02/07/2000 - 4675'
unror
Froa.�r
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ATTENDENCE SHEET
Manday, Febnuany 7, 2000
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS
�
� ..
ITEM
NUMBER
�
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or
treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public
assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to
participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at
572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
PRESENTATION:
Barbara Warren — Values Firsf Program
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of January 24, 2000
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
Receive the Planning Commission Minutes
ofJanuary 19, 2000 .................................................................s.... 1- 13
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
2. Special Use Permit, SP,#99-13, by Vern
Haldorson, for a Proposed Storage Building,
Generally Located at 514 Dover Street N.E.
(Ward 3) —
....................................................................................... 14 16
3. Approve Amendment to the Comprehensive
Sign Plan for MB Properties, Generally
Located at 8251 Main Street N.E. (Ward 3) .................................. 17 - 20
4. Approve 2000 Development Review
Schedule for Planning Commission and
City Council Action ....................................................................... 21 - 31
5. Resolution Revising the Agreement Language
of a Grant in the Amount of $5,000 to Elim
Transitional Housing, Inc. and Authorizing
Execution of a Revised,Grant Agreement ..................................... 32 - 39
6. Claims ....................................................................................... 40
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 PAGE 3
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED
7. Licenses ....................................................................................... 41
8. Estimates ...................................................................................... 42
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda — 15 Minutes)
PUBLIC HEARING:
9. Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by
Telemetry and Process Controls, Inc., to Add
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities and
Equipment for Minneapolis Waterworks'
Own Use, Generally Located at 4500 Marshall
Street N.E. (Ward 3) ........................................................................ 43 - 65
�
S
�
0
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000 PAGE 4
OLD BUSINESS:
10. Approve Year 2000 Community Development
Block Grant Application (Tabled January 24,
2000) ....................................................................................... 66
r
NEW BUSINESS:
11. First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the
City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by
Adding Approved Sites to Chapter 205, "Zoning,"
Telecommunications Towers ........................................................... 67 - 68
12. Informal Status Reports ................................................................... 69
ADJOURN.
0
0
� U � ��� �`a� �'� �
�
FRIDLEY CITY CDUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, Z000 �oF
' FRIDIEY
�e City of Fridley will not discriminate against or hazass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its
ervices, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual
orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation witl be provided to allow individuals with disabilities
to participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons
with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
� � 5�f SFar�
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
PRESENTATION:
Barbara Warren — Values First Program
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: �� %�� �5�
�
City Council Meeting of January 24, 2000
•
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS: �� � �S
1. Receive the Planning Commission Minutes
of January 19, 2000 .............................. 1-13
2. Special Use Permit, SP #99-13, by Vern
Haldorson, for a Proposed Storage Building,
Generally Located at 514 Dover Street N.E.
(Ward 3) ................................... 14 —16
3. Approve Amendment to the Comprehensive
Sign Plan for MB Properties, Generally
•Located at 8251 Main Street N.E.
(Ward 3) ................................... 17 - 20
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
4. Approve 2000 Development Review
Schedule for Planning Commission and
City Council Action ................................ 21 - 31
5. Resolution Revising the Agreement i 5
Language of a Grant in the Amount of $5,000 ��
to Elim Transitional Housing, Inc. and
Authorizing Execution of a Revised Grant
Agreement ................................. 32 - 39
6. Claims ..
7. Licenses
8. Estimates
40
41
42
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
ADOPTION OF AGENDA. �� %�r, � Jn S,fL
( w j�-c /-T
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
PUBLIC HEARING:
9. Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by
Telemetry and Process Controls, Inc., to Add
Wreless Telecommunication Facilities and
Equipment for Minneapolis Watennrorks'
Own Use, Generally Located at 4500 Marshall
Street N.E. (Ward 3) .....................
� �- ii1 '�i t S �� � � / � � .. �5 �
�:,►, y� `� � v t� � �3 / � �J I�S �
OLD BUSINESS: �� r ��i � �w�ave-
l �� �,r„� �`�
10. Approve Year 2000 Community Development �
Block Grant Application (Tabled January 24,
2000) ................................... 66
� ��� �c'Je. ���
� ��
NEW BUSINESS:
11. First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the
City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by
Adding Approved Sites to Chapter 205, "Zoning,"
Telecommunications Towers ................ 67 - 68
S � � ���
�
���c c�
12. Informal Status Reports ........................ 69
ADJOURN.��C - �� �i' �1, � �j� � ,�/
�� ` �."t , u.� ��,�j
«, �
PAGE 2
•
n
�
C�
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
OF JANUARY 24. 2000
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Jorgenson at
7:32 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Jorgenson led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jorgenson, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember
Billings, Councilmember Wolfe, and Councilmember Bolkcom
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STATEMENT OF CONDUCT:
Please be reminded that those present at today's meeting may hold a variety of views and
opinions regarding the business to be conducted. The exercise of democracy through
representative local government requires that ALL points of view be accommodated at these
proceedings. It is further expected that a standard of mutual courtesy and respectfulness be
exercised by all in attendance, through our individual expression, manner of speaking, and
conduct. Therefore, please receive the views of other with the same degree of courtesy and
respect which you desire to be given your views and opinions. Any departures from this
standard will be addressed by the Presiding Officer through whatever means are deemed
appropriate. Thank you for your attendance at today's meeting, and your agreement to abide by
these standards of personal conduct.
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Jorgenson stated that this was a proclamation establishing January 24, 2000 as Henry
(Hank) Peterson Appreciation Day. Mr. Peterson's wife, Opal, was present to accept the
proclamation. Mr. Peterson was a long-time resident and civic leader within the City of Fridley.
His dedication, high energy level and commitment to our community greatly enhanced the
quality of life in the City of Fridley.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
CitY Council Meetin� of December 13. 1999
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Wolfe.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 2
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Special Citv Council Meetin�of December 20, 1999
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Citv Council Meeting of Januarv 3, 2000
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
RESOLUTION NO. 7-2000 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS SPECIFICA-
TIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVE-
MENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2000 - 1:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, explained that this was consideration of a resolution ordering
preliminary plans and cost estimates for the 2000 street improvement project. The project
includes 715L Avenue, the 73rd Avenue service drive, 74`'' Avenue, Symphony Street,
Symphony Court, and the University Avenue east service drive. This item is included in
the 2000 Capital Improvements Plan at an estimated cost of $500,000. Staff
recommended Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 7-2000.
2. RESOLUTION NO. 8-2000 RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF CONSTRUCTION
OF CERTAIN IMPROVMENTS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST.
2000 -1:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of_ a resolution receiving the
preliminary report and calling for a public hearing on the proposed assessments for the
2000 street improvement project. The proposed hearing date is February 14, 2000. Staff
recommended approval of the report for the 2000 street construction program and
establishment of the public hearing for the assessments.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24. 2000 PAGE 3
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 8-2000.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 9-2000 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2000 - 10 (SEALCOAT):
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution ordering
improvement, approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for
bids for the 2000 seal coating project. The streets to be seal coated have been identified.
The amount of $180,000 has been budgeted for this purpose in the 2000 Capital
Improvements Plan. Staff recommended Council's approval of this resolution.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 9-2000.
4. RESOLUTION NO 10-2000 ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL
OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: SANITARY AND
STORM SEWER REPAIR PROJECT NO. 329:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution ordering the
improvement, approving plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for
bids for the 2000 sanitary and storm sewer projects. Our Capital Improvements Plan has
designated $240,000 for several sanitary and storm sewer repair projects. The projects
are: 1) Lining of 1,519 feet of 10-inch sanitary sewer line on Channel Road and 66`�
Avenue. 2) Lining of 1,044 feet of 12-inch sanitary sewer line on Hickory Drive. 3)
Lining of 620 feet of 48-inches storm sewer line on Old Central Avenue. Staff
recommended Council's approval of the resolution authorizing us to seek bids for these
projects.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 10-2000.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 11-2000 ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: 2000 -
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 330:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that we have $27,000 budgeted for miscellaneous curb,
gutter and sidewalk repairs that arise as a result of utility repairs or new driveway
construction. The bids being authorized are bids for unit prices for this work. Staff
recommended Council's approval of this resolution.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 11-2000.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 4
6. RECEIVE BID AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR HYPOLIM AERATOR
REPLACEMENT FOR MOORE LAKE TO HEGI ENTERPRISES LLC:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a motion to receive bids
and award a contract for the replacement of the aerator in Moore Lake (east basin). Bids
for the aerator were opened on Wednesday, January 12. Only one bid was received. The
bid was from Hegi Enterprises in the amount of $27,105. We've budgeted $30,000 for
this purpose in our Year 2000 Capital Improvements budget, including $15,000 in grant
funding that the City will be receiving from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources. Staff recommended that Council award the bid in the amount of $27,105 and
award the contract to Hegi Enterprises.
RECEIVED BID AND AWARDED CONTRACT TO HEGI ENTERPRISES LLC.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 12-2000 DESIGNATING OFFICIAL CHECK SIGNERS FOR
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY'S FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution designating
official check signers for the City's flexible spending account. The resolution authorizes
two employees of the City's flexible benefits program administrator, Flex Compensation,
Inc., to sign checks for the disbursement of funds to City employees. Staff recommended
Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 12-2000.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 13-2000 ADDING A THIRD CHANGE FUND TO THE
MINICIPAL LIQUOR FUND:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that with the addition of a third liquor store, staff
requested the establishment of a third change fund. The fund will be funded with $2,000
and enable the liquor store clerks to make change for customers. Staff recommended
Council's approvaL
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 13-2000.
9. MOTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE FRIDLEY
LIOUOR STORE PROJECT (WARD 3Z,
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the amount of the change order is $16,244. The
money was devoted to a long list of items. Staff recommended Council's approval.
APPROVED CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE FRIDLEY LIQUOR STORE
PROJECT.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 5
10. RESOLUTION NO. 14-2000 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT FOR MOOSE LODGE
38 (8298 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.I:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this was consideration of a resolution in support of
an application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for the Fridley Moose
Lodge. This is a renewal application for a pull tab operation at the Moose Lodge. It will
run from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. Staff recommended Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 14-2000.
11. CLAIMS:
APPROVED PAYMENT OF CLAIM NUMBERS 91205 THROUGH 91627.
12. LICENSES:
APPROVED ALL LICENSES AS SUBMITTED.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adopt the a�enda as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
Mayor Jorgenson invited members of the public to come forward to address any items not on the
agenda.
Mr. Peter Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked for information regarding the cost of the
special election process for the franchise fee.
Mr. Burns stated that he believed the estimate was $10,000 mostly to cover the cost of the
election judges.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 6
Mr. Eisenzimmer asked about the literature that was sent to the public used during the time of the
election.
Mr. Burns stated that there was only item sent to residents as part of the pre-referendum
education. He did not have a number for that right now.
Mr. Eisenzimmer asked about the cost for the special meetings held at the senior center.
Councilmember Bolkcom and Mr. Burns stated that there were no costs to the City.
Mr. Burns stated that when he went to the senior center to talk with the seniors there were no
costs incurred.
Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that the literature handed out to them was printed by somebody.
Mr. Burns stated that minor expenses for printing were incurred.
Councilmember Barnette stated that the piece of literature was more in conjunction with the 50`f'
Anniversary celebration of the City.
Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that there was a second piece of literature after that.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the newsletter comes out four times per year on all of the
different items.
Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that there were two letters put out within a month.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the bigger publication was something she and Mayor
Jorgenson had talked about with city managers when they went to the League of Minnesota
Cities meeting in Rochester. They thought it was a good piece to explain to people how their
dollars are spent. It really did not have anything to do with the franchise fee.
Mr. Eisenzimmer asked what would happen when the grants run out for the tunnels and bridges
for the highways.
Councilmember Barnette stated that those costs are incurred by the County.
Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that it is still taxpayers' money, and there will be upkeep needed for
those every year.
Cot�ncilmember Barnette stated that the City has to maintain the walkways but the tunnels are the
County's responsibility.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that Mr. Burns will give Mr. Eisenzimmer the numbers for the
cost of the publications sent out.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24, 2000 PAGE 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
13. LOCAL LAW ENFORCENIENT BLOCK GRANT:
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading and open the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:50 P.M.
Ms. Rosie Griep, Special Projects Coordinator with the Police Department, stated that the Local
Law Enforcement Block Grant Program, is in the fourth year of receiving funding. It comes
from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, at the Federal level. These are funds that are given out on
formulas based on the crime rate and given to local law enforcement agencies to spend within
certain parameters. One of the requirements is to have an advisory board make
recommendations. Another recommendation is to hold a public hearing for any public input on
how the funds should be spent.
They have been allotted $22,705 with a matching component of $2,523. The recommendations
coming forth from the advisory board will go towards offsetting some of the expenses involved
with having Vision Mobile Data software to allow the officers easier access to record
information on the ten laptop computers from their squad cars.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked who was on the advisory board.
Ms. Griep stated that there are criteria each member has to meet. There must be someone from
local law enforcement, which is herself, the local prosecutor's office, the local court system, the
local public school, and local community group of crime prevention.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember
Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:53 P.M.
14. YEAR 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION:
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to open the public hearing and waive the reading of the
notice. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:53 P.M.
Mr. Grant Fernelius, HRA Housing Coordinator, stated that he had a short presentation to
provide some history on the Community Development Block Grant program. The CDBG
program is funded annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Anoka
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 8
County receives the moneys from HUD directly and redistributes the money to each of the cities
in the County.
Mr. Fernelius said that, historically, the City of Fridley has used these funds for single family
housing rehabilitation and public service grants to a number of agencies located in the County
that provide services such as senior programs, women's shelter and the food shelf. This year the
City is expected to receive $138,686. This is a slight reduction from last year as a result of the
federal program cuts by Congress. Staff is proposing that the funds for 2000 be used for the
same activities that were funded in 1999. Housing rehab would use $116,496. The remaining
funds would be used for public services which equates to 15 percent of the budget.
Mr. Fernelius said that the County does also charge an administrative fee which would be
deducted from the amount so they have $137,000 to work with. Applications for this program
are due on February 11. Funds become available on July 1 and the City has eighteen months in
which to spend those dollars. There is a separate action item on the agenda that includes
approval of the application. A number of agencies are present this evening to answer any
questions.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that Alice Nelson is unavailable to speak for the SACA program.
Ms. Ann Ryan stated that was correct but she was available to answer to answer any questions
for the SACA program.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked how Mr. Fernelius arrived at the numbers as far as the certain
percentages for the programs.
Mr. Fernelius stated that they did have to cut each percentage from last year by five percent.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the programs that are given the money use the money like the
Fridley Recreation Department that uses the money for scholarships for programs versus a food
shelf program.
