AF-V - 40691� � '.. � E � � � �� 9, a$ "`�k - �,�,*i Y,a � . � '
6 �� '
� Tr a . '�2 x y '� � . �
- - 1. , 3' 'Fp"�,d�: �`'t S : x t• . .
'"+ . � y �3 � .q . : -g i �i f � _
. .. �
` .> - . � � T �. . �
- ,.. . �' . ` r = ' � � .
;�� 5 . . .�: . . . . .
. ;' ' , �- ''. . � . � .
�.�. ,.�' . � �`t . ' � �. 1/ _ . .
p y,'.- yk• ' Y} �rG�-. .. .
i� v t s` �a ' C�''�`�" F ' ��3. . A�� . - .. � .
� 8rt $ �'�yi �"A
�'� �� `�`%R �` '"' T,N b '� 'P''�� � � � � „��4 _
_ �� � } d�� � �tJ .. �.
- . x .�
. 'y �,.�s 6�' ,�+� q, . - �.. �
. - �` � �. - ' rp ,= . . _
. � � � � �' � W �., � Y - � . _
. . . . . 3 �&, � i< � � _ �F `Kt wq,y . ` .
: . -' � .� �: � �..� � ,
�. .� # �:d , �� '.' k - '
� ���''�'��ir!` ���" � �� ��`� �� �t�y�,.s�;: A � ���
_ , � s�E,"�^!`, V � `i7 , �\i'Di���,` �.�.+ ��'���,`�'r� `;� ��`��+" �" `' � ��1 lii�.,, '� �t �; . .
����� �� . . :.}d � .
_ . . '" _ � € _ , �
F � �� �� P '. , '
g 'e�bi�, � 8J} 1 i".c.gW� -: ' i.. � . � . .
� ' �y " i-X'.ry' At.. b t t 11 } . > $ L
4 .�q'i7"� �.'S'}+Py��"� �6 � � Q 7 P .. u il� `%• �' � y
.?i��+£�'x , *� .+a.. �i. � �'" �,' ,� �` m'� ( ; '.
� � � _
,
�
�� ,:'.� � r � 3 �� � "?`" - ' - �± - b
.z � • . , . .,. �.
. � . � .. � , r; �i .
. .. � � . +' ;r > � ,
. R J4 � _ . R� _. �
. , ,.
c
� _ ._ � � i. � _ - c f:f - .
. : .:.: .. ` ' ;:
�: a , �.. s.t �, .-� ,. .a : : ., �: i�
� ' k
3 � ��%���t �� *�n � �� t ,1 .
k.a4 YF�Y � �" � X� _ '.'� _ � '� .
. ?�A + a" .t'
a''f �3 . S�"�' ;,�5}.� �` ( H� 4' '
.� t'K�. }.�� _ y� . pG y � �"��. _
�=.�y U^x.-:a'°d' a.c � ,_ � ' . - Y'��..
; �r�
{�,m � � '` 3� � - -
�u`• a �-rtj ��.
� o z ��•
�x� N� �
N�".P" J"µ• ^4w uy, M . $ t '
� Yn y� .� � ) y 'w � ` �J Y �^ �" t'r�'�, .
5
� � '
:C f Sk. ::v y, .
� 4
�� � p �
� Y F Ni� j {��+ �� t\'�4 .'sa , t°� {.
z Z� ti ' a , � � -:
� rt � .�,� } ti >� ' . � �b��, �
� Y s.s
t�i+ d� °`� 3'.� � Y��. 'Kd _. �� ; : � i
ayt � rK
y�+�, R_ w I -
� *3�'�,���� r? :�. � 5 � a r }�. ,� -. "h , y k. } ;"� a 4xy, 'u-�C, , ,y� 7� ,
�y w i � � �� � � ,� y �� ¢��e , .
';.� �i s 3.�;'%. .�' ��,�r p� � ,�. �
�� � �z }��-- } '' t�. �� # �, „t�`„k"`i - ,�a�r"�,
�'x ; ' �' a` .� ' . � � � '� �` � : s �:f � � x ' .� '' '`
1'�+' a _ � € . 4 �' v
,¢ ' �,r � _ c t { , ..� . ,�, xw��^�
' v � S
.� :, # ' a� q r `' �w� � f -s�.:_..� :
� s<,4 ' k�, ` 3 , �3 �` $' '"�� `' -F�
.��• +.lg x a `� ' '7 `�, _ '; t -:� ; � ..
�, t s s:
,� ; v �, - � - - >''
�..� SQ � ~ K � �b ' ti, , f � k. " .
�i y
N� ii / y
� � i� 3 � 1
�' �� � { l' � - .
� �.�� � �
.r
n .
Y 4
-, n„ ,s�, '"- .. - t � ., �l � �'�
, , .,„ �.> ..`; . . ,' {. n. a'"r
+ » ffi :r ;' � t �,
�`' � � '� s� " ' � -
. . . `. . , �- . _ .
.
.
., y ; .� . : .-. , -" � �
- � � ; . � ;!' - � �
f . + " .�, r�.
:` � �_ �V . . � ; �� , y �
T
� � "„*� � ,: v�' � � . � �-.e� � � q
"^Rg14rr�f � k �� y�.' � a� �:r
* � \g`"k tc. �' � � , t -
p � s " ; :
R �� � � � � k�� x/ t iL ' �� � "
3 . �' 4 � � ,� :
^�� �n k � � A •.`e e'6
i �,.^
w ; -
.
� K �*1 ` � } )
, 4:
. .
� : ' ...... � . � , n.
, , . N � � n: y ..n .. , : .' . 4 , T'
..: ` ''1 � .. i } . 5 "'3' . },�
' �k'i �t� Y k � � ` .
n� � '�*�� �' � �` ���� � � � . � y�
s� �'�° r�" �x� �� �� }'_ � �� � � d�k :�� f' w "+'-.�,���"t� �� k--�� �, _ '` % � t +P'�"��� yp { `�
� ,e
. ;, „
, _
+• '�• :. s. � '.3{�" ."'g -i- 5. ,z '� x - -. �S -
.�- r �E� d . � g_ - . . _ k .
�
: MA�
£.. r. �. .__. ., . ... � � ...._... . �(. .. t.�e-4 < _4a_l" x ' . . ).v� . � ., .r anil��...,� -.. iask_ � .. .,. _ . . . . . . .a.. M�'. rr .
._���
/'1
April 6, 1993
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Attn: Scott Ericksan
Engineering Dept.
Dear Sirs:
i"�,
TOM AND BARB FISHER
5477 E. DANUBE RD.
FRIDLEY, MN 55401
�"
��
�
r D� "
V"
CA �J"�
y
� �
�� �`'
l
I am writing in regard to two vacant lots across the street from my
residence at 5477 E Danube Rd. I had previously discussed this
matter with Mr. Erickson on April 5, 1993. I thought it would be
wise to put my comments in written form to preserve them for your
and my use. I h.ave lived at my present address since 1978.
Initially Y was told by my builder that the lots across the street
were not buildable because of city ordinances and DNR restrictions
since the lots contained a pond used by wildlife and constituting
at wetland area. I also understood that the lots served a drainage
function for the entire neighborhood and a major drainage pipe runs
from that lot under East Danube Road and along my lot into Farr
Lake.
I understand that over the years, the owners, Keith Harstad, his
sons, and/or other nominees have attempted to sell the lots and/or
build on the lots. About two or three years ago, Harstad moved
considerable amounts of fill dirt onto the lots from excavations on
other homes he was building nearby. Portions of the wetland area
were filled in and I and my neighbors anxiously called the city. At
that time we were tol d that , whi 1 e a certain amount of fi 11 had
been al l owed to be pl aced on the 1 ot , there had been a considerabl e
amount over that placed on the lot. The city forbade further
filling of the pond and so for three years we have looked at mounds
of dirt lying on the lot. We were told that Harstad was supposed to
move the dirt off the lot but of course he never did so. We were
told that there had been unauthorized dumping on the lot but all
the trucks I ever saw dumping were trucks we followed back to a
Harstad building development a mile or so away.
Now I have been told by a contractor that he is going to buy these
lots from Harstad. He showed me a plat map that indicates a 20'
drainage easement behind one of the lots and a 40' drainage
easement behind the other lot. He also told me that nothing
prevented him from filling the swamp and/or excavating it and
/
� i'
� 9 ^ �
eliminating all of the standing water entirely. He acknowledged he
would have to leave the contours to allow drainage into Farr Lake
across the street. He told me he planned to leave the water on the
40' easement but I must say he did not feel he had to do this. He
showed me the plan of a home he proposed building. This home would
barely fit on the lot with the 20' easement and would come up
directly on the easement lines on one side and in the rear. He said
the home would occupy the area that now contains water.
