Loading...
AF-V - 36516_____-_ _ _____ _ ____ _ _ ,--'" T ,� • --.r. �. , • -�r. - _._ .... . _ __---r--- __ , y- _ _ _ __ � _.�- _--• •. _ . . �„_,� ; _ �f" � �tI �t �Y �,F � ��\ . � � �' R���rt' A►�,'!�,?�;�'E � ,��� z.. �rI �- �R1�,3L-��'. N'��"' 5��32 PART:�t�'�T ��t�, ��1 ��g� C`n;�ttit�:�I`t°k' ���'ELpP�1�,NT �E � .- _..�.�-�-� � _ -- = ������� AP�����A`T���; �ORM ^ _. .�..- �- �lA } ��_�_ �,�.� �~ �. -�- r � - site p:$n rz�uired for s�tb��ttal; see flit���ed �,�..�.�� �� . _ � _�_��._ _ � ��____ d,i�:�E;�;. �__. ,�._��.��------ . ..;� ;,�� �••,-r.t.�r �Pt';j_ r._.,—.�......._.-.�_���- .,. r;c,}�::y Cc:c�°:�.�,cht .,. ----�- � �.�-- -r..r---�- �.,Ej�:ii t��S�:t;�•'�G!1: _�..—,�. —�-----�-�---'_' � �,�.. �'----��.�-� � L�,t _ � . a �_ g °`=`=k �-�-� Tracc, P 4Y �c�v^r _ �- -�. �..�. ° � S�u.zrz fc;'�,r.`:�cre �gz _ .�---- . _ ..- - - �--- Cui��ntr'v�:i^� _� ---�--�� 4 _ _ � ,� ;��,;<�,n ''�� ta:�xf �e a�rd ha.rdth�� _,,....,..-.V...Y_ _.�_� _ _ . ._. _� _ _.. _ . - . _ -�------ - -_ ' _ _ � 5e�c#on af C�7 Cc��'� _ . -- - -��� _.�...�_ , _ � , ._ . j�.*t �f y: �-�:�'r� n j1���2SS !Pr ��ity u�°:rh ��e,u',.~e3 a}�u��n�.3 l:cense7 � �� - � , y�s, wr.��r► �i.y� � :'e> - -- • �`' .-�-. � _ Zf � �_�.. �- ---- . - - ^- R- � ;+ yz;, � !-,- �'Yrr Of f}US:r�ecg? ^..._ __ g � , • r , . _ . . . .. . ... '`°�`as w�'e ?�c�r�� e�e;� <:en;t� ,,r r�vnxedl Ye� __.�._.._ ��= �_.,...�.--. . . � _ _ _ _ _ .�,,. r�r.�r+�wr.�rt.�_�,.ti4--.�.. �� �- ._ . __��.�.w--�rlL�-�- ���,�rv4}��,���F4��►iATI�` (fiS {i 6�rGYrs or� tha proptrty title) ��'o, • : ° P :�'_�`:`.4e:a Fee dwrtr� +nuct �igr t}'..3 r.�r.-r: ?�cr ;0 prC�e�;ng) � � � I �' 4' : = ie �!'`.�� � � I�,r' � � h I�.t� 5:�. �''� ' ` _ �a _ -- • . i ���v - � t,��5c? ����.,�.���..�.�.�x�._d � �� �'!''i.�._..��� � __ .�ct. - _ �,�D.�Yt(ti�� F"r0�� _ '� �' �'5—�� �ii��.4 Tt���: � _ :�Ei���! � - - --. - _DATE S 8� �.� � - . � - - ---- _ _.-- _ _ _ �_,_ .�. . . . _ . . _ - - 4. . - �._ ,_ w.�4rv4L4Fk -., � . . . ti r��Y.�.'�v�.��.� � �z�..r� �.�.����'�� R ��ti ti A' � R � ���rf G: � r�§�� �� _������- r-..� _+.__.' ' ' __ " / — -`� . ,4 n �„� � . � � � �0 I�f a±��r�_� �. _�"�_r_' �` N S5 ,% _ . � - — - - b�rrL,� P�oh��a ._� ?-3.�° Sti�ti.�Ti���== �4�!?-�-��-_ � DATE �--��� �� - � . _'��..� . . �. _ . _.,..�-...�-_..- _ . _ ..._ . ___ _ ...... __.,...� _ . . . 4 . . � ti . � -. � e _ -. -_ . . . sa .ti ti.�. , � �_y 4 i�� it� ._ - � �� � s� . �i ' ;2t��CC?G'�1i Q�,:.�r,�: �e5 _ �-� ` _� ; Fe � r :t '� +� `� � �s' i y . -- _ -- ��� � `-�-�- � �. j �S`r`"�";t� =c t� 1,. � __ ` �-_ --__-- ' _-�._., _.__� t q k��„',2a �^��:�is �t?�'T'ii`�.:=� ��'r. (� _�'f 9 �._____--._�-. . ., .. � � � �' �. ' � 9 __� - -.. = = _ �. �.. c,�+��,��� ,:� �:a���t-+l dat _ _. �__.� _ . -- - - -- ---�---.. r�► =�- ? ��a�-� ��_r � ��f�;� t r;�� ���r i E � CFr'r� # �;., a_�.-�yr� EnX �t ,� � ti3,�; �;i� � � r.,-- . �a" -1�—�- � —_. --�—�--- . _ _ --�'���_�� ��.��;���� — - - — y~� � i� �� �'�1-�Y?�'r% . _ TI'`�: -I. C�.,�_..�_�__ r - ° _ ��'L'��s1�'.L _L'��i��� Fl,�t. �1��a _4.�' `3 �i i L' ti� � ` � � �_ 4. r/ . � J ,• , _� - ' ; - -?� � - • �_?s''� ;- �,j� _ -- � -_. � i C; � , i r� _ � � ' � � .�'��� �- ;- - � --.� �-'�� �_� � _ _ �i _ B,.- �,.n�� ��1.3tenal Fd�'-,t,.,y & �'r.�.��i�t;n5 y-,- `.,, 4;7 � � �� ; _ - , . _ � _ �_�t �� �.— �-`L,6,��_�1_.�L_ 1 �t.! �4 (�J � < ��` �__ ��1�-�c,����.:'� � �' , , � s� ^��� � t--i _ l-�� :i._.1'`-- _ -�_-'?�'� . �{_s.-r __�f'�z +�' i � , - � l� - — _�1 � • � � ��k , d� , G , ` . � f, Y, �, - _ ;1 .� - ° �-�r'� �. _ _ �' � .f-���� �1� � ` T �� � _ _ r, _ � '�+� �?'f✓�t' =- � {tz' � t �-' _ t,. ' � _ � r�- �� , ;, f �/ 7 �� � �. - � � • � � � _� _k--_�� L� t -K.,�� ���'-t ��'�-(�-'�- r,,���.���'.�X l�l�_� r.�-t1�-,s_� _�_�_',i.i�.�S'� ��� .�-- :., � r �'?'�"'� �---- - -- - - ---- --- _ , � � NEW ADDN ALTER 11 �l �) Construction Address: Legal Description: • • Effective 1 / 1 /95 C[TY OF FRiDLEY S[NGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application l� ( �� �' 1- ,c � -t � ,J- ��t; v � ''� Owner Name Xz Address: . �-- . � — l '. � Tel. # , . 8 ; � � r � "� �� - - :� �,,, �.,�.,2� � � � �. � , � � �� '� MI�i LICENSE # ` �� �' � � Contractor: �i -,, �,� �, � � , , � r �- , . _, ,� . Address: � �- c� �� l � � ,; � I � �� �� �� � � � � � � � Tel. # . ��( � � — l ` i � ` I LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: ' Attach to this application, a Cectiiicate of Survey of the lot, with the.proposed construction drawn on it to sc�le: Length Length Length DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT � ,�, Width j�` ` Height Sq. Ft. Width Height Sq. Ft. W idth �' � HgtlGround �_ ' Sq. Ft. Corner Lot [] Inside Lot [] Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks Type of Construction: � .>�' �j:?