The URL can be used to link to this page

Variance - 43112. . CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 572-3592 ZS� �o� aQ4 7 �i+rcc,� : ,�P�(� b� - ;� `��` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: Residential Commercial/Industrial � Signs � PROPERTY INFORMATION: (certific,ate of survey required for submittal, see attached; Address: S�o ►-c.�- S�ee�� ,�'� r�Qc,,, vGl� S'�F3 2- Property Identification Number: Legal Description: Lot Biock Tract/Addition � Current Zoning: Reason for Variance: Have you operated a bu iness in a city which required a business license? Yes No �_ If Yes, which City? � If Yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No �� FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing.) NAME: Sl+,rv r� a� � j nn, b I ADDRESS: �2ro D�.r� S%-�-�" DAYTIME PHONE: 7� � .S��f 2��3 SIGNATURE/DATE: �� PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: �L�.,+' oNa, � � ��E ��c� ADDRESS: !3 7 � 3 g �F*' � � N _ .�i1.9•�c DAYTIME PHONE: ��"L �Z 3- iF�-3"� SIGNA' �, r, � �� ._ _' f/Z s r o� , /V�V �V AYNI�I�V/VMA/IV/VIVNtiNI�IIrIrIY/�IIVIV�VIA/IVIV/V/V/V�V�YI1VM�►1/�I/V A/IVIAII�IMIVIVIV �VIV MA//ti1/�/IVIVIV IV M�VIVIVM�VNIVh/N/YI�YA/IVM�YIIW VtiYV1Y/�/ Section of City Code: FEES Fee: $1, or commercial, industrial, or signs: Fee': 0.00 f residentiai properties: Receipt #: Received By: A li umber: �. - PP VH- U(v Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: �� Scheduled City Councii Date: 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: -- 60 Day Date: �an _ I 9� (�Co ___ _- 13733 94�` Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 (612)423-�1558 cell (763)420-9756 fax Ta Stacy Stromberg, City of Fridley Planner �'r�are Ron Sonnek, President Daie: April 26, 2006 Rse Variance Application; Sandy Gimpl, 500 Dover Street Descriation of Proposed Work: Currently this 1 story rambler has an attached 1 stall garage, which we are seeking to convert into living space. In October of 2005 the property owner invested in a new 2 stall detached garage which satisfies all of the owner's parking and storage needs for the property. We seek to do the following: • Convert the attached garage into living space including the small porch on the rear of the garage. (12' x 20') • Remove the garage door and install windows to match the architectural design of the home and make the attached garage appear more residential in nature. • Open the attached garage area to the adjac:ent dining room area to extend the living space. Description of Hardship: After discussions with City Staff it has been determined that this properties "front yard" by Zoning Code classification is the yard that ftonts on Dover Street. The Zoning Code spec�es that a building must be se�adc from the property line a minimum distance from the front yard property line. Currently, the setback to the front of the garage is about 5' which then classifies the structure as a"non-conforming" use. A list of the hardships associated with what we have �ncountered includes: • The configuration of the property is not a typically shaped cit�r lot, and the zoning ordinance was designed to appty to typical iot configurations. The layout of this property puts a large portion of the existing home into a non-conforming status. • Due to the zoning code classification of the "front yard," this property was moved into a non-oonforming status. The Zoning Code would require that any improvements made to the home, that is within the front yard setback, would require a variance approvat in order to make any improvements. This potentially denies the owner the opportunity to remodel this part of the home, which would be allowed in the majority of other cases, due to the lot configuration. • It would be cost prohibitive for the homeowner to install an addition on the rear of the home for the square footage that was specified above. • With the construction of the new detached 2 car garage, the owner does not have need for the additional 1 stall garage. The zoning class�cation denies the owner of the opportuniiy to make this garage into usable floor space. • In discussion with the adjacent property owners, they are in favor of supporting the work that is proposed. I appreciate your help with the processing of this application. I will be forwarding you a copy of the completed property survey by the end of the week. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number above. Please forward information to me on the appeal hearing's time and date, when you have the opportunity. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. • Page 2 � �" �� D ��.,'n..., �"�.. � � r l!f f � � ,%� � 1 ( L1 W�3T' t..��Actot. �.t,F� uu r47� c1�J ' �X�� Nqa.� - _�id� �lS`�'i�C� t,JrN rtkA,J S-- l�J S T'e�'z c.. �7 � ��'� � S t �A;.�UCa 7b ,ti1�4-7 G� ( . ` - - - - - . .� _. _ _ .. �. _ _ _ _.� %1-t.�ru.pV L— C� � � Qc�,� f � — ► P�u s �� l�.� �o��-Z��r ; _ _ _._ . --_p___ __� x /i�J.�. ��.s �' S't�t� C.� iG(,�fi/�(��rt1 ' � f,Jc N lad�„� 7 1 r ' � � � �- Sro.�v� �hv �C�� 9 � � � 7� i� 6�P w� ��h �.a.a � L�c��Z,,� tl�,Ytf�L.,�,rL_ � t.�,�, � Develoqment Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Kevin Hanson � Rachel Harris ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ ❑ � � Planninq Issues: � Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Height ❑ Landscape o Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Buildinq Issues: o IBC 0 Stipulations: Scott Hickok � Ralph Messer Dave Jensen � Layne Otteson ]ulie Jones � Mary Smith Ron Julkowski � Stacy Stromberg Enaineerina Issues: ❑ Drainage ❑ Utilities a Curbing requirements ❑ Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ Comments: , � �, � �°�., 6. I�1��, �- ��, ,� I Name. L � ;� �. �;;� Date• . i, �. I � . .. Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 a Paul Bolin o Scott Hickok � Ralph Messer o Kevin Hanson ❑ Dave Jensen ❑ Layne Otteson ❑ Rachel Harris �@' ]ulie Jones ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Jon Haukaas � Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg Plannina Issues: ,� Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage o Allowable square footage ❑ Height ❑ Landscape yt� Hardship statement/narrative � Buildinq Issues: ❑ IBC ❑ Stirndatinnce Enaineerinq Issues: � Drainage ❑ Utilities ❑ Curbing requirements ❑ Fire Issues: ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location 0 Comments: Name: � �k.� � �: �h �_,� Date: `� - `l � 0(� / Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Kevin Hanson � Rachel Harris ❑ Jon Haukaas �Scott Hickok Dave Jensen ❑ ]ulie Jones ❑ Ron Julkowski Planninq Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage � Height ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Buitdinq Issues: ❑ IBC � Stipulations: Comments: Name: � Ralph Messer � Layne Otteson � Mary Smith ❑ Stacy Stromberg EnqineerinaIssues: ❑ Drainage ❑ Utilities ❑ Curbing requirements ❑ Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ Date: ` �� Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 � Paul Bolin � Kevin Hanson ❑ Rachel Harris ❑ Jon Haukaas ❑ ❑ � Planninq Issues: o Setbacks o Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Height o Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � Buildinq Issues: ❑ IBC ❑ Stipulations: Comments: Name: Scott Hickok � Ralph Messer DaveJensen ❑ Layne Otteson Julie )ones ❑ Mary Smith Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg EnqineerinaIssues: ❑ Drainage ❑ Utilities � Curbing requirements � Fire Issues• o Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ Date: Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 � Paul Bolin � Scott Hickok ❑ Ralph Messer � Kevin Hanson � Dave Jensen ❑ Layne Otteson � Rachel Harris � Julie Jones �� Mary Smith ❑ Jon Haukaas o Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg Planninq Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage � Height � Landscape o Hardship statement/narrative 0 Buildinq Issues: ❑ IBC ❑ Stipulations: Comments: Enqineerinq Issues: ❑ Drainage ❑ Utilities � Curbing requirements � Fire Issues• o Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ Name: `% Date• � — � — 0 � Develonment Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 � Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok � Ralph Messer ❑ Kevin Hanson o Dave Jensen ❑ Layne Otteson ❑ Rachel Harris o Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith � Jon Haukaas ❑ Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg Planninq Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Height ❑ Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � Buildina Issues: ❑ IBC ❑ Stipulations: Comments: EnaineerinqIssues: � Drainage ❑ Utilities o Curbing requirements ❑ Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ /'/ � Name: I� -- � nate: S � 9/0 � Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Scott Hickok ❑ Ralph Messer ❑ Kevin Hanson ❑ Dave Jensen o Layne Otteson �Rachel Harris � Julie Jones ❑ Mary Smith Jon Haukaas � Ron Julkowski ❑ Stacy Stromberg Planninq Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Height o Landscape o Hardship statement/narrative ❑ Buildinq Issues: � IBC � Stipulations: Comments: Enaineerinq Issues: ❑ Drainage ❑ Utilities o Curbing requirements 0 Fire Issues• � Truck access � Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ , I � —�, Name: ��/�-1��k:� �i l r,`r-- Date: ��.l L�i��' Development Review Committee Worksheet Address: 500 Dover Street Land Use Case: VAR #06-05 ❑ Paul Bolin ❑ Kevin Hanson o Rachel Harris ❑ Jon Haukaas o Scott Hickok ❑ Dave Jensen o ]ulie lones ❑ Ron Julkowski Planninq Issues: ❑ Setbacks ❑ Lot coverage ❑ Allowable square footage ❑ Height a Landscape ❑ Hardship statement/narrative � Buildinq Issues: ❑ IBC � Stipulations: Comments: �, Ralph Messer �% Layne Otteson ❑ Mary Smith ❑ Stacy Stromberg Enqineerinq Issues: ❑ Drainage ❑ Utilities o Curbing requirements � Fire Issues• ❑ Truck access ❑ Sprinkler requirements ❑ Hydrant location ❑ - Name: �� Date• `s / � , Page 1 of 2 kiG3c.,an�4 Y<t tl?c �re�i �i1c iif �� t� .iY'E3I3(lCR11#it Property Account Summary Raie ............. Owner GIMPL SANDRA E ..............................................•--..................--•--...................----.................----------............------.............---............-----............. Active Certificates Of Title , _..�� .___..�_____.�._.W._..____.__..__ _-------- - _.._,_,,,.._ Type ECertificate Number ._._.___,_�___»...._....,__ ._.____._.__._ .............»�.,._...._.____ �._..._ __:--....._________._.. CRTST CERTIFICATE OF TITLE - STANDARD i99089 • ..................................................................................................................................................;...................................... CRTST CERTIFICATE OF TITLE - STANDARD :60125 ..........................................................••-----.....................---............................................---............h...........-••••--..............----- Documents Recorded Within 30 Days Of "Recorded Throu�h"..Dates.Above .. Type EAbstract/Torrens Recorded Number ...... ......... ................ .. ......... ......... .. ....... ......... ......... ......... .......---.... No Documents Found ........................................................... Pro ertWCharacteristics Lot Size ..--• ...............•--•--................................. Year Built Size: Tax District Information City Name �� 5chool District Number and Name .......................••---......................._................ ..........................................�---...................-- PropertX Classification Tax Year 2006 ...................................................................I 2005 .....-• ...........................................................:. _____»__._______,,,,,,, __, _ Property Values ........ ............................... W90*250 .................... 1959 9 ECertificate Date _ .........ry06/20/2003•••... :05/13/1987 .................,............••••-.............. ................................................. Recorded Date ......................................••••••••... FRIDLEY ANOKA-HENNEPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT #11 Classification lA-Residential Homestead .................................................... 1A-Residential Homestead Tax Year Description ............................................. ............................................................. 2007 Est Market Land (MKLND) 2007 Est Market Improvement (MKI - ----- - -- ---- ----- - -------------w 2007 Est Market (MKTTL) https://prtinfo.co. anoka.mn.us/(rxnga555i1s4o0nqxaorOz55)/parcelinfo.aspx Amount ................. 81,800 135,400 217.200 5/15/2006 0 2006 2006 Tax Year 2006 2006 ................. 2006 � 2006 .................. Taxable Market Est Market (MK iPR Qualifying Tax Amount (Tax Bill Line 1) Prior Year Qualifying Tax Amount (Tax Bill Line ............................................................................................. Total Tax Amounts - Before Payments Special Assessments (Included in Total) ............................................................................................. Page 2 of 2 1$ 737.63 535.82 .............. 773J2 36.09 ....•••....... ._._ .�._._.�� ._.�_�...._...__ ......._.. .______._. ........ Payment History for Past Three Years .. . . . ............................. ..................................................................................................••••.....; ............••••••••••••••••................. Date Paid �Tax Year Principal Interests, Penalties and Costs: Amount Paid ............................................ ................................ .................................. ...........................................................................................................:................................•••........... 05/15/2006 .................... 2006-•----................�....................886: 86 ................................................................................................. � :��.:.............•••••••••••••.....886:86 10/10/2005 2005 785.96 O.00E 785.96 OS/ 15/2005 ..................... 2005...................... ....................785:95. .................................................................................................�:��{............................... 785 ;95 05/15/2004 2004 1,282.62 0.00; 1,282.62 ...........................•----------._._... ................................ ................................... ........................................................................................................•• ;.•••.......................................... 05/15/2003 2003 j 1,384.00 0.00: 1,384.00 .............................................................................................. :Installments Pa able ;Tax Year :Instaliment Due Date � Principal :2006 ;2 10/15/2006 : 886.86 --• ........................................................................................... :Delinquent Tax Years . ,............ .. .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . ... ...... . . . . .. :Tax Year :Installment Due Date PrincipalE ,_ � ,,._ __. :No Records Found Penalties and Costs: Instaliment Total: Cumulative DueE Select to 0.00� 886.86: 886.86`: Q Penalties and Costsl Installment Totall Cumulative Due1 Select to Developed by ASIX, Incorporeted. @2004 All rights reserved. Version 1.0.2288.19614 https://prtinfo.co.anoka.mn.us/(ncnga555i1s4o0nqxaorOz55)/parcelinfo.aspx 5/15/2006 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 500 Dover Street NE. CASE NUMBER: Variance, VAR #06-05 APPLICANT: Homeworks Remodeling & Repair, Inc., Ron Sonnek Petitioner or re resentative must attend the A eals Commission meetin . PURPOSE: Petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to recognize an existing non-conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessory use to living space. LOCATION OF 500 Dover Street NE PROPERTY AND LEGAL DESCR/PTION: LOTS 1 THRU 3 INCL BLK 8 SPRING BROOK PARK, TOG/W LOTS 22 THRU 24 SD BLK 8 EX N 150 FT OF SD LOTS, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC SPRING BROOK PARK CITY OF FRIDLEY LOTS 1, 2, 3, 22, 23 & 24, BLK 8, SPRING BROOK PARK (EX N 150 FTOF LOTS 22, 23 & 24 SUBJ TO PER DATE AND TIME OF Appeals Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, May 24, 2006, at 7:30 p.m. The Appeals Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 17. PLACE OF HEARING: Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTIC/PATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 763-571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: Interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than May 18, 2006. The TDD # is 763-572-3534. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 763-572-3595. *PROPOSED CITY The proposed City Council meeting date for this item will be on COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 12, 2006. *This date is subject to change depending on the outcome of the Appeals Commission meeting. Please confirm City Council date prior to attending City Council meeting. (Please note residential variances, if approved by Appeals Commission do not go on to City Council only if they are denied. Commercial variances do go on to City Council weather the are a roved or denied b the A eals Commission. Mailed: May 12, 2006 s��'� CITY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT F1�lDLFY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE o � � � _ . � � � cS� N ' > � q� , � � � ��t — , � cn _� � � - ` � W, m� �'L � ' � i, -�-� -/� � 1 \ V , . � �, � �, � w _ � - -- �- g121 g140 � � , � � - „ F�LF�A/I�L�' ! � � � `r � _ � � cr � � ��`, � , °' ' cp , � � � 8145 � 8160 , � - . �' \ cr o `, � ` �� " � - r�, - , cr ; N o , � � � � � 118 � � �� = , � cr`, N `� rnV ° � _.._ � . ; � �� "_'— ° 8111 ', , --� — �, 8 �---I �- , � � � ' ' cr � � , � �', � ' � �� :— �{ I� � �' 8135 8140 �� ,o � �,, N w� �° �50 � ��, o I o � 8101 � � � � o�, �rn' 6' � � � �,t �, �, g� cp � o � I g100 -- �-- .