I have several concerns. They are as follows:
A. Will and can the City guarantee me that alteration of a major
nature such as is proposed will not cause more groundwater pressure
on my foundation and possibly cause me to have�water problems which
I do not now have? How will the City make sure that drainage
easements are protected and properly mainta,�ined?
B. We have also been told by builders that soil tests showed that
any home construction would require sinking posts to support the
house foundation and such effort would make the lot and home too
expensive. I was.told by the prospective builder that new soil
tests were going to be made. I don't know if he has seen the old
ones, or been told about them, but why would anything have changed?
I think the City should look verv carefullv at any new soil tests
that suddenly show facts different than old tests. I am not
interested in having a half-built home that sits idle because of
water problems and soil problems that should have been foreseen.
C. What about the wildlife that uses this area? What about DNR
protection? What about the City's, County's and State's needs to
balance development against environmental protection? I believe
that the history of this lot is such that no one, in 1977, ever
seriously thought they would or could build on these lots.
D. What about the noise and dirt that accompanies construction
projects and is not expected in well established and completed
neighborhoods?
E. What about the lengthy period of neglect of these lots and the
illegal dumping on the lots? When will this be cleaned up? The
present owners of these lots have never cared about City
regulations and neighborhood well being. They only cut the weeds
and stopped filling when it was demanded. Why should we believe
anything they tell us now?
I wish to be advised of any permits issued by the City regarding
these lots. I want the City to protect all of legal rights
available to me so I may raise my objections to plans for
development of these lots before such plans are approved. I wish to
be notified as to whom I should call if I have further concerns
regarding these lots. Finally, as a citizen and taxpayer of the
City, I expect the City to only issue permits for construction on
this property after the City has fully examined the history of the
lots, the soil tests, both current and historical, and the
� y _ • . /�1 �"�
potential water problems development
and well established neighbors. If I
assistance I will gladly do whateve
help in this matter.
Yours truly,
C. Tom Fisher
might cause for surrounding
can be of any further help or
r the City feels I should to
,. S�
� /�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
't
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: 5470 and 5490 E. Danube
Property Identificati.on Number (PIN) R2 4-3 0-2 4-4 2-0 0 8 0 & R2 4-3 0-2 4-4 2-0 0 81
Legal description: Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Innsbruck North 2nd Addition
Lot Block TracdAddition
Current zoning: S i ng 1 e Fam . Re �quare footage/acreage
Reason for variance and hardship: To minimize impact on wetland and
provide mitigatian area . Section of Ciry Code:
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes No x If yes, which city?
If yes, what type of business?.
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No
�
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME Keith T. Harstad
ADDRESS 2191 Silver Lake Road
New Brighton, MN 55112 DAYTIMEPHONE 636-3751
SIGNATURE i���� %� � /� > DATE � ��e 0 �� e ��A-&
T
PETITIONER INFORMATION `
NAME Paul W. Harstad
ADDRESS 2191 Silver Lake Road
Brighton, MN 55112
SIGNATURE
DAYTIME PHONE 6 3 6-3 7 51
DATE !'�a' i�i �9
Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 � for residential propeities
Permit VAR # 9-� . Receipt # 1� I$
Applica.tion received by:
Scheduled Appeals Commission date:
Scheduled City Council date:
E
�
a
K
�
M
�
�
�
a
c
a
a
O
a
E
N
0
�o . �o
cmc
�o � m
M �O �
c
O
-.mi O �
XA �
m S
.,
�N�
� �
w C
.�
y+�+�
,� m
U '�
O � �p
� �
w
G� U
�3�,�
� � m
6 �
'DUmC
m � 3„��
�mm�ro
,� A �
�� m �
N � C �
� �y o
a a av w
m
�
.� •
y �
�
W .i O
Y >�
M �
O V `�
ro
a �
yo
"� m 0
a 1°
ti M �
� V O
U � N
m �a
d
b �
m 0+
{.I �
m i� � m .
.� � �y 'O
� � ��
3� �
MA �O
a a°� o
�
0.,. A
.IJ
U
6 � b+1�
M
0 m m U
H
+� f� � O�
V m � C.'�
b '"� y O
>u a�,�
.a
wm y�°'
0 m �"� Gl
m m ,C
c� ms��'
U.� m m'00
-�m .,c�
.� U tL-•+ .i
O. f� 6 b� U
a�o occ
�s o. u m �+
( �
o.'�+�m �wcro co�a.m+o
�3m3 O+.�u..�iC �O'�...�i
c �a ..�ip 3..fli ��"''' °
G � \ A b+a� +�i � � U
Oippy N�++—tiy� 4i0y�,rtlm
� m� m N'O A M p�w �"{
m vH o�qam ..,,� v
,.� �� C �� C m U y
m+�i�� W CL� =a�A�U
[+itl'�o ��'"� oo+m°iam
m �, ++ � �o
m
C>m,.bj "�yG� mHC�dCp
mmQ�i ��cmic�i mai�A�
��p�V m�y„�i m�,�UdlU
�
°�mi+ � a� u m m a c m�
3�p 0 om-.�6 mal 3�
aa.�-�ic°tl a'�°�,•°.ma. -�+wo-`"+:�w
�.�i C� 0. C G'L O 3 q TJ l� `„ �p sJ
�..1 � .� ^�
.�p�p�p�C b�3N-.�i U�U�m� �
O W.,�j 47 10 W M !+ N+r V� ..�
a a„ +' o+.c �, �o -� o n., a
�ao �m eu�o�o ow'�,��a
ato��yG ma4+�� wcm �w ..�r
b+m G�'� k O� 1� C N .qa-.�r �0 U q�
C H O J� m G N+� i1 W ID Gl i7 .� U
+��MI�C +�Ll� 01 �Ca10+dlW N
'O .Y y O 01 3 �C m al. .r af .r lr m w �D
Lqimm�m �-'�i.C+�ikL m+si+mi6�l�a C
c9wm��o 4mHmm >vromma� ►�
N � a
rl
�
s�
d
C
m
O
a
m
� U �
�r ; �o
w a m
� � �
�
� Q w
� O
m m m
� � �
W
O y ,.�.�
+� y a o 0°
U
T � y � O
M � � W N
a � o �
O� � Ay�
q �y fa
� � �o �
s+ a m v •o
'�O '{ L � m
p m '�G � tr
b a
� � p m N p
a
e o+ e 'io+ � �O
� � x°m co
t
m
t�i
u
w
O
.,
a
�
m
b
C
�
m
�
U
m
c
m
N
�
m
U
U
m
�
�.�i �
��
m
C
a
�
�
O
W
°o
N
w
0
.�
�1
y
m
b
e
..�
C
m
W
V
m
c
�
O
�
�
�
�
0
0
.�
U
M
.a
'O
.�1
�
ro
0
�
w
C
O
�
1�
�
m
e�
m
C
�.i
�
.�
.�i
a�0
c
M �
yo
m
.� d
% p
m C
w i°
O �y
C�
o 'tl
+1
l/ C.
bb
b�
m
+N1 '� �,�,
IG w -.1
�o
M m '.1
w.,G.r 'G
.�i .i '0
m � O
+1 3� O
q�a
a G 'N
� � C
� 3�
ai �o e� co v�
C
��
m
y
m�
tn„�
..=i �
�m
.i
� C
�
m�
� U
M �'
ma
7
O �
; � m
� � b�
m � L +��1
d tA 'r �
U
-•Ci � p �
�
�C� +�i O
C � .��i O A
M m�. N O
-•aiLA� .L �
L� U C .Y .�
NV�U � A
Om� W E
�"� N n � �
�o n
m
U
w
N
0
m
e �°r
M
� m
•� n,
L A H
� � A A
a '° m w
� � U U
d m m
m a � .�i
N fa � m
m 'o 0 0
O w � �
N O N M
v�i � a a
vM .ri
+� +i M
� v �
m
H
�
m
s�i
�
.0
m
N
m
O
U
m
ai
.�
m
w
0
L
:.
m
N
a
v
%�1
O �
� �
c
m
� b� C
a
+1 'O
i�i .-�i �
m
ro °c �
+i
M � � U
m H b
m � �r o �
o vm �' °i �
41
Ha � U U m
� •�, n. a F
�
M m .-�t C C "i
� �
.i
c m m w aa�a �
ro m
m o w o O pa, p
m ,mq U m m� � m
L�i 7 .-�i � � � •��i O
a za z z.c xm
�1 �.1 �I
> v +i v - �
�
��------�
/�
/�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
COMMIBSION APPLICATION REIVEW
------- - ----_______________________ __� — =_ -_______=
File Number File Date Meetinq Date
17 4-29-94 5�24-94
----- -----------------_------------------------
------------------------
File Description: -n� ����+-a4 i
5470 & 5490 East Danube Road
Front yard variances
--------------------
Complete Review Checklist and Retttrn
To The Community Development Department
✓
Barbara D.
