Loading...
PRE 2010 DOCSCity of Fridley, Minn. BUILDING PERMIT Date: ' "..'--•-.►� Owner:' Address Builder Address — CAT N OF� !,9 G No. VIP, Street JU Part ------ _T__ _ Lot _ Block ition or Sub -Division" K -+► Corner Lot ---- Inside Lot .— ._ Setback -- deyard Sewer Elevation Foundation Elevation . DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To Used Front Depth AboHeight ,._. Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft.:AV47 FLv!t Depth Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction` Est. CostCos7LVJ o be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with all provisions of ordinancce of the city of Fridley. , 4QV . In consideration of the payment of a fee of $06, , permit is hereby granted to to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon e express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, pair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violo of any of the provisions of said ordinances. wR. „ r! Building Inspector NOTICE: This permit does not cover the construction, installation for wiring, plumbing, gas beating, sewer or water. Be sure to see the Building Inspector for separate permits for these Items. 4 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Owner's Name Builder Address LOCATION OF BUILDING No. Street Part of Lot Lot Block Addition or Subdivision Corner Lot Inside Lot Setback Side -Yard SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and.proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To used as: F Front Depth Height _ Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction To be Completed Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Estimated Cost The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for-thework herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representatiq9s. stated in this app tion are true and correct. ��=� ,ems DATE SIGNATURE (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). City of Fridley Application for Plumbing and Gas FlMng Pern dt Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SU 4-7470 DESCRIPTION OF WORK ind and Location of Fixtures PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTA Number Fixtures ......................� x $1.50 $ 4, 48) Future Fixture Opening x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. x 1.00 $ Catch Basin ...... ..................... x 3.25 $ Water Heater (Up to 200,000 BTU) ...... x 2.00 $��� New Ground Run Old Bldg. ............ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL jJ 1st 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50---F-s-�� Additional Fixtures .................... x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. x 2.00 $ REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code Description ................................................ TOTAL. OTAL FF:E City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby .makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this applica on are true and correct. Owner Kind of Building Used as To be completed about Estimated Cost, $ Old—New. Building Permit No NIZI— -2 Permit No. = Signe--- By Business Phone No - ROUGH -1: o- y-z6-c�-c-v gam6/ ROUGH J .: sZ 3 - 7— FINAL 4z 2M 7-59 g Z • • WATER HTR. O F N GAS ELEG Base �1 i ist 2nd _ 3rd _ 4th • Future Connection Openings I Connected with Sewer � New Fixture, Old Openings Cesspool PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTA Number Fixtures ......................� x $1.50 $ 4, 48) Future Fixture Opening x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. x 1.00 $ Catch Basin ...... ..................... x 3.25 $ Water Heater (Up to 200,000 BTU) ...... x 2.00 $��� New Ground Run Old Bldg. ............ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL jJ 1st 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50---F-s-�� Additional Fixtures .................... x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. x 2.00 $ REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code Description ................................................ TOTAL. OTAL FF:E City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby .makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this applica on are true and correct. Owner Kind of Building Used as To be completed about Estimated Cost, $ Old—New. Building Permit No NIZI— -2 Permit No. = Signe--- By Business Phone No - ROUGH -1: o- y-z6-c�-c-v gam6/ ROUGH J .: sZ 3 - 7— FINAL 4z 2M 7-59 Application for Power Plants and Heating, Cooling, Ventilation, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems and Devices PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL Furnace Shell & Duct Work .......................... 8.00 $ Replacement of Furnace ............................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 .................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............... 2.50 $ MECH. WARM AIR Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 120,000 BTU ............ 8.00 $ each add. 60,000 BTU ....................... 2.00 $ Replacement of Furnace ............................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 ................. 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............ 2.50 $ STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam ..... 8.00 $ 8 ? 0 Furnace Shell & Line—to 640 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water ... 8.00 $ Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...................... 2.50 $ Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water .................. 2.50 $ OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour ......................... 5.00 $ over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule GAS BURNER (up to 400,000 BTU) ....................... 5.00 $ S > o GAS FITTING FEES: NO RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures ...................... x $1.50 $ /-JrQ Additional Fixtures ................. x .50 '$ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU ........... x 2.00 $ AIR CONDITIONING $ FAN HEATING SYSTEM See Fee Schedule VENTILATING SYSTEM $ ALTERATIONS & REPAIRS TOTAL FEEL r a ROUGH ��FINAL Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SII 4-7470 t_....vaa.... • 71 City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application Me true and correct. Fridley, Minn 19 � Z Owner�'� Kind of Building- Used as — � To be completed about o® Estimated Cost, $ (0 Old Ne . Building Permit No. O Permit No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK HEATING or POWER of Wa , Warm Air—No F Trade Name_4Size No U 6 Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.R- BTU H.P. Total Connected Load Kind of Fue BURNER —Trade Name Size No Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.R BTU H.R (REMARKS—OVER) onarl In By X48 2M Business Phone No 0-/7/0 16A September 8, 1975 0 LO M Mr. Edmond J. Bristol CD 133 West Lexington Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701 N cc Re: 1963 Ford Truck with License #YD 21403 Parked at -289 Liberty Street N.E., N a residential district of the City of Fridley M t L Dear Mr. Bristol: -It was brought to the City's attention and verified by an on site inspection w on July 16, 1975 that you were maintaining the above listed truck in the City z of Fridley. In response to this department's letter dated July; 1975, you decided to currently license said truck instead of removing it from this residential district. LU J At this time I must now advise you that Section 506.04 of the City Code c states that, "It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation owning, LL ® driving, or in charge of any bus, motor truck, truck, tractor, or commercial vehicle to cause or permit the same•to be parked or stand longer than 24 hours q in any residential district". The purpose being to restrict any commercial U' activities, in a residential district, thereby