile.
4. Supplemental Holiday Pay for Sergeants equivalent to one-half of their
regular rate of pay for work on City designated holidays.
PASSED AND ADOP'TED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CIT'Y CLERK
11.02
(��
I �. �
s..
CITY QF
FRiDLEY
GAS SERVICES
As U Neeci It Plbg & Htg
10610 South Shore Dr
Plymouth MN 55441
C& H Heating & Air Cond Inc
16730 242 Avenue
Big Iake MN 55309-9743
Contract Services Inc
11915 Highland Rd
Elk River MN 55330
1 st Choice Plbg & Htg Inc
29948 Hwy 47
Isanti MN 55040
�f ��riT�� �
Ronald Rath
Charlene Ribaudo
Howard Dunham
Randy Gifford
Midwest Fireplace Co
5205 N Hwy 169
Plymouth MN 55442 Kevin Murphy
GENERAL CONTRACTOR- OMMER IAL
American Liberty Construction Inc
279 N Medina St
PO Box 383
Loretto MN 55357 Howazd Jacobson
Gorski & Olson Construction Inc
527 Marquette Ave #2300
Minneapolis MN 55402 Bob Olson
Ives Enterprises Inc
1333 Osborne Rd
Minneapolis MN 55432 Ives Boisvert
GENERAL CONTRACTOR - RESIDENTIAL
Blomquist Mitch Contr (20047345)
9701 Austin St
Circle Pines MN 55014 Mitchell Blomquist
14.01
RON JULKOWSKI
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
Same
Same
Same
RON JULKOWSKI
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
Same
STATE OF MINN
Century Roofing 8i Construction (20034174)
6336 Lyndale Ave S
Richfield MN 55423 Dave Yantes
Midwest Fireplace Co (2359)
5205 N Hwy 169
Plymouth MN 55442 Kevin Murphy
Schoenborn Construction (20032072)
5107 Drew Ave N
Brooklyn Center MN 55429-3333 Everett Schoenborn
Sirodak Lauren Roofing (2734)
8465 110 St S
Cottage Grove MN 55016 Lauren Sirotiak
HEATING
As U Need It Plbg & Htg
10610 South Shore Dr
Plymouth MN 55441 Ronald Rath
Air Condidoning Associates Inc •
689 Pierce Butler Rte
St Paul MN 55104 John Matthews
C& H Heating & Air Cond Inc
16730 242 Avenue
Big Lake MN 55309-9743 Charlene Ribaudo
Contract Services Inc
11915 Highland Rd
Elk River MN 55330 Howard Dunham
lst Choice Plbg & Htg Inc
29948 Hwy 47
Isanti MN 55040 Randy Gifford
MOVERS
Semple Building Movers Inc
1045 Jessie St
St Paul MN 55101 Denice Semple
14.02
Same
Same
Same
Same
RON JULKOWSKI
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
Same
Same
Same
STATE OF MINN
PLUIVIBING
As U Need It Plbg & Htg
10610 South Shore Dr
Plymouth MN 55441
Jobco Plumbing
5225 Arrowood Ln
Plymouth MN 55442
Ronald Rath
Jim O'Brien
14.03
STATE OF MINN
Same
CITY OF FR,IDLEY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
6431 University Avenue N.E.
F�idley, Minnesota 55432
December 11, 1995
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fxidley
c/o William W. Burns, City Manager
6�431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Council Members:
C ' �1i s _ � � _ _ � �� _ s.
We hereby subnut the Iinal Estimate for Washington Street Watermain Repair
Project No. 272, for Penn Contracting, InG, 1697 Peltier Lake ' Drive,
Centerville MN 55058.
We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Washington Street
Watermain R,epair Project No. 272 and find that the same is substantially complete
in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made
upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year
contractual maintenance bond commence on December 8, 1995.
Respectfully submitted,
+ f.
,i �.. ��
��
ohn G. Flora
Director of Public Works
JT:cz
Prepared
Checked
15.02
CfIY OF
FRIDLEY
Penn Contracting, Inc.
1697 Peltier Lake Drive
Centerville, MN 55058
ESTIMATES
DECEMBER 11, 1995
Washington Street Watermain Repair
Project No. 272
FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,136.95
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of October, 1995
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
400 Northtown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Coon Rapids, MN 55435-5489
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,137.50
Services Rendered as City Attorney
for the Months of October/November, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,727.36
December 11, 1995
City of Fridley
WASHINGTON STR,EET WATER.MAIN REPAIR PROJECT NO. 272
. . . �
' � *- ►. * �--'- _ �
This is to certify that Penn Contracting, Inc. has abided by the Prevailing Wage
Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka
County.
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct.
PENN CONTftACTING, INC.
VVesley Crawf d, 'eci Superintendent
15.03
December 11, 1995
City of �idley
WASHINGTON STREET WATERMAIN REPAIR, PROJECT NO. 272
;_ *__ � �� '_ �.
This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified
herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in
accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract
cost is $41,970.00 and the �nal payment of �6,136.95 for the improvement project
would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and
other work down by the contractor under this project.
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct.
PENN CONTRACTING, INC.
Wesley Cra rd, o'ect Superintendent
15.04
December 11, 1995
To: Public Works Director
City of �idley
�_'�� �� ��* 1�_' h� �� ��
M1 �_ � �_
� *__ :��\ � \ _ _y� � 4 � U 4 \ � ' * �
. . � � � �
We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the
work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans
and specif'ications of the project.
All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the
City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the
contractor.
So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL
ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the
day of the final inspection that being December 8, 1995.
Jon ompso , Construction Inspector
Wesley Cra rd, ject Superintendent
15.05
I
FROM: City of Fridley
Engineering Division
�.i i t vr rniuLCY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
RE: Estimate No. 2 (FINAL)
Period Ending: December 8, 1995
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FOR: Penn Contracting, Inc.
City of Fridley 1697 Peltie� Lake Dr
6431 University Ave, NE Centerville, MN 55058
Fridley, MN 55432
JOB CODE NO. 601 -6000-415-4530-6045
Da#ed: December 11, 1995
WASHINGTON STREET WATERMAIN REPAIR
PROJECT NO. 272
STATEMENT OF WORK
,:;: ;:: ..... ,.. ..
;:::;>:;;;:::. ,. : .::: :.::.:.:.::»:.::>;> .;;:
..... >::::?:::«'::::::.>::s��::::::::::>:::': :>::::::�::>:�>::.: >::::.:.;:�::::;::;.::..;::;.:::;;::::;::;:.;::.:.: ..
� :.:>::::::>::;::::;:.:.....,.;>:.;:.;;;: ,;::.:.::<::::>:....... ..Quar�tit ..... .Tot�l �;;:_::: ;<:>::;:::;: >:;:.>:;:::;::;:.;:;
:>::�:::>::;::::::::»::>:;;::::::::::>::>.>::;:::;:::;:::::::><::�::>>>::::>::>:.::: ::>::;;:::.;::;:::;;:::.>:;:> .<::::>:<::
Y :.:. ..::::.::::::: .....::::.::: .: .::.::.:.:::::::::::::. :::... .�:..;«:.::;::<::::»::>::::>:::
:: <::::.;::>::::>; :»:::>:::::::><;::;:::»:»:;<.. :.>::>::>::::::::>::..:::>.:::::; :::.:.::... ...:::::::::.:::. ..: :::::
;
::;:>:::>::.:::.:::;<:::;»<::;:.>::;:;:::»>:::;;>;:;::;.;.:.::<;::::;: ::;:::::»>:<::::::::>:::>;:::::: ::>: .. .. . ......: ..:::.::.:::.:.>: �.::.::.;:.:.: .;:: .>.::;.;:�:
;:::: ::»:::<:::::::><:::::::::<:::::::>: ;>;:>:;:<:; , :...;�;::::,: .::;>;.�:: .. . :.:.:::::: .::..... >
>::>;::;:::<:::::>::>::>::>:. ;:<:>::>::>::;:.:� :::;:::::»::;.:;-:�::,::::;:»>:<:;.: ;:>;;;> .:;�stimated:::::::::<�»?<:::»:� ni: .::.::::: .:. .... .;;
... ..... ......................................:..._.. ...... .. ... . . .... ......... U t......:::-� .:;:.;;:.;:.:<.;:.;::::.;:.::.:. .:::;....�'h.is..::..:::.:. .:.;;;;:.;Tt�rs�::::::<:::::;:::;.>:>:;>7>otal:. . . .. :::::::TotaC..�:::.:�:
:.;:.;;:.;:.;::;.::.;: ::>:::<::�:»:<:>;::.
>:;.;;:.:::::.;:.:;,:.:.;: ; ; ..........
<::>::::::«:»::>::>�:::::<: . <:>:: <:::>::>=::::<::; ::.:� :::: . .::: :::.;::::.::.;::::::;;: >;:::<; ::;. ::»:::
. .... ...
..�UIr[TRAC >:;�:>::>::>::::>::>: � :;..;:.:;:<:: ;�: � ��<>:;�:.::.;�;:<.::;.;.:::;;.::;,:;:.::.
.::..::::::::... :..;�::;;:.;::::
<:
� . :::::::..::.;:.;
<::::>:::;:<>:::::»>:.>;::;� T.�TEM... �>_:::::::>:�;::::::>:::::: ... .Wanti ::::::>:::::::::::::: .:ri�� � <>:::>:: � ��
. .. ......:.. ......:...:............._ ._....................:.: :.:::Q............. :..: :.,::.�:.:P._ ...:::.:::�:-;:::.:::..i�nif.:.,::.::;E�f:im.a.fe.::: : Esfrmate;.::::;:�2uantit :.::,.::;�::Arn:ount.:.:>:::
Insta116-in. DIP Watermain (Class 52) 420.00 45.00 LF 0.00 0.00 420.00 18,900.00
Polyethyfene Encased
Remove F�cisting 6-in. Watermain 420.00 3.00 Lf 0.00 0.00 420.00 1,260.00
, Reconnect House Services 11.00 340.00 Each 0.00 0.00 11.00 3,740.00
Install 6-in. Gate Valve with Box 2.00 400.00 Each 0.00 0.00 2.00 500.00
Remove & Replace Concrete Curb 420.00 24.00 LF 0.00 0.00 391.00 9,384.00
8� Gutter (B-6-18)
�d 300.00 2.50 SY 0.00 0.00
Topsoil Borrow 60.00 10.00 CY 0.00 0.00
Traffic Control 1.00 1,500.00 LS 0.00 0.00 1.00 1,500.00
Install 6 in. x 6 in. x 6 in. Tee 1.00 160.00 Each 1.00 160.00 2.00 320.00
Furnish and lnstall Hydran# with 1.00 1,975.00 Each 1.00 1,975.00 2.00 3,950.00
Gate Valve 8� Box
Soil Correction (Change Order #1) 1.00 4,251.00 LS 1.00 2,116.00 1.00 2,116.00
fOTAL THIS ESTIMATE
15.06
$4, 251.00
TOTAL AMOUNT $41,970.00
Penn Contracting, Inc.
