The URL can be used to link to this page

AF-V - 45281STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of: Owner: �-�-. Variance, VAR #98-35 Kelly Ann Wolf � �y� 3d -,� � —a �-�o�� APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 9th day of December , 1998, on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 14 feet 7%Z inches to allow the continuance of an existing deck on Lot 1, Block 3, Parkview Manor, generally located at 5869 Hackmann Avenue N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approved with no stipulations. See Appeals Commission minutes dated December 9, 1998. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. . �'"� � IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the /�- day of , 19�. � DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley ��« �, �y ��g 6431 University Avenue N.E. �- , �'��` ""�'�'`��'+ `'` ° .,�4t�. Fridley, MN 55432 Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk �. :'�� f ''. �� `�j� � �� , ,. , , y �� . , �r� ^ - • � Y P� � i�� A�� y� p x�� ['�i 1[r E^�E �'. �I � � � 1 � • � 'ti, 6' � r�s -� � . .�' ' ` � : �.w'l � !s � Q � . f �t� +(�: C',': i ,�1�'a �e P� .,,R �r a�t V�/'�� c / � �� _/►k�� e'� �m . s �Ie♦ R "; �'' 1 ��_ � �, . A?t��ti� ;��. Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and shall be considered void if not used within that period. � n �, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1998 PAGE 15 same time, he cannot approve �r recommend approval of a 50-foot high, 200 square foot sign. What the solution should e he did not know. Dr. Vos stated the City Council w�l have to make that decision. Mr. Pelstring stated he thought th Commission could now appreciate what they have been through. They have had a n mber of conversations and appreciated the comments in terms of recognition of the hards ip situation. He would be more than happy to sit down with City staff and the City Co ncil to find out what options would work best for the City and for them. They see a situa n where they cannof work with the existing ordinance. He did not think a rooftop sign was adequate. He was not sure how that helps the commission's discussion. ey will try to cooperate. They have laid out the issues and the problems, and want to esolve it. They are concemed about negotiating publicly and/or coming back with a se nd request. Mr. Kuechle stated the Commission's denial. The commission is not in a pc Dr. Vos stated the Commission does Council. i is to recommend approval or to recommend to negotiate. the option to make a recommendation to Ciiy MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Jon s, to deny Variance Request, VAR #98-34, by Spikers Grille and Beachclub, to increas the size of a sign from 80 square feet to 200 square feet; and to increase the maximum h ight of a sign from 25 feet to 50 feet; and to place a free-standing sign on an entry drivew y rather than the code requirements locating the sign 10 feet from any driveway or roperty line; to allow the construction of a free-standing pylon sign on Lots 3& 4, A& R ddition, generally located at 7651 Central Avenue. I�PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CH IRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Kuechle stated the City Council would conside this request on January 4, 1999. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Mau, to re mmend to the City Council to investigate a creative solution to the hardship as off red by the Petitioner in Variance Request, VAR #98-34, by whatever means possible ven if it requires setting a precedent. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRP RSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #98-35 BY KELLI' WOLF: Per Section 205.04.06.A.(3) of the F�dl�y Zoning Code, to increa�� the allowable � � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1998 PAGE 16 encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 14 feet 71/2 inches to allow the continuance of an existing deck on Lot 1, Block 3, Parkview Manor, generally located at s 869 Hackmann Avenue. � MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, GHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:48 P.M. Mr. Bolin stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 14 feet 71/2 inches to allow the continuance of an existing deck at 3869 Hackmann Avenue. Mr. Bolin stated the code allows an encroachment of 10 feet into the rear yard setback f�P the construction of an open deck. The property is located on a comer lot at the intersection of Hackmann Avenue and Hackmann Circle. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family. The properties to the.north are zoned R-1. To the east is a playground zoned P, Public Facilities. To the south and vvest is also R-1, Single Family, zoning. Mr. Bolin stated the home was built in 1958. There was an addition to the home built in 1966. That is all that is on file for zoning and land use actions. Mr. Bolin stated the petitioner has indicated on the hardship statement that the deck was professionally built and has been in place for flve years. Removing the deck would create a financial hardship as well as decrease the aesthetics of the home. Mr. Bolin stated the deck was built without a permit. The building inspector looked at the deck in November. He stated the deck looke� as though it was well constructed; however, he was not able to view the footings at that time. Mr. Bolin stated similar requests have been granted in the past. Because the request is within previously granted variances, staff has no recommendation. Mr. Kuechle stated he was curious as to what triggered this request or to know why it is here now. Mr. Hickok stated the Ciiy recently undertook a project to survey all of the parks. As a result of that, they have found some interesting things. In one case, they found a sa4ella�� dish installed off of the private property and in the park. In this particular case, it was a chain link fence that had been installed into the park approximately 17 feet. In making � determination as to how to solve that issue, st�ff recognized that the fence was not th� only issue. There was a deck built without a permit that encroached into the setback. Also in 1966, the addition to the house was constructed without a variance although $�� "'� ��, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 9, 1998 PAGE 17 rear yard setback is deficient. That building addition did have a building permit however. The deck is the issue which they are asking to rectify. The fence has been removed. Dr. Vos stated that in looking at the site, the lot depth appears to be 100 feet. It must be a square lot about 100 feet by 100 feet. The house is set back about 37 feet so they are already iwo feet back. Then with the house, they could not put anything in the back yard. They would have a 5-foot deck without encroaching. Mr. Wolf stated he is probably responsible for the problem they are having at this time. Dr. Vos identfied the problem that there are not many spots to build a deck and have a deck you would like to spend some time on. He designed the deck. He is a mechanical engineer and built the deck. He did not realize this needed to have a permit. There is a unique history in that this lot had a row of trees back where the fence line is set 17 feet into the park. Before they built the deck, there were many trees there. They had grown up wild in the back. When they contacted the City at that time about getting some of those trees removed, the City response was that those were the owners trees and they could do with them what they wanted. The neighbors' fences were also set back. He did not do a survey when he did the deck. It appeared that, if those were their trees, it was a ways from the back of the lot. If you Iook at the site, there really was no other site to build a deck that one could use. Mr. Wolf stated the deck is well constructed. It is treated 2 x 10's on 16-inch centers with 9 footings on the deck. They are set down to frost level. The deck is constructed such that to reduce it would make it unusable and would destroy it. Even though economics are not considered a reason for a hardship, it would be a hardship for his daughter to destroy that deck. It has been there for five years. The structure speaks for itself. It has not settled or heaved in that time. Mra Kuechle asked the petitioner how long they have owned the house. Mr. Wolf stated the house was originally owned by his wife's sister who died �#0 10 yea�s ago. They then purchased the house for their.daughter, Kelly. It has been in the family for about 25 years. Mr. Kuechle stated he is curious about how that fence got to be where it was. Mr. Wolf stated that as an offshoot of that tree scenario, his daughter wanted to put up a 4-foot fence to keep the kids off the street. Ms. Wolf stated she called the City when that was done and was told to follow the existing posts. The City installed the fence on the park property and that has also been moved. Mr. Wolf stated on the diagram is the diagonal fence which