03/02/1998 - 00000149THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
MARCH 2, 1998
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
by Mayor Jorgenson at 7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilman Barnette,
Councilman Billings and Councilwoman Bolkcom
MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Schneider
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY 23, 1998:
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
1. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER, WILLIAM W. BURNS, TO SIGN
THE GRANT AGREEMENT END GRANT ("THE GRANT CONTRACT") FOR THE
YOUTH INITIATIVE GRANT AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this agreement spells out
the terms for receipt of $280,250 for the finishing of the
lower level of the Fridley Community Center. These terms
relate to record keeping, permitted use of grant money,
documentation of the final plan and costs, payment of
prevailing wages, and local matching requirements.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON
THE REGULAR AGENDA.
2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 18, 1998:
RECEIVED THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 18, 1998.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 2
3. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR HACKMANN AVENUE WATER LINE
REPAIR PROJECT NO. 317 AND HACKMANN CIRCLE STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-1:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that ten bids were received
and opened on February 25 for this project. This project
involves the reconstruction of Hackmann Avenue and Hackmann
Circle, as well as for replacement of the water line along
Hackmann Avenue from Hathaway Lane to Tennison Drive. The low
bidder was Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. in the amount of
$382,705. It is recommended the bid be awarded to them. The
bid contained an option for the sump pump connections and, if
this proceeds, there will be a change order for this project.
RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING BIDS FOR THE HACKMANN AVENUE WATER LINE
REPAIR PROJECT NO. 317 AND HACKMANN CIRCLE STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-1:
I: �.�i -.�i
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.
S.R. Weidema, Inc.
Valley Paving, Inc.
Thomas & Sons, Inc.
Midwest Asphalt
Northwest Asphalt,
Hardrives, Inc.
W.B. Miller, Inc.
Arnt Construction
C.S. McCrossan
Inc.
Co., Inc.
Total Bid
$382,705.00
$404,042.39
$408,454.05
$412,733.00
$414,577.00
$414,914.83
$419, 981 . 50
$438,027.00
$462,665.00
$502,331.00
AWARDED THE CONTRACT TO THE LOW BIDDER, FOREST T,AKF'
CONTRACTING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $382,705.00 FOR THE
HACKMANN AVENUE WATER LINE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 317 AND HACKMANN
CIRCLE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. ST. 1998-1.
4. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR REPAIR OF WELL NO. 2,
PROJECT NO. 316:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that bids for the repair of
Well Nos. 2, 6 and 7 were opened in January and contracts were
awarded for Well Nos. 6 and 7. At that time, however, the
bids were rejected for Well No. 2 and this portion of the
project was re-bid. Four bids were received and opened on
February 25. The low bidder was Keys Well Drilling in the
amount of $32,181. It is recommended the contract be awarded
to them for the repair of Well No. 2.
RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING BIDS FOR THE REPAIR OF WELL NO. 2,
PROJECT NO. 316:
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 3
I: �.�i -.�i
Keys Well Drilling
Bergerson Caswell Well Co.
Mark Traut Wells
E.H. Renner & Sons
Total Bid
$32,181.00
$35,544.00
$43,622.50
$46,954.00
AWARDED THE CONTRACT FOR THE REPAIR OF WELL NO. 2, PROJECT NO.
316 TO THE LOW BIDDER, KEYS WELL DRILLING IN THE AMOUNT OF
$32,181.00.
5. CLAIMS:
AUTHORIZED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NOS. 79390 THROUGH 79525.
6. LICENSES:
APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE IN THE
LICENSE CLERK'S OFFICE.
7. ESTIMATES:
APPROVED THE ESTIMATES, AS FOLLOWS:
Forest Lake Contracting
14777 Lake Drive
Forest Lake, MN 55025
TH 47 and I-694 Ramp N.E. Reconstruction
Project No. ST. 1997-3
FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M.C. Magney Construction, Inc.
19245 Highway 7
Excelsior, MN 55331
$ 4,559.85
Wellhouse No. 1 and Water Booster Station
Project No. 298
Estimate No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $31, 614.10
Councilwoman Bolkcom requested that Item 1 be removed from the
consent agenda.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding the proposed consent
agenda.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the consent agenda items,
with the exception of Item l. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the
motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 4
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt the agenda with the
addition of Item 1 from the consent agenda. Seconded by Councilman
Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson
declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
NEW BUSINESS:
8. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 407 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER
407, ENTITLED "RIGHT-OF-WAY MANAGEMENT" AND AMENDING CHAPTER
11 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, ENTITLED "GENERAL PROVISIONS AND
FEES:"
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a public hearing was
held February 23 on this proposed ordinance. At that meeting,
comments were received from Minnegasco, Northern States Power and
Paragon Cable. Those comments have been reviewed and, as a result,
several changes have been made in this ordinance. The changes
include the definition of pavement; added language regarding the
supremacy of a franchise; an added caveat of delayed penalty; the
requirement for City permits regardless of agency right-of-way
ownership; establishment of a two-year guarantee period consistent
with existing franchises; deletion of two denial items because they
were incorporated into another section and our reconstruction
restoration templates; clarification of underground facilities;
deletion of the nuisance aspect; expansion of the nuisance item for
abandoned facilities; and addition of the registration fee.
Mr. Flora stated that these changes have been reviewed with
representatives from Minnegasco, Northern States Power, and Paragon
Cable. He felt there was no major discontent with this ordinance
as currently written.
