The URL can be used to link to this page

PRE 2010 DOCSCity ®f Fridley, Minn. BUILDING PERMIT N® 6939 Date: I Owner: Builder t Address Address 'OCATI OF BUILDING No. Street Part of Lot r" Lot __ Block Addition or Sub -Division � s ® o Corner Lot — Off Inside Lot _ _ Setback _ _____ Sideyard � de �� s Sewer Elevation 4� A _ Foundation Elevation DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To Used ` Front 4 Depth Height Sq. Ft Cu. —&z47 Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. cu. Ft. Type of Construction 3.� Est. Cost ��_`�� To be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with aJl provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. 41 , A �� In consideration of the payment of a fee of , permit is hereby granted to— to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon vio n of any of the provisions of said ordinances. -----7.-1 f I Building Inspector NOTICE: This permit doss not eover the eonstroetien, huff lation ter wiring, plumbing, gas hating, sewer or water. Be ams to we the BulMiing htgm for for sepmft permits for these Bonn. City of Fridley, Minn. N° 8363 BUILDING PERMIT 8 e� /4 7 Date: ROBERT J. HEM - AUGUST 16, 1965 Builder Address 6601 Lucia Lane N. E, Address 4500 Lyndaley-enue North Fridley 32, Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota LOCATION OF BUILDING No. 6601 Street Lucia Lane N. E, part of Lot Lot 4 _ Block 1 Addition or Sub -Division _ Alice Addition Corner Lot _ Inside Lot Setback Sideyard Sewer Elevation Foundation Elevation DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be Used as: Det. Garage Front 14 Depth 20 Height 10 Sq. Ft. 280 Cu. Ft. 2,800 Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction Est.Cost $905,00To be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above I agree to do Mproposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with ill provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. e Q _� In consideration of the payment of a fee of $ 4.00 , pen it is hereby granted to MILES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done 4n, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regardingg location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limit uns permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. ALLEN G. JENSEN Building Inspector NOTICE ibis psrath don sof cover the eonstrudloe, hatallatloa for w1rh g, phmrbise, en hating, sewer or wafer. Be sun to we the sundbsg Inspector for Separate permits for thea Bens. L ' j APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA OWNER'S NAME t �. l� �- W,, BUILDER ADDRESS 6 (O D % L v c 41a As READDRESS LOCATION OF BUILDING N0. STREET _PART /OF LOT LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION CO R LOT INSIDE LOT SETBACK SIDE -YARD SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be used as; /& a r a Front_Depth I() Height S/r' Sq. Ft.---) - ? --" C' j d Cu. Ft. Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Type of Construction To be completed Cu. Ft. C' Estimated Cost /20,5' The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances.and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE /(O SIGNATURE A/, &P_� (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). a 77 372-3710 ` ' and ask for 'WWAW SYNDICATE BILL KRAMLINGER GORDII JOHNSON CREDIT CORPORATION x OR` 728 -2ND AVENUE SOUTH JOHN BARTON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402, FORMERLY FIRST BANCREOIT CORPORATION` 0 I rl. From the desk of FORM H284661(50'S) HQAn OF APPEAU MWO MINU72S 10 1 SEPTMOn 15, 1965 •---A.—A.- - .A. mss.. At.�....�=-��.__-_� �_•._Arr .... SLAB LOCATION AND.BUILDING PERMIT SLIP Name Address d> Home ,• - — —/j 4 City or Village Phone e/ Work Home Home Phone Days Evenings Salesman Garage Size 1�X�® 0r Countour ofLot / Gradual Steep All At Garage Site Flat �` Slope 4 Slope Permit to be obtained by: Miles �'� Customer 4ee Permit No. Lot No. Block No. Addition Z ce rt Size STREET C- Gf� I �I �m I❑ I c i - AGI i c J� J ` o F-1 IJ v ❑ Check here if alley ❑ Paved ❑ Not Paved Width �3 ❑ Office Copy ❑ Cement Copy _ J &TY & Nu L - .1: zir 1�,! MIUOTJ�,s &e�7v, t9&S- Hr. Brweil explained the action of the Board of Appeals to the Council. lir. * Reim was present at tt Council ting and stated that so objectors attended the �sawA ..�. A---va 1-- --- - A••�� ssvara vs _ . _ �_ - nus tbO ti0 Bo. . Mr. He$m stated that if the strats the side of his lot were blacktopped he would. not have to build a garage in this location, but since the street is not Improved* he is compelled to locate the garage according to the plans presented to the Council. fte City 8nglueer stated that the City has a right-of-way for emstruction of a street alang this property- COM0110n Wright stated that he knows the street is not maintained and suggested that perhaps the street could be built as a bicycle lane with provision for access by the fire depaart- nieut and as agreemat with the property owners to maintain the rest of the easeasent. Cotnncglmffi Wright also noted that the street was Included is the proposed street construction project for -the pr 4ous year but property owners objected to the construction. Mr. Heim stated that he believes a petition has been circulated to vacate 66th Avenue N.H. Notion by Wright to cansur with recoMmOndationsr of the Board of Appeals and approve waiver of the side yard requiremmt from 14.27 feet to 3 feet to perMIt construction of a detached garage upon the property of 1r. Robert J. Hot® on Lot 14, Block 1, Alice Addition. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried uoanimuely. 13.10 City of Fridley THE TOP OF THE TWINS SUBJECT BUILD.I N G P E R M I T 9AT El r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-560-3450 eg 6 NUMBER 910-F15 REV. DATE 8/19/76 PAGE OF APPROVED BY JOB ADDRESS 6001 Lucia Lane N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 4 1 Alice Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Anthony Swanson 6601 Lucia Lane N.E. 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Western Remodelers 2529 Nicollet 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑_ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR [I MOVE ❑ REMOVE % 8 DESCRIBE WORK Install aluminum trim 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $1,200 $.60 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $9.00 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE �� f�''✓�L✓ IIez/J�nc-$9.60 SIGNATURE OFC RACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT I TEI WHEN PRO ERLY VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT BLDG. )NSP )]ATE SIGNAT RE OF OWNER 0F OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) J CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL ALTERATION, ADDITION, OR REPAIR BUILDING PERMIT OWNER'S NAME:)q1V19 ADDRESS • 6 G6 ( /� v C c` 0 1-,4 ADDRESS • �� rl �L� C 0 ('C. � NO:. �LQ� STREET : Lt Ct14 LaN �, LOT: y BLOCK: / ADDITION: /9LI CL CORNER LOT: INSIDE LOT: SETBACK: SIDEYARD: Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To Be Used As: /�/* I Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet: Cubic Feet: Front: Depth: Square Feet; Cubic Feet: Height: Type of Construction: / fLCt_W7i1i)tkM Estimated Cost: $ /a-06 To Be Completed: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: SIGNATURE: (See Reverse Side For Additional Information.) --4-, �V(,0�0 ' Application for Power Plants and Healing. Cooling. Ventilation. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems and Devices PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SM -3450 GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL Location z Furnace Shell & Duct Work ............... , .......... 8.00 $ Replacement of Furnace ............................. 6.00 $ City of Fridley: Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 5.00 $ The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein .................. specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............... 2.50 $ and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. MECH. WARM AIR Fridley, Minn. 19 Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 120,000 BTU ............ 8.00 $ Q each add. 60,000 BTU. ........ 2.00 $ Owner Replacement of Furnace ............................ 5.00 $ Kind of Building Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 ................. 5.00 $ Repairs &Alterations each add. $500.00 .............. 2.50 $ Used as STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM To be completed about Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...... 8.00 $ d G Estimated Cost, $ Furnace Shell & Line—to 640 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water ... 8.00 $ Old New. Building Permit No. Permit No. Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...................... 2.50 $ Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water .................. 2.50 $ DESCRIPTION OF WORK OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour ......... .............. 5.00 $ over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule HEATING or POWER PLANTS --Steam, Hot Water, Warm Air—No GAS BURNER (up to 400,000 BTU) ....................... 5.00 $ G O Trade Name Size No. GAS FITTING FEES: NO RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures ! x $1.50 $ Sv Additional Fixtures ................. x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU ........... x 2.00 $ AIR CONDITIONING FAN HEATING SYSTEM VENTILATING SYSTEM ALTERATIONS & REPAIRS ROUGH FINAL $ See Fee Schedule $ TOTAL FEE $ Capacity /S�q. Ft. E.D.R BTU H.P. Total Connected Load � Kind of Fuel � r BURNER — Trade Nam Size No V–,:26 61 Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.R BTU H.P. (REMARKS -OVER) i Business Phone 1 No - SUBJECT P Cityof Fridley yP_ 2434 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r R �q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r I PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC) yds NUMBER REV GATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 910-F15 7/9/96 JOB ADDRESS 6601 Lucia Lane NE 1 LEGALLOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. (} 1 Alice Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Anthony Swanson 6601 Lucia Lane NE 574-0299 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Sussel Corporation 1852 Como Ave St Paul MN 55645-0331 1934 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK a NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR X ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 16' x 24' Garage 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Provide a hard surface driveway. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCYLOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $7,000 $3.50 DOES NOT P ESLIME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY THER STATE R LOCYL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION R THE RFORMANCE F CON TRUCTION $124.75 Fire SC. $7.00 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE License SC $5.00 140.25 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IDATEI WHEN PAOPERL ALIDATED THIS IS YOU�Rj PERMIT &_41i;_SP SIGNATURE OF OWNER pF OWNER BUILDERI IDATEI DATE NEW K Effective 3/1/96 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application ConstructionAddress: Cp(o / A u Lit'g I A n%F Legal Description: Owner Name &Address: mtZ,nl7adrJcJNSrt�c1el. # Contractor: 5S FL CIO A p MN LICENSE Address: 1-6-5-W � U /`r'�✓C i, PSL c3/I/l� !E57/0 5k' Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length lCo e Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER:3 Comer Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks Type of Construction: y 2c/� , 1 ? g -A A G7 E Estimated Cost: $ Approx. Completion Date: j (Cost on Back) Driveway Curbput Width Needed: DATE: lfYiee APPLICA i- 6 Ft Ft x $ Tel. # TOTAL $ �, ;`r STIPULATIONS: I CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee ,,,, ,,�� $ 0`7 #75- Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ 7.00 .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ 3,S'0 $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $900 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ s; DO $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL $ �, ;`r STIPULATIONS: I 44. LAND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY: JOSEPH 1\4ACIASZEK pt. f r. pt. Pli,l r.- 141sting Proposed X - Option 1- Vacate 66th Avenue -Lot d rl I i, (,L• I A 1,1 C. I-, A 1) 1) 1 j, I A n u k l.. n tY . kl i i; ;j L: s () t j 1. 1 1) 8 2 - :10 - Gtr 1 -HEREBY' CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT PEPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY ,: Of THE BOUNDARIES'OP.,1HE - R nOi �,,z DESCRIBED LAND, AND THE LOCATIOt4, 0 LL iUlLDINGS, THEREON, AND ALL VISIGL*E ENCROACHMENTS, *F ANY, F-" LAND. 'ON SAID AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS 4 -.. 1h ...... DAY OF All ',i I. Oil A.. .. ... .... . ...... .. .................. ................................ . D . I? N. C. HOW M AND ASSOCIATES, LAND SURVEYORS 3M% 16e A eel 7 t SUBJECT City of Fridley WRECKING 24349 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS PERMIT r UMM. RECEIPT NO. • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r : PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. � 1 � � NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF]APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 ' 612-571-3450 910-F15 7/9/9 10B ADDRESS 6601 Lucia Lane NE 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 4 1 1 1 Alice Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Anthony Swanson 6601 Lucia Lane NE 574-0279 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Sussel Corp 1852 Como Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 645-0331 1934 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Remove a 16' x 24' Garage 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Clear site of all demolition debris. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT CU. FT AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF AN OTHER STA OR LOCAL LAW RE ULATING CON- $15•��PLAN STRUCTION OR TH PERFORMAN OF CO STRW/%��- CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $15.00 GNA RE OFCONTRAC OR 0 IDATEI WHEN PAOPPMVY VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT B 5 INSP ' S,GNATURE OF OWNER of OWNER BUiLDERi iDATEi t EFFECTIVE 3/.1/96 CITY OF FRIDLEY MOVING [ ] OR WRECKING [ ] PERMIT APPLICATION 6431 University Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 572-3604 Job Address: (0&o / < u e r.4 lt_ g N E Legal Description: Owner & Address : Me, ,4,uTgaNS, I'a,�s®n/ &�d I ,C y e p ,CgivF Tel. Contractor: �LAP Tel. #G'Sls sd33/ Address: /,9��a e% d4�sem. Pqac ,Mtt State License #/-73t/ DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING HOUSE: Length Width GARAGE: Length Width ,::�Ry" OTHER: Length Width a Estimated Cost $ UTILITIES City*W- Sewer NOTIFIED: 57 [ ] Water Bill Paid: Yes [VI or Moving Route: Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Sl, ° Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Approx. Completion Date Minn asco P U West 372- 20 [ ] [ ] 66 - 000_ [ ] Collect [$ The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit to wreck/move the building described above, agreeing. to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rulings of the Building Division, and the State Code which requires any water well on the property to be sealed by a State licensed water well driller, and hereby declares that all facts and representations stat d in this application are true and correct. V6 L�Date Signature Moving: Principle Building into Fridley .... $300.00 Accessory Building into Fridley .... $ 42.00 Through or within the City ...... $ 20.00 Move a building out of City ...... $ 80.00 Wrecking: For each 1,000 cubic feet or fraction .. $ 1.25 For structures which would be impractical to cube the fee shall be based on the total cost of wrecking at the rate of $6.00 for each $500.00 or fraction. r PERMIT FEE: STIPULATIONS: Minimum Fee: $20.00 Minimum Fee: $15.00 CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIV. 0 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 �� APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING PERMIT 572=3604 MARK NUMBER OF FIXTURES TO BE INSTALLED ON EACH FLOOR Effective On Jan 1, 2000 PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL JOB ADDRESS 541YE I"s dt401E' i? New. Fixtures $ 7.00 Old Opening, New Fixture $ 4.00 Beer Dispenser $ 5.00 Blow Off Basin $ 7.00 Catch Basin $ 7.00 Rain Water Leader $ 7.00 Sump/Receiving Tank $ 7.00 Water Treating Appliance $10.00 Water Heater -Electric $ 7.00 Water Heater - Gas*' _� $10.00 Gas Range*" $10.00 Gas Dryer** $10.00 Back Flow Preventer Required ( )Yes () No Type $15.00 Reinspection Fee $47.00/Hr ALL OTHERS AND/OR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS 1.5% of Value of Fixture or Appliance State Surcharge TOTAL FEE $Z1550 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the city codes and rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts .and representations stated in this application are true and correct 6 7 .Zoe SWANSON, ANTHONY/JOYCE 6601 LUCIA LANE NORTHEAST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 574-0299 Estimated Cost PERMIT NO. PLUMBINGCOMPANY SIGNED BY . _ Approved By Rough -In Date Final COMBUSTION AIR SHALL BE- PROVIDED PER UMC SECTION 504(A) AND TABLE 6-A COMMON VENT INFO ON BACK SIDE CI7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (763) 571-3450 - FAX (763) 571-1287 February 11, 2002 Anthony & Joyce Swanson 6601 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Final Inspection at 6601 Lucia Lane NE Contractor: Norblom Plumbing Co. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Swanson: A plumbing permit was issued on May 15, 2000, to install a water heater at your address. According to Section 4715.2800 of the State Plumbing Code, a final inspection shall be conducted on the plumbing authorized by this permit. As of this date, no inspection has been called for. The permit fee that was paid covers the inspections to make sure the work was completed according to the Code. We will keep your permit open for another 30 days and if we do not hear from you within this time to set up the inspection, we will mark the permit "no permit called for" and take no further action. To set up the inspection or to have any questions answered, please contact the Building Inspection Division at (763) 572-3604. Sincerely, DJ/ls „qoo.r• 6,2.34� NEW [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY Effective 4/1/2004 ADDN [ ] 6431 University Ave NE, Fridley, MN 55432 (763) 572-3604 Bldg Insp ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 (763) 571-1287 Fax BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION .Construction Address: (O Co D t %-u Gl'o L4 -j' -L& IW 9 Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: Contractor. T Address: 90-7 f k LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: I t4ce_ kd F:Yqcr' l ivi Tel. # I 3 -57L/- 0��G] MN LICENSE # o�-0,23 0 5 70 Tei. # '7(P -3 -%g5 -&9Q/ Attach to this application, a Certfcate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Length Width Height Sq. Ft. Length Width Height Sq. Ft Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. Construction Type: r -e-51 Gte-, D{7ci f I estimated Cost: $ Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft + 6 Ft = Ft x $ =$ DATE: / C)- APPLICANT�� Tel. # o:3-785-985/ Call (763) 572-3604 for Permit Fees if mailing in application. Fax to 763-571-1287 if using credit card and we will call you for card number. CITY USE ONLY - Permit Fee Plan Review Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge Curb Cut Escrow Erosion Control Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL Fee Schedule on Reverse Side 65% of Permit Fee .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $1350 per SAC Unit $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Alt. "A” or Alt. "B" Above $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] STIPULATIONS: APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AM CITY COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE IN REQUIREMENTS OF CERTAIN ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (Applicant to complete items 10 2; 3) 1. Name and Address of Applicant 0 2. Legal Description of Property (also general location, such as;"north east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Street' or 64.5 Fifth'Street") r , �a 3. Describe the variance requested. (Attach Plat of Survey of Property showing location of proposed building, etc., also adjoining properties 4. Coments by administrative official denying original request for building permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative official. Appro iate ordinances and section of ordinances to be cited.) �� - 2 - 5. Notice of Hearing appeared in Official Newspaper on the following dates: Se tember 1 1965 and September 8 1965 (must beat least once 1 days before meeting -- copy of notice to be attached). 