AF-V - 45408� ,
� � ���� �� �������
� �T Tk� TfBP QP YH� TY�IN&
��...,
r`; L-------, GOkS�UPtITY D�V�l�EE7T DIV.
� � i pROY�.CYIVC{ W�'CTIGN QZ�°t;
�
�` � r.".4 � CIYY N�LL ��t191,�Y I�R�Q;32
i..a....J'�..� �.J ��3-6HQ^844�0
SI�d�C.Y
APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
Address
one
Legat Lot No. Block No. Tract or dditio
nes�. y'�"��/ � e �i� ��`�
Variance Requested (Attach plat or survey of property s owing location of praposed
building, etc., including adjoining properties and ownership within 200 feet of
sai property.) �J /J
�! // ° o D �D � DD.
_ /AaIiI �i y.. A._w � i • " ._ _ :l_ Jf _ _ . D� � i _ ` •
G
0
Meeting Date
- � �� '�'��y
Opinions and Recommendation �
by the �oard of Appeals �
For Above lteco�unendation
�?���.1.�
� <.����
����ri.z� �
City Council Action and Date
° �, �9���
r
Fee
���.o �
Receipt No.
�o����
Against Recommendations
/li./�_�
' 1 ` _., ���� �� �' H'8����
r��; AT Tk� Tt�P QF YwC Tl�IWS
� �
i +
� j L--"---� CO►AWIi►dITY D�VBl.�d�NT �IV.
f � � �'R�7ECYIVQ k�^�.'iCi1��Y ��Y,
�(, ' r.--� ; 6a7Y NEal6. P�I�L�V 4f��
L.....� � �.J �1�— 9630' 3 B�Q
IItY�J�CY
APPLICATIOfJ TO BOARD OF APPEALS
(Staff Report)
I 910-F23 j, 0 I 2/15/73 I Z 2 I 800
Commen�s by administrative official denying original request for building permit
or o�her permit. (To be completed by administrative ofi'icial. Appropriate Oxdinances
and sections of Ordinance to be cited.)
Board members notified of ineeting by �� ,� �/Cjo)
� date notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans �o a�tend hearing.
Nazne • I Date
�''� . r`^� ,
. List members,
Plan to Attend
�
Person ina.king appeal and the following propexty owners having property w ithin
200 feet notified;
Phone Notified B
Name �Date or Mail ( (Initial)
0
OFFTCIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLTC HEAStING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTTCE IS HEREBY GNIIV THAT the Board of Appeals of�the City of Fridley
will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday,
April 9, 1974 ta consider the following item: �
A request for a variance of Section 205.053, 1B,
Fridley City Code, to reduce the minimum lot
area from 7500 square feet (on a lot platted before
December 29, 1955) to 5500 squaxe feet, to allow
the construction of a dwelling to be located on
Lots 47 & 48,Block I, Riverview Heights, the same
being 546 Glencoe Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
(Request by Mr. Gordon R. Drake, 7226 Riverdale
Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota.)
Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter will
be heard at this meeting. ,
❑
�
WILLIAM A. DRIGANS
CHATRMAN �
BOARD OF APPEALS
0
�
r
1' � X
�
The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting of April 9,�1974 Page 2
2. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF 5ECTION 205.053, 1B, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE
MINIMUM LOT AREA FROM 7500 SQUARE FEET (ON A LOT PLATTED BEFORE DECEMBER 29, 1955)
' TO 5500 SQUARE FEET, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING TO BE LOCATED ON
LOTS 45 AND 46,�BLOCK I, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, THE SAME BEING 548 GLENCOE STREET N.E.,
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (RE UEST BY MR. GORDON R DRAKE, 7226 RIVERDALE ROAD, MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA.)
i
3. A REQUE5T FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.053, 1B, FRIDLEY CTTY CODE, TO REDUCE THE
MINIMUM LOT AREA FROM 7500 S UARE F�ET (ON A LOT PLATTED BEFORE DECEMBER 29, 1955)
TO 5500 SQUARE FEET, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING TO BE LOCATED ON LOTS
47 AND 48, BLOCK I, RIVEFVIEW HEIGHTS, THE SAME BEING 546 GLENCOE STR.�ET N.E.,
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY MR. GORDON R DRAKE, 7226 RIVERDALE ROAD, MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA.)
