The URL can be used to link to this page

AF-V - 41668r � i� `" � F _ C�IYOF FRIDLEY .-� � FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6121571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE July 6, 1992 James Zirngible 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E. Fridley, AIl�T 55432 Dear Mr. Zirngible: On June 29, 1992, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a Variance, VAR #92-11, to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet; all to allow the construction of a detached accessory structure and expansion of a single family dwelling on Lot 4, Block 1, Bourdeaux's Springbrook Addition, the same being 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The accessory structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwelling unit. 2. The east wall of the accessory structure shall have a minimum one hour fire rating if it is less than 6 feet from the dwelling unit. 3e The petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by June l, 1993. You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. o � �� James Zirngible July 6, 1992 Page 2 �� If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. v/.�[aav a ci � / Barbara Dacy, A CP Community Develop en Director BD/dn Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department b 0 1992e , . Concur w ac ' n taken �.: -�� --`�` � �� - � � �t `-,� '� ,� �""�`. N Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the water would be of trichlorethylene. f ree Mr. Burns stated that the contaminants will be duced to a non- detectable level. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how freque y this water would be tested and whether it would be tested rior or when entering the City�s system. Mr. Burns stated that he entering the City's system. it would be tested before MOTION by Councilman B' lings to adopt Resolution No. 45-1992. Seconded by Councilwo n Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dec red the motion carried unanimously. 9. RECEIVE E MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 27 1992: MOTIO y Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the minutes of the Pla ing Commission Meeting of May 27, 1992. Seconded by uncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee"declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RECEIVE ITEMS FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 19, 1992• A. VARIANCE REOUEST, VAR #92-11, BY JAMES ZIRNGIBLE. TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FROM 5 FEET TO 2.5 FEET; TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 17 FEET; ALL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND EXPANSION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8106 FAIRMONT CIRCLE N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the unanimous recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #92-11, to reduce the side yard setback from 5 to 2.5 feet and to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 to 17 feet, with the following stipulations: (1) the accessory structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwelling unit; (2) the east wall of the accessory structure shall have a minimum one hour fire rating if it is less than six feet from the dwelling unit; and (3) the petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by June 1, 1993. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there was any neighborhood opposition to this variance request. Ms. Dacy stated that there was none. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAREN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 0 n '".'�1 � FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF.JIINE 29, 1992 PAGE 9 Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she wished to clarify for this rezoning application would be waived and re petitioner. Councilman Billings stated that he wanted to make not part of the ordinance. , �the fee ed to the the fee is UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N ON THE A�OVE MOTION,�11 voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimo sly. 6. REOUESTS• A. B. MOTION by Councilman Bii ngs to receive the request by Mr. Merkel to withdraw his Varianc Request, �TAR #92-07 and Vacation Request, SAV #92-01. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting ay , Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: 7. MOTION by Co Councilman B declared the 8. 