10/27/2003 - 4614- - � -- , . .
�
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
7:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers
Attendance Sheet
ALFASF AR/NT NAMF, A1�URFSS ANt� /TFM NUMBFR YOU ARF /NTFitFSi�t� /N.
i,i� � ; ,� ,, j h ��
"
��� �,,; ��i�� ",, � � � �
��� � �y�,� �'��+�` {C1�Ar��� '� '`� Ac�+c'�"+�� �
.. � �i....', . \\_ , , .: .. // /C3,W',�' �j -
� � \ , , .. . �. ..x.:/�. . . , - '� '��;f i � i v"
.... , . .,.. . ,.... ,.,.: „ ,,,� , . . s.�y€
i.
� '� ''7 � `� � a ; �C
`---- �.,rl , L � ^ �
��' ��`:1 � �t=' ' � �` �/ i �•
�,-:> �� C; _- �, �- C.... � S 3 7 S r-( �: R ou �zv C K.: � � C r i� �. � ��-C' �}�
-� - � -
- � •--
. �� C /'�-�,.,� r �3� � �. � �. �; �-i 5 . . ���C����- � � �� - c� 2
� �`= �� ;�;,` ` ,' . �_�;� �v -' �',�> ;: �i i�--� ; , , l � O�-'
��%z �- � 4''�, `' �� '�k �� ' ,.�,yl. ,� ��' 1"L..� �'G'
�
"�j i � � � ; '�'��1 �a� i, G }'�r�S�� �°� (a.'' �� /�rt�. ��(, -�� � `7 -� O ��
� �
" �'c� ��..c.�'�`- 1�7 �, Vk�ci"r_�C_k�`�r� �iiil.� — CU
,,
,,
� � � \: ;� �!�� — i�'y � �K�'�. ��C1�1%=�'� � `�� �,�'
�, ^'i��:'�� � , �,%,�,t�� ;';Y�; -�fit�,�_':-�- SlT 1 � � �
� y�r � < � �' � <' v4� "�E! � ��JU�. ��G
Q. a-� . N E 15
�4ia., ✓ (� = , �i. 4 i .¢. i v ;:,,<' " -��, . '�.1 ` � � _
., � i � ?�,� , ;,:��� �� �, '�,�� � ; 'n ! :^ , l.� N� � ti�.y �
� L _ / �,,.� i ,.> � y _ ' ,� L ' �,-r�E�r � � �J L /� /,
� L`�ylSk ��'
�.. -�� �� ,,.� �����; �.; �� r� �� � � iv � �% lz �,.� ��- �
r
�� � � �, ��,� �� ,��
��(�) ,y �� � G` �� l�� � t,
,
G-� �'�
, _J , �� - , � 1�� ���
/ , . � � z�r�^����-.�„ �i �, -� �`' �-
�, ,
�
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
CfTY OF
FRIDLEY
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or ,
treatment, or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, seY, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regazd to public
assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to
- participate in any of Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require au�ciliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at
572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of September 8, 2003
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Resolution Approving a Plat, PS #03-02, Theilmann
Estates, by Jeffrey Cruz, Meadowview Homes, for the
Purpose of Creating 8 Single Family Lots, Generally
Located at 1540 Rice Creek Road N.E. (Ward 2) -
..............................................
2. Approve Development Agreement Befinreen the
City of Fridley and Theodore Theilmann and
Jeffrey Cruz for the Property Generally Located
at 1540 Rice Creek Road N.E. (Ward 2) -
............................................................
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
3. Master Plan Amendment, MP #03-01, by
Mohagen/Hansen Architecturai Group, on Behaif
of Columbia Park Medical Group, to Amend the
Master Plan for Columbia Park Medical Center
Campus to Allow for Future Parking and Building
Expansion, Generally Located at 6341 University
AvenueN.E. (Ward 1) ........................................................................................ 23 - 24
4. Approve Amendment to the Comprehensive Sign Plan
for the East Moore Lake Shopping Plaza, Generally
Located at 1250 East Moore Lake Drive (Ward 2) ............................................. 25
5. Resolution Ordering Preliminary Plans,
Specifications and Estimates of the Costs
Thereof: North Park Neighborhood Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 2004 — 1 ................... ... 26 - 27
........................................
6. Resolution Certifying Certain Delinquent Utility
Services to the County Auditor for Collection
withthe 2004 Taxes ........................................................................................... 28 - 35
7. Resolution in Support of an Application for
a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise
Permit for Fridley American Legion, Post 303
(Ward 2) ....................................................................................................... 36 - 37
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003 PAGE 3
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
8. Claims ....................................................................................................... 38
,
�
9. Licenses ....................................................................................................... 39 - 40
10. Estimates ....................................................................................................... 41
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items not on Agenda — 15 minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS: �
11. Consideration of the Assessment for
the 2003 Nuisance Abatement Project
(Continued October 13, 2003) ........................................................................... 42 - 43
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003 PAGE 4
PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED):
�
12. Consideration of the Assessment for Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 2003 — 1 .............................................................. 44 - 46
OLD BUSINESS:
13. Resolution Adopting the Assessment for the
2003 Nuisance Abatement (Tabied October 13,
2003) ....................................................................................................... 47 - 49
14 Resolution Adopting the Assessment for the
2002 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 2002 — 1
(Tabled October 13, 2002) ................................................................................. 50 - 58
NEW BUSINESS:
15. Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-07, by Michael
Juaire, PMJ Group, Inc., to Replat Property to
Accommodate a Four-Unit Townhome Developmerrt,
Generally Located at 1215 Norton Avenue -
N.E. (Ward 2) ..................................................................................................... 59 - 65 -
�
16. Informal Status Reports ..................................................................................... 66
ADJOURN.
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
<s . � -
-
��
�
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or
employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex_
disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regazd to public assistance. Upon request.
accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services.
programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who
require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of September 8, 2003
�
, ��-� � ���Q�- %�,�� �'���
���� � � �:' �k � �
,
NEW BUSINESS: � �
1. Resolution Approving a Plat, PS #03-02, Theilmann
Estates, by Jeffrey Cruz, Meadowview Homes, for the
Purpose of Creating 8 Single Family Lots, Generally
Located at 1540 Rice Creek Road N.E.
(Ward 2) .................................. 1 - 4
��y ��� _�
2. Approve Development Agreement Between the
City of Fridley and Theodore Theilmann and
Jeffrey Cruz for the Property Generally Located
at 1540 Rice Creek Road N.E.
(VVard 2) .................................. 5 - 22
�3 � Master Plan Amendment, MP #03-01, by
-� Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group, on Behalf
of Columbia Park Medical Group, to Amend the
Master Plan for Columbia Park Medical Center
Campus to Allow for Future Parking and Building
Expansion, Generally Located at 6341 University
Avenue N.E. (Ward 1) ........................ 23 - 24
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
4. Approve Amendment to the Comprehensive Sign Plan
for the East Moore Lake Shopping Plaza, Generaily
Located at 1250 East Moore Lake Drive
(Ward 2) .................................. 25
5. Resolution Ordering Preliminary Plans,
Specifications and Estimates of the Costs
Thereof: North Park Neighborhood Street
Improvement Project No. ST.
2004 —1 ................................... 26 - 27
55� ���
6. Resolution Certifying Certain Delinquent Utility
Services to the County Auditor for Collection.
with the 2004 Taxes .......................... 28 - 35
��_;�G2,�
7. Resolution in Support of an Application for
a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise
Permit for Fridley American Legion, Post 303
(Ward 2) ................................... 36 - 37
8. Claims
9. Licenses
.��-�OZ�
............................... 38
............................... 39 - 40
r . �.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: NEW BUSINESS:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
10. Estimates
ADOPTION OF AGENDA.
............................. 41
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Consideration of items not
on Agenda —15 minutes.
� ��j — ,2r��� �
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
u:�n� ����
11. Consideration of the Assessment for
the 2003 Nuisance Abatement Project
(Continued October 13, 2003) .......... 42 - 43
�rlt.� � �% �J�
12. Consideration of the Assessment for
Street Improvement Project No. ST.
2003 —1 ................................... 44 - 46
�'�,�- . � 1 � � :'
���
OLD BUSINESS:
13. Resolution Adopting the Assessment for the
2003 Nuisance Abatement (Tabled October 13,
2003) ................................... 47 - 49
`��c�^�'c�
14 Resolution Adopting the Assessment for the
2002 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 2002 —1
(Tabled October 13, 2002) ................. 50 - 58
a��:?�� � � � ���j�
15. Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-07, by Michael
Juaire, PMJ Group, Inc., to Replat Property to
Accommodate a Four-Unit Townhome Development,
Generally Located at 1215 Norton Avenue
N.E. (Ward 2) ................................... 59 - 65
��� �
16. informai Status Reports
ADJOURN.
[�:
t
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 8, 2003
The regular meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Lund at 7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Lund led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Lund, Councilmember Barnette, Councilmember Billings,
Councilmember Wolfe and Councilmember Bolkcom
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Lund read and presented a proclamation for Patriot Day on September 11, 2003.
Mayor Lund read and presented a proclamation for pomestic Violence Awareness Month,
October, 2003.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of August 11, 2003.
APPROVED.
OLD BUSINESS:
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-40 DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2002-1.
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said the City proposed to assess property owners
$109,897.52 of the total project cost of $681,535.83. The assessment was 16% of the
total cost. The average cost to the 97 property owners for ten years at 6'/z% interest was
$1,132.96. Staff recommended Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2003-40.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 2
2. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-=�1 DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF THE HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. ST. 2002 —1.
Dr. William Burns, City Nlanager, said the public hearing was scheduled for October 13,
2003. Staff recommended Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2003-41.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 — 42 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE ASSESS-
MENT ROLL FOR THE 2003 NUISANCE ABATEMENT.
Dr. Williams Burns, City Manager, said the public hearing was scheduled for October 13,
2003. Staff recommended Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2403-42.
4. RESOLUTION 2003-43 DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON THE
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 2003 NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said the public hearing was scheduled for October 13,
2003. Staff recommended Council's approvaL
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2003-43.
5. RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA,
ADOPTING A 2003 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2004
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said the resolution was for the renewal of a 19961evy
to support the HRA's revolving loan program for property rehabilitation. It was a market
value levy equal to .0144% of the estimated market value of taxable property in Fridley.
The levy cost the owner of a$175,000 home about $25 per year. The levy would generate
approximately $247,100 in 2003. The Fridley HRA approved the levy at their September
4, 2003, meeting. Staff recommended Council's approval.
THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED
ON THE REGULAR AGENDA.
6. CLAIMS
APPROVED CLAIM NOS. 113065 THROUGH 113332.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003
7. LICENSES
APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE.
8. ESTIMATES
APPROVED THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATES:
' Hardrives, Inc.
14475 Quiram Drive
_ Rogers, MN 55374-9461
2003 Street Improvement — Marian Hills
Project No. ST. 2003 —1
Estimate No. 3
Midwest Asphalt Corp.
5929 Bake Road, Suite 420
Minnetonka, MN 55345
Hickory Drive Watermain Replacement
Project No. 350
Estimate No. 1
Creative Curb Contractors LLC
64358 — 375�' Street
Watkins, MN 55389
2003 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair
Project No. 351
Estimate No. 3
$191,897.95
$ 48,958.40
$ 4,135.45
PAGE 3
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Barnette asked that Item No. 5 be removed and placed on the regulaz agenda.
Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive N.E., asked if the nuisance assessment would affect
all residents.
Dr. Burns, City Manager, said that it was a special assessment that was being levied against
individuals whose nuisances were abated and did not apply to the City at large.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adopt the proposed consent agenda with the removal of
Item No. 5. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 4
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
i�IOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adopt the agenda with the addition of Item No. 5.
Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OPEN FORU�1, VISITORS:
NIr. Blaine Jones, 54 Locke Lake Road N.E., invited Council, staff and the audience to Art at
Rice Creek at the Banfill-Locke Center on Sunday, September 14 from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
9. CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING SANITARY SEWER RATES IN EXCESS
OF THE INDEX PROVIDED IN THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and
open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNAIVIMOUSLY.
Mr. Richard Pribyl, Finance Director, said the resolution was for a proposed sanitary sewer
increase. Pursuant to the City Charter, any increase in utility rates that would exceed the defined
index would need voter approval. The index for 2004 would provide for a 1.8% increase in the
rates. The City would like to increase the rate by an additional 7.2% or 17 cents per thousand
gallons of waste disposed. With the 1.8% increase, the sanitary sewer fund would incur a loss of
approximately $222,000. The City of Fridley experienced a 3 percent increase in the cost of
waste water disposal fees and a 6.1 % increase in the annual waste water permit fee charged by
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for the discharge of City-wic�e sewage to their
treatment plants. The City requested a rate increase for the sole purpose of reducing the operating
loss for the year 2004. In order to provide for the possibility of raising the rates by an additional
7.2% in excess of the index, the resolution that was on the agenda called for an election on this -
issue. The public hearing notice was published �hree times.
Councilmember Barnette asked why the rates increased.
Mr. Pribyl said that in the sanitary sewer fund, the bulk of the expenditures were to Met Council
Environmental Services.
Dr. Burns explained that the rest of the budget for 2004 was than it was for 2003.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER S, 2003 PAGE 5
Councilmember Barnette asked if the City had a choice in paying the fee to Met Council.
Mr. Pribyl said the fee had to be paid to the Met Council because that was how Fridley got rid of
its waste.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked how Fridley's rates compared to other cities.
Mr. Pribyl said that Fridley was at the lower eighth of the list of inetropolitan communities. The
' current sewer rate was $2.37 per thousand gallons. The City proposed to increase it to $2.58 per
thousand with the 7.2% increase.
Councilmember Billings asked if the Charter allowed the City to pass on the costs that were
presented by other agencies.
Attorney Frederic Knaak, City Attomey, said to the best of his knowledge, any increase in utility
rates had to go to the electorate. He said the Charter specifically read that fees included utility
charges.
Councilmember Billings asked about having a separate line item on the billing statement that
delineated the Metropolitan Council charge.
Attorney Knaak said because of the language in Chapter 3 of the City Charter, that option would
not be available to the City.
Councilmember Billings said if the Metropolitan Council raised the fees 50% and the voters of
the City of Fridley decided that they did not want to pay that amount, then the fees would need to
come from the general budget.
Attorney Knaak said they would according to the Charter.
Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive N.E., said that any new fees or taxes have to go
before the voters. He said the City should pay the additional fees for increased storm sewer
charges.
_ Mr. Robert Scattarelli, 661 Marigold Terrace N.E., asked if there would be an advertisement if
the item were a balloted question.
" Mayor Lund said it would be advertised as required.
Dr. Burns said the item would also be published in the City newsletter.
Mr. Scattarelli asked if the storm sewer charges could only be increased up to 7.2% pursuant to
the Charter.
Mr. Pribyl said that 1.8% was what the rate could be increased per the City Charter and 7.2%
was the amount that would bring the City up to 9% with the voter-approved portion.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003
Mr. Scattarelli said that he did not want to see the general fund reduced.
PAGE 6
Dr. Burns said that the City would first take funds from the sewer fund reserves. However, those
reserves were set aside for the replacement of depreciated items in the sewer facilities and
provided working capital for that fund.
Mr. Scattarelli asked what the City would do to recover the additional costs if the referendum did
not pass this year.
Dr. Burns said that the sewer fund reserves would probably be drawn down or the City could
decide not to do some capital improvements.
Councilmember
municipal electi
election" meant.
Billings said that fee increases should be put on the ballot on the next regular
on. He asked Attorney Knaak to define what "the next regular municipal
Attorney Knaak said the "next regular municipal election" was something that was defined in the
City Charter under Section 402. He said there were two essential restrictions: regular municipal
elections must be held every even numbered year, although it was not required that they be held
only in even number years, and in addition, they had to be held on the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November at such place or places that the City Council designated.
Councilmember Billings said that as long as the election was on the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November, it did not make a difference whether it was an even or odd year. It was a
regular municipal election as long as it was set by the City Council.
Mr. Knaak said that if the City Council set an election on that date, even in an odd numbered
year, it was a regular municipal election under the Charter.
Mr. Jerold Bahls, 7514 Alden Way N.E., asked if it was counted as a"no" vote if the vote was
held on a presidential election year, and the voters missed it on their ballot. He said it would be
better to hold the election in 2003 rather than 2004.
Attorney Knaak said the City Charter indicated that 51 % of all votes cast were needed for the
measure to pass.
Mr. Scattarelli asked if the voting machines would know if a voter missed a question.
Councilmember Billings said the voting machine only read a yes or no vote. It did not read a
missed question.
Mr. Bahls asked what the cost would be to have an election in 2003 versus 2004.
Ms. Deb Skogen, City Clerk, said the cost would be about the same.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 7
Ms. Nancy Jorgenson, 5730 Polk Street N.E., asked if there was any historical data on voter
falloff between the presidential year, when the question was at the bottom of the ballot, versus a
special election.
Ms. Skogen, said there was usually about a 20 to 30% falloff of people who did not vote on City
or County issues.
Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, suggested putting it on the ballot in 2004.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember
Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING STORM WATER RATES IN EXCESS OF
THE INDEX PROVIDED IN THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and
open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Richard Pribyl, Finance Director, said in 2004, the City could only raise the storm water rate
by 1.8%. The City would like to increase the rate above and beyond the 1.8% by an additional
7.2%. There would be an increase of 88 cents per residential customer per yeaz. The operations
for 2002 resulted in a net operating loss of $87,000. It was projected that with the 1.8%
proposed increase, the storm water fund would still incur a loss of approximately $80,000. This
fund had been eYperiencing increased costs resulting from federal mandates associated with the
national pollutant discharge elimination system. The City of Fridley continued to perform
maintenance and upgrades to help protect City streets and neighborhoods from flooding. The
City requested a rate increase for the sole purpose of reducing the operating loss for the year
2004. The public hearing notice was published three times.
Mr. Robert Scattarelli, 661 Marigold Tenace N.E., asked if this was on the ballot, would there be
two questions, one for storm sewer and one for storm water.
Mayor Lund said there were potentially three questions.
Mr. Malcolm Mitchell, 1225 Regis Lane N.E., asked what it would cost the City if it were not
put on the ballot this year.
Mr. Pribyl said that in the year 2002, the City lost $87,000. He said there would be an
approximate loss of $84,000 for 2004. In 2003, the City would lose approximately $40,000.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 8
Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive N.E., said that the City had to live on the budget
according to the Charter. He suggested eliminating some of the parks and building houses on
park land.
MOTION made by Councilmember Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11. CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING WATER RATES IN EXCESS OF THE
INDEX PROVIDED IN THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and
open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNA1vIMOUSLY.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, said that with respect to the water utility fund, the index for 2004
would only provide for an increase of 1.8% in the rates. The City was asking for an additional
7.2% or 8 cents per thousand gallons above what was allowed by the City Charter. The City
needed to upgrade the main water filtration plant to meet stricter guidelines imposed by the
Federal EPA for the removal of Radium 226 and Radium 228 from the City's water supply. The
City also needed to replace the 1.5 million gallon water storage tank that was constructed in 1953
which provided water pressure to the eastern third of the City. It was projected that with the
1.8% increase, the water fund will incur approximately a loss of $180,000. The City requested a
rate increase for the sole purpose of reducing the operating loss for the year 2004. The 7.2%
equated to an annual increase of $5.76 per average residential consumer of 18,000 gallons per
quarter. The public hearing notice was published three times. If the vote failed this fall, the City
would need to use funds that had been set aside for cash flow and replacement of infrastructure.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked how Fridley compared to other cities with respect to water rates.