-cl-= �,; '�- `� �- � � `. � Estimated Cost: $ � i` � �'�-' Approx. Completion Date: ��., �� f`,� i�� c� ;�' T_ 'T �� �i (Cost on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x$ _$ ' Tel. # ' �.; � . - �, =� DATE: � ' ` �,�-� ; " APPLICANT: i _ , �, , ; ,-, J ti ) _ ., `, _ � (..' � i Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge Driveway Escrow Erosion Control Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL STIPULATIONS: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ CITY USE ONLY Fee Schedule on Reverse Side .001 of Permit Valuation (1/lOth%) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $850 per SAC Unit $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary ( ] Not Necessary [ ] �„� �. - �� 3� 2��D -� JZ• J 1 ' �.v=lo�ce� 32 . Co � 'b 23` �,�ui�.virv<� ,>,:EZn�t���� rr_�, scr{r;r�r_e i lu: (;I�i�:t l3uilciiri}; (��ticiai shall, t>cforc is�uing pc:rmits tor thc ercction of any huilding or stn�clurc, ur fur- any a�iclilion tu any cxistin�; buildint; or struclurc, or for any altcration or rc��air to any cxiStin� (�uiliiing <>r ��ructure, u�n ati��lication therefore, reqoire the payment by iJ�e a���lican[ for such �ermit c�( I�c:ti tc> th� aiiiount hcrcin hclo�v sc( fi�rth and in thc manncn c�rcin Prcivicicd tc�-�vit_ �I �501 �i�o�rn�_ vnr_tic r-r_t:s �o $SW $IS (Minimum Fcc is $1S Plus svrchargc) . to �2,000 �$15 foc . first $500 plus $2. for each .additional, $100� or fraction thereof, to an� incle�ding $2;000 : � �2,001 to $25,000 �25,001 to 550,000 $45 for fust $2,000 ptus $9 for each additional $1;0�0 or fracrioa thereof, to and including $25,000 � $252 for fust $25,000 pl�s $6_50 for each addirional $1;000 or fraction thereof, to. and including $50,000 �50,001 to �1Q0,000 $414_50 for fust $50,000 plus $4_SO for each additional . $1,000 or fraction thercof, to and including $100,000 �104,001 to �SOO,OQO $500,001 to $1,000,000 $1, 000,001 and up $639_50 for .fiist -$100,000 plus $3_50 for each additional� $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including -$500,000 $2039.50 for dae first $500,000 plus $3 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,OOO,Q00 $3539_50 for the first $1,OQ0,000 plus $2 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof - DR[VEWAY DEPRESStON ESCROW (Concrete Curtf Streets Only) Alternate "A": Removal and replacement of curi� and gutter only - Dciveway width plus 6 feet times � 13.50_ Alternate �Q": Removal and replacement of curb and guuer and install a 3 foot �vide approach with 6 inch depth - Driveway width pius 6 feet times $15_75_ � VLR(F[CA"CION OF FOUNDAT[0[Y Permits for cor�stiucUOn will be issued a minimum of 24 hours from the Ume of a{��lication to allow for ��ro�cr rcvic;w of thc ��roposcd structurc and of thc construction sitc_ A Certitic::ite o( Survcy of tl�e lot, showinfi the location of ttic founda[ion oncc it h�e it has hccn cUnslructc;�l will i>c rcyuirecl beforc proceeding with the fraoung_ u Design/Build General Contractors JUTIe b , 1.995 �, D. M. I�Sather COMPANIES ROOM ADDITIONS CitY Of �ridleY Community Development Departm�nt 6�-t:31 UniversitY Avenue N .E . Fridley, MN 55432 Re � 4lar a.ance App 1 ication for Don & Lee�a Betzold 6150 Briardale Court Dear Committee= • Building Material The i.rregularly shaped lot is located on a cul-de-sac with an unusual lot configuration. 7he North szde lot line is a great deal deeper than the 5outh side lat line. When applying the rear set back ordinance formula to this home there is not an npportunity to add on to the rear of the home on the end to the 5outh. The only reasnnable location to add a pnrch addition i� off the kitchen and dinning room which are located on the 5outh end (the remainin� rear facin� rooms are bedroom and bathroom). There ar� no other locations an the home that would wark for a porch addit�.an . The variance is reasonable porch encrnachment is constructa.on. necessary to allow for the construction o-F a addition (12' prnject,inn). The proposed minimum variance tn allow for the porch The variance is consistent with the intent of the city code in tf�at a reasonab:Le setk�ack s�.andard wou�.d be maintain�d for the add5.ta.on. ihe resulting development is compatible with the architecture and layout of the existing house and will not be detrimental to the character of the neighborhnod. Th� granting of a var.iance would mainta.in a property right held by others. The rear set back ordinance applied to this unusual lot cnnfiguratian d�nies the appJ.icant any opportunity for a reasonab.le rear yard addi.tion. 7920 Powell Road • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55343 •(612) 938-7989 Patio Village • 3918 W. 49Yz St. • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •(612) 92Cr2771 � LJ �� I' �, D.M. I�Sathe r COMPANIES Design/Build ROOM ADDITIONS Building Material General Contractors 7he p�oposed addition would not effect any life/safety issues� such as access foi- f ire CO1lt.T"OI . �Tf1E', addition would not a.lter substantial.ly any other property owner's view or daylight. Fa.nally, the irregu].ar shaped lot car the siting of the structure on the lot is a circumstance that is nat the re�ult of an action by the applicant. SincerelY, D.M. SA7HER CO PANY, INC. i t v� A . Sa�.her Vice President SA5/jk 7920 Powell Road • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55343 •(612) 938-7989 Patio Village • 3918 W. 49Yz St. • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •(612) 92Cr2771 :ti:-.; lond Plann�ng lond S�rrry.nq So�l� lr���ng (���I fng�nrr,mg Munir�pal fnt3mce�.iny � Mort�age _--- ... • �!