6. Board Members notified of meeting b mailing of notice 8-27-65 (List Members, Date Notified, and it ed" or ' o" for plans to attend hearing). .a Name Date Plan to Attend All members notified by mailing 7 notices - 8-27-65 M 7. Person making appeal and the following property owners having property within 200' notified: By Phone Notified by Name Date or Mail (Initial) Robert J. Heim, 6601 Lucia Lane N.E., Fridley ,M 8-27-65 H. S. Johnson, 6600 Lucia Lane N.E., Fridley M 8-27-65 Jain&A warringi, nn, AAi n r_„n3,a r.Azle bI R.0 Prldl ey M Q=17-65 R. W. Shackle, 6581 Lucia Lane N.E., Fridley, M 8-27-65 Ed haneella# 659q tuc±&-L-ane 9,9., Fridley, 14 8-27-65— Al Berndt, 6621 Lucia Lane N.E., Fridley, M 8-27-65 ISO S. TrMley, bb9b Perce Street .E . ,- Fridley M" -27-6T' E. J. Schilz, 6620 Lucia Lane N.E., Fridley M 8-27-65 8. The Following Board Members and interested parties were present at the Hearing; September 15, 1965 BOARD MEMBERS Chairman Nawrocki Meiaber - Saunders Member Goodrich Heim Member Jankowski - 3 - OTHER PARTIES: ADDRESS 9, Opinions and recommendations by BOARD OF APPEALS: September 15, 1965 Mr. Heim was present and discussed the variant -p- -ragvj ast with the Board. Motion by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Goodrich, that the Anard ranommranA that the xx26-i-a-u-0-8 Jae gecamteel. e, there being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the motion carried. 10. For Above Recommendations Unanimous Against Recommendations by_ City Council and Date: September 20, 1965 - All members present except Sheridan.-- -- - - --- s cJll. ocu�n a�of Ale. LAND SURVEYORS Anoka, Minnesota CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY: JOSEPH MACIASZEK iI/e,-c-c- 6 6 c 66 N. E. Lot 4, Block 1, ALICE ADDIT'ION, Anoka County, Minnesota Telephone 421-6340 --T D>: ioTcs IR5ri- 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND, AND THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE, ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS , 4.t.4...... DAY OF ..... .a.r.rr.............................................. A.D. 19,....G. • N. .C. HOIUM AND ASSOCIATES, IN LAND SURVEYORS 1082-130-68 F - z . w w 1� w � ~ i �} J (i --T D>: ioTcs IR5ri- 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND, AND THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE, ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS , 4.t.4...... DAY OF ..... .a.r.rr.............................................. A.D. 19,....G. • N. .C. HOIUM AND ASSOCIATES, IN LAND SURVEYORS R Norm= Xyl the D of s of City ®f FxJAlqr will amt In the C ll Chadma of the Cit pHal1 at 9a3yy o4cl �P, ®Waya S 150 19650 to ¢ i solicmySEI i POIIA a 10 3.965 septubw as 1965 SQA OF APPEALS MMMG 14UIMS a SEPMMR 15, 1965 fte meting was called to order by Chairs Nawrocki at 705 P.X* FEE=T. Nawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Goodrich and Jmkowskl Saunders Mr. Beim was present and discussed the variance request with the board. Notion by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Goodrich, that the board roe ad that the variance be granted!. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the ration carried. Agi Ty there being no further business Chairman Nawrocki declared the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Earl Fa Wagner Secretary to the Board G7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Anthony and Joyce Swanson 6601 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Swanson: January 18, 1996 On January 8, 1996, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #95-31, to reduce the side yard setback from a street right-of-way from 17.5 feet to .5 feet, to allow the reconstruction of a garage on Lot 4, Block 1, Alice Addition, generally located at 6601 Lucia Lane N.E. You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you hav"ny questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3590. �rv+nrnl� I iT-�< Barbara Dacy, AICP v Community Development Director Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by February 1, 1996. Concu a tion taken. MOTION by Councilman Schneider o adopt Resolution No. 5-1996. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorge on. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the otion carried unanimously. 17. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95-31. BY ANTHONY AND JOYCE SWANSON, TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 17_.5 FEET TO .5 FEET. TO ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6601 LUCIA LANE N.E. (WARD 2) (TABLED NOVEMBER 27.1995): Mayor Nee removed this item from the table. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that staff was asked to review the advantages and disadvantages of vacating 66th Avenue. He stated that the disadvantages are that the vacation of 66th Avenue would eliminate an access alternative to Lucia Lane should the State or County construct a median in Mississippi Street. He stated that in the event a median is constructed at a length that limits turning movements to Lucia Lane, or to head east on Mississippi Street from Lucia Lane, constructing a connection from Pierce Street to 68th Place would be an alternative that would allow residents to get back to Lucia Lane. Mr. Hickok stated that another disadvantage is the land to the north of Pierce Street is zoned for multi -family and the elimina- tion of 66th Avenue would force traffic to use Lucia Lane alone versus using 66th Avenue for east bound traffic. He stated that the vacation of 66th Avenue would also eliminate a shorter right- of-way and a lower street cost when comparing it to the Pierce Street and Lucia Lane connection. Mr. Hickok stated that another disadvantage is that utilities are currently in place in the 66th Avenue alignment, and a right-of- way allows for a combination of both street and utilities. He stated that although an easement could be reserved, the right-of- way is more efficient. He stated that the official mapping process for the Pierce Street extension is far more lengthy than simply installing the improvements to an existing right-of-way. Mr. Hickok stated that the advantages of the vacation of 66th Avenue are that it creates an interior lot for the petitioners, and they could then construct a double garage without requiring a variance. He stated that other advantages to vacation are the adjacent property owners could continue to use the property legally, it increases the tax base to the City, and eliminates the potential of a future road too close to accessory structures. Councilman Schneider was concerned about the construction and length of a median that would block or limit access to this area. Mr. Hickok stated that the right-of-way is in place for such an improvement; however, the design and length of the median is yet to be determined. He stated that from information he has received FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 1996 PAGE 10 from the County, this intersection improvement would not occur for five to ten years. Councilman Billings stated that staff was requested to review the pros and cons of vacating 66th Avenue. He stated that staff states that the County has plans to construct a median in the future. He stated that.if this is the case, there would be public input, but since Mississippi Street is a County road, the decision for the design would be with the County Board. He stated that staff has done a good job of reporting the advantages and disadvantages, but it is up to Council to make a reasonable decision based on the information available. Councilman Schneider stated that his only point is that he believes, generally, the County does listen to the Council and would not try to block access to the neighborhoods. He stated that it seems to him if greater than a 300 foot median was proposed, the County would have to provide cuts, protected lane movements, or signalization. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Variance Request, VAR #95-31, to reduce the side yard setback from a street right-of-way from 17.5 feet to .5 feet. Further, that this is an extremely unique situation as the variance is to a platted, but yet unpaved right-of-way and while there is a possibility in the future it could be completed, it is almost conjecture. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Councilman Billings asked what the largest variances granted in the past for this type of situation were. Mr. Hickok stated that there was a variance from 17.5 feet to 14.27 feet for a corner lot. Councilman Billings stated that the Appeals Commission has unani- mously recommended denial of this variance request. He stated that he is unable to determine the hardship as required by the Minnesota State Statutes. Mr. Hickok said that State Statute requires a hardship related to the physical characteristics of the land. He stated that in this case, the petitioner desires to build at the location of an existing garage. Councilman Billings stated that he believes in the integrity of the zoning ordinance and cannot support this motion. Councilman Schneider asked how many variance requests the City received for encroachment in the side yard. Mr. Hickok stated that there were several, and all side yard variances that were granted were in the range of about fifteen feet. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 1996 PAGE 11 Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings' point was well taken. He felt, in practical terms, this was an extraordinary situation. Councilman Billings stated that the only thing he finds unique about this request is that, at this time, the street is undeveloped. He stated that throughout the history of the City, there have always been streets that were undeveloped. To grant a variance adjacent to a street merely because it is undeveloped is not the kind of thing he felt the City should be doing. Councilman Schneider stated that there is an existing garage there, and this is only a two foot difference against vacant property. He stated that while he agrees that the integrity of the zoning code is important, the petitioner is making effective use of the garage now. He stated that the alternatives are costly, and it does not make sense to not allow the variance. He stated that a long-time resident wishes to improve his property, increase the tax base, and this seems a reasonable tradeoff. UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, Councilman Schneider, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilwoman Bolkcom and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Billings voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a four to one vote. 18. Mayor Nee removed this item from the table. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated th this is a request to increase the size of a free standing sig from 80 square feet to 126 square feet at 7600 University Ave e. He stated that in re- viewing the conditions for a varianc , the petitioner has not met four conditions. He stated tha the Appeals Commission has recommended denial of this reques and staff concurs. The petitioner was not MOTION by Councilwoman Bol,X60m by Erickson Oil Product , Inc. Upon a voice vote, avoting carried unanimously.l NEW BUSINESS• at the meeting. to deny Variance Request, VAR #95-34 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion 19. VARIANCE/REOUEST_ VAR 996i - Mr !Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for a variance to reduce the side yard setback from 20 feet to 2.9 feet r1 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 1996 PAGE 12 to allow the construction of an 83 foot by 88 foot addition to the rear of an existing industrial building at 5130 Main Street. He stated that when originally constructed, this building wa less than five feet from the lot line, and there were variances Vo allow additions to this structure. Mr. Hickok stated that the Appeals Commission recommen ed approval of this variance with four stipulations which he outlined, as follows: (1) the petitioner shall conduct soil bori gs in the area of the addition if contaminated soil exists. All ntaminated soil will be removed from the site prior to issua a of a building permit; (2) the petitioner shall relocate th above ground fuel storage tank in compliance with the Uniform F' a Code and all Fire Department permitting requirements; (3) t petitioner and the property owner to the north shall execute d record a maintenance agreement against both properties to ens a proper maintenance of both buildings; and (4) the shared driv way west of the addition shall be designed in a manner that p ovides a safe passage and distance between vehicular travel and he building addition. This driveway shall be approved by City taff prior to issuance of a building permit. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that yleist Central Environmental Consul- tants submitted a letter dated ecember 27, 1995 responding to the first stipulation regarding so 1 contamination. She felt that it may be best for the petit'oner to discuss the soil borings analysis, as they are in an dn-going program for monitoring pollu- tion on the site. Mr. Steve Schwartz, repre,,genting Dealers Manufacturing, introduced Jeff Hanratty, Projectngineer, from West Central Environmental Consultants. Mr. Hanratty stated that 67 soil borings have been taken in the last seven years.a stated that contamination below the ground water table inter ace exists on the western half of the site, including the pro osed building addition footprint. He stated that ground waterco tamination exists from 30 feet to 70 feet below land surface a cannot be excavated as noted in Stipulation No. 1 due to its de h and volume. He stated that, consequently, this contaminatio will be treated using "in-place" methods. Mr. Hanratt stated that in the past, degreasing solvents were used for clean' g parts and dispersed into the sanitary sewer system into a f1# waste trap which leaked. He stated that they are proposin to use a pump out well and are in the process of getting an indu trial waste water permit to contain the contamination to their roperty. He stated that to address the soil contamination and g ound water contamination on site, a remedial pump will be inst led inside the building to treat the soil and ground water. Mr. Schwartz stated that they would like the first stipulation removed because they have done the soil borings on the property. 6601 Lucia Lane Sidevard Setback Variance DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioners request that a variance be granted to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to .5 feet. If approved, the variance would allow reconstruction of an existing garage. The property was granted a variance in 1965 to allow construction of the existing garage to 3 feet. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The subject parcel is located at the intersection of 66th Avenue and Lucia Lane. The subject parcel is located adjacent to the paper right of way of 66th Avenue, 66th Avenue is an unimproved street. The petitioner has three alternatives which would meet the code: 1. Vacate 66th Avenue; 20 feet would accrue to the petitioner's property. 2. Locate the garage at the 17.5 foot setback. Locate the garage 25 feet from the south property line and acquire an easement from the City to drive on the 66th Avenue right-of-way. The Council could choose to grant a variance to maintain the 3 foot encroachment. The request exceeds all previous requests of this nature (five feet is the greatest variance granted). RECOAMENDED ACTIONS: As the request exceeds previously granted variances, staff recommends that the City Council deny the request. APPEALS COAMMSION ACTION: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the request to the City Council. PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. Variance to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to .5 feet. Location of Property: 6601 Lucia Lane Legal Description of Property: Lot 4, Block 1 Alice Addition Size: 8,391.73 square feet Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation: Typical suburban; grass trees, shrubs, etc. Existing Zoning/Platting: R-1, Single Family Dwelling; Alice Addition, 1963 Availability of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: Lucia. Lane Pedestrian Access: n/a Engineering Issues: Possible vacation of adjacent street. 17.05 Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Property Description and Dory The subject parcel is located at the intersection of Lucia Lane and 66th Avenue, with 66th Avenue unconstructed. Located on the subject parcel is a 20' X 40' single family dwelling unit built in 1964, and a 14' X 20' detached garage built in 1965. The petitioners are proposing to remove the existing garage and construct and new garage 16 X M. In 1965, the City granted a variance to the property owner to reduce the side yard setback from 14.27 (the distance of the dwelling to the south property line) to 3' to allow construction of the garage. See attached zoning code section from 1963. Analys Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the City Code requires that the side yard setback on the street side of a comer lot shall not be less than 17.5 feet. Public Purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. The petitioner is proposing to expand the garage to the south and east. This reduces the setback from the three feet granted in 1965 to .5 feet. The petitioner could choose to expand the garage to the north, thereby maintaining the existing encroachment. The subject parcel is unique since it abuts an unimproved right-of-way. The dwelling on the adjacent property to the south faces the same direction as the dwelling on the subject parcel. The dwelling on the property to the rear faces Pierce street, so there is no "line of sight" encroachment or traffic issues. The fact remains, however, that the City could construct a street within the a 50 foot right of way between Lucia Lane and Pierce Street. Sixty-sixth Avenue does exist between Pierce Street and Channel Road to the east. If the variance were granted, and the street constructed, the structure would be six inches from the right of way line, and 10 feet from the curb line. The petitioner has the following alternatives to pursue in order to meet the code (see attached drawing): 1. Vacate the 66th Avenue right of way between Lucia. Lane and Pierce Street. Twenty feet would accrue to the petitioner's property, thereby eliminating the need for a variance. All property owners abutting 66th Avenue would have to consent to the vacation. Staff understands that there may be at least one owner who objects to this option 3 17.06 2. Locate the garage behind the house 17.5 feet from the property line. This would require relocating the patio and existing garage slab. There is adequate room on the site to accommodate this option. 3. Locate the garage behind the dwelling facing the south property line and 25 feet from the property line; acquire an easement from the City to drive on the 66th Avenue right of way to access the garage. The Commission could also choose to grant a variance to maintain the existing encroachment of three feet. Recommendation The request exceeds those previously granted. Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the request to the City Council. ADJACENT SITES WEST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling SOUTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling EAST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling NORTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Dwelling Comprehensive Planning Issues: N/A Public Hearing Comments: To be taken 4 17.07 Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential. a�0 Community Development Department PLANNaNGDMSION City of Fridley DATE: January 4, 1996 TO: William Bums, City Manager FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Disadvantages and Advantages of Vacating 66th Avenue between Lucia Lane and Pierce Street Staff met to discuss the disadvantages and advantages of vacating 66th Avenue between Lucia Lane and Pierce Street adjacent to 6601 Lucia Lane N.E., property owned by Anthony and Joyce Swanson, the petitioners for variance request, VAR #95-31. We determined the following: Disadvantages: 1. The vacation of 66th Avenue eliminates an access alternative to Lucia Lane should the State or County construct a median in Mississippi Street. Staff has contacted the County to get information regarding the possibility of a median at Mississippi Street, east of Trunk Highway 65. The County lists the intersection improvement as a 'mid range project' to occur five to ten years from now. The exact length of a median has not been determined and could range from 300 feet to 780 feet. In the event that a median is constructed at a length that limits turning movements to Lucia Lane, constructing a connection from Pierce Street to 68th Place would be an alternative that would allow residents to get back to Lucia Lane. The right-of-way would have to be acquired, or an 'official map' adopted to reserve the right-of-way. A number of property owners are affected and a detailed engineering study should be conducted to determine if the road could be built. 2. The land to the north of Pierce Street is zoned for multi -family development. The elimination of 66th Avenue would force traffic to use Lucia Lane alone versus using 66th Avenue for east bound traffic. 3. Vacation of 66th Avenue eliminates a shorter right-of-way and a lower street cost when comparing it to the Pierce Street and Lucia Lane connection. 17.01 Advantages/Disadvanta�, os to Vacating 66th Avenue January 4, 1996 Page 2 4. Utilities are currently in place in the 66th Avenue alignment. A right-of-way allows for a combination of both street and utilities. Although an easement could be reserved, the right-of-way is more efficient. 5. The official mapping process for the Pierce Street extension is far more lengthy than simply installing the improvements in an existing right-of-way. Advantages: 1. Creates an interior lot for the petitioners. They could then construct a double garage without requiring a variance. 2. The adjacent property owners could continue to use the property legally. 3. It increases the tax base to the City. 4. It eliminates the potential of a future road too close to accessory structures. Partial Vacation Staff believes that partial vacation of the street would also not be an advantage to the City because of the reasons stated above. Utilities We have determined that a sanitary sewer line is located within the south 30 feet of the right-of-way. This area would also be a logical location to 'loop" the water system to improve pressure and quality. Staff requests that if the vacation is approved, a 30 foot drainage and utility easement be retained over the south 30 feet of the right-of- way. Recommendation Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the City maintain the right-of-way at 66th Avenue. Staff will continue to look for garage alternatives to meet the petitioner's needs. If the area is vacated, a 30 foot utility easement should be dedicated. SH/dw 17.02 CITY OF FRIDLEY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE To: Michele McPherson, Planning Asst. From: Leon Madsen, City Assessor Subject: 66th Ave. Vacation Date: November 27, 1995 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ The following tax impact may be expected if 66th Ave., St., was vacated: Address Value Incr. 6597 Lucia Ln. $3,700 6601 Lucia Ln. $2,700 6596 Pierce St. $3,900 6610 Pierce St. $2,000 between Lucia Lane and Pierce Tax Incr. $81 $59 $86 These value and tax amounts are only estimates based on current rates and value bases. If the vacation were to become final yet this year, the tax and value increases would become effective for taxes payable in 1997. For pay 1997, the value and tax rates may be different. The reason that the values are higher on Pierce is because land is worth more, there, than on Lucia Ln. with its apartment traffic. The reason the increase is less, on 6610 Pierce is because it's frontage is primarily on a non -improved street and it is much larger than the other 3. 17.09 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 27,E 1995 PAGE 7 Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:17 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this public hear "g is necessary to initiate the project for the improvement of S ony- brook Creek. He stated that Petition Number 6A-1995 was r ceived signed by eleven property owners agreeing to the $2,000 a essment and waiving the right to a public hearing. He sta ed that a petition has now been received from seven pro rty owners supporting this improvement, the $2,000 assessment, d waiving the right to a public hearing. He stated that the two petitions incorporate all of the properties on the Stonyb ook Creek portion of the project. Mr. Flora recommended that the petition be 'eceived and the public hearing be closed. No persons in the audience spoke regar ng this improvement project for Stonybrook Creek. Councilman Schneider stated thaletter was received regarding the easements. Mr. Flora stated that easem is have been executed except for two properties, and the major' y are permanent easements. He stated that the Netzs and Ma ns indicated that they will sign the construction easements after they are changed to indicate a temporary easement a d a final drainage utility easement. He stated that the So ios indicated that they will sign a release agreement once the roject has been completed. He stated that once work is complete the easements will allow for maintenance on the pipe and ditch ystems. MOTIONby uncilman Billings to receive Petition No. 12-1995. Seconded b Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, May Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. V N` by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. ded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the c hearing closed at 8:23 p.m. NEW BUSINESS• 13. VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #95-31, BY ANTHONY AND JOYCE SWANSON. TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 17.5 FEET TO .5 FEET TO ALLOW RECONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6601 LUCIA LANE N.E. (WARD 2): Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request to allow a variance from the required setback of 17.5 feet to .5 feet FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 27, 1995 PAGE 8 for a side yard on a corner lot adjacent to a public right-of-way. He stated that the variance is requested to allow the reconstruc- tion of a garage. Mr. Hickok stated that the Planning Commission and staff reviewed this variance request and determined that there are really three alternatives. He stated that these alternatives are: (1) to vacate the 66th Avenue right-of-way between Lucia Lane and Pierce Street; (2) locate the garage behind the house 17.5 feet from the property line; and (3) locate the garage behind the dwelling facing the south property line and 25 feet from the rear property line and acquire an easement from the City to drive on the 66th Avenue right-of-way to access the garage. Mayor Nee asked if 66th Avenue was closed if it would adversely affect the traffic in the neighborhood. Mr. Hickok stated that the potential for a street is debatable. He stated that, at this time, it is landscaped property that is being enjoyed by the property owners. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the right-of-way for 66th Avenue has been acquired to provide access between Lucia Lane and Pierce Street. He stated that this provides the City possibilities for future development. Councilman Schneider stated that the only reason for the variance is because of the platted right-of-way. He felt that if a street has not been constructed in the last thirty years, it should probably be determined if there is a need for the right-of-way. He stated that he can see the need to continue Pierce Street in order to open up possible development of lots in the future, but he questioned if the 66th Avenue right-of-way was really needed. Mr. Flora stated that the 66th Avenue right-of-way is another way of distributing traffic if Pierce Street is opened. He stated that if this right-of-way is vacated, it eliminates an option. Mr. Hickok stated that if 66th Avenue was vacated the land would be added to the four adjacent properties. This would increase the value of these properties from $2,000 to $3,900, and increase taxes in a range of $44 to $86 per year. He stated that for this particular site, the value would increase by $2,700, and taxes would be increased by $59 per year. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this variance request and request staff to submit a report on the pros and cons of vacating the 66th Avenue right-of-way. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Councilman Schneider stated that he did not feel the variance is very significant. He proposed to grant the variance and, if the City vacates the easement, the petitioner would accept it. He FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 27, 1995 PAGE 9 stated that this right-of-way is being used now by all the adjacent property owners, and it seems the right-of-way should be vacated and added to the tax rolls. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Variance Request, VAR #95-31, with the stipulation that should the 66th Avenue right-of- way be vacated by the City, the petitioner agrees to accept this parcel, maintain it, and pay taxes on it. Further, to direct staff to report on the pros and cons of vacating 66th Avenue. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Councilman Billings stated that he has a problem of approving a variance that is within six inches of the right-of-way. He stated that a variance has already been granted for 14-1/2 feet. He felt that this would be setting a dangerous precedent. He stated that it seems highly unlikely that the street will ever by constructed. If the street is vacated, the variance would not be necessary. He stated that if, in fact, the street is needed, a variance would have been approved which is greater than any in the history of the City when there really is not a hardship involved. This would be in violation of the spirit and intent of the State statute. He stated that he would vote against the variance because if the street is not vacated and constructed at some future date, the garage would be too close to the street. Councilman Schneider stated that the garage has been there for 25 years, and the street has not been constructed. He stated that the alternate location for the garage places it immediately behind the house, and the driveway would have to be much longer. He stated that the options are not very practical, and he did not feel there would be a pressing need to construct this street. Mr. Swanson, the petitioner, stated that if he built the garage in the back, his neighbors would only have a view of the garage instead of the trees. He stated that if he rebuilds the garage where it is now located, he is still twelve feet from the right- of-way. For the two foot variance, he would be ten feet from the right-of-way. He did not feel that there would be that much of a difference between ten or twelve feet. Mrs. Swanson stated that these buildings have been in existence on Lucia Lane over thirty years, and they wanted to improve their property and construct a new garage. Councilman Schneider asked if all four property owners must agree to a vacation. Mr. Hickok stated that the vacation policy for alleys has been to have one hundred percent in support for a vacation. He stated that staff viewed this as being similar to an alley vacation. Councilman Billings stated that the most important question is whether adjacent property owners are in favor or opposed, but the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING—W NOVEMBER 27, 1995 PAGE 10 vacation is at Council's discretion. He stated that the policy, in particular to vacation of alleys, is that the City wanted one hundred percent participation because that is an access to a particular property. He stated that in this particular instance, it is not that critical because access to these properties would not be affected. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table Variance Request, VAR #95-31 until the Council meeting on January 8, 1996. Seconded by Council- man Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to direct staff to prepare an analysis of the pros and cons of vacating 66th Avenue and to present a report to the Council prior to the Council meeting of January 8, 1996. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice Vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 91-1995 ADOPTING A DRUG AND ALCOHOL/POLICY TESTING ACT AND RELATED REGULATIONS: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated tat in 1988, the Federal government passed a Drug Free Workplac ct that led to a policy for all City employees that was approv by Council in May, 1993. He stated that in February, 1994, a ew set of regulations were initiated for the Transportation S ety Act that included municipalities. He stated this means at employees who drive large trucks, drivers of buses which ransport sixteen or more passengers, or drivers of trucks any size that transport hazardous materials are subject to ese regulations. He stated that the City is.required by law o have a policy covering these kinds of occasions. He reviewed a six different kinds of tests. Mr. Hunt stated that cities c choose to implement the regulations individually or join a con rtium administered by a third party. He stated that he is re ommending that the City enter into a service agreement with err Transportation Services, Inc. doing business as Metro -Test to administer the City's. participation in their consortium. H stated that the City Attorney has reviewed the agreement wi Kerr Transportation Services, Inc. and recommends that a rovision be added that specifies this service agreement is co ected to our policy. He stated that there is no reference as to ow much insurance Kerr Transportation should carry which should Irobably be included. He stated that there also is some langua that is apparently omitted under Item 10, Indemnifi- cation, wh ch should be inserted. He recommended that the resolu- tion be a opted to approve the agreement and that the City Attorney work ou the details with Kerr Transportation. by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 91-1995. 1 by Councilman Schneider. CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 7, 1995 Chairperson Savage called the November 7, 995, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Diane Savage, Lar Kuechle, Ken Vos, Cathy Smith Members Absent: Carol Others Present: ScotXeMcPh;rson, kokPlanning Coordinator Mic Planning Assistant J ce & Anthony Swanson, 6601 Lucia Lane N.E. ohn Allen, Industrial Equities Dennis Zylla, FBC Partnership MOTION bf Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve the Octob 24, 1995, Appeals Commission minutes as written. N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE OTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR *95 - Per Section 3205:07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback from a street right-of- way from 17.5 feet to 0.5 feet, to allow reconstruction of a garage, on Lot 4, Block 1, Alice Addition, generally located at 6601 Lucia Lane N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED,AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:04 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the request is for 6601 Lucia Lane which is located in the northeast corner of the city. It is located at the intersection of Lucia Lane and 66th Avenue. What is unique about this intersection is that 66th Avenue is actually not constructed between Pierce Street and Lucia Lane. The petitioner's property is adjacent to a "paper" right-of-way. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all the surrounding parcels. 17.11 APPEALS CObMSSION MEET3NG, NOVEMBER 7, 1995 PAGE 2 Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 0.5 feet. Currently located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and a detached single car garage. The existing garage measures 14 feet x 20 feet. The petitioner is proposing to construct a garage 16 feet x 24 feet. The property did receive a variance in 1965 in order to reduce the side yard setback from 14.27 feet, the distance of the dwelling to the south property line, down to 3 feet to allow construction of the existing garage. Ms. McPherson stated, as staff analyzed the request, there are potentially three options the petitioner could pursue which would avoid a variance request. The ',first would be to vacate the adjacent right-of-way of 66th Avenue. In order for that to be accomplished, all property owners abutting the right-of-way would need to agree to the vacation, Staff understands from a conversation the building official had with the petitioner that there may be at least one property owner who would object to this particular option. The second option would be to relocate the garage toward the back of the property and 17.5 feet from the south property line which would then comply with the code requirements. The third option would be to relocate the garage to the rear of the property facing 66th Avenue and acquiring an easement from the City to drive on 66th Avenue in order to access the garage. The third option would allow the petitioner to be in code compliance should 66th Avenue ever be constructed. The Commission also has the option of granting the variance to maintain a distance of 3 feet. Ms. McPherson stated the request as presented exceeds similar requests which were previously granted. Staff, therefore, recommends denial of the.request. Ms. Smith asked where the driveway currently exists. Ms. McPherson stated the current driveway extends from Lucia Lane, parallel to 66th Avenue, to the existing garage. Mr. Kuechle asked if the petitioner needed a new variance request for the 3 feet. Ms. McPherson stated yes. This is because the petitioner is expanding the line of encroachment. Mr. Kuechle asked how much property the petitioner would gain if they vacated the right-of-way. Ms. McPherson stated that according to staff's review of the plat, the petitioner would acquire an additional 20 feet. The entire right-of-way is 50 feet in width., When the area was platted, the petitioner's lot is in one plat, and 20 feet of the street right - 17.12 APPEALS CM44ISSION MET3NG, NOVMaZR 7, 1995 PAGE 3 of -way came from this plat to the north. An additional 30 feet came from the plat to the south. Mr. Kuechle asked if it was correct that, unless all the property owners adjacent to the right-of-way agree, the right-of-way cannot be vacated. Can the City Council override this? Ms. McPherson stated the City Council could choose to vacate the street over the objection of the adjacent property owner. It has been the Council's policy to require unanimous approval by the abutting property owners prior to approving a vacation. Mr. Kuechle asked if this request would go to Council regardless of the Appeals Commission's decision. Ms. McPherson stated yes. All requests where staff recommend denial go before the City Council. Ms. Savage asked if the City would be giving up the road if the vacation were approved. Ms. McPherson stated yes. If the City were to vacate this right- of-way, that would eliminate the City's option of ever completing the street. Mr. Kuechle asked if there was an interest in doing that. Ms. McPherson stated not to her knowledge. It is, however, a potential future option. Mr. Kuechle stated it does not appear there is any property along there that could be subdivided or better developed. - Ms. Savage stated, in looking at the area, it does not look like it would be made into a street. Ms. McPherson stated this is correct, but the fact remains that the possibility still exists. Dr. Vos asked if there was any history of why this was not made a street. Ms. McPherson stated she did not research that item. Dr. Vos stated the third alternative proposed by staff essentially says the petitioner has to come and ask for a right-of-way to go along the side. The property to the east has an attached garage. The one to the south also has an attached garage so it would be in an awkward position. He understands