Loading...
VAR 93-05"4a5�v M-7117-7 JM=U T1 May 17,1993 Michele McPherson Planning Assistant Dear Michele: Thank you for all your help. This is to notify you of my decision to discontinue any future action in respect to my variance request. (VAR #93-05) I would like to suggest next time an individual comes to your office, they be given more information as to what to expect in the Hearing. I was not aware I had to prove a hardship in order to get this Variance. My understanding of a hardship is much different that yours. If I had a so called Hardship I wouldn't be able to build this garage. I was very much intimidated by the Appeals commission hearing. I felt I was being treated like a child. Being told just because I wanting something doesn't mean I should get it. My son and I have worked 6 to 7 days a week for the last 5 years in order to save to build our dream garage. Thanks to an uncaring and cold bunch of city officials we have to settle for less. It's no wonder so many people are moving out of Fridley. I have lived in this home for 16 years and now I am seriously thinking of moving. Sincerely, Eva C. Mitchell ■r COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW FILE NUMBER FILE DATE MEE WG DATE FILE DESCRIPTION vAR #93-05 CITYOF 15 4-20-93 5-4-93 4765 Main Street N.E. FRIDLEY i raximmfloor area COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING DEPT. ❑ BARB D. COMMENTS l ta)va0p OM ICHELE M. t �� �1 19SCOTT E. �, G� JOHN F. V1 `?Y" 40CLYDE W. �a , =� .� � � 2��v � �� w► b*DE z L P -MO La 1999 3M LEON M. JIM,H. 37- CHUCK M. 7 &� j,,,tci. t - () -ib a-gpw ao-t tem� • 40 �Ecle� JWZO I I'l I 11 ;4D 0 Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: May 12, 1993 TO: William Burns, City ManagerA!A' FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #93-05, by Eva Mitchell, 4765 Main Street N.E. On May 4, 1993, the Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance request by Eva Mitchell. The variance request, if approved, would permit construction of a first accessory structure greater than the first floor area of the dwelling unit. The proposed request would allow construction of a 1,000 square foot first accessory structure. The dwelling unit is 754 square feet in area. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission recommendation and deny the variance as requested. MM:ls M-93-265 REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations PMOnMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author MM;ls STAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date May 4, 1993 Planning Commission Date City Council Date May 17, 1993 VAR #93-05 Eva Mitchell To allow the construction of a first accessory structure with greater square footage than the floor aroma of the dwelling unit 4765 Main Street N.E. 10,300 sq. ft. R-1, Single Family Dwelling Residential R-1, Single Family Dwelling to the N, E, & S; M-2, Heavy Industrial to the W Residential, vacant Six Cities Denial Denial s 01k,I10[Nivirl: r yAR 493-05 ra Mitchell S 1/2 SEC. CirY C/rY OF COLD C/rY 9 I C RNER �L 14 LL; a + n r a ti <lo,i I...,i c• > r ' i fv' f° r I a • a , u d I➢ l --?- i I9 I V ` _ 1.➢_ - I- • --p9- 1 _.(_ 1 a ♦ f r x A H 1 u tS. � : zs r ,2'+' • :s •.A r 'q? - ar-- r 1 .s r � r a r At• ' IJ 6 �• SIJ ! 1! � - Pr I a l ♦ H i 9 !y' a i� •1 Ir rro2 _ 8,_� B �. -,ilLEI l4 N� 7 '{pli 1 • \� • rr� 9 ,• 21-f .9 P Tr I +' 'r H ,o �• y Ql. r �,� j� I x rl. ,L,`r IIP. H ♦ r'o r, ,0 1i1 C a + v` a .D t , Jl• a Ol 1 N r r �10 t 1 . (S lv rr i'1. rc (./7 - µ• . p,. q I ,Lr , 3�� i i • n ' NCL- ' „ H.Q. ,.> -Y✓-. :? H -'^•-- -X- � 48 H. Al- i , „d arS, :r 9 i • s..., 571..s d c .�♦ r.: N.E. i >, r / i 'S, : 'EY c Sft}l , x q �!) , y ; +a •, "� e n ., x __40z__♦r_ r i i L\A>. 3_•11_ 9 (,u)r� 29 ii PD r Ir ♦ 9,,„ r •=-, P. . A , ro• x , A. .�µi <! Ft ( f rt n : �: re ,F f fit. ,,�'rn x r , a � r I', �L__ f l.i_�♦ i C� P' J :• ¢" I- H� �' J r• J l f 1 _ __ _a___ ! __ x • f � r: r �, � ` i l6C S V If r,r a - - -,v.- a , -JD,-'. ♦ e, tI s to > u '1 zi LtA on __04_ ♦r L$l, . , tIP. • x V° r P N .p , i b -• , _'e_ _ _ v I , - --• - -- ., -_A-- H a ♦ I� ➢lQ u s ��,. N 11 oW ➢ o. N iii - � r♦ ,. ., Vl. J H ` l lF -. v �t ', p9� 77 i. Pr N _ �llP lr _L. _ - _ - T - -- - - - ' t, i ry 1 1$ rc _ _ •, 1V�1 r! a 3t ° X41 .D 1 ., .