The URL can be used to link to this page

AF-V - 40989� � �� ' � �!�1p301 STATE OF 1�NNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of a variance, VAR �{91-28 CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS Richard Peterson , Oi,tneZ' ✓ YAR7.MTCE The above eatitled matter came before the C3ty Council of the Citq of Fridley and Was heard on the 7th day of October , �g 9] on a � petition Por a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley+s Z oning Ordinance, for the folloviqg described property: To increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet, on Lots 4- 6, Block 3,'Spring Brook Park, the same being 7939 East River Road N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance he graated as upon the following conditions or reasons: No stipulations. See City Council meeting minutes of October 7, 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY ) ) OFFICE OF TIiE CITY CLERK I� Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in fcr said City of Fridley, do hereby eertify that I have compared the foregoing eopy and Order granting a variance With the original record thereof preserved in iqy office, and have found the same to be a eorreet aad true traaseript of the Whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subseribed my hand at the City of Fr dley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka ott the �"� day of , 19�• DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6437 IIn3versity Avenue N.E. Fridley, 1�AT 55432 �GL , V�Ce.�' ev� SHIRLEY A. PAI.�, CI CLERR�: -�' >',", ; . � ��L �� a period of one ear follouii a �� i,�q� ��P Y n8 PProval �c� ;ab�al�l, �e, .� � ,. used within that period. ^��; ` � , o ' ' , . 4V e ' e ' r1••� . � y,a o � .�:�: '�1 . y � . , Z 3 � �!�+1� ,. av �4:�i w .. �a o..-.- � `��' �°• ..+ °`�yp1,,��%- si�l�'P��:? ��v' ° . �. i � o . Yarianees are valid for eonsidered void if not .. i ° -� . �'', . FRIDLLY CITY COIINCII, MEETING OF OCTOBER 7 1991 PAGE 4 UPON A VOICE VOTE TAREN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, ali voted aye, and � Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. -- � MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of September 18, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPE�LS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991• A. ��sy �A51 KiVER ROAD: • Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request for a variance to the height of a fence in the front yard. She stated that the petitioner is propos3,ng a six foot high fence rather than the four foot allowed by the code. She stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval by a 3 to 1 vote. Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission felt the height of the fence was necessary in order to provide the maximum amount of pro,tection, as the elevation of East River Road is higher than this � property. She stated that the Commission also noted that there are a number of fences on properties in this particular area, and that the property to the south of this parcel was granted a similar variance. Ms. Dacy stated that staff is recommending denial of this variance request. , MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #91-28. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that there is heavy traffic on E�st River Road which does have an affect on the property owner's privacy. � UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N .ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. i �� O r'S .L� F+� p a� a � rt � w ~' � � � K � m a c v� w h+ O w� � � � C � �° � � � r ��3F� � � � �IO� ��.� � �� . � ,� �� > � ,� , � � ° � � � �� e � � � � � � °�� 1� � ---- a � � � gLa#ya-�o-� t.��d�oo � � X ' �\ I \ �� .. ,� ��o � ` � I I � �i f-� G� � � �"a �N� ± _ C�ZYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE October 8, 1991 F?chard Peter�on 7939 East River Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Peterson: On October 7, 1991, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #91-28, to increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet on Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Spring Brook Park, the same being 7939 East River Road N.E. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. S� cere y, � Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director BD/dn Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by October 22, 1991. �� ` ��l Concur with action taken � �� UPON A VOICE VOTEc T,�EN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declare �he motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Co cilwoman Jorgenson to receive the minutes of the Planning Co ission meeting of September 18, 1991. Seconded by Councilma Schneider. IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declare the motion carried unanimously. 2. �.2ECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3. 1991: _- - A. VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR #91-28. BY RICHARD PETERSON TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF A FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD FROM 4 FEET TO 6 FEET ON LOTS 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCIC 3. SPRING BROOR PARK THE SAME BEING 7939 EAST RIVER ROAD: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request for a variance to the height of a fence in the front yard. She stated that the petitioner is proposing a six foot high fence rather than the four foot allowed by the code. She stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval by a 3 to 1 vote. Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission felt the height of the fence was necessary in order to provide the maximum amount of protection, as the elevation of East River Road is higher than this property. She stated that the Commission also noted that there are a number of fences on properties in this particular area, and that the property to the south of this parcel was granted a similar variance. Ms. Dacy stated that staff is recommending denial of this variance request. , MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #91-28. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that there is heavy traffic on East River Road which does have an affect on the property owner's privacy. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N OAT THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � r'°� �""� FRIDLLY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 7. 1991 , PAGE 3 F Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that he was told by a member,f�of the church that the road would be through next year. �'` ;" Councilman Billings stated that this mu�� have been a misunderstanding on the church's part. He st;�ted that there are no plans for the City to complete the conne�tion between Oakley Drive and 67th Avenue. Mayor Nee stated that if there is a straightened out. tanding, it should be Councilman Billings stated that he w ld take the responsibility of sending a letter to the church nforming them of the City's position. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated th it may be beneficial to include in this letter the concerns abo the cars and stepping up patrols of this area. NEW BUSINESS• 1. A. SEPTEMBER 18. 1991: A RENNEL: MOTION by Councilma Schneider to set the public hearing on this amendment to the Z ning Ordinance for October 21, 1991. Seconded by Councilwoman J rgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declar the motion carried unanimously. B. MOTION y Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoni g request, ZOA #91-02, for October 21, 1991. Seconded by Counc'lman Billings. Cou ilman Schneider`stated that at the Planning Commission meeting the e was discussion after the meeting, and some of the residents th ught the petitioner was withdrawing this request. He asked that s ff re-notify the neighborhood and any of those persons who a tended the Planning Commission meeting that this item will be discussed by Council on October 21. � _ � _ I i"� � Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley 0 DATE: October 3, 1991 TO: William Burns, City Manager � � ♦/ . FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SOBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #91-28, by Richard Peterson; 7939 East River Road Attached please find the above referenced staff report. The petitioner requests that a variance be granted to increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet. The Appeals Commission voted 3-1 to recommend approval of this variance request to the City Council. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request as the petitioner has an alternative which allows him to meet Code. MM:ls M-91-728 � ^ � � _ STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE September 3, 1991 CITY OF PLAN�IING COMMISSION DATE F[ZIDLEY CIIY COUNCIL DATE : Octoher 7;�� 199�1 AUTHOR �-�1S REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONWG UT(LR1ES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBIL,ITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONWG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION VAR #91-28 Richard Peterson 'Po increase the height of a fence in the front yard fr�n 4 feet to 6 feet. 7939 East River Road 1�1, Single Fami.ly Dwelling R-1, Single Family Dwelling to the W, N, & E; R-3, General Multiple F�n.ily Dwelling to the S Dex�.ial Approval � Staff Report VAR #91-28, 7939 East River Road Page 2 A. STATED HARDSHIP: � "4 foot fence would not block out traffic on East River Road due to raised road." B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner requests a variance to increase the maximum height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet. The request is for Lots 4-6, Block 3, Spring Brook Park, the same being 7939 East River Road. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit with an attached two car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are properties to the west, north, and east. The property to the south is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling. A variance was granted in 1991 to allow construction of a 3 foot berm and a 4 foot fence to the adjacent property to tha south. Analysis Section 205.04.06.A.(7) of the Fridley City Code requires that a fence, wall, or any natural hedge or closely planted vegetation that forms a barrier shall not exceed four (4) feet in height within the limits of the front yard in all residential districts. Public purpose served by this requirement is to prevent tall fences in order to maintain the attractability of a residential area. The petitioner requests the variance in order to construct a 6 foot high fence in the front yard to provide additional screening and privacy from traffic traveling on East River Road. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 6 foot high dog-eared cedar fence across the front of the property. Adequate area will be allowed at the ends of the fence to maintain the lawn in these areas. 2D /"� Staff Report VAR #91-28, 7939 East River Road Page 3 /"1 The proposed fence would have minimal impact on traffic visibility or sight lines from adjacent properties; however, the intent of the Code is also to prevent a"stockade" appearance in the front yards of residential properties. The petitioner can construct a 4 foot fence to meet the Code, but wishes more sound protection. An alternative which the petitioner could consider would be to plant small trees, such as Crabapple or Russian Olive, which would provide increased privacy during the summer months. There are several properties along East River Road which have fences along the right-of-way, but most are in rear or side corner yards. While sound protection is understandable in this location, a combination of 4 foot fencing and evergreen trees is a legitimate alternative. Recommendation As the petitioner has reasonable use of the property and an alternative which would allow him to meet the Code requirement, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the request to the City Council. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commisison voted 3-1 to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request. 2E �-, n APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 3. 1991 PAGE 6 3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #91-28, BY RICHARD PETERSON• Per Section 205.04.06.A.