Mr. Fernelius stated that they applied it at an across-the-board reduction to each of the agencies.
It is at Council's discretion to change the numbers.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that the first time they saw the numbers was on Friday night. They were
unaware of the reduction from Congress. She would have liked the opportunity to review this
and have more discussion with the Council members.
Mr. Fernelius apologized. Staff did try to move on their typical schedule and have not had
discussion with the Council previously. They do have the option of tabling. The deadline is
February 11, and there is a Council meeting on February 7 at which time they can consider
approval of the application.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that they have a City Council Conference meeting on Monday,
January 31, and it could possibly be discussed at that time. She would like to see some numbers
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 9
on the people that are participating in the Fridley Recreation Department through the scholarship
application and the types of programs they have.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the participants have to prove their income level to qualify for
the scholarships, and are the whole fees waived or only a portion of the fees.
Mr. Fernelius stated that they do not have to prove their income level. He said he is unsure of
how the fees are waived, but he would be happy to follow up on that.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that in the past there were to have a lot more different agencies
coming forward, and she asked if the guidelines were more strict.
Mr. Fernelius stated that the guidelines were more strict and that this is the third year that they
have closed the process for other agencies to apply.
Councilmember Barnette stated that there used to be as many as 25 groups applying but then the
amount for each agency was significantly smaller, so sometimes to apply for it did not make a lot
of sense.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Burns if there was some leeway for the Fridley Park and
Recreation Department to receive some grant money from someplace else.
Mr. Burns stated that he was not aware of anything, but he knows that one of the objectives for
the elementary after school program is to get an increasing number of families involved.
Mayor Jorgenson asked if it was a full scholarship or a sliding fee scale.
Mr. Burns stated he was unsure.
Mayor Jorgenson asked if there were any more questions.
Councilmember Wolfe asked Councilmember Bolkcom why she focused on the Fridley Parks
and Recreation Department with her questions.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she did mainly because it has been in their conversations in
the last several years about whether it should be budgeted in this program.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that children staying involved in these programs is very important
to him.
Councilmember Bolkcom stated that she agrees and she is all for doing programs for kids. She is
trying to figure out what number of kids they are serving and what would happen if these
programs were not there.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that the representatives from the various agencies could perhaps shed
some light on the subject.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF JANUARY 24, 2000 PAGE_10
Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked what the interest rate is on loans for $15,000.
Mr. Fernelius stated that the rate was zero percent (0 percent).
Mr. Eisenzimmer asked who was eligible for that.
Mr. Fernelius stated that low income families who meet the guidelines are eligible. The
guidelines range from $33,000 for a single family household up to around $47,800 for a three
person household.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the families have to meet with a counselor and if there is a lot
of criteria to meet.
Mr. Fernelius stated that was conect.
Ms. A.nn Ronnie, SACA representative, stated that they represent four cities including Fridley.
Up through December, they served 765 families 74,930 pounds of food in the Fridley area. They
also supply gas vouchers for folks, and to provide clothing for their families and job interviews.
They provide household items such as dishes, baby quilts, birthday cakes, and gift certificates.
They had food, gifts and toys at Christmas time that were delivered by volunteers.
Ms. Colleen Coyle, Senior Outreach Program representative, stated that they provide services to
seniors to help them to remain independently living in their homes. They meet with the client to
determine their needs and then refer them to the appropriate resources. During the last program,
she served 185 clients and an additiona162 follow-up visits were necessary. This resulted in 417
referrals being made to different program agencies. She wanted to thank Council for their
support for the program in the past year.
Ms. Linda Wells, Alexandra House representative, stated that this was a shelter for women and
children in Anoka County. Last year they served over 1,000 women and children. They are in
every Anoka Hennepin school district, and they also have advocates in the hospitals.
Mayor Jorgenson asked Ms. Wells how many people out of the 1,000 that were served last year
were Fridley residents.
Ms. Wells stated that it was probably close to fifty. The support group also has Fridley residents.
Ms. Connie Thompson, Senior Coordinator of the Fridley Senior Program, stated that they are
requesting funding for their senior companion program that services low-income seniors. The
program benefits those that are homebound by a social companion program, but it also benefits
those that are the companion because they also have to meet certain income guidelines. They
receive a stipend through Lutheran Social Services so they have some income as well as a sense
of purpose.
Ms. Thompson said the Fridley Senior Companion program serves older adults who live in
Fridley. Companions are trained through Lutheran Social Services and receive site supervision
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 11
through the Fridley Senior Program and Nancy Shaw in particular. The companions receive
quarterly training through Lutheran Social Services and also with other companions on the local
County level. In the past year, they have had four senior companions servicing eighteen of the
homebound seniors. Due to illness, they are losing two of their companions and are looking at
replacing them. They have a waiting list of twelve people that are waiting for companions. The
main purpose of the program in addition to socialization is to give caregivers a break. A large
number of seniors fall through the cracks and do not get into the ACG guidelines. That is why
Council's support is needed to continue this program.
Ms. Thompson thanked Council for their past support.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:22 P.M.
OLD BUSINESS
15. MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR A NEW FIRE
ENGINE FOR THE FIRE (TABLED NOVEMBER 22,19991:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to remove this item from the table for discussion.
Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Chuck McKusick, Fire Chief, explained that the data being presented tonight is to give a
little more background regarding the fire apparatus at the City of Fridley.
Mr. Dave Skirka, Assistant Fire Chief, outlined the number, ages and conditions of fire engines
they cunently have at the fire department. An ISO consultant will meet with the Fire
Department in March to make sure that they do have adequate equipment. The departmetn is
requesting approval to advertise for bids to purchase a new engine company, and to trade in two
old engine companies. They would surplus a third truck, Engine #8, after the warranty period
and the demo part has been accomplished on the new truck.
Mayor Jorgenson asked him if he could explain who Mark Foster is.
Mr. Skirka stated that Mark Foster is the City's Lead Mechanic who works on the fire engines
and does inspections on vehicles for routine services.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that she understands that Mr. Foster is a miracle worker.
Mr. Skirka stated that he is.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 12
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they had any idea on the cost of the vehicle.
Mr. Skirka stated that they try to be creative for the cost of the vehicle. When they purchased
Engine #1 in 1996 they were looking at a four to seven percent increase per year for purchasing
the next vehicle depending on when they bought it. To minimize the next truck's purchase price,
they will try to trade in vehicles, or allow the dealer to use it as a"demo" at trade shows. They
will also change the body of the vehicle from stainless steel to aluminum. They estimated they
could save $10,000 on that. Looking at what they paid for Engine #1, they are confidant they
can keep the cost down.
Mr. Burns stated that they had $320,000 in the 1999 budget. Mr. Burns asked if Mr. Skirka
thought they could stay within that number in the year 2000.
Mr. Skirka stated that he thought they could stay at that number or below that number. Their
intent is to go below that. All of the builders will bid on a number of items including the
demonstrator program. They are hopeful they can get a reduction in the cost of the vehicle.
Councilmember Barnette asked Mr. Skirka if the vehicles have a trade-in value. He asked if
some of the outstate smaller communities would be interested in purchasing these vehicles, and
what kind of dollars are they talking about.
Mr. Skirka stated that when they bought Engine # 1 in 1996, Onan gave them a check for $15,000
that they used for purchasing equipment. That part of the program is on hold right now. The
other area they are looking at is the generator at a cost of about $8,000. They can try to sell the
vehicles themselves or trade them in to receive credit depending on the condition. Some smaller
departments would be interested in Engine Nos. 7 and 8 and possibly 4. Their best bet would be
to trade them. All of the builders said that they would solicit a trade-in value for two vehicles.
Mayor Jorgenson asked if these vehicles are able to support Fridley in a fire.
Mr. Skirka stated that they need to look at where they are at with the two marginal vehicles
especially Engine #4. Engine Nos. 7 and 8 were both rebuilt in 1988, and that added an extra
eleven years to their time frame. Engine #4 is seventeen-years-old, and it is marginal at best.
They are anticipating replacing the aerial in two to four years. That is a significant replacement,
and they are trying to come up with a plan for the City. Their ISO rating right now is at 70.47
for a class C city, and they would like to maintain that class C rating.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that the ISO rating is what insurance companies look at for charging the
homeowner's insurance for a single family home or commerciaUindustrial businesses. By
maintaining a higher rate they are able to help the businesses and residents of Fridley have better
insurance rates.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they could wait another year.
Mr. Skirka stated that they could do anything the City Council wants to do. They are presenting
the proposal and asking that Council approve their request. They feel that purchasing this
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL NIEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 13
vehicle now is in the best interest of the City because of the three marginal vehicles that they
have.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked how long it takes to get a new fire truck.
Mr. Skirka stated that from the date of the delivery of the chassis, it takes 120 days. Mr. Burns
commented that it is generally about a one-year process.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that if one of the engines does go down, they have joint powers
agreement with their surrounding fire departments. '
Mayor Jorgenson asked if any members of the public had any questions.
Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked if the salt on the roads would be a problem for the
aluminum frame. An aluminum frame might be lighter, and there may be more corrosion which
is harder to repair.
Mr. Skirka clarified that aluminum is used in the compartmentation area of the vehicle, not the
chassis or under part of the vehicle. Aluminum is built onto the chassis, and is undercoated so
they feel comfortable with going from the stainless steel to the aluminum.
Mayor Jorgenson asked if it was basically the cab he was referring to.
Mr. Skirka stated that he was referring to the compartmentation behind the cab where all of the
equipment is carried the hose, where the water tank is, and the supporting structure that mounts
onto the frame of the chassis.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that the vehicles are kept spotless, and the salt is not on there very
long.
Mr. Skirka stated that they get washed after almost every run, especially in the winter time.
MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to approve the authorization of advertisement for bids for a
new fire engine for the Fire Department. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
0
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL I�IEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 14
16. RESOLUTION NO. 6-2000 APPOINTING/REAFFIRMING CITY OF FRIDLEY
REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SIX CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION:
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to remove this item from the table. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Jorgenson stated that they have received further information from Mr. Knaak and have
done some research into the appointment for this particular position. As Councilmember
Billings has recommended, this is an appointment that serves at the recommendation of the
Council.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to adopt the
resolution reaffirming the Six Cities Watershed Management Organization Appointment of John
Flora to represent the City of Fridley. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS
17. APPROVE THE YEAR 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
APPLICATION:
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to table this item until the next Council meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANINIOUSLY.
18. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mayor Jorgenson stated that Mrs. Kay Bonner Nee told her that former Mayor Bill Nee is in the
intensive care unit at Unity Hospital, and cards would be appreciated.
ADJOURN:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember
Wolfe.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 24 2000 PAGE 15
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR JORGENSON DECLARED THE
JANUARY 24, 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Signe L. Johnson Nancy J. Jorgenson
Recording Secretary Mayor
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 19, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Savage calied the January 19, 2000, Planning Commission meeting to
order at 7:38 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Diane Savage, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Larry Kuechle,
Brad Sielaff
Members Absent: Connie Modig, Leroy Oquist
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 15 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the December 15, 1999,
Planning Commission minutes as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Consideration of a special use permit SP #99-13, by Vern Haldorson, for a
proposed storage building, generally located at 514 Dover Street.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:34 P.M.
Mr. Hickok stated that this special use permit is to allow the construction of a 529
square foot accessory building at 514 Dover Street. The building will be used strictly for
storage and not for vehicle parking on a regular basis. Second accessory buildings
over 240 square feet are permitted with a special use permit in an R-1 zoning district
provided that the total cumulative square feet of all accessory buildings does not exceed
1,400 square feet.
Mr. Hickok stated the property is zoned R-1 single family residential. The property was
platted in 1922. The home was built pre-1949. A home addition was added to the
structure in 1960, and the existing garage was built in 1994. The existing garage and
the proposed accessory building total 1,393 square feet, just underneath the 1,400
square foot requirement. The existing garage is on the opposite side of where the
l�
proposed structure is going to be placed. The new structure will not have a driveway
to service it.
Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this special
use permit with the following stipulations:
1. At staff's discretion, inspections will be conducted of the yard area between the
street and the garage. If found to be regularly used as a driveway, a hard
surface driveway shall be constructed by the petitioner within three months of
receiving notice by the City.
2. All accessory permits �shall be obtained from the City prior to construction.
3. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation.
4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface drive as approved by the City.
5. The siding and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing
home.
Mr. Hickok stated that the petitioner is not present at the meeting.
Ms. Savage asked if there were any calls regarding this request.
Mr. Hickok stated that staff did receive a call that day with a concern about notification.
A property owner adjacent to this structure bought the property in October. The GIS
data records for notification still show the former property owner. The new property
owner was concerned about not being notified and not knowing the facts.
Mr. Kondrick asked if it meets all of the side yard setback requirements.
Mr. Hickok stated that it does.
Mr. Kondrick asked if it would be possible for the petitioner to park a vehicle on a pad
outside of this structure but not have it connected to the street by driveway.
Mr. Hickok stated that it is possible, but the primary use is for storage and he believes it
is the petitioner's intent not to have a driveway back there.
Ms. Savage asked if the petitioner had any problem with the stipulations.
Mr. Hickok stated that they had received the report and they did not hear anything any
concerns.
Ms. Savage asked if there would be a problem with the Planning Commission making a
recommendation in the absence of the petitioner.
Mr. Hickok stated that the Commission would be well within its right to make a
recommendation because the petitioner knew about the meeting.
Ms. Savage asked if anyone in the audience wished to address this special use permit.
�
Ms. Mary Shogren, 524 Dover Street, stated that she and her husband live right next
door. They bought the house in October. In November, the petitioner poured the slab.
Throughout their moving in, the petitioner has had a truck sitting on the yard where the
building is going to be built right now. They are wondering if there is a drainage plan,
because the trusses are fairly large and they are concerned about water running into
their basement. There is also no footing for the building and they are wondering if that
is required.
Mr. Hickok stated that the building will have to meet all building code requirements for
the State of Minnesota. The Building Inspection staff is aware that this slab had been
poured and are very cognizant of the requirements to support the weight of the
structure. All the necessary modifications will be made to do whatever is necessary. As
far as the water concern, the code states that in no case can construction or grading on
a property detrimentally affect adjacent property.
Ms. Shogren stated that the trusses are really large and they will go over the property
line because of where the slab sits. She is concerned that her property value will go
down because this structure is going to be built right outside her kitchen door.
Mr. Kuechle stated that the proposed building is 23 feet by 23 feet.
Ms. Shogren asked if they know how far away from the property line is right now.
Mr. Hickok stated that it is illustrated at five feet from the property line and code requires
that an overhang on a structure not exceed 24 inches. There needs to be three feet of
separation between the edge of the overhang and the property line.
Ms. Shogren asked if the building will have street appeal and not just some building
thrown up there.