�/, �(, t/(!1' 6A75 N�yV�woy No 65 N F ( M�nneupol�� � - �i Jii��'I'I/1/�, ./ii��. M,�� ss4» ielepl.onc 784-6066 F?�ip�ineers ez 5�r���>y<�rti n.<<� c�<,.,.et� Loan Survey for ��NAQ� _MILLE_R �CMES � �. T �J ° iti'�E �p I £'r �., � ;Y i S ':1 _ .r. � � I' - +�, : J,. � � Ql I 1 • - — � ' `� `� 6� � � ' � _-' � ,�, :��� , ; �Z.1 j� ', l. 3": � � '� ��� � � y' ' � �.:, , � << , , , , , � � �' �; � ae. � , � ,— � ' ' I�� I ?� � �� � � ,SG�. I � � a� � � 0 L r��� ��uiARuA�F ^ � �. L.'U,Q r �� ; � � �..��° ia �LOC 3 �R1A OA�E , 6 R —. — — `� f� : , , QNOkA �OUNTY . l, zno�z5 l�'ra�na e f U� � � ��� EaSement . � � ih�� �s o�rur o�d �o.rrcr .ep.osr��a�ion o) a�urvey of �he boundo��af o( �he lopd aborr desc.ibed and of the locofio� o� all b��idinqt, �f ony� Ihe�eon� o�d all v�s�bl• e�croachmenis, if any� from Or on �u�d lond Thi� tiurvey n mode only �n tonnevron w�th o morloaye loan now beinq placed on ►i�e prop�.ly a�d no liab�l�ly �• a�f�med e.csp� fo the holclr. o/ such morlyage o• ony o�he. intrre�/ acqu��ed by rhr r�a�on of such mo.�goge I� i� vndersrood and ogr�.d12`dmo�um.pj� 1.Q • b�e� v�a�ed /o. �h• purpose o� e�tobli+hrng l01 I�net o. boundary . coinera Daled Il�it,�`_/oy ol_ ��arthv a. o. ia_13 . � ,� ' i SUSURdAN ENGINEERING, INC. ���o�s3 � I ���^ •�� t��� Enqinee� , . Surv�yo�• ��a e � . � br ' � � �C�:�_ y`,_ r r ., . —�,�--- . �� . � • . • � 'j?.-Lr y �iusr SI{ i rl� _ vJ 3'F�M �XY�i� V./7 � aND �.s�1h 'O Go b� t f� IT� T F.%� �7� �r5 �. ICO'�0�, . � b � -:(q��+ �%��7 � � : �.' Y%-�GL ��'S� i�v�l �j'1' �yl�ti/,� i . j t I '� . ; D i Zr � � . �, � N ; - � r -, � I . �I M, .P� 3 - s�.sdrJ - -y : -_� — l�'o'•r�z-�a." N; g�7•n,��-fir • 4`Xl2b.. o w/��''6+•s� #;� �� � � � � � . �. � ' � q(.lvo �iL60 I �, _3•l0" . � � --� � I u „ � � 3 10___ __ g o'� IS'O t � _..._-- --- - .. ---_ _ _--._ ._ _---_ _ _,_ ---- - -.._ _ _....---�' ��� . . � . . Zh7i GE�. . _ 2iczGE�..�u I � ��-.CSF o.c . • � Z� k�i�e-1G I w� ,������ t-•�G''I`"�'� •Z � la � w" m. c, ?7.. GtibT'� __ �� � . t , _ �' . " ' - a . x..., : .. . ..... . .� .�� . .. . . . ..� .y - a ,. �1. .,t�.._ . .:. . . .. . � . � � . . .�, ry ol � �jY_qrd c/. ! . .. ' � ' Shii/tY �4 �M � -=ii IWa/� /ri � a ' ; (`� � : �, � r "`i � K ,. S; ��3s_ -� . . -- --. ._. ._ t K.� � r ..�s� +... � �-: sZ o �..i::' �� ry 2 a�: . �,� a, �>: qr3. y�' �! 1. . A .L!' f ! . . . ' , . � l�� �//�) � . . '� �� '-.A � � ` � 'V � 1 ^_ �` _ . � ' '# � `, cMojne _ � ,�n Lori • `-�.�- ��`'' "'=3 � ���f � i�Iii/�i/J :' Y :?'�i' � '.. '�" ' -�tr -� °�� � j �OtG�a � �j� �� �' .. �y� p +'' . f' � V} �� �� Gis) ; �- , � j �_� ,v ,� i r. .. o � .. �. . . .�_.�;. � w -�, j � .�.: C Q. .� �. , " Q _.L•. ��nA�p� � .YF. : .'L� .� r Y� • � ` 'F��I�� � � � � . � . Q� f �'; _ ... '-t- L-. C._ � p � •�� ♦ , t ;� ..� , ` �4 '� : �s E 4 ? z. - � ►�� ti...:....t � /%J �. O ` , � � j_" C .. �. _.. . . . � � :-� � ��o f y �...; i .. , . fe7 , ��)ON) V ` �..�...... .. .� . �� i , .. �f�,,"" "�. .K�fJM. � y� , y � � }�. �yF� � '�7I � 7SI.-.i ���� � ..."_.. . �,� W� �-..�., a..f i O 9 ' r '(ys� � �� � i " � - � - .�-,'� �. _� a �� t 1 /D � „ ",� �= � � � -. � ¢�,.��,�o?i1� m �2 +� �...,`'� , - � ,:' ��) ''F' • __ 1_._ -� , f ';:� �. � { • �. . ^ , . °,4�1 �.:,z.ti J 6 2 ND AVE. : k: -� �;� N � - ' ��.. F. �1�; �i�t,�,` f / .y��. \ . a (�: i a" Q. �KS•. / • .�y ; °r-`�`�� y�� � � , _ '.�,:�# � � e � Z . / �a �� . {� • �� ��.; � - -'� d'L�• - e � ,�� � 2 , � t (ft�) � rr. �: � y � ;�'s� i1 w: � � . n"� �. � �� � `�•� `� �� 3 �s�� � � � , 7 , ` 2 - ;� � � .� ,`i �C: .�.-*- .a a � �(}�,� Y � � ' . � ` -� R ' � ` ¢(�� _ , �,, ^ � l 7. � ' � (+p � � 3� �',��, � (s�+ , .�°�.� �z-�`- ,�,.,,rs� 5 � - . , f/id� � . , -i._..�,:.',d,:� , �'.� `�, ,. . � ._. , ., � �` lG � � 6(r� -"tr , . � �...�� � �7 � � ' _ ;,� �� : � 9 � `' � -�i ' w Mi , � � - i'..�", N'ss' !" 1 w � . •. . �. �/�j� ���r ��e/ ' . ~.�I rr-i �G� �r/ �i 1a y ` O�� � . ` r .. . ._., -�.. r'•�+ 1 Q S � �� .- �`� .t .Y" fi 1 . . . .. - . . . � � :+,� � �z �•,sE._. - l�NEA' " � _ .. �EC.�f3,�� ,, :�N,.°3 �o . : • � , �- � � `;:- - � � _ _ — '• k� _ / �'_ . �.f�r �� ,i: .-."S ^ . . . . .' �. / _ ... ,....� <H - . ���-. . r��. i: � � :... s. u`�t�.r. ee �.y:�p s �� �4 � �" � 1 cciviv�� su�if��i� � � . 1 �, �, � � �� � ; _ �,��,. �, ' �tNOKA COUfVTY, MINNESQtA � � �`x-_' ,y:�; � ��+ �.