Estimate No. 2 (FIIJAL)
SUMMARY:
Originai Contract Amount
Contract additions C.O.# 1
Contract deductions —
Revised contract amount
Value Completed To Date
Amount Retained (0°�)
Less Amount Paid Previously
AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE
CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR
$39,765.00
4,251.00
44,016.00
41,970.00
0.00
35,833.05
s6,136.95
I hereby certify that the work pertormed and the materials suppl'ied to date under the terms of the contract
for this project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contwact of the amounts
shown on this estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just
and correct and no part of the "Amoutit Due This Estimate" has been received.
BY � 1 �(�. '�-�.J�'
Contractor's Auth 'zed presentative (Title)
GERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER
I hereby certify that 1 have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment
of this estimate under the contract for reference project.
CITY OF FRIDLEY� INSPECTOR
By,
Checked By ' 12,-��
15.07
Date: � 2 '� � — �
Respectfutty submitted,
Flora, PE
of Publ'�c Wotics
Page 2
�-
CITY OF FRIDLEY
MEMORANDUM
TO: WII.LIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER
k'ROM[: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR .
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CIT'Y CLERK
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GOURMET VII.LAGE, INC. ON-SALE
BEER LICENSE
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1995
On the December 11 City Council agenda is a public hearing io consider the
approval of an on-sale beer lieense for Gourmet Village, Inc., located at 7890
University Avenue Northeast. A Public Hearing IeTotice is attached for your review.
Chapter 602 of the City Code requires that a public heari.ng be held.
This application has been approved by Dave Sallman, Public Safety Director.
1fi.01
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will
hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University
Avenue Northeast on December il, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. on the question
of issuing an On-Sale Beer License to Gourmet Village, Inc. for the
property located at 7890 University Avenue Northeast.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter
or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids
should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than December
8, 1995.
Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest
known at this public hearing.
William A. Champa
City Clerk
Publish: December 7, 1995
16.02
�
cmr oF �o�v
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTNEAST
FfiIOLEY. MN 554.32 -
(61 �5713450
Receipt # ��
License #
Public Heari�g
�ate
� APPLICATION FOR AN ON AND OFF-SALE BEER/
�y
�_:��� �;,� NONINTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE
i �o
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIOLEY, MINNESOTA:
The undersigned hereby makes application for an on end off-sale beer/�obcetine malt liquor license In accordance wNh Cfiapter 602 ot tt�e City
Code of Fridley. .
{Definition: Anv malt liquor with an aicoholic content of more than one-half of one perce�E (.5%) bv volume and not
more than 3.2 percent (3.2°�1 � weiqht. � -
Fee:
$ 60.00
$325:00
$ 90.00
$180.00
Off-Sale Beer
pane: - November 1 , ' 1995
On-Sale Beer (Includes Off-Sale) � -
Investigation Fee, Individual r,,�,�r� x� «�.
Investigation Fee, Corporation, Partnership, etc.
Expires: April 30, 19 96
TO THE C17Y COUNCII OF FAI�IEY, MINNESOTA:
The undersigned hereby makes appl'ication for an on end off-sale nonintoidcating mdt 1'puor (beer) license in atxordance wifh Chapter 603 of the City
Code of Fridley.
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATON
Nama of apptica�t: GniirmPt Vi 1 1 agg, Tnc �
(Name of i�dividual, partnership, corporation or association.j
Business name: (;c>>trmc�t Vi 1 1 agP
Businessaddress: 7H9O University Ave NE: ; Fridley, MN 55432
Business pho�e number: _( h 1 i� 5 7 2- 2 5 6 7
Type of Applicant: Nalural Person ({�dividuaf)
Type of license applicant seeks:
9/91
� Q� p o r a t i o n corporation
Pertriership
Associatio� or other
0 n- S a 1 e onsale pnciudes offsate)
OffSale
Temporary OoSde
16.03
�
!f appiicant is a natural person (individual) state fuil name residence and business addresses and telephone numbers
Full name:
Residence address:
Phone number:
Business address:
Business phone number.
� (PART VI -- PERSONA� lNFORMAitON FORM MUST BE COMPLETED BY INDlVIOUAL.)
The full name, residence address and telephone number of the agent in charge of individual owner's premises at such lime as the owner is absent.
Full narne:
Reside�ce address: �
Phone number:
(PART VI -- PERSONAL INFORMATION FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AGENT.)
PART III - PARTNERSHIP
If the applicant is a partnership state full names residences and business addresses and telephone numbers
Ful! name:
Residence address
Phona number:
Full name:
Resid�nce address:
Phone number:
��!! na�i=:
Residance addrsss:
Phone number.
Full name:
Residence add�ess
Phona number:
(PART VI -- PERSOf�lAL INFORMATION FORM MUST BE COMPLETED BY EACH PARTNER.)
Th� manager v�ill be:
Name:
Address:
Phone �umber:
(PART VI -- PERSONAL INFORMATION FORM MUST BE COMPI.ETED BY MANAGER.)
1s.�o4
If the appiicant is a corporation or association qive the name of co�poration or association, FridleY address and phone
number, and home office address and phone number.
Name of corpo�ation: G O U,i' tii e t— V�11-a-sg-, �^ �
Fridley address: 7$ 9 0 U n i v i� A v e �1 E; F r i r� 1 P�,_ M�j 5�5 L. '� �
Phone number: ( 612 ) S 7 2- 2 S 6 7
Home office address
Phone �umber:
The full names, residence addresses and telephone numbers of all officers of said corporation or associaGo�.
President: B8C Vien TruonQ
r��d�,c add��s: 956 Jefferson Ave; St Paul, MN 55102
Phone number: __( h 1� 2 2 4— 5 2 S�+
Vice President:
Resident address: '
Phone number.
Secretary:
Resident addresx
Phone number.
Treasurer.
Resident address:
Phone �umber.
(PART VI -- PERSONAL INFORMATION FORM MUST BE COMPLETED BY EACH OFFICER.)
The manag2r will be:
Nam�: B3C Vien Truong
aaa�e5s: 956 Jefferson Ave; St Paul, MN 55102
Phone number: _( h 12 ) 2 2 4— 5 7 S 4
(PART VI -- PERSONAL INFORMATION FORM MUST BE COMPLETED BY MANAGER.)
PART V - CLUB
If the applicant is a club, stafe name of club:
Date ihat club was first incorporated:
Address of club:
Phone number:
The full names, positions, residence address and phone �umbers of all oifice�s, executive committee members and membe�s ot board of directors:
Full name:
Residence address:
16.�J5
' Position:
- Fuli name:
Residence address:
Position:
Full name:
Residence address:
Position:
Full name:
Residence address:
Position:
Full narne:
Residence address:
Positio�:
Fuli name:
Residence address:
Position:
Fuil narne:
Residence address:
Phone number:
Phone number:
Phone number:
Pho�e numbe�:
Phone �umber:
Phone number:
Pos�tion. Phone �umber:
(PART VI -- PERSONAL INFORMATlON FORM MUST BE COMPLETED BY EACH OFFICER.)
The ful! names, residence addresses and telephone number of the manager, or any other indiyidual with managament responsibiliti=s �or the club's
premises to be licensed. �
�u':1 nw�•a:
Rasidence address:
Position: Phone number.
(PART VI -- PERSONAL INFORMATION FORM MUST BE COMPLETED BY fvtANAGER.)
ANY FALSIFICATION OF ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS MAY RESULT IN
DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION.
.t �
Subscribed and sworn to betore me a Notary Public
nd
on this day of , 9
otary Pubiic) yt N'����
�$ , Sl!?iihtlE l. � :':OLA
Commission expires o� ��__'j ��Q NCTAkYFUyL{G?,1�NhECr��.1
RAMSEY CO•.1Ni't
�1y Comm�ssron Expires Jan. 31, 2000
�
,.�nnnw x
1 �.os
PLEASE NOTE: Section 11.11: The penaity for late payment of di licenses and permit tees es shown in Section 11.10 oi tfie City Code shali be 25°k
of the amount of the fee if received trom 1 to 7 days late. If the paymeM is received more than 7 days after it is due, ihe panalty shall be 50%,of the
fee. If payment is not �eceived 30 days efter the due date the buslness MUST d'isconti�ue operation.
FOR CITY USE ONLY: , ` � � '
,,- 1 -- ;'� %"
: , . <._ _�
PUBUC SAFETY OIRECTOR By�� ` �/ penied• Approved• %� Oate: %�^ Z C_ (�
CITYCOUNClL- Approved: Oenied: Date:
9/t
, .�
16�7
a .
PART VI - PERSONAL 1NFORMATION
�PART VI - PERSONAL lNFORMATION -- MUST 8E COMPLETED BY EACH PARTNER OFFICER ETC )
Nar„e of applicant B a V i e n T r u o n Q
Residence add��s: 956 Jefferson Ave; St Paul. MN 55102
Phone number: ( 612 ) 224-5254
U.S. Citizen: Yes X No If naturaJized, date and place: j/ 1(/ H S; M i n n e a p o 1 i s. M i n n
Oriver's license number. T— fi 5 �— n f; l— Fi 4 7— 8 9 G Date of 6irth: 1 1� 2 3� 6 3
Last place of employment: F1St1eT'—ROSeID011rit S stems , Inc ;�u000�P��ela�� ��re�3� .
List your residence address for the past 5 years.
956 Jefferson Ave. .St Paul
Street Address C�ty
3950 Gramsie Court
Street Address
Street Addr�ss
Street Address
Shoreview
City
City
City
Minnesota
State
Minnesota
State
Sta,a
S:s:a
55102
Zip Code
55126
Zip Code
Zip Code
c'ip Code
Ust nvo residents of the State of Minnesota that have known you for two years, and that will vouch for your sobriety, honesty, and general good
character.
D u n� T r a n � S M a n 1 P T a n n� T; t t 1.�C a-� a� a�--�I1j���a
Name Address
Ethan Traen 3114 Joyce Court; Eagan, MN 55121
Name Address
ANY FALSIFIC,QTION OF ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE �UESTIONS MAY RESULT IN
DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION.
