12/13/2004 - 00026617CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DECEMBER 13, 2004
The regular meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order by Mayor Lund at
7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Lund led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Lund
Councilmember-at-Large Barnette
Councilmember Billings
Councilmember Wolfe
MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilmember Bolkcom
OTHERS PRESENT: William Burns, City Manager
Fritz Knaak, City Attorney
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Rick Pribyl, Finance Director
Jon Haukaas, Public Works Director
Julie Jones, Planning Coordinator
Rebecca Brazys, Recording Secretary
PRESENTATION:
Robert Christianson, Fridley Historical Society, stated the Anoka County Historical
Society has an annual Christmas tree with an ornament from each of the 21
communities in the county. The symbol for the Fridley Historical Society was a windmill,
which represented one hundred years of agriculture. The ornament had to be hand
made, so Charles Martin, a Fridley artist, spent over 100 hours making a perfect replica
of a windmill out of brass. This ornament was presented to the Anoka County Historical
Society last week. On behalf of the Fridley Historical Society, he presented a framed
photograph of the ornament.
Charles Martin stated it is in Fridley's best interest to have an attractive ornament on the
Anoka Historical Society Christmas tree where everyone in the state can see it and
become aware of our community.
Mayor Lund thanked Mr. Christianson and Mr. Martin.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 2
CONSENT AGENDA:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council meeting of December 6, 2004
APPROVED
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Receive the Minutes from the Planninq Commission Meetinq of November
17, 2004.
RECEIVED.
2. Approve Extension to Preliminarv Plat Request, PS #03-18, bv Town Center
Development, for the Properties Located at 1282 Mississippi Street N.E.
and 6490 Central Avenue N.E. (Ward 2).
Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated Dave Reiner and Richard Whinnery of Town Center
Development are requesting a six-month extension of their preliminary plat. Since
Council's approval of the preliminary plat in January of this year, the closing has been
held up by litigation filed by another party who claims a financial interest in the
properties. The matter will be heard in Anoka County District Court on December 22
and the judge has 90 days to render a decision. Staff recommends Council's approval
of the extension.
APPROVED.
3. Approve 2005 Tri-Citv Consultinq Services Aqreement Between the Citv of
Fridlev and GIS Ranqers, LLC.
Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated this is a renewal of a contract between the cities of
Andover, Columbia Heights and Fridley with GIS Rangers LLC. Fridley's share of the
contract cost is $28,183 for 80 hours of technical assistance per month, which is the
same amount paid in 2004. This contract enables the City to receive invaluable
assistance with geographic information system mapping in many areas of City
operations. In view of the high quality of service received through this agreement in
past years, staff recommends Council's approval.
APPROVED.
4. Resolution No. 2004-74 of the Citv of Fridlev Acknowledqinq Receipt of the
Time Warner Inc. Formal Franchise Proposal for the Provision of Cable
Television with the Citv of Fridlev.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 3
Dr. Burns, City Manager, stated the formal franchise renewal process was initiated by
Time Warner some time ago. The City received the formal proposal on November 30.
Council received an executive summary of the proposal in their packets. The resolution
before the Council tonight complies with the Federal Cable Franchise Act requirement
that the City must provide prompt public notice that it has received a renewal proposal
from the operator. Having received the Time Warner formal proposal, the City has until
the end of March to either renew the franchise with Time Warner or issue a preliminary
assessment that the franchise should not be renewed. If the City determines not to
renew, another administrative process must be started that will consider, among other
things, whether Time Warner's proposal is reasonable to meet the future cable-related
community needs. Within the next two weeks, staff will be reviewing the Time-Warner
formal proposal and will bring a recommendation to the Council regarding the
acceptability of that proposal. Staff recommends Council's approval.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2004-74.
5. Claims: 119540 — 119670
APPROVED.
6. Licenses.
APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON FILE.
7. Estimates.
APPROVED THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATE:
Natgun Corporation
P.O. Box 847140
Boston, MA 02284-7140
Marian Hills Tank Replacement
Project No. 356
Estimate No. 3 $214,272.50
Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked for more information regarding the Time
Warner franchise.
Dr. Burns explained that this relates to the renewal of their cable franchise. This is a
source of revenue for the City.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to approve
the consent agenda.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 4
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to adopt the
agenda.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PRESENTATION — MINNEAPOLIS METRO NORTH CONVENTION AND VISITORS
BUREAU.
Mr. Bob Musil, Executive Director of Minneapolis Metro North Convention and Visitors
Bureau, presented an overview of their 2005 budget.
OPEN FORUM (VISITORS): Consideration of items not on agenda — 15 minutes
Pete Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, stated he is not happy with the budget and levy
proposed by the City, and was particularly unhappy with the property tax increase.
Councilmember Billings explained that the total amount of real estate taxes that the City
will receive has gone up less than the cost of living since 1990. The way the property
taxes are calculated varies between commercial, rental, and residential property. In
addition, for years, the State was subsidizing property taxes by paying a portion of those
taxes. The sales tax was created by the State for the specific purpose of reducing
property taxes, but the state is now keeping the sales tax revenue.
Mayor Lund added that the 2005 budget expenditures reflect an increase of only 1.3%
over 2004.
Mr. Eisenzimmer commented that the 3% pay increase for City employees could have
been cut to 1.5% as a cost savings measure.
Mayor Lund explained that was considered, but based on the raise for police officers
that was determined by arbitration and comparisons to nearby communities, the 3%
raise was approved.
Councilmember Wolfe added that because the Charter amendment failed, the City was
forced to raise taxes just to keep up.
Jim Hamilton, 5990 Oakwood Manor, expressed his concern over the traffic problems
created by the turning island in front of the Holiday Service Station on Old Central. He
suggested the City get together with the County and State and get this problem fixed.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 5
Mayor Lund and Councilmember Wolfe explained that Old Central is considered a
county road and the City has discussed this issue with the County many times.
