The URL can be used to link to this page

AF-V - 46827,� _ _ C� l 1 �F FRIDLEY �. FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Mark Blegen 275 Ironton 5�reet N.E. Fridley, NIlJ 55432 Dear Mr. Blegen: September 16, 1993 On September 13, 1993, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a Variance, VAR #93-22, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet; to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet, in order to allow the reconstruction of a nonconforiuing structure that was damaged more than fifty percent of its value due to fire damage, generally located at 275 Ironton Street N.E. You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3590. � ��incer�;ly, �a �� `��( >� � P V �" Barba a Dacy, AICP .i Community Developme �Director BD/dn Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by September 30, 1993. Conc r with action taken i \ .�� setback. Seconded by Councilman voting aye, Mayor Nee declared,�� llings. Upon a voice vote, all motion carried unanimously. 14. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 31,1993: ' A. VARIANCE RE UEST. VAR #93-22, BY MARK BLEGEN, TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 3 5 FEET TO 8. 2 FEET ; TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 9.8 FEET; TO ALLOW THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE THAT WAS DAMAGED MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT OF ITS VALUE DUE TO FIRE DAMAGE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 275 IRONTON STREET N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet and to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet in order to allow the reconstruction of a non-conforming structure damaged more than fifty percent of its value due to a fire. She stated that this structure was damaged by a f ire in August, and the Chief Building Official has verified that over fifty percent of the value of the structure was destroyed in the fire. Ms. Dacy stated that staff and the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the variance request, but it should be noted that there is a creek that meanders through the rear portion of the property and moving the house back may impact the edge of that creek. She stated that some type of front yard variance would be necessary, but since over fifty percent of the val�ue was destroyed, this may be the opportune time to reconstruct the home within the existing code. Ms. Dacy reviewed some of the setbacks of other homes in the area, and some homes have only five feet to ten feet front yard setbacks. Mr. Blegen, the petitioner, stated that all he wanted to do was to build on the same footirigs. He stated that if he has to remove the existing foundation, it would cost $15,000. He stated that he is living in an apartment at the present time'and would like to get started on rebuilding. Councilman Schneider stated that he has contacted the Ward Council- member, Ed Fitzpatrick. He has indicated he supports this front yard variance. Ms. Sporre, 295 Ironton Street, stated that she lives next door to this property, and the neighborhood is in favor of the variance. She stated that if Mr. Blegen were to move the home back, it would impact on the beautiful oak trees on the property. She stated that there are other homes with these setbacks, and they would like to keep the integrity of the neighborhood. !� ^ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF BEPTEMBER 13, 1993 PAGE 18 Ms. Sporre stated that there is a long history to the boulevards on this street. She stated that both boulevards or easements are on one side of the street which was a compromise reached when residents stated that they would sue the City. Mayor Nee stated that the south boulevard was moved to the north side and the lot line moved north to include two boulevards. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she cannot foresee the street being widened, and she could not know what future councils might do. Ms. Sporre felt that if Mr.�.Blegen had to maintain a 35 foot setback and build to the rear of the property, there might also be problems with flooding. She stated that water backs up now in the creek with water coming from the housing project in Coon Rapids. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Variance Request, VAR #93-22, to reduce the frorit yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet and to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet at 275 Ironton Street because the adjacent homes on each side are approximately at the same setback or less, as well as the potential for flooding and past history of the drainage. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. RESOLUTION Nn_ tin- (BY 6JESTMINSTER CORPORATION)• MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resoluti�n�No.�60-1993. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voic��'vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion car•ried u�nimously. 16. APPROVAL RELOCATION CONSULTANT CQ�'I'RACT WITH PROFESSIONAL REDEVELOPMENT RESOURCES• .` ,%F Ms. Dacy, Community Development,Birector, stated that the City is responsible for relocation�xpenses as the result of the condemnation of property at,�6070 and 6074 Central Avenue. She stated that as part of th�`condemnation.proceedings, a relocation consultant must be hi�ed to determine appropriate relocation benefits for the tena,�`ts. �f Ms. Dacy stated-°' it is recommended that Kirk Schnitker of Professional Redevelopment Resources be hired to determine the relocation be,�iefits. Mr. Herri�k, City Attorney, stated that the City is not indicating the ter�ants must move; however, he understands this particular prope�ty owner wishes to move and purchase another home. � '� � ^ REQUEST Permit Number Applicarrt Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning I Present Land Use(s) I Adjacent Zoning I Adjacerrt Land Use(s) � Util'fies Park Dedication Watershecl District ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECOI�IlVIENDATION I Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author 1�i:1s S TAFF REP O RT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date �ugtlst 31, 1993 Planning Commission Date City Council Date Septe�er 13, 1993 VAR #93-22 Mark Blegen To reduc� the front yard setback fran 35 feet to 8.2 feet; to reduoe the side yard setback fr�n 10 feet to 9.8 feet 275 Ironton Street N.E. 24, 431. 25 squa.re feet 1�1, Single Fanaly Dwelling Residential 1�1, Single Fami.ly Dwelling, on a].l sides S].X C1t:12S Denial I)e�ni.al Y ' �"'� �"', Staff Report VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen Page 1 A. STATED HARDSIiIP: "Fire damage repair" B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner requests three variances: 1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet 2. To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet 3. To allow the reconstruction of a nonconforming structure that was damaged to more than 50% of its value due to f ire The request is for 275 Ironton Street N.E. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and a detached two-car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding properties. There is a creek located north of the dwelling unit which flows from the northeast to the southwest through the property. Analysis The dwelling unit was damaged by fire in early August 1993, and the damage sustained exceeds 50� of the fair market value of the structure. Necessary repairs include removing all interior wallboard insulation, flooring, ceilings, etc. Some. of the structural support members may also need to be replaced leaving only the exterior shell of the dwelling. Front Yard Setback Seation 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code requires a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off- street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building ��line of sight'� encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. t The first variance requested by the petitioner is to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet. The dwelling 14D � � � �� Staff Report VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen Page 2 is currently located 8.2 feet from the north right-of-way line of Ironton Street. There is a 66 foot right-of-way located in front of the dwelling unit. The Public Works Department has indicated that they propose in 1994 to upgrade Ironton Street to 32 feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. There is adequate room within the existing right-of-way to accomplish this improvement. However, the dwelling unit is 8.2 feet from the right-of-way, the closest any dwelling unit is located to a public right-of-way. As the structure is severely damaged, this is an appropriate time for the petitioner to relocate