AF-LS - 45641�/
. : . � . � , . . DOV-d45D .. ..
�it� o f �ridte� :
� .., :
. �-
� ` /WOKA COUNTY
,. .
!� 613i UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
CITI' COUNCIL
: RLANNIN6 :COP�IiSSION ;
ACTTON TATCEN NOTICE
Ronald C. Enroath - _
734D East River Road N.E. � '
Ff�idtey, Mn 55432
On ..:.. March 9, 197b , the Fridley City Councii '
official y approv t e recornnendation��.�s) of the PTann9ng Commiss�ion
an your request for '1ot sp7it, L.S; # 6-02 with the stipulations
listed 6elow. .
If you Rave any questions regarding tBe above actian, please call
the Coimiunity Devetop�nt Office at 571-3450.
SincereTy,
' rro L. B man _
JCB/de ity Planner ,
Stipulations:
1. An agreement must be signed to pay $1,506.75
for sewer and water hook-up for the new lot
before a building permit can be issued.
-�r,� /a `9 �-�i li`�u�/ ��-�—'
/
�
.,�. __ ,
. %}C'/ ��e,L �z� l�cQ . �� ;
� SUfUkGf ' � . •
c;�y ��f ��r•��i��,y � � �, .
� ;�A't"E'°' °F T"� T`"�"S � APPLICATION iTd BOARD OF APPEACS
. i �i _ � COMMUNITY OEVBLOPUENT DIV. ' ' � �
� r � �' � PpOTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. � . � . �
1 i
� � /""1 ��CITY MALI FHIDLEV � SSd3j NUUOEN RLV. DAiE �'�GF Of I.VV��OVEONY
4---�� �•' s�z-ssua�so g10-F23 1 3/21/75 1 2 800
Name ��� Address Phone
.�.y�� �. l C°Ii�i .57�-
Legal Lot No. Block No. Tract or Addn. �
Description . Z
Variance Request(s); including stated hardships (attach plat or survey of property j
showing building, variances, etc., where applicable) I
� i�//!/_��/L/'11:���—�i7 � � // ��_� ��7!'/-!.�I�
- /
Meeting Date ( Fee I Receipt I�lo. I SignatL�Z��^�.
s.- ��- �� iS vc �'UCo9� (�
Comnents & Recommendations by �-p�' �n
the Board of Appeals <5 -/�- �/� ' c_.�,(i,��,Z��7C, ___
City Council Action and Date
SUNJtGt
; � City of �� ricllcy APPLICATIOW TO BOARD OF APPEALS
�. AT iHE TOP UF THE TN/1NS
f
1 t
� � ' �� _ COMMUNITY DEVEIOPMENT DIV. �SLaiP Report)
r ��' i pROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC.
� �
�- ' �---t � CITY HALL FRIDLE� SSd�2 r+uuntn ��ev. onTfl rnce ov AVPHOVkU tlV
� ""1l.' •.�
612560-3<50 � 9]-O—F23 1 3�2�.��:5 2 2 80�
Staff Comments
� � /�� � List members,
Board members notified of ineeting by .Q' �� l R� �p
date notified, and "Yes" or "NO" for plans to attend hearing. Plan
. I Date �ITO Attend
Name
} I,�ne.;_�; �. � I �li. d, o I,n'„n _5_/D-�(,� UfS
S
Pearson making appeal and the following property owners having property within 200
feet notified: By Whom
'� � . Name -� I. �Date I Phone or Mail � Notified
�AJ .
' "
, ��
I�'�I�/� a�rlisi�L��I��=s_i,�±
�i ,_ , , . , • I � '���
' . � I �I� �
,� �� � �� � �
�
��'
� �d���z)
>t
\
NARVEY A. CARTWRIGHT � �f�����j��f���� �,��.�'�-. �€"����,�� �ONBtNING TNE w¢conos ar
AryOX11 COUN7Y SURV[YS Y���� V�� L�;���� �`'''`���� J. E. HiLl.. CIYIL EItiGINEER�
�//� p . tsi�BLIBX[O��uN
HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYS - � ��'� ��� S UR �jl� l V!t S C. �• SANQHO^F. ��
MtNN[AP0415 SVRVEYB � � . �
9410 PALM STRElT N.W. ��pEGiHTERCO UNU[R LAWB OF BTAT! OF MtNNZ50T11 CtVll ENGiM6ER
SVMl�T 4-i835 . PT60L19MG0 Ip� .