Mr. Al Swintek, representing Minnegasco, thanked Mr. Flora for
listening to their concerns. He stated that Mr. Pilon attended a
meeting on February 25 to discuss these issues. Although progress
has been made, there is still a substantial amount of work before
there is a meeting of the minds. He hoped that they could come to
an agreement that is workable for everyone. He requested this
ordinance be tabled in order to give time for these issues to be
worked out.
Mayor Jorgenson asked if the construction schedule would be
affected if this item is tabled.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 5
Mr. Flora stated that the City would not have an ordinance for any
spring construction.
Mayor Jorgenson asked if there is a first reading of the ordinance
this evening. She said the second reading occurs on March 16. She
wondered how long before it would become law.
Mr. Flora stated that it would become law ten days after
publication.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that if this is tabled until April, the
construction season would be well under way.
Mr. Swintek stated that his concern is if there is a first reading
of the ordinance this evening. He said then it would be only one
vote away from becoming law.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that it appears there is a meeting of the
minds on some of the issues. She would trust that staff would work
with the utility companies before the next City Council meeting on
March 16. She felt that the City had to look at other companies
that will be doing business in the City this construction season.
She asked Mr. Swintek if there were any specific items to which
they were opposed.
Mr. Swintek stated that it would be best for Mr. Pilon to address
these issues; however, he could address a few. As a franchise
utility, Minnegasco felt it should not be necessary to take out a
construction performance bond. The franchise agreement addresses
the City's recourse if Minnegasco does not perform up to certain
standards. Another concern is the need to pay permit fees to the
City on state and county roads, as well as some issues regarding
the unusable facilities and user fees.
Mayor Jorgenson pointed out that the City can only recoup the
actual costs for administration.
Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, stated that any fees have to be related
to the costs for administration and cannot be a means by which to
generate income.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that the City wants to have a good working
relationship with companies that have franchise agreements, but it
does not want to preclude other companies from coming into the
City. She was sympathetic to Minnegasco's needs but felt inclined
to proceed with the first reading of the ordinance and work on the
issues before the second reading of the ordinance.
Mr. John Theis, Northern States Power, stated that Northern States
Power is definitely opposed to user fees. He felt that some of the
permit fees are excessive. Their objections to this ordinance are
on file. Even though changes have been made, there is still
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 6
disagreement. Northern States Power has a good relationship with
the City and pays a considerable amount of property and real estate
taxes. He requested that this ordinance be tabled to enable them
to work further with staff. Mr. Theis referred to the City of
Edina ordinance which he felt was a good ordinance.
Councilman Barnette asked in what ways Edina's ordinance is more
favorable.
Mr. Theis stated that it does not have some of the user fees.
Mr. Flora stated that the Edina ordinance does not have any permit
fees for any franchised organization. He felt a number of issues
may change when the Public Utilities Commission task force submits
their recommendations. This ordinance will probably need to be
modified to adopt the Public Utilities Commission items, but, in
the meantime, the City still needs an ordinance under which to
operate.
Councilwoman Bolkcom suggested that staff could contact Edina on
their ordinance. Also, the City could further communicate with the
utility companies regarding their concerns.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that if Council is not prepared to proceed
with the second reading at the next City Council meeting this
ordinance could possibly be tabled at that time.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance on first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the
motion carried unanimously.
9. PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #98-01, BY HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES,
INC., TO CREATE A 1.26 ACRE LOT FOR A 3,690 SQUARE FOOT
CONVENIENCE STORE, CAR WASH, AND FIVE GAS PUMPS TO BE LOCATED
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE HOLIDAY PLUS SITE, GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 242 57TH AVENUE N.E. (WARD 3):
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that in addition to this
preliminary plat request there are requests for a special use
permit, variances, and approval of a comprehensive sign plan. This
plat includes two lots, a new lot (Lot 1) at Main Street and 57th
Avenue and the existing Holiday Plus Store on Lot 2. The purpose
of the plat is to allow the construction of a convenience store
with motor fuel dispensing and a car wash on Lot l. Each lot meets
the minimum standards of the C-3 zoning district.
Mr. Hickok stated that the petitioner, Mr. David Hoeschen, has
agreed to move the access drive from its current location to a
location that aligns with the proposed driveway for the Steve Linn
development on the north side of Main Street. As part of the
street improvement plan for 57th Avenue, the access drive for this
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 7
lot will be shared with the larger Holiday site with cross parking
and cross access easements. Future access to 57th Avenue will be
restricted to the three access drives identified on the 57th Avenue
improvement plans.
Mr. Hickok stated that staff recommends approval of this
preliminary plat. The Planning Commission has concurred subject to
six stipulations which he outlined.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to approve preliminary plat request,
PS #98-01, with the following stipulations: (1) subject to
approval of Variance Request, VAR #98-03 and approval of Special
Use Permit, SP #98-01; (2) cross-parking and driveway easement
documents shall be prepared and recorded with the final plat at
Anoka County; (3) the petitioner shall dedicate all additional
right-of-way necessary to complete the 57th Avenue improvement
projects as shown on the City's improvement plan dated February 3,
1998; (4) the petitioner shall agree to restrict access to the
three locations shown on the City's plan for 57th Avenue
improvements dated February 3, 1998; (5) the petitioner shall pay
the required park dedication fee at time of building permit
issuance for the stationstore; and (6) the 1994 variance
stipulation requiring a clean-up/landscape plan for Lot 2, Block l,
Holiday North 2nd Addition, shall be completed, approved by City
staff, and plant materials installed prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the stationstore building. Seconded
by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously.
10. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #98-01, BY HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC.,
TO ALLOW A MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL OPERATION AND A MOTOR VEHICLE
WASH ESTABLISHMENT TO BE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THE HOLIDAY PLUS SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 242 57TH AVENUE
N.E. (WARD 3):
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request by
Mr. Hoeschen for a special use permit to allow both motor fuel
operations and a car wash on this Holiday Plus site at 242 57th
Avenue. This zoning district, C-3, General Shopping Center,
permits these uses with a special use permit. Mr. Hickok reviewed
the code requirements for operation of this type of facility.
Staff believes this special use permit is appropriate for this
location and recommends approval.
Mr. Hickok stated that the Planning Commission has concurred with
staff's recommendation for approval subject to nine stipulations,
which he outlined.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to grant Special Use Permit,
SP #98-01, with the following stipulations: (1) subject to approval
of Preliminary Plat Request, PS #98-01 and approval of Variance
Request, VAR #98-03; (2) all signs shall be reviewed and approved
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 8
by staff to assure compliance with Chapter 214 of the City Code;
(3) the petitioner shall submit a performance bond in the amount of
three percent of the construction costs prior to issuance of a
building permit; (4) the petitioner shall install underground
irrigation for the landscape areas surrounding the stationstore
site; (5) the petitioner shall comply with all outdoor storage
requirements; (6) the petitioner shall comply with all outdoor
sales and storage provisions of Chapter 205 of the City Code; (7)
the petitioner shall install all waste trap and filtration devices
as required by the Building Code for Car Wash facilities; (8) the
petitioner shall install adequate informational signage on-site to
assure proper flow of traffic around the building and to assure
that cars waiting to be washed do not block access from 57th Avenue
N.E.; and (9) the petitioner shall assure that all use of the
intercom on this site is for instructional and emergency purposes
only. Intercom volume shall be set so intercom messages do not
carry beyond stationstore property. Seconded by Councilman
Billings.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to modify Stipulation No. 9 by
deleting the first sentence and in the second sentence to change
the word "does" to "do." Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a
voice vote, Councilman Billings voted in favor of the motion.
Mayor Jorgenson, Councilwoman Bolkcom and Councilman Barnette voted
against the motion. Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion failed.
Councilman Barnette stated that at some stations there is outdoor
display of pop, salt pellets, and wood. If the storage is not
permitted at this location it also should apply to existing stores.
Mr. Hickok said that if stations have outdoor storage it becomes a
code enforcement issue.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that in regard to the intercom she
understands they will use it to welcome their customers. She
received a complaint on one of the other service stations, as they
were using their intercom to play music, and the neighbors
objected.
Mr. Hickok stated that the intercom is quite necessary for
emergency or instructional purposes. This stipulation is for the
intercom to be used for instructional and emergency purposes and
not to play music.
Councilman Billings questioned if it was the City's business
whether the service station was playing music. The stipulation
indicates that the intercom should not be audible off the property
that is more important than for what the intercom is being used.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that some people perceive music as
noise. She was in favor of using the intercom for emergencies and
instructional purposes.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 9
Mayor Jorgenson felt that music is a personal preference, but these
sounds can travel through a residential neighborhood. She also
felt the intercom should be used for instructional and emergency
purposes only.
Mr. Hickok stated that in terms
and welfare of the residents,
various opinions as to what is
troublesome area to control.
of protecting the health, safety
if music was allowed there are
audible. This then becomes a
Councilman Billings stated that the location of this station is in
a predominantly industrial/commercial area. However, he felt if
this station was located in a residential neighborhood he would
have a problem with the architectural features. The massive
amounts of white on the roof and canopy are part of the new
trademark for Holiday; however, it is very bright.
Mr. Dave Hoeschen, representing Holiday Stores, stated that he
would agree. Where Holiday stations abut residential neighborhoods
they make modifications. This architecture addresses how safe
their customers feel and what they are requesting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #98-03, BY HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC.,
TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETRACK FROM 80 FEET TO 66 FEET; TO
REDUCE THE SIDE CORNER SETRACK FROM 80 FEET TO 49 FEET; TO
REDUCE THE PARKING AREA SETRACK FROM 20 FEET TO 9 FEET ALONG
THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF 57TH AVENUE; ALL TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,690 SQUARE FOOT STATIONSTORE, FIVE GAS
PUMPS, CAR WASH, AND RECONFIGURATION OF THE PARKING AREA AT
THE HOLIDAY PLUS SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 242 57TH AVENUE
N.E. (WARD 3):
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this variance request
is to reduce the front yard setback from 80 feet to 66 feet along
the 57th Avenue right-of-way, to reduce the side corner setback
from 80 feet to 49 feet adjacent to the Main Street right-of-way,
and to reduce the front parking setbacks along 57th Avenue from 20
feet to 9 feet along the entire Holiday site (including the main
store). Mr. Linn's building (across the street from this site) has
a very similar setback. Mr. Hickok stated that as a result of
Holiday's design analysis, it was determined that the stationstore
should be constructed as close to 57th Avenue as possible. The
City has approved similar variance request in the past for the Linn
property and for Miller's Funeral Home. Staff recommends approval
of these variances with ten stipulations which he outlined. The
Appeals Commission has concurred with staff's recommendation.
