Loading...
PRE 2010 DOCS�'.daacl/cG4i PROJECT: REPORTED TO: turn city teminci .�. �■ooneon.I,Rx. 662 CROMWELL AVENUE UT. ST PAUL. MN 55114 PHONE 6121645.3601 REPORT OF: EXCAVATION INSPECTION INNSBRUCK NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT ARTHUR STREET A NORTH.DANUBE ROAD FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA _ Park Construction Co 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 LABORATORY No. 0-9166 INTRODUCTION DATE: October 26, 1977 FURNISHED BY: COPIES TO: This report concerns our recent investigation at the site of the proposed residential lot at the junction of Arthur Street and North Danube Road, Fridley, Minnesota. The purpose of our involvement was to verify that competent materials were reached in the excavation from which to begin fill placement. Furthermore, we obtained density tests in the newly placed fill at your request. We received verbal authorization for our work from Bob Swanson of your firm on September 7. CONCLUSIONS # Based on our hand auger borings, it appeared that al.l-compressible soils have been removed from the excavation created on the western lot and fill placement was initiated. Additional excavation work is necessary in the eastern lot before fill placement can continue. The excavated area, as noted on the attached sketch, has been filled to approximately 61 below street elevation. Presently, we are unsure whether the excavation performed on the western lot will satisfy the building needs. Because the exact positioning and elevations of the building has not been determined, we cannot -comment on the ___suitability of the fill system to support the proposed construction. Therefore, we s�iould be contacted -o discuss place- ment of the residence within the excavated area and—verify-the--adequacy of the oversize. In this regard, it is mandatory for the lot and building lines to be provided in the field. With this information, additional excavation in the western lot may be necessary as well as the continued excavation in the eastern lot. As of this date, eleven field in-place density tests have been taken in the fill material placed within the western lot. The results of these tests indicate that adequate compaction has been attained in the test areas. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The area under development encompasses two lots. The eastern lot is located on the slope of a.hill and is approximately 1171 in depth. The western lot is located in a topographic low for the area. A large amount of silts and organics have collected in this lowF_area, necessitating approximately 81 of excavation. The western lot is 135, in depth. No penetration borings were performed at the site prior to excavation. We were not given lo'ds assume the foundation design to be footing a but an information regarding the exact 9 Y 9 -- AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TD QJINT/, THE MI/LIO AND OURSELVES. ALL Ri!'O RT/ AR! /Y/MITTID A/ THE CONFIDENTIAL DROICRTT OF CYSH". AND AUTHOR- IZATION FOR PUSUCATION OF /TATENENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR !!TRACT/ FROM OR RlGARDING OUR RZM*TS /R RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. 13 twin city testing est CROMWELL AVENUE _d'"D••4., ,,, ST. PAUL. MN 55114 ` PHONE 612/6453601 w REPORT OF: EXCAVATION INSPECTION • DATE: October 26, 1977 LABORATORY No. 9-0166 PAGE: 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION - Cont. of relatively light intensity (less than 1500 psf). INVESTIGATION METHODS AND RESULTS We performed our insepctions between the dates of September 6 and 8. During this time, approximately 2/3 of the lots were excavated. We advanced several hand auger borings into the excavated areas to ascertain the local subsurface soil conditions. The material re- trieved was Visually. -and manually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classifie-..' cation System, and estimates were made of their strength properties. A stiff glacial till was found in all areas-, inspected. This glacial till was under 6'-8' of peat and muck in the western lot and the western portion of the eastern lot. Our inspection of the western lot was hampered due to the presence of 2 1/2'-3' of water standing in the excava- tion. We were required to inspect the bottom by advancing our hand auger borings through the water. It was found that all topsoil and peat had been removed in those areas checked. However, trecause