AF-V - 46447�F
��`�' �����
.'�,'��,54
�g�p�"
;R�y
UTY OF
FRI DLEY
FRIDLEY MUNIC[PAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN SS432 •(612> 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
APPEALS COMII�IISSION
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
January 25, 1996
Ronald Zaczkowski
314 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mr. Zaczkowski:
On January 24, 1996, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a
variance, VAR #95-37, to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure facing a side
street from 25 feet to 14 feet to allow the construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29,
30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition, the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E.,
Fridley, MN 55432, with the following stipulations:
The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within su� months of the final
inspection of the new garage or apply for a special use pernut within 30 days.
2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the
final inspection of the proposed garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive
a special use permit for a second accessory structure.
3. The petitioner sha11 provide a hard surface driveway for the new garage by
February 1, 1997.
You have one year from the date of Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you
cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three
weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please
call me at 572-3593.
Sinc rely, �
�. �.��. � �. ��� �
L f � . �lr,r _�;.<___..
NI'i hele McPherson, BLA
Planning Assistant
Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one c�py to the City of Fridley
Planning Department by February 7, 1996.
Concur with action taken.
/�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
�
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Savage called the January 24, 1996, Appeals Commissio� meeting to
order at 7:32 p.m. .
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Diane Savage, Larry Kuechle, Cathy Smith
Members Absent: Ken Vos, Carol Beaulieu
Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Jan & Ronald Za�zkowski, 314 Hugo Street N. E.
Warren Lamusga, 195 Hugo Street N.E.
Michael Melby, 8100 Ruth Street N.E.
Robert Venne, 8118 Ruth Street N.E.
Bill & Jean Schacher, 8191 Ruth Circle N.E.
John & Lillian Meyer, 7868 Alden Way N.E.
Rosie Griep, Special Project Coordinator,
City of Fridley Police Department
APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 19 1995, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by IVIs. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve the December 19, 1995,
Appeals Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. COMMUNITY VALUES PROJECT PRESENTATION
Ms. Griep, Special Project Coordinator for the Police Department, made a presentation on
the Community Values Project. The purpose of this project is to identify community
concems and values and how to work on those concems and values.
2. PUBLIC HEARING' CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95-37.
BY RONALD 7J�CZKOWSKI:
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the setback
of an accessory structure facing a street from 25 feet to 14 feet to allow the
construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A,
Riverview Heights Addition, the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E.
� �.
APPEALS CONIl�IISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 2
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:38 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the variance request is to reduce the setback of an accessory
structure on a comer lot from 25 feet to 14 feet. The request is for 314 Hugo Street which
is located at the intersection of Hugo and Ruth Streets. Located on the subject parcel is
a single family dwelling unit with a single-car tuck-under garage facing north toward Hugo
Street The petitioner is pro�sing to construct a 22 foot by 36 foot garage addition on the
west side of the dwelling which would open onto Ruth Street. Typically, the setback of 25
feet is to provide adequate off street parking and to prevent encroachment into the line of
site by the adjacent property should that property face the same street.
Ms. McPherson stated that in reviewing the request, staff determined there are two
possible altematives which could prevent a variance request:
1. Expand the existing "tuck-under" garage toward the east property line. There is
room for an 18 foot by 24 foot addition.
Ms. McPherson stated there is approximately 23 feet to the easterly property line from the
single family dwelling which would allow construction of an 18 foot by 24 foot addition to
the existing garage and house. Staff does acknowledge there would be additionat
excavation required in order to accomplish this altemative.
2. Relocate the garage as a detached structure to another location on the property.
Ms. McPherson stated this structure could be placed between the dwelling and the south
property line. Staff estimated this accessory structure could be approximately 25 feet by
30 feet. However, this would dramatically reduce the amount of existing rear yard space.
There would also be some excavation needed for this altemative. The petitioner will need
to excavate for the plan as proposed.
Ms. McPherson stated the request as proposed is within previously granted requests. The
City has previously granted variances of this nature down to 5 feet and 15 feet. The
varianoe as proposed would allow parking of one car in front of the garage addition without
encroaching into the street. It would encroach over the property line. The proposed
addition could adversely impact the adjacent property to the south. There is currently not
a building for the property owner to the south to view. On the other hand, it could enhance
the property to the south by providing additional screening.
Ms. McPherson stated, as the request is within previously granted variances, staff has no
recommendation. If the Appeals Commission chooses to approve the request, staff
recommends the following the stipulations:
�, �,
APPEALS CO1rIl�lISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 3
1. The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within six months of the final
inspection of the new garage.
2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the
final inspection of the proposed garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive
a special use permit for a second accessory structure.
3. The petitioner shall provide a hard surFace driveway for the new garage by
February 1, 1997.
Ms. McPherson stated the second stipulation refers to the section of the code which
requires an accessory structure of over 240 square feet to have a special use permit.
Ms. Savage asked staff to review the status of the code with reference to enlarging a
single car garage to a double car garage. Is that allowed without a variance?
Ms. McPherson stated this was correct. The code requires a 5 foot setback for an
attached accessory structure. The code was changed for those who had homes with
existing single car garages where, in certain cases to expand to a two-car garage, the
garage can encroach down to 3 feet. In this case, there is adequate space to provide the
second stall without encroaching into the 5-foot setback area. The petitioner would have
approximately 18 feet between the property line and the existing single car garage.
Mr. Kuechle asked if staif knew of any other plans for the area that might have an impact.
Ms. McPherson stated, no, not at this time.
Mr. Kuechle asked if there are any traffic level problems in this area.
Ms. McPherson stated there are no problems that staff has heard. Ashton Avenue is an
industrial street. Most of that traffic goes to 79th Avenue. Hugo is a narrow street but
there are no plans to expand it. To her knowledge, the City has received no complaints
regarding traffic in this area.