Mr. Hickok stated that in regard to Stipulation No. 7, Holiday has
complied and shifted the entire building to the south.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 10
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to grant Variance Request, VAR
#98-03, with the following stipulations: (1) the enclosure for the
compressors, on the east elevation of the building, shall include
three (1 foot-6 inch x 1 foot-6 inch height necessary to match the
height of the screening fence) brick pilasters with a 4 inch pre-
cast concrete cap to match the new fence details that will be
placed along 57th Avenue. Also, the screening slats shall be
selected in a color that will match the new fence proposed along
57th Avenue NE; (2) subject to approval of PS #98-01 and approval
of SP #98-01; (3) landscape plan shall be modified to accommodate
the planned streetscape improvements along 57th Avenue NE. A new
landscape plan shall be submitted for staff review and approval
prior to issuance of the building permit; (4) the canopy signage
lights (facing north) shall be turned off by 10:00 p.m. until a new
commercial building is constructed on the northwest corner of 57th
Avenue and Main Street; (5) all parking islands south of the new
structure shall be configured in a manner that will allow a Fall
Golden Ash in each (except the island with the tank vents). All
vacuum and other additions to the island shall be situated in a
manner that will accommodate a tree; (6) the overhead door facing
57th Avenue shall be replaced by a pair of side hinged doors; (7)
the 25 foot drive aisle north of the proposed store shall be
shifted south 10 feet to accommodate the new 57th Avenue
streetscape and plantings; (8) create mock windows of a dimension
to match those on the plan submitted on February 18, 1998 and dated
February 18 by staff; (9) the 1994 variance stipulation requiring a
clean-up/landscape plan for the principal Holiday site shall be
completed, approved by City staff, and plant materials installed
prior to issuance of a certification of occupancy for the
stationstore building; and (10) recognition of a(City required)
variance to allow a nine foot parking setback along 57th Avenue.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette.
Councilman Billings asked if these variances apply to the new site
where the stationstore is constructed or the entire Holiday site.
Mr. Hickok stated that the two variances for the building setbacks
apply to the new site. The petitioner is in control of both of the
sites and the parking setback to nine feet is integrated across
both the stationstore site and the Holiday Plus site.
Councilman Billings stated that this variance request actually
involves two parcels of property, the stationstore and the Holiday
Plus site. He questioned if all stipulations and setbacks apply to
both sites.
Mr. Hickok stated that the parking setback applies to all the
property along 57th Avenue; however, the other variances are very
specific to the stationstore site. The subdivision separates the
two pieces of property, and it becomes very clear that the
stationstore site is the one being addressed. It is not the intent
of staff to have any stipulations, other than the one concerning
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 11
the parking setback, apply to both the stationstore site and
Holiday Plus site.
Councilman Billings stated that this discussion should be part of
the record so it is clear to any future owner as to how these
variances apply. He asked if these variances would be recorded at
the County against both pieces of property.
Mr. Hickok stated that they would be recorded against both parcels.
Councilman Billings stated that he understands it is staff's intent
to correct a situation that the City and the County are causing by
the improvement of 57th Avenue.
Mayor Jorgenson questioned the internal traffic patterns.
Mr. Hickok stated that each of the access points were designed for
two way traffic. The main access drive would be enhanced by having
a new drive aisle. The circulation of traffic will not be
diminished in the parking lot.
Councilman Billings assumed that the south side of the site will be
improved so there will not be grass growing out of the cracks in
the asphalt.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor
Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR HOLIDAY COMPANIES,
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 250 57TH AVENUE N.E. (WARD 3):
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that the City Code
requires that when a complex has three or more tenants a
comprehensive sign plan needs to be approved for the development.
He submitted a drawing of the proposed sign plan. Gander Mountain
is becoming a new element of Holiday Plus and is included on the
sign plan. Staff recommends approval of the comprehensive sign
plan with the exception of the pylon sign proposed along I-694, as
this would exceed the signage allowed.
Mr. Hoeschen, representing Holiday Stores, stated he expects that
the new tenants will want a pylon sign adjacent to the freeway.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to approve the comprehensive sign
plan for Holiday Companies, with the exception of the free standing
pylon sign. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried
unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 12
13. SITE PLAN AND MASTER PLAN APPROVAL AMENDMENT, MPA #98-01, BY
MEPC AMERICAN PROPERTIES, INC., TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN AND
REVISED MASTER PLAN TO PERMIT A ONE-STORY, 106,705 SQUARE FOOT
FLEX BUILDING FOR HIGH TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES ON A TEN-ACRE SITE
AT THE WESTERN END OF THE FRIDLEY EXECUTIVE CENTER PROPERTY,
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF I-694 AND HIGHWAY
65 (WARD 1) :
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that there are
several items before Council this evening related to the Lake
Pointe technology center. These include approval of the site plan
and master plan amendment, a preliminary plat request to create a
ten acre lot for the proposed development, a special use permit for
a nine foot wide parking stall in the redevelopment area, and a
special use permit to allow a parking area inside the R-1 zoning
line. A video was presented on buildings in Golden Valley and Eden
Prairie which are similar to the one proposed in Fridley.
Ms. Dacy stated that the exterior of the building would be brick in
a sandy rose color with tan accents. The majority or about three-
fourths of the buildings will be finished for Class A office space
and one-fourth for storage or production. High tech uses are
proposed, and the loading areas to the rear are smaller than what
would be found at a manufacturing facility. The developer is
proposing two wing walls to limit the view of the loading area.