0 ilwoman Jorgenson to table this item. Seconded by ings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee tion carried unanimously. � Mr. Bu ns, City Manager, stated that the Army is proposing to distr' ute 3 to 4 million gallons of water a day to the City during the ring, fall, and winter months. He stated that this would be don at the Army's expense. He stated that the distribution of th's potable water has been rev�ewed by the Pollution Control A ency and the Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Burns stated that the Council is being asked to accept or decline, in concept, the Army's proposal. d 0 � _ ' REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Densii�r Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacerrt Zoning Adjacerrt Land Use(s) , Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial I mplications Conformance to the I Comprehensive Plan I Compatibility with Adjacent i, Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECOMII�NDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author i�M+!/ls � STAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date May 19, 1992 Planning Commission Date City Council Date June 29, 1992 VAR #92-11 Jairies Zirngible 'Ib reducxi the side yard setbaGk for an accessor_y structure from 5 ft. to 2.5 ft. ; to red.uce the rear yard setback frcan 25 ft. to 17 ft. � 8106 F�-�nt Cixcle N.E. 9,095 sq. ft. P.U.D., Planned Unit Development Single Fa¢nily P.U.D., Planned Unit Developn�nt, to the N, S, E, & W Single Family to the N, S, E� & W Six Cities See Staff Report Approval ` ��, � e Staff Report VAR #92-11, James Zirngible, 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E. Page 2 A. STATED HARDSHIP: See attached hardship statement. B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner is requesting that two variances be granted: 1. To reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; 2. To reduce the rear yard setback for the dwelling unit from 25 feet to 17 feet; To correct an existing encroachment and allow the expansion of the second floor of the dwelling unit. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit with no garage. The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Develop- ment with the adjacent properties zoned similarly. Analysis side Yard 8etback Seation 205.04.05.B.(2) requires that all accessory buildings and structures shall not be any closer than five feet to any lot line. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space between individual structures ta reduce the possibility of fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies, and to limit the condition of crowding in the residential neighborhood. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 24 ft. by 24 ft. detached accessory structure. The accessory structure meets the setback from the street as it is 25 feet from the property line; however, a varianae to the side yard setback requirement is required as the structure is proposed to be located 2 1/2 � feet from the side lot line. The petitioner could reduce the width of the proposed accessory structure by 2 1/2 feet, thereby constructing a 21.5 foot wide garage which would meet the zoning requirements. 10.4 �� Staff Report VAR #92-11, James Zirngible, 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E. Page 3 The property to the west meets or exceeds the minimum setback requirements. If the proposed garage is closer to the existing dwelling unit than 6 feet, the wall of the accessory structure adjacent to the dwelling unit will be required to have a minimum 1 hour fire rating. As the petitioner has other options which meet the code requirements, staff recommends denial of this variance request. Rear Yard Betback Bection 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) requires that the rear yard shall have a depth of not less than 25� of the lot depth with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Egistinq Condition The petitioner is proposing to expand the upper level of the dwelling unit to add an additional bathroom and bedroom to the second floor. The existing dwelling unit is located 17 feet from the rear lot line. The dwelling unit is two stories tall; however, the second story does not extend the full length of the dwelling unit. As it is impractical to require the petitioner to remove 8 feet of the existing first floor of the dwelling unit, staff recommends approval of the request to reduce the rear yard setback to correct the existing condition for the first floor of the dwelling unit. Pro�ose8 Egpansion The petitioner intends to extend the second story of the dwelling unit to match the first floor, creating a setback for the second story of 17 feet. The petitioner has reasonable use of the property without the proposed addition. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission take the following action: 1. Recommend to the City Council denial of the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; 10.5 � � � Staff Report VAR #92-11, James Zirngible, 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E. Page 4 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of the request to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet for the existing condition of the first floor of the dwelling unit; 3. For the request to reduce the rear yard setback for the second floor expansion, staff typically recommends denial of these types of applications. Staff is responsible for interpreting the "letter of the law", and the Appeals Commission and City Council are responsible for determining whether the variance is warranted. In this instance, the Appeals Commission and City Council may want to aonsider granting the variance in order to encourage housing maintenance and improvement. In cases where improvements match existing encroachments, the City may want to encourage additions on certain properties. The City should be cautious to ensure that adjacent properties are not affected and that all other zoning requirements are met (lot coverage, height, etc.). Testimony from the adjacent property owner would be helpful to determine if there would be adverse impacts. The City Council, HRA, and staff are working on a long term housing plan to promote housing maintenance and improvements. This application, if approved, is consistent with the current planning effort. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of the variance requests, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The accessory structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwelling unit. 2. The east wall of the accessory structure shall have a minimum one hour fire rating if it is less than 6 feet from the dwelling unit. 3. The petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by June 1, 1993. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the staff's recommendation. 10.6 � r � � J � ,� Community Development Department P G D�SION City of Fridley DATE: June 25, 1992 TO: William Burns Cit Mana er �� . Y g �. FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SIIBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #92-11, by James Zirngible; 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E. Attached please find the above referenced staff report. The petitioner is requesting the following two variances: � 1. 2. To reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 fee� to 2.5 feet; To reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of both portions of the variance request to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. 2. 3. The accessory structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwelling unit. The east wall of the accessory structure shall have a minimum one hour fire rating if it is less than 6 feet from the dwelling unit. The petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by June 1, 1993. Staff recommends that the City Council ta]ce the following action: 1. 2. 3. NIlv! :1 s M-92-396 Deny the variance request to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet. Approve the variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet for the existing condition of the first floor of the dwelling unit. Deny the variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet for the expanded second floor of �he dwelling unit. � ' � � � CITY OF FRID7�EY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 19� 1992 CALL TO ORDER: Ken Vos agreed to be Acting Chairperson in the absence of both the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. Actinq Chairperson Vos called the May 19, 1992, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. � ROLL CALL: Members�Present: Renneth Vos, Cathy Smith, Carol Beaulieu Members Absent: Diane Savage, Larry Ruechle Others Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant James.& Michele Zirngible, 8106 Fairmont Circle Ron Roessler, 549� Fairmont Street N.E., Robert J. Van Den Berg, 10811 181st Ave. N.W., Elk River Robert M. Van Den Berg, 2852 Anthony Lane S., Minneapolis . Thomas Brickner, Brickner Builders, Inc. APPROVAL OF APRIL 21. 1992, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MoTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve the April 21, 1992, Appeals Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� ACTING CHAIRPER80N VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII3LY. l. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST, VI�R #92-11, BY JAMES , . ZIRNGIBLE• � Per Section 205.04.05.B.