The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR 97-19GiYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Scott & Connie Masica 1070 Lynde Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Masica: November 14, 1997 On November 12, 1997, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #97-19, to reduce the setback of an accessory structure on a comer lot from 25 feet to 20 feet to allow the construction of an addition to an existing two -car garage on Lot 1, Block 3, Lyndale Builders 61' Addition with no stipulations. You have one year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3593. Sincerely, �' 444.z.� Michele McPherson Planning Assistant MM:Is Please review the above action, sign below, and return the original to the City of Fridley Planning Department by December 1, 1997. Concur with action taken. 0 11 l/'7 a it - Ak", -6 CITY OF FRIDLEY� 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: Residential Commercial/Industrial _ Signs PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site plan r wired for submittal, see attached Address: for[ —, ARWL— r idly , Property Identification Number. Legal Description: Lot Block 3 Tract/Addition 5 Yaw , g Current Zoning: Squ re foci ge/acreage: Reason for Variance: To bw Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No k If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee gwners musts' gn this form prior to processing) NAME: i ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: _ $'eQ - N�9'� SIGNATUR ATE: PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: swmx a a.j4:Q LLP ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: U$- N 8'9'- SIGNATURE/DATE: Section of City Code: FEES Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, or signs: Fee: $60.00 for residential properties: ��/ Receipt #: Received By: Application Number. Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: �� l Scheduled City Council Date: // 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: vh7 1// �/4ty City.of Fridley Land Use Application- Process 60 Day Agency Action Law Application Date Planning Commission Meeting 60 Day Window Starts Recommendation to Council 21-40 Daysl. Application Complete i i 10 Day Notice Submit Complete Application and Materials , , Public Hearings: Variance Vacations Lot Splits Plats Rezonings Zoning Amendments Wetland Replacements Comprehensive Plan Special Use Permits City Council Decision Approval or Denial 50-60 Days Approved, Action Taken Letter , Tabled, 60 M�®reays 'Denied , Public Hearings: Rezonings Zoning Amendments CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 12, 1997 ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kuechle called the November 12, 1997, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Q�7Q�LLt� Members Present: Lary Kuechle, Carol Beaulieu, Terrie Mau Members Absent: Ken Vos Others Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Scott & Connie Masica,1070 Lynde Drive MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to approve the October 22, 1997, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #97-19 BY SCOTT & CONNIE MASICA: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((3)) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the setback of an accessory structure on a comer lot from 25 feet to 20 feet to allow the construction of an addition to an existing two -car garage on Lot 1, Block 3, Lyndale Builders 6th Addition, the same being 1070 Lynde Drive. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the variance request is to reduce the side comer setback of an accessory structure from 25 feet to 20 feet. If the request is approved, a 16 -foot x 24 -foot addition to the existing detached garage would be constructed. Ms. McPherson stated the subject property is located at the southwest comer of Lynde Drive and Fillmore Street. Located south of and directly adjacent to the subject parcel is property zoned R-2, Two Family Dwelling. A duplex is located on the property. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners' dwelling was constructed in 1960 and the existing garage was constructed in 1965 at a 20 -foot setback. The purpose of the code section is to preserve off-street parking and to reduce line -of -site encroachment from the neighbor's property. The petitioners have installed the garage slab and the first row of blocks for the proposed addition. The garage, as well as the proposed addition, would face Fillmore Street. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 12,1997 PAGE 2 Ms. McPherson stated there. is adequate room for off-street parking. Typically, the City requires that face-to-face parking stalls in a parking lot be 20 feet deep. The windows in the adjacent duplex on Fillmore Street are on the second story. The duplexes are constructed such that the garage is on the first level with living space above the garage. There is little or no line -of -site impact from this request. The petitioners have also constructed a privacy fence which also provides separation between the two uses. This request is within previous approvals. The City has granted variances of this nature down to 8 feet. Ms. McPherson stated staff has no recommendation since this request is within previously granted requests. Typically, for this type of request, staff stipulates a hard surface driveway. However, the petitioners have already completed that particular part of the project so a stipulation of that nature would be redundant. Ms. Beaulieu asked, when the existing driveway was constructed, was the code requirement then 20 feet? Ms. McPherson stated she believed the code was 20 feet at that time. Mr. Kuechle asked if there was a building permit when the garage was originally built. Ms. McPherson stated, yes. Mr. Kuechle asked the petitioners if they had any additional comments. Ms. Masica stated if they were to push the garage back an additional 5 feet, that would limit what little back yard they have. They thought that would obstruct more or look odd. Mr. Kuechle asked how the slab came to be. Ms. Masica stated this was their second attempt within a year to have the old concrete driveway tom up. They had a new concrete driveway put in and then doubled in width and to also have the garage slab. The first time this was done a floating slab was put in. The contractor at that time evidently did not check the building code requirements for putting an addition on a floating slab attached to something that had a foundation. They did not need to pursue that any further because the concrete crumbled and washed away in less than a year. They have fought with the concrete company who did supply a new batch of concrete to replace the faulty concrete. They are still pursuing the contractor whom they cannot at this time find. The concrete company put in another slab. Ms. Masica stated her lack of communication with Mary over the phone trying to describe what she needed, what required a permit and what did not, she thought that anything that was concrete she could go ahead and do without the permit but that once they began with the lumber they would need to get a permit. The same day she received a call saying this was 5 feet too close. The same day, Mary called back saying the new contractor wants to have the foundation inspected and for which the petitioners did not have a permit. If they cannot get it done this week, the contractor will leave them until PPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. NOVEMBER 12._1997 PAGE April so they will be sitting with a mud driveway. She said she would take a chance, have the footings and foundation put in and approved at each step of the way and the proper driveway. If the request is denied, if nothing else, she would fill the blocks with dirt and plant flowers. They went ahead, worked with staff through what they could, and are now at this point. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:42 P.M. Ms. Mau stated she did not see a problem with the request. It would look strange to set the addition back 5 feet more. As long as they have a driveway, it should be fine. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. Staff reported there is no problem with off street parking or with the line -of -site. The hardship is because of the comer lot having more restrictions. She would be favor of approving the request. Mr. Kuechle concurred. The request meets the spirit of the code. He would be inclined to vote in favor of the request. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to recommend approval of Variance Request, #97-19, by Scott and Connie Masica, to reduce the setback of an accessory structure on a comer lot from 25 feet to 20 feet to allow the construction of an addition to an existing two -car garage on Lot 1, Block 3, Lyndale Builders 6th Addition, the same being 1070 Lynde Drive. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Ms. McPherson provided an update on Planning Commission and City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT: TION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE NOVEMBER 12,1997, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:44 P.M. Respectfully submitted, r 0-,�LZ U Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO: Property owners within 350 feet of 1070 Lynde Drive CASE NUMBER: VAR #97-19 APPLICANT: Scott and Connie Masica PURPOSE: To reduce the setback of an accessory structure on a comer lot from 25 feet to 20 feet to allow the construction of an addition to an existing two -car garage LOCATION OF PROPERTY. 1070 Lynde Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 3, Lyndale Builders 61 Addition DATE AND TIME OF Appeals Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, November 12,7:30 p.m. The Appeals Commission meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 35. PLACE OF HEARING: Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers 6431 University Avenue HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, or Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or fax at 571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMMODATIONS: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than November 5, 1997. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact either Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 572-3599, or Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant, at 572-3593. Mailing Date: BAKOVIC HUSEIN & IZETA OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1061 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 VAR #97-19 1070 Lynde Drive BECKERLEG ALICE J OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1041 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 COLQTTI DOMINIC A & JOYCE C OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1121 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 DENSMORE STEVE W DEORAJ JAINARAINE & SATYAWATI FAUCHER CATHERINE M OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1081 LYNDE DR 1120 LYNDE DR 5586 FILLMORE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 GEHRKE ROGER & MARY TRUSTEES HANSEN WALTER P & DOROTHY A HURAJT JOHN E & BEVERLY I OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1010 HATHAWAY LN 1050 LYNDE DR 1101 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 ISLAM MUHAMMAD Q & ISHRAT R OR CURRENT RESIDENT 5560 FILLMORE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55421 KOEHLER CLARKE L & BONNIE K OR CURRENT RESIDENT 5570 FILLMORE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 LIEN JACKIE C & LINDA D OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1131 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MC CARTY THEODORE F & D OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1051 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 NYQUIST GARY A & LYDIA L OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1111 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PROIS ROBERT E & KARYN S OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1060 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 JENSEN MARK A OR CURRENT RESIDENT 5572 FILLMORE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55421 KUUBITS ERICK O OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1021 HATHAWAY LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 LOSKOTA JOSEPH & JENNIFER OR CURRENT RESIDENT 5562 FILLMORE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55421 NGUYEN AN VAN & TAM THI OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1040 HATHAWAY LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PENN MARK T & NANTHALIE J OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1040 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 RAMACHER R A & COOPER R A OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1020 HATHAWAY LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 JONES WALTER PEARSON OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1021 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 LENTZ MICHAEL J & ALYCE M OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1130 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MASICA SCOTT A & CONNIE OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1070 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 NOTSCH BARBARA R OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1020 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PRINCE WILLIAM E III OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1030 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 RAUSCH NORMAN G & VIOLET I OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1031 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 REED THOMAS EARL & P A ROLSTAD RICHARD D & VALERIE SCHERER DONALD D & SANDRA K OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 990 HATHAWAY LN 1100 LYNDE DR 1000 HATHAWAY LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SCHLIE SHIRLEY M OR CURRENT RESIDENT 5588 FILLMORE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 VAR #97-19 1070 Lynde' Drive STINSON JEAN F OR CURRENT RESIDENT 970 HATHAWAY LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 TERRY JOHN J & SUE A OR CURRENT RESIDENT 980 HATHAWAY LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 TIEMANN DESIREE A WEGLARZ TERRENCE J & JOAN WOJTOWICZ GARY M OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1030 HATHAWAY LN 1071 LYNDE DR 1110 LYNDE DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 Date: October 14,1997 To: City of Fridley Appeals Board (Variance Request) From: Scott A. and Connie L. Masica 1070 Lynde Drive Fridley, Mn. 55432 Request: We are submitting a formal request(variance) to allow for a 3rd garage stall to be attached to the existing 2 stall detached garage on the property (corner lot) of Lynde Drive and Fillmore Street, at 1070 Lynde Drive Fridley Mn. This requires a variance as, in the 1960's when the home and garage were originally built, the building inspection sign off was incorrect regarding the setback of the garage from Fillmore Street. According to the City of Fridley ` Variance Conditions', we feel the following conditions apply: 1) `Circumstances that do not apply to other property within the immediate area'; There currently are several other homes within the area that have approximately the same (setback) that we currently have on our existing garage. In addition, the new townhomes located at the end of Fillmore Drive were granted a variance for a reduction of driveway/garage setback for several units at Appeals meeting that I was in attendance. 