the water was not removed prior to our inspection, we cannot assure that some remnants of compressible material were not missed in : this area of the excavation. The water was forced to the southwest corner of the western lot during filling operations where it was funneled to a storm sewer. This left the remainder of the site dry. Therefore, the succeeding phases of excavation were able to be visually and manually inspected. The excavation v6se steeply upward to•the east from the denter of the eastern lot. Several small pockets of soft material were removed from the northwest corner of the eastern lot prior to the placement of fill. During the placement of fill,eleven in-place density tests were performed and evaluated according to the moisture -density relation of soil'as-designated by ASTM: D 698-70 (Standard Proctor). A minimum of 95% was established for backfilling operations. As can be seen from the attached results, all areas tested, have obtained adequate density. If adequate density was not obtained with the initial work, additional compactive Effort was applied unttl these areas met site specifiications. Additional tests, designated retests, were then performed to document this fact. It appeats all poor material was excavated from the western and southern portions of the western lot and the western section of the eastern lot. The front 20' of each lot have not been improved during this work and should not be considered capable of bearing any loads. Care should be taken in locating the building. In any event, the house should be positi6ned so that the fill extends 1' outside of the footing for every foot of fill under the footing. This lateril oversize is necessary for the distribution of the footing loads. The possibility of a bearing faMrecor settlement exists if this oversize is not attained. AB A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CUZMT�. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELt Ys. ALL REPORTS AM SUBMITTED AR THE CONP7ptNT1AL PROPERTT OF CLItNTS. AND ROVAL- gZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR ERO ETRACTB PM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS Be RtSERYED PENDING OYR WRITTEN APPPROVAL. tu.rrn attic wsanq MW wwwwwr m s»..m+hww- 882 CROWNELL AVENUE ST. PAUL. MN 55114 as '� PHONE !12/6453801 REPORT OF: EXCAVATION INSPECTION DATE: October 26, 1977 LABORATORY No. 9-0166 PAGE: 3 REMARKS_ For your information we are attaching to the last page information and detail sheets which stress the importance of lateral oversize in excavate and refill operations. If we can be of further service to you, please contact us. TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORYj INC Peter Fuller, Civil Engineer PSF:TKS:lqThomas K Smith P.E. 1 S A MUTUAL P P ROTS 1T ON OF •TAT•M T"K PUNUC AN CONCL i ON•Y'OR •%TRACT• FROM OR Ri6A•RD Na OYR RT• 1• R[•ERV[D SND NOOOURR VMITT[NNAPPROVAL. i0v516 c�ri,vRvq6ly� mfTIP�f7V 9� C� Af. Ac-g E. - E443 - NL N DAN U fLOAV cgv'r %o t \ rr1LLED A' Ae� gr"E6 I It --%o , JOB NO. SCALE: 5E-14 (73A) DRAWN BY S CHECKED BY tWin city te=inq MW = ImlormecwL , WW_ OW CROMWELL AVENUE .d �••O'•. • ST PAUL MN 55114 PHONE 612,645NO, REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL INNSBRUCK NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT -#3677 PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET & NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: October 20, 1977 FRIDLEY MINNESOTA NEPORTED TO:'Park onstruction co COPIES TO: (1) Fridley Inspection Dept 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Attn: Bob Swanson LABORATORY No. 9-0166 TEST NUMBER: 1 2 4 .r DATE TAKEN: Sept. 8, 1977 Sept.8, 1977 Sept. 8, 1977 Sept. 8, 1977 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand, fine to Sand, fine to Sand, fine to Sand, fine to (Moisture -Density Sample medium grained, medium grained, medium grained, medium grained, Number) with gravel, with gravel, with gravel, a little gravel, brown (SP -SM) -1 brown (SP -SM) -1 brown (SP -SM) -1 brown (SP -SM) -1 LOCATION: 114'S & 12'W 103'S & 9W 460'S &_12'W 68'S & 101W of NE corner of of NE corner of :of NE corner of;of NE corner of excavation excavation ,excavation - excavation DEPTH BELOW STREET ELEVATION: 15' 13' 12' 10' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 3' 1' 4' 1' FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place By Sand—Cone Method, ASTM:DI 556-64 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 115.5 120.5 101 117 Moisture Content W 5.8 5.3 5.8 5.5 Plus #4 Material W 46 33 32 16 LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70, Method "A" (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 121.6 121.6 121.6 121.6 Optimum Moisture W 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction W 95 99 3 96.5 Specified Compaction W 95 95 95 95 REMARKS: The above test locati(;is ware selected by Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory Inc. Compa,:tion meets specifications in the areas of tests #1, 2 and 4, but is below specifications in the other test area. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTB. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS AMC SUBMITTEO AS TNZ CONFIDENTIAL PROPSWT OF CLIENTS. ANO AUTHOR- IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Twin City T h* and Engirmoring Laborewy, Inc. sr f Q tujin City testinq 1WW erVcW1Neerno I1113orocorIA nc. @6? CKWWELL AVENUE a "°'."` •. ST PAUL MN 551:4 PHONE 612'645360+ REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL INNSBRUCK NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT -#3677 PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET & NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: October 20, 1977 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: Park Construction Co COPIES TO: (1) Fridley Inspection Dept 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Attn: Bob Swanson LABORATORY No. 9-0166 TEST NUMBER: DATE TAKEN: UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: (Moisture -Density- Sample Number) LOCATION: DEPTH BELOW STREET ELEVATION: 5 Sept. 9, 1977 Sand, fine to medium grained, with gravel, brown (SP -SM) -1 110'S & 10'W of NE corner of excavation 10' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 6" 6 Sept. 9, 1977 Sand, fine to medium grained, some gravel, brown (SP -SM) -1 12'W of NE korner of excavation' .;(Retest of #3) 12' 4' FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place By Nuclear Density Method "B" , ASTM: D2922-71 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 120 106 Moisture Content W 5.3 6.0 Plus #4 Material W 35 28 LABORATORY MOISTURE DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70, Method "A" (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 121.6 121.6 Optimum Moisture ( c) 10.2 10.2 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction W 98.5 1 '87 Specified Compaction W 95 —95--, REMARKS 5— REMARKS: The above test locations were selected by Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory Inc. Compaction meets. speciftcations to the area of test #5, but is still below specifications in the other test area. " A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENT@. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELI/E@. ALL IMPORTS ARL SUBMITTED A@ THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTT OF CLIENTS. ANG AUTHOR. IMATION FOR PUBLICATION OF BTATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR IMPORT@ 10 RESMRVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Twin City Testing and Engineering Lebaatory, Inc. dr_�.eXJ�li;� Q tuwin cItti+ testinq 66?CROMWELL AVENUE ST PAUL MN 55110 PHONE {12,6.5 *01 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL INNSBRUCK NORTH RESI LOT -03677 PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET & NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: October 20, 1977 FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA REPORTED To: park Construction Co COPIES TO: (See page one) 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 A to oh t ancon LABORATORY No. 9-0166 TEST NUMBER: DATE TAKEN' UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: (Moisture -Density Sample Number) r_ Sept. 9, 1977 Sand, fine to medium grained, some gravel, brown (SP -SM) -1 LOGATION: 01S & 12'W of NE )corner of excavation ? (Retes_"f__ � & #6) -- -' DEPTH BELOW STREET ELEVATION: 12' C? Sept. 9, 1977 Sand, fine to medium grained, a little gravel, brown (SP -SM) -1 135'S & 12'W of NE corner of excavation 8 1/2' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 411 411 FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place By Sand -Cone Method, AS71N:D1556-64 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 120 122 Moisture Content W 6.1 5.8 Plus #4 Material W 18 13 LABORATORY MOISTURE DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70, Method "A" (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 121.6 121.6 Optimum Moisture W 10.2 10.2 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: - Compaction (h) 100 '99 Specified Compaction W 95 95 REMARKS: The above test locations were selected by Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory Inc. Compaction now meets specifications in the above test areas. ALL MZpORTg IiAT1 MUTUALN ran P RO GTION O L19W [NT{. CONCLY AMD O� L TRACT{ OM ORARtDARDnz 1+NO OYM IIT{TM N IN{RRY[TIAL O�Pe"D NG OOF UR R TT[N A► APPROVAL Twin City Testing oW Engineering LLebwatery, Inc. By%�- twin cot% testinm Qwo wrowunorrm 1■bor ooru. w= 867 CROMWELL AvENUE ST PAUL MN 55114 .d^snor• - PMONE 81716453601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL • �''' ' INNSBRUCK NORTH RES I L L -OT -M-767 DE PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET & NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: October 20, 1977 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA COPIES TO: (See page one) • REPORTED TO: ark Construction Co 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Attn-Rn LABORATORY No. 9-0166 TEST NUMBER: 9 10 11 Sept. 12, 1977 Sept. 12, 1977 Sept. 12, 1977 DATE TAKEN: LTti IFIED-5-01 L GLASSIFIGATIO�: Sand, fine to medium grained, Sand, fine to medium grained, Sand, fine to medium grained, (Moisture -Density Sample with gravel, brown with gravel, brown with gravel, brown Number) (SP -SM) -1 (SP -SM) -1 (SP -SM) -1 LDCpTION: 50'S & 10'W of 751S & 20'W of 120'S & 10'W of NE corner of NE corner of excavation NE corner of excavation excavation DEPTH BELOW STREET ELEVATION: 8' 6 1/2' 6 1/2' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 6" 6„ GN V FIELD DENSITY D'RMINATION: Density in Place By Nuclear Density ,Method "B", ASTM:D2924-71 (-#4 Basis Method Dry Density (pcf) 119.5 116 4.7 4.6 Moisture Content (°�) 4.6 35 33 38 Plus #4 Material W LABORATORY MOISTURE DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method "A" (-#4 Basis) 10.2 ASTM:D698-70, Method Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 10.2 .6 10 10.2 10.2 Optimum Moisture W COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: 95.5 102 Compaction W 9895 95 95 Specified Compaction W REMARKS: The above test rselected iTwin intng ineering the abovetest areas. Laboratory Inc.Compactionmeetsspecifcationsi UC AND 1TTzD An TUB TIAL OF IiAT10N"�pRLPY�Ol1CACT:ON OF sTAT[N[NT[. CONCLUSION ON[ O�[[TRACT[ FROM ORAR[6ARDI,ND DUN R[PORCTO/N a R8N[[RY[0r[NDI 6 OUR MI111TT[N APPROVAL Twin City Testing and Engi ring Laboratory. Inc - By ��ime�G�7I� or PREREQUISITES FOR SOUND ENGINEERING PRACTICE In order to properly evaluate the foundation soils at a building site, it is imperative for our firm to know exactly where the building will be placed, its size, and the elevation of the foundation elements. Without this information, we cannot assure that the preparatory foundation earthwork is adequate. This project data is especially critical in situations where the excavation extends below the footing grade and compacted fill will be required to attain building elevations. In these situations, the excavation would require lateral oversizing to provide suitable lateral distribution of the footing loads. Offset batter boards or the building lines stakes provide the best on-site verification of the building "location and size. It must be recognized that Twin City Testing and Engineering Labora- tory, Inc., does not practice in the field of surveying. We, therefore, must rely on staking by others. If Twin City Testing is required to perform the survey, we will retain a licensed surveyor and invoice client for that amount per our current fee schedule. Provision of the building founda- tion plans is also important so that we may properly perform our inspection. If the construction is redesigned or otherwise moved subsequent to our inspection, we should be informed so our firm can assess if additional inspection work is required, or suggest sound engi- neering alternatives. We cannot be responsible for any soil foundation system if the structure has been relocated with respect to the excavation subsequent to our inspection. GENERAL OVERSIZE REQUIREMENTS Because of the lateral distribution of foundation pressures with depth, lateral oversizing is re- quired in an excavation where unsuitable soils extend below plan footing grade. The lateral oversize scheme