PLM 08/20/2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF FRIDLEY
August 20, 2014
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Kondrick
called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:15 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
David Kondrick
Brad Sielaff
Dean Saba
Courtney Elford
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Leroy Oquist
Tim Solberg
Todd Olin
OTHERS PRESENT:
Julie Jones, Planning Manager
Kay Qualley, Environmental Planner
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES:
June 18, 2014
MOTION
by Commissioner Saba to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by
Commissioner Saba.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. Consideration of EQE Recommendations to review and make recommendations for
a Resolution for Green Step Cities.
Kay Qualley,
Environmental Planner, stated the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission
(EQE) is a standing commission for the City of Fridley. It has has five active members, one
from each ward. The chair is Todd Olin and vice-chair, Courtney Elford, represent the EQE on
the Planning Commission. The Green Step program is a voluntary challenge assistance and
recognition program to help cities achieve sustainability and energy goals. It is sort of an
organization to bring cities together with the goal of reducing and sheparding resources through
the use of practical and innovative best management practices. It is a free program, a continuous
program, and it helps you stack up what you are doing as a city against other cities of similar size
or in your area.
Ms. Qualley
stated it is an interesting program, because it is a combination of public and private
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 2
partners. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is one of the partners, but the League of
Minnesota Cities strongly supports it and also conducts classes and seminars that help to educate
the city staff and interested commissioners and councilmembers who choose to attend these
educational presentations. The Minnesota Department of Commerce is another active partner.
Ms. Qualley
stated there are more than 70 Green Step cities throughout greater Minnesota.
Many of these cities, including Coon Rapids, are present in the Twin Cities and are of similar
size to Fridley.
Ms. Qualley
stated the program was established in June 2010. Best Management Practices are
clustered in several areas. It is important for the Commission to know that this is a self-paced
program. No one is hurrying Fridley to do anything, and it is guided by many of the things the
City is already doing, including the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Qualley
stated the five areas Best Management Practices are contained within are: (1)
Transportation and Streets; (2) Economic and Community Development; (3) Energy, Building
and Lighting (such as street lighting); (4) Land Use; and (5) Environmental Management. Within
environmental management many of the areas that the EQEC investigates in order to try and
create and shepardize the City's resources include things like air pollution and air particulate
matter, storm water management and energy.
Ms. Qualley
stated the City has already taken several of the steps that are encouraged for Green
Step cities. Even if the resolution were not passed, the City has already completed steps, like
passing an Active Transportation Plan, making waste improvements in storm water management
and recycling, and creating a TOD zoning district.
Ms. Qualley
stated that the City wants to achieve the goals in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
because soon we are going to be in the next phase of comprehensive planning with the Met
Council..
Ms. Qualley
stated the City's SHIP grants and Active Transportation Plan have been touching on
many of these areas as well. If the City participates, instead of reinventing the wheel in some
areas the City wants to pursue, it can cross-reference what other cities are doing and maybe
dovetail and fine tune instead of reinventing something. And it creates relationships, too. When
you sit down at the League of Minnesota Cities with somebody who is wrestling over some of
the same concerns that have been brought to the staff by the City's commissions and Council,
they do foster that kind of cooperation together. It can also help staff prioritize improvements
for budgets, too.
Ms. Qualley
stated the last advantage is to poise the City for possible status as a Resilient City.
Being a Resilient City means taking sustainability to the next level and possibly working with
the University of Minnesota in an application to become a Resilient City much like North St.
Paul was two years ago and work on many different areas with specialists from the University of
Minnesota grad programs. One of the steps to really be considered for that program is to become
a Green Step city as well.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 3
Chairperson Kondrick
stated he can see how this is going to be a benefit to the City in many,
many different ways.
Commissioner Saba
asked Ms. Qualley if they have any standard metrics they are using to
compare Fridley to other cities, other programs within itself, and continuous improvement?