2) `Necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property'; To date, we have completed several projects to improve both the visibility and personal enjoyment of our residence which includes extensive landscaping in the back yard directly to the rear of the proposed addition and existing garage. Therefore, if we are required to `setback' our new garage addition an additional (5) feet to meet current setback requirements, it would greatly inhibit the amount of recreational space for our family. 3) `Unnecessary hardship'; Had we been aware that the original garage was not of legal code, we would have exercised our right to an appeal in 1996 at the time we presented a request for variance for a window addition. In addition to this, we have already extended our driveway area with new concrete to allow for the space to drive into an addition of a 3rd stall. This driveway restoration did not require a permit from the City of Fridley. 4) `Detrimental to the property in the vicinity'; We believe that if we were forced to setback the 3rd stall only of the garage, this would destroy the appearance of the entire building structures on the premises. By granting the request, it in no way would be detrimental to neighbors via destroying views or causir}g safedS. I Thank You for your consideration in this request. CSC, Scott and Connie Masica C17YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 October 20, 1997 Scott and Connie Masica 1070 Lynde Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Masica: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 days if their land use applications are complete. We received an application for a variance on October 17, 1997. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete and that the City of Fridley will be processing your application in accordance with Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code. Your application schedule is as follows: Appeals Commission November 12, 1997 City Council November 24, 1997 If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Michele McPherson Planning Assistant WAS C-97-203 Date: October 14,1997 To: City of Fridley Appeals Board (Variance Request) From: Scott A. and Connie L. Masica 1070 Lynde Drive Fridley, Mn. 55432 Request: We are submitting a formal request(variance) to allow for a 3`d garage stall to be attached to the existing 2 stall detached garage on the property (corner lot) of Lynde Drive and Fillmore Street, at 1070 Lynde Drive Fridley Mn. This requires a variance as, in the 1960's when the home and garage were originally built, the building inspection sign off was incorrect regarding the setback of the garage from Fillmore Street. According to the City of Fridley' Variance Conditions', we feel the following conditions apply: 1) `Circumstances that do not apply to other property within the immediate area'; There currently are several other homes within the area that have approximately the same (setback) that we currently have on our existing garage. In addition, the new townhomes located at the end of Fillmore Drive were granted a variance for a reduction of driveway/garage setback for several units at Appeals meeting that I was in attendance. 2) `Necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property'; To date, we have completed several projects to improve both the visibility and personal enjoyment of our residence which includes extensive landscaping in the back yard directly to the rear of the proposed addition and existing garage. Therefore, if we are required to `setback' our new garage addition an additional (5) feet to meet current setback requirements, it would greatly inhibit the amount of recreational space for our family. 3) `Unnecessary hardship'; Had we been aware that the original garage was not of legal code, we would have exercised our right to an appeal in 1996 at the time we presented a request for variance for a window addition. In addition to this, we have already extended our driveway area with new concrete to allow for the space to drive into an addition of a 3`d stall. This driveway restoration did not require a permit from the City of Fridley. 4) `Detrimental to the property in the vicinity'; We believe that if we were forced to setback the 3`d stall only of the garage, this would destroy the appearance of the entire building structures on the premises. By granting the request, it in no way would be detrimental to neighbors via destroying views or causing " r safetyds. . �z "tea Thank You for your consideration in this request. (!