The URL can be used to link to this page

PRE 2010 DOCSCity of Fridley, Minn. BUILDING PERMIT �® 4310 02 Date: ....... ..................'................ ....... __ Owner: - - _..... .._............ . ...-----------................. Builder ......... ._..__..._..__....._.__ _.... Address... ....... _............. ........ .... .... ....... _...._.----- __._. ___..._.._.... Address LOCATI N ILDING No. ..... 0? Street ........ ...... -............_......r.. .... _..................................... Part of Lot ..................................._.._..__..._....... .._......._...._._ ® / Lot 3 ................_ Block .........................................-... Addition or Sub -Division.. a11•------ Pl................. Corner Lot ..__........... ......._..._..._.......... Setback z!� �..........?SideyA* ?Inside Lot ... `. ....._............. ..... ..a/- ............... ............. .... ...... Sewer Elevation ------------.e .................. _............. -............. ........................... .......... :. Foundation Elevation .................... .............. _............. ...... .... _-----------_----...._.------ To be Used as: _..�.------•---------- Type of Construction DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING it Front .®s�.7..-.� Depth .-3,;2 ght l f ..- `Sq. Ft. Z�K Front..... -................. Depth ... ........ ............ Height - Sq. Ft. ........ ............ _.. Cu. Ft ...... _............. ... Est. Cost To be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance vvi' T provisj�ns of ordinances of the city of Fridley. �� %f / ` // In consideration of thea p yment of a fee of $,./ ....................... permit is hereby granted to....._......................................... ........... ................ ................................................... to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. Building Inspector NOTICE: This permit does not cover the construction, installation for wiring, plumbing, gas heating, sewer or water. Be sure to see the Building Inspector for separate permits for these items. 4 J E T! Y st t43Z Inv .3575 i,n, J A Vtt iUWX- f MRTIFII THAT THE Aoob& IS A TRUfi CORIffiCT PLAT OF A SUR O/ J Y Udk .3 , Bl0e. ,p., .. Y HPc,6iL PST$ _ e"fi , Nlnn S oug t; v 4,4ke A. CARTWRIGHT. MINNESOTA"LICENSE NO. 1989, HPAOLD P '.SON. MINNESOTA UC ME No. 2989 _Y , Application for Power Plants and Heating, Cooling, Ventilation, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems and Devices PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL Furnace Shell & Duct Work .......................... 8.00 ® 0 Replacement of Furnace ............................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 .................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............... 2.50 $ MECIL WARM AIR Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 120,000 BTU ............ 8.00 $ each add. 60,000 BTU ....................... 2.00 $ Replacement of Furnace ............................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 ................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 .............. 2.50 $ STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...... 8.00 $ Furnace Shell & Line—to 640 sq. ft. IDR Hot Water ... 8.00 $ Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...................... 2.50 $ Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water .................. 2.50 $ OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour ........................ 5.00 $ over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule GAS BURNER (up to 400,000 BTU) ....................... 5.00 $ 0 GAS FITTING FEES: NO RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures ...................... x $1.50 $ Additional Fixtures ................. x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU ........... x 2.00 $ AIR CONDITIONING $ FAN HEATING SYSTEM ((See Fee Schedule VENTILATING SYSTEM ) $ ALTERATIONS &REPAIRS TOTAL FEE19 1 Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SII 4-7470 Lowtion City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Frid] Owner Kind of Building Used as To be completed about Estimated Cost, $ 195- 195- 195— Old—New. Building Permit No. �`� 3 / " DESCRIPTION OF WORE; HEATING or POWER PLANTS—Steam, Hot Water arm No Trade Name `- 0&!!f!T�9--� Size No_ Capacity aao e Ft. E.D.R BTU - H.P. Total Connected Load :349 1�9C:2 Kind of Fuel ' to BURNER — Trade Name _ Size No Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.R I BTU H.P. REMARKS: 11 POST 1M-12-58 FA D•fif ' r v HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS Weatherstrips A.S.H.V.E. Guide nduws( Doors Reference ;=Yo—es— 0 1 19— FI1I Room Length r DEPARTMENT OF Construction No. Width /2— Height Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area / 7 - IHeight No. of Lineal it. Area Ido. of pane of pane lightsof crack sq. tt. b 16 s� s// Z 2 3 e Coef. Btu Coef. Btu a 3 Infiltration � Coef.1 Btu Infiltration l7 a Exp.`wall 9 1010 Glass Net exp. wall 1 Int. wall Int. wall -2-7 YZ Exp. wall Ceiling � (p 1/ v Net exp. wall D6 % -1263 Int. wall Ceiling % C/ qy Floor Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area f I Fl,j %fir Room i Length ,2 --Width /ZHeight� Windows and Doors--Crackage and Area / 7 - Width Heig tNo. oC Lineal it. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. g 1 Coef. Btu Coef. Btu Infiltration Infiltration � $ Glass l7 a Exp.`wall Exp. wall 6 cg/ Net exp. wall! Net exp. wall 1 Int. wall Int. wall Ceiliiig Flood Ceiling � (p Total Btu. I L - Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq, ins. W.A. Leader area 1 FI. AJ r- 2— Roam I Unath 12-- Width -9 Height l° Windows and Doors--Crackage and Area r ! , / . 7.. (� Width Height No. of Lineal It. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. It. 1 Coef. Btu Coef. Btu Infiltration � -49 bog Glass 6 Glass p Exp. wall 6 cg/ Net exp. wall Net exp. wall 1 Int. wall Int. wall Ceiling Floor Ceiling � Int. wall . 1/ Floor Ceiling Floor Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area f s 7 ~14 Insulation i Floor Kind How Applitid s 1 ra, _ RMm I td north 1_ Width CJ :Height Windows and Doors---Craekage and Area r width Height iso. of Ltneal It. Area No. of paa of pane lights of crack eq. ft. D Coef. Btu Coef. Btu Infiltration / STC - Giasa .3 1? 6 Glass Exp. wall cg/ Net exp. wall 1 Int. wall Net exp. wall Ceiling Floor dg ' Int. wall . Total Btu. It 119 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. a ea 1 t+t r 7,. 