The URL can be used to link to this page

AF-V - 47717� � s � i �'' . � `� STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CiTI' OF FRIDLEY ) ) ) In the Matter of: Variance, VAR #02-08 Owner: Barry A. Seaberg and Mary Jo Seaberg � � �`� 13 �C� �-� �� APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 10th day of April, 2002, on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To increase the lot coverage from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a second accessory building on Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, generally located at 6716 Jefferson Street NE IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approved with stipulations. See attached April 10, 2002, Appeals Commission minutes. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY ) ) ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. � , IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the '�'�'k- day of � , 2002. DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 � ��- �� .�- � �,�; � Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk _ _ ��F . -�: :� � � � ,i ,' � V � b�e�• f. ��F�.� ? , �• �. Y ��'ab ! s �,. .�� ; w :f i, � � n� ��' 't° '�� • . ti• uA � . K � ��p//�� f � C , � �,.'�+ t... � �. � � 1' .'' �� "` � • � ��' .s �e�^" tI � �r e ,. . ._"_ . � ;t_A_+: �_...�.�.f_� " . . ; � � �� '�^, .,-S'� > , . . �. �+ ", �, -, , - Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and shall be considered void if not used within that period. i - APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 � PAGE 4 2. PUB�IC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #02-08. BY BARRY SEABERG: Per Section 205.07.03.0 of the Fridley Zoning Code, to increase the lot coverage from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a second accessory building on Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, generally located at 6716 Jefferson Street NE. MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Zinter, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:46 P.M. Ms. Stromberg stated that the petitioner is requesting a variance to increase the lot coverage to allow the construction of a 988 square foot accessory structure located in the rear yard of the petitione�'s residence at 6716 Jefferson Street. The summary of hardship states: 'The driveway on this property is a single drive and does not have enough width to make room for any additional vehicle parking. The existing garage is 15 feet wide and is within the 5 foot setback limit, so there is no possibility of any double garage, driveway added or change on the side or front. I can't think of any altemative way to allow for a solution to this problem other than leaving the garage as a breezeway and a drive-through for getting to a new garage in the back." Ms. Stromberg stated that the property is zoned R-1, single family, as are all surrounding properties. The subject property is 10,500 square feet and Code requires that the main building and all accessory buildings shall cover no more than 25% of the area of the lot. Twenty-five percent lot coverage on this lot would be 2,625 square feet. The petitioner is requesting that 2,716 square feet of the lot be covered by main buildings and accessory buildings, which is .8°l0 over the allowable square footage. Due to the position of the home on the lot, the petitioner is asking to construct a 26 foot by 38 foot detached garage in the rear yard of the property. Ms. Stromberg stated the existing single stall garage is located 5 feet from the side yard property line, limiting the petitioner from adding on to the existing garage. The proposed accessory structure will be located in the rear yard 25 feet behind the existing single stall garage. The existing garage will stay intact and will act as a carport to allow the petitioner to drive-through it to get to the proposed structure. The petitioner plans to add a garage door to the back of the existing garage allowing him to drive-through it to utilize the proposed structure. Ms. Stromberg stated tha� staff has no recommendations as similar variances were granted in the past: (1) a variance in 1995 at 7301 Lyric Lane increasing lot coverage from 25% to 28.7%; (2) a varianc� in 1994 at 6240 Alden Way increasing lot coverage from 25% to 25.8%. If the Commission approves the variance, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall install Code required hard surface driveway within 12 months of issuance of a building permit. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 3. The garage shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with complementary siding and color scheme. � 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface driveway as approved by the City. 5. The garage shall not be used for a home occupation or living area. 6. Variance approval is dependent upon approval of Special Use Permit, SP #02-06. Mr. Jones asked about the special use permit requirement. Ms. Stromberg stated the special use permit is for a second accessory structure. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 PAGE 5 Ms. Jackson asked if stipulation #5 applied to both the existing and proposed garages. Ms. Stromberg stated the existing garage would be used for a drive-through so it mainly relates to the proposed garage. Ms. Jackson asked if the size of the proposed garage was a typical double car garage size. Ms. Stromberg stated that it is a three stall garage. Dr. Vos asked if there was anything in the Code stating that accessory building square footage should be in relationship to living area. Ms. Stromberg stated that accessory buildings cannot exceed 100% of the first floor area of the house or a maximum of 1,000 square feet. This accessory building is 988 square feet, so the req�irements are beingmet. .. , � . - Mr. Jones asked if the original garage is attached or detached. Ms. Stromberg stated it is attached. Ms. Stromberg stated that according to the dimensions in the building permit file, the house is 44 by 24 feet which is 1,056 square feet. There is also an addition off the back of the house which is 16 feet by 18 feet, which