goes from Ms. Wolfs proper� to the neighbors property and onto the park property to the fence fhat was put in by the City. They put in their fence from th�t comer out to the street and dvhi�h encompassed ,� � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, DECEAVIBER 9, 1998 PAGE 18 the trees which they thought were a part of the property. The fence has been taken down. The ordinance was developed to protect the neighboring properties. The neighboring property here is the park. Ms. Ruwart stated she is a neighbor who came in to support the request. The deck is very nice. The lot is very small. She thought it would be nice if the variance is approvedo M T ON by Mr. Jones, seconded by Dr. Vos, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLAIZE� THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:02 P.M. Ms. Mau stated she understood the hardship. There is not much the petitioner can do �now that the deck is there. It would be a hardship to tear it down. It seems there was a misunderstanding as to where the property line was. She can see how it could happen. She would recommend approval. Mr. Kuechle concurred. He thought building without a permit is inexcusable. Even if they had applied for the permit, the deck probably would have ended up there anyway because it would not have been considered an encroachment on the backyard setback. Because the fence indicated that is where they thought the lot line was, they would have been issued a permit until the Cit�r started looking at the parks and the boundaries. There is no indication that the petitioner deliberately changed that. He would recommend approval. Dr. Vos stated he understands the petitioner's problem. He lives next to a park and he does not know where the lot line is. He can understand how this could happen. He visited the site and could not determine the location of the lot line. He would concur v�ith the variance request. Mr. Jones stated he drove by the s�te. His first reactio� was that he cou�ld not see a problem. If this had come up for a permit, they likely would have looked at the fenc� line and the lot line. If we had known where the lot line was, would we have given them a variance? He would have voted to approve it. A 5-foot deck is not adequate. From th�$ standpoint, he agrees there should have been a building permit. He would vote in favor of the request and would not make them take it down. OTI N by Mr. Jones, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve Variance Request, VAR #9�-��, by Kelly Wolf, to increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback frorv� �� feet to 14 feet 7 1/2 inches to allow the continuance of an existing deck on Lot 1, �locl� �e Parkview Manor, generally located at 5869 Hackmann Avenue. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DEC�� THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ABSTRACT ,...� Receipt #�� b�` � i � ❑ Certified Copy Date Mail�d DatelTime: � / � �� r ❑ Tax Liens / Releases Doc. Order � of � ❑ Multi-Co Doc Tax Pd ✓ by: Pins: Recordability / Delqs: �2�'� O ❑ Transfer ❑ New Desc. Filing Fees: � �' � ❑ Division ❑ GAC Well Certificate ❑ Status ❑ Def. Spec Received this Date: Anoka County Recorder ❑ Other No Change Notes: 0 � DOCUMENTNO. 1429278.0 ABSTRACT ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FlLED IN THIS OFFlCE FOR RECORD ON �Y 14 19 9 9 pT 5: O O PM AND WAS DULY RECORDED. FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $19 . 5 O pAID. ReceiPrNO. 1999056684 EDWARD M. TRESKA ANOKA COUNIYPROPERIYTAX ADM/NISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES RP ev DEPUIYPROPffl7YTAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR Of TITLES , . . , � � _ GiY OF FRIDLEY r-., FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CEIYTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. 1�1.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 � � 11ll. � � •l ��.. 1� � _ December 14, 1998 Kelly Wolf 5869 Hackmann Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Wolf: On December 9, 1998, the Fridley Appeals Commission officialiy approved your request for a variance, VAR #98-35, to increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 14 feet 7'/2 inches to allow the continuance of an ebsting deck on Lot 1. Block 3, Parkview Manor, generally located at 5869 Hackmann Avenue. You have one year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3599. Hickok / ina Coordinator SH:Is Please review the above action, sign below, and retum the original to the City of Fridley Planning Department by December 31. 