Ms. Qualley
replied, there is a spreadsheet that, once you are a member, you get access to,
where you can see what the different cities have achieved in their goals or in their measurements
for different things in terms of something like efficient city fleets or innovative storm water
management. You gain access to comparative data if you become a member. None of the
categories of these 29 Green Step practices are forced down your throat. However, with a
specific metric, the idea is to take your baseline measurements, and then make improvements
based on those. But then how do you determine that benchmark if that is one of Commissioner's
Saba questions, it can be by comparison with cities of similar size which have gone through
some of these exercises.
Chairperson Kondrick
asked, so there is much to be gained by talking to Fridley's sister cities
and see what they have gone through?
Ms. Qualley
replied, exactly. Recycling tonnage, maybe reducing solid waste and trying to
figure out how many tons of garbage is being generated by our City compared to another city can
help us decide whether some of our programs we have constructed are being successful.
Commissioner Sielaff
asked whether there was any interaction between cities like a committee
or something like that who discusses what is being done in the city and working together to
attain some sort of goals?
Ms. Qualley
replied, the program is not constructed necessarily for a group goal type of
situation; but each year the League of Minnesota Cities hosts a group of seminars that are
interactive with the participant cities. For instance, January 14 last year there was one on
efficiency on the streets, complete streets, and outdoor lighting. A specialist came in on LED
lighting to talk about the conversion and where the paybacks would be, and the cities could
weigh in on where they were at or if they had done some test roadway examples and which were
the most successful. Therefore, instead of having to go through the expense and wondering
when the payback was going to be, industry experts along with cities who have tried things were
present and so that type of interaction as opposed to maybe a gathering for a group goal is
probably more likely.
Commissioner Sielaff
asked whether it is the League of Minnesota Cities who is kind of
promoting this and encouraging the cities to do this?
Ms. Qualley
replied they definitely are because they are an active host of the seminars.
However, the Pollution Control Agency is driving some of the metrics and suggesting the best
management practices for cities to try and make sure they are not using more resources than they
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 4
possibly have to. There is a combination of organizations involved like the League of Minnesota
Cities, the Department of Commerce, the Pollution Control Agency, and the Center for Clean
Energy. These groups have produced a nice synergy, and the product is good, but it is not
onerous, and it is not necessary that we meet a certain level of best management practices in any
particular year. There are steps to move up the ladder if we choose to move more quickly. We
can go at our own pace.
Chairperson Kondrick
asked what is the City's B3 Benchmarking Database?
Ms. Qualley
replied that she is not familiar with that and would need to get up to speed on it to
report on in the future. The B3 Database is basically what she referred to earlier where all the
cities track their information when they are reporting on a best management practice they have
achieved. The City has access to that database when it becomes a Green Step city, so it is not
available to read and peruse in the meantime.
Chairperson Kondrick
stated the first step this evening is to go along with this concept to
realize there is a need for this to happen, and they should be aware of what is going on in our
community in terms of conservation. Then how do they go from step one to step two?
Ms. Qualley
stated the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission would be the most
actively involved. Based on measurements or assessments of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the
Active Transportation Plan, and other projects the City is completing, we would pick from and
select things that the City gets credit for, then you can obtain step two status.
Chairperson Kondrick
stated the EQEC is going to be kind of the measuring device, and they
report to the Planning Commission or the Council?
Ms. Qualley
replied, they would report through this Commission.
Chairperson Kondrick
stated through them and then to the City Council.
Julie Jones
, Planning Manager, stated the reason why this resolution is before the Commission
tonight is because she believes from the Charter and the City Code anything that the
Environmental Commission brings forward is to come to the Planning Commission before it
goes onto the City Council. And there is good reason in a project like this procedure exists;
because it could impact future planning.
Commissioner Elford
stated she just encourages passage of this because to her, coming from a
background with a double Master's Degree in environmental studies, someone who has been in
the field and working in corporate sustainability for five years, policies in the environment are
going to get a lot stricter, and this is going to help put Fridley on the route where it is already.
