Loading...
02/07/2000 - 4675' unror Froa.�r FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Manday, Febnuany 7, 2000 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS � � .. ITEM NUMBER � � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 CRY OF FRIDLEY The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PRESENTATION: Barbara Warren — Values Firsf Program APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of January 24, 2000 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: Receive the Planning Commission Minutes ofJanuary 19, 2000 .................................................................s.... 1- 13 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): 2. Special Use Permit, SP,#99-13, by Vern Haldorson, for a Proposed Storage Building, Generally Located at 514 Dover Street N.E. (Ward 3) — ....................................................................................... 14 16 3. Approve Amendment to the Comprehensive Sign Plan for MB Properties, Generally Located at 8251 Main Street N.E. (Ward 3) .................................. 17 - 20 4. Approve 2000 Development Review Schedule for Planning Commission and City Council Action ....................................................................... 21 - 31 5. Resolution Revising the Agreement Language of a Grant in the Amount of $5,000 to Elim Transitional Housing, Inc. and Authorizing Execution of a Revised,Grant Agreement ..................................... 32 - 39 6. Claims ....................................................................................... 40 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 PAGE 3 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED 7. Licenses ....................................................................................... 41 8. Estimates ...................................................................................... 42 ADOPTION OF AGENDA. OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: (Consideration of Items not on Agenda — 15 Minutes) PUBLIC HEARING: 9. Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by Telemetry and Process Controls, Inc., to Add Wireless Telecommunication Facilities and Equipment for Minneapolis Waterworks' Own Use, Generally Located at 4500 Marshall Street N.E. (Ward 3) ........................................................................ 43 - 65 � S � 0 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 PAGE 4 OLD BUSINESS: 10. Approve Year 2000 Community Development Block Grant Application (Tabled January 24, 2000) ....................................................................................... 66 r NEW BUSINESS: 11. First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by Adding Approved Sites to Chapter 205, "Zoning," Telecommunications Towers ........................................................... 67 - 68 12. Informal Status Reports ................................................................... 69 ADJOURN. 0 0 � U � ��� �`a� �'� � � FRIDLEY CITY CDUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, Z000 �oF ' FRIDIEY �e City of Fridley will not discriminate against or hazass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its ervices, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation witl be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534) � � 5�f SFar� PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: PRESENTATION: Barbara Warren — Values First Program APPROVAL OF MINUTES: �� %�� �5� � City Council Meeting of January 24, 2000 • APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: �� � �S 1. Receive the Planning Commission Minutes of January 19, 2000 .............................. 1-13 2. Special Use Permit, SP #99-13, by Vern Haldorson, for a Proposed Storage Building, Generally Located at 514 Dover Street N.E. (Ward 3) ................................... 14 —16 3. Approve Amendment to the Comprehensive Sign Plan for MB Properties, Generally •Located at 8251 Main Street N.E. (Ward 3) ................................... 17 - 20 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): 4. Approve 2000 Development Review Schedule for Planning Commission and City Council Action ................................ 21 - 31 5. Resolution Revising the Agreement i 5 Language of a Grant in the Amount of $5,000 �� to Elim Transitional Housing, Inc. and Authorizing Execution of a Revised Grant Agreement ................................. 32 - 39 6. Claims .. 7. Licenses 8. Estimates 40 41 42 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 ADOPTION OF AGENDA. �� %�r, � Jn S,fL ( w j�-c /-T OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) PUBLIC HEARING: 9. Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by Telemetry and Process Controls, Inc., to Add Wreless Telecommunication Facilities and Equipment for Minneapolis Watennrorks' Own Use, Generally Located at 4500 Marshall Street N.E. (Ward 3) ..................... � �- ii1 '�i t S �� � � / � � .. �5 � �:,►, y� `� � v t� � �3 / � �J I�S � OLD BUSINESS: �� r ��i � �w�ave- l �� �,r„� �`� 10. Approve Year 2000 Community Development � Block Grant Application (Tabled January 24, 2000) ................................... 66 � ��� �c'Je. ��� � �� NEW BUSINESS: 11. First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by Adding Approved Sites to Chapter 205, "Zoning," Telecommunications Towers ................ 67 - 68 S � � ��� � ���c c� 12. Informal Status Reports ........................ 69 ADJOURN.��C - �� �i' �1, � �j� � ,�/ �� ` �."t , u.� ��,�j «, � PAGE 2 • n � C� THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JANUARY 24. 2000 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at 7:32 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember Billings, Councilmember Wolfe, and Councilmember Bolkcom MEMBERS ABSENT: None STATEMENT OF CONDUCT: Please be reminded that those present at today's meeting may hold a variety of views and opinions regarding the business to be conducted. The exercise of democracy through representative local government requires that ALL points of view be accommodated at these proceedings. It is further expected that a standard of mutual courtesy and respectfulness be exercised by all in attendance, through our individual expression, manner of speaking, and conduct. Therefore, please receive the views of other with the same degree of courtesy and respect which you desire to be given your views and opinions. Any departures from this standard will be addressed by the Presiding Officer through whatever means are deemed appropriate. Thank you for your attendance at today's meeting, and your agreement to abide by these standards of personal conduct. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Jorgenson stated that this was a proclamation establishing January 24, 2000 as Henry (Hank) Peterson Appreciation Day. Mr. Peterson's wife, Opal, was present to accept the proclamation. Mr. Peterson was a long-time resident and civic leader within the City of Fridley. His dedication, high energy level and commitment to our community greatly enhanced the quality of life in the City of Fridley. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: CitY Council Meetin� of December 13. 1999 MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 2 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Special Citv Council Meetin�of December 20, 1999 MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Citv Council Meeting of Januarv 3, 2000 MOTION by Councilmember Billings to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS: RESOLUTION NO. 7-2000 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS SPECIFICA- TIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2000 - 1: Mr. Burns, City Manager, explained that this was consideration of a resolution ordering preliminary plans and cost estimates for the 2000 street improvement project. The project includes 715L Avenue, the 73rd Avenue service drive, 74`'' Avenue, Symphony Street, Symphony Court, and the University Avenue east service drive. This item is included in the 2000 Capital Improvements Plan at an estimated cost of $500,000. Staff recommended Council's approval. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 7-2000. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 8-2000 RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVMENTS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2000 -1: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of_ a resolution receiving the preliminary report and calling for a public hearing on the proposed assessments for the 2000 street improvement project. The proposed hearing date is February 14, 2000. Staff recommended approval of the report for the 2000 street construction program and establishment of the public hearing for the assessments. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24. 2000 PAGE 3 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 8-2000. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 9-2000 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2000 - 10 (SEALCOAT): Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution ordering improvement, approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids for the 2000 seal coating project. The streets to be seal coated have been identified. The amount of $180,000 has been budgeted for this purpose in the 2000 Capital Improvements Plan. Staff recommended Council's approval of this resolution. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 9-2000. 4. RESOLUTION NO 10-2000 ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: SANITARY AND STORM SEWER REPAIR PROJECT NO. 329: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution ordering the improvement, approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids for the 2000 sanitary and storm sewer projects. Our Capital Improvements Plan has designated $240,000 for several sanitary and storm sewer repair projects. The projects are: 1) Lining of 1,519 feet of 10-inch sanitary sewer line on Channel Road and 66`� Avenue. 2) Lining of 1,044 feet of 12-inch sanitary sewer line on Hickory Drive. 3) Lining of 620 feet of 48-inches storm sewer line on Old Central Avenue. Staff recommended Council's approval of the resolution authorizing us to seek bids for these projects. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 10-2000. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 11-2000 ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: 2000 - REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 330: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that we have $27,000 budgeted for miscellaneous curb, gutter and sidewalk repairs that arise as a result of utility repairs or new driveway construction. The bids being authorized are bids for unit prices for this work. Staff recommended Council's approval of this resolution. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 11-2000. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 4 6. RECEIVE BID AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR HYPOLIM AERATOR REPLACEMENT FOR MOORE LAKE TO HEGI ENTERPRISES LLC: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a motion to receive bids and award a contract for the replacement of the aerator in Moore Lake (east basin). Bids for the aerator were opened on Wednesday, January 12. Only one bid was received. The bid was from Hegi Enterprises in the amount of $27,105. We've budgeted $30,000 for this purpose in our Year 2000 Capital Improvements budget, including $15,000 in grant funding that the City will be receiving from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Staff recommended that Council award the bid in the amount of $27,105 and award the contract to Hegi Enterprises. RECEIVED BID AND AWARDED CONTRACT TO HEGI ENTERPRISES LLC. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 12-2000 DESIGNATING OFFICIAL CHECK SIGNERS FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY'S FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution designating official check signers for the City's flexible spending account. The resolution authorizes two employees of the City's flexible benefits program administrator, Flex Compensation, Inc., to sign checks for the disbursement of funds to City employees. Staff recommended Council's approval. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 12-2000. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 13-2000 ADDING A THIRD CHANGE FUND TO THE MINICIPAL LIQUOR FUND: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that with the addition of a third liquor store, staff requested the establishment of a third change fund. The fund will be funded with $2,000 and enable the liquor store clerks to make change for customers. Staff recommended Council's approvaL ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 13-2000. 9. MOTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE FRIDLEY LIOUOR STORE PROJECT (WARD 3Z, Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the amount of the change order is $16,244. The money was devoted to a long list of items. Staff recommended Council's approval. APPROVED CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE FRIDLEY LIQUOR STORE PROJECT. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 5 10. RESOLUTION NO. 14-2000 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT FOR MOOSE LODGE 38 (8298 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.I: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution in support of an application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for the Fridley Moose Lodge. This is a renewal application for a pull tab operation at the Moose Lodge. It will run from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. Staff recommended Council's approval. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 14-2000. 11. CLAIMS: APPROVED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NUMBERS 91205 THROUGH 91627. 12. LICENSES: APPROVED ALL LICENSES AS SUBMITTED. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adopt the a�enda as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Mayor Jorgenson invited members of the public to come forward to address any items not on the agenda. Mr. Peter Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked for information regarding the cost of the special election process for the franchise fee. Mr. Burns stated that he believed the estimate was $10,000 mostly to cover the cost of the election judges. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 6 Mr. Eisenzimmer asked about the literature that was sent to the public used during the time of the election. Mr. Burns stated that there was only item sent to residents as part of the pre-referendum education. He did not have a number for that right now. Mr. Eisenzimmer asked about the cost for the special meetings held at the senior center. Councilmember Bolkcom and Mr. Burns stated that there were no costs to the City. Mr. Burns stated that when he went to the senior center to talk with the seniors there were no costs incurred. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that the literature handed out to them was printed by somebody. Mr. Burns stated that minor expenses for printing were incurred. Councilmember Barnette stated that the piece of literature was more in conjunction with the 50`f' Anniversary celebration of the City. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that there was a second piece of literature after that. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the newsletter comes out four times per year on all of the different items. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that there were two letters put out within a month. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the bigger publication was something she and Mayor Jorgenson had talked about with city managers when they went to the League of Minnesota Cities meeting in Rochester. They thought it was a good piece to explain to people how their dollars are spent. It really did not have anything to do with the franchise fee. Mr. Eisenzimmer asked what would happen when the grants run out for the tunnels and bridges for the highways. Councilmember Barnette stated that those costs are incurred by the County. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that it is still taxpayers' money, and there will be upkeep needed for those every year. Cot�ncilmember Barnette stated that the City has to maintain the walkways but the tunnels are the County's responsibility. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Mr. Burns will give Mr. Eisenzimmer the numbers for the cost of the publications sent out. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24, 2000 PAGE 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 13. LOCAL LAW ENFORCENIENT BLOCK GRANT: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:50 P.M. Ms. Rosie Griep, Special Projects Coordinator with the Police Department, stated that the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program, is in the fourth year of receiving funding. It comes from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, at the Federal level. These are funds that are given out on formulas based on the crime rate and given to local law enforcement agencies to spend within certain parameters. One of the requirements is to have an advisory board make recommendations. Another recommendation is to hold a public hearing for any public input on how the funds should be spent. They have been allotted $22,705 with a matching component of $2,523. The recommendations coming forth from the advisory board will go towards offsetting some of the expenses involved with having Vision Mobile Data software to allow the officers easier access to record information on the ten laptop computers from their squad cars. Councilmember Bolkcom asked who was on the advisory board. Ms. Griep stated that there are criteria each member has to meet. There must be someone from local law enforcement, which is herself, the local prosecutor's office, the local court system, the local public school, and local community group of crime prevention. MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:53 P.M. 14. YEAR 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to open the public hearing and waive the reading of the notice. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:53 P.M. Mr. Grant Fernelius, HRA Housing Coordinator, stated that he had a short presentation to provide some history on the Community Development Block Grant program. The CDBG program is funded annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Anoka FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 8 County receives the moneys from HUD directly and redistributes the money to each of the cities in the County. Mr. Fernelius said that, historically, the City of Fridley has used these funds for single family housing rehabilitation and public service grants to a number of agencies located in the County that provide services such as senior programs, women's shelter and the food shelf. This year the City is expected to receive $138,686. This is a slight reduction from last year as a result of the federal program cuts by Congress. Staff is proposing that the funds for 2000 be used for the same activities that were funded in 1999. Housing rehab would use $116,496. The remaining funds would be used for public services which equates to 15 percent of the budget. Mr. Fernelius said that the County does also charge an administrative fee which would be deducted from the amount so they have $137,000 to work with. Applications for this program are due on February 11. Funds become available on July 1 and the City has eighteen months in which to spend those dollars. There is a separate action item on the agenda that includes approval of the application. A number of agencies are present this evening to answer any questions. Mayor Jorgenson stated that Alice Nelson is unavailable to speak for the SACA program. Ms. Ann Ryan stated that was correct but she was available to answer to answer any questions for the SACA program. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how Mr. Fernelius arrived at the numbers as far as the certain percentages for the programs. Mr. Fernelius stated that they did have to cut each percentage from last year by five percent. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the programs that are given the money use the money like the Fridley Recreation Department that uses the money for scholarships for programs versus a food shelf program. Mr. Fernelius stated that they applied it at an across-the-board reduction to each of the agencies. It is at Council's discretion to change the numbers. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the first time they saw the numbers was on Friday night. They were unaware of the reduction from Congress. She would have liked the opportunity to review this and have more discussion with the Council members. Mr. Fernelius apologized. Staff did try to move on their typical schedule and have not had discussion with the Council previously. They do have the option of tabling. The deadline is February 11, and there is a Council meeting on February 7 at which time they can consider approval of the application. Mayor Jorgenson stated that they have a City Council Conference meeting on Monday, January 31, and it could possibly be discussed at that time. She would like to see some numbers � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 9 on the people that are participating in the Fridley Recreation Department through the scholarship application and the types of programs they have. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the participants have to prove their income level to qualify for the scholarships, and are the whole fees waived or only a portion of the fees. Mr. Fernelius stated that they do not have to prove their income level. He said he is unsure of how the fees are waived, but he would be happy to follow up on that. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that in the past there were to have a lot more different agencies coming forward, and she asked if the guidelines were more strict. Mr. Fernelius stated that the guidelines were more strict and that this is the third year that they have closed the process for other agencies to apply. Councilmember Barnette stated that there used to be as many as 25 groups applying but then the amount for each agency was significantly smaller, so sometimes to apply for it did not make a lot of sense. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Burns if there was some leeway for the Fridley Park and Recreation Department to receive some grant money from someplace else. Mr. Burns stated that he was not aware of anything, but he knows that one of the objectives for the elementary after school program is to get an increasing number of families involved. Mayor Jorgenson asked if it was a full scholarship or a sliding fee scale. Mr. Burns stated he was unsure. Mayor Jorgenson asked if there were any more questions. Councilmember Wolfe asked Councilmember Bolkcom why she focused on the Fridley Parks and Recreation Department with her questions. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she did mainly because it has been in their conversations in the last several years about whether it should be budgeted in this program. Councilmember Wolfe stated that children staying involved in these programs is very important to him. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she agrees and she is all for doing programs for kids. She is trying to figure out what number of kids they are serving and what would happen if these programs were not there. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the representatives from the various agencies could perhaps shed some light on the subject. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF JANUARY 24, 2000 PAGE_10 Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked what the interest rate is on loans for $15,000. Mr. Fernelius stated that the rate was zero percent (0 percent). Mr. Eisenzimmer asked who was eligible for that. Mr. Fernelius stated that low income families who meet the guidelines are eligible. The guidelines range from $33,000 for a single family household up to around $47,800 for a three person household. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the families have to meet with a counselor and if there is a lot of criteria to meet. Mr. Fernelius stated that was conect. Ms. A.nn Ronnie, SACA representative, stated that they represent four cities including Fridley. Up through December, they served 765 families 74,930 pounds of food in the Fridley area. They also supply gas vouchers for folks, and to provide clothing for their families and job interviews. They provide household items such as dishes, baby quilts, birthday cakes, and gift certificates. They had food, gifts and toys at Christmas time that were delivered by volunteers. Ms. Colleen Coyle, Senior Outreach Program representative, stated that they provide services to seniors to help them to remain independently living in their homes. They meet with the client to determine their needs and then refer them to the appropriate resources. During the last program, she served 185 clients and an additiona162 follow-up visits were necessary. This resulted in 417 referrals being made to different program agencies. She wanted to thank Council for their support for the program in the past year. Ms. Linda Wells, Alexandra House representative, stated that this was a shelter for women and children in Anoka County. Last year they served over 1,000 women and children. They are in every Anoka Hennepin school district, and they also have advocates in the hospitals. Mayor Jorgenson asked Ms. Wells how many people out of the 1,000 that were served last year were Fridley residents. Ms. Wells stated that it was probably close to fifty. The support group also has Fridley residents. Ms. Connie Thompson, Senior Coordinator of the Fridley Senior Program, stated that they are requesting funding for their senior companion program that services low-income seniors. The program benefits those that are homebound by a social companion program, but it also benefits those that are the companion because they also have to meet certain income guidelines. They receive a stipend through Lutheran Social Services so they have some income as well as a sense of purpose. Ms. Thompson said the Fridley Senior Companion program serves older adults who live in Fridley. Companions are trained through Lutheran Social Services and receive site supervision FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 11 through the Fridley Senior Program and Nancy Shaw in particular. The companions receive quarterly training through Lutheran Social Services and also with other companions on the local County level. In the past year, they have had four senior companions servicing eighteen of the homebound seniors. Due to illness, they are losing two of their companions and are looking at replacing them. They have a waiting list of twelve people that are waiting for companions. The main purpose of the program in addition to socialization is to give caregivers a break. A large number of seniors fall through the cracks and do not get into the ACG guidelines. That is why Council's support is needed to continue this program. Ms. Thompson thanked Council for their past support. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:22 P.M. OLD BUSINESS 15. MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR A NEW FIRE ENGINE FOR THE FIRE (TABLED NOVEMBER 22,19991: MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to remove this item from the table for discussion. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Chuck McKusick, Fire Chief, explained that the data being presented tonight is to give a little more background regarding the fire apparatus at the City of Fridley. Mr. Dave Skirka, Assistant Fire Chief, outlined the number, ages and conditions of fire engines they cunently have at the fire department. An ISO consultant will meet with the Fire Department in March to make sure that they do have adequate equipment. The departmetn is requesting approval to advertise for bids to purchase a new engine company, and to trade in two old engine companies. They would surplus a third truck, Engine #8, after the warranty period and the demo part has been accomplished on the new truck. Mayor Jorgenson asked him if he could explain who Mark Foster is. Mr. Skirka stated that Mark Foster is the City's Lead Mechanic who works on the fire engines and does inspections on vehicles for routine services. Mayor Jorgenson stated that she understands that Mr. Foster is a miracle worker. Mr. Skirka stated that he is. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 12 Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they had any idea on the cost of the vehicle. Mr. Skirka stated that they try to be creative for the cost of the vehicle. When they purchased Engine #1 in 1996 they were looking at a four to seven percent increase per year for purchasing the next vehicle depending on when they bought it. To minimize the next truck's purchase price, they will try to trade in vehicles, or allow the dealer to use it as a"demo" at trade shows. They will also change the body of the vehicle from stainless steel to aluminum. They estimated they could save $10,000 on that. Looking at what they paid for Engine #1, they are confidant they can keep the cost down. Mr. Burns stated that they had $320,000 in the 1999 budget. Mr. Burns asked if Mr. Skirka thought they could stay within that number in the year 2000. Mr. Skirka stated that he thought they could stay at that number or below that number. Their intent is to go below that. All of the builders will bid on a number of items including the demonstrator program. They are hopeful they can get a reduction in the cost of the vehicle. Councilmember Barnette asked Mr. Skirka if the vehicles have a trade-in value. He asked if some of the outstate smaller communities would be interested in purchasing these vehicles, and what kind of dollars are they talking about. Mr. Skirka stated that when they bought Engine # 1 in 1996, Onan gave them a check for $15,000 that they used for purchasing equipment. That part of the program is on hold right now. The other area they are looking at is the generator at a cost of about $8,000. They can try to sell the vehicles themselves or trade them in to receive credit depending on the condition. Some smaller departments would be interested in Engine Nos. 7 and 8 and possibly 4. Their best bet would be to trade them. All of the builders said that they would solicit a trade-in value for two vehicles. Mayor Jorgenson asked if these vehicles are able to support Fridley in a fire. Mr. Skirka stated that they need to look at where they are at with the two marginal vehicles especially Engine #4. Engine Nos. 7 and 8 were both rebuilt in 1988, and that added an extra eleven years to their time frame. Engine #4 is seventeen-years-old, and it is marginal at best. They are anticipating replacing the aerial in two to four years. That is a significant replacement, and they are trying to come up with a plan for the City. Their ISO rating right now is at 70.47 for a class C city, and they would like to maintain that class C rating. Mayor Jorgenson stated that the ISO rating is what insurance companies look at for charging the homeowner's insurance for a single family home or commerciaUindustrial businesses. By maintaining a higher rate they are able to help the businesses and residents of Fridley have better insurance rates. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they could wait another year. Mr. Skirka stated that they could do anything the City Council wants to do. They are presenting the proposal and asking that Council approve their request. They feel that purchasing this FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 13 vehicle now is in the best interest of the City because of the three marginal vehicles that they have. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how long it takes to get a new fire truck. Mr. Skirka stated that from the date of the delivery of the chassis, it takes 120 days. Mr. Burns commented that it is generally about a one-year process. Mayor Jorgenson stated that if one of the engines does go down, they have joint powers agreement with their surrounding fire departments. ' Mayor Jorgenson asked if any members of the public had any questions. Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked if the salt on the roads would be a problem for the aluminum frame. An aluminum frame might be lighter, and there may be more corrosion which is harder to repair. Mr. Skirka clarified that aluminum is used in the compartmentation area of the vehicle, not the chassis or under part of the vehicle. Aluminum is built onto the chassis, and is undercoated so they feel comfortable with going from the stainless steel to the aluminum. Mayor Jorgenson asked if it was basically the cab he was referring to. Mr. Skirka stated that he was referring to the compartmentation behind the cab where all of the equipment is carried the hose, where the water tank is, and the supporting structure that mounts onto the frame of the chassis. Councilmember Wolfe stated that the vehicles are kept spotless, and the salt is not on there very long. Mr. Skirka stated that they get washed after almost every run, especially in the winter time. MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to approve the authorization of advertisement for bids for a new fire engine for the Fire Department. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 0 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL I�IEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 14 16. RESOLUTION NO. 6-2000 APPOINTING/REAFFIRMING CITY OF FRIDLEY REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SIX CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to remove this item from the table. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Jorgenson stated that they have received further information from Mr. Knaak and have done some research into the appointment for this particular position. As Councilmember Billings has recommended, this is an appointment that serves at the recommendation of the Council. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to adopt the resolution reaffirming the Six Cities Watershed Management Organization Appointment of John Flora to represent the City of Fridley. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSINESS 17. APPROVE THE YEAR 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to table this item until the next Council meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANINIOUSLY. 18. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mayor Jorgenson stated that Mrs. Kay Bonner Nee told her that former Mayor Bill Nee is in the intensive care unit at Unity Hospital, and cards would be appreciated. ADJOURN: MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 15 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE JANUARY 24, 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Signe L. Johnson Nancy J. Jorgenson Recording Secretary Mayor CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 19, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage calied the January 19, 2000, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Diane Savage, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Larry Kuechle, Brad Sielaff Members Absent: Connie Modig, Leroy Oquist Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 15 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the December 15, 1999, Planning Commission minutes as presented. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a special use permit SP #99-13, by Vern Haldorson, for a proposed storage building, generally located at 514 Dover Street. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:34 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated that this special use permit is to allow the construction of a 529 square foot accessory building at 514 Dover Street. The building will be used strictly for storage and not for vehicle parking on a regular basis. Second accessory buildings over 240 square feet are permitted with a special use permit in an R-1 zoning district provided that the total cumulative square feet of all accessory buildings does not exceed 1,400 square feet. Mr. Hickok stated the property is zoned R-1 single family residential. The property was platted in 1922. The home was built pre-1949. A home addition was added to the structure in 1960, and the existing garage was built in 1994. The existing garage and the proposed accessory building total 1,393 square feet, just underneath the 1,400 square foot requirement. The existing garage is on the opposite side of where the l� proposed structure is going to be placed. The new structure will not have a driveway to service it. Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this special use permit with the following stipulations: 1. At staff's discretion, inspections will be conducted of the yard area between the street and the garage. If found to be regularly used as a driveway, a hard surface driveway shall be constructed by the petitioner within three months of receiving notice by the City. 2. All accessory permits �shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface drive as approved by the City. 5. The siding and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing home. Mr. Hickok stated that the petitioner is not present at the meeting. Ms. Savage asked if there were any calls regarding this request. Mr. Hickok stated that staff did receive a call that day with a concern about notification. A property owner adjacent to this structure bought the property in October. The GIS data records for notification still show the former property owner. The new property owner was concerned about not being notified and not knowing the facts. Mr. Kondrick asked if it meets all of the side yard setback requirements. Mr. Hickok stated that it does. Mr. Kondrick asked if it would be possible for the petitioner to park a vehicle on a pad outside of this structure but not have it connected to the street by driveway. Mr. Hickok stated that it is possible, but the primary use is for storage and he believes it is the petitioner's intent not to have a driveway back there. Ms. Savage asked if the petitioner had any problem with the stipulations. Mr. Hickok stated that they had received the report and they did not hear anything any concerns. Ms. Savage asked if there would be a problem with the Planning Commission making a recommendation in the absence of the petitioner. Mr. Hickok stated that the Commission would be well within its right to make a recommendation because the petitioner knew about the meeting. Ms. Savage asked if anyone in the audience wished to address this special use permit. � Ms. Mary Shogren, 524 Dover Street, stated that she and her husband live right next door. They bought the house in October. In November, the petitioner poured the slab. Throughout their moving in, the petitioner has had a truck sitting on the yard where the building is going to be built right now. They are wondering if there is a drainage plan, because the trusses are fairly large and they are concerned about water running into their basement. There is also no footing for the building and they are wondering if that is required. Mr. Hickok stated that the building will have to meet all building code requirements for the State of Minnesota. The Building Inspection staff is aware that this slab had been poured and are very cognizant of the requirements to support the weight of the structure. All the necessary modifications will be made to do whatever is necessary. As far as the water concern, the code states that in no case can construction or grading on a property detrimentally affect adjacent property. Ms. Shogren stated that the trusses are really large and they will go over the property line because of where the slab sits. She is concerned that her property value will go down because this structure is going to be built right outside her kitchen door. Mr. Kuechle stated that the proposed building is 23 feet by 23 feet. Ms. Shogren asked if they know how far away from the property line is right now. Mr. Hickok stated that it is illustrated at five feet from the property line and code requires that an overhang on a structure not exceed 24 inches. There needs to be three feet of separation between the edge of the overhang and the property line. Ms. Shogren asked if the building will have street appeal and not just some building thrown up there. Ms. Savage stated that is part of the stipulations. Mr. Hickok stated that they require that the structure will be compatible with the elements of the principal structure. Ms. Shogren asked how wide the door on the building will be. She heard that if a door wider than eight feet could serve a second garage which the City of Fridley does not allow. ????? Mr. Hickok stated that is not correct. There was a special use request where a gentleman was making a request to reuse an older garage and demolish everything else on the entire site and it was their claim that they would not need this for vehicles at all so the City asked them to remove the overhead door and use a standard door. The Commission recommended that it have a standard overhead door. There is not anything in the code that would prohibit them from doing a standard garage door on this. ??? Mr. Kondrick stated that the fifth stipulation cites that the siding and the roof materials shall match the exterior of the existing home. � Ms. Savage stated that the petitioner will be going to the City Council on if Ms. Shogren has any additional concerns, she can attend the Council Ms. Shogren thanked the Commission. February 7 so meeting. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:45. Mr. Kondrick stated that he did not have a problem with the special use permit or the stipulations. Ms. Savage stated she concurred and feels that it falls within the requirements. MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to approve the Special Use Permit, SP #99-13, by Vern Haldorson with the following stipulations: 1. 2. 4. 5. At staff's discretion, inspections will be conducted of the yard area between the street and the garage. If found to be regularfy used as a driveway, a hard surface driveway shall be constructed by the petitioner within three months of receiving notice by the City. All accessory permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface drive as approved by the City. The siding and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing home. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., to add wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment for Minneapolis Waterworks own use generally located at 4500 Marshall Street N.E. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALND �HE P BLEC HEA'RING WAS OPENED AT 7�:45 P.M. THE MOTION CARRIED A Mr. Hickok stated that Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., and the City of Minneapolis are requesting to add the Minneapolis Waterworks site at 4500 Marshall Street and the Minneapolis Waterworks Pump Station #3 at the northwest corner of East River Road and 37th Avenue in the southern part of the City adjacent to Minneapolis as approved locations for telecommunications towers facilities and equipment. These sites are necessary to allow Minneapolis Waterworks to monitor and to change settings on pump � stations from a central location. They do need to be located adjacent to the pump stations. Fridley towers are just a portion of the large remote monitoring system that the Minneapolis system needs. The poles will utilize a stealth design as required by the telecommunications ordinance. The stealth design will insure that the poles disappear into the site as much as possible. Mr. Hickok stated there are a number of locations. The Minneapolis Waterworks facility is along the river befinreen East River Road and the river along the edge of the City of Fridley and Minneapolis where they meet. A location for equipment is on the building itself. Pump Station #3 is along 37th Avenue along the right-of-way by Sharx' Night Club along the roadway. Pump Station #1 along the river is a location for a stealth pole to blend with the backdrop and not be right on the face of the river. Pump Station #2 is a location and the equipment should disappear into the background from all directions. Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends approval with the following stipulations. 1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits/permission from Anoka County necessary to locate the tower in the right-of-way near Pump Station #3. 2. All poles shall be of a stealth design. The pole near Pump Station #3 shall resemble a street light structure and shall have a light fixture approved by City staff. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner is in agreement with these stipulations. Mr. Kondrick asked Mr. Hickok if the poles should be protected by crash barriers. Mr. Hickok stated they have concrete filled pipe bollards surrounding the outsides. It is their intent to have protection with the box that they created inside the concrete post bollard. Mr. Kondrick stated that possibly part of the deal should be that they ask that they be protected. Mr. Hickok stated that it would be a good recommendation Mr. Stuart Kirschbaum, Minneapolis Waterworks Engineer, stated that this project is a small part of a$10,000,000 project to use radio telemetry equipment to get data back and forth, control pumps, and gather data. The rates for the telephone lines keep going up. The consultant of EMA who is doing a lot of the design has recommended that they upgrade the system. This enables them to maintain the FCC radio license to have these three stations up and running. Mr. Kondrick asked what they would do if the pumps would fail. Mr. Kirschbaum stated that the consultant from Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., could better answer that question. Ms. Savage asked if he had any problem with the stipulations. � Mr. Kirschbaum stated that he did not. It probably is a good idea to have more protection for them because it is a very important part of the whole system. Mr. Sielaff asked if they were reviewing this only for the use for Minneapolis Waterworks or are there other uses? Mr. Hickok stated that the acceptance of this as a site does amend this facility and make it an approved location for telecommunications. This site could be utilized for additional telecommunications equipment. Mr. Sielaff asked if they were the owners of the pole and could they end up leasing space on this? Mr. Kirschbaum stated that he does not think that the poles are high enough for cellular phone use. Mr. Jim Edison, consultant for Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., stated they are utilized for single frequency and only for a single operation. The City of Minneapolis will own this pole and nobody else can utilize these poles. Mr. Kondrick asked if another telecommunications company could ask the City of Minneapolis to use the pole. Mr. Edison stated that he thinks that anyone would have to go through the FCC. This location was optimum for the City of Minneapolis for this particular use. He cannot address the issue of making a taller pole for cellular phones. If the system fails and shuts down, the station is manned 24 hours and, if not, they will be on computer for monitoring. Mr. Sielaff stated they are approving the location of a pole that has stealth design. There could be other uses for this pole in the future without any Council action at all. Mr. Hickok stated the equipment is a single purpose equipment. It is a relatively short monopole and has its purpose for the Waterworks functions. If Sprint or AT&T came in and said it is a good site for a telecom tower, this site had been approved for telecom communications and would be a permitted site provided they go through the standard things the ordinance requires. Somebody interested would first negotiate with the City of Minneapolis about a land deal and then come to Fridley. There are an abundance of telecommunication tower locations along East River Road. The Well House #13 site is a bit north of the Waterworks facility, th Ac oss theh aiN the AIITemp st aage fac li y s has also been approved as a location also a possible site. Mr. Sielaff stated that he wants to make sure they know what they are passing. There is the potential for this to be used for other telecommunications other than Minneapolis. The only thing that is preventing it from doing that possibly is the stealth design. Mr. Hickok stated that the next telecom user would need to follow up all of the other elements of a very complex telecom ordinance the City has passed. It is a series of 0 agencies they would pass through before they got their equipment on this site. The City would know exactly what they are approving at that point. Staff would analyze it and match it against the ordinance requirements and then approve or deny it. Mr. Kondrick asked if it would be appropriate to have the stipulation that the poles be protected by some kind of concrete pylons. Mr. Hickok stated that would be appropriate. Mr. Edison stated that it was a good idea. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:05P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated that he feels that it is up to the petitioner to protect their poles. He is not keen on proposing a requirement for the petitioner that is not something that has to do with the City. He would be more inclined to think that the poles should have some give in case they get hit. Mr. Kondrick asked what impact the poles being sheared would have on the City of Fridley. Mr. Hickok stated that they contacted the County to talk about standards of design for placement in a public right-of-way. They need to make certain their construction design meets City and County standards for elements in the right-of-way. The State takes great care in designing things to break away or slow vehicles down and do minimum damage to the passenger. It is staff's expectation that those same types of thoughts are going into these components. Ms. Savage asked if that is covered in the first stipulation. Mr. Hickok stated that is correct. Ms. Savage asked if they needed anything additional. Mr. Hickok stated that they felt that was adequate. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., to add wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment for Minneapolis Waterworks own use with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits/permission from Anoka County necessary to locate the tower in the right-of-way near Pump Station #3. 2. All poles shall be of a stealth design. The pole near Pump Station #3 shall resemble a street light structure and shall have a light fixture approved by City staff. 