Mr. Pribyl said that of the 108 communities that were surveyed, Fridley was the lowest. If this
passed, Fridley would be around 106.
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said that the planned appropriation for 2004 was less than
what was budgeted for 2003 by about $88,000.
Councilmember Billings asked what the cost would be to repair the water tank.
Mr. Jon Haukaas, Public Works Director, said that a consultant was hired to conduct a study on
repairing the water tank. He said the consultant determined that the tank had deteriorated much
worse than was originally thought. The estimated cost to repair the existing tank would be
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 9
$650,000 and would last about 15 years. The cost of a brand new tank, with a life expectancy of
75 to 100 years, would be about $550,000.
Councilmember Billings asked if the increase was enough to pay for the $�50,000 tank. He
asked of the fees would be lowered in 2005.
Mr. Pribyl said that the cost was spread over future yeazs. In this particular case, the tank had a
life of approximately 30 to 50 years. The amount would be spread over the next 30 to 50 years.
The tank was paid for in the year in which it was constructed, but on the income statement, the
expense was spread over whatever the life expectancy was for the fixed asset.
Councilmember Billings said the City was not raising taxes to pay for the tank in one yeaz. The
City was raising the rates because that was what it was going to take from now and into the
future.
Mr. Pribyl said the cost was going to be spread well into the future. If the City needed to pay for
the tank in one year and have the rates reflect that, it would be too expensive.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Haukaas what it cost to repair a water main in the City.
Mr. Haukaas said that a water main replacement project that might be done as a capital
improvement project would cost $160,000 for a 1,000-foot long water main repair.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the City would experience more water main replacement
projects in the future, since it was an older community.
Mr. Haukaas said it would.
Mr. Robert Scattarelli, 661 Marigold Terrace N.E., asked what the total increase would be for
homeowners if all three rate increases were passed.
Mr. Pribyl said it would be approximately $24.00 per year for an average home, based on 18,000
gallons of water per quarter for water and sewer.
Mr. Timothy Byrne, 6053 Woody Lane N.E., said that utilities were an essential public service.
He asked what would be cut out of the budget.
Dr. Burns said there was not much to eliminate out of the budget. It would first come out of the
City's reserves. He said when the City lowered the reserves, they were lowering the amount of
money for working capital and for other projects. If there was no money in the reserves to serve
as security for bonding, the City's interest rate for bonds would be hi�her.
Mr. Byrne said if the election failed, the City would still need to pay for the increase in utilities.
If the election was held next year, the City would have more time to decide where to cut the
budget.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 10
Dr. Burns said that for one year, it would come out of the utility reserves. He said that even with
the rate increase, compared to other communities, the City would have some of the lowest rates.
Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6�35 Oakley Drive N.E. asked how much was in the reserve fund.
Dr. Burns said there was approximately $2.8 million in both the water and sewer reserves. T`he
general fund was around $4 million.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember
Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OLD BUSINESS:
12. RESOLUTION DECLARING A QUESTION TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT
AT THE NEXT REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION, TO LEVY A TAX WHICH
IS IN EXCESS OF THE INFLATIONARY INDEX FOR TAX LEVY
REQUIREMENTS FOR 2004 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR
COLLECTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUING PROGRAMMING AT
SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER (TABLED AUGUST 25, 2003).
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to remove this item from the table. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Richard Pribyl, Finance Director, said the State legislature cut state aid funds during the last
legislative session. The total reduction of state aid for 2004 would be $1,103,605. The City was
required to provide a draft budget for 2004. One of the major cost reduction plans was to
eliminate the naturalist programming at the Springbrook Nature Center. It appeazed that a
number of citizens would like to see the City place a question before the voters regarding a levy
of $275,000 in added taxes to support the programming, maintenance, and administration of the
naturalist programming at Springbrook Nature Center. The resolution committed the City to the
election process. The public hearing was held on August 25, 2003. The question as presented
was: "The Council of the City of Fridley has proposed to increase its ta�c levy for general City
purposes by $275,000 beyond the index limit allowed by the City of Fridley Charter. The
additional revenue would be used to fund the administration, maintenance, and programming of
the Springbrook Nature Center. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be
applicable as a permanent levy indexed by the same limits imposed on the general tax levy as set
out in Section 7.01 of the City of Fridley City Charter."
Councilmember Bolkcom said that at the last meeting, staff was asked to come back with some
different options.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 11
Attorney Frederic Knaak, City Attorney, said that there were four options and language
suggestions for Council's consideration: (1) Leave the resolution language as is which would
levy $275,000 which must be spent on the Nature Center; (2) the "up to" option, which was a
more fleYible option that would designate an amount up to the $275,000, but under the operation
of the City Charter, whatever the amount was that was designated would then become a fixed
amount that would be subject to the limitations and tercns of increases annually on the part of the
City Charter, (3) the same as Option No. 2, but included an additional complicating factor which
was in order to be able to vary the amount levied from year to year, the City would have to
amend the Charter, (4) levy the $275,000 with the understanding that the funds would go into
the general fund, but would be utilized for the Springbrook Nature Center.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked Attorney Knaak if an election in 2003 would be considered a
regular municipal election.
Attorney Knaak, said it would.
Councilmember Billings asked what happened if the City was able to come up with admission
fees or other types of fees.
Attorney Knaak, said that issue was raised at the public hearing. The Charter language did not
govern fees that were charged for recreational purposes, so those fees could be raised without
changing the City Charter.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the Charter could be amended as a ballot question.
Attorney Knaak said there were different ways to amend the Charter.
Councilmember Barnette said he felt there was value in postponing the election on Springbrook
and the utility issues until 2004. He was in favor of using a limited amount of money during
2003 to keep the Springbrook Nature Center open.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked where the funding would come from.
Councilmember Barnette said it could come out of reserves.
Mayor Lund said that a petition had been signed by many citizens.
Councilmember Wolfe said that he did not feel that all of the information that had gotten out
about Springbrook Nature Center was correct and some residents had been misinformed. He
indicated that he called 123 people who signed the petition and 119 of them thought keeping
Springbrook a passive park was a good idea. He stated if there were 3,000 people who supported
Springbrook Nature Center, it would cost each of those people $7.65 a month to keep the
programming open at Springbrook Nature Center.
Mr. Malcolm Mitchell, 1225 Regis Lane N.E., Chair of the Springbrook Nature Center
Foundation Board, said they were very interested in getting information out that was as accurate
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 12
as possible. He said the petition was cleaz. He said 3,000 people signed the petition, but that
was not all of the households in Fridley. He said they were interested in an election this year. It
would save the City money. He said the City should let the voters decide this fall.
Councilmember Wolfe said that what was written on the petition was correct, but people were
told different things.
Mr. Mitchell said the purpose of the petition was to ask the City Council to put the issue on the
November ballot.
Councilmember Wolfe said that 119 people were told that Springbrook was being shut down
completely. They were not told it was going to be a passive park and when they found out, they
were fine with it. They thought it was going to be shut down completely. He said
Councilmember Barnette mentioned partial funding. If that was the case, the position of every
person who was being let go from the City should be funded.
Mr. Mitchell said to let the people decide.
Mr. Richard Coleman, 188 River Edge Way N.E., said that with respect to changing the
resolution language, he could not support putting the referendum money into the general fiznd.
He asked what the Parks and Recreation budget was for the upcoming year. If Springbrook was
included with that, it would allow some of the funds to be redirected so less money would have
to be spent from the general fund towazd other parks and recreation items. It might give the City
more flexibility.
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said the 2004 budget for Parks and Recreation was $776,203.
Mr. Coleman said if the language was added, it would be for greater flexibility in working with
the funds from the levy.
Attorney Knaak said the City could add language to include other parks so that the language
would read, "the additional revenue would be used to fund administration, maintenance and
programming of Springbrook Nature Center and other park and recreation programs in the City."
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the Springbrook supporters would be concerned with the
amount of the referendum the City would use for Springbrook and that some of it might be used
for other parks.
Mr. Coleman said trust would have to exist between the citizens and the City Council. Most
people would be concerned if the referendum money went into the general fund that it would get
lost in a large pool of money. This would be a compromise, and most of the supporters would be
more comfortable if the money was earmarked for parks and recreation and the preservation of
Springbrook Nature Center.
Councilmember Bolkcom said there was concern about where the money was that the
Foundation raised, how much was being spent and how much revenue came from programs.
FRIDLEY CITY_COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 13
Ms. Patricia Freeburg, �557 East Danube Road N.E., said her home backed up against Farr Lake
Park. Two years ago the walkway subsided two feet in one section and she called to get the
walkway fixed. One year later, they put in one foot of blacktop. She said it was still a hole. She
said if the City could not maintain that park, the City would not maintain Springbrook as a
passive park.
Dr. Burns said there was $30,000 budgeted in 2003 in the capital improvements fund to rebuild
the path in Fan Lake Park, but the City decided as a budget cutting measure, not to do the
. project. He said one of the reasons more wark had not been done at that park, was that it had
been identified as a capital improvements project for replacernent.
� Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6�35 Oakley Drive N.E., suggested that the City solicit donations from
big organizations.
Mr. Pete Meyerhoff, 1350 Hillcrest Drive N.E., said that by eliminating the programming and
the staff at Springbrook, you would effectively be closing it. He said he supported putting a
referendum on the ballot in 2003.
Ms. Jeanette Lindquist, 1326 Hillcrest Drive N.E., said it bothered her that people who were not
residents of Fridley signed the petition. She thought maybe some other cities should contribute.
Councilmember Wolfe said that no other city they had spoken with would contribute toward the
Springbrook Nature Center.
Councilmember Bolkcom said there were a lot of other communities who used the Nature
Center, but there were also a lot of people from other communities who volunteered at the
Nature Center. She said she asked some of the people who sent her e-mails if they lived in the
City of Fridley, and if not, would they be willing to pay a user fee or parking fee. People who did
not live in the community said they were more than willing to pay a user fee and a parking fee.
There are also people who use Moore Lake who do not live in the City. People use our softball
fields and soccer fields and although they pay a league fee, they use our pazks. She thought the
whole idea behind the petition was not only to show the people who were actually eligible to
vote, but to show that there was wide-range support from other communities.
Mr. Robert Scattarelli, 661 Marigold Terrace N.E., asked how long it would take to recoup the
funds taken out of the general fund for Springbrook.
Dr. Burns said that the City was already deficit financing and had been for a number of years.
Over the last five years including 2004, the City used $5 million. There was no way to make up
that money. The State legislature limited the amount of property taxes that could be levied back.
The City was allowed to levy back 60% of the lost 20041ocal government aid; however, the City
could not levy back the 2003 losses. There was no guaxantee that the City would be able to levy
back 2005. The City had very few other revenue tools. Property taxes were pretty much it.
Fridley was a fully evolved community, so the City could not gain tax base by an aggressive
economic development effort. He said much of the City's economic development was cash-user
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 14
rather than cash-gainer because redevelopment cost much more money than it ever would bring
in.
Mr. Scattarelli said he supported holding the election in 2004 because it would be more fair to
the voters.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked what should be done with the Nature Center if it was not put on
the ballot this year.
Mr. Scattarelli said he would put some of the money back and try to keep it open as best he could
in the interim until the election.
Mr. Stan Mraz, 6180 Benjamin Street N.E., said he spoke on behalf of the children. He said his
son would be visiting the Springbrook Nature Center with his school, and was elated to be taking
his first field trip there. He said the Nature Center had education programs for many people.
The City needed to keep the Nature Center with whatever measures are necessary. He said the
City needed to look to the future on behalf of the children.
Mr. Richard Lindquist, 1326 Hillcrest Drive N.E., asked if a study had been done on how many
people went to Springbrook during the year and how much would the user fee should be.
Mayor Lund said there were about 150,000 visits to Springbrook or 22,000 different people
making the 150,000 visits, but it was unknown about user fees.
Mr. Don Anderson, 8429 Fridley Terrace, said he worked at the Work Force Center asked why
the City was laying off workers at the Nature Center.
Mayor Lund said it cost money and they were looking at ways to cut the budget.
Councilmember Bolkcom said money was used to maintain the trails.
Councilmember Billings said there are a number of options. He said he would like to see the
City Council fund Springbrook Nature Center in the amount of $175,000 through the budget
process and initiate user fees. If there were 150,000 using the Nature Center, he _believed
$75;000 could be raised in user fees. The two amounts combined would be $250,000 and at that
level, $30,000 to $40,000 could be raised in other use fees from the current programs. By July
and August of next year, the City would have a better picture of what needed to be put on the
ballot. He said he did not want to deny the citizens an opportunity to vote, but they should have
the opportunity to vote on numbers that had been tried instead of the full $275,000. He said they
needed time to look at all of the possibilities and options for Springbrook, including user fees,
and possibly occupational-related therapy. Giving it a year and partially funding it and charging
user fees was the first step in that direction.
Councilmember Barnette asked the City Attorney if there was a problem legally if they passed a
resolution to place this matter on the ballot in November of 2004.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 15
Attorney Knaak said there would not be a problem.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there was a problem with including language that said up to
$275,000.
Attorney Knaak said there was nothing that required that an amount be set immediately. At
some point the County would need to be told what the levy would be. If the assumption was that
it would be put on the ballot, the "up to" language would keep it flexible. If the amount was not
set, a levy could not be set. He said the "up to" language avoided the issue of $275,000
regardless of whether it was determined that amount was needed. It deferred the decision of
what the amount actually was up to the point that it was actually levied.
Councilmember Barnette said he was in favor of partial funding and putting it on the ballot in
November, 2004. He said if it went to the ballot and did not pass, it would become a passive
park.
Councilmember Billings said if they were able to raise money through user fees, if they were
able to trim expenditures without damaging the programs too much and if they were able to get
money from other sources, an amount lower than $275,000 could be put on the ballot.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if a resolution would be passed that said it would be put on the
ballot in 2004.
Councilmember Billings asked if a resolution was passed for up to $275,000 to go on the ballot
at the regular municipal election of 2004, would that language go on the ballot.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the resolution could be amended next year.
Ms. Deb Skogen, City Clerk, said the resolution that was on the agenda was for the 2004 budget
levy year. If it was going to be postponed, there was no need to pass the resolution.
Councilmember Barnette asked if it could be done in a year.
Attorney Knaak said it could if that was the next regular municipal election. If there was a
regular municipal election this year and the resolution passed, it would have to be on the ballot. -
Councilmember Barnette said he would support delaying the decision for a year if the utility
referendums were also delayed for a yeaz.
Ms. Skogen said a question had been asked earlier about the falloff from the presidential election
of 2000. She said there was a 13.8 percent falloff from the presidential vote to the mayor vote,
for councilmember-at-large there was a 19 percent falloff, and for the charter amendment, there
was a 10 percent falloff. She said if a resolution was adopted to put the matter on the ballot in
2004, the ta�c levy requirements would be for 2005 and not 2004.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 16
Mr. Mitchell said that the Foundation and the supporters of Springbrook would prefer that a
motion be made for an election in 2003. He said it was important for Council to make their
intent clear. It was essential that 2003 funding be extended for 2004. He stated they were
willing to do their shaze. His recommendation was that they look at a 12% cut off the $300,000
amount. He said they felt it was important to maintain three things. The first was the revenue
stream that was Springbrook Nature Center's contribution back to the general fund. The second
was the programs that were offered. The third was the staff. Cutting one would affect the others.
He suggested the amount of $210,000 rather than $175,000. The Foundation Board would
commit to help raise the difference. They felt that if the programs were cut significantly before
the voters had a chance to decide, they would in effect be making a decision for the voters. He
said with respect to Councilmember Billing's proposal, it would initially be hard to initiate and
raise $75,000 in fees in one year.
Councilmember Wolfe said if there were 150,000 visitors and they were charged $1.00, it would
be more than that amount.
Mr. Mitchell said there were costs to administering the fees.
Councilmember Bolkcom said there was a budget work session that would be held in October
and there was some time before that meeting to work together.
Mr. Mitchell agreed but said he disagreed with the determination that $175,000 would maintain
the programs.
Councilmember Billings said he suggested $175,000 from the general fund and suggested that
$75,000 could be raised in user fees based on the numbers that were given to the City Council.
The total would be $250,000.
Mr. Mitchell asked that they look at the amount of $200,000 plus the $50,000 in revenue that
was there and the difference being made up of fees and any other kind of revenue. He said they
would work with Council but were getting frustrated with the process.
Councilmember Bolkcom said that Springbrook had not been cut from anything over the nine
years she had been on the Council. _She said they needed to work together on this matter.
Dr. Burns said that when the budget was prepared, they had a very good reason to believe that
there was a serious financial problems with the cuts from the state level. There have also been
some changes since June when we first looked at the budget. Other cities have indicated that
they would have employee cost of living adjustments. Health insurance rates would be 16 to 25
percent more than what we thought they would be. We may not get grant money for breathing
apparatus for the firefighters. He said to say they were going to spend money on the
Springbrook Nature Center without comparing that with the other priorities was not in the best
interests of the City.
Councilmember Barnette asked if a resolution was adopted placing it on the November, 2004,
ballot, could the figure of "up to" $275,000 be left in the language.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8. 2003 PAGE 17
Mayor Lund asked if a motion could be made to commit to a referendum in 2004 but not include
a dollar amount.
Councilmember Barnette said a dollar figure would have to be included.
Attorney Knaak agreed.
Councilmember Billings said the Mayor suggested that we pass a resolution committing that the
City Council would put some number on the ballot in 2004.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if that could be done with a time certain included. The present
resolution would be tabled and a resolution adopted which indicated support for the 2004 ballot
question and that the language would be provided no later than July of 2004. She said there
would be an opportunity before the next budget work session to work on a dollaz amount.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to table the Resolution Declaring a Question to be
Placed on the Ballot at the NeYt Regular Municipal Election, to Levy a Tax which is in Excess of
the Inflationary Index for Tax Levy Requirements for 2004 to the County of Anoka for
Collection for the Purpose of Continuing Programming at Springbrook Nature Center. Seconded
by Councilmember Wolfe.
Attorney Knaak said they could table the resolution for a time certain. He said it would put this
specific item on the agenda in July.
Mr. Mitchell asked what it did for the ability of the Springbrook Foundation to raise money from
other sources when there was no figure to use as a base.
Councilmember Bolkcom said they would after they have had a chance to meet.
Councilmember Wolfe asked if the goal would be to raise as much as possible every year.
Mr. Mitchell said that what Council seemed to be saying was that whatever money they raised as
a Foundation would get put back into the operating budget of Springbrook Nature Center. The
purpose and mission of the foundation was to help with that.
Councilmember Billings said that in his proposal he said $175,000 from the general fund and
$75,000 from admission fees. He did not want the Nature Center to depend on contributions
from outside sources or the ability of the Springbrook Foundation to raise funds in order to be
able to keep the operation going. He said he was talking about finding ways of financing the
operations, the maintenance, etc., from tax dollars and from admission or user fees. He said he
did not think this was a departure from what people were used to. Other parks chazged fees.