Mr. Kuechle asked the width of Ruth Street.
Ms. McPherson stated the right-of-way is approximately 50 feet and is paved at 32 feet
from face to face. This street was constructed in the last 15 years.
Mr. Kuechle asked the distance to the rear lot line.
Ms. McPherson sta#ed she did not have a verifying survey for the subject parcel. Based
on the verifying survey for the property to the east, she estimated the distance for the
petitioner's property to be approxima#ely 35 feet The proposed garage would be
approximately 10 feet from the rear lot line. The code requires 5 feet.
�`�, �
APPEALS COA�IISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 4
Mr. Kuechle stated the driveway is short. Are there any code problems with that?
Ms. McPherson stated there is no minimum driveway length. The only requirement is the
25�oot setback The Cit�r has granted variances down to 15 feet and 5 feet. There really
is no minimum although a precedent has been estabfished that a car should be able to
parlc without hanging out into the street. �
Ms. Savage asked the petitioner his reaction to the altematives provided by staff.
Mr. Zaczkowski stated he would prefer the addition as requested. Building to the east
would require excavation. He stated the correct dimensions of the house are 18 feet by
24 feet.
Mr. Kuechle asked if the house was 24 feet deep.
Mr. Zaczkowski stated, yes.
Ms. Savage asked the petitioner to respond to the stipulations.
Mr. Zaczkowski stated he would like to keep the garage in the basement that they now
have. He would remove the tum-around and the extra parking area. At this time, he wants
to remove the retaining wall and go back to a sloping driveway. He would like to keep the
garage. He would apply for the special use permit For 30 years, they have had very little
garage space and now he wants a lot of garage space.
Mr. Zaezkowski stated he will remove a utility building which is located in the rear corner
of the lot. With the garage the size he would like to build, he will no longer need that
storage. His neighbors to the south are at the meeting.
Mr. Schacher stated he lives behind the petitioner. He agrees with the request. They
don't get much of a view because of the hedge and evergreens which block the view
anyway. He has no objection.
Ms. Savage stated one altemative suggests that the petitioner build a detached garage
behind the dwelling. That would have an impact.
Mr. Schacher stated it would if the garage was built behind. He would rather see it on the
side as proposed.
Ms. Smith asked, with the building coming out as far as proposed, would it create any line-
of-site problems?
Mr. Schacher stated, no.
/"� ,•--,
APPEALS CONIl�lISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24 , 1996 PAGE 5
Mr. Venne stated he lives south of the property has lived there for quite a few years. He
did not see where this garage would affec� anything as far as driving is concemed. There
is a stop sign at the intersection. You can still see both directions on Hugo whether this
structure is there or not. He did not see where this would impact traffic. He thought it
would be just fine. �
Mr. Melby stated he did not have a problem with the request. It is not going to change the
look of the neighborhood. As far as the traffic, there is a stop sign. It will not cause a
problem. He would recommend approval.
Mr. Venne stated, to the south on the comer of Ruth Circle and Ruth Street, there is
another house with a similar arrangement where the garage entrance is on Ruth Street
and the front of the house is on Ruth Circle. That has been� there for 10 to 12 years. He
has not seen this have any effe�t on the traffic along the street.
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Kuechle, to close the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M.
Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend approval of the request. Because the garage is
set so far south, he did not think the view would be any less than it is now. He is
concerned about the stipulation and whether or not it should go hand-in-hand with the
special use permit �use the intent is to keep the garage. He would make it very clear
that the stipulations are included.
Ms. Savage agreed. There is a hardship in the need for a� larger garage. She did not see
the other altematives as being feasible. She did not see any adverse effects in the area
by having this addition. She shared Mr. Kuechle's concem about the stipulations. The
main reason for that is that they get a lot of requests for enlarging garages. A lot of people
would like to have additional space for an RV, boats, etc. Once they start by allowing the
petitioner to keep the existing garage, they are, in effe�t, agreeing to considerably larger
garage space than normally allowed. She would keep the stipulations.
Ms. Smith agreed.
Mr. Hickok suggested the first stipulation could be modified by adding "or apply for a
special use permit 30 days after approval."
Mr. Kuechle stated the petitioner needs to realize that, if a special use permit is not
granted, he has no choice but to remove that garage.
,�,,.� �.
APPEALS COI�IISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 6
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval of Variance
Request, #VAR 95-37, by Ronaid Zaczkowski to reduce the setback of an accessory
structure facing a street from 25 feet to 14 feet to allow the construction of a 22 foot by 36
foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition, the same
being 314 Hugo Street N.E., with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within six months of the final
inspection of the new garage, or apply for a special use permit within 30 days of
approval.
2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the
final inspec�ion of the proposed garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive
a special use permit for a second accessory structure.
3. The petitioner shall provide a hard surFace driveway for the new garage by
February 1, 1997. � " "
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDE TION OF VARIANCE RE UEST VAR #96-01
BY JOHN AND LILLIAN MEYER:
Per Section 205.04.06.A.(3) of the Fridley Zoning Code to increase the
encroachment of a deck in the side y rd ftom 3 feet to 4 feet 10 inches to allow the
reconstruction of an existing deck o Lot 6, Block 4, Pearson's Craigway Estates,
the same being 7868 Alden Way N. �
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. K echle, to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HE
SAVAGE DECLARED THE
OPEN AT 8:00 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is locat d at 7868 Alden Way which is at the
intersec�iion of Bellaire and Alden Way. The request 's to allow a variance to increase the
encxoachment of a deck into the side yard from 3 feet o 4 feet 10 inches. If approved, this
would allow reconstruction of a deck located on top f an underground storage facility.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners are in the process f constructing a 6 foot by 24 foot
porch addition onto the rear of the single family dwellin unit with attached garage. The
area of the variance is an open deck which provides ress from the porch to the side
yard. The underground storage facility was cons cted after the dwelling was
construeted. It is not a part of the structure itself. It n be accessed only from the
outside. Because the storage facility is considered an a ssory structure, it does meet
the 5 foot setback Therefore, the deck would also be set badc 5 feet as required by code;
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The petitioner r�ue.sts that a variauce be granted to r�luce the side yard setback for an accessory
struchue facing a side street from 25 feet to 14 feet. If granted, the variance would allow construction
of a 22 foot by 36 foot aitached garage.
