The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR-1975�� sux�ecr � � � City of Frid]ey AT TME ToP oF TME Tw�NS � APPLI CATIOM TO BOARD OF APPEALS ;� . � � � ��___ COMMUNITY OEVELOVMENT DIV. � r � � � PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEG. � 1 ; i ;- A �� • CITY HALL FR1�4E�' � SSd32 N�MbER HEV. DATE VNGF Oi ♦PYRO�ED bi ��J\'� �� siz-sso-a+so 910-F23 1 3/21/75 1 2 800 Name � Address Phone i`/�n.e .T �u»�i�7� �or� . ,ai � (�-7J Legal � No. Block No. Tract or Addn. . 7/o%�C�iJ.G�c,;✓ Descriptio� �� ,2 r L,�. Pk- oP - � Variance Request(s); including stated hardships (attach plat or survey of property showing building, varian�s�, et�.,,��h��re,a�pl}c�ble) r� OrT� �.4 7 �� UU£.sf /8� va.-.a��c� i,� .ba�.l��.a.-�. f-/orn� �o �z. Duel�- �or hd,ne��a� �l.�+i7ce�e%a�r1 wi�h ��v�na dred. � al/ � 1 kvLl � Date��,, /y 11 "rleeting Da:,e Fee Receipt No. ,igna ure � -a�3 -'� � �QC� � / 5�/So �' .�'i/J"c��7Z�v Comments & Recommendations by � the Board of Appeals � � City Council Action and Date .� � � i._. . _ __ _ . _ _ _ ,_....._ _ , :. ' <._,-. ,, :` ; ; , , � � � � _ � , r..__ _ . _.. __ � __. _._, _. - � ; , , . _. . ,� }__ _ . . , ._. . .�_ _, ._ � - _ ; ; , ; _._ . _ . _ _ � .._ . __ _ __ .._ ___ ; _ __ _ _ _ _ : � ;__ _ _ � __ . . _ � _ _ _ _ _. � _ _. _ . _. _. _ _ _.. , _ _ . __ _ . . _._.. _. ._ _,_. _ . __ , � . __ _ . ::. � _ ._ ,- , .. . : ,- _ _ .:.-.�. .._ . ��.:':�:-:�F`.p i . :. -�1... :- .� .. . . ._ ... , � :.. _.. _ . t. � .._.. . ._. _ ...... .. ...... .. ..'. .. .. ...: .. . .. :.'. . .��.�'.'.i. � . . . .. �. . . .. . • � . . . . . . ... i.� .. .. �, i � � .. .. �: �.... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . - ! , � ..:..:r.Y, � S � _ _. . .. . . _. ..__ . ..., _ . .. _ . ...__.. ._ . .. _ ...._...... . . _ . � 5 . ...... .�._.. ......... � .. .... .. ........�....... �...�..�._... � +"..��.�.�. �. .�.. . _��.. . � � _ ' ..� . . _ . ... ..�.. ....... . .. .. . . .. ... .. . . . .. ... ......... . . . �... .�... ' J...... ...._. . . ..... ..... .. .. . ! { ..� ... ....._. . .. .._.. ..._.. . ... .. �...._..._.__..�.__....._ . . . . ._ . . �. �._ . .. . . _...' .. ....�. .. ._.�....�......... _ . �...... P k :n ' :: . .-::�: � ,.��_..��...:: , _ . _. . - , ... �. , . � :: ..:.... _,.. _ _::=._ . . . ._:::��. _ ,:.:�._. -., ......,,,; f ' :-- � - - .�: _ ... , . . � , . . ._. . _ _ ...; .. ;�..,. ., .., - . , . _ . � .. . . . . .,:: ..,..._ . _. �...,.. � r �.:,3-. - � � ' � . _ . .� t �., j { � ._.. .. . _.. � . ._ ' ..i1f,.. j � ( � i � . ._. . .__.. ._.._. __. . ' 1 _ _ _.. ... _ . _. ; ,.. _. ._.__ .,. _ . .. _.._._. . ..._.__.. _... _.....__..._. . . ...._..._. . . _ .._ ..._....._."� t � �. ._._, __. - .... _ ... . ...._ _. ..�._ �,_.. �.� __'_ ..._.�.- ..._.. �. � � .- ...._ . .,..__.._. ....._. .. . _...__ _... ._....._..�. ..........� . ' � 1 I j .,._ _ . _ .. " ._..... ,. ,f...... ._..�_.__ .. .__.. . .. .. .... ............_._.. .. � ; . _ _ . .. _... _...._._._.._ . . . . E ! �__.. .�.. _ .. . .,_ ... _ . ....__ _ .. _.., ._...�._....._ i ' . ' " . .__.�__. ._..._ .��.�_�__._.�.i � � I 1 r c,ty of Fridley RT TME TOP OF THE TWINS ,�� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. � PROTECTIYE INSPECTION SEC. '°I � C�TY HALL FHIDLE� SSa72 ,'� 612•560-3a50 Staff Comments s�a�«, APPtICATIO�J TO BOARD OF APPEALS (Staff Report) UM9Efl ftEV. DATE 4NGE Oi ApPROVGU bY 9io-FZS 1 s/zi/�s 2 2 soo Board members notified of ineeting by -'Lr� J� date notified, and "Yes" or "NO" for plans to attend A , Name List members, • Plan Date I1b Attend Pearson making appeal and the following property owners having property within 200 feet notified: BY Whom Name Date Phone or Mail Notified 2 %irt � ��1 /(�i.L,.Y. � � ,��1 CE?e�L =-�� v'-�a -�� 7� � •�� , _ ��: � �� 2GG� ��- %�. �i �� Item #1 May 23, 1978 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7677 Arthur Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.D53, 4, C, requiring that a rear depth of not les� than 25 per cent of the lot depth be permited, and/or more than 40 feet is required. Public purpose served is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: Home to be built for a handicapped person in a wheel chair with all living area on one level. C. AD��1INISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Field measurements show that the proposed rear yard variance will be on the north side of the lot, adjacent to an existing house and detached garage. There is not sufficient survey information to show how far the existing garage on the north would be from the petitioner's proposed garage. There is a 13.5 boulevard on Arthur Street. The petitioner intends to stay back 35 feet from Arthur Street as well as the right of way on the south side of the lot. The total lot coverage proposed is 18.2l, with a house and garage totally 2,472 square feet. OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, May 23, 1978 to consider the following matter: A request for a variance to the Fridley City Code, Section 205.053,4,C, to reduce the required rear yard setback from 34 feet (1/4 of the lot depth) to 21.6 feet, to allow the construction of a house and garage on the South 135± feet of Lot 22, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside, the same being 7577 Arthur Street N.E., Fridleys Minnesota. (Request by Henry J. Gunnick, 8015 Madison Street N.