Ray McAfee, 1360 Hillcrest Drive, stated he agrees with the concerns expressed by Mr.
Hamilton about this intersection.
NEW BUSINESS:
8. Resolution No. 2004-75 Certifvinq Final Tax Levv Requirements for 2005 to
the Countv of Anoka.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated this resolution is in keeping with the State's Truth in
Taxation process. The public hearing was held December 6. The proposed levy
resolution complies with both State law and the City Charter requirement. The City
passed the proposed levy in August in the amount of $8,067,949. This resolution is
considered the final levy and was used to develop the 2005 budget. Staff recommends
Council's approval.
MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to approve
Resolution No. 2004-75.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. Resolution No. 2004-76 Adoptinq the Final Budqet for the Fiscal Year 2005.
Mr. Pribyl stated at the December 6 City Council meeting, the City Manager delivered
the 2005 budget message during the public hearing. This resolution actually adopts the
2005 budget and will complete the Truth in Taxation process required by the State. The
certification of this final budget must be before the County Auditor by December 28.
The City has complied with the appropriate sections of the City Charter. Copies of the
budget are available at City Hall, the Anoka County Library or on the City's website.
With no open issues to resolve as a result of the public hearing, staff recommends
Council's approval.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to approve
Resolution 2004-76.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
10. Special Use Permit Request, SP #04-06 bv Anwar Abdel-Karim, Islamic
Center of Minnesota, to Amend their Existinq Special Use Permit, to Allow a
School Expansion to be Used for Classrooms and a Multiple Purpose
Room, Subiect to Easement of Record, Generallv Located at 1401 Gardena
Avenue N.E. (Ward 2).
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 6
Mayor Lund announced this is not a public hearing but Council will take comments on
new information only. The public hearing on this matter was held by the Planning
Commission and Council has reviewed the minutes of that meeting. Also, no decision
will be made on this matter this evening because Councilmember Bolkcom could not
attend the meeting. The final decision will be made at the City Council's meeting on
January 3.
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to enter into
the record the following: December 6, 2004, letter from Don and Patricia Lewis;
December 12, 2004, letter from Fredrick Kile; December 10, 2004, e-mail from David
and Sharron Landes; and November 26, 2004, letter from Eldora Iverson.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Jones, Planning Coordinator, stated the petitioner is seeking a special use permit to
allow an expansion of the existing private school located at 1401 Gardena Avenue.
This private school and religious center exist as the result of previously granted special
use permits. The property is rather an odd shape due to the fact that the original school
was designed as a walk-in public school. The petitioner owns the property at 1345 and
1413 Gardena with the 1413 Gardena property being used to house a day care center.
Ms. Jones explained that the property is zoned R-1 as are the single family properties
surrounding the school. The property to the south is Totino-Grace High School. The
subject property was developed in 1967 when Gardena Elementary School was
constructed. Gardena closed in the fall of 1978 due to the projected decline in
enrollment. The school was then sold to Faith Academy, and the City has since
considered several special use permit applications for the property. The Islamic Center
purchased the property in 1988. The AI-Amal School opened in September 1994 and
leases from the Islamic Center. The AI-Amal School provides education for children in
kindergarten through 12t" grade and was founded by parents and community members
who wanted an alternative to public school. The AI-Amal School serves children and
their families from the Twin Cities and the surrounding suburbs and is the only Islamic
school in Minnesota. The AI-Amal school's classes are in session Monday through
Friday with extra-curricular activities in the evening. In addition, Sunday school and a
time of prayer are conducted for adults. No regularly scheduled religious services are
being held at this property.
Ms. Jones stated the Islamic Center is currently seeking a special use permit to expand
their existing 36,537 square foot school with a two-phase addition. The first phase of
the addition will extend to the northwest of the property and will include 14 classrooms,
a lounge, meeting room and rest rooms. This addition is 15,080 square feet and is
projected to be constructed in the spring of 2005. The second phase would continue
beyond the first phase to the northwest of the existing building and will include a multi-
purpose gym/gathering space, locker rooms, a library, a book store, a new main entry
and various administrative offices. This space would contain 24,614 square feet and is
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 7
tentatively planned to be constructed within five to ten years of completion of the first
phase. Ms. Jones reviewed the site plan to show how the addition will relate to the
existing single level school structure design and the surrounding residential
neighborhood. The multi-purpose area roof line is stepped back behind a single story
facade to diminish its mass as well.
Ms. Jones explained staff is considering Oakwood Manor as the front yard for this
property because that is the narrowest street width and it provides the greatest amount
of setback to surrounding residential properties. There will be a new entrance to the
school in the Phase I area. There have been some concerns raised about traffic flow to
the site, so this plan includes a new off-street area for school traffic to drop off and pick
up students. There is also parking planned for the eastern part of the property which
will not be constructed until Phase II is built. AI-Amal has stated that Phase I is
essential for the school to retain its student base. According to the Islamic Center,
Phase II is not on the horizon to be built any time soon, but was added to the site plan
to show the master plan for this location. This allows the City to be assured that the site
can accommodate the parking and storm water management requirements at full build-
out. The multi-purpose room proposed in Phase II will not be a mosque. The Islamic
Center's mosque currently exists in Columbia Heights and they have no plans to
relocate it even if Phase II is constructed. It should also be noted that the minaret tower
on the plan is an error and should have been removed from the plans.
Ms. Jones stated the AI-Amal School currently serves approximately 300 children
between grades kindergarten through 12. When the building was originally constructed
in 1967, it was designated as an elementary school. As a result, there is limited space
available to service middle school and high school children's needs. When the building
was originally constructed, science and computer labs were not common but these
types of services are essential for a private school to attract students today. Currently,
the gym is being used as a classroom for high school students. The prayer room and
library are also being converted daily into classrooms. Because of the lack of space,
most of the middle and high school grades have had to be combined. The Islamic
Center has told staff that the existing building would work wonderfully if they were
serving elementary students, but the additional space is needed to attract and keep the
middle and high school students. The main reason for the addition is that they have
outgrown their existing facility and they want to provide additional high school
educational opportunities. Constructing this addition will reduce crowding and provide
the extra space needed for extra classrooms. The Islamic Center hopes this will result
in bringing back some of their lost student population.
