The URL can be used to link to this page

AF - 9749• Cit of Fridle Minn• Y Y� BUILDING PERMIT N° 4192 Date : .................. ./........:..".- ....-: ..��../...._�........ �..n .l........_...�..---- ...-� --........ Owner: ......... ...........................................................................................:................. Builder .... ................ .... . .... .._.��!� ..,�i......y..._��!_.. `�.:.'�_..... Address........................................................�-----............_........---�--•-----------.._....--•�-------.. Addre� .... ........_...._...... .........._ .........................�---•--....._......._....................---•--••---......._.... LOCATIO OF BUILDING r , No. ...� �..5� ........... Street .. .... .. :....� -� - �- -- - .......... .. ,. ........................... Pa f Lot ..........--�----........- ------...--•--............ ... ..........._ ............._..._ � Lot ._.......��_........ .. Biock .....__...�..� ......._ .................... Addition or Sub-Division ........�... .. . . .. .............:._p� �� Corner Lot Sewer Elevation To be Used as: �-�*�.��1-�... f/ Type of Construction Inside Lot ................... � .......... Setback ............................................. Sideyard --...-.--... -...-- - ........ -� - ......... - -- � Foundation Elevation -- .........._. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING a •• � -y ' `- �/�% �//T Front ��..�_Z� Depth��.." � Height ..�.�_. � Sq. Ft. ./... .1.......:Q Cu. Ft. ...__.,(....v v Front ..............._.._... Depth ....__---...--- Height �._._.__... Sq. F't. ................_...... Cu. Ft. .............................._..-_._.. Est. Cost.��.��..'-'.'......... To be Completed ..........:................ In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agree to do the proposed wo�k in accordance with the description above set fo th and in compli ce with all provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. ...... ".........--�-----�--��---�--��* -.......��,�.�'�-� .._�C:' ..... .....- - . .................. .. In consideration of the payment of a fee of $ ...... ...:........................ permit is hereby granted to.............................................._..........._.. ....._ .................................................................... ta construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, emp2oyees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall confarm in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. �,. �- Building Inspector NoricE: This permif does nof eover the consfruefion, inslallafion for wiring, plumbing, gas heafing, zewer or waMr. M sure fo � the Building lnspeelo� for separsfe permits for fhese items. � , , _�. , . � � - ,�„ ,. " -f � ,»„ . « �= ._...._.._.�._._,.. � l�ii� �� "�"�. S17F; ''�] � X °� � i ,F ; ' ♦ .- N S�Oa� �s /� � ��v�T� -�l�s � ° �.�a,�e.. ADD. TYPE Property I►iue �/�l�fl1� I� l4A+ Atr i# i►�V ��+/+� � �i►V �! !'�. W ♦ 1► � /�O tI � � F� t t s fA�l C!L' �t t i' A s /ti'i � I►� 4 . � l�M� s'/' � !' !�! f,�A�!" �� t , � � Fr�at ED T'f3T L�1B � ; r # k f� � 2p (� d� k� � . � � � � ti ,� ,. I� �� .........� ....................._........_................................_.....:.......{ ' • � � ,�r�`7�-j Caty of Fridley, Minn. N•° 826 $ BUILDING PERMIT Da�: ��July 26, 1965 Oar�er: !�PEY JOHNSOI� Builder _ CAR3SON & KING.y�.__.�.__._._ ,p,d� __136 Iiori2or� Cirele _ A� �7�2 River 3.ane Y_�. F'ridley, Minnegota Auoka, Mi.ruiesota LOCATION OF BUILDING xo. �_ 136 ._._.. s�t �?�IZON CiRCLE ____ .__..._..___.___.. p�t oi Lot _ Lot ._.._.. __..___ Block _..._ _........._� Additian or Sub-Division ..�.�.._.._� Corner Lot �__....__..__ Inside Lot _._.._._..� Setback ..�__._.��_.__ Sideyard Sewer Ele�vatioz► .�.._.� ._�. .._�.� Foundati� Elevatioa DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To t� v�a �: _._.. _ Frant _..._ DePth _. Height __..._.._.._. Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft — ._._. �oat __.______ Depth _.._ Height �.._._.____ Sq. Ft _ Cu. F� Type of Construction _._.. Es� Coat �,rL(30.00..__......_ To be C�npleted __.._. REPAIRS — STGRM D�A'IAGE In cu�sideration of the 3ssuance to me of a permit to construct the building described abave, I agree to do th� proposed work in acoordance with the d�scriplioa abave set forth and in compliance wlth all proviaions o� a�rdinattces oi the city of Frfdley. `' /�✓ � �-� � ,�s In caosideratiaai of the payment of a fee ot $ 10.00 , permit is herel,�y Sranted to _��VEi JOHNSON to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is Sran'Ceci uposi the exprc+�s conditi� that the person to whom it is granted and lus agents, employees and workmen, in all work doae fn, around and uP� said building, or anyp�t thereof, shall conforra in all respects to the ordinances o� FridleY. Minnesflta regarding lacation, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair aad moving of bufl wlo��e dty litt�its and this per�niit may be revoked a t ar�y tune upoz� violation of any of the proviaions of�d AI.LEN G. dSNSEN 8��8 � NOTICE: , fhk p�tt doa � eowr fh� eonaroalloy �ios fa wk1��, pl�pnbieo. Ya h�sltn�, nwu er wN�r. d� wn fo w IfM luildfny Ieq�elor for s�p�a� P�nnits for fha� iN�ns. APP'LICATION FOR BiTILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNSSOTA OWi�ER'S NAMI� � 'vZ�� ,� ��_ BUILDE��d`L,..r�-� r- ' - ` ADDRESS Y . �� 2�� .� r. ��.i . c.�� s�'„QipDRESS ��2-vC�,:.`:., �-�-�- ,� - _ . . � ' �' -��--�-Y . LOCATI,ON �OF BUILDING No. �� '��,�-,ti �,�:., „�� Street Part of Lot LOT BLOCR ADDITION OR SUBDSVISION Corner Lot`�Iu�ide LOT�,"Setback . Side-Y�rd ,. ;.. SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATI� EiEVATiOiQ : Applicant attach tt► this fo�ai Two Gertificates o� Surv+ey af Lot at�d proposed building locatiorf drawn on tl�ege Certif�caCe�. - . . DESCRIPt�ON OF. BUiLDING :: . To be used ast ' Front Depth Height .� Sq. Ft. Cu._Ft. ,' �, t - . . : . Frcmt Depth ^_ Height �� J Sq.:Ft. _ Cu. Ft. y l �'/,_i✓.��5[� S.L.(�-� . �. � i" ,^� �' . i_i � ��T � Yy/� n�A.s.. 11 f/ ' .. �ype ,af Conists�iction • "'�t�i�, ,.�; � � I ~ i ted Cos�S, .��'�^:�, i"�" � � � � . . 'To�be campieted ' The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work her+�i� epeciiied, ,agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of,Fridley Ordinancea and rulinge of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that.all the facts aad representations stated in this appZication are true and correct. �� % �`i-d-'''"' � �J-�-v"`�" _ `'��,:.c�C�!``z..�a DATE � 2,� �.� � SIGNAI`tTRE �Cz --r�� J/ , .. . ,–_—=�.—_T ,..._�.– (Schedule of Fee Coats can be found on the Reverse Side). � �i� • � . , .� � \� �1 ! ♦ 4 BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE SBC'rION Z. The Inspector of Bui,ldings shall, be�ore issuing any permit for the erection of any bui�d�ng or atructure, or for eny addition to any existing build- ing or structure, or for anq alteratioas or repairs to any exisCing building or strucCure, upon application therefore, require the payment by the applicant for such permit of fess to the amount herein below set forth and in the manner hereia provided to-wit; 2.1. For any such permit for the erection of any fire-proof buildiag, other than a garage, warehouse, factory or grain elevator, or for the erection o� any fire-proof addition, for similar occupancy, to any existing building, shall be at the rate of $1.40 for each one thousand cubic feet, or fXaction thereof, in such cubical cantents. " � 2.2. For any auch permit for the erection of any fire-groof garage, Warehouse, factory or grain elevator, or for the erectio� of any fire-proof additioa, for similar ocCnpancy, to any existing buildi�4g sha1l be at the rate of $1.25 for each ane thousand cubic feet, classified as "fireproof" by Section 502 of the Minneapolis Buildin� Code. HOUSBS 2.3. For any such parmit for the erection of any non•fireproof building, other than a garage, warehouse, factory or grain elevator, or any nan-fi�reproof addition, for similar occupancy, to aay existing building - permit $1.D0 for each one thousand cubic feet. GARAGES �� 2�,4. For any such permit for the erectioa of any non-fireproof garage, warehouse, factory or grain elevator, or for the erection of any non-fireproof addition, for similar occupancy, to any existin� building or for each such building or addition - ainety cents ($0.90) for each one thousand cubic feet or fraction thereof, in the cubical contents thereof with t,he minimum of $4.00. For the p�rpose of c�nputirig fees for building permit�, the cubical coatents of any building or additioa to a uniforan height throughout by multiplying the ground area covered from a poiat six (6) inches below the floor iine of the basement or cellar to the average height of the upper surface or to the average height of the roof surface of the main gable of a pitched roof. 2.5, For repairs or alterations to an existing structure, the fee sha11 be at the rate of $3.00 per each Five Hundred Dollars ($SOO.QO) or fraction thereof in the coat of all propoaed work. 2.6. in no case shall the f�e charged for any permit as set forth in Section 2 be less than $4.00. • �" '.. • �. � ..� • � , ... ` r� U • City of Fridley, Minn. BUILDING PERMIT nate: ._.. August 11, 1965 �od�� N° 8352 �r: _ Harvey Johnson � B�aer �_ Carlson & King Builders Add�ss �� 136 Horizon Circle � __ � Ad� �_ 7�12 River Lane _� Fridley� Minnesota Anoka, Minne�ota LOCATION OF BUILDING No. . 136._.� Street HCffiIZODT CIRCI.E _._.._.._......_._..__._._...._._..._ Part o! �.ot .. Lot ._..__�.�_—__ Block _�`._ Corner Lot _______._.._ Inside Lot Sewer IIevatioa Addition or Sub-Division _—_� —. Setback �.._._.____�_ Sideyard _ Foundation Elevation _ _ DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be vaea as: Det. Garage 20 22 10 !�0 ls1,�00 ._.. Front _._..�._.. DePth ___._._._.. Height .__._.�_. Sq. Ft. .�.. Gtt. Ft ____...._�...._ Froat _w.. Depth ....._______ I�eight _.._.._._____ Sq. F� Cu. Fk Type of Construction 1''rame _�.. Es� Cost r.�1�3�•00 _....._ To be Completed _._ Itt co�sideration of tY►e issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agr�ee to do the proposed work in accordance with the d8scription above set forth and in compliance wi all pravisions � ordinanoes oi the dty of Frfdley. C�� ' l/" In cc�sideration of the payment of a fee o! S_� �._..._�, permit is herebY granted 'to CARSSQN & SI11�r BUII�ERS to canstruct the building or addition as described above. Thispe rmit is granted upon the express c�dition that theperson to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work doae in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinancea afi Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and �►ovin8 of bufldinga within the dty limits and this permit may be nevoked at any time upoa violation of any of the prov3siona of said ordinancea AIS�EN G. JENSEN B� � NOTICE: 7f�is p�emit do�s ne1 eewr fM eons�eueNoe, �Nen fsr wteinY. Pw�W Y� �Y. � or wat�r. d� swr to s» fh� Wildieo imp�elsr fer apwt� pwn�tls fer f6w it�s. � �: . :� APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRID�LEY, MINNSSOTA _. ,OWNEIt' S NAME ��-Z�,��i�� /1- x.Q,U7Z BVIiDE�t ��C��,�,,,�� -�% �.,,, , _... � __. � ADDR$SS,1S� ��.., � ` ? ADDRESS� S�Z.,��•��r%s.,�. � !¢� � , LOCATION .OF BtIILbING • � . . No. � �� ,� .� � ��,,-�:Street . Part of Lo � LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION � _ . Corner Lot . Inside L��Setback Side-Yard SEWER ELEVATION` ' FOUNDATIO�t ELEVATION : Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. � , . . � nESCRiPTI�I Ofi BUILDING ' . 2 U rX 2 2•/� , f ... . , " �y - T� be used as: �� .Z�y v , . Front _�.�,� Depth � � Hefght _ � . � . . . . . . Sq. Ft . y ��► � � Cu. gt � cz/� 0 _ G � . . . . . � . . . s .. . s . .� . . . r.• . gront ' DeptR ' tieight�, . .�� . �� . . Sq.. Ft. � . Cu. Ft. . : . +_ . . T�pe of Cpztstructioni �� 22 , �� "�� etimated Cos�*/.;3 c�-�-; oYr To,. be cosnpleted � l. � � � � ' , � . � The undersigned hereby makes &pplication for a permit�for the work herein spectfied, agreeing�to do all work in strict accordance with the City of�Fridley Ordiaancea and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby decl�rea that all the facta and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE (Scheaule ot Fee Coats can be found on Che Reverse Side). ��. . .. . . .A � . �( � v � . . r SUILDI1dG PERMIT FEB 3CHEDLI�.E SECTION 2. The Inspectv�' of Bui].dings sh��1,,I��fore is�uing any permit for the erecCion of any build ng or structure, o� fd� any gddition to any existing build- ing or structurc, d� �or any alterations or repairs to any existiag building or stxucture, upon applichtion therefore, require the paymgnt bq.tha applicent for su�h permit of fees to"the amourit lierein�below set�forth and°in the manner herein pYOVided t0��t� 2.1. For any such permiC for the erection of any fire-proof building, other than a garage, warehouse, factosy or grain elevator, or for the erection. of any fire-proof addition, for similar occupancy, to any existing building, sha11. be at the rate of $1.40 for each one thoda�nd cubic feet� or tr�ction thereof, in such cubical contents. --� '� - . _ ;.�_ ... . . __ .. --_--�_..�-.-�- �-__.�.,.'.`�`��y'-,�ii�� 3��`� � ��e erection of aby �ire-pr�# garage, Warehouae, factory or grain elevator, or for the erection of any fire-proof addition, far similar occupancy, to any existing buildiag aha1l be at the rate of $1,25 for each oae rhousand cubic feet, classified as "fireproof" by Section 542 of the Minneapolis Building Code. HOIISBS 2,�,3. For any such permit far the erection of any non•fireproof bu3lding, other than a garage, warehouse, factory or grain elevator, or any mm�-fi�e$roof addition, for simi#ar c�ccup�a�cy, to any existing bt�iiding - permit $1.00 for each oue thousand cubic feet. -GARAGBS . . .._..�_ 2.4� For any such permiC for the erection of any non-fireproof garage, warehouse, factory or g�cain elevator, or for the erection of any non-fireproof addition, for similar occupancy, to any existing building or for each such buiZding or addition - ninety cents ($0.90) for each aue thousand cubic feet or fractfon thereof, in the cubical contents thereof with the minimum of $4.00. For �he p�pose of computin� fees !'�r �bui'l�9ing permits, the cubical contents of any building or addition to e uniform heig�t throt�ghout by maltiplying the ground area� _aovered fro� a polt�t..�r'�6�' �niizie� '�eZow �``ie `floor line of the basement or cellar to the average height of the upper surface or to the average height of the roof surface of the �in gable of a pitched roof. 2.5. For repairs or alterations to an existing structure, the fee ahall be at the rate of $3.00 per each Five Hundred Dollars �$500.00) or fraction thereof in the cost of all propoaed work. 2.6. In no cas� shall �he t�e ch�rged for any permit as set forth in Sec�on� 2 be �ess th'an _$�.�"1: � � , �- �� .. . . � � .,. . . ,� • sua�ECr PERMIT N.O-:- ""1 City of Fridley _ 17 315 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS g U I L D I N G P E R M I T f ; � RECEI . � i v_____ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. ' r � � PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. // � �3 ' � /'��1 � CITY HALL FRIDLEY � 55432 NUMBER �REV. DATE PAGE OF� � APPROVED.BY � : »��.i`.i �.J 612-571-3450 9�0-F�5 11/1/83 � � JOB ADDRESS 136 Horiaon Circle N. E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 12 3 Carlson" s Summit Manor North. Addn . SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Harvey Johnsari 136 Horizon � Circle N. E. 572-1017 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADORESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Miltron L. Johnson 2513 Central Avenue N.E. 781-9548 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK O NEW ❑ ADDITION � ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Aluminum siding and trim 9 CHANGEQFUSEFROM TO STIPULATIONS TVPE OP CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTI�ATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZpNING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONEO FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE ANO CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED c� WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $S�OOO y2.SO DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE pERMITFEE SACCHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OT ST TE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERF R E OF CONSTRUCTION. y�SO. SO PLAN CHECKFEE TOTALFEE I� .3 $53.00 SGNATUR c N7aa To ORAUTHOAIZEDAGENT i n7E� WHEN PROPEfiLY LIDATED THIS IS VOUR P RMIT - . . L � � SiGNATUREOFOWNEFl�IFOWNERBU�LDER1 � IDATEI BLDG INSP �A CITY Or FItIDLCY /+f'PLIC/171a� FOft RCSIDL'i�Tl/'.� BUILQIi;G P�F2;�iITS (f�ch•�, Alterations, Additions� or Rc�airs) �� O��NER: ��4- 2U` � y �lo /i n� s d.� nasrESS: �.3 ��.; z.a a C� e�l� TELkO: 5%�/0/� � • STTiIxT t10: STltEF.T: Effective Aug, l, 1981 � �. ✓o ,�,F � s d -J t3UILDER: f��- �� nnn��ss: as� 3 C'rw T,e.�� ,�� .Jg- TEL 110: ��-ys� � Construction Location IA7': BLOC�C: ADAITIO:l : Corner Lot: Znside Lot: _ Setback: Sideyazds: ]�p�liceu�t attach to tl�is form t�.�o Certificates of S1�rvcy of lot and pzopo�ed building location drawn on certifi�cates to scale. OESCRIPTIO�� OF C0�lSTF:�JCT10N Front: Depth : Heiqht: Squarc Yee�: t�bic Feet: Front: De�th: Heigl�t: Square Fe�t: Cvbic Fee�: �- i��pe of Cor,struction : U �ia i o` /iLi�n.i, Zb Be Q�r.�pleted: rvo �C �-Z.-�.,� —T e-o� - EstimaCed Cost: $ ��O-�a Alt. A Alt. B Proposed Drivc�:ay hidth If New Opening Is Desired: $ S S�� Pi.VF:FLL' SIDE OF S}JEET 9iie undersianed hereb:� mal;c:� a�plic�lticn for a pernit fcz the �:ork he-ein specified, agreein3 to �.all �.ork ir, strict accozci3nce yith the Ci�y of I'ridley Ozdi»ances e,id rulii�� of the De��artme��t. of IIui:c3ings, and hereby decl�res thnt all t1�e f�cts and repre�c� �itiens stated in this applic�tion aze true and c-r t. D.`.TG: � / �3 SIC�1ATLl,'�.,.: ' '` � ._.__ Stil�ulali ns: �' �� - S� �3_�b � _ . . r �- _y„ . The Chief Building Official shall, Defore issuing permits for the erection of any building or atructure� or for any addition to any existing building or atructure or for any alteratioa or repairs to any ezistiag buildiag or atructure, upon application therefore, reQuire Lbe payaent by tDe applicant for auch pe�it of fees to the amount herein below aet lorLb and in LDe aanner berein provided to-xit: SQtal 7aluation =1.00 to =500.00 ees ;10.00 (Minimum =15.00) =501 to ;2�000.00 . =10.00 for the fir�t =500 plua =1.50 for each sdditional =100 or fraction thereof, to and including =2,000 =2,001 to =25�000 =25,001 to ;50,000 =32•50 for the first =2�000 plus =6.00 for each additional =1�000 or Praetion thereoP, to and inclpdiag =25,000 �170.SO for the tirat =25�000 plua =�.50 for each additional =1,000 or fraetion thereof� to and including =50�000 =50,001 to =100�000 =283.00 for the first =50, 000 plus =3.00 tor each additional =1,000 or fraction thereof� to and including =100�000 =100,001 and up tk33.00 for the �2•50 for each fraction thereof Plan Cbeck: 25 percent of building permit fee. first ;100,000 plus additional �1,000 or Driveva� Depres�ion Eacrox: Concrete curb atreets only. Alternate •A": Removal and replacement of curb and gutter only - Driveway width plus 6 feet times =13.50 Alternate ■8": Removal and replacement of curb and gutter and install a 3 foot wide approach With 6 inch depth - DriveWay width plus 6 feet times =15.T5 4erification Ot FouB¢�� Peraits tor eonstruction vill be iaaued a minimum of 2� houra lrom the Li�e of application to allorr tor proper revie�r ot tbe proposed atructure aad of tDe construction aite. ♦ Certificate of Survey of tbe lot, aboving the 2ocation of the toundation oace it bas been constructed vill be requfred Defore oroeeedina vith the framing. ..� . • � %�-- ,' %� ' � < < . ' , r�� _ �v.p Zp : Jock Rc�bertson, C�muni.tY D�rel-�nent Administrator MEND F1�JM: Darrel C'1ark, C�ief Building Offici.al N.�� DATE: August 4, 1988 RF�AF�Il�1G: Fotux7ation Prc�lens in Carlson's Stunnit N�mr North Acldn. Please be advised that sir�e July 21, 1988, I have received calls from six hcnbeawners who aan hanes in the vacinity of the 5300 block of Horizon Drive, requesting that I inspect their house foundations because o� apparent differencial settlanents. Prior to these calls we had inspected 5 other fourr3ations during 1987 ar�d 1976 that were in this ger�ral area. There appears to be a pattern of things that probably have caused these settlanents to occur or are present at each location: 1. The� have all occured durir.�g long chy spells (1976, 1987 & 1988) . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. All have had m-�ture trees growir�g in the general vacinity of the failure. Yar� and street settlenent has also occured in fr�nt of those hanes tr3at had mature trees in the front yard near the failure. All those that have had soil tests done have had a layer of moisture reeeptive or active soil at or below the footir�g elevation. All r�r�ers have been advised to contact a soils engiryeer to test ar�d report their fir�dings ar�d to suggest the method o£ correction. All of the hanes were buil� in the mid 1950's. The cost of repair will'depend upon the extent of the failures. We estin�te the cost of such repdair to range between a mini.mum of $500.00 to a maximum of 520, 000. 00 or possibly higher. One hosne repa i red i n June, 19 87 pa id an estim�ted 53,000.00 to a contractor to replace the back wall l32 feet) of their basanent. That repair consisted of the folla,uing: temporarily supporting the stru�cture on post arrl timbers; ranaving the back foundat�on wall arrl footing; diggir�g dawn through approximately six feet of clay or silt to granular gravel at three locations (each hole was about 4'x 2' ); pouring each hole full of coricrete; pouring a reinforced concrete grade beam over the top of t11e new pads to fonn a r�w footing; laying up a r�w block wall ; and setting the house back daan. A ca�Yposit map is being m3ir�tained that shows the reported dates and addresses of all reported prablens. If anyor� wants more inEorn�ation on this subject, ple�se contact aur department arr3 we will be ha� to review our files. We do have indi�idual records on each reported prcablen. Its possible that there could be more failures that have rnt been called in for our review. DGC/mh ATi'ACH : Map CC: Mr. Jahn Flora, Public Works Director r' � I � • �f�8�' 43to 4;xc;��.� ca�,,,' J . �4 �Z � �O� 1't o ►.! ' (�: �. , G �� -t-� S l4-B No+'� i� ��:Cr,� k, ,��U � �_�� 530� �a.:�z�� D�. ; i � , ` I ° .` .7Gr.�.,1.yYiy�e 'G .�:,�.�.'�� G , �: ' :.:.' :•%� r:.r� •�'��dP' / ✓.'.•.•. : :`�• ::� r9iJRit 'r.'.•.' / . . :•1�:�:�' fo--1�-�"1 �37C� N�.�,+j � �r�_.�c,_; ��,6,ha �-5- �� 4�y 4�c�'�.t-� �;;2��'r � I ' �''I' 1Z.-►�•Sl t`q CROw.a Rc� 1.� Jt , 1—IZ-7� f�I 53RO ��. / , ,� c� E� �_�z.:�7 llrl 53"7 , � i�4 r •�' �' . __.. �� .�,� 19S 5ur�pQ�� s� — � �� '� -21- � a�p,�n a. aa a p. �,4'� � a � � I��•'1� 51 b� �-;�J�'%�:, „i;� � .� �� ; �. � �'g_ �.� t, 13�0 �..�a:r=: ti.�. ti,,,�" i (c-111 1Zr,PA��c� .�3�� I la/�.'�jnRnk, t+e,o-! � S s� .� � t i �-y-�'va 14� Pa.x,G��r �a;� � 1 ,�� , — S ,� " _ l � 2'�'?8 4�0 0 ? �`° ;;� � �c� •�'t �� n �� ` �o•�' (`? � � / ` ,..� �._ 8- r.'73 �:: ? 7 �'�- � fl � � , f� � ��' � `•� �`� � ``a� � l ' �J' � 9•f•�� 455! Z'/l �-i-�� L1SSti �'�� '� f _ �� (Z� P Ar2 �i 4 �1jr � ��t � � / �� J � ,/�' � �� J v : � � j C 3 �' t„) e� �� .� �� ;��, , ,�.,J � c Ll � `� `� =� J ,•a�• �t • a uoiroR� F. r ��, J ti � �� , <� � , � ��" `J � to �� , ��, � . �� •-- � � �� ..j : . �:) .3 P / i' i ;; zi :� � :; S 0 m J � a 0 � O J c STaTEf ....]RL'vK f HIGNwaY ND IOQ L P �� /. J ��'' Rn�Y �:� ��: v} w � CAI.,....� � . � m �.,,.,,..;., � , , �� .�,.,�.,ti� �Ei� �� _is s�� `�� p� � � � _ � � ��--- yI ± ��.+ � �� ;�L!.J .4,_� ��,� �E� i ^`. M ��. . _ _ � ` ierntrr�r[ � -`�~� - - � _� _i �� .� -- � � -_-� ; �_1 �� '_�� SI+ '--' _ " '�� = �- ,_ ,— - z �s _ ,� : ,. - :. � _ �_�� =—_� � a -- —_ . = �- �� c� tnc _ �_� -� �. �-�'` � �a; -� : -_�` ��^_ ""p : .�_ � i� ' ;� _�. z ` ~ J _�-t i i 1 � .�L_ `.T � 'r i0.�� I m �,. , � � --- -�I! ��J� ;� � City of Fridley _ Home Improvement Program 335-2651 .,_,. _,...�.a.�..M.. . � �� . �i�U�� '� 4 s��u` ��c� I��`i' � � ► , � ��; .�� ,�____�_,_„_�a .,,��._�. BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION House Settlement Problems Various locations in the vicinity of Horizon Drive & Horizon Circle Fridley, MN September 8, 1988 � Prepared For: City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Attn: Mr. John Thompson Prepared By: Robert J. Janssen David R. Hausler, P.E. .��unt~ MINNESOTA Mmneapolis Hibbing St. Cloud Rochester St. Paul AFfILIATED OFFICES NORTH DAKOTA &Smarck Williston Minot MONTANA Billings Bozeman ILLINOIS Cn�cago J S Braun P.E. Cameron G Kruse. P E Geo. D. Kluempke. P E Paul H Anderson Oavid R Hausler. P.E Roger V. Blomqwst. PhD James J Cralg. Jr_ P E. Dale R Allen. P E. Wm. M Weyrauch. P E. Thomas R. 9lumberg Mlchael M Heuer. P E Kurt E. Dvorak Norman E. Hatl Ray A Huber. P E Williem K Cody P E AfFILIATED COMPANIES Braun Environmental Laboratones.lnc Braun Pavement Technolog�es. Inc September 8, 1988 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Attn: Mr. John Thompson e un�� ENGINEERING TESTING �� Qualify Services Since 1957 CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS Reply to sddress/phone 7t: 1061 109th Ave. N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (612) 754-2580 Fax. (612) 487-1812 RE: BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION House Settlement Problems various locations in the vicinity of Horizon Drive & Horizon Circle Fridley, MN Dear Mr. Thompson: As authorized on August 12, 1988, our firm recently performed ten soil borings at various locations in the vicinity of Horizon Drive and Horizon Circle in Fridley, Minnesota. The purpose of this subsurface investigation was to assist in evaluating possible causes for the foundation wall distress which has occurred in many of the houses in this area, and to formulate recommendations relative to alternative remedial measures. The borings were performed within the boulevard in front of houses which have recently experienced foundation wall distress. The borings typically encountered variable amounts of granular fill materials overlying water-deposited soils (alluvium) to the termination depth of the borings. The alluvial soils consist primarily of fine grained poorly graded sands. However, within many of the borings a+5 foot thick interbedded stratum of fat clay was encountered. At the locations where the clay was encountered, the stratum exists at or slightly below the estimated footing elevation of most of the houses in this area. BL88-095 - 2- September 8, 198E City of Fridley Tha fat clays encountered ara considered_ to be very susceptible to moisture related shrinkinq and swelling. Zt is our opinion that the foundation wall distress observed is the result of differential sattlement due to the desiccation and shrinkaga of th� underlying fat clays. It ia our belief that the primary cause of the desiccation of ths claya is the drought coaditions whicb havs rscently been experienced and the prozim2ty o! tre� root ayatans to the affected faundations. There are several types of zemedial measure� that caa be applied to problems regardinq the effecta of shrinkinq due to desiccatioa of clays. For a complete discussion of the most commonly employed remedial measured concerning foundation distres� caused from the effects of shrinking (or swellinq) claya, Me direct your attention to the attached report. It was a_pleasure beinq of service. If we c assistance in aASaering any questions or additional eaqineering and testing services, us at your convenience. Very truly youra, an be of further in providing kindly contact BR�►UN ENGZNEERING TESTING, INC. c�rz,�b�' Robert J. an sen • North Suburban Area Engineer � � --•- • y David R. Hausler, P.E. Vice President RJJ:DRH:baa Enclosure: Subsurface Investigation Report cc: Braun Engineering Testing, Inc. (Minneapolis & St. Paul) s��nt� TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION A.1. Purpose A.2. SCOpe A.3. Boring Locations and Surface Elevations A.4. Field Investigation A.S. Soil Classification A.6. Laboratory Testing A.7. Water Level Measurements B. RESULTS B.1. Logs H.2. Soils Encountered B.3. Laboratory Test Results B.4. Water Level Data � C. ANALYSIS AND RECONlMENDATIONS C.1. Available Information C.2. Analysis C.3. Remedial Measures C.3.1. Removal of Trees C.3.2. Restorinq water to the Clays C.3.3. Underpinning D. REMARKS D.1. Basis of Recommendations D.2. Level of Care D.3. Professional Certification 1 1 � i 0 BL88-095 SUBSURFACB INVESTIGATION House Settlement Problems various locations in the vicinity of Horizon Drive & Horizon Circle Fridley, 1rB�i A. INTRODUCTION A.1. Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to assist in evaluating possible causes for foundation distress which has occurred for many of the houses in the above referenced area and to formulate recommendations relative to alternative remedial measures. A.2. Scope: The subsurface investigation consisted of ten penetration test borings. The borings were typically extended to a depth of 20.5 feet with the exception of one of the borings which was extended to a depth of 30.5 feet. To better define the engineering characteristics of the soils encountered, laboratory tests were performed on many of the cohesive soil samples obtained during drilling. Based on the data obtained from the penetration information and laboratory test results, this engineering report has been prepared. test boring geotechnical A.3. Borinct Locations and Surface Elevations: The borings were performed at the locations which�were staked in the field by the � e�un.M v 0 BL88-095 City of Fridley - 2 - Segtember 8, 1988 City's surveyor. The locations of the borings were referenced to adjacent houses and are shown on the attached boring logs. A sketch showinq the approximate borinq locations is attached. Surface elevations at the bore hol�s were also referenced by your surveyors. A.4. Field Investigation: The borings were performed between August 17 and August 19, 1988, with a truck-mounted core and suger drill. This machine was equipped with hollow-stem augers. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D1586 "Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils". Using this method, a bore hole is advanced with the hollow-stem auger to the desired test depth. Then, a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches drives a standard, 2-inch OD, split barrel sampler a total penetration of 1-1/2 feet below the bottom of the bore hole. The blows for the last foot of penetration (BPF), which are an index of soil strength characteristics, were recorded and are shown on the respective logs. Soil samples were taken at 2-1/2-foot or 5-foot intervals to the termination depth of the borings. Undisturbed samples of cohesive soils were taken in accordance with ASTM D1587 "Thinwall Tube Sampling of Soils". The use of hollow-stem auger eliminated the driving of casing and the need for jetting water. A.5. Soil Classification: Soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D2487 "Unified Soils Classification System" and ASTM D2488 �"Recommended Practice for Visual and Manual Description of Soils". A chart explaining the Unified Soil Classification System is attached. Samples were sealed in glass bottles and returned to our laboratory for review of the 1 1 i � BL88-095 City of Fridley - 3 - September 8, 1988 field classifications by a Soils Engineer. Representative samples will be retained in our St. Paul office for a period af 60 days to be available for examination. A.6. Laboratorv Testing: To better define the engineering characteristics of the cohesive soils relative to shrink:inq and swelling, laboratory test were performed on a few of the fat clay samples obtained during drilling. The types of laboratory tests performed consist of Atterberg limits, shrinkage limit and one- dimensional swell test. Each of the tests were performed according to ASTM specifications. The. results of the tests are shown on the attached Log of Boring sheets. Included in this report are graphs indicating the results of the swell tests. A.7. Water Level Measurements: Water level readings have been made in the borings at the times and under conditions stated on the boring logs. This data has been reviewed and interpretations made in the text of this report. However, it must be noted that the period of observation was relatively short and that fluctuations in the level of the ground water may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein. The possibility of variations should be recognized. B. RESULTS 8.1. Logs: Log of Boring sheets indicating the depth and identification of the various soil strata, penetration resistances, laboratory test results, and water level information are attached. It should be noted that the depths shown as boundaries between the strata are only approximate. The actual change may be more of a transition and the depth of change likely varies horizontally. .e�un�M BL88-095 City of Fridley - 4 - September 8, 1988 B.2. Soils Encountered: Each of the borings were performed in roadway boulevards in front of houses which have recently experienced smne foundatioa distress. With the exception of borings ST-t, ST-5, and ST-10, the borinqs encountered between 4 and 11 feet of granular fill material (consistinq primarily of soils ranginq from poorly graded sand to silty sand) at the surface. Borinqs ST-4, ST-5, and ST-10 encountered approximately 1 foot of topsoil (silty sand� at the surface. The f111 or topsoil was typically underlain by water-deposited soils (alluvium) to the termination depth of the borings. The alluvial soils encountered consist �rimarily of fine grained, poorly qraded sands. Within borings ST-3 through ST-7, and ST-10, a 3 to 6 foot thick, interbedded stratum of fat clay was encountered. Boring ST-8 encountered lean clay between the 18-foot and 20.5-foot termination depth. Boring ST-2 was terminated in glacially deposited soils. Within the fill materials, penetration resistances range from 6 to 21 blows per foot (BPF). Within the native granular soils, penetration resistances ranged from 6 to 38 BPF, indicatinq these soils to be in a loose to dense condition. Penetration resistances within the native cohesive soils range from 5 to 19 BPF, indicating these soils to be rather soft to very stiff in consistency. H.3. Laboratory Test Results: Atterberg limits performed on the fat clays indicate rather consistent, but extremely high, liquid limits and plastic indexes (typically on the order of 99� and 70�, respectively). Inplace moisture contents of the fat clays tested were variable - ranging from between approximately 37� and 65�. e�unT� 0 BL88-095 City of Fridley - 5 - September 8, 1988 One-dimension swell tests and shrinkage limit tests were performed on samples of fat clay obtained from borings ST-4 and ST-10. At. a given moisture content, the one-dimensional swell test can be used to determine the magnitude of swell of a relatively undisturbed sample of soil under a known vertical pressure (referred to as percent heave), and the magnitude of vertical pressure needed to maintain no volume change of the laterally constrained, axially loaded specimen {referred to as saell pressure). Thinwall #2 from boring ST-4, with an inplace moisture content of approximately 37�, exhibited a percent heave of 2.1�k and a swell pressure of 1.6 tons per square foot (tsf). Thinwall ia from boring ST-10, which exhibited an inplace moisture content of 65�, showed a percent heave of O�c. Given the high moisture content of this sample, swelling did not occur. Since the sample did not swell, the swell pressure could no be obtained. The shrinkage limit test is used to determine various shrinkage factors of soils. This test was used to determine the shrinkage limit, shrinkage ratio, and specific gravity of the soil tested. From these factors, an estimate of the lineal shrinkage of the soil can be projected. The shrinkage limit (which is the water content at which a reduction of water content will not cause a decrease in the volume of the soil mass) for both of the samples tested was 17�. The shrinkage ratio (which is the ratio of a given volume change, expressed as a percentage of the dry volume to the corresponding change of water content) of both samples tested was 1.8$. The specific gravity of the samples tested was 2.59. 1 1 � �� 1 BL88-095 City of Fridley - 6 - September 8, 1988 By determining the lineal shrinkage of the soils tested, we were able to estimate the decrease in one dimension of the soil mass, expressed as a percentaqe of the original dimension, when the moisture content of the soil ia rec3uced. With the fat clay samples tested, we estimate a lineal shrinkage factor of 7.7� with a 15� reduction in water content. This indicates that with a 5-foot thick stratum of this material, approximately 4 inches of shrinkage could occur with e 15� reduction of the moisture content. � B.4. Water Level Data: During drilling, g�coundwater was not observed through the hollow-stem auger in any of the borings. Inmediately after withdrawal of the auger from the ground, groundwater �vas not observed to cave-in depths ranging from 9 to 16 feet. Based upon the water level observations and soil moisture contents observed during drilling, groundwater currently appears to exist near or below the termination. depth of each of the borings. C. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C.1. Available Information: We understand that as many as 15 houses in the vicinity of Horizon Drive and Horizon Circle have experienced some varying degrees of foundation wall distress. Based on our observation, the degree of distress typically appears to be greatest at those portions of the houses closest to large trees. ' The houses which are experiencing distress, typically consist of one-story structures with full-depth basements. The houses were constructed approximately 30 years ago. 1 1 i I 1 BL88-095 City of Fridley - 7 - September 8, 1988 For many of the houses, some foundation wall distress was first observed in 1976 and 1977. These years were very dry. We understand that the distress which occurred these years aas relatively slight, such that only cosmetic repairs were made. C.2. Analysis: As previously mentioned, as many as 15 home owners have recently reported the occurrence of cracks within the foundation walls of their house. we have recently observed some of these houses. Besides cracked foundation walls, some of the other types of distress observed consist of horizontal cracking along mortar in masonry brick walls, horizontal cracks within stucco exteriors, differential settlement within basement floor slabs, and settlement of exterior stoops. In the worst case observed, cracks have opened more than 1 inch wide and a column pad foundation has settled away from the column. The distressed areas appear to be rather localized, generally concentrating in areas close to large trees. Many of the borings encountered a+5-foot stratum of fat clay interbedded within the predominate clean sands. At all locations where fat clay was encountered, the clay appears to exist at or slightly below the estimated footing elevations of each of the houses. Based upon the results of our laboratory tests, the fat clays encountered appear to be highly sensitive to moisture controlled shrinking and swelling. As previously mentioned in section B.3. of this report, based on the results of the laboratory tests, with only a 15� reduction in moisture content of the soils tested, we would expect as much as 4 inches of shrinkage to occur within a 5-foot thick stratum of clay. 1 1 i 1 BL88-095 - 8- September 8, 1988 City of Fridley Based upon the findings of our soil borings, observations, and laboratory test results, it is our opinion that the distress ' observed is primarily the result of differential settlement due to desiccation and shrinkinq of the underlying cohesive soils. In turn, it is ovr opinion that the primary causes of the desiccation of the clays is the recent drought conditions and the proximity of tree root systems to the affected foundations. C.3. Remedial Measures: There are several types of remedial measures that can be applied to problems reqardiag the affects of foundation distress due to desiccation and shrinkage of clays. The most common remedial measures employed to correct for this problem is to: 1) remove any large trees near the affected areas; 2) restore water to the clays; or 3) underpinninq the affected areas to below the clays. We will discuss each of these alternatives separately within the subsequent sections of this report. C.3.1. Removal of Trees: As previously mentioned, the foundation distress observed in all the houses appears to be rather localized, appearing to be concentrated in areas close to large trees. The root systems of trees can remove a surprisingly large quantity of water from the soil, particularly when the weather is hot, dry, and windy. Published data indicates that as much as 100 gallons of water ma�r pass through an individual tree during a sunny day. This process of evaporative loss of water from trees is referred to as transpiration. With the lack of moisture in the clean sands which overlie the fat clays, root penetration would be expected to have extended through the sands and into the underlying fat clay. With the recent drought conditions, the roots have likely been forced to s� unrM 0 HL88-095 City of Fridley - 9 - September 8, 1988 spread laterally within the clay in an attempt to find water, thus, greatly increasing the zone of clay subjected to moisture loss. This reduction of moisture withia the clays due to transpiration is likely a cause for the foundation distress which has been observed. This may explain why there has not been settlement problems in years of normal or near _normal precipitation. To eliminate the risk of clays beinq desiccated by the tree roots it would be necessary to remove all trees in the vicinity of the affected houses. As a general rule of thumb, all trees should be removed a distance away from the house equal to the height of the trees. It should be mentioned that by simply removing the trees, there is st111 a risk that this may not be enough to totally control the shrinkage problems aithin the clay. Some future desiccation and settlement may occur. This is especially true since we understand that some of the houses which have experienced some foundation settlement do not have trees near the area where settlement has occurred. This being the case and due to the asthetic value of the trees, this alternative may not be desirable. As a possible alternative to removing the trees, a ditch could be dug between the house and trees. The ditch should be dug deep enough to extend a short distance below the clays and should be backfilled with clean, coarse sand wrapped in a layer of polyethylene (or any other substance which roots can not penetrate). The purpose of this ditch system would be to cvt away from the trees any existing root systems and block the growth of new root systems adj acent to foundations. C.3.2. Restoring Water to the Clays: Since the observed distress appears to be related to drying of the encountered clays, another � .er�un.� BL88-095 - 10 - September 8, 1988 City of Fridley alternative which could be considered is to restore the water to the desiccated clays and allow the clay to swell back to near its initial volume. To restore water to the clays, 3 inch to 6 inch diameter auger holes coul� be drilled at +5-foot intervals alonq the parameter of the affected foundations. The spacing between the holes should be decreased in areas between the foundations and large trees. The auger holes should be placed at a distance no closer than 3 feet from the edge of the foundation wall and should be extended approximately half way into the clay stratum. It is important that the auger holes not be extended through the clays and into the underlying highly pervious sands. The auger holes would then be filled with a well graded, coarse sand (containing less than 5� passinq the #200 sieve and less than SO�c passing the #40 sieve) or clean gravel. The holes should be supplied with water until swelling is complete and, thereafter, when drought or near drought conditions occur. To assist in monitoring the rate and amount of swelling which actually occurs, consideration should be given to installing strain gauges across some of the existing cracks. Strain gauges should be monitored frequently during the initial swelling stages and periodically thereafter. Due to the large amount of water which would be placed adjacent to foundation walls, moisture related problems within basements could be experienced with this approach. The extent of this potential problem is dependent upon the candition of the inplace draintile system (if it exists) and/or the location bf the clays relative to the foundation walls. To reduce the risk of wet basements, consideration could be given to placing casing within � 1 1 � 1 BL88-095 City of Fridley - �1 - September 8, 1988 the auger holes. The casing would serve to conduct water and act as an observation pipe to monitor the water level. The casing should be extended fran the surface to the top of the clays. The casing would also be useful in acting as a barrier to reduce the risk of contaminatinq the coarse sand or gravel placed in the auger holes with the inplace finer soils. Even thouqh this approach has been proven to be very successful in controlling the desiccation of clays in other areas, it must be understood that this approach would not eliminate the risk of future desiccation and settlement. Also, depending upon the actual condition and past history of the clays below each individual structure, it is possible that the clays may not swell to their exact initial volume. As mentioned earlier in this report, all of the borings were performed in the roadway boulevards. With the large distance between the borings and the houses, and the variability which was encountered in the depth and thickness of the fat clay (some of the borings did not even encounter clays), additional borings should be performed next to any of the houses where this option is being considered. C.3.3. Underpinning: To virtually eliminate the risk of future problems associated with settlement due to desiccation of clays, consideration should be given to underpinning the entire house or the portions of the houses affected by the desiccated clays. Underpinning consists of extending some sort of foundation system below the existing foundations to bear on the native sands below the clays. Depending upon the required depth of the foundations, the types of foundation systems typically employed for underpinning consist of drilled piers or spread foundations. B�un�M BL88-095 - 12 - September 8, 1988 City of Fridley With either foundation type, the base of the foundation would have to be anchored into the sands to resist the substantial uplift forces which would be created when the clays swell. Relative to the grade beams which would be placed on top of the new foundations, provisions must be made to prevent the contact or to eliminate the transmission of compressive forces when swell develops. To reduce the risk of this occurring, collapsible forms upon which the concrete grade beams can be poured, but which crush at loads only sliqhtly greater than the weight of the concrete should be used. The grade beams should be tied into the new footings with reinforcing. The exact design of the foundations,would be dependent upon the actual soil conditions which exist below each individual house and the anticipated structural loads. If this alternative is considered, we strongly recommend that additional soil borings be performed around the parameter of the houses to better define the subsurface conditions which exit and to more thoroughly analyze the subsurface conditions relative to foundation design. D. REMARKS D.1. Basis of Recommendations: The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from ten soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached boring logs and sketch. variations'may occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations are encountered, it will be necessary to make a re-evaluation of the recommendations of this report after performing on-site observations during construction and noting the characteristics of any variations. Such variations could result in additional construction costs. � iY r�un BL88-095 - 13 - September 8, 1988 City of Fridley To permit correlation of the soil data obtained to-date with the actual soil conditions encountered during remediation and to provide continuing professional responsibility for the conformance of the remediation to the concepts originally contemplated in this report and to the plans and specifications, it is recommended that we be retained to develop and perform the necessary observation and testinq program for the remediation phase of the project. If others gerform the recommended observations and/or testing of construction, professional responsibility becomes divided since in doing so, they assume responsibility for verifying that the soil conditions throughout the construction areas are similar to those encountered in the borings or recognizing variations which would require a change in recommendations. D.2. Level of Care: Services performed by the geotechnical and material engineers for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. D.3. Professional Certification: I hereby ce�tify that this report was prepared by me or under m direct direct su erv3sior. and tha� I am a duly Regis�ered Professional En ineer under the laws of the Sta�e of Minnesota. � � ""' . � David R. H�uslez P.E. � Re istration Num�er: 12784 Da�e: September 8, 1988 The .'Ont2n! �' �n�� epc�[ anc >:.eoo�t��^g o::uments a�e for the exciurve nse of tne adtl�essee In the a�sence ot ou� p��o� wrrtten aDD�ovai we mate no rEpres?��aLGn a^� a;5��^? ^�G '25pO�5�DihI�� tC 3rty Othe' part�es regar��ng sucn conrent � 1 1 � 1 Descriptive Terminology �MDesignation D 2487 — 83 Standard Test Method for CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES M a X W 0 2 a � V � � a J d CRIT�R;� FOR 1S:iGM:MG CFOV7 $ABOI$ NID �WV MMfi USING UBOI�7piY TESiS � 6111vE1S r ' �bre tMn SOf o� N c CO��S! ��KtiOn n�.,� o� ° � _ � �. . s,�.� �ro J ` SpNUS � � r ' � or nq.e o1 ! CO��S! {rCC�O� D+sses b. � a E Stive �. 5: dN�� ':0.+5 -�Gu�� T�t - iesti �+a� SCs .._ . .�:� ,_ . - .!Ou� ��•t ' SOi.. � . 60 CIEAN CA�vE�.S � C� >� eM i< C< < 3 � ��:� ��,� s: ��« � - - �L��ra/or 1>C� >Je OIAVELS Y:Tti i�NE, �Fines cless+�j aS K or rN �bre tn�n 12i �;nes �� vines c4ss;tr �s tt or Cn C�Eµ SAN�S :� 6 ena i c C� ! 3� �ess tMn Ss hnes a r-- !. 6 IIIC/Of j � �� > J ! SIiN05 �:"� �1vE5 � Fmes c?us��r as ►L or M� �pre tn�n :2S �tnes � iines class�r� as C: or [M � v: ,�a o:oc: o� a .ome marg�na ° �:�ne 7 �: � Q or p1ot5 �t7p� '0.• fin< % � ��: ii.�t - ^.e� or,ea org�n�c :!a��a ��w�t - ot Or��p '� 0.75 �i D�o[T on 0� aDOr! 'R' '�ne +norganfc ----' — P� 0�o[s De10� '0' line �9ani< .ip �e I�m�[ �o...�.•ea 0.15 �.ime.+:r a�3enic metce�, ae•, �� color, a�a ^+a^.'. - , . tc�'�.i orqan�< aaar $ABOL � 910Ui NME � �ell-gr�pM grpel � ►oo.tr gr�aea gr..e� re�t-yrweu sma � �owir g..eea s•ne ` SC Clay!) SinC 9.^.' �. .ean ctar t.�." ' Ml 5�1( t.�.� 0i Ory�n�c <iq t, 1, • n aganic ti�: '. �. ^�. o ;M fac cl�r k�t,� w� Ei�st�c s+it t.�.'" � Ygan�c d�Y �• �. 1°. D a .n,c s,�t � •. a �� Deat e. baset o� ;ne T.a:e•+a' Dass��9 '�e i-�r. ',75•mm; s�eve. � D. :� ��e'.] Smnp!e :a�le��t0 :DOO�eS anC:o� Oou70ers, a0E '��[n COOD'�es end:Or Go�`Olrs' to g�0u0 �aet. .. e'S . f. to ::i � nes •ea.��e auai symeo�s � w1-C�' .e�" g•wee gr�.e' . n siit O�-GC .e'�1 g.aoec g.a.e� . .n clar . C,7•uM poarty g.�eea q•�re1 .�tn s�1t fA-GC poariy �.aaea gr�re' .�:n c�•� .. Sanas .�[� 5[o :S •+nes rea"'•e G�a� Syna!s Sr-L' 1 q.aaea sana . +�t � � Sy-5. ! yr�eec s�M • ��ar Sv.SM �oo.ly gr�pea sana�. .n s�it Sv-SC poo�+r 9�dM sena v� ::ay �. _ ��,�.,, �c :,��__ io eo . I� sa•' :o�:a��s - 15i sa�a, aec •.�V. smo• to g•ouo �s•e. � g� ;r r�nes <'��cs��y es �.�1. �se aue; t�+�oo� GC-C�. 5C•SM. :� • s are o.qan�<. �ao •.+tn orgsn,c nnez' to grouo nane. 1� sa�e conte��ns '- :St g.�.e', aaa '.�t� gr�re�' to g�ouo �w�. ;r �t:e•Derg ' pipt in naecn�Q a�ea. soli �i �:: J1�. sileJ c1eJ. ' se�' conm�ns ,:'. to 29t ptus No. Z00. �aa ••�tn s��a' o .itn grare!' r„cne.er is p.MU��nant. u . ;f sc�.'. cont+��s � l0i pl�s hc, t00. Dr�ou.�nantiy send. �aa•'s�M r' to yrouD n�ne. �• so�' co�te;es "�ot oi�s wo. 'oo. o•eea.��c'y 9��re'. aaa •g.�.etlr ic g•o�o �r�e. P: '� a�a p:ots a� o� �DOre 'a• I�ne. o. �: d a� �I�ts De'•o. •�• line. D� °� D�ots o� or pore '►' lfne. 0• �: D�ats Deio. 'p' 7!n!. . : OSS��-CO' Or �' 'ine-7rp�ned 50 � — ' �Ouat�on 0` �6 -��n� � Hontooral at �I-a •: -?5 5. i .�ln P��-r: _��` � �F _. ' [OuO+�:pr as..�, in� j Vertitai a• :. °�6 e oj=7 � tnen p: = 0 ?'L�-9! 30 � ; �/ zo� � i d I�` �G�'. �o � • ;e-qramed � � i �� I J/� � .�� , P. i' � �'�+ '' � I 1 � � ' � ' MH � OH i OL • so eo 7o eo go �oo ��o LIOUID L�MtT (LL) LABORATORY TESTS DD Dry Density. pcf OC Organic Content, % WD Wet Density. pcf S Percent oi Saturation. % MC Natural Moisture Content. % SG Specitic Gravity LL Liquid Limit, % C Cohesion PL Plastic Limit. % � Angle of InternaL Friction Pt Plasticity Index. °io qu Unconfined Compressive Strength PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION Boulders ........................... overl2. Cob6les ..............:............. 3°to t2° Gravel Coarse ........................... ':� — 3.. Fine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4 — :,.. Sand Coarse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 4 — No. 10 Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 10 — No. 40 Fine .............................. No 40 — No.200 Silt ...................:............. No 200 — .005 mm Ciay ............................... Iesstnan.005 mm RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS SOILS veryloose .................................... 0 — 4 BF loose......................................... 5 — 10 BF medium dense ............................... 11 — 30 BF dense .......................................31 — 50 BF very dense ....................................... 50* Br CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS very sott .....:................................0 — 1 BF soft.......................................... 2 — 3 BF rathersoft ......:.............................0 — 5 BF medium...................................... 6 — 8 BF ratherstiff ..................................... 9 — 12 BF stifi ......................................... 13 — 16 BF very stiff ..................................... 17 — 30 BF hard.......................'..................... 