Loading...
AF-V - 45012� � `7 ` ����' �� �' i"'����� . '�� �T TH� T4P QP Tet� TWIN4 � �� , � , , � j L"'^'—'� CON1iUHiTY L�flVELOP►�4ENT OIV, � � i p�OTECiIVQ t4tII?»CT19N U�PT. �` � �—'•1 i GOYY kAl.� P�R�(?L�Y ��+IQ$ i,......11.r� �.J �la—Ca83�"J�O ilR3JEGT APPLICATIOfV TO BOARD OF APPEALS QATE Y �`7 J, �,�',� S 1 �, _ j G/ l� //� � l� G � O V V Name Address Phone /l1`f-7S��7> %I) . ! �' ' S�/� Lega Lot No. Block No. Tract or Addition Desc . �? `� ,� ,� �_:L.Z� '� � %� '5� ! /-�� %C� �-{ �.S �L i � Variance Requested (Attach plat or survey of property showing location of proposed building, etc., including adj�ining properties and ownership within 200 feet of said property.) . - . . , _. . �. , � � / �' � -t E � � —� -�i ' t �� C G 1 k� � ) _ - C:. yL � C ;��( 't -� '' ,%� � �— �� ��; � �.� , � C_-t`1 / � )�. � �C 1 ,F :'�. r � ;1 : � � . �,c � , .�c1 �� � , - ' ._� l ��- �- ��, �� ,"- �C '` %,� ,' --� �; � Meeting Dat Fee <_. J� - � . . .7 � � �' i � � � /� ��J - � ,'' Opinions and Recommendation by the Board of Appeals /a -ii - 9,� - For Above Recoirnnendation 1�2,c.�Qlrt.-�) �' �C�.e.Q� �,Lr�rn.Q..C� - City Council Action and Date l�.c �,,�,-, l� 1/'11 i 9 23 -��,�.�?...c�11�s'.1 a Receipt No. � �l //_ Against Recommendations _ � O')1�... . SU�JEGT _ _- — �� ���� �� ������� APPLICATIOfd TO BOARD OF APPEALS �,��� aT Tk� TAP OP THE TM�fNe � � � j; L-------� G0�1+a�JNITY p€v��cr�►�sGwr oiv, (Statf Report) � � � (+LiBT�CYIV� &ti��CTI�W a�6`T, � � r'--^t i C:TV HALL FF�l�i{.CcV 0'��32 �.o..4.I`..� �.J Q��-�S9'��A NU:�v3r'�t RBV. PRTE PAaE pP APPaOVED BY 910-F23 0 2/15/73 2 2 800 Comanents by administrative official denying original request for building pe.rmit or othe:r permit. (To be completed by administrative o=ficial. Appropriate Ordinances and sections of Ordinance to be cited.) Board members notified of ineeting by ,�Q�, , g`�C�^,� List date notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans to attend hearing. ers, Name I Date � Plan to Attend � . � • . �J� i � � � ) Person aking appeal and the foll 200 feet notified; _ Name , � _ ., . '_��z ; . �`� �. � ', b <� y �_ i �c.�_. �aC'�l i�'_i�. l ��� L �� ;�7C��i"1 -� %<-� ���'l �._�� �/ � . `7� % �1�l��vl � 1 :'� «_< �' 1 � � `� `�� i t ,�� t �� .�,_�-C �.� C ; L ' �,�,C ,:� X L ; `% � :� ( ( � , ' y ,�t�-�'Z.�_- CE ,(,C,C dC,�a .(`,-r�� 'J� �S ( -�``Lt�� t,��� �. L-r l c��: _ '/.-`; C�' / C.� k� �3 �. ,: _ � ��,�,��!���<k , i (C:C�-;?'� ��< cv�',,j- ' c� �O I I Na property owners having property within Phone Notified B !Date or Mail (Initial) _ � �; > � a - � - �z3 /a-�a�� yh - �( . TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, December 11, 1973 to consider the follawing ma.tter: A request for variances of: Section 205.153, 2, Fridley City Code, to increase the mean front yard setback from 56 feet to 76 feet and Section 205.052, 4b, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet �o 6 inches, to allow the construction of a house and garage on Lot 9, Block 3, Elwe11's Riverside Heights Plat 2, the same being 751� Alden Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. (Request by Mr. Nasim M. Qureshi, 5720 East River Road N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.) Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. WILLIAM DRIGANS CHAIRMAN BOARD OF APPEALS � x 6,�� �.. e Minutes_of the Board of Appeals Page 6 :ommittee Meeting of Da mber lI, 1973 _ Mrs. Gabel stated she lives in the area so she knows h the people feel but she thought she would like to have the area cleaned up. Mr. Plemel s-tated he didn't know what to th' . He said he didn't know how Mr. Rothgeber could come out ahead on this b� that �hat is his business. He said that with all the�possible correctio that might have to be made to this structure, it's going to be awful pensive. MOTION by Plemel, seconded Gabel, to recommend to Council approval of the variances as the side d setback is existing and the renovating of the structure wi11 imprave and cl up the area. He said the approval does have the stipulations tha the entrance on 57th Place be closed and that the building be throughly ins cted to see what corrections have to be made to allow occupancy. Upon a vo' e vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. A:22EQUEST FOR VARIAI�TCES OF: SE�TION 205.153, 2, FRIDLEY CITY CODE�TO INCREASE THE I�� FRONT YARD SETBACK FP.OM 56 FE�T TO 76 FEET A.NTJ SECTION 205.052z 4BZ� TO RED'JCE TriE 5ID� YARD SETBACK FROi�1 10 rNET TO 6 INCHES z TO .AI.LOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOUSE A.'