7, 7, Roam I Length iq Width Height Windows and Doors.--Crackage and Area l o it I°. � 7` Width Height Na of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of gang lights of crack sq. ft. Coef. Btu Infiltration Caer f. Btu Infiltration fv 5 .3 1? 6 Glass Int. wall cg/ Exp, wall 1 - ' Net exp. wall dg ' Int. wall . Ceiling Floor D6 Total Btu. (� Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area m I Rnnm I 1 math Width Height, Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area ' �L oss Width Height No. or Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights or crack sq. ft. Coef. Btu Infiltration Glass Exp. wall Net exp. wall Int. wall Ceiling Floor Total Btu. ft. E.D.R. or so. ins. WA. P City of Fridley Application for Plambing and Gas Fating Permit Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SU 4A DESCRIPTION OF WORK Number, Kind and Location of Fixtures .�y �yy y. a in w Z �a 00 • F • N WATER HTR. GAS ELEG Base 1st 2nd _ 3rd _ 4th • Future Connection Openings New .Fixture, Old Openings Connected with Sewer � Cesspool PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TCOiTA�L� Number Fixtures ...................... x $1.50 $ -� - Future Fixture Opening x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. x 1.00 $ Catch Basin ............................ x 3.25 $ . Water Beater (Up to 200,000 BTU) ...... Z x 2.00 $ New Ground Run Old Bldg. x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50 $ Additional Fixtures .................... x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. x 2.00 $ REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code Description ................................................$ TOTAL FEE $ Location City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do All work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fridley Minn 143 19 AA Owner Kind of Building Used as To be completed about — Estimated Cost, $ Old—New. Building Permit ROUGH (0 -,21 -Ley FINAL - -480-42 z 2M 7-59 Business Phone City of Fridley Application for Plumbing and Gas Fitting Permit Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SU 4-7470 DESCRIPTION OF WORK Number, Kind and Location of Fixtures PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: Number Fixtures ...................... Future Fixture Opening ................ New Fixture Old Opening .............. Catch Basin ............................ Water heater (Up to 200,000 BTU) ...... New Ground Run Old Bldg. ............ NO. RATE TOTAL _ x $1.50 $ x 1.20 $ x 1.00 $ x 3.25 $ x 2.00 $ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL ist 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50 $ Additional Fixtures .................... x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. x 2.00 $ REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code Description................................................$ TOTAL FEE `0 I City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fridley, Minns ig--/ A /1 1 I Owner v Kind of Building �j Used as To be completed about Estimated Cost, $ Old—New. Building Permit No 4k3 0 Permit dl d 'I,— ROUGH FINAL a z 2M 7-59 Business M z _ �j ZZ Z �O , F + N WATER NTR. GAS ELEc 3FS �RF 3 a 3 e��U' Base 1st 2nd _ 3rd 4th • Future Connection Openings Connected with Sewer New Fixture, Old Openings Cesspool El PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: Number Fixtures ...................... Future Fixture Opening ................ New Fixture Old Opening .............. Catch Basin ............................ Water heater (Up to 200,000 BTU) ...... New Ground Run Old Bldg. ............ NO. RATE TOTAL _ x $1.50 $ x 1.20 $ x 1.00 $ x 3.25 $ x 2.00 $ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL ist 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50 $ Additional Fixtures .................... x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. x 2.00 $ REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code Description................................................$ TOTAL FEE `0 I City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fridley, Minns ig--/ A /1 1 I Owner v Kind of Building �j Used as To be completed about Estimated Cost, $ Old—New. Building Permit No 4k3 0 Permit dl d 'I,— ROUGH FINAL a z 2M 7-59 Business M SUBJECT PER City of Fridley 14 _ 18138 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r R E C O. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. �� /'"'1 CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 � ,'j NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910-F15 7/30/85 JOB ADDRESS 200 Liberty Street N.E. 1 LEGALLOT NO. 31,32 BLOCK 6 TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED Spring XX1XXM= Brook Park DESCR. SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Dan Super 200 Liberty Street N.E. 780-1674 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK Ek NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 321 x 24' Detached Garage 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Appeals Commission approved side yard setback from side street to 23 feet instead of 25. Provide a hard surface driveway. WARNING PERMITS SEPARATING,HEERMITS REQUIRE® FOR Before digging call local utilities WIR TEtEyC .ELECTRIC. PLUI�IIRING AND SIGNS. GAS Etc. REQUIRED BY L,4. �/V SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION Z ISTALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $9,361 $4.68 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE DROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $80.50 1TRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALFEE y F $85.18 ' SIGN UR OFCONTRACTORO UTHORIZEDAGENT WHEN PROPE Y VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT -IDATEI 7 ^ C))O SIGNATURE OF OWNERIIFWN UILDERI IDATEI BLDG INSP f1AT NEW [ ] City of Fridley ADDN. I ] tR-1 AND R-2 ALTER. [ ] Building Permit Application Construction Address '2 c) c�) k I b-Q_r _-y_ Effective 4/1/84 Legal Description: L 31 3.