Ms. Savage stated that is part of the stipulations.
Mr. Hickok stated that they require that the structure will be compatible with the
elements of the principal structure.
Ms. Shogren asked how wide the door on the building will be. She heard that if a door
wider than eight feet could serve a second garage which the City of Fridley does
not allow. ?????
Mr. Hickok stated that is not correct. There was a special use request where a
gentleman was making a request to reuse an older garage and demolish
everything else on the entire site and it was their claim that they would not need
this for vehicles at all so the City asked them to remove the overhead door and
use a standard door. The Commission recommended that it have a standard
overhead door. There is not anything in the code that would prohibit them from
doing a standard garage door on this. ???
Mr. Kondrick stated that the fifth stipulation cites that the siding and the roof materials
shall match the exterior of the existing home.
�
Ms. Savage stated that the petitioner will be going to the City Council on
if Ms. Shogren has any additional concerns, she can attend the Council
Ms. Shogren thanked the Commission.
February 7 so
meeting.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 7:45.
Mr. Kondrick stated that he did not have a problem with the special use permit or the
stipulations.
Ms. Savage stated she concurred and feels that it falls within the requirements.
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to approve the Special Use Permit,
SP #99-13, by Vern Haldorson with the following stipulations:
1.
2.
4.
5.
At staff's discretion, inspections will be conducted of the yard area between the
street and the garage. If found to be regularfy used as a driveway, a hard
surface driveway shall be constructed by the petitioner within three months of
receiving notice by the City.
All accessory permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction.
The structure shall not be used for a home occupation.
All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface drive as approved by the City.
The siding and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing
home.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. PUBLIC HEARING
Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #99-03, by Telemetry &
Process Controls, Inc., to add wireless telecommunication facilities and
equipment for Minneapolis Waterworks own use generally located at 4500
Marshall Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALND �HE P BLEC HEA'RING WAS OPENED AT 7�:45 P.M.
THE MOTION CARRIED A
Mr. Hickok stated that Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., and the City of Minneapolis
are requesting to add the Minneapolis Waterworks site at 4500 Marshall Street and the
Minneapolis Waterworks Pump Station #3 at the northwest corner of East River Road
and 37th Avenue in the southern part of the City adjacent to Minneapolis as approved
locations for telecommunications towers facilities and equipment. These sites are
necessary to allow Minneapolis Waterworks to monitor and to change settings on pump
�
stations from a central location. They do need to be located adjacent to the pump
stations. Fridley towers are just a portion of the large remote monitoring system that the
Minneapolis system needs. The poles will utilize a stealth design as required by the
telecommunications ordinance. The stealth design will insure that the poles disappear
into the site as much as possible.
Mr. Hickok stated there are a number of locations. The Minneapolis Waterworks facility
is along the river befinreen East River Road and the river along the edge of the City of
Fridley and Minneapolis where they meet. A location for equipment is on the building
itself. Pump Station #3 is along 37th Avenue along the right-of-way by Sharx' Night Club
along the roadway. Pump Station #1 along the river is a location for a stealth pole to
blend with the backdrop and not be right on the face of the river. Pump Station #2 is a
location and the equipment should disappear into the background from all directions.
Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends approval with the following stipulations.
1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits/permission from Anoka County
necessary to locate the tower in the right-of-way near Pump Station #3.
2. All poles shall be of a stealth design. The pole near Pump Station #3 shall
resemble a street light structure and shall have a light fixture approved by City
staff.
Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner is in agreement with these stipulations.
Mr. Kondrick asked Mr. Hickok if the poles should be protected by crash barriers.
Mr. Hickok stated they have concrete filled pipe bollards surrounding the outsides. It is
their intent to have protection with the box that they created inside the concrete post
bollard.
Mr. Kondrick stated that possibly part of the deal should be that they ask that they be
protected.
Mr. Hickok stated that it would be a good recommendation
Mr. Stuart Kirschbaum, Minneapolis Waterworks Engineer, stated that this project is a
small part of a$10,000,000 project to use radio telemetry equipment to get data back
and forth, control pumps, and gather data. The rates for the telephone lines keep going
up. The consultant of EMA who is doing a lot of the design has recommended that they
upgrade the system. This enables them to maintain the FCC radio license to have
these three stations up and running.
Mr. Kondrick asked what they would do if the pumps would fail.
Mr. Kirschbaum stated that the consultant from Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc.,
could better answer that question.
Ms. Savage asked if he had any problem with the stipulations.
�
Mr. Kirschbaum stated that he did not. It probably is a good idea to have more
protection for them because it is a very important part of the whole system.
Mr. Sielaff asked if they were reviewing this only for the use for Minneapolis Waterworks
or are there other uses?
Mr. Hickok stated that the acceptance of this as a site does amend this facility and
make it an approved location for telecommunications. This site could be utilized for
additional telecommunications equipment.
Mr. Sielaff asked if they were the owners of the pole and could they end up leasing
space on this?
Mr. Kirschbaum stated that he does not think that the poles are high enough for cellular
phone use.
Mr. Jim Edison, consultant for Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., stated they are
utilized for single frequency and only for a single operation. The City of Minneapolis will
own this pole and nobody else can utilize these poles.
Mr. Kondrick asked if another telecommunications company could ask the City of
Minneapolis to use the pole.
Mr. Edison stated that he thinks that anyone would have to go through the FCC. This
location was optimum for the City of Minneapolis for this particular use. He cannot
address the issue of making a taller pole for cellular phones. If the system fails and
shuts down, the station is manned 24 hours and, if not, they will be on computer for
monitoring.
Mr. Sielaff stated they are approving the location of a pole that has stealth design.
There could be other uses for this pole in the future without any Council action at all.
Mr. Hickok stated the equipment is a single purpose equipment. It is a relatively short
monopole and has its purpose for the Waterworks functions. If Sprint or AT&T came in
and said it is a good site for a telecom tower, this site had been approved for telecom
communications and would be a permitted site provided they go through the standard
things the ordinance requires. Somebody interested would first negotiate with the City
of Minneapolis about a land deal and then come to Fridley. There are an abundance of
telecommunication tower locations along East River Road. The Well House #13 site is
a bit north of the Waterworks facility, th Ac oss theh aiN the AIITemp st aage fac li y s
has also been approved as a location
also a possible site.
Mr. Sielaff stated that he wants to make sure they know what they are passing. There
is the potential for this to be used for other telecommunications other than Minneapolis.
The only thing that is preventing it from doing that possibly is the stealth design.
Mr. Hickok stated that the next telecom user would need to follow up all of the other
elements of a very complex telecom ordinance the City has passed. It is a series of
0
agencies they would pass through before they got their equipment on this site. The City
would know exactly what they are approving at that point. Staff would analyze it and
match it against the ordinance requirements and then approve or deny it.
Mr. Kondrick asked if it would be appropriate to have the stipulation that the poles be
protected by some kind of concrete pylons.
Mr. Hickok stated that would be appropriate.
Mr. Edison stated that it was a good idea.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:05P.M.
Mr. Kuechle stated that he feels that it is up to the petitioner to protect their poles. He is
not keen on proposing a requirement for the petitioner that is not something that has to
do with the City. He would be more inclined to think that the poles should have some
give in case they get hit.
Mr. Kondrick asked what impact the poles being sheared would have on the City of
Fridley.
Mr. Hickok stated that they contacted the County to talk about standards of design for
placement in a public right-of-way. They need to make certain their construction design
meets City and County standards for elements in the right-of-way. The State takes
great care in designing things to break away or slow vehicles down and do minimum
damage to the passenger. It is staff's expectation that those same types of thoughts
are going into these components.
Ms. Savage asked if that is covered in the first stipulation.
Mr. Hickok stated that is correct.
Ms. Savage asked if they needed anything additional.
Mr. Hickok stated that they felt that was adequate.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve Zoning Text Amendment,
ZTA #99-03, by Telemetry & Process Controls, Inc., to add wireless telecommunication
facilities and equipment for Minneapolis Waterworks own use with the following
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits/permission from Anoka County
necessary to locate the tower in the right-of-way near Pump Station #3.
2. All poles shall be of a stealth design. The pole near Pump Station #3 shall
resemble a street light structure and shall have a light fixture approved by City
staff.
7
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - REVIEW OF THE WATER AND SEWER
CHAPTERS:
Ms. Dacy stated that the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan on December 15
went very well. There was some question from the public after that hearing about the
timing of the submission of the draft. She called Sandra Panelte, the sector
representative from Metropolitan Council for the City of Fridley. Ms. Panelle
encouraged that the draft be submitted even though there are still some parts missing.
Ms. Panelle said the Metropolitan staff would compile some meaningful comments for
the City to consider as they complete the process. Ms. Panelle stated that they keep
track of cities that do not submit the plans and it is better to submit something than not
to. In no way does the draft have any type of legal impact at all. Ms. Dacy is hoping to
submit the remaining parts of the plan in March.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Commission wanted some language in the plan about the
Nature Center planning process and the entrance to the park. That will be included with
amendments to the Land Use and Open Space chapters.
Ms. Dacy stated traffic counts were also discussed at the December 15 meeting. The
City did a little research on that and the plan was submitted just the way the
Commission saw it on December 15. The discrepancy was that Metropolitan Council
and Anoka County were projecting a larger amount of traffic than what the consultant
was projecting. University Avenue would have less amount of traffic in the Metropolitan
Council allocation as opposed to the East River Road and vice versa. Metropolitan
Council uses a regional approach to computer modeling so if they know that one road is
over capacity, they will assign it to a road that is under capacity without paying attention
to the local details. They are dealing with the macro, and the City's consultant is
dealing with the micro. The best way to do it is to show all fhree projections for the
reviewing agency. The plan does identify a document that the City's consultant has
identified a historical trend analysis, and these are the volumes that the City feels are
going to happen.
Ms. Dacy stated there was a comment that the plan does not map out how they are
going to accomplish the vision. They are going to try to identify a section to pult all the
pieces together and provide a connecting theme and map out what the various parts of
the plan means. They would review that with City Council and then bring that back to
the Commission probably within the next month. The City will go through the minutes of
the public hearing and try to identify individual issues and make sure they have
addressed it.
Ms. Dacy stated that what is left is the Surface Water Management Plan. There has
been a little bit of work with the Human Resources Commission. They met with them at
the beginning of January. The Implementation chapter will be worked on next. Those
three chapters should be done within the next two to three months,.
�;
Ms. Dacy stated that the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission reviewed the
chapters at their January 18th meeting and provided very good comments on the water
supply section. The sewer chapter is telling a good story in terms of having adequate
amount of sewer capacity. The Public Works Department has done a very good job in
trying to eliminate infiltration and inflow and trying to isolate any problems in the system.
It also paints a very good picture in terms of the future as they redevelop. The
population and employment projections probably will not cause any necessity to say
they need more capacity. The draft that the Commission has today is a 1995 plan
update and has been reviewed in the recent past.
Ms. Dacy stated there is also very good news in the water supply chapter. The Public
Works Department has done a lot of good work in the water supply capital
improvements to make sure that pressures are upgraded in certain areas of the City.
They are working on the water quality issue.
Mr. Sielaff stated that one of the main issues from the Environmental Quality & Energy
Commission meeting was the issue of water quality. That needs to be addressed.
They need a connection befinreen water qualities and water supply. There should be
something on quality on page 9-26 in the objectives for standards that the City should
commit to. The City should provide and maintain a high Fridley water quality for its
citizens. There is some water quality data provided, but it was the only water quality
data available for certain waters in the City. The only data available should be put into
table form and be compared with something.
Ms. Dacy stated that is the only data the City has. There is no data on Rice Creek; but
as part of the Medtronic AUAR, the water quality issue came up for Moore Lake. She
has contracted with Anoka Conservation District who took a water sample back in April,
and she should be receiving their reports on an annual basis. She agrees there should
be an explanation on water quality.
Mr. Sielaff stated that maybe they should identify water quality gaps and make some
suggestions on what they should do as far as closing those gaps. The other issue
concerns are on page 914. He is wondering if the water from New Brighton is sampled
individually, and that information should be provided. He is not clear how long the water
supply with New Brighton was going to be coming.
Ms. Dacy stated that it is a long-term agreement for 20 years and the intent is long-term.
Mr. Sielaff stated that maybe that should be defined.
Mr. Kondrick asked how often the water quality is tested from other suppliers.
Ms. Dacy stated that she does not have that information, but they test their own wells
and systems on a quarterly basis and then they do a monthly set. of tests for Wells #6,
7, and 8.
Mr. Saba asked if they look at the entire chemical content?
0
Ms. Dacy stated that she thinks they are looking at certain thresholds on certain
contaminants but she could find that out.
Mr. Saba stated that on "60 Minutes", the additive was discussed and he is wondering if
they are in that category of contaminated wells.
Mr. Sielaff stated that there is no water quality data from the public supply wells and he
wants to know exactly what parameters are they actually analyzing for and what are
those values. There is some indication that they have exceeded some values and he
wants to know the extent. He knows it is a lot of data, but maybe there is some way to
summarize it.
Ms. Dacy stated that she woutd be happy to check that out.
Mr. Sielaff stated that on page 924, the issue of the contaminant Telemetry & Process
Controls, Inc., needs more data about how much is it being exceeded by and how
frequently. He did not get an understanding of the water well contamination's present
status.
Ms. Dacy stated that Wells #6, 7, and 8 are in use, and the monthly testing determines
where they are at on certain thresholds and they have a system of blending the other
wells in order to meet the standards.
Mr. Sielaff stated that the PCA and EPA are looking at what is really the status of that.
He does not know where that evaluation is. He also had trouble of keeping track of
what was filtered on page 9-17. He thought that was filtered for iron and manganese.
There is another reference on page 9-24. That should indicate exactly what they are
filtering for. On page 9-28, he is not sure about how the City would evaluate
implementing increasing block method of water charges.
Ms. Dacy stated that the change made in 1997 is an increasing block system, but it may
be not as aggressive as maybe the Metropolitan Council would want. There are a lot of
financial issues the Council is concerned about and making sure that the water system
can pay for itsetf, so to speak.
Mr. Sielaff stated that his comment is what are they going to do to evaluate that. He
knows cost is an issue. On page 9-29, they should separate the paragraph on
retrofitting programs.
Ms. Dacy stated that paragraph is a holdover from the 1995 plan and that needs to be
changed.
Mr. Sielaff stated that he is not sure if the paragraph addresses water supply or water
quality.
Ms. Dacy stated that it is probably a little bit of both. That ordinance mirrors the State
regulations and throws in more control for the City in terms of replacement plans.