provides compacted fill material beyond the exterior footing limits where fill is required below footing elevation. The degree of lateral oversizing is dependent upon the sur- rounding soil's ability to resist lateral movement. In most soils, we generally recommend the lateral oversize be at least 2 ft. plus the depth of excavation below bottom of footing elevation. In extremely compressible swamp or organic soils, this oversize should be increased to 5 ft. plus twice the depth of unsuitable soils below footing grade. Due to these variations in the required lateral oversize, each project must be evaluated individually. Diagrams illustrating typical oversize dimensions are included below. ffptwin city 1, tinq twin city teminq awla L&wv NORMAL EXCAVATION OVERSIZE OVERSIZE FOR SWAMP OR EXTREMELY SOFT SOIL CONDITIONS PROPOSED FOOTINGS 51 COMPACTED FILL COMPETENT SOILS 0 2 4, ,\ 11. j� MINIMUM EXCAVATION LIMITS 2D .`'SWAMP DEPOSITS OR SOFT SOILS L EXCAVATION OVERSIZE IJOB NO. I SCALE: NONE I DRAWN BY-J.U_I CHECKED BYTESI HOUSE HEATING TEST RECORD 7$�. ADDRESS 1480 N Danube Rd APT. FLOOR CITY SUBURB Fri OCCUPANT R©bt Swansollk OWNER — Same HEAT LOSS DATE HTG. INST. October 28. 1979 °'SOLD BY ComfyHe_ ating INSTALLED BY Comfy Electrical Work By Gas Line By 0Om6 TYPE OF HEAT GA FA HW STEAM SPACE HTR. UNIT HTR. OTHER GAS DESIGN CONVERSION MAKE Hrvjqnt MAKE OF BURNER _ Model 14 9 4® Model Serial Max. BTU Rating INPUT MAKE OF FURNACE Model CONTROLS `� 01 4 THERMOSTAT Heat Plug Vent Size Volvo /✓ KIND OF LINER SIZE NONE Limit Draft Hood gularor Limit Setting Filters Size S, Numb,er Fan Setting Chimney Location In de Outside _ Pilot Type R ly Chimney Construction r-,(aa4,j.� Pilot Make Pilot Model `�� Smoke Bomb Wiring Pilot Timing rZ�ii Draft Test Tag L.W. Cut Off2 _ Door Pressure Lighting Inst. e� / .7 � s Date Tested Pressure Percent CO2 Input CFH / yam—Percent 02 " Company Testing wLld 92 Stack Temp. D Percent CO n t ® Name of Tester D 235 11611 Eldorado St, r Coon Rapids 55433 4215375 CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)571-3450 December 10, 1979 Kr. R. M. Swanson 1480 North Danube Road N.E. Fridley, F".N 55432 Re: Final Inspection at 1480 North Danube Road N.E. B Dear Mr. Swanson: A final inspection was made on December 7, 1979 of the above address and the following items were noted which must be completed before the structure can be finaled out; 1. Post address numbers on structure by January 1, 1980. 2. Provide a hard surface driveway by June 15, 1980. 3. Provide sod in the front.and side yards by June 15, 1980. We will expect the above items to be completed by the scheduled dates .when reinspections will be made to determine compliance. If you have any questions on these items, please contact me at 571-3450. Sincerely, DARRE G. CLARK Chief Building Official DGC/mh r . , c y ,L r g PROJECT: REPORTED TO: twin cItY testinq NNW 1Ed3CWetory, U-= 662 CROMWELL AVENUE " ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 REPORT OF: EXCAVATION OBSERVATION INNSBRUCK'NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT ARTHUR STREET AND NORTH DANUBE ROAD FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA DATE: P LOTS 2 l 1/✓AI-5..B:Zu G k A/0-0-77'/ N jnl R X1978 June ark Construction Co FURNISHED BY: 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 COPIES To: /y1 C77 Zt Attn: Bob Swanson C' LABORATORY No. 9-0947 INTRODUCTION This report concerns our recent observations of the earthwork activities performed at the residential lots at the junction of Arthur Street and Danube Road in Fridley, Minnesota. The purpose of our involvement was to judge if competent material was reached in the excava- tion from which to begin fill placement. Furthermore, we obtained density tests in the newly placed fill at your request. We received verbal authorization for our work from Mr Bob Swanson of your firm on May 3. CONCLUSIONS Based on our hand -auger borings, it appears that all compressible soils have been removed. Furthermore, the results of our density testing would indicate that adequate compaction was obtained in the areas tested. Please refer to our letter of October 26, 1977, for background information. OBSERVATION METHODS AND RESULTS We performed our visits between May 3 and 26. During this time, the remainder of the exca- vation necessary for the two lots was completed. We advanced several hand -auger borings into the excavated areas to depict the local