4. A REQUESZ' FOR A VARIANCE OF S�CTION 205.053, 1B, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE
MINIMUM LOT AREA FROM 7500 SQUARE FEET (ON A LOT PLATTED BEFORE DECEMBER 29, 195�)
TO 5500 SQUARE FEET, TO ALLOW 'PfTE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING TO BE L.�CATED ON LOTS
�9 AND 50, BLOCK I, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, THE SAME BEING 538 GLENCOE STREET N.E.,
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (RE9UEST BY MR. GORDON R. DRAKE, 7226 RIVERDALE ROAD, MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA.)
MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Plemel, to waive reading the public hearing notices.
Upon•a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. •
Mr. Drake was present to present his requests. Chairman Crawder fel� the Board
could consider all three requests together as the lots are adjacent to each
other and the same variance is being asked on all three.
Mr. Drake explained ti�ese are six 25 foot lots that he would like to divide into
three 50 foot building sites. Mr. Drake showed the Board drawings of houses
that he could posi.tion according to Code on a 50 foot lot.without other variances.
He said he has built houses on other similar lots on Glencoe Street that he
received lot area variances on. The drawings showed a 864 s.quare foot split entry
type dwelling, a 792 square foot split entry-attached garage type dwelling, and a
1056 square foot rambler type dwelling that Mr. Drake could construct on these
lots without other variances.
Mr. Drake said he does
area variances that he
four or five dwellings
own two other building sites on Glencoe that have lot
has not built on yet. He said they would like to build
this summer and fill up the neighborhood.
Chairman Crowder stated that since Mr. Drake has been before the Board before,
he has probably been asked this c�'uestion; why not divide the lots into two
building sites instead of three. Mr. Drake answered that it is a question of
economics. He said to build his house in the $27,000 range, the land cost has
to be quite low, otherwise, it is not economically feasible to build in this
area. He said for what the construction costs him, and to stay on a competitive
basis, you would have to build to large a house �'or the neighborhood if he had
to split the lots into two building sites. He said the neighborhood is basically
made up of 2 or 2� lots per site. He said the sewer lines are stubbed in on the
two lot building site basis.
� Chairman Crowder stated he understands then that the lots are flat so they are
buildable and he wondered if Mr: Drake had talked to any of the adjoining property
owners about his proposals. Mr. Drake stated there will be no problem in building
a,nice home iri this area, that will pay, and still improve the neighborhood. He
, ,. .
_ The Minutes of the Board of A eals Subcommittee Meetin of April 9, 1974
Page 3
said people tend to be better housekeepers when they have garages. He added he has
had personal conversations with the property owner to the east, Mr. Bixler, and he
had no objections to the construction. He said he felt the adjacent property owners
are interested in seeing the neighborhood fill up.
Chairman Crowder asked if there are buyers for these lots yet. Mr. Drake said
there are not but they are going to set them up for F.H.A. financing so they will
have that avenue to sell them on.
MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Plemel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice
vote, there being no nays, the motion carried.
Mrs. Gabel stated she could see no objection to the variance as the whole
neighborhood is macTe up of 50 foot building sites.
Mr. Plemel stated if.these lots were in other areas of Fridley, he would rather
see the lots split into two building sites, but this neighborhood has basically
small lots so he could see no objection.
Chairman Crowder said he had no objections as the variances would not be hurting
the neighborhood and Mr. Drake feels he qan build on the lots without any other
variances, .
MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Gabel, to recommend ta the City Council, approval
of the variances to reduce the lot area from 7500 square feet to 5500 square
feet for all three requests. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
carried unanimously.
5. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 214 055, 3, FRZDLEY SIGN ORDINANCE, TO INCREASE
THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA OF AN AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN FROM 36 S9UARE FEET TO 68
S UARE FEET, TO AI,LOW THE ERECTION OF At�T AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN TO BE LOCATED
ON LOTS 13 THRU 15, BLOCK 2, COMMERCE PARK ADDITION, THE SAME BEING ?362 UNIVERSITY
AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY SIGNCRAFTER'S, 13 - 77TH WAY N.E.,
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.)
MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Plemel, to waive reading the public hearing notice.
Upon a voice vote, there being no'nays, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Charles Peugh was present to present the request. Mr. Peugh.stated this sign
is for an office building which has a certain amount of names to put on the sign.
He said the main section of the sign, 3 feet x 12 feet, gives the name of the
building, and the one side section, 4 feet x 4 feet, is for the main tenant, and
the other side section, 4 feet x 4 feet, will be used to list the other tenants
in the building.