the structure to meet the 35 foot front yard setback. The existing garage is located 34.7 feet from the property line; therefore, there is adequate room for off-street parking of vehicles. There may not be adequate room to relocate the structure at the 35 foot setback due to the location of the creek located in the rear yard. However, staff is unable to make that determination at this time due to the lack of adequate information. If there is not enough room, it would be appropriate for a reduced variance to be granted. The amount of variance requested should be minimized by the petitioner. The petitioner should submit a plan which would increase the front yard setback and yet accommodate adequate room from the creek. Side Yard Setback Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a� requires a side yard setback of 10 feet between any living area and side property line. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce the possibility of fire and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. The second variance request is to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet. This variance request is minimal and would not have an adverse impact to adjacent properties if it is granted. However, if the petitioner relocates the dwelling unit, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to meet the 10 foot side yard setback requirement as well. 14E . �—,,, ,� Staff Report VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen Page 3 If the Appeals Commission grants this portion of the variance request, it would be within the extent of similar variances previously granted. Structure Damaged More than 50% 8eatioa 205.04.03.8 allows upgrading of a nonconforming structure to a safe condition, provided the necessary repairs do not exceed 50� of the fair market value of such structure. Public Purpose served by this requirement is to provide an opportunity, when nonconforming structures and uses are damaged more than 50�, for the City to bring them into compliance with current codes. The structure has been damaged to more than 50� of its value. Due to the extensive repair work required to reconstruct the dwelling, it is an appropriate time for the petitioner to bring the property into substantial conformance. The interior house systems will need to be completely replaced as well as substantial portions of the roof system. In essence, the exterior siding will merely act as a shell. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request to reconstruct the home at a nonconforming location. The intent of the 50% rule of the nonconforming structure regulations is to establish a point in time to correct non- conformities. Given the amount of structural damage which has occurred, it is appropriate for the City to require the petitioner to identify a house location which meets as many of the setbacks as possible. A front yard setback variance analysis should be conducted. ations, staff also recommends side yard setbacks as well. AApeals Commission Action may be necessary, but further Because of these consider- denial of the front yard and The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance request to the City Council. The Commission recommended that the petitioners develop an alternative plan or provide further evidence that the structure cannot be relocated. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action. 14F � _ � I DATE: TOt BROMs SIIBJECT: ^ � Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 William Burns, City Manager Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Variance Request, VAR #93-22, by Mark Blegen, 275 Ironton Street N.E. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council deny the variance request. The petitioner is requesting a three-part variance: 1. 2. � To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet To allow reconstruction of a nonconforming use that is damaged to more than 500 of its fair market value The Commission directed the petitioner to review the site and determine if it is possible to relocate the dwelling to meet the setback requirements. The Commission recognized the existence of the creek running through the property and acknowledged that some type of variance request may be required by the petitioner. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action. NIlK :1 s M-93-518 14 � S ' ~�` � i APPEALS COMlYlla�iva� .