Loading...
11/22/1999 - 4667� � o°�r FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Monday, Navembe�c 22, 1999 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ITEM rr.Twrm wTaiurt+ /r+T.T,��l?T.V1 ADDRESS NUMBER 0 � . �., 0 � � QT7 OF FRIOLEY William W. Burns MEMORANDIIM CityManager Nlemorandum to: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: William W. Burns, City Nlanager �'�► '� � Subject: Presentation by Bill Morris, Decision Resources Date: November 22, 1999 Bill Nlorris, Decision Resources, will be present at Monday night's meeting to present the 1999 Fridley Citizen Survey results. WWB:ch � � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 CRY OF FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of November 8, 1999 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: 1. Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Sectian 12.06 of the City Charter Declaring Certain Real Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing the Sale Thereof (Ward 1) - ...................... 1 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: 2. Receive the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 3, 1999 ....................................................... 3- 22 3. Approve Disposition of Tax Forfeit Properties Located in the City of Fridley ........................................................ 23 - 39 4. Resolution Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for the December 14, 1999, Special Election ............................ .. 40 - 42 5. Establish a Public Hearing for December 13, 1999, for the Construction of a Noise Wall on the West Side of University Avenue N.E. from 44th Avenue North to I-694 .................................:................. 43 6. Establish a Public Hearing for December 13, 1999, for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant....................................................................................... M 44 - 45 7. Motion to Authorize Advertisement for Bids for a New Fire Engine for the Fire Department ............................. 46 S ■ R FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22. 1999 PAGE 3 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): 8. Claims ....................................................................................... 47 L � ` . 9. Licenses .............................................:......................................... 48 - 51 10. Estimates ...................................................................................... 52 - 73 � ADOPTION OF AGENDA. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of Items not on Agenda —15 Minutes) NEW BUSINESS: , 11. Informal Status Reports ................................................................ 74 d I _ ADJOURN. �. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 �o��� � ,L���� > �� QiY OF FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or hazass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of November 8, 1999 I�--�l �-� �-�,�-� APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: OLD BUSINESS: � 1���.�,� �� '� iL,,,,,� � �econd Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.06 of the City Charter Declaring Certain Real Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing the Sale There (Ward 1) .............. ........ ..��. ... 1 - 2 ����� NEW BUSINESS: 2 Receive the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 3, 1999 ..... 3- 22 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): 4. Resolution Designating Polling Places and Appointing Election Judges for the December 14, 1999, Special Election ............................... 40 - 42 9� Establish a Public Hearing for December 13, 1999, for the Construction of a Noise Wall on the West Side of University Avenue N.E. from 44�' Avenue No�th to I-694 .. 43 6. Establish a Public Hearing for December 13, 1999, for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant................................... 44 - 45 Motion to Authorize Advertisement for Bids for a New Fire Engine for the Fire Department ................................. 46 �-a� �� /�-� �s�- 3. Approve Disposition of Tax Forfeit Properties Located in the City of Fridley ....... 23 - 39 8. Claims 47 r .�. a - _ y„ FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): 9. Licenses ................................... 48 - 51 10. Estimates ................................... 52 - 73 ADOPTION OF AGENDA. �� � �� �� �'� j'�n D U C� �`"� (� � � �._ '9 � �IM-✓� . OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of Items not on Agenda —15 Minutes) �, IrJ f I�°��-'' .� ro��e w�5 NEW BUSINESS: 11. Informal Status Reports ............... 7 5�.,..-�- s S P�' ^�- �� �-� {,f� ADJOURN. C/j •_pU �, v�n. � ��� �� 0 THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF NOVEMBER 8, 1999 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at 7:34 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember Billings, Councilmember Wolfe, and Councilmember Bolkcom MEMBERS ABSENT: None STATEMENT OF MEETING CONDUCT: Please be reminded that those present at today's meeting may hold a variety of views and opinions regarding the business to be conducted. The exercise of democracy through representative local government requires that ALL points of view be accommodated at these' proceedings. It is further expected that a standard of mutual courtesy and respectfulness be exercised by all in attendance, through our individual expression, manner of speaking, and conduct. Therefore, please receive the views of others with the same degree of courtesy and respect which you desire to be given your views and opinions. Any departures " from this standard will be addressed by the Presiding Officer through whatever means are deemed appropriate. Thank you for your attendance at today's meeting, and your agreement to abide by these standards of personal conduct. PROCLAMATION: COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING DAY - NOVEMBER 8, 1999 Mayor Jorgenson read the proclamation declaring November 8, 1999, as Community and Regional Planning Day in conjunction with the worldwide celebration of World Town Planning Day. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the City of Fridley Community Development Department won the NLC Award recently on putting together the "Rambler Planning Book, a Citizens Guide to Remodeling Their Home." The National League of Cities will present the award at their conference in California on Friday, December 3, 1999. Mayor Jorgenson congratulated Ms. Dacy and the Community Development Department for a j ob well done. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER S, 1999 PAGE 2 Ms. Dacy, Director of Community Development, thanked Mayor Jorgenson. Ms. Dacy thanked the Council for declaring November 8, 1999 as Community and Regional Planning Day. They are beginning the Comprehensive Plan process. They have produced a preliminary first draft and want to invite the public to an open house on Thursday, November 18, in Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 beginning at 7:00 p.m. The City would like feedback regarding how they are translating what was said to them a year ago into the plan today. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COtJNCIL MEETING — OCTOBER 25, 1999: MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the City Council October 25, 1999 meeting minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: 1. RECEIVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20, 1999: RECEIVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20,1999. 2. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #99-11 BY TED MATTKE MATTKE ENGINEERING INC. FOR WAL-MART STORES INC FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO THE OUTDOOR GARDEN CENTER GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8450 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a motion to approve a special use permit for Wal-Mart for a proposed addition to their outdoor garden center. Wal-Mart was seeking to expand their outdoor garden center by 4,445 square feet. While the addition will result in the loss of twelve parking spaces, staff felt that overall, levels of parking were adequate to handle this loss. The Planning Commission approved the special use permit that would make this expansion possible at their October 20 meeting. Staff recommended Council's concurrence with the issuance of the permit subject to the following stipulations: 1) All building permits be obtained prior to start of construction, 2) City reserves the right to require additional parking at the code required 1/150 ratio, � ' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF NOVEMBER 8 1999 PAGE 3 should demand warrant it at any time in the future; 3) Parking islands displaced by the expansion shall be relocation as indicated on the site plan submitted by Mattke Engineering, dated August 13, 1999; 4) No garden sales shall occur in the parking lot; 5) No products for sale may be displayed on the sidewalk; 6) There shall be no outside storage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides; 7) Bulk items shall be screened from the public right-of-way; 8) Proposed expansion shall be constructed of the same materials as, and be architecturally consistent with existing building; and 9) SP #99-11 shall replace SP #92-07 and SP #94-14. APPROVED SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #99-11. 3. RESOLUTION NO 89-1999 APPROVING A VACATION, SAV #99-05, VACATING A PORTION OF THE UNIVERSITY AVENUE SERVICE DRIVE (BY MARC RICEI: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Marc Rice, the owner of an 18-unit apartment complex at 6111 Star Lane, requested the vacation of a 1.03 acre portion of the University Avenue Service Drive that dead ends at his property. Since the service drive will not be extended to 615` Avenue due to its proximity to University Avenue, staff recommended approval of the request. The vacated property will be used by Marc Rice to provide additional parking for his tenants. � The request was approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting on October 20, 1999. Staff recommended Council's concurrence with the following stipulations: 1) Staff shall approve the design and location of garbage dumpster and recycling container enclosure prior to Council granting the street vacation; 2) The petitioner shall enclose the dumpster and recycling container by November 1, 2000; and 3) The petitioner shall agree to convey any necessary easements in the area to be vacated as determined by staff. APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 89-1999. 4. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEROF (WARD 11: Mr. Burns stated that this ordinance authorizes the sale of the 1.03 acre property discussed in Item 3 to Marc Rice for $1.00. Staff recommended Council's approval. WAIVED THE READING AND APPROVED THE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING. � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETTNG OF NOVEMBER 8 1999 PAGE 4 5. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO 1 TO THE LIOUOR STORE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 326• Mr. Burns stated that when staff prepared estimates for this project, they looked at area to be covered rather than to topography. After the contract was bid, it was discovered that the existing lot drained poorly and that a lot of the existing asphalt had to be replaced. In fact, the contractor, Diversified Paving, used more than twice the amount of patching leveling mix that was in our estimate. The cost of this additional work is $10,207.70. Staff recommended Council's approval for a change order for this amount. APPROVED CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE LIQUOR STORE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 326. 6. RESOLUTION NO 90-1999 REOUESTING FUNDING FROM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR TRUNK HIGHWAY 65 CAUSEWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM CENTRAL AVENUE TO 63RD AVENUE AND AGREEING TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT IF SAID FUNDING IS PROVIDED: Mr. Burns stated that this resolution authorizes the City to make application for funding from MnDOT's Metro Division. The source is their FY 2001 Municipal Agreement program for locally administered construction projects involving a trunk highway. By' authorizing the resolution, Council would be agreeing to complete the project if funding is provided. The project would add additional north and southbound lanes on Highway 65 between Interstate 694 and a point just north of 63�d Avenue. Staff recommended Council's approval. APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 90-1999. 7• RESOLUTION NO. 91-1999 AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN COMPENSATION AND CHANGES IN CERTAIN BENEFITS FOR THE 2000 CALENDAR YEAR: Mr. Burns stated that staff recommended a three percent increase in salaries and related fringe benefits for employees not in a collective bargaining unit. This is the same increase that is included in our year 2000 contracts for bargaining unit employees. The resolution also includes a three percent increase in applicable automobile allowances. If approved theses increases will take effect for work performed in 2000. Staff recommended Council's approval. APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 91-1999. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 92-1999 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-1999 CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION ON AMENDING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 409, ORDINANCE NO 1130• FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF NOVEMBER 8 1999 PAGE 5 Mr. Burns stated that Councilmember Billings has requested that the ballot language for the franchise fee referendum be changed to include the names of the two utilities, NSP and Minnegasco. His intention is to make it clear that the City is applying its proposed franchise fee to these two utilities and to no others. If approved, the ballot language will be changed as follows: Current language: "Shall the Fridley City Code be amended to impose a franchise fee on all entities providing electric and gas service in accordance with the franchise agreement entered between the City and each utility provider?" Proposed language: "Shall the Fridley City Code be amended to impose franchise fees on Northern States Power Company (NSP) and Minnegasco (now known as Reliant Energy) in the manner permitted in the franchise agreement between the City of Fridley and those two utility companies? ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-1999. 9. APPROVE APPOIINTMENT TO APPEALS COMMISSION: Mr. Burns stated that staff recommended the appointment of Jon M. Tynjala to the position on the City's Appeals Commission recently vacated by Terrie Mau. Mr. Tynjala resides at 1581 Rice Creek Road in Fridley. Staff recommended Council's approval. APPOINTED JON M. TYNJALA TO THE POSITION ON THE APPEALS COMMISSION. 10. CLAIMS: AUTHORIZED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NUMBERS 90054 THROUGH 90243. 11. LICENSES: APPROVED LICENSES AS ON FILE WITH THE LICENSE CLERK. 12. ESTIMATES: APPROVED THE ESTIMATES AS FOLLOWS: Frederic W. Knaak, Esq. Holstad and Knaak, P.L.C. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55110 Services rendered as City Attorney for the Month of October, 1999 $ 5,000.00 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF NOVEMBER 8,1999 PAGE 6 Park Construction Co. 7900 Beech Street N.E. Minneapolis, NIN 55432-1795 Riverview Heights Area Improvement Project No. ST. 1999-1 Estimate No. 7 Diversified Paving, Inc. 8019-146`'' Avenue N.W. Ramsey, MN 55303 Municipal Liquor Store Parking Lot Improvement Project No. 326 Estimate No. 1 Ron Kassa Construction 6005-250`� East Elko, MN 55020 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb Gutter and Sidewalk Project Number 322 Estimate No. 7 Lund Martin Construction, Inc. 3023 Randolph Street N.E. Minneapolis MN 55418 Liquor Store Project Estimate No. 2 Carl J. Newquist, Esq. Newquist & Ekstrom Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of August, 1999 $384,582.56 $ 43,067.28 $ 7,089.52 $278,820.00 $ 18,054.40 Mayor Jorgenson asked if there were any questions from the public on any of the consent agenda items. No persons in the audience spoke regarding the proposed consent agenda items. k FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVENIBER 8, 1999 PAGE 7 ` Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the project on Highway 65 was approved, if the neighbors would still have an opportunity to have input. Council is only approving implementing the plan, but the plan has yet to be clarified. Mr. Burns states that this was an attempt to get metropolitan MnDOT funding for the project. Mayor Jorgenson asked if they specifically names NSP, and in the event of electric deregulation, would that limit the ability to collect franchise fees on electric meters that did not belong to NSP. Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, stated that it would not. MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the consent agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adopt the agenda with the addition of the following item: Receive Bids and Award Contract for the Fridley Liquor Store Sign. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12a. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE FRIDLEY LIQUOR STORE SIGN: Mr. Burns stated that this was consideration of a motion to receive the bids and award the contract for the installation of signs at the new Fridley liquor store on 57`i' Avenue. Bids were opened on Friday, November 5, 1999, for a back lit canopy sign for the new liquor store. The sign would begin on the east side of the building and wrap around to the north side. The following bids were received: Nordquist Signs in the amount of $32,000 and Signcrafters in the amount of $36,000. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that as construction of the liquor store occurred, staff proceeded to modify some of the building components on the outside to accept a back lit canopy that would run from the east side of the building wrapping around to the north side. Because of those changes, the cost of the sign was pushed over $25,000, which caused staff to design specifications and request bids on the project. Mr. Pribyl stated that staff recommended awarding the contract to Nordquist Signs at a cost of $32,000. The cost would include the back lit canopy, which has more visual representation from I-694 and also from 57`'' Avenue. The light would then cast down onto the sidewalk all the way FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF NOVEMBER 8, 1999 PAGE S ' around the corner with a bright light to make it safer. Nordquist Signs promised to provide a a temporary plastic sign before completion of the canopy sign. The temporary sign complies with the City's sign code. Councilmember Wolfe asked for clarification of the back lit canopy. Mr. Pribyl said that the back lit canopy would go all the way down to just over the doors where it is painted on both the north and east side. Mayor Jorgenson asked Mr. Pribyl to clarify why the City would be spending so much money on the liquor store. Mr. Pribyl stated that the money would not come out of the General Fund. The money would come from the Liquor Fund. Mr. Burns stated that the Liquor Fund has become a source of revenue for the general operation of the City. He indicated that the Liquor Fund provided $140,000 in 1998 and $170,000 in 1999. They project $200,000 will be provided from the Liquor Fund in the year 2000. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that they transferred some of those funds for the Community Center. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to award the contract for the Fridley Liquor store sign to Nordquist Signs. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOITE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUNI, VISITORS: Mayor Jorgenson stated that this was time for consideration of items not on the agenda. Mr. Bob Boswell, 1564 69`h Avenue N.E., stated that he is a resident of the Rice Creek Townhouses. He asked the City to review Parking Ordinance 506. A notice was displayed on the vehicles in his neighborhood which stated that residents are not allowed to park on the streets between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. from November 1 through May 1 due to snow removal. Mr. Boswell stated that there are three adults with three vehicles in his townhome. The parking available for them is one parking spot and only one garage. Many people rely on the street. He did not find a terrible problem with the snow removal last winter. He said 69"' Avenue is a fairly wide street. The residents do not have any alternatives. There are no other parking spots provided. All of the curb within the parking lot is considered a fire lane. Perhaps a compromise could be made where they could park on one side of the street overnight and have their cars removed by 8:00 a.m. the following morning. 0 � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF NOVEMBER S 1999 PAGE 9 � Mayor Jorgenson thanked Mr. Bos�vell for coming to the meeting. Within any snow plow period when the City has to plow, all of the streets are plowed within 24 hours from curb to curb. They have been looking at this ordinance closely, but the majority of parking lots and buildings in Fridley were built in the 1960's when families usually only had one car. This measure the City takes is more cost effective. They do not have to keep going back to finish plowing day after day and try to get it done within 24 hours. Staff has been talking about the possibility of lookin� at the configuration of parking lots. There may be a way to use the green space around the parking lot for parking. Rice Creek Townhouses has a big field nearby there so that may work. Mr. Boswell stated that they had short notice on this ordinance receiving it on October 29. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the ordinance was published in Focus News. The first reading was in May of this year. The second reading was on June 24. The City does not mail out a specific piece of literature to every organization. They try to work with the property owners to give their tenants more notice. The City does not want to write tickets for every car that is in the way. It is not cost effective for anyone. The City is exploring various ways to hopefully avoid this problem. Ticketing is not to begin until January. Mr. Boswell stated that he wanted to submit a petition that he and his roommates have collected opposing this ordinance. There are about sixty signatures. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that a letter was recently sent to landlords stating that they need' to work on letting their tenants know about this ordinance. This is a big safety issue. She receives a lot of calls regarding the problem of snow being left around cars that were in the way. This ordinance also states that contractors cannot haul the snow into the streets after the City plows the streets. Mayor Jor�enson stated that, hopefully, they could come up with some temporary measures to help them get through this year which will enable them to come up with some proactive ways to work on this issue. Mayor Jorgenson thanked Mr. Boswell for his time. MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to accept the petition. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Barnette stated that he would like to offer condolences to a family of a long-time resident of Fridley and a retired Fridley police officer. Sergeant Tom Kennedy, who passed away the past weekend. Services will be held Tuesday, November 9 at 11:00 a.m. Mr. Kennedy served faithfully as a police officer for many years and was a good man. Council offered condolences to Mrs. Shirley Kennedy, his wife, and to their children who all were students at Fridley High School. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8 1999 PAGE 10 � Mayor Jorgenson stated that there were a number of high school students present who are working on their Community Awaxeness Certificates. The students names are as follows: Matthew Peterson, Spring Lake Park High School. Kristin Henke, Spring Lake Park High School. Peter Bruhjell, Spring Lake Park High School. George LaBreche, Spring Lake Park High School. Mayor Jorgenson stated that if the students are interested in participating in the Youth Commission in the City of Fridley they can call Dr. Burns at 572-3506. NEW BUSINESS: INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that they had a building inspection report in the packets. He thinks the total for October of 1999 represents the highest amount of new construction in Fridley's history. That total was $43,317,026. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Wednesday, November 10, 1999, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. MnDOT will be at the Municipal Center to show plans and have discussion for the neighborhood from 44`h Avenue to I-694 on noise sound barriers. The meeting will be held on the lower level: If anyone has any questions they can call John Flora at 572-3550. Mayor Jorgenson stated that on Thursday, November 18, the Planning Commission meetin� will be conducted regarding the Comprehensive Plan at 7:00 p.m. also on the lower level of the Municipal Center. Ms. Dacy, Director of Community Development, stated that Saturday, November 13 is recycling drop-off day and a unique feature has been added. The drop-off site is at 350 71st Avenue and will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. There is a coupon in the recycling brochure that allows residents to dispose of up to three electrical items free. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adjourn the November 8, 1999 City Council Meeting at 8:20 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Signe L. Johnson Nancy J. Jorgenson Recording Secretary Mayor . .. f AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 QTY OF FRIDLEY Date: 11/17/99 n , To: William Bums, City Manager ,� �, 4� f From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinato� Paul Bolin, Planner RE: Consider Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.06 of the Fridley Ciiy Charter Declaring Certain Real Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing the Sale Thereof M-99-278 INTRODUCTION The portion of the University Avenue senrice road, which is the subject of a recent vacation request by Marc Rice at 6111 Rice Street, was conveyed to the City in fee title in the early 1960s. In order to properly combine this strip of land with the petitioner's property, it must be conveyed by a quit claim deed. The City Charter requires that the "sale" of all public lands occur via an ordinance which declares the property as excess. Unlike other properties the City has sold as excess, this property is extremely unique and has very little value. There are ongoing snow removal and maintenance costs that burden the City's street maintenance budget. Therefore, staff recommends the property be conveyed to the adjacent property owner for $1.00. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Because a public hearing has been conducted as part of the vacation request, an additional hearing for this ordinance is not required. The first reading of the ordinance was approved at the November 8, 1999, Council meeting. Staff recommends that the City Council pass and adopt the second reading of the attached ordinance declaring the subject property as excess. 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING SALE THEREOF The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: That part of Outlot A, Sylvan Hills according to the plat thereof on record at Anoka County, Minnesota. Lying Easterly of the Northerly extension of the West line of Lots 1 through 15 inclusive, Block 5, Hyde Park according to the record plat thereof. And also; the West 25 feet as measured at right angles of the platted Service Road in said plat of Sylvan Hills, lying South of an Easterly extension of the North line of said Outlot A, and lying north of a line 20 feet, as measure at right angles to, and parallel with the South line of said Outlot A and its Easterly extension SECTION 2. It is hereby determined by the City Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property, and the City is hereby authorized to _ sell or enter into a contract to sell said property. SECTION 3. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary contracts and deed to affect the sale of said property. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 22"0 OF NOVEMBER, 1999. ATTEST: DEBRA A SKOGEN - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading Publication: November 8, 1999 November 22, 1999 December 2, 1999 NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR 2 .- � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the November 3, 1999, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Diane Savage, Brad Sielaff, Leroy Oquist, Dave Kondrick, Connie Modig, Dean Saba Members Absent: Larry Kuechle Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Missy Daniels, Code Enforcement Officer/Planner Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Brad Schieb, Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. John Thompson, Cub Store Manager Mitch and Sue Nelson, 7680 Highway 65 N.E., Fridley Amoco Leigh Harris, President of Southern Anoka County Chamber of Commerce Diane Wright — Chopper City Sports APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 20 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the October 20, 1999, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT ZTA #99-02 BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO ALLOW FOR LIMITED TEMPORARY OUTDOOR DISPLAY AND SALES PROMOTIONS IN THE COMMERICAL DISTRICTS. IN ADDITION THE AMENDMENT WILL DELETE A PART OF THE ORDINANCE THAT ALLOWS DISPLAY OF PETROLEUM PROJECTS BETWEEN PUMPS AND TEMPORARY DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE WITHIN FOUR FEET OF THE BUILDING AT SERVICE STATIONS: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 2 Ms. Daniels, Code Enforcement Officer, stated that the public hearing was regarding temporary outdoor display and sales in the commercial districts. The City is proposing this draft ordinance. The City has received numerous requests from businesses around Fridley to hold a temporary outdoor sale or display in their parking lot or in front of their store. Currently the ordinance does not allow that type of selling. Planners need to make sure that ordinances are fair to the City; therefore, in order to serve the communities needs, they thought they should propose an amendment that would allow for outdoor sales. The goal of this ordinance is to provide the businesses with an opportunity to conduct their outdoor promotions and maintain an enhanced image of Fridley at the same time. Ms. Daniels stated the current ordinance allows display of petroleum products between pumps at service stations and temporary displays within four feet of the station buildings. It also allows garden centers, and similar uses with a special use permit. No other temporary or permanent outdoor displays or storage are allowed in any of those districts. Staff is proposing an ordinance amendment that allows up to three outdoor sales events per business per year in the commercial districts, C-1, C-2, and C-3. Staff is also proposing an administrative permit process for these events, rather than Planning Commission or City Council action. Staff is also proposing a ten-day timeframe for the promotion for 20 days befinreen each of the events. Ms. Daniels stated staff believes that the advantage of this type of ordinance is that it will allow businesses to conduct sales events that currently are not permitted. The three - events per year fall in befinreen the extremes of other cities. The City conducted research for comparison befinreen the other cities in the metro area with their outdoor display ordinances. Blaine does not allow any outdoor displays; but if the outdoor displays are against the building, the City does not enforce the ordinance. This is a problem when there are things on the sidewalks and there is no wheelchair access or walking access. Brooklyn Center does allow two outdoor sales per year, ten days each. Brooklyn Park allows one promotional tent sale per year, per business, not to exceed ten days. This is part of their special use permit process. Columbia Heights allows outdoor sales with no clear regulations. Maplewood allows outdoor sales with no regulations. Sidewalk sales permits would be required to sell from a vehicle. Mounds View allows it in B-2 and higherwhich is compared to Fridley's C-1, C-2, and C-3 districts. They do have additional use permits for outside storage. Fridley's ordinance does not pertain to that because Fridley already has special use permits for permanent outdoor storage or displays like the garden centers. . Ms. Daniels stated the proposed ordinance language in each district C-1, C-2, C-3, has the same wording for this particular use, so only C-1 has been included here. For C-2 it can be found at 205.14.1.C. (5). (b), and for C-3 it is 205.15.1 C.(5) (a). 