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to table the Resolution Declaring a Question to be
Placed on the Ballot at the Next Regular Municipal Election, to Levy a Tax Which is in Excess
of the Inflationary Index for Tax Levy Requirements for 2004 to the County of Anoka for
Collection for the Purpose of Continuing Programming at Springbrook Nature Center until the
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 18
first meeting in July, 2004, and direct staff to make the necessary updates in the language.
Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings:
Be it resolved that the City Council for the City of Fridley, Minnesota, intends to -
place an item on the November, 2004, ballot regarding funding for Springbrook
Nature Center.
Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
13. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-44 CERTIFYING PROPOSED TAX LEVY
REQUIREMENTS FOR 2004 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA (TABLED
AUGUST 25, 2003).
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to remove this item from the table. Seconded by
Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNAlvIMOUSLY.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt Resolution No. 2003-44 and amend it by striking
the line "General Fund (Additional Levy for Springbrook Nature Center) $275,000" and change
"Total All Funds" to $6,483,�45. Seconded by Councilmember Ann Bolkcom.
Councilmember Bolkcom asked if that was the ma�cimum amount that could be levied.
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, said it was. _.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
14. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-45 ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET. FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2004 (TABLED AUGUST 25, 2003).
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to remove this item from the table. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED 'I'�€E
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 19
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to adopt Resolution No. 2003-45. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V4TING AYE, NIAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
NTOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS:
15. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES FOR THE REGULAR
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 4, 2003.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to deny the Resolution Designating Polling Places for the
Regular Municipal Election to be Held November 4, 2003. Seconded by Councilmember Ann
Bolkcom.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNAl�TIMOUSLY.
16. RESOLUTION DECLARING A QUESTION TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT
AT THE NEXT REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO INCREASE
SANITARY SEWER RATES IN EXCESS OF THE INFLATIONARY INDEX OR
5%, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 7.02 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to deny the Resolution Declaring a Question to be Placed
on the Ballot at the Next Regular Municipal Election to Increase Sanitary Sewer Rates in Excess
of the Inflationary Index or 5%, Whichever is Less, as Required by Section 7.02 of the Fridley
City Charter. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNAIVIMOUSLY.
17. RESOLUTION DECLARING A QUESTION TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT
- AT THE NEXT REGULAR MiJNICIPAL ELECTION TO INCREASE STORM
WATER RATES IN EXCESS OF THE INFLATIONARY �NDEX OR 5%,
WHICHEVER IS LESS, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 7.02 OF THE FRIDLEY
CITY CHARTER.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings to deny the Resolution Declaring a Question to be Placed
on the Ballot at the Next Regular Municipal Election to Increase Storm Water Rates in Excess of
the Inflationary Index or 5%, Whichever is Less, as Required by Section 7.02 of the Fridley City
Charter. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 20
18. RESOLUTION DECLARING A QUESTION TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT
AT THE NEXT REGULAR NIUNICIPAL ELECTION TO INCREASE WATER
RATES IN E�CESS OF THE I�iFLATIONARY INDEX OR 5%, WHICHEVER
IS LESS, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 7.02 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CHARTER.
MOTION by Councilmember Rick Wolfe to deny the Resolution Declaring a Question to be
Placed on the Ballot at the Next Regular Municipal Election to Increase Water Rates in Excess of
the Inflationary Index or 5%, Whichever is Less, as Required by Section 7.02 of the Fridley City
Charter. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-46 CONSENTING TO THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA, ADOPTING A 2003 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2004.
Mr. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said that at the last HRA meeting, one of
the HRA members, Mr. John Meyer, asked a question about not having the levy for the HRA to
rnake room for funds that could possibly go to the Springbrook Nature Center. He asked Council
to keep the issues distinct and to allow the HRA to continue their work with the levy.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 2003-46. Seconded by
Councilmember Bolkcom.
Mayor Lund asked how the HRA was going to continue to pay the City back on the loan.
Mr. John Meyer, 7868 Alden Way, N.E., member of the Fridley HRA. This issue was discussed
at the last HRA meeting. He said it had occurred to him that a way to alleviate some of the
budget problems might be to hold in abeyance the HRA levy for this year and some future times
as well, in order take some of the pressure off the City Council and to help the Springbrook
Nature Center. He said the levy for the HRA was about the same as the amount for the Nature
Center levy. He said this matter did not come to a.vote before the HRA.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNA1vIMOUSLY.
18A. MOTION FOR CITY STAFF TO WORK WITH THE SPRINGBROOK NATURE
CENTER FOUNDATION, THE FRIENDS OF SPRINGBROOK AND THE CITY
COUNCIL TO DEVELOP A DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR FUNDING FOR THE
YEAR 2004 AND TO HAVE A REPORT AVAILABLE BY THE OCTOBER 20,
2003, BUDGET WORK SESSION AND FOR CITY STAFF TO LEND THEIR
EXPERTISE IN HELPING TO LOOK AT ALTERNATE REVENUE SOURCES,
NOT ONLY TO INCLUDE USER FEES, BUT OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 21
MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom for City staff work with the Springbrook Nature Center
Foundation, the Friends of Springbrook and the Fridley City Council, to develop a dollar amount
for funding for the year 2004 and to have a report available by the October 20, 2003, budget
work session and that City staff lend their eYpertise in helping to look at alternate revenue
sources, not only to include user fees, but other sources of revenue. Seconded by Councilmember
Wolfe.
Mr. Mitchell said he did not want to have to discuss everything over again.
Councilmember Wolfe said he thought Councilmember Bolkcom's proposal was a good idea.
Mr. Mitchell said he felt the issue was being put off.
Mayor Lund said they needed time to work the differences out.
Dr. Burns said he was concerned with working things out one at a time. He said if they worked
this out and get committed to this issue and went to the budget work session on October 20, they
would be facing Values First, employee cost of living adjustments, and health insurance
increases. He thought it would become harder and harder to balance the interests.
Councilmember Billings said he thought any one of them could come out of reserves. It was just
a matter of how much would be taken out.
Dr. Burns said that should be reviewed at the same time.
Mayor Lund said they need to discuss all the factors at the budget work session on October 20,
not just Springbrook.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
19. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS.
Mayor Lund reminded the audience of the 9-11 event that would be held on Tt�ursday at 8:00
p.m. at the Fridley High School football field.
Mayor Lund said that Banfill-Locke would be holding their Art in the Park festival on Sunday
from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Dr. William Burns, City Manager, saicl that after the Council meeting staff would like to discuss
the Program Supervisor vacancy in the Recreation Department.
ADJOURNMENT.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember
Wolfe.
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 PAGE 22
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003, ADJOURNED AT 11:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Roberta S. Collins Scott J. Lund '
Secretary Mayor
0
0
/
�
qTY OF
FRIDLEY
Date
To:
AGENDA ITEM
C1TY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 13, 2003
October 7, 2003
William Burns, City Manager ��
�
From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator
Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Subject: Final Plat Request, PS #03-02, Jeffrey Cruz, Meadowview Homes
M-03-149
INTRODUCTION
On March 5, 2003, the Planning Commission considered plat request PS #03-02, by Ted
Theilmann. Ted Theilmann plans to replat the property located at 1540 Rice Creek Road
to create 8 single family lots. City Staff and the Planning Commission recommend
approval of plat request, PS #03-02, with 13 stipulations. At the March 24, 2003, City
Council meeting, the preliminary plat was approved, with 13 stipulations.
Since the approval of the preliminary plat, the property has been sold to Jeffrey Cruz, owner
of Meadowview Homes. Therefore, Jeffrey Cruz is requesting final plat approval to create
8 single-family lots at 1540 Rice Creek Road.
RECOMMENDATION
City Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of PS #03-03.
STIPULATIONS
1. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction.
2. Any remaining debris from demolition of existing home and any outdoor storage on
site shall be removed prior to granting of final plat.
3. Regular maintenance of the site to be done by the Developer until the homes are
built.
C!
5.
C�
Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to the
issuance of any building permits, in order to minimize impacts to the surrounding
properties.
Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems
located on the site are properly capped or removed.
During construction, silt fencing shall be used where applicable.
1
7. The petitioner shall provide easements as required by Section 211.07.21 of the City
Code.
8. The petitioner to pay $1, 500 per lot park fees prior to issuance of building permits.
9. The petitioner shall be responsible for the installation of sewer and water service
connections from property line to existing City utilities. Plan to be approved by
City's engineering department.
10. The petitioner shall agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All trees
required to be removed for the new homes shall be marked and approved by City
staff prior to issuance of building permits.
11.The petitioner shall wor{c with existing contours of the land and preserve existing
slopes to the extent possible.
12.A Development Agreement outlining the Developers obligation to install utilities, etc.
will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner, prior to final plat
approvaL
13.The petitioner shall hold a meeting with the neighborhood to go over the grading
and drainage plans prior to issuance of building permit.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAT, P.S. #03-02, THEILMANN ESTATES, BY
JEFFREY CRUZ, MEADOWVIEW HOMES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING 8 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1540 RICE CREEK ROAD
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 5,
2003, and recommended approval of said plat; and
�
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for THEILMANN
_ ESTATES at their March 24, 2003, meeting, with stipulations attached
as Exhibit A; and
�
WHEREAS, a copy of the plat THEILMANN ESTATES has been attached as
Exhibit B.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the
Final Plat for THEILMANN ESTATES and directs the petitioner to record
plat at Anoka County within six months of this approval or such
approval shall be null and void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 13�
DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
SCOTT LUND - MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK '. _ .
3
�
t
GTf OF
FRIDLEY
DATE:
TO:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETiNG OF OCTOBE��"2�, 2003
October 22, 2003
William W. Burns, City Manager I��
�
FROM: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator
Stacy Stromberg, Planner
SUBJECT: Development Agreement for Theilmann Estates
M-03-154
INTRODUCTION
On March 5, 2003, the Planning Commission considered piat request PS #03-02, by
Ted Theilmann. Ted Theilmann plans to replat the property located at 1540 Rice Creek
Road to create 8 single family lots. City Staff and the Planning Commission
recommend approval of plat request, PS #03-02, with 13 stipulations. At the March 24,
2003, City Council meeting, the preliminary plat was approved, with 13 stipulations.
Since the approval of the preliminary plat, the property has been sold to Jeffrey Cruz,
owner of Meadowview Homes. Therefore, Jeffrey Cruz is requesting final plat approval
to create 8 single-family lots at 1540 Rice Creek Road.
To be consistent in the plat process, staff has prepared a development agreement for
the Theilmann Estates. That development agreement has been attached for your
review and approvaL
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the enclosed development agreement as submitted.
5
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 2003, between
the Cifij of Fridley, acting through its Mayor and City Manager (hereinafter cailed the
"City"), and Theodore Theiimann, property owner of record, an� Jeffrey Cruz, developer,
(hereinafter collectively called the "Develope�').
WHEREAS, The Developer have made application to the City Councii for the
approval of a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City described as follows:
The North %2 of the West 132.47 feet, front and rear, thereof of the East %z of the
South Yz of the West'/� of the East %z of the Southeast Y. of Section 13, Township
30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. (Also described as the No�th %z of the
West 132.47 feet, front and rear thereof of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22).
Except that part lying Southerly of a line drawn 50 feet Northerly of and parallel
with the Southerly line of Briardale Road NE as platted in Rice Creek Estates.
And
Outlots A and B, Rice Creek Estates, Anoka County, Minnesota (the
"Subdivision"); and to be described as Theilmann Estates
WHEREAS, the City Council, by resolution # , adopted ,
2003, granted Developer's plat request for a portion of the property to allow it to
construct eight single family homes on the subdivision on the condition that the
subdivision is developed according to the site plan, dated , 2003, and in
accordance with stipulations of approval incorporated herein by reference (See attached
ExhibitC).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby agreed as
follows:
0
DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. Improvements to be installed at the
Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to
as "Deveivper Improvements". Improvements to be installed by the City and financed
through assessment procedures are hereinafter referred to as "Public Improvanents".
2. DEVELOPER'S ItiiPROVEMENTS. The Developer wili construct and install
at Developer's expense the foilowing improvements according to the following terms and
conditions:
A. The Developer shall retain a licensed professional engineer to design and
submit plans for approval by the City Engineer of all public and private site,
street, and utility improvements. The Developer shall be responsible for all
costs to design, construct, inspect, and administer the improvement
contract and be required to escrow funds as surety as listed in Exhibit B.
Public Improvements including street construction, watermain and services,
sanitary sewer main and services, and storm sewer shall be on a separate
set of plans from the private improvements to allow the City to bid and
construct the public improvements as a City project. All plans and original
survey information shall be provided to the City in an AutoCADD compatible
electronic foRnat.
B. The Developer shall do all site grading (unless othervvise determined and
approved by City Engineer), common greenway and open spaces, storm
water storage ponds and surface drainage ways inctuding sodding of
boulevards, all in accordance with the approved grading, drainage and
erosion control plan. A grading plan with maximum two-foot contours and
cross sections as necessary shall be submitted and approved by the City
prior to commencement of any site grading. The Developer shall be
required to provide finished (sodded) elevation stakes and hubs for all
drainage areas and any other a�eas as required by the City Engineer. The
location of the sod elevation staking and hubs are to be located at lot
corners and spaced every 20 feet. These locations must be submitted and
approved on the development plan and installed at the site prior to issuance
of any building permits.
C. The Developer shall control soil erosion insuring:
1. All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by
the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best
potential for preventing soil erosion. The Developer shall submit an
erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be
implemented during construction, said plan shall be approved by the
City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction.
2
7
2. Erosion and siltation controi measures shail be coo�dinated with the
different stages of development. Appropriate ccntroi measures as
required by the City shail be instailed prior to devebpment when
necessary to controi erosion.
Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that
adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as
construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall
be exposed at any one period of time.
4. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside
for respreading over the developed area and also seeded, mulched,
and disk anchored. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at
least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil
quality prior to development.
D. Upon issuance of a building permit for a lot, the Developer is responsible to
notify the builders and individual owners within the development that they
assume and are responsible for erosion control, including sodding of
boulevards, seeding or sodding of the front and side yards of all lots, Vee
protection and protection of water and sewer services. Such notification
shall not relieve the Devefoper of the responsibility for such items as
required under this contract. Any violation will be cause for red tagging fie
site by the City Building Official, or designee, and all inspections will cease
until coRected.
E. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block comers and
at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed
after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve
the lot markers for future properry owners.
F. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to
bring them flush with the topsoil (after grading}.
G. The Developer shall remove and/or treat all dead or diseased trees (as
determined by the CityForester) before building permits will be issued.
Burying or buming of trees or construction debris is not permitted on the
site. Trees, tree stumps, or construction debris shall be removed from the
plat. The Developer shall mow all tall grass and weeds on vacant lots and
boulevard areas periodically throughout the season or as required by the
City. Performance shall be guaranteed by the financial guarantee recited
herein.
H. The Developer shall be responsible for street maintenance, including curbs,
boulevards, sod and street sweeping until the project is complete. All
streets shall be maintained free of debris and soil until all lots wihin the
Subdivision have homes constructed upon them. Warning signs shall be
placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling
on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the street becomes
E��
impassibie, such streets shall be barricaded and cfosed. in the event
residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall
maintain a smooth driving surface and adequate drainage on ali temporary
streets. Performance shall be guaranteed by the financial guarartee recited
herein.
I. The Developer shall dedicate and survey all storm water holding ponds as
required by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for storm •sewer
cleaning and holding pond dredging, as required by the City, prior to
completion of the development. The Developer grants the City the right to
enter upon the property to perform all functions required under this contract
and City ordinances. Performance shall be guaranteed by the financial
guarantee recited herein.
J. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all necessary approvals
and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local
jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site gradng or construction and
prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public utilities.
K. The Developer shall make provisions that all gas, telephone, cable
television (if available) and electric utilities shall be installed to serve the
development.
L. On a comer lot, the front entrance shall face a designated front yard as
determined by the City and the assigned address.
M. The Developer shall construct a group of mailboxes of a uniform design that
is clustered at specific locations approved by the City and coordinated with
the United States Post Office.
N. Estimated cost of Developer's improvements, description and completion
dates are aslisted in the Attached Exhibit �
Furthermore, Developer shall be responsble for all of the development
costs and fees outlined in the Stipulations listed in Exhibit q attached
hereto and made a pa�t hereof.
O. Construction of Developer's Improvements:
1. Construction. The construction, installation, materials and
equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications
approved by the City. All plans required under this development
contract shall be submitted in electronic format.
2. Inspection. All of the work shall be under and subject to the
inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any
other govemmental agency having jurisdiction.
4
0
3. Easements. The Developer shail dedicate to the City, prior to
approval of the final plat, at no cost to the City, all permanent or
temporary easements necessary for the construction and installation
of the Developer's improvements as determined by the City. All
such easements required by the City shaii be in writing, in
recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City
shall determine.
4. Faithful Perfor►nance of Construction Contracts The Developer will
fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all
contracts entered into by the Developer for the install�ion and
construction of all Developer's Improvements and hereby
guarantees the wor{cmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the City's written final acceptance of the Developer's
Improvements. ConcuRently with the execution hereof by the
Developer, the Developer will fumish to, and at all times thereafter
maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or IRevocable
Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty (150%) percent of the
total estimated cost of Developers Improvemerts and Public
Improvement Contract Administration as indicated in Exhibit B The
Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit
of the City of Fridley and shall state thereon that the same is issued
to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the
terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction
of all requi�ed improvements in accordance with the ordinances and
specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in
whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for
the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this
contract. The IRevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically
renewed or replaced by not later than thirty (30) days prior to its
expiration with a like Letter of Credit.
5. Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. The Developer may request
reduction of the Letter of Credit, or cash deposit based on
prepayment of the value of the completed improvements at the time
of the requested reduction. The amount of the reduction shall be
determined and approved by the City Engineer.
P. The Developer shall provide a licensed professional engineer or their duly
authorized representative to oversee at the Develope�'s expense the
Developer's improvements until such improvements are completed and
accepted by the City.
Q. Upon written final acceptance of the Develope�'s improvements by the City
Engineer, a one year maintenance bond shall be provided by the Developer
for any areas not covered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(NPDES) erosion control permit. The warranty will include but not be limited
to the cost of turf restoration and erosion control.
10
3. CITY INSTALLED iMPROVEN1ENTS In accordance with the policies and
ordinances of the City, the following described improvements (hereinafter
coitectively called the "Public Improvements"), as referenced in the pians and
specifications adopted by the City Council shall be constructed and installed by the
City to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions herein set forth:
A. Street grading, graveling and stabilizing, including construction of berms
� and boulevards (hereinafter called "Street Improvements");
B. Storm sewers, when determined to be necessary by the City Enginea,
including all necessary mains, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances
(hereinafte� called "Storm Sewer Improvements");
C. Sanitary sewer mains, laterals or extensions, including all necessary
building services and other appurtenances (hereinafter called "Sanitary
Sewe� Improvements");
D. Water mains, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building
services, hydrants, valves and other appurtenances (hereinafter called
"Watermain Improvements");
E. Permanent street surfacing, sidewalks/trals (when required) including
concrete curb and gutter (hereinafter called "Permanent Street
Improvements").