10
Mr. Sielaff stated that maybe they shouid take into account some of the things to learn
about Springbrook regarding wetland protection to improve runoff for better water
quality in streams and lakes. He does not know what the applicability is. His point is
that there are some water quality benefits for wetlands. On page 9-27 for the water
audit program, he feels they need to summarize the results and how much water use is
decreasing and how much is the program benefiting the City. Are they able to improve
water conservation? In the sewer chapter with the infiltration/inflow analysis issue,
maybe there should be some cost benefit on that.
Ms. Dacy stated that they found that the Metropolitan Council meters on the interceptors
were incorrect. By doing the infiltration/inflow analysis on the sump pump
disconnection, the City was able to convince Metropolitan Council that the City of
Fridley was not using all of that water. They have eliminated as many sump pumps as
they could and televised as many lines. Metropolitan Council did reimburse the City
$500,000, and Metropolitan Council is thinking of reducing the sewer rates as a result of
that. She thinks it is under control and they can account for about as much as they can.
Mr. Sielaff stated that he thinks that should be put in that chapter to give them some
credit. �
Mr. Kuechle asked if the City has given any thought to the requirements for all new
developments for irrigation systems.
Ms. Dacy stated that they have not talked about that since 1995, and the City keeps
requiring it.
Mr. Hickok stated that they require it for front and side yards and commercial/industrial
properties.
Ms. Dacy stated that it is a policy issue for what to prioritize. Do they want to prioritize
water supply or the maintenance of landscaping and exteriors? The supply is not
threatened, but she can easily see the argument and the connection.
Mr. Sielaff stated that on page 9-32 there is a reference to alternative sources of water.
It refers to NICROP remediation facility, and he feels there should be water sampling
and evaluation of that data and should be noted before being listed as an alternative
source of water.
Ms. Savage asked if there were any more comments.
The Commission members did not have any more comments regarding the water and
sewer chapters.
4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 16 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING•
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the November
16, 1999, Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting.
11
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 8 1999 APPEALS
COMMISSION MEETING:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the
December 8, 1999 Appeals Commission meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 6 1999 PARKS &
RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the minutes of the
December 6, 1999, Parks and Recreation meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 22 1999 APPEALS
COMMISSION MEETING.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the minutes of the
December 22, 1999, Appeals Commission meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 3 2000 PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETING.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the minutes of the
January 3, 2000, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 21 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING.
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the minutes of the December
21, 1999, Environmental quality & Energy Commission meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Hickok gave an update on past Planning Commission actions.
Mr. Kuechle asked if there were any Y2k glitches.
Mr. Hickok stated that he has not heard of any for the City.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JANUARY 19, 2000, PLANNING COMMISSION
ADJOURNED AT 8:46 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Signe L. Johnson
Recording Secretary
13
/ AGENDA ITEM
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
qTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 2/01 /00
To: William Burns, City Manager���
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: Planning Commission Action on SP #99-13 M-00-19
INTRODUCTION
Vern Haldorson, property owner at 514 Dover Street is seeking a special use permit to
construct a 528 square foot second accessory structure. The building will be used strictly for
storage and won't be used for vehicle parking on a regular basis.
Accessory buildings over 240 square feet are a permitted special use. The existing garage
and the proposed accessory building are a total of 1,393 square feet, which is 7 square feet
less than the total allowed by Code. The location of this accessory structure is well suited for
this site. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this special use permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At the January 19, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for SP
#99-13. The Planning Commission concurred with Staff that the proposed location of the
accessory structure is acceptable. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission
endorsed staff's recommendation for approval.
A motion was made to recommend approval of special use permit, SP #99-13, with the
following stipulations:
1. At staff's discretian, inspections will be conducted of the yard area between the street
and the garage and, if found to be regularly used as a driveway, a hard surface drive
shall be constructed by the petitioner within 3 months of receiving such notice from the
City.
2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction.
3. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation.
4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface as approved by the City.
5. The siding and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing home.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the planning commission and grant
the proposed Special Use Permit, SP #99-13, with the stipulations as presented.
14
City of Fridley Land Use Application
SP #99-13 January 19, 2000
GENERAL INFORNIATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
Vern Haldorson
514 Dover St. NE
Fridley, NIN 55432
Requested Action:
Special Use Pemut to allow a second
accessory structure in excess of 240 square
feet.
Existing Zoning: �
R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Location:
514 Dover Street NE
Size:
12,982 square feet .3 acres
Existing Land Use:
Single family home.
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Single Family & R-1
E: Single Family & R-1
S: Single Family & R-1
W: Single Family & R-1
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Sections 205.07.1.C.(1) requires a special
use perniit to allow accessory buildings
other than the first accessory building, over
240 square feet.
Zoning History:
1922 - Lot is platted.
Pre- 1949 - Original home is built.
1960 - Home addition
1994 - Garage is built.
1997 - Garage Add'n.
Legal Description of Properiy:
Lots 34-38, Block L, Riverview Heights
Public Utilities:
Property is connected to Ciry utilities.
15
Transportarion:
Dover Street provides access to site.
Physical Characteristics:
Lot contains home and existing garage.
SUM�L-�RY OF PROJECT
Vern Haldorson, petirioner, is requesting a special
use peimit to allow the construction of a 529 square
foot accessory building. The building will be used
strictly for storage and won't be used for vehicle
parking on a regular basis.
SUNI�tiL�RY OF ANALYSIS
City Staff recommends approval of this special
use permit, with stipulations.
Second accessory buildings over 240 square feet
are a pernutted special use in the R-1 zoning
district, provided the total square footage of all
accesson• buildings do not exceed 1,400 square
feet.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin
SP #99-13
Analvsis
Vern Haldorson, petitioner, is requesting a special use permit to allow the construcrion of a 529 square
foot accessory building. The building will be used strictly for storage and won't be used for vehicle
parking on a rewlar basis.
Accessory buildin�s over 240 square feet are a permitted special use. The existing garage and the
proposed accessory building are a total of 1,393 square feet, which is 7 square feet less than the total
allowed by Code. The location of this accessory smictiu-e is well suited for this site. Therefore, staff
recommends approval of this special use permit.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the special use permit subject to the following
stipulations: �
1. At staff's discretion, inspecrions will be conducted of the yard area between the street and the
garage and , if found to be regularly used as a driveway, a hard surface drive shall be constructed
by the peritioner within 3 months of receiving such notice from the City.
2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construcrion.
3. The structure shall not be used for a home occupation.
4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surFace as approved by the City.
5. The sidin� and roof materials shall continue to match the exterior of the existing home.
Portion of lot where garage is proposed to be located.
16
= AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
GTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 1 /31 /00 �
To: William Burns, City Manager ��
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: Amendment to the Comp. Sign Plan for MB Properties (8251 Main Street)
M-00-22
INTRODUCTION
In 1988, the City Council approved a comprehensive sign plan for 8251 Main Street. Joseph
Maertens, property owner, is requesting an amendment to the sign plan to allow the use of
company "logos" on the building exterior.
SUMMARY
Code Section 214.14, requires shopping centers and multiple tenant building to have a
comprehensive sign plan approved by the City. The purpose of this requirement is to
assure that centers have a well planned, aesthetically pleasing appearance.
The 1988, 8251 Main Street Sign Plan made no mention of "logos". A recent request from
a tenant, Motorcycle Safety Center, has prompted the owner of the building to address this
issue through this amendment.
The square footage of the logos shall be counted in with the total allowable square footage
for each tenant.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the 8251 Main Street
Comprehensive Sign Plan with the following stipulation:
1. Total signage for tenant's, with logo, not exceed the total square footage allowed for
signage.
2. All businesses in building shall obtain sign permits prior to any modifications or
replacement of existing signs.
3. All logos shall be secondary to the individually lettered signs. Logos shall not exceed
24" in height.
17
0
January 13, 2000
Paul Bolin
"- - City ofFridT�y � ^ l
6431 LJniversity Ave. NE
Fridley, NIN 55432
RE: Signage Policy
8251 Main St. NE
100 83rd St. NE
160 83rd St. NE
Dear Bolin:
M. B. Properties
8251 Main St. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
(612) 786-4779
• ..._...__.
FAXED
Please be advised that M.B. Properties wishes to amend the sign policy on the above properties to
allow the use of company "logos" in addition to the company name on the building exterior. If
you have any concerns, please feel free to call.
JM/am
:
�CI�I11t� .71171\.7 i
,�r
_ _ �•.
;�
,�
_,.
� .:,�
�,. �: .. :
Yr� .. + .
J :
: H�.
' iJ.}�.f�JAG �• . .
� a °F��;,' , . ` .
. _: :,, .
. . .� . . •T � � in� ' .
,. rt ,
r"
a�,.,
. . $f'
. • . . ::;; ' ' �' �
. � ',!. i ::f •
� � i �.�� ��1: .
� 6.
,/ . .�
. ,
��
. ,
�
�
�
�
i �
�\1 - �
V
19
,
V
�
�
�
4
v CJ
L�J
�
V
l.J
� � � �
•
�
O
/W ?.
� Q�
F w�
; u,... �
�
= c`�n �-�'�
�%
�
r
4
/
�
N
I
1
�
i
F
�
r
i
+�
:�.�a�
{° '
Y�Y � .
�
��-
, ,,
�: _: �.. _• ---.....__ �_.�_ _ � ..... �. _ . �. .
__ _ - + ,,,,+� "+,.+..���'�c:�..:.t.�.....�r�. . .�....�. i�i. .
. t
. '
� M$rch 8, 1988
City oL Fridley
6341 University Avenue � ,
�'ri•:ley, tiN 55432 ' ' L� �
r� �..
'CRITERIA FOR SIGIiA(3E AT 82�i1 MAIN STREET
Pormitted signage: Individual lettera mounted to 30�� bricic
area directly above doore. Lettera may be either injection
molded plastic-painted to appear ca�t atwninum, or actual
cast aluminum lettera. All lettere muet be alffxed to the
building �rith the use of 3/18�� aluminum atuds, and all atuda :�• :'
must be set in mortar jointa only. Use of plaetic padn & s�licone
is prohibited. Maximu�n lstter height for 1 line of copy ia
18'�. If 2 linee are used, overall height of letters aray not
exceed 28'�, including aacenders and descandera. All square
foot allotments will be ae deecribed in the city of Fridley
ordinance under M-1 and ri-2 zoning. 'Aleo permitted, are individual
iltuminate�t U.L. approved lettere,'providing lettere are
r�ounted to a 20 guage metal wireway and wirer�ay ie fastened
to building with mounting holee drilled #n mortar jointa only.�--
Permitted sizea are to be the same. All propoaed signage must be �
approved by landlord. A sketchof the propoeed s3gnage, signed
by the landlord, will be required for sacuring of permit(s).
�- _r_ _._.--- .._._. ----- _
' Sincerely, �
�� �w�� � �� �iD`�`"F �02. Joseph Maertene
�� 8�:►l.D,rJG� � -Tj-�E¢E �� 't� Landlord • .
�'� M��.``v�?�.-t G� 3' b��t�:�� �j s�C,N�.�.
. , •�
' • •,
.
. . .
20
. .
�...w
� w
�
�
�
�
�
QTY OF
FRIDLEY
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
February 2, 2000
William W. Burns, City Manager �
�
Julie Tostenson, Planning Secretary
SUBJECT: 2000 Planning and Appeals Commission Calendars
The Planning Commission and Appeals Commission Calendars for 2000 have been reviewed and
approved by the Commissions. These Calendars have now been provided for City Council review and
approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Commissions and approve the 2000 calendars
as submitted.
JT/jt
21
�
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING
2000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR
PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION
City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting,
and also need of a public hearing before the City Couricil. * Different date due to a holiday.
Application Deadline: December 3, 1999
Ten Day Completion Notification: December 13, 1999
Publication Deadline: December 14, 1999
Planning Commission Meeting: January 5, 2000
City. Council Meeting: January 24, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: January 28, 2000
Application Deadline: December 17, 1999
Ten Day Completion Notification: December 27, 1999 �
Publication Deadline: December 28, 1999
Planning Commission Meeting: January 19, 2000
City Council Meeting: February 7, 2000
60 Day Agency Actibn: February 14, 2000
Application Deadline: December 30, 1999 * Holiday
Ten Day Completion Notification: January 10, 2000
Publication Deadline: January 11, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: February 2, 2000
City Council Meeting: February 14, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: February 28, 2000
Application Deadline: January 14, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: January 24, 2000
Publication Deadline: January 25, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: February 16, 2000
City Council Meeting: March 6, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: March 13, 2000
Application Deadline: January 28, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: February 7, 2000
Publication Deadline: February 8, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: March l, 2000
City Council Meeting: March 20, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: March 28, 2000
ZZ
- Page 2— City of Fridley - 200Q Planning Commission Schedule -
City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before
the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday.
Application Deadline: � February 11, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: February 21, 2000
Publication Deadline: February 22, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: March 15, 2000
City Council Meeting: April 10, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: April 11, 2000
Application Deadline: March 3, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: March 13, 2000
Publication Deadline: March 14, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: April 5, 2000
City Council Meeting: April 24, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: May 2, 2000
Application Deadline: March 17, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: March 27, 2000
Publication Deadline: March 28, Z000
Planning Commission Meeting: April 19, 2000
City Council Meeting: May 8, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: May 16, 2000
Application Deadline: March 31, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: April 10, 2000
Publication Deadline: April 11, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: May 3, 2000
City Council Meering: May 22, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: May 30, 2000
Application Deadline: April 14, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: April 24, 2000
Publication Deadline: Apri125, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: May 17, 2000
City Council Meeting: June 5, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: June 13, 2000
23
0
Page 3— City of Fridley - 2000 Planning Commission Schedule
. City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before
the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday.
Application Deadline: May 5, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: May 15, 2000
Publication Deadline: May 16, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: June 7, 2000
City Council Meeting: June 26, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: July 3, 2000
Application Deadline: May 19, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: May 29, 2000
Publication Deadline: May 30, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: June 21, 2000
City Council Meeting: July 10, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: July 18, 2000
Application Deadline: June 2, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: June 12, 2000
Publication Deadline: June 13, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: July 5, 2000
City Council Meeting: July 24, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: August l, 2000
Application Deadline: June 16, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: June 26, 2000
Publication Deadline: June 27, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: July 19, 2000
City Council Meeting: August 14, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: August 15, 2000
Application Deadline: June 30, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: July 10, 2000
Publication Deadline: July 11, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: August 2, 2000
City Council Meeting: August 28, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: August 29, 2000
�
Page 4— City of Fridley - 2000 Planning Commission Schedule
City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meering, and also need of a public hearing before
the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday.