the house is 14 feet from the side yard so that is in nonconformance as well. 17.13 APPEALS Ca44ISSION MEETING, NOVEMER 7, 1995 PAGE 4 Ms. McPherson stated yes. Ms. Savage asked the petitioner to discuss the hardship and his reaction to the alternatives proposed by staff. Mr. Swanson stated the existing garage is falling apart underneath. When the garage was built, it was built directly on a slab. The slab is cracked and the wood is rotting at the bottom. In order to repair it, they would need to lift up the garage and remove the bottom. The garage they have is too small. The request is for 2 feet so there will still be some distance away from the property line. If the street were put in, they are still 10 feet away from where the street would be. He was also under the impression that all property owners needed to agree to remove the street. Ms. McPherson stated the City's policy to vacate the street has been that all property owners must agree. She did not know the City's policy in terms of installing the street. Mr. Swanson stated the street goes nowhere. He was told by City staff that, if the City gave the property back, he still could not build anything on it. There will always be a right-of-way down the center and they will always have to maintain that right-of-way. Their neighbor to the south has a beautiful garden there, and there is no way he would give a variance for that property. He did not think 2 feet was such a big deal. Ms. Savage asked if any of the neighbors objected. Mr. Swanson stated he did not object. However, the taxes would go up in excess of $90 per year. Others use the right-of-way now, but do not have to pay taxes. They don't want the property on their tax roles because they have free use of the property now. He did not think the City would ever put a street in there. The street runs only one block. Dr. Vos stated there are some access problems. If he turned down Lucia Lane, he cannot go east. Ms. Swanson stated Lucia Lane is only a two -block street which exits out to Highway 65. It only goes to Pierce. They maintain the right-of-way and leave it open for walkers. Their neighbor uses the area for gardens, etc., but does not want the property put on his taxes. Dr. Vos asked the petitioner why they propose to expand to the south rather than to the north. Ms. Swanson stated they have a cement patio with an awning and a deck at the back of the house. They are trying to work with what 17.14 APPEALS CMIAI38ION METn-TG, NOVEMER 7, 1995 PAGE 5 they have.. They are trying to go with a new structure to replace a deteriorating structure. Mr. Swanson stated there are also existing shrubs there. Ms. Savage asked if any neighbors opposed their plan. Ms. Swanson stated they do not oppose. She has talked to several of them personally. Ms. Savage asked if any of the three alternatives would work. Mr. Swanson stated if he cannot get approval for 2 more feet, he will probably raise the existing structure and rebuild the bottom, put blocks under it so it does not rot. In 1965, they put the lumber down and bolted it directly to the cement. He would prefer to have a bigger garage with a new roof and have enough space for his equipment. This will still be a single car garage but measuring 16 feet x 24 feet. Ms. Swanson stated rather than having to tear everything out and move it they want to expand their garage by 2 feet on one side and 4 feet on the back. Dr. Vos asked, if the street were installed, how far would it be from the curb to the garage. Ms. McPherson stated the City typically builds 30 foot wide streets. Assuming it was centered in the right-of-way, there would be 10 feet on either side. The proposed structure would be approximately 10.5 feet to it feet from the curb. As it currently exists, there would be approximately 13 feet. Mr. Swanson stated he did not think the City would ever put a street in there. He was under the impression that if one owner said no, they could not it. Dr. Vos stated that is different than vacating. A vacation says that you are willing to put the area on your property and on the tax roles. That is different than saying we need a street for public safety, etc. If the street were vacated, the property would eventually pay taxes. If the street were installed, the owners would be assessed for curb, etc. Mr. Swanson stated, even if a street were put in there, he did not think being at 10 feet or 12 feet makes that much difference. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to 'close the public hearing. 17.15 APPEALS CMaSSION MET3NG, NOVEMBER 7, 1995 PAGE 6 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:23 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend denial of the request. Even though it is only 2 feet, it means we are granting a variance to 0.5 feet from the right-of-way. This is something that has not been done before. The vacation needs to be further investigated. What is happening here is the property owners enjoy the property rights that they would as owners but do not own it. The petitioner should check out whether or not the taxes really amounts to $90. If the value of the property is $4,500, that figure seems high. He would recommend denial of the request. Dr. Vos stated this is tough because, when you have a street that may not be there, it is hard to talk about a variance because there is no property next to it. There is no neighbor there being affected. He does not want to set a precedent but thought the City Council needs to solve the dilemma. Ms. Smith stated this is an unusual situation. She would be inclined to approve the variance but she has a problem with setting a precedent. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to deny Variance Request, VAR #95 -31, -by Anthony Swanson, to reduce the side yard setback from a street right-of-way from 17.5 feet to 0.5 feet, to allow reconstruction of a garage, on Lot 4, Block 1, Alice Addition, generally located at 6601 Lucia Lane N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council would consider this request on November 27. 2. Per Section 205.18.05.D: ).(a) of the Fridley City Code, to allow loading docks in th front the facing Northco Drive, to allow construction of 87,600 square foot multi -tenant office/warehouse industrial building on Lot 1, Block 1, Northco Business Park, and t 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park Second Addition, genera ly located at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and No o Drive. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr.' the public hearing notice and to open UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHK MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING 17.16 , to waive the reading of a public hearing. SAVAGE DECLARED THE 8:27 P.M. Inter - CitySh ngles Z gwdb ord Builders =: 4�6 Rafters Ranch ww'dow ,nwkftd 633-7389 atard Dou oncro» C SorvK* Wall flow Doo, Co. 2' Apron ESTIMATE FORM DATE_ GARAGE SIZE_( X APRON _ DRIVEWAY SIZE WIRE MESH 1/2' -RODS -CONDUIT PIPE OVERHEAD DOOR SIZE OFFSET _ SERVICE DOOR LOCATION BLOCK SIZE & LOCATION WATERPROOF BACKFILL EXCAVATION BY GRADE FLAT DROP OFF r CITY -d' f ADDRESS 0 ii`I4 • _1A 4 A a' .e__ NAME ,v TELEPHONE WORK PERMIT OBTAINED BY SALESMAN CEMENT MAN OLD GARAGE REMOVED BY OLD CEMENT REMOVED BY —it/ - t —114 i Al 45.28 ZONING SIDE Y A.RD EXCEPTIONS 45.24. The side yard width on a street side of a corner lot shall be not less than 45 1/2 the distance of the front yard depth requirement. for the lot to the rear thereofr fami when said lot to the rear thereof has frontage along a side street, and in such case no three accessory building on said corner lot shall be closer to said side streetthan the dis- tance of the front yard depth requirement for the lot to the rear thereof, provided, however, that this regulation shall not be so interpreted as to reduce the buildable over width of a corner lot to less than 25 feet, nor to prohibit the erection of an accessory building where compliance with this regulation cannot reasonably be had. The side 45 yard on the side of a private garage, attached to a dwelling at one side, may be re- grou duced to not less than 5 feet, provided the height of the building on that side is not more than 15 feet. four REAR YARDS 45.25, REAR YARDS REQUIRED. R-1 and R-2 Districts: A rear yard with a depth of not less than 25 per cent of the lot depth is required, with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for a dwelling, and not less than 30 feet permitted or more than 75 feet required for any other kind of main building. 45.251, R-3 Districts: Same as in R-1 and R-2 Districts, provided that 1 addition- al foot of depth of rear yard is required for each 2 feet or portion thereof, of building height in excess of 35 feet. 45.252. C-1 Districts: A rear yard is required only for a building containing any dwelling units and on any lot, the rear or side line of which adjoins any R-1, R-2, R-3 or C -IS District, and the depth shall be not less than 25 feet. �t 45.253. C-2, M-1, M-2 Districts: Same as in C-1 Districts, provided that 1 addi- tional foot of depth of rear yard is required for each 4 feet or portion thereof of build- ing height in excess of 35 feet. 45.254. REAR YARD DEPTH: WITH .ALLEY ADJOINING: In computing the depth _ ` of a rear yard for any building where the rear line of the lot adjoins an alley, 1/2 of the width of such alley may be included as rear yard depth, provided, that the rear yard depth actually on the lot shall be not less than 20 feet in any dwelling district and not less than 10 feet in -any other district. FRONT YARDS REQUIRED 45.26. R-1, R-2, R-3 and C-1 DISTRICTS: A front yard with a depth of not lessx'> than 35 feet is required. vin 45.261. C-2, M-1, M-2 DISTRICTS: None, unless a block is partly in a C-2, M-1 or M-2 District and partly in another. district, in which case the front yard depth required in such other district shall apply along its entire length. FRONT YARD EXCEPTION 45.27. In a block where the. average of the front yard depths of existing buildings within a distance of 100 feet on both sides of a building to be erected is not more than 6 feet greater or not more than 6 feet less than the front yard depth required for the district in which such block is located, the front yard depth for such building shall be a not less than such average depth. Should this difference be more than 6 feet the board of appeals may vary the front yard requirement for the building. t' LOT AREAS R E Q -U IRE D 45.28. R-1 DISTRICTS: A lot area of not less than 9,000 square feet fora dwell R-1 DISTRICT ing is required, or not less than 7, 500 square feet, if the lot is one on a subdivision . ?