HARDSHII':
See attach� statemeut. Petitioner ne�s additional space for car, boat, workshop.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code requires that an acce.ssory structure on a comer
lot shall be no closer than 25 fat from the side lot line when ogening oirto the stre�t.
Public Purpose seived by this r�uirement is to allow for off-street parldng without encroaching on the
public right-of-way. This requiremeirt also takes into accourrt the building "line of sight" of adjacern
properti�.
The existing single family dwelling located on the subja;t parcel has a single car, "tuck-under" style
garage. The petitioner has two alternatives which would allow him to have additional garage space.
Th�e alternatives aze:
1. Expand the existing "tuck-under" garage toward the east properiy line. There is room for an
18 foot by 42 foot addition; or
2. Relocate the garage as a detachai structure to another location on the progerty.
If the variance is granted, staff recommends the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner sha11 remove the existing driveway within six months of the final insp�tion of
the new garage or apply for a special use pemut within 30 da.ys.
2. The exisdng garage shall be converted to habitable space within one yeaz of the final
inspection of the propos� garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use
permit for a second acce.ssory structure.
3. The getitioner sha11 provide a hard surface driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997.
The vatiance as requested is within previously granted requests. The City has grant� variances to reduce
the side yard �setback from 30 feet to 5 feet and from 25 feet to 15 feet.
, -°•
VAR #95-37
314 Hugo Street N.E.
Page 2
AGTIONS:
^
As the request is within previously � varianc,es, stAff bas no recommendation regarding ttus request.
If approved, staff recommends the above stipulations as conditions of approval.
PROdECT DETAILS
Petition For. A variance to reduce the side yard se�tback of an acc�sory structure facing a side stre�t from
25 feet to 14 feet. �
Location
of Properiy:
Legal Description
of Property:
Size:
Topography:
F.Bisting
Vegetation:
F.gisting
Zoning/Platting
Ava�7ab7ity
of Mwticipal
Ut7ities:
Vehicular
Acc�ss:
P�estrian
Acces4:
s4
Engineering
Issues:
Site Planning
�ssues:
314 Hugo Street N.E.
Lot 29-32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition
10,2QD square feet
Slopin� toward the streets (comer lot)
Typic�l s�uburban; trees, sod, shrubs, etc.
R l, Single Family; Riverview Heights 1922
Connected
Hugo and Ruth Str�ts
N/A
Garage facing Ruth Street is a better option as Ruth Street has a lacger right-of-way and is a
larger stre�t.
/"''�
VAR #95-37
314 Hugo Street N.E.
Page 3
Analysis
DEVELOPMENT SITE
�,,
Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code requires that an accessory structure on a comer lot shall
be no closer than 25 fcet from the side lot line when opening orno the street..
Public Purpose seived by ttus req�rirement �s to allow for o� street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-
way. This r�uiremern also takes irno accoum the building °line of sight° of adjacern properties.
�
The petitioner requests that a variance be gramed to reduce the side yard setback of an accessory structure facing a
�de strcet from 25 fcet to 14 fe,et. If granted, the petitioner would construct a 22 foot by 36 foot attached garage.
Parcel Descriution & ILsto�
The subject parcel is locate,� in the southeast comer of the urtersection of Hugo and Ruth Streets in the Riverview
Heights neighborhood. In 1964, a 26 foat by 42 faot single fam�y dwelling with a single car "tuck-under" style garage
was construct�.
Alternatives
In reviewing the r�uest, staff detennined that there are two alternatives to the reque.st wluch would not require a
variance:
1. The �oner could constsuct an addition to the existing single car garage. This addition would
expand the existing garage to the east. There is approximately 23 feet from the wall of the earisting
garage to the �st properiy line. The petitioner could construct an addition of 18 f�t by 24 f�t, the
length of the dwelling. This option would eliminate the n�i to remove the existing driveway which
would be required if the new garage is construct�. The drawback to this alternative is that the
petitioner would ne� to excavate in order to construct the expanded garage.
2. The petitioner could construct a deta,ched accessory structure behind the e�risting dwelling. The
structure could then be locat� to meet the setback requirements. This would reduce the size of the
a�ccessory structure from the proposed 22 feet by 36 f�t to a width of 25 fcet by 30 feet. In order
to cons�cuct tbis alte�rnativ� the petitioner would lose a large portion of his rear yard to the struchire.
In a,ddition, this optiott would have greater unpact to the property to the south whose rear yard. abuts
the rear yard of the subject parcel. The structure would be as close as five fe�t to the common lot
line. Sitrv7ar amounts of exca�ation betwe�en this altemative and the proposed ga.rage would need to
occur.
�
VAR #95-37
314 Hugo Str�t N.E.
Page 4
�
The proposed addition could have an adverse impact on the properiy to the south. The property owner to the south
would be looking at a building which cutrently does not exist. However, the addition could provide additional
scr�ning from the street for the neighbor to the south, thereby making the rear yard more "private.".
The addition, as proposed, would provide adequate area for the petitioner to park a velucle on the driveway without
encroaching omo Ruth Street. The existing garage will ne� to be converted to habitable space in order for the
petitioner to avoid obtaining a special use permit for a second accessory structure. The request is within previously
grant� requests of 30 feet to 5 f�t and 25 feet to 15 feet.