(2) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; Per Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet; To allow the construction of a detached accessory structure and expansion of a single family dwelling on Lot 4, Block l, Bourdeaux's Springbrook Addition, the same being 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E. 10.10 k 6 � � �i APPEALS COMMIS3ION MEETING, MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 2 MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing�notice and to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON V08 DECLAR�D THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIHLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7s36 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at 8106 Fairmont Circle. The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, however, the use of the property is a single family dwelling, as are all the adjacent properties. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has a two-part variance request. The first is to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 24 foot x 24 foot detached accessory structure. The proposed location of the structure meet the setback from the front property line; however, it does not meet the 5 foot setback requirement for the side lot line. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has the option to reduce the width of the proposed accessory structure by 2.5 feet which would allow the petitioner to construct a 21.5 foot wide garage versus the proposed 24 foot. Staff acknowledges that this may be too narrow of an accessory structure; however, it would be possible to store two vehicles in the structure with the reduced width. The property to the west meets or exceeds the minimum setback requirement as far as the structures on the adj acent property. Mr. Zirngible has submitted a statement from the adjacent property owners stating they are comfortable with the location of the proposed accessory structure. Ms. McPherson stated that if the Appeals Commission recommends approval of this request, a requirement to have a one hour fire rating will be applied to the wall of the structure that is adjacent to the dwelling unit if it is less than 6 feet from the dwelling unit. Staff is recommending that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of this request because the petitioner does have an alternative which meets the code requirement. Ms. McPherson stated that the second portion of the variance request is to reduce the rear yard setback for the dwelling unit from 25 feet to 17 feet; to correct an existing encroachment and allow the expansion of the second floor of the dwelling unit. The existing dwelling unit is located 17 feet from the rear lot line. The dwelling unit is two stories tall; however, the second story does not extend the full length of the dwelling unit. Ms. McPherson stated that as it is impractical to require the petitioner to remove 8 feet of the existing first floor of the dwelling unit, staff recommends approval of the request to reduce 10.1� � '� APPEALS COMMI3SION MEETING, MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 3 the rear yard setback to correct the existing condition. However, the petitioner proposes to extend the second story o,f the dwelling unit to match the first floor, creating a setback for the second story of 17 feet. The petitioner has reasonable use of the property without the proposed addition. Ms. McPherson stated that for this request, staff has three recommendations: 1. Recommend to the City Council denial of the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of the request to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet for the existing condition of the first floor of the dwelling unit; 3. For the request to reduce the rear yard setback for the second floor expansion, staff typically recommends denial of these types of applications. Staff is responsible for interpreting the °letter of the law", and the Appeals Commission and City Council are responsible for determining whether the variance is warranted. In this instance, the Appeals Commission and .City Council may want to consider granting the variance in order to encourage housing maintenance and improvement. In cases where improvements match existing encroachments, the City may want to encourage additions on certain properties. The City should be cautious to ensure that adjacent properties are not affected and that all other zoning requirements are met (lot coverage, height, etc.). Testimony from the adjacent property owner would be helpful to determine if there would be adverse impacts. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council, HRA, and staff are working on a long term housing plan to promote housing maintenance and improvements. This application, if approved, is consistent with the current planning effort. Ms. McPherson stated that if the Commission chooses to recommend approval of all the variance requests, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The accessory structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwelling unit. 2. The east wall of the accessory structure shall have a minimum one hour fire rating if it is less than 6 feet from the dwelling unit. 10.12 � � ^� � � � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 19. 1992 PAGE 4 3. The petitioner shall provide a hard surface dri`veway by June 1, 1993. Ms. Beaulieu asked the standard size for a double garage. Ms. McPherson stated a size of 20 feet x 20 feet has been approved; however, the City receives many requests for 24 feet x 24 feet. Dr. Vos stated he looked at the property and stated there seems to be some question about what is the side yard and what is the front. Ms. McPherson stated the Code defines the front as the shortest of the two frontages. Again, similar requests have been reviewed where the front functions as the side yard and vice versa. Dr. Vos stated there seemed to be much lot between the east property line and the house. � Ms. McPherson stated the house could be 17.5 feet from the east property line. Dr. Vos stated it looks like 30 to 40 feet. This could affect all areas if interpreted differently. Ms. Smith asked if there was anything that states how close an accessory building can be to an existing home. Mr. McPherson stated that if it is within a certain number of feet, it is considered attached. The petitioner can define the distance the accessory structure will be from the dwelling unit. Dr. Vos asked, if attached, is there a different request and would the structure still need a fire wall. Ms. McPherson stated the structure would need to meet all building code requirements. - Ms. McPherson stated that underlying the long recommendation, it would be staff's recommendation to deny tlie request. There are some instances where the City may consider that the spirit of the Code would be met be granting the variance, and it may be appropriate in some instances to consider approval of the request. • Mr. Zirngible presented a letter from his�neighbor to the west supporting the request to reduce the side yard setback. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to receive a letter from Mrs. William Gorman, dated May 19, 1992, stating they do not object to the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.5 feet. 10.13 . ¢ �..� /'� , s � APPEALB COMMI88ION MEETING, MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 5 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON V08 DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. Mr. Zirngible stated on the west side of the property their Inouse is 22 feet to the property line. The hardship is that this is the only location on the property for tYae structure. He needs to keep garbage cans, boat trailer, etc. in a garage. There is currently no garage. Ms. Smith asked how close the garage would be to the house. Mr. Zirngible stated there would be 2.5 feet between the dwelling unit and the garage. Ms. Beaulieu asked what the hardship would be if the garage were limited to 21.5 feet in width. Mr. Zirngible stated the boat trailer takes the space of a.car, and in terms of cost, the costs for building would be the same. Dr. Vos asked if the building could be located in another place. Mr. Zirngible stated, no. There is an existing driveway at the north end of the property. If �a garage were placed in that are, he would still need a variance because of the placement of the house on the property. Ms. Smith asked what the petitioner has planned for the second story of the house. Mr. Zirngible stated they plan to add a bath and master bedroom. The roof line would be extended over what is now a flat roof. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE�.ALL VOTING AYE� ACTING CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED TH�E MOTION CARRIED AND THE PQBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. Dr. Vos stated his opinion of a 21.5 foot double garage gives no space to open the car door in the garage. One can hardly get out of the car. Ms. Beaulieu stated she would xnove to approve both requests. The first shows a hardship with where the house is located. A garage is necessary. It seems as if the petitioner has looked over the situation and has found the best placement. The second request is an existing condition so adding the second floor at 17 feet is not a detriment, and she felt that the spirit of the Code will be met. 10.14 , � • � � �-. � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING� MAY 19, 1992 PAGE 6 Ms. Smith stated she does not like the side yard setback because it constricts the neighbor in the future if they want to do anything, but the lot is large. Allowing the upstairs, if done pzoperly, will add to the property. Dr. Vos stated there is 22 feet from the adjacent dwelling to the lot line. If the petitioner goes 2.5 feet from the property line, it will hinder the neighbor. Ms. McPherson stated that if the property owner to the west wanted to build, the distance between structures would be reduced from 15 feet to 12.5 feet. O�+�i TION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve variance request, VAR #92-i1, by James Zirngible to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; and to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet; on Lot 4, Block 1, Bourdeaux's Springbrook Addition, the same being 8106 Fairmont Street N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. 2. 3. The accessory structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing dwelling unit. The east wall of the accessory structure shall have a minimum one hour fire rating if it is less than 6 feet from the dwelling unit. - The petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by June 1, 1993. QPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTING CHAIRPERSON V03 DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. Ms. McPherson stated the request would go before the City Council at their meeting of June 29. 2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE RE UEST VAR 92-12 BY RONALD J. ROESSLER: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2) (a) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the sida yard setback from 10 feet to 8 feet, to allow the construction of a 14 foo addition and basement under a single family dwelling unit on Lots 46 and 47, Block J, Riverview Heights Addition, th same being 544 Fairmont Street N.E. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms�Smith, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open he public hearing. IIPOld A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACT THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEA] 10.15 CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED OPEN AT 8:00 P.M. 0 � � It is okay with us, the Gormans, for Mr. and Mre. Zirngible to build the garage according to the stated variance, building the garage 2.5 feet instead of 5 feet from the property line. ,� , /, � 1 Lt.�'�! / �, . .CJI� . � �� . � ' �� /,e � � PIIBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION � ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, May 19, 1992, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #92-11, by James Zirngible: Per Section 205.04.05.B. (2) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.5 feet; Per Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet; To allow the construction of a detached accessory structure and expansion of a single family dwelling on Lot 4, Block 1, Bourdeaux's Springbrook Addition, the same being 8106 Fairmont Circle N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than May 12, 1992. Ng1II,TNG LIST FOR VAR #92-11 %�`�;, � szo� F� �r� ; r�r�: 5�s/�a Jat�s Zirngible 81Q6 �'airnor�nt Circle k`ridley, 1�MT 55432 k�reger �Iest 354Q �- 152nd Laxie Andover, PMT 5543Q4 John TnIalton 8Q66 Ruth �txeet N,E. Fri.dle�, NH�T 55432 AnthonX 'I�.o�kins, BQ26. Ruth �tl�e_�t , N. �e Fridleg, NAT �5432 Hiep Nguyern 8114 k'airnx�nt �C',�,�ccle Fridley=, N�T 55432 � jJE? l i Gh�k 8112 k'a�nt CC`iaccle k'ridley, 1�T 55432 Fredexick Fsickson 811Q �'a,�:xmont C;��cle Fx:%clleys 1�T 55432 Tniilliaan Gorman 81Q4. �'�iznqnt Ci.xcle k'ridl�, I�T 55432� Eroe.ry Gerva�s 81Q2 �'a�;�nt Ci.rcle. Fridley, NIl�T 55432 Kar.ui Fjeldos 8161 East River Road Fridley, NIl�T 55432 ]!+�x'X ►7o Kr�uel 8151 �'�mnt Circle Fridle�, 1�T 55432 Ra�d Arnold 8141 Fai:�amnt Circle ��dle�r, 3�V 55432 �dne� z�nh 8131 �'a,�,rm�nt Ca:xcle �`ar.�dle�� :N1DT 55432 V�.ncent y�.11el].a 8121 Fa,�nt Cascle �dle�,r, NlRT 55432 Jolan N,k�ron 8111 F�a�ant Ca.xcle �c11e�, 1�.V 55432 �rt ;F,r�,tc�. 81Q1� �'a,�x�i�� C�rcle x`r.�dle�, 1� 55432 E. �'aul L�.dn 8(�87 F�xmpnt t�i.rele Fr�;dley�, 1�T 55432 �oxY SY�i�shock- . 8Q71 Fa%rmont C�a:cle �'aei.dley, N�T 55432 J�es Johnson 8057 Fairm�nt Circle Fridley, N�T 55432 JeffreX �otter 8041 F�rmpnt Ca.rcle �'ridley, 1�T 55432 Joseph Kostuch 8Q27 �a��ront Circle Fridley, MM[�TT 55432 Diane Savage 567 Rice Cre�k Terrace N.E. Fridley, NIl�T 55432 City Manager City Council . � :.� � .�.::1� � �!