Subscribed �d�worn to b=fore me a Notary Public
on this day or 0(/ ��� . � g
otary Public) �. •
Commis,ion expires on�� � � , ���(� �'t )
a�.c—L_-L�.!
x lVV+NlNVNVW�f��
.-�-"" SUL1N�lE i.. A��,fOIA �
NCTAkY FU$l{C•?:iI�IrJE"C �,i
� � RA?iScY C•�t1?v'i�`! . �;
11,y Commks�cn rxrires,,.�.�. �;, t^;:� �
Y WMAMAM/�J�l1!J'JV43MM�V./�^N.'4W4N %
• - �•
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
En9�neering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Ma�ntenance
William W. Bums, City Manager ��
� �
John G. Flora, Public Works Director
December 11, 1995
Stonybrook Creek Special Tax District
PW95-335
To establish an ad valorem ta�c levy for the Stonybrook Creek storm water project, it is
necessary for the City to pass an ordinance establishing a special tax district.
This district is established in accordance with the Six Cities Watershed Management
Organization Plan and Minnesota Statutes 103. It defines the area of Stonybrook Creek
sub-watershed within the City of Fridley.
After a public hearing on the ordinance, the City requires two readings for formal
establishment of the district.
Recommend the City Council conduct a public hearing to establish Chapter 221 the
Stonybrook Creek storm water improvement district. �
JGF:cz
Attachment
17.01.
��
:, .
•.r, ,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A NEW CHAPTER OF THE CITY CODE
OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, CHAPTER 221 ENTITLED
"STONYBROOK CREEK STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT"
The City Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows:
CHAPTER 221
STONYBROOK CREEK STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
221.01. PLAN
The Six Cities Watershed Management Organization (WMO) Plan
approved in September 1988 has been adopted and implemented by the
City through the establishment of the erosion control, wetland and
critical area ordinances as well as the capital improvement
program. The Stonybrook Creek storm water improvement project is
a result of this plan.
221.02. PURPOSE
The purpose of this ordinance is to establish a special tax
district for a storm water improvement for properties within
Fridley in the Stonybrook Creek sub-watershed. This district will
allow for the levying and collection of ad valorem taxes on the
properties within the District. District-wide storm water, as well
as run-off from properties immediately adjacent to this project has
contributed to erosion of Stonybrook Creek.
221.03. LOCATION
The special tax district for Stonybrook Creek is identified in
Appendix A.
221.04. COST
The cities of Fridley and Spring Lake Park have recognized the
continued erosion problem along Stonybrook Creek from East River
Road west to the Mississippi River. As a solution to this problem,
the City of Fridley has agreed to initiate repairs sharing the cost
proportionately with the City of Spring Lake Park and the adjoining
land owners. The City of Fridley will contribute to the cost of
the project. Said payments shall be funded through the special tax
district. The City of Spring Lake Park, having properties which
contribute ta the storm water drainage into Stonybrook Creek, has
agreed to pay the City of Fridley $50,000 for a one-time
improvement project on Stonybrook Creek. The abutting residents to
Stonybrook Creek, after petitioning the City to correct the erosion
problem, having agreed by petition to contribute $2,000 per lot to
the project.
17.02
Page 2 -- Ordinance No.
221.05. PROJECT
This project is designed to correct the erosion problern by
extending the culvert from East River Road west behind the £irst
five properties and establishing a controlled drainage ditc�� `or
the remainder of the creek's run.
221.06. ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL TAX DISTRICT
The properties within the Stonybrook Creek sub-watershed district
are determined to contribute to the erosion problem and are
therefore subject to an ad valorem tax for their contribution to
the area surface water run-off. In accordance with the approved
Six Cities Watershed Management Plan established through a Joint
Powers Agreement and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103, the Stonybrook
Creek sub-watershed ad valorem special tax district is established
for the Stonybrook Creek storm water improvement project No. 246.
This ordinance shall be effective from, and after its adoption and
publication as provided by City Charter.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: December 11, 1995
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
17.03
STON�'BROOK SUB WA TERSHED
DISTRICT
I
CITY nF FllIOLF
i 7.04 APPENDIX A
�.
. �
)
�� �, � �g3r�0'�AVE:�.�M.E.
. . �, .;:
� , - t
, . 3 ;.
, :; `� . .
, . ��._ �.;�:81ST•I�VE.�tv;E
�.
0
r'� . �j .
>. _
� .
t- .
N
. Q
u�
85TH
�/ fr
��.�?�
�� ��
,-
4 r,
-i
>. .
�,a Subwatershed D�v�<�� � �
f
: Minor� Watershed '�e�t� �= r=-o-�-�^�-
:��
Flow Direction •� "�"�" " ���
t
Q: -
o . aoa�3�;' +
� �� � . . ��.. _. . . . . �
Scale in Feet :
:r,..` �
; �'". ' �
. .
� - �:
� ';�„
� . Figure 10 . • . '
� SUBWATERSHED STONEY BROOK �.
� � 17.05 �
� �
0
W � �
6
O° _ � �
� �P � � / � \ . • ,
' �����'�� o �/ $r /. \ .
��� � �� �� \\ ° �
�,P<' � ,,% '� � ��r / � co
,� �/°`� � � X e � il
��''/ _ / �.^���$ � � � � � � � • "
�- v�'�� �� �a \ /
>�',���" �� � � � ,� \ �. �
� �� \ `�\ {° � . \ . . • JJo ' �1
' / � � �i . r .- p .
// \ .``\�- �� � \`.. . ��� o o � � . � � � .
, � V�� � . ���$N � m o � . .
� ���� � . W���M� � � � j � �
W y�
� y� ; . . ./ ` � . d��F�� ' u � G u
� /, �� �� \/� � i �' , n�r��� I
/ � ` Y�,QYL � ` F����z I
�� � �$� v � ��e3�� �
/'�
I
� i
. � \ I
II � , i i
,
° %�' � � I
N � � �� .
�/ \� � � j \�
I'�I � � � � \ �
�
� �
� �� � ' � \
� /
, / � J� \ ' � � a*���\ ..
�
i� \ / � N `'t�� • \
� i
h
� � � � i �
, $ �
� � — _
� '� — — — �
. � —
� �. .
\ � � a�25 � � �� \
� �� . -\ � `- � �� \ �
i .. .
� � � �� � � �, l" � '. \ F � �
� � ��, -_�� ,,,_ ._1 � �. \ � \ \
. �'\ �~ / \ ' N .
/ \
<_�j /' � \ ' � � � \ � z \
�W O o �
' � . .Z � / � \ � � . T�
�\ �� ��/i � � �� �� � � � tl o. `�� 1}3ti �,� �
� �� � ^• � '� � � �- �- � � / \
' ��`C�i� � .� "8� W \ � � y sy ��
\ � ,l�l _ iS3s ', \ .� a � 4' n \
\ � � (p �, . ��� � �
�� /� J ��V � � b `�� N �� /
�/ t- � 8 � � $ ii� /
� � \ W / �°��\ <� ���ri� � G� �
� W � i � � � �\ � �� �� / � �,"R�
tn � / / � � � / ���`
w � �� _ � W .���� �///��� i /
� � � 4: ��`�. � �� �
� / � �� `� � � /
\ / a0 N$>� I`�.`b� I� / tl
\ ' 3 `s / �.+1, � �/ �
� �
� / .i>>c,0 � 0 /''` � ; s
, . � � / / / ��GO�/ � g
_ . . �� �� /� ���<�;�'2�
� / ,� / �
Y �_� / � � T
, �i _ � l c
, . / �/ \1 ` 6 .
� � \
/ _ ; �\ �
/ /� � `\� g � ..o
� / `� $3��), F \ �
\ �" � ,�
. .,
. � - .
\ V/
� < /
17.06 ' �
��
STONYBROOH CREEH IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 246
17.07
CITY OF FRIDLEY
NOTICE OF HEARING ON STONYBROOK TAX DISTRICT
STONYBROOK CREEK IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 246
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, has
deemed it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to the adoption of an ordinance
establishing the Stonybrook Tax District.
NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN THAT on the llth day of
December, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. the City Council will meet at the FYidley Municipal
Center Council Chambers, 6431 University Ave., NE, Fridley, MN, and will at said
time and place hear all parties interested in said Tax District in whole or in part.
The general nature of the Tax District is the repair and upgrade of Stonybrook Creek
which services this watershed, to-wit:
TAX DISTRICT
Generally the area bordered by UniversityAvenue, 81st Avenue, Burlington Northern
R,ailroad tracks, 79th Avenue, East River Road, Pearson Way to the Mississippi River,
Osborne Way and Osborne Road.
•, ' • � -
All of the land abutting said Stonybrook Creek and all lands within, adjacent and
abutting thereto.
All of said land established by the ordinance to be ad valorem tazed for the benefits
received by the Stonybrook Creek improvement.
Hearing impaired persons planning to atf,end the public hearing who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact
Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than November 20, 199�.
Published: FRIDLEY FOCUS:
November 23, 1995
December 7, 1995
17.08
POLICE DEPARTMENT
City of Fridley MEMORANDIIM
Minnesota
��
TO: William W. Burns ��� 1
FROM: Dave Sallman 'a���
SIIBJECT: Pawn Shop Ordinance -Second Readinq
DATE: December 1, 1995
�
�
Attached is the proposed revised Pawn Shop Ordinance (Chapter 31) which is
scheduled for a second readinq at the reqular City Council meetinq on
December iith, 1995. Changes from the first readinq include (1) usinq the
aqe of 18 instead of the word minor, (2) ahanqe in wordinq reqardinq
outside storaqe to make it consistent with the Soninq Code-Chapter 205, and
(3) a chanqe in identifications required by the customer. It was the
opinion of City Attorney Greq Herrick that requirinq only Minnesota
identification would constitute a possible violation of free trade.
I have also attached letters sent to the current and prospective pawn shop
license holders.
.
18.01
�
U��
F���
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UIVIVERSITY AVE_ N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHOIYE (612) 571-3450
December 1, 1995
Cash-N-Pawn Ltd, Hopkins, Inc.
5807 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, I�Ild 55432
The City of Fridley is proposing changes to the Pawn Shop Ordinance
(Chapter 31 of the City Code). There was a first reading on
November 27th, 1995 at the regular City Council meeting. The
second reading is scheduled for the City Council meetinq on
December iith, 1995 at 6431 University Ave. NE. The meeting will
begin at 7:30 P.M.