�D vAIZAGE ON LOT 9, BLOCK 3, ELi1ELL'S RNERSIDE HEIGHTS PI.AT 2� TrIE S��E BEING 7514 ALDEN WAX N.E.Z FRIDL�Y, MINNESOTt�. (REQI7�ST BY MR. NASIAI M. �URESHI, 5720 �AST RIVER ROA17 N.E., FRIDLEY�ffNNESOTA� Mr. Qureshi was present to present his xequest. Mr. Bob Lahti, 7524 Alden Way, Mr. Thure Erickson, 7515 Alden Way, and Mr. Arne Sjodin, 7541 Alden Way, were present to hear the proposal. The survey showing �Che h�use location and the aerial photo of the area �were shown to the Board and the audience. Mr. Lahti said he was concexned that the variance was 6 inches from his pxoperty but since it isn`t he had no objections. Mr. Exickson said he w as concexnad with his view of the river being obstructed but after seeing the proposal, he had na objections. Mr. Qureshi stated bacause the lots are narrow, he proposed to place the house on the lot so it would be farther away from Mr. T�ahti's property in case Mr. Lahti dacided to add on. He said this placement would also save some nice trees on the lot. Iie said the fxont yard setback variance would line his house up with the existing houses. Mr. Erickson ask.ed how he could build within 6 inches of the line and maintain 6 inches from the line. Mr. Qureshi said he plans to work with the St. Paul WateYworks, adjacent land owners, to try and level the slope on the side of the lot down more so it won't be difficult to stay at the 6 inch setback. Mr. Erickson asked if Mr. Qureshi had a house plan that they could look at. Mr. Qureshi said that he had a tentative plan.which he presented to the Board. He sai.d the basic idea was a 43 foot long split level dwelling with the garage jogged to the fxont to ma.ke a shorter driveway. f 5. Page 7 The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting of De�ember 11, 1973 Mr. Lahti asked Mr. that is down about flow. Mr. Qureshi it . Qureshi if he was aware of the blue clay strata in the area 15 feet, that has caused springs from the underground water answered he was not aware of it and that he would check into Mr. �rickson sa.id he would probably object if the house was placed forward from the proposal but the way it is he has no objections. Mr. Qureshi stated he could meet the setback requirements but he felt this layout would be better for the adjacent property owners as well as for himself. Cnai.rman Drigans stated that in 1970 another request for a sideyard variance and a frorLt ya�d variance had been asked for on this p�operty by a previous owner. He said there taas a letter in the file from the St. Paul Watercaorks which stated they had no objections at that time and appaxeni:ly they have no objections to this present variance as they have made no xesponse to the notice that was sent them. MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Plemel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, th�re being ne nays, the motion carried. Upon a voica vote, there being no nays, the motion caxried. � MOTION by Gabel, secondad by Plemel, to recommend to Council approval of the variances as the neighUoxs seem to prefer this plan to building to Code and because the St. Paul Wa�erworks see:n to have no objections. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carxied. , A�UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTTON 205.053z 5A, FRIDLEY CITY �fiE, TO REDUCE TH� SIDE YARD SETBACK ON T�iE STREET STDE Or A �OPtNER LOT F i7�17.5 FEET TO` 10.5 F`�ET TO L�I.LOW Tii� C�I�ISTRUCTTON OF A �OVERFD PORCH 0 A D;,7ELLING LOCATED O�t LOT 4 BLOCK 5 I:hTNSIiRUCK NORTH THE SAIKE BEING 5 M!