providing a more conducive M F- environment for living. Ca - Therefore, the City must require you to.remove said vehicle to a more M appropriate parking spot or as a minimum move the truck at least once in a L w 24 hour period. A member of the Cit staff will be conducting a reinspection on or about �. Y g P H ten (10) days from the date of this letter to determine compliance. We are 03 confident in your cooperation with regard to this matter and if any questions > or problems arise please feel free to call on me at 571-3450. Z D Sincerely, M cc LU ' STEVER J. MOON W Erivironmen fficer v U > SJO/mh V 5k+aCITY OF FRODLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)571-3450 July 17, 1978 Mr. Randall Spencer 289 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Re:. Depositing of Grass Clippings & Yard Wastes in the Alley Right of Way Dear Mr. Spencer: It was brought to the City's attention and confirmed by an on site inspection on July 14, 1978 that the unimproved alley right of way in the 200 block between Ely Street and Liberty Street N.E., Fridley was being used as a depositors► for adjacent property owner's grass clippings and yard wastes. Section 113.12, Refuse Disposal, of the Fridley City Code, prohibits the disposal of any grass clippings, yard wastes, or any refuse on the public right of way. In addition, it is the adjoining property owner's responsibility to maintain any unimproved alley right of way. Therefore, the City must require you to clean and maintain your property and the adjoining right of way free of all grass clippings and yard wastes found there. We are confident in your cooperation and desire to make Fridley a better community to live in. I£ any questions or problems result from this letter, please contact me at 571-3450. Sincerely, Jel STEVEN OLSON Environmental Officer S JO/mh 01, SUBJECT City of Fridley �' 5 6G AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS B U I L D I N G P E R M I T r RECEIPT N I L `L _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. INSPECTION SEC. r PROTECTIVE 1 ' i 1 ,"'1 CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY I,J 612-571-3450 910-F15 6/6/80 JOB ADDRESS 289 Liberty Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 3,4 Spring Brook Park SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Warren M. Stock 289 Liberty Street N.E. 784-9745 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION l ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Reside house and install escape windows 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS SEPERA-TE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR I "EATING, 9LUMBING AND SIGN. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $2,200 $1.10 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $15.00 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $16.10 RE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IDATEI N - V\FHEN PROPERLY V ATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT � -(0 aSiGNATUREO-FOWNER BLDG INSP DATLF ER BUILDERI IDATEI 01, CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR RESIDMTIAL BUILDING PERMITS (Neer, Alterations, Additions, or Repairs) ADDRESS:TEL NO: --A�SLk-R—t�� BUILDER: ADDRESS: TEL NO: Construction Location STREE, T N0: ��1' STREET: � A3e, -f LOT: �- BLOCK: ADDITION: Corner Lot: Insiae. Lot: Setback.: Sideyards: Applicant attach to this form two Certificates of Survey of lot and proposed building location drawn on certificates to scale. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION Front: Square.Feet: Depth: : H eight : Cubic Feet: Front: Depth: Height: Square - Feet: Cubic Feet: s Type of Construction: S Estimated Cost: $ To Be Completed: U Alt. A Alt. B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ SEL' REVERSE SIDE OF SHEET alie undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work' herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE:. LQ -�Q- �y SIGNATURE: Stipulations: r SUBJECT City of Fridley 16.5.0.9 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT rp REC ______ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. ~ r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. JC CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 1.j NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910-F15 3/31/82 JOB ADDRESS 289 Liberty St. N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 3,4 11 Spring Brook park SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE Warren Stock 289 Liberty St. N.E. Fridley _ 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Owner 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW IN ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 6 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 24' X 26" detached garage. 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Brovide a h.ardsurface driveway within one year. Use a treated bottom plate. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. Wood Frame THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION R 1 OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $5,896.80 2 $ 95 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT . DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $56.50 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALFEE $59.45 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORI ED GEN (DATE)EN _ X31 PROP VA ED IS IS YOUR PERMIT - BLDG INSP DATE SIGNATURE OF OW NER OF OWN RBUILDERI IDATEI CITY OF FRIDLEY Effective Aug. 1, 1981 APPLICATI94 FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS (New, Alterations, Additions, or Repairs) OWNER: •�j ADDRESS: � ' 0& -1y TEL NO: L5% BUILDER: ADDRESS: 5-6grn f - TEL NO: p Construction Location STREET NO: 0�0 STREET: 447 e,' 7�y LOT: '3BLOCK: ADDITION: leac)& 110�32/� Corner Lot: Inside Lot: (/ Setback.: Sideyards: Applicant attach to this form two Certificates of Survey of lot and proposed building location drawn on certificates to scale. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION o�4e 5fell Front: ����� Square. Feet: Depth: Height: Cubic Feet: • Front: Depth: Height: Square - Feet: Cubic Feet: Type of Construction: �(_) o o o 15— Estimated Cost: $ �d To Be Completed: 7TU - � �z Alt. A Alt. B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ SEE REVERSE SIDE OF SHEET . Mie undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work -herein specified, agreeing to co,all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: �/ O �a SIGNATURE: e��� �f• Stipulations: y� .�U Z,SQ0 Lot and Form Surveys Construction Surveys DONALD It. CAMPBELL Yana .Su-weyo% Registered under Laws of the State of Minnesoto I 1315 FROST AVENUE — ST. PAUL 9, JINN. Phone: SPring -6565 4 SU VEYOR'S CE RTIFICATE 1 Topographic Surveys Subdivision Design and Platting 2�{ r C'jJ.. I "he reby "certify that- this is s: tra-ud correct repro se>iiation -of a sarvey of the boundaries of: Lots yA 40 Block 110 Spring Brook Park, Village of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 2Tth day of December 1461 A.D. Survey for: Maynard Bassmuseea Signed: rt- up SUBJECT P City of Fridley17:5 7 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r RECEIP ` • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. � y_-_____ r � PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 � = CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATEP AGE OF APPROVED BY L 612-571-3450 910-F15 5/24/84 JOB ADDRESS 289 Liberty STreet N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 314 11 Spring Brook Park SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Warren Stock 289 Liberty Street N.E. 784-7659 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION [i ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct 16' x 10' Porch over Deck 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS :SEPERATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WIRING, HEATING, PLUMRI'NG AND SIGNS4 TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS WFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $1.40 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $2,800 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $38.50 None PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALFEE $9.63 $49.53 SIGATUREOFCONTRACTOR ORALIT AGENT IDATEI WHEN PROPERL VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT ` 41 'SIGNATURE ,BLDG INSP ATE O� IIF 0 R BUILDERI IDATEI up NEW [ ] City of Fridley Effective 4/1/84 ADDN. [ ] �R-1 AND R-2 ALTER. L 7 Building Permit Application Construction Address: �'� �'✓%�; S� �iF'if/.