Application Deadline: July 14, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: July 24, 2000
Publication Deadline: July 25, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: August 16, 2000
City Council Meeting: September 11, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: Sept. 12, 2000
Application Deadline: August 4, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: August 14, 2000
Publication Deadline: August 15, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: September 6, 2000
City Council Meeting: September 25, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: October 3, 2000
Application Deadline: August 18, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: August 28, 2000
Publication Deadline: August 29, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: September 20, 2000
City Council Meeting: October 9, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: October 17, 2000
Application Deadline: September 1, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: September 11, 2000
Publication Deadline: September 12, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: October 4, 2000
City Council Meeting: October 23, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: October 30, 2000
Application Deadline: September 15, 2000 .
Ten Day Completion Notification: September 25, 2000
Publication Deadline: September 26, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: October 18, 2000
City Council Meeting: November 6, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: November 14, 2000
25
- Page 5— City of Fridley - 2000 Planning Commission Schedule -
City Council meeting dates are contingent upon the outcome of the Planning Commission meeting, and also need of a public hearing before
the City Council. * Different date due to a holiday.
Application Deadline: . September 29, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: October 9, 2000
Publication Deadline: October 10, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: November l, 2000
City Council Meeting: November 20, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: November 28, 2000
Application Deadline: October 13, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: October 23, 2000
Publication Deadline: October 24, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: November 15, 2000
City Council Meeting: December 11, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: December 12, 2000
Application Deadline: November 3, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: November 13, 2000
Publication Deadline: November 14, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: December 6, 2000
City Council Meeting: December 18, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: January 1, 2001
Application Deadline: November 17, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: November 27, 2000
Publication Deadline: November 28, 2000
Planning Commission Meeting: December 20, 2000
City Council Meeting: (*subject to change) January 8, 2001
60 Day Agency Action: ' Jan. 16, 2001
��
0
CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS
2000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR
APPEALS COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Appeals Commission has final action on residential requests, unless there are objections
from surrounding neighbors or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If
any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council, with only a
recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday.
All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council.
Application Deadline: December 17, 1999
Ten Day Completion Noti�cation: December 27, 1999
Appeals Commission Meeting: January 12, 2000
City Council Meeting: January 24, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: February 15, 2000
Application Deadline: December 30, 1999 *
Ten Day Completion Notification: January 10, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: January 26, 2000
City Council Meeting: February 14, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: February 27, 2000
Application Deadline: January 14, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: January 24, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: February 9, 2000
City Council Meeting: March 6, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: March 14, 2000
Application Deadline: January 28, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: February 7, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: February 23, 200U
City Council Meeting: March 6, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: March 28, 2000
Application Deadline: February 11, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: February 21, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: March 8, 2000
City Council Meeting: March 20, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: April 1 l, 2000
27 ,
- Page 2— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule -
The Appeals Commission has fmal acrion on residenrial requests, unless there are objecrions from surrounding neighbors or the
peritioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council,
with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday.
All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council.
Application Deadline: February 25, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: March 6, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: March 22, 2000
City Council Meeting: April 10, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: Apri125, 2000
Application Deadline: March 17, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: March 27, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: April 12, 2000
City Council Meeting: April 24, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: May 16, 2000
Application Deadline: March 31, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: April 10, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: Apri126, 2000
City Council Meeting: May 8, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: May 30, 2000
Application Deadline: April 14, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: Apri124, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: May 10, 2000
City Council Meeting: May 22, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: June 13, 2000
Application Deadline: April 28, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: May 8, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: May 24, 2000
City Council Meeting: June 5, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: June 27, 2000
Application Deadline: May 19, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: May 29, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: June 14, 2000
City Council Meeting: June 26, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: July 18, 2000
28
- Page 3— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule -
The Appeals Commission has final action on residential requests, unless there are objections from sunounding neighbors or the
peririoner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council,
with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday.
All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council.
Application Deadline: June 2, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: June 12, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: June 28, 2000
City Council Meeting: July 10, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: July 31, 2000
Application Deadline: June 16, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: June 26, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: July 12, 2000
City Council Meeting: July 24, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: August 15, 2000
Application Deadline: June 30, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: July 10, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: July 26, 2000
City Council Meeting: August 14, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: August 29, 2000
Application Deadline: July 14, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: July 24, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: August 9, 2000
City Council Meeting: August 28, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: September 12, 2000
Application Deadline: July 28, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: August 7, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: August 23, 2000
City Council Meeting: September 1 l, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: September 26, 2000
Application Deadline: August 11, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: August 21, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: September 13, 2000
City Council Meeting: September 25, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: October 10, 2000
29
- Page 4— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule -
The Appeals Commission has final acrion on residenrial requests, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors or the
peririoner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council,
with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. * Different date due to holiday.
All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City Council.
Application Deadline: August 25, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: September 1, 2000 *
Appeals Commission Meeting: September 27, 2000
City Council Meeting: October 9, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: October 24, 2000
Application Deadline: September 15, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: September 25, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: October 1 l, 2000
City Council Meeting: October 23, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: November 14, 2000
Application Deadline: September 29, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: October 9, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: October 25, 2000
City Council Meeting: November 6, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: November 28, 2000
Application Deadline: October 13, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: October 23, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: November 8, 2000
City Council Meeting: November 20, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: December 12, 2000
Application Deadline: October 27, 2000
Ten Day Completion Notification: November 6, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: November 22, 2000
City Council Meeting: December 11, 2000
60 Day Agency Action: December 26, 2000
Application Deadline: November 9, 2000 *
Ten Day Completion Notification: November 20, 2000
Appeals Commission Meeting: December 13, 2000
City Council Meeting: January 8, 2001 * subject to change
60 Day Agency Action: January 8, 2001
(If needed extra 60 day extension) March 9, 2001
30
- Page 5— City of Fridley - 2000 Appeals Commission Schedule -
The Appeals Commission has fmal acrion on residenrial requests, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors or the
petirioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council,
with only a recommendarion from the Appeals Comxnission. * Different date due to holiday.
All commercial or industrial requests will always continue to the City CounciL
Application Deadline: November 22, 2000 *
Ten Day Complerion Notification: December 1, 2000
Appeals Commission December 27, 2000
City Council Meeting:
60 Day Agency Action:
31
January 8, 2�� 1* subject to change
January 21, 2001
� AGENDA ITEM
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
cmr oF
FRIDLEY
DATE: February 3, 2000
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �,r
�� �
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Pat Wolfe, Section 8 Housing Coordinator
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
RE� Revised Aqreement with Elim Transitional Housinq
Last month staff received a request asking that the City Council consider modifying 1998
contract language for a grant they awarded to Elim Transitional Housing.
On June 8, 1998, the City Council approved a grant in the amount of $5,000 to Elim
Transitional Housing. Elim is a non-profit organization formed to assist very low-income
individuals meet their housing needs. The source of Grant dollars utilized by the City was a
small pool of excess funds earned through the Section 8 Housing program. You may recall
a few years back, the Metro HRA determined that if there were funds that remained in an
agency's Section 8 account, after that agency has paid for its program expenses, the
agency could keep and reinvest those funds in other qualifying low-income housing
programs. The City's Elim grant program was designed as a result of having excess funds
to reinvest.
The purpose of the City's grant to Elim was to allow them to issue Inans to assist low-
income housing candidates to pay off their Unlawful Detainers (UDs). Unlawful detainers
are generally a result of earlier financial difficulties, which now keep an individual from
getting other housing.
The total $5,000 grant amount remains in the Elim account. City staff contacted Elim in
November, concerned that none of the funds had been used. Elim representatives
indicated they held onto those dollars and carefully screened candidates for eligibility. Elim
representatives responded that they appreciate the money and believe the UD relief
concept is a very good concept. However, they have not had a candidate yet that fits the
profile outlined in our grant agreement language. Further, they indicated that as they
screen candidates, they realize that beyond UDs, other financial issues are more prevalent
in keeping individuals from suitable housing. Things like: The money necessary for the
utility deposit, phone hook-up charges, and housing application fees, are keeping housing
from their reach.
Consequently, Elim staff is asking if the City Council would consider broadening their loan
capabilities by including a short, specific list of other financial situations where the money
can be loaned to qualifying individuals.
32
Elim Transitional Housing Grant
February 3, 2000
PAGE 2
Our staff has reviewed and decided on an appropriate list of other financial situations where
an Elim Loan would be appropriate for qualifying individuals. That list, the modified grant,
and a resolution approving the change has been attached for your review. All of the
elements protecting the City's interest and ability to recall the grant have remained as stated
in the original agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City eouncil approve the agreement language and associated
resolution as submitted.
M-00-23
33
RESOLUTION NO. _ - 2000
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE AGREEMENT LANGUAGE OF A
GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000 TO ELIM TRANSITIONAL
HOUSING, INC. AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A REVISED
GRANT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, The City Council at their June 8, 1998 meeting received information
regarding a housing program, using Section 8 Housing program dollars that have
accrued as a result of the City's successful management of Spring Lake Park, St.
Anthony, and Fridley clients in need of affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, The City Council concurred on June 8, 1998 to a grant in the amount of
$5000.00 for the described Unlawful Detainer program; and
WHEREAS, A contract agreement was entered into between Elim Transitional
Housing and the City of Fridley assuring standards for monitoring program success;
and
WHEREAS, the contract language provided an opportunity for the parties to make
adjustments as necessary to allow Elim Transitional Housing to further serve very
low income individuals; and
WHEREAS, City Staff made a determination, in response to a request by Elim, that
the grant contract language could and should be modified to allow their organization
to further assist very low income individuals; and
WHEREAS, The City retains the right to request and receive excess funds back, in
the event that the program is not being administered in the manner in which it was
designed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley
hereby approves the modified contract language as it relates to their June 8, 1998
grant of $5000.00 to Elim Transitional Housing, Inc. and authorizes the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute a revised grant agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS______DAY OF___�___�_____, 2000.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
NANCY J. JORGENSON - MAYOR
34
Execution
GRANT AGREEMENT
This GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made as of the 22"d day of June, 1998, by and
between the C�TY OF FRIDLEY, with offices at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota,
55432, ("City"), and Elim Transitional Housing, Inc., (a Minnesota non-profit corporation), with
offices at 3989 Central Avenue N.E., Suite 565, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55421-3972 ("Elim").
RECITALS
A. Elim has a need for funds to provide loans to individuals who are otherwise
strong rental tenantcandidates who, due to an Unlawful Detainer or other named
financial difficulties (see Appendix A), may be unable to secure comfo�table housing.
B. The City has $5,000 in funds that it can provide—funds that have
accumulated as a result of the successful administration of the City's Section 8
program in Fridley and through the sharing of the City's Section 8 Coordinator with
the Cities of Spring Lake Park and St. Anthony.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises contained in
this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:
1. City of Fridlev Section 8 Coordinator's Obliaations
1.1 The City (through its Section 8 Coordinator) shall provide $5,000 to Elim for the specific
use� stated.
1.2 The City (through its Section 8 Coordinator) shalt review the financial statements
provided by Elim to monitor program activity.
1.3 The City (through its Section 8 Coordinator) shall review the status of the program and
work with Elim if program changes are needed to better administer the funds.
2. Elim's Obliqations
2.1 Administration of funds including, but not limited to, creating loan forms, processing
loans, and monitoring loans.
2.2 Elim shall verify that the following eligibility requirements have been met by the client:
• Client is a current Section 8 certificate or voucher holder and currently in case
management with Elim Transitional Housing or currently on the Section 8 waiting list
with the Metro HRA.
• A rental unit has been found contingent on unlawful detainer or other (eliqible) debt
being paid off. Fridley Section 8 Coordinator shall provide a list of landlords who will
rent on this basis (when possible).
• Reason for clienYs unlawful detainer is limited to unpaid rent or domestic abuse
incident, the abuser is no longer a part of the household, and no more than one
unlawful detainer can be on record. A$750 damage limit has been identified for this
criteria.
• Client must be living in Fridley, Spring Lake Park, or St. Anthony, or, if currently in
another community and future rental unit is in one of the eligible communities,
verification must be provided from a landlord or management company.
• Client must have no recent (within the past 12 months) drug or criminal-related
offense by any household member as described by the Section 8 regulation.
• Client must have the financial ability and willingness to pay back unlawful detainer
payoff loan.
35
2.3 Elim shall provide quarterly financial reports to the City's Section 8 Coordinator.
2.4 Elim shall provide annual updates regarding the workability of program for clients of Elim.
3. Terms and Termination
3.1 The City of Fridley reserves the right to request the return of remaining funds from Elim
Transitional Housing, Inc., if the program is deemed unsuccessful by virtue of poor
performance in two consecutive quarterly reviews by the City's Section 8 Coordinator.
Poor performance for this purpose shall mean continued non-payment of clients
receiving funds, poor record keeping in quarterly reports, or loans granted by Elim to
non-qualifying clients. Otherwise, the funds can serve as an ongoing, revolving loan
fund for Elim, and there is no obligation to return the funds.
4. Insurance
4.1 During the term of this Agreement, Elim shall obtain and maintain the following insurance
coverage:
(a) Worker's Compensation Insurance at the statutory requirement of the State of
Minnesota
4.2 During the term of this Agreement, Elim shall provide the City with a certificate or
certificates of insurance rating to the insurance required pursuant to paragraph 4.1.
5. Liability and Indemnification
5.1 Elim represents that the services to be provided under this Agreement are reasonable in
scope and that Elim has the experience and ability to provide the services.
5.2 Elim warrants that any services provided hereunder shall be done in a professional and
workmanlike manner.
5.3 Elim shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, directors,
employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, injuries,
and expenses (including attorney's fees and damages for death, personal injury, and
property damage) which the City may incur as a result of any act or omission by Elim in
providing services under this Agreement.
5.4 The City shall defend and hold harmless Elim and its officers, directors, employees, and
agents from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, injuries, and expensed
(including attorney's fees and damages for death, personal injury, and property damage)
which Elim may incur as a result of any act or omission by the City in discharging its
duties under this Agreement.
6. Confidentiality
Unless otherwise agreed by the City in writing, Elim shall maintain in confidence and not disclose
to any third party any information obtained regarding the City and/or any of the Ciry's clients for
which Elim is providing services; provided, however, that this obligation to maintain confidentiality
shall not apply to:
• Information in the public domain at the time of disclosure;
• Information that becomes part of the public domain after disclosure through no fault of
Elim; or
• Information which Elim can demonstrate was known by it prior to the date of this
Agreement;
• Information required in accordance with mandatory reporting laws.
C�1•�
7. Relationship of Parties
Elim will provide services as an independent entity under this Agreement. Neither Elim, nor any
of its employees or agents, shall be considered employees of the City for any purpose, neither
shall Elim be eligible for any compensation or benefits which the City may provide to its
employees from time to time. Elim shall be solely responsible for employment and other taxes
applicable to providing services hereunder, and the Ciry will not withhold any taxes applicable to
providing services hereunder, and the City will not withhold any taxes or contributions from the
compensation payable to Elim under this Agreement. If any governmental authority owes taxes
or contributions which allegedly should have been withheld or made, then, to the extent permitted
by law, Elim shall pay the City the amounts claimed to be due, plus reasonable attorney's fees
and other costs which the City may incur in defending such claim, whether or not the lawsuit is
commenced.