1998. Concur with action taken. /''� � City of Fridley Land Use Application VAR-98-35 December 9, 1998 GENERAL INFORMATION Kelly Wolf 5869 Hackmann Ave. Fridley, NIN 55432 Requested Action: Variance Purpose: To increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback, to allow the continuance of an existi.ng deck. Existing Zoning: Residential - 1 Location: 5869 Hackmann Ave. Size: App. 10,000 square feet .23 acres Existing Land Use: Single Family Home Surrounding Land Use & Zoni.ng: N: Single Family & R-1 E: Playground & P S: Single Family & R-1 W: Single Family & R-1 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Consistent with Plan Zoning Ordinance Conformance: Section 205.04.06.A.(3) allows a 10 foot encroachment into the rear yard setback for the construction of open decks. Zoning History: Zoned R-1, home built 1958, Addition to home 1966. Legal Description of Property: Lot l, Block 3, Parkview Manor SPECIAL INFORMATION Council Action: N/A Public Utilities: Home is connected. Transportation: Home is located on the corner of Hackmann Ave. and Hackmann Circle. Physical Characteristics: Lot is well landscaped and contains the home, garage, deck, and other building. SUNIlVIARY OF PROJECT Kelly Wolf, properiy owner, is seeking to increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10' to 14' 7%2". SUNIMARY OF HARDSHIP "The deck is professionally built and has been in place for S years. It would create a fznancial haYdship as well as decYease the esthetics of the home. " (Full letter attached) SUMMARY OF ANALYSI5 City Staff has no recommendation due to the fact that this Yequest is within a previously g�anted dinZension. VAR 96-02 6496 Riverview Terrace Encroachment increased to 12', and setback red.uced to 26' for construction of a deck. VAR 98-16 10 Rice Creek Way Reaz yazd setback red.uced from 31.25' to 13' for construction of a three-season porch. 5taff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin �"\ ,� VAR-98-35 HARDSHIP STATEMENT "An employee from the City of Fridley was out to my house and showed me where to run my fence and gave me permission fo remove trees along that line because they were `my' trees. Therefore the assumption was made that was the lot line. Based upon that information we built the deck, knowing it was well within any possible setback and we built it at the most logical location on the lot. The deck was built by ourse/ves and didn't realize a permit was necessary if a builder was not involved. 1 have applied for a permit and would request your help in resolving this issue. The deck is professionally built and has been in place for 5 years. It would create a financia/ hardship as well as decrease the esthefics of the home. The deck is on mu/tip/e concrete footings that are below the frost line, 48" deep and are flared at the bottom. Because of the design, the deck could not be reduced in size without destroying the entire deck The construction is primarily of cedar and represents a substanfial investment that 1 cou/d not afford to /ose. � Kelly Wolf ANALYSIS Section 205.04.06.A.(3) allows a 10' encroachment into the rear yard setback for the construction of open decks. The petitioner is requesting a variance to increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10' to 14' 7'/2 ", thus decreasing the rear yard open space 15' to 10' 4'/2" to allow the continuance of an existing deck. . Building Inspection staff inspected the deck on November 17, 1998 and noted that the deck appeared to be well constructed. An "after the fact" building permit was issued for the deck on November 13,1998. RECOMMENDATIONS City Staff has no recommendation due to the fact that this request is within a previously granted dimension. Approved variances similar to this request include: VAR 96-02 6496 Riverview Terra.ce Encroachment increased to 12', and setback reduced to 26' for constntction of a deck. VAR 98-16 10 Rice Creek Way Rear yard setback reduced from 31.25' to 13' for construction of a three-season porch. �"� �"'�, CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO: Property owners within 350 feet of 5869 Hackmann Avenue CASE NUMBER: VAR #98-35 APPLICANT: Kelly Wolf 5869 Hackmann Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Petitioner or representative must attend the Appeals Commission meeting. PURPOSE: Per Section 205.04.06.A.(3), to increase the allowable encroachment into the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 14 feet 7%2 inches to allow the continuance of an existing deck. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 5869 Hackmann Avenue LEGAL Fridley, MN 55432 DESCR/PTION: Lot 1, Block 3, Parkview Manor DATE AND TIME OF Appeals Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, December 9,1998, 7:30 p.m. The Appeals Commission meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 35. PLACE OF HEARING: Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers, 6431 University Avenue HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432, or fax at 571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMMODATIONS: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than December 2, 1998. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 572-3599. Mailing Date: November 25, 1998 ^ r _ _ CI�iYOF F'RIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITYAVE. 1V.E. ERIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 November 23, 1998 Ms. Kelly Wolf 5869 Hackmann Ave. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Woif: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99� local govemment units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 days if their variance applications are complete. We received an application for a variance on November 13. 1998. This letter serves to inform you that your application is compiete. Your variance application hearing, discussion, and action will take place at the City of Fridley Appeals Commission Meefing on December 9, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Paul Bolin Planning Assistant PB C-98-227 /"'�, ,�, � � ��' � , /� � / / � �� J , , l � � � � �/ �v . � � � � �, , � �; � �� , � � � , � / i` � ' / � , i / � ' � . �► � � � / � �, � . � � / � � � ,�/ � � / i � i , 1 � i � � . � '� `:/� � � � //. i � � I / ,_ ` � :� �r f ��` � �, , i- / 0 , � � � � � � �• I i � � �r "� � " .i �i � ,� ,r � � ' ��. �1 � � � � � ..� - � � . / �'j� Jj' /t � / � � � i � /. �;. / � .,� . � � %� �� , � � / � �/ �� /� '� d � � � �, � � � i � / � � • �' / l y, � � ,_ � � . � � �, � , , � �-- - _ ,_.__, __.,. __ _._� �_ _ � - _ - _ _ _ ��.e _ - - _ - _ _ .�%- - _---- �"� crnr oF Fwo��r 6431 UNNERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 /�'\ (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: Residential _ CommerciaUlndustrial Signs �ROPERTY I OR TIO ��- site plan Address: � Property Identification Number. � Legal Description: Lot � Block � for submittal, see attached TracUAddition : . . . _ _ .. _.- r _. , r, 6 � � � I , ' /' . � /. i l�:1��'�- - • • = , .�%/ _%� �' �� -- Have you operated business in a city which required a business license? Yes No � If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes ' No � }►V/YMM1V�r�V V/ViV�VArrVN�VAr�V�VMA/�VAr�V�V/rNwp�V�V�V�VAI�VtiwrM�V�V�vArN�V�V�4r�YINWNiVAr�V/V�VNw�VAriV�VAr�V�VA/tiw�/V�V FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract p r asers: F wners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME: � JqDDRES : ' DAYTIME PHONE: - '�SIGNATURE/DA� PETITIONER INFORMATION � ' " NAME: � ADDRESS: • bAYTIME PHONE:\ • S�IGNATURE/ TE: ��a�� Section of City Code: FEES � Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, or signs: Fee: .$60.00 for residential properties: Receipt #: �'�� Received By: Ap'lication Number. "/� � � Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: l o� --�1— �'1 �° Scheduled City Council Date: 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: / � l� � 0 � � � � � � � � U � O � � � � � � O � •� ■ � � � � L�. U ■ � � oa � . � � ��....� a ■ �� a� .r � a� J C Y y � lp F-- � c ° `o � � Q � m° 0 `, m m fl. ,n 'c o� Q H 0 •y C y m � m OO Cf � � � ------------------- � m >> �, cayE UQp ScQ �. Q- c� 'c � UQ � -nn°�� d � N rn � � 'a� J '°"� C m � o �U N V O� H C C Q •y OC C � �Q ,�y-�• � . � � � N �-� y__________ � " .a cV0 j a� a �� _ �m��m � m � y H �+ E .. N M E Q' N t0 C� � N = V C� CQ-0 �� O o c � �- E � �� H o c e�o Q•� c° a� N Cj Z ��" �� c m E m a»�acrN�Uc� o � c� o � •n � m ;Q Q Q � . o 'a� .m c�c � � _ � o' W n� o c Qp U°�n o . _ � e a to------------ � _ �m ti ¢ � ^ �"� � ' N� 132226 INSPECTION REPORT `� ' CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA � (612) 572-3604 . ADDRESS �% �(/ OWNER BUILDER DATE .� PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION � a � �:�.H t�! ��/1/m i�ilT .�iLii �� - , / 0 INSPECTION RE�ORT DATE REPORT � �� / l .�.� � � -�. �� _ �: � ��/ � � l•'�. .� � �. 