There is no requirement for a public hearing in this type of
ordinance change but licensees have been invited and will have an
opportunity to express their views during the meeting. I have
enclosed a copy of the proposed revisions. Please feel free to
contact me if you have any questions regardinq this issue.
Sincerely,
�
�
, .
David H. Sallman
Public Safety Director
City of Fridley
� 8.�2
�G'A H
NPawn
December 11, 1995
David H. Sallman
Public Safety D'uector
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue
Minneapolis, NIN 55432
Dear Mr. Sallman:
5831 Cedar Lake Road, Ste. 12 • Minneapolis • MN 55416 •(612) 525-2008
I am in receipt of your letter dated December 1, 1995 in relation to the proposed changed
to the Pawn Shop Ordinance.
I would confirm that I will attend the meeting on December 11, 1995.
With regard to the proposed changes, my company would like to make the following
suggestions and requests.
Section 31.11 Conditions of Licenses
1(A) With regard to the recording of identifying�n and all numbers' t at he term serial
suggest that instead of usmg the words y
number be substituted.
The purpose of this section is to help the police department trace �d he�oli �e is
items that may be stoien. The main .-•a.:=her �are� fc�s this purpose by p
the serial number.
1(E) Identification. We would suggest that the following forms of identification be
allowed.
1) Niilitary I•D• 2) Passport and 3) Alien Registration Card.
Many people have these forms of I.D. and the backgound check on information
used to grant one of these forms of I.D. is equal to, if not more detailed than that
used to grant a drivers license.
2 Disposition of Articles.
We would suggest that a monetary amount be included here, say $125.00. Most
of the sales done in our store are for small items such as movies, CD's and other
general miscellaneous merchandise.
�
7 We would suggest that the redemption period be reduced to 60 days. Most loans
. are in pawn for between 45-51 days. In our experience, if a loan goes beyond
51 days it ends up being forfeited.
8 Our company has a voluntary agreement with the Fridley Police Department to
hold items from purchase for 15 days and we would suggest that this be written
into the ordinance.
10 We would like to see something written in to reflect an input by the Fridley Police
Department. We also feel that if an article is put on hold we should be given a
case number and a hold period of 6 months maximum.
11 This section serves no useful or good business purpose. We would propose it be
stricken from the ordinance.
31.13 Inspection
Again, we would like to see this altered to have the input of the Fridley Police
Department included. We also feel that it would be helpful and necessary to
include a section detailing the necessity for the police department to make
application for restitution on behalf of the pawn broker.
2 Again, we would suggest that this section be changed to reflect the input of the
local Fridley Police Department.
Finally, I would like to voice our objections to the proposed increase in the annual license
fee. We believe this exorbitant and totally unnecessary. Due to the minimal amount of
stolen merchandise actually recovered, in our case 121oans for $1,500.00. To spend
$15,000 to recover $1,500 in stolen goods is not prudent use of police time or city budget
dollars.
In order to save time on input, we would be prepared to produce the information on disk.
Yours sincerely,
� � ( (
.,�� ,� S .
:- .�.�:
AUTO PAWNBROKER�
iL��i
.si,
't'O: Fridley Cltj► COUnc1i . . . .
From: 8111 Rlcd�ts
Re: Annusi �i�lcenslag Fees
Date: Decootber 7 ,1995
I atn plea�sed to be a new bueinese Ownor in the olrY of Fr1Qle�►, an0laok
forwatd to a long rolsaronstrip with thc 5ne city . As I.�m e�me you can icnagin�o, I 1ookod at
eawrai naighboiing clties: �Colu�nbia Hoigh�s;l�a Ca�da; Coon Rap�lds; (�ircle Phue;
-Ramsey; 2318ine; Sprl�g I.eke Yack;� M�outtAs View; RoeevWe; shorc�►Iew; and New. .
13zig�iton, before #�i�alq► �g on.cLviflg b�►�eiaoes 1n:Fr1Q�1aY. BiU Ciisimp�, PJlen Duncan
and avoryonc dsa'Y d�oaatt �viah, before smd dudng tl�o lic�onsitlg p�ocoss. werc ve�Y helpfut
and'that intpactod:m,y Baal d�iaia� tv op�a my swro in Plridloy. '
1Lcou� the hce�eung parocose I fouad tt�at t�+e dty of Frldley, �at�e ihe
other ddoe I i�rvoecig�a�od, doas not p�rate t� iica�ng feo. L�t us vse one of your
n�eighboring ciucs :ae Bn exsmple. That aAaual lica�n$ i'ee i� 54,000.00. Thvy prorate !t
from'tha time th�r is�ue� the llc�ee. So, i� a naw l�ense w�s issued No�vnmbar 1, 1995,
and the reatowal dato far the c�+ i� Aprll 30 ,1996, �he a�wal oost of the prorated �conao
for the remainiog time �, would be 52,000.00 . When pnu�dt�g to�ether an ordiaance of .
sub�se�, possiblc a� can occur. The proratittg f�ue coulA be oIIe of tZ�ao
ov�,�tBig�tt�. t would raiuo�t d�at tltis part of the oa+�stance ba r�viscd- EsPxa�', in Y�u` �f
the faat, that du titlna�g aec�us to be ri�t with dte prapo�od �vlsions of flu cunent
ordinance that are oa the �genda for pocemb�' 11, 1995. . I aould also llko W p�ose a
cha�e in the 120-day rode�tion 1�siod. If a cuatomor hes not rod�emed ti►a1r pawn�d
merchandise wittiin 30 da�y$ , hietAncaliy it ha: bcen found t�at th�y w�t not. It wo�d
seam logical to ci�ang�e that patt of the ordin�co tn s 60-day redetnptian perlad.
Finally; I would like to oxprass my anc�aia�#ng of rho proposed imcroase
in licoit�e feea. Tjie c�ty is looking at purai�ss�g aa atlrtoin�ud pawn seivlce. I am no1. suro
it mis �s suppoged tfl �av�e me ci�y time and effort apent P��8 Pn��'O� but it would
seem that 'tt would. If'.ttWt ie the ca� i wouid be alt fot it. The other pa�t of 1ha incroa�e 1
got as 1 discussed�the propaaod cttia�t�ges with Ctdef S�ihna�t � ie that afta� closaty
moiritoring "Cash=N•Pawn," tit�e city fouad d�at thc �time spent polic�ng p�►wn �s wa$
7976 Universlty Avenue NE . '
Frldley, MN 55432 �
612.783.3987
1.800.111.PAWN
n
�
�_�
�'
more than the reveaue �ot�rstod 8nm cumont lsc�nse fi�e of 58,000.00. As a rosult, he
said, it would cogt the t8x pu�►os� more monCy. Thet+e ara thoee on the othot sida of the
isaue tlwt disa�ree with the orig�ttat fee of 5�,000.00, not to meatlon sn incrvas� t�
$15,000.00. I would recluost dnce the proposed inc�case in llcense feos is dirocted at
prImat�ly mo�titoring stoJ.en merchandise, tlte ciry would ad,jt�st the licensc f� ibr auto-
°�Y'Pawnbrokere. 'lhe time tl�a c�y wi11 spe�td po�ing auto psa►nbmlcerx wl11 vlrwaily be
nvne�st�ent eince it ie i�t�posatblo to pav�m a etolea veldaie when a�e, S+ee of stl flcns or
enwmbrazues with the .customer nsme , i�cludi�wg a vatiA pi�w�+e ID, ia required to
complete �e pawn. llio #hought occun+ed �o C�iaf Sa�hnat� and mysel� to hav�o a
justifice�ion of expendttutee� �1n tbe cily, P� tog�r rn+er.the nwcc four w e�x montha on
auto pawnwiily bu�inca� ih thc city of Fridlcy. With ffi9� in miaq I woind� ask d�ac a_fee
of 51,000, be assess�d un� a juedflca�ton ��expendtamos bas been complet+ea on suto-
onty'�s.wnbrokers. It ie m�y undotstanding tbat this appi+oach ie usod for gambling licenaes
8II� t�l�: fI1C fGL'8 8IG V8[�i0. • •
Your hacwtablo con�ideratio� of these mature are deepl3' ePPm�at�d. Zi'
you hav+e any questione.at all, ploaso call � at (cfayrj ?83.3987, (�eni�g) 780.1135, fax
783.3946 :
��- -� \
� '
\�': , �►��1\ �
� �:
Unlverslry Avenue NE
idley, MN SS432
612.783.3987
1.800.711.PAWtd
2
0
,„.,- �::�;�,.,
� , �:�,
,j� �
` �'�
�
� ,
CIV[C CENTER • 6431 UN[VERS[TY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (6l2) 571-3450
December 1, 1995
Pawn America II, Ltd.
3935 Cedarview Drive
Eagan, MN 55122
The City of Fridley is proposing changes to the Pawn Shop Ordinance
(Chapter 31 of the City Codej. There was a first readinq on
November 27th, 1995 at the regular City Council meetinq. The
second reading is scheduled for the City Council meeting on
December lith, 1995 at 6431 University Ave. NE. The meeting will
begin at 7:30 P.M.
There is no requirement for a public hearing in this type of
ordinance chanqe but licensees have been invited and will have an
opportunity to express their views during the meeting. I have
enclosed a copy of the proposed revisions. • Please feel free to
contact me if you have any questions reqardinq this issue.
Sincerel ,
: �
David H. Sallman
Public Safety Director
City of Fridley
18.03
�,g, -.
,�;;
i�
�
. �
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. IV.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450
December 1, 1995
William John Richards
8085 Garfield St. N.E.
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
The City of Friclley is proposing chanqes to the Pawn Shop Ordinance
(Chapter 31 of the City Code). There was a first reading on
November 27th, 1995 at� the regular City Council meeting. The
second reading is scheduled for the City Council meeting on
December lith, 1995 at 6431 University Ave. NE. The meeting will
begin at 7:30 P.M.
There is no requirement for a public hearing in this type of
ordinance change but licensees have been invited and will have an
opportunity to express their views durinq the meeting. I have
enclosed a copy of the proposed revisions. Please feel free to
contact me if you have any questions regardinq this issue.
Sincerely, �
.- ;,
`_ .
David H. Sallman .
Public Safety Director
City of Fridley
18,04
�
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 31, ENTITLED "PAWN SHOPS," BY
AMENDING SECTIONS 31.06, 31.11, 31.12, 31.13,
AND ADDING NEW SECTION 31.14, AND RENUMBERING
THE REMAINING SECTIONS CONSECUTIVELY, AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 11, �GENERAL PROVISIONS AND
FEES"
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
31.06. GRAN'PING LICSNSLS.
l. At the time of making an initial or renewal application, the
applicant shall, in writing, authorize the Police Department to
investigate all facts set out in the application and do a personal
background and criminal record check on the applicant. The
applicant shall further authorize the Police Department to release
information received from such investigation to the City Council.