Ms. Dacy stated that the property is zoned S-2; however, there is a
narrow strip of R-1 zoning that still exists and that contains the
buffer area. The site plan is for a 106,705 square foot one-story
high tech building on the west ten acres. This would leave room
for a multi-story office building or 250,000 square feet of office
space in two buildings, each with 125,000 square feet, and a multi-
story ramp to serve these two buildings.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff requested that the developer provide a
drawing on the appearance of the building from I-694. She
presented the computer graphic from the elevation at the
interchange of Highway 65 and explained that the metal roof screen
will adequately screen the HVAC equipment. A three foot arbor
vitae hedge was proposed as part of the landscaping plan in the
buffer area along the north edge of the development. There would
also be a retention pond in the southwest portion of the site which
meets all the storm requirements for this site of development. The
required parking requirements have also been met.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission reviewed these
requests on February 18 and recommended approval of all the items.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) considered the site
plan and amendment to the Master Plan on February 19. The HRA
recommended approval of the site plan and amendment to the Master
Plan; however, there was discussion on the roof plan. Staff
recommended additional screening on the roof, but the HRA suggested
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 13
that this not be included, as the requirement was unrealistic and
not practical.
Councilman Billings asked if the ponding on the west side is for
this ten acres only or for the entire parcel.
Ms. Dacy stated that the ponding is for this ten acres only. There
will be additional ponding needed as the site is developed.
Councilman Billings stated that this building would cover about
half the acreage of the entire site. The original proposal was to
have multi-story buildings. He asked for an explanation of this
change.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that in January, the HRA recognized
that the City has worked, without success, to attract multi-story
corporate office space for this site. After reviewing the
economics of corporate office space versus tech flex, it was
determined, for at least part of the site, that the City would head
in the direction of tech flex. It was felt that the City wanted to
recoup some of the investment before the tax increment district
expired. Tax increment allows the City to use the increment
generated from improvements on the property to fund allowable
improvements on the site which makes it easier for a developer to
develop the site.
Councilman Billings asked how much the HRA has invested in this
site and what increment will be generated.
Mr. Burns stated that about $7.5 million has been invested in the
site. Ms. Dacy stated that the estimated annual taxes are
approximately $1,462,000 and will generate about $5.1 million in
tax increment, if this building is constructed this year and
assuming construction of Phase II of the development.
Councilman Billings stated that at the July meeting of the HRA it
was clear that this building would take up over half the site.
Ms. Dacy stated that the lot area was not discussed, but the
developer has submitted site plans. The option discussed in July
was two, 50,000 square foot buildings which may have encompassed
more area than this proposal.
Councilman Billings said he asked
discussion about constructing one
at a later date. He stated
discussion to this effect.
at the July meeting if there was
building and the second building
that as he recalls, there was
Ms. Dacy stated that she did not specifically recall this
discussion, but she has seen several site plans. The developer
suggested starting with this one-story concept of a mixed use for
tech flex which could be used by one company. In the Phase II
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 14
development, a company could then have their corporate offices
constructed.
Councilman Billings asked how this proposal went from two to one
building.
Ms. Dacy stated that the developer indicated they felt 100,000
square feet was the right size for the market, and this design
seemed to work better for leasing the site. This building would
provide for four finished sides and would be screened on three of
the sides with a saw tooth design on the corners.
Councilman Billings stated that, at this point, the HRA felt the
City had waited long enough for multi-story and were not going to
get four multi-story buildings on that site.
Ms. Dacy stated that the concern was this type of building offered
a Class A environment and would not be inconsistent with the multi-
story phase. The market is right for these types of companies.
Councilman Billings asked how many different organizations have
been approached by the HRA and the developer to construct projects
on this site before going with this proposal.
Ms. Dacy stated that in the mid-1980's the HRA executed a
development contract with Woodbridge. Unfortunately, development
did not take place due to the economic conditions.
Councilman Billings stated that several years ago MEPC came in with
their own master plan for three buildings which was a change in the
master plan from 1987. He asked how many different companies MEPC
has contacted and why they feel they are unable to accomplish the
mission they set out to do several years ago.
Ms. Dacy stated that MEPC did a lot of work and submitted at least
seven proposals to major companies. MEPC also made other contacts
regarding the commercial site and potential hotel and bank site.
There were a number of issues, one being that this site is away
from other similar developments. There was also a concern
regarding the location. Chief executive officers had a preference
for locations to the west or south. She felt it was hard for MEPC
to initially overcome those type of images. The one asset the site
has is excellent access and visibility.
Mr. Burns stated that there are a greater number of projects in the
tech flex category than in the corporate area. There are not that
many corporate office projects. Another issue was the economics.
This kind of project is much more favorable for the City and HRA
than the multi-story office building. The developer was willing to
build speculatively for this tech flex space, but he was not
willing to gamble on speculative space for a corporate office
development.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 15
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked if the lack of access limited
corporations from building on this site.
Mr. Burns stated he felt the issues outlined by Ms. Dacy were more
prevalent than the access. There is not a lot of executive housing
in the immediate area to compliment the corporate offices.
Ms. Dacy stated that the tech flex building can house companies
that are expanding and growing to the point that a multi-story
office building would not be out of the question for corporate
headquarters. The City Council and the HRA control the master
plan, the amendment, and what would occur on the rest of the site.
Ms. Dacy stated that to get back to the original vision for this
site, it was contemplated that there would be two buildings and the
parking ramps. The HRA would have had to use the tax increment to
construct the parking ramps.
Mayor Jorgenson asked how much increment from the remaining
thirteen years of the district would have gone toward constructing
the parking ramps.
Ms. Dacy stated that the cost for constructing the ramps would be
$15 million. In the original concept for the multi-story buildings
and parking ramps, there was a net cost of $3.4 million which would
result in a negative balance. In this proposal, there would be a
positive balance of $2.4 million.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that the City would be money ahead by going
to the single-story building and not constructing parking ramps.