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432). Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter may be heard at this meeting. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN APPEALS COMMISSION Note: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on this request, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors, the City Staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occue, the request will continue to the City Council through the Planning Commission with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. _. i 1� _ I CITY OF FRIDL6Y. � SUBJECT M1NNE90TA COMMI55fON APPLICATION REVIEW Da1e r 1 ;� �� r � �i �T �� j T � r�' _ I , ; � _ _- � i • , , , ; , _- _ _ _ -- , %G 7 y /�-°�fu+2. sT �tJ, E. - - ' - - _- __ _ � , ��l�C � �fQu.'�S1 , ' ; �ZrAJQ� S, �7KNn1�N/� � � i , � , , � i , I � � '' ; %� - %S38 ' , � I I ' I I /0 i ' ; ; ! I il I ; ' �� I I � � ___ 4 � _ _ _ h - _ � � � , I'i � �} I l � � ; . � _. u.� � f -- I I � 1 i i eZ __�, � � �u;5 � � . � �llJ � CAe.4-�? i 7 0 _1 I� � -, i 36� , ��k ; an� �, � j - , , G3 � a ', � � � �, � . ;i I ' � � � � � I � ,I � I' QEA2 y.�� d��A�Gc ' 35 aX i1 I f�a�'/ 3y� T a/.6 �_. - .�y ay - ' `/8.5 -� 3r � ; ' � PQoPaS�� ' �: �� 7 y' ;, �G y7 A��au,� , � E�� ' � , � � � � I��' � � � �� I _ � � �+ � � FRIDEEY �' �' � � Ry ' �� _ �OARD �OF y4PPEALS '' � � � 40 3� �. � ; � , : � �XI�IBlT` I�o..= � ! '3'S MEETIN� DaTE lr � 3 -7� �7 r /� — '� a ._. -- �- 'n ��0 jUO,� %� �s� �r �� , � �'T � , i __ i I� _ � - i ^ � I -- -- � -F - - _. _ � � - I - ._ _�_ i -i — -- l -- ---- -- � ;_ _ ' �i � �CITV OF FRIDLFY� sue�ecr � NfINNE80TA APPLICATION TO APPEALS COf�if�lISSiUfV {612) 571-3450 �e�wr�mtnl ms�on� � � eV PUBLIC WORKS/CODE ENFORCEMENT 910-F23 2 Name Address C ; �� . ; i � Legal ✓�I ot (�p� Block No. Tract� o� Descri tion °� Variance Request s: attach plat or survey etc., where appiicable) �F,. ,� �.� ,,,.�„ot„ � List specific hardship(s) which requires . -,. ; . ��Id -�(� ��S`�.Or� I �'/ l`��lP Comments & Recommendations by the Appeals Commission �°�v ��'%�� `a?�u �- . `U.C. `.'i j '!`� variance{s) i�nature � ie Approve0 by Dcte 1 of 2 800 7-17-79� Phone �� a��/ ec� �u a�e� zl„ � a� E�' u 1.�ncm �h.zt.< <, �3(� e.i 3, �Sp�y . r� �,:�,� a owing bui d� �g, var�ances, 0 ; (�j�j' �u�s�c� tiPPLICATIGN T0 APPE�LS COhif°1ISSIDN ...:�/j'r�� CITY OF RF9143L�Y� � . . .:. ... . ' . .. . (1t1� I � MINNEBDTA ' �� v � (Staff Report) l.L.J ¢pCrtmCn rv�si0n � - � ; ; PJBLIC WORKS/CODE ENFORCEMENT -.-:. Staff Gomments: � rvumoer�� nev �r�yo � ppprovetl ny . �� Date 910-F23 2 2 of 2 800 7-17-79� � . � , Board members notified of ineeiing by �' S'�'° ` . List members, � date notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans to attend hearing. Plan —,l/ �,�,�-ti Name � � D/D � T� tend � y / ; Person ial;ing appeal a notified: �a � ny property owners having property within 200 feet Name � dward Viesselman - 7610 Stinson Blvd. • ' carle M. Welle - 7624 Stinson Blvd. � Nancy & Duane Doran - 7566 Stinson Blvd. ; Raymond & Michaelene Williams - 7584 Stinson Blvd. a Duane & Linda Weisen - 1682 Osborne Road '' James & Janet ,Rudnitski - 1658 Osborne Road N.E. , Robert & Alic'e Henderson - 7600 Stinson Blvd. N.E. 3 James C. Burgland - 1670 Osborne Road � City of Spring Lake Park 1301 81st Ave N.E., Spring Lake Park 55432 s M/M �ames Bergland - 1670 Osborne Road N.E. M/M Dennis Morley-1524 Osborne Road N.E. � M/M Henry Gunnink-7677 Arthur Street N.E. Francis Hlavinka-1500 Osborne Road N.E. Karla Blomberg - 1661 Camelot Lane --��, o , �� ,,;.,s By ; � r�� +r.� 5 a .t .: .. _ _ _�T ---- — - — $UBJ�CT ; ,. . .. �. �IT,Y ;f,i-�';I=W1o4Gl%, ' . . � `� - � � . " � a rvi�r�r�s�sorsa : " Cf3f'�/Ii�IESSCE7R1 �-Lf�G�fL:G��4"'B",iC�Ii� . ; i - � .,�, F"i��.AA7�W a ,�' � ., ., ,n ,�,�urr_, ii�Y �,,,GO ,, n�nrov�ra �y. , qoro ;..: �.i`�� _ z I, �--� . . .s CL7MPL�TF REVIEW CHECiCLIST � `vO`'"'�" `- r��°ru�rvre3-��-nsvr�iniG. .._:_.,:. _ - -?�7,? lvs,��,�" _.. � _ 1<�.,�.�ni �U ,� �/ E,__, .. _ .._ .......__ _. _._ ..... _,... , ... _.. __ . v _. . C�MMENTS-. . . . . .. . _ . .___. . ... __... .. o'°r��l �! � d �. .._ '�.q..6'-7�Tii:�.r9'_-�E.e.�.o � O�A/NA6E �"G ��rY ��i,d.. C _—� /" [ . _. . .. . _ . _ . . . _ . _ . ..... _ C'"." % . . ... _ . �._.. . .." . _ " __ . _ . .. f � �� R��-. � . . __. _- _-- ------- _ __ _______ _ _ ____ _ _ _. _ __ _.._. _. __ { _ � __ _ _ _ _ i� _d �,��- f�.,t h��:�,-- .