F. Standard street name signs at all newly opened intersections (hereinafter
called "Traffic Signing Improvements")
G. 1. Construction Procedures. All such imp�ovements set out in
Paragraph 3.A F above shall be instituted, constructed and financed as
follows: The City shall commence proceedings pursuant to Minnesota
Statute 429 providing that such improvements be made and assessed -
against the benefited properties. After preparation of preliminary plans and
estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing, if required by law,
will be called by the City Council for the purpose of ordering such
improvements. After preparation of the final plans and specifications by the
City Engineer, bids will be taken by the City and contract awarc�d for the
installation of improvements under the City's complete supervision.
2. Securitv Lew of Special Assessments and Required Pavment
Therefore. Prior to the approval of final plans and specifications for the
construction of said improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a
cash escrow or letter of credit in an amount equal to one hundred five
percent (105%) of the total estimated cost of said improvements as
approved by the City Engineer and indicated in Exhibit B.
6
11
Said cash escrow, including accrued interest therecn, or letter of credit, may
be used by the City upon default by Developer in the payment of special
assessments pursuant hereto, whether accelerated or otherwise. That
such cash escrow or letter of credit shall remain in fiull force and effect
throughout the term of the special assessments, except, the amount of such
escrow or letter of credit may be reduced, upon the request of the
Developer, at the City's option, but in no event shail be less than the total of
the outstanding special assessments against all properties within the
Subdivision. The entire cost of the installation of such improvements,
including any reasonable engineering, legal and administrative costs
incurred by the City, shall be assessed against the benefited properties
within the Subdivision in eight (8) equal annual installments with interest on
the unpaid installments at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by
law. All special assessments levied hereto shall be payable to the City in
semi-annual installments commencing on April 15 of the year afte� the levy
of such assessment and on each September 15 and April 15 thereafter until
the entire balance plus accrued interest is paid in full unless paid earlier
pursuant to Paragraph 3.G.3 herein. In the event any payment is not made
on the dates set out herein, the City may exercise its rights pursuant to
Paragraph 3.G.4 hereof. The Developer waives any and all procedural and
substantive objections to the installation of the public improvements and the
special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements and
any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. In the
event the total of all Ciiy Installed Improvements is less than originally
approved by the City Engineer in his feasibility report, Developer waives all
rights they have by virtue of Minnesota Statute 429.081 or otherwise to
challenge the amount or validity of amounts, orthe procedure used by the
City in levying the assessments and hereby releases the City, its officers,
agents, and employees from any and all liabiliry related to or arising out of
the levy of the assessments.
3. Required Pavments of Special Assessments bv Developer.
Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns hereby agrees that within thirty
(30) days after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residence on
a lot located within the Subdivision which is. assessed for the cost of such
improvements, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees, at
its own cost and expense, to pay the entire unpaid improvement costs
assessed or to be assessed under this agreement against such property.
If a certificate of occupancy is issued before fie special assessments have
been levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the
City the sum of cash equal to the Engineer's estimate of the special
assessments for such improvements that would be levied against the
property. Upon such payment the City shall issue a certificate showing the
assessments are paid in full. Notwithstanding the issuance of said
ce�tificate, the Developer shall be liable to the Ciry for any deficiency and
the City shall pay the Developer any surplus arisirg from the payment
based upon such estimate.
�
4. Acceleration Upon Default In the event the Developer violates any
of the covenants, conditions or agreements herein contained to be
per*ormed by the Developer, violates any ordinance, rufe or regulation of
the City, County of Anoka,-State of Minnesota or other governmental entity
having jurisdiction over the plat, or fails to pay any installment of any special
assessment levied pursuant hereto, or any interest thereon, when the same
is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City, at its option, in addition to its rights
and remedies hereunder, after ten (10) days' written notice to the
� Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are
then estimated or levied pursuant to this agreement due arii payable in full,
_ with interest. The City may seek recovery of such special assessments due
and payable from the security provided in Paragraph 3.G.2 hereof. In the
event that such security is insufficient to pay the outstanding amount of
such special assessments plus accrued interest the City may certify such
outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor pursuant to
M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3 for collection the following year. The City, at its
option, may commence legal action against the Developer to collect the
entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then estimated or levied
pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable attomey's fees, and
Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if more than
one, such liabiliry shall be joint and several. Also, if Developer violates any
term or condition of this agreement, or if any payment is not made by
Developer pursuant to this ag�eement the City, at its option, may refuse to
issue building permits to any of the property within the plat on which the
assessments have not besn paid.
4. RECORDING AND RELEASE. The Developer agrees that the terms of this
Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the
Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of
this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future
purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page
1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments
levied against a parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this
Development Contract subject to provisions contained in second paragraph of Section
3.G.3 on page 8.
5. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS. The Developer agrees to fully reimburse the City
for all costs incurred by the City including, but not limited, to the actual costs of construction
s
13
of said improvements, engineering fees, legal fees, inspection fees, interest costs, costs of
acGuisition of necessary easements, if any, and any other costs incurred by the City
relating to this Development Contract and the installation and financing of the
aforementioned improvements.
6. BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. Where a platted
street intersects an existing publicfy maintained road, the City Building Official will only
issue building permits on lots that are within 150 feet of a hard surFaced roadway. In the
event lots are more than 150 feet from a hard surfaced roadwax the Develope� shall
construct a service road to provide access to these lots as required by the City. The
Developer shall submit a plan to the City for approval identifying the location of the
proposed access roads and the lots being requested for build'ng permits. Building permits
can be requested for the remaining lots within the development after the first lift of the
asphalt has been installed on the street. The City shall require that a°Hold Harmless
Agreement° be provided by the developer if the drainage improvements serving the
development (i.e. ponds, outlet structures, and overflow pipes) are not completed prior to a
building permit being issued. No certificate of occupancy will be issued on any lot that
abuts a pond unless the pond infrastrudure is completed according to the City approved
plan.
No Certificate of Occupancy permit shall be issued for any house in the plat until the
following have been completed:
A. A letter from the Developer's engineer certifying the plat has been graded
according to the grading, drainage and erosion control plan as approved by the
City. The Developer will notify the City a minimum of two (2) weeks prior to any
Certificate of Occupancy permit being issued.
9
14
B. Removal/treatment of ail dead, dying or diseased trees, as determined by the
City Forester, from the properry at the owner's expense or escrow for any
remaining trees that will need to be removed. Stockpiling the dead trees on the
Ict for resident's removal for firewood will be acceptable only after the lot has
been graded to plan.
C. The first tift of street asphalt surface, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water
main, has been constructed, considered operational, and approved by the City
� Engineer. The Developer will notify the City a minim�,m of two (2) weeks prior to
any Certificate of Occupancy permit being issued.
D. The Developer will notify the City a minimum of two (2) weeks prior to any
Certificate of Occupancy permit being issued to allow adequate time for an
inspection to be completed of all the required improvements.
The Developer further agrees that they will not cause to be occupied, any p�emises
constructed upon the plat or any property within the plat until the completion of the gas,
electric, telephone, cable television (if a�railable), streets to asphalt surface, sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and water main, unless the City has agreed in writing to waive this
requirement as to a spec�c premises.
Seeding and sodding of the lot shall be completed as specified by City Code. In
the event a lot has not had the required 4 inches of black/organic dirt spread and been
seeded or sodded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the builder shall post
a$2,500 cash escrow to assure that the lot will have bfack dirt and a lawn established
within six months. Escrowing prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy shall also
be required for incomplete items.
The City Building Official will issue a stop work order for violation of silt fencing,
erosion control and tree protection.
r ��
10
7. CLEANUP. Developer shail promptly clean dirt and debris from streets
daily and surrounding properties that have resuited from construction by the Devel�er, its
agents or assigns. Performance shall be guaranteed by the financial guarantee recited
herein. The City reserves the right to perform such work as necessary and assess ail cost
to the developer.
The Developer shall be responsible for rubbish blavn off the building site.
8. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and
construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying
within the public easements shall become City property without further noti� or action.
9. INSURANCE. Developer and/or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain
until one (1) year after the City has accepted the private improvements, public liability and
property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for
properry damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his
subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily
injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 ($500,000.00)
Dollars for one person and One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each
- occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than Three Hundred Thousand
and no/100 ($300,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combinafon single limit policy
of One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City shall be named as an
additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with
the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate
shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the
11
�
_
�
canceilation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to
give the required notice.
10. REINiBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE The Developer agrees to
reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this
contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable enginee�ing and
attomeys' fees.
11. VALIDITY. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or
phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the
Development Contract.
12. GENERAL.
A. Bindinq Effect The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of
the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any
part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the
land.
B. Notices. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that
notice o� demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or
on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or
mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on
Page 1 by certified mail (retum receipt requested). Such notice or demand
shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited
in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties
hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above.
r C. Final Plat Approved. The City agrees to give final approval to the plat ofthe
Subdivision upon execution and delivery of this agreement and of all
, required petitions, bond and security.
D. Incorporation bv Reference. All plans, special provisions, proposals,
specifications and contracts for the improvements furnished and let
pursuant to this agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this
agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full.
E. Assiqnment and Third Partv Benefits. This development contract cannot be
assigned or transferred without the written consent of the City. There is no
12
17
intent to benefit any third parties and third parties shall have no recourse
against the City under this contract.
F. Clerical Revisions. In the event that any technical or clerical revisions are
needed in this document or if for any reason the Counry Recorder deems
the development contract ur}recordable, the Developer shall cooperate with
the City in the execution or amendment of any revised development
contract.
13. REMEDIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF CONTRACT. In the event the Developer,
builder, or any subcontractor violates any of the covenants and agreements
contained in this Development Contract and that may be performed by the
Developer, builder, or subcontractor, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights
and remedies as set out hereunder, may refuse to issue building permits to any
property within the plat until such time as such default has been inspected and
corrected to the satisfaction of the City. Furthermore, in the event of default by the
Developer as to any of the work perfoRned by it hereunder, the City may at its
option, perfoRn the woric of the Developer and the Developer shall promptly
reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City within thirty (30) days.
Failure to do so shall result in the City withholding the letter of credit. If the plat is a
phase of a multi-phase preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats
of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this contract and the breach
has not been remedied.
SIGNED AND EXECUTED by the parties hereto on this day of
, 2003
DEVELOPER CITY OF FRIDLEY
�
1, `
Owne . By:
Theodore Theilmann Scott J. Lund, Mayor
v
�
Developer.
Jeffrey Cruz
ATTEST:
Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk
13
18
EXHIBIT A- STIPULATIONS APPROVED BY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
1. The petitioner shall obtain ail necessary permits prior to construction.
2. Any remaining debris from demolition of existing home and any outdoor storage
on site shall be removed prior to granting of final plat.
3. Regular maintenance of the site to be done by the Developer until the homes are
built.
4. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to the
issuance of any building permits, in order to minimize impacts to the su�rounding
properties.
5. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems
located on the site are properly capped or removed.
6. During construction, silt fencing shall be used where applicable.
7. The petitioner shall provide easements as required by Section 211.07.21 of the
City Code.
8. The petitioner to pay $1, 500 per lot park fees prior to issuance of building
permits.
9. The petitioner shall be responsible fo� the installation of sewer and water service
connections from property line to existing City utilities. Plan to be approved by
City's engineering department.
10. The petitioner shall agree to preserve mature trees to the extent possible. All
trees required to be removed for the new homes shall be marked and approved
by City staff prior to issuance of building permits.
11. The petitioner shall work with existing contours of the land and preserve existing
slopes to the extent possible.
12. A Development Agreement outlining the Developers obligation to install utilities,
etc. will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner, prior to final
- plat approval.
13. The petitioner shall hold a meeting with the neighborhood to go over the grading
and drainage plans prior to issuance of building permit.
14
19
EXHIBIT B- DESCRlPTION, ESTiMATED COST, AND PROPOSED COMPLETiON
DATES OF DEVELOPER'S AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
I. Developer's Improvements Estimated Cost Completion
1. Site grading, certification letter, as-buiits $ / /
2. Lot Stakes � / /
3. Diseased Tree Removal $ / /
4. Erosion control, sweeping, tree protection $ on-going
5. Installation of sod on boulevards � on-going
I. Total Estimated Cost for
Developer's Improvements $
II. Public Imqrovements Contract Admin. Estimated Cost Completion
1. Design of Public Imp�ovements $ / /
2. Construction staking and survey $ on-going
3. Street and Utility As-Builts $ / /
II. Total Estimated Cost for
C.A. of Public Improvements $
Developers Improvements and Contract Administration Total (I +II) $ -
Estimated Legal, Inspection, and Administrative Cost (15°/a) $ .
Security Requirement (150%)
$
15
2�
III Public Improvements Construction Costs Estimated Cost Completion
1. Site Grading � �_�_
2. F& I Water Main and Services $ �_�_
3. F& I Sanitary Sewer Main and Services $ � �_
4. Street Grading, Concrete Curb and Surface $ � �_
III. Total Estimated Construction
_ Cost of Public Improvements �
�
Construction Secu�ity Required (105%) $
16
21
EXHIBIT C- PLAT APPROVED BY COUNCIL
17
22
/
�
CffY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
Date: October 21, 2003
' iam Burns Cit Mana er l��
To: Will , Y 9 �
From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator
Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Subject: Master Plan Amendment, MP #03-01, Columbia Park Medical Group
M-03-152
ANALYSIS
Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group, on behalf of Columbia Park Medical Group, is
requesting an amendment to its master plan to allow for future parking and building
expansions.
In 1982, the subject property, the City Hall property and the property north of City Hall
were rezoned to S-2, Redevelopment district. As a result of that rezoning, the two-story
medical clinic was constructed and exists as it is today. Please see attached drawing of
the existing conditions.
The petitioner is proposing to re-design the parking lot in order to construct additional
on site parking for the existing building and the building expansion. The current parking
configuration involves land owned by both the Columbia Park Medical Group and the
City of Fridley. The petitioner is proposing to reduce the parking stall width from 10 feet
to 9 feet, which will allow the construction of an additional 32 parking stalls. Re-
designing the parking lot will not only provide additional parking oppo�tunities but will
also reduce the access points on Formies Avenue from three to two.
The petitioner is also proposing to construct a two-story, 3,071 square foot addition to
the northwest side of the building to be used for a pharmacy, CT scan room, associated
support space and other clinic support services. They are also proposing to construct a
two-story, 7,450 square foot addition to the east side of the building. This addition
which will be used for: exam rooms, dictation space, lab area, and other clinic support
services.
Please see the attached drawing showing the re-design of the parking lot and the
location of the proposed additions.
23
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) had the opportunity to review this
conceptuai plan at its October 2, 2003, meeting. The HRA doesn't have the authority to
approve or deny this request, but staff wanted to get its input, as this project is within a
redevelopment district. Overall, the HRA was supportive of this master plan
amendment; however, the members did express concern about reducing the parking
stall width from 10 feet to 9 feet. They would encourage the developer to consider
reducing the stall width to 9 feet primarily for the employee parking areas. City staff has
conveyed this HRA concern to a Columbia Park representative.
PLANNING COMMtSSION RECOMMENDATION
At the October 15, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for
MP #03-01. After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval
of this master plan amendment request, MP #03-01, with the three stipulations as
presented and an additional stipulation, to read, "Parking stalls to be reduced to 9 foot
width in the employee parking areas only".
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION
City Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission.
STIPULATIONS
1. Petitioner to provide landscape plan for the complex prior to issuance of a
building permit.
2. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction.
3. The proposed additions shall be architecturally compatible with the existing
building and finished with complementary building materials.
4. Parking stalls to be reduced to 9 feet width in employee parking areas only.
24
�
t
C1TY OF
FRIDLEY
Date
To
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEET�tNG OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
October 23, 2003
William Burns, City Manager �
�
From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator
Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Subject: Amendment to the Sign Plan for the East Moore Lake Shopping Plaza
M-03-155
ANALYSIS
Quality Growth LTD, the owners of the East Moore Lake Shopping Plaza located at 1250
E. Moore Lake Drive requested an amendment to their sign plan at your August 25, 2003
City Council meeting. They are now requesting an additional amendment to that plan.
The previous amendment allowed the total vertical dimension of wall signage to be
increased from 24 inches to 32 inches. The proposed amendment requires tenants to
stay within the 32-inch requirement, however it allows tenants to increase their wall
signage to 60 inches for tenants whose space includes a gable feature (peak area) above
their sign band. The building letters are restricted to red in color, however the logos may
vary in color but are subject to the Landlord's approval.
The proposed sign plan amendment meets all the City's criteria and is viewed as a
modification to the plan that is within the owner's discretion.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the comprehensive sign
plan for the East Moore Lake Shopping Plaza, which is located at 1250 E. Moore Lake
Drive.
25
■
�
CiT1f OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
C
ITY COUNClL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2�03
� ��� •
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager
�
PROM: Jon H. tiaukaas, Public Works Director
DATE: October 23, 2003
SUBJECT: 2004 Street Improvement Project
PW03-090
The attached resolution is to iniriate the design and plan prepludes L f�de Drive� Regis Terrace d
Neighborhood Improvement ProJect No. ST. 2004 1, which in Yn
Regis Trail.
In addition, we propose to reconstruct the University Avenue East Service Drive from 61S` Avenue to
Mississippi Street.
The resolurion orders the preparaaon of preliminary plans, specificaaons and estimate for the
im rovements as a result of the neighborhood meetings an on �et Ccurb and gutter�, asreconstructed
P
upgrade of the bituminous curb streets within the area to c
street base and surface and repairs of the e e D g would reta'ln its xist g concrete curb and gutter
required. The Universiry Avenue East Servic
with minor repairs and have storm sewer improvements plus the entire pavement and base sections
reconstructed to accommodate the heavier vehicle traffic
Recommend the City Council adopt the attached resolution so th STh�004 i and design work can
initiated for the North Park Neighborhood Improvement Pro�ect No.
Jxx:�Z
Attachment
26
RESOLUTZON NO. - 2003
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: NORTH PARK NEIGHBORHOOD
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2004 - 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley as follows:
l. That it appears in the interests of the City and of the property
owners affected that there be constructed certain improvements to-wit:
� Street improvements, including grading, stabilized aggregate base,
hot-mix bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter, repairs to the
water and sanitary sewer mains and services, storm sewer system
repairs and/or extension, landscaping, and other facilities located as
follows:
Lynde Drive Polk St to Regis Dr
Regis Terrace Regis Drive to Regis Trail
Regis Trail Regis Lane north through cul-de-sac
In addition, the following streets outside this neighborhood shall be
constructed:
University Avenue East Service Dr: 61St Avenue to Mississippi Street
That the work involved in said improvements listed above shall
hereafter be designated as: NORTH PARR NEIGIi80RHOOD STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2004 - 1.
2. That the Public Works Director, Jon H. Haukaas, City Hall,
Fridley, MN, is hereby authorized and directed to draw the preliminary
plans and specifications and to tabulate the results of his estimates
of the costs of said improvements, including every item of cost from
inception to completion and all fees and expenses incurred (or to be
incurred) in connection therewith, or the financing thereof, and to
make a preliminary report of his findings stating therein whether said
improvements are feasible and -whether they can best be made as
proposed, or in connection with some other improvements (and the
` estimated cost as recommended), including also a description of the
lands or area as may receive benefits therefrom and as may be proposed
to be assessed.