LIGEfiGSO. BY ORDiNANC4 Of� C7TY Oi M{NNEAGOl.15 �.
� owwcw � � JAMES NE��SOIV
� � 326 PLYMOUTH BUILbING � FEOena� H•B7Zi Sugverort ��
tNOU6TR�A� - Juo1C�qL ' HENNEPIN AT SIXTH • M114NEAPOLlS 3. IAIfJNE50TA " ��wevaweo .o:s �
&USINf55 � TOPOGRAPMICAL . � .. �NTyC OT�S �' CCIlIlLdi[ �� . . METROPOLtTAM LAND �
GTY�LOTS - iLATT1N6 Y . . . � � SURVFYORS, [s�NUSUm avav
Ci•IARLES Fb§i�6-02 by Ronald Enrooth 46Q--124 . '
� �1 �s a ei. _,�_,_.;F_'^i"'_ _ .. � � � } Rb H, � � - . .
, � . "� 3 ' . � . ��•� . . . .
�� ; . i I ktERE6Y GEtt?tFY TliRT TK I S
�
1
�
� _
S
�
�
3' ..
.
��
: ,�,
!m
? # �
a
, �
f� �
�
� �
1 �
,�
,
— -- �',:-�rq
�
iS A TRUE AE�B �BRREGT PLP,T
OF A SURVEX OF 7t[E.I:�EST �.S,L
�FEET d6 ��T ��B[.QCK� yUA1C
GREEK ADFiITtQN P'LRT � GtTY
a� ER4n��x,A�c��c� Cou�-rt�,
�lEit�EESC�'f1� AS 6fR�E B'! ME: T[i!:
�E 3TH ��Y C1F ..{!lC.Y � � 1�Q.
t _.�
F
� _
. ��
T
�_
/ �1.
S� ��
��. .
�? .
O
�
. . . . . . _ . - r.
! �i �
� � - . _ � . . � . _ t� _ 'Ti°' . . t �� .
�q
. � � � � 7. �?2 \t� �� .� � .
� � . . � . . � - �
. � t
. �6 •i�f �� .
t ;K " - �
; y i � `
,�.�.._�$�._ :---- --.. � __- -�____.___.._.__ _.__�..� �
. - ' . +�'ronr . :
f''� .:----... � ] � - • - .
G �. L.. -�_ . .. < < _ t. .? � �.�".� "
�,, � � � �. � � 't =�1 � . � .
� �. q d..... !i.!. . .
.�.�`f'�C�� .-! f:,�y L.�a�w.-fy��
- sfanro CARri/RIGFtT .wr.n GtSON -
�;: �.�.;� . ..�. � .� __ .__ . .
. � .�.,. ., > . .x:..a.�.�. ...�..W _ ,. �...—
� � � � . � � �DESIGN CHART FOR HANDWRITTEN FORMS. . � � �
TNH CM�PT GN E V[[O fOM OCf10NING �OPM$ TH�T �RL XAMOWRITIfN. 1LL PEYLRSE IPIMT SMOUL� YE INOIUT[0. �� SM�GIN4 �YM01FI11F 1GEAISI INlLVE RMCIL. W��(p}O6MT.. 1
(MWNTMWIClE1NOIGT[GWEX4CINO�PPROPPIA1LRpfM51�IN6X[EMONf�<COffORN. �IISPECIf1ULIpNSlLO WNCMIM4.PFPfON1T10X5 NUMBEP1X4ElL� �NOSPECIµ1M-
STRYCTIOMS SNOIILQ BE CR/.YN �IN RFU �Y[NC L I.LL OIMfP fOR T ES�GN 5✓(�UJ�� N BL�CM PEMCIL. iME PUUNG ON iwl'i fD9M M�Y YARY YEGVSE Uf iN[ CfiER Oi.11MOF ..
MFIIIC 01�NLFSONP�PER. T0�56UNE�LC11NI1iERCPM0YGT10ND C6av NIMTE�u�4'O, � �� . .
.. � � fONM XO 613E 1� U � �� PI�RT.�.Of .��V1PfS. %IEP�R[D ON IMi4R p yppE� 1101 .. .
F011M N.NE . . x . . . . . . . .
OPOF � .. .. . CUSTCMER NMIE� CVSipILP �YYPMIL . O�TC �
m �'-��--.r-� �� a . ...s....��..�� � ����.���f�,..����iiili.�.�.
_1.
.,�_� .; �...�-_,
�:__! : .
