Loading...
AF-V - 46447�F ��`�' ����� .'�,'��,54 �g�p�" ;R�y UTY OF FRI DLEY FRIDLEY MUNIC[PAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN SS432 •(612> 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 APPEALS COMII�IISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE January 25, 1996 Ronald Zaczkowski 314 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Zaczkowski: On January 24, 1996, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #95-37, to reduce the side yard setback for an accessory structure facing a side street from 25 feet to 14 feet to allow the construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition, the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55432, with the following stipulations: The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within su� months of the final inspection of the new garage or apply for a special use pernut within 30 days. 2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the final inspection of the proposed garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use permit for a second accessory structure. 3. The petitioner sha11 provide a hard surface driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997. You have one year from the date of Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3593. Sinc rely, � �. �.��. � �. ��� � L f � . �lr,r _�;.<___.. NI'i hele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one c�py to the City of Fridley Planning Department by February 7, 1996. Concur with action taken. /� CITY OF FRIDLEY � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 ROLL CALL: Chairperson Savage called the January 24, 1996, Appeals Commissio� meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. . ROLL CALL: Members Present: Diane Savage, Larry Kuechle, Cathy Smith Members Absent: Ken Vos, Carol Beaulieu Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Jan & Ronald Za�zkowski, 314 Hugo Street N. E. Warren Lamusga, 195 Hugo Street N.E. Michael Melby, 8100 Ruth Street N.E. Robert Venne, 8118 Ruth Street N.E. Bill & Jean Schacher, 8191 Ruth Circle N.E. John & Lillian Meyer, 7868 Alden Way N.E. Rosie Griep, Special Project Coordinator, City of Fridley Police Department APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 19 1995, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by IVIs. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve the December 19, 1995, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. COMMUNITY VALUES PROJECT PRESENTATION Ms. Griep, Special Project Coordinator for the Police Department, made a presentation on the Community Values Project. The purpose of this project is to identify community concems and values and how to work on those concems and values. 2. PUBLIC HEARING' CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95-37. BY RONALD 7J�CZKOWSKI: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the setback of an accessory structure facing a street from 25 feet to 14 feet to allow the construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition, the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E. � �. APPEALS CONIl�IISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 2 MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:38 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the variance request is to reduce the setback of an accessory structure on a comer lot from 25 feet to 14 feet. The request is for 314 Hugo Street which is located at the intersection of Hugo and Ruth Streets. Located on the subject parcel is a single family dwelling unit with a single-car tuck-under garage facing north toward Hugo Street The petitioner is pro�sing to construct a 22 foot by 36 foot garage addition on the west side of the dwelling which would open onto Ruth Street. Typically, the setback of 25 feet is to provide adequate off street parking and to prevent encroachment into the line of site by the adjacent property should that property face the same street. Ms. McPherson stated that in reviewing the request, staff determined there are two possible altematives which could prevent a variance request: 1. Expand the existing "tuck-under" garage toward the east property line. There is room for an 18 foot by 24 foot addition. Ms. McPherson stated there is approximately 23 feet to the easterly property line from the single family dwelling which would allow construction of an 18 foot by 24 foot addition to the existing garage and house. Staff does acknowledge there would be additionat excavation required in order to accomplish this altemative. 2. Relocate the garage as a detached structure to another location on the property. Ms. McPherson stated this structure could be placed between the dwelling and the south property line. Staff estimated this accessory structure could be approximately 25 feet by 30 feet. However, this would dramatically reduce the amount of existing rear yard space. There would also be some excavation needed for this altemative. The petitioner will need to excavate for the plan as proposed. Ms. McPherson stated the request as proposed is within previously granted requests. The City has previously granted variances of this nature down to 5 feet and 15 feet. The varianoe as proposed would allow parking of one car in front of the garage addition without encroaching into the street. It would encroach over the property line. The proposed addition could adversely impact the adjacent property to the south. There is currently not a building for the property owner to the south to view. On the other hand, it could enhance the property to the south by providing additional screening. Ms. McPherson stated, as the request is within previously granted variances, staff has no recommendation. If the Appeals Commission chooses to approve the request, staff recommends the following the stipulations: �, �, APPEALS CO1rIl�lISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 3 1. The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within six months of the final inspection of the new garage. 