�
Michele M. `{'
Scott E. � � ��7
John F.
John P.
Clyde M.
Leon M.
*** Comments ***
� VI� v�e�-Ea v�c.e.ever-�( �Qa.t¢� i�
��� �. �K,� �, .
�
Q 1.1� �I-� 1�.,�s � �. �
� �awi�ta,� (� S�" 5�9� w+�
� 1 �'� i
. (�.�ev+P.�-11- a�-- ' c��� ,�-.
� �
� ��, � � � �
� �
� �dr � �.� � �s�i �` � � �� �L�/% � �i< <'hc f � �
/ _ /,/ -�i%��� ncc t� �J evc0�.�,1t La7��.. � Sc� v e_�� �/i�t�a/c-cr,�, , � -�
.�_� � �-,
G�,���.r., c�_� �/ �. �!/ (�c n�Csir�c.� /-�-� fCs ..��xt
�.�l� �y �� �-� ' .
� ���
f ��
�
�i s-�
' ,( V
Dave S . '�
Dick L. � 'S�' ��
%'�'�
PIIBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
APPEALS COMMISSION
�
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of
Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal
Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, May 24, 1994, at
7:30 p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of variance request, VAR #94-04,
by Paul Harstad:
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley
Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback
from 35 feet to 20 feet on Lot 6, Block 2,
Innsbruck North 2nd Addition, the same being
5470 East Danube Road N.E.;
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley
�Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback
from 35 feet to 25 feet on Lot 5, Block 2,
Innsbruck North 2nd Addition, the same being
5490 East Danube Road N.E.;
To minimize wetland impact and allow the
construction of two single family homes.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the
opportunity at the above stated time and place.
DIANE SAVAGE
CHAIRPERSON
APPEALS COMMISSION
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter
or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids
should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than May 17,
1994.
VAR #94-04 ^MAILING LIST
Paul Harstad
5470 & 5490 E. Danube Road
Paul Harstad Keith Harstad
2191 Silver Lake Road 2191 Silver Lake Road
New Brighton, MN 55112 New Brighton, MN 55112
Stanley Cihak
1406 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, NIN 55432
David Olsen
Margaret Hume
5457 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael Holly
1417 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Thomas Fisher �
5477 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Roger Harmon
5498 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
susan Williams
5568 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Bryan Steppe
5528 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Alexander Gonsalves
1406 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard Sworsky
1411 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
E. W. Fuerstenberg
5516 Regis Drive NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Boyd Henderdorf
5467 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Jeanine Olds
5468 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dennis Lemke
5548 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Steve Mackenthun
5502 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, NIN 55432
��Mailed 05/13/94
James Jensen
1410 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Thomas Forsberg
1404 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Amir Mangalick
Shankutal Devendra
1415 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Walter Ballard III
5497 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
LeRoy Corgard
5495 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Mary Adams
5588 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Conrad Rummel
5538 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Roger Hertel
5501 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Allen Messerli Joyce Christie Nault Virgil Lindstrom
5505 W. Danube Road NE 5535 W. Danube Road NE 5555 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432
Mailing List
VAR #94-04
Page 2
Robert Peifer
5575 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Christopher Menon
5564 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Patricia Freeburg
5557 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Roman Zawnirowycz
5527 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael Kittenski
5511 Matterhorn Dr NE
Fridley, MN 55432
�
Donald Johnson
5595 W. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
David Schulte
5554 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Russell Duncan
5587 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Edward Otremba
5567 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Diane Savage
567 Rice Creek Terr.
Fridley, MN 55432
n
Edward Smith
5584 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Glenn Furnier
5544 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Jerome Junquist
5547 E. Danube Road NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard Erickson
S. K. Mayer
5525 Matterhorn Dr NE
Fridley, MN 55432
City Manager
City Council
I �
�
�
��
,��
Community Development Department
PLa�NG D�SION
City of Fridley
DATE: June TO , 1994 yQ�
TO: William Burns, City Manager ���/
FROM:
3IIBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Variance Request, VAR #94-04, by Paul Harstad,
5470 and 5490 East Danube Road
The Appeals Commission reviewed the variance request at its May 24,
1994, meeting. The request is in two parts: (1) to reduce the
front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet for 5470 East Danube
Road; (2) to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet
for 5490 East Danube Road. The petitioner has requested the
variances in order to reduce the impact to the wetland located on
5470 East Danube Road.
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously t
request to the City Council. Staff has no
the variance request. Attached to th
Council's information is a list of front
from 1986 to 1993.
MM:ls
M-94-276
o recommend denial of the
recommendation regarding
e Staff Report for the
yard variances granted
- r"� i�
�
_
s
S TAFF REPURT
Community Development Department
Appeals Commissian Date May 24, 1994
Planning Commission Date
City Council Date June 20 ,�994
APPLICATION NIIMBER:
♦ VAR #94-04
PETITIONER•
♦ Paul Harstad for Keith Harstad
LOCATION•
♦ 5470 and 5490 East Danube Road
REOIIEBT•
♦ Reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet (5470
East Danube Road).
Reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 15 feet (5490
East Danube Road).
The petitioner has also applied to the City for approval of
a wetland replacement plan per Section 205.27 (O-4 Wetland
Overlay District) of the City Code.
The subject parcels are located near the intersection of
East and West Danube Roads, east of Matterhorn Drive and
South of North Innsbruck Drive. They are zoned R-1, Single
Family Dwelling and meet the minimum lot area and lot width
requirements of the district.
The petitioner gave the following hardship: "To minimize
impact on wetland and provide mitigation area.��
BACRGROIIND:
♦ In 1991, the Legislature passed the 1991 Wetland
Conservation Act. The Act reqtiires "no net loss" of
wetlands. Any wetlands that are drained or filled must be
replaced. The Act requires "sequencing" of wetland impacts,
and requires that persons wanting to drain or fill a wetland
explore all methods to avoid wetland impact, including
variances to the local zoning requirements. -
The petitioner does not intend to construct the dwelling
units himself, but would sell the lots with any stipulations
required by the City.
� ^ /"�
Staff Report
VAR #94-04, 5470
Keith Harstad
Page 2
ANALYSIB:
and 5490 East Danube Road, by Paul Harstad for
5490 East Danube Road (Lot 5�
♦ Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code requires
a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served 3�y this requirement is to allow for
off-street parking without encroaching on the public right-
of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the
building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's
front yard.
Located on the subject parcel is a Type 4 wetland. Filling
of a portion of the lot was authorized by a 1986 land
alteration permit. At the May 18, 1994, Planning
Commission, neighbors testified that illegal dumping of fill
occurred in 1992. The Planning Commission requested the
City to investigate potential enforcement action. The
petitioner is requesting a variance on this lot in order to
"blend" the proposed dwelling at 5470 East Danube with the
existing dwelling at 5544 East Danube Road which is located
to the north of this lot.
The dwelling to the north of the subject parcel is located
at the 35 foot setback and is located 20 to 30 feet from the
side lot line. The dwelling to the south of the subject
parcel, if granted a variance, would be 5 feet in front of
the proposed dwelling, however, the subject parcel is wide
enough that the dwelling could be placed farther north on
the parcel to mitigate this impact.
Stipulations
If it is determined that the lot has been properly filled,
denying the variance would not deny the petitioner the
ability to build a home on the property, meeting the 35 foot
setback. The wetland area would not be affected as well.
If the variance is granted, the City would be acknowledging
the petitioner's request to provide a"transition" of
setbacks between the-lot to the south and the existing home
to the north.
If the City approves the variance request for Lot 5, the
following stipulations are recommended:
. �,
- � - � �
Staff Report
VAR #94-04, 5470
Keith Harstad
Page 3
and 5490 East Danube Road, by Paul Harstad for
1. A building permit shall not be issued until the
City has completed its investigation and possible
enforcement action regarding filling of the lot,
2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
petitioner shall submit a soils report and
analysis by a structural engineer certifying the
stability and strength of the soils.
3. The petitioner shall receive a permit from the
Rice Creek Watershed District prior to issuance of
a building permit.
5470 East Danube Road (Lot 6Z
♦ Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code requires
a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for
off-street parking without encroaching on the public right-
of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the
building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's
front yard.
Located on the subject parcel is a Type 4 wetland. This
wetland has not been filled to the same extent as the
adjacent parcel that was also part of the 1986 permit. The
wetland covers approximately 500 of the lot.
If the requested 15 foot variance is granted, the variance
would reduce the impact to the wetland by 900 square feet
(1900 vs 2800 square feet). The petitioner would be
required to create 3800 square feet of wetland to replace
that which will be filled.
The petitioner's replacement plan proposes to create 2500
square feet of wetland. With the reduced impact created by
the variance, the replacement would still not meet the 2:1
ratio required by statute and ordinance. The petitioner
needs to revise the size and shape of the dwelling to
further reduce the impact of the wetland and meet the intent
of the O-4 regulations.
The petitioner could reduce the size of the dwelling to 30
feet by 50 feet. Placed at the 35 foot setback, approxi-
mately 450-800 square feet of wetland would need to be
filled. This could be replaced by the proposed replacement
plan. The petitioner would meet the R-1 and O-4
regulations.
14C
_ _ _ -- l°"� ,�
Staff Report
VAR #94-04, 5470
Keith Harstad
Page 4
and 5490 East Danube Road, by Paul Harstad for
A 20 foot setback will provide an area to park cars in front
of the garage.
Because the subject parcel is located on a curved street,
there is a 13 foot boulevard along East Danube Road. The
impact of the variance on the adjacent dwellings is reduced.
The dwelling to the south of the subject parcel faces West
Danube, therefore, no site lines would be impacted. The
dwelling to the north would be five feet or slightly behind
any proposed dwelling on this parcel.
In recent years, the City has granted front yard variances
to 22, 17.5 and 13 feet. These requests are within
previously granted variances.
Stipulations•
♦ If it is determined that the lot has been properly and
legally filled, granting a variance to avoid wetland impacts
would not be contrary to the intent of the code, because it
helps to avoid wetland impacts. Denying the variance does
not eliminate the use of the land, because a smaller
dwelling size could be constructed on the property and meet
the requirements of the O-4 district.
If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of the
request to the City Council, staff recommends the following
stipulations: '
1.
2.
A wetland replacement plan meeting the 2:1
replacement requirement for any wetland impact
over 400 square feet shall be approved.
A building permit shall not be issued until the
City has completed its investigation and possible
enforcement action regarding filling of the lot.
3. Prior.to the issuance of a building permit, the
petitioner shall submit a soils report and
analysis by a structural engineer certifying the
stability and strength of the soils.
4. The petitioner shall receive a permit from the
Rice Creek Watershed District prior to issuance of
a building permit.
APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION:
♦ The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial
of the request to the City Council.
14D
VAR ��94-04
�, �"'Paul Harstad
� Q ��� , •:� � �,r � l'D`'�n � �.�.•q:: ,a�: �, J ��(�� ,� ' � p�'���'• r ►A� �.�� s
�I�} � .�,er.� � %► w � ��l � ,1�� � • �. 1 �-
� .r l�P �� �� � � � � �1 �"� l4� I^;� �'� ' '�`� (��
� �j �/ � �;�r � /("j r ��� �� � �
R ,, ..; , y - r,;..:. � a a.
� � � N Iw��'' ? � �� 't �
�-I � ''�'s-� �A� .. . �
� '. �*' +- � �
���, , r .� .
' -• ��a 'r � � � '� '¢� �
� � , . y f• -� (hl
�
� `l� s � �;- �� i (y`� ►�- � �-�''""� �,`''' l�
°'o"r•ai �� ,�" ��V7ii �Z` � �(4� �
,�� r i . ° ' . s � � l �• �,, ;�'' �. ,�
.� G �'1 �''�•q• �y .1Q `�l '1 1 �. ` +. '4 �' `- ` (({... •i,�•�, ,
N� a � _ � L � � � � �� � �� L b � � .� ��
� �. � � ( /� '� .� �1 q: ,� �2� �
tl , '�� � ,� � '� ��1� .. � L(a)+ �� ..-y ���
.� � � lf � �:` d ip� � � ��,�� tP-. "
-�- r . s
���4 � E.. p � � � � ''� \
� � � �' � `�j �ii�' �,� � ,N � ��� ��'y .�. '�' � t �' ��I� �y
S � I6!'NI% �
� r
� � � l�.
,�� ,`, 4 �N ��,, ��; , c
r , t a
` t� , t /r) � �'� .. c
�
(i� � ��"' s (� � � i/(i� • M� ' (�)
� 1
l� �
�'� 3 � ir ' �� 1� � �. �,�) ��
. � 1 'd(�� .4 Q 4 �
p�. , ��n � l�� � ;r � • �� �
i
r � 9 �'/ � 9 �% + " � '�
�� �� t��� �R * �� f, � ,�7
w.•�. � �'�''y' �k ,y �'� � Q e({R' 6� , t �6s) , ���•
� �� P
� (��� y � � � �j • r'� � + r{�(�) � '�
�r � �, �. �'►� .I �� � � �� ` �3 � ti
l� -t,,, ,� � � � � �'i�. o
rff � ��• �a. � �„� � Ge�� � ,
� ��'i:Nir ` e E` •�
�J i � � � �� .
t
/ � 0, /� • � t
�) L►�pi a i� r
��� �� (/�) /d '1� �,'� � f'?� l 'yf '�
� q � „ .� �p� �'; 'R-;�• ; �/'�' �.11/�' �, �� ,. t
� .. � 1 (4) � Je �, {• � /1
--�. ` '- ��� � ($� $• �. .t '�`.� �� �
_� ; �
_-.. � � �� ��, y��' '
•' ` �f �1) ��� �/y'_ (M
� : . �, � �
�
, ,
,
► o ( . �'' '' C�,)
, � • r�.qc.. + .
i
, � .. N,
+r�,.yy '-
. "�
l+"t�l r �`�-- -
,� '' � � `: - 1 � ' ��--� . �` ,�
) .�+1 �� :�:���. � � - - ���_!� �
LOCATION MAP
/�w v,'_
.. L:J��:lL
J1 :. � :. i: a! +s
" c S. N�� �
������
7
s.. _� ._. �_—,
Jd i9 4: .1: a1
d . L` �
��
f/ 4��� �
���I 7 �
``Q'fift
►:y .c
. . .. 4 .
4� � , �
`��
�pN,
�1
• -Kai1 ,
VAR ��94-04
�aul Harstad
�ARD�NS' :: �' ; i
--'� i ��
� `� zs
..—�
-�� �v ��,,i
4 � �
3t � 1 \� . . � ,� j.
.+ ; � Y• �3 f„ a
,�
-- s � ac-- � 3 •-
;� -- •, �.�, �4.''�.� � �
��_, ._1� �;Ho�:, � �
ADL�1 i/Ul�/ Y��� � - I Nfi�58#�tTC� �
�_. -
�,
, , ,
- '�\
\ � ���'iti:'%5(i i!1
--�._ ___�`� ' -
�.� � �� Pr+Li %� � ' � 6
�Y � �•y'<,,i � � � �,y-�
� � ' � � C , r �J
i; -=j - � �.� ; ' �''�,�. `�-' ,. : ;,-,
!��� e G' , i i �� +� �, S' 7 `"'f �, jw
�T i-
, �� !9 • � �,� • • A • • •
^ 18�� e ••�/) • • • • • 0
C • • • • • • •
�a: ! • • • • O •
• O • • • • •
� � • • • • • • • �
,�' i • •. • • • ��0� • •
.Z � � � • • • • • • �
� /• • • •
t ���SE • • • • �
�i Y� • • • •
L � 1'� i-- .d• , i ��b�N� •�V • 1
• • • • •
��! j � ��� � r • • • • • �
O O • • O
5 6�+� :�� � y . �•�'�•�e�
_ -.-�r . V� - �
• ��
i :�`'i
�- — -?� _ : x� . o q .f-• r� ca. a' o . ,er�t
, . �e o c�-�. -s - �Jt" J '$'�. o - o� � �
g- � 'A a' '$^m �` `3 � ^r ;�
° � � ' - ' • ' � $- �- _ ; tis � a r�: y � -
� .f � .h` . � :.. .4"^ �I 3 . ' 1i:r g' y �'.
_ � �;��-- :,-: : � y-, - .., -; .� r � .� ,a �• � •
- ... ' � - i �- .• , - - o� , ; .�� }'; �� .. •� •
....-...-...'; . '•.. , ...� _„ ^.>w- .c r� � � �i �'j .s '
� 1�° �,� ��� /��-�.,__�.'�,R / 1 -� �� `_ � �'� � J�._`= i� � °9 a ,�
' ti „� L RT� , '+��,�,�,�, �a_��i.,e a
� _f...�,� +,�r � :r. !'� 6a`, „ T_' `"•� �._,,,,_,�"�-_ ` - �._
�q
J ii�:l a �^.. � J ?, � .
i ���.