Recommendation
The request is within previously grazrted vaiiances. Staff has no recommendation regarding the request. If the
Commission wishes to recommend approval of the request, staff recommends the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within six months of the final inspection of the new
garage or apply for a special use pennit within 30 days..
2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the final inspection of the
propo�d garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use pennit for a second
accessory structure.
3. The getitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997.
WEST:
SOIJT�i:
EAST:
NORTH:
Comprehensive
Planning �ssues:
PubGc Hearing
Comments:
ADJACENT STTES
Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling
Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling
Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling
Zorring: R 1, Single Family Dwelling
Land Use: Residernial
Land Use: Residemial
Land Use: Residential
Land Use: Residential
N
\/AR #95-37
314 H ugo Street
LOCATION MAP
0
�
/ . ._,. � '—� �` � �j E7'�
; � a
.. . — ---��, c: � .
� ' � �
o . � —�—
_ �' � � � �
�• _ �'
. F
f -
� F t '�� . ;� ..
�
.. � _ } p_ _ o,
_
. Gf:
W
.
,
_ � r
_.. , .
, . .
' i�.:' i-�' �': Q. T k S :. } f l .` (
.�' �«r- � I� jy ��_�y, y �
9 1� V / � _�
, � � �, , t�
- _ � .��A ' . ..
Yr!,!�+� - , _ .
�.. - •
� �
.:. '.� .. .. , � . ., ,,, . . . . . . . . : � - ,_. : ,: . .. .�. ..._�.
... . . , .'. . ' '.', .� . � . '.. ' . ' -.:: ..:.. �. �
_. ' _ :,..• :.. .:. ' ..., .. ' ..
1 ��
• , ��� • . , . � t � `1
��� � o. �,
� .� �;� �: ,
� -� ��, ._� - _ �
� , - �. -_ �
� � - \ �: � . � � .
� � Q'' � ,z A _
C � >�`...�
��• �>�f = =r v�-
. . „�
� � :: � . _ =� i
�..'�,.- ; � :c. - - � j ° i
�-�.,c � � \ -
a° �� . �,`�' ;..-.�°",,
_ . -�,.� � �� : ` � ��:.
_�M.N.:�rano--�-,efi �
� 3 �i7- bUe� HaK�
<:
�`
� ,� �
_ ,
- �, ,_ ,.'� . , p�
'_� �'1 � • 4
. � � c
� � ' �
-. � � , - � ;, � � 't i
4 .1 1 � � f , � t .- � �
._' � � _ {� , _
u � � o �� , ; � � ,� � # � � .;pT,� �' � ����
i :.` � ;,..,�.,;..�
_ � �� _ _ _
- � ,; � ,`
_ l�f
. . f : . �
= -� _....,.
�
�
7
� �.
p
�
�
�
��f .
i.
�
s
. � �
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
MY WIFE AND I HAVE LIVED IN FRIDLEY SINCE JULY, 1965.
WE DO NOT HAVE A LARGE HOME BECAUSE 1/3 OF OUR BASEMENT
IS A ONE CAR GARAGE AND WE ARE A TWO CAR FAMILY. SO
FOR 30 YEARS ONE OF OUR VEHICLES HAS SET OUTSIDE.
I AM GETTING CLOSE TO RETIREMENT AGE AND MY HOBBIE IS
WOOD-WORKING. WE ARE GOING TO SELL OUR LAKE PLACE BY
PRINCETON, MN. AND WILL NEED STORAGE FOR A SMALL BOAT.
WE NEED TO BUILD THIS 22' X 36' GARAGE TO GIVE US THE
STORAGE, NECESSARY INSIDE PARKING AND WORKSHOP WE WILL
NEED IN THE FUTURE.
SINCEREL ,
�
w _�
RONALD ZACZKOWSKI
/"'�
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE TI�
APPEALS COIVIlVIIS5ION
�"'1
Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public
Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, January
24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of
Consideration of variance request, VAR #95-37, by Ronald O. Zaczkowski:
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the setback of an
accessory structure facing a street from 25 feet to 14 feet to a11ow the construction of a 22
foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Additioq
the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55432
All persons desiring to be heard sha11 be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place.
DIANE SAVAGE
CHAIRPERSON
APPEALS CONIlVIISSION
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development
Department, 572-3592.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with
disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than
January 17, 1996.
HARVEY A. CARTWRIGHT
ANOICA COUNTY 6UttV6Y3'
MENNEpIN COUNTY SURVEYS
MINNEAAOIIi SURVEYS
8d10 PAIM 3TREET N.W.
8UN96T 4-7635
OWNFR
INDUETRIAI.. - JUOICIAL
BUSINHSS - TOP06RAPMICAL
CITY LO78 - PLATTING .
:u�o Sk:anc �es
�b
�
'd�
��
� � _
CARTWR�GHT & OLSON
LA1VD SUR �`EYORS
RLGIiTtRiO YNO<R LAWS OF 1TAT6 OF MINNESOTA
LICEN�tD Sr OROINANCt OF CITY OF MINNEAPOliB
32B PLYMOUTH BUILDING FEOERAL B-8721
HENNEPIN AT SIXTH • MINNEAPOLIS 3. MINNESOTA
l�urbcpor'g �cctificatc
COMB�NING THE NECOROS OF
J. E. HILL. Cw�� EN6INFHR
carwet�cHCO �ess
C. F. SANDHOFF
CIVII ENGINEER
[STqYL18 N EO 1 YO!
JAMES NELSON
SURVLYOR
CST4BLIiNEO 1 �22
METROPOLITAN LAND
SURVEYORS, cs�wsusMCO �o��
IIIV �� �3i�`�
734--14
�l;`j ti�� ;�_J � . S �'.�-_"�� ��� __ . � . �
A`
- .