� ',. �� wt � � � �--- ! � � � � , cr � � Q � � w � , �- , � � � ao 8087 � 8120 � _ ...� , -- �- � _, , , _ � � � , � �� ;, - -- — , 5 i t �, � ��,, , c9 ,, __ „ i � ; — _ ___'-- 8066 , ; _� � , o w y- _ - � W � , ��. o �,; , � p� I � �`\ 8 � W' ` cr � m � o I o cP � � ��-- -, S `�c� � � � �� O � � �� O�� 7�� ( C' � , -, � ` � _ � , � . � � � , � � , � - �_ _ -- �• � - �--- � � � � ____ - � °'O � � � I I � � � � 8020 � � �, � � '� � o �I -� �., � I � � � , � � D - - — � � cn � � �. � 8061 � ' I � - , � --- �_ - , � �'�,. "'--� '� N`'� , _�,�� ' j � � 8080 8051 /� "'��I '�,, 8_�� ; �� I r � , � , r �, cr � � - `` -- � W � _� � �,- - - �1 - � a�� S� � -�Y �T �� 361 � � ,- � _ , cr 80 �, �. , � 8012 � ;, � , , �L , - I � � �� , � � i ' � _ . � -� � � � ` �f , � �� ( R � � �� ! t0 i�SJ�! � � �c,� �`' � - � 0 470 440 � ,!�' ---- � El, � -_ O \ , � , �,. � �� 540 cn , ' ` 360 ��;-_ � BpOg n> n , , �O ��, � �' � cr � 1 � � �,, �, t ,. �, � i �T I, cc '�, cs SJ � ,- � � � � � /.� \ � " � Q $ _ � GO � C N --- --, _ s � �, �'� �y ,.�� _ i cpo ,� � �. 350 � M �� 002 �"� - � � .. � ,, � � i � � �� \ � ` � � !�� A _�-- i 7Z � Q � � — \� � - '� I �� ,� ;� ' : �h \ 1, -- �` � i N I �� 514 465 , w�� w � co I, � � � �— o o � co , , ' � � ' �'� �°�� ` ` � 8000 305 � u, � � ��i pt � � '� � , , , , , , , , , �, � O � �, �, �- - - - - �- � , " - � s %" s �� _T�T._ ---- � o Ll��F�T � �} _ — Y �� - � � - ��- � � � � � sa � , � � .� ,� � 520 � u, ' n� , � 300 � � � 7981 � 450 , � 0 7990 �� ; � ', t � i s � , , o = cs - �9 c� ` � _ �_ - _ ` , � _ � � - -- T —�— �� , , , �� , ' ' 79 , , g� �, � � ` ' 7951 � � I ' rn � �� w r�.� �� o � � ��'� � � � , s � � � rno� `� � -� cn � � � 1 � cfl � 'I �, �9,50 � � , t � � � � � �, �� , � � , � �� , , , � � � , � � � y , ..— - � � � � _- - � � � � � , � ,. -- ! � 6� �`� � c9 � - 1-- —r— - � .--r— �—_- � ' �' � � �' � � : � '� � � � � �i 794 ` ' � � � 7�7 � � .P '�: w � w �_. -- '�� i ) ,. � 555 , 46� w � � Cl ��"� � ` � � z � ° � � � ' � � � � o � � �� , � � , , ��'` �� , 541 � -- ��, _ -- � W ��_ -� -�- ��2 � �I � ; - � � � - � , � - — �1 -- � � � � � � � � �� i �i � W � -' I� I � t3�� Q � .P � .P � ? W W� W i W I Fnn �t �� `�� ' I �`S �, 4; � N � O l o � � � I rn � cn i� � - SOURCES N Fridley Engineering Variance: VAR #06'�5 Fridley GIS Anoka County GIS Petitioner: Home Works Remodeling & Repair Inc.�'�' E 500 Dover Street NE S Map Date: May 12, 2006 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 490 FAIRMONT ST NE 8100 E RIVER RD NE 480 FAIRMONT ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 467 LONGFELLOW ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 437 LONGFELLOW ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 500 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 440 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 490 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 8020 E RIVER RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 523 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 563 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 455 LONGFELLOW ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 434 LIBERTY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 465 LIBERTY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 470 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 501 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 471 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 537 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 511 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 447 LONGFELLOW ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 450 LIBERTY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 8000 E RIVER RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 470 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 8080 E RIVER RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 511 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 549 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 515 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 521 DOVER ST NE 531 DOVER ST NE 541 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 540 ELY ST NE 530 ELY ST NE 542 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 514 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 524 DOVER ST ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 514 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 520 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 7981 BROAD AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 7951 BROAD AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 526 ELY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 520 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 524 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY. MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 555 79TH WAY NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 540 DOVER ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 _ _ C[TYOF FRIDL�,Y FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287 May 3, 2006 Ron Sonnek Home Works Remodeling 13733 94th Avenue North Maple Grove MN 55369 Dear Mr. Sonnek: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 15 working days if their land use applications are,complete. We officially received your application for a variance on April 21, 2006. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete. Your Variance application hearing and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley Appeais Commission Meeting on May 24, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. If your variance application needs to be reviewed by the City Council, the meeting will be held on June 12, 2006 at 7:30 in the City Council Chambers. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, ,, ,� �! � 'f' �kl� � ^ ' ��({ j`�' �`�f �N�''� J f�J` ;Y '� �'V StaCy 'tro berg Planner ,� C: Sandra Gimble ---- 500 Dover Streef NE Fridley MN 55432 C-06-32 City of Fridley Land Use Application VAR #06-05 May 24, 2006 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECtQL INFORMATION Applicant: Ron Sonneck Home Works Remodeling 13733 94'h Avenue N Mapte Grove MN 55369 Requested Action: Variance reducing the front yard setback. Existing Zoning: R-1 (Single Family Residential) Location: 500 Dover Street Size: 22,500 sq. ft. .52 acres Existing Land Use: Single Family Home Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: N: Single Family & R-1 E: Single Family & R-1 S: Single Family & R-1 W: Single Family & R-1 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Consistent with Plan Zoning Ordinance Conformance: 205.Q7.3.D.(1) requires a front yard setback of finrenty-five (25) feet. Zoning History: 1922 — Lot is platted. House built pre-1949. 1958 — Home addition constructed. 1990 — Deck addition constructed. 2005 — Detached garage constructed. Legal Description of Property: Lots 1-3, Block 8, Spring Brook Park Public Utilities: Home is connected. Transportation: Dover Street provides access to the property. Physical Characteristics: Typical suburban lot and landscaping. SUMMARY OF PROJECT The petitioner, Ron Sonnek, of Home Works Remodeling, on behalf of the homeowner at 500 Dover Street, is seeking a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to recognize an existing non-conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessory use to living space. SUMMARY OF HARDSHIP "It has been determined that this property's "front yard" by zoning code classification is the yard that fronts on Dover Street. Current/y, the setback to the front of the garage is about 5 ft., which then classifres this structure as non-conforming. The following are hardships related to this property: ■ The configuration of the property is not a typically shaped city lot, and the zoning ordinance was designed to apply to typical lot configurations. The layout of this prope►ty puts a large portion of the existing home into a non-conforming status. ■ The zoning code classification of �front yard" puts this property into a non-conforming status." - Ron Sonnek, Home Works Remodeling SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of this variance request. ■ The variance is simply recognizing a pre- existing condition. ■ Converting the use from accessory to living space will have little impact on neighboring praperties. ■ Approving this variance should not set a precedent for undeveloped lots in the future. CITY COUNCIL ACTION/ 60 DAY DATE City Council — June 12, 2006 (Front yard setback reduction) Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg VAR #06-05 REQUEST The petitioner, Ron Sonnek of Home Works Remodeling, on behalf of the property owner at 500 Dover Street, is seeking a variance to reduce the required front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet in order to recognize an existing non-conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessory use to living space. The recognition of this non-conformity is required prior to issuance of any building permits for conversion of the existing single stall garage into living space. SUMMARY OF HARDSHIP "It has been determined that this properly's "front yarnl" by zoning code c/assification is the yarr.� that fronts on Dover Street. Currently, the setback to the front of the garage is about 5 ft., which then classi�es this structure as non-conforming. The following are harolships related to this property: ■ The configuration of the property is not a typical/y shaped city lot, and the zoning ordinance was designed fo app/y to typical lot configurations. The /ayout of this property puts a/arge porfion of the existing home into a non-conforming status. ■ The zoning code classification of "front yard" puts this property rnto a non- conforming status. " - Ron Sonnek, Home Work Remodeling ANALYSIS The property is zoned R-1 Single Family as are all surrounding properties. The property is located on the upper portion of Dover Street, which receives access off of East River Road and Ely Street. This section of Dover Street was constructed in 1971 as a narrow 30 ft. right-of- way; therefore, leaving the property with a 2ft. boulevard. The existing home was built prior to 1949. There was an addition constructed to the home in 1958 and a deck addition constructed in 1990. In 2005, a detached two stall garage was constructed. City Code requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet for all structures in the R-1 Single Family zoning district. Dover Street is considered the property owners front yard, because it's the only portion of the property that has street frontage, therefore, the petitioner is seeking to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to simply recognize an existing non-conformity. Since Dover Street was constructed after the subject property was developed, it left the property with a non-conforming status. Granting this variance will simply recognize this existing non- Left Picture — existing home Right Picture — Location of front yard setback reduction The petitioner plans to convert the existing single stall garage attached to the home into living space, as the recently constructed 2 stall garage provides the vehicle parking space and storage space needed for the property owner. City staff has received no comments from neighboring property owners. RECOMMENDATIONS City Staff recommends approva/ of this variance request. ■ The variance is simply recognizing a pre-existing condition. ■ Converting the use from accessory to living space will have little impact on neighboring properties. ■ Approving this variance should not set a precedent for undeveloped lots in the future. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends that if the variance is granted, the foilowing stipulations be attached. 1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to continued conversion of the garage space to living space. UW31� SISUlLq IADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 474 8267 HOME WORKS REMODELING & REPAIR April 27, 2006 DRAFTED: April 27, 2006 ILEGAL DESCRIPTTON: Lots l, 2 and 3 except the North li0 feet thereof, Spring Brook Park Anoka County, Minnesota. l. Showing the length and direcpon of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services dces na include determining what you own, which is a le�al mattet. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with compecent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is wrrect, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. We have not been supp(ied with an up to date legal descripbon. We are using a legal description that we ob[ained from Anoka Counry. We recommend tha[ you supply us wiN a deed or ede policy to verify that the legal descrip6on we are using is the correctfegat descripGOn. 2. Showing the locarion of existing imprwements we deemeA important. 3. Selting new monuments or verifying old monuments tu mazk the wmers of the properiy. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: •" Denotes 1!2" ID pipe with plasGC plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless other.vise noted. I brnebY certifY that tLis Plan. epaciSc�a4 report or eunroY a'ss PrePared bY me w imdermy dnect auperviaiai and 9ut I am alicrosed Profea�aml En�eer md Pro^fessiwsl Stuveyo�r im\da the lawa of the State of Ivl�eaota. NT'f mno n I 1 \ Tn n jyp am H. Parba P.S. � P.S. No. 9235 ��„�y,-----------------_ I I � 7.0"' / ii � I� �i � � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � — — — — y�--r R � a ' � � '� I % � Oi 1; �� i c �� ;a � ----------- —'�-----------------------------------------•---------y-�. � _---- --- ------------- ------------- ;� ` ---------------'o=_ t� I / ii �.r - --- �---- •----�--�--- ,/-------------- Cwmr of Mmn Rlk lmee b 1.B I reat ol fne bt lM ..r`w'.r w r a� � I x— a+ni�r I —_--�—I—_ _ i'Z T.9 I J' O Q I ~ O � I � — -�,.o _ _ I._ 29 H W O � � L. �l �7 GRAPHIC SCALE ro ➢e w ( 1N 1EC1' ) N 00�9:38" E --237.29-- F� `/ _ —_ Canr o/ cnoin � +\ o \ Mk kne� h 7.S � �wPt ol NI bt /iN _ _ _ _ — — _ � S� -----------�— i € < y w � o' r-y ------ ---------- y _ _ 3 '� x i --567. BOmeos. -- 56B.Op/ot �� ;. ,� �. ,�. --237. BB-- S 007709" W CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMlSSION MAY 24, 2006 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chair Commissioner Vos called the regular eting of the Appeals Commission to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Blaine La Ellard Briesemeister, Brad Sielaff, and Kenneth Vos OTHERS PRESENT: tacy Stromberg, City Planner Ron Sonnek, Homes Works Remodeling APPROVE PLANN G COMMISSiON MEETING MINUTES: April 26, 2006 MOTION by mmissioner Sielaff, seconded by Commissioner Briesemeister to approve the minutes as esented. UP 1. VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIR COMMISSIONER VOS DECLARED �ION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Variance Request, VAR #06-05, bv Ron Sonnek, Homeworks Remodelinq & Repair, Inc. for consideration of a Variance to Reduce the Front Yard Setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to Recoanize an Existina Non-Conforminq Setback and to Convert This Space From an Accessorv Use to Livina Space, Generallv Located at 500 Dover Street NE. MOTION by Commissioner Sielaff, seconded by Commi�sioner Jones, to open the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIR COMMISSIONER VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CQRRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 7:33 P.M. Ms. Stromberg, City Planner, stated the petitioner, Ron Sonnek of Home Works Remodeling, on behalf of the property owner at 500 Dover Street, is seeking a variance to reduce the required front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet in order to recognize an existing non- conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessary use to living space. The recognition of this non-conformity is required prior to issuance of any building permits for conversion of the existing single-stall garage into living space. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner's summary of hardship is as follows: "It has been determined that this property's "front yard" by zoning code classification is the yard that fronts on Dover Street. Currently, the setback to the front of the garage is abaut 5 feet, which then classifies this structure as non-conforming. The following are hardships related to this property: o The configuration of the property is not a typically shaped city lot, and the zoning ordinance was designed to apply to typica{ fot configurations. The layout of this property puts a large portion of the existing home into a non-conforming status. ❑ The zoning code classification of "front yard" puts this property into a non- conforming status." Ms. Stromberg stated the property is zoned R-1 Single Family as are all surrounding properties. The property is lacated on the upper portion of Dover Street, which receives access off of East River Road and Ely Street. This section of Dover Street was constructed in 1971 as a narrow 30 foot right-of-way; therefore, leaving the property with a 2-foot boulevard. The existing home was built prior to 1949. There was an addition constructed to the home in 1958 and a deck addition constructed in 1990. A detached two-stall garage was constructed in 2005. Ms. Stromberg stated City Code requires a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet for all structures in the R-1 Single Family zoning district. Dover Street is considered the property owners front yard because it is the only portion of the property that has street frontage. Therefore, the petitioner is seeking to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to simply recognize an existing non-conformity. Since Dover Street was constructed after the subject property was developed, it left the property with a non-conforming status. Granting this variance will simply recognize this existing non-conformity. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner plans to convert the existing single-stall garage attached to the home into living space, as the recently constructed two-stall garage provides the vehicle parking space and storage space needed for the property owner. City staff has received no comments from neighboring property owners. Ms. Stromberg stated City Staff recommends approval of this variance request for the following reasons: � The variance is simply recognizing a pre-existing condition. ❑ Converting the use from accessory to living space wil! have little impa�t on neighboring properties. 0 Approving this variance should not set a precedent for undeveloped lots in the future. Ms. Stromberg stated staff recommends that if the variance is granted, the following stipulation be attached. 1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to continued conversion of the garage space to living space. Commissioner Briesemeister asked when the road was built in 1971, it was non-conforming at that time? Ms. Stromberg replied, yes. Commissioner Briesemeister asked when the City does something such as put in a road, and at that time, why would it not be in the best interest to the City and homeowners to take care of non-conformities? Ms. Stromberg replied it would have been in the City's best interest to recognize the non- conformity at the time, however that is something that was never done. However, this 30-foot 2 y right-of-way would probably not have happened today, as it is so narrow. A more current example of leaving lots in a non-conforming status happened due to East River Road being expanded. The County came in and acquired land from property owners along East River Road and notified all of those property owners their properties were now going to be non-conforming. The City did not go through and recognize each of those non-conformities. We recognized that they are non-conforming now, but we did not grant variances for all of them. Commissioner Briesemeister asked so if any of those homeowners want to do worlc on their properties, they have to come to the Appeals Commission to get approval to do it? Ms. Stromberg replied if they want to expand. State Statute regarding non-conforming structures recently changed to allow people with non-conformities to reinvest in their homes, as long as they are not expanding; and it would allow them to rebuild if something were to happen, i.e., a tornado or a fire were to burn their house down. Prior to this new legislation, if something were to happen to the homes they would not be able to rebuiid. Commissioner Briesemeister stated they would have to build to Code. Ms. Stromberg replied, yes, or if the lots are too small and they don't meet square footage requirements for the City, the property owner is unable to re-build anything. Commissioner Sielaff asked in that situation where they wou(d have to rebuild, fhey would just get a variance then to be able to rebuild where it was before? Ms. Stromberg maybe, it is hard to say. If a property owner knew their lot was going to become non-conforming as a result of Anoka County taking their land for a road expansion and that left their lot in a non-conforming status, and their lot was maybe 5,000 square feet and the City minimum is 9,000, it is hard to say if a variance would be granted because that essentially is changing the City's minimum standards for lot size Commissioner Sielaff stated he guessed he was a little confused then as to what trips off a variance then for a non-conforming situation like this. It was already non-conforming. Ms. Stromberg replied the reason the City makes them go through the process is so it is recognized on their property that it is conforming. When they get a variance for a non- conformity, it means their lot is now conforming and it is recorded at the County. So if something were to happen to the house, they would be able to rebuild to this exact same setback. So that is why when somebody comes in and their lot is deficient of setbacks or whatever Code requirement, the City requires them get a variance before they can build an addition. Commissioner Sielaff asked what necessitated the variance in this case since the structure was already there and they are just changing it from a garage? Ms. Stromberg replied, the conversion of the garage from an accessory use to living space. Vice Chair Commissioner Vos asked about the hard surface going to the original garage, can that remain there? Ms. Stromberg replied it can. Unless they would like to stipulate that they remove and reestablish grass, but they do not have a lot of driveway space. 3 Commissioner Briesemeister asked if the backyard setback was non-conforming? Ms. Stromberg stated the rear yard setback requirement is 25 percent of the lot depth. They are required to have 22 feet and it looks like they have about 23-24. So, no, it is not deficient. Ron Sonnek, Homeworks Remodeling & Repair, Inc. approached and presented a neighborhood petition the homeowner had signed by all of her neighbors. Mr. Sonnek stated regarding the question related to the driveway, the homeowners would like to keep the driveway in place; however, where the asphalt led to the apron to go into the garage before, once everything is done, that is going to be cut back so it will not be continuous all the way to the house. They would like to keep it as a play surface for the children. MOTION by Commissioner Jones entering the owner's neighborhood petition into the record. Seconded by Commissioner Briesemeister. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIR COMMISSIONER VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOT10N by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Sielaff, to close the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIR COMMISSIONER VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:48 P.M. Commissioner Jones stated he has no problem with this, he sees the hardship by the street being put in after the house was there, and the street was obviously put in the best way possible for the a11 the owners. Commissioner Sielaff stated he does not have any problems. There is nothing the homeowners did that created this situation. He stated he was a little concerned how these situations are created in the first place. Commissioner Briesemeister stated he agreed. If the street came through without a dead end, he would vote against it because you could have someone driving right into the living room through that yard. Vice Chair Commissioner Vos stated he thought it was a reasonable request, and given the hardship and it is non-conforming. MOTION by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Sielaff, to approve Variance Request, VAR #06-05, by Ron Sonnek, Homeworks Remodeling & Repair, Inc. for co�sideration of a Variance to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to recognize an existing non-conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessory use to living space, generally located at 500 Dover Street NE, with the following stipulation: 1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to continued conversion of the garage space to living space. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIR COMMISSIONER VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4 . ' • � `- 2. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Ms. Stromberg stated the City Council approved the variance request by Mr. McPhillips at 291 Sylvan Lane that was before them on April 26. Also, the June 14 Appeals Commission meeting is cancetled. 3. OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by commissioner Briesemeister, seconded by Commissioner Jones, to adjourn. UPON UANANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, VICE CHAIR COMMISSIONER VOS DECLARED THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:52 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � �- �� Denise M. Johnson Recording Secretary � . : .. :�I�iOILA CULT:�"1'1� !�T1:�:� N,S(.)�1`<-1 . _ Dooument No.: 48R053.00� TORRENS I hereb�- certify that th� within instrun�e�nt was filed in this office for record on: 06i'2212006 1:��:00 PN1 Fees;Taxes In the Atnount of: $�6.00 MAUREEN J. DEVINE :�ioka County Propert�� Ta� _�diliinistratoriRecorder''Registrar of Titles JMD, Deputy Record ID: 170065g ' ,l • _ _ CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287 • TTD/TTY (763} 572-3534 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE June 6, 2006 Ron Sonnek Home Works Remodeling 13733 — 941h Avenue North Maple Grove MN 55369 Dear Mr. Sonnek: On Wednesday, May 24, 2006, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved the Variance, VAR #06-05, on behalf of the homeowner at 500 Dover Street, to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to recognize an existing non-conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessory use to living space, legally described as LOTS 1 THRU 3 INCL BLK 8 SPRING BROOK PARK, TOG/W LOTS 22 THRU 24 SD BLK 8 EX N 150 FT OF SD LOTS, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC SPRING BROOK PARK CITY OF FRIDLEY LOTS 1, 2, 3, 22, 23 & 24, BLK 8, SPRING BROOK PARK (EX N 150 FTOF LOTS 22, 23 & 24)(SUBJ TO PER, generally located at 500 Dover Street. Approval of this variance is contingent upon the following stipulation: Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to continued conversion on the garage space to living space. You have one year from the date of the City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, r �j �.,��; { � �Y j � � �.: t� ! j � i,�, �: 'i$ j1'. Stacy S'tro berg ' Planner :. ! " SS/jb . r . , � Action Taken Letter — VAR #06-05- Home Works Remodeling Page 2 June 6, 2006 cc: Sandra Gimpl — 500 Dover Street Variance File Sandy Stanger Stacy Stromberg Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to th ity of Fridley Planning Department by June 26, 2006. ,�� ,_' ,,/j C-06-40 Concur with STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of: A Variance, VAR #06-05 Owner: Sandra E. Gimpl i iiiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiii iiii Record ID 1700658 488�53. 004 APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 24th day of May, 2006, on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to recoc�nize an exi�ting non-conforming setback and to convert this space from an accessory use to living space, legally described as, LOTS 1 THROUGH 3 INCLUDING BLOCK 8 SPRING BROOK PARK, TOGETHER WITH LOTS 22 THROUGH 24 SAID BLOCK 8 EXCEPT NORTH 150 FEET OF SAID LOTS, SUBJECT TO EASEMENT OF RECORD SPRING BROOK PARK CITY OF FRIDLEY LOTS 1, 2, 3, 22, 23 & 24, BLOCK 8, SPRING BROOK PARK (EXCEPT NORTH 150 FEET OF LOTS 22, 23 & 24)(SUBJECT TO PER MAINTENENACE UTILITY EASEMENT 20 FEET WIDE ON LOTS 1, 2& 3 TO CITY OF FRIDLEY PER Q.C.D. 10/10/66), generally located at 500 Dover Street. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approval with one stipulation. See Appeals Commission meeting minutes of May 24`h, 2006. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK , � I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the �`�� _ day of ...� , 2006. DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Skogen, City Clerk _._`�r•` .f'�•�,��-- .y C* � y �`{ 1 �'�, z • %r �=. r e. � �. � �n i �': �'" r ;,.. � , , . � :-... rr �:^."��fi'y;^�+ � f� .. ; ' ��'SE�L� ' ' _ � � ; ,,, � - ,� . ,: r •. ' - 'r �' ` a . s ., , '� � f`� �. , � � � ��,i ��.., � � ,.. • �