C.:YW:`�,: �ry` �_�--'L—,. � " �_��..
r��_Ip �'jv;�--ra � ;� _ ��_c :r.
- .,' �.=j ..� - . .,,., . - �l : �' .
_ /%�1 +�J'!� � -i CiRCLE _
t ,L, N v. Y �! �.1
' �� � � - �"�4�E';.• ------�-� _ � � l � i ` _. . � 1 � ' d � �
`����;: � � >f.:E - _. _ v _ _,---- _ _ --� �- ; . .. �'�:` . , . _ . _. .
t -- N � ' �.� P� 94 � ���� 1� �ti � il��'��u`'�� � _ T
_�_ = � , � ��. � —
. :z . - � - . , �-�---� ROAS-
.. � � Z t , \ �—
.
_• �,i Q _._ �.k `_ �� ; z _ o;'� �TH - . ' ,
� :�= ° Z ' ` • 'ROt N rJ � \E.' � - � � - -
. _ �i- t 3- fI �, , �, N� �`c� ,- 3 . . �t
, . ~ .. iJ f i� � ^. 1 � �� � � ti, �!� � L_ / . \ � i • E. � .
14� ZONING M�►P
VAR �� 94-04
� �aul Harstad
,� � c rL�►�v
/O�
/"1
rvt � �a�L�l �Ci��L��
0
�
:
NORTH �.
t�
.ry �
�
N
.. • 1
O.' ;,/'' ���
:;.'i''. �'.%:.,...::" ;_� l
.,��� ,' • /• • '�� + 100.11
_ /���
..1•��,i�.
� +iazs
VAR �� 94-04
,�"1�'aul Harstad
/ �.�.�.�.�.�. . . •
. . . . : :.:. ek'st : ,
. .��� .'.
.�. ,
'� . � � A�EA
.. � ✓^ o
�,� ��. 4 � ='�/
/ .- , :.
� ` � �
\ ` �9� OM L ' ,
�a0 � '. �
�. �' tIOAO �� �
t/07.9 �� ' .� .
`p°'u t l � /
� �
ca.tAe stam .•..�
♦ '� /
\ �
�o
.O� ,� ?� : :.. t . �' 9;'' !��� i.; ' 2 �� `�� / 4j /
�O +� �� �' •.� : ' , .. �` �D F� O � �V
,.; , :',.. `=�.;�;:, .� � • t \ k6 �� +ios.1 /
�i ='` ' � •'•�':�;��;;� / �, '��"��.
�y:1, ;• .:'�;:� ,.. ,�.• ��. � / �' � �` /.
4:. �`�` •� `^ /
,� �tia . 100. \ • �%O v � �
'��: i, ,.. � j i Q
� ..`'����� Gump Coff aod /
��.�. � ' , , �°'� .
,,.::= �.. , ,�
: �...� � �. /
.'::J'-r'r,=t•� � �.� � ±, � 'O .,� p ��m
:�. ' '`•�: _' s � h � b
'<=::�;: •�•:: � +to4 � '� �
? �. ° •�.. � ' I� �� �
�� / �;� ��/ �5
", � .0 9 ,ph.
, I � � �os:4 °�° e�%�
♦ �� GJ(ro 0o;`n \ / V
� o /+102.6 / � �o��
"` � ° .
� � � 7 Red Ooks � JJ" � /
� �tT � k
� y � � � �I �y�1 �� ..� 7
� . ���' i Na rF's :
DR � f / � ,2 /'oa% Co�/our� ii�/�i✓o/
/lsavm<� i��ifico/ O%.�y
� , — Dcoa�'�.s Existii�y Ceir/o�i
/O(,' � � +1j5•J'I- �'�Denot��' P.-oPes�d ce�fe�.
� ��� �� Oeno%s P/oPo,sed E/rvot�v.�
�oea � / �BQ� rS9. f/� pJ� iyBT/ho' /D pe- �'��GY
/ � .:.—;� D.�o%,r S.//r F.��c
Lot 5& 6, B/ock 2, •'�'nnsbruck No�th 2nd Addition, Anoko County, Minnesota.
SITE PLAN
- - - . �"�,
April 29, 1994
Michele McPherson, BLA
Plarming Assistant
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Re: Front setback variance and wetland replacement plan
Lots 5 and 6, Block 2 Innsbruck North 2nd Addition
Dear Ms. McPherson:
/"'�
This letter is sent along with an application for a variance as we discussed on the
telephone on Apri128, 1994. The purpose of the front setback variance is to reduce the impact
on the wetla.nd by moving the house pad on Lot 6, Block 2 forward as far as the City will allow.
Consequently this variance request should be considered in conjunction with the Wetland
Replacement Plan submitted on April 14, 1994.
Variance
To minimi�e impact on the wetland, Harstad Companies proposes a front setback vaxiance
of fifteen feet on Lot 6. This would result in a home tha.t is at least 35 feet from the curb and is
still well within the property line. Wetland impact would be reduced by a total of 900 square feet,
for a total impact of 1,900 square feet.
Harstad Companies also proposes a setback variance on Lot 5 of ten (10) feet. The
purpose of this variance is to improve the curb appeal of both lots, so that one home is not set
back significantly farther from the other. This would also create a nice transition to the eausting
home to the North. (Please see the enclosed grading plan which shows the proposed setbacks on
each of the three lots, including the existing one to the North.) Harstad Companies would agree
to an even larger setback for both lots if the City prefened.
141
- - - �""�
Pad Dimensions and Square Footage
�
You also requested information regarding the square footage of the proposed homes to be
built. Included with this applica,tion are two different floor plans, both of which could fit onto
either lot. Cunently, neither lot ha.s been sold to a builder, since no one is sure what type or size
home can be built. However both of these homes were designed specifically for these lots and
neighborhood. Both are split levels with no full basement. The home with a three car garage is
1,283 squaxe feet, requiring a building envelope 51 feet wide by 48 feet deep. The floor plan with
a two car garage is 1,628 square feet, with a total building envelope 54 feet wide by 48 feet deep..
The home with a two car garage is sketched onto the enclosed grading plan and the wetland
replacement plan in a reverse ima.ge.
Harstad Companies no longer builds homes; we are strictly developers. Consequently we
cannot commit to any particular floor plan. Perhaps what is more relevant is that the City
establishes the maximum dimensions for a future home on Lot 6. That way when we correct the
soil, we will know what size house pad to build, and when we sell the lot, we will inform the
builder of a11 appropriate restrictions.
Harstad Companies proposes a house pad on Lot 6 that can accommodate a home 56 feet
wide by 50 feet deep. In addition, we propose a deck in the back, built on standard pier footings,
that is no more than 12 by 12 feet. The rear footings of the deck would have to be placed in the
wetland to minimi�e filling of the wetland; or instead the area under the deck could be included in
the replacement plan. A third alternative would be to allow some sort of elevated floating patio.
Please note that the each of the two floor plans submitted show patio doors (assume a 12 foot
deck) in different area.s, and that one deck would not extend from the building pad by a full 12
feet (due to a jog along the back of the home}. The point here is that it is extremely important to
have room for a minimum-sized deck or patio; without one, the lots are not salable.
Please consider this as an addendum to the Wetland Replacement Plan and as a request for
a setback variance as discussed. Specifically:
1) A 15 foot setback variance for Lot 6 Block 2
2) A 10 foot setback variance for Lot 5 Block 2
Please place this on the next available agenda and let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
HARSTAD COMPANIES
A �
fi'=' �.sr �J. �`�
�
Paul W. Harstad
enclosed: applic�tion, fee, grading plan showing proposed setbacks, two floor plans
14J
i
GR��i4DIIVG PLAN
Por: �CQi#,h H�r$#,sd
NORTH
�
.sry �e�
O '�
0
N
;;',;; :':':i-'•-•;.;, `-"`��^',t,; `; :.
,`.• . :=`�t:.:.�.�4;;;�':�;'r.�._.: �;;,; �;':' i
"` ; �T `; i'` ,`,�� T�Q, ; ;�: ;_. �.�; . '�,( ' � s
' ,:,- � .ti '/ •
�..� '` , s ' ` ;:'.=
Fz'i�„�,i �''�..f i � , � '' /�' , / �
, y��: .` "``'-'�3„ '�.,.��.��.:,�,: .:�;, �
'Y , '.^�,�~'t,•. , =.�
;ti'.i::�:.�} ...} � �./�'`�:�:�-% +taat
't �t,; = ' l?,�:: �c` - I' �^ / `
•? 1. .t';: .... �:
.� }� �� �� � � � � �j : . .
.f,�t �'•'..
'�(\`l�^''.�\.�.:`+•• ,��1'1`'�� � .,�••:,!,'��, �� 8
.��`
/.�.���'�.�.�.�. . . �
� � Fx�sr'�9
. . . y�OSe . . �
/
ln'/J��_ .t�'� % 'l'i�ZJr �
.� �J,'�,. �'�,,%7/ , EP
:�;:�:`�;�� `` `... �°➢� �
=:<:' / , ; ,` ,' �
�+ � \ �
9' i/aw �- ' :_
��o
�' t109.0 ' ���' /
:� +f07.9 � .� a
'�i��. .�'0 t103 /Q'���
�.Jr;; � � p
E�G19m sSmm Sea�s
��
;�:i• .t \
.�` ��'', �G �v, � � f� � h
��, `�, �� � a / 6. .
(' `� �
c �
�"-c''H
h2 L
`o,u � ,
\ i-'t� �� �j� . ^ -.��. �.- � � •�± �,
`� ;� �� •}; " , �-;�-�.�-�:� - , o / '�� pc�0� +�as2 /
�i 1 . , �..:s.t ��_' �'�,"�l'� G `L �•
�`.'- - -- <c. �..�yt.;:�,.. ,:fr•..y..-,'. - 1 1
r ,•` , : k: � - r !� - ' '� / �, � R
r�<� - .• �
'?t.' ���``�::'"' y,,; ^ ' �,' ��:", ,� v�//
i . -' � �� �; : :..�
14- ` . - i _ h �, ��,` +,oa Q � �� �
i. • :� •��:; '• / �ev �0
I 'c_-� ``- ` ��-' �'„'':1 i ' oow �: - �
I�. i�Y, � -�, '_ `yi ``,.
�,_�4 ��.��k . _�� �'� ��+ , Gump CottolNpood
t, 5, • ': •, � - : � � ��: ± /
i� ��`•.��°.��' �±t':- ::, "-.-, � � , /'i',oa �% /
i•�JV..'.' .` �.,\''�`� L'�: � /� /
�1? 1��•!'` �'- `..c; i=` � t104.4 , k $
Iti`�1 ;' �,r t`''� ':/ � / J
l , `,� /
'-�C'.;il� . t704.1
� ;ti:� T ` '.�: �i ; •.: .,� � � � � /L�
p . . . " . .. : .., � �1 /
. / � _ _
L, •`. .
�.�+�� + �w �� g9' �py'
/ .i J `�.: +104.4 e���
c,2w � /L� �� 9`�\� /�
4
o � c� c� �o /
+�ozs oak Sa,"y � �° coL�r
sr �
0
/Oa ts��, • � 7 Red Oaks 8 =73' �8„ �`�`f o / /
�i•ir °'tr �„°� b��1 1 p�6
� � � o o �5'�8�� os �
� � o k� i /Yo rES :
pR • f / � z %a / ce.�/oa. ,i�1�.ro/
Ass�ma�� yeifico/ Ooy�..�
o , — De�u1`es Exlsfi�y Co�fv�i
/06+ t10.J — -,pena/'e,t� Propasa�d Ca.�teai
/� � �� De�oles i�iopo.reo� E/evotio�
'°ao � � Z840 S'9. Fif o�'�yo��h� 7�0 �e �'/�o�
/ .•^=Y—i, OP�af6.r S./f F��c
Lot 5& 6, Block 2, •'l'nnsb�uck No�th 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Sca/e: 1°20' / he�eby ce�tify that this p/on, survey or report was prepored B�G.RLID 4 SONS, ING.
Book by me or unde� my direct supervision and that / am o du/y �p g�,��y�-p{Zg
Poge -� Registered Land Surveyo� u�e� the �/q ws of the Stote of 9180 LbtlNGTON Av6. NO.
Job No. amss Minnes to. Doted this doy ofMav 19, 9.3. GIRGI.� PINEB, Mf1�1660TA
Registration No. 9BD� 66mid-3626 7EL '186-6666
Variance #
VAR #86-01
VAR #86-27
VAR #86-28
VAR #86-34
VAR #87-14
VAR #87-16
VAR #87-28
VAR #87-30
VAR #87-31
VAR #88-12
VAR #88-23
VAR #89-16
VAR #89-21
VAR #90-13
VAR #90-15
VAR #90-16
VAR #90-17
VAR #90-22
VAR #91-02
VAR #91-09
VAR #91-11
VAR #91-12
VAR #92-09
VAR #92-14
VAR #92-16
�"1
�,
FRONT YARD VARIANCES GRANTED 1986 - 1993
Address
6715 Ashton Avenue
105 - 71 1/2 Way
5330 - 4th Street
537 Fairmont Street
5200 Lincoln Street
565 Cheri Lane
5660 Arthur Street
6133 Woody Lane
7231 East River Road
5201 Pierce Street
6405 Van Buren Street
7110 Riverwood Drive
590 Kimball 5treet
5720 Polk Street
590 Kimball Street
110 - 64 1/2 Way
6420 Alden Way
6850 Brookview Drive
600 Buffalo Street
5218 Matterhorn Drive
570 Ironton Street
405 - 57th Place
5096 Hughes Avenue
991 - 67th Avenue
6700 Anoka Street
14N
Variance Granted
35 ft. to 9 ft.
35 ft. to 25 ft.
35 ft. to 14 ft.
35 ft. to 26 ft.
35 ft. to 25 ft.
35 ft. to 16 ft.
35 ft. to 28 ft.
35 ft. to 25 ft.
35 ft. to 25 ft.
35 ft. to 15 ft.
35 ft. to 26 ft.
35 ft. to 30 ft.
35 ft. to 29 ft.
35 ft. to 18 ft.
35 ft. to 23 ft.
35 ft. to 34.31 ft.
35 ft. to 21 ft.
35 ft. to 31 ft.
35 ft. to 14.5 ft.
35 ft. to 29.5 ft.
35 ft. to 21 ft.
35 ft. to 14 ft.
35 ft. to 29.5 ft.
35 ft. to 17.5.ft.
35 ft, to 21 ft.
�
Front Yard Variances Granted 1986 - 1993
Page 2
Variance #
VAR #93-08
VAR #93-13
VAR #93-18
VAR #93-22
VAR #93-24
VAR #93-31
VAR #93-32
VAR #93-32
Address
180 Liberty Street
6810 - 7th Street
5831 W. Moore Lake Dr.
275 Ironton Street
71 - 63 1/2 Way
7536 Tempo Terrace
102 - 71st Way N.E.
7095-99 Hickory St.
� ��
/`\
Variance Granted
35 ft, to 34 ft.
35 ft. to 32.7 ft.
35 ft. to 31.3 ft.
35 ft. to 8.2 ft.
35 ft. to 22 ft.
35 ft. to 30 ft.
35 ft. to 28.44 ft.
35 ft. to 31 ft.
- �., � �
Ms. McPherson stated this item wi go to City Council on June 20,
1994.
3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #94-04 BY PAUL
HARSTAD•
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to
reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet on Lot
6, Block 2, Innsbruck North 2nd Addition, the same being 5470
East Danube Road N.E.;
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to
reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet on Lot
5, Block 2, Innsbruck North 2nd Addition, the same being 5490
East Danube Road N.E.;
To minimize wetland impact and allow the construction of two
single family homes.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos to waive the reading of
the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERBON SAPAGE DECLAR�D THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:30 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated this is a two-part variance request. Two
vacant parcels are involved, and both are located near the
intersection of East and West Danube Roads, east of Matterhorn
Drive, and south of North Innsbruck Drive. The southerly lot is
called 5470 East Danube Road, and the northerly lot is called 5490
East Danube Road. The variance request on the 5470 parcel is to
reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet. The variance
request on the 5490 parcel is to reduce the front yard setback from
35 feet to 25 feet. Both parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family
Dwelling.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has also applied for the
approval of a wetland replacement plan in compliance with Section
205.27 which is the recently adopted O-4 Wetland Overlay District
of the Zoning Code.
Ms. McPherson stated that in 1991, the Legislature passed the 1991
Wetland Conservation Act. This Act requires the "no net loss" of
wetlands and requires that any wetlands that are drained or filled
must be replaced. The Act also requires that a landowner or
petitioner intending to fill or drain a wetland must go through the
sequencing of wetland impacts and requires a person to explore any
and all methods to avoid wetland impact including variances to
local zoning requirements.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is not intending to construct
a dwelling on either lot, but would sell the lots with any
stipulations required by the City.