7 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - REVIEW OF THE WATER AND SEWER CHAPTERS: Ms. Dacy stated that the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan on December 15 went very well. There was some question from the public after that hearing about the timing of the submission of the draft. She called Sandra Panelte, the sector representative from Metropolitan Council for the City of Fridley. Ms. Panelle encouraged that the draft be submitted even though there are still some parts missing. Ms. Panelle said the Metropolitan staff would compile some meaningful comments for the City to consider as they complete the process. Ms. Panelle stated that they keep track of cities that do not submit the plans and it is better to submit something than not to. In no way does the draft have any type of legal impact at all. Ms. Dacy is hoping to submit the remaining parts of the plan in March. Ms. Dacy stated that the Commission wanted some language in the plan about the Nature Center planning process and the entrance to the park. That will be included with amendments to the Land Use and Open Space chapters. Ms. Dacy stated traffic counts were also discussed at the December 15 meeting. The City did a little research on that and the plan was submitted just the way the Commission saw it on December 15. The discrepancy was that Metropolitan Council and Anoka County were projecting a larger amount of traffic than what the consultant was projecting. University Avenue would have less amount of traffic in the Metropolitan Council allocation as opposed to the East River Road and vice versa. Metropolitan Council uses a regional approach to computer modeling so if they know that one road is over capacity, they will assign it to a road that is under capacity without paying attention to the local details. They are dealing with the macro, and the City's consultant is dealing with the micro. The best way to do it is to show all fhree projections for the reviewing agency. The plan does identify a document that the City's consultant has identified a historical trend analysis, and these are the volumes that the City feels are going to happen. Ms. Dacy stated there was a comment that the plan does not map out how they are going to accomplish the vision. They are going to try to identify a section to pult all the pieces together and provide a connecting theme and map out what the various parts of the plan means. They would review that with City Council and then bring that back to the Commission probably within the next month. The City will go through the minutes of the public hearing and try to identify individual issues and make sure they have addressed it. Ms. Dacy stated that what is left is the Surface Water Management Plan. There has been a little bit of work with the Human Resources Commission. They met with them at the beginning of January. The Implementation chapter will be worked on next. Those three chapters should be done within the next two to three months,. �; Ms. Dacy stated that the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission reviewed the chapters at their January 18th meeting and provided very good comments on the water supply section. The sewer chapter is telling a good story in terms of having adequate amount of sewer capacity. The Public Works Department has done a very good job in trying to eliminate infiltration and inflow and trying to isolate any problems in the system. It also paints a very good picture in terms of the future as they redevelop. The population and employment projections probably will not cause any necessity to say they need more capacity. The draft that the Commission has today is a 1995 plan update and has been reviewed in the recent past. Ms. Dacy stated there is also very good news in the water supply chapter. The Public Works Department has done a lot of good work in the water supply capital improvements to make sure that pressures are upgraded in certain areas of the City. They are working on the water quality issue. Mr. Sielaff stated that one of the main issues from the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting was the issue of water quality. That needs to be addressed. They need a connection befinreen water qualities and water supply. There should be something on quality on page 9-26 in the objectives for standards that the City should commit to. The City should provide and maintain a high Fridley water quality for its citizens. There is some water quality data provided, but it was the only water quality data available for certain waters in the City. The only data available should be put into table form and be compared with something. Ms. Dacy stated that is the only data the City has. There is no data on Rice Creek; but as part of the Medtronic AUAR, the water quality issue came up for Moore Lake. She has contracted with Anoka Conservation District who took a water sample back in April, and she should be receiving their reports on an annual basis. She agrees there should be an explanation on water quality. Mr. Sielaff stated that maybe they should identify water quality gaps and make some suggestions on what they should do as far as closing those gaps. The other issue concerns are on page 914. He is wondering if the water from New Brighton is sampled individually, and that information should be provided. He is not clear how long the water supply with New Brighton was going to be coming. Ms. Dacy stated that it is a long-term agreement for 20 years and the intent is long-term. Mr. Sielaff stated that maybe that should be defined. Mr. Kondrick asked how often the water quality is tested from other suppliers. Ms. Dacy stated that she does not have that information, but they test their own wells and systems on a quarterly basis and then they do a monthly set. of tests for Wells #6, 7, and 8. Mr. Saba asked if they look at the entire chemical content? 0 Ms. Dacy stated that she thinks they are looking at certain thresholds on certain contaminants but she could find that out. Mr. Saba stated that on "60 Minutes", the additive was discussed and he is wondering if they are in that category of contaminated wells. Mr. Sielaff stated that there is no water quality data from the public supply wells and he wants to know exactly what parameters are they actually analyzing for and what are those values. There is some indication that they have exceeded some values and he wants to know the extent. He knows it is a lot of data, but maybe there is some way to summarize it. Ms. Dacy stated that she woutd be happy to check that out. Mr. Sielaff stated that on page 924, the issue of the contaminant Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., needs more data about how much is it being exceeded by and how frequently. He did not get an understanding of the water well contamination's present status. Ms. Dacy stated that Wells #6, 7, and 8 are in use, and the monthly testing determines where they are at on certain thresholds and they have a system of blending the other wells in order to meet the standards. Mr. Sielaff stated that the PCA and EPA are looking at what is really the status of that. He does not know where that evaluation is. He also had trouble of keeping track of what was filtered on page 9-17. He thought that was filtered for iron and manganese. There is another reference on page 9-24. That should indicate exactly what they are filtering for. On page 9-28, he is not sure about how the City would evaluate implementing increasing block method of water charges. Ms. Dacy stated that the change made in 1997 is an increasing block system, but it may be not as aggressive as maybe the Metropolitan Council would want. There are a lot of financial issues the Council is concerned about and making sure that the water system can pay for itsetf, so to speak. Mr. Sielaff stated that his comment is what are they going to do to evaluate that. He knows cost is an issue. On page 9-29, they should separate the paragraph on retrofitting programs. Ms. Dacy stated that paragraph is a holdover from the 1995 plan and that needs to be changed. Mr. Sielaff stated that he is not sure if the paragraph addresses water supply or water quality. Ms. Dacy stated that it is probably a little bit of both. That ordinance mirrors the State regulations and throws in more control for the City in terms of replacement plans. 10 Mr. Sielaff stated that maybe they shouid take into account some of the things to learn about Springbrook regarding wetland protection to improve runoff for better water quality in streams and lakes. He does not know what the applicability is. His point is that there are some water quality benefits for wetlands. On page 9-27 for the water audit program, he feels they need to summarize the results and how much water use is decreasing and how much is the program benefiting the City. Are they able to improve water conservation? In the sewer chapter with the infiltration/inflow analysis issue, maybe there should be some cost benefit on that. Ms. Dacy stated that they found that the Metropolitan Council meters on the interceptors were incorrect. By doing the infiltration/inflow analysis on the sump pump disconnection, the City was able to convince Metropolitan Council that the City of Fridley was not using all of that water. They have eliminated as many sump pumps as they could and televised as many lines. Metropolitan Council did reimburse the City $500,000, and Metropolitan Council is thinking of reducing the sewer rates as a result of that. She thinks it is under control and they can account for about as much as they can. Mr. Sielaff stated that he thinks that should be put in that chapter to give them some credit. � Mr. Kuechle asked if the City has given any thought to the requirements for all new developments for irrigation systems. Ms. Dacy stated that they have not talked about that since 1995, and the City keeps requiring it. Mr. Hickok stated that they require it for front and side yards and commercial/industrial properties. Ms. Dacy stated that it is a policy issue for what to prioritize. Do they want to prioritize water supply or the maintenance of landscaping and exteriors? The supply is not threatened, but she can easily see the argument and the connection. Mr. Sielaff stated that on page 9-32 there is a reference to alternative sources of water. It refers to NICROP remediation facility, and he feels there should be water sampling and evaluation of that data and should be noted before being listed as an alternative source of water. Ms. Savage asked if there were any more comments. The Commission members did not have any more comments regarding the water and sewer chapters. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 16 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING• MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the November 16, 1999, Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting. 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 8 1999 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the December 8, 1999 Appeals Commission meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 6 1999 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the minutes of the December 6, 1999, Parks and Recreation meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 22 1999 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the December 22, 1999, Appeals Commission meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 3 2000 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the minutes of the January 3, 2000, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 21 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the December 21, 1999, Environmental quality & Energy Commission meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12 OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Hickok gave an update on past Planning Commission actions. Mr. Kuechle asked if there were any Y2k glitches. Mr. Hickok stated that he has not heard of any for the City. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JANUARY 19, 2000, PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNED AT 8:46 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Signe L. Johnson Recording Secretary 13 / AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 qTY OF FRIDLEY Date: 2/01 /00 To: William Burns, City Manager��� From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Paul Bolin, Planner RE: Planning Commission Action on SP #99-13 M-00-19 INTRODUCTION Vern Haldorson, property owner at 514 Dover Street is seeking a special use permit to construct a 528 square foot second accessory structure. The building will be used strictly for storage and won't be used for vehicle parking on a regular basis. Accessory buildings over 240 square feet are a permitted special use. The existing garage and the proposed accessory building are a total of 1,393 square feet, which is 7 square feet less than the total allowed by Code. The location of this accessory structure is well suited for this site. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this special use permit. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION At the January 19, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for SP #99-13. The Planning Commission concurred with Staff that the proposed location of the accessory structure is acceptable. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission endorsed staff's recommendation for approval. A motion was made to recommend approval of special use permit, SP #99-13, with the following stipulations: 1. At staff's discretian, inspections will be conducted of the yard area between the street and the garage and, if found to be regularly used as a driveway, a hard surface drive shall be constructed by the petitioner within 3 months of receiving such notice from the City. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction. 3. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface as approved by the City. 5. The siding and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing home. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the planning commission and grant the proposed Special Use Permit, SP #99-13, with the stipulations as presented. 14 City of Fridley Land Use Application SP #99-13 January 19, 2000 GENERAL INFORNIATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: Vern Haldorson 514 Dover St. NE Fridley, NIN 55432 Requested Action: Special Use Pemut to allow a second accessory structure in excess of 240 square feet. Existing Zoning: � R-1 (Single Family Residential) Location: 514 Dover Street NE Size: 12,982 square feet .3 acres Existing Land Use: Single family home. Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: N: Single Family & R-1 E: Single Family & R-1 S: Single Family & R-1 W: Single Family & R-1 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Consistent with Plan Zoning Ordinance Conformance: Sections 205.07.1.C.(1) requires a special use perniit to allow accessory buildings other than the first accessory building, over 240 square feet. Zoning History: 1922 - Lot is platted. Pre- 1949 - Original home is built. 1960 - Home addition 1994 - Garage is built. 1997 - Garage Add'n. Legal Description of Properiy: Lots 34-38, Block L, Riverview Heights Public Utilities: Property is connected to Ciry utilities. 15 Transportarion: Dover Street provides access to site. Physical Characteristics: Lot contains home and existing garage. SUM�L-�RY OF PROJECT Vern Haldorson, petirioner, is requesting a special use peimit to allow the construction of a 529 square foot accessory building. The building will be used strictly for storage and won't be used for vehicle parking on a regular basis. SUNI�tiL�RY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of this special use permit, with stipulations. Second accessory buildings over 240 square feet are a pernutted special use in the R-1 zoning district, provided the total square footage of all accesson• buildings do not exceed 1,400 square feet. CITY COUNCIL ACTION Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin SP #99-13 Analvsis Vern Haldorson, petitioner, is requesting a special use permit to allow the construcrion of a 529 square foot accessory building. The building will be used strictly for storage and won't be used for vehicle parking on a rewlar basis. Accessory buildin�s over 240 square feet are a permitted special use. The existing garage and the proposed accessory building are a total of 1,393 square feet, which is 7 square feet less than the total allowed by Code. The location of this accessory smictiu-e is well suited for this site. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this special use permit. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the special use permit subject to the following stipulations: � 1. At staff's discretion, inspecrions will be conducted of the yard area between the street and the garage and , if found to be regularly used as a driveway, a hard surface drive shall be constructed by the peritioner within 3 months of receiving such notice from the City. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construcrion. 3. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surFace as approved by the City. 5. The sidin� and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing home. Portion of lot where garage is proposed to be located. 16 = AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 GTY OF FRIDLEY Date: 1 /31 /00 � To: William Burns, City Manager �� From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Paul Bolin, Planner RE: Amendment to the Comp. Sign Plan for MB Properties (8251 Main Street) M-00-22 INTRODUCTION In 1988, the City Council approved a comprehensive sign plan for 8251 Main Street. Joseph Maertens, property owner, is requesting an amendment to the sign plan to allow the use of company "logos" on the building exterior. SUMMARY Code Section 214.14, requires shopping centers and multiple tenant building to have a comprehensive sign plan approved by the City. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that centers have a well planned, aesthetically pleasing appearance. The 1988, 8251 Main Street Sign Plan made no mention of "logos". A recent request from a tenant, Motorcycle Safety Center, has prompted the owner of the building to address this issue through this amendment. The square footage of the logos shall be counted in with the total allowable square footage for each tenant. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the 8251 Main Street Comprehensive Sign Plan with the following stipulation: 1. Total signage for tenant's, with logo, not exceed the total square footage allowed for signage. 2. All businesses in building shall obtain sign permits prior to any modifications or replacement of existing signs. 3. All logos shall be secondary to the individually lettered signs. Logos shall not exceed 24" in height. 17 0 January 13, 2000 Paul Bolin "- - City ofFridT�y � ^ l 6431 LJniversity Ave. NE Fridley, NIN 55432 RE: Signage Policy 8251 Main St. NE 100 83rd St. NE 160 83rd St. NE Dear Bolin: M. B. Properties 8251 Main St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 (612) 786-4779 • ..._...__. FAXED Please be advised that M.B. Properties wishes to amend the sign policy on the above properties to allow the use of company "logos" in addition to the company name on the building exterior. If you have any concerns, please feel free to call. JM/am : �CI�I11t� .71171\.7 i ,�r _ _ �•. ;� ,� _,. � .:,� �,. �: .. : Yr� .. + . J : : H�. ' iJ.}�.f�JAG �• . . � a °F��;,' , . ` . . _: :,, . . . .� . . •T � � in� ' . ,. rt , r" a�,., . . $f' . • . . ::;; ' ' �' � . � ',!. i ::f • � � i �.�� ��1: . � 6. ,/ . .� . , �� . , � � � � i � �\1 - � V 19 , V � � � 4 v CJ L�J � V l.J � � � � • � O /W ?. � Q� F w� ; u,... � � = c`�n �-�'� �% � r 4 / � N I 1 � i F � r i +� :�.�a� {° ' Y�Y � . � ��- , ,, �: _: �.. _• ---.....__ �_.�_ _ � ..... �. _ . �. . __ _ - + ,,,,+� "+,.+..���'�c:�..:.t.�.....�r�. . .�....�. i�i. . . t . ' � M$rch 8, 1988 City oL Fridley 6341 University Avenue � , �'ri•:ley, tiN 55432 ' ' L� � r� �.. 'CRITERIA FOR SIGIiA(3E AT 82�i1 MAIN STREET Pormitted signage: Individual lettera mounted to 30�� bricic area directly above doore. Lettera may be either injection molded plastic-painted to appear ca�t atwninum, or actual cast aluminum lettera. All lettere muet be alffxed to the building �rith the use of 3/18�� aluminum atuds, and all atuda :�• :' must be set in mortar jointa only. Use of plaetic padn & s�licone is prohibited. Maximu�n lstter height for 1 line of copy ia 18'�. If 2 linee are used, overall height of letters aray not exceed 28'�, including aacenders and descandera. All square foot allotments will be ae deecribed in the city of Fridley ordinance under M-1 and ri-2 zoning. 'Aleo permitted, are individual iltuminate�t U.L. approved lettere,'providing lettere are r�ounted to a 20 guage metal wireway and wirer�ay ie fastened to building with mounting holee drilled #n mortar jointa only.�-- Permitted sizea are to be the same. All propoaed signage must be � approved by landlord. A sketchof the propoeed s3gnage, signed by the landlord, will be required for sacuring of permit(s). �- _r_ _._.--- .._._. ----- _ ' Sincerely, � �� �w�� � �� �iD`�`"F �02. Joseph Maertene �� 8�:►l.D,rJG� � -Tj-�E¢E �� 't� Landlord • . �'� M��.``v�?�.-t G� 3' b��t�:�� �j s�C,N�.�. . , •� ' • •, . . . . 20 . . �...w � w � � � � � QTY OF FRIDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 February 2, 2000 William W. Burns, City Manager � � Julie Tostenson, Planning Secretary SUBJECT: 2000 Planning and Appeals Commission Calendars The Planning Commission and Appeals Commission Calendars for 2000 have been reviewed and approved by the Commissions. These Calendars have now been provided for City Council review and approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Commissions and approve the 2000 calendars as submitted. JT/jt 21 � � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING 2000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before the City Couricil. * Different date due to a holiday. Application Deadline: December 3, 1999 Ten Day Completion Notification: December 13, 1999 Publication Deadline: December 14, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting: January 5, 2000 City. Council Meeting: January 24, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: January 28, 2000 Application Deadline: December 17, 1999 Ten Day Completion Notification: December 27, 1999 � Publication Deadline: December 28, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting: January 19, 2000 City Council Meeting: February 7, 2000 60 Day Agency Actibn: February 14, 2000 Application Deadline: December 30, 1999 * Holiday Ten Day Completion Notification: January 10, 2000 Publication Deadline: January 11, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: February 2, 2000 City Council Meeting: February 14, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: February 28, 2000 Application Deadline: January 14, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: January 24, 2000 Publication Deadline: January 25, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: February 16, 2000 City Council Meeting: March 6, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: March 13, 2000 Application Deadline: January 28, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: February 7, 2000 Publication Deadline: February 8, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: March l, 2000 City Council Meeting: March 20, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: March 28, 2000 ZZ - Page 2— City of Fridley - 200Q Planning Commission Schedule - City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday. Application Deadline: � February 11, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: February 21, 2000 Publication Deadline: February 22, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: March 15, 2000 City Council Meeting: April 10, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: April 11, 2000 Application Deadline: March 3, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: March 13, 2000 Publication Deadline: March 14, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: April 5, 2000 City Council Meeting: April 24, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: May 2, 2000 Application Deadline: March 17, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: March 27, 2000 Publication Deadline: March 28, Z000 Planning Commission Meeting: April 19, 2000 City Council Meeting: May 8, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: May 16, 2000 Application Deadline: March 31, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: April 10, 2000 Publication Deadline: April 11, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: May 3, 2000 City Council Meering: May 22, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: May 30, 2000 Application Deadline: April 14, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: April 24, 2000 Publication Deadline: Apri125, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: May 17, 2000 City Council Meeting: June 5, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: June 13, 2000 23 0 Page 3— City of Fridley - 2000 Planning Commission Schedule . City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday. Application Deadline: May 5, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: May 15, 2000 Publication Deadline: May 16, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: June 7, 2000 City Council Meeting: June 26, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: July 3, 2000 Application Deadline: May 19, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: May 29, 2000 Publication Deadline: May 30, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: June 21, 2000 City Council Meeting: July 10, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: July 18, 2000 Application Deadline: June 2, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: June 12, 2000 Publication Deadline: June 13, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: July 5, 2000 City Council Meeting: July 24, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: August l, 2000 Application Deadline: June 16, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: June 26, 2000 Publication Deadline: June 27, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: July 19, 2000 City Council Meeting: August 14, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: August 15, 2000 Application Deadline: June 30, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: July 10, 2000 Publication Deadline: July 11, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: August 2, 2000 City Council Meeting: August 28, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: August 29, 2000 � Page 4— City of Fridley - 2000 Planning Commission Schedule City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meering, and also need of a public hearing before the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday. Application Deadline: July 14, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: July 24, 2000 Publication Deadline: July 25, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: August 16, 2000 City Council Meeting: September 11, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: Sept. 12, 2000 Application Deadline: August 4, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: August 14, 2000 Publication Deadline: August 15, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: September 6, 2000 City Council Meeting: September 25, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: October 3, 2000 Application Deadline: August 18, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: August 28, 2000 Publication Deadline: August 29, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: September 20, 2000 City Council Meeting: October 9, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: October 17, 2000 Application Deadline: September 1, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: September 11, 2000 Publication Deadline: September 12, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: October 4, 2000 City Council Meeting: October 23, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: October 30, 2000 Application Deadline: September 15, 2000 . Ten Day Completion Notification: September 25, 2000 Publication Deadline: September 26, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: October 18, 2000 City Council Meeting: November 6, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: November 14, 2000 25 - Page 5— City of Fridley - 2000 Planning Commission Schedule - City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday. Application Deadline: . September 29, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: October 9, 2000 Publication Deadline: October 10, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: November l, 2000 City Council Meeting: November 20, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: November 28, 2000 Application Deadline: October 13, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: October 23, 2000 Publication Deadline: October 24, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: November 15, 2000 City Council Meeting: December 11, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: December 12, 2000 Application Deadline: November 3, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: November 13, 2000 Publication Deadline: November 14, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: December 6, 2000 City Council Meeting: December 18, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: January 1, 2001 Application Deadline: November 17, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: November 27, 2000 Publication Deadline: November 28, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting: December 20, 2000 City Council Meeting: (*subject to change) January 8, 2001 60 Day Agency Action: ' Jan. 16, 2001 �� 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS 2000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR APPEALS COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION The Appeals Commission has final action on residential requests, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council, with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday. All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council. Application Deadline: December 17, 1999 Ten Day Completion Noti�cation: December 27, 1999 Appeals Commission Meeting: January 12, 2000 City Council Meeting: January 24, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: February 15, 2000 Application Deadline: December 30, 1999 * Ten Day Completion Notification: January 10, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: January 26, 2000 City Council Meeting: February 14, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: February 27, 2000 Application Deadline: January 14, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: January 24, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: February 9, 2000 City Council Meeting: March 6, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: March 14, 2000 Application Deadline: January 28, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: February 7, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: February 23, 200U City Council Meeting: March 6, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: March 28, 2000 Application Deadline: February 11, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: February 21, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: March 8, 2000 City Council Meeting: March 20, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: April 1 l, 2000 27 , - Page 2— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule - The Appeals Commission has fmal acrion on residenrial requests, unless there are objecrions from surrounding neighbors or the peritioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council, with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday. All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council. Application Deadline: February 25, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: March 6, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: March 22, 2000 City Council Meeting: April 10, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: Apri125, 2000 Application Deadline: March 17, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: March 27, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: April 12, 2000 City Council Meeting: April 24, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: May 16, 2000 Application Deadline: March 31, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: April 10, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: Apri126, 2000 City Council Meeting: May 8, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: May 30, 2000 Application Deadline: April 14, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: Apri124, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: May 10, 2000 City Council Meeting: May 22, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: June 13, 2000 Application Deadline: April 28, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: May 8, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: May 24, 2000 City Council Meeting: June 5, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: June 27, 2000 Application Deadline: May 19, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: May 29, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: June 14, 2000 City Council Meeting: June 26, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: July 18, 2000 28 - Page 3— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule - The Appeals Commission has final action on residential requests, unless there are objections from sunounding neighbors or the peririoner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council, with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday. All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council. Application Deadline: June 2, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: June 12, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: June 28, 2000 City Council Meeting: July 10, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: July 31, 2000 Application Deadline: June 16, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: June 26, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: July 12, 2000 City Council Meeting: July 24, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: August 15, 2000 Application Deadline: June 30, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: July 10, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: July 26, 2000 City Council Meeting: August 14, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: August 29, 2000 Application Deadline: July 14, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: July 24, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: August 9, 2000 City Council Meeting: August 28, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: September 12, 2000 Application Deadline: July 28, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: August 7, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: August 23, 2000 City Council Meeting: September 1 l, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: September 26, 2000 Application Deadline: August 11, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: August 21, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: September 13, 2000 City Council Meeting: September 25, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: October 10, 2000 29 - Page 4— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule - The Appeals Commission has final acrion on residenrial requests, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors or the peririoner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council, with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday. All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council. Application Deadline: August 25, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: September 1, 2000 * Appeals Commission Meeting: September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting: October 9, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: October 24, 2000 Application Deadline: September 15, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: September 25, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: October 1 l, 2000 City Council Meeting: October 23, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: November 14, 2000 Application Deadline: September 29, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: October 9, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: October 25, 2000 City Council Meeting: November 6, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: November 28, 2000 Application Deadline: October 13, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: October 23, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: November 8, 2000 City Council Meeting: November 20, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: December 12, 2000 Application Deadline: October 27, 2000 Ten Day Completion Notification: November 6, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: November 22, 2000 City Council Meeting: December 11, 2000 60 Day Agency Action: December 26, 2000 Application Deadline: November 9, 2000 * Ten Day Completion Notification: November 20, 2000 Appeals Commission Meeting: December 13, 2000 City Council Meeting: January 8, 2001 * subject to change 60 Day Agency Action: January 8, 2001 (If needed extra 60 day extension) March 9, 2001 30 - Page 5— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule - The Appeals Commission has fmal acrion on residenrial requests, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors or the petirioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council, with only a recommendarion from the Appeals Comxnission. * Different date due to holiday. All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City CounciL Application Deadline: November 22, 2000 * Ten Day Complerion Notification: December 1, 2000 Appeals Commission December 27, 2000 City Council Meeting: 60 Day Agency Action: 31 January 8, 2�� 1* subject to change January 21, 2001 � AGENDA ITEM � CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 cmr oF FRIDLEY DATE: February 3, 2000 TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �,r �� � FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Pat Wolfe, Section 8 Housing Coordinator Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator RE� Revised Aqreement with Elim Transitional Housinq Last month staff received a request asking that the City Council consider modifying 1998 contract language for a grant they awarded to Elim Transitional Housing. On June 8, 1998, the City Council approved a grant in the amount of $5,000 to Elim Transitional Housing. Elim is a non-profit organization formed to assist very low-income individuals meet their housing needs. The source of Grant dollars utilized by the City was a small pool of excess funds earned through the Section 8 Housing program. You may recall a few years back, the Metro HRA determined that if there were funds that remained in an agency's Section 8 account, after that agency has paid for its program expenses, the agency could keep and reinvest those funds in other qualifying low-income housing programs. The City's Elim grant program was designed as a result of having excess funds to reinvest. The purpose of the City's grant to Elim was to allow them to issue Inans to assist low- income housing candidates to pay off their Unlawful Detainers (UDs). Unlawful detainers are generally a result of earlier financial difficulties, which now keep an individual from getting other housing. The total $5,000 grant amount remains in the Elim account. City staff contacted Elim in November, concerned that none of the funds had been used. Elim representatives indicated they held onto those dollars and carefully screened candidates for eligibility. Elim representatives responded that they appreciate the money and believe the UD relief concept is a very good concept. However, they have not had a candidate yet that fits the profile outlined in our grant agreement language. Further, they indicated that as they screen candidates, they realize that beyond UDs, other financial issues are more prevalent in keeping individuals from suitable housing. Things like: The money necessary for the utility deposit, phone hook-up charges, and housing application fees, are keeping housing from their reach. Consequently, Elim staff is asking if the City Council would consider broadening their loan capabilities by including a short, specific list of other financial situations where the money can be loaned to qualifying individuals. 32 Elim Transitional Housing Grant February 3, 2000 PAGE 2 Our staff has reviewed and decided on an appropriate list of other financial situations where an Elim Loan would be appropriate for qualifying individuals. That list, the modified grant, and a resolution approving the change has been attached for your review. All of the elements protecting the City's interest and ability to recall the grant have remained as stated in the original agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City eouncil approve the agreement language and associated resolution as submitted. M-00-23 33 RESOLUTION NO. _ - 2000 A RESOLUTION REVISING THE AGREEMENT LANGUAGE OF A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000 TO ELIM TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, INC. AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A REVISED GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, The City Council at their June 8, 1998 meeting received information regarding a housing program, using Section 8 Housing program dollars that have accrued as a result of the City's successful management of Spring Lake Park, St. Anthony, and Fridley clients in need of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, The City Council concurred on June 8, 1998 to a grant in the amount of $5000.00 for the described Unlawful Detainer program; and WHEREAS, A contract agreement was entered into between Elim Transitional Housing and the City of Fridley assuring standards for monitoring program success; and WHEREAS, the contract language provided an opportunity for the parties to make adjustments as necessary to allow Elim Transitional Housing to further serve very low income individuals; and WHEREAS, City Staff made a determination, in response to a request by Elim, that the grant contract language could and should be modified to allow their organization to further assist very low income individuals; and WHEREAS, The City retains the right to request and receive excess funds back, in the event that the program is not being administered in the manner in which it was designed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the modified contract language as it relates to their June 8, 1998 grant of $5000.00 to Elim Transitional Housing, Inc. and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a revised grant agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS______DAY OF___�___�_____, 2000. ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR 34 Execution GRANT AGREEMENT This GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made as of the 22"d day of June, 1998, by and between the C�TY OF FRIDLEY, with offices at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, ("City"), and Elim Transitional Housing, Inc., (a Minnesota non-profit corporation), with offices at 3989 Central Avenue N.E., Suite 565, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55421-3972 ("Elim"). RECITALS A. Elim has a need for funds to provide loans to individuals who are otherwise strong rental tenantcandidates who, due to an Unlawful Detainer or other named financial difficulties (see Appendix A), may be unable to secure comfo�table housing. B. The City has $5,000 in funds that it can provide—funds that have accumulated as a result of the successful administration of the City's Section 8 program in Fridley and through the sharing of the City's Section 8 Coordinator with the Cities of Spring Lake Park and St. Anthony. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: 1. City of Fridlev Section 8 Coordinator's Obliaations 1.1 The City (through its Section 8 Coordinator) shall provide $5,000 to Elim for the specific use� stated. 1.2 The City (through its Section 8 Coordinator) shalt review the financial statements provided by Elim to monitor program activity. 1.3 The City (through its Section 8 Coordinator) shall review the status of the program and work with Elim if program changes are needed to better administer the funds. 2. Elim's Obliqations 2.1 Administration of funds including, but not limited to, creating loan forms, processing loans, and monitoring loans. 2.2 Elim shall verify that the following eligibility requirements have been met by the client: • Client is a current Section 8 certificate or voucher holder and currently in case management with Elim Transitional Housing or currently on the Section 8 waiting list with the Metro HRA. • A rental unit has been found contingent on unlawful detainer or other (eliqible) debt being paid off. Fridley Section 8 Coordinator shall provide a list of landlords who will rent on this basis (when possible). • Reason for clienYs unlawful detainer is limited to unpaid rent or domestic abuse incident, the abuser is no longer a part of the household, and no more than one unlawful detainer can be on record. A$750 damage limit has been identified for this criteria. • Client must be living in Fridley, Spring Lake Park, or St. Anthony, or, if currently in another community and future rental unit is in one of the eligible communities, verification must be provided from a landlord or management company. • Client must have no recent (within the past 12 months) drug or criminal-related offense by any household member as described by the Section 8 regulation. • Client must have the financial ability and willingness to pay back unlawful detainer payoff loan. 35 2.3 Elim shall provide quarterly financial reports to the City's Section 8 Coordinator. 2.4 Elim shall provide annual updates regarding the workability of program for clients of Elim. 3. Terms and Termination 3.1 The City of Fridley reserves the right to request the return of remaining funds from Elim Transitional Housing, Inc., if the program is deemed unsuccessful by virtue of poor performance in two consecutive quarterly reviews by the City's Section 8 Coordinator. Poor performance for this purpose shall mean continued non-payment of clients receiving funds, poor record keeping in quarterly reports, or loans granted by Elim to non-qualifying clients. Otherwise, the funds can serve as an ongoing, revolving loan fund for Elim, and there is no obligation to return the funds. 4. Insurance 4.1 During the term of this Agreement, Elim shall obtain and maintain the following insurance coverage: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance at the statutory requirement of the State of Minnesota 4.2 During the term of this Agreement, Elim shall provide the City with a certificate or certificates of insurance rating to the insurance required pursuant to paragraph 4.1. 5. Liability and Indemnification 5.1 Elim represents that the services to be provided under this Agreement are reasonable in scope and that Elim has the experience and ability to provide the services. 5.2 Elim warrants that any services provided hereunder shall be done in a professional and workmanlike manner. 5.3 Elim shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, injuries, and expenses (including attorney's fees and damages for death, personal injury, and property damage) which the City may incur as a result of any act or omission by Elim in providing services under this Agreement. 5.4 The City shall defend and hold harmless Elim and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, injuries, and expensed (including attorney's fees and damages for death, personal injury, and property damage) which Elim may incur as a result of any act or omission by the City in discharging its duties under this Agreement. 6. Confidentiality Unless otherwise agreed by the City in writing, Elim shall maintain in confidence and not disclose to any third party any information obtained regarding the City and/or any of the Ciry's clients for which Elim is providing services; provided, however, that this obligation to maintain confidentiality shall not apply to: • Information in the public domain at the time of disclosure; • Information that becomes part of the public domain after disclosure through no fault of Elim; or • Information which Elim can demonstrate was known by it prior to the date of this Agreement; • Information required in accordance with mandatory reporting laws. C�1•� 7. Relationship of Parties Elim will provide services as an independent entity under this Agreement. Neither Elim, nor any of its employees or agents, shall be considered employees of the City for any purpose, neither shall Elim be eligible for any compensation or benefits which the City may provide to its employees from time to time. Elim shall be solely responsible for employment and other taxes applicable to providing services hereunder, and the Ciry will not withhold any taxes applicable to providing services hereunder, and the City will not withhold any taxes or contributions from the compensation payable to Elim under this Agreement. If any governmental authority owes taxes or contributions which allegedly should have been withheld or made, then, to the extent permitted by law, Elim shall pay the City the amounts claimed to be due, plus reasonable attorney's fees and other costs which the City may incur in defending such claim, whether or not the lawsuit is commenced. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications shall be required to be given to the other party in person or by mail as provided in this section. If delivered personally, notice shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of delivery. If delivered by U.S. mail, postage pre- paid, to the address set forth at the beginning of this Agreement or such other address as a party may otherwise request, written notice shall be deemed duly given three (3) business days after mailing. 8. Assiqnment This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns; provided, however, that neither party shall assign or transfer in any manner this Agreement or any portion hereof without the prior written consent of the other party and any attempt to assign or transfer without prior written consent shall be void and of no effect. 9. Goveminq Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 10. Miscellaneous 10.1 Headings and captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning of this Agreement. 10.2 This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, discussions, and representations, written and oral, concerning the subject matter hereof. 