�TTERHORN DRNE N.E . L � L _t_ FRIDLEY, Mliv'NESOT[�. (P.EQU�ST BY WIITTE OAK BUIL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432) There was noone present to present the re�dest. CENTEP.. DRNE The Board want over the survey show' the proposed location of the covered porch. Chairman Drigans stated t t since the Board has questions on this request that the City Staff ca ot answer, the request should be tabled until the next meeting to have th applicant appear and pxesent his request. MOTION by Gabel, seconcl�c by Plemel, to table this item until the January 15, 1974 meeting. Upon �/'voice vote, there being no nays, the m�tion carried. ADJOUItNMENT : The meetin�aas adjourned at 10:00 P.M. by Chairman Drigans. Respec�ully submitted, O MARY HIN' Z �3� Secretary 0 �' RE:GULAR COU�dCII t�iEETIP�G OF DECEP�IQER 17, 1973 � � 2.4 ^ y PAGE 7 of the lots t��ou]d be unbuildab7e. He stressed that ali of the area people would have to be protected and he questioned if the properties should b split up in this manner. He indicated the plan for development shau be ordcrly and accordiny to the plan of the City. A merrGer of the audience addressed the Council and said f•1r. Roi eber t��as ill at the time of the present meeting and he ���as representin im in the request for the variance. The man said there is a home on eighty foot lot vrhich Pir. Rothgeber plans to upgrade and spend about �,000 for this upgrading. He added, he ti•Yould like to convert the use o the d��relling to tl�at of offices for attorneys or reai estate. . hfayor Liebl said this is not ti�hat the Council had isioned for this area anJ this ���ou]d not meet the square foot requireme s for the development of the area. The City Attorney said the original square f t requirements tvere for 25,000 square feet per building site and ha been amended to 20,000. Councilman Nee said he thought the requ t for the variance had to be denied. He 4,�as not sure if the actions and req re�nents of this area should have been placed there in the fir-st place, but ince this had been done, they ti•rould have to make the best of it. He ad ed, if the Council ���as going to take action like i:his, it wauld have t be follo�-1ed. He said this may be pain- ful for� the area pe�ple; but th t�lould have to hold out until it is profit- able for them to sell. He sai he thought the Planning Department should be assigned to study the are for the best possible develop;nent instead of continuing to just try to asp the ans�rers out of the area people t��hile they try to develop the ea, Councilman Nee said he thouyht it would be the best possibility to ncourage one man to buy the area and deve)op it. He recalled there are ome very nice homes across the street from this property, and these eople's interests must be protected. Ne said if this property is to be eveloped,7t ��rould have to be a good neighbor to the people of the ar because many of them ►aould be there for a long time. He went on to ate, the neighborhood should not have to put up with a mess, the ordinanc should be enforced. Councilma tdee repeated that the people should have some concepts for guidanc on what could be done and tdhat could happen to the area. MOTI by Councilman Nee to de�,y the request for the variance as requested by r. Rothgeber. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all v ting aye, htayor Liebl declared the mbtion carried unanimous7y. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF SECTIO;J 205.153, 2, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, 70 IP�CREASE `riir e�rn�i—� „�� .,,; — —_"'.. _. _._ �.__., _. E HE 0 _ � ,�. t�i0TI0N by Councilman Nee to approve the variance as requested b��t4r. Nasim Qureshi for 7514 Alden tday N. E. Seconded by Councilr:an Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P�tayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously, REQU�ST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 2a5.053, 5A, FRIDLEY CITY CODF,.TO ��-„ 7,,,- �,..� ..-- --- - - — -------- -- — CH OFI LOT 4, GLOCK 5, ItvfdS6RUCK idORTH, TNE Si�i�iF f fti; Di?I� ' E. , FRIULEY, P•1IN(;ESUTA _ R[Q'.;FST 6Y t•GIIT 5 (:ENTEf2 DR �t�itfdiJf"AP(li i� t.iit�t�v�cn�o ����� The City Engineer said this reques � been made by 4lhite O�k Builders and there was a problem �•rith the constru 'on time table. A representative of t�lhite Oak Quilctcrs addressed t uncil and said he had talked to all of the area people personally, and of them objected to the approval of the request. 7he representative said he ha t been informed that he ���as to attend the Subcommittee meetiny and had no e to the meetir.g. Fle said the footinys are in and the blocks ar•c 6eing pu� in at the present time. � � : ��