205.13 C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIONS USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses B. Accessory Uses � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 3 (5). Temporary outdoor display sales or promotion of inerchandise subject to the following conditions: a. � c. d. e. � � 11.10 Fees The property owner shall obtain a Temporary Outdoor Display License from the City prior to starting the event. The property owner shall submit the information required on the license application. The City shall approve the license prior to commencement of the event. , A Temporary Outdoor Display License is required whether the merchandise is sold for profit or given away as part of a promotion. Only items associated with the principal use may be displayed. Three events per year are permitted, and shall occur no closer than 20 days apart. The duration of each event shall be no longer than 10 consecutive days. The merchandise shall be displayed in a manner that does not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic or otherwise cause unsafe traffic conditions. The merchandise shall not be displayed in the boulevard or on any landscaped area. If a tent is to be used, the property owner shall obtain a building permit and comply with the requirements of the uniform building code related to tents. Fees for tents shall be as established by the Uniform Building Code. The property owner shall pay the fees as established in Chapter 11 of the City Code. License fee shall be as follows: CODE 205.30 SUBJECT Temporary Outdoor Display License FEE $75.00 Ms. Daniels stated that the City is also proposing to delete some language from the ordinance. The current language allows the temporary displays in front of station stores like SuperAmerica or Holiday. The proposed defetion is in C-1, C-2, and C-3. Each section has the same wording for this particular use, so only C-1 has been included here. For C-2 it can be found at 205.14.1.C.(5).(b) and for C-3 it is 205.15.1.C.(5) (a). Ms. Daniels stated that if anyone needs a copy of these ordinances the City can send a copy to them. Ms. Daniels read the deletion as follows: 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 4 205.13 C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1. USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses B. Accessory Uses C. Uses Permitted With a Special Use Permit. (7) Motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing service as an accessory use to a convenience store. (a) The use shall not provide for the outdoor operation of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor display of merchandise. The display of petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary display of inerchandise within four (4� feet of the station building is permitted (this sentence to be deleted). Ms. Daniels stated that temporary is not defined in the ordinance. This really allows permanent display in front of the stores. The display of petroleum products befinreen the pumps is really from a bygone era. The proposed revision for the ordinance language is to keep the first part the same with no changes and to only delete the last sentence. Ms. Daniels stated that the more items out in the parking lot and by the service pumps, the more the sidewalk is blocked and people cannot get in and out. If something were - to happen in the store, people may have trouble getting out. Ms. Savage thanked Ms. Daniels for the presentation and asked if there were any questions. Mr. Oquist asked if the City was proposing a new ordinance in exchange for another ordinance. Ms. Daniels answered, No, but the proposed amendment to the ordinance would allow for temporary displays or sales. Temporary is defined in this case. A convenience store would be allowed the same temporary display as a C-2 District would have. The proposed deletion to the ordinance is taking out the sentence where temporary is not defined. Mr. Oquist stated that rather than deleting the sentence, temporary should possibly be defined. Ms. Daniels stated that it would be more of a redundant ordinance if they did that. Ten days would already be allowed. Mr. Oquist asked if convenience stores could display on the outside of the building on a temporary basis for ten days. Ms. Daniels stated that is correct. 0 � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 5 _ � Ms. Savage stated that it would eliminate the displays of pallets of pop and various items. Ms. Daniels stated that the ordinance would eliminate that practice and they would have to store that inside the building, unless it was part of the temporary display that they applied for. Ms. Savage asked if anything could be displayed outside. Ms. Daniels stated that nothing could be displayed outside without a special use permit. Mr. Oquist asked how the convenience stores could display bundles of split wood. Ms. Daniels stated that it would be possible if it was temporary, but this ordinance would prevent them from storing it outside all winter. Mr. Kondrick asked for clarification regarding the permit application as to exactly how many items could be displayed. Could ten items be displayed? Ms. Daniels stated that the City would have to approve it and make sure where the ten items would be placed and the businesses could do this three times per year. Mr. Saba asked how this would impact businesses needing tent displays or auto dealers� with vehicles outside the building. Ms. Daniels stated that the special use permits allow that under permanent storage, and it still will be allowed. Mr. Saba asked if convenience stores could still display wood under a special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated that there are certain very specific provisions regarding unscreened outdoor display. Menards for example, had proposed a display of small accessory buildings by their store. This is an example where they have gone through a special use permit process. They had also historically had many things on their sidewalk. The City is very specific now to be able to state which things are allowed and in what area they are allowed. It is possible to go through in the C-3 District, for example, that same type of special use permit process. Home Depot and Wal-Mart went through a process to architecturally integrate with their building. This special use permit does not cause something that appears to be an afterthought, but instead they may have matching brick or rod iron to make it much more permanent. The special use permit woufd not allow the little garden center in the parking lot that is made up of concrete block with a split rail fence and taking out 40 parking stalls--unless they did it for ten days at a time, three times per year. Ms. Savage asked for clarification regarding the temporary greenhouse applied for by Cub Foods. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 6 Mr. Hickok stated that they have two options. They have what I'm sure they would view as a disruptive method of setting it up for ten days and then taking it all down, or Cub Foods in Apple Valley has to architecturally integrated its garden center area into a permanent area of the building. This option would exist in Fridley through the Special Use Permit process. Typically, it is not the parking lot but off from the side of the building in a nice enclosed area. What is garden center in the summer time is often Christmas tree sales in the winter. The City has not fully evaluated the letter by Cub Foods in Fridley; but unless Cub is willing to set it up and take it down on ten day increments, the garden center in the parking lot would not be able to happen. If they applied for a special use permit, the solution would be something much more permanent. An enclosed area, architecturally integrated into the building would be needed. Ms. Modig asked if this change would affect Petters Warehouse where they have a tent for their displays. Ms. Daniels stated that they are one of the businesses that would be affected by this ordinance. Ms. Modig asked how this ordinance would affect the annual Fridley garage sale. Mr. Hickok stated that that was on a piece of publicly zoned property at the ice arena. It is outside of the commercial districts being considered. That is under a different process and takes City Council approval. Mr. Oquist asked how United Stores would be affected with their annual tent sale. Ms. Daniels stated that this ordinance would apply to them as well. Mr. Hickok stated that they could still do that for their ten-day sale. Ms. Savage asked if anyone in the audience wanted to address any concems. Ms. Sue Nelson, owner of Fridley Amoco, 7680 Highway 65, a C district store, stated that this ordinance affects businesses by regulating how they should look. Ms. Nelson stated that she and her husband, Mitch Nelson, are tire dealers. She feels it is unfair competition for them because they are not allowed to display their only product outside like auto dealers do. They are right across the street from another city that has absolutely no regulations on its businesses for outside displays. She has no problem with a certain image but this ordinance has a direct impact to their business and to the economy. She hears comments from their customers that they should display more of their product outside. Ms. Savage asked if the tire displays were her main concern. Ms. Nelson stated that they received numerous notices about removing their tires from the outside display, the latest notice stating that they would be taken to court if they did not remove the tires. Most tire stores use outdoor displays and more city stores are : PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 7 moving toward outdoor payment, for example, at the pump to pay for gas so they do not ' have to go into the store. The $75.00 fee to pay a few times a year only for ten days at a time is exactly what they did, but then they had problems getting their $250.00 deposit fee back. The process really did not flow that well. Ms. Savage asked if Staff had any response to Ms. Nelson. Mr. Hickok stated that they have seen convenience stores moving product outside. If salt is selling big for a retailer, then soon every retailer regionally would be selling salt outside. If cypress wood chips for your garden seem to be selling well, next thing you know, the entire metro area would be selling cypress wood chips outside. Firewood outside the door is another great example. It is an unfair advantage to retailers selling outside versus retailers who pay more roof overhead for selling product inside. It is unfortunate regarding the Nelson's business; but if tires are the product, then they need to have their own internal warehouse space. Service bays typically have rolling cart with tires on them because when the doors are open, they roll those out to make room for the cars that go in to get tires put on there. It is a space demand issue. Though unfortunate, it looks like poor planning. From a safety perspective, it puts the product outdoors that can be stolen and puts a higher burden on the public safety folks. (Those carts may get in the way easier and not controlled very well). It may sound like a disadvantage to have this ordinance, but there are certain convenient advantages. Those sites glow at night and are able to have a lot of signage and opportunity to advertise things like tires. Ms. Nelson stated that they must pay for a sign permit and are only to be able to hang it in one spot to be visible from the canopy. She can only buy a permit finrice a year and would like to hang the sign year round. Mr. Mitch Nelson, co-owner of Fridley Amoco, stated that he understands what the City is trying to do. He agrees with the idea of presentable businesses. They try to keep their business as presentable and nice as possible, and not to be in the way of anything. On the corner by their store, the corridor of the service road is very unsightly with extremely high grass. He feels the City should keep their landscaping presentable also. Ms. Modig asked exactly where his place of business is located. Mr. Nelson stated that it is on the corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65 by Spring Lake Park. Mr. Hickok stated that the median befinreen the service drive and Highway 65 is a State right-of-way. It is a jurisdictional issue. The City has tried to work with the state on that very issue. The City has put additional funds in their budget to take care of corridor maintenance. The State's image and mowing characteristics are not the same as the City's. The City does not believe that finro times per year is adequate. Mr. Sielaff asked Mr. Hickok if Spring Lake Park was being mowed more frequently. � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 8 Mr. Hickok stated that sometimes the businesses themselves take care of mowing right out to the roadway because they do believe it is an image issue for themselves. He " cannot speak for that Spring Lake Park example. Many businesses in Fridley mow out to the State right-of-way. Mr. Hickok is not advocating that because of the OSHA requirements. Mr. John Thompson, Store Manager for Fridley Cub Foods, stated that he has some concerns also. It would not be very cost effective for Fridley Cub Foods to put up a greenhouse for ten days and then tear it down. He was wondering if there could be some seasonal type language that would allow for a seasonal promotion for 45 - 60 days. This would allow for firewood to be out in the winter at gas stations and would allow Cub to have a summer greenhouse. To his knowledge, Fridley would be the only Cub Foods store that is not allowed to have a greenhouse in the parking lot. He does not think they are gaudy greenhouses. They have a split rail fence and are professionally done. Ms. Modig asked Mr. Hickok if the greenhouse would be classified under the special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated that it would be covered under the special use permit. He wanted to encourage Mr. Thompson to look at the Apple Valley Garden Center at the Cub Foods there. That is an excellent example of where the garden center has been architecturally integrated into the site plan. It does not take parking stalls critical to the site. One of the things about the Holiday site in Fridley is that it would be hard to pick parking stalls that are not utilized. That is a very well utilized parking lot. Typically, what happens with the split rail fence in the garden center is that it goes up where the customers are and displaces parking for customers. Staff would be happy to talk with Cub and evaluate their site plan and talk about what would be likely stipulations in a special use permit. There is only so much landscape dollar to go around. Mr. Hickok stated there are already a Bachman's, Lyndale Garden Center, and Home Depot in Fridley. They have made the investment to architecturally integrate their garden center into their sites. To temporarily put up split rail fence in the parking lot takes some of the regional landscape dollar away from those places that are paying taxes on a permanent improvement year round and is unfair competition. Unless there is an improvement equivalent to the architectural quality seen in other places with permanent characteristic that allows circulation around it, then it is a dismal future. He has not heard the support for that type of thing with other requests. Ms. Savage asked if the Wal-Mart addition was permanent. Mr. Hickok stated that is an excellent example. This is the third time that Wal-Mart has expanded their garden center and needed a new special use permit to do that. They are doing it architecturally and permanently on their site. It does not contrast and has proper circulation. Ms. Savage stated that she would recommend that Mr. Thompson work with staff to go over the exact requirements for a special use permit. 