+ plat recorded prior to the effective date of this ordinance, or on a plat approved• by the City council subsequently, provided that an area of not less than .18, 000 squarg feet is required for a lot unserved by a City sanitary sewer or an approved private, community sewage disposal system, or not less than 10, 000 square feet if the lot is one on a subdivision plat recorded prior to the effective date of this ordinance or on plat approved by the City council subsequently. (1-2-63) 71 4r; 17.08 VAR #95-31 Mailing List Mailed: 10/20/95 Anthony Swanson i Anthony/Joyce Swanson Thomas/Nancy Rorte John/Teresa Gibson 6601 Lucia Lane NE or Current Resident or Current Resident Fridley, MN 55432 6580 Channel Road NE 1255 - 66th Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Ricky/Lu Ann Throndson Burton Scherven Edward Lancello or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6620 Lucia Lane NE 6610 Pierce Street NE 6597 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 David/Angela Visker M. Broos/M. Hoagberg Jackie Young or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6581 Lucia Lane NE 6565 Lucia Lane NE 6549 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Sandra Steinberg Janice Bednarski Loran/Shirley Palmer or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6533 Lucia Lane NE 6610 Channel Road NE 6596 Channel Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 W & I Hitchcock Vernon/Donna Brewers Martin/Ardis Imbertson or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6532 Pierce Street NE 6548 Pierce Street NE 6564 Pierce Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Marian Skyhawk Richard/Diane Berganini Donald/Mary Landry or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6580 Pierce Street NE 6596 Pierce Street NE 6597 Pierce Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 James/Beverly Wedan Erwin/Suzanne Berglund Gregory/Deanna Martin or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6581 Pierce Street NE 6565 Pierce Street NE 6549 Pierce Street NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Herbert/Susan Rainey Dennis/Carol Brantner Anoka County or Current Resident or Current Resident 325 East Main Street 6540 Lucia Lane NE 6546 Lucia Lane NE Anoka, MN 55303 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Dean/Betty Thomas Darrel/Marie Goerdt Dennis/Mary Johnson or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 6550 Lucia Lane NE 6610 Lucia Lane NE 6600 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 William McCloskey or Current Resident { 6620 Channel Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 Oscar/Agnes Pederson or Current Resident 6670 Channel Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 Carl/Adele Swanson or Current Resident 6663 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Milton Hughes or Current Resident 6670 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Quentin/Brenda Steele or Current Resident 6621 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Peter/Barbara Reith or Current Resident 6630 Channel Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 Darrel/Marie Goerdt or Current Resident 6610 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Stephen/Karen Hank or Current Resident 6630 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Milton Hughes 4410 Douglas Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Diane Savage Appeals Comm. Chair 567 Rice Creek Terr. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Ryle/Jami Young or Current Resident 6648 Channel Road NE Fridley, MN 55432 Kevin/Rita Kealy or Current Resident 6645 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Richard/Sandra Hardy or Current Resident 6640 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 Leland Anderson or Current Resident 6631 Lucia Lane NE Fridley, MN 55432 City Council Members PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Appeals Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, November 7, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Variance request, VAR #95- 31, by Anthony Swanson, per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback from a street right-of-way from 17.5' to .51, to allow reconstruction of a garage, on Lot 4, Block 1, Alice Addition, generally located at 6601 Lucia Lane N.E. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than October 31, 1995. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 572-3593. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR APPEALS COMMISSION CITY OF FRIDLEY CrTYOF COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW FMDLEY File Number File Date Meeting Date 57 10/16/95 11/7/95 File Description: Variance request, VAR f95-31 , by Anthony Swanson; 6— 01 Lucia Lane NE Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department *** Comments *** Barbara Dacy Scott Hickok Michele McPherson Jon Wilczek John Flora Ron Julkowski Clyde Moravetz Leon Madsen Dave Sallman Dick Larson CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 66OZ J.UCj'a Lr1 A)9- Property d9 Property Identification Number Legal description: 4.® x 41 R J-h- / A L,, c e. % c4d. n/ Lot Block / Tract/Addition�r'ce Aad Current zoning: i Square footagetacreage y / Reason for variance and hardship: `' D Lr c e-Y i ST rg qg� r� e _!F71TQ -/lu Qair�ge- �s JeT(ov-o-T�ection of City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No_ If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purcha7c, Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAMEn �F 4 C- c- • a W ct. +1!k in ADDRESS (0 O f Lk c.c):D, L,n /U L DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE ✓r/—//-1S' ce_ PETITIONER/ INFORMATION NAMEAa ti yl a swd.an so n ADDRESS % (a o I I l.,t c e.�` (. n IUE �`J C DAYTIlVIE PHONE lie- SIGNATURE DATE /6- Fee: 6-Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 ✓ for residential properties Permit VAR # Receipt # s9 o g Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commissi AA-- o Scheduled City Council date: /gJb/ CPe�'L APPLICATION DATE City of Fridley Community Development Variance Process APPEALS COMMISSION DATE weeks CITY COUNCIL DECISION CITY RECORDS ACTION AT ANOKA COUNTY 6550 (211 6556 (6W 6640 lsa) 6646 ( ail so (31) �! a 6540 cc t3f (1465301 C-> 6600 laa) im 6550 6556 (6W 6646 6646 ( ail (as l 6540 6540 6676 (1465301 laa) im im (17 ill) 6675 (sa) a t 1�1 VAR #95-31 MAnthony/Joyce Swanson A (6W I ) 6676 16 6675 (sa) a Lu) 6597 6596 6670 I) l) l �) ( 34 ) 6615 lWl (6W I ) l s0 l (6ka) 6631 (amu) z t51l 6630 (u l (� ) (6631) O (14) (57 a� l ) (N) (us) 37 (6) 6621 la) ORO M to 6W (14 1 163) t6) Q-' l 1n ) (44) A 16 a 6597 6596 I 1. I) l) l �) (40 ) t6m lWl (6W t6W ( uuS1 (amu) z t51l (421 () a (14) (57 a� l ) (N) d 163) t6) Q-' (49) (44) 6531 (10a) 6m 6S 60 6W 6501 (103) (�) ( ) ti) (a0) � ISm Street T N 13.05 LOCATION MAP ANCHOR BOLT SILL p4 �'• WIRE MESH • Free Estimates • Garage removal service a Driveways • Electrical work • Complete Financing with no money down 16" Construction ANCHOR BOLT - SILL 2" x 6" 6" BLOCK Shingles (Roof) Hardboard 2 x 6 Rafters Siding Ranch r + :* Window Service •• ••' Door JWIRE MESH ANCHOR BOLT SILL p4 �'• WIRE MESH • Free Estimates • Garage removal service a Driveways • Electrical work • Complete Financing with no money down 16" Construction RIDGE BOARD GABLE TRIM 'A" EXTERIOR SHEATHING BOSTON RIDGE ASPHALT SHINGLES 15' FELT PAPER BOXEDEAVES COLLAR TIES 48- O C 2"x BRACE 16 RAFTERS 16" O C 4000# TEST CONCRETE A A / �(I u L METAL CORNER DOU LE HEAD 2.2x12 INSULATED SHEATHING f TREATED BOTTOM PLATE ^� 4" CONCRETE SLAB 2'-0" APRON \ 1PLE\%RNER STUDS %z° Plywood Sheathing Shingles (Roof) Hardboard 2 x 6 Rafters Siding Ranch Window Service Insulated Door Overhead Door Double Wall Concrete Floor Construction 2' Apron RIDGE BOARD GABLE TRIM 'A" EXTERIOR SHEATHING BOSTON RIDGE ASPHALT SHINGLES 15' FELT PAPER BOXEDEAVES COLLAR TIES 48- O C 2"x BRACE 16 RAFTERS 16" O C 4000# TEST CONCRETE A A / �(I u L METAL CORNER DOU LE HEAD 2.2x12 INSULATED SHEATHING f TREATED BOTTOM PLATE ^� 4" CONCRETE SLAB 2'-0" APRON \ 1PLE\%RNER STUDS STUD ANCHOR BOLT SILL m WIRE MESH . Free Estimates • Garage removal service a Driveways. Electrical work • Complete Financing with no money down 16" Construction h° Plywood Sheathing ANCHOR BOLT Hardboard 2 x 6 Rafters - SILL 2" x 6" Ranch 6" BLOCK m Service Insulated Door Overhead Door Double Wall Concrete Floor Construction 2' Apron '' `►� WIRE MESH STUD ANCHOR BOLT SILL m WIRE MESH . Free Estimates • Garage removal service a Driveways. Electrical work • Complete Financing with no money down 16" Construction '''A" EXTERIOR SHEATHING RIDGE BOARD GABLE TRIM BOSTON RIDGE IkASPHALT SHINGLES LT PAPEyR ,/ BOXED EAVES COLLAR TIES 48"OC 2"x6" BRACE RAFTERS I6"0.0 4000# TEST CONCRETE METAL ICOR ER DOUBLE HEADER 2-2x12 INSULATED SHEATHING �- TREATED BOTTOM PLATE r. 4" CONCRETE SLAB 2'-0" APRON TRIPLE CORER STUDS h° Plywood Sheathing Shingles (Roof) Hardboard 2 x 6 Rafters Siding Ranch Window Service Insulated Door Overhead Door Double Wall Concrete Floor Construction 2' Apron '''A" EXTERIOR SHEATHING RIDGE BOARD GABLE TRIM BOSTON RIDGE IkASPHALT SHINGLES LT PAPEyR ,/ BOXED EAVES COLLAR TIES 48"OC 2"x6" BRACE RAFTERS I6"0.0 4000# TEST CONCRETE METAL ICOR ER DOUBLE HEADER 2-2x12 INSULATED SHEATHING �- TREATED BOTTOM PLATE r. 4" CONCRETE SLAB 2'-0" APRON TRIPLE CORER STUDS VAR #95-31 Anthony/Joyce Swanson 41�1� jjoul.ail at"d ooco k Telephone LAND SURVEYOPS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY. JOSEPH MACIASZEK 77'77 I 0 E$Isting j - 1082-1.10-68 6 -Proposed Option -17! Vacate 66th Avenue -e + -P A L I C 1-1* A 1) 1) IT I A ii u k a Couiity. Nliii;icsot:i " AW", N, ei';M AlWi e AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS ...... DAY OF M.U.11'.C- 11 A.D. 19 41, K.C.,HONM AND ASSOCIATES, INF.,,— LAND; ,SURVEYORS .'-t', of SEC. /3, T. 30, C/TY OF FR/DL EY