2. Each license shall be issued to the applicant only and shall
not be transferable.
3. Each license shall be issued only for the premises described
in the application and shall not be transferable to a different
location.
4. No change in ownership, control or location of a license shall
be permitted except by amendment to the license which amendment
must be approved by the City Council.
5. No more than three (3) licenses shall be issued by the City at
any time and priority shall be given to qualified applicants for
renewal of existing license.
18.05
31.11. CONDITIONS OF LICENSES.
l. Records.
Every license, at the time of receipt of an article deposited,
left, sold, purchased, pledged or pawned, shall immediately record,
in the manner prescribed by the city, the following information:
A. An accurate description of the article, in English; any
and all numbers written, stamped, impressed or engraved
thereon; any identifying marks; and the name of the
manufacturer and model if indicated on the article.
B. The amount of money loaned upon or pledged therefor.
C. The date, time and place of receipt of the item.
D. The full name, date of birth, current address of
residence, current telephone number if possessed, and a
reasonably accurate description of the person from whom
the item was received including at a minimum sex, height,
weight, and race.
E. The identification number from one of the following forms
of identification of the person from whom the item was
received:
(1) A valid Minnesota photo driver's license; or
(2) A valid Minnesota photo identification card; or
(3) A valid photo identification issued by the state of
residency of the person from whom the item was
received and one other form of identification.
2. Disposition of Articles.
When any article is sold or disposed of by the licensee, the
records shall contain an account of such sale with the date
thereof, interest and charges accrued, the amount for which the
article was sold and full name, current address and telephone
number of the person to whom soid.
18.06
3. Inspection of Records.
The records referred to in this section shall be open to the
inspection of the police officers at all reasonable times and shall
be retained by the licensee for at least four (4) years.
4. Receipt.
Every licensee shall deliver to the person pawning, pledging,
selling, leaving or depositing any articles, a certificate numbered
to correspond with the'licensee's records. The certificate shall
contain the substance of the record.
5. Reports to Police.
Every licensee shall prepare and deliver to the City, each day, in
the manner and form prescribed by the City, a legible, correct and
complete record of the hereinbefore required account of all
personal property or other valuables received, deposited,
purchased, pledged, pawned, sold or otherwise disposed of during
the preceding day.
6. Exceptions to Reports.
No licensee shall be required to furnish descriptions of any
property purchased from manufacturers and wholesale dealers having
an established place of business or of any goods purchased at an
open sale from any bankrupt stock or from any other person doing
business and having an established place of busines5. Any goods
referred to in this section must be accompanied by a bill of sale
or other evidence of open or legitimate purchase and must be shown
to the Police Department when demanded.
7. One Hundred Twenty-Day Redemption Period.
Any person pledging, pawning or depositing an article of property
for security shall have a minimum of one hundred twenty (120) days
from the date when the loan or pledge becomes due and payable to
redeem the article before the article becomes forfeitable.
8. Minimum Period Before Redemption or Sale.
No article of property on deposit with any licensee nor property
purchased by or sold to, or in any other ways coming into the
possession and under the control of any licensee in the due course
18.07
of business, shall be permitted to be redeemed from the place of
business of the licensee for a period of seventy-two (72) hours,
nor shall the property be sold within ten (10) days, after the
record required to be delivered to the City has been delivered.
9. Storage of Items.
All articles of property being held pursuant to the above sections
must be stored on the licensed premises. Outdoor storage of
oversized items may be permitted only if said outdoor storage is
permitted by the zoning requirements applicable to the licensed
premises. All permits and procedures required by Chapter 205,
Zoning Code, shall be obtained prior to, or in conjunction with, a
license for a pawn shop.
10. Police Restrictions on Sale or Redemption.
Whenever any police officer, acting in the course and scope of his
or her duties, shall notify a licensee not to sell or permit to be
redeemed any articles of property received on deposit or purchased
by the licensee, the articles shall not be permitted to be redeemed
or sold until such time as may be determined by the Public Safety
Director or designee.
11. Payment by Check.
Payment by licensee for any article deposited, left, purchased,
pledged or pawned shall be made only by a check, draft or other
negotiable or nonnegotiable instrument or order of withdrawal which
is drawn against funds held by a financial institution.
12. Posting License.
All licensees shall post their licenses, in a conspicuous place, in.
the licensed premises under the licensed activity.
13. Responsibility of Licensee.
The conduct of agents or employees of a licensee, while engaged in
performance of their duties for their principal or employer under
such license, shall be deemed the conduct of the licensee.
. .
. i .
14. Penalty for Property Owner.
It is unlawful for any person who owns or controls any real
property to knowingly permit it to be used for pawnbroking without
a license required by this Chapter.
31.12. RESTRICTED TRANSACTIONS.
l. No licensee shall be open for the transaction of business on
any day of the week before 7:00 a.m. or after 10:00 p.m.
2. No licensee shall purchase, accept or receive any article of
property from any person under eighteen years of age.
3. No licensee shall purchase, accept or receive any article of
property which contains an altered or obliterated serial number or
any article of property whose serial number has been removed.
4. No licensee shall purchase, accept or receive any article of
property knowing, or having reason to know, that the article of
property is encumbered by a security interest. For the purposes of
this section "security interest" means an interest in property
which secures payment or other performance of an obligation.
5. No licensee shall purchase, accept or receive any article of
property, from any person, knowing, or having reason to know, that
said person is not the true and correct owner of the property.
6. No licensee shall purchase, accept or receive any articl� of
property, from any person, without first having obtained one of the
following forms of identification from the person:
(1) A valid Minne�ota photo driver's license; or
(2) A valid Minnesota photo identification card.
(3) A valid photo identification issued by the state of
residency of the person from whom the item was
received and one other form of identification.
No other forms of identification shall be acceptable.
18.09
31.13. INSPECTION.
1. Stolen goods.
Any licensee shall, at all times during the term of the license,
allow any police office to enter or inspect the premises, where the
licensee is carrying on business, and all records pertinent to the
operation of the business for the purpose of•locating articles of
property suspected or alleged to have been stolen. No licensee
shall conceal any article in his possession from any police
officer.
Articles ot property determined, upon investigation, to be stolen
may be seized as evidence from the licensee by any police officer
and returned to the rightful owner in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statute 609.523.
No licensee may obstruct, hinder, or otherwise interfere with any
police investigation concerning stolen articles of property
discovered on the licensee's premises.
A licensee must report to the police department any article of
property pawned or received, or sought to be pawned or received, if
the licensee has reason to believe that the article.of property was
stolen or lost.
2. Inspection by Claimed Owner.
Al1 articles of property coming into the possession of any
licensee, under the terms hereof, shall at all times be open to
inspection and right of examination of any person claiming to have
been the owner thereof or claiming to have had any interest therein
when such person is accompanied by a police officer.
31.14. CONDUCT OF PERSONS ON LICENSED PREMISES.
l. No person may pawn, pledge, sell, leave, or deposit any article
of property not their own; nor shall any person pawn, pledge, sell,
leave, or deposit the property of another, whether with permission
or without; nor shall any person pawn,_ pledge, sell, leave, or
deposit any article of property in which another has a security
interest; with any licensee.
2. No person under the age of eighteen may pawn, pledge, sell,
leave, or deposit any article of property with any licensee.
. 18.10
3. No person may pawn, pledge, sell, leave, or deposit an article
of property with a licensee without first presenting identification
in the form of a Minnesota photo drivers license or Minnesota photo
identification card to the licensee.
4. All licensee's shall by adequate signage and separate written
notice inform persons seeking to pawn, pledge, sell, leave, or
deposit articles of property with the licensee of the foregoing
sections.
For the purposes of �his section "adequate signage" shall be deemed
to mean at least one sign, of not less than four (4) square feet in
surface area, comprised of lettering of not less than 3/4 of an
inch in height, posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed
premises and stating substantially the following:
TO PAWN OR SELL PROPERTY:
YOU MUST BE AT LEAST 18 YEAR.S OF AGE.
YOU MUST BE THE TRUE AND CORRECT OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY MUST BE FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL CLAIMS OR
LIENS.
YOU MUST PRESENT A PHOTO ID OR A VALID PHOTO
IDENTIFICATION ISSUED BY YOUR STATE OF RESIDENCY.
VIOLATION OF ANY OF THESE REQUIREMENTS IS A CRIME.
For the purposes of this section "separate written notice" shall be
deemed to mean the certificate, hereinbefore required to be
delivered to the person pawning, pledging, selling, leaving, or
depositing an article of property with a licensee; incorporating a
statement to the effect that the person pawning, pledging, selling,
leaving, or depositing the article is at least 18 years of age; is
the true owner of the article; and that the article is free and
clear of all claims and liens; and requiring a signature of
acknowledgment by the person pawning, pledging, selling, leaving,
or depositing the article as to the statement.
5. No person seeking to pawn, pledge, sell, leave, or deposit any
article of property with a licensee shall give a false or
fictitious name; nor give a false date of birth; nor give a false
18.11
or out of date address of residence or telephone number; nor
present a false drivers license or identification card; to any
licensee.
11.10. FEES.
Section 11.10, "Fees" is amended to include the following Pawn Shop
fees:
CODE
31
SUBJECT FEE
Pawn Shops $15,000
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
First Reading: November 27, 1995
Second Reading:
Publication:
18.12
'�
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ,�� �
.
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
PAUL S. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION A,DOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1996
DATE: November 14, 1995
As required by Section 7.05 of the City Charter, the attached Budget Resolution provides
for the adoption of the 1996 City of Fridley Budget.
Please present the resolution to Council on December 11, 1995 for their approval.