------ echle agreed. He stated e° the llet ti n r to imovel the Mr. Ku of requi ing p roval. line with the hardship addition over six inches. He wou d also vote for aP� Ve Va�an�e Dr. Vos, to app MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded bY er Section 205.07.03.D. request, VAR #93-21, by Diane Ha'da, P ard setback Zoning Code, o reduce the side y �2).(a) of the Fridley to allow t e construction of an addition from 10 feet to 9. 5 feet, 2 o f�t 19 glock 2, Oak Grove Addition, on Lot 20 and t 662�rA�oka Street N.E the same being , p�,L pOTING A , VICE-CiiAIRPER80N K�� pPON A VOICB VOTE� IMOIIS Y- DECLARED '1'HE MOTION CARRZED IINAN J_----------- ---------- --- -- --. ` 93-22 BY MARR BLEGENt _ LTEST �. V __ ----- - --- - - -- -- 2, CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE 1� �- Code, to Per Section 205.07•03.D•(1) of the Fridley Zoning reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet; a of the Fridley Zoning Code, Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2)•t � reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet; to Code to allow Zoning structure that was damaged Per Section 205.04.03.B of the Frid ey the construction of a nonconforming more than 50% of its value due to fire d�allor��t-�� On that part of the Southwest 4ua�er �oka County, Minnesota, of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, described as follows: sterly along the north line inning at the northwest cornee of said Southwest Quar ee Beg a distanc of the Northeast Quarter, thence . southerly, parallel with the west line of said Southwest Quce er of the Northeast Qua e�er, to the of 75.00 feet, then of the northerly line of Ironton Street of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast uae�ension, a easterly extension along said easterly N.E.; thence westerly, along said west ' tance of 75.00 feet to the Wee northerly Southwest..Quar er dis thenc of �he Northe�aint of beginning. line to the p gubject to easements of record, if any• The same being 275 Ironton Street N.E. seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of MO� N b� Ms. Smith, �lic hearing. the public hearing notice and open the p vICE-CHAZRpER80N RIIECHLE IIPON A eOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� DECLARED T� MOTION CARRIED AN� T� p�1'IC HE�ING OPEN AT 7:4 p.M. 14K S r., �'�1 t.�i i Yi�� --- . is located in the in the Ms. McPherson stated this property is zoned R-1, Single Riverview Heights neighborhood. The property arcels. The Coon Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding p Ra ids/Fridley border is directly to the north of the subject P propertY• Ms. McPherson stated a single familY dwelling unit and a two-car ro erty. A creek runs through detached gar�ge are located on the P P the property to the rear of the dwelling. dwelling was substantially Ms. McPherson stated the S August a1993. The Building Inspection dama g e d b y fire in early De artment has determined that the cos t t o re pair the damage airs P flooring, exceed 500 of the fair, ter or Vwallboard insu atione� ep include removing all in o� members. ceilings, and some of the structural supp Ms. McPherson stated the first variance exi ti g tWa t� rfga ag ais setback from 35 feet t� almost meeting the 35 foot requirement. set back at 32.7 feet, ro riate.width of 66�feet. Therefore, the Ironton Street has an app P ro riate distance from the structure appears to be set back an app P h sical street and not from tlze street, but that isas 1 gally described. public right-of-way McPherson stated a variance of n�ed. f There� isdadegua.te .r.aom Ms. and the extreme front yard variance ever gra arage, for off-street parking of vehicles in front of th ag ear to be set dwellings on eitheriateesetbackssubject dwelling PP back at the appropr there between the Ms. McPherson stated th��to� �o r locate the dwelling �e � appear s t o b e a d e q u a t e e a r s t o b e a p p roximately existing location a thisewase not surveyed Pby a surveyor so it may 77 feet. Howevaccurate. not be totally has been pgs , McPherson stated that sinc andh s nce lt e edwelllnq t ex re�e� variance granted by the City ro riate damaged more than 50% of its value, it would be aPP P. Code relocate the structure so that it conforms with the Zonin requirements. ired to Ms. McPherson stated staff recommenn�d the peti ioner be r�•re uce the front yard setback be denied Code requirements. relocate the dwelling to conform with Zoning 's variance request is minimal Ms. McPherson stated the second va Thl ce is to reduce the side yar setback from 10 feet to 9impact the adjacent properties. However, and would not adversely lred to relocate the dwelling, it would if the petitioner is requ' a ro riate to relocate it to meet the 10 foot setback as wel be pp P 14L � ' r'"1 !�� IPPEALS curir..�•�•��••-- --- as the front yard setback. However, if the Commission chooses to rove this variance, it would be within the extent of sim ar apP ranted. variances previously g est is to ��ii-ow ��t1r� Ms. McPherson stated the third s��turer to a safe condition, upgrading of a nonconforming 'ded the necessary repairs to do not excee os � for this code p r o v i T h e public p�P r o r i a t e t o market value of t he s t r u c t u r e. requirement is to provide a time which would be a p p P conforming stru�tures into conformancedamaged h itZw° ld bring n�n as the dwelling is substantially Code. Again, the structure into compliance. be an appropriate time to bring eals Commission Ms. McPherson stated he varianee reQuest to reconstruct the home recommend denial �f iocation. at its nonconforming the Rice Creek l+qs, Smith asked if there is any need for approval by Watershed District. n stated that this property is within the Six Cities or setback Ms. McPherso there are no zoningDepartment, Watershed District. At this time, The Engineering did not requirements from the creek area•all watershed requests, which is responsible for reviewing rotection for arding an appropriate se o�a any P m the cree , make any comment reg unit by flooding, any impact to the dwelling the creek itself. the house would Mr. Kuechle stated he would like to know how moving impact the petitioner. en stated that, economically, it impacts them Mr. Mark Bleg. ' el They did not have a��lot �ff 1n�sCket° eifn they have ts negativ y• out P As far a they would have to take money destroy the cement foundationht be lright to movea he hea�e back moving 'tlie house back, it �lg especially this y 30 feet, because the creek does flood, Dr . Vos aske d if there are any other factor�s e�y i°ned necessitate keeping the house within 8 feet of the p P He stated he did not kno� e easement on his front yard. In looking Mr. Blegen stated he did not think So• his house is in Why there is such a larg down the street from h� ho ses.t The house to the west is in line line with all the othe with his. what would the Dr. Vos asked that if texisti g garage?Ved back, petitioner do about the tated that in order to consta constructra n w n.the �r. Blegen S arage an lot, he might have to raze the g 14M . - �'"�, � Dr. Vos stated that the creek is definitely a factor in this cashe Council approves moving the house back on the lot, If the City where the flood level is would like someone to determine exact�lY He did not want-t-�-Cit� and just how far back the house can g to force the petitioners to move the house back into the flooding area. anded in 1994 as proposed Ms. Smith stated that if the streshel wo d be concerned about the by the Engineering Department, too close to the new street. house in its existing location being en stated that she did not have a problem with Ms. Shauna Bleg moved back on the lot, but someone needs to having the dwelling ess the footage from the back °like to be eable to a��h� �� addr She would also flood every sprinq: house to the existing garage. anded, the house would Ms. Blegen agre�e�rie street andswould be dangerous for their small be too close t at their financial situation after son. But, they are also looking losing everything in the fire. Mr. Stanley Leno stated he is Ms. Bleg en's brother. He stated he wanting to correct a nonconforming odd shaped could understand the City asi cul-de-sac at � situation. One of the problems is o a��hsal� very lot, and the street itseThese conditions, along with the creek at the end of the street. create an unusual situation. His concern the back of the property, e r the Blegens is the added cost to them this hhouses � 9ht t the fo ened, moved. If the fire hadn t happ ears. He asked tha continued ati h the factors and comee up wi h the best decision for City weigh a all parties involved. �lic OTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms• Smith, to close the p M hearing. ALL VOTING AYE� �1ICE-CHAIRPERS�N RUECSLE IIPON 1� VOICE VOTE, THE p�T,IC gEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED AND P•M• etitioners would not be here if there had not Dr. Vos stated the P ed a ma7 arity of the house. This is an been a fire which destroy of Fridley to make the structure opportunity for the City ortunity for the petitioner to use conforming, and it is also an oPP than it is now• Hc uldlrearrange their property in a different waY that the petitioners give some thought to how they o use the existing garage and stf��1 bthe s de proPerty a n e w h o m e t ro erty li n e a n d 1 0 f e e t from the front p P line on the west side. 14N '� / \ ` APPEALS �%��1 ° ° i"`. _�- - s stated he would recommend denial of all o�r ae riew Plane Dr. Vo etitioners some time to lay laced requests to give the p sure that the house is p He urged the petitioners to be very on the lot a safe distance from the creek• ee a definite hardship e of the lot and how the house was placed on the Ms. Smith stated that even though she coul S est as proposed. She in the odd shap rove the variance requ lot, she could not app would recommend denial of all three variances for the petitioners, Mr. Kuechle stated it is certainly a hardship the house back. On the the ersonal loss from the fine and because the City ls both for P mov 9 ier in askinq them to add to the cost by he believed the petitioners will be much happ other hand, est is denied and the house is moved five years if the variance requ back on the lot. Ms. Smith, to recommend to City MO� N by Dr. Vos, seconded by V� #93_22� by Mark Blegen, est, Zoning Code, to reduce Council denial of varian � o�he Fridley feet; per Section per Section 205.07.03.D.( ) to reduce the side the front yard setback from 35 fZoning Code, 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley er Section 205.04.03.B Code to allow the construction of a yard setback from �o i gt to 9. 8 feet: an re than 50 0 of its value of the Fridley ed ma nonconforming structure that was damag due to fire damage at 275 Ironton Street N•E• ALL VOTING AYEr �1ICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE IIPON A VOIC �OTION �CARRI�%D IIN�IMOIISLY. DECLARED T� Council on s, McPherson stated this item will qo to the City � 1993. September 13, ApJpiTgNMENT: to adjourn the meeting. Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, erson Kuechle MOT_ bY all voting aye, Vice-Chairp adjourned Upon a voice vote, and the meeting declared the motion carried unanimously at 8:20 p.�. Respectfully submitted, . Ly e Saba Recording Secretary l_ ' �� '� �� Z�x �� /,,,� ,/"� �l � 1�9� �� C�,�! I � �3�a�5 �'�t,"w.��'aio� - �� _ _6� � � 7'7�-��ct� ' O�t �v�a,tl �►a� a -�v lI - � � � r c�.�- o�, y'�e. o� � �� • �o��- v�.ee�. -#t� wwve.�'i'�e.. .�%�%vi c.c.� �vi c.es3 4(eS� ' s��r,r �.+�v�a�~ -��.. e�s � � �Z�- c��v�h� � �(�� , �vovir� �?^p �I U�'��-2?.��- , `Jn • . � �,� w+�hiwuwl 6�`" ��r�u-�� rl+�✓� �r�%��e1�� • � � �OA�2e�.ce�"l _, U`�� Q.. Cov� 2� o� b! • �1 —6 -�i' �d �c�r-- e G Locc�i�o�c� _ l9�' C✓'��-- ' G�e-e,Ec— -t��ot�o�s "� `Tu� -t�v�c� � � ivLe.. i v� a�al • a.c�f dMr�Il� la�; � • �1�,�-- %,s.�,$ -� �. w�- � de�,;e�_ �� , PIIHLIC HT�ARING BL80RE THE APPEALB CONIIdII88ION � Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, August 31, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #93-22, by Mark Blegen: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet; Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet; To allow the construction of a nonconforming structure that was damaged more than 500 of its value due to fire damage on that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly extension of the northerly line of Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly, along said easterly extension, a distance of 75.00 feet to the west line of Southwest Quarter of the Aiorthest Quarter; thence northerly, along said west line to the point of beginning. Subject to easements of record, if any. The same being 275 Ironton Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSOIJ APPEALS CONIlKISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 24, 1993. VAR #93-22 275 I�ontom Street N.E. N�rk. Blegen 275 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, NN 55432 Abdulqac7ex Mta�ahid 265 Ironton St?reet N.E. Fridley, MML�TT 55432 TBrzy Yattaa Industrial Spray Paint 820 - 3 8th Lane Anoka, MML�TT 55303 Ti.irothy Vescio 190 Iront� Street NeE. Fridley, NN 55432 James Ingalls 180 Irc�tca� Stxeet N.E. Fricl]_ey, �N 55432 l�an i e 1 Brent 280 Irontan Street N.E. Fridley, NN 55432 C4�xistaphe Karridc 290 IrontAn Street N.E. F'ridley, NN 55432 Chexyl Mason �1�- 30 4 I rariton Street N. E. Fridley, MV 55432 Warren Lalr�usga 195 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, NN 55432 � .NJ�ILING LIST City of Coon Rapids 1313 � Rapids Blvd. N.TrtI. Coon Rapids, N�V 55433 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terraoe Fridley, N.�T 55432 City Matiager City Cotuicil �� ;led: 8/20/93 0 � � CI�iYOF FRIDLEY � �!Z COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW A.PPEAI.S . _ - F'ILE NUMBER � oare ME�riN� �afi� - FILE DESCRIPTION �#g3-�� 46 8-31-9� 275 Ironton St. N.E. - fr�nt yard & side vard setbacks COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING D,EPT. D. ICHELE M. � �,�a�� E. COM�IIIENTS �'�� ' �,��` �;�'� �� ..�..ra� G.rw._.r�,� � J f y �i �fiJ�'i� r! � !'c.� y / TJ �'�vv/� %�/ ,�C u'�' �'d �y C� OHN F. �-�� l� �� 2 �— �o�� -� �� G.� .- s � rh.. ��L� �f� �t-,�� .-� �� .� �� /�_ � � $�� 2 � . M. � M. � � -� H. �/ � 0 DICK L. Q C-�� ,�' ��. �- � . �� v �.�- �� . - ��- � � __L � � � ✓�-� W� + = �"'� � CITX OF FRIDLTi' 6431 UNIV�R9TTX AVENUE N.E. •��-• � FKInLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 �OIVIMUNIT'Y �;1�'�ELOPMEIVT I�EPARTM�NT VAI�I,AN�� A,�PLICA�'ION �ORr/i �'R�P + RT INFO 1VIATION - s�te plaa required for submittal; see attached Address: 275 IRONTON STREET P�[operty Identiflcation Number (PIN) R03 30 24 13 0004 00456937 �.e�al description:UNPLATTED CITY OF FRIDLEY, TH PT OF SWl/4 0�' NE1/4 DES AS FOL Lot Block TracdAddidon BEG AT NW COR. Current zoning: � Square footagelacreage Reason for variance and h�nlship: �'Y� DAMAGE REPAIR �� ,. � Section of City Code: Have you operated a businese in a city which �equired a business license7 Ye� � No xx If yes, which city? If yes. what typ� of business7 Was that license ever denied or revoked? Xes No � FEE OWN ,R IN �RMA�IO1� (as it appeaxs �n the property tit�e) (Convaet Purchasers: Fee Owne�rs muat slgn this form prior to processing) NAME BLEGEN, MARK ADDRES$ 275•aI3.ZONTON STREET NORTHEAST � w• �.. SIGNA 55432 DAY'�XMEPHONB 786 1752 DATE ADDRESS SXGNA �YTIME PI�ONB DATE Pee: $100,00 _ $ 6p,pp � for residendal p�ties � Permlt VAR # �I2 -r �,� Recejpt # ,�'1 � Applicatiun rcceived by:• � Scheduled Appeals Com�mission date: _ _ =_3i � Scheduled C�ty Councll date: � 14J � ► ► 1' , IJ � � �� *� 'f, �i' `�� ' � �� 7 �.ti -�: � :, i � ��I �� '� u/• ��r� �U. 1 \\\ ' .� ��r�." _ t� �- . Y/�I � • ��\I i:: � �� ,.�i' , �� .,s.�'� �� , � 3;;;.:3� S � �� `'�� '+\� �� 0 7 ��,. . g + �► z + + ,�+*, f� �p _ ,- - - � ` .*� .'' ;4. , Is � q�M� s � !► 2 ( 4 ELV CIR. N ♦ �o tl g � 1 � �(1 b # � r.� VAR. ��93-22 Mark Blegen ,,� ;� �� ' -� � ,� ,-,} , 4� � `'� V� p�, R9� `� � �' � `� � �::� . � � � ��` �" �""'� � � � � � � .� �� '� g:� ,� ``�, ,.� � .�`�� -�'`� � ,;;;� q � � _ �_ � ,�.� � n� �'.: � � .� �'� �,,:r� � `r �� ;,, �. ��„�. � , . �`� � � � � -._� .,�� .� � , �,-.� � � �:� � � �. � � �� : � �y V � `r� �1 � � ,� � y � �� ,,s� � r� ''� � � " r� ty ' �J �• � � � , � `� �� \ � � '�'1� �� ."y J ',`.� � � � .Y '-S ' la�' � �ty � '7 ` tiry } �' . ^1• �'.'1• — i /�� .�.. } � , `�:•� �� `.'�_ �`"' <<"� `"� V//i 1� °LY � � o P� G ' V`` `� z..•, ...� . ... o . . �., . •. •. •. ,, - i Ik.' � � •k•� • • I � �+�p � � 1 ,�� ''� "�, � g g �l� �' ' • � „ . �q ` � •3�, �, a • • • \ �t r,, e� � :� ♦ � �'+'. •� � a � QF, 01 ��a a�i e•• �aJ'\ . a„ . �y,� o�,iO a��•�•�• :� �'. •_ �� 9r.�'b 6ai. •�.�i ;. � .�: _•• •.�' i � • "Z� ��Z � . • • O �, 139 ��' ,V • tcdh►�� i ,�� 14C Z��i1�� VAR ��93-22 � %��Iark Blegen . �.v�/y � �vl� M�►�►r .t 9 /'�, NORTH �./NE -bF 7't,FE- SouTNWc1S'!' , QU�9R'�"E2 oF -TS1E �Yo2THERST fJR/ZTE2 /Z 4 .--_�. _ aF SFe. 3. /�027'NJNEST CORNE/! OF 7f/E ,y89°,Z5'S8'� SOUTi�/Y✓EST QuFJ2TER OF TNE �j►� ND/zTHE.4ST QUqRTE2 OFSEG.3� / .r. DD 7; 30 ��, 2¢, R�YoKR CouKry� /YI//5(NESOTfI. �, ro v y b ti �° �tr � � � �� h � � � � ,� o � �� M 0 �� lW � N We 3Q VAR �i�93-22 �"\ Mark Blegen DESCRIPTION: That part of Northeast Qu 30, Range 2� described as Beginning a� Southwest � p� Quarter; the: a0 � line of sai �j , North�ast Qt nj p feet; thence � � west line o] the Northeas extension a Ironton Str� along said e� of 75. 00 f Southwest S Quarter;� th� west line to Subject to Ex�ar. �? N G�r� � /b� �EXU� � HouaE m �� 89°.20'45•• � � 7'S.00 � s89 °z3'25"w �� ,fxisr. CONG. CUR6 �Ti2EET '.CrX�3>• BiT. ��n'( ��... �---�°-+� . � . :..� '•� � . . . � ■ l �r' .,�: � �E .z.�canson Anderson n+��.,i��. ��.w�d�� 222 Manme Stree4 (�aka. AA4v�aaoa 88303 612/427•5860 HORTH L/NE eF 7�'HE Sou7^NWEST Qf/RRTC.Q OF TH6 NoRTHCqS'%C1UqQTE2 aF See, 8, NORTHWEST coa,vEa oF Tae iyB9°25'SB'E SoUTHWCST du9/LTER OV'TNE �j Ne/(TNE.o.ST QUqRTEQ OFS6C.S� /�oo T, 30� ,Q, Z¢� ANOKF CoUM7'y � M/NNCSOTF. � L� ^ � 1� N � �L�►� � ti�la ��`� °��'��J;, S�� j1 �IZ o Denotes Iron Monument Scale / „ - SD � gook 290 pa$e 32•33 � Z R EI.tV. l 13�� \� L�'�'��`t2 STi2EET Bir. Bee�q r� Certificate of Survey FOR MARK BLEGEN DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 30, Ranga 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Baginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter oP tha Northeast Quarter; thence easterly along the north lina of said Southwast Quartar of tha Northeast Quarter a distance of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the west lina of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly extension of the northarly line of Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly, along said eastarly extension, a distance of 75.00 feet to the west line of Southwest Quarter of the Northeast S2uarter; thence northerly, along said west line to the point of beginninq. Subject to easements of record, if any. I hereby cerdfy that thls survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct wpeMsion and that I am a duly Regls- tered Land Surveyor urrcler the laws of the State of Minnesota. _��%1.�.7%� /2263 v8��93 2�1oT.0/ �'Na � Job Na �� PIIBLIC HEARING BBFORE THE APPEALS COMMIBSION �\� Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, August 31, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #93-22, by Mark Blegen: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet; Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet; To allow the construction of a nonconforming structure that was damaged more than 500 of its value due to fire damage on that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly extension of the northerly line of Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly, along said easterly extension, a distance of 75.OQ feet to the west line of Southwest Quarter of the Northest Quarter; thence northerly, alo°ng said west line to the point of beginning. Subject to easements of record, if any. The same being 275 Ironton Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 24, 1993. . � �;: `;,'�' � =�: i f"s �� ;: �t�� - � �� . � � �z R � � t {� .�,�: � �,� ; - � 4 y� � . �� ..i„�5 + r� ' � ( ' �� " 4 �� - = � .. �� .:.;�fi��. '� �. � � ,� .�„ � 1 ,�- r � .ss � � � �� * � � � �- >��r`�,uta .� ,:�,�,r s r. ;�, _ ^� =� � �,��= � �� .. � ," • _ = � _;- � � --= � _ �=� � `.� �. _�� .. � -�' �� 'F� x��,� a� .'A�''"#`t��.�i4,�'A Y 'm-. ' � -�` �„ h� �s� z _ # �'.�� s � :ri � 7 � ?� _ �r , _ �� - s - u � " - . Ls= � _ �y, �� ..a � _ ;� _ - -� , • �rl � . + � . < � � .� �� . 'y,. fi ...�`��_ sw.. � i ` . 7 T ;"s.'.i'�' �R �T - � � • ; _v�-� � ' - �� - _ .. �� , . � �'� � �'�, �' �— �s-vi - sa _.�L �,�r s. �� ' a , . "� ' ..� _. ' �..� } - � - . � � � �" � ,. -�e i � -a z �. � _ "t.. y. ..,.��, ,_ .. - _ e . Y. r - , ��-�+ "��;. K � -�:; � } � � -�� ,�`'��"`- ::��,�� _ �:.� - z e� �#x . :�..�;. �: _ Yb � •� � ", - �.. E�_y , � �� _ �� '�� 4 ' . - '.�, �,. ., ,. ..� �S-� . ...t :�: �, i� ¢.4 � .*;T yi�E�^ �� .ai,� k .� -. �{ �� - r�y,��.� � -�a �E .� . . t . 't�3 «� �� I 7 � � ` �a Y 3� g; �. � �� -x.;,, � .. ,y� �-k ' e.. �`� d _` _ � � �� ` ' ��_ �� i � $ �� - �+- �� ' � __'�k t`.� ,t—' �.- ° � � t�-�+. � � ��y ��$ ¢� + r �� i 1 5 ��,_ Xyr � � �� } � '��L� . � '�'F... s.:��`y"aap'qY�y��"E� 7 y ,�x � :. lC� �� ?�� 4�' � � �7r� �i�dy�,�,� � .�Y>iz � � - ��. �"��"ar�� e ��" ".,�°.��;T.�..�b.".:,.��'� _-ce s.. :�c.. °'�''�i.-,�lcRS•�b _ . ,..��- 4 � . �. . � � � _ y�' ' � _� n � � -�'r`� � �T ?�� -.� _ � 4 � � �-�`� , .� ��,� y ��.e �^' �— .c' �IN� `� +�R <^ � ��+-��-a3-u-s f �' . a ---= � ' --y� rs,, ; � ��!-s 'C �� t} ,� �' :..�i� - _� � ,� . ,re ..., x � '�:1 „ ��. T- � e � �:. �A �rs, f � �� '. � , -.:t --r.,fi. . t ''� � �. � � - �__._ ?�" � fY...-..t F -_ _ ;�....� � . , .. � �� - ;�" r ' `:'`,�' �r � " _--. s�; ��