�a�;-i_"
__
.:.--�-. __.'..'_ �. 1
c+ l"'Y-� ` i�±7 � :T'-_'_�� i!-1 �� 1-Li '-+�-� r` r i F _�_ 7»'�. . 4+r -�' � -_ i:
-b _ -, { �-,�* y._- r r-.-. , � � � ' , _ i _� ,�
{ �iJ �._ -�-t+i-r ! r--�r-�+-- � ' � /� ,^ OrG - t . 1
: ��-�-i - r+ r �'� 1 t � f � i �' ^ � r � �
�- t � — L ._ ��-. �
1 _ -f' '- -'_t � �. � .. ` « . 1 � _ + F 1 � '
i
1 f � � � m �,.. ~- � � \ � _ � 1_ " _
V �. '� _ - � �:
� .
_ . , . .
t , V i .. \ �� �._ � :. .. . �-. � . "
.. � r �• " ...-� .. 1 - -- 1 ' ' ; - = �
- --1 Y i L� - I _ � _ _
, ._
� _ . �i- . .. . .
�, �— —g�
� � - = _-i - - '
.� �...�,_,. �
- � � �� /
� 1 .£ �x �_
�" - , ,� _.: , ; ` . " . _- � � -- _ ✓B{Gf�uLw
- - � ' �� - --- �_; '� -
- . . ---
_. .. _ _ -- �----r _ - � , �
' � -�---� --- ___ -
�;
. , - _�,�,�:1�j � - - ,-
-1 l - � I
l
� _ _ . i
_
� � r _
_ .>.r . . �� I L �. . » ��...
� ' ._ � - � - ` -- — �. .
� � 'J}
, _ � _ __ I _L��—y � _ _._ L . - - '-
. _ _ 1 __ � � __�— ) ` _
� ,
�_ -- --- � , ��;--, , � ,_ �.. _
_: e-w t- -�-r. - -
4 ' - -- 1 -
_ - r � :. - I - - � � ,- `- ..
-'r - � 1 _,_ � }�— _ -1 � �- - 1 -
_ y �� t . _ t t _� " ' ' ' _
L '- - I "�'�' `•"_ t t 1-i-_ ,' .. i _- T _ _..
_ .''. � ' .. J]. .'- - .. I- i
:' _ .. .- ." , ."._. ,-.-. `_4.' '_
_. _�_ _-�. � ..: + F , , . . '� .. �. . i ' .._-. .. ;�. _. _:.. . _ .-... . _ _ .-_
� � -''_ . . _.—'
.. , _;.i-_' " ', r'. . . .. _. . .. .._.:.. ... . .
_<-� .,_ . ' . , - _�-_ � ._
. _... ..._ . . . , , . .
._,. -�- f .Y� _ , � � . - __ . .. :. ._
, _ _..._._ __�-.���-r-f� t-F-T^Y -- I ..._ _�__ -, � _ -.,_.+- r .
���~l.r�r ��
� {_i _ �
y � _ -- �
Y�
`7_ I_I _ + _ 1 ` 1 __ ' .
-1 �. .� �_ 1 ..'. _.
� F #
L,-r �-1- ^^ � +
_�i '� !' �1_} � Lj � I � _ t
I � ��t
� + . � �-r -*-y ��.� � — -
� � �
� � t ' �—r}� fi � Y; ���-�'-'
t��F-� r i'1 'k_i'j�it.. �
� t {
��
i �. �` � ���I�f�T }I�i
� -�-� r , '����; } � - i_ �1i' _ �
, i� . . : �� - , � , '?- � �_�, �-
nie,�g r�`n
�' o
...�.� Y%
� �
� f. r
�
�o�.�f
w„y';,�"
��.
„��-.�..R-
-- ----- -
'�� ��,�c..�2-_usG j
�7 '
L T _ l I �F �i J t-
+
, I .l .. .> >. .
_ ,
,- �,T , ��T� ���
���' �-i- � � . _ ,
+ r r+ � '
��� t L ���. „ � i.. ' � ' �:
� -i-i t-�-7 � �" - � y�.� �--�.�i�
_-r7�t � . ; r '_i ��—,
L-'.