3. That said preliminary report of the Public Works Director shall
be furnished to the City Council.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
27th DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
ATTESTED:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
27
SCOTT J. LUND - MAYOR
/
�
GTY OF
FRIDLEY
TO:
AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
^ � .1�'
WILLIAlV1 W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ���
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
ALAN D. FOLIE, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
JUDY M. MELHAM, UTILITY BILLING CLERK
SUBJECT:
DATE:
CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITY SERVICES
October 23, 2003
Attached is a resolution for the purpose of certifying delinquent utility accounts to the County for
collection with the taxes in the year 2004.
All property owners have been notified that the utility bills are being certified to the County and have
been given adequate opportunity to pay the bill. The penalty shown on this resolution is in addition
to the regular penalties that accrue on the utility bills. The number and dollar value of accounts
varies each year. We cannot be sure of the final count or dollar value until mid-November since
property owners have 30 days after the adoption of the resolution to pay without penalty.
RDP/me
Attachment
•
0
RESOLUTION NO. 20032
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING CERTAIN DELPIQUENT UTILITY
SERVICES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH
THE 2004 TAXES
WHEREAS, certain utility services for the City of Fridley are delinquent in payment, and
WHEREAS, Chapter 402, Water and Sewer Administration, Chapter 113, Solid Waste Disposal and
Recycling Collection, Chapter 216, Storm Water Drainage Utility, and Section 1.02 of the City
Charter provides for the certifying of delinquent charges to the County Auditor for collection with the
taxes, and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify the following charges to the County Auditor for collection with the 2003 taxes due and
payable in the year 2004, to wit:
All these noted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 27`h
DAY OF OCTOBER, 2003.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
SCOTT J. LUND - MAYOR
29
2003 DELINQUENT UTILITY CERTIFICATION LIST - EXHIBIT A
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DELINQUENT UTILITY SERVICES - 2003
PIN ACCT # LOCATION # ADDRESS BALANCE PENALTY
ACTIVE ACCOUNTS:
26 30 24 32 0062
23 30 24 23 0104
23 30 24 22 0056
14 30 24 23 0046
26 30 24 32 0081
26 30 24 32 0079
23 30 24 23 0072
26 30 24 32 0099
26 30 24 32 0094
26 30 24 22 0014
23 30 24 23 0133
23 30 24 34 0031
23 30 24 31 0055
23 30 24 31 0055
23 30 24 31 0055
23 30 24 31 0052
23 30 24 21 0130
23 30 24 21 0103
11 30 24 21 0019
11 30 24 21 0020
11 30 24 21 0026
23 30 24 34 0016
23 30 24 21 0040
14 30 24 34 0071
14 30 24 34 0082
14 30 24 34 0016
23 30 24 24 0059
23 30 24 21 0082
14 30 24 34 0066
23 30 24 31 0092
26 30 24 22 0046
23 30 24 43 0056
13 30 24 44 0049
15 30 24 43 0093
15 30 24 43 0042
15 30 24 44 0010
15 30 24 44 0012
15 30 24 43 0020
15 _30 24 43 0023
14 30 24 31 0027
14 30 24 31 0024
13 30 24 34 0011
15 30 24 41 0036
13 30 24 42 0047
15 30 24 42 0099
14 30 24 24 0021
14 30 24 24 0017
13 30 24 14 0042
13 30 24 14 0017
14 30 24 24 0068
14 30 24 13 0050
13 30 24 12 0005
10 30 24 42 0057
12 30 24 13 0026
12 30 24 12 0103
12 30 24 12 0104
505
715
1035
103385
128945
1715
127865
2765
115705
3375
3555
15175
97095
103585
97665
15455
119335
89325
94535
94665
58075
104085
17135
104105
106185
94215
81805
81815
126935
110055
132545
20905
127955
4885
4945
94115
5005
5205
5265
130025
118645
23055
122945
23205
95235
120735
122275
23395
107735
24595
24725
58565
121125
111515
93655
60865
443880
444090
444410
444620
445040
445080
445510
446110
446210
446690
446870
458410
458600
458620
458630
458680
459160
459230
500650
500670
500790
459550
460350
460390
460510
460570
461310
461510
461730
462200
447700
464010
465700
448190
448250
448280
448310
448510
448570
465780
547430
466140
448660
466280
448940
466580
466620
466470
466510
467670
467800
501260
502010
502480
503510
503520
4740
5790
6012
6701
4720
4744
5847
4700
4756
5111
5760
5330
5600
5602
5604
5614
5981
6034
7501
7509
7557
5410
6061
6111
6221
6252
5901
5981
6130
5538
200
649
1601
140
180
11
30
146
182
415
459
1100
40
1356
120
363
369
1601
1621
491
548
1380
115
1367
1401
1409
1
30
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 1/2 ST
2 1/2 ST
2 1/2 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
6 ST
6 ST
6 ST
7 ST
53 AVE
53 AVE
61 AVE
62 WAY
62 WAY
621/2 WAY
62 1/2 WAY
63 WAY
63 WAY
63 AVE
63 AVE
63 AVE
631/2 WAY
64 AVE
641/2 WAY
66 AVE
66 AVE
661/2 AVE
661/2 AVE
67 AVE
67 AVE
69 AVE
71 1/2 WAY
73 AVE
76 AVE
76 AVE
398.02
147.98
97.58
202.01
426.T3
532.86
376.83
418.00
438.23
745.50
848.42
456.55
536.36
65.56
845.52
615.73
330.04
80.02
509.24
332.44
188.45
490.35
354.69
246.90
396.39
899.84
613.07
195.79
429.80
238.78
195.84
74.82
400.05
413.42
191.55
447.68
1,121.96
459.68
3T1.74
639.88
451.09
367.40
261.30
62.90
652.11
439.77
361.86
61.52
266.78
632.12
654.09
171.86
125.81
382.55
487.10
316.25
39.80
14.80
9.T6
20.20
42.67
53.29
37.68
41.80
43.82
T4.55
84.84
48.66
53.64
6.56
84.55
61.57
33.00
8.00
50.92
33.24
18.85
49.04
35.47
24.69
39.64
89.98
61.31
19.58
42.98
23.88
19.58
7.48
40.01
41.34
19.16
44.77
112.20
45.97
37.17
63.99
45.11
36.T4
26.13
6.29
65.21
43.98
36.19
6.15
26.68
63.21
65.41
17.19
12.58
38.26
48.71
31.63
TOTAL
437.82
162.78
107.34
222.21
469.40
586.15
414.51
459.80
482.05
820.05
933.26
535.21
590.00
72.12
930.07
677.30
363.04
88.02
560.16
365.68
207.30
539.39
390.16
271.59
436.03
989.82
674.38
215.37
472.78
262.66
215.42
82.30
440.06
454.76
210.71
492.45
1,234.16
505.65
408.91
703.87
496.20
404.14
287.43
69.19
717.32
483.75
398.05
67.67
293.46
695.33
719.50
189.05
138.39
420.81
535.81
347.88
PIN
12 30 24 11 0028
03 30 24 44 0038
03 30 24 42 0012
13 30 24 33 0019
12 30 24 23 0016
12 30 24 23 0016
12 30 24 23 0014
12 30 24 22 0021
10 30 24 42 0007
03 30 24 34 0037
23 30 24 33 0101
13 30 24 32 0003
12 30 24 12 0037
12 30 24 12 0051
13 30 24 32 0034
13 30 24 43 0018
24 30 24 11 0033
24 30 24 44 0134
13 30 24 44 0021
12 30 24 11 0133
04 30 24 11 0005
13 30 24 23 0035
13 30 24 41 0037
13 30 24 43 0006
12 30 24 12 0077
13 30 24 24 0023
03 30 24 32 0110
14 30 24 32 0213
03 30 24 43 0036
03 30 24 32 0038
03 30 24 32 0098
24 30 24 41 0098
24 30 24 41 0108
24 30 24 41 0093
24 30 24 41 0089
24 30 24 41 0084
24 30 24 44 0203
24 30 24 44 0191
24 30 24 44 0192
15 30 24 44 0093
15 30 24 44 0006
15 30 24 41 0071
15 30 24 42 0022
15 30 24 42 0095
10 30 24 11 0013
10 30 24 11 0011
03 30 24 43 0008
03 30 24 31 0047
03 30 24 31 0086
03 30 24 24 0026
03 30 24 22 0083
03 30 24 32 0010
03 30 24 23 0198
03 30 24 24 0033
03 30 24 24 0022
03 30 24 24 0021
25 30 24 21 0019
24 30 24 33 0014
03 30 24 34 0006
13 30 24 14 0049
24 30 24 12 0025
24 30 24 12 0019
24 30 24 12 0013
03 30 24 23 0075
ACCT #
132985
61095
120465
25335
55555
106035
127375
134485
56095
56665
127805
120565
56875
57175
36095
113575
27255
25975
127025
93435
70505
36125
101635
28905
119215
99455
108275
105045
99215
117635
129465
31435
128495
87385
104885
125485
130785
30715
119445
118225
128795
14555
127365
130385
63825
119115
96215
133075
134175
90765
111635
111655
65595
100795
65295
65315
124655
32355
65965
32655
119475
122485
122485
66385
LOCATION # ADDRESS
503640 1621 76 AVE
503740 55 77 AVE
503930 195 79 WAY
468410 6261 ABLE ST
498340 7417 ABLE ST
498350 7419 ABLE ST
498410 7447 ABLE ST
498640 7553 ABLE ST
498830 125 ALDEN CIR
499400 7892 ALDEN WAY
449660 5455 ALTURA RD
449730 5489 ALTURA RD
499610 7676 ARTHUR ST
499910 7689 BACON DR
479060 6444 BAKER AVE
469830 6250 BEN MORE DR
470320 6021 BENJAMIN ST
469050 1623 BRENNER PASS
470000 1603 BRIARDALE RD
500640 7675 BRIGADOON PL
546870 8320 BROAD AVE
479090 6554 BROOKVIEW DR
471400 1670 CAMELOT LN
471960 6271 CENTRAL AVE
529230 7639 CENTRAL AVE
472470 6631 CHANNEL RD
504470 627 CHERYL ST
545940 167 CHRISTENSON CT
505080 210 CRAIGBROOK WAY
505620 524 DOVER ST
505740 687 DOVER ST
474430 5529 EAST BAVARIAN PASS
474540 5540 EAST BAVARIAN PASS
474600 5547 EAST BAVARIAN PASS
474640 5567 EAST BAVARIAN PASS
474660 5573 EAST BAVARlAN PASS
473690 5457 EAST BRENNER PASS
473750 5471 EAST BRENNER PASS
473780 5475 EAST BRENNER PASS
457730 6175 EAST RIVER RD
457760 6255 EAST RIVER RD
457800 6305 EAST RIVER RD
547890 6410 EAST RIVER RD
457870 6437 EAST RIVER RD
506450 7513 EAST RIVER RD
506470 7525 EAST RIVER RD
506650 7899 EAST RIVER RD
506710 7969 EAST RIVER RD
506740 8000 EAST RIVER RD
506800 8161 EAST RIVER RD
506930 8340 EAST RIVER RD
508160 590 FAIRMONT ST
508180 615 FAIRMONT ST
507840 8087 FAIRMONT CIR
507890 8110 FAIRMONT CIR
507910 8112 FAIRMONT CIR
475310 5261 FILLMORE ST
475340 5300 FILLMORE ST
508540 7871 FIRWOOD WAY
475640 6631 FRIDLEY ST
475950 1337 GARDENA AVE
475960 1345 GARDENA AVE
476010 1437 GARDENA AVE
508930 565 GLENCOE ST
2
31
BALANCE
120.48
388.14
354.79
407.39
260.12
161.00
197.87
155.85
268.79
154.38
762.40
324.67
173.29
328.27
407.42
102.71
353.23
295.06
808.02
161.90
85.11
473.24
749.85
131.59
362.23
137.41
236.75
304.29
182.96
274.50
258.69
336.49
316.43
448.12
153.97
201.14
140.30
393.87
370.16
199.33
463.81
392.48
47.95
147.98
546.83
388.20
2,538.76
56.78
85.44
343.23
308.48
251.23
287.79
552.03
330.18
331.54
366.07
358.82
319.41
688.22
483.87
240.58
131.42
541.44
PENALTY
12.05
38.81
35.48
40.74
26.01
16.10
19.79
15.59
26.88
15.44
76.24
32.47
17.33
32.83
40.14
10.27
35.32
29.51
80.80
16.19
8.51
47.32
74.99
13.16
36.22
13.74
23.68
30.43
18.30
27.45
25.87
33.65
31.64
44.81
15.40
20.11
14.03
39.39
37.02
19.93
46.38
39.25
4.80
14.80
54.68
38.82
253.88
5.68
8.54
34.32
30.85
25.12
28.78
55.20
33.02
33.15
36.61
35.88
31.94
68.82
48.39
24.06
13.14
54.14
T.OTAL
132.53
426.95
390.27
448.13
286.13
177.10
217.66
171.44
295.67
169.82
838.64
357.14
190.62
361.10
441.56
112.98
388.55
324.57
888.82
178.09
93.62
520.56
824.84
144.75
398.45
151.15
260.43
334.72
201.26
301.95
284.56
3T0.14
348.07
492.93
169.37
221.25
154.33
433.26
407.18
219.26
510.19
431.73
52.75
162.78
601.51
427.02
2,792.64
62.46
93.98
377.55
339.33
276.35
316.57
607.23
363.20
364.69
402.68
394.70
351.35
757.04
532.26
264.64
144.56
595.58
PIN
03 30 24 23 0170
03 30 24 23 0203
24 30 24 24 0084
24 30 24 24 0083
24 30 24 24 0065
15 30 24 12 0056
24 30 24 31 0046
12 30 24 13 0057
23 30 24 13 0057
15 30 24 12 0022
15 30 24 12 0019
10 30 24 43 0019
10 30 24 44 0040
12 30 24 21 0002
24 30 24 12 0040
24 30 24 12 0062
26 30 24 22 0073
03 30 24 24 0108
03 30 24 24 0079
03 30 24 24 0139
03 30 24 23 0044
03 30 24 23 0046
03 30 24 23 0187
03 30 24 13 0005
03 30 24 24 0066
03 30 24 23 0031
03 30 24 23 0136
11 30 24 14 0048
11 30 24 14 0008
11 30 24 11 0028
11 30 24 11 0023
03 30 24 23 0228
03 30 24 23 0120
03 30 24 23 0122
14 30 24 33 0077
14 30 24 11 0017
14 30 24 11 0004
03 30 24 23 0126
04 30 24 14 0002
12 30 24 11 0007
12 30 24 11 0102
03 30 24 42 0085
03 30 24 42 0083
25 30 24 21 0115
10 30 24 42 0033
10 30 24 42 0032
03 30 24 42 0073
13 30 24 24 0026
24 30 24 32 0040
24 30 24 31 0026
24 30 24 31 0025
11 30 24 24 0040
11 30 24 12 0010
23 30 24 13 0073
14 30 24 12 0100
26 30 24 33 0122
14 30 24 23 0026
02 30 24 33 0029
24 30 24 43 0031
24 30 24 42 0058
12 30 24 12 0071
12 30 24 12 0087
11 30 24 13 0105
11 30 24 11 0048
ACCT #
66495
106065
122505
34025
125535
66845
96825
67045
130875
109575
131755
67325
111825
80935
35125
92345
104645
133095
68265
68305
113325
108015
124315
68745
129755
69195
69325
80865
69615
102525
104405
70105
70185
70235
8915
37695
37765
133025
129795
85625
70935
71195
71225
38385
97235
123565
94075
93645
38935
38965
38985
97325
125935
39585
40095
9045
9735
73015
111155
71075
107685
134245
92125
121495
LOCATION # ADDRESS
509040 629 GLENCOE ST
509100 680 GLENCOE ST
477000 5874 HACKMANN AVE
477010 5882 HACKMANN AVE
477090 5917 HACKMANN AVE
509390 173 HARTMAN CIR
477450 1181 HATHAWAY LN
509590 7458 HAYES ST
477790 671 HELENE PL
509T60 6807 HICKORY ST
509810 6817 HICKORY ST
509860 6906 HICKORY DR
510320 7084 HICKORY DR
523290 7699 HIGHWAY 65
478110 1340 HILLCREST DR
478270 1359 HILLCREST DR
451910 5060 HUGHES AVE
510790 389 HUGO ST
510800 420 HUGO ST
510840 451 HUGO ST
510880 517 HUGO ST
510940 551 HUGO ST
511220 680 HUGO ST
5112T0 265 IRONTON ST
511480 401 IRONTON ST
511720 595 IRONTON ST
511850 671 IRONTON ST
512030 7370 JACKSON ST
512130 7441 JACKSON ST
512310 7600 JACKSON ST
512420 7678 JACKSON ST
512610 585 JANESVILLE ST
512690 641 JANESVILLE ST
512740 679 JANESVILLE ST
452190 6220 JUPITER RD
480650 800 KENNASTON DR
480720 841 KENNASTON DR
513000 656 KIMBALL ST
513050 729 KIMBALL ST
513320 7513 LAKESIDE RD
513430 7590 LAKESIDE RD
513690 225 LIBERTY ST
513720 239 LIBERTY ST
481330 5197 LINCOLN ST
514040 116 LOGAN PKWY
514060 130 LOGAN PKWY
514320 201 LONGFELLOW ST
481690 6645 - LUCIA LN
481880 1070 LYNDE DR
481910 1100 LYNDE DR
481930 1110 LYNDE DR
514780 7361 LYRIC LN
515060 7549 LYRIC LN
482530 5720 MADISON ST
483040 6881 MADISON ST
452320 4551 MAIN ST
453010 6721 MAIN ST
515500 7835 MAIN ST
4834T0 5400 MATTERHORN DR
483600 5555 MATTERHORN DR
515640 1377 MEADOWMOOR DR
515710 1418 MEADOWMOOR DR
516520 7432 MELODY DR
516780 7498 MELODY DR
3
32
SALANCE
298.74
491.56
96.78
839.90
- 322.55
258.10
432.82
640.12
98.17
339.23
506.37
197.69
102.28
773.53
147.38
422.89
706.45
131.61
342.37
79.93
673.05
146.20
326.86
675.85
415.58
137.53
119.38
330.83
348.68
522.38
504.05
695.09
425.22
527.85
443.02
343.73
271.09
301.45
294.14
276.29
442.18
214.50
788.80
761.25
676.32
161.98
414.15
685.94
419.50
159.86
441.95
322.10
222.48
287.49
453.63
335.83
321.78
244.90
224.50
553.20
346:64
111.50
391.28
291.58
PENAI.TY
29.87
49.16
9.68
83.99
32.26
25.81
43.28
64.01
9.82
33.92
50.64
19.77
10.23
77.35
14.74
42.29
T0.65
13.16
34.24
7.99
67.31
14.62
32.69
6T.59
41.56
13.75
11.94
33.08
34.87
52.24
50.41
69.51
42.52
52.79
44.30
34.37
27.11
30.15
29.41
27.63
44.22
21.45
78.88
76.13
67.63
16.20
41.42
68.59
41.95
15.99
44.20
32.21
22.25
28.75
45.36
33.58
32.18
24.49
22.45
55.32
34.66
11.15
39.13
29.16
TOTAL
328.61
540.72
106.46
923.89
354.81
283.91
476.10
704.13
107.99
373.15
557.01
217.46
112.51
850.88
162.12
465.18
777.10
144.77
376.61
87.92
740.36
160.82
359.55
743.44
457.14
151.28
131.32
363.91
383.55
574.62
554.46
764.60
467.T4
580.64
487.32
378.10
298.20
331.60
323.55
303.92
486.40
235.95
867.68
837.38
743.95
178.18
455.57
754.53
461.45
175.85
486.15
354.31
244.73
316.24
498.99
369.41
353.96
269.39
246.95
608.52
381.30
122.65
430.41
320.74
PIN
11 30 24 14 0038
11 30 24 14 0039
11 30 24 13 0090
11 30 24 13 0092
14 30 24 32 0033
14 30 24 32 0023
14 30 24 42 0125
14 30 24 42 0011
14 30 24 41 0115
14 30 24 14 0078
14 30 24 14 0083
13 30 24 13 0021
13 30 24 13 0006
14 30 24 41 0029
14 30 24 11 0037
14 30 24 11 0062
24 30 24 41 0226