2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the final inspection of the proposed garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use permit for a second accessory structure. 3. The petitioner shall provide a hard surFace driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997. Ms. McPherson stated the second stipulation refers to the section of the code which requires an accessory structure of over 240 square feet to have a special use permit. Ms. Savage asked staff to review the status of the code with reference to enlarging a single car garage to a double car garage. Is that allowed without a variance? Ms. McPherson stated this was correct. The code requires a 5 foot setback for an attached accessory structure. The code was changed for those who had homes with existing single car garages where, in certain cases to expand to a two-car garage, the garage can encroach down to 3 feet. In this case, there is adequate space to provide the second stall without encroaching into the 5-foot setback area. The petitioner would have approximately 18 feet between the property line and the existing single car garage. Mr. Kuechle asked if staif knew of any other plans for the area that might have an impact. Ms. McPherson stated, no, not at this time. Mr. Kuechle asked if there are any traffic level problems in this area. Ms. McPherson stated there are no problems that staff has heard. Ashton Avenue is an industrial street. Most of that traffic goes to 79th Avenue. Hugo is a narrow street but there are no plans to expand it. To her knowledge, the City has received no complaints regarding traffic in this area. Mr. Kuechle asked the width of Ruth Street. Ms. McPherson stated the right-of-way is approximately 50 feet and is paved at 32 feet from face to face. This street was constructed in the last 15 years. Mr. Kuechle asked the distance to the rear lot line. Ms. McPherson sta#ed she did not have a verifying survey for the subject parcel. Based on the verifying survey for the property to the east, she estimated the distance for the petitioner's property to be approxima#ely 35 feet The proposed garage would be approximately 10 feet from the rear lot line. The code requires 5 feet. �`�, � APPEALS COA�IISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 4 Mr. Kuechle stated the driveway is short. Are there any code problems with that? Ms. McPherson stated there is no minimum driveway length. The only requirement is the 25�oot setback The Cit�r has granted variances down to 15 feet and 5 feet. There really is no minimum although a precedent has been estabfished that a car should be able to parlc without hanging out into the street. � Ms. Savage asked the petitioner his reaction to the altematives provided by staff. Mr. Zaczkowski stated he would prefer the addition as requested. Building to the east would require excavation. He stated the correct dimensions of the house are 18 feet by 24 feet. Mr. Kuechle asked if the house was 24 feet deep. Mr. Zaczkowski stated, yes. Ms. Savage asked the petitioner to respond to the stipulations. Mr. Zaczkowski stated he would like to keep the garage in the basement that they now have. He would remove the tum-around and the extra parking area. At this time, he wants to remove the retaining wall and go back to a sloping driveway. He would like to keep the garage. He would apply for the special use permit For 30 years, they have had very little garage space and now he wants a lot of garage space. Mr. Zaezkowski stated he will remove a utility building which is located in the rear corner of the lot. With the garage the size he would like to build, he will no longer need that storage. His neighbors to the south are at the meeting. Mr. Schacher stated he lives behind the petitioner. He agrees with the request. They don't get much of a view because of the hedge and evergreens which block the view anyway. He has no objection. Ms. Savage stated one altemative suggests that the petitioner build a detached garage behind the dwelling. That would have an impact. Mr. Schacher stated it would if the garage was built behind. He would rather see it on the side as proposed. Ms. Smith asked, with the building coming out as far as proposed, would it create any line- of-site problems? Mr. Schacher stated, no. /"� ,•--, APPEALS CONIl�lISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24 , 1996 PAGE 5 Mr. Venne stated he lives south of the property has lived there for quite a few years. He did not see where this garage would affec� anything as far as driving is concemed. There is a stop sign at the intersection. You can still see both directions on Hugo whether this structure is there or not. He did not see where this would impact traffic. He thought it would be just fine. � Mr. Melby stated he did not have a problem with the request. It is not going to change the look of the neighborhood. As far as the traffic, there is a stop sign. It will not cause a problem. He would recommend approval. Mr. Venne stated, to the south on the comer of Ruth Circle and Ruth Street, there is another house with a similar arrangement where the garage entrance is on Ruth Street and the front of the house is on Ruth Circle. That has been� there for 10 to 12 years. He has not seen this have any effe�t on the traffic along the street. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend approval of the request. Because the garage is set so far south, he did not think the view would be any less than it is now. He is concerned about the stipulation and whether or not it should go hand-in-hand with the special use permit �use the intent is to keep the garage. He would make it very clear that the stipulations are included. Ms. Savage agreed. There is a hardship in the need for a� larger garage. She did not see the other altematives as being feasible. She did not see any adverse effects in the area by having this addition. She shared Mr. Kuechle's concem about the stipulations. The main reason for that is that they get a lot of requests for enlarging garages. A lot of people would like to have additional space for an RV, boats, etc. Once they start by allowing the petitioner to keep the existing garage, they are, in effe�t, agreeing to considerably larger garage space than normally allowed. She would keep the stipulations. Ms. Smith agreed. Mr. Hickok suggested the first stipulation could be modified by adding "or apply for a special use permit 30 days after approval." Mr. Kuechle stated the petitioner needs to realize that, if a special use permit is not granted, he has no choice but to remove that garage. ,�,,.� �. APPEALS COI�IISSION MEETING, JANUARY 24, 1996 PAGE 6 MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval of Variance Request, #VAR 95-37, by Ronaid Zaczkowski to reduce the setback of an accessory structure facing a street from 25 feet to 14 feet to allow the construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition, the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within six months of the final inspection of the new garage, or apply for a special use permit within 30 days of approval. 2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the final inspec�ion of the proposed garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use permit for a second accessory structure. 3. The petitioner shall provide a hard surFace driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997. � " " UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDE TION OF VARIANCE RE UEST VAR #96-01 BY JOHN AND LILLIAN MEYER: Per Section 205.04.06.A.(3) of the Fridley Zoning Code to increase the encroachment of a deck in the side y rd ftom 3 feet to 4 feet 10 inches to allow the reconstruction of an existing deck o Lot 6, Block 4, Pearson's Craigway Estates, the same being 7868 Alden Way N. � MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. K echle, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HE SAVAGE DECLARED THE OPEN AT 8:00 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is locat d at 7868 Alden Way which is at the intersec�iion of Bellaire and Alden Way. The request 's to allow a variance to increase the encxoachment of a deck into the side yard from 3 feet o 4 feet 10 inches. If approved, this would allow reconstruction of a deck located on top f an underground storage facility. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners are in the process f constructing a 6 foot by 24 foot porch addition onto the rear of the single family dwellin unit with attached garage. The area of the variance is an open deck which provides ress from the porch to the side yard. The underground storage facility was cons cted after the dwelling was construeted. It is not a part of the structure itself. It n be accessed only from the outside. Because the storage facility is considered an a ssory structure, it does meet the 5 foot setback Therefore, the deck would also be set badc 5 feet as required by code; DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner r�ue.sts that a variauce be granted to r�luce the side yard setback for an accessory struchue facing a side street from 25 feet to 14 feet. If granted, the variance would allow construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot aitached garage. HARDSHII': See attach� statemeut. Petitioner ne�s additional space for car, boat, workshop. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code requires that an acce.ssory structure on a comer lot shall be no closer than 25 fat from the side lot line when ogening oirto the stre�t. Public Purpose seived by this r�uirement is to allow for off-street parldng without encroaching on the public right-of-way. This requiremeirt also takes into accourrt the building "line of sight" of adjacern properti�. The existing single family dwelling located on the subja;t parcel has a single car, "tuck-under" style garage. The petitioner has two alternatives which would allow him to have additional garage space. Th�e alternatives aze: 1. Expand the existing "tuck-under" garage toward the east properiy line. There is room for an 18 foot by 42 foot addition; or 2. Relocate the garage as a detachai structure to another location on the progerty. If the variance is granted, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner sha11 remove the existing driveway within six months of the final insp�tion of the new garage or apply for a special use pemut within 30 da.ys. 2. The exisdng garage shall be converted to habitable space within one yeaz of the final inspection of the propos� garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use permit for a second acce.ssory structure. 3. The getitioner sha11 provide a hard surface driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997. The vatiance as requested is within previously granted requests. The City has grant� variances to reduce the side yard �setback from 30 feet to 5 feet and from 25 feet to 15 feet. , -°• VAR #95-37 314 Hugo Street N.E. Page 2 AGTIONS: ^ As the request is within previously � varianc,es, stAff bas no recommendation regarding ttus request. If approved, staff recommends the above stipulations as conditions of approval. PROdECT DETAILS Petition For. A variance to reduce the side yard se�tback of an acc�sory structure facing a side stre�t from 25 feet to 14 feet. � Location of Properiy: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: F.Bisting Vegetation: F.gisting Zoning/Platting Ava�7ab7ity of Mwticipal Ut7ities: Vehicular Acc�ss: P�estrian Acces4: s4 Engineering Issues: Site Planning �ssues: 314 Hugo Street N.E. Lot 29-32, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition 10,2QD square feet Slopin� toward the streets (comer lot) Typic�l s�uburban; trees, sod, shrubs, etc. R l, Single Family; Riverview Heights 1922 Connected Hugo and Ruth Str�ts N/A Garage facing Ruth Street is a better option as Ruth Street has a lacger right-of-way and is a larger stre�t. /"''� VAR #95-37 314 Hugo Street N.E. Page 3 Analysis DEVELOPMENT SITE �,, Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code requires that an accessory structure on a comer lot shall be no closer than 25 fcet from the side lot line when opening orno the street.. Public Purpose seived by ttus req�rirement �s to allow for o� street parking without encroaching on the public right-of- way. This r�uiremern also takes irno accoum the building °line of sight° of adjacern properties. � The petitioner requests that a variance be gramed to reduce the side yard setback of an accessory structure facing a �de strcet from 25 fcet to 14 fe,et. If granted, the petitioner would construct a 22 foot by 36 foot attached garage. Parcel Descriution & ILsto� The subject parcel is locate,� in the southeast comer of the urtersection of Hugo and Ruth Streets in the Riverview Heights neighborhood. In 1964, a 26 foat by 42 faot single fam�y dwelling with a single car "tuck-under" style garage was construct�. Alternatives In reviewing the r�uest, staff detennined that there are two alternatives to the reque.st wluch would not require a variance: 1. The �oner could constsuct an addition to the existing single car garage. This addition would expand the existing garage to the east. There is approximately 23 feet from the wall of the earisting garage to the �st properiy line. The petitioner could construct an addition of 18 f�t by 24 f�t, the length of the dwelling. This option would eliminate the n�i to remove the existing driveway which would be required if the new garage is construct�. The drawback to this alternative is that the petitioner would ne� to excavate in order to construct the expanded garage. 2. The petitioner could construct a deta,ched accessory structure behind the e�risting dwelling. The structure could then be locat� to meet the setback requirements. This would reduce the size of the a�ccessory structure from the proposed 22 feet by 36 f�t to a width of 25 fcet by 30 feet. In order to cons�cuct tbis alte�rnativ� the petitioner would lose a large portion of his rear yard to the struchire. In a,ddition, this optiott would have greater unpact to the property to the south whose rear yard. abuts the rear yard of the subject parcel. The structure would be as close as five fe�t to the common lot line. Sitrv7ar amounts of exca�ation betwe�en this altemative and the proposed ga.rage would need to occur. � VAR #95-37 314 Hugo Str�t N.E. Page 4 � The proposed addition could have an adverse impact on the properiy to the south. The property owner to the south would be looking at a building which cutrently does not exist. However, the addition could provide additional scr�ning from the street for the neighbor to the south, thereby making the rear yard more "private.". The addition, as proposed, would provide adequate area for the petitioner to park a velucle on the driveway without encroaching omo Ruth Street. The existing garage will ne� to be converted to habitable space in order for the petitioner to avoid obtaining a special use permit for a second accessory structure. The request is within previously grant� requests of 30 feet to 5 f�t and 25 feet to 15 feet. Recommendation The request is within previously grazrted vaiiances. Staff has no recommendation regarding the request. If the Commission wishes to recommend approval of the request, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall remove the existing driveway within six months of the final inspection of the new garage or apply for a special use pennit within 30 days.. 2. The existing garage shall be converted to habitable space within one year of the final inspection of the propo�d garage, or the petitioner shall apply for and receive a special use pennit for a second accessory structure. 