adds another 288 square feet of living area. Mr. Jones asked if they add together the difference, or is it either one or the other? They could go with 1,000 square feet. Ms. Stromberg stated the Code goes by each individual accessory structure. The maximum allowable square footage of accessory structures is 1,400 square feet. Mr. Jones stated that the garage would be considered an accessory structure. Ms. Stromberg stated that it is considered an accessory structure. Ms. Jackson asked if the public hearing notice indicated that this would be a triple car garage. Ms. Stromberg stated that the notice sent out to the neighboring properties stated that this would allow for the construction of an accessory structure. Ms. Jackson stated that the size of the accessory structure would be a good piece of informatiqn in helping decide whether this would be a problem or not. Ms. Stromberg stated staff has not heard from any of the neighbors. Mr. Barry Seaberg, 6716 Jefferson Street, stated that he has not had any comments from the neighbors. � Ms. Stromberg stated that the letter to the neighbors spoke about lot coverage and what he was seeking the variance for, but it did not talk about the size. � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 PAGE 6 Mr. Seaberg stated he needs this size garage because there is no place to pa�fc. He has a truck and a trailer sitting out on the street right now. There is no place to park on a single driveway due to ail his vehicles. The biggest reason for this is to bypass other vehicles to get the cars out. Ms. Jackson stated the two garage doors to drive-through is a very creative idea. Mr. Seaberg stated that it appears that driving through will be very easy. Ms. Jackson asked what the size of the garage would be if he had kept to the 25% lot coverage. Mr. Seaberg stated that it would be 925 square feet. Construction materials mandate the size with pre-measured tresses. There is one double door and a single door probably. Dr. Vos stated there will be an 18 foot door and then another 8 foot door. The property does drop to the back comer where it will be buil4. How are you going to do that? Mr. Seaberg stated they will put in 60 yards of fill for making it on the level consistent with the garage. Dr. Vos stated that the efevation difference of his lot and the house behind is a pretty good size drop. Mr. Seaberg stated he would guess that his back yard has a foot drop and then on the other side is another foot or two. Dr. Vos stated he is looking at the drainage from the petitione�'s lot. Mr. Jones asked where the drainage would go. There would be more hard surface there. Mr. Seaberg stated there would be about 26 feet of cement. Dr. Vos stated that the concem is the added hard surface on the lowest parts of the lot. Where will the water go with more hard surface? Ms. Stromberg stated that this project was brought to the staff Development Review Committee, and the Public Works Director looked at the property. He did not feel there would be enough of a drainage issue to waRant a specific stipulation. Dr. Vos asked if one of the stipulations is the special use permit. Ms. Stromberg stated that is correct. The special use permit will be discussed at the Planning Commission meeting on April 17. She will talk to Mr. Haukaas about this again to see if an additional stipulation should be added on the drainage issue. Dr. Vos and Mr. Jones stated they would feel more comfortable with adding a stipulation about the drainage due to potential water problems with ponding or a wet basement. MOTION by Ms. Jacksan, seconded by Mr. Zinter, to close the public hearing. . APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 PAGE 7 , UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. Jackson stated that she would feei rnore comfortable if the neighbors knew of the size of the garage, not just knowing that it is 900 square feet. It is large and there are other options for storing things. Since the neighbors did not complain and it would be checked for water, there is no basis to deny the variance. She is just not sure if that large of a structure would fit into the neighborhood. Mr. Jones stated that his concem is the hard surface amount. He is not sure he would deny due to the lack of neighbor complaints. This is 9 feet tall and gradually dropping back and is 38 feet long. The aesthetics are questionable. Mr. Seaberg stated that it is impossible to have a structure that is aesthetically unpleasing in Fridley, because it needs to comply with Code requirements. Mr. Zinter stated that with all the vehicles and parking issues on the street and safety issues with traffic, he would not deny the variance. This does seem quite large though. Dr. Vos stated that he does not believe there is a hardship because a garage could be put back there if you lopped off 91 feet. He is not happy about that large a structure. MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Zinter, to recommend approval of VAR #02-08, subject to the stipulations as amended and addition of #7 as follows: 1. The petitioner shall install Code required hard surFace driveway within 12 months of issuance of a building permit. 2. The petitione� shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 3. The garage shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with complementary siding and color scheme. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface driveway as approved by the City. 5. The garage shall not be used for a home occupation or living area. 6. Variance approval is dependent upon approval of Special Use Permit, SP #02-06. 7. The Public Works Depa�tment shall examine the site and make a report before the special use permit hearing. UPOIV A VOICE VATE� ALL VOTING AYE, VIC�-CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Ms. Stromberg provided an update on Planning Commission 8� City Council actions. Ms. Stromberg stated the April 24 and May 8 Appeals Commission meetings have been canceled. The next regularly scheduled meeting is May 22. A joint Pfanning Commission/ Appeals Commission/City Council meeting will be held on Monday, April 15, at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the Council/ Commission survey. ABSTRACT Receipt # � /%,� o�iw ❑ Certified Copy Date Mailed oaterr�me:51� 4 0 � 1� ;o�o ❑ Tax Liens / Releases Doc. Order � of �_ ^ � ❑ Multi-Co Doc Tax Pd ✓ by: Pins: �) Recordability / Delqs: �p ❑ Transfer ❑ New Desc. Filing Fees: �-�' o� ❑ Division ❑ GAC Well Cert'rficate ❑ Status ❑ Def. Spec Received this Date: Anoka Counry Recorder ❑ Other �No Change Notes: V_ DOCUMENT N0. 