RDP/ph
Attachment
19.01
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1996
WHEREAS, Chapter 7, Section 7.04 of the City Charter provides that the City Manager shall
prepaze an annual budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared such document and the City Council has met several
times for the purpose of discussing the budget; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that the City shall hold a
public hearing to adopt a budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing and has concluded the budget as prepared is
appropriate;
NOW 'THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the following budget be adopted and approved:
GENERAL FUND
Taxes and Speciai Assessments:
Current Ad Valorem
Delinquerrt, Penafties,
Forfeited
Special Assessmerrts
Licenses and Permits:
Licenses
Permits
lntergovernmental:
Federal
State -
Homestead and Agriculture
Credit Aid
Local Govemment Aid
AII Other
Charges for Services
HRA
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Storm Water Fund
Liquor Fund
Cabie N Fund
Construction Funds
Fines and Forfeits
Interest on Irnestments
Miscellaneous Revenues
Other Financing Sources:
Sales of General Fixed Assets
Closed Debt Service Fund
Liquor Fund
TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER
FINANCING SOURCES
Fund Balance:
General Fund Reserve
TOTAL GENERAI FUND
ESTIMATED
REl/ENUE
$3,703,641
75,344
2,530
152,122
382,827
4,116
1,024,834
1,625,082
473,847
271,632
237,609
148,575
143,154
79,575
56,850
21,653
55,640
203,573
425,000
84,211
13,456
134,843
75,000
9,395,114
395,367
59.790.481
� 9.02
Legislative:
City Council
Pianning Commissions
Other Commissions
City Managemerrt:
General Managemerrt
Personnel
i.,egal
Finance:
Eledions
A�ccou�ing
Assessing
MIS
City Cle�k/Reoords
Pot'ice:
PoGce
Civil Defense
Fire:
Fre
Rerrtal Housing Inspections
Public Works:
Civic Center
Engineering
Lighting
Park Mairrtenar�ce
Street Mairrtenance
Aecr�tan:
Recre,ation
Naturalist
Community Developmerrt:
Building Irwspection
Planrnng
Resenre:
Emergency
Nondepartmerital:
APPROPRIAl10NS
$95,183
3,518
6,961
27&,228
87,839
252,700
23,216
543,006
117,20Ci
159,140
109,523
3.,173,037
9,850
703,707
93,917
189,961
437,536
192,900
652,096
1,121,417
569,519
210,229
222,646
334,206
100,000
104,939
_ E9.790.481
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Cable TV Fund
Grant Management Fund
Solid Waste Abatemerrt Fund
Housing Revitalization Fund
Fund Balance
TOTAL SPECIAL RE1/ENUE FUNDS
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Capital Improvement Fund
Taxes — Current Ad Valorem
IMerest on Investrnerrts
Donations
State Aid Construction
Fund 8ala�ce
$101,389
208,674
228,029
250,000
25,865
5813.957
�85,550 General Capital Improvemerrt
271,036 Streets Capital Improvement
10,000 Parks Capital Improvemerrt
650,000
320,154
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS s1.336,740
AGENCY FUND
Six Cities Watershed Fund
Taxes — Currerrt Ad Valorem $3�g� �
TOTAL AGENCY FUND =g,g� �
TOTAL
�11.945.089
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CTTY COUNCIL OF TI� CTTY OF FRIDLEY THI$
OF DECEMBER, 1995
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
19.03
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
$117,100
208,674
238,183
250,000
5813.957
$63�000
941,640
332,100
t1.336.740
$3.911
53.911
511.945.089
DAY
i
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ���r
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
PAUL S. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO LEVY TA7�S WHICH APPEA,R TO BE IN
EXCESS OF 16 NIILLS AND CERTIFYING TAX LEVY
REQUIREMENTS FOR 1996 TO ANOKA COUNTY
DATE: October 30, 1995
The attached resolution gants City Council the authority to levy a tax which appears to
be in excess of 16 mills.
As stated in Section 7.02 of the City Charter, pursuant to three weeks published notice
and a public hearing the Council may adopt a resolution showing the necessity for such
taxes.
The attached resolution also provides for the certification of the 1996 tax levy to Anoka
County for collection.
RDP/ph
Attachment
20.01
RE30LUTION NO. - 1995
A RESOLIITION DECLARING THE NECESSITY TO LEVY A TA8 NHICH
APPEAR3 TO BE IN EXCESS OF 16 MILLS AND CERTIFYING TA%
LEVY REQIIIREMENTS FOR 1996 TO THE COIINTY OF ANORA FOR
COLLECTION
WHEREAS, Chapter Seven, Section 7.02 of the Charter of the City of
Fridley, grants the City the power to raise money by taxation
pursuant to the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, said Section 7.02 of the City Charter provides that if
the taxes levied against property within the City exceeds 16 mills
on each dollar of assessed valuation, that the Council shall adopt
a resolution showing the necessity for such tax; and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has changed the method of computing
taxes from "mill levy" to "tax capacity"; and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota transferred state aid dollars from
the city to the school districts to reduce school district taxes;
and
WHEREAS, in addition, the State of Minnesota reduced the amount of
state aid dollars it had previously distributed to cities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley needs to levy taxes which appear to
be in excess of 16 mills because of the reduction of local
government aids by the State of Minnesota.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Fridley pursuant to three (3) weeks published notice and public
hearing on the 5th day of December, 1995, shall have the authority
to levy a tax which may be in excess of 16 mills; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Fridley certify to the
County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the following tax levy to be
levied in 1995 for the year 1996.
20.02
Page 2 - Resolution
GENERAL FUND
General Fund
CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
- 1995
Capital Improvement Fund - Parks Division
AGENCY FUND
Six Cities Watershed Management Organization
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$3,821,853
72,689
3,087
$3,897,629
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
20.03
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Erickson Oil Products requests that a variance be granted to increase the maximum square footage of a
free-standing sign from 80 square feet to 126 square feet. This would allow the installation of a new
freestanding sign on their properly at 7600 University Avenue N.E..
HARDSHIP STATEMENT:
See attached letter from the petitioner.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
Section 214.11.02.(B) requires that a ma�amum size of 80 square feet in area of signage per development.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in
commercial areas.
The petitioner has not met the four conditions of the sign code which allow granting of the variance. The
peritionex has adequate signage through the use of the existing freestanding and wall signs. This request
is similar in nature to the request by Conoco which the City denied in 1989.
The City Council has previously approved variances for Bob's Produce (120 sq. ft.), Home Depot (160
sq. ft.), Home Valu (150 sq. ft.), and Embers (120 sq. ft.) within the last five years.
RECOD�VVIEEIVDED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request.
APPEALS COMIVIISSION AGTION:
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the request to the City Council.
21.0
Petition For:
Location
of Property:
I.egal Description
of Property:
Size:
Topography:
Eaisting
Vegetation:
Eaisting
Zoning/Platting:
Availability
of Municipal
Utilities:
Vehicular
Access:
Pedestrian
Access:
Engineering
Issues:
Site Planning
Issues:
PROJECT DETAILS
A variance to increase the maximum size of a sign from 80 square feet to 126 square feet..
7600 University Avenue N.E.
Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park Additioa
42,827 square fcet
Flat
New Vegetation; trees, shrubs, etc.
C-2, General Business; Conunexce Park 1965
Connected
Osborne Road, West University Avenue Service Road
University Avenue Bikeway/Walkway
None
2
21.02
DEVELOPMENT SITE
Section 214.11.02.(B} requires that a maximum size of 80 square feet in area of signage per development.
Public purpose served by this require�ne�rt is to corrtrol visual pollution and excessive use of signs in commercial areas.
Request
Erickson Oil, owner of the Freedom Station located on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, the same being 7600
Univecsity Avenue N.E., is requesting a variance to the sign ordinance for an increase in allowable sign area from 80
square feet to 126 square feet. The sign will be located at the corner of the properly. A freestanding sign of 48
square feet is already located on the propex�y in the location of the proposed sign. The existing sign will be removed
if the variance is granted.
Site
The site is located on a loopbacic parcel on the corner of Osborne Road and Utuveisity Avenue and is the site of what
was the old Jet Mast Sta.tion south of and acxsoss from the University Station Restaurant and Bob's Produce. The
original Jet Mart building was constructed in 1968. The petitioner recently bought the property, and in June 1995
removed the old building and consttucted the new Frcedom Station.
Analysis
The petitioner is requesting an increase in the allowable sign area from 80 square fcet to 126 square feet. Their
standard freo-standing pricing signs corrtain ttu�e areas for gas prices, the Conoco logo, and a read�board area. The
petitioner would like to add the Freedom name to this standard sign design. This is 46 square feet larger than the
80 square feet «ur�tly located by the Cit�s Sign Code. This request is sim�ar in nature to the Conoco request which
the City Council denied in 1989.
Section 214.21.03 of the City Sign Code sets forth four conditions which the applicant must prove in order for the
Commission to grant a variance to the City Sign Code. The following analysis will analyze each of the four
conditions:
Condition A"That there are acceptionai or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended
use that do not apply generally to othes properly in the same vicinity and district."
As was stated earlier, the property in question is not an exceptional cir«xmstance. The City has several loopback
propeities which ocaxr at many of the intersections along the major corridors in the City. These parcels typically are
sucrounded on all sides by street frontages, and many of these loopba.ck pazcels contain automobile, motor fuel, and
oil dispensing starions. Other propaties similar to this have been restrided to one free-standing sign to advertise prices
and company logos, so restricting the petitioner to one 80 square foot sign would not be atypical.
21.03
Condition B: "That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right
possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and district, but which is denied to the property in question."
The petition� can sstillll install 80 square feet of signage on the fre�standing sign, and the petitioner has the option of
wall signage. By denying the variance, the staff is not denying the petifione�'s right to have signage. The proposed
area of the Frcedom text is 15.75 square feet. This area could be adde�l to the existing sign without requiring a
variance. A sign variance was granted for the Bob's Produce sign to 120 square feet, however, this allowetl a
consolidation of two business signs into one.
Condition C: "That the strict application of the chapter would conskitute an unnecessary hardship."
The strict application of the Fridley Sign Ordinance would not create an undue hardship for the petitioner. The
petitione.r has utilizsd wall sigr�age as allowed by code as well as the proposed signage. A freestanding sign less than
that allowed by code already exists on site.
Erickson Oil Products does have the benefit of canopy signage. This benefit is not universal and dces tend to draw
additional attention to the site, providing an opportunity to do ample advertisemerit.
Condition D: "That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safexy, or.
general welfaze, or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located."
The variance requested is not exc�essive, however, the public purpose is to reduce the visual clutter caused by large
signs. The azea already has one sign variance, the petitioner can meet the code requirements.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the variance request, VAR #95-34, by Erickson Oil, to increase the allowable square
footage of signage for a development from 80 square feet to 126 square feet on the basis that the petitioner does not
me� all of the criteria for variances as listed in the Sign Ordinance. The petitioner can install an 80 square foot sign
which is required of other establishments in the general vicinity of the site.