�I � ,P v P 'Q B •l ° ,47TH. AVE. y W Cr�.> Z 3 v n s�• r s y)t' r i fit' D' T Il), 4 N� '+li , tt x WZ s tr s Wl• - r� - r. , t}1 r, l+l • D a - fl , lr�, x �i � I s i la � ��iw .s3' ::Yu � I U al �' • ;.� 3 '�.�. C}� w U1 ♦ r, t �l• <, ♦ st. a of I B I � r ✓'Qt, f_ rss., I rr>f, � � p • � 4'>i u Pl m �,. H a �i ✓ N). a pt ~' T• (,D%a` ~e) ��.,., (�f>_.. I i R.•� r 'aw)) '� i .,ii, re ° H , I•• .7M1 n ¢ bt: n .a „ a d, :� ,-i=r t w•:.-�, �e� r.,,. L')r.>> d \Y•1 i ,l ! i(i3 J!: H, 4 r . r i ,ply t ` ';i"• - O. '(id , (11')• f bl Ra 6 ,M p:, ) ltn ! I ti 7 .� -� � � rHro(!'7 :I (! n�..y - - Ci 6'� r 2 k Dtaj `a � )� z i � -1 I ✓Hv� '� • 1', ♦e, .w: fN fie._ N nsi s Ik rJo, fisc, r, •Un)•::! 'a 2fA- rr (* .• A rs �i p ♦Lao Q KS • rs �' �_° � � A (.i • 3 r n _ � ' .,�-(d. _ , � Lii.s+ _, .i tt M s hn LS't• s � ++1 _ s r el � 7 a ° � + ' Q ' ,„,)l$. �� d P A__ r, 6 UeJ ,O IN, �Hpyl r P, ;1 a I� 7 �,i�Fo) ai d x 6 ,_ r... '.L✓ U�, (N'- o bt . W4 ! � 0 / H re I I _7 Oi o), r� I '.c"-.•,(iP) ”. �' r k ... r_ ... II w' 9 L -T-- li ie) (nt Ju u.wlMQ r..� :'Q♦) ..-. , e I n 1 ✓i I i ( L� A 9 pd . B Nj , e Irn � 7 >tl M) -i I r. � "�� 'I rwv 4w.{aq (d0 �. •) !j>< r (n �o 33 I� nn - �H-• —Avg-- �� LOCATION MAP Staff Report VAR #93-05, 4765 Main Street N.E., by Eva Mitchell Page 1 A. STATED HARDSHIP: "Need larger garage for three vehicles and construction drywall equipment." B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner requests that a variance be approved to allow construction of a first accessory structure which exceeds 100% of the first floor area of the dwelling unit. The request is for Lots 27 and 28, Block 5, Plymouth Addition, generally located at 4765 Main Street N.E. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and a detached single car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the properties to the north, east, and south. The property to the west of Main Street is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. Analysis Section 205.07.01.B.(4) requires that a first accessory building shall not exceed 100% of the first floor area of the dwelling unit or a maximum of 1,000 square feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain the residential quality of a neighborhood by limiting the size of accessory structures. The petitioner is proposing to construct a new detached accessory structure of 1,000 square feet. The original proposal was to construct a 32 ft. by 32 ft. or 1,024 square foot detached accessory structure. The maximum floor area of a detached accessory structure is 1,000 square feet as required by Section 205.07.01.B.(4). The dwelling unit is 754 square feet. The petitioner would like to construct a three -car garage on the property. The petitioner could construct a 24 ft. by 32 ft. or 768 square foot garage which would permit parking of three vehicles with some additional storage space. At 768 square feet, the detached accessory structure would be closer to the first floor area of the dwelling unit. A variance Staff Report VAR #93-05, 4765 Main Street N.E., by Eva Mitchell Page 2 would still need to be granted; however, it would not be to the extent proposed by the petitioner. The petitioner's request does not adversely impact the maximum lot coverage on the property. The petitioner has indicated a need to store construction drywall equipment. If the petitioner is conducting a home occupation, the ordinance clearly states that the home occupation must occur within the dwelling unit and not in an accessory structure. Granting a variance to allow construction of an accessory structure to be used to store stock in trade of a home occupation would violate Section 205.03.34 of the Zoning Code. Staff reviewed the adjacent properties to determine if there were instances where the garage exceeded the first floor area of the dwelling unit. The garage at 4748 - 2nd Street was granted a permit in 1980 to be larger than the first floor area of the house. A permit was issued in 1989 to increase the size of the dwelling unit to be greater than the garage. A review of the address files revealed that no variances were granted for this particular address. There is no indication in the address file as to why a permit for the garage was issued. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request as proposed. The petitioner would have adequate room to park three cars in a 24 ft. by 32 ft. garage which would be closer to the first floor area of the dwelling unit, but a variance would still be required. If the Commission chooses to approve the variance request, staff recommends the following stipulation: 1. The existing accessory structure shall be demolished prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new accessory structure. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to deny the request as proposed. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action. veu Aoq—ns SITE PLAN LU:). VJ. J0. 34. Home Occupation. Any occupation or profession engaged in by the occupant of a dwelling unit and carried on within the unit and not in an accessory building. Any home occupation shall be clearly incidental and secondary to the )) principal use of the premises and shall not change the residential character. The following are criteria of home occupations: A. Professional offices, minor repair services, photo or art studios, dressmaking, teaching and similar uses. B. No stock in trade is stored outside the dwelling unit. C. No over the counter retail sales are involved. D. Entrance to the home occupation is gained from within the structure. E. Teaching is to be limited to six (6) or less students at any given time. F. Licensed home based Family Day Care that serve twelve (12) or fewer children when one (1) care giver is provided and licensed home based Group Family Day Care that serve fourteen (14) or fewer children when two (2) care givers are provided, as defined by the Minnesota Rule, Parts 9502.0300 to 9502.0445. (Ref. 864) G. In addition to spaces required by the occupant (family), there is no need for more than two (2) additional parking spaces at any given time. H. Employees shall consist of members of the immediate family only. 35. Hospital. An institution open to the public, in which sick or injured persons receive medical, surgical or psychiatric treatment. 36. Hotel. A building consisting of six (6) or more guest rooms and designed for occupancy as a temporary lodging place of individuals. 37. Integral Part Of A Principal Structure. Constructed in general conformity to the principal structure in terms of framing, finishing and overall use. 38. Junk Yard. (Automobile Recycling Center) An open area where waste and used materials are bought, sold, exchanged, stored, packed, disassembled or handled as a principal use, including scrap iron and other metals, paper, rags, rubber, wire and bottles. A junk yard includes an automobile wrecking or salvage yard, but does not include uses that are entirely within enclosed buildings or City Council approved recycling centers. 10/9.0 205-6 1� CITY OF FRIDLEY -p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: x/'76 Property Identification Number Legal description: ,figf5 A9F7 4-9,Y Lot Block Tract/Addition Current zoning: Square footage/acreage �® X I A Reason for variance and hardship: -900j 14 3 .6jo%w4 11 ' ection o ity Code: 0 9==a o2/ Have you operated a business n a city which required a business license? Yes No _�� If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contrast Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAMES�� M. ± 0- Ui e U— ADDRESS �rZ(�`S M g4 -!�'T, DAYTIME PHONE 6 3e SIGNA _ DATE PETITIONER �I/NFORMATION NAME _ _ rSG O�-�� V e. ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 _�_ for residential properties Permit VAR # Receipt # 12z Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: CITY OF BRIDLHY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicants for vacations must submit the legal description of the parcel (easement, street, etc.) to be vacated. Complete site pians, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect, or other design professional, to include the following: A. General: 1. Name and address of project 2. Legal description (certificate of survey may be required) 3. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record 4. Date proposed, north arrow, scale, number, of sheets, name of drawer 5. Description of intended use of site, buildings, and structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load 6. Existing zoning and land use 7. Tabulation box indicating: _ (i) Size of parcel in sq. ft. (ii) Gross floor area of buildings (iii) Percent of site covered by building (iv) Percent of site covered by impervious surface (v) Percent of site covered by green area (vi) Projected number of employees (vii) Number of seats if intended use isa restaurant or place of assembly (viii) Number of parking spaces required (ix) Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped (x) Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories S. site Plan: 1. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions and floor elevations 2. Grading and drainage pian showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.) as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and storm water retention ponds. Calculations for storm water detention/retention areas. 3. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths of property lines, turning radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated center line, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways 4. vehicular circulation system showing location and dimensions for all driveways, parking spaces,parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow, and traffic -control devices 5. Landscaping Plan 6. Location, access, and screening detail of trash enclosures 7. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment S. Building elevations from all directions 9. Utility pian identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building 4 Ms. Savage stated she a eed. Granting the variance is not going to adversely affect the rea, and it is in conformance with the public purpose. She woul also vote to approve the variance. Ms. Beaulieu stated that if the house had been positioned differently, there would be no need for a variance. So, there is a hardship because of that.. Dr. Vos stated he believed curve of Briardale Road; (2) the south lot line instead of yard setback. He stated these house back onto that curvature. the variance. re are three hardships: (1) the a house was built 13 1/2 feet from 0 feet; and (3) the 42 foot front :hree situations really forced the �He stated he would vote to approve MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by request, VAR #93-04, by 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the the side yard setback from 17.5 expansion of an existing garage Estates, the same being 6190 Benj UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. . Smith, to approve variance ven Mokita, per Section -idley Zoning Code, to reduce eet to 15 feet to allow the Lot 1, Block 4, Rice Creek Street N.E. SAVAGE DECLARED THE Per Section 205.07.01.B.(4).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a first accessory structure which exceeds 1000 of the first floor area of the dwelling unit (1,000 sq. ft. versus 754 sq. ft.) on Lots 27 and 28, Block 5, Plymouth Addition, the same being 4765 Main Street N.E. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:13 R.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located just south of 48th Avenue on Main Street. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the properties to the north, east and south. The property across Main Street to the west is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. Ms. McPherson stated that located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and a detached single car garage. The petitioner has stated that the existing garage will be removed prior to construction of the proposed accessory structure. Ms. McPherson stated that, originally, the petitioner requested a building permit to construct a 32 ft. by 32 ft. (1,024 sq. ft.) APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 4-a 1993 PAGE 4 detached accessory structure to be located in the northeast corner of the property. The maximum floor area of any detached accessory structure is limited to 1,000 sq. ft. as required in section 205.07.01.B.(4) of the Zoning Code. The dwelling unit is 754 square feet. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner would like to construct a three -car garage to store three vehicles and construction drywall equipment. Staff has proposed that the petitioner could construct a 24 ft. by 32 ft. (768 sq. ft.) garage which would permit the parking of three vehicles with some additional storage space. While a variance would still be necessary to construct a 768 sq. ft. structure, it would be closer to the maximum square footage of the dwelling unit. The request as proposed does not adversely affect the lot coverage. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has indicated a need to store construction drywall equipment. If the petitioner is conducting a home occupation, the ordinance clearly states that the home occupation needs to occur in the dwelling unit and not in any accessory structure. If the City was to grant a variance to allow the construction of an accessory structure to be used to store stock in trade of a home occupation, this would violate Section 205.03.34 of the Zoning Code. Ms. McPherson stated staff reviewed the adjacent properties to determine if there were other instances where the garage exceeded the first floor area of the dwelling unit. The garage at 4748 - 2nd Street was granted a building permit in 1980 to be larger than the first floor area of the house. In 1989, a permit was issued to increase the size of the dwelling unit, and the dwelling unit is now larger than the garage. There is no indication in the address file of why the permit for the garage was issued when it exceeded the first floor area of the dwelling unit or why a variance was not processed. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the variance request as proposed. The petitioner would have adequate room to store three vehicles in a 24 ft. by 32 ft. garage which would require a variance from 754 sq. ft. to 768 sq. ft. because it would still be greater than the first floor area of the dwelling unit. If the Commission chooses to approve the variance request as originally proposed by the petitioner for a garage of 1,000 sq. ft., staff recommends the following stipulation: 1. The existing accessory structure shall be demolished prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new accessory structure. Dr. Vos asked if the petitioner could attach and expand the single car garage. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 4, 1993 PAGE 5 Ms. McPherson stated she did not believe there is adequate space between the existing dwelling unit and the garage to expand the existing garage. Ms. Eva Mitchell, 4765 Main Street, stated there is no home occupation. She stated her son used to be in the construction drywall business, and this is extra material that needs to be stored. Ms. Savage asked the petitioner about her hardship. Ms. Mitchell stated that right now they have two vehicles, one of which is a new j eep . She stated the j eep was broken into and badly damaged a few weeks ago. Her son has also purchased a new truck that will be arriving soon. The truck is a large one ton truck which needs more room for storage. They also have a snowmobile trailer with two snowmobiles, expensive tools, etc., that need to be stored inside. Ms. Mitchell stated that it is dangerous backing out of the existing garage onto Main Street. One reason for placing the new garage on the alley is for safety reasons. They like the neighborhood and don't want to move. They would like to finish the basement which is now being used for storage of the drywall material. Ms. Mitchell stated she had called the Municipal Center to inquire about building this size of a garage. She was told by a staff person that there was "no problem". They then removed trees and shrubs and were ready to build. However, when the contractor came to pull the building permit, he was told they could not build and that a variance was required. She stated they have worked hard and have invested a lot of money to get to this point. Ms. Mitchell stated her neighbor at 4748 - 2nd Street was able to build a garage larger than her home with no problem. Dr. Vos asked about the alternative suggested by staff, a 24 ft. by 32 ft. garage? Ms. Mitchell stated the garage would not be deep enough. They could get the cars in the garage, but they would not