For her it should be pretty straightforward. To be sustainable is common sense. That is just her
generation and her mindset.
Commissioner Sielaff
asked as to what they are voting on, becoming a Green Step City, which
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 5
is allowing them to access the database? He is not sure what specifically best management
practices they are talking about or are they still being developed and eventually they would be
looking at those? We have 28 Best Management Practices right now?
Ms. Qualley
stated and she is sure as Commissioner Sielaff is surmising they will be developed
along the way. They can pick and choose from that just like a menu. Tonight it would be ideal to
move the accompanying draft resolution to Council if the Commission approves of the concept
of pursuing Green Step City, step one status.
Motion
by Commissioner Saba approving the consideration of EQE recommendations to review
and make recommendations for a Green Step Cities resolution. Seconded by Commissioner
Elford.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
2. Receive the Minutes of the June 2, 2014, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting.
MOTION
by Commissioner Sielaff to receive the minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Saba.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. Receive the Minutes of the June 5, 2014, Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Commission Meeting.
OTION
M by Commissioner Sielaff to receive the minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Elford.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OTHER BUSINESS:
4. Update on the TOD Grant Master Plan Project.
Ms. Jones
stated Mr. Hickok has asked her to give them the full report staff did at the open
house a few weeks ago. They did have some public meetings back on July 24. This is a project
they have been working on all year. In the City's TOD area they are encouraging mixed-use
development. The City has actually created a TOD zoning district, and this master plan is
looking at part of that district and creating a master plan for it. In those areas they also look at
creating amenities not only that will support the Northstar Train Station but the other transit
opportunities like the bus transit the City has in that area, creating convenient access to that
transit to allow less parking and have more people walking and biking, and making it safe for
everyone. Also they would like to create a unique sense of identity. Those are some of the
things they are looking at in this master plan project around the Northstar station. The real
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 6
purpose of creating a TOD master plan comes from the fact that the City has this ability to create
a special transit tax increment financing district in this area.
Ms. Jones
stated as new development occurs, tax increment can be used for transit
enhancements in this district. The City wants this plan in place so that the City Council and the
HRA have guidance as to how to use TIF money when it becomes available. Part of that plan is
to create a cohesive network of trails and multi-modal access to transit. Right now everybody
can get there by car but it is not so easy to get there by bus and walking because they have this
train station that got plopped into a fully-developed area without the planning happening over the
years to make those multi-modal connections to it. Staff is also hoping that the master plan will
serve as a guide to developers, showing what the City' has preliminarily approved for a site.
Ms. Jones
stated the City created a TOD overlay zoning district, which is basically Main Street
on over to the river, south of the train station over to the freeway. There are a lot of things that
have happened that are being taken into account on this plan. One of them is the HRA
identifying a redevelopment interest in a multi-family housing area south of Stevenson
Elementary School some years ago. The HRA ended up buying a property that became offered
to them for sale in that area, and they did a market study of the area to look at what could be
developed there. A market study revealed it was going to require millions of dollars more in
subsidy than they were prepared to spend, but they obtained insight into what could be
marketable in the area.
Ms. Jones
stated the City completed its 2030 Comprehensive Plan in 2009. There are many
things in that Plan which involved the TOD area. There was much attention given to Islands of
Peace Park and wanting to create more visible access to that park. The big thing that came out of
the Comprehensive Plan was a need for a 57th Avenue connection over to East River Road.
Ms. Jones
stated the City received special legislation in 2008 to create a Transit TIF district and
in 2009, the Northstar commuter rail station opened. Then, the City created its TOD overlay
zoning district in 2011.
Ms. Jones
stated a big piece of what is being incorporated here is the East River Road Corridor
Study, which was completed a couple of years ago. A lot of neighborhood discussions and
meetings took place during that project to look at how East River Road could be improved. The
main plea the City heard was please keep East River Road more like a parkway. There was a
plan made to put in planted medians in the middle of the roadway, to put in lighting in the area,
and create a five-foot sidewalk on one side and an eight-foot trail on the other side of the
roadway, creating alternative transportation connections.