(7) of the Fridley City Code, to increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet on Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Spring Brook Park, the same being 7939 East River Road. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CBAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:06 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located on the east side of East River Road, one house north of 79th Way. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The property to the south is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, and there is additional R-1 zoning to the north and east of the subject property. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance in order to construct a 6 foot high fence in the front yard to provide additional screening and privacy from traffic on East River Road. Adequate area will be allowed at the ends of the fence to maintain the lawn area. Ms. McPherson stated that while the fence would have minimal impact on traffic visibility or sight lines from the adjacent properties, the intent of the code is to prevent a"stockade" appearance i.n the front yards of residential properties. The petitioner could construct a 4 foot fence to meet the Code; however, he does wish to provide a little more sight and sound protection from East River Road traffic. Ms. McPherson stated an alternative suggested by staff for a previous similar request is to plant small trees which would provide increased privacy during the summer months. There are several properties along East River Road which do have fences along the right-of-way; however, most of those fences are in rear or side corner yards. A combination of 4 foot fencing and evergreen trees would be a legitimate alternative for the petitioner. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner does have reasonable use of the property and does have an alternative that would allow him to meet the Code requirement; therefore, staff is recommending the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the variance request. Ms. McPherson stated the Appeals Commission did have a similar variance request earlier this year for a 4 foot fence on a 3 foot berm for the property directly south and adjacent to the subject property. 2H C 9 � �� j � APPEALS COMMI83ION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 PAGE 7 Mr. Peterson stated he has lived in this house since 1984. He not only lives on East River Road, but has a service road in front of his house, so he has two roads to deal with. He has a unique situation in that in these three blocks along East River Road, only two houses face East River Road. Most of the houses face city streets. His lot is very low. East River Road is set up higher than his property, and the construction of a 4 foot fence would not even cover the shoulder of the road. Two additional feet would be enough to cover the traffic. Mr. Peterson stated he has two small boys�.and a 6 foot fence would help deter them from going out into the street. There will be about 32-33 feet between the two ends of his driveway, so there would be adequate room for any emergency vehicles. He stated he has planted some evergreens. Trees would provide some privacy during the summer months, but not in the winter months. He would like to plant more maple trees for aesthetic reasons and for shade. Mr. Peterson stated that as far as noise, he can deal with that, but he really wants more privacy. He really feels his house is on display to the traffic. He stated he has talked to his neighbors, and they do not have any objection to the fence. Ms. Savage stated she is concerned that if the City grants this variance, then everyone along East River Road can also come in and ask for a 6 foot fence along East River Road. However, she did understand the desire to have a fence along East River Road. Dr. Vos stated that the terrain of the highway and the service road are much higher along the area where Mr. Peterson lives than along the rest of East River Road to the south. Mr. McPherson stated that is true; however, this variance request could not only apply to people living along East River Road, but could apply to people living along any other city street (7th Street is an example) that has high traffic volumes. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY Ms. Savage stated that she had requested a copy of the minutes for a similar variance at 7905 East River Road which the Commission approved on May 28, 1991. She is concerned that since they had recommended approval of that variance, should the Commission, in fairness, recommend approval of this one. She stated she did have a very strong concern about setting a precedent for allowing a 6 foot fence due to the hardship of traffic. Granted, the traffic is a hardship and she understands the petitioner's position in wanting to have that protection and privacy from the traffic, but 2� m ' " " �,..� �"`, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 3. 1991 PAGE 8 she is not comfortable in recommending approval of this variance ` because it would be setting a precedent. She stated that the planting of evergreens could achieve the same purpose. In comparing this variance request with the one at 7905 East River Road, the property at 7905 East River Road is somewhat different in that it is on a corner lot, it is closer to the traffic signal, and there is business property across East River Road. She would reluctantly recommend denial of the variance. Ms. Smith stated she agreed with the spirit of the Code to prevent tall fences in order to maintain the attractability of a residential area. Staff's example of 7th Street is a good example, because if everyone along 7th Street was allowed to have 6 foot fences in the front yard, there would be a"stockade" effect. However, in this case, the Petersons are being unfairly put upon. Almost everyone else along East River Road in this area can put up a 6 foot fence strictly because the homes face city streets. So, there could be a stockade effect anyway. She would be in favor of recommending approval, although she agreed with Ms. Savage that she did not want set a precedent for 6 foot fences in front yards. Mr. Kuechle stated he� agreed with Ms. Smith. This situation is unique enough and the hardship is severe enough to make this allowance. Comparing 7th Street to East River Road is not quite in the same league. He would recommend approval of the dariance. Dr. Vos stated that what convinced him to vote in favor of this variance is that East River Road is much higher at this point, and Mr. Peterson's home is one of the homes affected by that. That is not true up and down East River Road. A 4 foot fence would not do much as far as privacy. The petitioner had no control over the height of the road. As far as a stockade effect, there is a service road plus the petitioner's home is set back 11 feet from the curbline, so there is quite a distance from the property to East River Road. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #91-28, by Richard Peterson, per Section 205.04.06.A.(7) of the Fridley City Code, to increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet on Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Spring Brook Park, the same being 7939 East River Road. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, SMITH, RIIECHLE, AND VOS VOTING AYE, SAVAGE VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3-1. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on September 30, 1991. 2J VAR ��91-28 � /`�Richard Peterson � S l /2 SEC. 3 C/TY OF 31 1 0 SSRE� • ,. fi� Zc . � � � \ / � L � � \\ , \ � \\\\� �e*s-�� ,/, ' .. .�\��', 34 � . � T. 30, R. 24 FR/OLEY � � � �� s�� \e ` \ . c,F f � 43 �� . '. I 2h ■ 2B LOCATION MAP VAR ��91-28 !'"1 -'�"�ichard Peterson � - - - . , ,, .,� ,.- ..... -.�-.. - , ; � �� . 7084 � k . �, � � � �Q3i . } . . f r� y t � " iei� J�i."��t ' }'� .^ ... ' � I +.i,�F� �6 ,�.'t � ,. r ..�,r �y `� �e ;. . .. . .:'`7 r". . '.;j�' " • • ' . _ ' . a ��, �� __ � �� ` • L,p►ND �� „�!�'�/ORS� � , � , . .' ty,� � ` �' .:. .rr .'lF'.l^�Pi� �'�'� .7��'7 �� . , i E Y F O �i � y .� t � I C��1 S�6'i�a � 11 �3i �'�F� „Y�t ,� O!1 ��d - . . " 1'"� i � <� a� . r � �' •� �:C � . . J � �` • . C ]y��`r RDNER REAI.TY.�,& CONSTR�T`I ON � I :� � �-� t � ..r� �� . I. . - � :�i .- �� - � �+ r � � �°` 1+� . L g ,.