Res 1996-27 0604:0
RESOLUTION NO. 27 - 1996
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S.
#96-01, TO SPLIT PROPERTY INTO TWO SEPARATE PARCELS,
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 276-78 58TH AVENUE N.E.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the April 8, 1996 meeting,
and stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, such approval was to split Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park,
together with all that part of the vacated alley lying west of said lots and
lying between the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 1, and the
Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 3 into two parcels as
described:
Parcel A The West 65 feet of Lot 1, 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, Anoka
County, Minnesota, as measured along the North line of said Lot 1,
and along the South line of said Lot 3, together with all that
part of the vacated alley lying West of said lots, and lying
between the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 1,
and the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 3.
Parcel B That part of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 27, Hyde Park, Anoka County,
Minnesota, lying East of the West 65 feet thereof as measured
along the North line of said Lot 1 and along the South line of
said Lot 3.
WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the
owner; and
WHEREAS, such approval will split the property into two separate parcels.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the petitioner
to record this lot split at Anoka County within six months of this approval or
else such approval shall be null and void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 8TH DAY OF
APRIL, 1996. -)tOjr
WILLI . NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WI
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
00041
Page 2 -- Resolution No. 27 - 1996
EXHIBIT A
1. The petitioner acknowledges that the City's action creates a
nonconforming front yard setback for the existing duplex.
2. If the petitioner fails to obtain a building permit within 12 months and
a certificate of occupancy within 18 months after approval of the lot
split, then the petitioner shall remove the garage on Lot B.
3. The petitioner acknowledges that Lot B has a long, narrow buildable area
and shall design a house to fit that area.
4. The petitioner shall provide adequate parking for the duplex.