Notice of Conditions for Building Permit s
6/23/83
STATE OF MINNESOTA).
ss NOTICE OF CONDITIONS FOR
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) BUILDING PERMIT
WHEREAS, Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. , fee owner of Lot 1, Block 1,
Rice Creek Estates Second Addition, has applied to the City of Fridley for
approval of a building permit to construct a single family dwelling to be located
at Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second Addition, the same lying in the
South Half of Section 13, Township 30, Range 24, City of Fridley, County of
Anoka, State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley finds that approval of the building permit will
be in the public interest, welfare and convenience to the people of the City of
Fridley if the above understands and agrees to the items below.
NOW THEREFORE, NOTICE IS GIVEN that the above fee owner, its successors and
assigns do hereby convenant and agree to comply with the following conditions
which are stipulations to the requested building permit:
1) Fee owner understands that the public right-of-way adjacent to Lot 1,
Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second Addition is presently unimproved and the
City will not improve the roadway until the property to the east is properly
platted and graded and appropriate right-of-way is dedicated for street
purposes which would allow the City to complete the improvement of Woodside
Court lying between Rice Creek Drive and Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates
Second Addition.
2) Fee owner understands that the City cannot improve any portion of
Woodside Court adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second Addition
since proposed street grades would direct drainage toward the east and
existing topography would not permit proper drainage without dedication of
right-of-way and subsequent street improvement as noted in item #1 above.
_47 w
- 2 -
3) Fee owner would install a hard surface driveway in the existing right-
of-way of Woodside Court to provide access to Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates
Second Addition; however, fee owner understands that all maintenance of the
driveway, including surface treatment and snow r anoval, is the responsibility of
the fee owner.
4) Fee owner understands that the driveway constructed in Woodside Court
would be removed at the time of proposed street improvement without any
compensation for existing driveway.
5) Fee owner understands that upon completion of the proposed street
improvement, the driveway will be realigned to come off the newly, improved street
and any realignment costs will be at the expense of the fee owner.
6) Fee owner understands that future street improvement costs will be assessed
against Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second Addition and other benefitted
properties as per existing City assessment policy and agrees to $2,000 for
payment of the special assessments related to the s.tr_eet..improvement.
7) Fee owner understands that without street improvement of Woodside Court,
the City cannot ensure proper drainage and subject property may be subjected to
water problems.
8) Fee owner understands that without proper platting and grading of the
property to the east, subject property will need to be regraded at future date
to conform to proposed platting and grading. All regrading will be at fee
owner's expense. In order to develop Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second
Addition, retaining walls will be required along property lines to eliminate
any erosion or safety hazards due to existing topography of property to the
east. In future, when property to the east has been platted and regraded to
conform to adjacent properties, retaining walls may be required to be removed
at fee owner's expense.
„ A . ►,.►
- 3 -
r
9) Fee owner must ensure that development of single family residence on
Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Creek Estates Second Addition will not be detrimental to
surrounding property; and appropriate grading, retaining walls, and other
means will be taken to ensure no negative impact of development on surrounding
properties. It is understood that appropriate grading, retaining walls and
other means might need to be removed, replaced, revised, changed, etc., when
property to the east is platted and graded properly.
f BO c%- ' , ,r., ,
(Fee Owner) NED`GAARD CONSTRUCTION COMP , IN .
P2L /LkL/
FUTURE HOME BUYER
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
On this vq5?-g”day of 4A,A.A.- , 1983, before me, a Notary Public
`,71L067
within and for said County, personally appeared /3/14441... 4.
President of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc., to me known to be the
person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged
that they executed the same as a free act and deed.
/61eudA..
. e,„/„.;,....
� 2,azia d• eozgin Notary Public S
NOTARY N - INNESOTA
AOKA PUS!IC COMUNTY
My commission expires May 15,1987
This instrument was drafted by: City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432