30* BF DRILLING NOTES Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3' �' or 6 I.D. hollow-stem augers unless noted otherwise. Jetting waterw� used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated c logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by tt prefix "ST" (Split Tube). Power auger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diamete continuous-flite. solid stem augers. Soil classification a�d stra depths are inferred from disturbed samples augered to the surfac and are therefore somewhat approximate. Power auger borinc are designated by the prefix "B". Hand probings were advanced manually with a 1'.z' diamet� probe and are limited to the depth irom which the probe can b manualiy withdrawn. Hand probings a►e indicated by the pref ..H.. SAMPLING — All sampies are taken with the standard 2" O.0 split tube sampler, except where noted. TW indicates thin-ws (undisturbed) sample. BPF — Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standar penetration test, aiso known as "N" value. The sampler is set E into undisturbed soil below the hollow-stem a.uger. Drivin resistances are then counted for second and third 6" increment and added to get BPF. Where they diifer significantly, they ar reported in the tollowing form — 2i 12 for the second and third E i�crements respectively. WH — WH indicates that sampler penetrated soit under weight c hammer and rods alone, driving not required. NOTE — All tests run in accordance with applicable AST� standards. � � I 1 0 SKE'IQ�i SHCWIlVG APPRQ}�IlKATE PII�TRATICN TEST BORL•VC L�CX'ATICINS / �� V�t�a ,P�, - tiorizon Circle W Z � � � � .,� � 1 1 � � -•-• � • � 69 15� � 1 � i I ; �� .,� 0 [ N .,..� � � e Represents IACation of Penetrati� Test Boring BL88-095 SUBSURFAC� Il�VESTIGATIC�7 Settlement Prablem FYidley, N�1 GAB �s`•": N�ne > a 0 0 c E a� a� > a U ti a� v � c �a c 0 .� � � a'� � 0 � a� � a � m � c cv � � C cp C O a n� � a� a� � LOG OF BORING � Br�un� ENGINEERING TESTING . PROJECT: BORING: ST-1 BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOCATION: Settlement Problem Various Locations 34'S. 10'W of S.E. bullding corner F�Idley, �IN of 129 Horizon�Clrcle DATE: 8-17-88 SCALE: � ��4• Elev. Depth ASTM Desc►ipGon oi Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes D2487 (ASTM D2488) 851.4 0.0 Symbol 850.9 0.5 SM FILL: SILTY SAN � mostly ne gra ne . w oo , , e y balck, moist. flne to tlne grained, brown, molst. �a , 847.4 4.0 - w StLT. mostly very t{ne to ti�a 21 845.9 5.5 rainad. brown. molst. . , moS y tlne gralned, brown. motst. 844.4 7.0 . mos y ne �� grained. Iight brown� moist, medium dense. (Coarse Alluvium) 13 14 837.4 14.0 , m s y �ne to medium grained, brown, moist� �� medium dense. (Coarse Alluvfum) / 830.9 20.5 14 ' END OF BORING. Water level not encounte�ed with 19' of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to cave-in depth ot 14' Immediately aftar wlthdrawal of auger. Bor fng tRnned{atefy backf I I led. �- LOG OF BORING PROJECT: BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Settlement Problems Various Locations FridJey, MN D2487 851.0 0.0 Symbol SI� 850.0 1.0 � rn 0 0 c � 845.0 6.0 a� n� > a U ai � v c � 0 840.0 11.0 .� � �a > a� `o � a� �a d � � � c ti N � 833.0 18.0 m r 0 a a� � n� a� � ` 829.0 22.0 � e�un-� ENGINEEq�NG TESTING BORING: ST-2 LOCATION: 37'N, 19'E ot N.W. bullding corner of 1a6 Horiaon-Circle DATE: g_�g_gg SCALE: 1"�4• Description of Materials (ASTM D2488) FILL: SILTY SAND, most y ne grained. with Roots. black. mois FTCC-"5'TLT , mos Y very flne to tine grained, dark brown. molst. fine to flne gralned. Ilght brown. moist, loose to medlum dense. (Coarse Alluvlum) 7 21 7 13 .. .... ..� �..�. �� .� to medium grafned. brown. molst. madium dense to loose. �� (Coarse Alluvlum) to�medium^gralned,�gray.�motst, loose. (Coarse Alluvtum) tine.grained.`dark�brown,vmoist, dense. (Glacial Tlil) Continued on next page. 8 9 38 � ests or Page 1 ot 2 > a 0 �E � � a� > .a .` U h G1 � v c eo c 0 .� � � > a� 0 N � f0 d � f0 � C eO � � C �O r O a a� � n� d � LOG OF BORING �rBRAU(� ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: BORING: ST-2 (cont ) BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVES71GAT10N LOCATION: Settlement Problems Varlous Locatlons 37'N. 19'E of N.W. bullding corner � Frldley. MN of ?'�6 Horizon�Circle DATE: 8-18-88 SCALE: 1"�4' Elev. Depth ASTM Description ot Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes D2487 (ASTM D2488) 826.0 25.0 Symbol Page 2 ot 2 w . mo y tine pralned� dark brown, molst. dense. 824.0 27.a (Glaclal T111) » �(Glacial Outwash) mostly fine to medium grained, a trace ot Grav�l, brown. molst. ; 822.0 29.0 medlum densa. , a race o Gravel, brown, wat� very stitf. 19 820.5 30.5 (Glaclal TIII) END OF BORING. Water lavel not encountered with 29' of hollow-stem auger In the ground. Wate� lavel not encountered to cave-in depth of 16' Immedlately attar withdrawal of augor. Boring Immedlately backtllled. LOG OF BORING PROJECT: BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Settlement Problem Varlous Locations Fridiey, MN Elev. 850.1 849.1 D2487 0.0 Symboi SM 1.0 >. 0 846.1 4.0 0 c E a� 844.1 6.0 a� > a U N d � � c `0 840.1 10.0 c 0 .� � m > d o` � a� c� a � � � v c cC � � C l0 t O a a� ¢ � 829.6 20.5 � � s�un� � ENGINEERING TESTING BORING: ST-3 LOCATION: 37'N. 13'E Of N.W. bullding corner ot 148 Horizon�Cl�cle DATE: g_18_88 SCALE: ��4� Descriptio� of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes (ASTM D2488) FILL: SILTY SAND. mostly ti4e ralned. wlth Roots, black. . mos y very ffne to tine flrained. dark brown. moist. � V� v• � V� V�� 1 � IIN � � l � I W � p• (Fine Atluvium) . ... __. , . .... ,. .... , gray and white, wet, medlum. (Flne Alluvium) .. __ .,. .. tine to tine gralned, light brown, moist, medlum dense. (Coarse Alluvlum) END OF BORING. Water levei not encountered with 19' ot hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to cave-in depth ot 13' Immedlately atter withdrawa{ of auger. Boring immediately backtllied. 8 mOlst. 7' '� - Llquld Lim(t: 98X Plastic Llmit: 30% Plastic Index: 689G Moistura Content: 47 TW M1 17 19 15 LOG OF BORING PROJECT: BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Settiement Probtem Varlous Locatlons F� ldley, MN �pth ASTM D2487 0.0 Symbol SM 1.0 o�'i 843.0 4.0 0 0 c E 841.0 6.0 a� a� > a U h a� � � c c� c ° 836.0 11.0 .� � � > a� `o n, 833.0 14.0 � a. � � , �a � c cC (/J 'D C e0 C O a a� ¢ � 826.5 20.5 � xiption of Materials (ASTM D2488) B�un� ENGINEERING TESTING BORING: ST-4 LOCATION: 31'N. 10'W of N.E. building corner ot 53�8 Horizo� Drive DATE:' 8_18_88 SCALE: �„�4, BPF WL Tests o� Notes SI�TY SANO� mostiy tine fl�alned, with Roots black. molst. . rown. mo s. me um dense. (Ffne Affuvlum) �� V V � tine to tine gralned. tl�ht brown. molst, loose. (Caarse At tuvlun+) � w e ses o . gray and whlte. wet, rather stitt. (Ftne Altuvlum) tine towf�ine gra�ined, gray, moist, medium dense. (Coarse Alluvlum) 7 12 13 ---- ------ • . •.__.., . to medfum gralned, brown. moist, �5 medium dense. (Coarse Alluvium) END OF BORING. Watef level not encountered wtth 19' ot hollow-stam augar In the ground. Water tevet not encountered to cave-in depth ot 12.5' imnediatel atter withdrawal ot auger. Boring immedlately backfilled. 13 (Topso{1) TW N2 Liqui3 Llmit: 98% Plastic Limit: 31% Plastic Index: 67% ShrtnKage Llmit: 17% Moisture Content: 37. Dry Denisty: 78.8 pcf Percent Heave: 2.1% Swell Pressure: 1.6 T Shrtnkage Ratio: 1.896 � � LOG OF BORING PROJECT: BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Setttement Problem Yarlous Locatfons Fr idley. _�IN Elev. Depth ASTM D2487 846.2 0.0 Symbol 845.2 1.0 �: o� 0 0 c E � a� a� > .a ` U N � � � C c0 c 0 '� � 834.2 12.0 > a� 0 � a� R a � � ca � � 829.2 17.0 � � c �a r 0 a a� � 825.7 20.5 a� a� � ri K/`i U 11 � ENGINEERING TESTIHG BORING: ST-5 LOCATION: 43'E, 9'N of S.E. buliding corner of 538A Horizon Drive DATE: 8-18-88 SCALE: 1 "�4' Oescription ot Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes (ASTM D2488) , mos y ne gr�a n with Roots. black, molst. , mos y ve flne to fine grained. Ilght brown. moist. loose to medlum dense. (Coarse Alluvium) v�r.. � y� o� � ov a� rather soft. (Fine Ailuvium) . 9 11 11 TW N3 6 5* *Llquid Limit: 58% Plastic Limit: 19% Ptastic Index: 39% Moisture Content: 48. . �.....,�., ..�...,, ...�. �, . � o I Q gralned. brown, moist, loose to L medlum dense. (Coarse Atluvlum) I END OF BORiNG. Watar level not encountered with 19' ot hollow-stem auger In the ground. Mlater level not encountered to cave-in depth ot 15' Immediately after wlthdrawal ot auger. Water level not encountered to cave-ind epth of 14' 1 day aiter withdrawal of auger. Boring then backtlllad. 15 a 0 0 c �E a� d > .a .` v N � � � C c0 C O .� � R > d � O N � �o a � � ca � C � � � c �v r 0 a � ¢ a� a� � LOG OF BORING �BRAUII ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: BORING: ST-6 BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOCATION: Settlement Problem Varlous Locations 35'W. 7'N of S.W. bullding corner Fr(dley. MN ot 5385 Horizon Drive DATE: g_ � g_gg SCALE: 1"-q � Elev. Depth ASTM Description ot Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes D2487 (ASTM D2488) 845.6 0.0 Symbd SM FILL: SILTY SANO. mostly tlQe mo s. 844.6 1.0 rained. with Roots, black, , mos y very flne to tine �ralned. dark brown, moist. 14 841.6 4.0 . mOS y n9 gralned. Ii�ht brown to Ilght � gray. molst. loose. (Coarse Alluvium) 6 % 6 831.6 14.0 . gray, we , ra er sott .- 5 (Flne Alluvlum) 828.f� �%.� � mos y ine gralnad, gray. water-bearing, medium dense. (Coarse Aliuvlum) 825.1 20.5 12 END OF BORING. Water level not encountered with � 19' oi hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to cave-in depth ot 15' immediately after withdrawal ot auger. Bortng Inmediately backfllled. � � 0 0 c E � a� > a .` U H � � � C � C O .� � io > n� 0 � � � a � � e� � c �a � � c � t 0 a a� ¢ n� a� � LOG OF BORING � r�un� � ENGIHEERING TESTING PROJECT: BORING: ST-7 BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOCATION: Sattlement Problem Varlous Locatlons 38'E. 8'N of S.E. bulid(ng corner. Fr l d I ey ,�IN of 5364 Hor 1 zor� Dr I ve DATE: g-lg-gg SCALE: 1"�4' Elev. Depth ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes D2487 (ASTM D2488) 845.0 0.0 Symbol S1� FILL: SILTY SAND. mostly IQe mo s. 8d4.0 1.0 rained, with Roots. black. . . mos y tlne grained. Il�ht brown. moits. 6 7 839.0 6.0 , moS y ne gralned, gray. molst, loose. (Coarse Ailuvlum) � s 7 831.0 14.0 , g ay, we . me ium. (Ffne Alluvium) 6 828.0 17.0 , mos y very 9 fine to tlne grained, brown. moist, loose to medfum dense. (Coarse Alluvium) 824.5 20.5 13 END OF BORIN6. Water level not encountered with 19' of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water levet not encountered to cave-In depth of 12' immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring tmmediately backftlled. >, rn 0 0 c �E � a� > .La `v a v �v c eo C 0 .� � � a'� � 0 � a� � a � c� v c m � n c �o r 0 a d ¢ � � I LOG OF BORING �Br�un� � ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: BORING: ST-8 8�88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOCATION: Settlement Problem Varlous Locatlons 36'S. 11'W ot S.E. buflding corner FrldleY. MN of 169 Crown Road DATE: - - SCALE: � Elev. Depth ASTM Description oi Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes D2487 (ASTM D2488) 847.0 0.0 Symbol . . � . mos y b ack, molst. ffne to medfum �ralned, brown� moist. 8 7 sai.o s.o , mos y ne 840.0 7.0 rained, dark brown, mofst. . mos y 9 tine to madlum grained, gray. mOlSt. 838.0 9.0 . , mos y tine gra(ned� a trace ot Gravel. 25 raddish brown. moist. 836.0 11.0 . mos y ne to medlum gralned. brown. moist. madlum dense to dense. 29 (Coarse Alluvlum) 33 829.0 18.0 . gray. we . s . (Fine Alluvium) • 826.5 20.5 16 END OF BORING, Water level not ancounterad wfth 19' of hollow-stem auger In the ground. Water leve! not encountered to cave-in depth of 10' Immedlately atter withdrawal ot auger. Boring immediataly backtilled. >, rn 0 0 c .� � a� a� > .a U N a� � � c ea C O .� � � > n� � 0 N � c4 a � � .� c � � � c �o r 0 a a� ¢ c� a� � LOG OF BORiNG B�un _._. ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: BORING: ST-9 BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOCATION: Sett{ement Problem Various Locatlons 34'N of N.E. building corner of Frldley, MN 112 Crown Road DATE: - - SCALE: � Elev. Depth ASTM Description oi Materials BPF Wl, Tests or Notes 850.0 0.0 D2487 (ASTM D2488) Symbot . grafned, w(th Roots. dark brown. 848.5 1.5 molst. , mos y very fine�to fine gralned. dark �5 brown, molst, 10 842.0 8.0 7 , mos y ne gralned. Ilght brown, moist. medium dense. (Coarse Alluvlum) 21 28 ' 2g 833.0 17.0 , mos Y �ne 26 grained. with seams of SII.T� brown. molst, medlum dense. (Codrse Alluvium) 829.5 20.5 25 ENO OF BORING. Water level not encountered with 19' of holiow-stem auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to cave-(n depth ot 10' immedlately after withdrawal ot auger. Boring immedlataly backfilled. �. rn 0 0 c E a� a� > a U � a� v � c ea c 0 .� � �a > n� � 0 � n� � a � � �v � c c� � � c c� r 0 a a� � a� � LOG OF BORING � B UII ENGIHEERING TESTING PROJECT: BORING: ST-10 BL88-095 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION LOCATION: Settlement Problem Varlous Locatlons 27'S, 15'E ot S.W. building corner Frldley. MN • ot 117 53rd Avenue DATE: 8-19-88 SCA�E: 1"�4' Elev. Depth ASTM Descripdon o( Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes D2487 (ASTM D2488) 846.1 0.0 Symbd . . 845.1 1.0 with Roots, dark brown, molst. , mos y ne gralned, brown, moist. loose. (Coa�se Alluvium) �� 9 840.1 6.0 , mos y very tlne to tlne grained. with lenses ot LEAN CLAY. gray, �� molst, loose to medlum dense. (Coarse Alluvlum) 12 835.1 11.0 , w enses o GRADED SAND� 9ray. wet. rather stitt to medium. 11 (F(ne Alluvlum) 8 829.1 17.0 TW M4 . mos y ne 13 Liquid ��mit: 100% grained� gray. molst. medium Plastic Limit: 27% dense. Plastic Index: 73% (Coarse Ailuvlum) Shrinkage Limit: 17X �iolsture Content: 65. Dry Density: 56.6 pcf 825.6 20.5 �� Percent Heave: 0% END OF BORING. Swell Pressure: NA Shrinkage Ratio: 1.8% Weter level not enCOUntered with 19'•ot holtow-stem auger In the ground. Water level.not encountared to cave-in depth of 9' immedlately afte� withdrawal ot auger. 8oring immadiately backfilled. • S W E L L T E S T ( Unifi Strain vs� Log Vertical Pressure ) ,��un� , ENGINEERlNG TE57ING i PROJECT �.,ss-o9s DATE TESTED s-z�- SOI� DESCRIPTION a� - F� c�r 80RING S�4 SAMPLE �,,�2 SAMPLE DEPTH 9� - 11� LL 9s %', Pv1C 3�.4�'o PL 3i �'o SPECIFIC GRAVfTY GS z.sy �IN. VOID RATIO DRY UNIT WT. , d �s.s pcf OTHER � 15 12.5 10 \ � �Q 7.5 i +- V) �+- .� � � 5 2.5 -�_ VERTfCAL PRESSURE (tsf ) S W E L L T E S T �� ( Unit Strain vs= Log Vertical Pressure ) E�,iNEER�NG TESTiNG PROJECT BLSS-095 OATE TESTED s_= SOIL. �ESCRIPTION cx - F� cr�,r BOR ING �-lo SAMPLE .R,,� - a SAMPLE DEPTH ls� �-.. 1� � LL ioo % MC 6s.o% PL 2� 9'o SPECIFIC GRAVITY GS 2.s9 IN. VOID RAT10 �RY UNIT WT. , d s6.6 pcf OTHER 7.5 5 z. s . . � -o 0 � � � � .� _ -2.5 -5 -7.5 VERTiCAL PRESSURE (tsf ) . . . . . .. _. . . . . ��'�� _�� 0�� _�� _�� 1�� _��- �� n�n��n��n �dm� ��t��e �� w��n � a avm �� .�........�:, �• Q ,..- .- _�� Q�� v� �nt��y� _�� _d� �� V�� 0�� , �,' � �2 % C�4 S � //�� ti23 C� ! �� V� 4 L- �lS'� �� p �- �-� C�� % � � _ 22 � Z �,Q-�i� 0� G 3 tq-�Iq � G�s c�-� � �� ►�-� ,�lf �•- �,� c�� C'�,1�� D �`� ��,� `� Z � - 2}�, °j �i 1� ��(� � .� : , , _ CIIYOF FR[ DLEY FR[DLEY MUNICIPA[. CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 June 15, 1992 Harvey and Jean Johnson ' 136 Horizon Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 RE: First Notice of Noncompliance at 136 Horizon Circle N.E. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Johnson: The City of Fridley has established a City.Code for the purpose of promoting a pleasant and attractive suburban environment. A recent inspection of the property at 136 Horizon Circle N.E. revealed that not all Code requirements are pre�ently being met. Listed below is an item which does not comply with the City Code: 1. Fridley City Code requires that all vehicles must be currently licensedjstreet operable and kept on a hard surface parking area if they are stored outside. I observed a vehicle located on the grass along the west side of the property which does not fully meet these requirements. Your prompt attention in correcting this situation would greatly assist us in helping make Fridley a better place to live. An inspection will be conducted on or about June 29, 1992, to determine compliance. If you have questions or would like to discuss this, please contact me at 572-3595. Thank you for your cooperation! Sincerely, Steven Barg Code Enforcement Officer SB:ls CE-92-281 I � ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES INC. 715 Florida Avenue South, Suite 406-B Golden Valley MN 55426-1759 TEL [612] 546-8500 FAX [612] 546-9490 December 11, 1998 City of Fridley Dave Mayer 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley MN 55432 RE: Harvey Johnson Home 136 Horizon Circle Fridley MN Dear Mr. Mayer: I have been thinking about the condition of the basement and structural elements of this home. Cracking and displacements indicate all basement walls are under attack from the surrounding soil and the apparent failure of the foundation system. A brief review of the super structure disclosed questionable areas withi.n the framing. I think :the basement walls can be repaired by the choose of one of several methods. Judging the extensive damage, I think the complete replacement of the walls and strip footings is the better option. Knowing other solutions are available, the use of a shot crete wall and underpinning the footings may be an selection worthy of investigation. No matter what solution is selected for the walls and footings, the super structure will need attention. At this ti.me there is not enough information available to form a reliable opinion about the level of involvement. �ven though this hume exhibits a Iengt;hy list of needed repair, it is a good candidate for repair or remodeL I know there will be questions about my comments. Feel free to call me when these questions occur. Respectfully Submitted, � � Robert E. Ferguson, P.E. HRA Home Client Tracking Sheet Remodelin-g AdvisoF Contact Date: %f -- / �� U �� . ., . � -- Nature of Call: ��ti��-�� Appointment Date: � j_��- q . :�� , *� ,_-� ,;::� x,� � �� : G�2c�cs" �� 5�; ��'� Wk Phone• � z .� ; -_, ---� v� S i�-ts c.._� —�� cc,:�± :.; .�� - . r, gj Time: ,� ,' UD - Action Log/Meeting Notes: , �� CV� f!n� '�G / �Cti2 (e� �ic°" ��UcJ S �'s � 1L.,r2rr�. �� S�4 7"(1 S, ., ,} --I _ _ _ __ _ _ _ � Y ��v�,., j�l� �f d�� j Ij�j� � ' - �j�� `Z� c i� c,-�% C;� �u c��2 - --� ; � �., v t ,_ _ , y� _t �."� �-� ��' i-��. ,.- . : � —_� , -� � '� �,�-� s_ l i t. �j�.. � ��'`-° � � �) l• �� .i� _ _ � , � � ,l�'��` /� ' �f_� %/<•:,,�._ J %•� �- /C� � �j i � f� ', 1-.� --- --..___ __ _ �, EXPLORATORY :•� FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY Job Number 981566 5300 Highway 101 South Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: (612) 474 7964 i ' � � ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING SURVEYING / ENGINEERING / GEOTECHNICAL I' S300 Highway 101 South, Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone 474 7964 Fax 474 8267 December 23, 1998 Attn: Mr. Dave Mayer City Of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Phone: 572-3515 Dear Dave: At your request, we have conducted a preliminary investigation of soil conditions on your site at the locations you specified. The following is a tabulation of data about your site: METHODS: The investigation consisted of exploratory soil borings to aid in identifying soil and water conditions. We have indicated the approximate locations of the borings on an attached site plan sketch. Elevations are very approximate. Borings were taken with a truck mounted CME 45 drill rig using solid stem continuous-flight augers. Soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually examined in the field by the soils engineer. The soils are classified on the basis of teacture and plasticity in accordance with ASTM D2487 "Unified Soil Classification System" and a chart explaining that system is attached. � I� ' ' RECOMMENDATIONS : �' The compact, brown sand encountered in the borings is suitable for the support of the proposed structure. It is our opinion that these soils are capable of supporting footings proportioned to exert a bearing pressure of no more than ' 3000 pounds per square foot. The existing structure shall be supported by compact, brown sand. The grey-brown clay is not suitable to support the � existing structure. �J , , ' � , ' ' � � STANDARD CAUTIONS & LIMITATIONS: We measure the depth of any ground water that may have accumulated in the borings immediately at completion of the borings. We do not monitor the borings over a period of time. Borings left open are a hazard to pedestrians, leave and opening for pollutants, and quickly cave in rendering any measurements of little value. The water levels we observe are thus only an indication of an immediate and rapid flow of water into the borings indicating that drain tile system might be over taxed in such soils. Slow inflows may not be detected and variations in rainfall can affect ground water levels. While it is our opinion that a properly designed and installed drain tile system and submersible sump pump will keep most below grade spaces dry, and should be a standard part of all new construction, we make no guarantees in this regard. Of necessity, the area of the borings in relation to the area of the site and the depth of the borings are limited. Suggestions and recommendations of this report are opinions based on data obtained from the borings. If upon excavation, conditions that are not consistent with the borings are revealed, it is agreed that you will notify us so that we may gather further information and modify our opinion or indicate that no modification is necessary in a written addendum to this report; or failing to engage our services to prepare such written addendum it is agreed that you proceed at you own peril. I hereby certify that is report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. ' � Ja�es ' ' � .E. & P.S , No. 9235, President ' ' ' UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION 5YSTEM (CL) Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravely clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays (SV� Well graded sands and gravely sands, little or no fines (SP) Poorly graded sands and gravely sands, little or no fines (GV� Well graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines (SC) Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures (GC) Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures (SM) Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures (OL) Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity (OH) Organic clays of inedium to high plasticity (Pt) Peat, muck, and other highly organic soils (ML) Inorganic silts, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sand (CH) Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays (MH) Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous silts, elastic silts (GP) Poorly graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines (GM) Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures XPLORATORY SOIL BORING LOG # 981566 'DLS 23-Dec-98 !Cit Of Fridle JOBNO I BY DATE CLIENT CITY ATION DEPTH I lir,Jl;KlY 11VN � 98 0� 97 1 96, 2{ � � �Loase , brown well graded sand (SV� -Fill 95 3 � � 94 , 4 ' , � 93 5 s �� 92 � 6 ��: � �, ��°� .�,, �� \� . C - 'f3 � \� \ : �� _ �� \� ��j �/ / � � �L /� \ � p �7 l � � � / pe a'• /� � 4 � ' � 91 ; / � /s " �\ : pr'/� � r %i � % �� \ � f : /r 5� �r�a y u� .: �� f �� \ ° � �� \,�� a n� ii� � �L� - � � �' - r � ii ` � : �� \ 9� li Q � : � �� , � �� y � 3 p /i Z.< � �c \ `�� a � ,s � ' � , � ji � �, � y�� i�6� �� \4 C�� \KC ��«� � a g9I 9 �� `y� � � ' �� y �a» y � � � � �� A� � - ��Z : � � i i �� . (� �� . � � � �: � �, � .,�%"` - . .. � . . ,.. , �... , a� , :.%� . . '1��.a. ,".� . .....�. � '"�i� � . . � ggl� 1� ��i I II 87 11 ' Compact , brown weil graded sand (SV� ; '� 86 12� ' , 85 13 � ; I � -D- 84, 14; ; N* 1 continued next page * W- DENOTES WATER LEVEL DETECTED AT COMPLETION OF BORING, MAY RISE !(D=DRY} *N - STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BLOW COUNT �DVANCE SURVEYING / ENGINEERING / GEOTECHNICAL 300 HIGHWAY 101 SO. MINNETONKA MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 474 7964 LORATORY SOIL BORING LOG # 981566 'DLS 23-Dec-98 Cit Of JOBNO BY ! DATE i CITY 2 *W - DENOTES WATER LEVEL DETECTED AT COMPLETION OF BORING, MAY RISE !(D=DR� *N - STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BLOW COUNT DVANCE SURVEYING �1 ENGINEERING / GEOTECHNICAL 00 HIGHWAY 101 SO. MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55345 PHONE: 4 ,�D VANCE ENGINEERING�GE 0 TECHNI CAL/S UR VE YING 5300 HIGHWAY 101 S. MINNETONKA, MN 5 345 PHONE 474-7964 FAX 474-8267 SI TE PLAN FOR : CI T Y OF FRIDLE Y SOIL BORING � SOIL BORING # 1 � SB# ITOP ELEV { FIRM SOILS I ELEV OF WATER I DESC SUITABLE SOIL BENCHMARK ELEVATION OF MAIN FLOOR OF EXISITNG DWELLING = 1 s8�s6s CIT� OF FRIDLE� FA�:�ST1l�I��E TRANSM�TTAL S��ET ro� PROM: �c9g ��y � s v �J D�l ��a-`1 t�'z. COMPANY: DAT& ' t— �7-r�� PAX MJNtBERs 'POTAL NO.OP PAGES INCLUDING COVERz 61z - S�t� -`� 4� a Z- PHON8 NLJldSEl� SENDER'S PHONE NUMBERi Gt2- ��• 8so� �'�Z - s�z- 3�i� � � �ror�sr�utHC�ae: . �a �#rJ S � � �S, D URGENT �FOR RBVIEw. � PLE1►S8 COMMBNT �PLEASE RHPLY O PLEASB RBCYCLE N01'ES/COMMBNTS� City of Fridley _ Home Improvement Program 335-2651 �� ,¢.y vs r�v �� G�z�6- q4qC� �� ,�� 46 -��;� , 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, NE, FRIDLEY, MN 55432 � � �'�o� 3 � � � � � l- � � . , �, .� � � N = � � 7 �Q � ? � � � � 0 ��s � _ �"1 � �' J � �L � U � � i � � � t � � � ' �J � J a�1 �- � � � �' tl � w� s � � � � � � � � � � � J Q � r � � � � J � � 9 Z � � � � � � � � � � �' � 2 �. _ � � v r � � � � V �' 4 1 � 4_ _ _. _ _ ___ _ _ _ :: _ __ _ . __ : _,- . _ _ � �_ . �_ _ .__: . . _ � _ : _ ::_ . _ _ � : . -: _-- .. . _ _�_: �_ � -�w_ - _ FROM � HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PHONE N0. � 612 915 1519 Jan. 06 1999 12:1BPM P1 L . � � i0: �i��JE /Y/.� 0� �� F� 57l -/o� �7 Pa,g��: a/�/c.0 �o a� �ifro�' Rw: /3!o f�'d�e/zo�/ �i�e. � �� - !o - �i C� Phon� G,so -.�C� /.�"� C] Urgent �I �or Rev%w � Ptease Conument D Please R�tly • Cornmerits: MIKE KONCZAL Foreman Mobile: 612-839-9426 Sales: 612-861-4243 � Office: 612-928-9399 Fax: 612-915-1519 IME bS 1 H CAMBRIDGE STREET NTEED �� MINNEAPO�IS, MN 55426 RK HAG � TECHNiCRETE� L1FEi1ME GUARANTEE CONCREfE 6518 CAMBRFDGH STREET, MINNEAi'OIIS, MN 554�26 iEL: 6t2-8$1-42�13 FAX: 612-91�1518 FROM � HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PHONE N0. : 612 915 1515 Jan. 06 1999 12:18PM P2 Hage Concrete Works is the creator and excius��e �nsrv�� ...�._ --•- Proposal for:%jr,t� f� Frid��(—��—�av�X� ob Address 136 Horizon Circle Fridley, MI� b431 University Avenue N.E. �.