�
-. _,-.._.....--_
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY�
PUBLIC HEARING
BEE'ORE THE
APPEALS COMMISSIOPI
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley
will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M, on Tuesday, May 11,
1976 to consider the following matter:
A request for a variance of Section 205.053, 4A,
Fridley City Code, to reduce the front yard
sethaek from the required 35 feet to 29 feet, to
allow the construction of a house and garage to
be located on the East SS feet of Lot 1, Block l,
Oak Creek Addition Plat 2, the same being 109
Glen Creek Road N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. (Request
by Mr. Ron Enrooth, 7340 East River Road N.E.,
Fridley, n7n. 55432.)
Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter will be
heard at this meeting.
VIRGINIA WAHLBERG
CHAIRWOMAN
APPEALS COMMISSION
NOTE: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on all residential
variance requests unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors,
the City staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Board's decision.
If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council
through the Planning Commission with only a recommendation from the Appeals
Commission. �
May 10, 1976
To: The Fridley Appeals Commission
From: Ron Enrooth, 7340 East River Road, Fridley
Subject: Request for variance - front yard setback -
109 Glen Creek Road, Fridley.
A business trip for my employer (Honeywell) has made it
impossible for me to attend your meeting Tuesday night.
Please do not judge my absence as a lack of interest or
importance on the above subject matter.
A lot split, earlier this year, was approved by the
Planning Department and the City Council, conforming to
city regulations.
I have two reasons for requesting the setback variance:
1. To save Q�Me mature maple trees.
2. Provide a gradual setback in comparison
to the adjacent lots.
ie: the setback to the east is 23.2feet,
to the west 35 feet.
In addition to the setback, the city has a full 10 foot
easement from the lot line to the street.
I have discussed this setback variance with all the
neighbors within 100 feet of said property, without
objections.
I own the property to the east, Ben Ho to the south, and
Dean Coleman to the west. Please 5ee signed statements
from Mrs, Ho and Mr� Coleman.
Thank you for your consideration.
/ ,
- �%1
•w� ••
A
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
109 Glenn Creek Road
PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.053, 4A, front yard
setback of 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this section is to allow for off-street park-
ing without encroaching on the public right of way. Also the aesthetic
consideration of the neighborhood to reduce the 'building line of sight"
encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
B. STATED HARDSHIP: A 35 foot setback vrould involve the removal of one
additional tree, and a lesser setback would fit in better with existing
setbacks.
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Examina�ion of the lot shows that a 35 ft.
setback would in fact require the removal of one additional tree. The
house West of this lot has a 39 foot setback. The garage to the �t is
setback 23.2 feet from the front lot line, which is permissible because
it is situationed on a corner lot. This lot is the result of a recent
lot split by the owner to the �t, who is also the pe�itioner.
FM^/
Although an additional tree would be sacrificed to build with a 35 foot
setback, such a setback would not be out of order because the City Zoning
Code does allow for a 17.5 setback for a corner lot such as the lot to the
Bast, in this case. There is an 8 foot boulevard in this area, which would
give a 37 foot setback from the curb with a 29 foot setback.
° FRIDLEY APPEAIS COhII�fISSION MEETING OF MAY 11� 1976 - PAGE 5
MOTION b,y Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mrs. Gabel� to close the public hearing. Upon
a voice vote� all voting aye� the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Mr, Kemper� seconded by Mr. Plemel, to approve the request for variance
with the stipulation that a fire wall be required on the west side, Upon a voice
vote� all voting aye, tne motion carried unanimously.
Chairwoman Wahlberg explained to Mr. Gusta£son that his reouest had been approved
and he was free to apply £or his building permit,
,�5. A REQUEST FOR A V�TAid �' Or THE FRIDLEY CITY CO➢E AS FOLLOIdS:
� SECTIOPd 205.053� l�k� TO ?.EDIIC�' TH� r"RO.:T Y}?RD SFiB,�CK FROi•1 TIIE RF^UIF�.D 35 FEFT
FF.ET� "I'0 AiiO'r! THE COi�STRUCTI0P1 Or A HOUSF Atdll GAitAGr. TO BE I.00ATED ON THE
. L J�!' EAST 8$ FF.ET OF LOT 1� BLOCK 1, OAK C:2EEK ADDITION PLAT 2} THE SAA'�� BEING 10
��v� ,� FRIDLEY� t�1IiIIdESOTA. (REQUEST BY 1�R. RON EPIP.00TH, 73:i0
EAST RNER RQAD Py,. � FRIDLEY� I•iV. 55k3z)
MOTION b,y t�1r. Kemper� seconded by Airs. Gabel� to open the public hearing. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
ADn1IP;I6TR.1TIVfi ST9FF REPORT
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SS�VED BY R�!�UIR�•1ETdT: Section 205.053, LtA, £ront ,yard setback
of 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this section is to alloi�r for o£f-street parking .
witheut encroachin� on the public rigzt of *.•ra,y. Also the aesthetic consid-
eration of the neignborhood to reduce the "building line oF sight° encroachrient
into the neighbor's front yard.