WEST:
SOITTH:
EAST:
NORTH:
ADJACENT SITES
Zoning: G2, General Business
Zoning: C-2, General Business
Zoning: G2, General Business
R 1, Single Family
Zoning: C-3, General Shopping
21.04
Land Use: Muld-Tenant Retail
Land Use: Mu1ti-Tenarn Retail
Land Use: Vacant Residential
Land Use: Vacant Residential
Comprehensive
Planning Tssues:
Public Hearing
Comments: To be taken
21.05
ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS, INC.
1231 INDUSI'RIAL SfRHET
HUD.SON, WTSCONSIN 54016
October 30, 1995
715-386-8241
612�33fi-8056
Fa�c 715-386-2022
Michelle McPherson
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Michelle,
Thank you for seeing me last week on such short no6ce. I do appreciate the input and help you gave me. I wili
attempt to answer the four variance conditions in this letter. It would be easier, of course, if we were permitted
to have two 80 square foot signs (1 per street frontage) as Scott and I discussed, but I trust you have interpreted
the code correctly. The sign we are proposing is approximately 120 square feet.
Condition A: I think it would be appropriate to explain the proposed sign. It consists of a 40 square foot
CONOCO capsule, a 50 square foot gasoline price sign, a 16 square foot reader board and a 16 squaze foot
FREEDOM sign. As you can see, the largest sign is the one that advertises our gas price. Our store will be
selling three grades of gas, so the state requires us to post all three prices. If our store, like some others, sold
only two grades of gas this sign could be 1/3 smaller. We have proposed a 16 sqnare foot reader board below
the price sign. We have found in large metro communities this is our best way to advertise. It is often cost
prohibitive to advertise in the newspaper, such as larger retailers do. Historically, we occasionally use our reader
boards for civic and comimunity events, wlaich I. feel benefits those that are not our customers. Lastly, the 16
square foot FREEDOM signi this is us, our company. We have found that without letting the customer know
this, they often think iYs a CONOCO corporate store. We have had to negotiate with CONOCO to allovv us
to be on "their" sigq but we think it is important for the customer to know who they are doing business with.
Condition B: As I drive the University Avenue comdor, I certainly see many large signs over 80 square feet-
restaurants and other retail businesses. Our problem is that we need to post our gas prices as required by the
State anrl we are really advertising two corporate identities - CONOCO and FREEDOM, not to mention the
cost effective advertising of the reader board.
Condition C: We have made a significant investment in your community and are delighted to be there. It is
pazamount to our success to be recognized to the traffic on University Avenue and Osborne Road. I am sure
you will remember the former CONOCO store had used the rear or side of the building to mount their price
sign. I believe they also used the canopy facia to mount signs. I have not "looked" faz enough into the ordinance
to see if we have used up our available building signage, but I would doubt that we have. I do not wish to even
explore mounting other signs on the building or canopy unless we absolutely have to. I think it would detract
from the appearance we have worked hard to achieve.
Condition D: I believe thaf there would be zero negative impact to any of the other property in our vicinity.
I would like to believe our investment and future success would enhance values in the area. I certainly can see
no detriment to the public health or safety. The sign will be mounted high enough and far enough back to
eliminate any traffic problems.
21.06
Michelle McPherson
October 30, 1995
Page 2
In closing, I think it is important for the staff and board to know that our request is real and warranted. By most
retail standards, this is not an above average sign. We recendy installed this identical sign in White Bear Lake
with support from the City staff.
The support from the City of Fridley staff, Board of Appeals and Council will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
�C
David B. Erickson
President
DBE/cef
2 �.�7
l
VAR �� 95- 34
�Frickson Uil Products
21.os �O�AT10N MAP
� /r/I
''I I
I-��
I� �I-/ • � /A. �,� ��'� /
'�' �' ♦ � �
i � �` 1���������� � � .
/ � � �� �.�♦�.ih�♦�`� ■ �
//�
i �/ ���������</���� C
:� i � ►-�-�_1-�-�-��.
:
•�
• ■�■
, �►�T � ��
►r��'�`�� �
�r'���
• ° �
= = -_==�=�i �..
�(�::.--
■e�■■■■ �
.....--
�■������■
�►n:.��u
�%������■
■�:.���■
������■
a�����■ ��
��I.i��■
r���■ ��
' ��/,��1,��1/1
�►�i�iii i�i� .
o� ai � '��. �
��
r
��' ��l�ll�[t�►��/!�:
SUSURSAN LIGHTING INC_ 612 439 7521 P.82
SiGNAGE IDEN'Y'IFICATION
I2' CAP'SULE p1tICE SiG ti
Two 12' capsute price si�S do not
have service message panels. A
tivcce-panel wrttparound sign (B7�
is available with a twaline mar-
quee. Tbere is no diesel option
Sign Type B7
3-Panel Wi�paroutid
with 2 Line Marquee
� �.
ava�abk. The four-panel wrap-
arouad sign (B9) co:aes only w�th
the gree� diesei panel fox jobbers
cammitted M long-term marketing
of tivi8 produc�
T
s• r
�
�'
r s�
�'9"
�
„
��
pne Face i '� 6: +q• �k.
'A aepa�atc toot aet mast be ordered tor ihe
Marquee board.
21.10
Remember to paint the poie
a►hite witbit► the pri� sign when
adding a wraparownd p�ce sign.
This wil� asstune even �[wnin►ation
across the face of the sign.
� ljrpe B9
nel Wrapaxnund
Dieset
��
•
�r OrR ��H U
�_ ��==��
��
one Ihca ./ 2 8 �- �-
T
� s� r
�
�
T 9'
i� `
.
�
� � � � �
_
CITY OF
FRlDLEY
Fi�1DLEl' MUNICIPAL CENTER •(r331 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6121571-3450 • FAX (61?► 571-1?R7
CITY COUNCIL
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
October 24, 1989
Conoco Inc.
Connie Lutton
^Z68 Commerce Circle South N.E.
Fridley, I�1 55432
Dear Ms. Lutton:
On October 23, ridley City Council denied your request
for a varianc , VAR �89-24 to increase the total square footage
of signage from square feet to 110 eet on Lot l, Block
1, Commerce Park, the same being 00 University Ave . et
Mart).
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call
the Planning Department at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
BD/dn
21.11
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETZNG OF OCTOBER 23 1989 PAGE 2
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated this is a request for an on-
sale beer license for the Yung Tae Hoe Restaurant at 6440
University Avenue. He stated a background investigation has been
completed and staff is recommending approval.
Councilman Billings stated the public hearing.notice states the
public hearing is to be on November 23, 1989 and questioned if this
was the date published in the hearing notice: After checking the
publication in the Fridley Focus, the hearing date published was
November 23, 1989, therefore, it was determined that this notice
was defective and the public hearing should be re-published and
held on November 20, 1989.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding the issuance of this on-
sale beer license.
MOTION by Councilman Billings/to find tYie publication of the public
hearing defective, close th,iis hearing and order the public hearing
to be re-published for Nov�mber 20, 1989. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson. Upon a voice�vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried un �iimously.
OLD BUSINESS• �
2. ORDINANCE IrTO. 936 APPROVING A VACATI�N. SAV #89-04_ TO VACATF
MOTION�by Councilman Billings to waive the second reading of
Ordir�ance No. 936, adopt it on second reading and arder
publication. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
urianimously.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR #89-24. TO INCREASE
THE TOTAL SOUARE FOOTAGE OF SIGNAGE FROM 80 SOUARE FEET TO 110
ON LOT l. BLOCK 1, COMMERCE PARK. THE SAME BEING 7600
UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.. BY CONOCO, INC. (TABLED 10-2-89�:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this item was tabled at the
last Council meeting in order for staff to determine if a variance
for a sign greater than 8U square feet had been approved previously
for this property. She stated in August, 1983, a variance request
was filed to increase the signage from 80 to 183 square feet,
however, this variance was denied.
Ms. Dacy stated this variance request was originally for two free
standing pylon signs each to be 110 square feet. She stated the
21.12
%
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1989 PAGE_3
petitioner has now reduced the request to one pylon sign of 110
square feet which would be 30 square feet over what the ordinance
allows.
Ms. Dacy stated both staff and the Appeals Commission recommend
denial of this variance as it does not meet the criteria for a
variance as outlined in the Sign Ordinance.
Councilman Billings stated his primary concern was if variances had
been issued in the past. He stated the current signage is 75
square feet and seems to be adequate for this station.
Ms. Connie Lutton, District Manager for Conoco, presented photos
of signs at other Conoco stations. She stated the signage they are
requesting is a standard sign which Conoco uses nationwide.
Mayor Nee commended Conoco for the attractiveness of this station,
and stated he did not have a problem with the increased signage
they are proposing at this particular location. He stated,
however, if this variance was granted, it would definitely set a
precedent and the Council may be obliqated to grant other requests
of a similar nature.
Ms. Lutton stated she has taken pictures of other siqns in Fridley
which are greater than the 80 square feet allowed by the ordinance.
She stated one such sign is for Bob's Produce.
Mayor Nee stated some of the signs existed before the Sign
Ordinance was adopted and they are, therefore, qrandfathered such
as Bob's Produce.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated what Ms. Lutton is doing is exactly
what the next person would do if they requested a variance. He
felt to grant the variance would set a precedent.
Ms. Dacy stated an alternative may be to list two types of fuel on
one side of the sign and the other two types of fuel on the other
side to meet the requirements of the Sign Ordinance.
Councilman Billings felt there are options available and even
though he does not find the sign displeasing, it does not meet the
code and there really is not a hardship.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to deny this variance, VAR #89-24.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
21.13
�
�
cinroF
FRIDLEY
DATE:
��
FROM:
� PLANNING DIV�[ON
MEMORANDLiM�
October 5, 1989
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Conoco Inc. Variance; 7600 University Avenue
N.E.
Per your request dated October 3, 1989, I have researched the
Conoco building file for any potential sign variances that were
previously granted to the parcel at 7600 University Avenue N.E.
In my research, I have found three variance requests for this
parcel.
Variance Reauest #1: In July of 1968, a variance was granted by
the Appeals Commission for an increase in the amount of signage for
the building at 7600 University Avenue H.E. The sign variance
granted by the Appeals Commission was for an increase in signage
from 1,184 square feet to 1,776 square feet. The total square
footage included signage on a11 four walls of the building and one
rotating pylon sign. Exact square footage of the wall and pylon
signs are unknown.