All notices, requests, demands, and other communications shall be required to be given to the
other party in person or by mail as provided in this section. If delivered personally, notice shall be
deemed to have been duly given on the date of delivery. If delivered by U.S. mail, postage pre-
paid, to the address set forth at the beginning of this Agreement or such other address as a party
may otherwise request, written notice shall be deemed duly given three (3) business days after
mailing.
8. Assiqnment
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective
heirs, successors and assigns; provided, however, that neither party shall assign or transfer in
any manner this Agreement or any portion hereof without the prior written consent of the other
party and any attempt to assign or transfer without prior written consent shall be void and of no
effect.
9. Goveminq Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
10. Miscellaneous
10.1 Headings and captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not
affect the meaning of this Agreement.
10.2 This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior
agreements, discussions, and representations, written and oral, concerning the subject
matter hereof.
10.3 No waiver by the Authority of any item or condition of this Agreement or any document
referred to herein shall, whether by conduct or otherwise, be construed as a waiver or
release of any other term or condition in this Agreement.
10.4 This Agreement may only be amended in a written agreement signed by both parties.
10.5 Except as expressly set forth in Section 5, the rights and benefit under this Agreement
shall inure solely to the benefit of the City and Elim, and this Agreement shall not be
construed to give any rights, benefits, or causes of action to any third party.
10.6 The invalidity or partial invalidity of any provision of this Agreement shall not invalidate
the remaining provision, and the remainder shall be construed as if the validated portion
shall have never been a part of this Agreement.
10.7 Elim shall comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Government
Data Practices) that are applicable to the Authority and shall not disseminate any
37
information concerning loan requests or the borrowers without the prior written approval
of the City.
10.8 This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written
above.
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
By:
Date Nancy J. Jorgenson
. � Its: Mayor
By:
Date Debra A. Skogen
Its: City Clerk
:
APPENDIX A- Grant Agreement Elim/City of Fridley
1. Utility deposits or past bills:
Funds needed to connect utilities. Clients often have old utility bills that must be paid in order
to begin new service. Typically there is no funding available for old bills. Loans would be
made for this purpose, when Elim representatives determine there are no other funding
sources available.
2. Phone hookups or past bills:
Client would be limited to basic service until the loan is paid back. Phone service is
necessary in order to seek employment, set up therapy and other appointments and obtain
assistance for emergencies. Loans would be made for this purpose, when Elim
representatives determine there are no other funding sources available.
3. Car repairs:
This would be used only if there is no other help available and the car is necessary for work,
school or medical reasons. Loans would be made for this purpose, when Elim
representatives determine there are no other funding sources available.
4. Assistance in preventing a UD:
The current housing shortage has made it nearly impossible for people with UD's to find
housing. Loans would be made when Elim representatives determine there are no other
funding sources available.
5. Application Fees:
These would be limited to housing the client actually has a good chance of obtaining. Upon
initial credit check and determination of need, Elim shall provide funds necessary to cover the
application fees.
39
� AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
CITY OF
FRIDLEY
CLA1 MS
9 � 630 - 9 � 87 �
.,
�
`
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
LICENSES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
Type of License
GAS SERVICES
H& S Weiding Heating & AC Inc
7037 205 Street
Kimball, MN 55353
GENERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL
Renovation Systems
2735 Cheshire Lane
Plymouth, MN 55447-2903
Ryan D R Construction
4447 Victoria Street
Shoreview, MN 55126
Shingobee Builders Inc
PO Box 8
Loretto, MN 55357-0008
HEATING
H& S Welding Heating 8� AC Inc
7037 205 Street
Kimball, MN 55353
PLUMBING
Accredited Plumbing & Repair
22700 Pine Trail
Lakeville, MN 55044
Annandale Plumbing
300 E Elm .
Annandale, MN 55302
Stull Lee Plumbing
15532 Nowthen Blvd
Ramsey, Mn 55303
�
Daniei Salzbrun
Michael Ehzufan
Darrell Ryan
Keith McDonald
Daniel Salzbrun
Tom Hoch
Dan Roller
Leland Stull
41
Approved By:
RON JULKOWSKI
Building O�cial
RON JULKOWSKI
Building Official
Same
Same
RON JULKOWSKI
Building Official
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
e
0
/
�
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
ESTIMATES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING� OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
Carl J. Newquist, Esq.
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of November, 1999 ...
42
........................... $ 17,692.00
` AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
CfTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 2/1 /00 �
To: William Burns, City Manager ��
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: ZTA #99-03, Public Hearing to add "Approved Sites" for Wireless Communication Towers and Facilities
M-00-20
INTRODUCTION
As you are aware, the City of Fridley has spent a great deal of time analyzing locations for
the deployment of telecommunication towers and facilities. Past analysis resulted in a
consensus of a mixture of public and privately owned sites strategically located to minimize
impacts but, also provide adequate wireless service for residents and businesses. The
purpose of this application is to amend Appendix A to add two additional sites to be
considered as "approved sites" or permitted uses. A total of 13 other sites have been
previously approved by the City CounciL
The petitioners, TPC, Inc. & the City of Minneapolis, are seeking to add the Minneapolis
Water Works site (4500 Marshall Street) and the Minneapolis Water Works Pump Station #3
(NW Corner of East River Road & 37�h Avenue) as approved locations for
Telecommunication Towers. The location of these towers are necessary to allow the
Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely change settings on the pump stations
from a central location. These towers are actually 25' monopoles that will utilize a stealth
design to fit into their surroundings. The towers located in Fridley are just a portion of the
larger remote monitoring system the Water Works is installing at all of their facilities. Due to
the fact that the towers need to be located adjacent to the pump stations, much like the
City's SCADA system, the petitioners have met the burden of proof required by the
Ordinance to place additional sites on the approved list.
ORDINANCE
The telecommunications ordinance itself, with 7 approved sites for telecommunication
towers, was approved in November of 1997. In January of 1998, ZTA #97-04 was
approved, adding an additional 6 approved sites for telecommunication towers. ZTA #99-03
would amend Appendix A of Section 205.29 of the Fridley zoning code and place these
additional two sites on the list of approved sites.
43
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At the January 19, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZTA
#99-03. The Planning Commission concurred with Staff that the approval of the Water
Works Site was necessary for the City of Minneapolis to continue efficiently delivering water
to it's residents. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission endorsed staff's
recommendation for approval.
A motion was made to recommend approval of zoning text amendment, ZTA #99-03, with
the following stipulations:
1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits / permission from Anoka County necessary
to locate tower in right-of-way near Pump Station #3.
2: All poles shall be of a stealth design. Pole near Pump Station #3 shall resemble a street
light structure and shall have a light fixture, approved by City Staff, installed.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR ZTA #99-03
City Staff recommends the City Council hold the public hearing and receive comments on ZTA #99-03.
The proposed towers will allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely adjust
certain settings at their water pumping stations.
..
0
Date: 1/12/00
To: Members of the Fridley Planning Commission
From: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: ZTA #99-03, "Approved Sites" for Wireless Communication Towers and
Facilities ,
INTRODUCTION
As you are aware, the City of Fridley has spent a great deal of time analyzing
locations for the deployment of telecommunication towers and facilities. Past
analysis resulted in a consensus of � mixture of public and privately owned sites
strategically located to minimize impacts but, also provide adequate wireless
service for residents and, businesses. The purpose of this application is to amend
Appendix A to add two additional sites to be considered as "approved sites" or
permitted uses. A total of 13 other sites have been previously approved by the City
Council.
The petitioners, TPC, Inc. & the City of Minneapolis, are seeking to add the
Minneapolis Water Works site (4500 Marshall Street) and the Minneapolis Water
Works Pump Station #3 (NW Corner of East River Road & 37th Avenue) as
approved locations for Telecommunication Towers. The location of these towers are
necessary to allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and remotely change
settings on the pump stations from a central location. These towers are actually 25'
monopoles that will utilize a stealth design to fit into their surroundings. The towers
located in Fridley are just a portion of the larger remote monitoring system the
Water Works is installing at all of their facilities. Due to the fact that the towers need
to be located adjacent to the pump stations, much like the City's SCADA system,
the petitioners have met the burden of proof required by the Ordinance to place
additional sites on the approved list.
ORDINANCE
The telecommunications ordinance itself, with 7 approved sites for
telecommunication towers, was approved in November of 1997. In January of
1998, ZTA #97-04 was approved, adding an additionaf 6 approved sites for .
telecommunication towers. ZTA #99-03 would amend Appendix A of Section
205.29 of the Fridley zoning code and place these additional two sites on the list of
approved sites
STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR ZTA #99-03
City Staff recommends approval of this zoning text amendment, with stipulations.
The proposed towers will allow the Minneapolis Water Works to monitor and
remotely adjust certain settings at their water pumping stations.
45
Memorandum
STIPULATIONS
1. Petitioner shail obtain all necessary permits / permission from Anoka County
necessary to locate tower in right-of-way near Pump Station #3.
2. All poles shall be of a stealth design. Pole near Pump Station #3 shall resemble
a street light structure and shall have a light fixture, approved by City Staff,
installed.
. �
r.��
\\Engineering2\C\Image Expert Images\Minn. Wa... - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 1 of 1
��.� Q 5-�-�-�-� o,� � 3
, RS _� �
11 /8/99
. •
9:52:20 AM
\\Engineering2\C\PICTURES\poleps3 jpg (local) - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 1 of 1
11 /8/99
j � ,�, � 5 iz� �� � �
�_� , �
w , �;% }-, Ix.��lc� �s ��:1�
. •
9:51:25 AM
\\Engineering2\C\PICTURES\fiberglasspole3.jpa... - Nticrosoft Internet Explorer Page 1 of 1
: :;;i
11 /8/99
j' � �lu�°, �
�'��. � t'���1e�
�t; , t�-, `( ��cJ�, ��-��,�+�, _
L;��� �CiC,��;�;i�
; :-. Ccic�, . �.C�c�
50
10:0g:5% AM
r
�
4'
�"r
�
t�
11
�
3 7 �'�
�
�
C�
Z
0
0
�
d
�
l 1 l J
��ar:;y��t�.u�-��� `� � �-r'�:
1.�� � o� 1� n i-t�c„n L� t
I`-�'c\� e.� S�t\ e v-� C; �y
�,nz.
52
�
\
H.
3
Insulator: Accommodate transmission cable and a
number six ground wire. Unless otherwise
indicated, transmission cable is 0.5-inch
diameter coax.
Provide W.J. Whatley, Inc., Series E30 fiberglass pole or Approved Equal.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.01
A
B.
C.
POLE INSTALLATION
Install poles in the locations shown on the drawings.
Verify all underground Utility locations before digging antenna poles or underground
conduit.
Bury poles to the specified burial depth in undisturbed earth.
D. Place backfill in layers not more than six-inches in loose depth and to not less than 95
percent proctor density, AST1�ID-1557. Compact each layer to required percentage of
maximum density. Use hand compaction adjacent to buildings and other structures.
E. Use concrete backfill when solid rock is encountered or where existing soil conditions
upon compaction does not provide a stable foundation for the pole.
F. Notify the Engineer when solid rock is encountered. Altemative locations will be allowed
with Engineer approval if the communications path is not obstructed and transmission
losses are not increased.
G
H.
Conform to all applicable local codes and regulations for erection of utility poles.
Coordinate installation of antenna and cables prior to installation.
END OF SECTION 17960
sioaott ►�ww sc�o���cs�unnc�noHS��oeo�w�v, 17960 - 4
53
EMA SeMces, inc. +
,
G
.
ROOF LINE
60"
60"
DEWATERING PLANT
DRAWN BY DATE
TAG 11-9-99
diEqCED BY DATE
23"
24"
REMOVABLE SERVICE ENTRANCE
SCALA YAGI ANTENNA
ANDREW MICROWAVE ANTENNA
WITH RADOME
NOTES:
ANTENNA HEIGHTS ON POLE MAY VARY ACCORDING TO
SIGNAI STRENGTH.
MINIMUM 2" x 10' POLE WILL BE USED
MOUNTING BRACKETS TO BE DETERMINED AT INSTALL,
WITH A MINiMUM OF 2 MOUNTING HOLES
AND 2° TO 4" SPACING FROM BUILDiNG
ANCHORS WILL BE A MINIMUM 5/8 LAG BOLT WITH
CONCRETE ANCHORS.
STANDOFFS WILL BE SPACED 16" TO 20" APART.
COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT WILL BE
PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN.
TTELEMETRY AND PROCESS
P C CONTROL INC. STII.L1fATER �r
PPROVED BY DATE pROJECT NMIE PROJECT NO.
- - MINNEAPOLIS WATER WORKS 99108
DRAYNNC N0.
FRIDLEY DEWATERING PLANT gg108-002
ANTENNA AND MAST DIAGRAM
= 54
REV.
REVISIONS
E
♦
� �
Y y
� �� ���_ ���
�
� � �
� I
� �� �� �ir�' � .
a.
�S
<1
4i,_
.. � �. . � .. ,.
r � ..����' �.: .� �a . ..
g� 'a Y � +s`' � � . .
7^,s ...x�C a ..
s
�r'ti . _
� '� �� ,
,� s�}� �. `
�' ' � a , •,, .
r�
� �. �� a: ��- .
� �� '
t-�'� ', k �P'.� xa ,1'�,_.
.s. ',: w � . 'w. . °
�{
- ' —,� .� "�n; ,
� --�� � �+ -�
; .r � . ,
'.�c���a
,, ,
; .
s
' I
�. "+ � �:
��� �,,, •,; ;,
.�as.� � ��`� " 1�:. f `�",�,�
�' ° � . . � �. _
���" .� �
�
�;
�`
} ''°.
a�
:f
3�"':.�
Lz'•_'
� . _.
� _
���� �:
�,�,y, � �� �� .,
��,�� � ��
�va� ���
',; x�`.�,.� � � , . .
t. "� � �'' °' `�'
�� ��_ � "�.
���.�•.� _, .
A�- Y �Y'+�[ �' .