have enough room to do any work in the garage. She stated she would be willing to reduce the garage to 30 ft. by 32 ft. (960 sq. ft.). Dr. Vos stated the real reason the petitioner needs a variance is not about a two -car garage or a three -car garage, but about the fact that the house is 754 sq. ft. The size of the house is the limiting factor on how big a garage the petitioner can build. The petitioner can build a two -car garage up to 754 sq. ft. The APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 4, 1993 PAGE 6 petitioner is also proposing a lot of blacktop area. He stated he had difficulty in seeing any hardship for the garage as proposed. Ms. Mitchell's son stated that if they have to build a smaller garage, a lot of things will have to be stored outside and that is not very aesthetically pleasing for the neighborhood. He stated there are quite a few properties on Main Street that have very large garages. There is also one on East River Road. Ms. Carol Bazevage, 4740 - 2nd Street, stated she lives across the alley from the Mitchells. She stated she is not concerned about the size of the garage, as she also has a large garage. She is only concerned about where the snow is going to be stored from this 50 feet of driveway. Dr. Vos asked if Ms. Bazevage thought the building of more hard surface by the petitioner would cause more drainage problems in the alley. Ms. Bazevage stated, yes, she believed the extra water would certainly impact the alley. The drainage is very bad in the alley now. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 8:45 P.M. Ms. Beaulieu stated she would not approve the garage at 1,024 sq. ft. even if the house was that large. She stated everyone wants to have a large garage to store their things, but she believed that 754 sq. ft. is sufficient for the garage. She would recommend denial of the variance. Ms. Smith stated she also has difficulty in seeing a hardship. If they approve this garage as proposed for the simple reason that someone wants it badly, then they would have requests for large garages all over Fridley. Even building the garage to the same size as the house at 754 sq. ft. is still a big garage. She believed the petitioner should have to live within the rules as they are exist. Dr. Vos stated he did not see'a shred of a hardship, and he would vote to recommend denial of the variance as proposed. Ms. Savage stated she is sympathetic to the petitioner's situation and hopes an alternative can be worked out. She stated the Commission has to adhere to the code, and there is just no hardship to justify this extreme a variance. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 4, 1993 PAGE 7 Ms. Mitchell's son asked why the people at 4748 - 2nd Street were allowed to build a garage larger than their house. Ms. Savage stated that if a mistake was made 13 years ago, the Commission -cannot compound that mistake by allowing this variance. Ms. McPherson stated she will re -review the address file for 4748 - 2nd Street before the Council meeting. Ms. Mitchell's son asked why they were told when they called City staff that they could build this large a garage, and then when the contractor came in for the permit, he was told they needed to apply for a variance? Ms. McPherson apologized for the misinformation. She stated that staff tries to administer the code as consistently and fairly as possible, and that is what they are doing through the appeals process. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR #93-05, by Eva Mitchell, per Section 205.07.01.B.(4).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a first accessory structure which exceeds 1000 of the first floor area of the dwelling unit (1,000 sq. ft. versus 754 sq. ft.) on Lots 27 and 28, Block 5, Plymouth Addition, the same being 4765 Main Street N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on May 17, 1993. 3. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS: Ms. McPherson gave a verbal update of past Planning Commission and Council actions. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Savage declared the motion carried and the May 4, 1993, Appeals Commission meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Res ectfully s witted, L Saba Re ording Secretary VAR #93-05 4765 Main Street N.E. MAIISNG LIST Eva Mitchell Joyce Sivlertson 4765 Main Street N.E. 4769 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MlV 55421 Fridley, MST 55421 Burlington Northern Railway Timothy Kaczrcwski 176 East 5th Street 4756 - 2nd Street N.E. St. Paul, MLV 55101 Fridley, MLV 55421 - Thelma Strong Arthur Gilles 4733 - 2nd Street N.E. 4748 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Fridley, M 55421 Vincent Anderson Carol Bazevage 4741 - 2nd Street N.E. 4740 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, MN' 55421 Fridley, MN 55421 Zeno Tonala Chester Levander 4749 - 2nd Street N.E. 4732 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, MLV 55421 Fridley, MN 55421 Kenneth Ochocki Joseph Stzzyzewski 4757 - 2nd Street N.E. 4724 -- 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Fridley, MN 55421 James Stager Diane Savage 4715 Main Street N.E. 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, MLV 55421 Fridley, MN 55432 Peter Zirkle City Council 4757 Main Street N.E. City Manager Fridley, MLV 55421 Stephanie Muse 4761 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MLV 55432 Mailed: 4/23/93 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION _______---------------- __________________________________________ Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, May 4, 1993, at 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #93-05, by Eva Mitchell: Per Section 205.07.01.B.(4).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to allow the construction of a first accessory structure which exceeds 100% of the first floor area of the dwelling unit (1,000 sq. ft. versus 720 sq. ft.), on Lots 27 and 28, Block 5, Plymouth Addition, the same being 4765 Main Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than April 27, 1993. Inter - City Builders DATE 411 GARAGE SIZES 3 X APRON DRIVEWAY SIZE WIRE MESH-1/2"-RODS—CONDUIT PIPE OVERHEAD DOOR SIZE—OFFSET- SERVICE IZEOFFSETSERVICE DOOR LOCATION BLOCK SIZE & LOCATION WATERPROOF BACKFILL EXCAVATION BY GRADE FLAT DROP OFF go' LA l< , a aL�` e, 633-7389 CITY _a fj t - ADDRESS Ali 6 �' 1"A / s NAME EL1,4 in 17-12, 4 -e L�- TELEPHONE 6-') R - �9G �' WORK PERMIT OBTAINED BY SALESMAN CEMENT MAN OLD GARAGE REMOVED BY OLD CEMENT REMOVED BY 3 Na Nl--4 3a. S 5�-,aT`e' t /c - ovV - 000('0 /3 I- ,T s/-Ze- 91® x lag %" Fh^M�► 4ao/ 5 ShinghoaNno les Marcummd — -- — 4x6 Railers swhv -- Rand + Irouhftd wkwaw aa„ overhead Serv;m Wall Flow Door Door Corm. r Apron DATE 411 GARAGE SIZES 3 X APRON DRIVEWAY SIZE WIRE MESH-1/2"-RODS—CONDUIT PIPE OVERHEAD DOOR SIZE—OFFSET- SERVICE IZEOFFSETSERVICE DOOR LOCATION BLOCK SIZE & LOCATION WATERPROOF BACKFILL EXCAVATION BY GRADE FLAT DROP OFF go' LA l< , a aL�` e, 633-7389 CITY _a fj t - ADDRESS Ali 6 �' 1"A / s NAME EL1,4 in 17-12, 4 -e L�- TELEPHONE 6-') R - �9G �' WORK PERMIT OBTAINED BY SALESMAN CEMENT MAN OLD GARAGE REMOVED BY OLD CEMENT REMOVED BY 3 Na Nl--4 3a. S 5�-,aT`e' t /c - ovV - 000('0 /3 I- ,T s/-Ze- 91® x lag NEW [ ] ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER[) SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application Effective 1/1/93 Construction Address: % G 5 12?2A /'V 5 "- Legal Description: pt vy, AA'dC T3/- o k 5 / o T a-7 Owner Name & Address: E v 14 IW i c, LL 6,-- 1Vk 1N —. Tel. # e- -2 2, - S 9c 2r Contractor: ,.Tiy7'c r- - r- 14 MN LICENSE # oo o Address: -273 -PPI/q, _ -- Tel. # 633 Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length 3 Width -3-2- Height ' w < <S Sq. Ft. o q DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot DQ Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks Type of Construction: Yrp on -f- Estimated Cost: $ f 1 o d Approx. Completion Date: 4 Al (Cost on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ = $ DATE: / r li3 Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge $ SAC Charge $ License Surcharge $ Driveway Escrow $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main Charge $ TOTAL STIPULATIONS: APPLICANT: AJLTel. # CITY USE ONLY Fee Schedule on Reverse Side .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $750 per SAC Unit $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] G 33 -73 2r�;