B. STATED HARI)SHIP: A 35 foot setback urould involve the removal of one additional
tree� and a lesser setback v.ould £it in better with existing setbacks,
C, ADMIiIISTRATIVE ST.9r"F RBVIr:!: F�amination of the lot shows that a 35 foot
setbac'c tiaould in fact require the removal of one additional tree. The house
YJest o£ this lot has a 39 fooi setback. The garage to the East is setback
23.2 feet £rom the front lot line� :,rhich is permissible because it is situated
on a corner lot, ihis lot is the resuli of a recent lot split by the owner
to the East� zaho is also the petitioner.
Although an addi_tional tree Vrould be sacrificed to build with a 35 foot
setback, such a setback would not be out of order because the City Zoning
Code does alloFr for a 17.5 setback £or a corner lot such as the lot to the
East� in this, case. There is an 8 foot boulevard in this area� which would
give a 3% foot setback from the curb with a 29 foot setback.
Mrs. �rooth was at the meeting to represent her husband, who had been called away
on a business trip.
Chairvroman iJahlberg read the following letter to the Appeals Commission dated
May 10, 1976 from Mr. Ron Ehrooth:
5ubject: Request for variance - front yard setback - 109 Glen Creek Road�
Fridley.
.��,�.,,�T ,..
FRIDLEY APPEALS COM1•1ISSION h]EETIIIG OF MAY 11, 1976 - PAGE 6
A business trip for my employer (Honeywell) has made it impossible for
me to attend ,your meeting 'Ihesday night. Please do not judge my absence
as a lack of interest or importance on the above subject matter.
A lot split� earlier this ,year� was apnroved b,y the Planning Department
and the City Councila conforming to city regulations.
I have toro reasons £or requesting the setback variance:
1. To sav� one mature maple tree.
2. Provide a gradual setback in comparison to the adjacent lots,
i.e.: the setback to the east is 23,2 feet� to the west 35 feet.
In addition to the setback, the city ha.> a full 10 foot easement from the
lot line to the street.
I have discussed this setback variance i�rith all the neighoors :-rithin 100
feet of said property� laithout objecticns.
I oi�rn the property to the east� Ben Ho to the south� and Dean Colernan
to the laest. Please see signed statements trom I�1rs. Ho and i�irs. Coleman.
Thank you for your consideration.
MOTIOV by Mrs. Gabel� seconded b;� i•1:. Plemel� to receive the letter from �Lr. .
IIlrooth. • upori a vo:.ce vote� all voting av�, t.he -:ction r.zrri.ed unani;nousl,,�.
Chairwom3n [�?ahlberg said the surve,y shousd a 30 foot setback, and asked if this
was a change from the 29 foot setback. Mrs, r,-hrooth replied ,'r.e thought so, but
wasn't positive.
rir. Holden shot•?ed on the dra*rrino that b,y usin� the house plan sho:.�n�the trees
could b.e saved. Chairsroman i;ahlberg asked i£ there t,ras some doubt in their minds
as to the actual design oi the house� and i4rs. �irooth s?id the.y chose the side-
split to save the trees, and the plans :�:ere beina dra�m no�r,
Chairvrornan �dahlberg said that i£ there taas any taay they could �-rork out the plan
to go back even flzrther� that �rould be preferable� but 29 feet would be as close
as the,y could come if this zrariance is to be appreved. She asked if the living
area iaould be across the back of the house, and t•1rs. Ehrooth renlied it 4�rould,
Air. B�s�na asked if the back of the lot was on the creek� and Mrs. Ehrooth said
it.was not.
MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Kemper� to close the public hearing. Upon
a voice vote� all voting aye� the motion carried unanimously.
Mrs. Gabel commented that aesthetically this would be more pleasing� and she favored
saving the trees, She said she wouldn't have any objections.
MdTION by birs. Gabel� seconded by Mr. Barna� to grant the variance. Upon a voice
vote� a21 voting aye� the motion carried unanimousl,y.
Chairwoman Wahlberp, told Mrs. II�rooth that they could proceed with the construction.