? �' �. fi
� " f .c�,', '-sL � � - 1
a' - �
� _ �
f',_..._ � . .
x '
�. � w
I
�::
�
�. �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
W
W
W
�
C
l�I
�I
�
Q 1
�
�
�
��
n
�
�V
:�
�
_
0
�
N
24 •
�TARY
� �
�
�
-� �
O D
� Z
D �
G1
�
W
W
� /r
56
lwJ
� *
d
fTl
"p �
r D
D �
Z �
--I �
�
Z
Gl
�
z
�
12' RCP
�
O1/11/00 15:23 FA% 651 430 0783 TPC
To• Paul Bolin
Company: City of Fridley
Fax�: * C 12-s1�-►��
Telemetry
and
� Process Controls, inc.
t+'rom: Todd Garber
Re: Minneapolis Water
Works Communication
Upgrade
Remarks: �
Paul,
C� O 1
.
�.c�X
a�aac• 1�11�VV
Number of Pages: 4
Phone: 651 - 430 - 0435
Fax: 651- 430 - 0783
Page Number Includes Cover Shect 1
Attached are the pictures for the two additional pump stations the 25' fiberglass poles will
be installed, along with a drawing indicating the locations.
Please give me a call, should you need any further infonnation.
Thank You
�
Todd Grarber
Design Engineer
5640 Memorial Ave. N. Complex C. Stillwater, MN 55082
,
.
�.
Y
Oliil/00 15:2� F.�1.Y 651 �30 0783
`.- .'
�
TPC
• _ ..:. • .'_ '.' ' -`r'?'a:�t;;"�l��v
' ,. ,. .' , , rM"i2.( , "•'. w ' ' , 'tp .
� , , , . . .. � � ''r • 1 !�.�,� �! . a�
� .f '� '` � � �t,. `7���� �tyP�'yv�. Y �'� '� � K+, � �~!',�f ' `,,�''`';�. , i � �i� . ; � �' .�=�1� ,
.� r I � Yr +
i� � •y�jM'i��a��� ���:�/'��. Y�:,r, �'fy}��i_��. �K'r.. �'�,�_l�:: �'.,. ��' :J. i, .y,
� �,-� ~t,"l:xS�� f � *'�. i.�" �' •�.°Y �.� 7 a.�r f 1',-' •�'. ` �.
_.ad ���'. 1•'.. ..4�..'. �:�i'. .. ��i�•.t�.�r�. •}�_.'i:�s�i�'��. .a .y��;;•R�.
l��� P ��-�,z,,`. -� �
���
r.�,
f
O1/11/00 15:23 F.�Y 651 430 0783 TPC
r.�,
.
0
_,.•.,T�� .—� .. . _ � .. .r—�----�:�.�.T..s�•°tTr--_;r,-.a�T-�.--q?�n .� :�., .`."ti /�
• �.b'��\.�.�r�.. �.� �. �� � . T • �A..�� �.+�r.� �+���r�r'w.w ti\�r� .� ', ^•, • , _. .� � �%�� .iY': . ' � , . . � MIf'►i I.
. .T .r� ��r �.��. .� F���i�r����. ' �: �� ���/l! ^'� �. � . . _ ��.� . ��� r. �.�� .. •. . .
�' � � � 1/'r'� sf.! " ' `�' �r����. . � • .. ,. _ . � . � _ . � �.�= r
e..� �� 1� Ar.Y�.`J+'�'4 '�.r r� :.. � M�.. �,,,•_�''iP��+.'°'�..� � �� � . � ;i�,: .�'�',,y,�[,��'I , .' •.
, � �t�,',`•. '''Y• ' ��,-',�; ,,i�y'�` �,q�. . ` �. e:a1'•'� --• � .
�N� • ,�'S,I�'���� `�t a�v�.: ,i,-J'��i,t�, ^ "r�,;�T�1�� . ��'nrr' -�V"�• . �.;�"�,�,"cRi�'b' ,r b�fw�dt�'��,,,�'.4�.r���r.
� � %.r, � 4. e �.,� �. �?y,'��. 1�c •: �r..,� AnX -�y, .. ' .i. • �o`'. . ? F. , s'� �' • 7�. n- � ..� . .� �"
;4 � k °Y�j^��'^��r hi'J,,.' ,;±•i ^ �l� �.��:..�,+ • T � : ,��,.,,,. .,,��'J°"t�;x�'�9,�x• e". . �. . . '� :'xb''If�,� °f�•'�^ ' ° . .
.� ,r�Y�� JY�,��,.�, � ..;n:�Li•..;, ��N.:��r�'�s '�•ir.,y,�' , .�f�: 'i �:. i2, , . 9`�•rff,��.,,.�� ..,��•" ',.ir,�Y
-v�'. � . 4 IN��<'a�.{ � � I;� : i . . � Rt•.• . � .. • ' yf' . . . �..��,�,
`�A 1 .. .'. �. �� T� ' .. . • � � � ., . ' �. . � 1
�'y1 0.�yi: A ' �^ �°'y��",��'��''i•`''i.. �L�p ��'.. ,��. 'i,•`�., • , �����.�'�;,y '�1. •ay�
, ...%�!.'.� `I:f � .�s„�;,e}I'�„w���' •J� ' �d . •T��'I:f.�'�y,`, ry � •�••l ��.i..«� , �,;� �`��,'• �,,,.:+.�'� � "�1jy...�...' ' . . 1 . ."' �.�.'i`7' �� 1
.h T v �4�� . � � ' � 7• � ^ , • �~' � �%'�r;•.��,�.� ' •., , �: ►.h`"� �ei � � , � ' � � � , � .
ir.,1�:...�;r�i�rk^�•''�'�:`.,'N' Ft''�'L�a.. � � ,'�a. ,.,.,,�,� y,� r �
. . ���tPfi.: ' <'� +,`.F•.l�w U lroP^ r '����l���CiwiY�.r.C!:!t • � _. ,�`��w� m�MMi���yi� .
�I,n9�•:e.�� +:: di�.e !,'u.. �ti�'�t iM'�' '1C1.�'�4 2n �.. _ .�ea � ___ '�f.
��°at ^"�_'C'J"+ge��Jiy,rC�,''Si'r� 1;:I:�l�:.i -• K�' .
,; • `a�i..aTj� �. . ��yy , ,-,
ary �7-"'�; �
� +�'N" y.�,,�,;y�.•�. • .:�:� �•''-cR� : r �� . .
��4f.t:�r',Li�'�.�q�I��"'� �Y�{��'i��J���"'�
fiK
Pv •�-� � J�-k�i�n.� I
59
r
�
.
t
•
O1/11/00 15:2� FAR 651 430 0783
♦ y
s �
s
y
a
r �
�
s
2
�
�
:
TPC
� I
a� I
�4
_
a-
��
O
OQ
�N �- a �
�� �° � � °
00
O a
�
�
E
N
� � �
�� _
�
—
J ��
° o�o �
o �
ao a �
oa o a
.
.
. a
a
' o
. o
0
0
s Q
• Q
0
0 O
O
• • �
� ,
� � .•
� : r
i
? � • �
�
��
�
�
....�':
.� I
:,
..�
� 04
Q
O
Q
� Q �
F�
v � I
'��
� r ' ,'I'I', �
1��
,�' '
• -��
1C�(t� o 0
C��
@
GROUND LINE—>
STEEL TENON
r --'-•��
�
�_� -�
OPTIONAL POLE TOP
CAP AND SNOE BOX
BRACKET AVAILAgLE
STANDAFlD 2+/z' x 5" HANOHOLE wITH
CAST ALUMINUM COVER. HANDHOLE
AFlEA REINFORCED FOR AODED
sra�ni.
�
POLE SIZFS �
The Series E30 siandard duty and Series E31 heavy dury �_�
poles are avaitable in overail shaft lergths of 11 ft, to 35 ii
OPTIONAL POLE TOP TENON SIZES
7ENON ��
�r�+ a�uevs�ior�s an�oNs
STANDARD 3*fz' 3' 2�'
STANOARD g,� �,. Z,
OP110NA1 IXTRA COST 3+M 3 234'
STEEL SHOE BOX BRACKET SIZES
oar� ocrw� cQSr r N.p.s. cz�- o.o.�
opnow� �w cosr , v.- w.PS. �i�- o.�.>
HANDHOLE SiZES
�'��0 2'h' x 5' OVAL
OPT70NAL REDUCEp Cp�f 2�fz' ROUNO
� WIRE ENTRY HOLE SIZES
sr"N°^R° r x s
srav�ARO HnRE avrRY r x s. oPnow►� srzES nv,vias�E uPOn� aEQUESr
SQUARE DIRECT BURIAI BASE
FOR ANTI-ROTATION
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
ROUND TAPERED FlBERGLASS
SERlES E30 AND E31
��
. ,
1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION be reinforced in areas of handho(es and special hardware
1.'I Fberglass lighting pole to be round, hollow, and attachments.
of uniform taper along its length. The butt end of the 3.5 The pole shall be desig�ed wi#h a minimum safety
embedded-type poles will be e�larged and square so as ��r of 2:1 and have no more than 10% deflection at fuil
to increase resistance to rotation and provide maximum W��d loading.
ground bearing resistance (anti-lift)_ The pole shall be 4. POLE TOP
non-conductive and chemicalty i�ert 4.1 Tenon Styie: A galvanized steel tenon will befirtnly
2. INSTALLATION OATA bonded to the pole fo� mounti�g a post top luminaire. The
21 Oirect-embedded poies from 11 ft. to 1 T ft, will be 9a��n¢ed steel tenon will be straight with no taper. The
set to a depth of 3 ft. Direct embedded poles '18 ft to te�on will be coated with matching urethane finish.
29 ft will be set to a depth of 4 ft. Poles 30 ft, to 35 ft. will 4•2 Bracket Styte: The pole shall be capped (otio�at)
be set to a depth of 5 ft. and rei�orced for side mounted boft-o� brackets.
3. POST SHAFT CONSTRUCTION 5. HANDHOLE
3.1 The pole will be co�structed from continuous 5.1 The handhole shall be 21/2' x 5' oval, located 18`
fibergtass filaments combined with thermosetting above grade. The cover shall be non-corrosive metal
polyester resin. painted to match the pole and secured with a stainless
3.2 The fiberglass and resin ratio of the pole wilt steel, tamper-proaf locking screw.
contain at least 65% glass, the ba(ance polyester resin. 6. WIRE ENTRANCE
3.3 The glass filament will be heticalty wound, under 6.1 The pole shall have a wire e�trance hole af Z" x 5'
tension, first at a relatively high angfe (65-85°) to the located 24° below grade, 90° clockwise to luminaire.
longitudina! axis of the pole, with alternate layers of 7. FINISH
filaments in opposite directions for maximum 7.1 The surtace of the pole shall be u�iform and
circumferential (compressive) strength, consistent for the entire len
Secondly, an outer core section of greater weightthan 7.2 The resin shall conta� colored p gme�t to match
the inner core section is helically-wound by wrapping the fsnish coat of the pole. Solid cotoration will be
continuous glass fiiaments at a relativety low angle (3-15°) throughout the entire wall thickness af the pole.
to the longitudinal axis of the pole for maximum 7.3 The finish coating will be a pigme�ted urethane
longitudinal (bending) stre�gth, finish capable of withstanding exposure to ultraviolet, ��
3.4 The pole shall have a minimum wail thickness of chemicals, and extreme weather conditions. '
3/32'. The pole shall have a tapered wall increasing in 7.4 The surtace coating shall be a minimum dry film �
thickness from the top to the base in proportion to thickness of 1 1/2 mils.
load and ground line moment requirements. The pole v� 1 .
E-2
,
�
.
�
r
S?E�JFICATION SHEET
DIRE�T BURIAL POLES
"
STANDARD DUTY ROUNDTAPEREDFiBERGLASS __�_!
,
SERIES E30 FOR USE WiTHTENON OR O TON BRACKET
(NOT RECOMMENDED FOR MASTARM APPLICAIIONS'�
POLE DIMENSIONS RECOMMENDED TpTqL Lpqp�NG
ruma
uruos ovEnati �o�orK �� r�ertxr
Mu�t sx� � wxw. w�esxr � �T �u� towia o s s s „ ,.
(s�. o� r�x x�sxr o�rx = sx ��� � � arx arx ttx r�r�t am �
(� 1 (F� 1 (� ) Ms.) N�.) l�) � rILSE �Q EPJI E.rJI ETA E.rJI Et�l ErJ►
1�1 f�.l I�s.) Isa�'U IsaF'q RO.Fq Rn.�1 ImFq {slF:
q011 11 8 3 22 3.4 4S 54 12 150 120 8.3 6,3 49 3g
p012 12 9 3 u 32.
3.4 4b 54 12 150 120 8,3 63 t9 3,g �
E3013 13 10 3 27 3.4 4.8 54_ 12 t50 120 8.3 g„3 4.g gq �
E3014 14 11 3 29 3.4 d9 54 12 150 120 8.3 &3 4_8 38 37
:l.70t�.:,..`: �.Y : T�'._-.'� :$i:� ..::�� '' wSi�i`"�," . �3�e^� ,.�
�• ' _ ... ,_ � . =�+. . . .,. " � _ � ' �:...r.?•. :_ .:" ''-�'-k'i�.' �.'r�.9
E7016 16 13 3 33 a4 52 : :'+ �
� 12 t50 11.8 .81 .`'g,� .:V4.71~ 38 31
E3017 17 14 3 35 3.4 53 54 12 150 11.8 8.1 8�/ 4J 37 31 -
E7018 18 14 4 37 3,4 5.3 56 24 150 11.8 8./ fi.i 4.7 3,7 3�
E3019 19 15 4 40 3.4 5.5 66 24 100 11_7 8.0 6.0 1,7 3�7 3,p
�J01ffi'-x-.�; ;'�:�� c�t�+�._ ���; _ =�`�'x�- ^ ... ��"=_.v� %'t"� .��,
E,i021 21 17 4 47 _ 3,y . -. 5.7 • -, 65 24 � 10D 87 6.4 `4.7 36 � 2g '
E30Z2 22 18 d 24
� 3.4 59 66 24 100 8 6 B.3 4.6 3.6 29 y3
E30�i 23 t9 4 53 3.4 6.0 66 24 100 8.6 &.3 4.6 3.6 Zq y;
E30?� 24 20 4 57 3.4 62 66 24 100 85 62 t.6 3.B 2$
.�"�.., -'2�� _ � ., .,t�, 2.3
- • _ . :. . _.. _ , _ _x �z
E3026 26 22 4 66 3.4 6.4 66 24 100 8A Gt - <S 3S 27 21
E3027 27 23 4 69 3.4 6.6 66 24 100 8.4 6A 4 4 3�4 26 p.p
E3028 28 2a 4 T3 3.4 6.7 66 24 /00 8.3 6.0 4.4 3,.3 ?S 19 �
E� 29 25 4 77 3.a 69 66 24 100 8.2 59 42 32 24 19
'�:a3�-. - --- c..s.�-� _...�
_ . ''"'C`ZSr-� ' " - � . ' _ �
�'-r ,=?Z., 'af� .Sl � . .