24 30 24 41 0039
24 30 24 41 0010
13 30 24 11 0099
13 30 24 11 0094
12 30 24 31 0033
12 30 24 31 0021
12 30 24 31 0022
12 30 24 31 0022
12 30 24 13 0069
10 30 24 14 0028
12 30 24 22 0013
12 30 24 22 0012
12 30 24 12 0055
14 30 24 14 0097
13 30 24 22 005T
14 30 24 23 0058
14 30 24 23 0035
02 30 24 32 0019
24 30 24 31 0093
15 30 24 14 0008
14 30 24 22 0050
14 30 24 21 0034
13 30 24 44 0007
14 30 24 21 0047
10 30 24 12 0011
15 30 24 42 0086
15 30 24 42 0079
10 30 24 42 0042
04 30 24 14 0014
10 30 24 42 0076
03 30 24 24 0057
03 30 24 24 0039
15 30 24 41 0085
24 30 24 44 0022
13 30 24 41 0044
13 30 24 41 0059
15 30 24 44 0086
13 30 24 14 0028
12 30 24 14 0012
12 30 24 14 0011
12 30 24 14 0050
12 30 24 14 0047
14 30 24 33 0045
15 30 24 41 0052
14 30 24 33 0092
11 30 24 24 0063
11 30 24 24 0139
ACCT # LOCATION # ADDRESS
114545 516030 7379 MEMORY LN
95355 516050 7381 MEMORY LN
91865 516090 7386 MEMORY LN
116875 516130 7390 MEMORY LN
9815 453090 222 MERCURY DR
9825 453100 231 MERCURY DR
41145 484090 506 MISSISSIPPI ST
124735 484170 574 MISSISSIPPI ST
41405 484350 772 MISSISSIPPI ST
111015 484400 811 MISSISSIPPI ST
102175 484480 871 MISSISSIPPI ST
41875 484810 1361 MISSISSIPPI ST
101075 484920 1465 MISSISSIPPI ST
117355 485650 6381 MONROE ST
42925 485850 6800 MONROE ST
83025 485930 6862 MONROE ST
103985 486580 5610 NORTH INNSBRUCK CT
84625 486T00 1546 NORTH OBERLIN CIR
126155 486T70 1559 NORTH OBERLIN CIR
74335 516790 1501 NORTH TIMBER RIDGE
74445 516890 1521 NORTH TIMBER RIOGE
125225 547730 1280 NORTON AVE
91975 517210 1285 NORTON AVE
128355 517230 1295 NORTON AVE
121525 517240 1297 NORTON AVE
125625 517280 1365 ONONDAGA ST
127775 517850 30 OSBORNE WAY
75665 518100 940 OSBORNE RD
94725 518120 980 OSBORNE RD
96315 518190 1342 OSBORNE RD
126275 487590 6750 OVERTON DR
99515 488510 910 PANDORA DR
88435 453800 6731 PLAZA CUR
10635 453910 6800 PLAZA CUR
99285 517780 8010 RANCHERS RD
46455 489340 5650 REGIS DR
12195 455470 58 RICE CREEK WAY
76285 518710 254 RICE CREEK BLVD
131865 519100 485 RICE CREEK BLVD
116315 489760 1520 RICE CREEK RD
94245 490200 315 RICE CREEK TER
97985 519410 171 RICKARD RD
11645 454920 6440 RIVERVIEW TER
11655 454930 • 6441 RIVERVIEW TER
112025 519550 7157 RIVERVIEW TER
77435 519830 8241 RIVERVIEW TER
80295 522660 7115 RIVERWOOD DR
106215 520000 8121 RUTH CIR
122395 520040 8140 RUTH ST
90015 455740 115 SATEL�ITE LN
49685 492560 1552 SOUTH OBERLIN CIR
49775 492650 6311 SQUIRE DR
49915 492780 6450 SQUIRE DR
121845 546830 6250 STARLITE BLVD
49535 492410 6530 STINSON BLVD
77755 520150 7340 STINSON BLVD
77765 520160 7360 STINSON BLVD
102895 520180 7400 STINSON BIVD
127515 520210 7450 STINSON BLVD
13335 456580 6240 SUNRISE DR
113115 456610 101 SYLVAN LN
13535 456780 250 SYLVAN LN
112885 520520 7321 SYMPHONY ST
131505 520700 7398 SYMPHONY ST
4
33
BALANCE
104.08
818.11
414.70
450.98
509.68
175.81
354.44
563.89
288.40
502.40
159.54
489.48
569.20
569.51
495.15
178.90
292.75
295.51
273.16
341.28
262.40
531.54
194.21
319.31
133.55
828.64
100.62
437.03
287.59
273.55
334.05
473.87
251.02
423.64
611.35
429.00
320.04
427.79
170.39
510.80
53.50
624.90
305.18
199.95
157.47
229.70
189.92
442.48
281.50
574.63
383.27
578.99
383.09
230.36
343.96
112.49
350.94
461.58
131.48
119.38
597.06
653.61
241.31
161.50
PENALTY
10.41
81.81
41.47
45.10
50.97
17.58
35.44
56.39
28.84
50.24
15.95
48.95
56.92
56.95
49.52
17.89
29.28
29.55
27.32
34.13
26.24
53.15
19.42
31.93
13.36
82.86
10.06
43.70
28.76
27.36
33.41
47.39
25.10
42.36
61.14
42.90
32.00
42.78
17.04
51.08
5.35
62.49
30.52
20.00
15.75
22.97
18.99
44.25
28.15
57.46
38.33
57.90
38.31
23.04
34.40
11.25
35.09
46.16
13.15
11.94
59.71
65.36
24.13
16.15
TOTAL
114.49
899.92
456.17
496.08
560.65
193.39
389.88
620.28
31 T.24
552.64
175.49
538.43
626.12
626.46
544.67
196.79
322.03
325.06
300.48
375.41
288.64
584.69
213.63
35t.24
146.91
911.50
110.68
480.73
316.35
300.91
367.46
521.26
276.12
466.00
672.49
471.90
352.04
470.57
187.43
561.88
58.85
687.39
335.70
219.95
173.22
252.67
208.91
486.73
309.65
632.09
421.60
636.89
421.40
253.40
378.36
123.74
386.03
507.74
144.63
131.32
656.77
718.97
265.44
177.65
.
PIN
25 30 24 22 0028
11 30 24 24 0018
11 30 24 23 0140
11 30 24 12 0044
24 30 24 41 0176
25 30 24 11 0081
14 30 24 34 0004
14 30 24 22 0021
11 30 24 24 0092
11 30 24 24 0096
02 30 24 23 0006
14 30 24 41 0062
11 30 24 14 0080
11 30 24 11 0069
23 30 24 13 0007
24 30 24 43 0046
13 30 24 44 0016
24 30 24 12 0063
ACCT #
90105
129925
78765
79055
109065
103865
51415
79555
79685
118015
129955
106625
80565
124425
132455
54345
55285
107885
LOCATION # ADDRESS
492890 5235 TAYLOR ST
521030 7321 TEMPO TER
521150 7381 TEMPO TER
521430 7519 TEMPO TER
493160 1517 TRAPP CT
493480 1546 TROLLHAGEN DR
494270 6205 UNIVERSITY AVE
521930 6890 UNIVERSITY AVE
522060 7337 UNIVERSITY AVE
522150 7385 UNIVERSITY AVE
522590 8298 UNIVERSITY AVE
494000 6405 VAN BUREN ST
522930 7411 VAN BUREN ST
523100 7528 VAN BUREN ST
496100 5797 WASHiNGTON ST
497170 1418 WEST DANUBE RD
498090 1629 WOODSIDE CT
497810 6083 WOODY LN
FINAL BILLED ACCOUNTS:
23 30 24 23 0082
23 30 24 34 0034
23 30 24 31 0055
23 30 24 21 0044
23 30 24 31 0092
23 30 24 43 0103
23 30 24 42 0015
11 30 24 24 0074
11 30 24 24 0074
11 30 24 24 0074
12 20 24 23 0013
12 30 24 23 0011
12 30 24 23 0010
12 30 24 23 0010
12 30 24 23 0010
12 30 24 22 0024
12 30 24 22 0024
12 30 24 22 0024
12 30 24 22 0023
12 30 24 22 0022
12 30 24 22 0022
12 30 24 22 0022
12 30 24.22 0022
12 30 24 22 0021
12 30 24 22 0019
12 30 24 22 0019
12 30 24 22 0018
13 30 24 13 0047
12 30 24 12 0076
13 30 24 24 0035
03 30 24 31 0047
03 30 24 24 0153
24 30 24 12 0012
24 30 24 12 0012
24 30 24 12 0072
24 30 24 32 0033
23 30 24 13 0036
15 30 24 42 0107
26 30 24 23 0059
24 30 24 41 0076
15 30 24 41 0082
110185
131425
122115
17045
122205
92195
135085
134425
128615
134555
134095
134425
121095
134455
134425
134425
129555
134425
134425
122745
134425
134475
134425
134425
134525
134995
134425
93285
61775
133315
131625
64165
132215
133625
134745
100405
103835
117815
132745
98265
120305
445360
458350
458620
460260
462190
463700
464740
502690
502710
502710
498450
498500
498530
498530
498540
498550
498560
498560
498600
498610
498610
498620
498620
498650
498700
498700
498T20
472080
504410
472490
506710
506770
476020
476020
476020
481870
485470
454970
455T00
492590
456360
5800
5310
5602
6020
5536
516
645
360
362
362
7463
T495
7501
7501
7503
7513
7515
7515
7529
7539
7539
7541
7541
7555
7581
7581
7595
6525
7651
6648
7969
8100
1465
1465
1465
1061
5880
6471
4989
1557
6423
Sub Totai Active Accounts
2 1/2 ST
4 ST
4 ST
5 ST
7 ST
53 1/2 AVE
57 AVE
74 AVE
74 AVE
74 AVE
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
AB�E ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
ABLE ST
CENTRAL AVE
CENTRAL AVE
CHANNEL RD
EAST RIVER RD
EAST RIVER RD
GARDENA AVE
GARDENA AVE
GARDENA AVE
LYNDE DR
MONROE ST
RIVERVIEW TER
ROMAN RD
SOUTH OBERLIN CIR
STARLITE CIR
5
34
BALANCE
1,491.68
95.55
702.72
314.22
567.17
79.76
176.60
318.56
271.12
241.36
2,424.10
148.33
768.04
605.54
181.79
T70.23
402.29
422.61
PENALTY
149.17
9.56
70.27
31.42
56.72
7.98
17.66
31.86
27.11
24.14
242.41
14.83
76.80
60.55
18.18
77.02
40.23
42.26
TOTAL
1,640.85
105.11
772.99
345.64
623.89
87.74
194.26
350.42
298.23
265.50
2,666.51
163.16
844.84
666.09
199.97
847.25
442.52
464.87
S 101,874.92 510,187.63 $112,062.55
46.90
116.78
212.23
85.35
66.57
21.07
95.05
81.87
73.58
41.44
103.23
22.78
110.66
38.61
38.07
123.51
38.83
19.59
53.95
123.17
108.25
75.45
72.36
36.40
34.73
38.38
36.18
30.94
193.74
99.27
37.65
33.28
40.06
53.95
25.11
64.38
70.57
108.76
96.29
84.53
73.38
�
4.69
11.68
21.22
8.54
6.66
2.11
9.51
8.19
7.36
4.14
10.32
2.28
11.07
3.86
3.81
12.35
3.88
1.96
5.40
12.32
10.83
7.55
7.24
3.64
3.47
3.84
3.62
3.09
19.37
9.93
3.77
3.33
4.01
5.40
2.51
6.44
7.06
10.88
9.63
8.45
7.34
51.59
128.46
233.45
93.89
73.23
23.18
104.56
90.06
80.94
45.58
113.55
25.06
121.73
42.47
41.88
135.86
42.71
21.55
59.35
135.49
119.08
83.00
79.60
40.04
38.20
42.22
39.80
34.03
213.11
109.20
41.42
36.61
44.07
59.35
27.62
70.82
77.63
119.64
105.92
92.98
80.T2
�
0
0
PIN ACCT # LOCATION # ADDRESS BALANCE PENALTY TOTAL
11 30 24 24 0095 134425 522130 7373 UNIVERSITY AVE 132.01 13.20 145.21
11 30 24 24 0095 123925 522140 7375 UNIVERSITY AVE 267.68 26.77 294.45
11 30 24 24 0095 134425 522140 7375 UNIVERSITY AVE 63.15 6.32 69.47
23 30 24 14 0016 88915 495690 5751 WEST MOORE LAKE DR 23.41 2.34 25.T5
Sub 1'otai Final Billed :lccounts $ 3,41315 S 341.38 S 3,754.53
Grand Total actives & Finals S 105,288.07 � t0,529.01 S 115,817.08
6
35
/
�
CRY OF
FRIDLEY
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
October 27, 2003
William W. Burns, City Manager �:1`'� •
Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director
Deb Skogen, City Clerk
October 21, 2003
Fridtey American Legion Post 303 - Charitable Gambling Premise Permit
Renewal
Section 30 of the Fridley City Code allows Lawful Gambling by a licensed organization. The
Fridley American Legion, Post 303, is currently conducting charitable gambling on their
premises located at 7365 Central Avenue NE. Their Charitable Gambling Premise Permit
expires on February 28, 2004.
The renewal application requires a resolution from the City Council approving the renewal. If
approved, the premise permit would become effective March 1, 2004 and expire February 28,
2006. Please find a resolution for the renewal premise permit. Staff recommends approval of the
premise permit renewal by adoption of the attached resolution.
0
36
RESOLUTION NO. - 2003
RESOLUTION IN SL"PPORT OF A1�1 APPLICATION FOR
A;VIINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT FOR
FRIDLEY ANIERICAN LEGION, POST 303
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has been served with a copy of an Application for a Minnesota
Lawful Gambling Premise Pemut for the Fridley American Legion, Post 303, and
WHEREAS, the location of the Premise Permit is for their premises located at 7365 Central Avenue
NE and will be effective from March 1, 2004 to February 28, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has found no reason to restrict the location for the charitable
gambling operation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley approves the
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Pernut Application for the Fridley American Legion, Post
303 on their premises located at 7365 Central Avenue NE.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 27Tx
DAY OF OCTOBER 2003.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
37
SCOTT J. LUND - MAYOR
= AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
GTY OF
FRIDLEY
0
CLA1 MS
113830 - 113971
E��:3
�
� ��
City of
Fridley
AGENDAITEM
City Council Meeting Of Monday, October 27, 2003
�
Gas Services
Fireplace Gallery
433 East Main St Mike Moriarty
Anoka MN 55303-
General Contractor-Commercial
Thor Construction Co
5400 Main St STE 203 Denise Spanbauer
Minneapolis MN 55421-
Velander Construction 8� Investments
7757 Ewing Ave N Mark Velander
Brooklyn Park MN 55443-
General Contractor-Residential
D 8 D Contracting Inc (6898)
15045 Lake Dr Dennis Dumoulin
Forest Lake MN 55025-
Dalsin John A& Son Inc (9178)
2830 20 Ave S Robe�t Dalsin
Minneapolis MN 55407-
M 8 R Home Service Inc (20225403)
3336 S Coon Creek Dr Mike Caron
Andover MN 55304-
McCloud Construction (20396131)
1635 Merrimac Lane Rocky McCloud
Plymouth MN 55447-
Standard Construction Services (20319453)
595 N Snelling Ave Chad Liddicoat
St Paul MN 55104-
39
Approved Bv:
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
�
Statewide Home Supply 8� Service Inc (4774)
340 14 1/2 Ave Hal Weber
Turtle Lake WI 54889-7808
Heatinq
Binder Heating & AC Inc
222 Hardman Ave N Richard Binder
S St Paul MN 55075-
Mobile Home installer
Statewide Home Supply 8� Service Inc (9373)
360 14 1/2 Ave Hal Weber
Turtle Lake WI 54889-7808
Plumbing
Backdahl 8 Olson Plbg 8 Htg Co
3157 Chicago Ave S Rich Olson
Minneapolis MN 55407-
Erickson Plumbing Htg S Cooling
1471 92 Lane Stacy Erickson
Blaine MN 55449-
Whelan Davis Co Inc
7872 12 Ave S Mike Whelan
Bloomington MN 55425-
Sian Erector
Electro Neon 8� Design Inc
1680 99 Lane NE Nucgaek Zuertnab
Blaine MN 55449-
Source One Graphics Inc
7703 Central Ave NE Tom Polson
Spring Lake Park MN 55432-
. �
Approved By:
State of MN
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
State of MN
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
Ron Julkowski
Building Official
�
�
`
an oF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
, P.O. Box 86
Minneapolis, MN 55486-2119
ESTIMATES
Municipal Garage Parking Lot Overlay
Project No. 343
FINAL ESTIIVIATE .................................................
,
G:�
................. $ 53,647.00
�
�
CfTY OF
FRIDLEY
AGENDA ITEM
COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �t
��
FR01VI:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2003 NUISANCE
ABATEMENT
October 24, 2003
At the meeting of October 13, 2003, the Public Hearing was opened on the issue of the annual nuisance
abatements. This is an annual assessment that is done in regazd to expenses that are incurred to clean up
city code related issues. At the public hearing the attorney for Mr. Ulrich requested that it be continued
to the evening of October 27; 2003.
RDP/me
Attachment
� y�
0
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PUBLIC AEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Fridley City Council-will conduct a public hearing at 7:30 p.m.
on October 13, 2003 in the Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue, to consider, and possibly
adopt, the proposed assessment for the following improvements:
2002 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Project #2002-1
2003 NUISANCE ABATEMENT
6211 Sunrise Drive
157 Hartman Circle
5750 Madison Avenue
Assess 10 years @ 6.5% Interest $109,897.52
Edgewater Gardens Neighborhood
Assess 1 year @ 6.�% Interest $ 7,277.00
The proposed assessment rolls are on file for public inspection at the Finance Office. Notices are
being mailed to all property owners.
Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the
amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the clerk prior to the hearing
or is presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may, upon such notice, consider
any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, upon such
further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081
by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
The City of Fridley has adopted Resolution No. 14-1995 deferring special assessment payments for
senior citizens. The City Council may defer the payment of special assessments for any homestead
property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the
payments.
Publish: September 25, 2003
Scott J. Lund
Mayor
43
�
�
QTY OF
FRIDLEY
T�:
FROiVI:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
GREG TIREVOLD, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST.