16 7 6 0 41. 0 AB S TRACT ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT iHEJNRNI�I INSTRl1MENT WAS FlLED IN THIS OFFlCE FOR RECORD y 1�lAY ]: Z 0 UZ �.00 PM AT ��. � a AN U �ECORDED. FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF PAID. 2002067730 RECEIPT N0. A9AUREEN J. DEVINE ANOKA COUMYPROPEI�4XqpMlNISTHATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OFT//LES BY DEPUIYPROPERIYTAXADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR Of TITLES 0 , � s s CI"IYOF FR(DLEY FRIDLEY MUr1ICIPAL CENTER • 6431 LJNIVERSI'TY AVE.IV.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 17, 2002 Barry Seaberg 6716 Jefferson Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Seaberg: On Aprii 10, 2002, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved a request for variance, VAR #02-08, to increase the lot coverage from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a second accessory building on Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, generally located at 6716 Jefferson Street NE, with following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall install Code required hard surface driveway within 12 months of issuance of a building permit. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 3. The garage shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with complemen#ary siding and color scheme. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface driveway as approved by the City. 5. The garage shall not be used for a home occupation or living area. 6. Variance approval is dependent upon approval of Special Use Permit, SP #02-06. 7. The Public Works Department shall examine the site and make a repo�t before the special use permit hearing. You have one year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3595. Sincerely, � 1 ry' r SYtr r L��Y W`�� S acy , g (� Planner Please review the above action, sign below, and retum the original to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 30, 2002. �B� Is Concur ' action take City of Fridley Land Use Application VAR #02-08 April 10, 2002 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: Barry Seaberg 6716 Jefferson Street NE Fridley MN 55432 Requested Action: Variance increasing lot coverage requirements. Existing Zoning: R-1 (Single Family Residential) Location: 6716 Jefferson Street Size: 10,500 sq. ft. .24 acres E�cisting Land Use: Single Family Home. Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: N: Single Family & R-1 E: Single Family & R-1 S: Single Family & R-1 W: Single Family & R-1 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Consistent with Plan Zoning Ordinance Conformance: Section 205.07.03.0 requires no more than 25% of the area of a lot shall be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. Zoning History: 1955 — Lot is platted. 1956 — Home is built. 1961— Garage is built. 1978 — Addition to home. Legal Description of Property: Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4 Public Utilities: Home is connected. Transportation: Jefferson Street provides access to the residence. Physical Chara.cteristics: Typical suburban lot and landscaping. SUMMARY OF PROJECT The petitioner, Mr. Seaberg is seeking a variance to increase the lot coverage requirement from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a 988 square foot accessory structure in the rear yard of his residence. SUNINIARY OF HARDSHIP "The driveway on this property is a single drive and does not have enough width to make room for any r�dditional vehicle parking. The existing garage is 1 S feet wide and is within S feet setback limit, so there is no possibility of any double garage, driveway added or change on the side or fYOnt. I can't think of any alternative way to allow for a solution to this problem other than leaving the garage as a breezeway and a drive through for getting to a new garage in the back. "— also see attached hardship statement. - Barry Seaberg SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff has no recomfnendation as this variance is within previously gYanted dinaensions. Similar variances granted: • VAR #95-29 7301 Lyric Lane Lot coverage requirement increased from 25% to 28.7%. ■ VAR #94-16 6240 Alden W,�y Lot coverage requirement increased from 25% to 25.8% CITY COUNCIL ACTION/ 60 DAY DATE City Council — Apri122, 2002 (Existing Home) Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg VAR #02-08 REQUEST Petitioner, Barry Seaberg is seeking a variance to increase the lot coverage requirement from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a 988 square foot accessory structure located in the rear yard of his residence at 6716 Jefferson Street. SUMMARY OF HARDSHIP `The driveway on this property is a single drive and does not have enough width to make room for any additional vehicle parking. The existing garage is 15 feet wide and is within 5 feet setback limit, so there is no possibility of any double garage, driveway addition or change on the side or front. 