Ms. Jones stated the school will physically be larger; however the student body
population and the student to teacher ratio will stay very close to what they currently
have. Even with the proposed addition, they believe 500 students would be their
dream, but 400 total is more realistic. The AI-Amal website indicates that they hope to
go to 1,000 students, but that statement has been clarified by the school that if their
population should reach that number, they would need to relocate to a larger facility
somewhere else.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 8
Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, said the City Code requires a minimum
of 212 parking stalls with the existing building, Phase I and Phase II. To meet those
requirements, the petitioner will have to construct the code-required stalls for the
existing facility and Phase I which is 102. The remaining 110 stalls can be proof of
parking until Phase II is constructed. Petitioner has asked that 30 of the 102 required
stalls be added to the proof of parking because they feel it better matches the parking
they would need. The AI-Amal students are not allowed to drive to the school, which
creates less need for parking. The Islamic Center also has a cross-parking agreement
with Totino-Grace. This agreement allows AI-Amal to use the Totino Grace parking lot
on a space-available basis when Totino-Grace is not holding normal classroom
activities. The Islamic Center has indicated to staff that they have a very close working
relationship with Totino-Grace and they coordinate their schedules so both schools do
not have big events at the same time.
Mr. Hickok explained the City Code requires that the maximum lot coverage in a R-1
district be 25% and that there be a 40-foot rear yard setback. The proposed project with
the existing and proposed additions has 13% lot coverage and a 40-foot rear yard
setback. The City Code also requires that the lighting be shielded and downcast so as
not to extend over the property line. The proposed expansion of the school was
designed in a manner that allows the scale to relate to the lower rise residential
structures that surround the campus. Phase I is designed to be a single story with
some architectural embellishments that will relate to Phase II once it is completed.
Phase II has a larger peaked roof over the multi-purpose room and the mass of that roof
has been diminished by stepping it back beyond the single story farade. This helps to
create an eye line that is more in line with the houses across from the building. This is a
positive influence in pulling down the scale of the taller portion of the building so it can
relate to the low-rise residential structures around it. The exterior material of the
additions will be primarily stucco.
Mr. Hickok stated Fridley City Code does have a wetland overlay district but it does not
restrict how close buildings can be located to a wetland. Staff contacted the
Department of Natural Resources to get advice on what a proper building setback would
be from the wetland located on the Islamic Center site. The DNR informed staff that this
is not a protected wetland area and as a result, the DNR does not have restrictions on
how close you can build. The closest portion of the proposed building in Phase II will be
48 feet from the delineated edge of the wetland. All other portions of Phase I and
Phase II are back further than 48 feet. The petitioner hired a consultant to delineate the
existing wetland. The wetland has been delineated and the wetland boundary has been
identified. Currently, the petitioner's consultant is working with the Rice Creek
Watershed District to evaluate any additional restrictions that might be on the site in
relation to the wetland.
Mr. Hickok stated the Fridley City Code requires that no land shall be altered in a way
that would result in water run-off that would cause flooding, erosion or deposits of
minerals on adjacent properties. The petitioner is proposing to locate a storm pond to
collect a majority of the run-off on the lot at 1345 Gardena Avenue. Fridley engineering
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 9
staff will review the project to ensure that engineering calculations protect the integrity of
the State's run-off requirement and to ensure neighboring property owners are not
affected by this addition. The petitioner has indicated they would like to preserve the
two homes as long as possible and hope to create the ponding in a way that does not
necessarily mean that a home is removed on the first phase of the project. City staff
reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Chapter to evaluate the traffic
capacity for Gardena Avenue. It indicates that Gardena Avenue's daily traffic capacity
is between 8,000 to 9,000 vehicles per day to be considered to function at a Level of
Service (LOS) D. The 2001 traffic count on Gardena Avenue, east of Matterhorn Drive,
was 4,150 AADT (vehicles a day), which is approximately 50% of the capacity it could
handle in a given day. He said that currently, students are dropped off in front of the
school through the use of street/curb expansion. The proposed addition will allow the
buses and parents to drop the children off in front of Phase I, within the new parking lot
expansion, reducing congestion on Gardena Av.
Mr. Hickok further explained that AI-Amal School currently has 344 students, Woodcrest
Baptist Academy has 235 students and Totino Grace has 1,100 students. AI-Amal's
campus is just shy of 14 acres. The current building for the AI-Amal School is 36,537
square feet. With both Phase I and Phase II built, the AI-Amal school will occupy only
13% of their entire school property. The Woodcrest Baptist grounds are approximately
4 acres. Their total building area is 35,433 square feet for a lot coverage of 20%.
Totino Grace High School has 30 acres and just over 250,000 square feet of building
space for a total lot coverage of 19%. Another comparison would be to balance the
student population to the square foot dimension of the respective facility. This number
is derived by dividing the number of square feet of facility by the number of students
who attend. Totino Grace has 227 square feet per student, Woodcrest has 150 square
feet per student and AI-Amal has 106 square feet per student. With the Phase I
addition, AI Amal will have 153 square feet per student, and with the Phase I and Phase
II addition, they will have 227 square feet per student.