subsurface soil conditions. The material retrieved was visually and manually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, and estimates were made of its strength properties. A stiff glacial till was found in the southwestern portion of the western lot. This glacial till was found to exist in the excavated portion of the eastern lot and was in a stiff condition. The competent material was found below approximately 5' to 8' of peat and muck. Our observations of the southwest portion of the western lot were hampered due to the presence of 3' of standing water. Our judgements on the condition of the excavation bottom were restricted to advancing hand -auger borings through the water. The results of these auger probes indicated all topsoil, peat and muck were removed in those areas checked. However, because the water was not removed prior to our field observations, we cannot assure that some remnants of compressible material were not missed in this area of the excavation. Filling operations confined the water to the southwest portion of the western lot, where it eventually drained from the site. We were able to observe the remainder of the excavation. The excavation rose steeply from the center portion of the eastern lot to the east. At the eastern edge of this lot, approximately 2' to 3' of fill will be required to attain grade. However, on the western edge of this eastern lot, the fill will be from 8' to 12' deep. During the placement of fill, four in-place, density tests were obtained and evaluated accord- ing to the moisture -density relation of soil as designated by ASTM:D698-70 (Standard Proctor). AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHOR- IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. twin city testinq ow- U2 CNO"EU AVENUE ,.d ST PAUL MN 55114 PHONE 812/6453601 REPORT OF: EXCAVATION OBSERVATION DATE: June 12, 1978 LABORATORY No. 9-0947 PAGE: 2 OBSERVATION METHODS AND RESULTS - Cont. A minimum of 95% was established for backfilling operations. As can be seen from the attached results, all areas tested have obtained adequate density. If adequate density was not obtained with the initial work, additional compactive effort was applied until these areas met site specifications. Additional tests, designated "retests", were then performed to document this fact. It appears that all poor soils have been excavated fr he lots. The attached sketch locates the improved areas with respect to the lot boundaries. Care should be taken to position the building correctly within the filled area. The house should be positioned so that the fill extends 1' outside of the footing for every foot of fill under the footing. This lateral oversize is necessary for the distribution of the footing loads. The possibility of detri- mental settlement exists if this oversize is not maintained. REMARKS Since soil borings were not performed, we cannot warrant the competency of the material below the depth of our shallow hand -auger borings. However, based on geologic data at our disposal, the likelihood of deep-seated deposits of compressible soil and peat are minimal. In order to properly evaluate the foundation soils at a building site, it is imperative our firm know exactly where the building will be placed, its size and the elevation of the founda- tion elements. This project data is especially critial in situations where the excavation extends below the footing grade and compacted fill will be required to attain building elevations. In these situations, the excavation would require lateral oversizing to provide suitable lateral dis- tribution of the footing loads. It must be recognized that Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory Inc does not practice in the field of surveying. We, therefore, must rely on the staking performed by others. If the construction is redesigned or otherwise moved subsequent to our work, we should be informec so our firm can assess if additional engineering observation is required or suggest sound engineering alternatives. We cannot be responsible for excavation subsequent to our observa- tions. If we can be of further service, please contact us. TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEE�G LABORATORY INC Peter S Fuller, Terry Swor, Civil Engineer Manager, Soils & Geology Dept PSF/TES/jb AS A MUTUAL PROTMCTION TO CLISNTR. THE PUBLIC AND OURSMLVMS. ALL REPORTS AIL SURNITTICD AS TMR CONFIDMMTIAL PROPMRTT OF CLIMNTS. AND AUTHOR. KATION FOR PUBLICATION OF RTATMMMNTS. CONCLUSIONS OR MMTRACTS FROM OR RMOAROING OUR IMPORTS 18 RMBMRVED MINDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. •. .o�.mwel"cs .t 0 twin city tomunq ano suwwwmm smw3c"tcwLL inc. 