, . : _ •-
—� � f '--"a,. - -'--- `-t---.._ �S _ r: _.. . � _ .. _._ .. _._ .. _ _ __._. _.��_ �` � t ' .
l f � � # ��
� . � �� ti`�
, . ; U
: ; � ' �,
j ; �� b'' : .� �� �,�
� � ; � �,�� �.l
, . � ,.
. `L �. ,.,_
� a � ... , . +" �� ,1 �°'
. �
��►�� . �b : ��
: �a' � �. ' "' � . � i
. �
, � . fii
� - ����' �� -� �� j �,� � �
�� . '' t . t \�<•+ � �
, _ ; � �� !
�
. . . { ,
; .
�
< < ' o
�.� i •� :
� .,-,� ;, ��- ;
I '
� �
� ' ` y. i
1
{ ,,'J . .. 1� .
! , /
. �
j _
. �
I
_ d..y...:°. . . ` . ... _ .. .. ........ .. --. ... . .. . ..._-�w `... ._..e._ �...... ....• -_-�-----. .
' . i .'`
We he^eby certi`'y trst this is a true ard ccrrect. � l�t of n su:-vey of
Lota 30,31 snd 31 Block e�, : iverview �?ei�: ts Ar.�ka �ou:it�, A:ir.nesots as
3ur�:F,ed bq �e this ;t:� day of Aagust,lGE4.
�
. . ,,�. . �,
�� . . .,, ..: _ . ..�:.
�..�:...��..��w
�
i
0
�
Lond Plan�ing .
la�d $�rvayi�g
Soils Teati�g
. Civit Enyi�eering
Municipol Emji�maring
�- .
-�359-
%4' .
Mortgage
. 3
��
.;
Q�
�
0
�
�
0
�
c�
c
�
�
3
�
N
�
�
i � '-/r= �. .l � � i(.. 4 i % f 8 ; �,
.�'
r �/� ♦ /
���i���r��I.'-LL%C ��� / 6875 Nighway No.65 N.E.
(! lt�l/lPP'l tj1.� �%,�lC� Minneapolis �
/ �M���. 53432
� � Talephone 784-6066
" Engineers & Surveyors Area code aiz
Loan Survey for t Rl - CO 8CJILDERS
�uGo
/
'� �
,�i
SrREET
�oa o.—
I �'
�
��
�
BASEME�ur '
FOUNOqTlON jONLY
� I . I
,�f3� .�f3h
i�J� I ��,1 �
— /00. O
r
� �-r ��
. .1
��
�
�
�
.�
�
� .,
oQ
cV �
o m
� �
�
c�
0
�
�
� ,a
Sa�lh line o� !.�}s 33, 34, 35�36, 8/o,c�rA, Qnie�view�lei �its
�
Lors 33, 3�, 35 F36, BL�C�A
R�vEUv�Ew �E�cNrs
A/V0l(q CDUNTy
a
�
Scale=l,n�h=30� e f
NOVEMBEQ�.1975
Thia is a true oad wrrecf ropr�sentatisn o/ a surwr of ths bounda�ies of tF�e land above dsscribed o�d af fh�
lacatien of oll buildiegs� if arryr� lh�r�on� a�d a�� visfble McroacMnents� iF anr� �rnm or oo said land. This sur�ror is
nwd+ onlr in coen�cfioe witl� a morfgaqe loae now being placed an the prop��ty and no liabilitr is ossu�n�d
�ac�pt to th� hotde► ot such mortgag� er anr oth�r ieteres� acquind br the r�ason of such mo�tgage. It;is
�ederstood aa�d agrNd,� m��m� a hov� 6��n loced /or �he purpos� ef ���ablishing lot lines w beuedorr
cern�rs. Dafsd fhis�_day o{��1-� A.O. 19��
SU8UR6AN ENGINEERING, INC.
fegine ��/�_ ._, _ .Su/v�rero
bi !r . � - (/�•. s,s ' �, 'Y w., -,. . .. _
MAII,ING LIST
VAR #95-37
RONALD ZACZKOWSKI
314 HUGO STREET N.E.
Ronald Zaczkowski
314 Hugo Street AT.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Marlene Oftedahl or
Current Resident
319 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Steven & Teresa Carlyle or
Current Resident
301 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
7ohn & Marlys Dunlap or
Current Resident
8111 Fairmont Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Glen & Gloria St. Cyr or
Current Resident
8140 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert & Sharon Burris or
Current Resident
8160 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Walter & Julie Streich or
Current Resident
8125 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
William & Jean Schacher or
Current Resident
8191 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
�,
Geneva Gasper or
Current Resident
361 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kenneth & Lee Ann Sporre
295 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Priscilla Lamb or
Current Resident
8131 Fairmont Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert & Janice Fritch or
Current Resident
8101 Fairmont Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert & Ethel Venne or
Cwrent Resident
8118 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
1Vlichael McLean or
Current Resident
8140 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gregory & Brenda Hansen or
Current Resident
8135 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Darrell & Cheryl Saari or
Cunent Resident
8181 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55342
�
City Manager
City Council
Eleanora Paulson or
Current Resident ���ti�i��'�- �'��`°�
355 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Troy Alan Larson or
Current Resident
311 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert & Kristin Seery or
Cunent Resident
8121 Fairmont Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael Malmborg or
Current Resident
8160 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
1ltichael Melby or
Current Resident
8100 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James & Mary 1Vfitchell or
Current Resident
8120 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gary & Audrey Scherber or
Current Resident
8145 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, NiN 55432
Douglas & Sharon Howe or
Current Resident
8171 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MIV 55432
7ames & Cazoline Stammers or Stanley & Barbara Jones or ponald & Ruth Livgard or
Cwrent Resident Current Resident Current Resident
8161 Ruth Circle N.E. 8151 Ruth Circle N.E. S 141 Ruth Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432
/'�,
�
MAII,ING LIST - PAGE 2 Todd & Jodi Lavine or Jerry & Renee Kielblock or
VAR #95-37 Current Resident Current Resident