.. .. ... . ... _ .^.��'! .. . !/Ya .. , ;
E303� 31 26 5 86 3.4 7.0 78 3g 700 "8.2 a 59 42 3.1 23 1S
E30;i2 32 27 5 90 3.4 7.1 78 36 100 81 5.8 4.1 3.1 2.3 1.7
� � � 5 94 3.4 7.3 78 � 100 8.] 5,7 4.1 30 22 1.7
E3034 36 29 5 98 3.4 7.4 78 36 100 80 SS 39 Z9 21 1_6
E3035 35 30 5 102 3_4 7.6 78 36 1Q0 8.0 55 3.8 28 21 15
ROUND TAPERED FlBERGLASS
HEAVY DUTY DIRECT BURIAL
FOR USE WITH TENON OR BOLT-0N BRACKET
SERI ES E31 (NOT RECOMMENDED FOR MA��' ARiw epvr ire-nn��c�
0297 _ ...-- • ........... .... .��.
E-1
�A�rrrna�oosaedotidacAl6YI�61M�A0.9if0�tisw�irLi�ldea30xg�� �
0
.
�J ``'',t1 U � � c�
�
ORDERIiVG INFORMATiON:
ROUND TAPERED, SQUARE STRAIGHT AND SQUARE TAPERED PULES
IMPORTANT: Due to the diversity of the product li�e, W.J. Whatley custom makes ail products. We cannot accept
returns due to mistakes in ordering All quotations and orders are subject to approval by the factory.
�,�,��
OVERALL
SHAFT
LENGTH
(FEE'n
`°, �FABCEtE�
�?-�- :� : �,:: ''���•.�:'�""�,*x€;�'=
wWO►+aF ro� roP
����+ OPTIONS
���^ Teno�� �Oj' PbM��opT
abM OptlorW Sdneard Bawat Sa�eisl SpeeW�r
TeD GO T«qn Tarwn Conq�i� T�twn Assembir
zaro.c.• raa- raa-
r�a r��.n_ 2�u-�.a soee�y so.�+h
riw,� so s� sz sa sz �o
2'h' Ramd 54 55 56 57 63 71
2Y+'�5-Owl 58 59 60 Bt 6a 72
a'x 6' Av1' 65 68 67 68 68 73
4v.lilabi� onlv �n srnrs EAO F61 Aa'J nd3 Pnba
..5.. _ iiwicaaes stanaxa oe4gi tean,es as esned on wna+kr socafiration s+�eeb.
..N.. -:+aicaoes u,at oeeona� noe-sranmra aes,q� teaa.« a�e req�a.ee. oa�on� a�icr
kalt+es rtuy be otaerfld Cy aiCiciung tl+e nan•sinndartl destyf Mah+e � ae�oNantt
� aM� +9 TaDM. 0.g EJOZ�-10,50N1.2.,T. Sd� eD0a�a1 Oesign tladirs aR at
O 50
- N1 - Nor►NaWard hsd�plp bcatqn
N2 - Npr►sta�W�d Miis entry bc�oon �
w- Nor.sb,earo �.:. ermy san (sta,wara sas r X sf
1'M - Specal areas d mntaeemnx tor bad�et or mase am� amacM�r�t
►'G - S0�'+a� padieC aeas !or brad�rt a ma�t sm a�tadsnem (O.E.M. Ternp�ata
�
N6 - A^Y a%�e► �eei� r�e�oa+b w
Facc«r aoo�oral �eau+ea o� ar noi.stanmro 2qioremer� aleas. sicrt.c onvn,gs ,nnra�
mecGntcro on a/ no�standard d�s,
0297 � W.J. Whatley, Inc. 1997
10 -
COLOR
AND
FINISH
SEE TABLE I
.1-1
60 -
POLE TOP
AND
HAND HOLE
SEE TABLE II
�/l�I
DESIGN
FEATURES
SEE TaBIE III
MISCELLANEOUS SPECIF(CATIONS
�„yn, I oucs�ae I insae _ '�
Oimensions Dimensions �I
Ectra Cost 3fi° pi;,° 2- �
Exrra Cosr 3 h- 3_ Z,N.. li
Extra Cost fType ea0. Ea t. aa2. an31 3 h^ a- 3�a" I�
INf1t4F'TfiPEREEDEQVAtEi��ti�Si:Ep!E�F II
Standard 2'N.P.S(2375Q0.; I,
° "`==6Ii��E1tNLZEI7K:Si'EEL:SR/CETfEES�kPF��E�S#2'E� =` '',
Staridard t,ti.• NlP 8(1 66 O D)
. _. ,
-.°.--s��sHaESa�-s�cxE�sup��s� ��-
S88-2 2" N.P.S(23750.D.) '
588-1 t,k^ N.P.S (�.66 Q0.) I
�" I � l ��
•�e � � �.
'� �• x 2,- ec oso sQ
�z zo•-zs• ,z.o- �.-x2�°
aa2 aa�a I �o'-�a• _1 -- a--f �-xzr
��w ,a�-zb- �os �r.-x2i- ec�os
a� zr•-a�� �r �.-x2r ec�2o
3.3
8 A.'i8 15'-23' 10S' �i" X 21" BC 705
8� A38 24'-30' 12" �i X 21 Fl[` t 90
iv+z e� A43 i8'-24' 12' �s X 21 BC 120
A42 3 A43 25•_35• 1q• 1' X 36" BC 140
L na2 a naa I �'-as' � �s- r X 3s ec �60
-� �."�'-,�'°�`A[�'�HQi�B'I�SEE'A1EER_`�7tIIRENSidNS���`:� g=
Gtalog Number Bottom Width �O.O.) Height i
_ BC 080 SY." S4uare 8y.'
BC 105 t0�4" Square t0�h" ---
8C t 20 12'/.•' Square t O' '
8C 140 74'ft" $quef2 tY
ec , so � s�•• saua.e -, r
:=' BAL•T�tRCLE/iNQ./tNCEEQR BIrSEQtMENS1�NS=;:-
---+ A B C D E
�iT �,t �,t
. Pattem � Pattern � Plate Hole Ho1Q I
ire�a Square Size Width Leng�
8" 5.65.. $•. � .. 1.5..
0.5" 7.42" 10.4" 1.. 1.5"
7 2" 8.50" 1 1.5" 1.. l.Sy
�a^ s.9o° t3S• �.2s.. 2..
t6" t1.3t.. t5" t.25" _ 2..
r
a"V
�
�
�
�'. 6 - 6.2 G�z
uHx� -� Ultra High Performance Antennas -TEGLAR� Long Life Radome Included
Uual UhUCIU-�ti(; lU (:�.Uj C:t'H7J7(a' 4"L.5 4'L.y 4:3.3 1.1 ;iti %Z 1.Uti (:iU.%j
MPx � T �linh P�rfnrrnanrp Ant�nnac - Hynalnn �ta�inmp Inrl��cial
f1r.-�i NPY1LrjP R/7 d1 /`PR71?7I. df1 G di /1 di d i C,, 411 CJt 1/1R l411 T
- HPXY2-56 12 (3.7) PDR70 43.8 44.2 4�3.7 1.0 30 71 1.06 (30.�
a7. ! .I"ie� - b.li�``ie7 �ill.z
HP ,ti High Performance Antennas - Hypalon Radome Included
c�.,,.ia a�oe_s�w � i� �� I`OAY?7I_ • � a �� n vs �
-. --- HP&57W 8(2.4) PDR7(} ^ 407 41.2 41.7
HP10-57W 10 (3.0) " 42.5 42.9 43.4
� HP12-57W 12 (3.7) " 44.2 44.6 45.0
P � Standard Antennas
Sinate P2v7W- - 2 ��.Sl CPR137G
D..�.�.i+�! Dd_G7W A/1 n1 V.
A&5TN 3 (2.4j cr N"'
5.92� - 6.�25 GHz
?o
1.6
1.3
1.0
�
30
30
30
�? i,in i� ��
s� ;:o� i�o:��
65 1.06 (30.7)
70 1.06 (30.7)
` 29.2 29.3 29.9 5.8 .iG 40 i.10 (26.41
* 4A C 4S /l �F A ?!� ?/� AI1 1 1(1 l�J� A�
"' 40.7 412 41.? 1.6 30 47 1.06 (°A.Tj
_ _. .., . _. ..: _ .- � - -- -- -- � -- ---� --- - ... .,.- .., ._...-- �----... - --- ----�-
�e unchanged, except 120 VSWR (20.8 d8 R.L).
MAY � i-iinh �+sar{nrman�Q t1��ai i2aam �nfi��nac -TF(:i aR� i nnn i i#a Cta�nmo inrl��ii�i
.,.a, :ii.i:,,.-..� �_.Tj ,.�.,...,._. ,. �;.� ��.� _,�.., �.t �..�.�.;��� � ;.,,o�:::i.:j
HDX1a59A' 10 (3Aj COR>3TG A 42.9 43.2 43.4 1.1 26 Main 74 1.06 (30.7)
20 Div.
1 � uiv.
t U.S. FCC Part 21. ' For unused waveguide port use terminaliun load Type na 62901-137 (see page 242).
. . , �. , .
-- -'_' -=_--' . , _ :. .
--'- - - _ __- --• -_'--= • _. _ .::� _ .
• �
Radome Electrical
Characteristics
Planar Radomes. The electrical characteristics of the
planar radome are incorporated into the electrical
pertormance specifications of the shielded antenna.
Molded Radomes. The use of a molded radome on
standard (P-Series) or focal plane (FP-Series) antennas
may slightly impact maximum antenna VSWR.
Attenuation and system VSWR effects are listed in the
table below. To determine the maximum VSWR across
the band for the antenna/radome combination, add the
figure from the table to the maximum antenna VSWR
specification.
10' and 12' standard molded radomes are rated for 125
mph (200 km/h) while 4', 6' and 8' standard radomes
are rated for 150 mph (240 km/h); extra strength mold-
ed radomes for 10' and 12' which are rated for 150 mph
(240 km/h) are also available.
Typical Molded Radome Attenuation and YSWR
Standard Antenna Radomes
Standard 2 (0.6)
Standard 4 (�.p�
Standard g (1.8)
Standard g (2,q�
Standard 10 (3.0)
Standard 1 p (3_7�
Extra Strength 10 (3.0)
Extra Strength 12 (3.7)
Focal Plane Antenna Radomes
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Extra Strength
Extra Strength
Extra Strength
Extra Strength
Extra Strength
4 (1.2)
6 (1.8)
8 (2.4)
10 (3.0)
12 (3.7)
4 (1.2)
6 (1.8)
8 (2.4)
10 (3.0)
12 (3.7)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.03
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.9
1.0
12
1.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.9
1.0
0.4
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.4
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.2
1.5
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.3
1.5
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.9
0:02 0.03
0.02 0.03
0.02 0.03
0.02 -0.03
0.02 0.03
0.02: 0:03
0.02 0:03
0.02 0'.03
0.05 ! 0:05 :
0.05 ' O;b5
OAS 0.05
.�+''� Customer Service Center - Call toll-free fro QJ.S.A., Canada and Mexico 1-800-255-1479 • U.K. 0800-250055
�'����� • Republic of Ireland 1-800-535358��'�ustralia 1800-803 219 • New Zealand 0800-441-747
p.139
r
�
c
,
r
w
r
ti
•
r
`
GTY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
C�ITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
DATE: February 4, 2000
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager���
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Fernelius, Hoc�sing Coordinator
SUBJECT: Approval of 2000 CDBG Program
This item was tabled by the City Council at their January 24, 2000 meeting due to concerns about
funding the Parks and Recreation Department's Youth Scholarship Program. It is our understanding
that the Council has reviewed the January 27th memo prepared by Jack Kirk which described the
program in greater detail.
In 2000, the City will receive $138,686 in federal CDBG funding. Staff is proposing that the funds
be used for housing rehabilitation and public services. Below is the breakdown of funding, including
a comparison of the 1999 amounts.
Activity 1999 2000 Change %
Housing Rehab
ACCAP
Alexandra House
Fridley Rec. Dept.
Fridley Senior Program
SACA
Sub-Total
County Admin.
TOTAL
$122,500
$8,500
$3,000
$4,000
$4,000
$2,500
$22,000
$1,000
$145,500
$116,883
$8,038
$2,837
$3,782
$3,782
$2,364
$20,803
$1,000
$138,686
Applications for this year's program are due by February 11, 2000.
-$5,617
-$462
-$163
-$218
-$218
-$136
-$1,197
N/C
-$6,814
-4.59%
-5.40%
-5.40%
-5.40%
=5.40%
-5.40%
-5.40%
N/C
-4.72%
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the year 2000 CDBG program as presented and
further authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute all documents with the County to secure the
funding.
• •
�
0
: AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
CfiY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: 2/1 /00
To: William Burns, City Manager fi��
From: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Paul Bolin, Planner
RE: First Reading of ZTA #99-03, "Approved Sites" for Wireless Communication Towers and
Facilities M-00-21
INTRODUCTION
TPC, Inc. & the City of Minneapolis are seeking to add the Minneapolis Water Works site
(4500 Marshall Street� and the Minneapolis Water Works Pump Station #3 (NW Corner of
East River Road & 37 h Avenue) as approved locations for Telecommunication Towers.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
At the January 19, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZTA
99-03. After reviewing the proposal, a motion was made to recommend approval of the
zoning text amendment request. The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends that the City Council hold the first reading of the ordinanee to amend
the zoning text of Appendix A of Section 205.29, adding the Minneapolis Water Works to the
list of approved telecommunications towersites.
s
67 •
�
ORDINANCE NO. 1127
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA,
BY ADDING APPROVED SITES TO CHAPTER 205 "ZONING", TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TOWERS, SECTION 205.30, APPENDIX A.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 205.30 Telecommunications Towers and Facilities District, Appendix A, of the Fridley
City Code is hereby amended as hereinafter indicated.
The following locations are zoned to and have been determined to be Approved Sites for the
installation of Towers or Wireless Telecommunications Facilities.
� Municipal Garage or Recycling Center
• Community Park "
• Edgewater Park
• Fridley Reservoir along Matterhom Drive
• Fridley Water Tower in Locke Park
• Fridley Commons Water Tower on 615` Avenue
• Well #13 •
• Commons Park
• Onan Comoration
• AIITemp Storaqe
• Aqro-K
• FMC Water Tower
• Undeveloped Citv riqht-of-wav south of 694
• Minneapolis Water Works
• Minneaqolis Water Works Pump Station
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF � , 2000
NANCY J. JORGENSON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN, CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: February 7, 2000
First Reading: February 7, 2000
Second Reading: '
Published:
� 68
�
� AGENDA ITEM
` CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2000
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
1NFORMAL STATUS RE'PORTS
.•