� -ix� z22Cl-,QLe a Scott and Connie Masica VARIANCE APPLICATION SUBMISSION CHECKLIST The following shall be the minimum submission requirements to the Appeals Commission. Applications will not be accepted if the following is not submitted: RESIDENTIAL: ITEM SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS/DATE Completed application, with fee (Application is considered complete if �/ v/ p all blanks are completed, and both fee owner and petitioner have signed) Scaled site Man of property showing north arrow, existing and proposed structures, lot and block number, V adjacent street names, and buildings on ✓ adjacent lots within 10 feet of the common lot lines. Elevation of building and description of ✓, materials. Narrative of proposed building. ✓ COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL: ITEM SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS Completed application, with fee (Application is considered complete if all blanks are completed, and both fee owner and petitioner have signed) Scaled site plan of property showing north arrow, existing and proposed structures, lot and block number, adjacent street names, and buildings on adjacent lots within 10 feet of the common lot lines. Elevation of building and description of materials. Landscape plan for all projects requiring a parking lot expansion of four (4) or mores aces. -Grading and drainage plan. Erosion control plan. Calculations for stormwater runoff: VARIANCE APPLICATION SUBMISSION -CHECKS � - ITEM IZWNTT .D--.-- •:R€€EiVER-�= - COMPLETE- -=REWEWERIS INITIALS INITIALS a --undeveloped condition b. existing condition c. proposed condition Calculations for excavation and/or fill. Utility Map: (If item is nonexistent, note on plan) Water size and type of a. existing mains b. existing services c. proposed services d. hydrants e. valves f. fire services Sewer: size and type of a. existing mains b. existing services c. proposed services d. manholes and lampholes e. elevations (inverts and top of castings) Storm: size and type of a. existing mains b. existing services c. proposed services d. manholes and lampholes e. elevations (inverts and top of castings f. existing catch basins ro osed catch basins SIGNS: SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS/DATE pleted application, with fee lication is considered complete if anks are completed, and both fee r and petitioner have signed) [Drawing of ro osed si n. d site plan showing location of or Wildin elevation if wall si n. en response to Section 214.21.02 Si2n Code. Date Created: File Number: Summary of Reques Date- Submitted: LAND USE APPLICATION FILE CHECKLIST Application Deadline: 111 10 Day Completion Notice: (Official Receiving Date) 60 Day Action Date: 10" understand that while my application was submitted for (applicant's name) review on , the application deadline is: , and the 60 day action window, will not begin until I receive a letter stating that.myapplication is complete. I also understand that the City may, at any time during the 60 day action window, in writing, notify me that the process will be extended an additional 60 days. (signed) (witnessed by receiver) Application Found Complete ✓ yes no Application Completion Notices Mailed: o ki Al Scheduled Planning Commission: Scheduled Appeals Commission: Scheduled City Council: CHECK LIST FOR AGENDA ITEMS APPEALS COMMISSION Item indexed correctly? t-111,� Has staff visited the site? �U145 ,fes. a C 17 What is the issue? p �- How is the issue to be/� ,� ( -pb resolved? Was the petitioner's hardship Y clear) stated? -14 - fi T Was there a site history ` researched and attached? r Was an aerial photo attached? G� What is the Appeals Vim, A AJCrz Commission/ City Council � 5 action requested? Are the stipulations clear? Is the cover sheet clear? Are the attachments complete and easy to l ✓ w f 74 read? (site plan, ��p y landscape plan, O/F l io directional indicators, etc.) V jet AX,5 S& IT - PREPARED BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING STAFF- AUGUST 7, 1997 Land Plan" GB7S-H. land.finayrn� � Air .�.�, sols is%,yJ. ENGINEERING, INC. Eyreermy En9i7eers Survecyors Certificate of survey, �'r N � M OEVELOPMEWT CO LYN D E DRIVE. .F �r 7tl! - 0.0 LJ Iran J h 10- -7 0 �•--'S-alc 1=30 '41 = W rya"• UT 1 E? l ctc 3 LYNDALE EUILDERS ADDITION 1 5'!,'fiJi+y � praiNAge �sew:h�7 IoM — — -- — — — •— Ir n _ ., .•.,. � y Fits a o hue and awMd iep►rSW19tM7 ofe xrwy 40Ae &v"&rw �l'11(r e&,r Amuv ad /ad,.nd �'� ��s , f/rrN►. rd d/ risib/t a�v�oaJrnm/j . if 'iy. �Gsn �r n �vd knd. As swti+r• yed 6� m� /Y� � . A.D � SW URMAN ENGINEER/NG, INC. I, A 1 I 1 ir . . 1 . . . . . . . i 1 I � N JJJ ? I j Qr" `3! i I 1 t I i i 1 ;-'k `. +�i ;o N . . . . LL i I i 1 b 2 ... _ : . . . . .? l �P-VP - a1 2 \.A ?NMS It Z- •L%Z * } Z N LYNDE DR NE LYNDE DR NE Parcels within 359 of 1070 Lynde Drive