� �� /�.r,,.�*;� --- .. , _ �__.....____ _.. _---_____.._ . _..t__ _ �� v�cr._/�a.rs-e._ _ �r.-/.. lr.�_�+-��,_ � - _ Fi 1�.� f/ �. _ c�/, t`�.,i _ . . � --. ��.:_. ,� f�t,�� , � .- _ f ,. . . __ _ _ _ � �ti�::� . ; .�d� , a� �,�,1' � r � �. ".,o , eM d �� . � � ,Fr, ; . / � ��-':;� �. J! j � f': } N►'r� ' � �L /�t/tio-'�iy. . �� . � __ l.'-- � , / � _. _._.._ t�rfE� : Hry"'t�G� __ ._. _ . _ . . _ _ � ' _ __ _.__.___...___ _— .__---- __ _: -- _ � i_ __.._ _ _--. __ _ _.. _. _ -- -r ._ . . _ _._r.. _ __ _ ___ �__ _._... __._ �_ ..__ _ _.--- --._. --.—_ . _ __ __ __ . __ ._ _ ; � , t � 3 • _! �_ _____._..._ _. . . _.____...____---_--- --_ ._. � � � __ ___--._ _ _. _ ` M -- - - - _ _ ___ ._. - -. _ _ _. - - __ __. _--- . ____ __ . . _ ,., � , _: _ _ . _ _ - ,';S. ,,... .�..:-:i1i t. �.�rl�`�i� I.t �;f'i ._ . „ ,t � � .. `.t. .I ��.. _ , T_ -:£ - � � � � , ti... ..,,.''ii (� � i,��i` i ��iOi�i � �(u:': ^Q i.'.YIJ'��{ ._. __.__�..�.._.._.._.. _ .. �._ _. _..."___....'_" ... �. _. ( .,._..�..__.__`...._. _._,._"_.._._..._..._"_ "__' _. _ ...._...... __. ,� .. .___ ._ .� _...._._'_�.�._. �._"'_"_"_7".._.:._"_._:._.__ { � I .._._ .._ ._..._._�..__._._"'._....�...._.. � _.. ..,._._._'__ I � . ."'.M__._,..�._.... __.. . . ..__ _._ _._._.�__ __.._ _ . i � _. ___—_i._' "_"' _" _.. _. . . � � + _ `. ip i CITY OF FRIDLEY 843/ UNIYERSITY AVENUE N.E., .FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE (812)5T1-3450 May 30, 1980 Id"u7If.E CF �L`BLIC HEARING Nctic? is he�•ehy give^ �';c�4 th^ °,ureais Commission of the City of FriGiey w;ll cor�d�ci � pc�b7i�: }��ea.t°;�-�g 'n i:�a ��;ty Council Chambers at 6431 U=�iver- sit:y A�renu�� ;!o;•;:heas* a�; 7: ;� F; '�!, on TuzsdaY, June 10, 1980, in regard t� the Ta': icr:�i�;�; ;;�att:2t , Request for a variance pursuant to Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback on the living side of a dwelling from the required 10 feet to 4 1J2 feet, to allow a 12 ft. by 24 ft. addition to an existing house, to be used for enlargement of the kitchen and family room area, located on all of Lot 22> except the North 135.7 feet as measured along the east & west lines thereof; Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside Addition, subject to the South 25 feet for street, the same being 7677 Arthur Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. ?';il�i?l? 'i�3 iT4rF.�,`j �1VF'Pi i:',li?'.; a71 Persnns hriV?Ilt! �i'�(1 �lYl�.",fl':'. �� t6erein wi i i L� ��a�,c;� �ir, �ipnnr�un�it,y to �,e lieard st t+ze above time ani'. piace. V1KG?f�IP, �r'�;h;�15LE CiiAI R�d?];-tl1"�; :�YPEAzS CO`;f4ISSION i�• t�:c auneu�� ,� ,•�r- - ' �'`lC1�.�... �_ ^� .. 'U� {�;li i2dVE� �,�10 fin;;j 3Ct1Df1 011 t{17J�iE'.Qi:2S�i,s iLt �?':::> t.�l^':':? dl"u' !'[:�2Ct�7Cil1 Yi't;iil •�a -�u!.l)?i1�'t� Pl2ltJFti01"S� i;i1G' i'.l�y $tdfl`� 6Y' �hiiG'��?:lilfli�t`t' :0°,`S IICI,�", d'.ii'G'� R']��1 .fii. I,0'i0��.,.'�l"�I'i S �tE`Cl5'-^,Il. iT dli,y Of th2�e .^9@!ij:5 �C-,t'1"s i�'.5; �„�- . _,, .. . ., , i1.,.1.i''�. Nli'sl Ci!ilf.?f��t' :::7 �"f� �,t2�.y' t14(;C'll �;'!2".`�ilirfl �i`8 ��d��l"ICI,CI I��Tr-:��t�:.lvi. 4e!�:�'� (71?i'9 ,..._ .�;,��47�1i�� 7t�ii' ) , i��•r.�:,.:5 �QIi� i1.�S�t6i'1. ..., . .. ... ...i. , .. , . . - . . _� .. _ .. . . . .'� .. . .�, , ."... i -..�, ; . .. . . . . . .. ...., ., _.. � . ... ... . �- . . . . 'i: . ' .. -i � r. . ... . .., . .� � . . ' . �: . - .'J �:.: ,.. . .' � . . . . _.. - � h '. - � . . . . .� .. . ._ _ . ... . . . '�.; . r. .. .. : ... - � r.zr � , �� (• . ....�.-�r 1 . ': . � . ;.,, .. ., - :. .r . .� .♦ � ( �.. . .. . .. _._ . . . .S - . . .rb . - -, .�.. ,. . _.. . . .. . . .... .. . . _ - . .. - .,. . ..... � �:i��;i .. r'. . i. ::: � _.,.-:`:.. ,.._... . �_, : : �._. .,�',': �,. '. i.: I . .- . '.,:! ,3'-.:. .'. C ,,.. ,.� .. � , . . . . � . _. . _ .. . _ ,�..t . ` _ . o_ � -i:J .i. ' , , ' . . . . . .._ , 3ft.. ' i .. . .... v - .. y �. .. . � . . _ . .�. _ . . . .. _ ...� .... � � �L 4 . . . .r. . . . .. . .... � . � i. . ��. .. ... �•. i . .. . � .. _. . _ _ . ' ' . . . . . . . _... , ... . . .., .. - �.. ..v.. . ...�.....L . . . � n . � :..:. ,..�.;�i.r�. � i G r Item #3 June 10, 1980 ADMItdISTRATIVE STAFF REYORP 7677 Arthur Street- N.F. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SER�IE13 BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.053, 4B, requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet fox living area. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent'structures and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to open areas around residential structures. �, STATED HARD$HIP: "We were unable to build a home with a full basement durinq the original construction. This has created a space shortage that has limited the free movement of the wheelchair in the family room and kitchen area." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This same petitioner was granted a variance on rear yard setback in May of 1978 (£rom 34 to 22 feet).. It should also be noted that they could add 12' to the north of the family room or 6 feet to the east without a variance. Also for some reason the north/south dimension of the lot has been reduced by a little over 1 foot {1.15) therefore, note that the setback off the south line is 33.4 instead of the required 35 feet. �f the addition is made it will be overlooking the rear yard of the vacant lot to the,east, that lies only 4.5 £eet away. Therefore, it is staff recommendation that the request be denied, or if approved, no windows be allowed along the east side to maintain some degree of rear yard privacy for the lot to the east, also that the south setback should be approved. / ,_ ~ CITY OF FRIDLLY AFPEA�S COMf^ISSIGN f1EETING - t1AY �?�, .1,978 CAi_L TO ORD��R: Chairperson Schi�abel ca11Fd the Piay 23, 1978, Appeals Commission meeting to order at '1:35 F.f1. ROL.L CALL: M�mbers Present: t1embers Absent: Others Present: Plemel, Kemper, Schr�abel, Gabel, Barna None Ron Holden, Building Inspector AF'�ROVE APPEALS CO"1MISSION f1INUTES: MAY 9, 1978 MOTIOfV by "Is. Gabel, seconded by Mr=_6arna, to approv� the Appeals Cornmission minutes of May 9, 1978, as written� Upcn a voice vote, al.l votin�� aye, the motion carried unanimously. �RCQUES'P P�P VARIANCE TO THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, SECTI6N c�5 7U ftCDUCE 1'4E F?E�iU�if<EL' REl�R YAR.D SETF3ACK t"�Ui9 :34 FFF'(' {L/4 � �. �_ � , ii`i'N i,35+ {REQUES9' L"( FiEPdfiY J. GUPdI'dICK, MINfJEAPOLIS, I9INNF507'A 5543G 7 �L\J�.T C� .)Yf\ R�ET NE, Ff2IDL SO��f S7'REET NE, 3,4,C, P S Ci0TI0N hy Mr. Kemper, seconded by f1s. Gabzl, to open i:he Public Hearing. Upan a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion car•ried unanimously. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:37 P.M. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT A. PUBLiC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.053,4,G, requiring th�_r a �,ear depi.l� ofi not l�ss than 25 percent or the lot depth be permi�ted, and/or rriore than 4� fee:, is required. Public purpose served is to provide rear �!ard space to be used for green are�s which enhance the neighborhood. B. STaTED HARDSHIP: H�ma to be built for a handicapped person in a wheel chair o�ith all livir�g area on one level. APPEAL3 COMMISSION MEETING - MAY 23, 1978 Paqe 2 C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Field measurements show that the proposed raar yard variance will on the north side of the lot, adjacent to an existing house and detached garage. There is not sufficient survey information to show how far the existing garage on the norS� would be from the petitioner's proposed garage. There is a 13.5 foot boulevard on Arthur Street. The petitioner intends to stay back 35 feet from Arthur Street as well as the right of way on the south side of the lot• The total lot coverage proposed is 18..2i, with a house and garage totally 2,472 square feet. Ms. Karla Blomberg was present at the meeting with Mr• & Mrs. Gunnick. Ms. Blomberg explained on a drawing to the Appeals Commission how the house would be situated on the lot. She also indicated that the house would be an L-Shape Rambler that would be constructed to accommodate a wheel chair• She said the halls would be larger/wider than usual and would be entirely ramped. She said that the plans indicate the only way that particular house could be located on the lot. Ms. 8lomberg pointed out to the commission the �etbacks that wo�ld be needed on the lot. Chairperson Schnabel asked if the house would setback 35 feet from the 25 foot street right-of-way. Mr. Holden said that even if the street went through {street right of way on the property}, the 6unnick's would have enough setback. He said that the Gunnick's garage and the adjacent neighbor's garage would be at least 24 feet apart- • Mr• Plemel asked if the 35 foot setback would be maintained on both the proposed street and Arthur Street. ,. be Mr. Holden said that it would be done because of the way the house would be situated on the lot. _ Ms. Blomberg pointed out that an adjacent property owner had been approached re�ardzng selling some of their lot to enable the Gunnick's lot to have more rear yard space. However, she said that the house was set back quite far from the street and the land purchase was never persued. Chairperson Schnabel asked how soon they planned construction� Ms. Blomberg said they wanted to start construction some time i� September• T 9!