10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 9 Mr. Thompson stated that he would have to upgrade the facility to accommodate a greenhouse. The building is 30 years old. They have already put hundreds of thousands of dollars to upgrade the parking lot. He feels that down the road there may be a chance to make something similar to Apple Valley's store. He worked there up until three years ago, but all of the other Cub Foods stores are allowed to do this and he was wondering why the Fridley store cannot. He understands the concerns with the appearance and parking. He feels there may be space available between Cub and the gas station for a greenhouse. He stated that he appreciated the Planning Commission's time. Ms. Savage asked for clarification regarding the Target greenhouse. Mr. Hickok stated that the Target greenhouse has a special use permit from an era that predates the City's current requirements. Ms. Leigh Harris, President of Anoka County Chamber of Commerce, stated that this is an issue they have been contacted about. There are three issues. One is regarding the outdoor temporary display. She wanted to thank the Fridley staff for putting together the amendment that does allow for that being less restrictive. She hears frustration from the business community. She wants the Commission to consider that they are competing with the communities that are directly surrounding Fridley. She feels that Fridley should be treating the business community as competitively as the surrounding communities. She feels that the businesses in Fridley are not afraid of competition. The cost of using something only four months out of the year will not allow businesses to price their product competitively. There are at least 50 businesses that have the same concerns regarding these issues. Some have picked up their business and moved because they feel Fridley is too restrictive, and they were not able to compete on an even playing field. She feels the business community is very respectable and they care about the aesthetic quality of the community. She would love to have the opportunity to have some more dialogue meetings with the businesses to address more issues. She wants the City of Fridley to realize hovir they compare with other communities. Ms. Diane Wright at Chopper City Sports, Fridley, stated that she had a question regarding United Store's tent sale having it all on the grass and how this policy would change that. Mr. Oquist stated that the sale is allowed only for ten days. Ms. Wright asked for clarification regarding the sale being on a non-landscaped area. Mr. Oquist stated that they do have it on a landscaped area. Ms. Daniels stated that this ordinance would not allow anything to be displayed on the landscaped areas. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 10 Mr. Hickok stated that if they were to modify the sale to allow the tents on the slabbed area around, it would be an example of how they could conduct the sale. It may restrict r the number of tents. Mr. Oquist stated that when you put tents on grass, it makes for a good display area. Ms. Wright stated that they have a small landscaped area with rocks where they display their items. Ms. Daniels stated that they have a special use permit for the permanent display in front of the building and this would not be affected. Ms. Wright brought some pictures of businesses around them in a two block radius that have product stacked way above their fences. Mr. Hickok stated that this is an ordinance for the commercial districts only. The pictures Ms. Wright brought in are of industrial districts. They are pre-existing and non- conforming that have screening issues outdoors. Staff is talking with one of them for removal of items to improve their image. Mr. Hickok stated that the consideration this evening would allow additional things outside for Chopper City Sports. This ordinance does not affect the issues behind their building with storage of their sleds (snowmobiles). The special use permit they have is - specific saying that no storage would happen in view of the public above the screening fence. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:29 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated that there will be a first and second reading by the Council on November 22, and any members of the public are welcome to attend the meeting and voice any concerns. Ms. Savage stated that she is in favor of eliminating the cluttered look of outdoor displays. She feels that it is a good idea for business to have a permanent addition that fits in architecturally with the design of the building. She would like to see that happen with Cub Foods in Fridley with a very nice addition. She is generally in favor of the ordinance. Ms. Modig asked Mr. Hickok for clarification with the ten days temporary use permit with Section E. She asked if they could get an extension on the ten days. She stated that basically she is in favor of this ordinance and does not like to see clutter either. Mr. Hickok stated that the City would enforce these conditions under the licensing process. When an application comes in, there would be insistence that the sale be ten days only and also an inspection would be required. The $75.00 fee covers the 12 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 11 . inspection cost for the 11 �' day to make sure the sale was not still going on. If the Commission feels that ten days is inappropriate, they can tell the Council how many days they feel are appropriate. He feels enforcement is such an important thing and wants the Commission to make sure they want exceptions. Long-range outdoor opportunity is available through the special use permit process. Ms. Modig stated that it seems that some things are falling in the cracks. Some products do not fall into these categories. There are service type buildings that are not built space-wise to accommodate all items. Mr. Oquist stated that he agrees with Ms. Modig. There are a lot of little businesses in Fridley that do not have the outdoor storage. There are certain reasons that some things should not be stored inside, for example, wood because of the insects. He feels they should be careful of the ordinance that shuts out competition. Mr. Saba stated he agreed. He stated the City of Mankato allows 20% of property to be used. He feels they could have percentage applied toward small businesses and have a specific area for outdoor displays without having to go through the licensing process. This ordinance is too restrictive for small businesses. Cub Foods has done great things with their landscaping; they do not feel they would have anything not presentable in front of their store for a garden center. There are different situations for different size businesses and he would be opposed to the amendment the way it is written. Mr. Kondrick stated that he feels it is the smaller businesses that are really effected by this ordinance and there should be another way around this. This is geared toward the larger businesses. He feels it is a good idea to improve the aesthetics of Fridley. He wants the businesses to stay and that is his primary concern. He would oppose this amendment. Ms. Savage asked for clarification of what allows the small convenience stores to display items outdoor. Ms. Daniels stated that the proposed deletion part of the ordinance allows that with temporary not being defined. Mr. Saba stated that this is too restrictive and they should define separate ordinances for small businesses and look at the seasonal aspect. Mr. Sielaff stated that they should be careful when making differentiation between large and small businesses. He wants to see a certain amount of consistency and to be fair. It is more important to regulate the volume of product a business wants to display outside. Mr. Kondrick stated that he agrees with what Mr. Saba stated about the percentage idea for small businesses. In Mankato, there is differentiation between the sizes of businesses and what they can have out. 13 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 12 Mr. Sielaff stated that he is all for restrictions but does not want to make it too restrictive and have too much differentiation between large and small businesses. � Ms. Modig asked how long it took for the City to ask Wal-Mart to integrate the greenhouse into their site. Mr. Hickok stated that Wal-Mart came to town in 1993. They applied for their special use permit immediately for the garden center. The first year they utilized all of their outdoor garden center space plus they did their parking lot garden center without asking the City. To avoid shutting a new business down for that season, the City allowed them to continue to sell that season only. The next year they had to expand their garden center or not sell in the parking lot. Ms. Savage stated that she thought they should also consider the ten day part of it. That does apply in certain situations. Ms. Modig stated she agrees but there has to be something to cover the every day product sales. There is too wide an umbrella, and this does not cover the small and large business special sales. Mr. Sielaff stated that he does not want to get into the seasonal business. He thinks the ordinance should just restrict a certain percentage on what they use on a seasonal basis. Ms. Dacy stated that the majority of businesses in Fridley are very good at their aesthetic appearance. There are violations out there, and they need to address the impact of outdoor display without the proper controls. There are two parts to the ordinance. Right now, aside from a convenience store or gas station, Petters Warehouse or the businesses across the street, cannot have any temporary outdoor display at all. The ordinance is providing a business with an additional option. The second part does deal with convenience stores and gas stations. Garden centers are listed separately with a special use permit. Through that process, the City has been more aggressive with outdoor sales. It is typical for cities to react to a transient marketplace. There are separate issues that the ordinance is providing the means to control. Ms. Savage stated that it looks tike the Commission is in agreement with the ten day temporary part of the ordinance for outdoor sales. Mr. Oquist stated that he is still confused with the ordinances and does not necessarily agree with what Ms. Dacy stated. All of this ordinance states that you cannot store items outside. He feels the ordinance is not written clear enough. Ms. Dacy stated that the ordinance is adding a new section allowing temporary outdoor sales. It deletes an existing sentence in the ordinance that permits the temporary display of petroleum-related products. Mr. Sielaff asked for clarification regarding long-term storage outside. 14 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 13 Ms. Dacy stated that there is a special use permit for garden centers and outdoor display of inerchandise. There is a special use permit for car sales. Mr. Oquist asked Ms. Dacy if a gas station wanted to display wood bundles or tires, would they have to get a special use permit and be charged for that every season? Ms. Dacy stated that is correct. Mr. Oquist stated that he does not agree with that. Maybe the problem is what they want to delete out of this ordinance. There is nothing wrong with the ten day ordinance, but they have to be careful with the other one. Ms. Savage stated she thought the confusion is that the ordinance permits what it calls temporary display, but it does not define temporary. Presumably that part of the current ordinance allows convenience stores to put the salt product outside without the special use permit. Ms. Savage stated that maybe they could have it re-examined to see whether there could be some restrictions placed on display of inerchandise outside the store without a special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated that they would not have to get a special use permit every time they � wanted to display something outside. Mr. Oquist stated that rather than to delete the sentence, they could come up with a way to handle the small businesses and allow them to display some of their merchandise outside. Ms. Savage stated that she felt there needs to be some more discussion also with staff and the Chamber of Commerce before there are changes made. Mr. Sielaff stated that to summarize, they are saying that they want to have some restrictions so there is not a special use permit needed at some point. Ms. Savage stated she believes that is something that needs to be discussed. Mr. Sielaff asked whether United Stores tent sale would classify under the ten day permit. Mr. Oquist stated that would be restricted by paragraph F. Mr. Saba stated that he felt they should reword that. Mr. Hickok stated that he would caution Commissioners to not include displays on the boulevard area. There are a lot of safety reasons to not do that. That is also called the public right-of-way. 15 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 14 Mr. Hickok summarized that the Commission is okay with the ten day part of the � ordinance. The Commission is not okay with striking existing code language without further discussion. The Commission is not sending a recommendation onto the City Council but instead giving Staff instruction to go back and work on that piece and then come back with the ten day and also the deleted language in a modified form and leave special use permits untouched as an option for long-term outdoor display. Ms. Savage asked if it should move on to City Council or should the Planning Commission look at it again. Mr. Hickok stated that they probably would be best off to table it and hold open the decision until it comes back in a modified form. MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modig, to table the Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-02. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Savage stated that this would be removed from the City Council agenda. Ms. Nelson stated that she wanted to add that the language to delete regarding the four feet perimeter is not going to be enough help. Their permit was denied until they � remove the product from the four feet perimeter which is the current allotment. Mr. Hickok stated that the recommended ten day outdoor sale opportunity three times per year is new. They are not entitled to do the sale right now. The outdoor storage on a permanent basis was set up as an outdoor display on a permanent basis and is not permitted currently. It is a special use permit requirement. They would have needed a special use permit to have the tires outside or agree that they would do it on a very temporary basis. Our observation has been that it is essential that Nelson's pull their tires out of the stall to do their business. It is not a temporary thing and would require a special use permit. 2, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISCUSSION: Ms. Dacy stated that the Commission has a first draft of a part of the plan. Brad Scheib, employee of the Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc., prepared much of the draft and consultation with Staff. She wanted to review what the City has done so far and what the City is hoping to do in the next six to eight months. Two years ago, the City had planning area meetings by dividing the City into seven areas and sent a letter to every household and had an open forum. There were written surveys, and they got tremendous information out of the process. A year ago last September, the Planning Commission reviewed the vision statement and guiding principles that the consultant proposed. Ms. Dacy stated that the consultant has gathered a lot of information about the housing market. There has been a land use analysis about what has been developed and 16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 15 undeveloped. That will continue as they go through the process. A GIS consultant developed maps and the City will be distributing plan drafts to the all of the Commissions. Ms. Dacy stated that on November 8, they will kick off the process with a proclamation by the City Council on Monday to declare November 8 World Town Planning Day. That is a promotion being done by the American Planning Association and the World Town Institute in Europe to heighten the awareness of the importance of planning in the communities today. They are also planning an open house on November 18. They will invite back the vision participants and share the plan draft and receive feedback. More of the chapters will be accomplished by that time. Tentatively they are thinking the first official public hearing on the plan will be at one of the December meetings. Ms. Dacy stated a goal is to submit a draft to Met Council by the end of this year. The City has received a year extension at this point in time. All of the Cities in the metropolitan area are doing this process. State law requires that communities share their comprehensive plans. After they submit the draft to Met Council, there will probably be a number of changes as they move through the process. Sometime in the year 2000, probably the first four months, there will be a second official public hearing with the Planning Commission. In between that time, the Commission will be kept up to date as to how they are progressing. When Met Council signs, a resolution will be presented to the Council to approve the comprehensive plan. The product you will see is a notebook with all of the text in it and a publication of an executive summary which - they would like to send to every household and business in the community. Ms. Dacy stated that the plan will address the Community Vision Chapter, Land Use and Housing and Plan Overview. They have yet to do the preface which explains the process and the State requirements. They are working on a draft of the Parks and Open Space Chapter, Sewer and Water Services, Transportation, Storm Issues, and