3. The getitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway for the new garage by February 1, 1997. WEST: SOIJT�i: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning �ssues: PubGc Hearing Comments: ADJACENT STTES Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling Zoning: R 1, Single Family Dwelling Zorring: R 1, Single Family Dwelling Land Use: Residernial Land Use: Residemial Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential N \/AR #95-37 314 H ugo Street LOCATION MAP 0 � / . ._,. � '—� �` � �j E7'� ; � a .. . — ---��, c: � . � ' � � o . � —�— _ �' � � � � �• _ �' . F f - � F t '�� . ;� .. � .. � _ } p_ _ o, _ . Gf: W . , _ � r _.. , . , . . ' i�.:' i-�' �': Q. T k S :. } f l .` ( .�' �«r- � I� jy ��_�y, y � 9 1� V / � _� , � � �, , t� - _ � .��A ' . .. Yr!,!�+� - , _ . �.. - • � � .:. '.� .. .. , � . ., ,,, . . . . . . . . : � - ,_. : ,: . .. .�. ..._�. ... . . , .'. . ' '.', .� . � . '.. ' . ' -.:: ..:.. �. � _. ' _ :,..• :.. .:. ' ..., .. ' .. 1 �� • , ��� • . , . � t � `1 ��� � o. �, � .� �;� �: , � -� ��, ._� - _ � � , - �. -_ � � � - \ �: � . � � . � � Q'' � ,z A _ C � >�`...� ��• �>�f = =r v�- . . „� � � :: � . _ =� i �..'�,.- ; � :c. - - � j ° i �-�.,c � � \ - a° �� . �,`�' ;..-.�°",, _ . -�,.� � �� : ` � ��:. _�M.N.:�rano--�-,efi � � 3 �i7- bUe� HaK� <: �` � ,� � _ , - �, ,_ ,.'� . , p� '_� �'1 � • 4 . � � c � � ' � -. � � , - � ;, � � 't i 4 .1 1 � � f , � t .- � � ._' � � _ {� , _ u � � o �� , ; � � ,� � # � � .;pT,� �' � ���� i :.` � ;,..,�.,;..� _ � �� _ _ _ - � ,; � ,` _ l�f . . f : . � = -� _....,. � � 7 � �. p � � � ��f . i. � s . � � TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN MY WIFE AND I HAVE LIVED IN FRIDLEY SINCE JULY, 1965. WE DO NOT HAVE A LARGE HOME BECAUSE 1/3 OF OUR BASEMENT IS A ONE CAR GARAGE AND WE ARE A TWO CAR FAMILY. SO FOR 30 YEARS ONE OF OUR VEHICLES HAS SET OUTSIDE. I AM GETTING CLOSE TO RETIREMENT AGE AND MY HOBBIE IS WOOD-WORKING. WE ARE GOING TO SELL OUR LAKE PLACE BY PRINCETON, MN. AND WILL NEED STORAGE FOR A SMALL BOAT. WE NEED TO BUILD THIS 22' X 36' GARAGE TO GIVE US THE STORAGE, NECESSARY INSIDE PARKING AND WORKSHOP WE WILL NEED IN THE FUTURE. SINCEREL , � w _� RONALD ZACZKOWSKI /"'� PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE TI� APPEALS COIVIlVIIS5ION �"'1 Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, January 24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of Consideration of variance request, VAR #95-37, by Ronald O. Zaczkowski: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((2)) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the setback of an accessory structure facing a street from 25 feet to 14 feet to a11ow the construction of a 22 foot by 36 foot garage on Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block A, Riverview Heights Additioq the same being 314 Hugo Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 All persons desiring to be heard sha11 be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS CONIlVIISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3592. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than January 17, 1996. HARVEY A. CARTWRIGHT ANOICA COUNTY 6UttV6Y3' MENNEpIN COUNTY SURVEYS MINNEAAOIIi SURVEYS 8d10 PAIM 3TREET N.W. 8UN96T 4-7635 OWNFR INDUETRIAI.. - JUOICIAL BUSINHSS - TOP06RAPMICAL CITY LO78 - PLATTING . :u�o Sk:anc �es �b � 'd� �� � � _ CARTWR�GHT & OLSON LA1VD SUR �`EYORS RLGIiTtRiO YNO<R LAWS OF 1TAT6 OF MINNESOTA LICEN�tD Sr OROINANCt OF CITY OF MINNEAPOliB 32B PLYMOUTH BUILDING FEOERAL B-8721 HENNEPIN AT SIXTH • MINNEAPOLIS 3. MINNESOTA l�urbcpor'g �cctificatc COMB�NING THE NECOROS OF J. E. HILL. Cw�� EN6INFHR carwet�cHCO �ess C. F. SANDHOFF CIVII ENGINEER [STqYL18 N EO 1 YO! JAMES NELSON SURVLYOR CST4BLIiNEO 1 �22 METROPOLITAN LAND SURVEYORS, cs�wsusMCO �o�� IIIV �� �3i�`� 734--14 �l;`j ti�� ;�_J � . S �'.�-_"�� ��� __ . � . � A` - . , . : _ •- —� � f '--"a,. - -'--- `-t---.._ �S _ r: _.. . � _ .. _._ .. _._ .. _ _ __._. _.��_ �` � t ' . l f � � # �� � . � �� ti`� , . ; U : ; � ' �, j ; �� b'' : .� �� �,� � � ; � �,�� �.l , . � ,. . `L �. ,.,_ � a � ... , . +" �� ,1 �°' . � ��►�� . �b : �� : �a' � �. ' "' � . � i . � , � . fii � - ����' �� -� �� j �,� � � �� . '' t . t \�<•+ � � , _ ; � �� ! � . . . { , ; . � < < ' o �.� i •� : � .,-,� ;, ��- ; I ' � � � ' ` y. i 1 { ,,'J . .. 1� . ! , / . � j _ . � I _ d..y...:°. . . ` . ... _ .. .. ........ .. --. ... . .. . ..._-�w `... ._..e._ �...... ....• -_-�-----. . ' . i .'` We he^eby certi`'y trst this is a true ard ccrrect. � l�t of n su:-vey of Lota 30,31 snd 31 Block e�, : iverview �?ei�: ts Ar.�ka �ou:it�, A:ir.nesots as 3ur�:F,ed bq �e this ;t:� day of Aagust,lGE4. � . . ,,�. . �, �� . . .,, ..: _ . ..�:. �..�:...��..