�� , � � ` ' � r5 �� ,t , „�'_ `' /� `f � ,� � • ; -. -. P -� t: :�' • . . - l �.� - � ' ' . � �� \ \ �� r ,'S � . � -. _ j56.8o - - . ,,,, %a 3 30 �,, N � 1` . \O L 1 _ . `O � ^_ y � � � � L_ � \ �� "� ..,,, ti� ~, 1 �' ., _ � ,.N , �-j�C� _ _. . �. �•3S' y . ,2%�. � . O 04 � b � � i,3 /74• 96 a�. " �,i, � �r;D • :�� . • .. t. I � .� � � IL DESCRIPTlON; LOTS 4� S AND G� BLOCK ��SP.RING BROOK PARK, � . 'EREBY CERT 1 FY THAT ON THE � 1 TH DAY OF .JULY� 1973, WE LOCATED BUiLDING Otd THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THAT THE ABOVE �ESENTATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT. � .. -,��''l�-.�G� �._,;_'�t • ; � �__�ll.:�'�. > _____ �A � NN. RE�. No. •5648� � � 2F SITE PLAN ' VAR ��91-28 � �'Richard Peterson .I - � ��, � �� ,� � '�... .J �. ;, � � , � cc , � :.� . �� _ _,: e . i ., ., ..:, ...� • :- !;:; . , . .., ,ff�� : ;._. :c�.� �� :::� ��...� :::: .. � � i�� - OF �� ■ , ,� �� L� `� .� � � �� -y ��, � � . �� `=�'� � .� �. � `� �� , � �� 'f:•r ...`� �� ^�+�� K \ ,,° � � � � ` �,.� ��ir E":•� ,� . � �:;„�� ` Y� ! '� ' �! •C+:�sl s•' : j " G� � �- ,� � Q �� / . i � Rii�'' ' I��.. , , K �;;, 1� �/ � � � � ELY CIR. � E�r `�' Q 0i 9 � a Q �� 70 6� 1/ 1' V `. W '�, � 4 P Q ` �� l�1BERTY ST •., �� Z �" � ��, � � ♦ _ � Q �( �� L LOW ,�� `�� ,2 . � �•� - -- . �. y ... � . . . `., .• , •.• . ' • ♦ � � �, , � iT� I �: 4 . t' i t % ♦ � t �'�\ k � �1 � � '�'%r �1� R� W /. � �� ti ,�,� � ,�,, es � �� ♦i I G N Ta� �t r., l k � i� �, .. • r•.. � • ♦ • • • \ �' �J' � � ',;;� Q � ��sti � • �� • • � �� vi '! � fi ♦ � • • • � •, � '� ' � ` ' ME'Q . �� , � � �� • I \ \ � y q� { t5 �}_, b �� •�� '•�\ � , � � �, � g � ,, �k�'� -� � �� . . � � ��. . ` �` �� o - • �. • � � �q • � .�1p-1 �� • � � • ' � \ �� '�. 1 `� • 9 � � .� �, � I \ � � �"��`;� ��:`r' �� ' 0 �� ti ' 3 w \� �.P��O '' 1`r � �'� ,�� ar� � A ,�I. . S Q e . ,S .� • - � � �!� 1S 1�F , b " �. . • ' �1� i J :� � � � � =�� 2C ZONING MAP � PIIBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEAL3 COMMIS3ION � Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, September 3, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #91-28, by Richard Peterson: Per Section 205.04.06.A. (7) of the Fridley City Code, to increase the height of a fence in the front yard from 4 feet to 6 feet, on Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Spring Brook Park, the same being 7939 East River Road, Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPER50N APPEALS COMMI5SION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Richard Peterson 7939 East River R�a.d FYidley, N�T 55432 Erast Win.iarczyk .290 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, N�T 55432 Fe�n �:Tegesa 305 Longfella,� Street Fridley, NIl�T 55432 R�ndy Kraft 303 I,ongfellunr Street N.E. Fridley, NIlV 55432 Izvin Iialvorson 301 Longfellvw Street N.E. Fridley, N.�T 55432 Ra.ymond KingsbuYy 281 Longfellaa Street N.E. Fridley, NAT 55432 l�sident 321 - 79th Way N.E. Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Auren Kerntop 201 Mercury Drive Fridley, .NIl�T 55432 Carl Pet�xson 7942 East River Road Fridley, Nb�T 55432 �� ^ MA�LII�T� LZST �7AR #91-28 . . , ��►� ��a:_�� Clarenoe Fischer 7897 Fixwood Way Fridley, N.�T 55432 John KloPP 788Q Fi�rood Way Fridley, ML�TT 55432 Michael Klismith 79Q5 East River Road Fridley, N�T 55432 [nTaltex Kuckes 1340 - 9th Avenue South St. Cloud, NA�T 56301 Resident 231 � 79th Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 William [nTalus 221 � 79th. Way N.E. Fridley, Nb�T 55432 Resident 211 - 79_ th TnTay N. E R Fridley, N�T 55432 D-b2 Properties 112Q1Q T�%odhill Iaa�e Blaine, NIl�T 55434 Laurrence Davis 210 Lon.gfellvw Street N.E. Fridley, N�T 55432 � Mailed; �/23/91 Gaty Stelt�on 23Q Longfellaw Street N.E. Fridley, r'.NT 55432 John Jarvi 240 I�ngfellaa Street N.E. Fridley, NN 55432 Paul Jaeger 260 Longfellaw Street N.E. F'ridley, NN 55432 Tracy Halvorson 280 L�.gfellaa Street N.E. Fridley, N�T 55432 Mary Zin� 273 Lon.gfellaa Street N.E. Fridtey, N.