�y�y Johnson Residence) Fridley, MN 55432 7�u�, 6, 1999 571-3450 GENER-AL I.TITENTION: Construct a naw foundation under the existing dwelling. Iiucluded: r BuildiAg pet[tut. � Holdin� the dwelling in place (no t�aising). • Removing and disposing of the block walls and the footing- ■ Const�ucxing 8" diam�ter oonc,rete piers to 4'.0" below the top of t�e basement ftoor. . Fi,ers to be placed S'0" apart and be stagge�ed. * 12" thi�ck x 20" wide footing�on top of tlie piers. Two #4. rods coutinuous- ■ 10 raws of 12" blocks on footings up to the rim joist (full high blocks). � Corc filling blocks at 4'0" isrtervals. ` RePairin$ outs�de edges of the basement ftoor. . ` � ■ Excavating and ba�ck��lling• • Waterproofing. � ■ Removing and disposiag of debris. TOTAI. $28,740.Q0 OPTIQN: Replau�e the front.aad side eutrarice steps, same dimensions 2�000.00 and design as prases�t. Excluded: � Plumbing ■ �lectrical ' ' CarPentr�+ ■ Insulation � �. Yard repair � � 5irrubbery repeir ■ Paint�ng • Any other work not specifically mentioneci in the "Included" items o�'tlie job. ' � $$28,740.00 + OQtion �:Page ,� of � Estimator: :. founder of Minnesota Concrere and Mosonry Conirecton Association � M�mber of United Conc�ete und Mosonry Contrectors Association � Quality Engineered Cancrete Work Since 1930 �.. �onded • Licensed �• �Insured � b5�8.CANI�RIDG� STREET, ST. LOU�S PARIC,.N�INNESOTA 55426� PHONE 812-86i�243 ..EAX 61?�915-1519� , ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES INC. 715 Florida Avenue South, Suite 406-B Golden Valley MN 55426-1759 TEL [812] 548-8500 FAX [612] 546-9490 . . � � �. . ' BILL TO � . - Gdty. t?f `Fridley . , . . '. Ron`J�ikowski : ' . , : 6431 `_University Avenue Northeast � Fridley, MN 55432 � .. . y � , _ - ��o�� -as- � Invoice DATE INVOICE NO. 1/22/99 8901.1 0 TERMS PROJECT� I -' Y - , Net 30 � 9901 Johnson... _ I - • - DESCRIPTION AMOUNT SERVICES 0F A PRINCIPAL ENGINEER - _ SERVICES OF�A TECHNICIAN FOR DRAFTING FOR THE PURPOSE 4F DEVELOPING CALCULATIONS AND CERTIFIED DRAWINGS . FOR�THE BASEMENT WALL REPLACEMENT FOR THE JOHNSON RESIDENCE AT 136 HORIZON CIRCLE, FRIDLEY MINNESOTA : .. -. , , . . __ __. , ' 612 546-8500 FAX 612 546-9490 . , ' ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. � � ROBERT E. FERGUSON, P.E. ' ' STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - ' ': - 715 FLORIDA AVENUE SOUTH ; SUITE 406-B � � GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55426 - � Total , 300.00 . `700.00 .I � $1,000.00 � ;� � � �, CALCULATIONS ., BASEMENT REPLACEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE 136 HORIZON CIRCLE FRIDLEY MINNESOTA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 715 FLORIDA AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 446-B GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 ' 612.546.85� TEL ' 612.546.9490 FAX �� TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN LOADS STEEL FRAME DESIGN DRILLED SHAFr FOUNDATION MASONRY WALL STRUCLAM FRAME' DESIGN ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN i HEREBY CERT�Y 7NAT THIS PIJW. SPECFICA710N OR �RT WAS COII�LETED BY MYSELF OR UNDER MY DRECT SUPERYISION AND TNAT I AM A DULY �7ERFD PROFESSIONAL B� UNDER THE LAWS OF 7HE STAiE OF II�INESOTA. ' RECi NUM ZO E FERGUSON, P /�F'' j� ' / �� ' /� � • ROOF SNOW LOAD ROOF DEAD LOAD FLOOR LIVE LOAD FLOOR DEAD LOAD PARTITION SELF WEIGHT SOIL BEARING CAPACITY DESIGN LOADS GIVEN ASSUMPTIONS "k" MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION SOIL EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSUR,E 40 PSF 20 PSF 40 PSF 15 PSF . 8 PLF 3000 PSF 320 KCF 20 PCF RI5A-2D (R) Version 3.03 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 11 Oak Road Circle Pines, MN 55014 •POST AND BEAM FRAME FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE Units Option : U5 Standard AISC Code Checks : 9th Edition ASD Shear Deformation: No P-Delta Effects : No Redesign : No Edge Forces : No A.S.I.F. : 1.333 Job Page Date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Boundary Conditions ' No X-Coord Y-Coord X-dof Y-dof Rotation Tem . -----------(ft)--------(ft)-----(in,x/in)----(in,x/in)---(r,K-ft/r)-----(F�- 1 11.00 0.00 R R 0.00 2 0.00 7.00 R R 0.00 3 11.OQ 7.00 0.00 4 34.00 7.00 R R 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Material Elastic Poisson's Thermal Weiyht Yield Stress � __Label______ Modulus____'__ Ratio_____Coefficient_^_ Density____w (F ____ -(Ksi)- -(F) -(K/ft3) -(Ksi� A992 29000.00 0.30000 0.65000 0.496 50.000 A500 29000.00 0.30000 0.65000 0.490 46.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section Database Matl. Area Moment of As y/y Label Shape Set Inertia Coef �___ ----------- ---------- ------(in^2)---------(in"4)------------- BM W8X40 A992 11.70 146.000 1.20 COL PI4.00S A500 3.17 7.230 1.20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I J I Releases J End Off��sets No Node Node Section x y z x y z Sec Sway I , J Length --�----2-_---3--BM------------------------------------(in)---,-(in)-----i1f00 2 3- 4 BM 23.00 3 1- 3 COL 7.00 � RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. il Oak Road Circle Pines, MN 55014 .POST AND BEAM FRAME FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE Job Page Date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I J Unbraced Lengths K Factors Bendinq Coefs No Node Node Lb-in Lb-out Lc In Out Cm Cb --------------------(ft)-----(ft)-----(ft)------------------ --------------- 1 2 - 3 2 3 - 4 3 1 - 3 ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BLC Basic Load Case Load Totals No. Description Nodal Point Dist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DEAD LOAD 2 2 LIVE LOAD 2 Member Distributed Loads,BLC 1: DEAD LOAD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Memb I J Start End Start End No Node Node Dir Magnitude Magnitude Location Location -------------------------(Kjft,F)-----(K/ft,F)---------(ft)---------(ft)---- 1 2- 3 Y -0.270 -0.270 0.000 11.000 2 3- 4 Y -0.270 -0.270 0.000 23.000 Member Distributed Loads,BLC 2: LIVE LOAD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- sMemb I J Start No Node Node Dir Magnitude -------------------------(K/ft,F)-- 1 2 3 Y -0.720 2 3 - 4 Y -0.720 • End Start End Magnitude Location Location �- (K/ft, F) --------- (ft) --------- (ft) ---- -0.720 0.000 11.Q00 -0.720 0.000 23.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Load Combination Self Wt BLC BLC BLC BLC BLC' W E No. Description Dir Fac Fac Fac Fac Fac Fac DYNA S V ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DL 2 DL + LL Dynamic Analysis Data Y -1 1 1 Y-1 1 1 2 1 Number of modes (frequencies) Basic Load Case for masses BLC mass direction of action Acceleration of Gravity 3 None X only 32.20 ft/sec**2 Y Y RISA-2D Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 11 Oak Road Circle Pines, MN 55014 �POST AND BEAM FRAME FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE (R) Version 3.03 Job Page Date ENVELOPE SOLUTION Nodal Displacements ----------------------------------------------------------------- - Node Global X -------------------(in)------LC--- 1 max min 2 max min 3 max min 4 max min -0.00000 1 -0.00000 2 0.00000 2 0.00000 1 0.00010 2 0.00003 1 0.00000 2 0.00000 1 Global Y ,Rotation ----(in)------LC----------(rad)-----LC- -0.00000 1 0.00214 2 -0.00000 2 0.00065 1 -0.00000 1 0.00092 2 -0.00000 2 , 0.00028 1 -0.00668 1 -0.00129 1 -0.02211 2 -0.00429 2 -0.00000 1 0.01114 2 -0.00000 2 ' 0.00335 1 ENVELOPE SOLUTION Reaations ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Global X Global Y ' Moment --------------------(K)------LC-----------(K)------LC----------(K-ft)----LC- 1 max 0.38251 2 24.23678 2 0.00000 1 min 0.11508 1 7.34417 1 0.00000 1 2 max -0.07785 1 1.24118 2 0.00000 1 . min -0.25876 2 0.37347 1 0.00000 1 4 max -0.03723 1 9.61118 2 0.00000 1 min -0.12375 2 2.89149 1 0.00000 1 ENVELOPE SOLUTION Member Section Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nodes Member Quarter No I J I-End 1/4, 1/2. --------------(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in) 1 2- 3 A -0.08 1 -0.08 1 -0.08 -0.26 2 -0.26 2 -0.26 V 1.24 2 -0.48 1 -1.33 0.37 1 -1.59 2 -4.42 M 0.00 1 0.48 2 8.75 0.00 1 0.14 1 2.63 D 0.000 1 0.031 2 0.059 0.000 1 0.009 1 0.018 \J Points 3/4 ' J-End LC (K, Kft, in) LC (K, Kft, in) LC-- 1 -0.08 1 -0.08 1 2 -0.26 2 -0.26 2 1 -2.18 1 -3.03 1 2 -7.25 2 -10.09 2 2 24.81 2 48.65 2 1 7.46 1 14.64 1 2 0.057 '2 -0.007 1 1 0.017 1 -0.024 2 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 11 Oak Road Circle Pines, MN 55014 � POST AND BEAM FRAME FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE Job Page Date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nodes Member Quarter Points No I J I-End 1/4. 1/2. 3/4 J-End --------------(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC(K,Kft,in)LC-- 2 3- 4 A 0.12 2 0.12 2 0.12 2 0.12 2 0.12 2 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 1 V 14.0? 2 8.15 2 2.23 2 -1.11 l -2.89 1 4.23 1 2.45 1 0.67 1 -3.69 2 -9.61 2 M 51.33 2 -3.78 1 -12.77 1 -1.1.50 '1 -0.00 1 15.44 1 -12.58 2 -42.43 2 -38.24 2 -0.00 2 D 0.000 1 -0.143 1 -0.248 1 -0.194 1 0.007 2 0.000 1 -0.476 2 -0.826 2 -U.646 2 0.002 1 3 1- 3 A 24.24 2 24.22 2 24.20 2 24.18 2 24.16 2 7.34 1 ?.33 1 7.31 1 7.29 1 7.27 1 V -0.12 1 -0.12 1 -0.12 1 -0.12 1 -0.12 1 -0.38 2 -0.38 2 -0.38 2 -0.38 '2 -0.38 2 M -0.00 2 0.67 2 1.34 2 2.01 2 2.68 2 -0.00 1 0.20 1 0.40 1 0.60 1 0.81 1 D 0.000 1 0.042 2 0.067 2 0.059 '2 -0.000 1 0.000 1 0.013 1 0.020 1 0.018 l -0.000 2 ENVELOPE SOLUTION AISC Code Checks ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nodes Member Quarter Points •No I J Max lc 0 lc 1/4 lc 1/2 lc 3/4 lc L lc Shear lc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2- 3 0.551 2 0.00 2 0.01 2 0.10 2 0.28 2 0.55 2 0.17 2 2 3- 4 0.732 2 0.73 2 0.18 2 0.61 2 0.55 2 0.00 2 0.24 2 3 1- 3 0.606 2 0.35 2 0.41 2 0.47 2 0.52 2 0.61 2 0.01 2 n L _J 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 1 11:35:08 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT A1 - GENERAL INFORMATION: ------------------------- ------------------------- � Project : DRILLED SHAFT FOOTING FOR JOHB=NSON RESIDENCE Engineer: REF File : C:\PROJECTS\9901�SHAFT.MAT Units : English Date : 01-07-99 Code : ACI 318-89 Time : 20:21:43 Maximum number of iterations = 10 Maximum allowed displacement = 12 in Minimum contact area allowed = 50.00 $ Displacement limit for uplift = 0 in Reinforcement is based on maximum moment within an element. ', Number of nodes = 36 Number of elements = 25 A2 - THICKNESS DEFINITIONS: Label t (in) -------- -------- THICKNES 60.00 A3 - CONCRETE DEFINITI023S: -------------------------- -------------------------- Label f'c (ksi) Wc (pcf) Ec (ksi) v -------- ------------ ------------ ------------ -------- CONC 3.5 130 2893.8 0.150 A4 - SOIL DEFINITIONS: � __Label_ Ks (kcf? Qa (ksfj ------------ ------------ SOIL 327 3 A5 - REINFORCING STEEL DEFINiTIONS: Label Fy (ksi) Es (ksi) ------ ------------ ------------ STEEL 60 29000 A6 - DESIGN PARAMETERS DEFINITIONS: Label Top-X (in) Top-Y (in) Bot-X (in) Bot-Y (in) Min Reinf -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- PARA 2.7500 3.0000 2.7500 3.0000 0.1800 $ • 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 2 11:35:08 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT A10 - SURFACE LOAD DEFINITIONS: ------------------------------- ------------------- • Label Case Wz (psf) -------- ---- ------------ DEAD A -10000 LIVE B -60000 All - LOAD COMBINATIONS: Self weight is included under Case A. Ld Combo Case A Case B Case C Case D Case E Case F Type Save? -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---- ----- SERVICE 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Ser. Yes ULTIMATE 1.400 1.700 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Ult. Yes ' � � U 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 3 11:35:08 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT Al2 - X-GRID LINE DEFINITIONS: ------------------------------ ------------------------------ . No. Coord. (ft) No. Coord. (ft) No. Coord. (ft) --- ------------ --- ------------ --- ------------ 1 0 2 0.333333 3 0.666667 4 1 5 1.33333 6 1.66667 A13 - Y-GRID LINE DEFINITIONS: ------------------------------ ------------------------------ No. Coord. (ft) No. Coord. (ft) No. Coord. (ft) --- ------------ --- ------------ --- --------�--- 1 0 2 0.333333 3 0.666667 4 1 5 1.33333 6 1.66667 � • 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 4 11:35:08 Licenced to: EnqineerinQ Enterprises. Inc. SHAFT.MAT A14 - NODAL DATA: ----------------- ----------------- • Node X(ft� Y(ft) Fixity Spring Loaded? ---- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- -------- 1 0.000 0.000 - - 2 0.333 0.000 - - 3 0.667 0.000 - - 4 1.000 0.000 - - 5 1.333 0.000 - - 6 1.667 0.000 - - 7 0.000 0.333 - - 8 0.333 0.333 - - 9 0.667 0.333 - - 10 1.000 0.333 - - 11 1.333 0.333 - - 12 1.667 0.333 - - 13 0.000 0.667 - - 14 0.333 0.667 - - 15 0.667 0.667 - - 16 1.000 0.667 - - 17 1.333 0.667 - - 18 1.667 0.667 - - 19 0.000 1.000 - - 20 0.333 1.000 - - 21 0.667 1.000 - - 22 1.000 1.000 - - 23 1.333 1.000 - - 24 1.667 1.000 - - 25 0.000 1.333 - - 26 0.333 1.333 - - � 27 0.667 1.333 _ _ 28 1.000 1.333 29 1.333 1.333 - - 30 1.667 1.333 - - 31 0.000 1.667 - - 32 0.333 1.667 - - 33 0.667 1.667 - - 34 1.000 1.667 - - 35 1.333 1.667 - - 36 1.667 1.667 - - � 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page S 11:35:08 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAET.MAT A17 - ELEMENT GEOMETRY: � Elem i j k 1 1 1 7 2 8 2 2 8 3 9 3 3 9 4 10 4 4 10 5 11 5 5 11 6 12 6 7 13 8 14 7 8 14 9 15 8 9 15 10 16 9 10 16 11 17 10 11 1� 12 18 11 13 19 14 20 12 14 20 15 21 13 15 21 16 22 14 16 22 17 23 15 17 23 18 24 16 19 25 20 26 17 20 26 21 27 18 21 27 22 28 19 22 28 23 29 20 23 29 24 30 21 25 31 26 32 22 26 32 27 33 23 27 33 28 34 24 28 34 29 35 25 29 35 30 36 � � � �J� X-Dim (ft) 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 Q.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 Y-Dim (ft) 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 Thick.(in) 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.Q0 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 6 11:35:08 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT A18 - ELEMENT ASSIGNMENTS: Elem Thick. Concrete 5oil Steel DesParam Loaded? ---- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 1 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 2 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 3 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 4 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 5 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 6 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 7 THICEINES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 8 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA Yes 9 THiCKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 10 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 11 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 12 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA Yes 13 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 14 THICKI3ES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA Yes 15 THICKNES CONC SOIy STEEL PARA 16 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 17 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 18 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA Yes 19 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 20 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 21 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 22 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 23 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 24 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA 25 THICKNES CONC SOIL STEEL PARA � � � J 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page $ 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT B1 - FORCE VECTOR: ------------------ ------------------ `Units --> Force (kip), Moment (kip-ft) Service Load Combination: SERVICE Node Force, Pz Moment, Mx 1 -0.018056 -0.0010031 2 -0.036111 -0.0020062 3 -0.036111 -0.0020062 4 -0.036111 -0.0020062 5 -0.036111 -0.0020062 6 -0.018056 -0.0010031 7 -0.036111 0 8 -0.072222 0 9 -2.0167 -0.10802 10 -2.0167 -0.10802 11 -0.072222 0 12 -0.036111 Q 13 -0.036111 0 14 -2.0167 -0.10802 15 -3.9611 -1.0331e-009 16 -3.9611 0 17 -2.0167 -0.10802 18 -0.036111 0 19 -0.036111 0 20 -2.0167 0.10802 21 -3.9611 0 22 -3.9611 -1.0331e-009 23 -2.0167 0.10802 24 -0.036111 0 25 -0.036111 0 � 26 -0.072222 0 27 -2.0167 0.10802 26 -2.0167 0.10802 29 -0.072222 0 30 -0.036111 0 31 -0.018056 0.0010031 32 -0.036111 0.0020062 33 -0.036111 0.0020062 34 -0.036111 0.0020Q62 35 -0.036111 0.0020062 36 -0.018056 0.0010031 � Moment, My 0.0010031 0 0 0 0 -0.0010031 0.0020062 0 0.10802 -0.10802 0 -0.0020062 0.0020062 0.10802 1.0331e-009 0 -0.10802 -0.0020062 0.0020062 0.10802 0 1.0331e-009 -0.10802 -0.0020062 0.0020062 0 0.10802 -0.10802 0 -0.0020062 0.0010031 0 0 0 0 -0.0010031 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 9 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT B1 - FORCE VECTOR: ------------------ ------------------ �Units --> Force (kip), Moment (kip-ft) Ultimate Load Combination: ULTIMATE Node Force, Pz Moment, Mx Moment, My � L J � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 -0.025278 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.025278 -0.050555 -0.10111 -3.3233 -3.3233 -0.10111 -0.050555 -0.050555 -3.3233 -6.5455 -6.5455 -3.3233 -0.050555 -0.050555 -3.3233 -6.5455 -6.5455 -3.3233 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.10111 -3.3233 -3.3233 -0.10111 -0.050555 -0.025278 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.050555 -0.025278 -0.0014043 -0.0028086 -0.0028086 -0.0028086 -0.0028086 -0.0014043 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 -0.17901 -0.17901 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 -0.17901 5.3804e-009 4.7401e-009 -0.17901 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 0.17901 4.7401e-009 5.3804e-009 0.17901 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 0.17901 0.17901 -2.3768e-011 -2.3768e-011 0.0014043 0.0028086 0.0028086 0.0028086 0.0028086 0.0014043 0.0014043 2.3768e-011 2.3768e-011 2.3768e-011 2.3768e-011 -0.0014043 0.0028086 2.3768e-011 0.17901 -0.17901 2.3768e-011 -0.0028086 0.0028086 0.17901 4.1564e-009 -4.7401e-009 -0.17901 -0.0028086 0.0028086 0.17901 -4.7401e-009 4.1564e-009 -0.17901 -0.0028086 0.0028086 2.3768e-011 0.17901 -0.17901 2.3768e-011 -0.0028086 0.0014043 2.3768e-011 2.3768e-011 2.3768e-011 2.3768e-011 -0.0014043 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 10 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT B2 - NODAL DISPLACEMENTS AND ROTATIONS: •Units --> Displacement (in), Rotation (Radians) Flags --> [x] Indicates maximum displacement is exceeded. Service Load Combination: SERVICE Node Disp, Dz X-Rot, Rx Y-Rot, Ry ---- ------------ ------------ ------------ • � U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 39 35 36 -0.12358 -0.11493 -0.10628 -0.097633 -0.088983 -0.080332 -0.12086 -0.11221 -0.10356 -0.094906 -0.086255 -0.077604 -0.11813 -0.10948 -0.10083 -0.092179 -0.083528 -0.074877 -0.1154 -0.10675 -0.098101 -0.089451 -0.0808 -0.072149 -0.11267 -0.10402 -0.095373 -0.086722 -0.078071 -0.06942 -0.10994 -0.10129 -0.092644 -0.083993 -0.075343 -0.066692 0.00068178 0.00068178 0.00068177 0.00068179 0.00068182 0.00068189 0.00068182 0.0006818 0.0006818 0.00068181 0.00068184 0.00068187 0.00068192 0.00068191 0.00068192 0.00068193 0.00068194 0.00066196 0.00068205 0.00068209 0.00068209 0.00068209 0.00068209 0.00068207 0.00068215 0.00068219 0.0006822 0.0006822 0.00068217 0.00068215 0.0006822 0.00068221 0.00068223 0.00068222 0.00068218 0.00068219 -0.0021624 -0.0021624 -0.0021625 -0.0021626 -0.0021627 -0.0021628 -0.0021624 -0.0021624 -0.0021625 -0.0021627 -0.0021628 -0.0021628 -0.0021624 -0.0021624 -0.0021625 -0.0021627 -0.0021628 -0.0021628 -0.0021624 -0.0021624 -0.0021625 -0.0021627 -0.0021628 -0.0021628 -0.0021625 -0.0021625 -0.0021625 -0.0021627 -0.0021628 -0.0021628 -0.0021625 -0.0021625 -0.0021626 -0.0021626 -0.0021627 -0.0021628 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 11 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT B2 - NODAL DISPLACEMENTS AND ROTATIONS: •Units --> Displacement (in), Rotation (Radians) Flags --> [x] Indicates maximum displacement is exceeded. Ultimate Node . � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Load Combination: ULTIMATE Disp, Dz X-Rot, Rx Y-Rot, Ry ------------ ------------ ------------ -0.20305 -0.18884 -0.17463 -0.16042 -0.1462 -0.13199 -0.19857 -0.18436 -0.17015 -0.15593 -0.14172 -0.12�51 -0.19409 -0.17988 -0.16567 -0.15145 -0.13729 -0.12303 -0.18961 -0.1754 -0.16118 -0.14697 -0.13276 -0.11854 -0.18513 -0.17091 -0.1567 -0.14249 -0.12827 -0.11406 -0.18064 -0.16643 -0.15222 -0.138 -0.12379 -0.10958 0.0011202 0.0011202 0.0011202 0.0011202 0.0011203 0.0011203 0.0011203 0.0011202 0.0011202 0.0011202 0.0011203 0.0011203 0.0011204 0.0011204 0.0011204 0.0011205 0.0011205 0.0011205 0.0011206 0.0011207 0.0011207 0.0011207 0.0011207 0.0011207 0.0011208 0.0011209 0.0011209 0.0011209 0.0011208 0.0011208 0.0011209 0.0011209 0.0011209 0.0011209 0.0011209 0.0011209 -0.0035529 -0.003553 -0.0035531 -0.0035533 -0.0035535 -0.0035535 -0.0035529 -0.003553 -0.0035531 -0.0035533 -0.0035535 -0.0035535 -0.0035529 -0.003553 -0.0035531 -0.0035534 -0.0035535 -0.0035536 -0.003553 -0.003553 -0.0035531 -0.0035534 -0.0035535 -0.0035536 -0.003553 -0.003553 -0.0035531 -0.0035534 -0.0035535 -0.0035535 -0.003553 -0.0035531 -0.0035532 -0.0035533 -0.0035535 -0.0035535 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION 11:35:09 Licenced to: Enqineerinq Enterprises, Inc. B4 - ELEMENT SOIL DISPLACEMENTS AND PRESSURES: �Units --> Displacement (in), Pressure (ksf) Flags --> [x] Indicates allowable pressure is Service Load Combination: SERVICE Elem Node Disp, Dz Pressure, Qz Node 1 8 -0.1122 -3.06 x 2 7 -0.1209 -3.29 x 1 2 9 -0.1036 -2.82 3 8 -0.1122 -3.06 x 2 3 10 -0.0949 -2.59 4 9 -0.1036 -2.82 3 4 11 -0.0863 -2.35 5 10 -0.0949 -2.59 4 5 12 -0.0776 -2.11 6 11 -0.0853 -2.35 5 6 14 -0.1095 -2.98 8 13 -0.1181 -3.22 x 7 7 15 -0.1008 -2.75 9 14 -0.1095 -2.98 8 8 16 -0.0922 -2.51 10 15 -0.1008 -2.75 9 9 17 -0.0835 -2.28 11 16 -0.0922 -2.51 10 10 18 -0.0749 -2.04 12 17 -0.0835 -2.28 11 11 20 -0.1068 -2.91 14 19 -0.1154 -3.14 x 13 12 21 -0.0981 -2.67 15 • 20 -0.1068 -2.91 14 13 22 -0.0895 -2.44 16 21 -0.0981 -2.67 15 14 23 -0.0808 -2.20 17 22 -0.0895 -2.44 16 15 24 -0.0721 -1.97 18 23 -0.0808 -2.20 17 16 26 -0.1040 -2.83 20 25 -0.1127 -3.07 x 19 17 27 -0.0954 -2.60 21 26 -0.1040 -2.83 20 18 28 -0.0867 -2.36 22 27 -0.0954 -2.60 21 19 29 -0.0781 -2.13 23 28 -0.0867 -2.36 22 20 30 -0.0699 -1.89 24 29 -0.0781 -2.13 23 21 32 -0.1013 -2.76 26 31 -0.1099 -3.00 25 22 33 -0.0926 -2.52 27 32 -0.1013 -2.76 26 23 34 -0.0840 -2.29 28 33 -0.0926 -2.52 27 24 35 -0.0753 -2.05 29 34 -0.0840 -2.29 28 25 36 -0.0667 -1.82 30 35 -0.0753 -2.05 29 • exceeded. Disp, Dz -0.1149 -0.1236 -0.1063 -0.1149 -0.0976 -0.1063 -0.0890 -0.0976 -0.0803 -0.0890 -0.1122 -0.1209 -0.1036 -0.1122 -0.0949 -0.1036 -0.0863 -0.0949 -0.0776 -0.0863 -0.1095 -0.1181 -0.1008 -0.1095 -0.0922 -0.1008 -0.0835 -0.0922 -0.0749 -0.0835 -0.1068 -0.1154 -0.0981 -0.1068 -0.0895 -0.0981 -0.0808 -0.0895 -0.0721 -0.0808 -0.1040 -0.1127 -0.0954 -0.1040 -0.0867 -0.0954 -0.0781 -0.0867 -0.0694 -0.0781 Pressure, Qz -3.13 x -3.37 x -2.90 -3.13 x -2.66 , -2.90 -2.42 ' -2.66 ' -2.19 '' -2.92 -3.06 x -3.29 x -2.82 ' -3.06 �t -2.59 ' -2.82 -2.35 ' -2.59 ' -2.11 -2.35 -2.98 -3.22 x -2.75 ' -2.98 -2.51 -2.75 ' -2.28 ' -2.51 ' -2.04 '' -2.28 -2.91 ' -3.14 x. -2.67 -2.91 -2.44 ' -2.67 -2.20 -2.44 ' -1.97 ' -2.20 ' -2.83 ' -3.07 x, -2.60 -2.83 -2.36 -2.60 ' -2.13 ', -2.36 -1.89 ' -2.13 , Page 12 SHAFT.MAT 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. _ B5 - ELEMENT NODAL MOMENTS: • Units --> Moment (kip-ft/ft), Angle Ultimate Load Combination: ULTIMATE Elem Node M(xx) M(yy) ---- ---- ---------- ---------- • r1 LJ 1 8 2 7 1 2 9 3 8 2 3 10 4 9 3 4 11 5 10 4 5 12 6 ii 5 6 14 8 13 7 7 15 9 14 8 8 16 10 15 9 9 17 11 16 10 10 18 12 17 11 11 20 14 19 13 12 21 15 20 14 13 22 16 21 15 14 23 17 22 16 -1.31 -0.49 0.18 -0.75 -2.00 -2.83 -1.19 -0.39 -3.38 -2.48 -2.81 -2.71 -1.49 -1.22 -3.22 -3.03 0.10 -0.56 -1.13 -1.26 -0.74 -1.57 -0.45 0.77 -3.19 -2.00 -1.99 -1.23 -3.18 -3.64 -3.88 -3.12 -1.83 -1.24 -3.83 -3.35 0.26 0.10 -1.38 -1.17 -0.92 -1.25 0.36 -0.08 -3.03 -3.19 -1.86 -1.95 -3.60 -3.69 -3.40 -3.85 -1.69 -1.83 -3.32 -3.90 -1.77 0.54 -1.51 -0.08 -0.71 -0.52 -1.67 0.55 -0.94 -0.80 -1.01 -0.54 -1.37 0.31 -0.86 -0.94 -1.18 0.20 -1.25 0.10 -2.70 -2.03 -3.06 -0.78 -4.14 -1.54 -2.74 -2.20 -3.48 -2.80 -4.23 -1.81 -3.16 -1.44 -3.57 -2.58 -3.24 -0.41 -2.97 -1.34 -3.58 -4.05 -3.10 -z.i� -3.26 -4.62 -3.54 -4.19 -3.15 -4.50 -3.49 -4.56 -3.23 -3.96 -2.87 -4.44 (Deg) M(xy) M(r2) M(rl) Angle ---------- ---------- ---------- ------ 0.26 -0.17 0.18 -0.24 0.23 0.28 0.23 0.28 -0.37 -0.33 0.14 0.21 -0.65 -0.73 -0.48 -0.56 -0.28 -0.16 -0.63 -0.51 0.22 0.49 0.17 0.44 -0.48 -0.14 -0.09 0.25 -0.19 -0.09 -0.20 -0.05 -0.10 -0.63 0.01 -0.55 -0.24 -0.41 -0.30 -0.47 -0.53 0.21 -0.77 -0.09 -0.10 -0.26 -0.15 -0.30 -0.01 -0.20 -0.09 -0.29 0.05 0.03 -0.18 -0.20 -1.89 0.56 -1.53 -0.00 -0.67 -0.49 -i.�� 0 . 62 -0.89 -0.?3 -0.99 -0.52 -0.78 0.60 -0.77 -0.80 -1.24 0.23 -1.82 0.27 -2.73 -2.34 -3.07 -0.90 -4.34 -1.50 -2.75 -2.26 -3.57 -2.80 -4.32 -1.80 -3.17 -1.98 -3.57 -2.30 -3.26 -0.64 -3.02 -1.74 -3.68 -4.06 -3.26 -2.18 -3.30 -4.66 -3.56 -4.23 -3.15 -4.55 -3.54 -4.66 -3.23 -3.96 -2.81 -4.50 -1.20 -0.52 0.20 -0.83 -2.04 -2.86 -1.io -0.47 -3.44 -2.54 -2.82 -2.73 -2.09 -1.51 -3.32 -3.17 0.15 -0.59 -0.56 -1.43 -0.72 -1.26 -0.44 0.88 -2.99 -2.04 -1.98 -1.17 -3.09 -3.69 -3.79 -3.12 -1.82 -0.70 -3.83 -3.64 0.27 0.32 -1.33 -0.77 -0.82 -1.24 0.53 -0.08 -2.99 -3.15 -1.87 -1.91 -3.60 -3.64 -3.35 -3.74 -1.69 -1.83 -3.38 -3.84 Page 13 SHAFT.MAT 24.0 8.9 6.0 '17.8 ',-9.8 -6.7 22.2 -15 . 4 8.4 ,10.9 '-4.6 '--5.5 42.4 21.9 '11.1 14.1 -''11. '7 11.4 -42.1 i8.� 6.4 32.4 3.8 1.4.9 -�2.9 16.0 -6.9 13.6 -�5.8 ', 2.5 -,�4.7 ' 2.1 r4.2 -40.5 '-2.4 27.6 r3.9 -29.2 -�.0.4 -�9.8 -�0.8 '4.3 -12.0 -2.5 -21.5 +9.9 �- 5 .1 �-7.6 1.3 -�3.4 -32.$ -�,9.4 1.7 '0.9 19.8 -18.0 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 14 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT B5 - ELEMENT NODAL MOMENTS: •Units --> Moment (kip-ft/ft), Angle Ultimate Load Combination: ULTIMATE Elem Node M(xx) M(yy) ---- ---- ---------- ---------- 15 29 0.42 -1.60 18 0.00 -2.57 23 -1.49 -3.07 17 -1.30 -3.81 16 26 -0.24 -1.57 20 -0.92 -3.00 25 -0.16 -1.14 19 0.29 -3.33 17 27 -2.99 -2.23 21 -3.29 -3.29 26 0.10 -1.38 20 -1.98 -3.12 18 28 -3.57 -1.90 22 -3.86 -3.54 27 -3.35 -2.21 21 -3.31 -3.28 19 29 -0.57 -0.66 23 -1.95 -3.04 28 -2.65 -1.48 22 -3.32 -3.70 20 30 0.02 -0.78 24 0.16 -2.53 29 -0.53 -0.85 23 -1.30 -3.09 • 21 32 -0.25 -0.30 26 0.27 -0.42 31 -0.03 0.62 25 -0.48 -2.20 22 33 -2.49 -0.34 27 -2.73 -1.50 32 -0.29 -0.18 26 0.35 -0.31 23 34 -1.69 -0.15 28 -3.32 -1.29 33 -1.93 -0.34 27 -3.41 -1.69 24 35 -1.36 0.27 29 -0.83 -1.23 34 -2.18 -0.10 28 -2.66 -1.33 25 36 0.17 -0.55 30 -0.24 -1.20 35 -1.11 0.22 29 -0.54 -1.21 � (Deg) M(xy) M(r2) M(rl) Angle ---------- ---------- ---------- ------ 0.45 -0.31 0.51 -0.28 -0.56 -0.56 -0.54 -0.54 -0.01 0.09 -0.58 -0.48 0.14 0.01 0.20 0.08 0.77 0.23 0.32 -0.24 0.27 0.37 0.34 0.44 -0.22 -0.70 -0.11 -0.59 -0.36 -0.12 -0.36 -0.12 0. 68 0.58 -0.27 -0.36 0.51 0.30 0.76 0.55 -0.07 0.39 0.11 0.59 -1.69 -2.61 -3.22 -3.84 -1.77 -3.14 -1.39 -3.41 -2.23 -3.38 -1.59 -3.29 -1.89 -3.54 -2.18 -3.21 -1.38 -3.09 -1.40 -3.82 -0.87 -2.58 -1.07 -3.19 -0.49 -0.85 0. 64 -2.38 -0.28 -1.49 0.13 -0.33 0.11 -1.13 -0.30 -1. 62 0.41 -1.39 0.15 -1.13 -0.56 -1.34 0.23 -1.51 0.51 0.04 -1.34 -1.27 -0.03 -0.78 0.08 0.37 -2.99 -3.20 0.30 -1.80 -3.59 -3.86 -3.39 -3.38 0.15 -1.90 -2.74 -3.20 0.10 0.21 -0.32 -1.20 -0.05 0.71 -0.05 -0.30 -2.55 -2.75 -0.60 0.37 -1.94 -3.47 -1.97 -3.48 -1.50 -0.67 -2.43 -2.86 0.18 -0.10 -1.12 -0.24 11.9 -6.8 16. 