��w � i 0 � Lond Plan�ing . la�d $�rvayi�g Soils Teati�g . Civit Enyi�eering Municipol Emji�maring �- . -�359- %4' . Mortgage . 3 �� .; Q� � 0 � � 0 � c� c � � 3 � N � � i � '-/r= �. .l � � i(.. 4 i % f 8 ; �, .�' r �/� ♦ / ���i���r��I.'-LL%C ��� / 6875 Nighway No.65 N.E. (! lt�l/lPP'l tj1.� �%,�lC� Minneapolis � / �M���. 53432 � � Talephone 784-6066 " Engineers & Surveyors Area code aiz Loan Survey for t Rl - CO 8CJILDERS �uGo / '� � ,�i SrREET �oa o.— I �' � �� � BASEME�ur ' FOUNOqTlON jONLY � I . I ,�f3� .�f3h i�J� I ��,1 � — /00. O r � �-r �� . .1 �� � � � .� � � ., oQ cV � o m � � � c� 0 � � � ,a Sa�lh line o� !.�}s 33, 34, 35�36, 8/o,c�rA, Qnie�view�lei �its � Lors 33, 3�, 35 F36, BL�C�A R�vEUv�Ew �E�cNrs A/V0l(q CDUNTy a � Scale=l,n�h=30� e f NOVEMBEQ�.1975 Thia is a true oad wrrecf ropr�sentatisn o/ a surwr of ths bounda�ies of tF�e land above dsscribed o�d af fh� lacatien of oll buildiegs� if arryr� lh�r�on� a�d a�� visfble McroacMnents� iF anr� �rnm or oo said land. This sur�ror is nwd+ onlr in coen�cfioe witl� a morfgaqe loae now being placed an the prop��ty and no liabilitr is ossu�n�d �ac�pt to th� hotde► ot such mortgag� er anr oth�r ieteres� acquind br the r�ason of such mo�tgage. It;is �ederstood aa�d agrNd,� m��m� a hov� 6��n loced /or �he purpos� ef ���ablishing lot lines w beuedorr cern�rs. Dafsd fhis�_day o{��1-� A.O. 19�� SU8UR6AN ENGINEERING, INC. fegine ��/�_ ._, _ .Su/v�rero bi !r . � - (/�•. s,s ' �, 'Y w., -,. . .. _ MAII,ING LIST VAR #95-37 RONALD ZACZKOWSKI 314 HUGO STREET N.E. Ronald Zaczkowski 314 Hugo Street AT.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Marlene Oftedahl or Current Resident 319 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Steven & Teresa Carlyle or Current Resident 301 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 7ohn & Marlys Dunlap or Current Resident 8111 Fairmont Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Glen & Gloria St. Cyr or Current Resident 8140 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert & Sharon Burris or Current Resident 8160 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Walter & Julie Streich or Current Resident 8125 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 William & Jean Schacher or Current Resident 8191 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 �, Geneva Gasper or Current Resident 361 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth & Lee Ann Sporre 295 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Priscilla Lamb or Current Resident 8131 Fairmont Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert & Janice Fritch or Current Resident 8101 Fairmont Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert & Ethel Venne or Cwrent Resident 8118 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 1Vlichael McLean or Current Resident 8140 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gregory & Brenda Hansen or Current Resident 8135 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Darrell & Cheryl Saari or Cunent Resident 8181 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55342 � City Manager City Council Eleanora Paulson or Current Resident ���ti�i��'�- �'��`°� 355 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Troy Alan Larson or Current Resident 311 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert & Kristin Seery or Cunent Resident 8121 Fairmont Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Michael Malmborg or Current Resident 8160 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 1ltichael Melby or Current Resident 8100 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James & Mary 1Vfitchell or Current Resident 8120 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gary & Audrey Scherber or Current Resident 8145 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, NiN 55432 Douglas & Sharon Howe or Current Resident 8171 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MIV 55432 7ames & Cazoline Stammers or Stanley & Barbara Jones or ponald & Ruth Livgard or Cwrent Resident Current Resident Current Resident 8161 Ruth Circle N.E. 8151 Ruth Circle N.E. S 141 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 /'�, � MAII,ING LIST - PAGE 2 Todd & Jodi Lavine or Jerry & Renee Kielblock or VAR #95-37 Current Resident Current Resident 314 HUGO STREET N.E. 350 Ironton Street N.E. 366 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel & Martha. Bernt or Current Resident 280 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Randall & Darlene Lobash or Current Resident 314 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Alfred Omlie or Current Resident 360 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 D. J. & 5. J. 7azdzewski or Current Resident 308 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Michael & Lavonne Rennert or Current Resident 295 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Terrence & Patricia Poss or Current Resident 321 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Marti & Nwa Povlitzki or Current Resident 369 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Carl & Dawn Jacobsen or Current Resident 358 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Christopher & C. M. Karrick or Current Resident 290 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Charles & Janice Seeger 324 