314 HUGO STREET N.E. 350 Ironton Street N.E. 366 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432
Daniel & Martha. Bernt or
Current Resident
280 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Randall & Darlene Lobash or
Current Resident
314 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Alfred Omlie or
Current Resident
360 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
D. J. & 5. J. 7azdzewski or
Current Resident
308 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael & Lavonne Rennert or
Current Resident
295 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Terrence & Patricia Poss or
Current Resident
321 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Marti & Nwa Povlitzki or
Current Resident
369 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Carl & Dawn Jacobsen or
Current Resident
358 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, NIN 55432
Christopher & C. M. Karrick or
Current Resident
290 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Charles & Janice Seeger
324 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Leonard & Linda Harris or
Current Resident
350 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
John Owen & Sharon McCollow or
Cunent Resident
200 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kurt & I�'ildegard Skrandies or
Current Resident
311 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Debra Kay Betz or
Current Resident
341 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ken & Diane Hausken or
Current Resident
331 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ma.rk Blegen or
Current Resident
275 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Mark & Jenifer Artman or
Current Resident
304 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Cheryl Halverson or
Current Resident
340 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Alvin & Lisa Wassemlan or
Current Resident
340 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Wanen & Belinda Lamusga or
Current Resident
195 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ra1ph & Syrie Officer or
Current Resident
315 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Irene Ryan or
Current Resident
355 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
David & Camilla Schultz or
Current Resident
371 Hugo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bryan & Sandra Nelson or
Current Resident
190 Ironton Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
7ames Ingalls or Clarence & Margaret Sporre or Diane Savage
Current Resident Current Resident 567 Rice Creek Terrace N.E.
180 Ironton Street N.E. 180 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432
Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432
g �-93,f�: Ate y oiW Y'8T.7 R�60 ° J/ p"' ` ` m� ��33.76+'� 1 ��� �� �
� p O�� b � b.BB 'Q . 2 b _
A n I87)� a� � Z N �J ��. 2ii. B9 `
,• ? q�. �m � s W63Tj_.A�• sTe �O 4 ; i76.20 � \
� y�110� \ a �� gA t�ii (86) b � 'p Z 8 e '4� � �.. 388� �
� o �` ., yo =ti 6� � g csalg � r j cea) �*�,��'�• wes�za'az"a ( �'�;. /'�
� N`64 0�� •" 146.6� VD N �0 ' 9 ``� �/
30 1r r28� NB�J az'sa-w � .:�� "' 58,� `,�6 �+\
� aaG �s � ee.si =� � 59 �,"'.'0a�a I � �N
+� �, ��e.� �, °s.ee � ' �'`.•0 � �...,,,��� c^
�, s�P `,ya (se)N N,� s N (�01�•{p� Mraa �,�� oe.pe i p�o��' � I � \Z\ PONO
y Q �`� oN v Q F n 65 A � v� ,8 �M' a � `• • �{
N� (89) �- : a(71) O � 1 V'
�J O �
� �°,�,� TD r = 84.16 �f9 2�� oy6 �e = w ( 1241 t�` � 0 2
;so ���! 06.qy78.04 '' Ng� [rP� � ,m, OUTLOT A �'� a \
l iA p ���� � `�� N/ V 7�i O A `\
0 i P ♦ � 0 I �,
7B, ° °�, � N . W. \
a s� �s 9'69 �I N87°E ,� r � ��' a=
00.°�ry��' � 7'J.91 � B.O t R=60 0�� hs oe•?s N � \
�pog� (77) ' Q�%e��a j�.176),$-P e�.6qy P i8 �J�d�e Q � i � \
a TZ � � �+ Nd �W i � M A � \
A b�/ f=�0 �p � V9'� ��68�73) A NBa 61'a_ 1
-..Nesa��, -. �„s.��.- o -.. � CITY OF COON R�QIpS �.;, �s°�
i � z � . �-' { - - --� �- .oe•- .., ' •►
.a-•446.84"-'� ,,,a"'686.80.." _. �i9 _ �/•"•186'- . � \
�I �.. e�o.es- yi� -- a�28g�a 6D � -- � I �
OF FRI LEY --- �o . , ,�_ . , �� ,s , ��sw. s -
al°' ;�• oss9► ' •w � `- - �
//SED �' AUD�TOR ;� ,; �. ��as.z s---. .r8 ; 2 � ` -- -
O � / ' �
• � z � �
� os � M � m , ' . � � �I �� �
�e� g � , �iae, �, I .�, N �i4> I iie� j . „ � . �
p OI N �
IO9 0� eri' .. IA�.O6 N . M M � t0 �V N N ti A� `00 \\ \
�02 76 : 92 � "' �' A .i- n , a �' ---
n w 8 liil (i2) �. I�3) (�6) ��n . ° w (�1 p
� a (60)m fl) N (2) (3) N F m '� Z � IY (I) '. (6) "� 'D ^ �o \ \
6�!" N n � � � 2/ m -__ � ;2`,3 R , 2�� , 2 � �` � o �, �s � �
- - � .. , � ; , „,, �
)2 76 92 80 BO -_ i44 � s��"f- A - ���6'b� ``
_.. -- - - ��-- � 60 � _6Q 60�_ 1 7S �:. �,\ 76 {O ��, � w�7�� \ \ \
IRONTON � �3s_._.-,
° N STREET - - �
� � ,: �;
�_OL f --a33.s3 tte�°e2�19 "" '•' '^99I.14 ne»°az'ia'w_. n.�Z � -200-�-._, �' \ `
W � 80 i-$6 �_� .,148. � A 83.60m B� '- - V ,
p/� 813 eLS.a 9i.3 � 81.4 ~ \
ls) o' g �� . � �''f'i�"zfsi} �c,�/t o�°� rtrai� i�'�� wQ t�i�3 g (ro�Z81 � �m • •I � ' � esl 40� �
ra_ _� (sa�¢�� �'_• � a 6 � '°. ' �ee� � • �e�o ��� � `
�o •_. �Q o��,�« ,7'EISjR = '° � s, � �74/a ;A0 /T/ N ' ' �
Q� x7. 1� $(i:L.1 L4 � a g p MI P'�/� N M�1� �� \N \
g� � � .Y'� 82.3 81.6 - 81.4 _. 8i.6 � 81.6 BI. '� � !