�.C!i � �� , � �1 � - � _� � ��-� �) � � . � � C�N �F FRIDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIE�W F� Nu� FlLE DATE NIC-EFINiNC�,� FILE DESCRIPTION �#92-11 24 4-24-92 5-19-�2 8106 Fairnmnt Circle COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING D,EPT. � - -- � - � - � � �� M CH LE M. � � �� •qv -- l �5 MARK �11�1� G��, � JOHN F. �� CLYDE W. ��, LYDE M. � , �LEON M. �, � I�yl_ I�M 1.1 S` 1 � , CHUCK I f/ COM�IAENTS �, �� , �� r � / ��• ' �► � � r!� � • ! • 'i��% i � !�� s,� ► � i � �� . � � ��', / ,� / i.. . . _ �_l�� ,(./iJ�� A � r / l..�C.,. � � (..�"'v � _ ,, �. <<� �� z� � �� %� �� , � r� `J ��=�t" ��,�� , 1 I�� ,�� . �— � c�' � � � ;� � ,�, o�� CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. � FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM �ROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: �l a �—a►',�,,�xB,a.-� Gi ��i� Property Identification Number (PIl� Lega1 description: Lot � Block 1 Tract/Addition� vrd�w�C.�S '�r;;�o.Q��-�1 Current zoning: Square footagelacreage Reason for variance and hardship: � Cei. __C�� Section of City Code: 1� o�-o�!� ��e1 ��,� ��I. �� i(�( �, Have you operated a business in a ciry which required a business license? Yes No � If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes 1Vo FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME �-�n�C.� � . � �2�U� /B�C ADDRESS �I�G� �i4/�2�Y1C7/V i �i � . =R /��- �/� D YTIME PHONE �7 � 3 -f � /� SIGNATURE � DATE `�- o� `f ° S' � PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME � A�INt�S Z ► L�,t.1G `�L�' ADDRESS �I � f"J4 ! �M�� l �C�� . f'r � dL� /�I /� D YTIME PHONE �� / f3 SIGNATURE �� `�r�� " DATE y� a` �- 9 Z Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 ,�_ for residential properties Permit VAR #�2 �'�� Receipt # � 3 7/ � Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission da.te: Scheduled City Council date: 10.9 /,�` � e -.�. � ! 3 'O 'O .� e�1 6 Ja 0 O� W 'O i� m M l. b� C0C q.-tl.�m IOCtO COIELO 0 C a� at �m o s+ ..� �+ A.� m b q +� a 0+4� a'ima�03 0��+�iC �'e+�+o y +� m� �C„�� ..�ia \00+� „��x�a�y� x V P! a U s� al � ..o� a•�� a.�.°.o bow�om o .,� °'Q� ��'��'m �oa.m �°'�� '6� °,.bi .� ,n ,. a �p a�a �� u�� m��m � g, .y.°�� G�'O �� ^�C �ma+p,b> � M$ G NC .°, a a ��'p � y y m 'm a"�e an.: m.i .°i w m�o �a. o'�°m mb°��p �..°iU� yo"a�J°+a +�+ .� '� �m .� 'o �.0 ►�+ O d Q U m� a�+.�r ��.� t�i dC � m yJ .��1 � w C C-�+y C''Y� mA 0�t�7 m m 3 C aM .p � q b� .�i 3� m m CL�„�� my w b+ C0m p��GoQ ��+�iCl?� '.�f�0"��N � "� � M..CiA�p �N +CiO.�WO �pG'JC03 A'CM"m� 0 � k y�dl .�p�m� Mt�i'�Dqi� y�0"�O> 7"�my� C � N 1+ +�i ��+0 k�U3G �S'►pi�m ym��G.f�.i iUiq+V>i��`� ..�.� V m e�.�i3p �� RJ O��pd'� � C i� A'O � O w l� O�� a � 'O O C� Oi ""��> qvdl�\ �+�i3�Ue IOm b.��i G 1A O o �-pl O m m+' a m a�+ o w a .. ..r m a'° .+ �°'m o m o�o a�-°� x c�P e m .°�� m n o o a o >,°a� +'moc cwo s+ mem.�„ �mmmi+.+ n.+m -+ � y e $.av� b�GMiamm 3.�emm +�+m.-�iwmw v� �'.�°� +' .bi .�imw a �H�$ �°+mWbm �x.°,'x� '�.��e�w ° �c � ti yoa� a aavw �wo3v �Cm�mm >�ooatm�+ r�i at oa �3�c m •+ . . M . �i n v iei �o r ao m � '+ m m .1 o m .p W U,.� � U � � Y y► la O ° ,i o �' a � °'..�i u � •.°+ m m � q m ..�i � � � b+ c a v m ,$ m � m w ,itl+ .°, �o w �C o �. � w ti�d m m � a H � b O C i� ri N m �0 O' � y,� � b 7 m �0 C m a �o m m m>' e.°� a m � �' � �, m � m a� � m p, :° � m ar w� � .01r a m'd a � w � o� a � �+ m a �r o � mw� ''r, � m .. o0 ►+ r> °' m m° m »�+ a. >. a, a�. m � a, G � +i � l.�i � � � � t�i m �y � 01 i� .b-� 'G .4 .O � C m m � L A O U V m U � � w � m m m 6 Y U U � Q O � N r@i � m I�i O �p �py, � A 3� N N Q1 R �0 t0 � � m^ ,q G M � iJ W iNi 01 "" C +Ci Na W > > > W '� m ya "'1 b � b a m �� ° ~ U-r�i p U U Cl �+1 i, b� o+ M � ++ ti �o � w � e� y � e .d ..a m m m m m m'� -.[i .•�i a °� y m G m o o m y� �.•� q �o .i H a� s+ s+ ,q ai '� x x O Q T.,�� a0 p O 'd �d C Gl itl +r +� +1 q e0 Cl N 1+ ,� �„� „� � m � � � � +i V 10 t0 N C. t0 0 G. LL'C � 11i 0! �Y �0 U m i� � p V'0 k X � O W W w p m � a O m p.. 'NO „�j' m C m � O C p p' ,,,�j O O O 'O w a w p, ya O i�+ � 0 C 'Oy M 3+ t0 y C .� O W W 1� J� y y � O � � pa � q q m C y„� U '0 O O 0 N C O G C A U i� 1� M U y m � U � a 3 'tf m y W W H «i al A O m m m dl Ol QI dl cl � m+1 �+i M °> u a �,° o m � o m y w � b+ -., o m o 0 0,�, o ,[� v o+ s+ 'C N 3 a a t. C y N o N M f.� o � ro H � 41 CI p� 10 M y I tl + i � +/ 3 1 C l G i C I b i �-1 7 W m iJ V y� m y'~ •1 C f+ f+ V 01 �J .-� UJ f7 a a a a SL O. Z 7G .0 x f0 y C O m �0 m+i m'O U� 7 0 ao �+ m "{ r+ al .r Z � C �ro w ami a� U x '�tl v ,� ,i > v-:a .i .i x % �� m,� H � 7G m O O O m o W E � ++ V v ; � v .'i.. Av a�imm C " � +Ui m .�i t 7 C9 .-1 N 1'1 V N 10 P .-, o a..� ., a�+ s rno .io. c°�mM a 0 0 ,, --- ----- -- -- ----- -- ---- � 0 ..