Human Resources is an optional element, but they do intend to include that, and of course implementation. The time line is 20 years. Met Council does its population, household, and employment projections that far out Ms. Dacy stated that there is a very strong movement across the country to contain sprawl. Growth is beginning to jump out into areas that do not have sewer service or proper urban types of services to the detriment of the central city and the communities surrounding it. The Met Council sees Fridley as a first ring suburb just outside the . central cities and within the urban service area and almost fully developed. Met Council wants to encourage as much investment and redevelopment as possible within that urban service area before people start moving out to the outer communities and building on a five acre lot with a septic system. They are projecting the region to grow by 300,000 households in 20 years. Ms. Dacy stated Fridley is projected to hold fairly steady, presently 28,600 people. In the year 2010 it is projected to hold at about 29,000. The City needs to decide how aggressive they want to be in adding new housing or businesses. Some of it might happen without the City's control. Medtronic will generate a lot of interest from the business community and potentially another type of housing market. They need to be 17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 16 prepared to respond. Fridley is 50 years old this year and grew up in the automobile era and suburban movement. For the next 20 years, Fridley is going to be changing more toward urban. They are almost fully developed and have some of the traditional issues associated with urban development such as strip malls and large parking lots. Ms. Dacy stated that in the document, they have tried to make a strong connection between what the vision process said and try to translate that into what they want to accomplish. The issues identified are probably something everyone can agree on. They want to improve their image and maintain the housing stock. The debate is how to get there. What are the strategies to implement what they want to accomplish with those goals? Ms. Dacy stated that the vision statement refers to Fridley as being a diverse and well balanced community with small town types of qualities. They derive the sense of community from the different types of elements that define the heritage. The vision statement says that: "We want to maintain and promote a friendly atmosphere." Fridley is wonderfully poised in a convenient location in the metropolitan area. They do offer a high quality environment to the residents and the businesses and want to see that maintained. They want to continue with an aggressive housing program and work on a creative transportation system. There are three very well traveled corridors and highways and traffic will increase. They want to create a distinctive image. Medtronic will probably spur a lot of interest in doing that. Medtronic is very concerned about the image created in new developments. Ms. Dacy stated that they need the Commission's feedback on the list of key issues. The plan identified a number of community image issues relating to what happens as a result of the Medtronic Corporate Campus. The housing analysis shows that there is a need for move-up housing. The vision meetings were clear in that they wanted us to continue in maintaining the housing stock and economic stability. The tax base is wonderful to retain businesses. There are traffic issues on the horizon, and they need to look at transit alternatives. Bikeway, walkways and park and recreation needs are also important for leisure alternatives. Retail uses are important to look at also. There ace only one or two undeveloped commercially zoned lots. The river area for redevelopment area is an important issue to look at also. Ms. Dacy stated that the Commission does have a lot of detail work to do. They need to count acres, fill in the blanks, and look at future land use to make a recommendation to the Council. They have to work on the strategies, not just the goals and policies. Future meetings will probably have some of the items on the comprehensive plan. The Commission will have to review additional chapters. Mr. Saba stated they have to be very careful with what they do with their green spaces. He feels they should be enhanced and not developed necessarily without a very good plan. The green spaces are a very big part of the quality of life in Fridley and are very well used. Ms. Savage stated that she felt the very best part of Fridley is the park. That is what makes Fridley extremely livable. The shift from suburban to urban is a tendency that : PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 17 - Fridley has. She feels that people would rather walk to a gathering place. She would like to see more walkways and bikeways and good transportation so people do not have to rely on their cars. Increasing traffic congestion is a problem that should be addressed. Mr. Saba stated they do have some areas along the river, and he is not sure if they should do a lot of development there because it is mostly residential. He feels they should enhance the park land they have. Mr. Oquist stated that he does not associate the river with Fridley. It is very dangerous. Ms. Savage stated they could improve the park area near the river that they already have. There is not that much of that area where they can ride a bike or walk by the river. Mr. Saba stated that the biking and hiking and the ability to walk across the City is a value to have adversity in the landscape. Mr. Kondrick stated that he feels that Fridley is a very convenient place to live. He feels it is an advantage as the population grows. He can see that some things are now happening to make Fridley a beautiful place to live in. The traffic problem is a concem. Mr. Oquist stated that University Avenue is very hard to drive on in rush hour. Mr. Kondrick stated that as time goes on, with the traffic problem, people might say they want to live in Fridley but they cannot very easily drive there because of the traffic congestion. Mr. Oquist stated that Fridley is attractive and convenient. Fridley is also getting to be an older community. As the people move out, we want the younger folks to move in and want to maintain the school district and housing stock. People want to move out to the five acre lots because they want to be away from the closeness. They may need more than one central gathering place. Mr. Sielaff stated that one of the greatest resources in Fridley is the people. What sort of things can they do as a community for self-improvement such as education and recreation is an issue. There is a shortage of facilities in Fridley. The City and the . school district did some good things with the basketball court but there is still strain. There is a payback for more education and recreation such as education for the homeowners so the City can have better kept-up houses. Ms. Savage stated that she would like to see an expanded community center similar to the ones in Maple Grove and New Brighton. Ms. Modig stated that she feels that there are a lot of things that are not conducive to keeping senior citizens in Fridley. There are not a lot of housing opportunities for senior citizens for one-level housing type that has some space to it. The Rottlund homes do not have any three bedrooms. 19 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 18 Mr. Kondrick stated that maybe they could have more Christenson Crossing type + developments in Fridley. Ms. Modig stated that the land area is not there. Some of those housing developments are out there but they are located next to something like a car lot. Ms. Dacy stated that the City has been meeting an hour a day with the comprehensive plan trying to think futuristically. They are running out of vacant land to start brand new, but there are a lot of underutilized areas that may require acquisitions. Now that there are two Metronic campuses flanking Central Avenue, Central Avenue may change a tot. The ramblers are currently at a sale price that attracts the younger types of families. Mr. Oquist stated that maybe they should start reviewing their ordinances that will allow some of the development. Maybe the City will have to get creative and not have the ordinances to have so much green space to be able to build certain complexes. Ms. Dacy stated the ordinance setback for single family homes may be changed to relax the front yard requirement. The mother-in-law apartment may be an addition on to the rear of the home that avoids the stairs. Mr. Saba stated that there are more changes with shopping on the web, and you may not see a lot of usage for the big malls anymore. It saves people trips to the malls and in- that light they should plan for the impact of technology. Transportation systems might have to be re-evaluated. More people are working in their homes and work via e-mail and the web. The enhancement to the Springbrook Nature Center for a garden area at the entrance is also being talked about. A small amphitheater may be possible too. Mr. Kondrick stated that the Riverview Heights area has been turned into a cute, sharp area. It is just amazing how the streets, curb and gutter has changed the whole area. Mr. Sielaff stated that there are some issues with technology that need to be looked at. There is now cable N with a debate going on nationally with high speed Internet access and who is going to own the cable lines. This may affect the cable franchise in Fridley. As a City, what things could they provide over the Internet, and there are a lot of opportunities for education. Ms. Dacy stated that at the next meeting, the project to be discussed is the North Star Rail Line from downtown Minneapolis to St. Cloud on the existing railroad tracks. They are evaluating a station stop in Fridley at both the east and west side of the tracks at 61 St Avenue. They have another presentation at the next meeting on November 17 about the Nature Center. Staff will also make a presentation about the North Star Corridor. Mr. Kondrick asked if they were talking about putting in a third track. Ms. Dacy stated that they would use the existing tracks that are there now for the northbound and southbound peak hour of service. Anoka County staff advised her if it � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 19 , does become a reality in the year 2002, that probably from a funding point of view, an LRT route through Fridley to Northtown as planned may be placed several years out in the future. This gets the funding and has a strong backing by Mr. Oberstar. In January or February of 2000, the City will be coming back to them with some recommendations about that park-and-ride site and how it should be handled. Mr. Kondrick stated that the rail from downtown to the Mall of America started out to be a$400,000,000 deal and now it is a$548,000,000 in just finro years time. That makes him nervous and he feels money is not being very well spent. Mr. Sielaff stated that they would not even consider anything north until the thing with the Mall of America has been decided. Ms. Dacy stated that that is the first priority because it has the highest ridership projections. Ms. Savage stated that the arts in Fridley are very important in getting the community together. Fridley does not have a single bookstore. She would like to see a Barnes and Noble type format with a coffee shop inside. A concert hall would be nice. Mr. Oquist stated that the use of their business community to help them develop some of these things should be considered as to what can they do to help in some of these areas. Mr. Sielaff asked if part of the discussions of traffic in the area was talking about not necessarily increasing the width of highways and additional lanes. They would try to encourage people to live around near where they work. That may be something they have to look at as to how they could do that. Medtronic has an increase in the number of employees and what are the ramifications. Ms. Dacy stated that some of that may fuel move-up housing demand. Only about ten percent (10%) of the employees in Fridley live in Fridley. Mr. Oquist stated that one of the issues with Medtronic are that these are high-tech people making high-tech money and it is not possible to build many new homes at a higher price range in Fridley. Ms. Dacy stated that they need to start thinking of going up with the buildings and reduced acreage in Fridley rather than one-stories to make more uses. Mr. Sielaff asked if the draft the Commission received was the beginning of the comprehensive plan. Ms. Dacy stated, yes. The Commission will receive a Parks and Open Space chapter, a Transportation chapter, a Sewer and Water chapter, Storm chapter, and then there will be a discussion on implementation about some of the ideas on the plan as well. 21 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 3, 1999 PAGE 20 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE NOVEMBER 3, 1999, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � !�'h/�'ti Signe Johnson Recording Secretary 22 � � � CRY OF FRIDLEY To: From: Date: Re: AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 William W. Burns, City Manager ��! �` Richard Pribyl, Finance Director Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk November 17, 1999 Tax Forfeit Properties We have received notice from Gene Rafferty, Anoka County Land Commissioner, that five parcels of land will become tax forfeit. The County requests the City's response to the sale by November 23, 1999. Attached are the following materials: 1. List of tax forfeit properties in Fridley 2. Parcel Classification and appraisal forms 3. Verifications of relating special assessments 4. Maps illustrating locations of the forfeited properties The Anoka County Land Commissioner has established a County-wide numbering system for tax forfeit properties. Those located in Fridley are 12, 13 14, 15, and 16. We recommend selling all five of the parcels to the townhome unit owner or townhome association. In compiling this information, we solicited input from Assessing, Community Development, and Public Works-Engineering. We recommend that the City Council approve the above mentioned action on these five properties at the November 22, 19�9 Council meeting so that we may respond to the County by the November 23, 1999 deadline. Attachments 23 . Anoka County List of Pazcels Shown on Classification List CL200 Unplatted (Exhibit L) CITY OF FRIDLEY ----------------------------------------------------------- 12. 24 30 24 32 0079 Commissioner District 04 This approximately 175' x 222' x 278' irregular shaped parcel is located at the end of Polk Street South of Lynde Drive NE. 13. 24 30 24 44 0199 Commission District 04 This approximately 25' x 50' rectangular parcel is an open area between garages leading to two townhouses. 14. 24 30 24 44 0293 Commissioner District 04 This approximately 10' x 25' rectangular piece is a parking space for the townhouses. 15. 24 30 24 44 0294 Commissioner District 04 ' This approximately 10' x 25' rectangular piece is a parking space for the townhouses. 16 24 30 24 44 0295 Commissioner District 04 This approximately 10' x 25' rectangular piece is a parking space for the townhouses. 24 REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 32 0079 Please complete the following information by answering all applicable questions. Is this parcel buildable or unbuildable? BUILDABLE a) Has your city/township adopted a local ordinance governing minim� �e�, shape, frontage or access? (If yes, answer 1(b); if no, proceed to question 5.) YES b) Does this parcel comply with your local ordinances regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access and, because of this, can be improved? If it does not comply, please list reason(s) for non-compliance. YES 2. Do you recommend combining this pazcel with an abutting forfeit parcel (if there is one)? NO 3. If your answer to #2 is yes, indicate which pazcel on the list. 4. Do you recommend selling this parcel to the abutting landowner? THE ABUTTING TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION MAY WANT IT. What is the current zoning of the forfeit parcel? R-3, GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY 6. Are there any buildings on the parcel? If so, what type, and what is their present condition? NO 7. Do you have an appraised value on the parcel? If so, what it is? $26,400 - CLASSIFIED 4B1 8. Does the city/township want an easement over the parcel? 