Mr. Hickok described a"pyramid of applications." At the top of the pyramid are permitted
uses. The City has the least amount of discretion to say no or in any way affect
permitted uses that meet all of the City's guidelines. Next in the pyramid is a conditional
use permit which has a slightly broader discretion. Permit uses that have a non-
conforming aspect which would require a variance are next. Below that would be
unpermitted uses consistent with the comprehensive plan which would require a
building permit, zoning amendment, and sometimes a conditional use permit. The final
level would be unpermitted uses inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan that would
require a building permit, rezoning, sometimes a conditional use permit and ultimately a
Comprehensive Plan amendment. The importance of this pyramid is that it points out
the amount of discretion the City has. He said Council acts like a judge and the citizens
are the advocates. The City must defend its decision based on the record made at the
City Council meeting and Planning Commission meeting. Even when a building permit
and conditional use permit are required, the City Council's blessing may not be
required. If the law gives criteria for a permit or conditional use permit, and the
application meets it, often the City must issue the permit. Sometimes ambiguous City
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 10
ordinances are construed in favor of the property owner, usually the applicant.
Neighbors and neighborhoods cannot be given veto power over applications. Advance
approval is not required and neighborhood opposition cannot be the sole basis for
denying an application. The facts and evidence neighbors provide can support approval
or denial of an application.
Mr. Hickok stated there were five categories discussed at the public hearing held by the
Planning Commission. One was the parking. In the parking analysis, staff determined
the number of stalls required vastly increases the required parking on the site--over 70
initially and ultimately 212 stalls by the completion of Phase II. One concern expressed
was about the close proximity of the parking lot to surrounding properties because
Oakwood was used as the front lot line. He explained that parking in the side or rear
yard can be as close as 5 feet. The front yard designation is only a factor in building
setbacks. Using Gardena Avenue as the front yard, the standard setback would be 25
feet along Gardena Avenue and the rear yard setback would be 40 feet. This would
mean that the school could actually start their addition on the lot labeled 1401 between
two existing houses as long as they met the 40 foot setback. Staff did not believe the
neighbors would like that scenario. Another option was to use Hillcrest as the front lot
designation and the rear yard would then be Gardena and the school could build as
close as 25 feet to the vacant lot on Hillcrest and as close as 10 feet to the building on
the Gardena Circle side and the other side. With Oakwood Manor as the front setback,
there is a greater setback from the homes on Gardena Circle. It was never the school's
intention to go any closer than the 20 feet they are from 1314 on the north side of the
property. Using Oakwood Manor as the front yard for setback requirements gives the
surrounding neighbors a better setback.
Councilmember Billings asked if staff has the discretion of choosing where the front,
side, or rear yard will be.
Mr. Hickok stated there is a definition in the City Code that if the lot is on a corner and
fronts on more than two streets, the narrowest lot dimension would be considered the
front yard. The narrowest dimension on the Islamic Center property is the 60-foot wide
lot on Oakwood Manor. This is not the classic corner situation. It does front on two
streets and runs longer east—west than it does north—south. The developer did not
object to having that interpretation and staff wanted to have the building put back the
furthest from all adjacent dwellings.
Councilmember Wolfe asked if Oakwood Manor extends to Gardena.
Mr. Hickok explained the City likely has the remainder of Oakwood Manor as easement
rather than right-of-way. Though the street goes through, it is by virtue of easements as
opposed to right-of-way in that segment and easements do not show up on the County's
maps.
Mr. Hickok stated that another concern expressed at the public hearing was the phasing
of the special use permit. Special use permits are granted with the requirement that the
project be started within one year. This project has two phases. Phase I must
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 11
commence within the first year, but they do not need to complete Phase I or commence
with Phase II within the first year. Staff suggested, and the petitioner and their
architects agreed, that the best way to proceed would be to show all phases of the
project up front to eliminate surprises later. This would also allow for a master plan
decision-making process as opposed to an incremental decision-making process. This
is consistent with what has happened in Fridley historically; specifically, the expansion
plan of the United Methodist Church on Mississippi Street that was submitted in 1966.
Mr. Hickok explained another issue at the public hearing was the safety of the proposed
pond. The pond needs to be approved for capacity and must meet all the engineering
requirements. State laws require that the run-off from a site be treated before it leaves
the site. This project is required to have a pond. It is not designed to dump into the
wetland and it is not meant to be something that is dangerous to children. This will be
analyzed as they get to the final design stages.
Mr. Hickok said another concern was the traffic. Traffic numbers were taken from the
2001 traffic count, the last official traffic count on Gardena. Some residents questioned
whether new development, such as Medtronic, could have caused an increase in traffic
along Gardena. Mr. Hickok explained there has been a great increase along Highway
65 and Old Central, but along Gardena there are about the same traffic patterns. Staff
pulled did pull up the accident data for this area for the past two years. The street in
front of AI-Amal has not been the scene of any accidents in that period.
Ms. Jones stated the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
petition at their November 17 meeting with 11 stipulations as recommended by staff.
Staff recommends concurrence with their recommendation with the following
stipulations:
1. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction.
2. Petitioner to meet all building, fire and ADA requirements.
3. Existing building and proposed Phase I and II to be sprinkled to MN Rules
Chapter 1306.
4. City engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior
to issuance of building permits.
5. Petitioner to submit storm pond maintenance agreement prior to issuance of a
building permit.
6. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance
of building permit.
7. Petitioner to provide landscaped hedges along the west and south side
property lines, when abutting a single family residence.
8. Curb cut and corresponding drive aisle off of Gardena shall be widened to 30
feet.
9. All lighting on the property shall be shielded and downcast and shall not
exceed 3 foot candles at the property line.
10. The maximum height of either addition shall not exceed 45 feet.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 12
11. When Phase II is constructed, existing parking now shown as proof of parking
shall be installed.
Councilmember Billings asked if there were other examples where Council has
approved projects that took place in phases.
Mr. Hickok stated Medtronic is a master plan development with two more phases yet to
begin. The Rottlund project across from City Hall happened in three phases. Phasing
is not an unusual concept.
Councilmember Billings stated one of the stipulations is that the maximum height is not
to exceed 45 feet. He asked if there are other buildings in an R-1 district that are that
high that have not gone through a variance process.