Ms. Jones
stated that creating a parkway connection into Islands of Peace Park on Island Park
Drive and making it a full intersection out of that neighborhood along the river there rather than
Charles Street became part of the plan. Interestingly the engineer who is working on this project
now thinks differently about that, so that is currently being debated.
Ms. Jones
stated there were a couple of market studies done related to the train station. One of
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 7
them was through a HUD grant which gave them some insight into the fact that there really is
very little market support for commercial areas around the commuter rail station. The reality is
that even though you have commuter rail traffic going at rush hour, in order to sustain a business,
there needs to be traffic other times of the day to support that business. Ms. Qualley was very
instrumental in getting an Active Transportation Plan passed last year, which they are using as
guidance for trail and sidewalk connections.
Ms. Jones
stated they found out at the beginning of the project that the City could not use the
Livable Communities grant money to do anything related to park planning. Luck had it that
Anoka County (who manages Islands of Peace Park - the land is owned by the City but it has a
joint powers agreement with the County to run the park and maintain it) was updating their
master plan for Riverfront Regional Park which includes Islands of Peace Park. They are putting
a master plan together because they wanted to do some improvements to both Riverfront Park
and Islands of Peace down the road. It was kind of good timing that they got together, hired a
consultant, and came up with a plan. A key piece they found in the neighborhood meetings was
that neighborhood to the north of Stevenson Elementary does not have good access to that park
and would like it.
Ms. Jones
stated as far as zoning it really is already a mixed use area. They are not looking at
really changing uses at all as it is already is mixed use. She showed the key map that was
approved in the Active Transportation Plan that kind of shows the different routes of focus for
improvement. One of them is the Safe Routes to Schools which will fund a new trail section
along East River Road. Also the City received Transit for Livable Communities money for on-
street bike lanes and new sidewalk along Main Street. Finally, the City has received Transit
Enhancement grant funds to build a pedestrian bridge over the freeway at Main Street to create
safe access over the freeway and continue the Main Street bike trail concept all the way to the
south border of the City to the bridge that goes over the rail switching yard.
Ms. Jones
stated that the existing sites in the project area west of East River Road contain 604
multi-family housing units. There are seven industrial businesses and two commercial
businesses, Home Depot and Goodwill. From the calculations staff got from those business,
there are 821 jobs in the TOD area. It is an ideal place to for recreation with the amenities of the
parks and River in the area. The housing opportunities and jobs in the area make it a great area
where you can live, work, and recreate all in the same place. The City just has to figure out how
to make it better. Of course there is the train station, too, which is an amenity.
Ms. Jones
explained the debate occurring with the County about stop light spacing and access
connections between the park and future multi-family housing along East River Road.
Ms. Jones
stated that one of the key factors being studied is the potential 57th Avenue
connection. Meetings with Burlington Northern Railroad have revealed a 32 foot height
clearance requirement for new bridges, which makes it impossible to meet ADA slope
requirements within the space available for the bridge connection.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 8
Ms. Jones
stated some money from this project was spent having an engineer look at the bridge
design feasibility. Also, they spent time looking at whether they could tunnel underneath the
railroad tracks in that area. The difficulty they have known all along is that the Metropolitan
Council’s high pressure sanitary sewer line goes through this area and there is not enough
distance between where that is buried and the bottom of the railroad tracks to meet the height
needed for truck traffic. Also, Burlington Northern is planning on spending millions of dollars in
improvements in this area, so they will not allow the City to put any support pillars for the bridge
in their rail right-of-way, which means it would then have to become a suspension bridge, which
doubles the price of the bridge.
Ms. Jones
stated some people asked what if they just put in a pedestrian/bike access, but people
were saying you really need to make it accessible for cars, too, to make it really usable. Staff has
the consultant looking into the feasibility of at least creating a bike/ped access.