9. Any other information you feel would be helpful? SITE MAY NEED SOIL CORRECTION 10. Name and title of person who completed this questionnaire. BARBARA DACY, COMMUIVITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Thank you for providing the information. Please return to: Gene Rafferty, Land Commissioner Anoka County Government Center 2100 3'� Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 (612) 323-5427 25 REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 VERIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CITY OF FRIDLEY PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 32 0079 Date of Forfeiture: 06/08/1999 Before Forfeiture Amount � NO ASSESSMENTS After Forfeiture Amount Special Assessments Not Previously Certified Watershed District We ask that you enter the amount of special assessments by category on the captioned pazcel. If there are none, please enter a zero. If you need to verify the amounts, please contact the Special Assessments Clerl� at (612) 323-5434 , in the Property Records and Taxation Division. If your municipality or township has not previously certified special assessments on a forfeit property, you should now certify them to the PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION DIVISION, and enter them on the line, "Special Assessments Not Previously Certified." Improvements before forfeiture should include principal and interest up to the date of forfeiture and all deferred installments of principal. Improvements after forfeiture should include ONLY TI� TOTAL PRINCIPAL AMOLJNT. MS 282.01, Subd. 3, requires improvements made after forfeiture to be considered by the County Board in setting the appraised value for sale purposes. The apportionment of proceeds after sale is done in accordance with MS 282.08. (Seal) 26 Clerk of Tovcroship, Municipality or Watershed District Date y ��� � ,I REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0199 Please complete the following information by answering all applicable questions. Is this parcel buildable or unbuildable? UNBUII�DABLE a) Has your city/township adopted a local ordinance governing minimum area, shape, frontage or access? (If yes, answer 1(b); if no, proceed to question 5.) YES b) Does this parcel comply with your local ordinances regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access and, because of this, can be improved? If it does not comply, please list reason(s) for non-compliance. NO, IT WAS NOT PLATTED OR A i11vIT, IT WAS INTENDED FOR OPEN SPACE. 2. Do you recommend combining this parcel with an abutting forfeit parcel (if there is one)? 3. If your answer to #2 is yes, indicate which pazcel on the list. 4. Do you recommend selling this parcel to the abutting landowner? RECOMNIEND COMBINING WITH LAND OWNED BY TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION OR TOWNHOME OWNER 5. What is the current zoning of the forfeit parcel? R-3, GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY 6. Are there any buildings on the pazcel? If so, what type, and what is their present condition? NO 7. Do you have an appraised value on the parcel? If so, what it is? $1,000 - CLASS 4B1 Does the city/township want an easement over the parcel? NO 9. Any other information you feel would be helpful? 10. Name and title of person who completed this questionnaire. BARBARA DACY, COMMU1vITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Thank you for providing the information. Please return to: Gene Rafferty, Land Commissioner Anoka County Government Center 2100 3`� Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 (612) 323-5427 : � . � REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 VERIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CITY OF FRIDLEY PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0199 Before Forfeiture Amount After Forfeiture Amount Special Assessments Not Previously Certified Watershed District Date of Forfeiture: 06/08/1999 NO ASSESSMENTS We ask that you enter the amount of special assessments by category on the captioned parcel. If there are none, please enter a zero. If you need to verify the amounts, please contact the Special Assessments Clerk at (612) 323-5434 in the Property Records and Taxation Division. � If your municipality or township has not previously certified special assessments on a forfeit property, you should now certify them to the PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION DIVISION, and enter them on the line, "Special Assessments Not Previously Certified." Improvements before forfeiture should include principal and interest up to the date of forfeiture and all deferred installments of principal. Improvements after forfeiture should include ONLY THE TOTAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT. MS 282.01, Subd. 3, requires improvements made after forfeiture to be considered by the County Board in setting the appraised value for sale purposes. The apportionment of proceeds after sale is done in accordance with MS 282.08. (Seal) 29 Clerk of Township, Municipality or Watershed District Date � 30 � REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 PARCEL P1N # 24 30 24 44 0293 Please complete the following information by answering all applicable questions. 1. Is this parcel buildable or unbuildable? UNBUILDABLE a) Has your city/township adopted a local ordinance governing minimum area, shape, frontage or access? (If yes, answer 1(b); if no, proceed to question 5.) YES b) Does this parcel comply with your local ordinances regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access and, because of this, can be improved? If it does not comply, please list reason(s) for non-compliance. NO, ITS PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE PARI�NG SPACE FOR A TOWNHOME U1�TIT. 2. Do you recommend combining this pazcel with an abutting forfeit parcel (if there is one)? CITY RECONIlV�NDS COMBINING IT WITH THE APPROPRIATE IJNIT OR TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION 3. If your answer to #2 is yes, indicate which parcel on the list. 4. Do you recommend selling this parcel to the abutting landowner? YES, TOWNHOME IJ1vIT OR TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION. 5. What is the current zoning of the forfeit parcel? R 3, GENERAL MULTIPLE FANIILY 6. Are there any buildings on the parcel? If so, what type, and what is their present condition? NO 7. Do you have an appraised value on the parcel? If so, what it is? $600 - CLASS 4B1 8. Does the city/township want an easement over the parcel? NO 9. Any other information you feel would be helpful? 10. Name and title of person who completed this questionnaire. BARBARA DACY, COMMUlvITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Thank you for providing the information. Please return to: Gene Rafferty, Land Commissioner Anoka County Government Center 2100 3`� Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 (612) 323-5427 31 REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 VERIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CITY OF FRIDLEY PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0293 Date of Forfeiture: 06/08/1999 Before Forfeiture Amount NO ASSESSMENTS After Forfeiture Amount Special Assessments Not Previously Certified Watershed District We ask that you enter the amount of special assessments by category on the captioned parcel. If there are none, please enter a zero. If you need to verify the amounts, please contact the Special Assessments Clerk at (612) 323-5434 in the Property Records and Taxation Division. � If your municipality or township has not previously certified special assessments on a forfeit property, you should now certify them to the PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION DIVISION, and enter them on the line, "Special Assessments Not Previously Certified." Improvements before forfeiture should include principal and interest up to the date of forfeiture and all deferred installments of principal. Improvements after forfeiture should include ONLY TI� TOTAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT. MS 282.01, Subd. 3, requires improvements made after forfeiture to be considered by the County Board in setting the appraised value for sale purposes. The apportionment of proceeds after sale is done in accordance with MS 282.08. (Seal) 32 Clerk of Township, Municipality or Watershed District Date � � � 33 REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0294 Please complete the following information by answering all applicable questions. Is this parcel buildable or unbuildable? LTNBUILDABLE a) Has your city/township adopted a local ordinance goveming minim� area, shape, frontage or access? (If yes, answer 1(b); if no, proceed to question 5.) YES b) Does this pazcel comply with your local ordinances regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access and, because of this, can be improved? If it does not comply, please list reason(s) for non-compliance. NO, ITS PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE PARKING FOR A TOWNHOME IJIVIT 2. Do you recommend combining this parcel with an abutting forfeit parcel (if there is one)? CITY RECOMIVIENDS COMBI1vING IT WITH TI� APPROPRIATE TOWNHOME LTNIT 3. If your answer to #2 is yes, indicate which parcel on the list. 4. Do you recommend selling this parcel to the abutting landowner? YES, THE TOWNHOME iJNIT OWNER OR THE TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION 5. What is the current zoning of the forfeit parcel? R-3, GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMII.Y 6. Are there any buildings on the pazcel? If so, what type, and what is their present condition? NONE 7. Do you have an appraised value on the parcel? If so, what it is? $600 - CLASS 4B1 8. Does the city/township want an easement over the parcel? NO 9. Any other information you feel would be helpful? 10. Name and title of person who completed this questionnaire. BARBARA DACY, COMMU1vITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Thank you for providing the information. Please return to: Gene Rafferty, Land Commissioner Anoka County Government Center 2100 3`� Avenue Anoka, NIN 55303 (612)323-5427 ��� r � �. REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 VERIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CITY OF FRIDLEY PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0294 Before Forfeiture Amount After Forfeiture Amount Special Assessments Not Previously Certified Watershed District Date of Forfeiture: 06/08/1999 NO ASSESSMENTS We ask that you enter the amount of special assessments by category on the captioned pazcel. If there are none, please enter a zero. If you need to verify the amounts, please contact the Special Assessments Clerk at (612) 323-5434 in the Property Records and Taxation Division. ' If your municipality or township has not previously certified special assessments on a forfeit property, you should now certify them to the PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION DIVISION, and enter them on the line, "Special Assessments Not Previously Certified." Improvements before forfeiture should include principal and interest up to the date of forfeiture and all deferred installments of principal. Improvements after forfeiture should include ONLY TI-� TOTAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT. MS 282.01, Subd. 3, requires improvements made after forfeiture to be considered by the County Board in setting the appraised value for sale purposes. The apportioxunent of proceeds after sale is done in accordance with MS 282.08. (Seal) 35 Clerk of Township, Municipality ar Watershed District Date � Nl'' � � REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0295 Please complete the following information by answering all applicable questions. Is this parcel buildable or unbuildable? UNBUILDABLE Has your city/township adopted a local ordinance governing minimum area, shape, frontage or access? (If yes, answer 1(b); if no, proceed to question 5.) YES Does this parcel comply with your local ordinances regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access and, because of this, can be improved? If it does not comply, please list reason(s) for non-compliance. NO, ITS PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE A PARKING SPACE FOR A TOWNHOME IJNIT 2. Do you recommend combining this parcel with an abutting forfeit parcel (if there is one)? CITY RECOMN�NDS COMBINING IT WITH THE APPROPRIATE TOWNHOME LTNIT OR TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION 3. If your answer to #2 is yes, indicate which parcel on the list. 4. Do you recommend selling this parcel to the abutting landowner? CITY RECONIMENDS COMBIIVING IT WITH THE APPROPRIATE TOWNHOME U1�TIT OR TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION 5. What is the current zoning of the forfeit parcel? R-3, GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY 6. Are there any buildings on the parcel? If so, what type, and what is their present condition? NO 7. Do you have an appraised value on the parcel? If so, what it is? $600 - CLASS 4B1 8. Does the city/township want an easement over the parcel? NO 9. Any other information you feel would be helpful? 10. Name and title of person who completed this quesrionnaire. BARBARA DACY, CONIMUIVITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Thank you for providing the information. Please return to: Gene Rafferiy, Land Commissioner Anoka County Government Center 2100 3'� Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 (612)323-5427 37 REPORT: FORFTCRPT GENERATED: 27 MAR 1999 20:36 VERIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CITY OF FRIDLEY PARCEL PIN # 24 30 24 44 0295 Before Forfeiture Amount After Forfeiture Amount Special Assessments Not Previously Certified Watershed District Date of Forfeiture: 06/08/1999 NO ASSESSMENT We ask that you enter the amount of special assessments by category on the captioned parcel. If there are none, please enter a zero. If you need to verify the amounts, please contact the Special Assessments Clerk at (612) 323-5434 in the Property Records and Taxation Division. � If your municipality or township has not previously certified special assessments on a forfeit property, you should now certify them to the PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION DIVISION, and enter them on the line, "Special Assessments Not Previously Certified." Improvements before forfeiture should include principal and interest up to the date of forfeiture and all deferred installments of principal. Improvements after forfeiture should include ONLY TI� TOTAL PRINCIPAL AMOLJNT. MS 282.01, Subd. 3, requires improvements made after forfeiture to be considered by the County Board in setting the appraised value for sale purposes. The apportionment of proceeds after sale is done in accordance with MS 282.08. (Seal) : Clerk of Township, Municipality or Watershed District Date 0 .� 0 � r � C]TY OF FRIDLEY TO: FROM: DATE: RE: AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 William W. Burns, City Manager � � Rick Pribyl, Finance Director Deb Skogen, City Clerk November 17, 1999 Resolution Appointing Election Judges and Polling Locations The attached resolution appoints the polling locations and election judges for the December 14, 1999 Special Election. _ In 1997 Fridley annexed a small area of land that had been detached by Coon Rapids. Because the municipal boundary between Coon Rapids and Fridley was also the boundary between Anoka County Commissioner Districts 5 and 6, a separate precinct for the this territory was established as Ward 3, Precinct 1B. The Secretary of State has ordered a correction to the boundary of Anoka County Commissioner District 5 so that it is again coterminous with the municipal boundary between the cities of Coon Rapids and has merged it with Ward 3 Precinct lA, as allowed by Minnesota Statutes 204B.146, and now becomes Ward 3 Precinct 1. For this election, the head judges are being appointed by precinct. The other election judges are being appointed without precinct assignments at this time to allow the city more flexibility in determining precinct assignments. The election judges being appointed for this special election have been selected from previous work as election judges and others who have expressed an interested. Training for this special election will be held the first week of December. Staff recommends a motion adopting the attached resolution. . � � RESOLIJTION NO. - 1999 RESOLUTTON DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOIN'I'Il�TG ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE DECEMBER 14, 1999 SPECIAL ELECTTON NOW, TI�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at a regular meeting on November 22, 1999. SECTION 1. That on the 14th day of December 1999, there shall be a Municipal Special Election: SECTION 2. That the polling places for said election shall be as follows: Ward 1 Precinct 1 Ward 1 Precinct 2 Ward 1 Precinct 3 Ward 1 Precinct 4 Ward 2 Precinct 1 Ward 2 Precinct 2 Ward 2 Precinct 3 Ward 2 Precinct 4 Ward 3 Precinct 1 Ward 3 Precinct 2 Ward 3 Precinct 3 Ward 3 Precinct 4 Grace Evangelical Free Church Hayes Elementary School Fridley Municipal Center Fridley Senior High School Woodcrest Elementary School Knights of Columbus St. Philip's Lutheran church North Park Elementary School Springbrook Nature Center Redeemer Lutheran church Stevenson Elementary School Fridley Covenant Church SECTION 3. That the polling place will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of voting: SECTION 4. That the following judges are appointed to act as chairperson of the Election Board for the precincts designated and shall have the duties set forth in Section 204B.20 of Minnesota Statutes. Ward 1 Precinct 1 Ward 1 Precinct 2 Ward 1 Precinct 3 Ward 1 Precinct 4 Ward 2 Precinct 1 Ward 2 Precinct 2 Ward 2 Precinct 3 Ward 2 Precinct 4 Ward 3 Precinct 1 Ward 3 Precinct 2 Ward 3 Precinct 3 Ward 3 Precinct 4 Carolyn Holmen Linda Colstrom Bernadette Bovy Norma Rust Teresa Hub Joann Cederholm Larry Ovshak Marjie Douglas Betty Bonine Marie Nelson Barb Pickering Robert Hosman SECTION 5. That the following people are hereby appointed to act as Judges for said election except that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to appoint qualified substitutes as set forth in Chapter.4, Section 4.05 of the City Charter: Ron Anderly Nena Anderson Eleanor Anderson Louise Bennethum �_i__ Rita Binkowski Carole Blaska Dennis Bushnell Linda Colstrom r Resolution No. _-1999 Page 2 Jean Coyle Glen Douglas Carolyn Doyle Harold Dwire Barbara Enrooth Marion Ertl Velma Farr Marguerite Gilbert Janet Crriffith Laurie Harris Oksana Hawryluk Eleanor Heyda Jane Hosman Sharon James Carol Johnson Elnerine Johnson Irma Kelly Bob Kelsey Mary Kirkwood Janet Kothman Marlys Kranz Nina Landt Joan Leonard Jeanette Lindquist Marlys Lisowski Natalie Lohmer Jan Long Connie Metcalf Annabel Monson Ben Monson Myrtle Morphew Joe Murphy Doris Nord Donna Novak Eunice O'Neill Dona Mae Odland Kay Olson Lois Palmquist Wilfred Raeker Cindy Ruschy Darlene Sammarco Beverly Sax Marlene Schonebaum Tom Schonebaum Joan Schroeder Betty Scott Marilyn Seeman Dorothy Sielaff Nornia Spencer Beverly Steeves Marlene Steichen Janet Swanson Ruth Sydow Betty Tonneson Regina Tony Darlene Vallin Dorothy Veres Ann Williams Maureen Woodard Laurence Zimmerman Maria Zurbey SECTION 6. Compensation for said Judges will be paid at the rate of $7.00 per hour for regular Judges and $7.50 for the Chairperson of the Election Board. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCII.. OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 22� DAY OF NOVEMBER 1999. ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN, CITY CLERK ��� NANCY JORGENSON, MAYOR m . � � CRY OF FRIDLEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF N�VEMBER 22, 1999 William W. Burns, City Manager ��� � John G. Flora, Public Works Director November 15, 1999 Noise Wall Meeting PW99-185 On November 10, 1999, Minnesota Department of Transportation representatives conducted an open house at the City of Fridley in regards to the construction of a noise wall on the west side of University Avenue from 44`" Avenue north to I-694. A total of 27 people attended the meeting, including Councilmembers Bob Barnette and Ann Bolkcom. After the explanation of the noise wall was presented, a straw vote was taken of those in attendance. Fourteen of the property owners voted in favor of the noise wall and seven of the property owners voted against the noise wall. During the meeting, it was indicated that Council would hold a meeting the first week of December on this issue. It later became apparent that the first Council meeting in December was December 13, 1999. Accordingly, we will be sending a letter to the Fridley residents on the west side of University Avenue indicating that there will be a public hearing on December 13 and that a decision will be made regarding the construction of the noise wall from 44`h Avenue north to I-694. Accordingly, recommend that the City Council set a public hearing for the University Avenue noise wall for the City Council meeting on December 13, 1999. JGF:rsc 43 � � CRY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING a� NOVEMBER 22, 1999 To: William W. Burns, City Manager �� From: David H. Sallman, Director of Public Safety Date: November 18, 1999 Re: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant The City of Fridley has been selected to receive funds in the amount of $22,705 in connection with the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program. This grant has a$2,523 match requirement and In order to receive the funds, the following conditions need to be met. 1. On Thursday, December 2 an advisory board consisting of the recommended agencies will meet to discuss use of the funds, making their recommendations. The attached � sheet contains suggestions from the Police Department as well as the Neighborhood Crime Watch Advisory Board which met in September. 2. Upon completion of the advisory board's recommendations, a public hearing needs to be held. The Public Hearing notice has been submitted for inclusion in the December 2 and December 9 issues of the Focus with the Public Hearing date scheduled for the December 13 meeting. We do not anticipate a large response to this non-controversial issue. Given the limited amount of funds available through this block grant, and the other grant funding sources already in place, it was felt, once again, that purchasing equipment was the best use of these funds. .. �. � � � PURPOSE AREA I- Law Enforcement Funds C: Equipment /tem 5 Digital Cameras @ $500 each 2 Panasonic laptop computers @ $4700 each 1 modem 2 docking stations for laptops @ $600 each CompuKid photo imaging/ Fingerprint system FundinA Source LLEBG LLEBG LLEBG LLEBG LLEBG LLEBG Funds Total Match/Donations Amount PurOOSe $ 2,500 Domestic Violence Crime Scene Evidence $ 9,400 Squad Cars $ 3,500 $ 1,200 Squad Cars Squad Cars $ 5,500 Child Safety Donations: $2,500 $22,100 2,500 0 Remaining funds ($607 LLEBG/$23 Match) Cell Phones for NROs $129 each (approximately 5) � �� r i GlY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 � FROM: DATE: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER�(��` CHUCK MCKUSICK, FIRE CHIEF NOVEMBER 15,1999 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO REQUEST BIDS FOR FIRE APPARATUS The 1999 Capital Improvement Fund has funds designated for the purchase of a new Class A fire truck which will replace two aged engine companies. A committee of our firefighters has spent this year researching speciiications. We are now ready to advertise for bids. Accordingly, staff requests Council's authorization of the Fire Department to advertise for bids for a new Class A engine company. . � � d 0 � AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 GTY OF FRIDLEY CLA1 MS 902A�� - 90A�84 � �� ! � GTY OF FRIDLEY LICENSES CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Type of License CHRISTMAS TREE SALES Emerald Evergreens Tazget Pazking Lot 755 - 53rd Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55421 CIGARETTE SALES Discount Tobacco 315 Osborne Road Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Holiday Stationstore #188 5695 Hackmann Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 FOOD SALES Holiday Stationstore #188 5695 Hackmann Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 RETAIL GASOLINE SALES Holiday Stationstore #188 5695 Hackmann Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 LICENSES � Douglas J. Kloss Approved By: Police Department Fire Department (deposit) Fees: $ 100.00 $ 200.00 Taleb Wazwaz Police Department $ 125.00 ` Fire Department Community Development Donovan Erickson Police Department $ 125.00 Fire Department Community Development Donovan Erickson Police Department $ 45.00 Fire Department Community Development Donovan Erickson Police Department $ 60.00 Fire Department Community Development � 48 • _t 0 L I C E N S E S(CONTINUED) Type of License EXCAVATING Rivard Contracting 21560 Cedar Dr NW Cedar MN 55011 GAS SERVICES Krinkie Heating & Air Conditioning 87ECoRdB St Paul MN 55117-1928 � Mike Rivard Bruce Krinkie GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL Eagle Window 19300 Linden Dr Rogers MN 55374 Scott Nelson New Edition 1301 Fairmount Ave St Paul MN 55105 Kate Hebel Riverside Construction of Elk River Inc (Changed from Reshatar Systems) 19230 Evans St NW Elk River MN 55330 Keith Johnson Superior Roofing Construction Inc 2717 E 32 St Minneapolis MN 55406 Shelly Edwards GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESIDENTIAL Andover Exteriors (20052503� 2780 S Coon Creek Dr Andover MN 55304 Dan Davich Caliber Builders Inc (20019551) 716 Hwy 10 NE #133 Blaine MN 55434 Fredrick Johnson Coty Construction (9356) 1001 6 St S Hopkins MN 55343 Bill Edgeworth FFC Inc (20019555) 4148 26 Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406 Erik Karia Fine Home Building Services (20133015) 23290 Melanie Trl Scandia MN 55073-9745 Terrance Dreyer 4i�J Approved By: RON JULKOWSKI Building Official RON JULKOWSKI Building Official RON JULKOWSKI Building Official Same Same Same STATE OF MINN Same Same Same Same L I C E N S E S(CONTINUED) Type of License � GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESIDENTIAL Giertsen Co (1796) 860 Decatur Ave N Golden Valley MN 55427 Richard Giertsen Lunemann Mike Construction (20045212) 11617 Zane Cir Champlin MN 55316 Mike Lunemann Meuenga Construction Inc (4659) 1292 Woodcrest Ave Shoreview MN 55126 Tony Mezzenga Most Bruce Construction(20178882) 22545 Olinda Trl Scandia MN 55073 Bruce Most Northside Siding (20172687) 5150 Florida Ave N � Crystal MN 55428 Gina Kilgore Roncor Construction (2337) 10740 Lyndale Ave S Bloomington MN 55437 Doug Baldwin Stenco Construction (6163) 2955 Co Rd H New Brighton MN 55112 Jerome Stenhoff Viking Exteriors (3773) 1775 Selby Ave St Paul MN 55104 JK Jubicka HEATING Heated Floor Systems 1658 Louise Ave St Paul MN 55106 Dave Gulbranson Krinkie Heating & Air Conditioning 87ECoRd6 St Paul MN 55117-1928 Bruce Krinkie Master Mechanical Inc 1027 Gemini Rd Eagan MN 55121 Gordon Peters 50 Approved By: STATE OF MN Same Same Same Same Same Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Building Official Same Same � s� - 0 � Type of License PLUMBING Weld & Son Plumbing 315 Juneau Lane Plymouth MN 55447 SIGN ERECTOR Fish & LaBeau Signs Inc 2327 N 2 Street Minneapolis MN 55411 L I C E N S E S(CONTINUED) � Donald Weld Tim Williams 51 Approved By: STATE OF MINN RON JULKOWSKI Building Official ` ESTIMATES CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 CRY OF FRIDLEY Park Construction Co. 7900 Beech Street N.E. Minneapolis, NIN 55432-1795 Riverview Heights Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1999 —1 FINAL ESTIMATE ......................................................................... $ 19,527.74 Diversified Paving, Inc. 8019 — 146�' Avenue N.W. Ramsey, NIN 55303 Municipal Liquor Store Parking Lot _ Improvement Project No. 326 FINAL ESTIMATE ......................................................................... $ 878.92 Ron Kassa Construction 6005 — 250�' East Elko, MN 55020 1999 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 322 FINAL ESTIMATE ......................................................................... $ 2,747.54 0 .- 52 ' .. -� CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DMSION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c% William W. Bums, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: November 22, 1999 CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Riverview Heights Area Improvement Project No. ST. 1999 - 1, for Park Construcrion Company, 7900 Beech St NE, Fridley MN 55432. • We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Riverview Heights Area Improvement Project No. ST. 1999 — 1 and find that the same is substanrially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on November 19, 1999. Respectfully submitted, .-�� ��' �- _�i �-- `�ohn G. Flora Director of Public Works JT:�Z Prepared Checked 53 November 22, 1999 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS AREA IMPROVEMENT ROTECT NO. ST. 1999 - 1 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-menrioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specificarions of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. , So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being November 19, 1999, , . Jon Thompson, Construcu n Inspector �^� Robert men, Project Coordinator 54 » .- � _, November 22, 1999 City of Fridley RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS AREA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1999 - 1 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-menrioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $1,952,??4.10 and the final payment of $19,527.74 for the improvement project would cover in full, the conuactor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. PARK CONSTRUCTION COMI'ANY Robert U men, Project Coordinator 0 55 November 22, 1999 City of Fridley RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS AREA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1999 - 1 PREVAII,ING WAGE VERIFICATION This is to certify that Park Construction Company has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and conect. ' PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY /,�� Robert Uelm , Project Coordinator 56 r .- a . -. APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 8 (Final) OSM Copy City Copy Contractor Copy Inspector Copy Project Riverview Heights Street Improvements City of Fridley, MN Owner City of Fridley Owner's Project No. 1999-1 Engineer's Project No. 99004.01 Contractor: Park Construction Application Date: 15-Nov-99 For Period Ending: 12-Nov-99 Fridley Project Code 558-0000-415-4530-9904 Original Contract Amount $ 1,969,634.75 Net Change By Contract Amendment $ 162,968.84 Contract Amount to Date $ 2,132,603.59 Total Amount of Work Completed to Date: $ 1,952,774.10 Material Suitably Stored on Site but not $ - Incorporated into Work Crross Amount Due to Date $ 1,952,774.10 Less 0% Retainage $ _ Amount Due to Date $ 1,952,774.10 Less Previous Payments $ 1,933,246.36 Payment Due this Application $ 19,527.74 � , h:�99004.00\civil�spread�PAY8.XLS 57 VOUCHER DETAIL LIST �, Es�irtu�e Voucher Numbec 3 Dxe: I?.Nov-99 OSbI Prqect Number 990P1.01 . � Pro�ect. Rivm�iew Tmxe Uliliry and Street Impro��emenB fa CITY OF FRIDIEY Cirv Prqa� No. SI. 1999-I ' Contnet CompletM Thls Moo�h Toul to Date y_ . „ ..c. �..._.+-+.er..a: ��� �'�EStim�te Vouchtt Numbcr 3 OSbI Projtt� Number 9900.1 01 for CIT'Y OF FRIDLEti" ' � Item Spe<. no. Deftrlplle� ?J Z50} 602 INSTALL CASTING -_.._....-- __ 55 2503 602 INSTALL WATERTIGHTCASTING ----.�._.__--'_.---- 56 2503 60: COMVECT TO EYISTING STORM SEWER --` -- 57 2503 602 COYNECT TO EXISTING MAYHOLES ISTq i3 _'?03 602 CONSTRUCT BULKHEAD - ----'- --.-._..._ 9 SOJ 60 INSTAIL Ht DR.�NT g SALVAGED LE.iD --._.._ --.-.____ 60 '_50� 60? ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX ____ __ 61 ?54J 602 WATERbfAIN OFFSET 6? 25W 60'_ 6' GATE VALVE _._....._._..�.. ---'-'---- 6� 'PI 60� 6 WATER.�14I� DCCTILE IRON CL 32 ._ ..-------'--."--.... N 250.1 60} g- 0.•ATERtiIAIN DGCfILE fRON CL 52 65 ?SPI 60? ?" POIYSTYRENE INSUI.,\TION ` 66 25W.608 DUCTILE (RON PIPE FI'ITINGS 67 ?SO6 502 C.�ITCHBASIN 68 2506.502 CATCHBASIN MANHOLE �' DIA. (48 FTJ 69 2506.502 CATCHBASIN MANHOLE 5' DIA.(0.8 FT. 70 2506.502 CATCHBASIN MANHOLE 6' DL4.(0�8 FT.) 71 2506.502 CATC}iHASM MANHOLE T DIA.(0.8 FTJ 72 2506.502 CATCHBASIN MANHOLE 8' DIA (0.8 F[J 73 2506.SQ2 CATCHBASIN MANHOLE 9' DU.(0.8 FI'.) 74 2506.503 CATC}fBASIN MANHOLE (4• DUJ EX7RA DEY7N 75 2506.503 CATCHBASIN MANFiOLE (8' DIA.) EX'tRA DEP'iH 76 2506.503 CATCHBAS[N MANHOLE (7 DIA.) F�C7Rp DEPTFi 77 2506.522 ADIUST FRAME & RING CASTING 78 2506.522 RA1SflLlFTSTATION )9 2511.502 ILIWOM RIPRAP CL1SS III BO 252I.507 �' CONCRETE SIDEWALK BI 252I.511 2' BI171MINOUS 7RAIL 32 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GVRER DESIGN 8618 33 2331.507 6'CONCRETEDRIVEWAYPAVEMEN! &1 2540.602 GIL1S5 PAVING SYSTEI�t 85 2557.602 INSTALL PARK GATES 86 2557.602 INST.11.L FLOOD GAGE 87 2564.531 F& I SIGN PANELS 7YPE C SS 2564.602 24' STOP LINE WHi1'&FppXY 89 2564.603 BALE CHECK 90 � 2564.604 ZEBRA CROSS WALK • WHITE FPDXY 91 2573.501 CLE\NUP 92 25�5.502 ASH • FALL GOLD - 25' CAL BkB 91 2575.502 MAPIE - SILVER QUEQ�I _ 25 GL B&B 41 2575.502 SFRVICEBQtRY-GHTCI,IIMp 95 2575.502 DOGWOpD, GRAY - l' HT • 5 GAL % 2575.502 DOGWOOD, CARDINAL RFD TWIG - 3' HT - 5 GAL 97 2573.502 SILT FIIJCE 98 2573.503 SODDING TYPE LAWN 99 2575.603 SEFDING MIX7l1RE 250 100 2575.603 SEEDMG MIXTURE 100 101 2575.604 FROSION COMROL WOOD FIBER BLANKET, CA'[EGpRy 2 102 262�.602 SANITARY SERVICEREPAIR LESS THAN IdDEEP 103 2621.602 SANITARY SERVICE REPqIR GRFATER THpN Id DEFP CR,VVD TOTAL � ..o�.�...a�.-�.,.�..v, YOUCHER DETAIL LIST Daie. I .-NOV-99 Prqecc Rirorview Tertace Uiiiiry anA Slreet Imprrn�emrnLs Ciry Piqtt� 40. St. 1999-I Contnct CompktM Thb �lonth Total to Date U.�u Q.a.ii�r U•i� ►rice Total Prlee Q�aulry Toul Prke Q.a�iur Toul Priee E?�CH IS 163.00 2.J75.00 61.70 10.06500 j� ."__'_--.--____'.._.__-' -"'___..__'-_._' _'_'-.. I EACH 5 175.00 875.00 . . - --------'-- -------- --- E.•1CH J J6500 IA60.00 6.00 2.I90.00 � --'---- --------- -�- � E4CH 6 i00.00 3.000.00 i00 �jpppr+ - ---- -'------------- -----__._._.. ._- F.�CH------'. s_._.--._...135:00..."------- Z.680.00 . _ . - '- '._......"-- -' - ---.._... _..-'-- EACH i }00.00 IS00.00 1_00 7.600.6: --'- '-'-...._......_._..._..__...._......__....__..._....._......._._._._._---. EACH 30 I 10.00 7.J00.00 J6 00 ... 7.960.p�: . __ _'. __ -____ '� �- __ '....._.. ..._ _.._... ; E4CH J 1.000 00 J.000.00 . ' -__.._'_"'_�.'_'_ .._""'._' "'_ -------'--' -.�__._._.. __. ........-- -.._ __. ._._...'-- �_��- : E4CH i __.._76i_00._...-'--_'-- 7.825_00 . ...10 00 7.630.R-.'. ---. ..----- --'--' - � - _ ..... . ------- FT 95 }700 JSI5.00 - i38 70 I0.681 A:� - -----...__ .-.'-.-'.----.......__._._...._..--. FT SO J I 00 7.250.00 . �p pp s�p.a . --- -'----- ----_._.. ---------- S.Y 2> 9.00 225.00 - I}9.�6 1.2i5JJ; .._ -. _.__..-..---...-'-�---.... LBS 3100 2.25 _ 6.975.00 - ?,I15.00 i.326.25 `. FACti 18 I.100.00 19.800.00 19.00 20.900_00.: EACFf IJ I.850.00 24.030.00 20.00 37.000-06 �� Fi1CH 9 3.000.00 27.000.00 5.00 I5.000.00 � FAC71 1 3.900.00 3.900.00 � I.00 3.900.00 i Fi\CFI 2 5.600.00 11.200.00 1.00 5.600.00 ; Fi\CF{ 3 6300.00 19.500.00 �.00 26.000.00 � FACH 2 9.200.00 18,400.00 � z.00 ia,aao.00' tF i �zo.ao �20.00 0.�� u�: LF 4 �t25.00 I.700.00 7.82 1.627.50 ��: LF 3 600.00 t.800.00 J.07 I.d120Q i� EACH 50 225.00 I I,250.00 31.00 6.975.0� � � IS t I300.00 1,200.00 CY 500 45.00 22,500.00 7a6 79 13.605.SS � SF SO 4.10 728.00 � ?35.% %7.W � SY 100 8.25 825.00 248.71 2,051.86 i � F1' 17100 6.35 108,585.00 16,6f0.00 105,661.00 SF I3000 2.50 32.500.00 9,526.15 23,815.J6 SF I773 i.65 8.021.25 1.75� 00 8.14215 EACH 2 335.00 670.00 I.50 50250 f FACH 1 225.00 225.00 I.00 225.00 � SF 259 t7.50 4,5J250 218.50 3,823.75 i FI' 65 5.00 325.00 _ � FACFI 100 5.00 500.00 SF 90 4.00 360.00 + IS 1 IQ000.00 10.000.00 I.00 10.000.00 �: PACfi 11 225.00 2.�75.00 11.00 2,475.00 � FACH 3� 200.00 600.00 3.00 60Q00 � E1CH t6 200.00 7200.00 16.00 J.200.00, EAC7i 40 50.00 2.000.00 40.00 2,00Q00 � EACFI 42 50.00 2,100.00 32.00 2,100.00 � LF 3000 2.00 6.000.00 723.00 1.446.00 SY 16.000 1.90 30.400.00 17.120.00 J2.526.00 AGRE 1.0 I,240.00 1,240.00 0.50 620.00 ACRE 3 I.075.00 3,225.00 2.50 2,667.30 SY 5000 I.75 6.750.00 tj40.00 6.129.00 EACN IS 750.00 13.500.00 16.00 12.00Q00 EACH I 1,040.00 1.040.00 II.00 11.440.00 S �,969.6il.75 S - S 1.775.770.26 �� Fs�imale Voucher Numbcr' 8 OSM Prqect Number 9906:.01 fa CITY OF FRIDLEY (CHAIVCE ORDfR NO. q Ilem Syee. Na D<xripl'q� 1 25W.603 S' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL i? ... ---...: 2 25M 605 I' COPPER SERVICE (COMPLETE) ___ _�__ _._�._--- J 2504.608 DUCTILE (RON PIPE FfiTINGS ......., � 2506.502 I' NRB STOP & BOX _.__.._._._.__.__ 5 2506502 ABANDON 8' WATER MAN. SAND FILL _ ._...-.__ 6 2506.502 REMOVE EYISTiNG WATER �.fA1N ._. _...__._._...._ . 7 2506.502 CONNECTTOEXISTiNG'NATERNAIN(DRY') _.....__. 8 2506.502 BULKHE4D E`CISTING WATER MAIN _,_^ _,____ 9 2506.502 ...3" GATE VALVE 3 BOX CRA�D TOTAL CH.4NCE ORDER I .�u.ucrnoncoun n VOUCHER DET.11L LIST Projec�: Riverview Trnace U�iliry and Stree� Impro��emmts Ciry Projat No. S1. 1999-I Contraet U�iu QruWv Usil hiee Total Prfee FT 1,650.0 5 J0.00 49,54 EACH_ 7.0 5 _ 350.00 T^^y__2.45 LBS I.500.0 S 2.50 3.75 � EACH 7.0 5 35.00 59 .�.T^ LF . 1.600.0 S 8.00 12.8C Y�LF 50.0 S 15.00 7= EACH 5.0 5 800.00 � 4.0C EACH 8.0 5 250.00 2.0( ^ EACH 11.0 S 850.00 2.i` $ 78.35 Contract M Dalc. 12-NOV•99 Chaape Order Na I Work Chan4e O�der Na 1 Worlc Compkted This M1lonth Toul lo Date �. Qu�lib� TOtal Mtt Q�antin TMaI Pikt I.W0.00 J9,200.00 -'.._. . . I� 00 L900.00 - - 2.i85.00 6,%2.50 � . . 3.00 � 680.00 . . L310.00 11280.00 . . ...._._10900 _-- �.635.00 . . i 00 1.000.00 _ . - 10.00 2.500.00 � � a.00 J.100.00 S • 5 3455).50 Chante Order No. 2 Work Chanye Order No. 2 Work � ComptetM Thfs M1lonth Toul to Date GIUND TOTAL CHANCE ORDER NO. 2 H •.vmw.aad.in4..ar�n ws �f� E 84�73.84 $ - S 'lZ.a6C•3s � w .� CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c% William W. Bums, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: November 22, 1999 CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Esrimate FOR Municipal Liquor Store Parking Lot Improvement Project No. 326, for Diversified Paving, Inc., 8019 146`� Ave NW, Ramsey, MN 55303. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Municipal Liquor Store Parking Lot Improvement Project No. 326 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on November 19, 1999. Respectfully submitted, � John G. Flora Director of Public Works JT:�Z � Prepared Checked 61 November 22, 1999 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY MUNICIl'AL LIQUOR STORE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROTECT NO. 326 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-menaoned project and find that the work required by the contract is substanrially complete in conformity with the plans and specificarions of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. ; So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspecrion that being November 19, 1999_ � - _ �->'1 D�_ Jon Thompson, Construction Inspector � Ur an . Schmi tbauer, President 62 C7 N i r � November 22, 1999 City of Fridley MUNICII'AL LIQUOR STORE PARHINNG LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 326 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specificarions heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $43,946.20 and the final payment of $878.92 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials � and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and conect. DIVERSIFIED PAVING, INC. �C.Kr Urban H. Schmidtbauer, President 63 November 22, 1999 City of Fridley M d MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 326 PREVAILING WAGE VERIFICATION This is to certify that Diversified Paving, Inc. has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. � DIVERSIFIED PAVING, INC. _ �cL,�,, Urban H. Schmidtbauer, President � • '� �+ CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. •• FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 FROM: Ciry of Fridley Engineering Division Estimate No. FINAL Period Ending: November 19, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council For: Diversified Paving, Inc. City of Fridley 8019 146th Ave NW 6431 University Ave, NE Ramsey, MN 55303 Fridley, MN 55432 Dated: November 22, 1999 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 326 Job Code: STATEMENT OF WORK i::v:4'?::::i::i:::v::v:::::S::i::i:::::i::v::i::ii':iy::iii::vi:::::::i::i::i:i:::i::i::j::ii:::::iv?::i::ii::i::i::: :i:::ii::ii::i::i:i:::::::iii::i::i :iiii::i:::i::i::ii::i :}!i::::iiiii::ii::i::i:Li::ii::ii::i::: i::ii:i�...i�ii�iiy'.iiiiii"::i::: ::i:L:: �i::. � .::•:'.::•'iiiiiiii :i::i`::i::i::i::i::i:•iii::iii::i i5ii:i:i::ii::iii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:.i:: v:rax�'iuE��:tii �'• a:�'•��:'i:'i:•i:•i �:• ::�;�': ;' :`>�.��... .;• :::::::::::::::::::: :.::::.�:::::.� :::..;•:::::::.;.;:.::;•::<.;:�;:�;:;;::;:•;;:�;::�;:>:• .:.;::::::::: :::• :::::::::.::..::•::::. �::;::.:. �::: :..::..::;:: <::::.;.; :.;•.: �:: ::::.:: : :...:::::::::::: ::•:::. :.:;..:•� •;:�;:�;:�:�.;::.::•:•:;:�;:;;. ;.: :.;::::... ;;::. �. �;;.: ... : ::::.:.� :•:;.�:::: :•.:� ::..:. ::..::::::..:::.:...........::.::::::::..::::::...::. � ;;.......::.:.. . ..... ::.:�:::.::::;;: •: ............... :::.:�::.:::.:.: :.;;;,:;;:;;:;:�::::::::;:•:;:•:�::•Si:�;:�: i: ............. : •:.:::�:...... :r:;:::>;:a : .;:..;�::::;::.::::._.� ::::::: :::.:.........::.:�.�:::: :.::::::.:<:.�::::::::._::.;.:.: � ... . :.:::::::::::::: �»�::;:.;>:: ;:::.fi�:::�.;::._:::.;n..; ::: :.;:4��:':'>'::::;`:::>:: :> ��'�k���:��:<�:>:::::::<: ::;: :.: .:;::.;::::.:;::::.;:.:..� :::::::.:::::: :.:::.:::.:::::.�.�::: _:..::::::::;::::::..�. . :.............. . :��: ..h�:..:.... .:���:::>::>:<'��:':�::�'�;;'' ::: ............. ..:.:.:. ..: ::::::.�::.::<::>:::::>,:::> , ::::::.::: . :.:::.;:.::.::::�.::::: ri::: : .........:..:.::::.;.::: . � .............. ..... ::;.;:.;.::::. :.:;:... .....:.. :::: ; ..:<:,... ... :...... .::.�: :.. . :.......... ............ .....: �::::.:,::: :.:<:<.:::.::::::.;�;:.;:<.::: �: �:.;;�.;:::.::.::.;:.;:;:;.::;< :::..:........ ............ . ,: :::.:::::.:..:.....:.,.:::.. . . ........ ....:.......:...... .::::.�. ... . ... .... ..... :.:::::::::::::;;;:.;::::: .. ...,... .. :::><>::>:;�ttr��::l�:::::::::::::::»::::>�:>:::::::<:>::>:>:<��:' ::>::>::`.,,<:::>::>_::;;.:..>::::::::., ;s.::::':;:::::��:::.',: �:::::::::::::: ":.>�.«<,:::::::>::>':::: ::>::'��'�::::>::;«;;.«:::::>:<;:: ::::::;::;:.::<::::>:::::;::::::<:<::.>::�: :<��::�:>�:>':�;:,`..>>.;:::::,:;:' :.::::::::::::`::><�`:�:::<.<_:::::<:<:::::::...::::»: : .::.;:>.;: � :.:: �::.;:.;:.; ::::.;;::::::::::::«<:;:>:<:: � ....... .......>....... .....�ansi .........t3n�t.........::.�.�tc�::._:::::.:::.��:�........��::.::..;:.�.:<;7°�E ............:�tt�un€......... Remove concrete islands 2,000 Sq ft 1.35 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 2,700.00 Mill bituminous pavement 100 Sq yd 9.50 0.00 0.00 200.00 1,900.00 Patch island and repair pavement 60 Ton 60.00 0.00 0.00 146.67 8,800.20 Type 31 asphalt ; Type 41 wear course ixture 2 in. 630 Ton 38.50 0.00 0.00 725.00 27,912.50 Bituminous material for tack coat 490 Gal 1.75 0.00 0.00 490.00 857.50 Adjust gate valve box 2 Each 100.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 100.00 Adjust frame and ring casting 3 Each 200.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1,000.00 Grout fill fence post bases (52) 52 LS 13.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 676.00 SUBTOTAL $0.00 $43,946.20 TOTAL �, 65 Municipai Liquor Store Parking Lot Improvement Project No. 326 Pa9e 2 .. Estimate No. FINAL SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Contract additions: C/O #1 Contract deductions: Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (0%) Less Amount Paid Previousiy AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR $33,838.50 10,207.70 44,046.20 43,946.20 0.00 43,067.28 $878.92 I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under the terms of the contract for this project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correct and no part of t "Amount Due This Estimate" has been received. ByQ-.-�- Contractor's Authorize Representative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR By � / Checked By r-- • • Date ! . �� Respec Ily Submitted, ohn G. F ora, P.E. Public Works Director � .� M .. CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c% William W. Bums, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: November 22, 1999 CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Fsrimate for 1999 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 322, for Ron Kassa Construction, Inc., 6005 250`� Street East, Elko, MN 55020. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Miscellaneous Concrete Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 322 and find that the same is substanrially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on November 19, 1999. Respectfully submitted, � John G. Flora Director of Public Works )T:�Z � Prepared Checked 67 November 22, 1999 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley N .- REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY MISCEL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROiECT NO. 322 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specificarions of the project. All deficiencies have been conected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being November 19. 1999. .: a. z November 22, 1999 City of Fridley MISCEL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 322 CERTI�iCATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually fumished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specificarions heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $42,614.10 and the final payment of $2,747.54 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. RON SSA CO TRUCTION, INC. n Kassa, Presid nt . � �� November 22, 1999 City of Fridley MISCEL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 322 PREVAILING WAGE VERIFICATION This is to certify that Ron Kassa Construcrion, Inc. has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. RON KASSA CONSTRUCTION, INC. ��1 on Kassa, Presi ent 7� 8 --, � s � . �,. CITY OF FRlDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � 6431 UNNERSITY AVENUE N.E. � FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Division Estimate No. FINAL Period Ending: November 19, 1999 T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council FOR: Ron Kassa ConsUuction City of Fridley 6005 250th Street East 6431 University Ave, NE Eiko MN 55020 Fridley, MN 55432 Dated: November 22, 1999 1999 MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIOEWALK PROJECT N0. 322 STATEMENT OF WORK ""' "' ..,� $649.30 TOTAL SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Contract additions: Contract deductions: Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (0%) Less Amount Paid Previousiy AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE ti $53,375.00 0.00 42,614.10 0.00 39,866.56 52,747.54 71 a42,614.10 � Ron Kassa Construction 1999 Miscel Concrete Curb and Gutter & Sidewaik Project No. 322 Estimate No. 7 CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR I hereby certify that the work perfoRned and the materiais supplied to date under the terms of the contract for this project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shown on ' timate (and the f quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and corr d no part of the'A nt Due This Estimate' has been received. By 4� �. Co ors Authorized Representative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entiUed to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. CRY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR Oate Respectfuily Submitted, l/ �— John G. Flora, P.E. Public Works Director 72 Page 2 .r a e � c M s ESTIMATE WORKSHEET FOR: 1999 MISCEL. CONCRETE CURB GUTTER 8 SIDEWALK, PROJECT N0. 322 ,� • ,� CITY OF FRIDIEY, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIOLEY, MN. 55432 ESTIMATE N0. FINAL FOR: Ron Kassa CansUuction 7438 Upton Richfieid MN 55423 DATE: November 22,1999 ConUact Item Street Water Sewer Escrow Parks HRA Total #181 #408 #438 #596 FT FT FT� $ FT. $ FT, S F[', $ $ $ $ 1. Remove and Replace Concr Curb & Gutter Quantiry this Estimate 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.00 Amount this Estimau 3,035.00 755.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,790.00 Total Quantity 695.00 189.00 258.00 99.00 72.00 0.00 1,313.00 Total 10,494.50 2,853.90 3,895.80 1,494.90 1,087.20 0.00 19,826.30 2. Remove and Replace Conc Curb & Gutter (less than 85 � lineal feet) Quantiry this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Amount this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Quantity 151.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I51.00 Total 2,529.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,529.25 3. Constrvct 5 ft wide, 4 in. thick) Sidewalk Quantiry this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Amount this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Quantity 738.00 470.00 2,0�7.00 0.00 4,202.00 0.00 7,487.00 Total 1,955.70 1,245.50 5,504.05 0.00 11,13530 0.00 19,840.55 4. Install 36 in. x 6 in. Cencrete Valley Gutter Spitlways Quantity this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Amount this Estimate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Quantity 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 44.00 Total 114.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 304.00 0.00 418.00 TOTAL. : SI S>U93.45 54,049 4Q :;: 59,399;85 S1;494.9Q > 512,5.2.6 50 SFa OU; : S4Z,6F4.10: THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE TO BE CHARGED TO EACH ACCOUNT FOR THIS ESTIMATE: Street(101-06-68-435-4340-6351) Water (601-73-00-415-4340) Sewer (602-78-00-415�340) Park (408-00-07-415-4530-4091) Escrow (501-00-00-415�340) HRA (236-37-00-415-4340) Fire (408-00-00-415-4530-4006) TOTAL 2,747.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 73 9 � ` AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22, 1999 CfTY OF FRIDLEY INF'ORMAL STATUS REPORTS �- 74