5 '-6.2 �20.0 -14.1 -24.0 -8.4 ' 0.7 45.0 -19.2 -20.2 '-4.6 --2.4 ,-9.7 -:39.2 43.4 ',11. 5 -'14.4 -26.2 17.0 7.8 32.2 13.2 -41.8 -31.9 9.1 -'17.2 ' 9.3 , 5.3 A0.4 ,-9.9 -20.7 -�4.9 9.3 11.5 -16. 0 27.9 -18.2 -19.9 -5.6 19.5 T4.7 29.1 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 15 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C1 - NODAL DISPLACEMENT ENVELOPES: � Downward Node Dz (in) Ld Comb. ---- ---------- ---------- 1 -0.1236 SERVICE 2 -0.1149 SERVICE 3 -0.1063 SERVICE 4 -0.0976 SERVICE 5 -0.0890 SERVICE 6 -0.0803 SERVICE 7 -0.1209 SERVICE 8 -0.1122 SERVICE 9 -0.1036 SERVICE 10 -0.0949 SERVICE 11 -0.0863 SERVICE 12 -0.0776 SERVICE 13 -0.1181 SERVICE 14 -0.1095 SERVICE 15 -0.1008 SERVICE 16 -0.0922 SERVICE 17 -0.0835 SERVICE 18 -0.0749 SERVICE 19 -0.1154 SERVICE 20 -0.1068 SERVICE 21 -0.0981 SERVICE 22 -0.0895 SERVICE 23 -0.0608 SERVICE 24 -0.0721 SERVICE 25 -0.1127 SERVICE � 26 -0.1040 SERVICE 27 -0.0954 SERVICE 28 -0.0867 SERVICE 29 -0.0781 SERVICE 30 -0.0694 SERVICE 31 -0.1099 SERVICE 32 -0.1013 SERVICE 33 -0.0926 SERVICE 34 -0.0840 SERVICE 35 -0.0753 SERVICE 36 -0.0667 SERVICE � Upward Dz (in) Ld Comb. ---------- ---------- 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 16 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C3 - ELEMENT DISPLACEMENT AND PRESSURE ENVELOPES: �Units --> Displacement, Dz (in) - Pressure, Qz (ksf) Flaqs --> [x] Indicates allowable pressure is exceeded. Compression Elem Dz Qz Node Ld Comb. 1 -0.1236 -3.3676 x 1 SERVICE 2 -0.1149 -3.1319 x 2 SERVICE 3 -0.1063 -2.8962 3 SERVICE 4 -0.0976 -2.6605 4 SERVICE 5 -0.0890 -2.4248 5 SERVICE 6 -0.1209 -3.2933 x 7 SERVICE 7 -0.1122 -3.0576 x 8 SERVICE 8 -0.1036 -2.8219 9 SERVICE 9 -0.0949 -2.5862 10 SERVICE 10 -0.0863 -2.3505 11 SERVICE 11 -0.1181 -3.219 x 13 SERVICE 12 -0.1095 -2.9833 14 SERVICE 13 -0.1008 -2.7476 15 SERVICE 14 -0.0922 -2.5119 16 SERVICE 15 -0.0835 -2.2761 17 SERVICE 16 -0.1154 -3.1447 x 19 SERVICE 17 -0.1068 -2.909 20 SERVICE 18 -0.0981 -2.6733 21 SERVICE 19 -0.0895 -2.4375 22 SERVICE 20 -0.0808 -2.2018 23 SERVICE 21 -0.1127 -3.0703 x 25 SERVICE 22 -0.1040 -2.8346 26 SERVICE 23 -0.0954 -2.5989 27 SERVICE � 24 -0.0867 -2.3632 28 SERVICE 25 -0.0781 -2.1274 29 SERVICE u Tension Dz 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 17 11:35:09 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C4a - ELEMENT TOP MOMENT ENVELOPES: �Units --> Moment (kip-ft/ft), Angle (Deg) -------------------------- ----- Elem Node Ld Comb. M(xx) M(yy) ---- ---- -------- ---------- ---------- 1 8 - 0.00 0.00 2 ULTIMATE -0.49 0.54 7 ULTIMATE 0.18 -1.51 1 - 0.00 0.00 2 9 - 0.00 0.00 3 - 0.00 0.00 8 - 0.00 0.00 2 ULTIMATE -0.39 0.55 3 10 - 0.00 0.00 4 - 0.00 0.00 9 - 0.00 0.00 3 - 0.00 0.00 4 11 - 0.00 0.00 5 ULTIMATE -1.22 0.31 10 - 0.00 0.00 4 - 0.00 0.00 5 12 ULTIMATE 0.10 -1.18 6 ULTIMATE -0.56 0.20 11 - 0.00 0.00 5 ULTIMATE -1.26 0.10 6 14 - 0.00 0.00 S - 0.00 0.00 13 - 0.00 0.00 7 ULTIMATE 0.77 -0.78 7 15 - 0.00 0.00 � 9 _ 0.00 0.00 14 0.00 0.00 8 - 0.00 0.00 8 16 - 0.00 0.00 10 - 0.00 0.00 15 - 0.00 0.00 9 - 0.00 0.00 9 17 - 0.00 0.00 11 - 0.00 0.00 16 - 0.00 0.00 10 - 0.00 0.00 10 18 ULTIMATE 0.26 -3.24 12 ULTIMATE 0.10 -0.41 17 - 0.00 0.00 11 - 0.00 0.00 11 20 - 0.00 0.00 14 - 0.00 0.00 19 ULTIMATE 0.36 -3.10 13 - 0.00 0.00 12 21 - 0.00 0.00 15 - 0.00 0.00 20 - 0.00 0.00 14 - 0.00 0.00 13 22 - 0.00 0.00 16 - 0.00 0.00 21 - 0.00 0.00 15 - 0.00 0.00 14 23 - 0.00 0.00 � 17 _ 0.00 0.00 22 0.00 0.00 16 - 0.00 0.00 M(xy) M(rl) Angle -------- ---------- ------ 0.00 0.00 0.0 -0.17 0.56 98.9 0.18 0.20 6.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.28 0.62 -105.4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 -0.73 0.60 111.9 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 -0.28 0.15 -11.7 -0.16 0.23 101.4 0.00 0.00 0.0 -0.51 0.27 108.4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.44 0.88 14.9 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 -0.29 0.27 -3.9 -0.41 0.32 -29.2 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 -0.77 0.53 -12.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 U.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 18 11:35:10 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C4a - ELEMENT TOP MOMENT ENVELOPES: �Units --> Moment (kip-ft/ft), Angle Elem Node Ld Comb.� M(xxj ---- ---- -------- ---------- -- 15 24 ULTIMATE 0.42 18 ULTIMATE 0.00 23 - 0.00 17 - 0.00 16 26 - 0.00 20 - 0.00 25 ULTIMATE -0.16 19 ULTIMATE 0.29 17 27 - 0.00 21 - 0.00 26 ULTIMATE 0.10 20 - 0.00 18 28 - 0.00 22 - 0.00 27 - 0.00 21 - 0.00 19 29 ULTIMATE -0.57 23 - 0.00 28 - 0.00 22 - 0.00 20 30 ULTIMATE 0.02 24 ULTIMATE 0.16 29 - 0.00 23 - 0.00 21 32 - 0.00 � 26 ULTIMATE 0.27 31 ULTIMATE -0.03 25 - 0.00 22 33 - 0.00 27 - 0.00 32 ULTIMATE -0.29 26 ULTIMATE 0.35 23 34 ULTIMATE -1.69 28 - 0.00 33 - 0.00 27 - 0.00 24 35 ULTIMATE -1.36 29 - 0.00 34 ULTIMATE -2.18 28 - 0.00 25 36 ULTIMATE 0.1? 30 - 0.00 35 ULTIMATE -1.11 29 - 0.00 � (Deg) M(YY) -1.60 -2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.14 -3.33 0.00 0.00 -1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.78 -2.53 0. 00 0.00 0.00 -0.42 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.18 -0.31 -0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 -0.10 0.00 -0.55 0.00 0.22 0.00 M(xy� 0.45 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.54 -0.54 0. 00 0.00 -0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.70 -0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.36 -0.12 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.76 0.00 -0.0? 0.00 0.11 0.00 M(rl) 0.51 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.QO 0.08 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.37 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.23 0.00 Angle 11.9 -6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -24.0 -8.4 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 -31.9 99.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 130.4 -9.9 -110.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 -106.0 0.0 -108.2 0.0 -5.6 0.0 -94.7 0.0 O1-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 19 11:35:10 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C4b - ELEMENT BOTTOM MOMENT ENVELOPES: �Units --> Moment (k�p-ft/ft), Angle (Deg) --------- --------- ------------------ Elem Node Ld Comb. M(xx) M(yy) � 1 8 2 7 1 2 9 3 8 2 3 10 4 9 3 4 11 5 10 4 5 12 6 11 5 6 14 8 13 7 7 15 9 14 8 8 16 10 15 9 9 17 11 16 10 10 18 12 17 11 11 20 14 19 13 12 21 15 20 14 13 22 16 21 15 14 23 17 22 16 ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE j3LTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE L3LTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE -1.31 -0.49 0.18 -0.75 -2.00 -2.83 -1.19 -0.39 -3.38 -2.48 -2.81 -2.71 -1.49 -1.22 -3.22 -3.03 0.10 -0.56 -1.13 -1.26 -0.74 -1.57 -0.45 0.77 -3.19 -2.00 -1.99 -1.23 -3.18 -3.64 -3.88 -3.12 -1.83 -1.24 -3.83 -3.35 0.26 0.10 -1.38 -1.17 -0.92 -1.25 0.36 -0.08 -3.03 -3.19 -1.88 -1.95 -3.60 -3.69 -3.40 -3.85 -1.69 -1.83 -3.32 -3.90 -1.77 0.54 -1.51 -0.08 -0.71 -0.52 -1.67 0.55 -0.94 -0.80 -1.01 -0.54 -1.37 0.31 -0.86 -0.94 -1.18 0.20 -1.25 0.10 -2.70 -2.03 -3.06 -0.78 -4.14 -1.54 -2.74 -2.20 -3.48 -2.80 -4.23 -1.81 -3.16 -1.44 -3.57 -2.58 -3.24 -0.41 -2.97 -1.34 -3.58 -4.05 -3.10 -a.i� -3.26 -4.62 -3.54 -4.19 -3.15 -4.50 -3.49 -4.56 -3.23 -3.96 -2.87 -4.44 M(xy) M(rl) Angle ------- ---------- ------ 0.26 -0.17 0.18 -0.24 0.23 0.28 0.23 0.28 -0.37 -0.33 0.14 0.21 -0.65 -0.73 -0.98 -0.56 -0.28 -0.16 -0.63 -0.51 0.22 0.49 0.17 0.44 -0.48 -0.14 -0.09 0.25 -0.19 -0.04 -0.20 -0.05 -0.10 -0.63 0.01 -0.55 -0.24 -0.41 -0.30 -0.47 -0.53 0.21 -0.77 -0.09 -0.10 -0.26 -0.15 -0.30 -0.01 -0.20 -0.09 -0.29 0.05 0.03 -0.18 -0.20 -1.89 -0.52 -1.53 -0.83 -2.04 -2.86 -1.77 -0.47 -3.44 -2.54 -2.82 -2.73 -2.09 -1.51 -3.32 -3.17 -1.24 -0.59 -1.82 -1.43 -2.73 -2.34 -3.07 -0.90 -9.34 -2.04 -2.75 -2.26 -3.57 -3.64 -4.32 -3.12 -3.17 -1.98 -3.83 -3.64 -3.26 -0.64 -3.02 -1.74 -3.68 -4.06 -3.26 -2.18 -3.30 -4.66 -3.56 -4.23 -3.60 -4.55 -3.54 -4.66 -3.23 -3.96 -3.38 -4.50 114.0 8.9 96.0 17.8 -9.8 -6.7 112.2 -15.4 8.4 10.9 -4.6 -5.5 42.4 21.9 11.1 14.1 -101.7 11.4 -132.1 18.4 96.4 122.4 93.8 104.9 -112.9 16.0 -96.9 103.6 -115.8 2.5 -114.7 2.1 -94.2 -130.5 -2.4 27.6 -93.9 -119.2 -100.4 -129.8 -100.8 94.3 -102.0 -92.5 -111.5 -99.9 -95.1 -97.6 1.3 -103.4 -122.8 -109.4 91.7 90.9 19.8 -108.0 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 20 11:35:10 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C4b - ELEMENT BOTTOM MOMENT ENVELOPES: �Units --> Moment (kip-ft/ft), Angle (Deg) Elem Node'Ld Comb. M(xx) ` M(yy) M(xy) M(rl) ---- ---- -------- --------- 15 24 ULTIMATE 0.42 -1.60 0.45 -1.69 18 ULTIMATE 0.00 -2.57 -0.31 -2.61 23 ULTIMATE -1.49 -3.07 0.51 -3.22 17 ULTIMATE -1.30 -3.81 -0.28 -3.84 16 26 ULTIMATE -0.24 -1.57 -0.56 -1.77 20 ULTIMATE -0.92 -3.00 -0.56 -3.14 25 ULTIMATE -0.16 -1.14 -0.54 -1.39 19 ULTIMATE 0.29 -3.33 -0.54 -3.41 17 27 ULTIMATE -2.99 -2.23 -0.01 -2.99 21 ULTIMATE -3.29 -3.29 0.09 -3.38 26 ULTIMATE 0.10 -1.38 -0.58 -1.59 20 ULTIMATE -1.98 -3.12 -0.48 -3.29 18 28 ULTIMATE -3.57 -1.90 0.14 -3.59 22 ULTIMATE -3.86 -3.54 0.01 -3.86 27 ULTIMATE -3.35 -2.21 0.20 -3.39 21 ULTIMATE -3.31 -3.28 0.08 -3.38 19 29 ULTIMATE -0.57 -0.66 0.77 -1.38 23 ULTIMATE -1.95 -3.04 0.23 -3.09 28 ULTIMATE -2.65 -1.48 0.32 -2.74 22 ULTIMATE -3.32 -3.70 -0.24 -3.82 20 30 ULTIMATE 0.02 -0.78 0.27 -0.87 24 ULTIMATE 0.16 -2.53 0.37 -2.58 29 ULTIMATE -0.53 -0.85 0.34 -1.07 23 ULTIMATE -1.30 -3.09 0.44 -3.19 21 32 ULTIMATE -0.25 -0.30 -0.22 -0.49 � 26 ULTIMATE 0.27 -0.92 -0.70 -0.85 31 ULTIMATE -0.03 0.62 -0.11 -0.05 25 ULTIMATE -0.48 -2.20 -0.59 -2.38 22 33 ULTIMATE -2.49 -0.34 -0.36 -2.55 27 ULTIMATE -2.73 -1.50 -0.12 -2.75 32 ULTIMATE -0.29 -0.18 -0.36 -0.60 26 ULTIMATE 0.35 -0.31 -0.12 -0.33 23 34 ULTIMATE -1.69 -0.15 0.68 -1.99 28 ULTIMATE -3.32 -1.29 0.58 -3.47 33 ULTIMATE -1.93 -0.34 -0.27 -1.97 27 ULTIMATE -3.41 -1.69 -0.36 -3.48 24 35 ULTIMATE -1.36 0.27 0.51 -1.50 29 ULTIMATE -0.83 -1.23 0.30 -1.39 34 ULTIMATE -2.i8 -0.10 0.76 -2.43 28 ULTIMATE -2.66 -1.33 0.55 -2.86 25 36 ULTIMATE 0.17 -0.55 -0.07 -0.56 30 ULTIMATE -0.29 -1.20 0.39 -1.34 35 ULTIMATE -1.11 0.22 0.11 -1.12 29 ULTIMATE -0.54 -1.21 0.54 -1.51 � Angle 101.9 -96.8 106.5 -96.2 -110.0 -104.1 -114.0 -98.4 0.7 135.0 -109.2 -110.2 -4.6 -2.4 -9.7 -39.2 133.4 101.5 -19.4 -116.2 107.0 97.8 122.2 103.2 -131.8 -121.9 9.1 -107.2 9.3 5.3 40.4 -99.9 -20.7 -14.9 9.3 11.5 -16.0 117.9 -18.2 -19.9 -95.6 109.5 -4.7 119.1 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 21 11:35:10 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C5a - ELEMENT TOP DESIGN MOMENT AND REINFORCEMENT: Units --> Moment (kip-ft/ft), As (in^2/ft) -- ---------------- --- ------------------------- � -- �----- Flags --> [m] Minimum reinf controls. [*] Cannot compute As. [x] As exceeds maximum, Mu/Mmax is output. Elem Node Ld Comb. Max. M(ux) As(xx) Node Ld Comb. Max. M(uy) As(yy) ---- ---- -------- ---------- ------ ---- -------- ---------- ------ 1 7 ULTIMATE 0.20 1.296m 2 ULTIMATE 0.59 1.296m 2 9 - 0.00 1.296m 2 ULTIMATE 0.79 1.296m 3 4 - 0.00 1.296m 9 - 0.00 1.296m 4 11 - 0.00 1.296m 5 ULTIMATE 0.75 1.296m 5 12 ULTIMATE 0.16 1.296m 5 ULTIMATE 0.30 1.296m 6 7 ULTIMATE 1.02 1.296m 13 - 0.00 1.296m 7 9 - 0.00 1.296m 14 - 0.00 1.296m 8 16 - 0.00 1.296m 16 - 0.00 1.296m 9 16 - 0.00 1.296m 16 - 0.00 1.296m 10 12 ULTIMATE 0.51 1.296m 12 ULTIMATE 0.00 1.296m 11 19 ULTIMATE 0.55 1.296m 20 - 0.00 1.296m 12 15 - 0.00 1.296m 15 - 0.00 1.296m 13 16 - 0.00 1.296m 16 - 0.00 1.296m 14 16 - 0.00 1.296m 16 - 0.00 1.296m 15 24 ULTIMATE 0.54 1.296m 17 - 0.00 1.296m 16 19 ULTIMATE 0.38 1.296m 19 - 0.00 1.296m 17 26 ULTIMATE 0.34 1.296m 20 - 0.00 1.296m 18 22 - 0.00 1.296m 21 - 0.00 1.296m 19 29 ULTIMATE 0.19 1.296m 29 ULTIMATE 0.11 1.296m 20 24 ULTIMATE 0.22 1.296m 23 - 0.00 1.296m 21 26 ULTIMATE 0.97 1.296m 31 ULTIMATE 0.73 1.296m 22 26 ULTIMATE 0.40 1.296m 32 ULTIMATE 0.19 1.296m 23 28 - 0.00 1.296m 34 ULTIMATE 0.12 1.296m � 24 29 - 0.00 1.296m 35 ULTIMATE 0.46 1.296m 25 36 ULTIMATE 0.18 1.296m 35 ULTIMATE 0.23 1.296m L,..1 01-22-99 PCA-Mats V5.10 - PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION Page 22 11:35:10 Licenced to: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. SHAFT.MAT C5b - ELEMENT BOTTOM DESIGN MOMENT AND REINFORCEMENT: Units --> Moment (kip-ftJft), As (in^2/ft) - ------------ ---=-------------- --------------- P � - ----- Flags --> [m] Minimum reinf controls. [*] Cannot com ute As. [x] As exceeds maximum, Mu/Mmax is output. Elem Node Ld Comb. Max. M(ux) As(xx) Node Ld Comb. Max. M(uy) As(yy) ---- ---- -------- ---------- ------ ---- -------- ---------- ------ � � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 8 3 10 10 5 6 15 15 10 17 14 15 15 16 23 20 21 22 22 23 25 27 28 28 35 ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE -1.57 -3.10 -3.75 -3.71 -1.77 -2.06 -3.68 -4.08 -3.90 -1.68 -1.46 -3.45 -4.13 -4.10 -2.00 -1.48 -3.38 -3.87 -3.57 -1.75 -1.07 -2.85 -3.90 -3.21 -1.17 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 8 8 10 11 11 13 15 15 16 18 14 15 15 16 17 19 20 22 22 23 25 27 27 28 29 ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE -2.03 -1.90 -1.31 -2.03 -1.88 -3.23 -4.62 -4.43 -3.58 -3.46 -4.26 -4.87 -4.84 -4.64 -4.08 -3.87 -3.60 -3.55 -3.94 -3.53 -2.79 -1.61 -2.05 -1.88 -1.75 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m 1.296m M-Wall!: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Project : FOUNDATION/BASEMENT WALL cation: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE By: REF - ---------------------------- -------------------------- TIME: 12:09 PM Page: 1 DATE: 01-22-1999 DESIGN METHOD : Uniform Building Code: Unity Equation MASONRY MATERIAL : Hollow Core Concrete Masonry Units MORTAR TYPE : Type S MORTAR MATERIAL : Masonry Cement Mortar BLOCK PLACEMENT : Running Bond MASONRY WALL DATA: ------------------------------------ Wall Height = 10.00 ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in. Parapet Height = 0.00 ft. Nominal Parapet Thickness = 0.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Parapet = 0.00 in. esign Strip Width = 12.00 in. ain Wall Reinf. Layers = Unreinforced Wall Wall Grout Spacing = Grouted Solid Support Type at Base Span Type = Pinned Support = Supported Top and Bottom WALL LOADS: ------------------------------------ Wall Weight Floor or Roof Load: e Dead = Live = Eccentricity = Additional Vertical Load: Dead = Live = Eccentricity = Vertical Distance (y) _ Equivalent Fluid Pressure = � Vertical Distance (x� _ 63.00 psf. 270.0 Lb 720.0 Lb 2.00 in. 0.0 Lb 0.0 Lb 0.00 in. 0.00 ft. 0.00 pcf. 0.00 ft. M-Wall!: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Project : FOUNDATION/BASEMENT WALL �cation: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE By: REF _________________________________________________________________Pa e:=2=== TIME. 12:09 PM g DATE: 01-22-1999 SEISMIC LOADS: ------------------------------------ Seismic Load Zone (0 to 4) Seismic Zone Factor, Seismic Importance Factor, = Zone 0 Z = 0.00 I = 0.00 Seismic Numerical Coeff: Wall Cp = 0.75 Parapet Cp = 2.00 Include Masonry Veneer Weight? = Yes Veneer Weight = 0.00 psf. WIND LOADS: ------------------------------------ �1 2 3 4 5 Distance From Load Magnitude Base of Wall (ft) W or H (plf, lb) Start End ---------------------------------------- Notes: 1. "W" designates a uniform distributed wind load. "H" designates a concentrated horizontal wind load. 2. Horizontal loads are positive to the right. • M-Wall!: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Project : FOUNDATION/BASEMENT WALL �---cation: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE By: REF ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------------- ---- ----------------- --�----- TIME: 12:09 PM Page. 3 DATE: 01-22-1999 MASONRY DATA: ------------------------------------ Masonry Unit Strength Special Inspection? = 1900.00 psi. = Yes Masonry Compressive Strength, f'm = 1500.00 psi. Allowable Flexural Stress, Fb = 500.00 psi. Allowable Shear Stress, Fv = 38.73 psi. Allowable Tension: No Grout, Ft = 15.00 psi. Solid Grout, Ft = 15.00 psi. Modulus of Elasticity, Em = 1,125 ksi. Modular Ratio, Es/Em = n= 25.78 Single Grouted Cell + Web Width = Nominal Length of Masonry Unit - Block Face Shell Thickness = �ominal Minus Actual Thickness - MATERIAL DATA: ------------------------------------ Steel Yield Strength, Allowable Steel Stress, Modulus of Elasticity, 8.31 in. 16.00 in. 1.25 in. 0.38 in. Fy = 60.00 ksi. Fs = 20.00 ksi. Es = 29, 000 ksi . REINFORCED WALL DATA: ------------------------------------ Minimum Steel Ratio, As/bt = 0.0007 � M-Wall!: MASONRY WALL ANALYSI5 AND DESIGN Project : FOUNDATION/BASEMENT WALL �cation: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE By: REF ___________________________________________________________________________ TIME: 12:09 PM Page: 4 DATE: 01-22-1999 GRA.PHIC SUNIlKARY OF MASONRY WALL DATA � 8.0 3.8 � 2.00 in. D.L. 270.0 Lb L.L. 720.0 Lb Floor / Roof ft. M-Wall!: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Project : FOUNDATIONjBASEMENT WALL �cation: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE By: REF ___________________________________________________________________________ TIME: 12:09 PM Page: 5 DATE: 01-22-1999 *******�****************************************** S U M M A R Y O F R E S U L T S F 0 R M A I N W A L L ********�**********************�****************** DESIGN LOADS: ------------------------------------ Moment, Ms =-165.0 ft-lb / 12.00 in. Axial Load, Ps = 990.0 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = (DL + LL) Max. Shear, Vs = 16.5 Lb / 12.00 in. Load Combination = (DL + LL� ANALYSIS RESULTS: ------------------------------------ Design Strip Width = Actual Wall Thickness, t = ffective Height, h' _ /t Ratio = eismic Force, Fp = ZICp * Wt = 12.00 in. 7.63 in. 10.00 ft. 15.74 0.00 plf. / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Vertical Reinf. = 0.064 in.^2 / 12.00 in. Minimum Area of Steel, Horiz. Reinf. = Not Req'd, Ref. UBC 2106.1.12 A11. Bending Stress, All. Tensile Stress, All. Shear Stress, Fb: DL + LL Only = Wind / Seismic = Ft: DL + LL Only = Wind ! Seismic = Fv; DL + LL Only = Wind / Seismic = 500.00 psi. 666.67 psi. 15.00 psi. 20.00 psi. 38.73 psi. 51.64 psi. DESIGN RESULT5: ------------------------------------ Grout fa, psi fb, psi fv, psi ft, psi Comb. Stress Spacing (P/Ae) (M*12/S) (V/Ae) (fa-fb) (fa/Fa+fb/Fb) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Solid 10.82 17.03 0.18 -6.21 0.068 O.K. i M-Wall!: MASONRY WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Project : FOUNDATION/BASEMENT WALL �---cation: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE By: REF --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- TIME: 12:09 PM Page: 6 DATE: 01-22-1999 DETAILED RE5ULTS FOR MAIN WALL: ------------------------------------ LOAD COMBINATION : (DL + LL) WALL DESIGN : Grouted Cells @ Solid o.c. No. Dist From Mom. Axial Shear ft, psi Comb. Stress Bot {ft) (ft-1b� (lbs? (lbs� (fa-fb) (fa/Fa+fblFb) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 10.00 -165.0 990.0 -16.5 -6.21 0.068 O.K. 1 9.00 -148.5 1,053.0 -16.5 -3.82 0.067 O.K. 2 8.00 -132.0 1,116.0 -16.5 -1.43 0.066 O.K. 3 7.00 -115.5 1,179.0 -16.5 0.97 0.064 O.K. 4 6.00 -99.0 1,242.0 -16.5 3.36 0.063 O.K. 5 5.00 -82.5 1,305.0 -16.5 5.75 0.062 O.K. 6 9.00 -66.0 1,368.0 -16.5 8.14 0.061 O.K. 7 3.00 -49.5 1,431.0 -16.5 10.53 0.059 O.K. 8 2.00 -33.0 1,494.0 -16.5 12.92 0.058 O.K. � 1.00 -16.5 1,557.0 -16.5 15.31 0.057 O.K. 0.00 0.0 1,620.0 -16.5 17.70 0.056 O.K. WALL PROPERTIES: ------------------------------------ Effective Flange Width, bf = 12.00 in. / Effective Grouted Core Width, b' = 0.00 in. / Solid Masonry Area, Ae = 91.50 in.^2 Gross Moment of Inertia, Ig = 443.32 in.^4 Section Modulus, S= 2* Ig / t= 116.28 in.^3 Radius of Gyration, r= 2.201 in. / Slenderness Factor, h'/r = 54.52 .ALLOWABLE STRESSES: ------------------------------------ Allowable Axial Stress, Fa = Allowable Bending Stress, Fb = Allowable Tensile Stress, Ft = Allowable Shear Stress, Fv = � 318.14 psi. 500.00 psi. 15.00 psi. 38.73 psi. 12.00 in. 12.00 in. 1 12.00 in. / 12.00 in. / 12.00 in. 12.00 in. Willamette Industries, Inc. Engineered Wood Products � Ca�C (v3.07.02a) ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC PROJECT: JOHNSON RESIDENCE LOCATION: FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 01/16/99 JOB NO.: 9902 DESIGNER: REF SHEET: MARK BM1 Floor Beam HEADER PARA. TO STAIRWELL OPENING TRIB.: 6 ft. Input reflects horizontal center to center spans. W1= 330 plf LL = 40 psf DL = 15 psf Duration= 100% • TOTAL APPLIED LOAD, SHEAR AND MOMENT DIAGRAMS W7 [117 11' 1814�t 18151t 4991'�k Maximum Reactions Dead Load: Live Load: (DOL) Shear: (Ibs) Positive Moment: (ft-Ibs) Deflection Span: Support 1 Support 2 s2s sas 1320 (100) 1320 (100) % Allow. Maximum Allow. 34% 1646 4821 63% 5084 8060 LL Ratio TL Ratio 0.36 l/ 370 0.5 // 264 DOL - Control 100% - Total Load 100% - Total Load EI=222x106 *** USE DOUBLE 1.75 x 7.25 INCH StrucLam(2.OE) *** Min end bearing length =1.5 in. Support bearing length requirements must be checked separately. Continuous lateral support required at top edge. Lateral support required at bea�ings for bottom edge. • The products noted are intended for interior use, normal temperatures, untreated applications and must be installed in accordance writh local building code requirements and Willamette Industries, Inc. recommendations. This calculation reflects the speciTic design information and product determination for engineered vuood products manufactured by Willamette Industries, Inc. The bads, spans and spacings have been provided by others and all infortnation noted should be carefully e�ramined arxl verified for the accuracy and suitability of all design parameters and product selections. Date : 1/11/99 2:18:56 PM • ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN (A36, A307) Page 1 INPUT DATA: Maximum Compression Force (Live Load) 20.00 kips Maximum Horizontal Force (Live Load) 5.00 kips Maximum Uplift Force (Wind or Seismic Load) 0.00 kips Maximum Horizontal Force (W'ind or Seismic Load) 0.00 kips Compressive Strength of Concrete 3500 psi Base P1ate Type Base plate on grout. Bottom of plate above We ooncrete RESULTS: Bolts per Base Plate 2 Anchor Bolts Diameter S!8" Minimum Embedment Length 8" Bolt Hook Length 4" Recommended Bolt Projection 2" Bolt Overall Length 1'-2" ANCHOR BOLT DIAMETER CALCULATIONS: • 1) Checic the Bolt Diameter for Shear and Tension Combination: A,Fy z T Whero ?' _`CV��+ TF la L J A�= 0.226 in.� Tensile Stress Area Fy = 36.0 ksi Minimum Yield Stress of Steel C=1.85 Si�ear Coeffincient or Im+erse of Friction Factor Y, _.00 kigs Sheat Design Load Per Bolt Tp =.00 ldps Tension Design Load per Bolt � _ .SS Capacity Reduction Factor a = .75 Probability Factor A, Fy = 8.14 kips T_{� C V, + TF l a =.00 bps L � J Ratio = T =.00 A, Fy 2) Check the Bolt Diameter for Shear and Compression Combination: • Shear Design Load per Bolt ={Horiz. Load -(0.55 x Comp. Load)}/ Number of Bolts =< 0.0 kips *** Friction Force is Greater Than Shear Load *** � • Date : 1/11/99 2:18:56 PM HOOK LENGTH DESIGN (A36, A307) INPUT DATA: Maximum Compression Force (Live Load) Maximum Horizontal Force (Live Load) Maximum UpliR Force (Wind or Seismic Load) Maximum Horizontal Force (Wind or Seismic Load) Compressive Strength of Concrete Base Plate Tj�pe RESUI.TS: Bolts per Base P1ate Anchor Bolt Diameter Minimum Embedment Length Bolt Hook Length R�ecommended Bolt Projection Bolt Overall length HOOK LENGTH CALCULATIONS: L _ l2J � (0.7j' dl Where T = 0.33F,As l i.�� ) Fw = 58 ksi A� = 0.307 in.� I'� = 3.s ksi d = S/8" L — `2J _ "' (07f'� dl 4" ` 1.7 ) Page 2 20.00 kips 5.00 kips . 0.00 kips 0.00 kips 3500 psi Base plate on grout. Bottom of plate above We concrete 2 S/pN ,o 8M 4" 2N 1'-2" Minimum Tensile Strength of Steel Nominal Area of Bolt Compressive Strength of Concrete Anchor Bolt Diameter Hook Length EMBEDMENT LENGTH CALCULATIONS: Minimum Embedment I.ength =1200d(FY�60�((fcy`0.5) = 8" Total Length = Min, projection + Min, Bmbedment + Hook Length =1'-2" � CITY OF FRIDLEY FAeSIM�LE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROMe � � 0.J'< � COMPANY: / ` � L _ ^( _ r _ �� DATE: �' j �r G � �� F� L' Jl'uG � PAX NUMBERs 70TAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVERs �IZ- �'�S- ��/ Z PHONE NUMBP.Rr SENDER'S PHONE NUMBEI� �1z��- �� '1Z .�72-��1� � SPAIDPRS P MA1�Plt. — � � � / S�� s� �-�, 6 r ��1 � URGENT � FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMEN?� PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENiS: J��S � S.� c� y� �'I�-� �� -� �7"��s �,�_ �� C� S � L 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, NE, FRIDLEY, MN 55432 � � i i i I t f � / , 1 l � � --� ,� � �' ; 1� '�� -;. �I �.. '�2 ts S w,r� � u,.� � crrL. .� � s u,.� t. ZS �� 3 � � � � f f � i � ! � o c> �s i t � �l►�, q"U 4 � �- OC ,4V �- S �s �-�- � c. a � cc. �� ; L,1� t `_ � � � ,�/ `?� i � � �- Z � ��►�y (� CJ�/ T �r��..� �� /� c. � -z fc I FOR �� M OF PHONE,_ FAX#�, MESSAGE._ ,.. �,� �L �e�n PHONE CA DATE - TIME _ �,� A. ' , � - � � . TELEPHONED � RETURNED YOUR CALL ! BER • EXTENSION ry� �jp J,p /�r, y,� y�' ,' PLEASE CALL -1..,�`�/ TO SEE WANTS ' TO SEE // ! /rl / � . 1. � _ _ CIIYOF FRiDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287 Apr.il 2, 2001 Mr. Harvey Johnson 136 Horizon Circle NE Fridley, MN 55421 ✓ Re: Hazardous Building at 136 Horizon Circle NE, Fridley Dear Mr. Johnson: On June 9, 1999, an inspection was conducted of the damaged foundation at your residence to determine what repairs were needed to correct the situation. Per Section 102 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code which states in part, any structure that constitutes a hazard to safety, or health, or public welfare by reason of disaster or damage, shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings shall be declared a public nuisance and shall be abated by repair or demolition as referenced in the Dangerous Building Code. It is clear that the damaged foundation at your residence constitutes an unsafe building. Section 302 of the Dangerous Building Code states that any building or structure which has any or all of the conditions or defects herein described shall be deemed a hazardous building, provided that such conditions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. The following items deem the foundation and therefore your residence dangerous 1) Whenever the stress in any materials, member or portion thereof, due to all dead and live loads, is more than one and one half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location. 2) Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, food, or by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before the catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure. 3) Whenever any portion, member, or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property. Mr. Harvey Johnson Re: Foundation Damage at 136 Horizon Circle NE April 2, 2001 Page 2 4) Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. 5) . Whenever any portion thereof has inracked, buckled or settled to such an extent, that walls or other structural portions have materia{ly less resistance to winds or earthquakes than is required in the case of similar new construction. 6) Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used. 7) Whenever the exterior walls or other vertical structural members list, lean or buckle to such an extent that a plumb line passing through the center of gravity does not fail inside the middle one third of the base. 8) Whenever the building or structure, exclusive of the foundation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its supporting members or 50 percent damage or deter+oration of its nonsupporting members, enclosing or outside walls or coverings. 9) Whenever the bu'ilding or stru�ture which, whether or not erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has in any nonsupporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent of the strength, fire resisting qualities or characteristics or weather resisting qualities or characteristics required by law in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and occupancy in the same location. 10) Whenever any building or structure, because of obsolescence, dilapidation, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating equipment or other cause, is determined by the Fire Marshal to be a fire hazard. 11) Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as to constitute a public nuisance known to the common law or in equity jurisprudence. Over the course of the last year and a half, the City has attempted to provide you with a variety of financial resources (ioan and grant programs) to assist you with the costs of completing the repairs. Further, the City has attempted to place you in contact with the appropriate building professionals in order that you can hire the proper personnel to make the necessary repairs. Because there has been no activity to respond to the previous requests for correction, and because your safety is at risk if no action is taken, the City hereby orders repair of the structure within 30 days, or you can vacate the building and demolish the structure (see Section 403 of the Dangerous Building Code). Mr. Harvey Johnson Re: Foundation Damage at 136 Horizon Circle NE April 2, 2001 Page 3 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 572-3602. Sincerely, RON JULKO�SKI Building Offi ial RJJmh CC: Ralph Messer, Fire Marshal .SS�� - v 1 � � i'�?�. c��/,f,i ��?-l� �� 9c:�� f-- ,�.�,��i �z_ � . ��ic= ��- l��i -�r� c�� /a�,/ � �.Q.�•iv �•�,� %* .�,�j/� ��Lr�� .� �'i�•a i FROM : HAGE CONSTRUC7ION COMPANY PHONE N0. : 612 915 1519 Jun. 03 1999 09:54AM P1 : . w . , �+ �, I � ' ' �' � � , 0 �Qr � �� \�� C�W��V �ramY '� - ``� � M ' �^ Fa�c �? I- � a.$'L Pages: 3 y� '�� - R�: �1.�„�,. �e�-�►.a.-,s R..�,- Daite: � 4�3 �4 �i � , _ -- - CC: " . Phone: . ❑ U`rgent O For Re�ew ❑ Ptease Comment' t7 Please Reply � Cotnt�enfs: � �-=�..� ,P.�-+� e�-�. .,�.;f, � �c.�,.-� .d.,e,e_, ��u.-k..,��' �z�.,.�.f �,�:� ,l•c-i. � . _ ..._... 0 • �� Y'ECHNICRETE! ut�nME �un��wTEE ooNCAETE 85/8 C/1MBR{O(3E S7'REET, Idp(�JI�IEqppl,�S„�Mly 55426 -1� 612�861=42l.4 FNC 612�ir1519 FROM � HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PHONE N0. : 612 915 1519 Jun. 03 1999 09:55AM P2 � �� VO��c� °r��t�r�,��°� Hage Concrete Works is the creator and e�adusive installer of TECHNICRETEm. B�utiful corierete with a�fetime gua�aMee SUMMARY OF PROPOSED INORK TO BE DONE Pa�e � o� 3 Name: HARVEY JOHNSON � ��'� Job Adc�re6s: 136 HORIZON CIRCLE � Phone: 612-572-1017 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 Bf0 To: TECHNiCRETR�: Other rMOrk to be don� SEE ATTACHED RaiGtt� PermR Fo�tings Estima�tor OLIVER M. HA�GE � Estimate iee paid ❑ Payment sd►edule; � p�g� �, JOB TOTAL Time at�d •Mata4sl Worlc BiNing rate Tim� (per Person Per hour) E75.00 s16lled; �65.00 unsblled. M�aterfal� Cost + 2596 Paymerrt schedute: SEE PAGE THREE. Work bo be done: iMef� �ad tl�ts carefully: l aooept the abore propo�al. l have r�eoeived e oopy of the TectmiCrete � and guaraMee. l undesstaM and aqree m the Im�ations of the guaraMee. ( knau dime+�ions 1'��ted on d�e propoaal �d any e�awp� are appr��dmate ongr. I agree to meet wRh the foreman prior to the start of the job. I wip pa1Y ha1P of Ide f� amouM due at tl�at Wne. 1 wxlerstand�tl�a# Hsge doec not redu� tl�e pice or repl�ee ca�erote If the eonaebe dries or hardens wkh surface maAc�gs and/or wlar d�e�renaes for arry reswn induc�ng. but not �rtuTed to. veriadw'i� In sun6�rt, wind. bempefetu�e, humid)ly, PoIY or mernbrane amng and/oriracl� or odher anpriMAs mads by �ims�s.lea+ves, p�ar�ts or psopfe. I know tl�t fhe coet of !he propoF�ed projeet i� normal ezcavatlon and demoli�on oNy� as outlMed on Ihe speciflpMon shest 1 agree to D�Y any addititmat cost for e�ecavetion and demol�ion which eatc�eds the norrr�al rary�e. I ur�deratand ff�t ff 1 do not pay the botat a�rrount �te within 30 days of the oonq�ledon of my job. I will be �espons� fa an addidonal f�anoe cherge of 1.5�6 par month. !( the bala�xe i� le4t unpaid for 110 �ys, l know tft� Hage Co� Works nrey file a lien against my home. HAGE CONCRET� WORKS — TECHNICRETE� ss�a c�nbrid�e Saoee� s�t. �ouis Park, MN ss42s Phwie 612-861-4TA3 Rax 672�15-1519 Famder a� Minnesota Coner�e 8 Mersonry Contracto�s A�on� M�nDer of Unkod Conore�te 8 Mawnry Contraetors AssociaUon Mem6er of � Busl�wss Bvroau — Qualky anglneaed ooncrete wak elr�ce 1850 - Bonded — Ucensed • Insured FROM : HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PHONE N0. : 612 915 1519 Jun. 03 1999 09:56AM P3 �iA� �t��a��°� w�� I�R��IE� i � Hage Concrete Works is the creator and exdusive installer of TECHNICRETE� " Beaudful concrete with a lifefime guarantee Proposal for. Harvey Johnson qddress: 136 Horizon Circle, Fridley MN 55432 Date: Phone: q6-01-99 612-572-1017 C,�,enera� intention: Rep�i�heplac�e house foundation as needed to create a stable, structuratty sound foundation for the hous� bo rest on. Inctu�d: • � Removing �the basemerrt floor. • R�ising the house front arid badc �o cneate a more level first and seoond floor. :Ce�ter conuets block wa11 to remain. • Underpinning footings as deemed neoessary. • Reptacing all or part of the frorrt a�td rea� foundaaon walls as de�rned ne�c,essary• AIt ne�w walls to have a horizoMal ooncrete beam located three rows of blodcs from the floor, and one in �the second row from the top. • Construcdng vertical beams 4'0" on cer�ter in the n�w wall arpaas. Rema'ini�g wa{Is to hav�e vertical ooncrete wall reirrForcements ev�ery 4'0" on cen�er. Steel reinforcemer►t in all walls tn be �5 b�rs. • Cor�struding a 4' thidc, wire mesh reirr%roed, concre�te basernent ffaor. • Waeerproofing exterior blodc fuundation in areas w�here replaoement was done- • Removir� and connecting the etednical panel, I�ndry tray. washer, dryer, and trot w�ter he�ter. • Buifdinq permit. • Grouting� between rim joistlsilt plate and foundation wall using non shrinking grout. •. Replacing front and rear s�s same as present • Ar�choring rim joist/plate to foundation walls_ • Other necessary worlc not speaf'�cally merrtiorted but necessary tio have a good job. •�Plac.ing btack dirt at foundation tio create posiUve dreina� aw�y from the h�se. Exc� . • Landscap�htan! repair. • Basement steps repairheplacemerrt. «. Plumbing�work of anY kind. • No Responsibility for t�adcs in fitst and s�eoo�d itoar wal�s 8 ceilings. • CarpentrY work. The.al�ove work is to be done w�t a time and material basis_ An appro�dmafie oost is $35�Q00.00 . This does not mean that the cost of the job is limited to $35,000.00 . Labor will be biffed at a Page: 2 of 3 Estimafior. Otiver M. Hage T�: Pa.r�r ot M�nnesola ca,uel� and AAesoroY C�ac� As�Uon Member d Un�ed Ca�aele aM 1u�sanry Ca�6adas Asao�tion Q�pY(y E�ed ConpplaMlafc5lnce 1936 Bo�d�d•Uansrd �•MKUred � 6518 CAN�WDGE STRELT, S7: LOUIS P/it�t,111�NNESOTA�55NZ6 PH01� 61Z�861� FAX 67�815r�1519 FROM : HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PHONE N0. : 612 915 1519 Jun. 03 1999 09:56RM P4 , �, �� F��1C� I� ��°�� wat�� TE� I��i�E� Hage Concrete vVorks is the creator aod exdusive insfiaUer of T�CHNICRETE°D ' Beautiful oonuete witfti a tifetime guarantee Proposal for: Harvey Johnson Address: 136 Horizon Grcie, Fridley MN 55432 Date: O�r01-99 . Phone: 612�'572-1017 cha�rge af $75.00 per man hour skilled, a65.00 per man hour unskilled. Materiat at cost plus 20°46. Atl wo�lc �o be approved by the Fridley Buiiding Inspec6or, Ron Julko�wski. Pam�ent Schedule- A$10;000.00: down paymettt would be required. Another $10,000.00 paymerlt w�ould be due after the house is raisedAevefed, new walls i►�stalled, and the ren�a�ing watls repaired. Balance �wbuld !� tfue upon completion of the job. Page: 3 of 3 Estimab�r. Oliver M. Hage Total: Poa,der of Minn�sota ca�crete and Ma�►c«itraelas AssoaaAion �. . .. Member of Uro1ad Co��uete �d AAasonry Conha�ocs Assocration Quail�l �d Contrefe Wodc Stnos 1890 BoiMed �tke�d �6esured � 6518 GAN�RIDGE STR�T, Si: LOUIS PARfC, MINNESOTA55426 PHOl� 612�61�Z+13 FAX 612-9151519 MONTHLY PAYMENT CALCULATOR Enter Loan $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Enter Interest Rate 0.05 0.417% Enter Term 20 240 ($164.99) PAYMENT Page 1 �� r --1 �. ....�. ,�t� ��8 v '` � � C� 1�4-+C� S c�-..J . �` -�- ` J �� 5��. u �v� a� -� i� ,; ,, � ;;' � � �^ I L. S��- � � �� j Z_ � �6 g �s.s G ;,� �'' � _ _ CIlYOE F1zIDL,EY FRIDLEY'MUNICTPAL CENTER • 643�1 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN'S5432 : •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287 • TTDlI'I'Y (763) 572-3534 October 17, 2006 Homeowner 136 Horizon Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 . RE: 136 Horizon Circle N.E. Pin# 23-30-24-33-0025 Owners: Harvey and Jean Johnson To Whom It May Concern: On October 16, 2006 an inspection was conducted at the above noted property. The South and East foundation walls are in failure. The block wa11s have buckled and settled to an extent that the structural stability of the entire house is deemed a hazardous building. T'he roof at the South side of the house has several holes at the roof line. The garage and shed have not been maintained due to lack of maintenance. Per State Statue 463.15 the structures located at 136 Horizon Circle N.E., Fridley, NIN will be posted as a hazardous building. The definition per 463.15 is any building or property which because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical damage, unsanitary condition, or abandonment, constitutes a fire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health. You will have 20 days from the date of this letter to respond in writing if you aze to repair or demolish the structure. If you are to repair the structure a structural report and plans will be required prior to a building permit being issued. If the structures are to be demolished, proper permits will also need to be issued. If you fail to respond to this letter, the City of Fridley will proceed with the demolition per State Statue 463.151. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 763-572 3602. Sincerely, i�C� (,� • Ron Julko ki Bwlding Official cc: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director _ _ �' ` V^-, ��1 FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Ra.:_ ..;;.:�.�.,,� Fy - .....,. .^..w ..� ; `� `��`a�:.,,.,,� �•'�+��'^W,�R'� �m '�� - � .. ..., � ......., / r1 \ � l � Homeowner `, � � 136 Horizon Circle N.E. `� ti� Fridley, MN 55421 � �: �:� ,f. ..,- _�`... .... .. � • - 1 — �._,s�m: ..._.. . �- . � �"=�? i� i i� i-1 �� i i l�,�ll�l�l��ilt�il,�li��il��i ; � rac �I K�t_. �� n� �� — �-�8l �--� � �h�`�� ,5�.m �� d�� 7 � � �S �� 13C� �'� �`�►� �- �� ,�.ov �-�� , � y�� -- � �- �.�--�:�� s..� � Gity of Fridley (othcia� Pub�icatior,) PUBLIC-HEAppdG BEFORE TNE CITY COUNC�I �lotice ie Nereby given thai there witl be a Wb� , of the Fridey City Council et • tha ,.t�i�� Municipal Center, 6431 - Ualve�? Av�nue N.E.. on Monday, �ecaMbllr 1'I, 2006, at 7:99 p.m. fo[ the P�� : To�a��a�_. �rdous hb►ne at 136 Horizon Circle. C4�dF ta deem twme hazardous and sta.ff to procead �1th abate- �e s►li�rsuant to statu�e 483.t61; �_ ., . �, Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall ba given an oPportunily at tl�e sbove � stated time and place. MY 4�estiohs relat- ed jo this, item may be referred to Ssog I' hNe9wit Community DevelopmenE Direator at � 763-6T2-3590. yyho�`��e � o �.�a�end wlth dGsahlNties vvWw � stlotdd�� Ro6erta�� soo n�o �ro► man n�, � r �" ' Tnn n�;� �s3-sra�a. � �oos. "� ' . _scorr,r. �uw�a,�v,� - � � �¢: ` November ri, 2008 � � �Nov. �t,'2006) f2-136 horizai €ir•haz bldg PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, December 11, 2006, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: To consider a hearing regarding a hazardous home at 136 Horizon Circle. Council to deem home hazardous and authorize staff to proceed with abatement pursuant to statute 463.161;463.21. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Scott Hickok, Community Development Director at 763-572-3590. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than December 4, 2006. The TDD number is 763-572-3534. , SCOTT J. LUND MAYOR Publish: November 23, 2006 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 136 Horizon Circle. CASE NUMBER: Hazardous Home —136 Horizon Circle APPLICANT: Cit of Fridle PURPOSE: Consideration of a hearing regarding a hazardous home at 136 Horizon Circle. Council to deem home hazardous and authorize staff to proceed with abatement pursuant to statute 463.161;463.21. LOCAT/ON OF 136 Horizon Circle PROPERTY AND LEGAL CARLSONS SUMMIT MANOR NORTH ADDITION CITY OF DESCR/PTION: FRIDLEY LOT 12 BLK 3 CARLSONS SUMMIT MANOR N ADDITION-SUBJ TO 5 FT DRAIN & UTIL EASEMENT ALONG SLY LINE- LOT 12 BLK 3 CARLSONS SUMMIT MANOR NORTH ADD, SUBJ TO EASEMENT OF RECORD DATE AND TIME OF City Council Meeting: HEAR/NG: Monday, December 11, 2006, at 7:30 p.m. The City Council Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 17. PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers HEAR/NG: 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PART/C/PATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 763-571-1287. SPEC/AL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: Interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than December 4, 2006. The TDD # is 763-572-3534. ANY QUEST/ONS: Contact Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, at 763-572-3590. Publish: November 23, 2006 � �—� �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ��'��L�Y PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE - � �, - �� `, "� `�,� '��; � ', ; � .', 6'O �` �p�5 � � �� ' `'°`�� a�� s \ �Q.P' �33 �zo -� 5 ��-�v� 5�� o� v�� 5 �� - ti o G �% � `�� '.�� - �32 �� 5�` � �3g't � � '`, 5 '� 5� �� 9� -� � cp �� 3 -� � � � �' � �`� ,��oo� � 3g't \ � 53g � ��'�,:�� , � � cs�, �j � n�� ,� A _--; ' 11 `, > � � ` N �` '�`� �� 0 53�� 1g � �3 , �, �` `° \ �� , �3�� 3 53 , �36� , � � ��2� Q 53 �36� � �� O �� ____ 3 , �� . __ --Y-�'" �' �� 536� 5 �� 53�� cp 536� � 53 � _� � ,, � � �,� 5349 4 � 5347 n, �, � � � cp�, �g3 53 .- , rn � ____t.---'i-;�, � � \` � \', � 5337 �� 5336 5337 � 1 � W �� - 0 �'�--� - � v� ��. �° �� 5 I I 5325 � 5325 �� \, R� .� � 324 , 5324 G = ; .r ` , ---- - � '' __ '�� >\ � o� N 5313 5312 5313 — - - '�` � � \ 5312 � � �'\ W� � \ � � - - ,v ''�� -��'� �� ; � 53D � �� 213 305 �� y , � �� , 95 �\ �� , I , �, 159 53RD AVE � (!� _ 11 W /" -� , , �� 184 200 ______! _----�- pP ' � � 53 � , _ _ � - -�., �, � � 5272 5273 � � � � j \ �O � ! �, ``'', i6, '\\ �W ' 5261 � � � ', �� 5260 SOURCES Fridley Engineering Fridley GIS Hazardous Home Anoka County GIS petitioner: City of Fridfey Map Date: December 1, 2oos Generally located at 136 Horizon Circle N W E s ALLTEMP DISTRIBUTION COMPANY RAMEL CORY VOSSLER WESLEY P& VERDELL 5400 MAIN ST NE 195 53RD AVE NE 183 53RD AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 KNUDSON FLOYD ORLAND & LEAH 100 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 DEGIDIO ROY S& CINDY M 136 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BLEICHNER ROSS A 172 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MARKUSON CHRIS A& VALERIE S 193 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 WOLSFELD GERMAINE M 157 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 LITTLE BRIAN 115 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 GROENKE RALPH A& JOAN B 112 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 CLARK CONNIE 148 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 DE LA CRUZ 112 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 KRAMASZ CHARLES K& SUSAN E 148 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 SCHULTZ JOHN M 5324 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 ANDERSON DEREK D 181 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 HELLER BERNARD F JR 143 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 MERCHAN RAMON R& GLADYS E 101 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 JANSEN RITA M 124 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 EWER WALLACE C& VfRGINIA G 160 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 DE BOER MAIDA J 124 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 ,fESSER GREGORY M & TERRI A 160 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 WATTENHOFER DONALD J & RUTH 5312 HOR{ZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRAULY ROSEMARY 169 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 BAZEWICZ MICHAEL 129 CROWN RD NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 LARSON SCOTT A& PAULINE M 100 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 JOHNSON HARVEY B& JEAN A 136 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY> MN 55421 OPSAHL ALFRED W& CONNIE L 5388 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 HARJAMAKI ROBERT J BALEGO DANIEL A& BOOTH D L BONESTEEL PETER L& MARY A 5376 HORIZON DR NE 5364 HORIZON DR NE 169 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 NYBERG CARL J& BETTY J REINECK JOHN C DZUBAK JOSEPH JAMES & MARY 157 HORIZON CIR NE 143 HORIZON CIR NE 129 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 TATLEY LINDA L 20249 FAIRWOOD DR NEVIS, MN 56467 ANDERSON PAMELA A 100 VENTURA AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 BUTKES ANNA 118 VENTURA AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 SARAZIN DARYL & KELLEY P 5432 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 STRELOW RONALD G& ELLEN G 5373 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 HIRTH RONALD F& MARLENE E 5409 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 CURRENT RES{DENT 115 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 KUDEBAH DARRELL D& ANNE M 5148 RED OAK DR MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112 CARTER LEON J& BALLEJO TAWNY 126 VENTURA AVE NE FRfDLEY, MN 55421 SMALL LENNY L& NICHOLSON T M 5349 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 PLASTER JEFFREY A& MARIA H 101 HORIZON CIR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 CURRENT RESIDENT 110 VENTURA AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 PERKINS AMBROSE H 5444 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 CAMPBELL KATHERINE 5361 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 GREENWALDT RICHARD A& ANNETTE FORSYTHE THOMAS K& MARY H 5385 HORIZON DR NE 5397 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 BARTH GEORGE E 5421 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 MILLER STEVEN P 5433 HORIZON DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 171 53RD AVE NE 133 53RD AVE NE 159 53RD AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 FRIDLEY, MN 55421 � � CRY OF FRDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUB3ECT AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2�� December 7, 2006 William W. Burns, City Manager Scott 7. H'ickok, Community Development Director Ronald Julkowski, Chief Building Official PUBLIC HEARTNG - Hazardous Building at 136 Horizon Circle INTRODUCTION An abandoned property at 136 Horizon Circle has been deemed hazardous (by virtue of extreme foundation/soils damage) by our chief building official and is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on December 11, 2006. Staff recommends not only having Council hold the public hearing, but also recommends that Council approve a resolution to authorize staff to commence the statutory process toward demolition. That resolution will appear on the legislative portion of the agenda. ELEMENTS At the Public Hearing, Council will be advised of the property conditions and will be asked to act to officially deem the properry hazardous, by resolution, and to authorize staff to begin the statutory process and commence toward demolition. State Statute 463 defines a process by which the demolition proceedings must move forward if the City is to proceed with the demolition. Essential structural items of this home such as foundation wa11s have been compromised by an unusual geological condition on this property. Clay soils often referred to as, "Fatty Clay" has damaged the foundation of this home beyond service. The foundation has buckled and is depressed an inch and a half or more across one face of the foundation. Anyone entering the home at this juncture may be in danger of injury or death. The homeowners have failed to respond to any attempts City staff has made to communicate the dangers of this structural compromise that has occurred. For that reason the home must be demolished to eliminate the attractive nuisance and eliminate risk to those who may enter. RECOMI��NDATION Staff recommends Council Hold the Public Hearing and receive Public comment. Also, because of the hazardous nature of this property, staff further recommends that Council approve a resolution to deem the structure hazardous and authorize staff to proceed with the statutory process to assure the structure is repaired or removed from this property. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 __ PAGE 9 Mr. Pribyl said the Health Department would be Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the January 8. a final inspection. would be completed by the meeting on Mr. Pribyl answered that staff will watc�he progress of this item. MOTION by Councilmember olkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOT ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED A1�TIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:32 P.M. 13. Consider the Building Located at 136 Horizon Circle Hazardous and Order its Removal or Repair Pnrsuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 463. (Ward 3) MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive the reading and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Billings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAl�tIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:35 P.M. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said the home is located at 136 Horizon Circle and is a modified story and a half. State Sta.tute 463 defines the process by which a building is deemed hazardous. The process begins when sta.ff has completed an investigation and ask Council to deem the property hazardous based on the findings of the investigation. StafF began the investigation on October 16. Based on that inspection, a notice was sent to the owner on October 17. T'he house has been vacant for months--possibly years. In April 2001, staff conta.cted the homeowner by letter to notify, the owner of the hazardous conditions. The home has evidence of foundation failure on the lower face of the structure's southeast corner. Mr. Hickok stated that since the hearing natice was sent out, both the owner and daughter have come forth regarding this property. A private party has prepazed a purchase agreement for the property and the offer has been accepted. The buyer grew up in the neighborhood and plans to demolish the home, make necessary soil corrections and build a new home in its place. Staff recommends that Council approve the hazardous ordinance. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how staff came upon this hazardous home. Mr. Hickok said in 2001, City staff went to inspect two homes on this block. One had fixed the problems and this home remained hazardous. Sta.ff was aware that it was abandoned and the conditioned worsened. Councilmember Bolkcom asked why sta.ff waited so long to list the home as hazaxdous. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 PAGE 10 Mr. Hickok answered that there was a list of actions that was taken with the property owner. Staff had given the owner time to fix the home on their own and thought the owner was seeking solutions. The owner was not seeking solutions and in time the property has deteriorated and is now abandoned. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the home had been homesteaded since 2001. She asked if the taxes were paid by the homeowner. Mr. Hickok answered that the taxes have been paid, but the homeowner chose not to live in the home. Councilmember Bolkcom sta.ted that staff waited five years to deem this property hazardous and now gives the new owner 20 days to come to a resolution. She asked if the property had been inspected since 2001. Mr. Hickok said the property had not been inspected since 2001. In 2001 after the inspection, staff had hoped that the owner was seeking a solution to f x the problem. This did not happen and the situation got worse. Now that the property is abandoned, it is a liability to leave it sit. Councilmember Bolkcom asked that if staff knew in 2001 the property was hazardous, why did it take so long to come forward. Councilmember Billings questioned what the procedure would be if no buyer was present. Mr. Hickok stated that Council would make a resolution and the property owners wou�d be notified by having papers served. Twenty days would be given to resolve the issues on the property. The 20 days allows time for the owner to respond to staff and come up with a reasonable solution. If nothing happens, an abatement process starts and the City can demolish the property and bill the property owner for the demolition fees. Right now, staff would like something done to rectify this property so it does not present a dangerous situation for residents. Valerie Tatley, buyer of property stated that she has met with the owners and signed a purchase agreement. Mayer Lund asked if she had a problem with the staff s recommendations. Ms. Tatley asked if the 20 days could be pushed back a little to give the owners time to clean out the house and pack up their personal things. Councilmember Barnette asked if a11 the belongings were still in the home. Ms. Tatley answered yes. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the 20 days does not mean that the home needs to be demolished. A plan just needs to be in place as to what you plan to do with the property. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 PAGE 11 Ms. Tatley asked if the issue could be dropped with the title transfer as she thought it was a waste of City funds. Mr. Hickok answered that the City would not add their costs on top of the fees. He asked if her request was to stop the proceedings and not put money into the issue of tearing down the structure. Ms. Tatley answered yes. Councilmember Bolkcom sta.ted that the proceeding still needs to be on record in case the sale does not happen. Ms. Tatley sta.ted that she could get the paperwork to Council once the property is closed. Councilmember Billings answered that the paperwork could be subxn.itted after closing. Sometimes it is difficult to find the title of the property, and anything can happen. Hopefully this will not be the case, but we need this on record so if something does happen, we can proceed. Ms. Tatley responded that they should have a clear title prior to closing. Councilmember Billings stated that he hopes everything works out okay. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the resolution should be tabled until the first meeting in Januazy. Mr. Hickok sta.ted that he is convinced that a workable solution can be made to move ahead with this matter. Ms. Tatley sta.ted that the sale is conditional and could be stopped upon title transfer. Bids are being submitted on the property and she hopes to have a plan in place soon. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the plan has to be given to sta.ff within 20 days. Attorney Knaak stated that the action by Council is used to initiate a lawsuit. A document is filed with the court in which there are 20 days to respond. If no answer is filed with the court, on the 21St day, the city can raise the property. The issue of the title may create an impediment to the title. This can make it difficult to explain to a mortgage company why there was a lawsuit to destroy the house. This may be a reason to delay the passing of the resolution until the property is closed. You have that option and run a risk of stating that the City knew about the hazardous condition. To eliminate problems, you may want to put off the resolution until the property is closed. Mayor Lund sta.ted that due to Mr. Knaak's response, Council may want to consider tabling this item until the ne� meeting. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if they could continue the resolution and close the public hearing. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 PAGE 12 Attorney Knaak answered that no additional information would be needed to continue the public hearing. Mayor Lund stated that it is not the intent to use tax dollars to demolish a building that someone is taking care of. The new owners aze willing to work with staff. By postponing the action, the new owner would have additional time to take care of matters. MOTION by Councilmember Billings to continue this hearing until January 8, 2007. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VUTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 14. Consider the Building Locate at 8100 East River Road Hazardous and Order its Removal or Repair Pursuant to innesota Statues, Section 463 (Ward 3). MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom Seconded by Councilmem�er Billings. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTI MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 9:05 P.M. waive the reading and open the public hearing. AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE U THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, tated that the property at 81 UO East River Road has been deemed hazardous by virlue of fire d age, food waste and lack of underground tank corrosion protection by the City's Chief Building fficial, code enforcement staff, and the Fire Mazshall. On October 24, 2006, a fire was res onded to and the building had been compromised by the fire. A letter was sent to the prope owners after the fire. The building has been vacant for months. In the month of November, th Fire Department and staff inet with the property owner to notify him of the concerns of the bu ding's hazardous conditions. The south of the building has been boarded up by the City's contr tor and secured, but not repaired. Also, rotting food has been observed and documented to exist i ide of the structure. Further, a11 underground. gas tank corrosion protections that require power, ave been compromised due to lack of electricity at the site. Anyone entering the structure at this ite may be in danger of injury or death. Gazbage has been an issue on the site with no collection s rvice scheduled. Mr. Hickok stated that the property owner is present. The owner rebuild the facility as required. Staff recommends Council ap� resolution. Councilmember Bolkcom asked how long there has been no electrical Mr. Hickok answered that he was not sure of the exact date but at Ieast �ted that he is willing to the hazardous building Couacilmember Bolkcom asked how long it has been since the business was to the building. the fire. ., FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 PAGE 13 Mr. Hickok answered that it was June or July of 2006. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the State inspector has been on the site. Mr. Hickok answered that the inspector has been in contact with the owner and visited the site. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if there was a current license to do business an the property. Mr. Hickok was not sure of the current status of the business license. Councilmember Bolkcom commented on complaints she has heazd of garbage in the neighborhood and graffiti. Councilmember Billings asked about the underground tanks and if it had any impact on the hazardous conditions. Mr. Aickok answered that the tanks aze a separate issue, and even thougl� it is important, they are a different problem. Councilmember Billings said the hazardous situa.tion we are talking about now is just the structure. Mr. Hickok answered that the integrity of the structure is the question. Engineers will need to access the damage and present a plan to conect the structure. Councilmember BiUings asked if the property owner has 20 days to respond and present an accepta.ble plan of action. Attorney Knaak stated tha.t if a response is not received, the abatement process would start. The owner can negotiate a workable solution under court action up to 20 days. If nq solution is resolved, the abatement process will start, a trial will take place and the City will get the court's decision to demolish and abate the property. Soloman Hersh, 8100 East River Road, staxed that this issue was brought to his attention from Mr. Hickok. He has owned the property for five yeazs and owns 14 other locations he subleases. This sta.tion had a corporate lessee, Fridley Food and Fuel. The iessee has left the store and Mr. Hersh has no key to enter the building. He has received an appraisal from the insurance company and has two contractors lined up to inspect the property and give bids. The intention is to rebuild and reopen the doors with a new lessee. The trash is something he cannot control, but he would like to rebuild and repair the property. Mayor Lund asked if Mr. Hersh ha.d received any information regarding the hazardous property prior to the call from staff. ' Mr. Hickok stated that a letter was sent out to the property owner with an Eagan address but the owner moved and did not give the City the new address. . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 PAGE 14 Mayor Lund asked when the business was last open. Mr. Hersh answered it was open until mid-June. Mayor Lund asked what the future intent of the property was. Mr. Hersh answered that he planned to fix the property, rent it out and open a business. Mayor Lund asked what the business was prior to the fire. Mr. Hersh answered that prior to the fire he was going to clean and remodel the building for a new look. Mayor Lund asked for clarification that the property sublease tenant left a mess and the business has been closed since mid June. Mr. Hersh answered yes. He was not sure what was left inside. Mayor Lund asked if the insurance claim has been settled. Mr. Hersh answered that he was contacted Friday morning and was told the claim was approved. He said he would start to find his own contractor. Mayor Lund thought 20 days wa.s a reasonable amount of time to come up with a solution. Nuxnerous complaints have been received regarding this property. Mr. Hersh respected the Mayor's opinion but compared this business, which has been deemed hazazdous for two months, to the previous hearing of the house deemed hazardous for 5 yeazs and they got an extension. He said the trash was from people in the neighborhood dumping it there. Mayor Lund responded that it is typical for trash to be dropped off when buildings are abandoned. Mr. Hersh stated that he was interested in fixing up the property as soon as possible and reopen for business. Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the fire was on October 24 and the building is boarded up. The hash is a separate issue and is there because of the abandoned business. Soon this building could be vandalized causing further damage and possibly injury. This building is not secure and is a bigger issue than the previous public hearing. Mr. Hersh commented that he was at the building two days after the fire and the building vvas already boarded up. He saw the damage through photographs. He did not receive any communication until he received a telephone call about this public hearing. The insurance company has approved the claim and he is getting bids. The 20 days is workable. . FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2006 PAGE 15 Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Hersh if he understood the process in that if the resolution was passed, the deadline to get a plan of action to the City would be in 20 days. Councilmember Billings stated this is Mr. Hersh's problem to take care of. The building is dangerous and the City will go ahead with the proceedings as needed. Mayor Lund sta.ted that Mr. Hersh will need a plan submitted in 20 days. Councilmember Billings stated that once the papers are served, he has 20 days to respond and present an action plan. Mr. Hersh sta.ted that he will work with staff to get the business ready to reopen. Councilmember Billings recommended tha.t Mr. Hersh ca11 the insurance adjustor and advise them that the building will be torn down in 20 da.ys if they do not start the process. Tori Swanson, 8080 East River Road, stated that she lives down the street from the gas station. The station has been in shambles since January. No gas has been for sale and because of the food, crows and animals are loitering in the area. The fence is torn down and a new one was never built. This makes the neighborhood look bad. Jody Beyers, 534 Fairmont Street, stated that she agreed. with the concerns that were addressed. She added that within the garbage on the property there were receipts with credit caxd numbers possibly creating concerns for identity theft. She agrees that it is a health hazard and does not think the abandoned property is safe. Brandon Brinkly said he bought a home in the area 6'/2 months ago. This property was a concern. People were wondering since the owner left why someone had not come sooner to check on the property. One would think that a business owner would visit the store more than once every six months. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:40 P.M. NEW BUSINESS 15. Resolution Certifying Final Taz Levy� Requirements for 2007 to the County of Anoka. `, MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe to adopt esolution No. 2006-96. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. !�1 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, YOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 16. Resolution Adopting the Final Budget fo iscal Year 2007. Councilmember Barnette noted that the budg is down from last year. Richard Pribyl, Finance Director, answ ed that the City needs to continue to balance the budget and reduce funds from transfers. William Burns, City Manager, stated at the Ievy is down considerably. Councilmember Barnette sta.ted t residents should be pleased with the efforts o� staff. MOTION by Council� Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE ` MOTION CARRIED Wolfe to adopt Resolution No. 2006-97. Seconded by ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE IMOUSLY. 17. Resolution Ordering the Removal or Repair of a Hazardous building Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 463, Located within the City of Fridley, Minnesota (136 Horizon Circle) (Ward 3). MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to ta.ble the resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAIVIMOUSLY 18. Resolution Ordering the I� Minnesota Statues Section � East River Road) (Ward 3). MOTION by Councilmember Councilmember Wolfe. val or Repair of a Hazardous Building Pursuant to Located within the City of Fridley, Minnesota (8100 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOT MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 19. Informal Status Reports Councilmember Bolkcom thanked Coi their years of service on the City Council. to adopt Resolution No. 2005-98. Seconded by AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE Wolfe and Councilmember Billings for . .� � � CRY OF FRDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCI.L MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 2007 January 3, 2007 William W. Burns, City Manager Scott J. Hickok, Community Development Director Ronald Julkowski, Chief Building Official PUBLIC HEARING - Hazardous Building at 136 Horizon Circle INTRODUCTION An abandoned property at 136 Horizon Circle has been deemed hazardous (by virtue of extreme foundation/soils damage) by our Chief Building Official and was scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on December 11, 2006. The hearing was opened and after comments that evening; Council chose to continue the hearing until January 8, 2407. It appeared from discussion that night that the property would likely be changing hands to a new owner by the end of December 2006. Potential buyer indicated that they had made a purchase offer and that offer was accepted by the owners of 136 Horizon Circle. Since the December 11, 2006 meeting; that new owner has closed on their purchase of the property. That new owner's soil engineers and foundation contractor have been working on the project and have been in touch with our Chief Building Official. Soil boring results are due to be completed today (January 3, 2007). Staff recommends having Council continue to hold the hearing open until February 26, 2007. If an acceptable plan is in place by that date, staff will prepare a memo to Council describing the homeowner's proposed plan to eliminate the hazard. With an acceptable plan in place, staff will recommend denial of the resolution to deem the sttucture hazardous at that time. ELEMENTS At the Public Hearing, Council was advised of the properiy conditions and was asked to officially deem the properiy hazardous and to authorize staff to begin the statutory process and commence toward demolition. State Sta.tute 463 defines a process by which the demolition proceedings must move forward if the City is to proceed. � Essential structural items of this home such as foundation walls have been compromised by an unusual geological condition on this property. Clay soils often referred to as, "Fatty Clay" appears to have damaged the foundation of this home beyond service. The foundation has buckled and is depressed an inch and a half or more across one face of the foundation. Council member Bolkcom asked, if the facts of this foundation problem were known in 2001, why staff is requesting this action now in 2006? Why not before? Simply put, the owners of this home were elderly, held very few options for alternative housing, and they would have been displaced from this home. It is always sta.ff`s first choice; once a problem has been identified to: work with the homeowners, to seek resolution, and to assist in any manner necessary to bring the project to a close. Staff did identify the problem for these owners and their neighbor on the next lot; both homes were experiencing similar problems. Staff suggested potential courses of action for resolution of the problem. Staff also highly recommended professional engineering (both soils and structural) as the first step toward solving the problem. The solution would certainly be costly and would likely require time for the elderly owners to gather the funds the engineering and ultimately the structural improvements would require. The ba11 was in their court and we allowed time for the folks to work on their solution. Staff hoped that these owners, like their neighbors (who had the same problem) were seeking a solution and that we would be hearing from their contractors at some point. We heard from contractors on the one home and the problem was resolved through the construction of a new foundation. We did not hear from contractors about 136 Horizon and upon recent investigation found that the home was now empty. Once it was known that the home was abandoned, displacement was no longer an issue and the matter would now not only be a structural problem, but the house would be an attractive nuisance as well. The homeowners failed to respond to any recent attempts at communication and staff then recommended hazardous structure statute to resolve the dilemma. RECOMI��NDATION Staff recommends Council hold the public hearing and receives public comment. Further, sta.ff recommends that Council continue to hold the hearing open until February 26, 2007. If an acceptable plan is in place by that date, staffwill prepare a memo to Council to define the schedule for elimination of the hazard and close the loop on this matter. Staff will at that time recommend denial of the resolution to deem the structure hazardous if a satisfactory plan is in place. �� a�� AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCiL MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 2�07 DATE: January 3, 2Q07 TO: William W. Burns, City Manager FROM: Scott J. Hickok, Community Development Director Ronald Julkowski, Chief Building O�icial SUBJECT: RESOLUTION - Hazardous Building at 136 Horizan Circle INTRODUCTION The praperty at 136 Horizon Circle has been deemed hazardous (by virtue of extreme foundationlsoils damage) hy our chief building official and was scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on December 11, 2006. At that time, Council considered the item and heard from a potential new buyer for the property. The buyer had indicated that a purchase offer had been made and accepted by the owners of 136 Horizon Circle. Since the December 11, 2006, meeting; that new owner has closed on their purchase of the property. That new owner's soil engineers and foundation contractor have been working on the project and have been in touch with our building department. Infact, the soil boring results are due to be completed today (January 3, 2007). RECOMIVIENDATION Staff recommends that Council delay action on the attached resolution until February 26, 2007. If an acceptable plan is in place by that da.te, staff will prepare a memo to Council to close the loop on this matter and will recommend denial of the resolution to deem the structure hazardous. The purpose of the delay will be to allow additional time for the new owner to prepare a reasonable plan for correctian of all foundation defects once a11 soils and other conditions are known. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING TT� REMOVAL OR REPAIR OF A HAZARllOUS BUII.,DING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 463, LOCATED WITHIN TI� CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota as follows: In the matter of the hazardous building located at 136 Horizon Circle: Legally Described as: Lot 12, Block 3, Carlson's Summit Manor North Addition, Anoka County, as on file and of record in the County Recorder's office of said County. TO: Mr. Harvey B. and Ms. Jean A Johnson, and any tenants, occupants, or other persons claiming an interest in the above described premises 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.15 to 463.61 the City Council of the City of Fridley, having duly considered the matter, finds the above- described building to be a hazardous building for the following reasons: the Chief Building Official of the City of Fridley has inspected the exterior of the home and has determined that the essential structural items of this home such as foundation walls have been compromised by an unusual geological condition on this property. Clay soils often referred to as, "Fatty Clay" have damaged the foundation of this home beyond service. The foundation has buckled and is depressed an inch and a half or more across one face of the foundation. Section 1300.0180.2000 MN State Building Code, states in part, "any struchue that constitutes a hazard to safety, health, or public welfare by reason of disaster or damage, shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings shall be declared a public nuisance and sha11 be abated by repair or demolition, as referenced in the MN. State Staxutes Sections 463.15 to 463.26. The above mentioned property was posted as a hazard in accordance with MN Statute 463.17. 2. The Council further orders that unless such corrective action is taken or an answer is served upon the City of Fridley and filed in the office of the clerk of District Court of Anoka County, Minnesota within 20 days from the date of the service of this order, a motion for summary enforcement of this Court will be made to the District Court of Anoka County. Enforcement of this order shall include, in the City's discretion, the option of razing the structure. The Council orders that a11 personal property or fixtures that may unreasonably interfere with the razing and removal of the building sha11 be removed within 20 days, and if not so removed by the owner, and the City then Resolution No. Page 2 determines to raze the structure, the City of Fridley may remove and sell such personal property or fixtures at public auction in accordance with law. 3. The Council further orders that if the City is compelled to take any corrective action herein, a11 necessary costs expended by the City will be assessed against the real estate concerned and collected in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.22. 4. The mayor, clerk, city attomey and other officers and employees of tlie City are authorized and directed to take such aetion, prepare, sign, and serve such papers as are necessary to comply with this order and to assess the costs thereof against the real estate described above for collection along with taxes. PASSED AD ADOPTED BY TI-� CITY COUNCIL OF TI-� CTTY OF FRIDLEY THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2007 Scott J. Lund, Mayor ATTEST Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk 0 . CY COUNCIL MEETIN�OF J 6 Mayor Lund stated possibly by the �fext meeting they can announce a tentative schedule of the Comprehensive Plan. �f / Toni Swanson, 524 Fairmon treet, asked if anyone had any updates on what is going on with the Texaco station at 8880 E�River Road. Scott Hickok, Co� The owner has 28 provicled a proper demolition. PUBLIC HEARING: dity Development Director, stated they did serve the property owner. to respond and would need to respond by January 18. If they have not �onse by the 19�', the City could with the court's permission begin 14. Consider the Building Located at 136 Horizon Circle Hazardous and Order its Removal or Repair Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 463 (Ward 3) (Continued December 11, 200'n. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to remove the item from the table and waive the reading. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNA1vIMOUSLY AND ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE AT 8:27 P.M. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, stated at the last meeting they had a public hearing regarding this property. There . was a resolution being requested of the Council authorizing and approving staff moving ahead with the demolition of this structure as well if a plan was not in place within the required 20 days. The house was purchased and the closing was held on December 19. Since that meeting, the new owners have had contractors and soil engineers working on a solution for this property. Staff would recommend allowing some time for the new owners to get their plan in place and recommend keeping the hearing open until the second meeting in February. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if staff is comforta.ble that there is no increased risk by waiting. Mr. Hickok replied one of the City's concerns on December 11 was that the house was sitting vacant and the future of the home was uncertain. Any time a foundation is deteriorating is a problem for the City. When the City knows that it needs to act swiftly. The owners aze now out and no one is living in there. The property has changed hands and all of the right things are happening. Staff believes the risk has been contained to the point that staff is comforta.ble allowing time for them to come back with a plan. Attorney Knaak stated it is important to remember that the purpose of the process is for the protection of the public. As a practical matter in these kinds of cases, when it arrives at court, the only time you ever really see a house immediately demolished or a structure unmediately R FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETTNG OF JANUARY 8, 2007 PAGE 5 School Distril Varichak, AItE Northstar � Cor Jon Haukaas, Visit Minnea� APPROVED 11. Anooi 16 Advisory Council: Councilmember Saeflce, Representative; Councilmember Development Authority: Councilmember-at-Large Barnette, Representa.tive; c Works Director, Alternate : Debra Skogen, City Clerk, Representa.tive. INTMENTS. City Employee. William Burns, City a Fridley Police officer. i Sherif�s Department. S APPROVED APPOINT: 12. Claims (129818 — APPROVED. 13. Licenses. �ager, stated staff recommends the appointment of Perry Jones as a is Officer Jeff Schoeberl who is becoming part of the Anoka. County f recommends Council's approval. � APPROVED THE LICENSES AS MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to by Councilmember Saefke. AND AS ON FILE. the consent agenda as presented. Seconded UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING �AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to approve th agenda. Seconded by Councilmember V arichak. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MA OR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN FORUM (VISITORS): Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street NE, asked what is going to happe�n with the Comprehensive Plan. He presented a book to the Mayor and City Council. i FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 8 2007 PAGE 7 demolished is when there is no one in it and no one is responding. The court is not interested in imposing any kind of extreme sanctions on anybody and it is not in the business of being punitive, it is in the business of getting a result. Even if the City would have gone forward in this kind of case, you would be in a situation where the court would be asking those kinds of questions especially if the owner is represented. So this is one of those situations where the City, by deferring, has basically offered a gesture to the owners that they axe prepared to hold off on this legal action and do what the court would probably make them do and that is to sit down and hy and negotiate. The City is not in any way prejudiced legally by taking this action. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if staff was asking them to continue the public hearing and table the resolution. Mr. Hickok replied, yes, that is correct. Dr. Burns stated the resolution was atta.ched to the hearing information but it was not listed as an agenda item. The resolution was there in case the Council chose to adopt the resolution tonight. He asked whether it needs to be tabled if it was not on the agenda. Mr. Knaak replied if it is in the packet, even though it is not acted upon necessarily, his recommendation is that they continue it. He agrees if it has not been put on as an agenda item, ordinarily he would not say that. However, given the fact it is a quasi judicial action, he would not want to create a technical reason for someone to object subsequently. Valerie Tatley, the homeowner, 115 Horizon Circle N.E., approached and stated she can give them a timeta.ble. There is a dumpster at the house. She thinks the other family is in the process of cleaning out probably about 40 to 50 years worth of stuff. It is going very well. The soil boring samples have already been taken and they are waiting to hear the results. When they bought the properly they had not even seen what the actual damage was. They had originally intended on just buying it for the property alone because of the location. The actual damage that occurred in the home is completely repairable. They have had seven different contractors who have said they can fix it. Mayor Lund asked if the work will have started if this is continued until the second meeting in February. Ms. Tatley replied yes. Their goal is to have this thing done hopefully by June. Mayor Lund said because of the safety issue, he assumes the foundation is one of their first objectives. Ms. Tatley said it was. Councilmember Bolkcom stated if they were to continue this, it is for a plan to be in place, not that the work needed to be completed by February 26. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 2007 PAGE 8 Mr. Hickok replied correct. The City's only position on the question as whether to leave this open and go to February or not, they have been very impressed with Ms. Tatley and her fiance and the group they have been working with. There is no doubt they will get the work done; however, in any situation like this it would provide for them a safety net just to make certain. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to continue the public hearing to February 26, 2007. Seconded by Councilmember Varichak. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAIVIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 26, 2007. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to ta.ble the Resolution Ordering the Removal or, Repair of a Hazardous Building Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 463, Located within the City of Fridley, Minnesota, to a date uncertain. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 15. Approve City ' en es for JWBB, Inc., d/b/a Baggan's Pub, Generally Located at 3720 East River R (Ward 3). Richard Pribyl, Finance Direc r, stated this is the liquor license approval for JWBB, Inc. which will be doing business as gan's Pub. The public hearing on this matter was held uutially on November 12 and was co ' ued to December 4 and then to December 11, at which time it was closed. When it was clo d, the license was to be scheduled for issuance this evening. At this time, staff feels the iss s have been addressed and they recommend the City Council approve the license with the follo g stipulations: That the license not be issued until e Anoka County Health Department, the Fridley Building and Mechanical Inspectors d the City Fire Marshall have given their approval to open and operate a restauran 2. That the Sta.te of Minnesota. has approve� 3. That the license be issued for a 16-month liquor license. >d to expire April 30, 2008. This particular license would then be issued for a durati of 16 months based on the timing related to the approval of this particular liquor license and re ewal period that would actually be entered into within the next month or two, so the City does ot actually subject the owner to going back to a renewal process probably within the same month acquired his liquor license. Councilmember Bolkcom sta.ted she does not remember doing an ing like this before. She is a little concerned about approving a license with stipulations related t'ssues that are still there. She understands they have made a lot of improvements. f � CRY OF FRIDLE1f DATE: TO: FROM: AGENDA 1TEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 2��7 February 20, 2007 �`Y William W. Burns, City Manager � Scott J. Hickok, Community Development Director Ronald Julkowski, Chief Building Official SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - Hazardous Building at 136 Horizon Circle INTRODUCTION You may recall, in late 2006 staff brought your attention to a hazardous/abandoned property at 136 Horizon Circle. Soil conditions had damaged the home's foundation wall beyond repair. Since that recommendation, new owners have submitted an acceptable hazard elimination plan. After further consideration; however, staff recommends holding the action on the resolution over until Council's frst meeting in May to assure the work has been completed according to their plan and to City satisfaction. ELEMENTS This item was scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on December 11, 2006. The property was subsequently purchased by new owners, Ken Zahorski and Valerie Tatley. The hearing was held over until January 8, 2007. On January S, 2007, staff recommended that, due to the new owner's progress toward a solution, Council should continue to hold the hearing open until February 26, 2007. We also recommended that if an acceptable repair or removal plan is in place by that date, staff would prepare a memo to Council describing the homeowner's proposed plan to eliminate the hazard and recommend denial of the resolution to deem the structure hazardous at that time The new homeowners have determined that they will not try to salvage the house. Their analysis included having several contractors look at the foundation. All experts came to the same conclusion. The home and foundation should not be saved and should be removed. As a result, the homeowners have comrr�itted to having the structure completely removed the foundation excavation iilled, and the site properly seeded by May 4, 2007. 15 136 Horizon Circle February 21, 2007 PAGE 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council receives final comment and close the public hearing. Staff also recommends that Council allow the homeowners to proceed as they have planned and have the home removed and all work completed by May 4, 2007. This approval includes the caveat that the homeowners are to secure and monitor the home and any excavation, until the hazard has been completely removed. Finally staff recommends a separate motion holding action on the Hazardous Building resolution over until May 7, 2007. 16 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING THE REMOVAL OR REPAIR OF A HAZARDOUS BUILDING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 463, LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota as follows: In the matter of the hazardous building located at 136 Horizon Circle: Legally Described as: Lot 12, Block 3, Carlson's Summit Manor North Addition, Anoka County, as on file and of record in the County Recorder's office of said County. TO: Mr. Harvey B. and Ms. Jean A Johnson, and any tenants, occupants, or other persons claiming an interest in the above described premises 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.15 to 463.61 the City Council of the City of Fridley, having duly considered the matter, iinds the above- described building to be a hazardous building for the following reasons: the Chief Building Ofiicial of the City of Fridley has inspected the exterior of the home and has determined that the essential structural items of this home such as foundation walls have been compromised by an unusual geological condition on this property. Clay soils often referred to as, "Fatty Clay" have damaged the foundation of this home beyond service. The foundation has buckled and is depressed an inch and a half or more across one face of the foundation. Section 1300.0180.2000 MN State Building Code, states in part, "any structure that constitutes a hazard to safety, health, or public welfare by reason of disaster or damage, shall be considered unsafe. All unsafe buildings shall be declared a public nuisance and shall be abated by repair or demolition, as referenced in the MN. State Statutes Sections 463.15 to 463.26. The above mentioned property was posted as a hazard in accordance with MN Statute 463.17. 2. The Council further orders that unless such corrective action is taken or an answer is served upon the City of Fridley and filed in the office of the clerk of District Court of Anoka County, Minnesota within 20 days from the date of the service of this order, a motion for summary enforcement of this Court will be made to the District Court of Anoka County. Enforcement of this order shall include, in the City's discretion, the option of razing the structure. The Council orders that all personal property or fixtures that may unreasonably interfere with the razing and removal of the building shall be removed within 20 days, and if not so removed by the owner, and the City then 17 Resolution No. Page 2 determines to raze the structure, the City of Fridley may remove and sell such personal property or fixtures at public auction in accordance with law. 3. The Council further orders that if the City is compelled to take any corrective action herein, all necessary costs expended by the City will be assessed against the real estate concerned and collected in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.22. 4. The mayor, clerk, city attorney and other officers and employees of the City are authorized and directed to take such action, prepare, sign, and serve such papers as are necessary to comply with this order and to assess the costs thereof against the real estate described above for collection along with taxes. PASSED AD ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007 ATTEST Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk � Scott J. Lund, Mayor � � CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 2007 DATE: February 20, 2007 n) ,�l �� TO: William W. Burns, City Manager (,.� 9� 'I' FROM: SUBJECT Scott J. Hickok, Community Deveiopment Director Ronald Julkowski, Chief Building Ofiicial RESOLUTION - Hazardous Building at 136 Horizon Circle INTRODUCTION This hazardous building item was scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on December 11, 2006. The property was subsequently purchased by new owners; Ken Zahorski and Valerie Tatley. T'he hearing was held over until January 8, 2007. On January 8, 2007, staff recommended, that due to the new owner's progress toward a solution, Council should continue to hold the hearing open until February 26, 2007. The new owners have committed to having the home completely removed from the site, the excavation filled, and the site seeded by May 4, 2007. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends holding action on the Hazardous Building resolution over until May 7, 2007. 35 0 0 FRIDLEY CITY COUN� I:�'1 PAG MOTION by Councilmember Saeflce to remove this ite from the table. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, YOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HE G WAS OPENED AT 8:05 P.M. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director sta.ted this item relates to the property located at 6071 University Avenue NE. In November, he City Council discussed the Sinclair Station and the stipulations that were placed on the s cial use permit. The property owner must abide by all of the stipulations to keep the special e permit inta.ct. At any point, Council can recall a special use permit and can revoke a special se permit if tliey choose to do so. Council can also modify the permit or they can check and ake sure the special use permit and stipulations are being observed. Mr. Hickok stated that tonight is a`check in" point on the special use pernut. Staff is not recommending revocation at this t' . At the first of the yeaz, new tenants came to this location. Council continued the public he ' g to this date so the new tenants had a chance to run the operation. There ha.ve been o ervations by staff and some minor inconsistencies, but no complaints from citizens. Staff is optimistic that the new owners are working to abide by the special use permit. At this ' e, other than staff working through some of the rough spots on some stipulations, there is no ecommendation for revocation. Staff will bring this item back if any future issues arise. MOTION by Bolkcom. Saefke to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember UPON A VOICE V�TE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OSED AT 8:10 P.M. 7. Consider the Building Located at 136 Aorizon Circle Hazardous and Order its Removal or Repair Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 463 (Ward 3) (Continued January 8, 200'n. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to remove this item from the table. Seconded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:11 P.M. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director, said the property at 136 Horizon Circle had a crumbling foundation. Staff concluded the investigation and asked Council to deem this building hazardous on December 11, 2006. New owners came forward and decided to demolish the home. The new owners had several contractors look at the property, and all experts came to the same conclusion that the foundation was beyond repair and the best result was to remove the house and foundation. After the house has been demolished, the owners will decide if they will maintain the lot or build a new home on the property. Once the home has been torn down, the � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 2007 PAGE 5 4. Claims (130606-130773). APPROVED. 5. Licenses. APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SUBMITTED AND AS ON Councilmember Bolkcom asked for ciarification of the Mr. Haukaas replied that when a bid package is put out, s� changed and an addendum is sent out to all of the contrac contractors are required to acknowledge they received the a� bid. This way staff knows the contractors are all bidding on were three sma11 addendums between the time the bidding/ was opened. the project bid. t�fnes something may need to be � who received the packet. The �dum when submitting their final same package. In this case there posted and the time the bidding Councilmember Bolkcom asked if staff was comforta.b�k that Forest Lake Construction had the people and resources to respond to this lazge project. � Mr. Haukaas answered that staff was excited to ha e Forest Lake Construction back, as they have done a few projects in the past and have done a eat job. C�uncilmember Varichak asked for Item 1 to be moved from the Consent Agenda. Attorney Knaak sta.ted that there was a typo on em 12. It should read 8.07 not 8.31. MOTION by Councilmember Barnette to app ve the consent agenda with the removal of Item 1. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V07 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:22 ADOPTION OF AGENDA MOTION by Councilmember Boll Item 1 and the correction of Item 12. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MOTION CARRIED UNArTIMO OPEN FORUM (VISITORS): G AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE to approve the consent agenda. with the addition of nded by Councilmember Varichak. Y. G AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE 6. Consider Revocation of pecial Use Permit SP# 06-0$, for Sinclair Fridley, Generally Located at 607 University Avenue N.E. (Ward 1) (Continued November 20, 2006) FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26. 2007 PAGE 7 foundation hole is filled and turf is established, the time clock for correction on the hazardous condition will stop. The owner is not required to build a home on the property but is required to maintain the site. The owner has to complete all necessary work by May 4, 2007. Staff recommends closing the public hearing and continuing the resolution until May 7, 2007. It would be the homeowners' responsibility to secure and maintain the property until that time. Mayor Lund asked if it would be better to continue the public hearing until May 7. Fritz Knaak, City Attorney, stated that as faz as legal action goes, it would not start until the resolution is passed. Councilmember Bolkcom preferred to close the public hearing and adopt the resolution at the May 7 City Council meeting. Attorney Knaak stated that if the public hearing were left open, it would leave more flexibility for the owners but it is not necessary. From a legal point of view, what matters is passing the resolution. Councilmember Bolkcom sta.ted that she was concerned this could be dragged out if we did not close the public hearing. Councilmember Barnette agreed with Councilmember Bolkcom. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilxnember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. Councilmember Saefke said the previous owners were listed in the resolution and that would need to be corrected. Mr. Hickok said the new owners will be listed in the resolution. 8. Consider the Creation of 'TIF District N. 19 (Industrial Equities Project Generally Located at 5110 Main Street N.E.) (Ward 3� MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to waive th reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilmember aeflce. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, 112A�OR LUND DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:22 P.M. � Paul Bolin, HR.A Assistant Executive Director, stated that John len of Industrial Equities is planning to redevelop the property located at 5110 Main Street. Allen is proposing 202,000 square feet of new office and wazehouse space. There are high cos anticipated for demolition FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 2007 PAGE 8 and soil corrections. After the 1965 tornado, the previous owners dug a trench and buried debris into the trench. Also, there is old raikoad spur that will need to be removed. Mr. Allen is seeking $1.5 million in pay-as-y u-go f nancing and assistance. The entire site is over 12 acres. Mr. Bolin sta.ted that the $1.5 '11� makes the site cost competitive between this site and a vacant site without this assistance. Industrial building, eliminate outdoor storage � $10 million. This will also provide 1 Mr. Bolin stated that the HR�1 ap 2007. Staff recommends Council's �n in assistance that Mr. Allen is seeking from the HRA i outlying suburbs. T'he amount is really the difference an outlying suburb. Redevelopment would not be feasible ;quities plans to clean up the site, demolish the existing �oblems, remove debris, and provide a project worth over jobs based on the size of the building. a resolution to create TIF District 19 on February 1, MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to�move a 63 page memorandum from Krass Monroe da.ted February 19, 2007, into the record. Se onded by Councilmember Barnette. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Bolkcom asked Mr. Bolin to AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE TIF districts. Mr. Bolin replied that currently this site generate t�es based on the value of $2.0 million to $2.5 million. Through this redevelopment project, will see the value increase to $10 million. Mr. Allen will continue to pay taxes on the current v e of the property until the loan is paid off. The pay-off of the loan should occur in approximat y 15 to 16 years. The school district, county and city will continue to receive taxes durin this time on the current value of the property. Once the TIF is paid off, Mr. Allen will pay which should be azound $10 million. Councilmember Barnette stated that the owner will now. Councilmember Bolkcom asked about the comment from intent. on the new value of the property to pay the taxes they aze paying County and the notice of Mr. Bolin replied that he attended the Anoka County Board mee ' the first week of Februazy and gave a verbal presenta.tion of the project. The County Board ha no comments or questions on the project. A letter was received sta.ting that they did not hav any objections with this project moving forward. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if this district would take away from ther districts the City has. She asked how it related to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Bolin answered that this would not take away from any other district. �he Comprehensive Plan is a very broad statement. As part of the TIF 19 creation, there is an ove�11 TIF plan in the Y ITY C UN IL 6, 2007 PAGE 15 Councilmember Bolkcom stated that the internet Mr. Abbott replied that he will reconcile MOTION by Councilmember ] Ordinance No. 1239 on second Saefke. , the wrong chapter versions posted. to waive the reading of the ordinance and to adopt and order publication. Seconded by Councilmember UPON A VOICE VOT , ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED U ANIMOUSLY 10. Resolution Ordering the Removal or Repair of a Hazardous Building Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 463, Located Within the City of Fridley, Minnesota (136 Horizon Circle) (Ward 3) (Tabled January 8, 200'n. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to table this issue until May 7, 2007. Seconded by Couricilmember Varichak. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 11. Resol 'on Modifying the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Taz ncrement Financing Plans for Taz Increment Financing District Nos. 1-3, 6-7, 9, 11-14 nd 16-18 to Reflect Increased Bonding Authority within Redevelopment Project No 1, Creating Taz Increment Financing District No. 19 and Adopting Taz Increment ' ancing Plan Relating Thereto (Industrial Equities Project Generally Located at 51 0 Mai� Street N.E.) (Ward 3). MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom to adopt Resolution No. 2007-14. Seconded by Councilmember Bolkco�n stated that there was a lot of good discussion but the project would not go forward without a'�IF district. The project is needed iri the area. Mayor Lund said Districts resolution. Mr. Bolin answered that the and 15 are included in the memorandum but are not listed on the ion has the correct districts listed. Mayor Lund said he was in favor �f the redevelopment project. Dr. Burns said it can be diffici%�lt getting developers interested in development and redevelopment. It is great to have a de�loper of this quality working in Fridley. r FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 200'1 PAGE 16 UPON A VOICE ` MOTION CARRIED 12. Resolution of the City Opinion from the 1V Chapter 8.07. ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE IMOUSLY Fridley, Minnesota, Direction its Attorney to Obtain a Legal iesota Attorney General Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Fritz Knaak, City Attorney, stated that this chapter allows cities to request the Attorney General's opinion on legal m tters regarding questions of public importance. An Attorney General's opinion provides a od legal basis for future city actions based on importance specifically for the city. Questio have been raised on the possible conflicts between the City's current language which restricts e amount that can be charged for certain things including utilities and the requirements of Mi esota Statues, Section 44.4. This provision requires cities to maintain funds, spend money for p lic health and safety, have sewer and water available and provide for special revenue bonds when ecessary for utilities. The City cannot go forward with revenue bonds based on these restriction Outside consultants have raised the question that this represents a conflict between the charter d the requirements of staxe law. The requirements of state law would supersede the Fridley Ch er. Accordingly, we would like to ask the Attorney General the following: Does Sta.te law supe ede the Fridley Charter? If so, to what degree can the City regulate tliat kind of restriction in 's charter without conflicting with Sta.te law? In order to that, the City must make a formal re est. Mr. Knaak cannot do this on behalf of the city without the authority of Council. Accordi ly, staff is asking Council to authorize the City Manager to direct Mr. Knaak to make this reques to the Attorney General. Mayor Lund stated that he is in favor of this reso tion. He thought a legal opinion would help come to some kind of formalization regarding our u ity funds. Our current projections state that our losses will not only continue but increase in the e. Councilmember Barnette is also in favor of this item a%d to do it legally would be better. William Holm, 7424 Melody Drive, sta.ted that he was pro ided with the resolution as a member of the Charter Commission. He fully supports this idea agrees it is appropriate to move forward with this item. He had some suggestions on the lan ge. On question number one in the draft letter he thinks it should be made clear that we are askin the question "Does Minnesota State law relating to the provision of the utilities by meter m'cipalities preempt the cities' charter provision such as Fridley where the charter langua results in operating and maintenance costs substantially exceeding revenues the city can enerate from users of its utilities?" We need to be clear that this is the main issue. Also on th second question, it would be helpful to note at the end that Fridley already has a dedicated utility d, and the City Charter already requires that excess revenues be returned to utility users throug lower rates or refunds. Finally, it seems that this resolution should come from the Mayor and Council rather than the City Attorney. Attorney Knaak answered that it is regular protocol that the City Attorney c�ntact the Attorney General. � CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 University Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 MOVING ( ] (763) 572-3604 FAX (763) 571-1287 Job Address:_� Legal Description: Owner & Address: Contractor: ,T`j, Address: ,t�� f� HOUSE: Length GARAGE:Length OTHER: Length Estimated Cost 2.0 � Effective 1/1/04 WRECKING �?C PERMIT APPLICATIO 3 �0� � �-� f� N � 2�r.� # Tel. # �9a. �! te License # DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING �� Width � Height �� Sq. Ft. � Width �-� Height � Sq. Ft. Width Height Sq. -Ft. S Approx. Completion Date CALL GOPIiER STATE ONE AT 651-454-0002 FOR UTILITY UTILITIES FOR DISCONNECTS BEFORE WRECKING MOVING STRUC' � Cu . Ft . Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. �NS. CALL ALL Water Bill Paid: Yes or Coll ct �`s [ ] e [$ ] -Signature Moving Route: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit to wreck/move the building described above, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rulings of the Building Division, and the State Code which requires any water well on the property to be sealed by a State licensed water well driller, and hereby declares that all facts and representations stated in this application aze true and conect. ALL DEMOLITON DEBRIS, INCLUDING FOUNDATION & SLAB, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE. S— (c -�l� Date � Movin� Principle building into Fridley . . . . $300.00 Accessory building into Fridley ...$ 42.00 Through or within the City ......$ 20.00 Move a building out of City ......$ 20.00 � PERMIT FEE:_ � MINIMUM $20.00 STIPULATIONS: Wrec ' For each 1,000 cubic feet or fraction.. ....$1.25 � For structures which would be impractical to � cube, the fee shall be based on the total cost of wrecking at the rate of $6.00 for each $500.00 or fraction. Office Use Only: SAC-D form completed