� Legal Description: � In ..min a JZO6- Tel. # Owner Name & Address: u �N� Contractor: Tel. # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length /6 , Width /0 Height ., Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [A Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback Type of Construction: Poce C9 Estimated Cost: $ -Mwwnw'!�� Zgora.dv Approx. Completion Date: Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ See Back Page for Explanation DATE: 51-.26 3" APPLICANT: iC te-Reo stoce Tel. # ;2g�57 Permit Fee Plan Check State Surcharge SAC Charge Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL STIPULATIONS: CITY USE ONLY $ g.+�V Fee Schedule on Reverse Side $ 25$ of Building Permit Fee $ $.50/$1,000 valuation $ ® $425 per SAC Unit $ -- Fee Determined by Engineering $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] Gr� I 3 M CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE RESIDENTIAL Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner (Also replacement furnace) Gas Piping (piping needed with new furnace) Gas Range Gas Dryer • Air Conditioning (all sizes) AIL Others/Repairs and Alterations It of Value of Appliance or Work COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL if of Value of Appliance or Work Effective Aug. 1. 1981 State Surcharge TOTAL !EE Reinspection Fee ($15.00) Rough Insp. Date d---&- / Final Insp. v[ & - a Date Approval for Permit 14-1 MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $10.00 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE USED AS !/L,&.'& --&--N/ -/ RATE TOTAL Job Address $ 20.00 $ Department of Building a 6431 University Ave. N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 ESTIMATED COST $ City of Fridley $ 10.00 $ Tel. 4571-3450 $ 10.00 $ The undersigned hereby maked application for a permit for the work herein DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE/BURNER specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes $ 10.00 $ and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the Capacity Sq. Ft. EDR BTU NP facts and representations stated in this application ar_e a and correct. Total Connected Load Kind of Fael Fridley, n � _ h . 1 $ 10.00 $�G� . I OWNER S KIND OF BUILDING., State Surcharge TOTAL !EE Reinspection Fee ($15.00) Rough Insp. Date d---&- / Final Insp. v[ & - a Date Approval for Permit 14-1 MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $10.00 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE Attach stack verification form with replacement furnace permits *Air Conditioners can not ba- placed in side- yard without written pu mission from adjoining neighbor. Capacity Sq. Ft. EDR STU HP Company Signed By Tel. No. USED AS !/L,&.'& --&--N/ -/ — COMPLETED ESTIMATED COST $ OLD - MEM BUILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT No. `f & $ DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE/BURNER HEATING or POWER PLANTS, Stem, Not Nater, Man Air- No. Trade Name Size No. Capacity Sq. Ft. EDR BTU NP Total Connected Load Kind of Fael BURNER - Trade Name Size No. Attach stack verification form with replacement furnace permits *Air Conditioners can not ba- placed in side- yard without written pu mission from adjoining neighbor. Capacity Sq. Ft. EDR STU HP Company Signed By Tel. No. City of Fridley SUBJECT �% 2 0 3 6 4 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT 1 ? REC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. 1 v PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 3� 3e' r 1 � 1 . � NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY i ,.j CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 ---- ,� L „ 612-571-3450 910415 5/17/90 JOB ADDRESS 289 Liberty Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 3,4 11 1 Springgook Park SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Warren Stock 289 Liberty Street 784-7659 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW E]k ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK 14 Construct a, I&k' x 26 r Garage Addition 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS s WARNING Before digging. Call for �`� all Utility locations 454-0002�j�G REQUIRED BY LAVA �No�� TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES VALUATION SURTAX AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED N $5,416 `M)n $2.71 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- )&W�= $81.00 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE *VA- $83.71 AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE) VAIEN PROPERLY IDAT THIS IS YOUR PERMIT ZSIGATUREOFCONTRAC BLDG INSP GATE SIGNATURE OF OWNER OF OWNER BUILDERI IDATEI NEW [ ] Effective 1/1/90 ADDN [ ] R-1 AND R-2 ALMR [ ] Building Permit Application Construction Address: Zldk-, �y X571 /;Z Ill y Legal Description: L�pTs 0 6 Owner Name & Address: Tel. Contractor: L' Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lomat,, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. "� 6 A , j � SON OF IlUTIOVEMM �-r ti 'v 4, 1798 LIVIIJG =Z*Lex�igth Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE a Width Height Sq. Ft. DBM AREA: Length Width Hgt/GroLu-d Sq. Ft. GMM: Corner lot [ ] Inside Lot M Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks /r Type of Construction: e j oyo /;MM C Estimated Cost: $ W� Approx. C c npletion Date: a t,N e- 1,5 ! bio Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: Ft. $ $ !� Width + 6' See Back Page DATE: 5/7/fd APPLICANT:/�',;/� Tel. # 7f`�-7G.f9 CITY USE OMY C3/ OU Permit Fee $ - Fee Schedule on Reverse Side State Surcharge $ r,7.7/ $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $600 per SAC Unit Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] s Lot sand Fare Surreys Construeftn Surreys DONALD- R. CAMPBELL land Suwzyoz !legifersd ender Lave of do Stoh of ALinnesoto I 1315 FROST rVIENUE — ST. PAUL 9, INN. 1; Phone: Spring -6565 SY YETOR'S CE TIFICATE i 1 �1' C zz 1.-41 4 Topographic Surreys SabdWition Design and Planting —`—T or* dortiry %US Sin Us if tra WE wwtct a surrey of tbs bouadariee of: Lots V11 h. block U. Spring Brook Pari, Village of Fridley. Anoka Conntys Mmosota ani of the location of all buildings, if my, thereon, and all visible enaroacbmmts, if any, tram or oa said land. As sw"eyed by ow this 27th &a of December 1961 A.D. Surrey for: 11>bylard ss►asga • _ _ .'.�[SY "YfiF�9�Ki 2c 4ti 'i:x%5$�!i'-i tzrfa.aC$Mi'i.�tS�}.`iTR'4 BiM!