Mr. Hickok stated a special use permit includes a provision that allows other uses in R-1
districts that may require special provisions; including churches, schools, and hospitals.
Grace Evangelical Church has a height of 36 feet on its new addition.
Councilmember Billings asked if United Methodist, Grace and Unity Hospital have
variances for their height.
Mr. Hickok stated they do not. The height was a part of the special use permit approval.
Historically a special use is viewed as something that may need additional consideration
or mitigation for features like height.
Councilmember Wolfe asked when staff is reviewing the potential traffic impact, did they
take into consideration all development in the area.
Mr. Haukaas, Public Works Director, stated there was no traffic study done for this
project, simply a traffic count, which is only a reflection of how many cars actually drove
on the road during the time of the count.
Councilmember Wolfe explained part of the concern he and neighbors have is the
increase in traffic on surrounding roads create back-ups on Gardena.
Mr. Hickok stated petitioner is anticipating no increase in the vehicle activity for their
school as a result of this expansion. Even if the school population reaches the peak of
400 to 500 students, they do not expect an impact on the traffic beyond the peak hours
that would take the intersections to a point that they could not accept it. Gardena and
its intersections were designed for at least double the traffic.
Councilmember Barnette commented there is a great deal of difference between a
retention pond and a detention pond. It is his understanding that the proposed pond for
this site will be a detention pond, similar to the pond at the Fridley Community Center,
and will very seldom have water sitting in it.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 13
Mr. Haukaas stated that is essentially correct. The soils in the area will most likely
make this a dry pond that will hold the water during large events and meter it out and
the rest will infiltrate into the ground.
Mayor Lund asked if this involves any zoning change, such as from R-1 to CR-1.
Mr. Hickok responded it does not.
Mayor Lund asked if Council has the authority to add stipulations to those already
recommended by staff, such as a fence around the pond or a privacy fence along the
property line.
Mr. Hickok stated the City can impose any reasonable restrictions related to public
health and safety in the case of a special use permit. Those restrictions, however, need
to be based on the record and information presented at the public hearing or information
that the Mayor or council members may have. If there is something off the record, it
would have to be stated.
Mayor Lund asked if there has been any discussion about Phase II being located to the
east of the existing facility rather than to the west and tucking the 45 foot building into
the existing hillside to minimize the height. Placing Phase II in the area to the east
would result in it being much further away from surrounding properties.
Mr. Hickok stated that a couple of years ago the Islamic Center had looked into adding
temporary classrooms on the northeast corner but the amount of grading was enormous
and would change the contour of the land. For that reason and the fact that they have
the shared arrangement with Totino-Grace for outdoor activities, they want to retain the
open area to the east. Also, this would mean the area to the west would have to
become a very large parking lot which would diminish the playground area. He stated
the petitioner has evaluated all options and the current proposal is the best scenario
and the most sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood.
Mayor Lund asked about the proposed parking.
Mr. Hickok stated the location of the parking is one of the byproducts of having an odd
shaped parcel and having a wetland that carves out the middle of the property.
Councilmember Wolfe stated he is concerned about approving both phases now. He
asked if Council can make changes to the plan when petitioner decides to proceed with
Phase II.
Mr. Hickok stated that is the purpose of planning ahead of time; so they know what they
are planning for and can start budgeting and set a course for the final project. He
thought that unless the Council has an issue with the project now, it would be unfair to
come back in five years and try to make changes. Council can recall a special use
permit, however, at any point and look at it to make sure the impacts are being
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 14
mitigated the way the stipulations required. Also, if Council discovers something in
Phase I that they want to correct before Phase II, Council could call it back and add an
additional stipulation or mitigation that may not have been caught on the site plan.
Councilmember Wolfe stated in five years there could be five new Council members
who do not like the plan at all.
Mr. Hickok stated for the benefit of the people who are doing the budgeting and
planning for the school, it is only fair to set a course so they can move on with planning.
Councilmember Wolfe stated he has a problem with "rubber stamping" Phase II and
asked how the project can be stopped if it is something the Council decides in three or
four years that it does not want.
Mr. Hickok discouraged the Council from that kind of strategy. He recommended
instead that Council give serious thought about what it is that causes them concern and
add stipulations to mitigate those concerns.
Councilmember Barnette asked if, at some point, the Islamic Center decides to move
their mosque to this site that would constitute a significant change.
Mr. Hickok said it would and petitioner would have to apply for another special use
permit.
Mayor Lund said his problems with the proposal are the height of Phase II, the parking
exception and the need for a privacy fence.
Anwar Abdul-Karim, Vice President of the Islamic Center, stated this expansion will help
resolve overcrowding problems, provide additional educational opportunities and
improve the quality of education for their students. He said AI-Amal created a new
drop-off area for buses and students and they set their school start and end times later
than Totino-Grace to lessen the traffic congestion. AI-Amal is willing to work with their
neighbors and the proposal before Council includes changes that were made to address
some of the neighbors' concerns. He stated they have no intention of moving their
mosque from Columbia Heights to this site.
Councilmember Barnette asked if the Islamic Center will allow Totino-Grace to utilize
the additional parking planned for this site.
Mr. Abdul-Karim responded that they would have no objections to working with Totino-
Grace on the parking.
Dean Dovolis, project architect, reviewed an aerial view of the project site. In response
to the suggestion that the expansion be built to the east of the current school, he
explained there is a 20 foot rise in that area while the west side of the property is flat.
They did consider the east side of the property but determined that the impact would be
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 15
considerably greater; including the loss of many trees and the loss of athletic fields.