10.3 No waiver by the Authority of any item or condition of this Agreement or any document referred to herein shall, whether by conduct or otherwise, be construed as a waiver or release of any other term or condition in this Agreement. 10.4 This Agreement may only be amended in a written agreement signed by both parties. 10.5 Except as expressly set forth in Section 5, the rights and benefit under this Agreement shall inure solely to the benefit of the City and Elim, and this Agreement shall not be construed to give any rights, benefits, or causes of action to any third party. 10.6 The invalidity or partial invalidity of any provision of this Agreement shall not invalidate the remaining provision, and the remainder shall be construed as if the validated portion shall have never been a part of this Agreement. 10.7 Elim shall comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Government Data Practices) that are applicable to the Authority and shall not disseminate any 37 information concerning loan requests or the borrowers without the prior written approval of the City. 10.8 This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY By: Date Nancy J. Jorgenson . � Its: Mayor By: Date Debra A. Skogen Its: City Clerk : APPENDIX A- Grant Agreement Elim/City of Fridley 1. Utility deposits or past bills: Funds needed to connect utilities. Clients often have old utility bills that must be paid in order to begin new service. Typically there is no funding available for old bills. Loans would be made for this purpose, when Elim representatives determine there are no other funding sources available. 2. Phone hookups or past bills: Client would be limited to basic service until the loan is paid back. Phone service is necessary in order to seek employment, set up therapy and other appointments and obtain assistance for emergencies. Loans would be made for this purpose, when Elim representatives determine there are no other funding sources available. 3. Car repairs: This would be used only if there is no other help available and the car is necessary for work, school or medical reasons. Loans would be made for this purpose, when Elim representatives determine there are no other funding sources available. 4. Assistance in preventing a UD: The current housing shortage has made it nearly impossible for people with UD's to find housing. Loans would be made when Elim representatives determine there are no other funding sources available. 5. Application Fees: These would be limited to housing the client actually has a good chance of obtaining. Upon initial credit check and determination of need, Elim shall provide funds necessary to cover the application fees. 39 � AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 CITY OF FRIDLEY CLA1 MS 9 � 630 - 9 � 87 � ., � ` CRY OF FRIDLEY LICENSES CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 Type of License GAS SERVICES H& S Weiding Heating & AC Inc 7037 205 Street Kimball, MN 55353 GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL Renovation Systems 2735 Cheshire Lane Plymouth, MN 55447-2903 Ryan D R Construction 4447 Victoria Street Shoreview, MN 55126 Shingobee Builders Inc PO Box 8 Loretto, MN 55357-0008 HEATING H& S Welding Heating 8� AC Inc 7037 205 Street Kimball, MN 55353 PLUMBING Accredited Plumbing & Repair 22700 Pine Trail Lakeville, MN 55044 Annandale Plumbing 300 E Elm . Annandale, MN 55302 Stull Lee Plumbing 15532 Nowthen Blvd Ramsey, Mn 55303 � Daniei Salzbrun Michael Ehzufan Darrell Ryan Keith McDonald Daniel Salzbrun Tom Hoch Dan Roller Leland Stull 41 Approved By: RON JULKOWSKI Building O�cial RON JULKOWSKI Building Official Same Same RON JULKOWSKI Building Official STATE OF MINN Same Same e 0 / � CRY OF FRIDLEY ESTIMATES CITY COUNCIL MEETING� OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 Carl J. Newquist, Esq. Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of November, 1999 ... 42 ........................... $ 17,692.00 ` AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 CfTY OF FRIDLEY Date: 2/1 /00 � To: William Burns, City Manager �� From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Paul Bolin, Planner RE: ZTA #99-03, Public Hearing to add "Approved Sites" for Wireless Communication Towers and Facilities M-00-20 INTRODUCTION As you are aware, the City of Fridley has spent a great deal of time analyzing locations for the deployment of telecommunication towers and facilities. Past analysis resulted in a consensus of a mixture of public and privately owned sites strategically located to minimize impacts but, also provide adequate wireless service for residents and businesses. The purpose of this application is to amend Appendix A to add two additional sites to be considered as "approved sites" or permitted uses. A total of 13 other sites have been previously approved by the City CounciL The petitioners, TPC, Inc. & the City of Minneapolis, are seeking to add the Minneapolis Water Works site (4500 Marshall Street) and the Minneapolis Water Works Pump Station #3 (NW Corner of East River Road & 37�h Avenue) as approved locations for Telecommunication Towers. The location of these towers are necessary to allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely change settings on the pump stations from a central location. These towers are actually 25' monopoles that will utilize a stealth design to fit into their surroundings. The towers located in Fridley are just a portion of the larger remote monitoring system the Water Works is installing at all of their facilities. Due to the fact that the towers need to be located adjacent to the pump stations, much like the City's SCADA system, the petitioners have met the burden of proof required by the Ordinance to place additional sites on the approved list. ORDINANCE The telecommunications ordinance itself, with 7 approved sites for telecommunication towers, was approved in November of 1997. In January of 1998, ZTA #97-04 was approved, adding an additional 6 approved sites for telecommunication towers. ZTA #99-03 would amend Appendix A of Section 205.29 of the Fridley zoning code and place these additional two sites on the list of approved sites. 43 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION At the January 19, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZTA #99-03. The Planning Commission concurred with Staff that the approval of the Water Works Site was necessary for the City of Minneapolis to continue efficiently delivering water to it's residents. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission endorsed staff's recommendation for approval. A motion was made to recommend approval of zoning text amendment, ZTA #99-03, with the following stipulations: 1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits / permission from Anoka County necessary to locate tower in right-of-way near Pump Station #3. 2: All poles shall be of a stealth design. Pole near Pump Station #3 shall resemble a street light structure and shall have a light fixture, approved by City Staff, installed. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR ZTA #99-03 City Staff recommends the City Council hold the public hearing and receive comments on ZTA #99-03. The proposed towers will allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely adjust certain settings at their water pumping stations. .. 0 Date: 1/12/00 To: Members of the Fridley Planning Commission From: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Paul Bolin, Planner RE: ZTA #99-03, "Approved Sites" for Wireless Communication Towers and Facilities , INTRODUCTION As you are aware, the City of Fridley has spent a great deal of time analyzing locations for the deployment of telecommunication towers and facilities. Past analysis resulted in a consensus of � mixture of public and privately owned sites strategically located to minimize impacts but, also provide adequate wireless service for residents and, businesses. The purpose of this application is to amend Appendix A to add two additional sites to be considered as "approved sites" or permitted uses. A total of 13 other sites have been previously approved by the City Council. The petitioners, TPC, Inc. & the City of Minneapolis, are seeking to add the Minneapolis Water Works site (4500 Marshall Street) and the Minneapolis Water Works Pump Station #3 (NW Corner of East River Road & 37th Avenue) as approved locations for Telecommunication Towers. The location of these towers are necessary to allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely change settings on the pump stations from a central location. These towers are actually 25' monopoles that will utilize a stealth design to fit into their surroundings. The towers located in Fridley are just a portion of the larger remote monitoring system the Water Works is installing at all of their facilities. Due to the fact that the towers need to be located adjacent to the pump stations, much like the City's SCADA system, the petitioners have met the burden of proof required by the Ordinance to place additional sites on the approved list. ORDINANCE The telecommunications ordinance itself, with 7 approved sites for telecommunication towers, was approved in November of 1997. In January of 1998, ZTA #97-04 was approved, adding an additionaf 6 approved sites for . telecommunication towers. ZTA #99-03 would amend Appendix A of Section 205.29 of the Fridley zoning code and place these additional two sites on the list of approved sites STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR ZTA #99-03 City Staff recommends approval of this zoning text amendment, with stipulations. The proposed towers will allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely adjust certain settings at their water pumping stations. 45 Memorandum STIPULATIONS 1. Petitioner shail obtain all necessary permits / permission from Anoka County necessary to locate tower in right-of-way near Pump Station #3. 2. All poles shall be of a stealth design. Pole near Pump Station #3 shall resemble a street light structure and shall have a light fixture, approved by City Staff, installed. . � r.�� \\Engineering2\C\Image Expert Images\Minn. Wa... - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 1 of 1 ��.� Q 5-�-�-�-� o,� � 3 , RS _� � 11 /8/99 . • 9:52:20 AM \\Engineering2\C\PICTURES\poleps3 jpg (local) - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 1 of 1 11 /8/99 j � ,�, � 5 iz� �� � � �_� , � w , �;% }-, Ix.��lc� �s ��:1� . • 9:51:25 AM \\Engineering2\C\PICTURES\fiberglasspole3.jpa... - Nticrosoft Internet Explorer Page 1 of 1 : :;;i 11 /8/99 j' � �lu�°, � �'��. � t'���1e� �t; , t�-, `( ��cJ�, ��-��,�+�, _ L;��� �CiC,��;�;i� ; :-. Ccic�, . �.C�c� 50 10:0g:5% AM r � 4' �"r � t� 11 � 3 7 �'� � � C� Z 0 0 � d � l 1 l J ��ar:;y��t�.u�-��� `� � �-r'�: 1.�� � o� 1� n i-t�c„n L� t I`-�'c\� e.� S�t\ e v-� C; �y �,nz. 52 � \ H. 3 Insulator: Accommodate transmission cable and a number six ground wire. Unless otherwise indicated, transmission cable is 0.5-inch diameter coax. Provide W.J. Whatley, Inc., Series E30 fiberglass pole or Approved Equal. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 A B. C. POLE INSTALLATION Install poles in the locations shown on the drawings. Verify all underground Utility locations before digging antenna poles or underground conduit. Bury poles to the specified burial depth in undisturbed earth. D. Place backfill in layers not more than six-inches in loose depth and to not less than 95 percent proctor density, AST1�ID-1557. Compact each layer to required percentage of maximum density. Use hand compaction adjacent to buildings and other structures. E. Use concrete backfill when solid rock is encountered or where existing soil conditions upon compaction does not provide a stable foundation for the pole. F. Notify the Engineer when solid rock is encountered. Altemative locations will be allowed with Engineer approval if the communications path is not obstructed and transmission losses are not increased. G H. Conform to all applicable local codes and regulations for erection of utility poles. Coordinate installation of antenna and cables prior to installation. END OF SECTION 17960 sioaott ►�ww sc�o���cs�unnc�noHS��oeo�w�v, 17960 - 4 53 EMA SeMces, inc. + , G . ROOF LINE 60" 60" DEWATERING PLANT DRAWN BY DATE TAG 11-9-99 diEqCED BY DATE 23" 24" REMOVABLE SERVICE ENTRANCE SCALA YAGI ANTENNA ANDREW MICROWAVE ANTENNA WITH RADOME NOTES: ANTENNA HEIGHTS ON POLE MAY VARY ACCORDING TO SIGNAI STRENGTH. MINIMUM 2" x 10' POLE WILL BE USED MOUNTING BRACKETS TO BE DETERMINED AT INSTALL, WITH A MINiMUM OF 2 MOUNTING HOLES AND 2° TO 4" SPACING FROM BUILDiNG ANCHORS WILL BE A MINIMUM 5/8 LAG BOLT WITH CONCRETE ANCHORS. STANDOFFS WILL BE SPACED 16" TO 20" APART. COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT WILL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN. TTELEMETRY AND PROCESS P C CONTROL INC. STII.L1fATER �r PPROVED BY DATE pROJECT NMIE PROJECT NO. - - MINNEAPOLIS WATER WORKS 99108 DRAYNNC N0. FRIDLEY DEWATERING PLANT gg108-002 ANTENNA AND MAST DIAGRAM = 54 REV. REVISIONS E ♦ � � Y y � �� ���_ ��� � � � � � I � �� �� �ir�' � . a. �S <1 4i,_ .. � �. . � .. ,. r � ..����' �.: .� �a . .. g� 'a Y � +s`' � � . . 7^,s ...x�C a .. s �r'ti . _ � '� �� , ,� s�}� �. ` �' ' � a , •,, . r� � �. �� a: ��- . � �� ' t-�'� ', k �P'.� xa ,1'�,_. .s. ',: w � . 'w. . ° �{ - ' —,� .� "�n; , � --�� � �+ -� ; .r � . , '.�c���a ,, , ; . s ' I �. "+ � �: ��� �,,, •,; ;, .�as.� � ��`� " 1�:. f `�",�,� �' ° � . . � �. _ ���" .� � � �; �` } ''°. a� :f 3�"':.� Lz'•_' � . _. � _ ���� �: �,�,y, � �� �� ., ��,�� � �� �va� ��� ',; x�`.�,.� � � , . . t. "� � �'' °' `�' �� ��_ � "�. ���.�•.� _, . A�- Y �Y'+�[ �' . ? �' �. fi � " f .c�,', '-sL � � - 1 a' - � � _ � f',_..._ � . . x ' �. � w I �:: � �. � � � � � � � � � � � � W W W � C l�I �I � Q 1 � � � �� n � �V :� � _ 0 � N 24 • �TARY � � � � -� � O D � Z D � G1 � W W � /r 56 lwJ � * d fTl "p � r D D � Z � --I � � Z Gl � z � 12' RCP � O1/11/00 15:23 FA% 651 430 0783 TPC To• Paul Bolin Company: City of Fridley Fax�: * C 12-s1�-►�� Telemetry and � Process Controls, inc. t+'rom: Todd Garber Re: Minneapolis Water Works Communication Upgrade Remarks: � Paul, C� O 1 . �.c�X a�aac• 1�11�VV Number of Pages: 4 Phone: 651 - 430 - 0435 Fax: 651- 430 - 0783 Page Number Includes Cover Shect 1 Attached are the pictures for the two additional pump stations the 25' fiberglass poles will be installed, along with a drawing indicating the locations. Please give me a call, should you need any further infonnation. Thank You � Todd Grarber Design Engineer 5640 Memorial Ave. N. Complex C. Stillwater, MN 55082 , . �. Y Oliil/00 15:2� F.�1.Y 651 �30 0783 `.- .' � TPC • _ ..:. • .'_ '.' ' -`r'?'a:�t;;"�l��v ' ,. ,. .' , , rM"i2.( , "•'. w ' ' , 'tp . � , , , . . .. � � ''r • 1 !�.�,� �! . a� � .f '� '` � � �t,. `7���� �tyP�'yv�. Y �'� '� � K+, � �~!',�f ' `,,�''`';�. , i � �i� . ; � �' .�=�1� , .� r I � Yr + i� � •y�jM'i��a��� ���:�/'��. Y�:,r, �'fy}��i_��. �K'r.. �'�,�_l�:: �'.,. ��' :J. i, .y, � �,-� ~t,"l:xS�� f � *'�. i.�" �' •�.°Y �.� 7 a.�r f 1',-' •�'. ` �. _.ad ���'. 1•'.. ..4�..'. �:�i'. .. ��i�•.t�.�r�. •}�_.'i:�s�i�'��. .a .y��;;•R�. l��� P ��-�,z,,`. -� � ��� r.�, f O1/11/00 15:23 F.�Y 651 430 0783 TPC r.�, . 0 _,.•.,T�� .—� .. . _ � .. .r—�----�:�.�.T..s�•°tTr--_;r,-.a�T-�.--q?�n .� :�., .`."ti /� • �.b'��\.�.�r�.. �.� �. �� � . T • �A..�� �.+�r.� �+���r�r'w.w ti\�r� .� ', ^•, • , _. .� � �%�� .iY': . ' � , . . � MIf'►i I. . .T .r� ��r �.��. .� F���i�r����. ' �: �� ���/l! ^'� �. � . . _ ��.� . ��� r. �.�� .. •. . . �' � � � 1/'r'� sf.! " ' `�' �r����. . � • .. ,. _ . � . � _ . � �.�= r e..� �� 1� Ar.Y�.`J+'�'4 '�.r r� :.. � M�.. �,,,•_�''iP��+.'°'�..� � �� � . � ;i�,: .�'�',,y,�[,��'I , .' •. , � �t�,',`•. '''Y• ' ��,-',�; ,,i�y'�` �,q�. . ` �. e:a1'•'� --• � . �N� • ,�'S,I�'���� `�t a�v�.: ,i,-J'��i,t�, ^ "r�,;�T�1�� . ��'nrr' -�V"�• . �.;�"�,�,"cRi�'b' ,r b�fw�dt�'��,,,�'.4�.r���r. � � %.r, � 4. e �.,� �. �?y,'��. 1�c •: �r..,� AnX -�y, .. ' .i. • �o`'. . ? F. , s'� �' • 7�. n- � ..� . .� �" ;4 � k °Y�j^��'^��r hi'J,,.' ,;±•i ^ �l� �.��:..�,+ • T � : ,��,.,,,. .,,��'J°"t�;x�'�9,�x• e". . �. . . '� :'xb''If�,� °f�•'�^ ' ° . . .� ,r�Y�� JY�,��,.�, � ..;n:�Li•..;, ��N.:��r�'�s '�•ir.,y,�' , .�f�: 'i �:. i2, , . 9`�•rff,��.,,.�� ..,��•" ',.ir,�Y -v�'. � . 4 IN��<'a�.{ � � I;� : i . . � Rt•.• . � .. • ' yf' . . . �..��,�, `�A 1 .. .'. �. �� T� ' .. . • � � � ., . ' �. . � 1 �'y1 0.�yi: A ' �^ �°'y��",��'��''i•`''i.. �L�p ��'.. ,��. 'i,•`�., • , �����.�'�;,y '�1. •ay� , ...%�!.'.� `I:f � .�s„�;,e}I'�„w���' •J� ' �d . •T��'I:f.�'�y,`, ry � •�••l ��.i..«� , �,;� �`��,'• �,,,.:+.�'� � "�1jy...�...' ' . . 1 . ."' �.�.'i`7' �� 1 .h T v �4�� . � � ' � 7• � ^ , • �~' � �%'�r;•.��,�.� ' •., , �: ►.h`"� �ei � � , � ' � � � , � . ir.,1�:...�;r�i�rk^�•''�'�:`.,'N' Ft''�'L�a.. � � ,'�a. ,.,.,,�,� y,� r � . . ���tPfi.: ' <'� +,`.F•.l�w U lroP^ r '����l���CiwiY�.r.C!:!t • � _. ,�`��w� m�MMi���yi� . �I,n9�•:e.�� +:: di�.e !,'u.. �ti�'�t iM'�' '1C1.�'�4 2n �.. _ .