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leonard & Linda Harris or Current Resident 350 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 John Owen & Sharon McCollow or Cunent Resident 200 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kurt & I�'ildegard Skrandies or Current Resident 311 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Debra Kay Betz or Current Resident 341 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ken & Diane Hausken or Current Resident 331 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ma.rk Blegen or Current Resident 275 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mark & Jenifer Artman or Current Resident 304 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Cheryl Halverson or Current Resident 340 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Alvin & Lisa Wassemlan or Current Resident 340 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Wanen & Belinda Lamusga or Current Resident 195 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ra1ph & Syrie Officer or Current Resident 315 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Irene Ryan or Current Resident 355 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 David & Camilla Schultz or Current Resident 371 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Bryan & Sandra Nelson or Current Resident 190 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 7ames Ingalls or Clarence & Margaret Sporre or Diane Savage Current Resident Current Resident 567 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. 180 Ironton Street N.E. 180 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, NIN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 g �-93,f�: Ate y oiW Y'8T.7 R�60 ° J/ p"' ` ` m� ��33.76+'� 1 ��� �� � � p O�� b � b.BB 'Q . 2 b _ A n I87)� a� � Z N �J ��. 2ii. B9 ` ,• ? q�. �m � s W63Tj_.A�• sTe �O 4 ; i76.20 � \ � y�110� \ a �� gA t�ii (86) b � 'p Z 8 e '4� � �.. 388� � � o �` ., yo =ti 6� � g csalg � r j cea) �*�,��'�• wes�za'az"a ( �'�;. /'� � N`64 0�� •" 146.6� VD N �0 ' 9 ``� �/ 30 1r r28� NB�J az'sa-w � .:�� "' 58,� `,�6 �+\ � aaG �s � ee.si =� � 59 �,"'.'0a�a I � �N +� �, ��e.� �, °s.ee � ' �'`.•0 � �...,,,��� c^ �, s�P `,ya (se)N N,� s N (�01�•{p� Mraa �,�� oe.pe i p�o��' � I � \Z\ PONO y Q �`� oN v Q F n 65 A � v� ,8 �M' a � `• • �{ N� (89) �- : a(71) O � 1 V' �J O � � �°,�,� TD r = 84.16 �f9 2�� oy6 �e = w ( 1241 t�` � 0 2 ;so ���! 06.qy78.04 '' Ng� [rP� � ,m, OUTLOT A �'� a \ l iA p ���� � `�� N/ V 7�i O A `\ 0 i P ♦ � 0 I �, 7B, ° °�, � N . W. \ a s� �s 9'69 �I N87°E ,� r � ��' a= 00.°�ry��' � 7'J.91 � B.O t R=60 0�� hs oe•?s N � \ �pog� (77) ' Q�%e��a j�.176),$-P e�.6qy P i8 �J�d�e Q � i � \ a TZ � � �+ Nd �W i � M A � \ A b�/ f=�0 �p � V9'� ��68�73) A NBa 61'a_ 1 -..Nesa��, -. �„s.��.- o -.. � CITY OF COON R�QIpS �.;, �s°� i � z � . �-' { - - --� �- .oe•- .., ' •► .a-•446.84"-'� ,,,a"'686.80.." _. �i9 _ �/•"•186'- . � \ �I �.. e�o.es- yi� -- a�28g�a 6D � -- � I � OF FRI LEY --- �o . , ,�_ . , �� ,s , ��sw. s - al°' ;�• oss9► ' •w � `- - � //SED �' AUD�TOR ;� ,; �. ��as.z s---. .r8 ; 2 � ` -- - O � / ' � • � z � � � os � M � m , ' . � � �I �� � �e� g � , �iae, �, I .�, N �i4> I iie� j . „ � . � p OI N � IO9 0� eri' .. IA�.O6 N . M M � t0 �V N N ti A� `00 \\ \ �02 76 : 92 � "' �' A .i- n , a �' --- n w 8 liil (i2) �. I�3) (�6) ��n . ° w (�1 p � a (60)m fl) N (2) (3) N F m '� Z � IY (I) '. (6) "� 'D ^ �o \ \ 6�!" N n � � � 2/ m -__ � ;2`,3 R , 2�� , 2 � �` � o �, �s � � - - � .. , � ; , „,, � )2 76 92 80 BO -_ i44 � s��"f- A - ���6'b� `` _.. -- - - ��-- � 60 � _6Q 60�_ 1 7S �:. �,\ 76 {O ��, � w�7�� \ \ \ IRONTON � �3s_._.-, ° N STREET - - � � � ,: �; �_OL f --a33.s3 tte�°e2�19 "" '•' '^99I.14 ne»°az'ia'w_. n.�Z � -200-�-._, �' \ ` W � 80 i-$6 �_� .,148. � A 83.60m B� '- - V , p/� 813 eLS.a 9i.3 � 81.4 ~ \ ls) o' g �� . � �''f'i�"zfsi} �c,�/t o�°� rtrai� i�'�� wQ t�i�3 g (ro�Z81 � �m • •I � ' � esl 40� � ra_ _� (sa�¢�� �'_• � a 6 � '°. ' �ee� � • �e�o ��� � ` �o •_. �Q o��,�« ,7'EISjR = '° � s, � �74/a ;A0 /T/ N ' ' � Q� x7. 1� $(i:L.1 L4 � a g p MI P'�/� N M�1� �� \N \ g� � � .Y'� 82.3 81.6 - 81.4 _. 8i.6 � 81.6 BI. '� � ! . � � 2S 25 S 24 26 26 2S � b 2 26 26 26 23 2 26 2 2d 26 6 2 2S �1S 26 23 43 � CAS� `_ !r ` \ �ay (1 1' (i lq (1 6) ,! ! f I ) M a- � 7B. ' . r, •� i� + i V � � � � g o � i o� ��) t� a i c s lo o d i a l 9 2 ) : 1 9 � 6 9. � ° `� � '' N�����°w� �� o '` h ti� , - a � ��� �W3 � • ,� \ � cia il e z 2g 2a 2 as z:, xs as zb r 2s g. �0 �o � �n h�� � o t _ .. .-- . S� 5 25 2S 2 5 2 3 ' t S 2 5 2 S 2 3 2� 2 S 2 2 Z C 6 2 8:5 29 41.9 �O� • ` ^f10) q 20 �:� i� , - .. � a � mQm � \ � � /,� 26 ?d 26 � 26 �23 20 [6 20 <S 25 . ?, � 2S 2'L 2 25 --�- - � . . '� _ y0 1��2.2� ri � �t \'� \ � s? 25 2 23 23 23 �5 2S 0 2S 2b �90 N� O( ��,�,°jg� A m l.26� i (i ) _O� (81i � I 13 )' ( 4) f 8 1 �� '- � � 11 2) � �9J) 41`�„ (911 „iT �j�' NO�y �q • \ \ ` p f=t�� ^. !��wt_ e� l�1^ (� 11 F �/ (b) �� � O {O � vl O � ` � ��. Iw (� \ � \ (�� C (Y��� _) v � � v' \ r -j 1! y� �) O N N R � � � /Y/ N �L " � 'V �('V � �I hi �i � � '.'Jhi �i d' C 00���yA11 K� �"�I'��II) �N ` \ 0 30: 25 23 25 3� S 25 23 ',� 'S 29 2 23 2 2 2S 6 26 ?3 � • ' 25 5 25 :3 25 ZS � -�' j pp !�'�O K�-. Z ` r�. _ �s p f2A�) ^� �� 2i,� ,_� / T� �25 -a - o ios Q � � 1 ` m (27) M o� 746.3� 589°4370Yr / "�1� 09 n� �.