The thought was to keep the building concentrated on the west side and if Phase II was
built, the parking lot would be built in the low area to the east of the school and would
not have the same visual impact. The logic was to wrap the buildings around the
wetlands and nestle the parking into the east side. This layout allows for the bus drop
to come back off Gardena. That would not be possible if they developed the east side
of the property due to the grading issues. In terms of all analyses this location proved to
be less detrimental to the surrounding neighborhoods in terms of all factors; ecology,
traffic, visibility, access, height and green space. Also, this layout made it possible to
not have a second access into the property which was a key concern for the
surrounding residents. He said they had no problem with putting in a fence. He has
worked with natural barriers and a well maintained green barrier holds up much better
over time. A fence has a more immediate impact, but deteriorates over time. Another
possibility is a low fence along with a green barrier.
Mr. Dovolis said in response to concerns over the height of Phase II, he recently
completed a project in Minneapolis with a multi-purpose room similar to what is
proposed for Phase II. That community overwhelmingly preferred the gabled hipped
roof even though the peak was higher in the sky, but the fact that it slanted up the sides
was much more acceptable to the residents in terms of scale. He explained they could
lower the height of the Phase II building, but the corners would have to come higher to
make the multi-purpose space work. With respect to access to this property, they were
able to remove the connection to Hillcrest and keep that green area intact to appease
the neighbors' concerns. Phase I will include a controlled drop-off site to get the traffic
off Gardena. People parking in the east lot, will be able to connect through the school
and get to the addition. With this plan, they are able to retain nearly 100% of the
existing trees on the site.
Mayor Lund said that his suggestion was to build Phase II into the hill east of the school,
not grade the hill down.
Mr. Dovolis explained that there would be a significant loss of trees and green space.
The area to the east of the school is unbuildable unless you level it out, top off the hill
and fill it in.
Naeem Qureshi, civil engineer hired by the petitioner, explained that soil borings on the
east side of the property revealed very poor soil for 19 to 20 feet, which would make it
necessary to sub-cut the area about 20 feet to construct a building in that area.
Mayor Lund questioned the maximum height allowed in an R-1 district.
Mr. Hickok explained that for a typical R-1 use, the maximum height would be 30 feet.
But there are a number of examples in Fridley that by special use permits are larger and
no variance was required.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 16
Jim Hamilton, 5990 Oakwood Manor, commented that the City of Minneapolis is closing
17 schools--11 next year and 6 in two years. He suggested that the Islamic Center may
want to look into purchasing one of those schools rather than expanding the AI-Amal
school.
Councilmember Wolfe pointed out that Pike Lake Elementary School on Silver Lake
Road is closing.
Mr. Dovolis explained that many families have moved to Fridley to be near the AI-Amal
School and want the school in their neighborhood.
Abdisalam Adam, 5708 Jefferson Street, stated he would not want AI-Amal to relocate.
The student population is diverse from all over the Islamic world; many of them are
multi-lingual and many are multi-cultural. This type of school is a model school. The
families intend to remain a part of the community and hope to be viewed as positive
neighbors.
Todd Belland, 1322 Hillcrest Drive, questioned if the hill to the east would have to be
dug out to install the new parking lot.
Mr. Dovolis responded that a portion of the parking lot will be at grade and then it will be
tiered up to the next level.
Kimal Balioglu, 6160 Rice Creek Drive, stated he moved from Germany to this area.
Right now there are 197 families, 140 of which drive to their children to the school. If
the population grows to 400, there would be about 20 more families driving. Also, more
and more of the students' families are moving to Fridley, so he anticipates the number
of families will actually decrease in the next five years.
Mr. Abdul-Karim pointed out that to date, 45 AI-Amal families have moved to Fridley
which helped increase the value of homes in the city.
Paula Thorson, 1314 Hillcrest Drive, commented that she is not opposed to the school
or growth but said it was not just a school. It is the Islamic Center for the state with
programs and activities that are more consistent with a school, community center and
church all combined. She claimed that AI-Amal is a 7-day a week, 24-hour a day facility
and the traffic and noise will definitely have an impact on the neighborhood. She stated
the neighbors felt that their concerns were not taken into consideration at the Planning
Commission meeting. She questioned what additional services will be offered once
Phase I and Phase II have been completed and questioned the expected growth in the
number of people coming to the school. The other schools in Fridley are not
surrounded by privately owned homes. The people on the west side of this property
will have their lives changed by the expansion. She expressed concern about the
safety risks to children with a holding pond in the area. She did not feel it is fair for Mr.
Hickok to compare this site with a CR-1 zoning district. The multi-purpose structure is
actually going to be 49 feet high, much more than the 30 foot minimum in an R-1
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 17
district. She asked why an exception was being made for the height restriction. She did
not want a sidewalk put in between 1310 and 1314 Hillcrest because people would park
on Hillcrest and walk up to the school. This is an oversized build and questioned if it is
an appropriate fit and whether it is in violation of the City Code. It would mean a major
change to the residential character of the neighborhood. The codes are there to protect
the neighborhood's quality of life. She questioned the requested reduction in the
required parking pointing out that there are two schools right across from each other
which makes adequate parking essential when there are events going on at both
schools. She asked if Phase I and Phase II should both be approved now. Council
should do what is best for the City by listening to both sides and making a fair decision
that will last into the future and that everyone can live with.
Councilmember Barnette questioned Ms. Thorson's claim that the AI-Amal school is
used 7 days a week until late at night.
Councilmember Billings stated that Ms. Thorson actually stated the building is used 7
days a week, 24 hours a day.
Ms. Thorson stated the gym doors of the building have been open past midnight with
traffic coming and going. She listed services offered by the Islamic Center, including
community events, funeral services, bookstore, food shelf, marriage services and
counseling services. She clarified her statement that the activities go on 24 hours a
day, but they have gone on as late as 1:00 a.m.
Mr. Abdul-Karim stated they do not have a 24-hour operation at the school. The office
hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. which is when the counseling is offered. All the
other services Ms. Thorson mentioned are offered at the Columbia Heights facility.
Most of the activities at the Fridley site are educational activities. They do operate
seven days a week with school on Saturday and Sunday school on Sunday. There are
sports activities after school hours, but those are usually over by 7:00 or 8:00. Beyond
that, the only activity in the school would be janitorial services. The building is closed by
10:00 p.m.