�T 55432 Robert Purdes 261 Longfellav Street N.E. Fridley, NN 55432 Cary Ritter 243 Longfellav Street rI.E. Fridley, MLV 55432 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, NIl�T 55432 City Maazager City Council � � c�nr oF FRIDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW � � � � � oa� FILE DESCRIPTION � #91 2s 45 8/15/91 9-3�91 7939 East River Road fenoe heiqht variance COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING DEPT. ❑ BARB D. ;LE M. •Iq•`�l [� JOHN F�� COMMENTS �i�� u�-r -L� �.�. `r��s I • �,��.,e.� e�,c.�� :p��i �r..��.�../�. � ,� G%2� /� 7(�(.� ui D U • �-i��.a.-�-i � � � � � . ` -i � � .��uc,� a „� �,:;.-- . �� i�,` ;, • %/ • , . � �I r , . 1l� ■ ,� CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 O�TIVERSITY AVII�I[JE N.E. FRIDLEY� 1�T 55432 (612) 571-3450 � F• u in__ii �i' �.a' :.;• ii.a�l —�.-• _ ti�ii - � VARI�iNCE APP�ZG�iTI�1T FORNI PiioPIItTY ��1 - site plan required for suban.ittals; see attached P�ddress i �% °l ,� % L� �}.� 1 �/!�� /�.(� a Iegal description: 1=�� y � � t� � � �il�y�' � , S��ci/�/c� +��u�C �l�� Lot e/� S� � Block � Z'ract/Addition c�rent zonirlg: �., Square faatage/ac�eage Reason for variance aricl hardshi.p: � F� T-�i+�Cl 1,v�vU 1�Ft��C GnJ �.,e..�. pu� ;b �+�s�o ,G,� . sectian of city cocle: __......,.�,.. � � �tv�c� e.. �n2t � ' �� ..^, i:�• . i . •� r� • (Contract Pu.mhasers: Fee O�ane�.^s na�st � � ��C �.�*r �� this form prior to prooe-ssincJ) r� �1e ��t� �E7��s�o � ADI�2ESS � Z.�`� L . •�', � D, �l � l� � � �I%'��- $ ��l .3�. I]AYTIl� PliO� �� `° � f�/ � SIC�URE � w�i� l�..��'J OATE � /� � � --�— �.�...�,....�...,..,...........r._....,..r.r.,, ........� PE'PI't'IO1�R II�ORN�iTION NF�ME .� �� S � �� ADDRESS I]AVmrn�r� PHO� SI�JRE � Fee: $100.00 ��~� - $ 60.00 � for re.sidential properties �t�# I� �;.��1�� Application received by: s�a��a �S c�� aa�: r 9� �•9 � scrieauled city co�uncil aate: 2G J �� a .� a m L �.�1 fA � N � Ma U � o� � � a Oi� �Y 0 E M v GfAC �ma .r � '��O m C O +�iOm mp d 6 '" o � � M � � � W � O ,d y�A �m � �'d m �i G'i U �3�+d C m m �M a 'dUmC 3� ��m� -+ � > a� m � LQIUm w a.itlu o t�i H +�i .-�i a av o+ � 01 .�i O � >� 0 U ,� ro C � V� � m� a t° -� "�� w �+ � o U � N m „a m 'd C m � N� m 3� � m �b 0 � � �x N �a �o A � O � m� A U � m b�L M m� mU � m +�iM �O� b m � � O > a� C4 �U .� w m y �w +i ro � am+ m m -v � v � m � -.Vi m � C y .� U C+r .r O.M Eb+U a�o oce �s a u m ..� .� .r M ►i0imoy a7i3m3 0 C � 'O i� C � b �+U'om d� -10+ o 0 m ..°� G w m �� C � O � 3 � m 4 � > ,o .a mmb� b � � � � +i � LL 3 � � O > m � C r m O G •+ a a,� bg�� M � m R7 Qa'N m a y, ��y� 10 � C O+m 0.��^�+ +�i7►�tNC aa°is°1+� �wb3b N a �1 � % m � � U m �r'� M a a O m � b a C b e z ,��`1 mcro comam+o wa�+vm °'�c> -.Ci A 3-.oi �..�pi 1'ia o C .,� •,.i N��CU y%+m�V m+� .r ar ,� b s� 'd y�, 1�ibrosmi Qaw�b � si°+ °',�, '� m �CIM �� tG� m EI a..�i C C W�A�+�i ��.�iC 3m4aA> IOti{a�6 CFrO O'� � � � tll m ?C b�•. m ^� �mut�i ��.�roAS�+ a m ,� � G �p >.�N'�C �� m.� U od�.Vi6 mm�34+ W O'�+Cim>. +�Mp^�+�iM .p G'.0 O 3 b� �vma+ e w•+ a m �,,,� m b bm3w� ►+'��°"'�`° M � V m ..Ci� 3 C'O �w m �`�'� C ..mi3ob+� aom0'pw �as�+a�+ m �i e m o+mw .cmm ,.d.+s�atw .� O++i lr .0 q 0 m M i0 .a .e .�+ x� m...r q a� Ia •smHmm >woarma l'1 V m b �0 C � � � y � mro 8 b � �"'� � m W � m w -+ � O A � ►� � m � m � � y U +i �' a � ma w�i m ,.�.i O � �°c sb. m m w m U � O ti y�i � I�i m ?i O � C� F}! 4f C1 ^ C 'O O o � 4, � O mC m +�O b� as� .°�m�, aw od yH � p,3� ..0'iym � b+ �� m � U zaGi co cmo rl N PI V' U1 a � .� a c � U N eq ►7 m w J� W 0 � .� � JJ m � G �.i m w O � C A � m U U m m d +�i 0 �U m C B a � � O Y W O i� w 0 � � � m b C a m w m e A O a ai � c �W yo � +i d X p m � a� o� C '� o �° a L O 1� C +1 M W '0 b � pF ti m mw M b m �� M +�im7 4+ �. C A e y'� d M m %+O m a ��o � pma ° w'° �°+ C +[i ��C .�i ."�i m 1�i +�1 �.1 J� 'O 0�7 D 3 � �i1 t0 P m O� m 0 7 � m � u a :c +��1 p C A N t'. a � � a w � b n C v�l 'd .i � C A 'O A w A i�+ k � U +i A m m m � � a .°o� o O W G m m � N m v� v a V .� :a v 'r v � N O ai C W �A 0 m N O 3�i � � A Vl M MH �i � 7 A A O � .-� C N {�i m C U t�l N +�i � v � � ami� w w � m � 0 o m ow u n � �u a w a �a > > •i .:� � � v W O 1� � b C b � a � .a � C m � w U ►�1 � � a > +' D` O m � a � � m C m � a .,, b � � M a � a av � 0 o a °' � O � m '�� N a .w o z' zr xm .r x % M v�.�1 v 0