Ms. Jones
stated staff has also met with Metro Transit because, as everyone knows, the park and
ride sites are not being used to the capacity they were designed for. Metro Transit staff indicated
that they realize now that they do not need the number of parking stalls they planned in Fridley.
They are agreeable to developing some of that land into some other use and are agreeable to
decking some of that parking if the City wanted to do more intense development there.
Therefore, the City is looking at that on the west side of the tracks which is owned by Metro
Transit and also the east station site, which is owned by the HRA and leased to Metro Transit.
Ms. Jones
stated staff has met with Kapstone Container and Tristar Installation staff, two
industries along the rail line. Both industries would like to expand but have no room to. The
City is keeping them in the plan thinking industry is going to stay along the rail line.
Ms. Jones
stated staff has met with the School District folks a couple of times, looking at what
their needs are. They really would like to have a secondary access at Stevenson for safety
reasons and for better bus traffic circulation. That is why they supported a secondary road going
south of the school, to give them another access point.
Ms. Jones
stated staff has met with the County Highway Department and they will have another
meeting with them now that staff has gotten some more traffic study information.
Ms. Jones
stated as far as the land use concepts, they are really not talking about changing much.
They are looking at one area that could maybe be a live/work building with a parking deck at the
West Train Station.
Ms. Jones
stated they are proposing more looped trails through the park area along the river and
connecting that to the MRT Trail and the concept of having sidewalk and trail in the area close to
the park and connecting that along East River Road.
Ms. Jones
stated staff is analyzing the impacts of proposed new housing units on traffic. On the
east side of the train station site they were looking at 100-160 new housing units or a 60,000-
80,000 square foot industrial building. As far as the site right in front of the Goodwill store they
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 9
see potential for maybe a small fast food restaurant or small retail shop in that corner. They are
still planning for a new parkway concept even if the 57th Avenue bridge does not happen, having
a nice parkway view into the new expanded park and having a park pavilion building in your line
of sight from East River Road.
Ms. Jones
stated as far as new housing in the area west of East River Road, they are seeing a
potential for at least another 130 housing units there.
Chairperson Kondrick
stated the main problem is getting in and out of there.
Ms. Jones
stated that is why the traffic is being closely studied. The intersection to the freeway
entrance has been rated at a Level D, but we have to be careful they do not develop too much
that it makes it worse. The City's traffic engineer who just looked at the traffic analysis again
stated it is only mostly at the afternoon peak rush hour, a very limited time, where those poor
ratings are happening. It is not like an all-day problem. However, a big of piece of this, too, is
the timing of the lights. The City has had some discussions with the County and with MnDOT
(because some of those lights are also controlled by them and they are not working together to
have them timed right), and they have said it is a fairly easy fix.
Chairperson Kondrick
asked about the property east of East River Road and south of the box
company, if it turns out to be industrial or retail, how are those cars going to get in and out?
Ms. Jones
stated it is proposed to be a mix. They had to do a traffic study for their master plan,
and it was concluded they were going to need another turn lane. The City's engineer looked at it,
too, and agreed they will need two left-hand turn lanes coming out of that site.
Ms. Jones
stated they have to wrap up the project by the end of the year. They are tentatively
planning the next round of public meetings on November 5. The City Council and HRA will
probably have some work sessions to take a look at this again. Staff also has materials posted
on the City website.
Commissioner Sielaff
asked whether they will incorporate any changes at the upcoming public
meetings?
Ms. Jones
replied the idea is that the next public meeting will be the presentation of the draft
final master plan. She explained that the draft plan would them come back to the Planning
Commission before they take it to City Council.
ADJOURN:
MOTION
by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Sielaff, to adjourn.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING
ADJOURNED AT 8:10 P.M.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 20, 2014
Page 10
Respectfully submitted by,
Denise M. Johnson
Recording Secretary