2003-1
DATE: October 20, 2003
Attached is the Public Hearing Notice for the assessment for the Street Improvement Project No. ST.
2003-1.
The Public Hearing Notice was published in the Focus newspaper on October 9, 2003 as required by
State Statute. This notice included an incorrect amount for the total assessment. In order to comply
with State Statute requirements, an assessment needs to be published at least two weeks prior to the
Public Hearing. As a result, a Public Hearing Notice with the correct amount of the assessment was
placed in the StarTribune on October 19, 2003.
Based upon advice from the City's legal counsel, the City Council should conduct the Public Hearing
tonight as noted in the first notice published in the Focus and continue the hearing to the meeting of
November 3, 2003 as referenced in the notice published in the StarTribune on October 19, 2003. The
resolution to adopt the assessment will be presented at the November 3, 2003 City Council meeting.
RDP/gt
Attachme nt
..
PUBLISHED IN THE FOCUS
CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MIi�TNESOTA
• PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Fridley City Council will conduct a public hearing at 7:30 p.m.
on October 27, 2003 in the Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue, to consider, and possibly
adopt, the proposed assessment for the following improvements:
2003 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Assess 10 years @ 6.5% Interest $109,897.52
Project #2003-1 Marion Hills Neighborhood
The proposed assessment rolls are on file for public inspection at the Finance Office. Notices are
being mailed to all property owners.
Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the
amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the clerk prior to the hearing
or is presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may, upon such notice, consider
any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, upon such
further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessmert to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081
by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
The City of Fridley has adopted Resolution No. 14-1995 deferring special assessment payments for
senior citizens. The City Council may defer the payment of special assessments for any homestead
property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the
payments.
Publish: October 9, 2003
Scott J. Lund
Mayor
45
PUBLISHED IN THE STARTRIBUNE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Fridley City Council will conduct a public hearinQ at 7:30
p.m. on November 3, 2003 in the Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue, to consider, and
possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the following improvement:
2003 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Assess 10 years @ 6.5% Interest $145,207.02
Project #2003-1 Marion Hills Neighborhood
This hearing is for the same project as was previously noticed on October 9, 2003, for hearing
on October 27, 2003. The notice for that hearing incorrectly stated the project cost. You are hereby
notified that the October 27, 2003 hearing will be continued to November 3, 2003.
The proposed assessment rolls are on file for public inspection at the Finance Office. Notices
have been mailed to all property owners.
Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the
amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the clerk prior to the hearing
or is presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may, upon such notice, consider
any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, upon such
further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section
429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the
adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service
upon the Mayor or Clerk.
The City of Fridley has adopted Resolution No. 14-1995 deferring special assessment
payments for senior citizens. The City Council may defer the payment of special assessments for any
homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to
make the payments.
/s/ Scott J. Lund, Mayor
Publish: October 19, 2003
��
r
�
UTY OF
FRIDLEY
' TO:
• FROM:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER I�
�� .
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
GREG TIREVOLD, SPECIAL ASSESSNIENTS
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2003 NUISANCE
ABATEMENT
DATE: October 20, 2003
Attached you will find the final assessment roll for the 2003 Nuisance Abatement along with the
Resolution to adopt the assessment. The Public Hearing for this assessment was conducted at the
October 13, 2003 City Council meeting. The adoption of the assessment was tabled until the October
27, 2003 meeting.
The assessment includes 3 properties at a cost of $7,277.00. The assessment will be certified for 1
year at an interest rate of 6.5%.
RDP/gt
Attachment
47
RESOLUTION NO. 2003
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
FOR 2003 NUISA�iCE ABATEMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard
and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 2003 Nuisance Abatement.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA:
Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of
the assessment levied against it.
Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of one year,
the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 6'h percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of
this resolution until December 31, 2004.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the
county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid
within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution.
The Finance Director shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county
auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected
and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 2003.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
SCOTT J. LUND - MAYOR
� ���
ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Name PIN No. Actual
Assessment
Anthony Howe 14-30-24-33-0004 $ 1164.85
6211 Sunrise Drive
Fridley, MN 55432
David Ulrich 15-30-24-12-0052 $ 3,862.34
157 Hartman Circle
Fridley, MN 55432
Pairdon Colstrom 23-30-24-13-0070 $ 2,249.81
5750 Madison Avenue
Fridley, MN 55432
.
.•
/
�
CRY OF
PRIDLEY
0
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
. ��
I O: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �!
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
GREG TIREVOLD, SPECIAL ASSESSMElV"TS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSNIENT FOR THE 2002 STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 2002-1
DATE: October 20, 2003
Attached you will fnd the final assessment roll for the 2002 Street Improvement Project No. St.
2002-1 along with the Resolution to adopt the assessment. The Public Hearing for this assessment
was conducted at the October 13, 2003 City Council meeting. The adoption of the assessment was
tabled until the October 27, 2003 meeting.
This project included 94 properties. T'he assessment will be for 10 years at a rate of 6.5%.
RDP/gt
Attachment
r
50
0
- . .
CI I i �F
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSTTY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287
October 15, 2003
Mr. Donald tiolien 8� Mrs. Mary ReVoir (Flolien)
47 Rice Creek Way nE
Fridley MI`I 55432
Subjec� ST 2002-1 Edgewater Gardens (`leighborhood Street Improvement Project
Dear Mr. 8� Mrs. Holien:
' • •.•
Your letter protesting the assessments for the 2002 street improvement project was received by the City
Council during the Publ'�c liearing for these as.sessments at their October 13, 2003 meeting. Your
object3ons were noted and discussed and the incident you refer to was determined to be a separate issue
from the assessment process.
� I would like to clarify a number of misstatements in your letter. First off, the storm sewers to the lake were
not sealed but rather had a filter placed over them to protect the lake from construction sediment These
filters do slow the passage of the water and this was compounded in this case by the quick intense duration
of the storm event
Secondiy, the project did not inciude any new storm sewers nor the ad�tion of back-up systerns for heavy
rainfall. The existing storm sewers were reconstructed and a low flow filtration system to protect the lake
was added. There was no change to the capacity of these storm sewers.
Reviewing this incident with the Public Service Worker who responded to the call confirmed thak he was able
to open the storm sewer filter. lie also stated that he talked to you and saw the water and rnud that had
entered your home. You were offered to have Service Master come to clean up this watPr and mud at the
City's expense. This is our standard policy in the event of a sewer backup and was extended to this
incident That service was refused by you at that time. We have had no other contact regarding this
incident since.
You may stiil file a damage claim with the City. Such claim will be tumed over to an agent from the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for invest3gation and a determination. If y�ou wish to pursue this
opdon, please contact Marcy Everette in our Finance Department at 763-572-3533.
If you have any othex questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 763�572-3550.
Sincerely, '
�
Jon ti. tlaukaas
�, Director of Public Works
cc: W. W. Bums, City Manager
. ,.� • ^ �
� � •v .�
`/
To: City of Fridley
Greg Tirevold, Special Assessments
From: Donald Holien & �iary ReVoir (Holien)
Date: October.l3, 2003
The following is our written objection to the proposed assessment on our property
located at 47 Rice Creek Way NE, Fridley, triN 55432.
The reason we are objecting is because we incurred a large amount of damage to
our home while the improvements to the street were being completed. The workers
for the company that was doing the work sealed the sewer that was located ia front
of our property. There was a heavy rainfall and since the sewer was blocked the
rain frnm the street came pouring into our front yard which is located at the bottom
of a hill in the neighbor600d. The rain was getting very deep in our yard and
started coming into the house all atong the front and side of the house. Four men
from acrnss the street helped us shovel the rain arnund to the rear of the house
where it would rua into the take. One of the men was video taping everything that
was 6appening.
It was on the weekend so we could not reach anyone at the city offices so we called �
911 and said we were having a major flood and asked if they could send someone
over frnm the city to open the sewer. A city worker came over and he wasn't sure
what to do. He mansged to create a small opening in the sewer for the rain to drain
which helped somewhat.
As a result of t6e rain and mud seepage into our home the carpet in our family room
6as mud stains and the carpet in one of the bedrooms is stained in a large area
w6ere the glue got wet and came up t6rough the carpet and stained it yellow.
The city must have been aware that this was a problem area because they placed
two new sewers there that have built in back-up systems for heavy rainfatL
We talked to our insurance agent recently and she said that the city or who they
hired should be responsible for the damages to our home and for compensation to
us.
We feel that we should not have to pay the assessments until we are compensated for
the damages that were caused as a result of the road improvements.
� �� � .. T �. . •
� t4
�rl l l O�
FRiDLEY
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287
October I5, 2003
Mr. 8� Mrs. John Toedter
38 66�' Way I`{E
Fridley MI`I 55432
Subject ST 2002-1 Edgewater Gardens l`(eighborhood Street Improvement Project
Dear Mr. � Mrs. Toedter.
PW03-061
At the October 13, 2003 Fridley city council meeting, you presented a letter protesting your
assessments for the 2002 street improvement project in your neighborhood. It appeared that the
main thrust of your objection centered around a perceived lack of pubiic involvement
The City of Fridley goes weil beyond the IegislatNely required pubiic notification on these types of
projects. We hold neighborhood meetings the summer before a proposed project to present the
concept and general reasons behind the project to all affected proPerties. Petitions of support are
circulated through the neighborhood at that time. We also request these property owners inform
us of any and ali area specific problems they may be aware of that we may know about so that
correction can be incorporated into the project during design rather than after the fact This
neighborhood meeting was held on Thursday, June 7, 2001.
Onfy after this initial buyin from the neighborhood does the City begin project surveying and
design. Through the summer and early fall preliminary plans, specifications and estimates are
prepared and presented to the City Council. A public hearing is then held on the proposed project
and the proposed assessments and notice is sent to aii affected properly owners in addition to the
requirement for pubiication of the notice in the local paper. This notice was mailed on I`lovember
27, 2001 and the hearing was heid on December 17, 2001.
After this pubiic hearing the Ci'ty will move forward with creation of final plans. Once these final
plans are finished and presented to and approved by the city council, only then is the project
ordered and the assessments are put into the system to become a Pending Assessment This
project was set up in our system as a Pending Assessment on April 25, 2002.
The final step is advertisement for bids, award and construction. As you can plainty see, this is
a long careful process with several opportunities for public involvement Throughout the
development and construction of a project we encourage property owners to participate in the
design by informing us of specific issues they would like to see resolved. All of the construction
update newsletters had contact information if you had questions on the project
�
,
. . s � , , -,.
October I5, 2003
Page 2
1 understand that the date of your final closing was April 26, 2002, one day after this was set up
as a pending assessment it appears your ciosing company failed to perform a last day check for
pending assessments. This is an issue you should take up with that closing company. The
assessment that was paid off was part of a lOyear asse.ssment for repairs to the Locke Lake dam
from 1996.
Your last issue was with the notification being sent to your previous address in Roseviile. We use
the Anoka County Recorders Office property ownership information for these mailings. That office
still has the Roseville address listed for the fee ownership of your house on 66�' Way. 1 would
recommend you contact your title company and the Anoka County Recorder s Office as soon as
possible to get this corrected.
We have documentation on all this, including meeting dates and information, mailing dates, filing
dates, assessment processing dates, policies on the assessment calculations, and city council
meeting minutes of the public hearings and resolutions passed for this project I would be happy
to meet with you to review this information. You may contact me directly at 763-572-3550.
I would also encourage you to become more aware of what is happening in our community by
watching the Council and Commission meetings on local cable Channel 17, visiting the Fridley
website at www.ci.fridley.mn.us, reading the City newsletter published six times annually, and
checking for public notices in the Focus newspaper. -
;
Sincerely,
i
: -
Gji
Jon tl. tiaukaas
Director of Public Works
Jlili:cz
-cc: W. W. Bums, City Manager -
.�
t � .' �. � :
38 66th Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
October 13, 2003
To Whom It N1ay Concern,
I would like to register my protest to the proposed assessment that would be
applied to our property. The current lack of detail that has been provided to us appears to
have no basis in need and no documentation as to why it was proposed to be
implemented.
At a minimum, I believe that the public should have been solicited to help
determine the scope of the project, since they are the principle stakeholders in the
process. Additionally, I do not recall any notification for the public to participate in the
initiation and planning stages of this process. Without that participation, I can not support
a process until I have been reassured that all project management and quality cost saving
steps have been completed. As stakeholders and as some of the homeowners that aze
being asked to pay for this, it is our responsibility to ensure that the money is being used
not only in the most effective manner, but in a manner that provides the best return on
investment. At this time, we aze definitely not convinced of that fact.
In closing, I believe that the proposed assessment should be submitted to a11 of the
affected home owners with adequate documentation, to deternune their level of support
before the issue is voted on by the city council. If the majority of affected homeowners
are persuaded as to the need and utility, then the matter should proceed to the council for
vote.
Thank you for your time.
John & Darlene Toedter
P.S. '
I would also like to object to the fact that the notification for the vote of this assessment
was sent to my former place of residence. The address that is being assessed is both my
homestead and my legal residence, sending notification to any other both deprives me of
my rights as a member of this community and shows that the city is not adequately
completing it's responsibilities to it's citizens.
jt
(ti ) � �� - 5� �- 3v3�1
�tal 651 - q83- 352�
RESOLUTION NO. -2003
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE
2002 STREET IMPROVENTENT PROJECT NO. 2002-1
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard
and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 2002 Street Improvement Project
No. 2002-1.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA:
Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of
the assessment levied against it.
Such assessmer�t shall be payable in equal annual instaliments extending over a period of ten years,
the first of the instaliments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2004, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 6'h percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of
this resolution until December 31, 2004. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the
county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the city �easurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid
within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city
treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31
of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
The Finance Director shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county
auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected
and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF OCTOBER, 2003.
ATTEST:
DEBRA A. SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
���i � 1�1� u : ��:7
51
OCT-28-200� �3:44 AM DORFF
.r , ,�;
October 27, 2043
Fridley City Counci!
Fridley Municipal Center
6431 University Ave NE
Frid(ey 1�N 53432
Re: 253024210074
PropeRy of Paul J and Karen E Dorff
1315 52'� Ave NE, Fridley MN SS421
763 S71 9�25 P,,�1
/
/ ri �^: �• A ��1•
/ _
� � •�7-03 ��t � �� �' r,�
�� �b3�� �/� /� �,
W Q� 1�.� a5 St�u� �
S h'� 7
�,�bS�,�, f�ra w �r k. �k�P .
���
Due to prior cocnmitments du prepecty owners themselves are unable bo app�ear in person
before the Council tonight Mr. Jonathan Da�tff iatcnds to bc present to answer aay
questions you may have. Mr. Paul Dortihas met with City staiiand previously discussed
this matter, however, no written communications have been received regarding the final
outcome of the tnstant rnanner described below as follow up to d�at me�tin�.
The purpose of this letbcr is document concems and to call to the attention of the Ciry
Council the problems with the concrete appro�ch installed by the Ciry's convactor at the
above rofezenced address and is a request to have said contractai-takg e.ppmpriate
remediat ection andlor request that the City further pursue payment for and reinstallatioa
of said work by Johnson & Sans Cancrete of said concreie approach.
The driveway pourod by the Ciry's cantracbvr is subst�sttdand far th�e following r+easons:
•'The Ciry contracbor's driv�way appraach paur was subst8ndard; the v�aci�nce in
heigbt to the p�e-existing driveway has voided the watranty of the preexisting
driveway adjaoent to the appraach (see attached Exhibit l, l�tter from Johnson &
Sons Conct�t� da/ed October24, 2003)
• There are ripples and di� in the concrote due. to the fa�t thaz it is on a hill aad the
poured concrete used ia the approach was of improper consistency for the job
causing sags and dips and leaving the surface uneven. This msy become a hazard
in icy weather.
• The cuts mede into the concttte for stress reduction are nat uniform and in at
lease one instanee are larg� enaugh far �. shoe hcel to c�tch in it making it a
potential hazard far wh�ch this propeaty owner intr.tsds to hold the City liable if
the City accepts the work finished aa is (it is the view of this owner that if said
crack was in any city aidewalk it would b� deelared unacceptable and would ba
replace�):
• Property owner conte�nds t�hat there are tweo options for reinedying this situaaon:
1. The city must require the City's contractor, at its own cxpense; came out
and redo the wor�c so that it is up to industry standard withaut damaging
any other portion of the �riveway; or
♦
OCT-28-2003 03:45 AM DORFF 763 571 9325 P.02
Fridley City Council
Octo6er 27, 2003
Page 2
2. The City must have the City's contractor pay Johnson & Sons to tear out
the approach and replace it with workmaaship ti�at matchcs that of the
remaining driveway suct� that it will bc fret from defects and the warrntriy
originatly of%�td by Johnson 8t Soas for the remaining driveway will bc
reirtstatsd and remein in �ct.
• Property owner contends that there shorila 6e no additional cast to th� pmperty
owntr directly or indirectly for rec}uiring th�e City's contractQr to accompli�h this
additional work up to industry standard. Any such costs should be bome by the
City's co�ctor for failure t�o comglet�e ib original job in a sstisPactory mamxer.
Any questions regarding this matoer may be addressed to Joe Jahnsoa at 612-867-Sb66 or
Katen and Paul Dorfi612-986-2625.
Sincerely,
�.
aren Dorff
1315 52"d Ave
Fridley MN SS421
�63-571-9325
OCT-28-2003'0a:45 AM DORFF
.. .
763 571 9325 P.03
JOHNSON & SONS CONCRET.E'
1,3008 Oregon Gircle
Che,m,plin, MN 6531 B
(B12)8B7-��6�
Fax.• (?B3),213-1392
vpww�ahnsane.nfleonscancrete.00m
Ootober 24, 2003
Pe,ul Dortf
1318 - 82.nfl Av�e. NE
F'ridley� MN
Dear P�ul:
Thie letter ie a followup to your telephone oa11. Johneon �I Sons Conorete
inetalled a ooncsete driveway Por you in Auguet. Follo�vi�ag, t.he oit{y's
contsactor installed an approa�ah to Lhe driv�ea�ray whic:h does not ma�tah the
hei�it of Johnson � 8ons Conorete'e ingta�lle,tion. Coneequent�y, at�p dsmage
done Lo Jahneon 8r 8one Concrete'e work due to these hei�.t ditferenceg will
not be oovered under we.rranty.