Adrianna Sutherland, 8450 Mississippi Boulevard, stated her children attend AI-Amal
School. The land use issue is very important because this is the home of the Islamic
Center and it is not against the neighborhood but is part and parcel of the
neighborhood. The issues they have are the same as those issues the other neighbors
have. The City has the support of all of the people who send their children to AI-Amal
School and those people come from very diverse neighborhoods. They have an
investment in Fridley that goes beyond "just our land." In presenting the 5 or 10 year
plan, it is specifically done to try and alleviate the fears being expressed. She stated
she has fear of certain neighbors who move into her neighborhood, but she does not
have the right to suggest that they live elsewhere. She would like to see Council focus
on the land use and that the neighbors' concerns are also the concerns of those people
who live in Fridley and send their children to AI-Amal School. They want the parking
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 18
issues resolved for the safety of everyone. The arrangement with Totino-Grace shows
what is possible when people are willing to work together for the good of everyone.
Dr. Hamdy EI-Sawaf, Islamic Center, stated there are some evening hours but they are
mainly community gatherings and fund-raising activities to bring the students and
parents together as a community. The expansion project is an effort to keep their
students at their school. These students are the second generation of Muslims in
Fridley and they are the hope of building bridges of understanding between this country
and what Muslims are all about.
Tokan Sarsour, 7847 Able Street N.E., Spring Lake Park, stated all schools are more
than just a school, they are centers for community gatherings. He pointed out that his
experience with public schools includes many after hours activities including PTA
meetings and voting.
Martin Schutz, 5991 Gardena Lane, said that it appears some City staff inembers have
been advocating for this project.
Mayor Lund responded that it is the role of staff inembers to bring forth all the
information related to a project.
Mr. Schutz specifically disagreed with Mr. Hickok's comment that there was no rational
basis for a traffic study. To his knowledge there has been no review of the pedestrian
traffic in this neighborhood. He has no issues with Phase I, but is concerned about
Phase II and the fact that eventually there will be two high schools across the road from
each other. If these two schools are currently sharing facilities, that would say the
facilities are not sufficient to meet the needs of Totino-Grace or AI-Amal School. He
was concerned about what will happen in five or six years if AI-Amal ends up with the
number of students they are hoping for. If the Council is going to vote on this issue, this
should be considered.
Spencer Minear, 1291 Gardena Avenue, stated he lives three doors west of AI-Amal.
He was concerned about the proposed bookstore as it has a"commercial smell" to it.
He was also concerned about the five-foot setback for the parking lot as the cars will be
parking in his back yard. He pointed out that the numbers Mr. Hickok referred to
regarding lot coverage were not based on the usable land, but the full acreage. Right
now, Totino-Grace uses the area of proposed development for their athletic field and it
is already a limited space. When this school was originally built, it did not meet state
standards for outside space for activities for students. This is not a good plan and it will
not benefit the neighborhood. The traffic congestion is already at Grade F and the
proposed development around this site will add to the traffic concerns.
Mr. Hickok stated the school already has the bookstore and it is for students, not a
commercial operation. As far as the usable space, the ordinance for lot coverage is
based on the land that the petitioner owns regardless of what that land consists of.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 19
Mayor Lund commented that the Council is looking at the big picture. They are listening
to the concerns of the neighbors and will try to make the best decision for the
community.
Don Lewis, 6001 Gardena Circle, stated with the parking lot five feet from the property
line and two feet above his back yard, he is concerned about snow accumulation
melting onto his property.
Mayor Lund commented that the parking lot will be sloped towards the retention pond
and there will be curbing along the parking lot.
Mr. Hickok stated the open area at the entrance which is closest to the pond will be the
primary storage area for snow. There will be a hedge along the parking lot to provide
screening.
Mr. Lewis stated he is not against education and he has no problem with Phase I, but
he is concerned about Phase II.
Irfn Sandozi stated he is a parent of AI-Amal students and is one of the trustees of the
Islamic Center. He explained the bookstore is non-profit, not commercial, and is part of
the Islamic Center with no separate account. The books are sold as a part of the fund-
raising activities for the Islamic Center.
Mr. Hickok said that in response to Ms. Thorson's comments regarding the City Code,
the specific section of the code she referred to is Section 205.05.5F(3) under the special
use permit provisions, which states: "In considering applications for a special use permit
under this code, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and
general welfare of occupants of surrounding land, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. If it is
determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to health, safety, and welfare
of the community nor will cause serious traffic congestion, nor hazard, nor will result in
serious depreciation of surrounding property values and the same is in harmony with
the general purpose of the intent of the zoning code, the City Council may grant such a
permit and may impose conditions and safeguards therein by a favorable vote by a
majority of the Council members."
Mayor Lund said that basically leaves it up to Council to determine what is a detriment
to the neighborhood.
Mr. Hickok stated creating a record is part of what the City Attorney would advise and it
is that record that evaluates whether or not this proposal would be a detriment to the
surrounding area. If there are concerns, those need to be mitigated, or Council needs
to say no to the proposal.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 20
Mayor Lund explained that Council will not be voting on this issue tonight, but will take
the matter under consideration and take action at the January 3 meeting when all
Council members are present.
Councilmember Wolfe asked if Council could add stipulations at tonight's meeting.
Mr. Hickok stated stipulations could be recommended this evening and those would
then become a part of the motion on this matter.
Charlie Olson, 5926 Oakwood Manor, asked when the traffic count was done.
Mr. Haukaas stated traffic counts are done in either late spring or early fall while school
is in session and are generally done on a Tuesday or Wednesday to make it the most
typical count for the area.
Mr. Olson asked what would trigger a traffic study.
Mr. Haukaas explained that a traffic study would be triggered at the request of Council if
they determine that there is enough change and want additional information. For this
proposal, they anticipate a maximum of 150 additional students which would not be a
large increase percentage-wise.