Mr. Burns stated that with the original proposal, the City would
have to contribute the parking ramps and the land. In this
proposal there would be revenue from the land and no cost for the
parking ramps.
Councilman Billings stated that he has received telephone calls
regarding traffic in the adjacent residential neighborhoods. He
asked how many entrances and exits there would be to this site.
Ms . Dacy stated that there would be two, one at Lake Pointe Drive
and Highway 65 and the other on the west end at Seventh Street and
Lake Pointe Drive. There would be less traffic with this proposal,
as there would be less space and not as many employees.
Councilman Billings stated that if traffic was backed up on Highway
65, probably the only street that would be affected would be West
Moore Lake Drive which people may use as an alternate. Seventh
Street has always been viewed as a minor entrance and exit to this
site. If an assessment was made as to whether this building will
have a positive or negative impact on traffic, he assumed it would
be positive rather than negative.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 16
Mr. Dave Jellison, MEPC, stated that the question has been raised
as to why they are constructing one building versus two. He felt
that a 100,000 square foot building would be more marketable versus
a 50,000 square foot building. The buildings they have marketed in
other cities are about 90,000 square feet in size. In the 1980's
companies wanted to update their image. Now they want to keep
their costs down. There has not been a multi-level parking ramp
built in the cities in the 1990's.
Mr. Jellison stated that road construction will be proceeding, and
improvements will be not be completed until 1999. These things are
a concern, and they will have to work at ways of getting people
into this site. He felt they have some ideas that will not disrupt
the neighborhoods and allow access.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that she understood the building would
be constructed, but until there is a tenant, the inside would not
be finished. She asked if construction would begin before the
intersection improvements are completed.
Mr. Jellison stated that they would like to begin construction this
summer. They want to be sure they can get traffic to the site.
Hopefully, they will have tenants the first part of 1999.
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked if their sites in other communities have
residential properties in close proximity.
Mr. Jellison stated that in Golden Valley to the north of their
site, there are some very expensive condominiums. He felt that
most of the people are happy with their project. These residents
also had the same concerns as Fridley residents about the traffic.
Residents on the north of the site will not have to look at a
parking ramp, as there will be landscaping and a service parking
lot.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that she has heard a lot of positive
comments about this plan. Several people made reference to the
larger corporate office users in the City. She asked if any of the
corporations in Fridley could build on this site if they wanted to.
Ms. Dacy stated it is possible that someone could build either a
corporate office or manufacturing facility, depending if Council
approved it.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that several residents to the north are
concerned about manufacturing on this site. The type of company
locating in a tech flex building would be a design and engineering
company versus a smaller company that will have a full fledged
manufacturing facility.
Mr. Jellison stated that the buildings would not be designed with
24-foot high ceilings which are required for manufacturing. The
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 17
operations would be very clean with companies probably involved in
technological research.
Councilman Billings stated that he wanted to make sure that the
taxes are paid on the building even though the space may not be
leased. He asked if there are other tech flex type buildings in
Fridley.
Mr. Jellison stated that the East River Road Business Center is an
example of a tech flex building. Others are located in the
northern portion of the City.
Councilman Billings stated that there are vacancies in the East
River Road Business Center, as well as other similar facilities.
He questioned how companies can be attracted to this facility.
Mr. Jellison stated that he felt the design and color of the
buildings, with the glass, is excellent and will attract possible
tenants. There would be sufficient parking available to expand
office space. The site would be visible and the type of user they
would attract is a company that wants a good working atmosphere for
their employees.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Jellison if he felt that once this
single story building is constructed that it would set a precedent
and the city will end up with two single story buildings on the
site.
Mr. Jellison stated that he does not believe this building will
detract from an office tower. He felt the City had a certain
clientele for each of the prototypes, and this building would be
compatible with corporate offices. In a multi-use park, he did not
think there would be a problem with either one.
Councilman Billings asked if there are any assurances that there
would not be a service door or access point to the building.
Mr. Jellison stated that there is the possibility of having a
service door at some time in the future.
Councilman Billings stated that he would like to discourage an
access point so that there is a solid wall.
Councilman Billings stated that buildings are often appraised based
on the cash flow analysis. He asked if there is anything in the
development agreement that locks the City into a value on this
building. He felt that if it is vacant, the value should not go
down.
Mr. Jellison stated that they are agreeing to a minimum value in
the development agreement.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 18
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked if American Properties will be sold.
Mr. Jellison stated that the entire American Properties is for
sale. They have had no shortage of buyers, but he could not be
sure what would happen. Some of the best corporations in America
are considering purchasing the company.
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked if this would have a negative impact on
the project.
Mr. Jellison stated that this package would be put together and
taken to the Board to request approval to proceed with the project.
Councilman Barnette stated that this plan is for the one-story tech
flex building. In Phase II, hopefully, there would be some office
buildings and, in Phase III there may be a hotel and restaurant.
He asked if the site would support a second one-story building
excluding the idea of a hotel and restaurant.
Mr. Jellison stated that if the City decided to proceed with two
the high tech buildings and attracted clientele, it would be
possible to proceed with a hotel and restaurant on the site. He
has been dealing with one major user for this site, and they have
had specific requests regarding the hotel. Once this project is
under way and finalized, if this user wants to proceed with the
site, he felt something could be finalized for a hotel and possibly
one or two restaurants. He would not exclude this idea.