� � _"�Mr. Holden showed the Cammission an aeriel view of the area in Guestion. Mr. Holden cautioned the Gunnick's about the water table in the area. He told them to use precautions in planning their basement• MOTION by Ms. 6abe1, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:54 P.M. MOTION by Mr• Barna, seconded by Ms. Gabel, to approve the request for variance to the Firdley City Code, Section 205.053,4,C, to reduce the required rear yard setback from 34 Feet {1/4 of the lot depth} to 21•6 Feet, to allow the construction of a house and garage on the South 135+ Peet of Lot 22, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside, The same being 7677 Arthur Street NE, Fridley, flinnesota. llpon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously• 2 LVI �� 6LVLh .]� 6760 f1ADISON ST {REQUEST BY h7R• FRIDLEY, MN}. � QUIRED REAR YARll STRUCIION OF AN RICE CREEK TERRA EET NE, FRIDLEY, & MRS. GERALD D. S L, 6760 MADIS N i+Z.7 STREET NE, Chairperson Schnabel eicplained that it had been req sted that they hear the request that evening.even though Public Notic had not been sent out and the request had n t been published. She said that the petitioner, received from City Hall a ist of the people t t would be the effected property owners. The petiti ner went to the roperty owners and asked them to sign a notice of publ'c hearings. e read the petition wording into Public Record, "We the un ersigned wa' e our rights to the traditional ten day notice of public hearin for var' nce request on a property located near the corner of Jeffe on an Madison Streets NE, the address being 676� Madison Street NE. Le 11 described as follows: Lot 3, Block 5, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 6• he variance request is to Code Section 205.�53,4,C, to reduce the quired rear yard setback from 28.27 feet to ten feet. We under an that this matter will be presented before the May 23, 1978, meetin of the Board of Appeals ard there wi11 be a Public Hearing• Our sign ure here oes not necessarily mean our approval of this request, but erely noti 'cation of the Public Hearinc•^ Ms. Schnabel indicated that 6 people had s ned the petition. Mr. Kemper wanted to/fcnow why the request\as proceeding in this manner. / Mr• Bethel said at it was due to a misunder anding on his part. Ne said he wasn't aw re that a variance had to be ob ained. He said that he had already con acted with a person to dig the ba ment, however, the equipment broke d n and the work hadn't been ccmplete He said that he didn't want to h ve to wait until the midd7.e of June bec use the person had the equipme t repaired and would be able to start work around the first part of June. He pointed out that the Appeals Commission's next meeting wasn't until une 13, 1978. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING - MAY 23, 1978 Paqe 4 w Mr. Bethel indicated that he planned to sub-contract the work on the addition. He said that the process of sub-contracting was usually time consuming. He wanted to be able to have enough time t� have the addition completed by winter. He said that he didn't want to start any type of scheduling of the contractors until he had final approval. Mrs. Bethel said that she had taken the petition around to the neighbors. She said that she explained exactly what the petition was saying as well as asked each person to read the petition 6efore signinq. She said that she brought the plans along with her and showed it to the people. She said that the only person that had showed concern was a neighbor who was to the back of their roperty. She said that he was relieved when he saw the plans. She sai that presently when anyone used the rear door, they looked directl on the neighbors deck= She said that in the-new plans, that rear d or would be moved and the entire wall would be sblid with a fireplace• he said that the neighbor liked the plans. She said that she indicated to each person that they should appear at £�e Public Hearing if hey had any questions or concerns Mr. Kemper said that he had a prob em with the manner the request was being put through the process. He id not feel that the Appeals Commission should have final approval o this type of hurry-up request. He said that he realized that the Appea s Commission did have authority to act on R-1 requests; however, he sai that the approval was giver� to the Commission by City Council with he intent that there would be due process and an appropriate length o time for publication and notification. Chairperson Schnabel explained to Commission was authorized and governed which the City had established. Sh�.se property owners adjacent to areas whe�e She said that the Appeals Commission we situations. She said it was not in the appear before the Board on the evening without having some prior notification Ms. Schnabel felt that the notice th�t neighborhood was specific in that it di would be held on May c3, 1978. She sai the notice that by