� , �: �� _ . . . - '. ?.. - ' 4 i^ -! ���� . •._ r ' A�.. �Di�ii�r%1�. %}r�i:�`�/��� � � ; f � �/ �/ '-/ •-- �_� �', • • CITYOF I CITY OF FRIDLEY FRiDLEYj COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW -------------------g-------------------- File Number File Date Meetin Date vau db95-14 6/6/95 6/20/95 ------------------------------------------ File Description: Petitioner: Leesa Betzold 6150 Briardale Ct., Fridley, MN 55432 -----�--------------------------------------------------- Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department , *** Comments *** . ��' Barbara Dacy ;~,�"" � � �� � � � � n �� �� Scott Hickok Michele McPherson j� � 7'oN c,Ji'�c.zek � }� � • � i 1�..J1JV31 John Flora John Palacio Clyde Moravetz Leon Madsen Dave Sallman ����gs � � ry � ,� i ;I . 5��� / �i �%'i � . �' � V � I -, I Dick Larson Q�' C- C-S� • PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION � Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, June 20, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #95- 14, by Donald & Leesa Betzold, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6' to 23' to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13, Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3592. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than June 13, 1995. � � `;�, t�0, c�0' c�0' t�6, t�o' c��a°, t�� 1581 (�f ��� l�) (�91 t�) I �� 1 (�i l 625p �oodside Court c �+_ � �'°' � c ;,�� c'su°' isre ��� c�� c�� t�� t�� � u � c�+°) � � (�) (�l il�l l�l (:4 � l 1 (�) ll�l (1�� Briardale ftoad c�0� � � � -� 62nd Avenue rr� ad ��� �� ��� cl+�� c�0� �o� � '� iliil li�) � `1�' l�' l ) � � � � �6��0 � 6184 � �6�) (�) 6171 6170 0 ���� ( 44 1 ( �� ) z� � � r (f1j (7�) c6 l�) ���� � ��� 6156 'sr,-� la�) ('s ) ��� 6151 6150 � �41% (31 ��� � 6140 ( Sf ) (�o) ( �� 1 6140 �'� 6130 (3S) �31� (�� � �b`30, `�' j 3�4 ) (�33�) 6116 �a) II��1 15&5 1571 1585 1601 16ll IGLt ipl 1641 1651 (�41 �is) (�:) (+�) (se) (s�) (`=) l°�) �°4� ���� � 61s venue ' The applicant requests that the required distance � from the rear property line be reduced from 32' to 23'. � 0 � .� � m 3 � z �•--. 0 � U T N � LOCATION MAP � 4 � VAR #95-14 •Mailing List •Mailed: 6/7/95 Donald & Leesa Betzold 6150 Briardale Ct., Fridley, MN 55432 Dionisio M. Jr. & K. Pastones 6165 Briardale Ct. Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph & Marjorie Krauter 6175 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Larry & D.J. Poundstone 6135 Briardale Ct. Fridley, MN 55432 John & Carol Kapotas 6160 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Howard & Carol LaBelle 6190 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Rodney & M. A. Ramaker 6181 Benjamin Street Fridley, MN 55432 Dale & Elsa Lindquist 6151 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 City Council (6) James & Virginia Beran 1650 Briardale Rd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Jack & Sharon Mugan 6155 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Gordon & Joyce Fischer 6130 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, N1N 55432 Nickolas Mavrogenis 6170 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Clifford & Wendy Thelen 1608 Briardale Rd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James & Nancy Rodgers 6171 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 David & Annette Buhman 6141 Benjamin Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Stephen & Maria Nuspl 1640 Briardale Rd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leo & Flavia Otto 6145 Briardale Ct. N.E. Fridley, NiN 55432 Roger & Laurie Solz 6140 Briardale Ct. Fridley, NiN 55432 Thomas Eggen 6180 Briardale Ct. Fridley, MN 55432 Eugene D. Gasparro Eta1 1604 Briardale Rd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ronald & Vicki Bohm 6161 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, N1N 55432 Martin & Doris Rolek 6131 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard & Flore O'Donnell Earl & Patricia Hendricks Clarence F. Cassell, 7r. 1601 - 61 st Ave. N.E. 1611 - 61 st Ave., 1621 - 61 st Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 M. W. & EK. G.L. Schlichtmann Grover & Sheryl Cleveland 1631 - 61 st Ave. • 1641 - 61 st Ave. Fridley, NIN 5543 Fridley, MN 55432 Dennis & Cheryl Schneider 6190 Stinson Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Charlene R. Jensen 6156 Stinson Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James & Joy Sovada 6116 Stinson Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Steven & Lynn Mokita 6190 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 John & Marjorie Simon 6160 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard & Jayne Franta 6130 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 P.A. Leschisin & M.M. Zwiers 1565 - 61st Ave. N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Tim Harris & Susan Marsh 6184 Stinson Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Doo Y. and Sun H. Shin 6136 Stinson Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Frank & Barbara Wrzos 6100 Stinson Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Vilpin & Renu Kumar 6180 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Henry & Jolayne Widen 6150 Benjamin Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert E. & C.R. Phaneuf 1585 - 61 st Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Lee & Margo Tech •1651 - 61 st Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Harald F. Markley 6172 Stinson Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph & Tracy Buffalo 6130 Stinson Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Philip & Chari Hansen 1566 Briardale Rd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Katherine A. Divine 6170 Benjamin St. N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Donald J. & B.A. Reichow 6140 Benjamin St. Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas R. & K.A. Shelton c 1571 - 61 st Ave. N.E. ���C a� Fridley, NIN 55432 , 1'4 �O � DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests that a variance be ganted to reduce the rear yazd setback from 32' to 23'. Approval of the request would allow conshuction of a three season porch addition. The petitioner's stated hardship: ". ..The irregularly shaped lot is located on a cul-de-sac with an unusual lot configuration. The north side lot line is a great deal deeper than the south side lot line. When applying the rear setback ordinance formula to this home, there is not an opportunity to add on to the rear of the home on the end to the south. The only reasonable location to add a porch addition is off the kitchen and dining room which aze located on the south end ( the rem�ning rear facing rooms are bedroom and bathroom). There are no other locations on the home that would work for a porch addition ..." SiTMMARY OF ISSiTES: An open deck is located in the location of the proposed porch. There aze a number of alternatives the petitioner could pursue including: leaving it as a deck, relocating it to a side yazd, or constructing it at the front of the dwelling. RECOMl�'IENDED ACTIONS: The request is within previously granted variances. Staff has no recommendation regarding the request. �50 Briardale Court Variance Reque� PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: Variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 32' to 23' Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: Ezisting Vegetation: Ezisting Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: 6150 Briardale Court Lot 10, Block 3, Briardale Addition Approximately 12,777.24 sq. ft. Mostly flat, slight slope to the west Typical suburban; sod, trees Briardale Addition Connected Vehicular Access: Briardale Court Pedestrian Access: N/A Engineering Issues: N/A Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the City Code requires a rear yard setback equaling 25% of the lot depth with a minimum of 25 feet required and a maximum of 40 feet required. Public Purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. 2 The petitioner requests that a variancc,T% reduce the rear yard setback from 32' t�3' be granted to allow constniction of a 12' x 18' screened porch and deck addition. Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit with an attached two car gazage. The dwelling is setback at 35' from the front properiy line as required. An open deck is located in the azea of the proposed addition. Open decks are pernutted by code to encroach into the required front and rear yard setbacks by 10 feet. The petitioner has several alternatives to the variance request: 1. Reconstruct the existing deck as a deck. 2. Relocate the addition to the south side of the dwelling (a narrower addition would be required, 9' x 18', or 12' x 12'). Construct a porch in the front of the dwelling. The lot is unique in shape, as the subject parcel is located on a cul-de-sac. The right of way and the cul-de-sac is not centered, but is offset to the west. The distance between the proposed addition and the dwelling to the west would be approximately 68 feet. This request is within previously granted variances, therefore staff has no recommendation. WEST: SOUTH: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Lssues: Public Hearing Comments: ADJACENT SIT`ES Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential Dwelling Land Use: Residential Dwelling Land Use: Residential Dwelling Land Use: Residential Dwelling • CITY OF FRIDLEY f:L��i�1�71 • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 1995 7:30 P.M. Location: Fridley Municipal Center City Council Chambers 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER• ROLL CALL• APPROVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: June 6, 1995 CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST, VAR #95-14, BY DONALD & LEESA BETZOLD Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6' to 23' to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13, Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 ' �: • \ ' \ \ �,l��! � \ : \ 1 • � �,�� ��� � *���� ��i�� �,� ��� : � � �.\�4 � • • CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Kuechle called the June 20, 95, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Larry Kuechle, C y Smith, Carol Beaulieu Members Absent: Diane Sava , Ken Vos Others Present: Miche McPherson, Planning Assistant Lee Betzold, 6150 Briardale Court, Fridley eve Sather, 7920 Powell Road, St. Louis Park � MOTION by s. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to approve the June 6, 95, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UP.O1Q A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CIiAIRPERSON ROECHLE ISECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. l. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95- 14, BY DONALD & LEESA BETZOLD: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6 feet to 23 feet to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13 , Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is located at 6150 Briardale Court which is generally located west of Stinson and south of Rice Creek Road. Located on the subject parcel is a single family dwelling with an attached two car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are all the surrounding parcels. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 32 feet to 23 feet to construct a 12 foot x 18 foot screened porch with an 8 foot x 12 foot deck addition on the rear of the dwelling. Located in the position of . • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 20 1995 PAGE 2 the proposed porch is an existing open deck which would be removed and the porch and new deck constructed in that location. Ms. McPherson stated staff in analyzing this request determined that there are three possible alternatives to the request which would meet the code requirements, as follows: 1. Reconstruct the existing deck as a deck. 2. Relocate the addition to the south side of the dwelling (a narrower addition would be required, 9 feet x 18 feet or 12 feet by 12 feet). 3. Construct a porch in the front of the dwelling. Ms. McPherson stated the lot is uniquely shaped. The parcel is located adjacent to a cul de sac which is not typical in shape. This cul de sac has more of a curve on one side than the other. This results in a uniquely shaped lot with the north boundary line being substantially longer than the south boundary line. That does impact the point from which the setback is measured. If the cul de sac were more straight, the house could have been moved closer to the curb and not setback to the distance that it currently is. The dwelling unit does meet the front and rear yard setback requirements as constructed. There is approximately 68 feet between this structure and the structure to the west. Ms. McPherson stated this request is within previously granted variances; therefore, staff has no recommendation regarding this request. Mr. Kuechle asked what the typical lot depth would be in the City. Ms. McPherson stated the average is approximately 125 feet. Mr. Kuechle asked if there is typically 50 feet between the back of the house and the end of the lot. Ms. McPherson stated this can vary from approximately 25 to 27 feet up to 50 feet or more. Mr. Kuechle asked how staff came up with a reduction of 32 feet down to 23 feet. Ms. McPherson stated the lot depth is calculated as an average between the two property lines. Ms. Betzold stated, regarding staff's alternative for a deck on the side, they already have a deck and want to replace it. The side is not desirable because the neighbor's garage is right there and they would look at a garage. The existing deck comes out 16 feet. • • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JONE 20, 1995 PAGE 3 The addition would come out 12 feet or 4 feet less than the current deck. Ms. Beaulieu asked if there had been any comments from the neighbors. Ms. Betzold stated the neighbors had said they would enjoy the addition very much. ,The neighbors to the west, north and south have screened porches�and like theirs. Mr. Sather stated the Commission might have concern about the rear yard setback and the houses being too close. The house to the immediate west, which is the closest neighbor affected, already has a screened porch so there is no potential for the houses becoming too close. This is a right that has been granted to others. He recognizes staff's efforts to locate the porch in the front of the house, but this is not a desirable location. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M. Ms. Smith stated she would be inclined to vote for approval. The public purpose is being served by putting the addition on the back side. There are several circumstances including the unusual lot size and shape. Putting the addition on the side would be more of a closing in of the green space rather than putting it in the back. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The hardship is the shape of the lot. If the cul de sac were more rounded, the structure would be farther forward. She saw no adverse impact. Mr. Kuechle concurred. He looked at the site. It is not that far off the 25 feet, which is the minimum requirement. It looks like this is the best of the choices. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #95-14, by Donald and Leesa Betzold to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6 feet to 23 feet to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13, Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY. ' • � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE 4 2. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS Ms. McPherson provided an update on Planning Commission and City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by M eaulieu, to adjourn the meeting. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOT CARRIED AND THE JIINE 20, 1995, APPEALS COMMISSION MEE G ADJOIIRNED AT 7:50 P.M. Respectfully, submitted, ',,�.� ��% � '> Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary U' «. � STATE OF MINNESOTA ) � APPEA�COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS COUNTY OF ANOKA � I 3 - `�o -��i -�I �I - Oo3 C� � ��z��E CITY OF FRIDLEY ) In the Matter of: a variance request, VAR ��95-14 Owner': Donald R. and Leesa M. Betzold The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 20th day of June , lg 95 , on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6 feet to 23 feet to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot ]0, Block 3, Briardale, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted a� upon the following conditions or reasons: � No stipulations of approval. See Appeals Commission meeting minutes of June 20, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, William A. Champa, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the �jT� day of � 19�- DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 l/�/ � William A. Champa, City Caerk ;," �'�= ;':�_��': .. ':' �� �`QOG7.9n.iR { j�1 . �<�'�1 -0 - ' 6 f c /^. � �� `(sE���: :�' .,:� . . Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval', :�rir�i •shall�: be•;,4 ,,� . "' � �: : . Z Y . •..;�:. ... considered void if not used within that period. - , - ,, ' . r- > . q _ sii.��� ,1'���i ,, , , i�, � � CITY OF FRIDLEY � U APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20, 1995 CALL TO ORDER• Vice-Chairperson Kuechle called the June 2,r 1995, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m• ROLL CALL • . J=' Members Present: Larry Kuechl�� Cathy Smith, Carol Beaulieu ,. Members Absent: Diane S�age, Ken Vos Others Present: Mi�k�ele.McPherson, Planning.Assistant _ . �,I�eesa Betzold, 6150 Briar�ale Court, Fridley ' Steve Sather, 7920 Powell Road, St. Louis Park APPROVAL OF JkJNE 6 1995 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION b��Ms.. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu,__to.approve the Jun.e.�6,,, : 1,9.95, .A�ppeals -Commission minut�es as�. writteri. � � IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALI, VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE �HECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #95- 14 BY DONALD & I,EESA BETZOLD: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6 feet to 23 feet to al low construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13 , Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE DOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARiNG OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Ms_ McPherson stated the subject parcel is located at 6150 Briardale Court which is generally located west of Stinson and south of Rice Creek Road. Located on the subject parcel is a single family dwelling with an attached two car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are all the surrounding parcels. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 32 feet to 23 feet to construct a 12 foot x 18 foot screened porch with an 8 foot x 12 foot deck �',,' addition on the rear of the dwelling. Located in the position of • • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JIINE 20 1995 PAGE 2 % t the proposed porch is an existing open deck which would be removed and the porch and new deck constructed in that location. Ms. McPherson stated staff in analyzing this request determined that there are three possible alternatives to the request which would meet the code requirements,.as.follows: 1. Reconstruct the existing deck as a deck. 2. Relocate the addition to the south side of the dwelling (a narrower addition would be required, 9 feet x 18 feet or 12 feet by 12 feet). 3. Construct.a porch in the front of..the dwelling. - Ms. McPherson stated the lot is uniquely shaped. The parcel is located adjacent to a cul de sac which is not typical in shape. This cul de sac has more of a curve on one side than the other. This results in a uniquely shaped lot with the north boundary line . being substantially longer than the south boundary l�.ne. . That does impact the�point from-which the se�back is measured.