Variance Request #2: In August of 1983, the variance request was
to increase the allowable square footage of signage from 80 square
feet to 183 square feet. The Appeals Commission voted to recommend
approval of a five square foot increase from 80 square feet to 85
square feet. The City Council on October 17, 1983 denied the
variance request to increase the allowable signage from 80 square
feet to 183 square feet. The petitioner at that time was not
interested in a compromise on the square footage, so the five
square foot variance was also denied.
Variance Reauest #3: In August of 1984,
which was not associated with signage.
hardsurface setback from the required 20
the widening of an entry driveway. This
Appeals Commission and City Council.
MM/dn
M-89-602
21.14
a variance wa's requested
It allowed a reduction of
feet to 10 feet, to allow
was approved by both the
� �
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCZL MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 1989 PAGE 7
Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals Commission stated this var nce request
would be submitted to the Council on October 2, 1�
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he understands me of the neighbors
signed a petition indicating they were awar of the request and had
no objections, with the exception of one rson who wanted to think
about it.
Mayor Nee asked what Mr. Schrei s meant when he stated at the
Appeals Commission meeting tha it would be the only house on the
block that would extend beyo the other houses." Ms. Dacy stated
she believed he was referr' g to the rear of the homes because the
front yard setback woul e maintained.
Councilman Fitzpatr
with development.
more extensive an
seems reasona e.
re,'k stated this lot has a history of problems
!ie stated the variances granted in 1986 were
w�at is now being requested and this variance
MOTION b ouncilman Fitzpatrick to grant the Variance, VAR #89-
23, to educe the side yard setback for an accessory building on
a c er lot from 30 feet to 20 feet. Seconded by Councilman
S eider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
e motion carried unanimously.
D. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE, VAR #89-24, TO INCREASE
THE TOTAL S4UARE FOOTAGE OF SIGNAGE FROM 80 SQUARE
FEET TO 220 SOUARE FEET (2 PRICE SIGNS AT 110 S4UARE
�EET EACH,� ON LOT l. BLOCK 1, COMMERCE PARK. THE SAME
BEING 7600 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., BY CONOCO, INC.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request to
increase the total square footage of signage from 80 square feet
to 220 square feet. She stated the Sign 4rdinance allaws
properties to have more than one freestanding pylon sign if it has
more than one street frontage, however, the total square feet must
not exceed 80. She stated the petitioner has adequate means to
advertise the business with an 80 square foot sign, as wall signage
is permitted as well.
Ms. Dacy stated Conoco is petitioning for this variance as they are
refurbishing this site of the Jet Mart Station.
Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals Commission recommended denial of this
variance request. She stated staff has since received information
from Conoco that they wish to reduce their request to have one 110
square foot sign, rather than two signs of 110 square feet each.
She stated the petitioner is present this evening and may wish to
confirm this request.
Ms. Connie Lutton, District Manager for Conoco, stated when they
originally submitted the variance request, they were under the
21.15
( �..
FRIDLEY CITY_COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 1989 PAGE 8
impression that 80 square feet per sign was allowed. She stated
she would like to change the variance request to have only one sign
at 110 square feet.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if there was some particular
reason why they needed a 110 square foot sign.
Ms . Lutton stated it is a standard sign that Conoco uses throughout
the company.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked staff if they knew the range of
variances allowed in the past.
Ms. Dacy stated Viking Chevrolet had a sign up to 200 square feet.
She stated several other applications for sign variances were
received from other gas station owners, with most of them being
denied.
Ms. Lutton stated Fina has a 196 square foot sign.
The Regional Manager stated a variance was received in 1985 to add
to their sign when they wished to advertise diesel fuel.
Ms. Dacy stated this variance is not reflected in the master list
of variances which dates back to 1981.
Councilman Billings stated he was prepared to concur with the
recommendation of the Appeals Commission to deny this variance
request for the two signs totaling 220 square feet, however, he
would like the item tabled to the next meeting for staff to
research the size of the existing sign and check if a variance was
granted at this location in 1985.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item until the next
regular meeting. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
4. CONSIDERATION TO CLOSE PROJECT #629 CRIME PREVENTION AND
RETURN UNUSED CDBG FUNDS TO ANORA COUNTY:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, s ed the City
received $15,500 in CDBG funds to conduct a s rity program for
low and moderate income households by ' allation of security
locks. He stated a portion of the ds were to be used in the
actual implementation and a rtion for administrative and
advertising costs. He ed there is a surplus in the
administrative and adve sing fees of $1,023.73 and this should
be returned to Anok ounty.
MOTION by Co cilman Fitzpatrick to authorize staff to notify Anoka
County t Crime Prevention Project $629 authorized in 1986 is
21.16
l_
�
can be constructed witho t any variances. Even with the proposed
house plan, the garage c uld be detached, and there would be no
need for a variance. so, because of the history of the
development in the area, e would have to vote against this
variance.
Dr. Vos stated he is also oppo ed to the variance. There are quite
a few different ways the house nd garage could fit on the lot that
could satisfy the petitioner an the neighbors. He did not see any
hardship that made it necessary o encroach 10 ft. into the rear
yard setback.
Ms. Savage agreed with Mr. Barna and Dr. Vos. She hoped the
petitioner and the neighbors can wor together and find a solution.
Mr. Kuechle stated he is also in gen al agreement with what has
been said. A variance should not be eeded in a new plat like
this. He was sympathetic to the petitio er; however, he felt there
is someway the house can fit on the lo without a variance. He
would vote against the variance.
MoTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage t
Council denial of variance request, VAR #89- 3,
pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of
to reduce the rear yard setback for an acce
corner lot from 30 feet to 20 feet, to allow
a single family home and attached garage on
Riverwood Park, the same being 7100 Riverwood
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON
MOTION CARRIED QNANIMOIISLY.
o recommend to � City
by 0. B. Zachmann,
e Fridley City Code
sory building on a
he construction of
Lot 15, Block 2,
D 've N.E.
DECLARED THE
Mr. Barna stated this item will go to City Council %n October 2,
1989. �
4.
` INC ,.
Pursuant to Section 214.11.02.(b) of the Fridley City Code to
increase the total square footage of signage.from'80`sq. ft:
to 220 sq. ft. (2 price signs at 110 sq. ft. each), on Lot l,
Block 1, Commerce Park, the same being 7600 University Avenue
N.E. �
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOiCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:13 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the o1d.Jet Mart Station.is being refurbished
by Conoco, Inc. The property is zoned C-2, General.Business:, The
maximum allowable square footage for a free-standing sign is 80 sq:
21.17
� �. .
APPEALS_COMMIS3ION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 PAGE 12
ft. Conoco, Inc., is requesting an increase in the allowable sign
area for two free-standing signs, one on the University Avenue
frontage and one on the Osborne Road frontage, at 110 sq. ft. each.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is also proposing to replace
the existing diesel signs with the Conoco logo on the canopies over
the pump islands. That is not a part of the variance. In
addition, they are remodeling and repainting the exterior of the
existing building. Conoco has removed the existing facia, and at
this point,.do not have any plans to utilize that wall space for
additional signage. Staff states that the petitioner could use
this wall space for additional square footage of signage, and that
this particular parcel is similar to other loopback parcels in the
City that have similar uses, are zoned similarly, and have been
limited to the one 80 sq. ft. sign. In staff's opinion, the
petitioner does not any special condition that creates a hardship
for the petitioner as they have other alternatives to place signage
on the building as allowed under the Sign Code. For that reason,
staff is recommending denial of this variance.
Ms. Connie Lutton, District Manager for Conoco, Inc., stated she
represents the Fridley area. She stated Conoco, in its reimaging
program, has eliminated the bright yellow color and has restricted
all signage on the facia. Unfortunately, Fridley's sign code
varies from Conoco's new image. She stated there will be one
Conoco emblem per canopy.
Ms. Lutton stated that when they are completely done with the
remodeling, the station will lose some of its recognition because
it will not stand out as it did with the bright yellow. Because
of that, they will lose some of their customer base. She stated
they need two signs so that they will be visible to traffic on both
University Avenue and Osborne Road. There is no way of angling one
sign so that the logo and price of gas can be visible from both
roadways.
Ms. McPherson stated staff has discussed with the petitioner that
they must modify the existing site plan to allow the sign to meet
the required 10 ft. setback from Osborne Road. They will be adding
additional green area and moving the sign to comply with the 10 ft.
setback from Osborne Road.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:26 P.M.
Ms. Savage stated she is glad to hear that the yellow color is
going. She thought that yellow station was one of the worst
eyesores on University Avenue. She stated she feels very strongly
about signs, and that excessive signs, like billboards, are visual
21.18
� ��.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 19. 1989 - PAGE 13
pollutants. There is no hardship. Apparently, the Amoco station
across the street does not have a variance for its sign. She is
opposed to even one sign that would exceed the 80 sq. ft. allowed,
and certainly would be opposed to two of them. She would vote
against the variance request.
Mr. Kuechle stated he is in agreement. Zf they have not allowed
other stations and businesses in similar situations to have
variances, it would be very difficult to approve it in this case.
Dr. Vos stated he certainly did not see the need for two signs.
Even one sign at 110 sq. ft. is a 40� increase over what is allowed
which seems excessive. Since there are "quick stop" stations along
University Avenue and Highway 65 which seem to do quite well, he
felt fairly confident Conoco could compete in the market with an
80 sq. ft. sign.
Mr. Barna stated the Amoco station on the northeast corner of
Osborne/University is completely within the sign code. The car
wash and station at 73rd/University Avenue was given no sign
variance, and the SuperAmerica an East River Road/University was
given no sign variance, so in this surrounding area, everyone seems
to be doing alright with 80 sq. ft. Conoco can always put signage
on the building even though they do not want to. He stated he
would also be opposed to any variance in increasing the allowable
square footage for signage.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City
Council denial of variance request, VAR #89-24, by Conoco, Inc.,
pursuant to Section 214.11.02.(b� of the Fridley City Code to
increase the total square footage of signage from 80 sq. ft. to 220
sq. ft. (2 price signs at 110 sq. ft. each) , on Lot 1, Block l,
Commerce Park, the same being 7600 University Avenue N.E.
OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED LJNANIMOIISLY.
5.
0
SANDBLASTING SERVICE, INC.:�
1. Pursuant to Section 205. 8.03.A of the Fridley City Code
to reduce the required 1 t area from 65,340 sq. ft. to
14,768 sq. ft.;
2. Pursuant to Section 205.18. .B of the Fridley City Code
to reduce the required lot idth from 150 feet to 104
feet;
3. Pursuant to Section 205.18.03.D (2) of the Fridley City
Code to reduce the required si yard setback from 20
feet to 5 feet;
21.19