signing the petition fact they were not giving their approva properly notified. Mr. Holden indicated that the neig invitation to appear at a Public Hearin He felt it was probably more effective notices. he Bethel's that the Appeals nly to act under certain rules d it was for the protection of variances were being requested. not allowed to circumvent those �- discretion to have people f the meeting with a request iven to the adjacent property owners. s. Bethel took through the indicate that a public hearing it had`also been evident i� the peopl�.,were aware of the , only tha��,they had been bors actually g t a personal regarding the v iance request. han the mailed xer type of Mr. Kemper said.that tfie Appeals C�mission mistekenly ac�ed on a previous request for variances hand ed in the like manner. He said that the peopie had misrepresented their`request to the neighbors and the neighbors signed the petition and no one appeared at the Public Hearing. He said that when the house was constructed, the neighbors were upset because that was not what they had been told would be built on that peoperty. He did not feel the Appeals Commission shovld teke the responsibility of acting on the particular request because of the manner it was being handled. ._Z,T'T "ffL:i._i ,[r'123��IVi�t „� ,1.L1,1i� rtFil c}s `lrr 1 ar;e 7 -' Mr. FIolden pointed out tha't it was somewhat different in that the � request �aias for an addition to an already eristing house. He said 'che request referred to l�ias regarding a new clti�rellin�, Chairper:>on Schnabel aUain expl.ained to Mr, & Mrs, Bethel that under norMal circumstances the I.npeals Comrnission did have the final apProval nroviding that there rras a unanimou� decisinn by the Commission, provided that Staff concurs l�rith their decision, and provided that there were no objections from an� of the adja.cent neighbors, She said that if any_: of �he provisions viere not met, tnen the item ti�JOUld have to go on to the Cb.ty Council for their final decision. She said that Mr. Kemper rras�'uestionin� :�ihether the Appeals Commission should actuall,y have th finai decision in this type of situation. She said he vras conce ed that all the a.djacent neighbors eaere properly notified, P4rs, T3ethel sai that she understood v;hat t��as eing sa�d, She said that her major co cern vras the fact that th did �=iant to start coastructicn as soon as ossible. She said t they had to vrork around ai.J. the other con ractor schedules an that it could be a timely thino. She said that she did indeed tell ch perscn that th.ey t�rere only signin� the petition o indicate th they ha.d been notified of the Pub1�_c :�earing. ;ne ex lained tha they could voice any opinionU at the Public Hearing. Mr, Kemper asked if any o t e other members had the concern on the itern thut he had, Mr. Holden �aid that if e'tem ti�;as clela.yed until the June 15, 19?�, meeting� additional notices �ould not be sent out. He said the manner that Ifrs. Bethel handled th notif'cation vlould surfice as official notification , unless requ sted by he Commission to mail notices. t�r. �arna sa?d tha e felt it iould be i��ithin the Appeals Commis�ior.'s bounds t ct on this it m. i4s. Gabel said at she tivas sometir at uncomfortable r�ith the request. Hor�ever she said th it did clearly st te in the petition that the residents rrere e�ai ing their rights to t n-day notice. She really felt that people vroul pay more heed to the v bal notzfication than they did to copy of t e notice being sent to t eir hou.�es, Mr. Plcmel said that the petition did eem clearly stated. Chairperson Schnabel said that as a ma ter of practice she didn't Iike to see the normal procedure bypassed, oraever, she did feel tl;at in the particular case the petitioners did present a very specific petitien. She felt much more comfortable 1V1tY2 the particular request beinm discussed than she had with previous reouests-that had been hand°led in like manner. APPPAT„3 C0,1,�fI>CIOTI P^PP:TING - I��i�Y 23, 1978 Pa�;e G MO`PION by P4s. GaUel� seconded by 1•1r. Kemper� to open the Public Hearin�. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye� the motion carried unanimously. The Public Hezring t�ias opened at.8:30 P,M, t✓OTIOr? tiy Mr. P1eme1, seconded by Ms, Gabel� to receive the petition indicating that the 26 neighbors had been notified of the i�iay 23� 197�� Pubi�c Hearing. Upon a voice vqte� all voting aye� the motion carried unani�ously. j Chairperson Schnab indicated that all by City Hall to be valid e�. Mr, Bethel explained to do. He said that tne point approximately 12 feet. e Commission �est to the t4r. Bethel had a set of actual �lans He also had a verified survey, \ Mr. Holden sho�ved an aerial-vie��r map names had been verified actly e�hat he planned to line orould be show to the Commission, the area