1 it no corrections are ustea aoove, approvai nereoy g�ven io proceea. rou wm oe m violation of the ordinance if you do not call for the proper inspections and make corrections as called tor. . Q 0 � OQUIST LE ROY E& BARBARA C 1011 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FREDRICKSON JOSEPH & CHERYL 1041 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BERG LAWRENCE J 8� GERALDINE 1080 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 OVA GORDON L& LOIS E 1104 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 KUCERA DORETTA V 5834 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 GERRETY COLIN T 5842 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 5850 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SKALLET DARRYL G 5858 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 GRENDLER SALLY J 5866 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 COX DARON L 1021 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MCLAUGHLIN JOAN I H 1050 GARDENA AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 OVERACKER TERRY 8 GINA ?088 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 NYBO CHERYL L 1612 BERNE CIR MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 HEDLUND RICHARD C & LORAYE 5835 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 THAYER JOHN D& KRISTIN S 5843 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PINEAULT JAMES J 8� CAROL E 5851 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MORGAN GAYLE L 5859 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 OTTERNESS DUANE A 5867 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 ^ NYHOLM PAUL J 8 LORI A 1031 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 HAGEL MICHAEL A 1060 GARDENA AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 LANGSETH JAMES R& THEA A 1096 HACKMANN CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 GARDNER GREGORY J 5829 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 RUWART THOMAS M& KARA L 5837 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BJORKLUND TREVOR K 5845 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 O'NEILL EMMITT R& JOYCE L 5853 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SOMMERS KERMIT A 8� KAREN J 5861 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WOLF KELLY ANN 5869 HACKMANN AVE fVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 TOWNSEND ROBERT J 8� M A JERMANOUS ANTOUN K& HAYAT J RINGHOFER JAMES 8� KIMBERLY 5874 HACKMANN AVE NE 5875 CENTRAL AVE NE 5882 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 i'� CURRENT RESIDENT 5887 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 HESS WILLIAM H 8 NANCY M 5895 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 HOLLES GERALD 8� SANDRA 5906 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 AUDETfE DOUGLAS A SR 5917 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 Bad Address 1 FRIDLEY, MN 0 FRIDLEY CITY OF Bad Address 4 FRIDLEY, MN 0 ROGGENBUCK VERNON E & JANET 5889 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 TONY GEORGE H 8 REGINA M 5898 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WHITE ROBERT F& SHIRLEY J 5909 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 TONCO WILLIAM R& BARBARA L 5925 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY CITY OF Bad Address 2 FRIDLEY, MN 0 FRIDLEY CITY OF Bad Address 5 FRIDLEY, MN 0 /� BURKE STEVEN L& PAMELA N 5890 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 ODEN JOHN L& DOROTHY M 5899 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MCGLONE CAROLYN J 5914 HACKMANN AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 JOHNSON & LUTGEN INC 8111 60TH AVE N NEW HOPE, MN 55428 FRIDLEY CITY OF Bad Address 3 FRIDLEY, MN 0 � ---- - -- - -- - -- -- -------------- ----- , i � i I` t i I I � . : R I I � I � N c0 I I r� �� "y '� �� -� � I i �I i I � I i � i i i i � City of Fridley $ �� s � � � � J �� k � :rara � \ / / � z W � w � � s �� $ � � � 0 R-1 - One Farrily Units 0 R-2 - Two Famity Urvts � R3 - General Multipe Urrts � R� - nnoa� � � � a,� - Ranned u�it oeveJoFx„e�,t � S1 - Hyde Pak Neighboriioods � S2 - RedEVeJoprnert Distrid Oc,-�a,g� 0 a2 - c�,� a�� G3 - Ger�al Shopping � GR1- General Office Community Development Department Variance Notification � �� ,�. �� 11:� . : .. .• � - � �� I I I I I � m�,� mmmm mmm .�..,E�,.,, �-_�..--_ o �, -� �� nM2 - r�y i�,d�a;� � NE3 - Qitdoor �rtensiNe �-Imvy �ndustrial 0 P - wa� F�irt� ��i� Variance Request, VAR 98 - 35 �� i�,c �� 5869 Hackmann Ave. v� r-�� Kelly Wolf �� .,,..• ,,..:,; �I��_ � �� E F � N �� Fridley Plaming Fridley GIS a� c«rny as Arbka Couny Assessing