Mr. William Nee, 219 Logan Parkway, stated that when he read the
article in Focus News, he was very upset. He felt the City was
being well-served by this Council, staff, the HRA, as well as all
of the citizen groups. It is with reluctance that he decided he
should speak. He felt the community would be best served if the
City stopped and looked at what they were trying to accomplish on
this parcel and what they will be actually doing. He always felt
there was room for a mix on this site that made sense.
Mr. Nee stated that when he moved to Fridley, Jim Klobuchar made
the City synonymous with dog patch, and years were spent proving
that to be a lie. This is the last piece of land where Fridley can
make a statement to the metropolitan area about who we are, what we
are about, and what we stand for. He felt it deserved a new look
to make the people of Fridley proud. He was not entirely sure that
this tech flex building would be out of the question. He felt it
would use too much land. He recalled that Ms. Dacy said that 75
percent was office. This means it could be four or five stories
high and one-quarter of the footprint, with manufacturing on the
first floor.
Ms. Dacy stated that the building could be four stories tall. The
issue is that one-story provides tech flex space which is popular
in the market for the technological companies. These are the
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 19
companies which are expanding. Some of these companies are moving
out of the taller office buildings. From the site plan
perspective, if it is one or four stories, the site can accommodate
it. The City is trying to attract industry but still not detract
from corporate office space.
Mr. Jellison stated that companies do not want four or five story
buildings with manufacturing on the first floor. They want 50,000
to 60,000 square feet of floor space without any elevation. If you
do not have elevators or a lot of common areas, it keeps costs
down.
Councilman Barnette stated that he felt, with Bill Nee being here,
it is like E. F. Hutton, when he talks everyone listens . Bill Nee
brought the pictures that Woodbridge had given Council and gave the
drawings to everyone. This was the vision the City had for this
property. It would be great to have four or five multi-story
buildings on this site. However, in listening to all the people
the HRA, the Planning Commission, and staff, things have changed.
This proposal is not necessarily what he would like for this site,
but economics drive business. Apparently, the economic market is
for the single story tech flex building. The City has been
sitting on the property for a long time already and probably should
sit on it longer. However, in looking at the HRA's decision, there
was total approval. Councilman Barnette stated that he truly
appreciated Bill Nee coming here to voice his concerns.
Mr. Nee stated that the remark in Focus News bothers him where it
was stated that, almost in despair, this may be the best we can do.
He understands the inclination and the desire to get a building on
the property, but there are some things the people of Fridley
expect, such as a good hotel and several enterprises that create
excitement and polish the City's image. He felt there was an easy
market to do the kind of selling that MEPC does. He did not know
if anyone else would be interested, but he thought United was the
best of those interested in marketing the property, as they are
sales people. He is not convinced that MEPC are sales people. He
felt it was worth it to stop and take another look and request the
developer to try to get something that works for the people of
Fridley, as well as for their firm and some of the firms the City
hopes to have participate in the community. He asked that these
requests be denied and that Mr. Jellison go back to the drawing
board to see if he can come closer to helping the City realize
their goals.
Mayor Jorgenson thanked Mr. Nee for coming to speak to the City
Council.
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked if there is a time frame for Council to
take action.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 20
Ms. Dacy stated that the sixty-day action period will expire
March 17.
MOTION by Councilman Billings t
the Planning Commission and Hou
approve amendment, MPA #98-01,
the following stipulations:
shall be submitted and approvec
of the property; (2) all uses =
the following list of permi
associated with corporate/Clas:
high technology uses, hot
banks/financial institutions, C
Section 205.03.59 of the zoning
uses as specifically approved
individual building after const
to those uses identified in
review and approve each use
architectural plans of each bui
� concur with the recommendation of
>ing and Redevelopment Authority and
to the 1996 Master Plan subject to
(1) appropriate plat applications
prior to each phase of development
n the development shall comply with
=ted uses: office uses typically
A office developments, office and
el and conference facilities,
lass III restaurants as defined in
code, daycare facilities; and other
by the City. Uses allowed in each
ruction will be the same or similar
=his application. The City shall
prior to occupancy; (3) detailed
ldina shall be submitted durina the
plat application process; or if a plat is not required, plans shall
be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the City prior to issuance
of a building permit. The type of materials used on the exterior
walls shall be approved by the City; (4) a comprehensive signage
plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to
issuance of the first building permit based on the plan dated
March 29, 1996 and addressing the following issues: (A) wall signs
(building identification and tenant signage) shall meet the wall
sign requirement of the sign code; (B) no free-standing pylon signs
are permitted; (C) height, width, illumination and type of all
signs shall be clearly identified; (D) two free-standing project
identifier (D) signs are permitted, the size and height to be
approved by the city Council; (E) all free-standing signs shall be
set back ten feet from property lines; and (F) the petitioner shall
receive a sign permit prior to installation of each sign; (5) the
petitioner shall work with the City in preparing transportation
demand strategies to promote ride-sharing and transit use to the
property; (6) twelve to fifteen foot light standards shall be
installed along Bridgewater Drive adjacent to the residential area.
Sodium high pressure lights shall be used for the parking lot
lights and street lights; (7) appropriate permits from the Rice
Creek Watershed District, Six Cities Watershed Management
Organization and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for storm
water management and grading shall be obtained prior to the
issuance of a building permit. Detailed engineering plans and
calculations shall be submitted in conjunction with plat
applications and building permit applications for review and
approval by the City; (8) when appropriate, MEPC shall accept the
transfer of the Indirect Source Permit from the HRA; (9) detailed
landscaping plans shall be submitted in conjunction with plat and
building permit application. Ten to twelve foot evergreens shall
be installed along the north wall of the proposed parking ramp.