Mrs. Gabel asked how many other tenants they expect to have. Mr, Peugh answered
that they have allowed 10 lines on the sign as�there are 10 uni.ts to rent in the
building.
Chairman Crowder asked how they would cope with more tenants. Mr. Peugh answered
they would have to redo that section of the sign to make the letters smaller as
they don't intend to have any other 5igns. .
Chairman Crowder asked Mr. Mattson why the Code states two different sign sizes
for a free standing sign (48 square feet) and an area identification sign t36
square feet) in this zoning district. Mr. Mattson read aloud the Code discription
of an area identification sign and stated the question as to whether this sign
• A
/ •
�
��
1-i a) ••
RE'GULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1974 PAGE 4
MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Building Standards-
�esign Control Subcommittee Meeting of April 4,.1974. Seconded by Councilman
Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Ciebl declared the motion
carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MIfdUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF APRIL-9, 1974:
� �,e/ �
FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.103, 4, B1, FRIDLEY CITY CODE
.,
THE NORTH SIDE OF AN EXIST1fJG BUILDING, LOCATED ON TRACT D. REGISTERED
DL
The City Manager explained this request to be for the construction of a
covered walkway area to allow the customers at the Riverside Carwash to have
protection from the weather.
The City Manager said the Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the
request and the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee had also
recommended approval. He said if the Council concurs, the building permit
could be issued.
MUTION by Councilman Nee to approve the request to construct the �rotective
walkway as requested by Riverside Car,wash, 6520 East River Road N. E., and
that the building permit be issued. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
A REQUEST fOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.053,1B, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE
ER-
E
A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTIOfd 205.053,1B, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE
N
EY, MIPdNESOTA. (REQUEST BY t4R. GORDON R. DRAKE. 7226 RIVER-
The City Manager explained the request to be to reduce the minimum lot require-
ment from 7,500 square feet to 5,500 square feet to allow the construction of
dwellings on three locations. He said the plans call for one house with a
garage and tG��o without garages. He s,aid he hoped the contractor �rou]d consider
the addition of garages to the other t��ro planned home constructions. He
explained each o1 the three f�ouses would be built on two 25 foot lots. He
further explained there are no requirements that a garage be built with the
construction of the homes, but the recommendation of the City administration
would be that this is done at,the present time.
Mr. Gordon R. Drake, 7226 Riverdale Road, applicant, addressed the Council and
explained that the three homes ��rou1d be about the same in price, even though
one did have a garage. He said the•other two homes �aould be slightly larger.
He pointed out there }vould be enough area remaining to construct a detached
garage on the parcels for these two homes.
Councilman Utter asked ifi the placemert of the houses would be so that if at
a later date the home owner w��uld desire a garagc, would it be possible to
constrwt one. Mr. Drake e>:plained this provision had been taken care of hy
the requirements in the Code. He said it is required to allow space f�r the
G
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1974 PAGE 3 �
. �
' � e
:
MOTION by Councilman Nee to concur with the recommendations of the Building
Standards-Design Control Subcommittee and approve the request by Safetran ;
Systems, Corporation to construct an addition on to the present building
for the storage of materials at 4650 Main Street with the three stipulations
of the subcommittee. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
IDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION ON TO THE' PR
1
Mayor Liebl explained the Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the
request with four stipulations. He read the stipulations aloud to the Council
and audience.
The City Manager asked if there is a representative from Woodcrest Baptist
Church present and there was no response. He said there are some questions
concerning this request. �le explained this a�as to be a large expansion to
the present building and there �mould be a drainage problem. He said there
has been and could be a problem �•�ith the banks vrashing out. He said the
second concern is'the dedicaiion of a walkway-bikeway easement. He said he
would recommend approval of the request �aith the Administration working out the
aforementioned problems with the applicant.
Mayor Liebl asked if the questions presented in the statement by the City Manager
would be presented in the form of stipulations number five and six. The City
Manager recommended this be done.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the i°equest for the constructioi� of an
addition to the existing structure at 6875 University Avenue N. E., by Woodcrest
Baptist Church with the fourt stipulations recommended by the subcommittee
and adding the following stipulations:
5. That a drainage plan be submitted to the City.
6. That an easement for a walkway-bikeway be granted to the City.
7. That protective measures be taken so that no terrain is washed
into the creek during the construction period.
Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl
declared the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW EUILDING FOR THE USE AS A PRECISION
Mayor Liebl said the subcommittee had recommended approval of the request with
five stipulations. He said this request had been unanimously approved by the
subcommittee. •
The City Manager said the City did have some plans of the proposed construction
and asked the Assistant Engineer to point out the landscaping plan to the Council.