Mr. Olson asked what roads would be included in such a study.
Mr. Haukaas explained the traffic counts were done mid-block in several locations, both
east and west of Matterhorn, on Matterhorn and east of Benjamin.
Mr. Olson asked if there are any projections on Medtronic's growth and increased
impact on traffic.
Mr. Haukaas stated what staff has seen is regional growth throughout the City, not
concentrations of growth because of Medtronic, but a 20% to 30% traffic growth in every
neighborhood. The counts for Highway 65 and Central Avenue have not increased as
much as the neighborhood counts. Highway 65 across Moore Lake has been relatively
steady at around 36,000 a day, and Central Avenue has been pretty steady at about
8,200 to 8,600 cars per day. The peak seemed to be in 1997. The 2001 counts were
down slightly.
Mr. Hickok stated a few years ago a joint study was done with Columbia Heights about
the impact Medtronic would cause in terms of the development and one thing they
wanted to evaluate was where people were coming from and going to. What they found
is that Medtronic is such a regional organization that people come from all points of the
map in the metro area and beyond to work there.
Mayor Lund asked what a traffic study entails.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 21
Mr. Haukaas explained a traffic study gets into much more detail, looking at destinations
and origins of traffic, and will look at population growth and other factors to try to make
some projections on a more localized basis. There is nothing in the code requiring a
traffic study for consideration of this petition.
Zafar Siddiqui, an AI-Amal board member, stated the Islamic Center cares about its
neighbors and will do everything possible to take their concerns into consideration.
They would like the neighbors to be proud of AI-Amal School.
Don Anderson, 7304 West Circle, spoke in support of the petitioner.
Jim Hamilton, 5990 Oakwood Manor, stated he travels Gardena frequently on his mail
route and the traffic problems he sees is at the curbside in front of AI-Amal which is
posted no-parking but is filled with parked cars. He questioned if the new entrance to
Phase I will address the traffic problems. There are no signs indicating that this is a
school zone.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that the Fridley Police studied the traffic issues in this area
and found that most of those speeding are actually residents of the neighborhood.
Mr. Olson said there is a certain window of time when the traffic is heavier and that
needs to be considered.
Dave Landes, 5928 Woody Lane, stated he did not believe there was any contention on
this matter with the Planning Commission. Unless the neighborhoods had legal
representation, their concerns were not being considered. This matter needs more
serious scrutiny.
Mayor Lund stated Council is spending a lot of time listening to neighbors' concerns
even though this is not a public hearing.
Councilmember Barnette questioned how this proposal will impact Mr. Landis' home.
Mr. Landes responded this has very little impact on his property, but he was talking
more in a neighborhood sense. There were some meetings where neighbors were very
opposed but it just did not seem to make a difference.
Mayor Lund stated that Council is trying to address the concerns of the neighbors. He
stated the neighbors have to give credible reasons to deny such a request and the
petitioners have to give credible reasons to accept it.
Mohamed Eisa, Brooklyn Park, stated he is considering moving to Fridley because his
children are AI-Amal students. If the expansion is not approved, it would be devastating
to the Muslim community. As far as the traffic concerns, the increase in student
enrollment would result in only a 10% to 15% increase in traffic and the traffic may even
decrease as more AI-Amal families relocate to the Fridley area. He added that the
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 22
problems created by the current drop-off location will disappear when the new entrance
and drop-off area has been completed.
Mr. Abdul-Karim stated the expansion will improve the safety of the children because of
the new drop-off location. The Islamic Center listened to their neighbor's concerns and
changed their plans to try and address those issues, and they will continue to listen.
Already 70 AI-Amal families have moved into Fridley and this will help improve property
values and increase the tax base.
Mayor Lund said that after listening to the comments this evening, the staff presentation
and reviewing the Planning Commission minutes, he is not sold on approving the
parking lot concession and the higher roof in Phase II. As for the traffic, he does not
believe a traffic study is necessary as he does not believe there will be a significant
increase. He also stated he plans on requesting a privacy fence for those neighbors
affected by the parking lot. From what he's heard, Phase I is not the problem. Phase II
is, and he hopes the applicant will come back with some revisions on the roof line and
address the parking.
Councilmember Billings asked Mr. Hickok if the petitioner had been notified that an
extension of the 60 day limit was necessary.
Mr. Hickok stated he had done so.
Councilmember Billings asked if the existing drop-off site on Gardena will be removed.
There are a number of special use permits that current exist for this property, and he
asked how this special use permit will impact those already approved for this site.
Mr. Hickok stated this becomes the modern adaptation of the former special use
permits. Special use permits go with the land. For the record, as this is filed, staff
would consolidate any and all special use permits under the new special use permit and
include any stipulations that were a part of those special use permits.
Councilmember Billings listed a 1988 special use permit for a church, a 1989 special
use permit to operate a day care, a 2000 special use permit to add a classroom and a
2002 special use permit to operate a day care. He asked if there was a special use
permit granted originally in 1967.
Mr. Hickok stated a special use permit was not required for the school.
Councilmember Billings asked if there are any other special use permits on this
property.
Mr. Hickok said there were not.
Councilmember Billings asked for copies of all the special use permits and the
stipulations that were a part of those approvals. He asked if a stipulation could be
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004 PAGE 23
included in this approval that the maximum height of any addition shall not exceed a
specific amount without a variance.
Mr. Hickok responded that he would caution against that, but if Council chooses to do
so, they need to make sure the record supports that this is a mitigation issue and
articulate in the record why the height is important.
MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to table
Special Use Permit Request, SP #04-06, to the January 3, 2005, City Council meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11. Informal Status Reports.
No items were discussed.
ADJOURN
MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to adjourn.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:35 PM.
Respectfully submitted by,
Rebecca Brazys
Recording Secretary
������
Scott J. Lund
Mayor