14P
�
�
APPEAL3 COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 13
5490 East Danube Road, Lot 5
Ms. McPherson stated the variance request is to reduc
yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet. A Type 4 wetlan�
on this parcel. The City authorized the filling of �
the lot in 1986. Many of the neighbors testified at
1994, Planning Commission meeting that illegal dumping
1992. The Planning Commission has requested staff to
any potential enforcement action.
e the front
i is located
portion of
the May 18,
occurred in
investigate
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner's request for the variance is
to "blend" the proposed dwelling unit at 5470 East Danube Road with
the existing dwelling at 5544 East Danube Road north of the subject
parcel which is located at the required 35 foot setback.
Ms. McPherson stated the dwelling at 5544 East Danube Road is
located at the 35 foot setback and approximately 20-30 feet from
the side lot line. If a variance is granted, a dwelling on Lot 6,
or 5470 East Danube Road, would be five feet in front of the
proposed dwelling. This would negate the differences in the
setbacks between the three dwellings.
Ms. McPherson stated that if it is determined that the lot has been
properly filled, denying the variance would not deny the petitioner
the ability to build a home on Lot 5 meeting a 35 foot setb.ack.
The wetland area also would not be affected.
Ms. McPherson stated that if the variance is granted, the City
would acknowledge the petitioner's request to provide a transition
of setbacks between the lot to the south, 5470 East Danube Road,
and the lot to the north, 5544 East Danube Road. If the Commission
recommends approval of the variance request for Lot 5, staff
recommends the following stipulations:
1. A building permit shall not be issued until the City has
completed its investigation and possible enforcement
action regarding filling of the lot.
2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
petitioner shall submit a soils report and analysis by
a structural engineer certifying the stability and
strength of the soils.
3. The petitioner shall receive a permit from the Rice Creek
Watershed District prior to issuance of a building
permit.
5470 East Danube Road, Lot 6
Ms. McPherson stated a Type 4 wetland is also
parcel. This wetland has not been filled to th
Lot 5 by the same permit that was issued in 1986
50% of the lot is covered by this wetland.
14Q
located on this
e same extent as
. Approximately
� �.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 14
Ms. McPherson stated that if the requested 15 foot variance is
granted, the variance would reduce the impact to the wetland by
approximately 900 square feet with the proposed house plans
submitted by the petitioner (1,900 square feet versus 2,800 square
feet). The petitioner would be required to create 3,800 square
feet of wetland to replace that which is to be filled.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner's current replacement plan as
submitted only proposes to create 2,500 square feet of wetland.
With the reduced impact created by the variance, the petitioner
could still not meet the 2:1 replacement ratio as required by the
ordinance. The petitioner further needs to revise the size and
the shape of the dwelling to reduce the impact to the wetland and
to meet the statute and the 0-4 regulations.
Ms. McPherson stated staff has determined that the petitioner could
reduce the size of the dwelling to approximately 30 feet by 50
feet. Even placed at the 35 foot setback, ap�roximately 450-800
square feet of wetland would need to be filled� This could be
replaced by the proposed replacement plan, and the petitioner would
then meet the R-1 and 0-4 regulations.
Ms. McPherson stated that if granted, the 20 foot setback would
provide an area to park cars in front of the garage, which is one
of the concerns stated in the public purpose.
Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is located on a curved
street. There is a 13 foot boulevard between the property line
and the curb along East Danube Road. Therefore, the impact of the
variance on the adjacent dwellings would be reduced. The dwelling
located to the south of this particular parcel faces West Danube
Road; therefore, no sight lines along the front yards would be
impacted. As discussed earlier, if a variance is granted for 5490
East Danube Road, this dwelling would be approximately five feet
in front of the dwelling at 5490 East Danube Road.
Ms. McPherson stated that in the past, the City has granted front
yard variances down to 13 feet. .
Ms. McPherson stated that if the Commission chooses to recommend
approval of this request, staff recommends the following
stipulations:
1. A raetland replacement plan meeting the 2:1 replacement
requirement for any wetland impact over 400 square feet
shall be approved.
2. A building permit shall not be issued until the City has
completed its investigation and possible enforcement
action regarding filling of the lot.
3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
petitioner shall submit a soils report and analysis by
14R
,�. ,•�-,
APPEALS COMMIBSION MEETING. MAY 24. 1994 PAGE 15
a structural engineer certifying the stability and
strength of the soils.
4. The petitioner shall receive a permit from the Rice Creek
Watershed District prior to issuance of a building
permit.
Ms. McPherson stated that denying the variance would not totally
eliminate use of the land, because a smaller dwelling size could
be constructed on the property and still meet the requirements of
the 0-4 district. Granting a variance to avoid the wetland impacts
would not be contrary to the intent of the 0-4 district which does
require a landowner or petitioner to pursue other methods to avoid
wetland impacts.
Mr. Kuechle stated that stipulation #3 refers to the petitioner
submitting a soils report, etc., prior to the issuance of a
building permit. However, the petitioner has said that he will
sell the property and someone else will build on the lot. How is
this tied to stipulation #3?
Ms. Dacy stated that stipulation could be amended to say that "a
soils report shall be submitted by a structural engineer..."
Ms. Smith asked if any variances have been granted
neighborhood.
Ms. McPherson stated no variances have been granted
neighborhood.
The petitioner was not in the audience.
in this
in this
Mr. Norman Nault, 5535 West Danube Road, stated he lives directly
behind 5470 and 5490 East Danube Road. When people built in this
neighborhood, they were told by the developer that these parcels
were designated wetlands and that nothing would be built there.
The petitioner has not paid taxes. At the May 18, 1994, Planning
Commission meeting, the petitioner stated that he was only at the
meeting to get a denial from the Commission so he could appeal to
the state, making a mockery of this process.
Mr. Nault stated this land was illegally filled in 1991 and 1992.
Since then, he has had water problems. The water table has
increased significantly, at least 18 inches to two feet. He is
asking that this variance request not only be denied, but that
legal action be taken regarding the illegal filling.
Mr. Tom Fisher, 5477 East Danube Road, stated he lives directly
across the street from Lot 6. He has lived there since the fall
of 1977. On the map where staff has drawn the lines for the 15
foot variance and 10 foot variance, or at least at the 35 foot
setback line), that is where the swamp started in 1977, and it was
all water. It was a large beautiful pond. If the City authorized
filling in 1986, no one was notified. It just got filled. That
14S
,� �.
APPEALS COMMI38ION MEETING. MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 16
did not occur in 1986; it occurred subsequent to 1986. And, anyone
can see that the property has been illegally filled since then.
Mr. Fisher stated that part of the issue is whether the petitioner
is really, at any point, entitled to believe that these lots have
value when he promised everyone that these lots were unbuildable
and would not be built upon. He stated these two lots, at no time,
had any value in the petitioner's mind when he purchased them and
developed the groperty. It is only after he has developed all the
other lots that he is now deciding to do this to make some more
money. If he was really going to do something with these lots, why
didn't he do it in 1977, in 1979, 1981, etc.? The answer is
because all the lots were not all sold then and the development in
place, but now it is.
Mr. Fisher stated that on April 6, 1993, he mailed a letter to
Scott Erickson, Engineering Department of the City of Fridley,
complaining about the filling of these lots and also complaining
about a builder he had talked to who said he was going to buy the
lots from Mr. Harstad. He stated he has never received a written
reply to this letter. He read the following excerpt from this
letter:
"Now I have been told by a contractor that he is going
to buy these lots from Harstad. He showed me a plat map
that indicated a 20' drainage easement behind one of the
lots and a 40' drainage easement behind the other lot.
He also told me that nothing prevented him from filling
•the swamp and/or excavating it and eliminating all of the
standing water entirely. He acknowledged that he would
have to leave the contours to allow drainage into Farr
Lake across the street. He told me he planned to leave
the water on the 40' easement but I must say he did not
feel he had to do this. He showed me the plan of a home
he proposed building. This home would barely fit on the
lot with the 20' easement and would come up directly on
the easement lines on one side and in the rear. He said
the home would occupy the area that now contains water."
Mr. Fisher stated that if the City allows a building permit and
variances on this property leading to a building permit, he knows
that lot is going to get filled. One year ago, he complained about
the fact that this lot had been filled. He was told the fill would
be removed, but nothing has been done. What will happen if the
builder comes in and starts pushing the dirt back over the water?
He can guarantee it is going to happen.