�� Owner Name 6 Address: ��^ `� Tel. # d ^ 16 Contractor: ��"� S`' Q _ Tel. # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, With the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length 3 2 Width Height Sq. Ft. 7lr o DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: Corner Lot Inside Lot Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback Type of Construction: // ''[ ll] lN0c,� 9,,0,4-M Estimated Cost: $ Approx. Completion Date: Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ See Back Page for Explanation ,DATE: �0 _ APPLICANT: Tel. # Permit Fee Plan Check State Surcharge SAC Charge Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL STIPULATIONS: CITY USE ONLY Fee Schedule on Reverse Side 25$ of Building Permit Fee $.50/$1,000 Valuation $425 per SAC Unit Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] HARVEY A. CARTWRIGHT ANOKA COUNTY 9URViYOR IIK FIFTH 9T.N.IL GRAws" 711110 MAROLO R. OLSON tAM LITTON A Vi. N. NYLAf1O til>) John Super CARTWRIGHT & OLSON LAND SURVEYORS REGISTwt" MMMM LAWII OF STATE CF %MINNESOTA NCiNsw N CRDINANm .7F CITY OF YINNiAPpLIS 240 miwC JTH NUIL0191a MIOGEPORT 1361 AntbtpWa Clrtifkm —sc. s- 30 � 1 se.s `{�2l ho c' ore- � ► ��q, - L �c-oPa.c- - Aw v-. ,.. COMIUMINC TM[ "=once OF J. L MILL. 9STASLI11M[D tws IIAMOMOwr. IMITAmus"I D two INDUSTRIAL wslN[SS = LAT SURVEYS w,�l L.AIMS HORS PLATTING I v.3575 - A41 -4Y W9 HUMST CCRT/FY THAT THE AMOVE 19 A TRUE CORRECT PLAT OF A SUR V OF ao 1 ti 13 Bloc 6 sS ins Brook Parkt F_ los Cofintyl N1nn sots ' t c ;• v: � 1 j , Ak* . v � _ ��, �a Al • � � _� It • � a - � �[ 4 24 - - az eVZ CARTKRIGHT. MINNESOTA LICKNSE NO 1983, MARCH -0 R 'SON. MIMMCbOTA LICENSE NO. 2039 CITY OF FMOLEY, 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. NB. FRIOLEY, MN. 69431 9612:671-3030 DATE L� APPROVED DISAPPROVED _ DATE NO.________ REQUIRED: rYES APPROVED DISAPPROVEDDATE N0._______ ADDRESS (:!� 00 ) APPEALS COtM4ISSION: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: CITY COUNCIL: STIPULATIONS: � 1?,585 .. SUBJECT VARIANCES NAME �ti-� j� (�-�� FEE C). 6d) RECEIPT No. �s LOT NO. BLOCK NO. TRACT OR ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �t/V ANCE•REQUES Attach plat or survey of property showing building, variances, C etc., where applicable) �°-® a - r �_� e.� 16�o�A Se tion(s) of -the City Code ,% ° Ig6-9 U� List specific hardship(s) which requires the variance(s): DATE S 4S SIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO ' S7 I 3 .r VARIANCES FOR CITY USE ONLY Board members notified of meeting by List Qembers. _ date notified. and "Yes" or Otto" for plans to attend hearing. • Plan Name Date'- To Attend Patricia Gabel -2 Alex •Barna ' JegLterou 6-21 Donald R. Betzold 6-,21 James Plemel 6-21 Person noting appeal and the following property owners having property within 200 feet notified: Name By Whom • ;., Date Phone or Mail Notified - see Attached Sheet 6-14 I • ��\-IVY►•.I�.�,�.in-�- �F�• � •.+� I MAILING LIST Variance 200 Liberty Street John Super Lawrence A. Schmitz Allan D. Rassman 200 Liberty Street 160 Liberty Street 200 Ely Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley,'NN 55432 Scott S. Savage Chris H. Brown Gary Donald -Donna Odland 238 Ely Street 170 Liberty Street 201 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Clarence Godlewski John A. Wozniak Doanld H. Hoff 228 Ely Street 180 Liberty Street 215 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Frain Niznick William E. Super Keith Woods 191 Liberty Street 190 Liberty Street 225 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Dennis Maternowsky Lawrence B. Davis James P. Doody 181 Liberty Street 210 Longfellow Street 229 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Gregg C. Olson Gary Stelton Marvin Hietala 175 Liberty Street 230 Longfellow Street 239 Liberty Street Frdiley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Peter J. Kadlec John G. Jarvi John J. Sowad 2804 30th Avenue South 240 Longfellow Street 201 Longfellow Street Minneapolis, MN 55406 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel B. Steen Gary D. Anderson Mark W. Rhoades 190 Longfellow Street 196 Ely Street 9011 Pierce Street Fridley,.MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432' Minneapolis, MN 55432 MarvinC. Breiland Diana Bradway Terry Erickson 7583 Highway 13 Street 186 Ely Street 231 Longfellow Street Savage, MN 55378 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel D. Weiderholt Robert Flaten Keith A. Severin 197 Longfellow Street 176 Ely Street 243 Longfellow Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Stella M. Yahr Arlo Krueger Robert S. Purdes 187 Longfellow Street 220 Ely Street 261 Longfellow Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432' Fridley, MN 55432 Victoria Zembal Edward D. Bishop Mark J. Wocken 161 Longfellow Street 212 Ely Street 273 Longfellow Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Michael J. Boyer Eugene Graunke Leroy Erdahl 159 Longfellow Street 254 Liberty Street 248 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Samuel Irwin 236 Liberty Street Fridley, NTN 55432 Charles E. Anderson 222 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 Timothy M. Zembal 204 Liberty Street Fridley, MN 55432 3 Mr. Betzold asked Mr. Carroll if he would make provisiono for off-striff arking. Mr. Carroll stated he has never parked on the street as 1 he has lived there. He stated there would be room to park betty th garage and the street. Ms. el asked if the driveway would be hard surfaced. Mr. roll stated t would be blacktopped. Mr. Clark tated all dimensions given are from the prop line and there is a #`4 foot boulevard. He stated two properti cross the street have aizes which are set back 17-1/2 feet. Mr. Plemel stat he didn't feel this is a big p em i Mr. Carroll would be agreeabl,to a 20 foot setback as rec ended b staff. Mr. Carroll stated his would be satisfactory, th him. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, CONDED BY MR. PLEMF; TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V ANG AYE, CHA,; ERSON GABEL DEC ARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:47 P. Mr. Barna stated several vari ces'; ere granted in this area and the petitioner has indicated he woUNA16e willing to settle for a 20 foot setback which he felt would fi, to the neighborhood. Mr. Plemel stated because t'`'e is \.14 foot boulevard, 'e would be willing to allow the varia'` a from th ,required 25 feet t 20 feet. Mr. Betzold stated he i' troubled by the express d by the petitioner. He state to enforce the is situat'on would only make this part `` lar structure sither than others in the immediate are Ms. Gabel state', he was not sure about the hard sh but o move this garage farther ack, it may no longer fit into the `eighb rhood. She stated based,,:` 'n the It neighborhood and bec `''se here is such a large boV ward, she would be agreeable to this vari`'c . MOTION& ;MR. PLEMEL, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO APPROVE E VARIANCE REQUESSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, T\PR