in questicn, Chairperson Schnabel said that the Be he 's stated hardship on the application had beeni "Planned family size ad increased since the horne had been purchased in 1967, resultin in in equate space in the kitchen, eai;in� area� and family room, l'1 could n t find adequate home rre could afford, and ;re did not e�ant to ve out of ridley," ' Chairperson Schnabel asked if there'rrould be full laasement under the addition, \ Tirs. Bethel said that there vrould �5e a full basement un er the proposed addition. Chairperson Schnabel asked 1�rhat p�rcent lot coverage t�ould re lt ti�rith the proposed addition. � Mr. Holden said that it tivould r MOTION by Mr. Kemper, seconded Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote� carried unanimously. The Public He t in 21% lot coverage. Mr. Barnas to close the �roting aye, the r�otion g rras closed at 8:47 P,P4, �YPPIlI,N COI-'[MISNTOPi P�tI,PTI�IG - MAY ?_3, 197Q, Pa�e � w ' " �t407'IOid by f•Sr. Pieme?_� �econded. by Pir. Yarna, to approve the reauest for variance to the Pridley City coae, Section 20y.o53,i;.�C� to reduce the required. rear yard setback fror: 28.2'7 feet to 12 feet, to 30�: the conUtruction o£ an a:idition to an existin�; house on Lot 3 Bloc!. 5, Rice Creek Terrace f�ddition, the same being 6760 Madison St eet IdE� Fridley� I�t3. Upon a voice vote, a11 vot�ing aye� the moti carried unanimousl?�. 3. Chairpers Schnabel explained r�hat had trans ired at the Plannin� Co:�mis�' re,;ard5_ng the Energy Commiss' n, She said that it r�as planned to t� notice in the paper ind'catin� the formation of an �ner�y Comrni �^i.on and asking any nerson ;tn Fridley that had �some �noti�rledge and ��erest in the �nergy iss�tfe to submit a resuMe to City Hall for consid �tion, She said that �he item had been continued to the Plannin� Commi ion's next meetin� t rrhich time the ooals a�d objectives c�ould be set and resumes rroul be considered, NIr. Holden said that that an art be submitted to the I�ppeal Cornraiss� required setbacks, etc. IIe felt th� people in Fridley ��iere made lvare �'f they planned to put additions nt� to as the procedures that lia� to b/met i le for the Ne�asletter �•aould ior their approval regarding it 1•roulc� be helpful if the exactly rrhat they had to do if their existing homes as rrell to construct a nert dt��elling, Mr. Plemel ��ras concerned.abo t the excessive signage located at th� Caballero. H� �aid it �^as sta in� to look �'tacky��. P1s, Gabel agreed, Sh� said that here vrere too many signs located �t that corner (Osborne I?�ad & Universi y t?venue). Mr. Iiolden saicl Mr, Boar.dman. 11DJOURI�4FNT t he ti�ould forerar2i�their comnents onto �to hfOTION by P�ir. Tiemper, seconded by t4r. Barna, to adjourn 'the May 23, 1978} AgpealU Commission meeting. Upon a oice vote� all voting aye� the'meeting c�as adjourned at g;00 P,A4. Respectfull,y�submitted� DiaryLee Carhill Recording Secretary , � � � I �' I �' � I li � � ; . . .. . .�. i . _. _;. _ �I . _ . . , , ', ' rl� � �I i'!l��7h�t 1'� ✓% !J , �` . � �li��ll��IJCG �G��'�.�� ; �� M i� i GO i Bz ----�. �us� L/D� C�� Y—, 7 0 lf- �� i � _ . : ,��{'i a�,� - ' {` 3S ay ,z . �. _ ' _ . _ ___ �3� . ay a�f ' �/8.�=-�-- ' � _ � n �i � � ` _ � E/��f%� � �r � K Nlti1 ! I'-. %�� – .!3 ,�� ,Q�F�� 5�f1i20 ��l�c�iF}.c1c_.c, f.E'� � , ,3 5�' �o �21, 6 '� . ,� ' , 3�, 7 � � � ' � �/�oPasaD _ , G ? �7 y �r4-u. 7 � � .2 �'�� 7G � � i �z -,, � ;Z l-� i � � � �7 , � � • I \ �� `'' ` I � . ' t �� ', l � FRIDL�Y � � M�D I a`� 3G � 1' - Ei0E1RD �F APPcALS � � � ��f-!i�IT �'o /-� � ; , � � : � , , � : � , �},: � 35 n,E�-rn�c oare �� Z 3- �8 � r . . .. ' � � ' _o � ..�-- _ . /A? I � ��'0 ��DS G D S� � �T S--_-_-_�__..._,__.. _. _,_ __-____.__. __�___ __ � Appeals Commission Meeting June 10 1980 PaRe 5 MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Ms. Gabel to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTiNG AYE, CHAIRWOPfAN SCHNAI3EL D�CLARED TIiE PUBLIC HEARING CliOSED AT II:45 p.m. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by M„ Gabel, rhat the Appeals Conunission recommend to City Council, through the Ylanning Commission, that ihe variance to reduce the side yard setback from the required 10 feet to less Chan 6 feet be approved with the stipulation that the petitioner cannot encroach into the easement without City Council approvaL UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE h10TI0N CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. VAP.IANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 0: THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE kIiQUIRF.D SIDE YARD SETBACK ON TAE LIVING S7DE OF A DYIELLING FROM THE P.EQtIIRPsD 1Q FF,ET TO 4]./2 FEET, TO ALLOSd A 12 FT. BY 24 FT. ADDITION TO GN EXISTING HOUSE, TO BE USED FOR ENLARGEhfGNT OF TtIL KITCHEN AND FAhfILY ROOM AREA LOCATED ON ALL OI' LOT 22, EXCli°T THEPdORTH 135.7 FF.ET AS r�ASURED ALONG THE EAST AND W�ST LINES � THEKEOF; 'BI.00K 2, SPP.IP�G L?.I:P; PARK LAKESIDE ADDITION. SUf3JECT TO TH� SOI?TH ?5 FEET FOR STREET, THE SA2•� ISEING 7677 AR'PHUR STREET N,E., FR by Aenry Gunnick, 7677 Arthur Street N.E., Fridley, Mn Mr. & Mrs. Henry Gunnick were present. I40TION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Ms. Gabel to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOT�, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOriAN SCHNABEL DECLAREll THB PI7BLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:50 p.m. - CHAIP.ZdO:�.� SCt�PiABEL read . I. ' the scaff report. ADMItdISTP.ATSVE STFFF' ,.ispOFT 7677 Arthur Street N.F. A. PUELIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: 5ection 205.053, 4B, requizes a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet f.ox living area. . Yublic purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet betcaeen living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet beto,�ten garages and li.vi.nq areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to eyen areas around residential structures. B. STAT�D I1l1RDSHIP: "PIe were nnable to buil.d a home with a full basement during the original co:,structien. 'Phis has creat.ed a space shortage that has limited the iree movement of the wheelchair in the family room and kitche.n area." C. 11Ui4INISTPJIT2VL STAPt' REVIEW: This >ame l�etitioner was granted a variance on rear yard setback in May o£ 7.97£3 (from 34 to 22 feet).. It sbould also be noted that they could adcl 12' ;co t.he nortl� oi the family room or G feet to the east without a�tari.ar,ce. Also for some reason the north/soutl�i dimension of the ].ot h�s been mtuced by a littic over 1 foot (1.15j tharefore, note that the sotback off tha south line is 33.4 insL-cad of the requir.ed 35 feet. � � �peals Commission Meeting June 10, 1980 PaRe 6 If the addition�is made it will be overlooking the rear yard of the vacant lot to the east, that lies only 4.5 feet away. Thezef.ore, it is staff recommendati.on that the request be denied, or if appreve3, no ----- windows be allowed along Che e4st side to maintain some deg�ee of rear yard privacy for the lot to the east, also that the solith setback shoutd be approved. t}r. Clark said that he had talked to Karla Blomberg, who is the developer of the � property on the South side of this house, and she said she had no objection to the variance being granted. i Mrs. Gunnick said that the present 12' by 24' living area was not large enough for her wheel chair to move around in, and if there were other people in the room, it became too congested. ' Mrs. Kurtznolan, owner of the property to the east side of the house, said that she did not object to the addition to this house. lier house sits north of this house, and her lot is over 300 feet long. Even if Mrs. Kurznolan were to split off the south half of her property, the lot was over 100 feet wide and it was felt. that any new house could be placed so as not to be bothered by this addition. (The new lot would be approximately 150` x 100'). Mrs. Karla Blomberg spoke in favor of the addition and showed the Commission members the house plans. Mrs. Schnabel asked if the proposed addition would be appoxi.mately the same size of the existing deck? Mrs. G�nnick said it would be as wide (12') bur would be about 2 feet shorter: Mrsr Schnabel asked if the trees growing behind the deck, and serving as a screen from the property to the east, were on the lot line. Mrs. Gunnick said yes, they were on the property line. Pirs. Scluiabel asked Mr. Clark if, in view of the comments of the neighboring property owners, the staff would withdraw their objections? Mr. Clark replied that yes, the objection would be withdrawn, especially in light of the large lot size of the property to the east. MOTION by Ms. Gabel, seconded by hir. Barna, to close the puUlic hearing. UPON A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTING AY�, CIIAIRWOPIAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:12 p.m. NIOTION by Tis. Gabel, seconded by Barna, that the Appeals Commission recommend approval of the variance request to reduce the living side of a house from 10 feet to 4 1/2 feet, to allow an addition at 7677 Arthur Street N.E. UPON A VOICE VOT�, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DGCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAIdIMOUSLY. 4. CE isR 205. REDLiCI: TIIE SIDE YARD SETBACK FRODf A SIDIi STREET DI' A CORN 35 feet TO 32 r]:ET TO ALLOW TELE CONSTRUC;7'ION OF A 6-UNIT LOTS 1-4 BLOCK 11 HAPfILTON' S ADDITION TO ri}�CHANIGSVILLIi STFI STR�GT N.�. FRIDL�Y, rf7NNESOTA. (Request by Richard Coon Rapids, Mn 55433) Mr. Traczik, the petitioner, was present. I,OT FROM TRE THS SL�ME BEING 5450 Tracz.ik, 12315 Gladiola,