The AssistanL Engineer said the construction would be in East Ranch Estates.
He poirited out the landscaping plan indicating this included some berming.
Councilman Breider asked how much area the construction would occupy. The City
Manager said this would be one lot.
Mayor Liebl asked�if all of the requirements for building and zoning were
being met and the City Manager said they were.
Councilman Breider asked if this construction would be in a platted area, and
the City Manager said yes.
MUTION by Councilman Breider to concur with the recommendations of i:he Building
Standards-Design Control Subcorrenittee and grant approval of the construction as
requested by Graham Testers, to be at 78�0 Ranchers Road with the five stipula-
tions as recommended by the Subconnnittee. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried
unanimously. ._
�4�
� i
f• REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1974
PAG E 5
driveway and garage and this had been done. He said the homes would be
approximately 1,000 square feet and the plans would allow the construction
of a one and a half size garage also. �
Councilman Nee asked if ii would be'possible to build a double garage at
these two locations. Mr. Drake answered it could be built, but it would be
almost impossible with the limited radius to gain access to both stalls of
the garage. He explained with this size lot a smaller size would be more
feasible and would provide for one car and adequate storage area.
The City Manager said the Code does require off-street parking area on a hard
surface driveway. He explained the variance would allow the construction on a
smaller area.than required in the City. He further explained with the total
parcel of land planned for the development of three structures, it•is the
normal circumstance to provide two homes. He commented, maybe, the Council
should request the contractor to add the garages on all three locations.
Mayor Liebl said this would provide a greater density than in other residential
areas, but would conform to the constructions in this area. He said he would
'recommend the request be approved because the construction of the $29,000 ,
homes would be an asset to this area. He added, he would encourage the
applicant to install a garage on all three parcels.
Mr. Drake said the plans for construction are not firm plans; they could be
changed. It ►oould be possible to construct smaller homes with the addition
of the garages. He said as planned at the present time, al1 of Lhe homes would
have hard surface draves and some would have garages. Mr. Drake stated two of
.the lots are 50 feet wide and one is 62'Z feet wide.
Mayor Liebl asked the Ward Councilman, Councilman Pdee, how he felt about the
request. Councilman Vee said he agreed with the suggestions of the City Manager
in that garages should be added, but he 4aould recommend installation of double
garages. Mr. Drake again stated it would be physically possible to install
the double garages, but it would be very difficult to get into them.
Councilman Nee'asked what amount of additional money would have to be put into
the house price if the garages t�ere added. Mr. Drake replied this would be
from $2,500 to $3,000.
MOTION by Councilman Nee to concur with the recommendation of the Board of
Appeals and approve the variances as requested by htr. Gordon Drake, for 548
Glencoe Street, N.E., 546 Glencoe Street N. E., and 538 Glencoe Street N. E.,
to reduce the minimum lot requirement from 7,500 square feet tfl 5,500 square
feet. Seconded by Councilman Utter for discussion purposes. .
Councilman Utter asked if it would be possible to rel�cate the pians for the
homes using the plan for abutting driveways, this way allowing more usable space
and area for a larger garaye. He said both of the drives would be together and
not located next to the other's bedroom �,�indows.
i�r. Drake said the plans he �vas presenting at the present meeting were just plans
and they were not concre�te. tie said the plan for placement could be changed.
He said it would be difficult to put in attached garages, Uut he wou7d try to
install the single detached garages wherever possible. •
Councilman Sta�°walt asked if a hard surface driveway would be installed. The
City Manager said this would have to be done and this has been provided for
by' ordinance. T;;c Cii:y I�anager said he ��ould like the plans to call for the
best possible type of construction and he �vould work with the applicant for
the change in plans for the most feasible positioning of the proposed const-
ruction. '
UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye,:iayor Liebl decl•ared the motion Earried
unanimously.
A REQUEST FOi; A VARIANCE OF�SECTION 214.(155� 3, FRIDLEY SIGN ORQINANCE. TO
E
,_
�r�, u,v �v�� �.� iru<u i5, �;�ocr; z, co:k
IVCRSI(Y AVENUE iJ, i:., FRIDLEY, iiIPJ�d[
t:�,�Y W. E_. Furnt r-v_ idfNfdFCf1TG�—
140TION by Councilman Utter to concur with the recommendation of the Qoard of
T0
i���� c ,
<
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 75, 1974 PAGE 6 �
Ap,�eals with ti�eir suggested stipu]ation that no additional sign be placed on
the building at 7362 University, and approve the variance for the maximum area
of an area identification sign from 36 square feet to 68 square feet as requested
by Signcrafters. Scconded by Councilman Starwal't. upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Liebl.declared the motion carried unanimously.
N REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.135 1, E3, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO RFDUCE
THE OFF-S�REET PARt;IIJG SET�ACK P;EX� TO A LOT LIP;E, FROP1 5 FEE7 TO 4.5 FEET TO
A LOW OFF STREET PAFKIIdG IN TF{E REP,R YARD, FOR TNE 6UILDING TO 13E COtdSTRUCTED ON
LOTS 8, 9, 10, AfdD 11 BLOCI: 1, Oida41AV ADDITIOid, THE ShPIE 6EIIvG 7839 P�1AIN STREET
N. E., FRIDLEY, ��1INNESOTA. RE(IUEST BY PACO, Ir1CORPORA ED, 5920 KIRKWOOD LANE
NORTH, i1I"iINEAF'OLIS, MINNESOTA 55442 :
MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the request for a variance to reduce
the off-st�reet parking setback next to a lot line, from 5 feet to 4.5 feet to
allow off-street parking in the rear yard, as requested by Paco Inc., for
7839 P1ain Street N. E. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote,
a71 voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously.
, MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the minutes ofi the Board of Appeals Meeting
of March 25, 1974. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting
. aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. •
Councilman Utter asked the Chairman if it would be possible to go on to item number
' � 24 on the agenda, because there were many people present who would 7ike to hear the
action without waiting �hrough the entire meeting. P4ayor Liebl said this would be
possib7e. ' '
CO(JSIUERATION CF APPROVAL OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RICE CREEK ESTATES PLAT
GOODCO, I;dC. ANU �IUTHORIZATION OF APPROVAL OF FIRST PHASE OF TF{E PLAT:
Mayor Leibl asked if there wereany objection to moving this item up on the agenda.
� There was no response. -
The City Manager said it Vaould not be possible to take care of the westerly portion
of the plat because a problem in obtaining clear tit7e to the property had occurred,
but it wou7d be possible to approve the Phase I portion of the plat as indicated
in the agenda.
The City Manager explained that the representatives of Goodco, Inc, and the City
had met and came to an agreement which was submitted to the Council in thsir agenda
folders.
The Assistant Engineer pointed out the portions of the plat which would be platted
at the present time. He said i;his wou7d only include those lots on Benjamin and 61st.
Ile stated the City would obtain a temporary easement from the developer at the end
of 61st Stt,eet for the maintenance of the area and the turning of the maintenance
equipmen�t. He said there would be no additional develo�mcnt of improvements at this
time, this would only be done on the existing roadways.
The City Manager continued to explain i:hat the Parh an� Recreation Commission had
requested i:hat additional property be a c�uired for park in this area. Fle explained
that within the agreemeni:, there had been some provisions for the acquisition of
additional area for park purposes and this would be at an estimated cost of $8,756.
He said this would be at 35� per square foo�. He explained the City would tal<e
care of all area and fron�age assessmen�:s for the walkvaay between the park and
Briarwood Road. He said the Ci�y would provide utilities �o the plat when completed
and the benefited property owners vaould be assessed.
ihe City P1anager further enplained that all of the'affected property o�aners had been
notified as provided for at the previous Council meeting. He pointed out that the
Thielmann sec�ion of the plat would be lefit until the prublems in this area had
been solved. He cominented the development of the ar-ea wquld be staged to follow
a three s�age plan.
f�layor Liebl asked if the Phase I developinent would be implemented immediately with
the remainder of the development being done in the future. The City Manager said
yes.
Mayor Liebl questioned if the letter of no�ice that the Council v�ould be taking some
actiQn on the plat had been seni: to a11 the affected property owi�ers and the City
Manager said yes.
,. _ . r. ,„ _
_,
- ,�
.- .� � . -. :
,�x . . =:; ,� :
, ., • .
� � .: .,. � _� ; ..
> , ,. , ,..�;f, -
_, . _ . .
, E _.
_, � .. ,
. . �-Y : .� •. . �: ..
. . � . . , �� ... . . - . .. � .
_ .. �_. " . . _ . � .
- . . � � . .. . . . ,�;`f ':-�. .
, _. .. _ .. . . � '::.r..�� . , . .. " ���. .