. � � 2S 25 S 24 26 26 2S � b 2 26 26 26 23 2 26 2 2d 26 6 2 2S �1S 26 23 43 � CAS� `_ !r ` \
�ay (1 1' (i lq (1 6) ,! ! f I ) M a- � 7B.
' . r, •� i� + i V � � � � g o � i o� ��) t� a i c s lo o d i a l 9 2 ) : 1 9 � 6 9. � ° `� �
'' N�����°w� �� o '` h ti� , - a � ��� �W3 � • ,� \ �
cia il e z 2g 2a 2 as z:, xs as zb r 2s g. �0 �o � �n h�� � o t
_ .. .-- . S� 5 25 2S 2 5 2 3 ' t S 2 5 2 S 2 3 2� 2 S 2 2 Z C 6 2 8:5 29 41.9 �O� • ` ^f10) q
20 �:� i� , - .. � a � mQm � \
� � /,� 26 ?d 26 � 26 �23 20 [6 20 <S 25 . ?, � 2S 2'L 2 25 --�- - � . . '� _ y0 1��2.2� ri � �t \'� \
� s? 25 2 23 23 23 �5 2S 0 2S 2b �90 N� O( ��,�,°jg� A m
l.26� i (i ) _O� (81i � I 13 )' ( 4) f 8 1 �� '- � � 11 2) � �9J) 41`�„ (911 „iT �j�' NO�y �q • \ \ `
p f=t�� ^. !��wt_ e� l�1^ (� 11 F �/ (b)
�� � O {O � vl O � ` � ��. Iw (� \ � \ (�� C (Y��� _) v � � v' \ r -j 1! y� �) O N N R � � � /Y/ N
�L " � 'V �('V � �I hi �i � � '.'Jhi �i d' C 00���yA11 K� �"�I'��II) �N ` \
0 30: 25 23 25 3� S 25 23 ',� 'S 29 2 23 2 2 2S 6 26 ?3 � • ' 25 5 25 :3 25 ZS � -�' j pp !�'�O K�-. Z `
r�. _ �s p f2A�) ^� �� 2i,� ,_� / T� �25 -a - o ios Q � � 1 `
m (27) M o� 746.3� 589°4370Yr / "�1� 09 n� �.�9 q 124.62 ., p`, 200 ' F..
N 3 q M . c� . p ry�"' a. C.56N89 :37'W- � SB9°13' ,� � t
i lze)� 2 NNnN ou q c2oa $ ml'% /isqi �'� '�iea/� t��?tut,�i '� " ~ N �
N - A "� � r- 1 y�' ? 161� 13S ��� ° `9 ��g� a , �0ry � N \Z
i23 73 N� �� Sqs �i4 oE W�4 -'�'� EiIST -N � 1 7759 ? 6j,����' Y'
, R=,o - „=�� ��c �,; t�9, �^ - V�H .��,, � 1�'N r � ;
FAIRMQNTn `.-- �6.oa ���3�,io �,� z � � � e Ne��Z�» T.�, �, y�, �^ , � - a -- `
30.82 80 74.07T�18 3, P i2� G: =I27 � 6e1�= 1i0�976 �� 9�.4�81491 8� a�. "�100.0� a N
q A�' �y IG BSR �'L EAST 00 - �� 60 �.. � �I m \
/ o '0 2"� o�0°o Flal :\s l,a)� ��� F: ~ 6 r � �1.,1-.,; ��o ts.� o ° 'aP li,
to)' � � _ 3 °' a � '. �rV°.r. .3 � � ioe ioa f� �,°' Si�� WiM' ,�! � �
(211 f 22) m� I �: `� .v�ii , _ p ,. � '� p ,
_e�8 90 I M N86°Ey� � ;7� 83 � _ 4B _ .( 95,1,/� � �', 100 03 , o!„ W �
6 t �__ /Eyg, a a� 5�� A � V- ^ V' S! ...- °- ( 2) 9 NN
. 6 ro f2l1 ^ - �� � j^�� ��� F. ry�, pti� !ai% � �.z �` ° I .� z ` N .
o�Zy � � m� �' �IBI1----- 4.�- %F"�, Y4 ' iJ< Z e'�6'�..m e - !+ N �a 292.20
,�OCY (P�) 0 4� $SO m EAS� bE� /_ �.. , _ 1 5 �IOO.Oi C-^. UTY OF FRIO�EY ���N �p� EAST Np
SI.DI 86 - 4 A/ - � -°`t♦ � t-06• � O -(OARKS DEG1. N 26
66 '/ ^(3D)B �I A b�r / I1� A 'T'.'- � ..-. _, r� m- 1 � A � 4T.46a090T�W u�
T.17.&9 V�RV''p T+20� � 9S e A� �66 e �irLA3T �. `p�4 4lboi ,7 3 � SO p IS61 ~� 'i N RNA� �N�
ra LER , e� � ��$ ��tt�� �� es ea �Qf �' � o ,� A
CA� 71.97 7S ' P�• � ��� s ��TsYO M/E�9°p21�1 T.� ��+ /Oa 40 gp� � /
°v ♦ N �� O �� 27 i � � 5 6 � j s �a�0$ � r � R C L E �±P Ba h+6°os' i p: � � I O
i. 9 N I N
�O p�2t� I/ � N j�m� �p EAST J aA � fp 110 62.1i � 4y� ° N N J
A m J� 9°� j�'� 1t31 �'IC„h/ .,�Od (S9)_ to � P O i'N�OD �
t N tss��^ 00 . �, ts�►b.\ . ; °� '�a '° a B '• •'s ! • °'.