� If the cul de sac were more straight, the house could have been moved closer to the curb and not setback to the distance that it currently is. The dwelling unit does meet the front and rear yard setback � requirements as constructed. There is approximately 68 feet between this structure and the structure to the west. Ms. McPherson stated this request is within previously granted variances; therefore, staff has no recommendation regarding this request. Mr. Kuechle asked what the typical lot depth would be in the City. Ms. McPherson stated the average is approximately 125 feet. Mr. Kuechle asked if there is typically 50 feet between the back of the house and the end of the lot. Ms. McPherson stated this can vary from approximately 25 to 27 feet up to 50 feet or more. Mr. Kuechle asked how staff came up with a reduction of 32 feet down to 23 feet. Ms. McPherson stated the lot depth is calculated as an average between the two property lines. Ms. Betzold stated, regarding staff's alternative for a deck on the side, they already have a deck and want to replace it. The side is =}. not desirable because the neighbor's garage is right there and they would look at a garage. The existing deck comes out 16 feet. �. i i APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JIINE 20 1995 PAGE 3 The addition would come out 12 feet or 4 feet less than the current deck. Ms. Beaulieu asked if there had been any comments from the neighbors. Ms.. Betzold stated. the neighbors had said they would enjoy the add'ition very much. .The neighbors to the west, north and south have screened porches�and like theirs. Mr. Sather stated the Commission might have concern about the rear yard setback and the houses being too close. The house to the immediate west, which is the closest neighbor affected, already has a screened porch so there is no potential for the ho.uses becoming. too close. This is a right that has been granted to others. He recognizes staff's efforts to locate the porch in the front of the house, but this is not a desirable location. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. � IIP.ON A VOICE VOTE, AI�L VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M. Ms. Smith stated she would be inclined to vote for approval. The public purpose is being served by putting the addition on t�e back side. There are several circumstances including the unusual lot size and shape. Putting the addition on the side;would be more of a closing in of the green space rather than putting it-in the back. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The hardship is the shape of the lot. If the cul de sac were more rounded, the structure would. he farther forward. She saw no adverse impact. Mr. Kuechle concurred. He looked at the site. It is not that far off the 25 feet, which is the minimum requirement. It looks like this is the best of the choices. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #95-14, by Donald and Leesa Betzold to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6 feet to 23 feet to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13, Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, NIN 55432 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. � � � '� APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20, 1995 PAGE 4 ! [ 2. NG :OUNCIL ACTIONS Ms. McPherson provided an update on Planning Comm�sion and City Council actions. / ADJOURNMENT � . /- MOTION by Ms. Smith,_ se�onded by Ms-/aulieu, to adjourn the meeting. � � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOT G AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRI AND THE JUNE 20, 1995, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOU AT 7:50 P.M. i2espectfully, submit ci, � , � .� � Lavonn Coo 'er Recordi Secretary % ABSTR�►CT Receipt # � Certified Copy DateRme: '�� I(� � 30 ❑ Tax Liens/Releases Doc. O:der__�of� Q Multi-Co Doc Tax Pd � by: Racordability: l� '�3 New � Transfer � Desc. Filing Fees: 1� •� � Division ❑ GAC Def. Delqs: Pins: � Status � Spec. �- DOCUMENT N0. 117 $$ 9 Fi . O ABSTRACT ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE FOR RECORD ON AUG 17 9 5 qT 4: 3 O PM AND WAS DULY RECOFDED. FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $19 . 5 0 pAID. RECEIPTNO. 95�37070 EDWARD M. TRESKA ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES AJH ev DEPUTV PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES �;: • _ • _ CITY OF FRI DLEY FR[DLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FR[DLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 � 414 ���)�� : �, : � \ \� June 21, 1995 Donald & Leesa Betzold 6150 Briardale Ct. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr.& Mrs. Betzold: On June 20, 1995, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #95-14, to reduce the rear yard setback from 32.6 feet to 23 feet to allow construction of a three season porch addition on Lot 13, Block 3, Briardale Addition, generally located at 6150 Briardale Court N.E., Fridley, MN. You have one year from the date of Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3593. Sincerely, 4�'r�'`� ____ � i�fo�� � Michele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant MM/da Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by July 5, 1995. ����'� �� � � Concur with ction taken.