�ea � ___ '�f. ��°at ^"�_'C'J"+ge��Jiy,rC�,''Si'r� 1;:I:�l�:.i -• K�' . ,; • `a�i..aTj� �. . ��yy , ,-, ary �7-"'�; � � +�'N" y.�,,�,;y�.•�. • .:�:� �•''-cR� : r �� . . ��4f.t:�r',Li�'�.�q�I��"'� �Y�{��'i��J���"'� fiK Pv •�-� � J�-k�i�n.� I 59 r � . t • O1/11/00 15:2� FAR 651 430 0783 ♦ y s � s y a r � � s 2 � � : TPC � I a� I �4 _ a- �� O OQ �N �- a � �� �° � � ° 00 O a � � E N � � � �� _ � — J �� ° o�o � o � ao a � oa o a . . . a a ' o . o 0 0 s Q • Q 0 0 O O • • � � , � � .• � : r i ? � • � � �� � � ....�': .� I :, ..� � 04 Q O Q � Q � F� v � I '�� � r ' ,'I'I', � 1�� ,�' ' • -�� 1C�(t� o 0 C�� @ GROUND LINE—> STEEL TENON r --'-•�� � �_� -� OPTIONAL POLE TOP CAP AND SNOE BOX BRACKET AVAILAgLE STANDAFlD 2+/z' x 5" HANOHOLE wITH CAST ALUMINUM COVER. HANDHOLE AFlEA REINFORCED FOR AODED sra�ni. � POLE SIZFS � The Series E30 siandard duty and Series E31 heavy dury �_� poles are avaitable in overail shaft lergths of 11 ft, to 35 ii OPTIONAL POLE TOP TENON SIZES 7ENON �� �r�+ a�uevs�ior�s an�oNs STANDARD 3*fz' 3' 2�' STANOARD g,� �,. Z, OP110NA1 IXTRA COST 3+M 3 234' STEEL SHOE BOX BRACKET SIZES oar� ocrw� cQSr r N.p.s. cz�- o.o.� opnow� �w cosr , v.- w.PS. �i�- o.�.> HANDHOLE SiZES �'��0 2'h' x 5' OVAL OPT70NAL REDUCEp Cp�f 2�fz' ROUNO � WIRE ENTRY HOLE SIZES sr"N°^R° r x s srav�ARO HnRE avrRY r x s. oPnow►� srzES nv,vias�E uPOn� aEQUESr SQUARE DIRECT BURIAI BASE FOR ANTI-ROTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ROUND TAPERED FlBERGLASS SERlES E30 AND E31 �� . , 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION be reinforced in areas of handho(es and special hardware 1.'I Fberglass lighting pole to be round, hollow, and attachments. of uniform taper along its length. The butt end of the 3.5 The pole shall be desig�ed wi#h a minimum safety embedded-type poles will be e�larged and square so as ��r of 2:1 and have no more than 10% deflection at fuil to increase resistance to rotation and provide maximum W��d loading. ground bearing resistance (anti-lift)_ The pole shall be 4. POLE TOP non-conductive and chemicalty i�ert 4.1 Tenon Styie: A galvanized steel tenon will befirtnly 2. INSTALLATION OATA bonded to the pole fo� mounti�g a post top luminaire. The 21 Oirect-embedded poies from 11 ft. to 1 T ft, will be 9a��n¢ed steel tenon will be straight with no taper. The set to a depth of 3 ft. Direct embedded poles '18 ft to te�on will be coated with matching urethane finish. 29 ft will be set to a depth of 4 ft. Poles 30 ft, to 35 ft. will 4•2 Bracket Styte: The pole shall be capped (otio�at) be set to a depth of 5 ft. and rei�orced for side mounted boft-o� brackets. 3. POST SHAFT CONSTRUCTION 5. HANDHOLE 3.1 The pole will be co�structed from continuous 5.1 The handhole shall be 21/2' x 5' oval, located 18` fibergtass filaments combined with thermosetting above grade. The cover shall be non-corrosive metal polyester resin. painted to match the pole and secured with a stainless 3.2 The fiberglass and resin ratio of the pole wilt steel, tamper-proaf locking screw. contain at least 65% glass, the ba(ance polyester resin. 6. WIRE ENTRANCE 3.3 The glass filament will be heticalty wound, under 6.1 The pole shall have a wire e�trance hole af Z" x 5' tension, first at a relatively high angfe (65-85°) to the located 24° below grade, 90° clockwise to luminaire. longitudina! axis of the pole, with alternate layers of 7. FINISH filaments in opposite directions for maximum 7.1 The surtace of the pole shall be u�iform and circumferential (compressive) strength, consistent for the entire len Secondly, an outer core section of greater weightthan 7.2 The resin shall conta� colored p gme�t to match the inner core section is helically-wound by wrapping the fsnish coat of the pole. Solid cotoration will be continuous glass fiiaments at a relativety low angle (3-15°) throughout the entire wall thickness af the pole. to the longitudinal axis of the pole for maximum 7.3 The finish coating will be a pigme�ted urethane longitudinal (bending) stre�gth, finish capable of withstanding exposure to ultraviolet, �� 3.4 The pole shall have a minimum wail thickness of chemicals, and extreme weather conditions. ' 3/32'. The pole shall have a tapered wall increasing in 7.4 The surtace coating shall be a minimum dry film � thickness from the top to the base in proportion to thickness of 1 1/2 mils. load and ground line moment requirements. The pole v� 1 . E-2 , � . � r S?E�JFICATION SHEET DIRE�T BURIAL POLES " STANDARD DUTY ROUNDTAPEREDFiBERGLASS __�_! , SERIES E30 FOR USE WiTHTENON OR O TON BRACKET (NOT RECOMMENDED FOR MASTARM APPLICAIIONS'� POLE DIMENSIONS RECOMMENDED TpTqL Lpqp�NG ruma uruos ovEnati �o�orK �� r�ertxr Mu�t sx� � wxw. w�esxr � �T �u� towia o s s s „ ,. (s�. o� r�x x�sxr o�rx = sx ��� � � arx arx ttx r�r�t am � (� 1 (F� 1 (� ) Ms.) N�.) l�) � rILSE �Q EPJI E.rJI ETA E.rJI Et�l ErJ► 1�1 f�.l I�s.) Isa�'U IsaF'q RO.Fq Rn.�1 ImFq {slF: q011 11 8 3 22 3.4 4S 54 12 150 120 8.3 6,3 49 3g p012 12 9 3 u 32. 3.4 4b 54 12 150 120 8,3 63 t9 3,g � E3013 13 10 3 27 3.4 4.8 54_ 12 t50 120 8.3 g„3 4.g gq � E3014 14 11 3 29 3.4 d9 54 12 150 120 8.3 &3 4_8 38 37 :l.70t�.:,..`: �.Y : T�'._-.'� :$i:� ..::�� '' wSi�i`"�," . �3�e^� ,.� �• ' _ ... ,_ � . =�+. . . .,. " � _ � ' �:...r.?•. :_ .:" ''-�'-k'i�.' �.'r�.9 E7016 16 13 3 33 a4 52 : :'+ � � 12 t50 11.8 .81 .`'g,� .:V4.71~ 38 31 E3017 17 14 3 35 3.4 53 54 12 150 11.8 8.1 8�/ 4J 37 31 - E7018 18 14 4 37 3,4 5.3 56 24 150 11.8 8./ fi.i 4.7 3,7 3� E3019 19 15 4 40 3.4 5.5 66 24 100 11_7 8.0 6.0 1,7 3�7 3,p �J01ffi'-x-.�; ;'�:�� c�t�+�._ ���; _ =�`�'x�- ^ ... ��"=_.v� %'t"� .��, E,i021 21 17 4 47 _ 3,y . -. 5.7 • -, 65 24 � 10D 87 6.4 `4.7 36 � 2g ' E30Z2 22 18 d 24 � 3.4 59 66 24 100 8 6 B.3 4.6 3.6 29 y3 E30�i 23 t9 4 53 3.4 6.0 66 24 100 8.6 &.3 4.6 3.6 Zq y; E30?� 24 20 4 57 3.4 62 66 24 100 85 62 t.6 3.B 2$ .�"�.., -'2�� _ � ., .,t�, 2.3 - • _ . :. . _.. _ , _ _x �z E3026 26 22 4 66 3.4 6.4 66 24 100 8A Gt - <S 3S 27 21 E3027 27 23 4 69 3.4 6.6 66 24 100 8.4 6A 4 4 3�4 26 p.p E3028 28 2a 4 T3 3.4 6.7 66 24 /00 8.3 6.0 4.4 3,.3 ?S 19 � E� 29 25 4 77 3.a 69 66 24 100 8.2 59 42 32 24 19 '�:a3�-. - --- c..s.�-� _...� _ . ''"'C`ZSr-� ' " - � . ' _ � �'-r ,=?Z., 'af� .Sl � . . .. .. ... . ... _ .^.��'! .. . !/Ya .. , ; E303� 31 26 5 86 3.4 7.0 78 3g 700 "8.2 a 59 42 3.1 23 1S E30;i2 32 27 5 90 3.4 7.1 78 36 100 81 5.8 4.1 3.1 2.3 1.7 � � � 5 94 3.4 7.3 78 � 100 8.] 5,7 4.1 30 22 1.7 E3034 36 29 5 98 3.4 7.4 78 36 100 80 SS 39 Z9 21 1_6 E3035 35 30 5 102 3_4 7.6 78 36 1Q0 8.0 55 3.8 28 21 15 ROUND TAPERED FlBERGLASS HEAVY DUTY DIRECT BURIAL FOR USE WITH TENON OR BOLT-0N BRACKET SERI ES E31 (NOT RECOMMENDED FOR MA��' ARiw epvr ire-nn��c� 0297 _ ...-- • ........... .... .��. E-1 �A�rrrna�oosaedotidacAl6YI�61M�A0.9if0�tisw�irLi�ldea30xg�� � 0 . �J ``'',t1 U � � c� � ORDERIiVG INFORMATiON: ROUND TAPERED, SQUARE STRAIGHT AND SQUARE TAPERED PULES IMPORTANT: Due to the diversity of the product li�e, W.J. Whatley custom makes ail products. We cannot accept returns due to mistakes in ordering All quotations and orders are subject to approval by the factory. �,�,�� OVERALL SHAFT LENGTH (FEE'n `°, �FABCEtE� �?-�- :� : �,:: ''���•.�:'�""�,*x€;�'= wWO►+aF ro� roP ����+ OPTIONS ���^ Teno�� �Oj' PbM��opT abM OptlorW Sdneard Bawat Sa�eisl SpeeW�r TeD GO T«qn Tarwn Conq�i� T�twn Assembir zaro.c.• raa- raa- r�a r��.n_ 2�u-�.a soee�y so.�+h riw,� so s� sz sa sz �o 2'h' Ramd 54 55 56 57 63 71 2Y+'�5-Owl 58 59 60 Bt 6a 72 a'x 6' Av1' 65 68 67 68 68 73 4v.lilabi� onlv �n srnrs EAO F61 Aa'J nd3 Pnba ..5.. _ iiwicaaes stanaxa oe4gi tean,es as esned on wna+kr socafiration s+�eeb. ..N.. -:+aicaoes u,at oeeona� noe-sranmra aes,q� teaa.« a�e req�a.ee. oa�on� a�icr kalt+es rtuy be otaerfld Cy aiCiciung tl+e nan•sinndartl destyf Mah+e � ae�oNantt � aM� +9 TaDM. 0.g EJOZ�-10,50N1.2.,T. Sd� eD0a�a1 Oesign tladirs aR at O 50 - N1 - Nor►NaWard hsd�plp bcatqn N2 - Npr►sta�W�d Miis entry bc�oon � w- Nor.sb,earo �.:. ermy san (sta,wara sas r X sf 1'M - Specal areas d mntaeemnx tor bad�et or mase am� amacM�r�t ►'G - S0�'+a� padieC aeas !or brad�rt a ma�t sm a�tadsnem (O.E.M. Ternp�ata � N6 - A^Y a%�e► �eei� r�e�oa+b w Facc«r aoo�oral �eau+ea o� ar noi.stanmro 2qioremer� aleas. sicrt.c onvn,gs ,nnra� mecGntcro on a/ no�standard d�s, 0297 � W.J. Whatley, Inc. 1997 10 - COLOR AND FINISH SEE TABLE I .1-1 60 - POLE TOP AND HAND HOLE SEE TABLE II �/l�I DESIGN FEATURES SEE TaBIE III MISCELLANEOUS SPECIF(CATIONS �„yn, I oucs�ae I insae _ '� Oimensions Dimensions �I Ectra Cost 3fi° pi;,° 2- � Exrra Cosr 3 h- 3_ Z,N.. li Extra Cost fType ea0. Ea t. aa2. an31 3 h^ a- 3�a" I� INf1t4F'TfiPEREEDEQVAtEi��ti�Si:Ep!E�F II Standard 2'N.P.S(2375Q0.; I, ° "`==6Ii��E1tNLZEI7K:Si'EEL:SR/CETfEES�kPF��E�S#2'E� =` '', Staridard t,ti.• NlP 8(1 66 O D) . _. , -.°.--s��sHaESa�-s�cxE�sup��s� ��- S88-2 2" N.P.S(23750.D.) ' 588-1 t,k^ N.P.S (�.66 Q0.) I �" I � l �� •�e � � �. '� �• x 2,- ec oso sQ �z zo•-zs• ,z.o- �.-x2�° aa2 aa�a I �o'-�a• _1 -- a--f �-xzr ��w ,a�-zb- �os �r.-x2i- ec�os a� zr•-a�� �r �.-x2r ec�2o 3.3 8 A.'i8 15'-23' 10S' �i" X 21" BC 705 8� A38 24'-30' 12" �i X 21 Fl[` t 90 iv+z e� A43 i8'-24' 12' �s X 21 BC 120 A42 3 A43 25•_35• 1q• 1' X 36" BC 140 L na2 a naa I �'-as' � �s- r X 3s ec �60 -� �."�'-,�'°�`A[�'�HQi�B'I�SEE'A1EER_`�7tIIRENSidNS���`:� g= Gtalog Number Bottom Width �O.O.) Height i _ BC 080 SY." S4uare 8y.' BC 105 t0�4" Square t0�h" --- 8C t 20 12'/.•' Square t O' ' 8C 140 74'ft" $quef2 tY ec , so � s�•• saua.e -, r :=' BAL•T�tRCLE/iNQ./tNCEEQR BIrSEQtMENS1�NS=;:- ---+ A B C D E �iT �,t �,t . Pattem � Pattern � Plate Hole Ho1Q I ire�a Square Size Width Leng� 8" 5.65.. $•. � .. 1.5.. 0.5" 7.42" 10.4" 1.. 1.5" 7 2" 8.50" 1 1.5" 1.. l.Sy �a^ s.9o° t3S• �.2s.. 2.. t6" t1.3t.. t5" t.25" _ 2.. r a"V � � � �'. 6 - 6.2 G�z uHx� -� Ultra High Performance Antennas -TEGLAR� Long Life Radome Included Uual UhUCIU-�ti(; lU (:�.Uj C:t'H7J7(a' 4"L.5 4'L.y 4:3.3 1.1 ;iti %Z 1.Uti (:iU.%j MPx � T �linh P�rfnrrnanrp Ant�nnac - Hynalnn �ta�inmp Inrl��cial f1r.-�i NPY1LrjP R/7 d1 /`PR71?7I. df1 G di /1 di d i C,, 411 CJt 1/1R l411 T - HPXY2-56 12 (3.7) PDR70 43.8 44.2 4�3.7 1.0 30 71 1.06 (30.� a7. ! .I"ie� - b.li�``ie7 �ill.z HP ,ti High Performance Antennas - Hypalon Radome Included c�.,,.ia a�oe_s�w � i� �� I`OAY?7I_ • � a �� n vs � -. --- HP&57W 8(2.4) PDR7(} ^ 407 41.2 41.7 HP10-57W 10 (3.0) " 42.5 42.9 43.4 � HP12-57W 12 (3.7) " 44.2 44.6 45.0 P � Standard Antennas Sinate P2v7W- - 2 ��.Sl CPR137G D..�.�.i+�! Dd_G7W A/1 n1 V. A&5TN 3 (2.4j cr N"' 5.92� - 6.�25 GHz ?o 1.6 1.3 1.0 � 30 30 30 �? i,in i� �� s� ;:o� i�o:�� 65 1.06 (30.7) 70 1.06 (30.7) ` 29.2 29.3 29.9 5.8 .iG 40 i.10 (26.41 * 4A C 4S /l �F A ?!� ?/� AI1 1 1(1 l�J� A� "' 40.7 412 41.? 1.6 30 47 1.06 (°A.Tj _ _. .., . _. ..: _ .- � - -- -- -- � -- ---� --- - ... .,.- .., ._...-- �----... - --- ----�- �e unchanged, except 120 VSWR (20.8 d8 R.L). MAY � i-iinh �+sar{nrman�Q t1��ai i2aam �nfi��nac -TF(:i aR� i nnn i i#a Cta�nmo inrl��ii�i .,.a, :ii.i:,,.-..� �_.Tj ,.�.,...,._. ,. �;.� ��.� _,�.., �.t �..�.�.;��� � ;.,,o�:::i.:j HDX1a59A' 10 (3Aj COR>3TG A 42.9 43.2 43.4 1.1 26 Main 74 1.06 (30.7) 20 Div. 1 � uiv. t U.S. FCC Part 21. ' For unused waveguide port use terminaliun load Type na 62901-137 (see page 242). . . , �. , . -- -'_' -=_--' . , _ :. . --'- - - _ __- --• -_'--= • _. _ .::� _ . • � Radome Electrical Characteristics Planar Radomes. The electrical characteristics of the planar radome are incorporated into the electrical pertormance specifications of the shielded antenna. Molded Radomes. The use of a molded radome on standard (P-Series) or focal plane (FP-Series) antennas may slightly impact maximum antenna VSWR. Attenuation and system VSWR effects are listed in the table below. To determine the maximum VSWR across the band for the antenna/radome combination, add the figure from the table to the maximum antenna VSWR specification. 10' and 12' standard molded radomes are rated for 125 mph (200 km/h) while 4', 6' and 8' standard radomes are rated for 150 mph (240 km/h); extra strength mold- ed radomes for 10' and 12' which are rated for 150 mph (240 km/h) are also available. Typical Molded Radome Attenuation and YSWR Standard Antenna Radomes Standard 2 (0.6) Standard 4 (�.p� Standard g (1.8) Standard g (2,q� Standard 10 (3.0) Standard 1 p (3_7� Extra Strength 10 (3.0) Extra Strength 12 (3.7) Focal Plane Antenna Radomes Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Extra Strength Extra Strength Extra Strength Extra Strength Extra Strength 4 (1.2) 6 (1.8) 8 (2.4) 10 (3.0) 12 (3.7) 4 (1.2) 6 (1.8) 8 (2.4) 10 (3.0) 12 (3.7) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.03 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 12 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 1.5 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 0:02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 -0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02: 0:03 0.02 0:03 0.02 0'.03 0.05 ! 0:05 : 0.05 ' O;b5 OAS 0.05 .�+''� Customer Service Center - Call toll-free fro QJ.S.A., Canada and Mexico 1-800-255-1479 • U.K. 0800-250055 �'����� • Republic of Ireland 1-800-535358��'�ustralia 1800-803 219 • New Zealand 0800-441-747 p.139 r � c , r w r ti • r ` GTY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM C�ITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 DATE: February 4, 2000 TO: William W. Burns, City Manager��� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Grant Fernelius, Hoc�sing Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of 2000 CDBG Program This item was tabled by the City Council at their January 24, 2000 meeting due to concerns about funding the Parks and Recreation Department's Youth Scholarship Program. It is our understanding that the Council has reviewed the January 27th memo prepared by Jack Kirk which described the program in greater detail. In 2000, the City will receive $138,686 in federal CDBG funding. Staff is proposing that the funds be used for housing rehabilitation and public services. Below is the breakdown of funding, including a comparison of the 1999 amounts. Activity 1999 2000 Change % Housing Rehab ACCAP Alexandra House Fridley Rec. Dept. Fridley Senior Program SACA Sub-Total County Admin. TOTAL $122,500 $8,500 $3,000 $4,000 $4,000 $2,500 $22,000 $1,000 $145,500 $116,883 $8,038 $2,837 $3,782 $3,782 $2,364 $20,803 $1,000 $138,686 Applications for this year's program are due by February 11, 2000. -$5,617 -$462 -$163 -$218 -$218 -$136 -$1,197 N/C -$6,814 -4.59% -5.40% -5.40% -5.40% =5.40% -5.40% -5.40% N/C -4.72% Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the year 2000 CDBG program as presented and further authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute all documents with the County to secure the funding. • • � 0 : AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 CfiY OF FRIDLEY Date: 2/1 /00 To: William Burns, City Manager fi�� From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Paul Bolin, Planner RE: First Reading of ZTA #99-03, "Approved Sites" for Wireless Communication Towers and Facilities M-00-21 INTRODUCTION TPC, Inc. & the City of Minneapolis are seeking to add the Minneapolis Water Works site (4500 Marshall Street� and the Minneapolis Water Works Pump Station #3 (NW Corner of East River Road & 37 h Avenue) as approved locations for Telecommunication Towers. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION At the January 19, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZTA 99-03. After reviewing the proposal, a motion was made to recommend approval of the zoning text amendment request. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the City Council hold the first reading of the ordinanee to amend the zoning text of Appendix A of Section 205.29, adding the Minneapolis Water Works to the list of approved telecommunications towersites. s 67 • � ORDINANCE NO. 1127 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, BY ADDING APPROVED SITES TO CHAPTER 205 "ZONING", TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS, SECTION 205.30, APPENDIX A. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 205.30 Telecommunications Towers and Facilities District, Appendix A, of the Fridley City Code is hereby amended as hereinafter indicated. The following locations are zoned to and have been determined to be Approved Sites for the installation of Towers or Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. � Municipal Garage or Recycling Center • Community Park " • Edgewater Park • Fridley Reservoir along Matterhom Drive • Fridley Water Tower in Locke Park • Fridley Commons Water Tower on 615` Avenue • Well #13 • • Commons Park • Onan Comoration • AIITemp Storaqe • Aqro-K • FMC Water Tower • Undeveloped Citv riqht-of-wav south of 694 • Minneapolis Water Works • Minneaqolis Water Works Pump Station PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF � , 2000 NANCY J. JORGENSON, MAYOR ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN, CITY CLERK Public Hearing: February 7, 2000 First Reading: February 7, 2000 Second Reading: ' Published: � 68 � � AGENDA ITEM ` CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 CRY OF FRIDLEY 1NFORMAL STATUS RE'PORTS .•