AF-LS - 47847���
=-'�1�IE� FROM:
' -" RICHARD N. SOBIEGH
Publ i c Worlcs Di rector
MEMO N0. TC 3 2 5
DATE 8/16/77 -
��
i
REPORT BY: 8/19/77
cc: Clyde - Please.Handle
SUBJECT: Lot Split on Property Located in Coon Rapids �
Fridley __� -- `"..�� , ; _ � .
.� C[ See attached
W
�
�
J
a
�
0
�
0
J
�
0
3
[j Review & take appro-
priate action
[� Review & comment
❑ Naie & discuss with me
� Work with
� Rush, immed�ate action
desired
REMARKS:
We have received a request for a lot split
on Lot 24 B1. 4 Mississippi Oaks and
ot 1, B1. 0, Riverview eig .
Would you please check with the County to
see if they would allow a lot split-�,rhich
•would be a combining of the above lots,or
what procedure would we have to follow to
get a lot split approved?
Make reparts, w/bacKgrouna COMMENTS•
material as complete as poss- •
ible. Make interim report if
necessary.
�
oc
0
n. �
w
�
z
0
�, ❑
�
�
a
❑
❑
Action completed, no
further review needed
Further action necessary
See attached letter
Interim report
OATE: 8 z2
DS/j
�'
SIGN.4TURE �i'�7'�
� _ ,--.:
crrY oF �n�
� �oR�rmur�
I'�IO T0:
N�'IO FROM:
T�I.A.'CE :
SiJ&TECT :
�
Richard N. Sobiech, I'ubTic Works Director
� �
/ L� Clyde V. =loravetz, Engineering Division
t.�
August 18, 1977
LOT SPLIT ON FROPERTY LOCATED IN COON RAPIDS
AND FP.IDLEY (TC 325)
I inquired at the Recorders Office, nuditors Office, and Assessors Office
and there is no pr.able,�n. The County does not have an_y procedtmes regard�
lot splits �:, � only procedtmes are �tYiase established by tfie loca.l co�muni-
ties.
The only probl�n with the lot split is the c�some situation it will ca.use
the Assessuig Offices regarding valuation, etc.
'I'he best resolve wnuld be to annex Lpt 24 with Fridley. ^.nne�tion forms
must be completed by the Council. You may desire to have Virg handle the
proceedit�gs .
I discussed the possibility of annexing Lots 22 arid 23, ?sssissippi Qaks,
together with L�ots 14-17, �u.ditors Subdivision No. 103 Revised, �th Gaylord
Atdinger, Coon Rapids City A,ssessar, and he was very receptive. F:e felt the
above mentioned properties should rea.11y be in Fridley an,yU:�.y. Perhaps if
all these lots were annexed they could be combined in a re-glat, which would
dedica,te sireets to aceo�nodate the land locked or limited access property
in Auditors �ubdivision No. 103.