„u': - i r (*02 N nx Q'/ e z),q .7v Lc) ACA.)f&a Y t F 91(hxe) r® jofv Cyr& SUBJECT PERMIT NO. City of Fridley 210 7 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT T NO. 16COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. Jy/ r 1 CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 ''j NUMBER REV.DATE PAGE OF APPROVED By 612-571-3450 910-F15 9/24/91 JOB ADDRESS 289 Liberty. Street NE. 1 LEGALLOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 3, 4 11T Spring Brook Park Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTYOWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Warren/Gerry Stock 289 Liberty Street NE 784-7659 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW �f7 ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 20t x 10t ,addition to House 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Variance approved 9/9/91 to increase lot coverage to 260. WARNING PARA TE PERMITS REQUIRE© FOR WIRING, HEATING, PLUMBING AND SIGNS. Before digging call for all utility locations 454-0002 REQUIRED BY LAW TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES VALUATION SURTAX AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $10,536 $5.27 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $1 26.00 Fire SC $10.54 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $141.81 EOF CO ACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IDATEI WHEN PROPERLY VALI TED THIS IS YOUR PERMITy�+ �SIGNATU ' �2f_/ / c 6 DG NSP GATE SIGNATURE OF OWNER iiF OWNER BUILDER? iDATEi MW I ] Effective 1,/1/91 ADM [ ] R-1 AMID R-2 AIR [ ] Building Permit Application CM tructian Address: Legal Description: (4%`. Owner Name & Address: 4A46,Lac, Tel. Ctntractoar : rc114- Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed amistruction drawn on it to scale. LE�«iTPTIQQ of Ina 117 LTVIM AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. c G ORRAM AM: length Width Height Sq. Ft. IS= AMM: I,engrth Width Hgt/Grcund Sc Ft. Olt: Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot M Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks ZYpe of Cm truction: 6Vcuo f2&,,. a Estimated Oust: $- '41 Approx. Om pletion Date: Proposed Driveway Width If New opening Is Desired: Ft. $ $ C Width + 6' See Back Page DATE: ® � �� APPLICANT: � Permit Fee $ l Z . z2D Fire surcharge $ tLl- State Surdharge S a!d 22 SAC Charge $ Driveway Escrow $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main Charge $ S`I'IPUTA'I'ICNS: Fee Sdhe&de on iaeverse Side .001 x Permit Valuation (1/10th $) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $650 per SAC Unit Alt. "A" oar Alt. "B" Above Fee Determined by Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIV. Effective On January 1, 1991 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, 572-3604 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner - Also Replacement Furnace Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace) Gas Range Gas Dryer Rate TOTAL $ 20.00 $ $ 10.00 $ $ 10.00 $ $ 10.00 $ *Air Conditioning - All Sizes $ 10.00 $ All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK) 1 % of Value of Appliance or Work $ .17 Commercial/industrial 1 % of Value of Appliance or Work State Surcharge TOTAL FEE JOB ADDRESS 08? '57- The undersigned hereby makes ,application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the city codes and ruling of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this$pplication are true and correct. tea- z ,199z. OWNER UJ A-Q�&O S�12!�=k BUILDING USED AS 5 ESTIMATED COST -17_0CP , C0 PERMIT NO. 1Z)?c0:2 DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND OR BURNER No. of Heating Units ' Circle One (Steam =Hot (Warm Air) Trade Name 1 r _L A.tSize No. BTU 1'?0 a QnQ H P EDR Fuel XL k=T— Total Connected Load $ .50_ Burner Trade Name Size No. BTU HP EDR $ _Z_ 50 ,,� , 14Ar) A HEATING COMPANY ` MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/_COOLINGIVENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $15.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $30.00 *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without written permission from adjoining property owner. Signed y Tel No. Approved By Rough -In Date Final Date FILL OUT BACK SIDE FOR STACK VERIFICATION ON REPLACEMENT FURNACE CHIMNEY AND STACK VERIFICATION The undersigned hereby verifies that the existing chimney or stack: 1. Has been carefully examined Yes No ( ) 2. Is free from rust or deterioration Yes ( No ( ) 3. Has no foreign objects lodged within Yes pCj No ( ) 4. Is securely supported Yes No ( ) 5. Meets all current Code requirements for size and total BTU's connected Yes No ( ) 6. Has total heating BTU's of 1067, t98'C> All other BTU's 10, Do � TOTAL BTU's 146,000 Remarks 1 clA IS Z£ List Alterations Being Done: ` c� I —/0�'Ztt7� r?ZL7 L i Tl'i T�� HEATING COMPANY Signed By Date 47-- �� 1Z— 961305 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of a variance, VAR #91-23 ✓ VARIANCE Warren and Gerry Stock , Owner The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 9th day of September , 19 91 , on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25% to 26%, to allow the construction of.an addition, on Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Spring Brook Park, the same being 289 Liberty Street N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: No stipulations. See City Council meeting minutes of September 9, 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. subscribed my hand at the City of Anoka on the (04'h day of Fridley, MN 55432 SHIRLEY A. PALA, CIT Variances are valid for a period of one year following approiiilAnd1ghu.l.;.1 considered void if not used within that period. , FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 PAGE 10 within the 15 foot drainage and utility easement located parallel to the north lot line. Councilman Billings asked what hardship in Minnesota State Statutes is applicable to this piece of property that gives Council the authority to grant the variance. Councilman Schneider stated that the hardship is stated in staff's report on agenda page 6.4: "While the subject lot is shorter than adjacent properties due to its location on a cul-de-sac, the design of the home is such that the living area is set back farther than the garage area." He stated that the lot is unique also in that it abuts Harris Pond. Councilman Billings stated that as he understands Minnesota State Statutes, the hardship has to be something that is a unique quality of the lot, not something that the property owner has willfully done in order to create a situation that is different from others. He stated that he would request an opinion from the City Attorney as to whether or not granting this variance would meet -the intent of Minnesota State Statues. Mr. Herrick stated that Councilman Billings correctly paraphrased the statute. He stated that there has to be something unique about the property and that the property owner did not create the problem. He stated that that is the law. He stated that Council are the judges as to whether this.situation meets that requirement of the law. He questioned if the situation as described in the agenda and illustrated on the.map is a situation where there is a hardship created by the nature of the property and not by the property owner. - Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, Mayor Nee, Councilman Schneider, Councilwoman Jorgenson, and Councilman Fitzpatrick voting aye, Chairman Billings voting nay, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried on a vote of 4 to 1. B. VARIANCE REQUEST,{VAR #91-23,�BYiWARREN AND GERRY STOCK TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE FROM 25 PERCENT TO 26 PERCENT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION ON LOTS 3 AND 4. BLOCK 11, SPRING BROOK PARK, THE SAME BEING 289 LIBERTY STREET N.E. Ms. Dacy stated that the original variance request was to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25 percent to 28.3 percent. She stated that at the Appeals Commission meeting the petitioner presented a plan to construct a 12 feet by 20 feet addition to the existing house. She stated that the Appeals Commission recommended denial of that request on a 2 to 1 vote, and the petitioner then reduced his request to a 10 feet by 20 feet addition, reducing the lot coverage from 28.3 percent to 26 percent. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 PAGE 11 Ms. Dacy stated that the dimensions of the lot are 60 feet by 144 feet. She stated that there is a 12 foot unimproved alley behind the property. She stated that the petitioner wanted staff to point out that if the alley was vacated, it would add 6 feet of depth to his property for a 150 foot deep lot, which would bring the lot area to 9,000 square feet and would equal the 25 percent lot coverage. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that it seemed to him that if it is an unimproved alley it remains only an easement, and an easement on a property doesn't subtract from the area. Mr. Herrick stated that in looking at the Springbrook plat, he believed this is an alley that was created as part of the plat. He stated it is correct that if the alley was vacated there would not be any requirement for a variance; however, until the alley is vacated there is a requirement for a variance. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that the- application is for a variance. He stated that he visited the site and, with the alley there, it gives the appearance -of more space, but he did not get the feeling that the lot was overcrowded. He stated that this variance is for lot coverage and there are no setback problems. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to grant variance request, VAR #91-23. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #91-24, BY PATRICK HAYES OF HARDEE'S RESTAURANT, TO REDUCE THE HEIGHT OF THE REQUIRED SCREENING ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FROM 6 FEET TO 3 FEET, ON THE EAST 20 FEET OF LOT 7, LOTS 8 THROUGH 12, AND THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 13, BLOCK 7, CITY VIEW ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 289 - 57TH AVENUE N.E.: Ms. Dacy stated that this property is located in the northwest corner of 57th Avenue and University Avenue. She stated that the property is literally surrounded by four streets. She stated that to the east is University Avenue, to the south is 57th Avenue, to the west is 3rd Street, and to north is 57th Place. She stated that to the north of the property are two single family homes. She stated that the Hardee's Restaurant property is zoned C-2, General Business, with R-1,. Single Family Dwelling, to the north. Ms. Dacy stated that when the building was originally constructed and occupied as Country Kitchen in 1969 the screening fence along the north lot line was a point of controversy. She stated that in 1970 there was a request from the neighborhood that a 6 foot screening fence be constructed along the north property line. She stated that at the time of Council action, a 3 foot fence was constructed along the north property line. She stated that 0%61305 VffiK OF MUN { PaL• kh STATE OF IlOMEBOTA, COUNTY OF ANOKA I het 4 partly that the wtwn WsVu_ nVM was Ibd In ttds WfIce for r=M ova --- JM! - 7 199 12s'si t -M., and was My reccrM c� P•• 7 Cid rL City of Fridley 6431 University Ave NE Fridley Mn 55432 Community Development !y6i CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE September 16, 1991 Warren and Gerry Stock 289 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Stock: On September 9, 1991, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #91-23, to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25% to 26% to allow the construction of an addition on Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Spring Brook Park, the same being 289 Liberty Street N.E. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Si;�cereVf,l Ba'fbara Dacy Community Development Director BD/dn Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by September 30, 1991. Conc r with action taken Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she believed they could ,address the hardship as being the irregularity of the lot and the that the house is placed considerably back from East River ad. She stated that if the petitioner reduced the sign to 3 fe by 3 feet and put it on the house, the sign would be illegib " to people driving by at 45 m.p.h. Councilman Billings asked if the sign could be put on the garage. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the garage's set even further back than the house, and there are some ve large trees on the boulevard that shelter a portion of the gar, e. Mayor Nee stated that he drives by this area a lot, and he has never even noticed the sign. He stated hat if the sign has been there for three years it is not doing hat it is supposed to be doing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. pon a voice vote, Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, and Councilman Fitzpatrick voting aye, Councilma Billings voting nay, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried on a 4 to 1 vote. 6. AUGUST 20, 1991• A. Ms. Dacy sta/va the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. Sd that the property is located at the end of the cul-de-samelot Lane just south of Harris Pond. She stated that tnce request is to reduce the rear yard setback from 28 feetet to allow the construction of a three season porch. Shethat staff had recommended denial of the request; howee Appeals Commission recommended approval with one stipulat.) No construction shall occur within the 15 foot drainagility easement located parallel to the north lot line. Ms. Dy tated that the hardship addressed by the Appeals Commission was that this is a unique situation in that the property abuts Har is Pond to the rear; therefore, it would not overcrowd the neig orhood. MOTION y Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant variance request, VAR #91-22, with he following stipulation: (1) No construction shall occur FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 PAGE 10 within the 15 foot drainage and utility easement located parallel to the north lot line. / Councilman Billings asked what hardship in Minnesota State SVdtutes is applicable to this piece of property that gives Co oil the authority to grant the variance. Councilman Schneider stated that the hardship is eta ed in staff's report on agenda page 6.4: "While the subject lot s shorter than adjacent properties due to its location on a cul- -sac, the design of the home is such that the living area is se back farther than the garage area." He stated that the lot is unique also in that it abuts Harris Pond. Councilman Billings stated that Statutes, the hardship has to be of the lot, not something that done in order to create a situat He stated that he would request as to whether or not granting t of Minnesota State Statues. O as he u erstands Minnesota State someth' g that is a unique quality the roperty owner has willfully ion hat is different from others. aX opinion from the City Attorney Is variance would meet the intent Mr. Herrick stated that Co oilman Billings correctly paraphrased the statute. He stated th t there has to be something unique about the property and that he property owner did not create the problem. He stated t t that is the law. He stated that Council are the judges as to ether this situation meets that requirement of the law. He qu stioned if the situation as described in the agenda and illust ted on the map is a situation where there is a hardship create by the nature of the property and not by the property owner - Seconded by ouncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, Mayor Nee, Councilman Councilwoman Jorgenson, and Councilman Fitzpatr'ck voting aye, Chairman Billings voting nay, Mayor Nee decla7d the motion carried on a vote of 4 to I.' B. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #91-23. BY WARREN AND GERRY STOCK TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE FROM 25 PERCENT TO 26 PERCENT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION ON LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 11, SPRING BROOK PARK, THE SAME BEING 289 LIBERTY STREET N.E. Ms. Dacy stated that the original variance request was to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25 percent to 28.3 percent. She stated that at the Appeals Commission meeting the petitioner presented a plan to construct a 12 feet by 20 feet addition to the existing house. She stated that the Appeals Commission recommended denial of that request on a 2 to 1 vote, and the petitioner then reduced his request to a 10 feet by 20 feet addition, reducing the lot coverage from 28.3 percent to 26 percent. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 PAGE 11 Ms. Dacy stated that the dimensions of the lot are 60 feet by 144 feet. She stated that there is a 12 foot unimproved alley behind the property. She stated that the petitioner wanted staff to point out that if the alley was vacated, it would add 6 feet of depth to his property for a 150 foot deep lot, which would bring the lot area to 9,000 square feet and would equal the 25 percent lot coverage. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that it seemed to him that if it is an unimproved alley it remains only an easement, and an easement on a property doesn't subtract from the area. Mr. Herrick stated that in looking at the Springbrook plat, he believed this is an alley that was created as part of the plat. He stated it is correct that if the alley was vacated there would not be any requirement for a variance; however, until the alley is vacated there is a requirement for a variance. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that the application is for a variance. He stated that he visited the site and, with the alley there, it gives the appearance of more space, but he did not get the feeling that the lot was overcrowded. He stated that this variance is for lot coverage and there are no setback problems. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to grant variance request, VAR #91-23. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C. VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #91-24. BY PATRICK HAYES OE,-AiRDEE'S 289 - 57TH AVENUE N.E.: Ms. Dacy stated that this propertylocated in the northwest corner of 57th Avenue and Universi Avenue. She stated that the property is literally surroundedby four streets. She stated that to the east is UniveZY e, to the south is 57th Avenue, to the west is 3rd Strnorth is 57th Place. She stated that to the north ofy are two single family homes. She stated that the Hardant property is zoned C-2, General Business, with R-1,ly Dwelling, to the north. Ms. Dacy stated, at when the building was originally constructed and occupied Country Kitchen in 1969 the screening fence along the north to line was a point of controversy. She stated that in 1970 ther was a request from the neighborhood that a 6 foot screeni fence be constructed along the north property line. She stated that at the time of Council action, a 3 foot fence was cons cted along the north property line. She stated that FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 PAGE 12 apparently it was the policy of the Council at that time not to require a fence in excess of 3 feet high on the streev side of a commercial property. 7 Ms. Dacy stated that in 1989 the wooden fence that w s constructed and maintained through the years was removed by ardeeIs. She stated that apparently, on several occasions the Community Development Department staff received telephone ca is from Hardee's management requesting information as to wh ther or not a landscaping screen could be installed in place f the fence. She stated that it is her understanding that staff dvised Hardee's to submit a landscaping plan, because they was a screening requirement between commercial property and s' gle family property; however, a landscaping plan has never been submitted or approved prior to removal of the fence or the installation of the landscaping that is there now. Ms. Dacy stated that Hardee's mani half foot high arborvitae shrubs center just south of the existing along the north property line. interpretation is that since the ordinance stipulates a 6 foot pl between commercially zoned prop property. Ms. Dacy stated that staff re the 6 foot screening require Installation of a 6 foot high feet in height and planted 2 1 November 1, 1991. jemen installed 25 two -and -a pace approximately 4 feet on 10,20, and 30 foot tall elms S".1 e stated that the City's E ce was removed the current ing screen or 6 foot fence y and residentially zoned mended denial of the variance to ht with one stipulation: (1.) ;reening fence or vegetation of 4 t on center shall be completed by Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission concurred with staff's recommendation but deleted/the recommended stipulation. Ms. Dacy stated that St en Barg, Code Enforcement Officer, has been closely involved with this variance request since the beginning of June, 199 . She stated that she would like him to briefly review the st s that led up to the variance application. Mr. Barg stated t it he was contacted by a complainant on June 3, 1991, rega ng the Hardee Is site. He stated that the complainant indica ed that the fence that had acted as a screening had been taken do , and the caller was requesting information as to what screenin Hardee's is required to provide. Mr. Barg stated that he then in pected the site and found that all that remained were a fewsh s. He stated that he then sent a letter of noncompliance o Hardee's which received no response. He stated that after se ding the second letter later in June requesting that Hardee's eitMer construct a 6 foot fence or submit a landscaping plan to the( City to meet the landscaping requirement, he was contacted by Patrick Hayes of Hardee's. He stated that he reviewed AM STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE August 20, 1991 CITYOF PLANNING COMMISSION DATE FMDLEY CITY COUNCIL DATE September 9, 1991 AUTHOR MM/12 REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONING UTILITIES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES & ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION VAR #91-23 Warren Stock. Th increase the lot coverage from 25% to 28.8% 289 Liberty Street 8,640 sq. ft. R-2, Single Family Dwelling IL-2, Single Family Dwelling, to the N, S, E, & W Denial Denial 6.16 Staff Report VAR #91-23, 289 Liberty Street N.E. Page 2 A. STATED HARDSHIP: "Need for additional bathroom and larger laundry area" B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner requests a variance to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25% to 28.3% to allow the construction of an addition. The request is for Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Springbrook Park Addition, the same being 289 Liberty Street N.E. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and a three -car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the adjacent properties. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 12 ft. by 20 ft. (240 sq. ft.) addition to the rear of the home. Analysis Section 205.07.03.0 requires that not more than 25% of the area of a lot shall be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. Public purpose of this requirement is to eliminate the condition of overcrowding of residential areas. The proposed addition increases the maximum allowable lot coverage by 3.3%. The petitioner's home is 1,062 sq. ft. and the three -car garage is 988 sq. ft., for a total square footage already on the property of 2,050 sq. ft. As the lot is slightly undersized at 8,640 sq. ft., the maximum square footage to be built on the property would be 2,160 sq. ft., which allows the petitioner to construct an addition of 110 sq. ft. If the lot had been platted at 9,000 sq. ft., the maximum allowable square footage to be built on the property would be 2,250 sq. ft., which would only give the petitioner an additional 200 sq. ft. in which to build an addition. The petitioner has adequate use of the property; therefore, denying the variance would not constitute a taking. The location of the addition, however, will not affect surrounding properties. Recommendation As the petitioner has adequate use of the property, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend to the City Council denial of the request. 