Mr. Fisher stated that all the homes on both sides of East Danube
Road are at the 35 foot setback. There are no variances. If two
houses are built jutting out into the middle of all the setbacks,
it will look like a bunch of garbage. The sight lines will be
destroyed, and the pleasure of the neighborhood will be taken away
from them. He strongly opposed any variance on this property.
14T
, �-. r►,.
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 17
Mr. Bob Horeck, 5505 West Danube Road, stated he lives directly
behind Lot 6. The major problem has been the illegal fill. His
lot is located approximately 12-15 feet below the street level of
East Danube Road. In 1987, he had 2-3 inches of water in his back
yard.
Mr. Horeck stated that all the neighbors built or bought in this
neighborhood with the same understanding--that these lots were
wetlands and there would be no construction. They all paid a
premium price for their properties because of the wetlands, but
they all felt it was worth the premium price to have these
wetlands. In 1991, these wetlands were officially declared a
wetland. Nothing has changed since then, and there is no reason
for a house to be built there. If a house is built there, he and
his neighbors are going to have major water problems.
Mr. David Blank, 5544 East Danube Road, stated his house is right
next to the lots in question. As Mr. Fisher had said, looking down
this street from the north, all these houses are in line and set
back at the 35 foot setback to make a very pretty place to live.
Also, he is adjacent to the wetlands which are full of wildlife and
birds, and it is a very delightful place to live. He and the
neighbors do not want to see it filled in. It is his belief that
those two lots are simply not large enough on which to build the
kind of homes that are in this area. If variances are granted to
allow the homes to be set forward, they will look out of place
because they will be out of place. He is very opposed to the
variance request. :
Ms . Pat Freeburg, 5557 East Danube Road, stated there is also a
curve in East Danube Road right next to these two lots. If front
yard variances are granted and the houses are set forward, not only
will it look like they have been set forward, but because of the
curve in the street, the houses will look like they are set forward
even more. The lots are quite small, and cheaper houses would have
to be built. If cheaper houses built, it will lower the values of
the other homes in the neighborhood which will, in turn, lower the
amount of taxes to the City. It will also destroy the
neighborhood. Everyone in the neighborhood is totall� against this
variance request, and they need to discourage this kind of
development in Fridley.
Mr. LeRoy Corgard, 5495 West Danube Road, stated his sentiments
are the same as those of his neighbors. Also, with a 20 foot front
yard setback, there would not be room to park some cars. Some cars
are over 20 feet long, and that should be taken into consideration.
Mr. Roger Hertel, 5501 West Danube Road, stated these lots are
located behind his property. In the past, Mr. Harstad has not been
a good neighbor. Mr. Harstad filled Lot 6 illegally. He did not
see why Mr. Harstad should be granted a variance at the expense of
everyone else in the neighborhood so that he can make a profit.
14U
• ,^-. �"`�,
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 18
Mr. Hertel stated there seems to be a question about whether or
not Mr. Harstad filled illegally. Before he filled, there was some
concrete back there. If they could dig down and find that
concrete, would that prove that he had filled illegally?
Ms. Barbara Fisher, 5477 East Danube Road, stated she was the one
who observed dump truck after dump truck coming in and filling.
Her husband was called home at that time, and they called the City.
There was no question that the dumping was done illegally.
Mr. Fisher stated he is a retired law enforcement officer, and he
followed the dump trucks from another Harstad building development
where they were digging out fill to East Danube Road where they
were dumping the fill.
Ms. Fisher stated that if the fill was done illegally, she could
not understand why nothing has been done about it.
Mr. Boyd Henderdorf, 5467 East Danube Road, stated he lives across
the street from Lot 5. He stated that in order to build a house
on this property, soil conditions are such that the foundation
would have to be set on pilings. The houses would have to be built
without basements. Homes of that type should not be put into a
neighborhood such as this.
Ms. Sue Williams, 5568 West Danube Road, stated she lives on the
upper pond, and her basement is the lowest on the pond. Mr.
Harstad is directly responsible for lowering her basement. When
her house was.built, the City Engineer came out and explained the
wetland drainage theory. As she recalled, he implied that because
these were wetlands, they would always stay wetlands, and the
location of her basement was based on the assumption that these
wetlands would continue to flow freely and would continue to be
there. The City Engineer assured her that as long as the wetlands
were there, she would be able to live through a 100 year rain. She
believed it is the City's responsibility to back up what their City
Engineer implied to her and make sure that the wetlands remain as
big as they were when the City Engineer made that commitment to
her. That means Mr. Harstad should be required to remove all the
fill.
Ms. Williams stated she never received any notification in 1986
when Mr. Harstad first put fill in there. How could Mr. Harstad
get permission from the City to fill in a wetland that the City
Engineer had promised would stay part of the drainage area? She
would certainly appreciate it if the City would check that out and
try to rectify it.
Mr. Tom Fisher stated that regarding soil samples, a number of soil
samples have been taken on those lots over the years. Where are
these soil samples, and why are more soil samples needed?
14V
/ �\ r�,
APPEALS COMMI6SION MEETING, MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 19
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to receive into the
record the letter dated April 6, 1993, from Tom Fisher to the City
of Fridley to the attention of Scott Erickson.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINC� AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII3LY.
Mr. Norman Nault stated that because these are designated wetlands
and wetlands breed mosquitoes, the Mosquito Control Commission
comes out often to spray the mosquitoes. Would the Mosquito
Control Commission have records on the changes in the sizes of the
pond over the years?
Ms. McPherson stated that is possible. Staff is just beginning
its investigation and will pursue all resources to clarify and
verify any activity in the wetland area.
Ms. Sue Williams stated she wanted to reiterate the comment that
the neighborhood paid premium prices for their properties because
of the wetland area environment and the lots that were supposedly
set aside for nature. She believed that now Mr. Harstad is
claiming the wetland as a hardship. That is ridiculous because he
presented those lots as a gift to the community.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECI,ARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:20 P.M.
Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend denial of both variances,
based on the fact that both lots are apparently buildable. There
is no history of variances in this neighborhood, and there are some
definite setback problems with the house at 5544 East Danube Road
which is made worse by the fact that Lot 6 is on an outside curve.
Any new setback would be more noticeable on an outside curve than
on an inside curve.
Dr. Vos stated that in order to have a variance approved,
needs to be a hardship. The petitioner's hardship is:
minimize impact on wetland and provide mitigation area."
looking at both lots, he considers them unbuildable even at
present condition, especially with the size of the houses ir
neighborhood. He would recommend denial of both variances.
there
"To
In
their
this
The
variance request does not meet the spirit or the letter of the
code.
Ms. Smith agreed. Putting the houses forward would affect the
traffic line of sight.
Ms. Savage also agreed. The only hardship indicated is the wetland
mitigation. At the May 18, 1994, Planning Commission, the
petitianer indicated that he was actually looking for denial of his
wetland replacement plan application so that he could appeal the
14W
�"� ^
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 24, 1994 PAGE 20
denial to the
exemption from
has difficulty
request meets
neighbors that
neighborhood.
request.
Board of Water and Soil Resources to obtain an
the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act. She stated she
with that. Also, she did not think the variance
the spirit of the code. 5he agreed with the
any houses would not fit in with the rest of the
She, too, would recommend denial of the variance
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend to City
Council denial of variance request, VAR #94-04, by Paul Harstad,
per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce
the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet on Lot 6, Block 2,
Innsbruck North 2nd Addition, the same being 5470 East Danube Road
N.E.; and per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code,
to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet on Lot 5,
Block 2, Innsbruck North 2nd Addition, the same being 5490 East
Danube Road N.E.; to minimize wetland impact and allow the
construction of two single family homes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED iTNANIMOIISLY.
Ms. McPherson stated that the City will review the Wetland
Replacement Plan application and variance application on June 20,
1994.
Ms. Dacy stated that on May 18, 1994, the Planning Commission asked
staff to investigate the issue of fill on Lots 5 and 6. Staff has
met with the City Attorney and is beginning their investigation.
4.
�
RODGERS•
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Ci Code, to
reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet t 22.4 feet to
allow the construction of an addition on Lot , Block 2, Bonny
Addition, generally located at 6050 - 6t Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. S th, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and ope he public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY , CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Ms. McPherson stated t property is zoned R-1, Single Family
Dwelling. The proper meets the minimum lot area and lot width
requirements. A s' gle family dwelling unit and two-car attached
garage are locat on the property. The petitioner has indicated
that the exis 'ng dwelling is located 32.4 feet from the front
property li . If the requested variance is not granted, a
variance correct the existing encroachment should be granted.
Ms. herson stated the petitioner is proposing to construct a l0
fo by 22 foot addition to the front of the dwelling unit. The
14X