�-• - • -- -- - �"�� The reason for the firat variaace aad hardship ia to build a garage. We do not preaently have a garage on the property. The aize of the garage that we want to build ia 24 feet by 24 feet. It is not going to be attached. It is going to be built on the west aide of the house. The second variance and hardship ie to add on to the aecond floor of the house on the north end. It would cover the portion of the houae that present].y has a flat roof. We would like to build a bedroom and a bath. The houee presently has only one bathroom. 10.8 � VAR ��'92-1 1 !��, James Zirngible - ¢-, �.,>,[.. ' I? �tsA��- �.� �+ '� • • q ' - - �`-', � - - -,sr�is�`i,cr�=•---�';�`�"��--�ra - -�--� � ' „ . � < ' 7� � �,.'4•.. REVISED AUDITORS � -- 0 �,Q �.1 `. `� � � `- 3 �� `� �4 "' �z �`Qv � QQ � �� '�.c ti �� G• /� .s t«n a. :Ii � § v Q � � . zi �., � C /i.r. o�ri . F .0 -' ...p..a.��>ei�n..... ;i t'yfA 0 C) rn r�) � � p � 1 . ,� \ o..r rt�' ¢a. _' ' . �s e � a / Q .Z � m •\'n �se h� .-' �P...��,.n. �n nn' � Ri) N+) C«I N�J, FQ ! G \� � /�e� -/. � 3Cr) lr.� i��;an �a� �n i 4• 3� 2?qJl 3 � _ � � � ia�e -1�� sns ` 2��i'�i �� ao a. , � " Z,. (� � � . ...�. �°� W . 2 y � 9 � � ale , ,..� „..r' t,� AVE. " ` -. .. a�,v �� r` tl �` iw c ,.r • p u n ' . Ye r ri.. y ; .,�� 9qj�• �.v'� - Fi� ::,v,(� � I(� • , ;f03 e : � , a aa � Y .� r �u irs~ . �oo / .� � . �r . �J .� N Z � � °CKC .ln.� # �`/47) �0! `.ts QU i�Q (f,)• � \ e�aa �` s Q ss � "� ti � Z�`� :� � _ � �$�y, ��) w� ° 1�" ��> ' (�� : � �'�5 � � '` � SUB. N0. 103 3 � �� sa,A(�� `� g. � '�: ;"r ' 1 s /B (v) I� A i=� � � 0 7 (vl ; ' � in , � ° ,� ,, , . �u) •C3* , (r) ! f (�J e � 8 '6. ; i /7 u.e� o � ! •" : y _ Ctd : �, _ „ ^ � 9„ � sao.or) �6 (y) � (r� ` ; i ,` . iz(pI tw ln) ' �,.� c_ G') �� 3 � : ` � n.�� /.S �+i o�,.., � ll �� ' � s � u..n � � �.,, , o:l` e. ,.. (n � J . wr � 8 /Z(f�) �sJ �') �a.c 'i • a � (� �� !KJ s� �„� ��i /3��• \ �� a /4 /3 i2 � ii , /a y g \ � 4 � � r � � sz� ` aa iss✓ iar i� ��m P 14 ISSISSIPP�;�,, . '" ,i::. � ... � >. ' r ' �. ' 13 ` �4�n � o , . . . . . _ .. .� m , „ J, , r . . - " ;\ p ' 3 1 Y ^ � ' '- ' •��'� 9 �at � ...2 E�: -- - - 6fJ C�J � Gv . s U''��: ' \\ \ r is • zo + zi ; ; v > , . ,', , >'C�. . .'.. ��E -. � � -----1 , ; � ` ' � \ � , '.� 'YSE . • �� =�� '' � i �'' .s 1. . )� �� '; 4 �K � �:� o»�Cn)o. � � s�?. ... .,'n •s ° ,e�� C� \ � 3rrr, r r C . T�, �°�MM'� ��'��,� � , `,��►bd�� -.��1�0 a� �CITY OF " " COON RAPI03 � _ � � �, . u,>, �C�TY OF Ts.. �..-.'°: °'="�' � �. .. � :,P' M� RIOLEY ,r„�, ` EV (N�.��AUU v;vv U ��GO ;41 �� ,,,\ �� _,�,e , � a 'J .) 2 �' �` � � . '/�° +6• ; �,i.�« � ? �j" `� � a l�' _.. . �y,u 'om� � ; q . � h <o) � c t- - a 1 � ,u� 4s� ;, �� a,.,� �] e� �f 2 _ t" i� �. , z i a cfG.a i.w. � G� , G G Q�\ F� ``� �P. L. i�i', �� L1 D. ml�t nro"�°: _ <' �. ��d � � „IROyTqN , y _ .�;,-• r°� i{CH Ul � "�� 9 � . ='i � .t., . 3 � � Cn) (y) (b�: : ""��O) bi 'F h"J . '�p�� S •yy ' M,�. • ir. a • FA MON+ n (:v . � � �DJ � e' ' RU � ' "` � / � (u�"' " �S«� � %{ � '(" ~ (oJ CM �yi ' � r i "" , �1 � p z . , r✓ .� �� r ✓ � , Nn �aJ "�o .c�RC �, ,l� �, D� '� t..y `•• ln� ra� ;� N,� i�. ..•CIRCL.,. �3� i77 ' �e•' ra /H! � �(Ol ` ��Y �i 5: �4T � ' �0.2 24 n�p.' ..�� ,F ��:� ; .,,,, � �a"�""'rt)o a� d f�i�sU CAJ I CENTER SEC.3 � LOCATION MAP � � 1 , 1 , �. R' i _ , � , , . , ��, , •.�i-c� n / � . - L�� '`'�' ±� .,, ��'' " � � � �'� � �'�� r,;'} � � i, � �� .t.�;rl'�' � ��; � �� I � -G �' � !� 1 . ,��. .., �: -; :..� • .% ;; 0 ;� . . ... ,ff�, r � �ii.-� ��:[�.1 � �i v �: ,�iiii � u�i � - —�ui ..�. .• -- � , r� �� . � � ,.�i' .:•r�� /� /;��3 t~ .r»i=�s• �� 1 3- :.. � ��1 e . � � � � �; � O � �,�� T • + S + ir+ +"'' 6 k 4 �.� s l� sr 4 E�r � �� .� '1 Q ! ._ 7 �± � '� � � � � �'��', 1 �� ,� �� 22 VAR 4�'92- I 1 '�'�, James Zirngible � � � � � � � �T � � ;� � r'� � . � �g � ,! � � �, r"2 � s+ ....��n,�:�� , � .,� � �,.,,� �..� � . r"� �^;�' �� ;'; , � . 1 �� ,. � ;�, , . � � L� �� ' � � .�,�,.-� ..a . .�� w�� z� � �� .� �, ;�' . � K �;,, 1�i" E lf �� P 41 BERTY � � 7 Q Q �T ` `� � • �� • •.� �••. •.. Y �� , �� • �9 � ♦ . �a.� � •I��,� �'• -�, �'�� ti� ,,�,, ,� :�; _,.ls�_.., �� ,. �� ` k �� , 88 �•�•� �.�•�•�•• � � � • • • •�• • a�' Q `,1�� 6i ��;�:�:��• •�� • � fi, ♦ • 1� ` j ~ � �� 5�.�� }' �� • • • � g� .� �w1±�. b ' •9� �� -�� • 42 • � e.4 �. i__ ��'.�L__1 � »P�/��_ ��i/K�"� 10.3 ZONING MAP � � � � � o !'"�. A � �� {} .{}�}Q� � 6" c y � � N � /� i'"� i �I '� � 2' 5.0�� - � I � � � � d � p _ � s�Tl T I'��I 24 ' 0 .�DO" — VAR �t92-11 '� '�`. James .Zirngible • ' . ' �' Rear YarCl r� 0 Q� Co 0 i � � . • � � �. � � � � 0 � � 2 o � . _ � o _ . g° o � = a Q �--�-------- -------------------� . -�e- Street �5' Q.04�� 10.7 0 r ty ti � < � � � -< c� � � � SITE PLAN