The detailed landscaping shall be based on the concept plan dated
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 21
March 29, 1996. An irrigation plan shall also be submitted at the
time of building permit issuance; and (10) park fees shall be paid
prior to initiation of construction of the first development on the
site. Easements shall be dedicated at time of plat approval over
the existing bikeway/walkway areas. Seconded by Councilman
Barnette.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the
motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission and Housing and Redevelopment Authority and
approve the site plan for the Lake Pointe Technology Center with
the following stipulations: (1) the proposed colors of the
exterior materials shall be approved by the Planning Commission,
HRA, and City Council; (2) the plat and special use permit requests
shall be approved; (3) the petitioner shall comply with the
requirements of the HRA's development contract; (4) the 33 existing
perimeter trees shall be protected during construction. The
petitioner shall transplant as many trees as possible from the
interior of the site to other areas on or off site as approved by
staff; (5) the petitioner shall construct metal panel rooftop
screen as indicated on the plans dated January 16, 1998. The
petitioner shall also incorporate additional screening (vegetation
or other materials) on the roof of the building if required by the
City as part of the site plan review for the multi-story office
development; (6) the sign plan dated January 16, 1998 shall be
amended to replace the wall panel signs with a plan to provide a
sign with individual letters; and (7) the petitioner shall comply
with the Engineering Department requirements as stated in the memo
dated January 26, 1998. Seconded by Councilman Barnette.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to delete the second sentence of
Stipulation No. 5. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried
unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, P.S. #98-02, BY MEPC AMERICAN
PROPERTIES, INC., TO CREATE A TEN-ACRE LOT FOR A 106,705
SQUARE FOOT, ONE-STORY FLEX BUILDING AND TO CREATE OUTLOTS FOR
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND TO DEDICATE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AT THE
FRIDLEY EXECUTIVE CENTER PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF I-694 AND HIGHWAY 65 (WARD 1):
MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission and approve preliminary plat request,
P.S. #98-02, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner
shall execute the City Storm water Pond Maintenance Agreement and
record it along with the filing of the final plat at Anoka County;
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 22
(2) the petitioner shall prepare and dedicate final bikeway/walkway
easements in Lot 1 along Lake Pointe Drive and record the
easements, along with filing the plat at Anoka County; (3) the
petitioner shall pay the park dedication fees of $36,137.81 at time
of building permit issuance for the Lake Pointe Technology Center;
and (4) the Special Use Permit request and the site plan and master
plan requests shall be approved. Seconded by Councilman Barnette.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the
motion carried unanimously.
15. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #98-02, BY MEPC AMERICAN
PROPERTIES, INC., TO PERMIT NINE-FOOT WIDE PARKING SPACES:
AND
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #98-03, BY MEPC AMERICAN
PROPERTIES, INC., TO PERMIT A PORTION OF THE DRIVE AISLE OF
THE PARKING AREA WITHIN AN R-1 ZONING DISTRICT AT THE FRIDLEY
EXECUTIVE CENTER PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF I-694 AND HIGHWAY 65 (WARD 1):
MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission and grant Special Use Permit Request,
SP #98-02. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission and grant Special Use Permit Request,
SP #98-03. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried
unanimously.
1. RESOLUTION NO. 15-1998 AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER, WILLIAM W.
BURNS, TO SIGN THE GRANT AGREEMENT END GRANT ("THE GRANT
CONTRACT") FOR THE YOUTH INITIATIVE GRANT AS REPRESENTATIVE OF
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that she was concerned that the City
allow the youth to do some of the work. She wanted to make sure
that the City listens to their input, right down to the interior
decorating. She felt the architect was more interested in doing
the project than having the youth participate.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that she concurs with Councilwoman Bolkcom's
comments.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that one of the goals is youth
involvement. Staff is still investigating the possibility of
letting the youth do the mural and some cabinet work. Jack Kirk,
Recreation and Natural Resources Director, is contacting people.
He felt the City was headed in that direction.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1998 PAGE 23
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt Resolution No. 15-1998.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously.
16. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Jack Kirk was to present an
update on the Community Education Center after this regular
meeting. He also hoped to discuss the Council/Commissions survey.
He stated that Mr. Flora was informed today that the County wants
to remove parking on Old Central Avenue.
Mr. Flora stated that the County wants to remove parking on the
first 200 meters on Old Central Avenue that is involved with the
Lake Pointe improvement project. They would like a letter from the
City Council indicating their support.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that this improvement project will not move
forward as planned. She asked how much work would be done in 1998.
Mr. Flora stated that what will probably happen this year is
removal of the median and bypass paving, as well as starting the
intersection work at Highway 65 and Lake Pointe Drive. He thought
the I-694 ramps would be done in 1999. There are a lot of agencies
involved in this project. They also need to meet both Federal and
State requirements. It was the consensus of the City Council that
this issue be placed on the agenda for March 16 and that the
residents affected be notified.
Mayor Jorgenson reminded everyone of the caucuses on Tuesday,
March 3. If there are any questions they can call the City Clerk
at 572-3523.
ADJOURNMENT :
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting.
Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all votin
Jorgenson declared the motion carried unanimously and
Meeting of the Fridley City Council of March 2, 1998
11:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Seconded by
g aye, Mayor
the Regular
adjourned at
Carole Haddad Nancy J. Jorgenson
Secretary to the City Council Mayor