1 can't think of any altemative way to allow for a solution to this problem other than leaving the garage as a breezeway and a drive through for getting to a new garage in the back"— also see attached letter from the petitioner. - Barry Seaberg ANALYSIS The property is zoned R-1 Single family and is located and fronts on Jefferson Street. The existing home was built in 1956 and a single stall garage was constructed in 1961. An addition was constructed off the rear of the home in 1978. The subject property is 10,500 square feet. City Code requires that the main building and all accessory buildings shall cover no more than 25% of the area of the lot. Twenty-five percent lot coverage on this lot would be 2,625 square feet. The petitioner is requesting to have 2,716 square feet of the lot covered by the main building and accessory buildings which is .8% over the allowable square footage. Due to the position of the home on the lot, the petitioner is asking to construct a 26 ft. by 38 ft. detached garage in the rear yard of the property. The existing single stall garage is located five feet from the side yard property line, therefore, limiting the petitioner from adding on to his existing garage. The proposed accessory structure will be located in the rear yard approximately 25 feet behind the existing single stall garage. The existing garage will stay intact and will act as a carport, which will allow the petitioner to drive through it, to get to the proposed structure. The petitioner plans to add a garage door to the back of the existing garage, which will allow him to drive through it to utilize the proposed structure. The proposed accessory structure meets all setback requirements. City staff has received no comments from neighboring property owners. Location of the Proposed Garage RECOMMENDATIONS City Staff has no recommendation, as similar variances have been granted in the past. Similar variance granted: VAR #95-29 7301 Lyric Lane Lot coverage requirement increased from 25% to 28.7% VAR #94-16 6240 Alden Way Lot coverage requirement increased from 25% to 25.8% STIPULATIONS Staff recommends that if the variance is granted, the following stipulations be attached. 1. Petitioner shall install Code required hard surFace driveway within 12 months of issuance of a building permit. 2. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 3. Garage shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with complementary siding and color scheme. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface driveway as approved by the City. 5. Garage shall not be used for home occupation or living area. 6. Variance approval is dependent upon approval of Special Use Permit, SP #02-06. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 ' PAGE 4 2. PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #02-08. BY BARRY SEABERG: Per Section 205.07.03.0 of the Fridley Zoning Code, to increase the lot coverage from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a second accessory building on Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, generally located at 6716 Jefferson Street NE. MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Zinter, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:46 P.M. Ms. Stromberg stated that the petitioner is requesting a variance to increase the lot coverage to allow the construction of a 988 square foot accessory structure located in the rear yard of the petitioner's residence at 6716 Jefferson Street. The summary of hardship states: 'The driveway on this property is a single drive and does not have enough width to make room for any additional vehicle parking. The existing garage is 15 feet wide and is within the 5 foot setback limit, so there is no possibility of any double garage, driveway added or change on the side or front. I can't think of any altemative way to allow for a solution to this problem other than leaving the garage as a breezeway and a drive-through for getting to a new garage in the back." Ms. Strornberg stated that the property is zoned R-1, single family, as are all surrounding properties. The subject property is 10,500 square feet and Code requires that the main building and all accessory buildings shall cover no more than 25% of the area of the lot. Twenty-five percent lot coverage on this lot would be 2,625 square feet. The petitioner is requesting that 2,716 square feet of the lot be covered by main buildings and accessory buildings, which is .8% over the allowable square footage. Due to the position of the home on the Iot, the petitioner is asking to construct a 26 foot by 38 foot detached garage in the rear yard of the property. Ms. Stromberg stated the existing single stall garage is located 5 feet from the side yard property line, limiting the petitioner from adding on to the existing garage. The proposed accessory structure will be located in the rear yard 25 feet behind the existing single stall garage. The existing garage will stay intact and will act as a carport to allow the petitioner to drive-through it to get to the proposed structure. The petitioner plans to add a garage door to the back of the existing garage allowing him to drive-through it to utilize the proposed structure. Ms. Stromberg stated that staff has no recommendations as similar variances were granted in the past: (1) a variance in 1995 at 7301 Lyric Lane increasing lot coverage from 25% to 28.7%; (2) a variance in 1994 at 6240 Alden Way increasing lot coverage from 25% to 25.8%. If the Commission approves the variance, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall install Code required hard surface driveway within 12 months of issuance of a building permit. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 3. The garage shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with complementary siding and color scheme. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface driveway as approved by the City. 5. The garage shall not be used for a home occupation or living area. 6. Variance approval is dependent upon approval of Special Use Permit, SP #02-06. Mr. Jones asked about the special use permit requirement. Ms. Stromberg stated the special use permit is for a second accessory structure. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 PAGE 5 � Ms. Jackson asked if stipulation #5 applied to both the existing and proposed garages. Ms. Stromberg stated the existing garage would be used for a drive-through so it mainly relates to the proposed garage. Ms. Jackson asked if the size of the proposed garage was a typical double car garage size. Ms. Stromberg stated that it is a three stall garage. Dr. Vos asked if there was anything in the Code stating that accessory building square footage should be in relationship to living area. Ms. Stromberg stated that accessory buildings cannot exceed 100% of the first floor area of the house or a maximum of 1,000 square feet. This accessory building is 988 square feet, so the requirements are being met. Mr. Jones asked if the original garage is attached or detached. Ms. Stromberg stated it is attached. Ms. Stromberg stated that according to the dimensions in the building permit file, the house is 44 by 24 feet which is 1,056 square feet. There is also an addition off the back of the house which is 16 feet by 18 feet, which adds another 288 square feet of living area. Mr. Jones asked if they add together the difference, or is it either one or the other'? They could go with 1,000 square feet. Ms. Stromberg stated the Code goes by each individual accessory structure. The maximum allowable square footage of accessory structures is 1,400 square feet. Mr. Jones stated that the garage would be considered an accessory structure. Ms. Stromberg stated that it is considered an accessory structure. Ms. Jackson asked if the public hearing notice indicated that this would be a triple car garage. Ms. Stromberg stated that the notice sent out to the neighboring properties stated that this would allow for the construction of an accessory structure. Ms. Jackson stated that the size of the accessory structure would be a good piece of information in helping decide whether this would be a problem or not. Ms. Stromberg stated staff has not heard from any of the neighbors. Mr. Barry Seaberg, 6716 Jefferson Street, stated that he has not had any comments from the neighbors. Ms. Stromberg stated that the letter to the neighbors spoke about lot coverage and what he was seeking the variance for, but it did not talk about the size. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 PAGE 6 Mr. Seaberg stated he needs this size garage because there is no place to park. He has a truck and a trailer sitting out on the street right now. There is no place to park on a single driveway due to all his vehicles. The biggest reason for this is to bypass other vehicles to get the cars out. Ms. Jackson stated the two garage doors to drive-through is a very creative idea. Mr. Seaberg stated that it appears that driving through will be very easy. Ms. Jackson asked what the size of the garage would be if he had kept to the 25% lot coverage. Mr. Seaberg stated that it would be 925 square feet. Construction materials mandate the size with pre-measured tresses. There is one double door and a single door probably. Dr. Vos stated there will be an 18 foot door and then another 8 foot door. The properly does drop to the back comer where it will be built. How are you going to do that? Mr. Seaberg stated they will put in 60 yards of fill for making it on the level consistent with the garage. Dr. Vos stated that the elevation difference of his lot and the house behind is a pretty good size drop. Mr. Seaberg stated he would guess that his back yard has a foot drop and then on the other side is another foot or two. Dr. Vos stated he is looking at the drainage from the petitioners lot. Mr. Jones asked where the drainage would go. There would be more hard surface there. Mr. Seaberg stated there would be about 26 feet of cement. Dr. Vos stated that the concem is the added hard surface on the lowest parts of the lot. Where will the water go with more hard surface? Ms. Stromberg stated that this project was brought to the staff Development Review Committee, and the Public Works Director looked at the property. He did not feel there would be enough of a drainage issue to waRant a specific stipulation. Dr. Vos asked if one of the stipulations is the special use permit. Ms. Stromberg stated that is correct. The special use permit will be discussed at the Planning Commission meeting on April 17. She will talk to Mr. Haukaas about this again to see if an additional stipulation should be added on the drainage issue. Dr. Vos and Mr. Jones stated they would feel more comfortable with adding a stipulation about the drainage due to potential water problems with ponding or a wet basement. MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Zinter, to close the public hearing. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 10, 2002 PAGE 7 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. Jackson stated that she would feei more comfortable if the neighbors knew of the size of the garage, not just knowing that it is 900 square feet. It is large and there are other options for storing things. Since the neighbors did not complain and it would be checked for water, there is no basis to deny the variance. She is just not sure if that large of a structure would fit into the neighborhood. Mr. Jones stated that his concem is the hard surface amount. He is not sure he would deny due to the lack of neighbor complaints. This is 9 feet tall and gradually dropping back and is 38 feet long. The aesthetics are questionable. Mr. Seaberg stated that it is impossible to have a structure that is aesthetically unpleasing in Fridley, because it needs to comply with Code requirements. Mr. Zinte� stated that with all the vehicles and parking issues on the street and safety issues with traffic, he would not deny the variance. This does seem quite large though. Dr. Vos stated that he does not believe there is a hardship because a garage could be put back there if you lopped off 91 feet. He is not happy about that large a structure. MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Zinter, to recommend approval of VAR #02-08, subject to the stipulations as amended and addition of #7 as follows: 1. The petitioner shall install Code required hard surface driveway within 12 months of issuance of a building permit. 2. The petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 3. The garage shall be architecturally compatible with existing home and finished with complementary siding and color scheme. 4. All vehicles shall be stored on a hard surface driveway as approved by the City. 5. The garage shall not be used for a home occupation or living area. 6. Variance approval is dependent upon approval of Special Use Permit, SP #02-06. 