- . � .,.� . . _..,.�"°.+�,o� _ . . . ,. „ , �� .. .:.
;�. , : }', �'-. . . .v-..��. ....s.-., u-. �..'
, , � . � .. _. . ,.... ,:� . .
� .. . . ':c . - � . . .. . .. _ .
� � Y g - . � ' . . � . � � �� ,. . �
.
- ..- - , - -. � '
` , a.. .:".,:. . -_ . . . .
o+.�w` - - .. �. . . . _ .. � . .
,
.� .. .. .. �. � , - _ . .
� . t.., �, . . . .. . ..: - � �:
,> ,_. ,. .: . �. .-� , . . . . --.:: � '. , -
, . . _ . . . . . . . � . . - ' . . . �.,� � - - � .
� . . . . .. . . - . � _ _ .
4 .. ..� , . . - . . � _ -
� ' ,
I . _,. . . . .. _ ;- ,. . .
,�- ... . . .- . „'� ,:
: -. ; ' . .. ' � � , . . :. : ; -..�. � � . , .. - .. ..., , . , .
t
� � � � ' .. � � . . '. '� '
, . �'��,� � �°r � . - �. - � � ' .
' , . ry`y`■ s
: �. . . 11111��1�11� . .. , _
� "�. • , . ` '....� '� . . ,.r �.. . . . . . . . .
_ ' '� � � � � � x. � .
. . . . .. . . � . _ .
�Y��� ..� . . � ' n K --9` � . " ' _
, , . . y�
_ . .. .._ .,, . .
y ,
t - . .. ,� . . .. _>. �� � .:... _. .
'� . � , . : ,.,. -
. _��: .., .... .�: ,•. _ ..:�
.�. _ . . ,. :;; .�. s ...... . -� . :.. . .. :, , __ �. ,. . �- .... � � . ��
���^�� � �-� ��" � "��� � ,r���1���� � �
�, � �:�� �'- � �° _
� � -� R:
I ` � � �.� � '�� �� '�� �������������j 4 f_�'- ,
I ,: _
, - : --� �y
s
{ _ ' ' i� , .; < i� �� � . .. c7 , r S'L"' _ . . _
(- � � . . -. ��� �`' j .
, -. . .. :. � ., ..,
_ ���� �« �. _ 3
.
.�
.. . �
, _ -.,
.
,
__. � _�_ �
.. _ � _
.� : ,
. � � - �` �
- �, � . '� � � � � ` i
.�� ` � .�. � — . -
, , ; . <. `' :-
V ; � -w`�
. ._ „' �_• � 6 - -� �C. t 3 .
�. �
.+, «_" . � � TiY�,Y �[ ' �' .w- . ' . . � �_ -•� . .. _ _ S .
?- �< .j �f Ss - �:' .- � � ' ' ' � 5 �. i
y '� t � a - . � � � - ��'-p: � � . '
� � - r �,:} � �' . �. � � i � ,� � � �.I
- � `:: � _ � �yq-F.Yt . . _ . . . , . al
�;�s. �, * � i ��� � �,`�* r. � � � � ; � � � : � � �
,. - . , •. � ` T`'�,_..� - '
�_ .. � . �
.. . . . . . - . �
,< ,- ;. , . . . . .
. . , . � --. �.. . . - . .
_ ... ^a�s,
. , . __ - `�
_ _.
, ' - ' � . �' -
J . _ _. . . � ., ., '° ,
- : �
�� � 7
�=� i
_ � � - _z _�
_ �
�;� :�
:�. �. �: y t 4 , , �
_ :_ - _ . ,�.� >>,
� . t x,
_ Y _ ,,
� '� ' F � . . � . . . � � �� `�, , ?-I
�°
� . . . - . . .. . � . ". � .•�
. . .. � ,.� , ..
. . . . . ..-. . . _
.� ' . : ' ' . . :� ... .. ..
. M1 ^_ . . . :_ : . . -: ._. ;
. ., a' .. � � . , . . . .�1
>. ,
' sa
_ .
-�_
, a..
�
.,...-_,� , . , �
� '� �
h.�` `iiv-i �n:.fcr .i . �� . � - . . . " � - . . ..
_.R' ? . ' � .. � .. ' . . � .
.
..: _ � . . " . . - - . +il!+1�
. ... � . ' .. . . .
.:_ �...._.�_ . . '�%
� _
. w.:s._x. ., ..'.' ... ...: � •..r-s.-.-�R'.'. . .<.-i . . .. . . . .. . .. -