6.19 Staff Report VAR #91-23, 289 Liberty Street N.E. Page 3 ADDeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted 2-1 to recommend denial of the request to the City Council. Staff Update The petitioner requested that staff consider the unimproved alley to the north and also proposed to reduce the addition to 10 feet by 20 feet instead of 12 feet by 20 feet. If the alley was vacated, the petitioner would gain an additional 360 sq. ft. of lot area, increasing the lot area to 9,000 sq. ft. By reducing the addition, the lot coverage decreases to 26.5%. If the lot, in fact, was 9,000 sq. ft., the lot coverage would decrease even further to 25%. City Council Recommendation As the petitioner has reasonable use of the property, staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request. 6.20 � Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 5, 1991 TO: William Burns, City Manager FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance, VAR #91-23, by Warren Stock; 289 Liberty Street N.E. Attached please find the above -referenced staff report. The requested variance would increase the maximum lot coverage on a residential lot from 25% to 28.8%. The Appeals Commission voted 2-1 to recommend denial of the request to the City Council. An unimproved alley is located to the north of the property, and the petitioner has also proposed to reduce the addition to 10' x 20' instead of 12' x 201. Reducing the addition reduces the variance request to 26. %. Staff recommends that as the petitioner has reasonable use of the property, the City Council deny the request. MM/dn M-91-650 b.10 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 20, 1991 PAGE 6 MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend t 1ty Council approval of variance request, VAR #91-22�o�f�e byald and Jennifer Prasek, per Section 205.07.03.D. (3) . (a)Fridley City Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 28eet to 18 feet, to allow the construction of a three -season ch addition on Lot 25, Block 2, Harris Lake Estates, the same eing 1681 Camelot Lane N.E., with the following stipulation: 1. No construction shal ccur within the 15 foot drainage and utility ease t located parallel to the north lot line. UPON A VOICE ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. M erson stated this item will go to City Council on September 9 991. 2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #91=23, BY WARREN ANY GERRY STOCK: Pere�i Scon.­205.07.03.0 of -the Fridley City Code, to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25% to 28.3% to allow the construction of an addition, on Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Spring Brook Park, the same being 289 Liberty Street N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located on Liberty Street just east of Ruth Street. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the adjacent properties. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to increase the allowable lot coverage from 25% to 28.3% in order to construct a 20 ft. by 12 ft. addition on the rear of the property. Currently located in this area is a fenced concrete patio. The petitioner is proposing that the addition be used for an additional bathroom and laundry room. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner currently has a single family dwelling unit on the property as well as a three car garage for a total square footage of 2,050 sq. ft. The lot is undersized at 8,640 sq. ft. The required minimum lot size is 9,000 sq. ft. The difference of maximum lot coverage between the two is approximately 90 sq. ft., so the impact which would allow the petitioner to construct an addition is relatively minimal. The petitioner does have adequate use of the property; however, the construction of the addition would have minimal impact on adjacent neighbors as it would meet the minimum setback requirements and would be located where the existing patio area is. Ms. McPherson stated that as the petitioner does have adequate use of the property, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the request to the City Council. 6.24 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 20. 1991 PAGE 7 MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Mr. Warren Stock, 289 Liberty Street N.E., stated the house was built in 1962 and it has the original circuit breakers and 60 AMP service. He had planned to increase the service to 150 AMPS. When he inquired of the electrician who will do the work, the electrician told him that the laundry room was set up next to the electrical box and does not meet code. The room next to the laundry room is a bathroom which he constructed a few years ago. He had planned to remove the downstairs bathroom and enlarge the laundry room. However, with his family, he needs two bathrooms, and that is why he is proposing the addition. The other part of the addition is closet space as the house had very. little closet space when it vias. built in 1962. Mr. Stock stated that the basement is 94 sq ft. more than the first floor. He was told staff calculates -the lot coverage with the building footprint. So, he questioned whether he is at 25%, or would he really be 60 sq. ft. as far as square footage. He is proposing the addition at 12 feet instead of 10 feet so he would have the same kind of extension out the back as in the front to look better architecturally. Mr. Kuechle asked if the petitioner has any alternatives if the variance request is denied. Mr. Stock stated the alternative would be to build another floor on the house. Mr. Stock stated there is also an unimproved alley in the rear, and he did not know how that affects his lot coverage. Ms. McPherson stated that if the alley is vacated, he would gain half the alley. It would add to his lot area and his lot coverage would be reduced. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE -CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:11 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated that the part of this variance request that concerns him is the fact that the public purpose of the maximum lot coverage is to eliminate the condition of overcrowding of residential areas. In looking at this particular area, it does 6.25 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 20, 1991 PAGE 8 seem very crowded. With a fairly large three car garage, house, and undersized lot, the lot appears to be quite crowded. On the other hand, he can appreciate the need by the petitioner to add some living space and do some modernizing to his house. Ms. Smith stated she agreed with Mr. Kuechle that the area does appear to be crowded. Similar to the first variance in talking about a hardship, the petitioner made the choice to build a 1,000 sq. ft. garage which brought the lot coverage to 25%. The petitioner is at full coverage now. Ms. Beaulieu stated she agreed with Ms. Smith. The petitioner built the three car garage when a two car garage would have given him a little leeway for an addition. If they allow one property owner to go to 28% lot coverage, then they are setting a precedent for others to come in wanting higher and higher lot coverages. Because there is a good purpose for the maximum lot coverage of 25%, she would recommend denial of the variance. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR #91-23, by Warren and Gerry Stock, per Section 205.07.03.0 of the Fridley City Code, to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25% to 28.3% to allow the construction of an addition, on Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Spring Brook Park, the same being 289 Liberty Street N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, BEAULIEU AND SMITH VOTING AYE, RUECHLE VOTING NAY, VICE -CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 2-1. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to Council on September 9, 1991. 3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR 91-24 BY PATR HAYES, HARDEE'S RESTAURANT: Per Section 205.14.06.G.(1).(a) of the Fridley Cit ode, to reduce the height of the required screening acent to a residential district from 6 feet to 3 feet on the east 20 feet of Lot 7, Lots 8-12, and the west feet of Lot 13, Block 7, City View Addition, the same ing 289 - 57th Avenue N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the proper is located at the intersection of University Avenue and 57 Avenue, directly across from the Cattle Company Restaura The property is zoned C-2, General Business, as is the operty to the west. The property to the south is zoned C- General Shopping Center, and the property to the north is z ed S-1, Hyde Park. Ms. McP son stated that the Hardee's Restaurant was formerly a Cou y Kitchen approved by the City in 1969. At that time, the pullding plan indicated that a 3 foot high cedar fence would be 6.26 • PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, August 20, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #91-23, by Warren and Gerry Stock: Per Section 205.07.03.0 of the Fridley City Code, to increase the maximum allowable lot coverage from 25% to 28.3% to allow the construction of an addition, on Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Spring Brook Park, the same being 289 Liberty Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Warren and Gerry Stock 289 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Mark Weisenberger 254 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, M 55432 James Zukcwski 249 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, MST 55432 Howard Walters 262 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Peter Jessen 260 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Tadeusyn Galecki 270 Liberty Street NE Fridley, DMT 55432 Stanley Carey 278 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DSV 55432 David Peterson 288 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Kevin Maynard 298 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 MAILING LIST VAR #91-23 289 LIBERTY STREET N.E. Richard Fitch 300 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Kenneth Brustad 272 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Jean Marie Fudali 280 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Duane Nbtzko 290 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Cheryl Micheuski 298 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, MV 55432 Jerry Hanson 299 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Stephen Reinarts 279 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Ida Jane Brock 269 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, M 55432 Donald Budzeak 259 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, MLV 55432 Mailed: 8/9/91 Eugene Erickson 264 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, M 55432 James Klipstein 303 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 James Olmscheid 301 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Check Kwan 8002 Muth Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Lawrence Coulter 8008 Ruth Street N.E. Fridley, DMT 55432 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, NN 55432 City Manager City Council COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW Appeals � � DATE oars FILE DESCRIPTION � #91-23 �IN�F 39 7/31/91 8/20/91 289 Liberty Street N.E. FRlDLEY lot coverage variance COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING DEPT. D. MICHELE M. MARK ,W, ❑ JOHN F. L C. COMMENTS -Pvh-haye� Inas: I Hat. L-EM�tt cxe. o- 4e f I'm 10 ami-�ior� e.�r- LEON M. , , 112, vaned ail tta JIM H. �- x L� ❑ CHUCK M. � �40 50 ��Ist 4Ao-A ��' S CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRMNM,r MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 VARIAE APBLICATION FORM PROPERTY IMMUMMON - site plan required for submittals; see attached Address: % Li�e� �✓o�i�/t' y Legal description: Lot 3 4 el Block // Tract/Addition S'�✓t��.c ��e®�.� /oi9� Current zoning: eej. Square footage/acreage Reason for variance and hardship: yeeo 11>4 -XQdiA A"-.L�g enc �� e,e�2� �-eea Section of City Code: l a /. _ U r I I -- - n A--ff7 1 nrz ®/ ;�� • ^i ice• � i • •� r• •) �' s�� � � ; � � (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) ADDS_ SY. �idicf� r 1 4 10 Q M 0akN ID4• •i•VF- • DAYTIME PHONE cs% Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 for residential properties Permit VAR # II c� Receipt # -Y/o?® Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: 6.23 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicants for vacations must submit the legal description of the parcel (easement, street, etc.) to be vacated. complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect, or other design professional, to include the following: A. General: 1. Name and address of project 2. Legal description (certificate of survey may be required) 3. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record 4. Date proposed, north arrow, scale, number of sheets, name of drawer 5. Description of intended use of site, buildings, and structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load 6. Existing zoning and land use 7. Tabulation box indicating: (i) Size of parcel in sq..ft. (ii) Gross floor area of buildings (iii) Percent of site covered by building (iv) Percent of site covered by impervious surface (v) Percent of site covered by green area (vi) Projected number of employees (vii) Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly (viii) Number of parking spaces required (ix) Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped (x) Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories B. Site Plan: 1. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions and floor elevations 2. Grading and drainage plan showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.) as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and storm water retention ponds. Calculations for storm water detention/retention areas. 3. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths of property lines, turning radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated center line, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways 4. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimensions for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading' areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow, and traffic -control devices 5. Landscaping Plan 6. Location, access, and screening detail of trash enclosures 7. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment S. Building elevations from all directions 9. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building a VAR #91-23 Warren Stock S //2 SEC. 3 77309 R.404 C/TY OF FRIDLEY 31 J 81 ss i3 e,ar„' d W 0 0 01 ( V d I ♦ d c T e ni ny4): W I^PP e ELYST BON ,II K ., .I +• K • M I ' ufn �` _ ' � �� � / 1 s J c 8 9 n/z/!• �"G, /B ,9 ,71 , P➢LB. B 9ro••n /9 417 i 1f IBERTY STREETX4�% 1.1 UA eL---- ) ,H J e. v )9Ie ,T i•) N U � i 19.• / J. J 99 8 ° 3' � ➢ °J ? T 7 _•'43� *N FELLOWp 3 STREET ➢ 7 t , 3T 3G e/ a 'T e - L7. + i • 3 s uB ➢ ➢ ° BP - , ' f 'J r TL •� (v.i r�) o •may � G ' ti091 MEAD �,� RUN o' r•':. gyp,' '' C •'�+ _ �) U) �)� , (a) ° 'r spy j�.➢'�f , (a)� a �+) ' Ge)` + j 1 ,s /V / ' ADD. ,, . •�S` % (+9f • ''��P�� ( (y)+ spy (II} �� Aj ➢ °s T n n.n. _._ ^'`_ (*) ��'� CNI' (�� M•'4�y N � Cn)dir➢+"sr p, °; �, , ` � � '� ~ �', � .6 PEARS Q ; 2ND +`•\ - �) ° t (A)y.'' �� `'r rr�. `(eV '. \ s. ,. (P+. � _ :� ADD. . ` F ° S 7/I co (U sec.5 34 � S 43 6.17 LOCATION MAP VAR #91-23 Warren Stock 6.21 6�/. SITE PLAN IG OF go.,% VAR #91-23 Warren Stock >( i BERTY R I � �• • �� ��.ti % ••1M ( 9'• W Q 00 11 0 0 0 11 i 6.18 ZONING MAP �VAR #91-23� fock t } t N 0 • :y.�:_ �. ._ .�casa�.r:. � 2 -� .2, Zb�' � � a z � 2 -� .2, Zb�' Z I cea -- gtp4o 0 61 ICC5D VWD 1a�Q- 14ci JSP