7. The Public Works Department shall examine the site and make a report before the special use permit hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON VOS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Ms. Stromberg provided an update on Planning Commission 8� City Council actions. Ms. Stromberg stated the April 24 and May 8 Appeals Commission meetings have been canceled. The next regularly scheduled meeting is May 22. A joint Planning Commission/ Appeals Commission/City Council meeting will be held on Monday, April 15, at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the Council/ Commission survey. . , , � " � � Barry Seaberg . 6716 Jefferson St. NE �'rid�ey, �N 55432 To whom it may concern.: � I am applyi.ng for a variance for my garage to go from 25% to 25.8% lot c�.�verage. The extra three feet on the. building width would atlow for pazking of thre�: vehi�les and a sz�ow�oba�e tzailex. �e square footage wil� be 1,U00 squa.re feet. The driveway on this property is a sing�e dnive and does �not have enough �vxdth to �xaake xoox�a �oz� ai�y add�tioz►a� vehicle paxking. The existing ,garage is 15 feet wide a�ad �s w�tbaiz� S� �eet setback l�rrut, so there is no possibility of any double girage, driveway added or change on the side or front. I can't think of any altetna�ive way to allo�r �ox a so�uCion to this problem other than leaving the gazage as a braezeway and a drive through for getting to a new garage in back. � The att�a,ched photo's of the roof li�ne, £�ont and rear, show how the �arage and addittion wexe added w�tl� a z�ew roof. Removal of the garage would be ver�y difficult because t.�a� north side roof line would have to be partially removed from �•orn�t to rear - about 24 feet. From the rear of the house, the top hup roof �iu�e dvouJc� ll�ave to be changed all the way acxoss the rear if the home, a 14 x 16 foot area. Th�; othei consideration would be how to �oin a new hip roof with the e7dstiu�g roof �ii�e orn the house. I figure abou�t 600-800 square feet of roof would have to be talcen v:E% vvith al� new tresses, �lywood and shingles replaced. The existing gaxage can be tumed irrto a breezeway by adding a,rear door �o the ga�rage to a.11ow c{xi.vu�g th�cough to tk�.c new garage. I will install a rear gara�;e door on existing ,garage so tlie interior doesn't need to be gutted and replaced w:ith �xt�ri4r typ� �t��l�� 'h� r��r d�r wo�.ld alco F�ev��nt ��►i�d tx�aan�1 �t�r� b�iz�g created. T'b�is way th,e roo� o� garage can stay in place and we can use it as� a patao area - since I' ll be lasing. my deck with the new garage. The old garage wauld o�ly be used as a breezeway and patio area, as this is the only path ieading to th.e nev� garage. I can install 2x2x1 ��/2 �az�au�tated headers iun eacl� end of garage for prope:r support. �`hat wi.�:l also allow for a path for bringing gravel and b�oc�cs to bac�C ax�d ,vithout going on my �n�ighbors �roperiy �or fihe new garage. . � . _ - � . * . �_.: lapd; Plonniny . . � / / :� . �t*iCyu�iT��%%i � 6875 Miyhwor No.03 N.E. '' laud S�rv�ri� t� • .' � s�n�' T..�� l� �Li1P6�lZll. �f�'tC• Minn�apeli��." � . �) Mi�n. SS431 . Civ�l Engin��riny • ; Tal�phons 7d4-A006 Mw�Icipal Engin��rin9 � EAg�II@e!S 8L ,�• $L1I'V@y0I'B . Ar�a Cod�,612 Mortgage Loan Survey for FRi��Ey , STATE BANK ,: �V ; , • . . : . - - ----��..--.�-� ;-.�. ,._r ;_ , _ . ..-�� , _ . _ . __. _. _.. • :�a � . , - �. �,:; . . . � � '�,iio.00 --- • _ �.... � ��;'� Z ; , � %�i ` � y�' �'. `�I� ` y �� . . . _ I . V ��r \ _ $ � �`;'. � r�n-. �� I � � �- - _ ' . . - �.:. s � :_.�roinc�� Utility Easement �- �- ------ � 2�` � - . � _— �. . , 13 0. �Y �o r`,� �,�� . . _. .�-�.. , ,� ------ ------�` ------`:----36.4_ - � �. 140.00 ---- � �. AUGUST� 191� I -._ _ { I O � � I . W . w. !�^ v J Z O � 1.� �1._ � I� . tb � � �'Y. � srq,` . �` • l� � :. . " �f� 3 � �6- � �+�-. G y . 3. :. :: �--�'� ,.'� �� . . �� LoT �, B�ocu.::xi � • 1 ;.�:-�-:� -: -_ . . Ri�E -�REEI� TER�ACE�PLAT 4. � - .- � �: . ., * �.: . ..� - ANOkA CoUNTY � . '4 � • a ��' . ;.� . _ _:M1 .; ;�:,< �� :� =t: .'�� . . .__.s. .r....,'�e;.;; n, , .� `'� 'r' �-'=T+t��.This•is a true•and corroct representotion of o surv�y of fhe boundari�s of the lond obove d�a�ribed and of fh� * `<` �".,�-+, ��' '��;�,iya• �,�lotofioe of all build(ng�� if any� t6�r�oe� and oll visible �etroachrnenft� it any� from or on faid lond. �Thi� iurvey i� ` ��'��d��-on�r in conn�etion with o mort9o9e �aa� now being ploced on eha prop�rtr ond no liability i,�yi�umed ��QP� �o tF�e holdar of such mortgoy or any oth�� intenst oequirod by Iho roasen of tuch mv►�goge, �t is understoodand ogree�TOnume ts hovs b�en��d for the purpose of �stablisi�ins lof linei 'br,bo�ndary , , . Dafad �I�is day of�A. D. 19 . � ` � SU�URBAN ENGINEERING, INC. � s��'�e.s . . ' Desi n # 81914 9. �,MEN�IRDS� 3/3/2002 *** Take this sheet to the 6uilding Materials counter to Purchase your materials. You selected a ara e with these o tions: 9 9 P 26' INide X 38' DeeP X 9' High - � Gable roof w/ 6/12 Pitch truss construction 12" gable/12" eave overhangs 7/16" OS6 Wall Sheathing 7/16" OS6 Roof Sheathing 8" Textured f iber Cement laP Siding 25 yr. Oakridge, Chateau 6reen Shingles Nunter 6reen Aluminum Soffit � Fascia Hunter 6reen Aluminum Regular Roof Edge j , �� ,� � �ti f'��- � S�� s �** �� / 9/I�iiCG ��/r /-�4�� I� G C' J� �! �x� Y /� � ��'iL1 / ��/ G � ��6 /�� -�F'ir�%'�C,� 5�l /�L�� c 7o c;? �, � .� i�E.F.�F� _ �/ �Au?f�GC G'�'�,P N6.�,� .7oC/.� Gv�l�� C I� � L/7/11 iti.� i'c .o H6AVE� , . Front View �j,,�'ry� �E c c�a � F B�ck View Today's cost for materials estimated in this design: $ 4420.�1 6ase garage without options: $ 307�.90 *The base priea ineludes: 0" Eave/0° 6able Overhengs, 2X4 Wall Studs, 7/16 OBS Roof Sheething, 20 yr. Fiberglasa Classie - Onyz Black Shingles, Pine Faseia, 6�Ivonized Regulor Roof Edge, 8° Tex#ured Vettical Hardboard Siding, No Servies Doors, No Overhead Doors, No Windows, or Any Other Options. r ,:-� City of Fridley Variance Request #02-08 �II�IIII ,■�,,,, ,��,�� s �� ILEGEND L �--r�l . n� _ �1� _ �1 _ Barry Seaberg 6716 Jefferson Street NE N A Sources: Frdiley Engineering Fridley GIS Anaka County GIS Map Date: 3/28/02 r ' y. � i r _ .� CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 'UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 572-3592 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: Residential Commercial/Industrial Signs PROPERTY INFORMATION: (site plan required for submittal, see attached) Address: �'7/� �"�G��2Sdti ,Sp". �/. � . Property Identification Number: Legal Description: Lot_� Block _�TractlAddition �� C� ,.� �.-r . L�z� � Current Zoning: Square Foota e/acreage: Reason for Variance: �� 1�,- �S �� ,�� „ �7�Em TQ ,LPA-U� �-1C/5�`/Jt� lr �.g/ZA��r /?oOr //� G�LfFCc� GU /Tff i9' /U E�/ �s fYl2R� � e: �ff� G /3U/Gp"' 6�v %3�c�' 1/�f�! Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No If Yes, which City? If Yes, what fiype of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No �VM�VIV�VA/MIV �V 1V �V IV /VMA/�VN�VIV/�11VMN/VIVA1/V /Y41\/�V IV/Y/VIrA//�/N/V1�/1VAI//V/�f/V/Y/YAIIYAI/�/A/A11Y/�/ti/bA//VAIM�Yl1/�VA/IV/1/OV+V,ViVM�VAIMRIA/ FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract rchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing.) NAME: ADDRESS: >'� . DAYTIME PHONE:7�,,3- y�8-,��D/ SIGNATURE/DATE: 0 I �I►IYIVIV/VNiVIVIVIYA//VA►/r�VAlA1/VM�IA/�VI��Y/V�1/,VA/M�YA/A//�IIVMAIMMAIMMMMA/1VIY�VN�Y�V�V/VMM�IIA/N1V/V/V1VIVIYA/A1�1Y/Y/V1VIV�VAI/M1V �, NAME:` '�IADDRESS: , DAYTIME PHONE: ��1,.,�J3 -,�?Q/ SIGNATURE/DA' _ �r I�/A//1//Y/�VI�//V IV/VIYN/�/AI^/A/NAI/Y�V/1/�VN/�IN�VPYI�1//�/N�V�VNIYIV/VN�V 1V �Y/V/�//VIV/VM�I/�V�YM�VA/IVIVM/�/M1V1VAr/�I1V/YI\IIV/V/VIVIV�Y�IiV�V1�/AINIVAI Section of City Code: FEES Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial_ nr s cins: ' Fee: $60.00 for residential,prR perties:--�__� _�_'Receipt #: � Application Number: �N�K � 1��.—t�� Scheduled Appeais Commission Date: d L�� I Scheduled City Council Date: �� ' 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: � 60 Dav Date: _ � � � / c� � ' /�-/ ' / �_` �r�'��S �` ��" � � � ��( J - ��" � ,� a f � � L. 7' �..�e�..i� �t v i � VARIANCE APPLICATION SUBMISSION CHECKLIST The following shaii be the minimum submission requirements to the Appeals Commission. Applications will not be accepted if the following is not submitted: RESIDENTIAL: ITEM SUBMITTED RECENER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS Completed application, with fee (Application is considered complete if all blanks are completed, and both fee owner ;� and etitioner have si ned. Scaled site plan of property showing i��; north arrow, existing and proposed �� structures, lot and block number, adjacent street names, and buildings on adjacent lots within 10 feet of the common lot lines. Elevation of building and description of `� �tiL�' materials. � I�' Narrative of proposed building, and summa of hardshi . � COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL: ITEM SUBMITTED RECENER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS Completed application, with fee (Application is considered complete if all ° blanks are completed, and both fee owner and etitioner have si ned. Scaled site plan of property showing north arrow, existing and proposed structures, lot and block number, adjacent street � names, and buildings on adjacent lots within 10 feet of the common lot lines. Elevation of building and description of materials. � Landscape plan for all projects requiring a parking lot expansion of four (4) or more s aces. Gradin and draina e lan. Erosion control lan. Calculations for stormwater runoff. � d � _ CI"IYOF FRiDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UMVERSIT'Y AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(763) 571-3450 • FAX (763) 571-1287 March 18, 2002 Barry Seaberg 6716 Jefferson Street NE Fridley MN 55432 Dear Mr. Seaberg: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 working days if their land use applications are complete. We officially received your application for a variance on March 8, 2002. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete. Your Variance application hearing and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley Appeals Commission Meeting on April 10, 2002 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. If your variance application needs to be reviewed by the City Council, the meeting will be held on April 22, 2002 at 7:30 in the City Council Chambers. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, �� /ry! � ,� (;� '1 ��`'ir�`��'�'�7�. Stacy St omberg � Planner C-02-29 .� CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO: Residents within 350 feet of 6716 Jefferson Street CASE NUMBER: VAR #02-08 APPLICANT: Barry Seaberg 6716 Jefferson Street Fridley, MN 55432 Petitioner or re resentative must be at meetin . PURPOSE: To increase the lot coverage from 25% to 25.8% to allow the construction of a second accessory building LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 6716 Jefferson Street LEGAL DESCR/PTION: Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace, Plat 4 DATE AND TIME Appeals Commission Meeting, Wednesday, April 10, OF HEARING: 2002, at 7:30 p.m. The Appeals Commission meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 17. PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers HEAR/NG: 6431 Universi Avenue HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, or Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or fax at 763-571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMMODATION: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than April 3, 2002. (TDD 763-572-3534) ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 763-572-3599, or Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 763-572-3595. Mailing Date: March 29, 2002 ,� _ a LEViJIS CAI�4ERON G 6740 MADISON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NIHART JAMES A& TAMMY R 548 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PETERSON LEONARD J & DIANE 6757 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 RENKEN JOHN C& MERCEDES C 6815 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SCHMITT ROBERT