�9 q 124.62 ., p`, 200 ' F.. N 3 q M . c� . p ry�"' a. C.56N89 :37'W- � SB9°13' ,� � t i lze)� 2 NNnN ou q c2oa $ ml'% /isqi �'� '�iea/� t��?tut,�i '� " ~ N � N - A "� � r- 1 y�' ? 161� 13S ��� ° `9 ��g� a , �0ry � N \Z i23 73 N� �� Sqs �i4 oE W�4 -'�'� EiIST -N � 1 7759 ? 6j,����' Y' , R=,o - „=�� ��c �,; t�9, �^ - V�H .��,, � 1�'N r � ; FAIRMQNTn `.-- �6.oa ���3�,io �,� z � � � e Ne��Z�» T.�, �, y�, �^ , � - a -- ` 30.82 80 74.07T�18 3, P i2� G: =I27 � 6e1�= 1i0�976 �� 9�.4�81491 8� a�. "�100.0� a N q A�' �y IG BSR �'L EAST 00 - �� 60 �.. � �I m \ / o '0 2"� o�0°o Flal :\s l,a)� ��� F: ~ 6 r � �1.,1-.,; ��o ts.� o ° 'aP li, to)' � � _ 3 °' a � '. �rV°.r. .3 � � ioe ioa f� �,°' Si�� WiM' ,�! � � (211 f 22) m� I �: `� .v�ii , _ p ,. � '� p , _e�8 90 I M N86°Ey� � ;7� 83 � _ 4B _ .( 95,1,/� � �', 100 03 , o!„ W � 6 t �__ /Eyg, a a� 5�� A � V- ^ V' S! ...- °- ( 2) 9 NN . 6 ro f2l1 ^ - �� � j^�� ��� F. ry�, pti� !ai% � �.z �` ° I .� z ` N . o�Zy � � m� �' �IBI1----- 4.�- %F"�, Y4 ' iJ< Z e'�6'�..m e - !+ N �a 292.20 ,�OCY (P�) 0 4� $SO m EAS� bE� /_ �.. , _ 1 5 �IOO.Oi C-^. UTY OF FRIO�EY ���N �p� EAST Np SI.DI 86 - 4 A/ - � -°`t♦ � t-06• � O -(OARKS DEG1. N 26 66 '/ ^(3D)B �I A b�r / I1� A 'T'.'- � ..-. _, r� m- 1 � A � 4T.46a090T�W u� T.17.&9 V�RV''p T+20� � 9S e A� �66 e �irLA3T �. `p�4 4lboi ,7 3 � SO p IS61 ~� 'i N RNA� �N� ra LER , e� � ��$ ��tt�� �� es ea �Qf �' � o ,� A CA� 71.97 7S ' P�• � ��� s ��TsYO M/E�9°p21�1 T.� ��+ /Oa 40 gp� � / °v ♦ N �� O �� 27 i � � 5 6 � j s �a�0$ � r � R C L E �±P Ba h+6°os' i p: � � I O i. 9 N I N �O p�2t� I/ � N j�m� �p EAST J aA � fp 110 62.1i � 4y� ° N N J A m J� 9°� j�'� 1t31 �'IC„h/ .,�Od (S9)_ to � P O i'N�OD � t N tss��^ 00 . �, ts�►b.\ . ; °� '�a '° a B '• •'s ! • °'. N(37) I3S) � Q d�� �0 6 Sd �'�$ �, /0 0 .9 .� N e N mp N (7) � i1Z_ 62 73 120 t 91 i �~ '�f �d 9O - (6B1 -�I371 =,� M99°18'18"E Nl.71� �7.95 ' = 220 a I10 91.71 •I�_!8 80 15171 ' � _ � --" .,,..NORTM •-979.83 EAST•• m �---- ��_ _� � CEIV � £R 22'." SB9°16't8"w , ' SEC.3 �� - �� 6 ° � , .a . � � CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. C� FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan requirf Address: � � [.� a � _l�`' AR�� �lQsa Sa� �� 7� � p ��'/ submittal; see attached Property Identification Numher�PIl� � Legal description: Lot ��9���,� � Block �- Tract/Addition �,�� ��d p/ i � � ,�� � � � Current zoning. �i es %� v��i �� Squaze footage/acreage � l�7� a�JC� Reason or variance and hardship: _ � h ( � h � � � � [/ � � � � �� � � � ��� �:��� � $See �01- S ecti�n �f City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No �_ If yes, which ciry? If yes, what rype of business? � Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No �.,�,.�. FEE OWNER I1�TFORMA'�IOIlT (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: NAME �n v� s, I ADDRESS s must sign thi� form prio� to processing) � e, YTIME PHONI SIGNATURE ` DATE �.., PETITIONER INFORMATIOIY Sa m e ����v� NAME ADDRESS � DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE �......4.a.. �„ Fee: $1U0.00 $ 60.0p for residenrial properties Permit VAR # °� �a �° �a IReceipt # �o�' A li -�� pp cahon received by: � Scheduled Appeals Commission da,te: Scheduled City Council da.te: 6v Fi�� '�—��" -F���� , �� �� � , � e� /""'\ � 711J1S�';fr� ' � ' `.' � ' ! 1 ,:.� __ $�',:::} � � Q H a z WUQO aZU � H �Ya HE�O U�� a H U z �z 00 UH � �+ H HU HW UQ z 0 H � � a �n � H � �UD z 0 H F � U H aw aH aA C�l _ � �, _ � � CITY OF FRIDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW File Nwnber File Date Ma e aiyq2 Dat996 67 Dec. 2.9. 1995 File Description: VAR 4�95-37 • Ronald 0. Zaczkowski, 314 Hugo Street N.E.; to reduce the setback of an access. structure facing a street from 25 ft. to 14 ft. to allow the construction of a 7� f�j��� ft_ varaaP _ Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department *** Comments *** Barbara Dacy Scott Hickok Michele McPherson Jon Wilczek John Flora R����wski — .�� Leon Madsen Dave Sallman Dick Larson ��� �� APPUCATION REVIEW CHECKLtST FlLE: �%%�� �°.��° ��' .:>w :.::.:<.:>:.:>:::..:, .. .;:.,.;:,,..,,:;.>::.;:.;>:.:�:: :; :i:F>iii?)i:•' .•,}. .}{� ;:T.�'ti •:i}:;:•i+:}�::�:•:. ................,. ... .,.:::: ....,.,... •:: .., .... ........, v.i+:v :::.:••:::::::. �::.. .. . .:::::...... ... ;::•:.;; .; .. . , :;x • +'•:::.:;::;:;;;:ff:$•.:'•'•:=:�:•' .,. x. •r+:: •::•;:a>:••,';.;;:.;:�:::�:::: • •::.•....:•..•.,,,:;•.:; �(; {�� '?j•;,:;:':�:;�.<,:;'•';•.•.'::.�<''r,:;:;:;�:;;3`•�';��?r::<`::::;:::: =:+•• ����i':•C�i'^:-\�:i� ::ii+ti i������i:ii%:� �ii�: : '' \^?: ii: 'K. 'K.����...... ♦v . .•. ; •A•.: . ..?::}::.�':::::•:io•�.V:::::: :4 .r:..�.... :.a! ., :::. .. . . .. ..... ..»: . v..... �.�::...... • v...., v.v.v ...:. ........ v•: •••: v:J:x..,- ...�. • ................v..:.......:::...r..v.•: .................................... ........n............ ...................; ................. .:�{.m::::.�::::......::. $:.::..:,.:.:i...t..:::.ne .,.{....v..:.v:•.�..i:^iriC�: APPUCA�oN �'lee",�3Q.►+lt+� RECEIVED � �� ��fA✓ �t� DEVELOPMENT �^,�- �� �pV REVIEW COMM ✓ I'�•"�� (�tYt°%Q"�i' Ov �'..G� tiVl ' f�d.�9/$/ ADDRESS FI LE I ��;�: ��y�yj��— '�i(G }� �� � q�2 ��O > REVIEVI/ED I�`�D= �G.-J'� � * LAND USE ,� / ��,q� I FI LE8� PETITIONER CALLED SITE VISIT/MEETING AERIAL � PHOTO MADE / �y �� MaPS ooNE �i I ' I `�'�1(0 REPORT WRITTEN �