Sincere�y,
� .,�,,,�,�,..�'
oe J on
'� .Tlicensed * 1�onded � InBUred *
Estimated
Assessment for
Concrete Curb � �ctuai
Gutter Based on Assessment
Address PII`1 I`1o. Front Ft �15.00 per Front Ft �12.90 per Front Ft
t11nZ GREGG C 8t BOnrIE M 153024110021 86 1,290.00 I.ill.12
6715 AStiTOIY AVE hE
FRIDLEY, Mh �5432
t10LLIt1Al`I JOtil`i T LY KIMBERLY 153024110022 i 5 1,125.00 969.00
6709 ASFiTOn AVE nE '
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
REBRO JUSTIn T&t bVILILITI P 153024110023 75 1,125.00 969.00
6705 ASFiTOIY AbE IYE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
FICEIYKO WILLIAM &t OLSOn D E 153024110029 121 1,815.00 1,56332
15 RICE CREEK WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
SCtiULTZ KENnETH P 8t t10LLY 153024tl00�0 109 1.635.00 1,408.28
Il RICE CREEK WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
FARMER GREGORY I� MARY M 153024130011 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
71 RICE CREEK WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
JOfinSOh WILLIAM E Lt CAROL Y 153024130012 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
75 RICE CREEK WAY IYE
FftIDI.EY, Mn 55432
BERGQUIST ALLEIY & LOIS 153024t30013 86 1,290.00 1.111•12
77 RICE CREEK WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
�VESTEnFIELD MARLISS A 153024130014 94 1,410.00 1.214•48
81 RICE CREEK WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
SKARIIUS ROf`IALD E Lt KAY A 153024130015 83 1,245.00 1.07236
85 RICE CREEK WAY I`IE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
LOUGtiLIIY PAUL R 153024130017 75 1,125.00 969.00
72 RICE CREEK WAY nE -
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
JOtiIYSOn DEAI`I E 153024130019 75 1,125.00 969.00
80 RICE CREEK WAY I`IE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
STOREVIK ROBERT M 153024130021 75 1,125.00 969.00'
84 RICE CREEK WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
nELSOn BRUCE 8t BE�ERLY 153024130022 74 1.110.00 956.08
90 RICE CREEK WAY I�E
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
rfART DAV1D L& WAI`fDA K 153024130023 78 1,170.00 1,007.76
91 66Tti WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
IIYLAI`fD MARK L 8t KAREIY L 153024130024 75 1,125.00 969.00
81 66Tt1 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
53
Estimated
Assessment for
Concrete Curb & Actual
Gutter Based on Assessment
Address PII`I I�o. Front Ft 515.00 per Front Ft �12.90 per front Ft
SETERInG DUAI`1E PETER 8t D C 153024I30025 75 f,125.00 969.00
71 66Tti W/�Y nE
FRIDLEY, Mn Sy+32
YURKEW SR DAV1D A St nICKY L 153024130026 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
80 66Tti WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
DUPAY WILLIAM 8Y PAULA 153024130027 79 1,185.00 1,020.68
90 66Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
GERDIn BRYHIY & SAI`IDRA 153024130028 81 1,215.00 1,046.52
91 65 V2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
hELSOn ELDOn D� SAI`1DRA L 153024130029 109 1,635.00 1,408.28
6660 t11CKORY ST nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
IYGUYEn JAMES T 8t JULIA L 153024130030 90 ],350.00 1,162.80
6640 t11CKORY ST IYE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
JOFinSOIY DOI`IAL,D E 8t SIiIRLEY 153024130031 94 1,410.00 1,214.48
6600 t11CKORY ST i`IE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
LARSOn RICFIARD A 8t I`IAI`ICE E 153024130032 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
6580 t11CKORY ST nE
PRIDLEY, MIY 55432
AMBUtiL DA1M`i 8t GREGORY 153024130035 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
6544 F1ICKORY ST nE
FRIDLEY, Mh 55432
LAI�GER MIRTt1 B TRUSTEE 153024130036 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
6530 t11CKORY ST nE
FRIDLEY, Mh 55432
OLSOn OMER 8c PLOREIYCE 153024130052 151 2,265.00 1.950.92
98 FtICE CREEK WAY I`IE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
IYORBERG BRUCE S& JUAf`iffA 153024130061 67 1,005.00 865.64
M
6560 t11CKORY ST IYE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
GOhZALEZ CtiARLES t1 � 153024130062 67 1,005.00 865.64
C1T1Tt11A T
6570 t11CKORY ST nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
BAKKE tIERMAi`I 8t SIIAROIY 153024140001 115 1,725.00 1,485.80
59 R10E CREEK WAY I`IE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
RUIKKA PAUL M& ROSE E 153024140002 90 1,350.00 1,162.80
65 RICE CREEK WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
54
Estimated
Assessment for
Concrete Curb � Actual
Gutter Based on Assessment
Address PIIY no. Front Ft �I5.00 per Front Ft �12.90 per Front Ft
Af`IDERSOIY LARS G&�`!nA E 153024140003 130 1,950.00 1,679.60
6696 AStiT01`1 AVE I`iE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
BOSKOV1Cti BORIS St MARYAIYn 153024140004 75 1,125.00 969.00
16 67Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, P1n 55432
YMIG YOU & SA1 153024140005 75 1.125.00 969.00
24 67f11 WAY I`iE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
SCtiMIDT ROBERT E�C JUDfi't1 C 153024140006 75 1,125.00 969.00
32 67I'ti WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
GABEL PATRICIA 153024140007 126 1,890.00 1,627.92
5947 2 1/2 STREET IYE 40 Rice Cric Way
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
STECKMAf`I ROIYALD E E� EUnICE 153024140008 126 1,890.00 1.627.92
58 RICE CREEK WAY I`�
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
IIAMER BARBARA 153024140009 75 1,125.00 969.00
41 66 1/2 WAY IYE
FRIDt,EY, MIY 55432
ALLEI`I DAVID 8t JOAI`1 153024140010 75 1,125.00 969.00
9540 S KIMBLE RD 33 66-1/2 Way
PEQUOT LAKES MI`I 56472
I10VE MARK A 8t SUZAI`1nE Y 153024140011 75 1,125.00 969.00
25 66 I/2 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
SIIELTON JOF11Y D& BO(YTA L 153024140012 75 1,125.00 969.00
17 66 1/2 WAY I`�
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
WI1ALEn DOI`IALD J& DEAI`11YE 153024140013 81 1,215.00 1,046.52
M
Il 66 1/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
LE VOIR RICYIAFiD E 153024140014 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
10 66 1/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MfY 55432
ADOLPtISOn FCEIYT O& CYnTtilA 153024140015 80 1.200.00 1.033.60
16 66 1/2 WAY IYE '
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
BOSKOVICFi STEVEn J 153024140016 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
24 66 I/2 WAY f�E
FRIDLEY, Mn �5432
KAZMIERKOSKI JOHI`i V 153024140017 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
32 66 1/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
55
Estimated
Assessment for
Concrete Curb � Achial
Gutter Based on Assessment
Address PIIY I`1o. Front Ft �IS.00 per Front Ft �12.90 per Front Ft
BLAIR RICt1ARD S 8t BETTE M 1530241400t8 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
40 66 1/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
.JEnKInS DOI`IALD & ROSLITI 153024140019 80 1,200.00 I,033.60
48 66 1/2 WAY I`IE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
BARTELS V E& P A TRUSTEES f53024140022 101 1515.00 1,304.92
64 RICE CREEK WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
SOLBERG DALE W tt PAMELA J 153024140023 86 1Z90.00 l,lll.l2
65 66TF1 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, MIY 5�432
GUIIAIYICK DHI`IIEL J� 153024140024 87 1,305.00 1,124.04
BARBARA
55 66Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
F10LLEn F(ERMIT E 8t FRHI`iCES 153024140025 88 1,320.00 1,136.96
M
49 66Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
GREVEh DIAI`IE M 153024140026 75 1,125.00 969.00
41 66Tt1 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, MI`i 55432
MEIER ALFRED E 8t JULIE L 153024140027 75 1,125.00 969.00
33 66TF1 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
JOFinSOn BOIYITA R 153024140028 75 1,125.00 969.00
25 66TI1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MI`1 55432
TERWISSCf1A GAY L 153024140029 75 1,125.00 969.00
17 66Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
TtiIMMESCt1 t1AROLD J� MHftY 153024140030 95 _ 1,425.00 1,227.40
E
11 66TF1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MI`i 55432
BJORKLUI`ID MARSFIALL V� L 153024140031 85 1,275.00 1,098.20
10 66TF1 WAY (`iE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
t10FFMAn AMY K 153024140032 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
18 66TF1 WAY I�E
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
ALLARD MARK G St REI`IAE K 153024140033 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
28 66TF1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mf`I 55432
tiEnDRICKS CARTER & FAYE 153024140034 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
38 66Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
56
Estimated
Assessment for
Concrete Curb & Actual
Gutter Based on Assessment
Address PII`I I`lo. Front Ft �15.00 per Front Ft �12.90 per Front Ft
DIEDERICti ftOLAI`ID J St JAI`!E L 153024140035 80 1,200.00 1.033.60
46 66Tt1 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mf`I 55432
WILLEY JERALD D 153024140036 78 1,170.00 1,007.76
54 66Tt1 WAY I`� �
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
r
ST MARIE BREnT L&' SARAti J 153024140037 97 1,455.00 1,253.24�
62 66Tt1 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
t1ART RICt1ARD W& LIIYDA D 153024140038 83 1,245.00 1,07236
70 66TH WAY IYE
FRIDIEY, Mh 55432
GETAt1Un WEBIT 8t KASSA A 153024140039 75 1,125.00 969.00
81 65 1/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
SICtiAK MICFIAEL 8Y VIOLA J 153024140040 82 1,230.00 1,059.44
71 65 1/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
STEIhMAIYIY FREDERICK Lt 153024140041 86 1,290.00 1,111.12
PAULETTE
61 65 1/2 WAY I`IE
FR1Dl,EY, MIY 55432
JOFinSOn WALTER R 8t JEAI`I A 153024140042 88 1,320.00 1,136.96
51 65 1/2 WAY f`IE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
VA(`i EE RUfF1 GRACE LErORA 153024140043 80 1.200.00 1,033.60
41 65 1/2 WAY IYE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
t1ALVERSOIY DAVID E� DOREEf`I 153024140044 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
31 65 1/2 WAY IYE
PRIDLEY, MI`i 55432
BOEDIGf1EIMER ELWin L� A I 153024140045 80 1,200.00 1,033.60
21 65 I/2 WAY nE _
FRlDLEY, Mn 55432
VRKLJHI`1 PAUL M& L/U`IGER C 153024140046 95 1,425.00 1,227.40
M
II 65 1/2 WAY I`IE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432 '
REDEEMER LUTt1ERAh Ct1URCli 153024140047 494 7,410.00 6,382.48
61 MISSISSIPPI WAY (574 less 80 ft
FRIDLEY, MIY 55/+32 credi�
MCGILLICUDDY J A 8t J L 153024140050 70 1,050.00 904.40
6701 AStiTOh A� IYE
FRIDLEY, MIY 55432
TROJAI`10WSKI D J 8t JOtinSOn 153024140051 70 1,050.00 904.40
C R
6699 AStff01`i AbE I`�
FRIDLEY, Mh 55432
57
Estimated
Assessment for
Concrete Curb & Actuai
Gutter Based on Assessment
Address PII`1 f`lo. Front Ft �15.00 per Front Ft 512.90 per Front Ft
RITCt11E DOUGLAS � PATRICIA 153024140069 89 1,335.00 1,149.88
6685 ASFiTOn AVE nE
FRIDLEY, Mn ��432
CAM/iRILLO AIYTOnlO � TERESA 153024140070 88 1.320.00 1,136.96
6673 ASFiTOn AVE nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
CRACRAfi' RICt1ARD J Lt LORA 153024140071 88 1,320.00 1,136.96
M
6651 ASFiTOn AbE nE
FRIDLEY, MI`I 55432
SPADGEnSKE SCOTT A& KIM M 153024140084 99 1,485.00 1,279.08
56 66 I/2 WAY nE
FRIDLEY, Mn 55432
8,506 � 109,897.52
� •
/ AGENDA ITEM
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
crrr oF
FRIDLEY
Date: October 21, 2003
To: William Burns, City Manager ��
�
From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator
Stacy Stromberg, Planner
Subject: Preliminary Plat Request, PS #03-07, Michael Juaire, PMJ Group, Inc.
M-03-153
INTRODUCTION
Michael Juaire, PMJ Group, Inc. is requesting to replat the property located at 1215 Norton
Avenue, to create 5 separate lots from part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision #89, in order to
construct a 4-unit town home development.
This is the fourth plat request submitted by Mr. Juaire for a town home development on
Norton Avenue and staff has heard from the petitioner that this will be the last plat request.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At the October 15, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for PS
#03-07. After receiving public comment and a brief discussion, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of plat request, PS #03-07, with the stipulations as presented.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION -
City Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission.
STIPULATIONS
1. The final landscape plan shall meet code requirements for number of and size of
plantings and be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a
building permit.
2. All landscaped areas shall have irrigation installed.
3. Brick type and application on elevations and other external building materials to
be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Columns shown on all elevations of the building plans shall be constructed using
brick.
59
5. Shakes shown on the front and rear elevation shall be wrapped around to the
right and left elevations for a consistent four-sided appearance.
6. For architectural consistency, all windows on front elevations shail have shutters
instalied.
7. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the City's
engineering staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
8. A utility plan shall be submitted and approved by the City's engineering staff
prior to issuance of a building permit.
9. Individual serVices will be required for each unit.
10. A 12-foot utility and drainage easement shall be granted along the entire
northern edge of the property prior to final plat.
11. All elements of the building shall meet the current building code and be
approved by the City Building Official.
12. The petitioner shall pay applicable park dedication fee of $1,500 per unit prior to
the issuance of any building permits.
13. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage
treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed.
14. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities,
etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner, prior to
final plat approval.
.1
City of Fridley Land Use Application
PS-03-07 October 15, 2003
GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION
Applicant:
Michael Juaire
9814 Pin Oak Avenue
Brooklyn Park MN 55443
Requested Action:
Replat property to accommodate a 4-
unit town home development.
Existing Zoning:
R-3, General Multiple Units
Location:
1215 Norton Avenue
Size:
17,419 sq. ft. .40 acres
Existing Land Use:
Single Family Home.
Surrounding Land Use & Zoning:
N: Apartment building & R-3
E: Duplex & R-3
S: Multi-Family 8� R-3
W: Multi-Family & R-3
Comprehensive Plan Conformance:
Consistent with Plan.
Zoning Ordinance Conformance:
Multiple dwelling complexes, including
rental and condominium apartments
are a permitted use in the R-3 zoning
district.
Zoning History: -
1949 — Lot is platted.
Home built prior to 1949.
Legal Description of Property:
The east 130 feet of Lot 5, Audito�'s
Subdivision #89
Public Utilities:
Located at the property.
Transportation:
Town homes will be accessed from
Norton Avenue.
Physical Characteristics:
Typical suburban lot and landscaping.
61
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Petitioner, Michael Juaire is requesting to
replat the property located at 1215 Norton
Avenue to allow for the construction of a 4-
unit town home development.
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
City Staff recommends approval of this
preliminary plat request, with stipulations.
• Provides additional housing
opportunities.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION / 60 DAY DATE
City Council — October 27, 2003
60 Day — November 10, 2003
Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg
PS #03-07
REQUEST
Michael Juaire, of PMJ Group, Inc. is requesting to repiat the property located at
1215 Norton Avenue, to create 5 separate lots from part of Lot 5, Auditor's
Subdivision #89, in order to construct a 4-unit owner occupied town home
development.
0
This is the fourth plat request submitted by Mr. Juaire for a town home
development on Norton Avenue and staff has heard from the petitioner that this ,
will be his last plat request.
�
_
ay
�
<
�
O
2
�
D
° � "' , � 1305
i
72ND
Green Circles — 1" Plat Request — approved (1153 & 1170)
Pink Circle — 2"d Plat Request — approved (1275)
Blue Circles — 3`d Plat Request — approved (1163 & 1175)
Red Circle — 4�h Plat Request (1215)
ANALYSIS '
The property is zoned R-3, Multi-Family, as are all surrounding properties. The
existing house and garage were constructed prior to 1949. Both of these -
structures will be removed to accommodate the proposed town home
development.
City Code requires that lots in the R-3, Multi-Family zoning district have a
minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet for a four unit dwelling. The subject
property is 17,419 square feet, which exceeds the minimum requirements. The
proposed town home development also meets all setback and lot coverage
requirements.
62
Existing Home
As you wiil recail from past meetings, there has been some discussion from
neighbors regarding the zoning of Norton Avenue. Staff has researched and
determined that the Norton Avenue block was rezoned from R-1, Single Family to
R-3, Multi-Family on August 19, 1963. A public hearing was held at the June 13,
1963, Planning Commission meeting and was continued to the June 27, 2003,
PC meeting to deliver notices to the neighborhood. At the June 27, 2003, PC
meeting, no one was present in opposition of the rezoning. The rezoning request
was approved by the City Council on August 19, 1963.
It appears from past zoning decisions that the vision of the City Council was to
allow higher density in this area. Mr. Juaire's requests are bringing the
neighborhood closer to that vision. The petitioner for the 1963 rezoning request,
Mr. George Norton, stated at the June 13, 1963 public hearing, that this was the
only remaining residential portion in the area and therefore, he wished to rezone
so that the full value of the property could be obtained.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the 2020 future land use of this property as
"Redevelopment." Redevelopment is described in the Comprehensive Plan as a
form of community revitalization that transforms undesirable elements into
desirable elements that reflect the community collective vision. The purposes of
redevelopment are to remove older blighted structures and to provide the
opportunity for more e�cient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and
under utilized parcels. �
63
�
The Norton Avenue block is categorized under the Redevelopment Area #1 in
the Comprehensive Plan, which also includes the salvage yards. It states that,
"The multiple family properties located along Norton Avenue may be eligible for
rental rehabilitation programs. The City should also pursue aggressive code
enforcement to assist in eliminating any negative images regulating from illegal
outdoor storage or other code enforcement problems." The redevelopment
section for this area doesn't specify that this area should be used for anything
other than Multi-Family.
Anytime something new is constructed in a neighborhood, the existing neighbors
may view the changes negatively and an alteration to the character of the area.
However, the intent of the 1963 rezoning was to accommodate multi-family in this
neighborhood. Adding these additional town home developments is consistent
with the decisions made by the City Council 40 years ago,
Fridley City Code states that construction hours are between the hours of 7:00
a.m. and 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and_between the hours of 9:00 a.m.
and 9:00 p.m. on Saturdays and legal holidays. Any work activity on Sundays is
unlawful. Mr. Juaire and one of his sheetrock contractors have been issued a
citation for violating the construction hours code requirement and additional
citations will be issued if this law is violated again.
Staff Recommendation
City Staff recommends approval of this preliminary plat request, with stipulations.
• Provides additional housing opportunities.
Stipulations
City Staff recommends that the following stipulations be placed upon approval of
this request.
1. The final landscape plan shall meet code requirements for number of
and size of plantings and be reviewed and approved by City staff prior
to issuance of a building permit.
2. All landscaped areas shall have irrigation installed.
3. Brick type and application on elevations and other external building
materials to be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of
a building permit.
4. Columns shown on all elevations of the building plans shall be
constructed using brick.
5. Shakes shown on the front and rear elevation shall be wrapped around
to the right and left elevations for a consistent four-sided appearance.
6. For architectural consistency, all windows on front elevations shall
have shutters installed.
7. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the
City's engineering staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
.�
8. A utility plan shall be submitted and approved by the City's engineering
staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
9. Individual services will be required for each unit.
10. A 12-foot utility and drainage easement shall be granted along the
entire northern edge of the property prior to final plat.
11. All elements of the building shall meet the current building code and be
approved by the City Building Official.
12. The petitioner shall pay applicable park dedication fee of $1,500 per
unit prior to the issuance of any building permits.
13. The petitioner shall provide proof that any existing wells or individual
sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or
removed.
14. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to
install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by
the Petitioner, prior to final plat approval.
65
�
� AGENDA ITEM
cmroF CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2003
FRIDLEY
� ,
INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS
r i
� •