F& MARY J 6747 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SEVERSON ROBERT A & MARION 6801 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SMITH MARK P& LARSON PAMELA J 556 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 WEIMAR RICHARD L& E M 6810 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MANDERSHIED RANDALL & CHERYL 541 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NORD DORIS M 6805 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 RADEMACHER BRENDA J 620 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 RICCI MICHAEL A& ROXANNE V 621 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SCHULTE ERVIN J& LILLIAN E 601 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SHEA HELEN I '' 630 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SPERINO JUDITH M 6730 MADISON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 WRAY KATHERINE G 6716 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MOTL ALLEN D JR 8 NELSON R K 564 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PALMER JEFFREY & CHARLENE J 565 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 REDMAN JANIS L 6726 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ROBBINS SCOTT C& ELIZABETH J 6747 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SELNES DAVID A& LILLIAN E 6750 MADISON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SHOBERG WENDELL T& DONNA J 600 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 STAHL ROBIN A 580 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 .� , t ABDELRAI�MMAN MAHMOUD 8 T J 6717 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BOSWELL ROBERT S& GAYLE M 6800 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 COLLINS MAUREEN O 6720 MADISON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6735 7TH ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 DROSSEL LELAND E 6737 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLE I OF Bad Addre 1 FRIDLEY, 55432 GABEL MARK S& HINCE MARY E 6737 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HILLUKKA HATTIE A& MICHAEL R 6736 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JACOBS HARLEY A 611 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BACKSTROM WILLIAM E 8� S A 572 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BULGER BRADLEY S 540 68TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 533 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6821 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FERGUSON LORIS M 532 67TH AVE N E FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FROST TERRY A 6717 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GIRON LUIS E& DIANE L 5830 STINSON BLVD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 IND SCH DIST #14 6000 W MOORE LAKE DR FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JORDAHLJOANJ 575 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BETHEL GERALD D& CAROLYN G 6760 MADISON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CLINE JODY L 6800 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 613 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 DONLEY WILLIAM G& KATHY L 555 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FISCHER LYNN H& SANDRA K 525 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GAASLAND BONNIE L 6727 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HENDRICK RUSSELL C& D R 6736 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ISAACSON JALMER W & DOROTHY 6746 JEFFERSON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JOST MICHAEL J& MARY J 610 67TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KOSTELECKY RAYMOND V& B M KUHNS DAVID L 8� JUDY A LARSON DANIEL G& DORATHY R 532 67TH AVE NE 540 67TH AVE NE 6727 WASHINGTON ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 4 � :{ £ � `�o � /.�f� �p� � � - �� ,�'�� + � f': � � •. ,� �� ,� a�J � . J. P 2 � e�l� , �; '� � ,� I �. ..�-��... J � � � �� .w�._ '_ ._.. .. �,� r Y r � _.4 � J. b �.'� ^�a r��.- ; .,y;��. . � y ;��' � r .� ' f' � . f ��s' �� Y �s � �`�,' �('� j� . . +' �� , 1' � j .� . .� � `r + "� .....v^�fi��4� i � , r.lr� ' .� _ l:.� '� —l+PY^� Y„►�.. f�'r��' _ " _ —d"'J.,,.. . , s��y� �.� _ ..._ _ .. `�v. —�`�r..� �'+��'..: �'�.a" '. �� o � � � _ \' \ � '� ""'�' ��_�a � j a i '�s� c...s�__� '�t'�+�� y... � .. � '�« . � � _ '� ,y`' . ��` � �'.+�� ' ' - ,{` - .��, t' `'� � "" � . . � �~�.. �� - i ��}fi 7� �' � >� � ' , - � t' � ` � �(J 1 . l. ' r �.�:s s. � � , f _ L'a 1 `��t- � ��,�' � � �� . �. }��. _ _� �{� � - f� / .. �./ 7 ! , �v � �' �� ,; , r s ,y , � �' � ° � r` {..;�`y d �', . , - � t Y _ �,�..,�`t • .: � , ..,�'� •ti lt °, -� • � • ,1t • a ` ,,: . <"" �:i-.; t � �. � . � . .� . :� � � � � t !. �.� � [ � _. �t � = g s f'�+� � / 4 .: �� i '� ,j "�'� 1 � ; `# :,�!-.F'a. ` �. :''� � ' �� r �y, . . , •�. , r. � � r� _�.. 4' '.. f`��.� .�� _� ��.°' b� ��'°� °'�, � Y _. � , � . � �' ",Pr a/1 i � : /'� li��:,: - �..,; �� r• fs ,� � ' . :. t �' ai ..'. .` ' � .-, . . .� F � J�� .t�.�,�� .r-. � �e� � � � .�-_ > a� E J� f . _ . ^ ' �'." :d W r� [,� y �` � .+IF�i t.....r,,,,...,.� �.. �� } ` . r� ' � F y�t�� . _<i"" i _ d �� 1 ��:�� e �' -� ! � � � �� . �� . � �, ��:�.;y . � . �'.:. ` � . � ; �Rr- � � �Y .,� � {�'^�� i �+ �: .. � _ " " �_�;.�... ��N _ �y-� .. - � ° 1. �: ai _ f r t � � 4 �� 7 � ';' i , ,'� � ' � � � 1 , \ � . �` � 1 ijLU .�_n .�n� i: � �j �i t: p M1 i uxy s : �� . � � �t �" _. ,.._. i°''� Lt' � .. .�... ;'� . .. ., :..c.r � .. �r � . �,i ,�.. ( � �: �' i ��; { . � F :�:�, a . ` fi �. � . • � . ��, f ��' � } ��.. (;"y�. _ `�� `��,.y. ��` , 5r, i ,�„#, � � �_.-__,�� n�. 1 ! '% �^ � � A/ � �z. .. � - � � � � A/ , �+��i�_� ! . / i � ��; i / `% `'��, : .� ��1 � � `S ` � � v c� � N W �r.;; i:.�:' ?v , l� i A' " �'� °,1� � � � ,.+ r� !� ...,. ..�.. ' Y i. '� r� � _�. � ..�� a , � -� �.� � � � � .t� � :� �" g . � x+« ��_ a� -�� .� � �� '` �� ' � Y � ��r _ �. w . . , � ,, . v � _, � , �. � _ : �_ _ . , �:.: , ,, �. . _ ; . .� �,°" a, �. " w ��-� r ; �, :,$ r a. f � �'�. �� - '!l�.�,"` : � 4 -� }� � � � o �� N \ b i q O O O \ : � � , .. � , �` , +.:;�1''-� .� •;.�,:°�'t, , � � � ;, k� � � � :� �1 _i �