THE S YARD SETBACK FOR A DETACHED GARAGE OFF SIDE STRE T FEE 0 20 FEET ON LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 11, THE SAME BEI G1/2 S T, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT A HARD SURFACE DRIVEWAY BED. A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DEC RED THE IED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. VARIANCE 205 OF THE FRIDLEY C TY CODE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 17-1/2 FEET TO 16 FEET OR LIVING AREA; TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 16&ET ET FOR GAR- AGE; TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 36 FEET TO 26 FOR GARAGE; TO INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE FROM 1.818 FEET TO 1.968 FEET ON LOTS 31 AND 32 BLOCK 6, THE SAME BEING 200 LIBERTY STREET (Reque$t by Dan Super, 00 Liberty Street, Fridley, MN 55432) APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 4 MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P. M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 200 Liberty Street N. E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3D.2C.1 requires the side yard width on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than 17-1/2 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" en- croachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.2C.3 requires that any attached or unattached accessory building which opens on the side street, shall be at least 25 feet from the property line of a side street. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also the aesthetic consideration of the neighborhood to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.3a requires a rear yard of not less than 1/4 the lot depth with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Section 205.07.3C requires that not more than 25 percent of the area of a lot shall be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. Public purpose served by this requirement is to eliminate the condi- tion of over crowding of residential areas. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "I would like to buy this house on Lot 31-32, Block 6, Spring Brook Park, and put a 14 by 24 addition on it with a three car garage 24 by 36. I want to keep the addition and garage in line with the house with the roof lines the same so it doesn't look like it's been added onto. I need the extra space on the house because we plan on having more children and we need'the extra living space. The house now is 768 square feet. The garage I need because we have three vehicles, r APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 5 one which gets stored in the winters. If we had a three car garage all the vehicles could be parked in the garage or the driveway and not on the street in front of the house, which would be safer than if on the street. They block the view of on -coming traffic at the corner, children playing can run out from in front of or behind the car and get hit. I know this can happen because it happened to my sister 15 years ago at the same location, my father lives across the street and my grandfather owns this house, he just passed away. This house was appraised for $35,000 in need of a lot of remodeling, in a neighborhood of houses that have values worth $70,000 to $80,000. So with the money and work I want to spend to make this house nice, with an addition and garage remodeling it would have the same value as the rest of the homes in the neighborhood so it would be benefitting the community and me. I have discussed this with the neighbors and they all would like to see improvements. The amount of foot- age we are talking about is so very little, 6 feet in front and 12 feet on the side, and when we get the alley vacated only 6 feet then." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: There is an existing house and detached garage on this lot. The existing house is 16 feet from the side street. The petitioner plans to make extensive improvements on the property which include a 14 x 24 foot house addition and a 36 x 24 foot garage. The City Code does allow the use of one half of an alley for rear yard setback and therefore the petitioner would have a 33 foot rear yard; 4.5 feet less than the required 25 percent of the lot depth. If the garage width could be reduced to 31.5 feet, the petitioner would not need a rear yard variance or a lot coverage variance, if one half of the alley is used for setback and lot area. The setback variance off the side street (Ashton) is necessary to build in line with the existing house. If the Board approves these request, the staff recommends that the Board recommend a hard surface driveway. Mr. Clark presented an aerial photo of the area and pointed out detached garages in the area have setbacks ranging from 22 to 38-1/2 feet. He stated detached garages are allowed to be built three feet from the rear property line, however, attached garages must be ten feet. Mr. Clark stated the -year yard and lot coverage variances could be eliminated if the size of the garage was reduced. Mr. Super stated he changed his plans for the garage and will build a detached, rather than an attached garage, which would reduce the APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 6 request for a variance from the side yard setback from 25 to 23 feet. He stated, however, he still wanted to keep the same size for the garage. , Mr. Super stated he has a hobby vehicle, as well as two other vehicles, and his daughter would be driving in the future, and felt he needed this size garage. Mr. Clark stated, if the garage is detached, the variances needed would be a reduction in the side yard setback from 17-1/2 to 16 feet; a re- duction in the side yard setback from 25 to 23 feet for the garage; and an increase in the lot coverage from 25 to 26 percent, or about 1% over what is allowed. He stated there would not be a need for the rear yard variance. W. Plemel asked Mr. Super if he could get by with a 32 by 24 foot. garage, rather than the 36 foot width. W. Super stated he would really like the larger garage so he can store all his vehicles. W. Plemel stated he felt this was a very large garage for such a small lot. Ms. Gabel stated when there are this many variances requested, it is really overbuilding for the size of the lot. She stated she hoped there could be some compromise and still allow Mr. Super to do the majority of things he wished. Mr. Super submitted a petition signed by residents in his area indi- cating they had no objection to his building plans. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL, TO RECEIVE THIS PETITION DATED NNE 24, 1985. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated the size of the lot may impose a hardship, but felt some of the plans W. Super was attempting may be a self-imposed hard- ship. W. Super stated heintended to apply for vacation of the alley and once this is accomplished, it would add six more feet to his .property. W. Clark stated if one-half of the alley is included in figuring the lot coverage, Mr. Super would be one percent over what is allowed or about 103 square feet. W. Barna asked how much the garage would have to be reduced in order to meet the lot coverage requirements of the code. Mr. Clark stated it probably should be shortened a little more than four feet to make it either 30 or 32 feet. r r APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 7 W. Barna stated builders usually build in four foot sections so felt the garage should either be 32 or 36 feet. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY M. BARNA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:12 P. M. Mr. Plemel stated there is no neighborhood objection to Mr. Super's plans, however, he really didn't feel the size of the garage should be more than 32 by 24 feet on this small lot. Mr. Betzold stated he would concur the plans of the garage should be altered to be consistent with the size of the lot. He felt a garage more than 32 feet is larger than any he has seen in this area. Mr. Barna stated he would be in favor of the 16 foot variance, as well as the 23 foot variance, in order to maintain the continuity of the structure. He stated he can sympathize with the petitioner for wanting more room for his vehicles, however, with this small lot, he would be in favor of a 32 foot wide garage. Ms. Gabel stated she would agree with the variance for the house and garage relating to the setbacks, but thinks the size of the garage is excessive for the lot. She stated she would be in favor of a 32 by 24 foot garage, but not any larger. Ms. Gabel stated the public hearing notice indicates the Appeals Commission would have the final action on this request, unless there is objection from surrounding neighbors, the City staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. Ms. Gabel stated the Commission is willing to approve the variances, with the exception of the size of the garage. Ms. Gabel advised Mr. Super he may concur or otherwise exercise his option to have this request continue to the City Council, through the Planning Commission, with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. Mr. Super stated he would concur with what the Appeals Commission would approve as he wished to get started with his building plans. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED B MR. BETZOLED, TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 17-1/2 FEET TO 16 OR LIVING AREA; TO RE- UCE THE SID TB CK FROM 25 FEET TO 23 FEET FOR GARAGES AND TO THE LOT COVERAGE FROM 2 OF THE o THE CON- STRUCTION OF A 32 BY 24 FOOT DETACHED GARAGE AND A 14 BY 24 FOOT ADDITION TO THE HOUSE ON LOTS 31 AND 3.29 EING 200 LIBERTY STREET, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE DRIVEWAY BE HARD SURFACED-.) UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPEALS_ COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 25. 1985 - PAGE 8 ADJOUR11MENT : NO N BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BX;MR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE" , ALL VOTING AYE, ,CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE JUNE 25, 1985, APPEALS G01 aSSION MEETING"ADJOURNED AT 8:25 P. M. Respectfully su Car a Haddad Recording Secretary June 24, 1985 I would like to build a 14' x 24' addition on to my existing home at 200 Liberty Street. Code calls for 172' frontage and I would have .16' frontage. Which is the same y as the home has at the present time. In addition I would like to build a 24' x 36' unattached garage. The building code requires 25' frontage for a driveway and I would have 23' frontage. After the construction is complete I would be approximately 130 square feet over the -code requirements. If you have no objections to the construction please sign here, so that I may present this to the city council for approval. i •� , A Th you C� r Dan Super Al �Q �v � �F `je-a -�--r S� ✓v � G�" L>11-, / , 6, CCiYOF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue Northeast at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 25 1985 in regard to the following matter: Consideration of a request for variances pursuant to Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback from 172 feet to 16 feet for living area; to reduce the side yard setback from 25 feet to 16 feet for garage; to reduce the rear yard setback from 36 feet to 26 feet for garage; to increase the lot coverage from 1818 feet to 1968 feet on Lots 31 and 32, Block 6, the same being 200 Liberty Street. Notice is hereby given that all persons having an interest therein will be given the opportunity to be heard at the above time and place. PATRICIA GABEL CHAIRWOMAN APPEALS COMMISSION Note: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on this request, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors, the City Staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council through the Planning Commission with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. Item #3, June 25, 1985 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 200 Liberty Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3D.2C.1 requires the side yard width on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than seventeen and one-half feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.2C.3 requires that any attached or unattached accessory building which opens on the side street, shall be at least twenty-five feet from the property line of a side street. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right of way and also the aesthetic consideration of the neighborhood to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.3a requires a rear yard of not less than 1/4 the lot depth with not less than twenty-five feet permitted or more than forty feet required for the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Section 205.07.3C requires that not more than twenty-five percent of the area of a lot shall be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. Public purpose served by this requirement is to eliminate the condition of over crowding of residential areas. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "I would like to buy this house on Lot 31-32, Block 6, Spring Brook Park, and put a 14 by 24 addition on it with a three car garage 24 by 36. I want to keep the addition and garage in line with the house with the roof lines the same so it doesn't look like it's been added onto. I need the extra space on the house because we plan on having more children and we need the extra living space. The house now is 768 square feet. The garage I need because we have three vehicles, one which gets stored in the winters. If we had a three car garage all the vehicles could be parked in the garage or the driveway and not on the street in front of the house, which would be safer than if on the street. They block the view of on -coming traffic at the corner, children playing can run out from in front of or behind the car and get hit. I know this can happen because it happened to my sister 15 years ago at the same location, my father lives across the street and my grandfather own's this house, he just passed away. This house was appraised for $35,000 in need of alot of remodeling, in a neighborhood of houses that have values worth $70,000 to $80,000. So with the money and work I want to spend to make this house nice, with an addition and garage remodeling it would have the same value as the rest of the homes in the neighborhood so it would be benefitting the community and me. I have discussed this with the neighbors and they all would like to see improvements. The amount of footage we are talking about is so very little, 6 feet in front and 12 feet on the side, and when we get the alley vacated only 6 feet then." ,or K C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: There is an existing house and detached garage on this lot. The existing house is 16 feet from the side street. The petitioner plans to make extensive improvements on the property which include a 14, x 24' house addition and a 36' x 24' garage. The City Code does allow the use of one half of an alley for rear yard setback and therefore the petitioner would have a 33 foot rear yard; 4.5 feet less than the required 25 percent of the lot depth. If the garage width could be reduced to 31.5 feet, the petitioner would not need a rear yard variance or a lot coverage variance, if one half of the alley is used for setback and lot area. The setback variance off the side street (Ashton) is necessary to build in line with the existing house. If the Board approves these requests, the staff recommends that the Board recommend a hard surface driveway. MINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY, INC. 2889 LOUISIANA AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 89427 MINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFM AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY, INC. 28D9 LOUISIANA AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 58427 = CITY OF FRIDLEY. COMMISSION APPLICATION MINNESOTA REVIEW owwww/owsmftim ew •Ifoof ANrwee Ov Planning 39 •' Pux No. Aoowces variances wu oATs EAMPLATE REVIEW CHECKLIST 2 sideyard setbacks, 1 rear 5/28/85 PUTLMN TO PLANNING yard setback and lot covera I ®us oATs IQ COMMENTS wl JIM PHIL Lid -I _ - r' - Clvde 10-f"'John 1-7 Leon s-3� 6`9842 STATE OF MINNESOTA APPEALS COKiISSION PROCEEDINGS CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of variance requests on Lots 31ai nd 32, Block 6. Spring Brook Park, the camp hPing 20n I;hPrt" VARIANCE Street N.E. Dan Super , Owner The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on on the 25th day of Jung , 19 85 , on a petition for a variance pursuant to the Cify of Fri ey s Zoning r finance, or the following described property: To reduce the side yard setback from 17 1/2 feet to 16 feet for living area; to reduce the side yard 6etback from 25 feet to 23 feet for garage; to increase the lot coverage from 25% of the area to 25.7% for the construction of a 32 foot by 24 foot detached garage and a 14 by 24 foot addition to the house on Lots 31 and 32, Block 6, Spring Brook Park, the same being 200 Liberty Street. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: See Appeals Commission minutes of June 25, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss. CITY OF FRIDLEY ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk for the City of Friley with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and hve found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at th Ci y of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the 1,00" day of 1985. DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley a 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 SIDNEY C. MAN, CITY CU-jj' -..'° Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and shall..bere,'ar'` considered void if not used within that period.' APPEALS COMYIISSION MEETING, JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Betzold asked Mr. Carroll if he would make provisions for off -s eet parking. Mr. Carroll stated he has never parked on the street as ong as he has lived there. He stated there would be room to park be een the garage and the street. Ms. Gabel asked if the driveway would be hard surfaced. W. Carroll stated it would be blac ktopped. Mr. Clark stated all dimensions given are from the prop ty line and there is a 14 foot boulevard. He stated two properti across the street have garages which are set back 17-1/2 feet. It. Plemel stated he didn't feel this is a big pr lem if Mr. Carroll would be agreeable to a 20 foot setback as recd ended by staff. Mr. Carroll stated this would be satisfactory ith him. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. PLEME , TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHA RSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:47 P. M. Mr. Barna stated several variances ere granted in this area and the petitioner has indicated he would a willing to settle for a 20 foot setback which he felt would fit nto the neighborhood. Mr. Plemel stated because th a is a 14 foot boulevard, he would be willing to allow the varian a from the required 25 feet to 20 feet. Mr. Betzold stated he is troubled by the hardship expressed by the petitioner. He stated he/ enforce the code in this situation would only make this partic lar structure sit back farther than others in the immediate area. Ms. Gabol --tate3 a was not sure about the hardship, but to move this garage farther ack, it may no longer fit into the neighborhood. She stated based the surrounding neighborhood and because there is such a large bou vard, she would be agreeable to this variance. MOTION B MR. PLEMEL, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUES SUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE S E YARD SETBACK FOR A DETACHED GARAGE OFF SIDE STREET FROM 25 FEE TO 20 FEET ON LOTS 14 AND 15, BLOCK 11, THE SAME BEING 4604 2-1/2 S ET, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT A HARD SURFACE DRIVEWAY BE PRMTIDED. PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. `VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER _205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, fi0 ,REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 17-1/2 FEET TO 16 FEET FOR LIVING AREA; TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 16 FEET FOR GAR- AGE TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 36 FEET TO 26 FEET FOR G APRT_; TO INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE FROM 1,818 FEET TO 1,968 FEET ON LOTS 31--- AND 1-AND 32 BLOCK 6, THE SAME BEING 200 LIBERTY STREET (Request by Dan Super, 00 Liberty Street, Fridley, MN 55432) • APPEALS COKMISSION MEETING, NNE 25, 1985 PAGE 4 MDTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P. M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 200 Liberty Street N. E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3D.2C.1 requires the side yard width on a street side of a corner lot to be not less than 17-1/2 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" en- croachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.2C.3 requires that any attached or unattached accessory building which opens on the side street, shall be at least 25 feet from the property line of a side street. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also the aesthetic consideration of the neighborhood to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.3a requires a rear yard of not less than 1/4 the lot depth with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Section 205.07.3C requires that not more than 25 percent of the area of a lot shall be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. Public purpose served by this requirement is to eliminate the condi- tion of over crowding of residential areas. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "I would like to buy this house on Lot 31-32, Block 6, Spring Brook Park, and put a 14 by 24 addition on it with a three car garage 24 by 36. I want to keep the addition and garage in line with the house with the roof lines the same so it doesn't look like it's been added onto. I need the extra space on the house because we plan on having more children and we need the extra living space. The house now is 768 square feet. The garage I need because we have three vehicles, 1 APPEALS COMMISSION FETING, JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 5 one which gets stored in the winters. If we had a three car garage all the vehicles could be parked in the garage or the driveway and not on the street in front of the house, which would be safer than if on the street. They block the view of on -coming traffic at the corner, children playing can run out from -in front of or behind the car and get hit. I know this can happen because it happened to my sister 15 years ago at the same location, my father lives across the street and my grandfather owns this house, he just passed away. This house was appraised for $35,000 in need of a lot of remodeling, in a neighborhood of houses that have values worth $70,000 to $80,000. So with the money and work I want to spend to make this house nice, with an addition and garage remodeling it would have the same value as the rest of the homes in the neighborhood so it would be benefitting the community and me. I have discussed this with the neighbors and they all would like to see improvements. The amount of foot- age we are talking about is so very little, 6 feet in front and 12 feet on the side, and when we get the alley vacated only 6 feet then." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: There is an existing house and detached garage on this lot. The existing house is 16 feet from the side street. The petitioner plans to make extensive improvements on the property which include a 14 x 24 foot house addition and a 36 x 24 foot garage. The City Code does allow the use of one half of an alley for real• yard setback and therefore the petitioner would have a 33 foot rear yard; 4.5 feet less than the required 25 percent of the lot depth. If the garage width could be reduced to 31.5 feet, the petitioner would not need a rear yard variance or a lot coverage variance, if one half of the alley is used for setback and lot area. The setback variance off the side street (Ashton) is necessary to build in line with the existing house. If the Board approves these request, the staff recommends that the Board recommend a hard surface driveway. it. Clark presented an aerial photo of the area and pointed out detached garages in the area have setbacks ranging from 22 to 38-1/2 feet, He stated detached garages are allowed to be built three feet from the rear property line, however, attached garages must be ten feet. Mr. Clark stated the rear yard and lot coverage variances could be eliminated if the size of the garage was reduced. Mr. Super stated he changed his plans for the garage and will build a detached, rather than an attached garage, which would reduce the APPEALS COr!MISSION MEETING. JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 6 request for a variance from the side yard setback from 25 to 23 feet. He stated, however, he still wanted to keep the same size for the garage. Mr. Super stated he has a hobby vehicle, as well as two other vehicles, and his daughter would be driving in the future, and felt he needed this size garage. Mr. Clark stated, if the garage is detached, the variances needed would be a reduction in the side yard setback from 17-1/2 to 16 feet; a re- duction in the side yard setback from 25 to 23 feet for the garage; and an increase in the lot coverage from 25 to 26 percent, or about 1% over what is allowed. He stated there would not be a need for the rear yard variance. Mr. Plemel asked Mr. Super if he could get by with a 32 by 24 foot garage, rather than the 36 foot width. Mr. Super stated he would really like the larger garage so he can store all his vehicles. Mr. Plemel stated he felt this was a very large garage for such a small lot. Ms. Gabel stated when there are this many variances requested, it is really overbuilding for the size of the lot. She stated she hoped there could be some compromise and still allow Mr. Super to do the majority of things he wished. W. Super submitted a petition signed by residents in his area indi- cating they had no objection to his building plans. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL, TO RECEIVE THIS PETITION DATED NNE 24, 1985. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIrUUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated the size of the lot may impose a hardship, but felt some of the plans Mr. Super was attempting may be a self-imposed hard- ship. Mr. Super stated heintended to apply for vacation of the alley and once this is accomplished, it Mould add six more feet to his.property. W. Clark stated if one-half of the alley is included in figuring the lot coverage, Mr. Super would be one percent over what is allowed or about 103 square feet. Mr. Barna asked how much the garage would have to be reduced in order to meet the lot coverage requirements of the code. Mr. Clark stated it probably should be shortened a little more than four feet to make it either 30 or 32 feet. ' APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 7 Mr. Barna stated builders usually build in four foot sections so felt the garage should either be 32 or 36 feet. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:12 P. M. Mr. Plemel stated there is no neighborhood objection to Mr. Super's plans, however, he really didn't feel the size of the garage should be more than 32 by 24 feet on this small lot. Mr. Betzold stated he would concur the plans of the garage should be altered to be consistent with the size of the lot. He felt a garage more than 32 feet is larger than any he has seen in this area. Mr. Barna stated he would be in favor of the 16 foot variance, as well as the 23 foot variance, in order to maintain the continuity of the structure. He stated he can sympathize with the petitioner for wanting more room for his vehicles, however, with this small lot, he would be in favor of a 32 foot wide garage. Ms. Gabel stated she would agree with the variance for the house and garage relating to the setbacks, but thinks the size of the garage is excessive for the lot. She stated she would be in favor of a 32 by 24' foot garage, but not any larger. Ms. Gabel stated the public hearing notice indicates the Appeals Commission would have the final action on this request, unless there is objection from surrounding neighbors, the City staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. Ms. Gabel stated the Commission is willing to approve the variances, with the exception of the size of the garage. Ms. Gabel advised Mr. Super he may concur or otherwise exercise his option to have tLis request continue to the City Council, through Ehe Planning Commission, with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. Mr. Super stated he would concur with what the Appeals Commission would approve as he wished to get started with his building plans. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED B MR. BETZOLED, TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 17-1/2 FEET TO 16 FEET FOR LIVING AREA; TO RE- DUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 23 FEET FOR GARAGE; AND TO INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE FROM 25% OF THE AREA TO 25.7% FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A 32 BY 24 FOOT DETACHED GARAGE AND A 14 BY 24 FOOT ADDITION TO THE -HOUSE ON _LOTS 31 AND 32, BLOCK 6, THE SAME BEING 200 LIBERTY STREET, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE DRIVEWAY BE HARD SURFACED.- UPIN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. moo "SPW PiH< APPEALS COM."SISSION MEETING, JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 8 '( ,I -h ADJOURNMENT: K N. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE JUNE 25, 1985, tnrt(D APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:25 P. M. Uk &< 1p WRespectfully submitted, m Carole Haddad Recording Secretary w VJ 00 N !'S `�+' rm C C -J O to ii g rn D Q o s rn M a� a kti 71 00 CITY OF FRIDLEY PERMI O.: 2004-01002 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FMLEY, MN 55432 DATE IS 8/2004 572-3604 FAX: (763)571-1287 ADDRESS : 200 LIBERTY ST NE PIN : 033024420074 LEGAL DESC : UNAVAILABLE : LOT BLOCK PERMIT TYPE : BUILDING PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : DECK VALUATION : $ 2,980.00 NOTE: SEE NOTATIONS ON PLAN. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE AT 651454-0002 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. CONSTRUCT A 10'X 24' DECK. APPLICANT BUILDING PERMIT FEE 83.25 STEFFENS JOHN G PLAN CHECK FEE 54.11 200 LIBERTY ST NE FIRE SURCHARGE 2.98 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 STATE SURCHARGE, VALUE 1.49 TOTAL 141.83 PAID WITH CHECK # 7472 G]:%M0 STEFFENS JOHN G 200 LIBERTY ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 60 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 120 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be co pied with whether specified herein or not. The granting o it j esume to give authority to violate or c 1 theof any other state or local law regulating c tie ormance of construction. • Ap is Date Bldg Insp' Dae `-)-7 t d CRPAR ATF PRRMTTC RFfNTTR'Pn POR W(1RK OTNRR THAN T1PRr.RTRRrI AROW NEW [ l Effective 1/1/2001 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY (763) 572-3604 Bldg Insp ALTER [) SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Construction Address: L/ r` t - �i-r !p�4�v Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: Tel. #C-`7(o?S) -MOL-453a T� 5 Contractor:, , �� MN LICENSE # -- Address: Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length 10 " Width 914-1 Hgt/GroundP[ Sq. Ft OTHER: /cif- 1W s Construction Type: Estimated Cost: $ Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ _ $ DATE: G APPLICA Tel. #� 9'433� (6pl� `7?/-17Sa CITY USE ONLY - Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge Driveway Escrow Erosion Control Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL STIPULATIONS: Call (763) 572-3604 for Permit Fees if mailing in application $ Fee Schedule on Reverse Side --- $' .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $ c > $.50/$1,000 Valuation $ A 9 $1150 per SAC Unit $ — ®--' $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review $ Fee Determined by Engineering $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ]