Loading...
09/27/2004 - 00026424CITY OF FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 The regular meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Lund at 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Lund led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Lund Councilmember-at-Large Barnette Councilmember Billings Councilmember Wolfe Councilmember Bolkcom OTHERS PRESENT: William Burns, City Manager Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Jon Haukaas, Public Works Director Layne Otteson, Assistant Public Works Director Rebecca Brazys, Recording Secretary Fritz Knaak, City Attorney PROCLAMATION: Fire Prevention Week: October 3— 9, 2004 Mayor Lund presented Fire Marshal Ralph Messer with this proclamation. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council meeting of September 13, 2004. APPROVED NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution No. 2004-53 Approving a Plat, PS #04-02, Capretz Addition, by John F. and Sandra K. Capretz, for the Purpose of Creating Two Single Family Lots, Generally Located at 7335 East River Road NE (Ward 3). FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 2 of 14 Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated this request will create two lots out of one. It was unanimously approved by the Planning Commission on May 24 with the following twelve stipulations: 1. Property owner of record shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 2. Property owner of record at time of building permit application to pay required $1,500 park fee prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Property owner of record at time of building permit application to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Property owner of record at time of building permit application shall obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 5. Petitioner to properly maintain Lot No. 1 until sale occurs. 6. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 7. Petitioner shall provide easements as shown on preliminary plat drawing. 8. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to issuance of any building permits, in order to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties. 9. Each property shall have their own access onto East River Road, defined and separated with B6-18 curb drops and aprons. 10. Access to lots 1 and 2 shall be made within 30 feet of their common property lines. 11. Property owner of record at time of building permit application to obtain residential access permit from Anoka County Highway Department for the new access to Lot 1. 12. Each property shall be accessed through proper, legal driveways. Staff recommends Council's approval. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2004-53. 2. Resolution Extending the Term of the Southern Anoka County Community Consortium Joint Powers Agreement. Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated Fridley has been a part of the Southern Anoka County Community Consortium since the early 90's. SACCC has sponsored the Values First Program and served as a discussion forum for Fridley and Columbia Heights city and school district representatives. Hilltop has also been a member and participant. The resolution asks Council to commit to membership for another two years at an annual cost of $5,782. Staff recommends Council's approval. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 3 of 14 3. Approve Renewal of Contract for Towing, Storage and Impounding of Vehicles between the City of Fridley and Shorty's Heavy Duty Wrecker Service, Inc. Dr. Burns, City Manager, explained staff recently sought quotes for towing services. The quotes received from three companies were similar and competitive. Since the City has a long history of satisfactory service from Shorty's, staff is recommending that the City enter into a two-year contract with Shorty's that will expire December 31, 2006. APPROVED THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND SHORTY'S HEAVY DUTY WRECKER SERVICE, INC. 4. CLAIMS: 118278 —118546 APPROVED. 5. LICENSES: Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Applebee's license request should not be approved at this time. APPROVED THE REMAINING LICENSES. MOTION by Mayor Lund, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to approve the consent agenda with the removal of Item No. 2. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to adopt the agenda with the addition of Item No. 2. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUM (VISITORS): Consideration of items not on agenda — 15 minutes Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive N.E., stated he received a letter from Julie Jones regarding the recycling issues he had questioned at previous meetings. He received the letter Friday at 3:30 p.m. and has not had a chance to talk with her. He said he did not feel the letter answered his questions. He also questioned the HRA assessment per household and asked what the HRA does for the City. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 4 of 14 Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, explained that Mr. Eisenzimmer had indicated he was not interested in coming into the office to discuss this issue with staff and, in fact, requested a letter from staff. Staff reviewed the videotape of the Council meeting where Mr. Eisenzimmer made his request, and was not certain what Mr. Eisenzimmer was looking for. Julie Jones sent Mr. Eisenzimmer a copy of the Power Point presentation with the facts and figures related to the recycling contract. He encouraged Mr. Eisenzimmer to call and talk directly to Julie Jones for the specific information he is seeking. Dr. Burns, City Manager, explained the HRA levy has been on the books for quite some time and it is very common for cities to have HRA levies. The Fridley HRA supports single family housing by providing low interest loans for people with low income who are rehabilitating their homes. Mayor Lund suggested Mr. Eisenzimmer attend the HRA meetings if he has questions. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated all he wants to know is how much it costs to run the garbage truck one time a week. Mr. Hickok stated it would be very helpful for Mr. Eisenzimmer and for staff if he would come into City Hall to discuss his concerns, or at least contact the appropriate staff people via telephone. Ms. Karen Allard, 516 — 54t" Avenue N.E., expressed concern about the statements being made by Springbrook Nature Center supporters. She wanted clarification from Council as to what will happen should the referendum for funding fail. She also questioned the claim regarding the number of visitors and the reduction in visitors since a fee has been charged. There has also been a statement made that the City Council could choose to fund Springbrook even if the referendum fails. This is particularly disturbing because so many City employees lost their jobs due to budget cuts. She also stated that Springbrook has never offered to cut back to one full-time employee. Mayor Lund said the question on the ballot is will the voters support additional taxes to fund the interpretive center, the paid staff and the educational programs. The 128 acres will remain as park use regardless of the outcome of the referendum. Councilmember Bolkcom commented that the Nature Center also suffered staff reductions as a result of budget cuts. Mayor Lund commented that the new fees have not been successful at the Nature Center. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6. Consideration of Neighborhood Street Improvement Project No. ST. 2005-1. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 5 of 14 MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:05 PM. Mr. Otteson, Assistant Public Works Director, stated this project is part of the annual street reconstruction program. It will be an increase in cost and size compared to previous projects as it will be approximately 3 times the previous project size. They will be focusing on those streets that do not have curb and gutter. City streets are reviewed based on certain criteria and then grouped into project areas according to condition rating. City street standards are concrete curb and gutter, standard driving width of 30 feet curb face to curb face, street rating of 9 tons (axle weight), and drainage off the street (2% grade to curb line). Mr. Otteson explained that the work description for this project is: • Replace existing streets with new aggregate base and pavement surface. • Replace existing bituminous curb with new concrete curb and gutter. • Upgrade and repair miscellaneous utilities such as hydrants, sections of water main, sections of sanitary sewer main, storm sewer inlets, and piping. • Restore boulevards with sod and minor landscaping. • Replace private water and sewer services. • Replace private driveways. Mr. Otteson said the project schedule was as follows: • February, 2005: • April, 2005: • October, 2005: • October, 2005: • January, 2006: Open bids Begin construction Complete construction Public hearing to set assessment Property taxes. Assessments start. Mr. Otteson said the construction issues include: • Project communication with residents • Mail boxes (under the direction of the local postmaster) • Landscape, sprinklers, driveway restoration • Water and sewer service repairs • Daily access issues • Special needs or access for residents • Warranty (work done by the contractor) FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 6 of 14 Mr. Otteson also reviewed the residential assessment policy as follows: • Calculations are based on the length of the adjusted front footage. Adjusted front footage is measured across the property at a distance of 35 feet from the front property line (on the address side). • All work associated with the installation of concrete curb is assessed. If concrete curb is already existing on the address side of the property, there will be no assessment to the property. The assessment cost will be no more than $17.50 per foot for the concrete curb work. There are three options for repayment of the assessment, Mr. Otteson explained. They include: • Lump sum paid within 30 days of the assessment hearing (after construction). • Added to property taxes that are paid over 10 years with an interest rate of approximately 7.0%. • Senior citizens meeting certain criteria (65, income level, etc.) may request to have the assessment deferred until future sale of the property. Interest accrues until the sale. (Per City Res. No. 14-1995.) Mr. Otteson also reviewed the engineer's opinion of probable cost as follows: • Streets • Sanitary sewer • Storm sewer • Watermain Grand Total $2, 261, 000 $71, 000 $165, 800 $108, 900 $2,606,700 The funding source breakdown for this project is as follows: • Minnesota State Aid • Special Assessments • Sanitary Fund • Storm Water Fund • Street Fund • Water Fund Grand Total $325, 000 $497, 300 $71, 000 $165, 800 $1, 438, 700 $108, 900 $2,606,700 Mr. Haukaas, Public Works Director, stated there is a general residential assessment policy. There are, however, four corner lots along East River Road that at the time of the East River Road improvements were not assessed. Although they are East River Road residents, they will be assessed with this project. There is also a commercial property in this project area. The assessment calculation method for commercial property is different. They are charged for the entire cost of the reconstruction project at $55.00 per foot. The owner of that business is aware of this situation. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 7 of 14 Councilmember Bolkcom asked for the addresses of the corner lots and whether those property owners are aware of this. Mr. Haukaas explained that none of those four property owners are aware but they will be informed via individual letters. Councilmember Bolkcom stated she received an email from Michael Coyan, 260 - 67tn Avenue, objecting to the project because he did not think the street needed it. Mr. Haukaas explained that staff has a pavement rating system that is done on a biannual basis. Seven different rating criteria are used, based on condition, number of cracks, weathering, rutting and different pavement stresses. Based on that criteria, they came up with a pavement rating for every street in the City. By doing this, they can also track how the streets degrade over time. Staff then makes a map of the City with a rating designation for each street. They hope to have all City streets up to standards within the next four to five years. Councilmember Bolkcom commented that if a resident wants to have their whole driveway done as a part of this project, the resident has to pay for those improvements. Mr. Haukaas explained the City will pay for that portion of the driveways that was disturbed as a result of the road construction. They are asking the contractor to submit bids for those residents who wish to have their entire driveway done. The residents would have to pay for that. Councilmember Wolfe commented that if a resident chooses to have their driveway redone, they would be working with the contractor, not the City. Mr. Haukaas stated City staff will help coordinate the driveway installation and will help if there are problems in the future. Councilmember Barnette said it was his understanding that the homeowner will only be assessed for the curb and gutter portion of this street improvement project. He questioned how the City can do that and how it compares with neighboring cities. Mr. Otteson explained that the homeowners will be assessed for work associated with the curb; that would be the curb, the removal of the existing curb, four feet of excavation and some restoration. All the neighboring cities charge 100% assessment for street projects. The balance of the construction after the resident's contribution comes from the street fund. Mr. Rod Trocke, 280 Rice Creek Terrace, asked if the road improvement project will address the drainage problems currently experienced at the storm sewer near his property. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 8 of 14 Mr. Haukaas stated they will not be changing the street grades, but they are looking at storm sewer extensions and additional catch basins to help reduce the drainage problems. The concrete curb and gutter will provide much better control taking the water to the storm sewers. Mr. Trocke asked if he should tear out his sprinkler system. Mr. Otteson replied the sprinkler system will be pulled out along the construction area, set back, and then reinstalled by the contractor. He also stated staff wants to know of any unique situations homeowners may have. They will work with residents to address those concerns. Mr. Trocke asked about a tree on the property adjacent to him. Mr. Otteson stated during the construction phase, they try to minimize impact on trees by staying away from the tree where possible. Ms. Ethel Dzubay, 220 Rice Creek Terrace, asked what portion of the project will be the homeowner's responsibility and what will be the City's. She also requested that there be a clear timeline for the various stages of the project so residents can be prepared. In addition, she stated she would have appreciated a more advance notice of this project as she recently invested in a new driveway. Mr. Otteson stated plants, shrubs and flowers are the resident's responsibility if they are within five feet of the curb line. A newsletter will be going out as soon as the bid has been awarded. This newsletter will let the residents know what the schedule is. They will only go into certain neighborhoods at a time. During construction, the residents will be responsible for keeping the plants alive. Afterwards, the contractor will come back through and replace landscaping rock and edging. He believes the project will start in May with the utilities starting a little earlier. The asphalt will stay in place while the utility work is done. The residents can expect to have gravel in front of their home for a 6 to 8 week period and access will be provided during that time. Throughout the project, updates will go out to the residents if changes occur. Construction driveway work will be done with white concrete. For those residents who have unique driveways, the City will match the material or work with the resident's contractor and pay what the City would have paid for a typical restoration. The information about this project went out to residents as soon as the project plans were finalized. Mr. Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked if the $17.50 per linear foot assessment includes the cost for the blacktop. He also asked what the interest rate is for the deferred assessments. Councilmember Bolkcom explained the residents will not be assessed for anything but the concrete curb and gutter. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 9 of 14 Mr. Haukaas stated the percentage on the deferred assessment will be the same as the general percentage, probably around 7%. Mr. Jim Holtzlider, 351 Bellaire Way NE, stated he owns a corner lot and asked which lot width he would be assessed for. He also suggested that staff take a look at the flooding problems in the park near his home as a part of this project. Mr. Haukaas stated the staff ineasured the lot width on the address side which is the narrower dimension. That is the side on which the assessment will be determined. Jon McGinn, 7600 East River Road, asked about a tree on his property that is about 2 feet off the street. He asked if he will be responsible for removing the tree or if the City will handle it. Mr. Haukaas stated the City avoids removing healthy trees as much as possible. There is always a possibility, however, that the work will impact the tree's roots and if it impacts the root structure to the point where the tree will die, the City will remove it. Ms. Mary Addison, 150 Rickard Road N.E., stated she has a concrete curb by her driveway and asked if it will be replaced. She also asked if the $17.50 per linear foot would include the area of a power line easement on her property. Another concern is a second lot she owns which also has a driveway. Mr. Haukaas stated the City will replace and match the curb. He also explained that the power line easement would be included in the width of Ms. Addison's property and, therefore, would be assessed. As far as the second driveway, he recommended Ms. Addison keep in contact with City staff to ensure the curb cut is maintained. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:52 PM. 7. Special Use Permit Review SP#03-07, by Frattalone Companies for the Purpose of a Rock Crushing Operation on the North Side of the Property, Generally Located at 8170 Hickory Street NE (Ward 3). Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, stated in May, 2003, a special use permit was granted to allow outdoor rock crushing on this property. In May or June of this year, Council discussed the annual review required as a part of that special use permit and talked to the petitioner. The petitioner has now reevaluated the success of this site and determined that it is important for them to evaluate whether or not this site will be viable as a rock crushing site. In order to be a viable location, 100,000 tons of concrete and asphalt materials would be needed per year in addition to the processing of black dirt daily. To this point in time, the petitioner has only stockpiled 20,000 tons of FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 10 of 14 material for the crushing operation. Mr. Frattalone has indicated he would like to give this site an additional year to see if they can reach the goal of 100,000 tons. In the event they cannot reach this goal, they would close this as a recycling facility. Mr. Hickok explained that Mr. Frattalone is requesting that some of the stipulations that were a part of the approval of this project be delayed until such time as they determine whether this is a feasible site. In exchange for not doing those improvements at this time, Mr. Frattalone has offered to put into escrow $18,125 or provide a letter of credit to ensure those improvements will take place once this site is deemed a viable operation. As a temporary measure, the water will be metered and drawn from a fire hydrant. Mr. Hickok stated this special use permit was very controversial. If the rock crushing operation fails at this location, the rock crushing use can go away thus providing development opportunity. If the additional investment is made and the improvements in the stipulations are made, the trial period for using this site would likely be extended to make use of those investments. Mr. Hickok said a screened fence and landscaping has been installed on this site. In Stipulations 8 and 10, curb and asphalt and a permanently installed water meter would be required. This is what they are requesting relief from. Staff believes this is a reasonable risk because petitioner has offered to provide a letter of credit or escrow the cash. Staff is recommending approval of a one-year extension to further evaluate the site and at that time they will either need to remove this use from the site or make the improvements. Councilmember Bolkcom asked at what point the improvements would be required. She also asked about the petitioner's request for a variance on the height of the stockpiles. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner is asking for one year to determine if this site will attract the kind of customer base they were hoping for. If it is not going to work, the petitioner would prefer not to make the improvements and move elsewhere. However, if staff feels the improvements are necessary and the petitioner decides to stay at that location, they have assured staff that the improvements will be made. Councilmember Bolkcom stated she does not think they should make the improvements either, if the site is not viable. She asked at what point Stipulations 8 and 10 would have to be followed. Mr. Hickok said Petitioner has requested a year. At that point, if they determine the site is not viable, they will be moving on. He stated petitioner may not even wait the full year. If they find it is going to be a viable site, they will start making the improvements required in Stipulations 8 and 10. Councilmember Bolkcom said petitioner could get a lot more material and run the rock crushing operation without any improvements having been made. She asked if they FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 11 of 14 suddenly start crushing, did they have to make the improvements or could they wait until the year was up. Mr. Hickok replied that when the site gets to a certain point, they are going to have to crush to make room for more material. That one-time deal is not enough to have them decide that the site is viable. Councilmember Bolkcom asked why staff's position is different than it was when the special use permit was originally before the Council. She also questioned what prevented the petitioner from coming back again next year and requesting the same thing. Mr. Hikcok stated that if they are only going to be on the site for a year, it is not worth investing $18,000 worth of curb and asphalt only