N(37) I3S) � Q d�� �0 6 Sd �'�$ �, /0 0 .9 .� N e N mp N (7) �
i1Z_ 62 73 120 t 91 i �~ '�f �d 9O - (6B1 -�I371 =,� M99°18'18"E Nl.71� �7.95 '
= 220 a I10 91.71 •I�_!8 80
15171 ' � _ � --" .,,..NORTM
•-979.83 EAST•• m �---- ��_ _�
� CEIV � £R 22'."
SB9°16't8"w
, ' SEC.3
��
- ��
6
° � , .a .
�
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY p
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. C�
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan requirf
Address: � � [.� a � _l�`' AR�� �lQsa
Sa� ��
7� � p ��'/
submittal; see attached
Property Identification Numher�PIl� �
Legal description:
Lot ��9���,� � Block �- Tract/Addition �,�� ��d p/ i � � ,�� � � �
Current zoning. �i es %� v��i �� Squaze footage/acreage � l�7� a�JC�
Reason or variance and hardship: _ � h ( � h � � � � [/ � � � � �� � � �
��� �:��� � $See �01- S
ecti�n �f City Code:
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes No �_ If yes, which ciry?
If yes, what rype of business? �
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No
�.,�,.�.
FEE OWNER I1�TFORMA'�IOIlT (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers:
NAME �n v� s, I
ADDRESS
s
must sign thi� form prio� to processing)
�
e,
YTIME PHONI
SIGNATURE ` DATE
�..,
PETITIONER INFORMATIOIY Sa m e ����v�
NAME
ADDRESS
� DAYTIME PHONE
SIGNATURE DATE
�......4.a.. �„
Fee: $1U0.00 $ 60.0p for residenrial properties
Permit VAR # °� �a �° �a IReceipt # �o�'
A li -��
pp cahon received by: �
Scheduled Appeals Commission da,te:
Scheduled City Council da.te:
6v Fi��
'�—��" -F����
, �� ��
� , � e�
/""'\ � 711J1S�';fr� ' � ' `.' � '
! 1 ,:.�
__ $�',:::}
� �
Q H
a z
WUQO
aZU
� H �Ya
HE�O
U��
a
H
U
z
�z
00
UH
�
�+ H
HU
HW
UQ
z
0
H
� �
a �n
� H
�
�UD
z
0
H
F
�
U
H
aw
aH
aA
C�l
_ �
�,
_
� � CITY OF FRIDLEY
COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW
File Nwnber File Date Ma e aiyq2 Dat996
67 Dec. 2.9. 1995
File Description: VAR 4�95-37 •
Ronald 0. Zaczkowski, 314 Hugo Street N.E.; to reduce the setback
of an access. structure facing a street from 25 ft. to 14 ft. to allow the construction of a
7� f�j��� ft_ varaaP _
Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department
*** Comments ***
Barbara Dacy
Scott Hickok
Michele McPherson
Jon Wilczek
John Flora
R����wski
— .��
Leon Madsen
Dave Sallman
Dick Larson
��� ��
APPUCATION REVIEW CHECKLtST
FlLE: �%%�� �°.��° ��'
.:>w :.::.:<.:>:.:>:::..:, .. .;:.,.;:,,..,,:;.>::.;:.;>:.:�:: :;
:i:F>iii?)i:•'
.•,}.
.}{� ;:T.�'ti
•:i}:;:•i+:}�::�:•:.
................,. ... .,.:::: ....,.,... •:: .., .... ........,
v.i+:v
:::.:••:::::::. �::.. .. . .:::::...... ... ;::•:.;; .; .. . ,
:;x • +'•:::.:;::;:;;;:ff:$•.:'•'•:=:�:•'
.,. x. •r+:: •::•;:a>:••,';.;;:.;:�:::�::::
• •::.•....:•..•.,,,:;•.:; �(; {��
'?j•;,:;:':�:;�.<,:;'•';•.•.'::.�<''r,:;:;:;�:;;3`•�';��?r::<`::::;:::: =:+••
����i':•C�i'^:-\�:i� ::ii+ti i������i:ii%:� �ii�: : '' \^?: ii: 'K. 'K.����......
♦v . .•.
; •A•.: . ..?::}::.�':::::•:io•�.V::::::
:4 .r:..�.... :.a!
., :::. .. . . .. ..... ..»: .
v..... �.�::......
• v...., v.v.v ...:. ........ v•: •••: v:J:x..,- ...�.
• ................v..:.......:::...r..v.•: .................................... ........n............ ...................; ................. .:�{.m::::.�::::......::. $:.::..:,.:.:i...t..:::.ne .,.{....v..:.v:•.�..i:^iriC�:
APPUCA�oN �'lee",�3Q.►+lt+�
RECEIVED � ��
��fA✓ �t�
DEVELOPMENT �^,�- �� �pV
REVIEW COMM ✓ I'�•"�� (�tYt°%Q"�i' Ov �'..G� tiVl ' f�d.�9/$/
ADDRESS FI LE I ��;�: ��y�yj��— '�i(G }� �� � q�2 ��O >
REVIEVI/ED I�`�D= �G.-J'� �
* LAND USE ,� / ��,q�
I
FI LE8�
PETITIONER
CALLED
SITE
VISIT/MEETING
AERIAL �
PHOTO MADE / �y ��
MaPS ooNE �i I ' I `�'�1(0
REPORT
WRITTEN �