to be torn out. The petitioner is not here to push and do this without the standards. Petitioner, Frank Frattalone, stated they currently have 30 tons of material on the site. If business does not pick up on this site, they will be moving it elsewhere which would mean the investments required in Stipulations 8 and 10 would have been a waste. They are looking for a little reprieve so they do not have to waste that money. That money will be put in escrow or a letter of credit will be prepared to assure Council that they will not be asking for another reprieve. Mr. Frattalone explained that the 15-foot limitation on the height of the stockpile is very limited. Councilmember Billings stated if the petitioner currently has 15-foot stockpiles and there is enough material to begin crushing, it appears the variance to increase the height of the stockpile is just to get a little more out of the mobilization. He stated he understands the economics of this, but also one of the reasons for the 15 feet was because of site lines. He was not anxious to allow the 20-foot height unless there was a reason other than economics. Mr. Frattalone said to his knowledge there have been no complaints about the property. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the height limitation on the stockpiles was one of the stipulations that was part of the approval. She said it makes sense to give petitioner a little leeway on Stipulations 8 and 10 but, in all fairness, not on the stockpile height. Councilmember Billings asked if there was anything that would trigger doing the improvements before the year is up. Mr. Frattalone explained he did not anticipate not getting enough business at this site. He could put in the improvements earlier than September if there is a significant increase in tonnage. He will definitely know by September whether or not he will continue the rock crushing operation on this site. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 12 of 14 Councilmember Billings asked if this special use permit is set to be reviewed every year. Mr. Hickok stated because they had not started crushing and there was very little activity it was extended. This has served as a review of what they have been doing and it would be appropriate to review the special use permit at this time next year. Councilmember Bolkcom asked the City Attorney if there is enough in the records to validate taking this type of action on a special use permit without setting a precedent. Mr. Knaak, City Attorney, stated it appears that the circumstances are sufficiently unique so that Council can justify a waiver for a period of one year. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Billings, to concur with City staff on Special Use Permit Review, SP #03-07, that Stipulations 8 and 10 be waived until the review of the Special Use Permit at the first Council meeting in September, 2005. Mayor Lund asked the City Attorney if this motion fulfills the requirements on this matter. Mr. Knaak said it does. Councilmember Billings asked the petitioner if they understood and accepted the motion. Mr. Frattalone responded affirmatively. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: 2. Resolution No. 2004-54 Extending the Term of the Southern Anoka County Community Consortium Joint Powers Agreement. Councilmember Billings stated the reason he pulled this item is because at this time last year, staff recommended that the Council not fund this for 2004 because of financial concerns. Councilmember Barnette stated as chairman of the Values First Committee, budget cuts were made. To the best of his knowledge, Columbia Heights, Hilltop and the school districts have agreed to continue their participation for another two years. He stated he believes these are dollars well spent and he is in favor of continuing this. Councilmember Billings asked if there are funds set aside for this in the 2005 budget. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 13 of 14 Dr. Burns, City Manager, responded that he believes there are. When the 2004 budget was being prepared, they were facing the loss of $1.75 million LGA funds and did not see a way to recover a substantial portion of that loss. It has been made clear with the past legislative session that we probably will have a little bit more latitude to recover some of that money which makes it easier to fund the Southern Anoka County Community Consortium. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if contributions to other community organizations are in next year's budget. Dr. Burns responded that they are not. Councilmember Billings reviewed the funding for SACCC as follows: Anoka County City of Hilltop School District 14 School District 13 City of Fridley City of Columbia Heights $7, 500 $304 $4, 262 $4, 262 $5, 782 $5, 782 Councilmember Billings asked if Fridley's contribution is the same as last year. Councilmember Barnette said it is. MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to adopt Resolution No. 2004-54. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. Informal Status Reports: Mayor Lund stated two debates were scheduled. The first debate was Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. at the Fridley Community Center, and would be hosted by the Fridley Concerned Citizens Group. A second debate is scheduled for October 12 at the same time and location hosted by the League of Women Voters. Councilmember Bolkcom thanked those who attended the second housing forum. Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated the October newsletter will be going out by October 10. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 Paqe 14 of 14 ADJOURN MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:35 PM. Respectfully submitted by, ������ Rebecca Brazys Scott J. Lund Recording Secretary Mayor