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST PAUL. MN 55114 PHONE 61216453601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL INNSBRUCK NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET AND NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: June 12, 1978 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: park Construction Co COPIES TO: 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Attn• Bob Swancon LABORATORY No. 9-0947 TEST NUMBER: DATE TAKEN: UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: (Moisture -Density Sample Number) LOCATION: DEPTH BELOW STREET ELEVATION: 12 May 12, 1978 Silty sand, mostly fine grained, a little gravel, reddish brown, (SM) -2 40'N & 40'W of SW corner of lot _�8 13 May 12, 1978 Silty sand, mostly fine grained, a little gravel, reddish brown, (SM) -2 30'W & 80'N of SW corner of lot 14 May 12, 1978 Silty sand, mostly fine grained, a little gravel, reddish brown, (SM) -2 30'W & 100'N of SW corner of lot DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: —31 —31 —611 FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: 130.3 130.3 130.3 Method Density in Place By Sand -Cone Method, ASTM: D1556-64 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 124.5 121 131 Moisture Content W 8.4 9.0 9.0 Plus #4 Material N) 12 12 12 LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D598-70, Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 130.3 130.3 130.3 Optimum Moisture NO 8.4 8,4 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 95.5 93 100.5 Specified Compaction (%) 95 915 95 C REMARKS: The above test locations were selected by Park Construction,Co:--Compaction meets specifications in the areas of Tests 12 and 14 but is below specifications in the other test area. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR- KATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IB RESERVED PENDING OUR wRITTEN APPROVAL Twin City Testing- ¢and- ,En-gineerinngg/Laboratory, Inc. By�— s ,O�,,N01.lM0j r� tumn city to= inq ano end, uw- 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645.3601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL INNSBRUCK NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET AND NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: June 12, 1978 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: Park Construction Co COPIES TO: 7900 Beech St NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Attn• Bob Swanson LABORATORY No. 9-0947 TEST NUMBER: DATE TAKEN: UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: (Moisture -Density Sample Number) LOCATION: DEPTH BELOW STREET: DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 15 May 18, 1978 Silty sand, mostly fine grained, some gravel, brown (SM) -2 WIN & 30'E of assumed SW corner of Lot Retest of 13 91 N FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place By Sand -Cone Method, ASTM: D1556-64 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 137 Moisture Content W 9.0 Plus #4 Material W 18 LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70, Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 130.3 Optimum Moisture (%) 8.4 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction W 105 Specified Compaction W 95 REMARKS: The above test location was selected by Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory Inc. Compaction now meets specifications in the above test area. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR- IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WR44TEN APPROVAL Twin City T ingJ�ineering Laboratory, Inc. R sy 0 t twin city testinq aria 8rW3ffWWMQ raborarmu,vw- 667 CROMWELI AVENUE ST PAUL MN 55114 PHONE 612.6453601 • �' .� MOISTURE - DENSITY CURVE INNSBRUCK NORTH RESIDENTIAL LOT PROJECT: ARTHUR STREET AND NORTH DANUBE ROAD DATE: REPORTED TO: FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA COPIES TO: Park Construction Co LABORATORY NO. 9-0947 METHOD OF TEST: ASTM: D698-70, Method "A" SAMPLE NO. 2 June 12, 1978 TYPE OF MATERIAL: Silty sand, mostly fine grained, reddish brown (SM) MAXIMUM DENSITY: 130.3 1b. /cu. ft. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 8.4 % O twin Cltti+ testing rn spricurlwarLM rnoraco ". nc. Fi J h l � N C i 1_ 7K- -6c 6c IRE S G,D7'S iN eiP-0ak Np JOB NO. 9- ��4%% SCALE: / �r. 20 0"WN BY PSF CHECKED BY 6A May 89 1979 CITY OF FRIDLEY MR. RICHARD SOBIECH Dear Sir; By this letter, I am respectfully requesting permission to encroach approximately seven (7) feet into the fourty (40) foot drainage easement, located at the rear of Lot 3, Block 29 Innsbruck North, for the purpose of constructing a single family residence on said lot, according to the certificate of survey attached. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. l. / Sincerel R. M. Swanson 2509 — 118th Lane N.W. Coon Rapids, Minn. 55433 MEMO TO: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager MEMO FROM: Richard N. Sobiech, Public Works Directo MEMO DATE: May 15, 1979 SUBJECT: Encroachment into Drainage Easement Lot 3, Block 2, Innsbruck North Please note the attached request from Mr. R.M. Swanson pertain- ing to referenced encroachment. A review by the Engineering Division indicates there would be no problem allowing this mini- mal encroachment, since we would still retain a total of seventy- three (73) feet of drainage easement in the area. This amount of easement is more than adequate to handle the drainage of this area. It is therefore requested that the City Council consider approval of the encroachment at the meeting of May 21, 1979. RNS:ik Attach. Encroachment into drainage easement 6 C Lot 3, Block 2, Innsbruck North s e,�r PARR �1 ri7 r C95Y%f %i SEC. C. RA ° g zaJF av —�; ' ' A a � 7S �.ir�JdJ4•-i.Sf'•33't 1'ed.t / JO j.'O.� BdJe 9 00 //H.JJ /-YS•OJ /B.4•Fd °O� /Fl.lf' y d'17 r .yp"i '• 4� \Wm io ` 14 � 01 i two ��.. O o N/'/• � \ Y'�.9d .:�-�••- � \ � -'� Y 0 y,,'t•�, 6p 1{ ` a �� . ..�. / 4 �: : �° 1 ':n., � -•L t^ •�^, /B � � // � hy'.1y �.. _a g. �''�� eR' � '�. J;yr-. �- �.r 309 e-- ti rr S 4B A• ,q��:6c r. q7e> 7.a vo "u• rn.s �. �. �1 t A.. '( \•, ° '�, � � �., n�• ��% � ^'c�J:%� a F' x �lAd s. r7 e.s �; ' "� ar• �y '�.sO� � •��,13 O 1 t jt ` / � o , `� �`6�{• Al vo O /sv.ne.-- u fJaGa vn_py M.J '"•: 3p ty1 ?A.p+ , •6' 'G..� ', �%=CSO n 0�6.�fi•`b 0 �•' >,pf 3y 'r!o d• X76 �� `-'.i` Di y( f_ F - �C1 n '' >n W � � � @,•. �, �' p• 9: 7aty 9Zav G2 -f. �s:,v -�-IPA / Pi9 Q V o /i b' /P �` ` y. pp,, 'r1:/fysiF 8 e �'f� M1 Y9 d 8� X46 1 --o�ti•+ ,, �� (,%��' F� f a 1a' a",9�V:~ e ���.��® ?AW^ •��• �� �al`J �o.� .�: s# `S ��. tl'��' g .°F a•�,J.� � rJ 't `ii - q� a. aRr°ly�� 4 \''t \0 �1h` ti� .n' '1'e'•�,° �' g,.o�a y � � 75 /r''; /o .vd of y; F -;t .f a+"•�°'�. - ' Zi.j ''/�� use_. 0`A p�ntm�1�°� /8 (�� ., r� r>'j ��1�\149 `a�1� ¢rx- flak/' W�, J�?sT ` • •6 :3 �. d 9 :,Y...ry `'� .a � ' 4j� � V � � ;�s_ywE'.3v -� 5 N �-`<�'•� �a J:.e:ra,'yl \ p t(� ^� • . /� : � tF ®/ p _ a>. r? ~� a/d. P.O ` s fW• 9 J� °' \ T• " O+OJ 3 m.. ••13 ?aJ •F• � 6 � _.+ CCCDDD'41 °7V v �� l i y.,a" ,q .�a=a h �- a.,�, �•-ham.\ h � m yj � � .a Q '^�,-•;. .. M� lil En •�y�ti •iM ® tl.�--- a; �G��9. ! ��� i g �1. ''k1 .� 9 „ ca. -,r• r Z� .'A /od/•a ^ ,.J _ .v�. $ N p` 2. •%sia _ �1 ����; �;�� � � ,� � � j �� /3 y` �,�. .'� fffYYY�a_ o,' / � -' -6�:._ 9 f �.� •5�4 "h' Y a9\y�`'- :.'t�"'t' m 9ov� `.�.,s•'� '� y �J, i,'"'�' d,ge i �' `c,� 3 , •' �. 2e�h , 61 w t --;i Il' / r7 -+Y 4 $:�'.. � � � � �^� �8 �` Q � �ni •. ,-� �'M '� �0 �� � Ci -',�a .» ��''. \ ,e.i° �t ,�'r� _ �1 "�i� n& � v `� .> � ) ? $�: ) _'asr � j s�'n / ,Q c . � l • r '� 3 Ct� 4 e °p g �-. c t4 ^ a, �s+ � �, /9S�j •.ate l •� Z p° ` ;�.. � e p ��• q J �. � . i � �ft�Af7` e. _. �a 'o � q ��7 �• h• e, 9a' n, .. A> � >•^y'�.. er � Zt y i ZT ��id'4 `W :� �� .t..a � '� �� v ,S^a s. '� � d � . �,y� Q1 3�• T�cJe'�,,�1 n� .9\ � � " �" ,/., 3'T""'si _` - �.Y.� i > 1 E r O � 9 0 $ v C y .3g'� . � moo 'F i � \.,4� j!2 � �p2. •!'l;.nt^ © `r'-' r+ x 00 /�.�e \ ayst r.a o•M A ,z7' C a° • _:0' /✓� �`� J7a74 a� �'O' ®��.: 9ti Z ° 9•�-ymay'- \�•- P�4 3» (� i� �, E•t. ;: 1'too, Sys •% e ' .- r.s$ - `;73 �U � �`a idb_ � ^.__�-G,4,-r,- y�dj S.d�'ol •a A�4- Tr _ � i+15 e ro _�•y •i a � R !' 7 r° p.*�p E%r 6•r s.''`r``:gA f' 1 1 al.\ b ra $'i^a q• E�� pb• .fit+' v,.� i f' n .S.•. --- � � f - � /i3 _ � �O ��¢ � 4 D`��y L�. sz, � �� � �,� A ' �':f �� �.f f7 ��; �vs� . i ` Ess 7 '\. 'e�� � T� �_�'- =q �4 •-" . > � ° /Z W ,,�7� ���� \ o,'° U 44 e, � '��:.i� 0.9°'-T''n.2„��, � D � �^• : ':i9 miR i � �{j "�� � yup wS+. (• .�3..'. t` k'°� '"�. '•e9 �- � -"'.• _ , � �;� U / � 'jQ b � E.s.sT— ,l..sf � : S" 'Q• s� �,aJJ k -'P j4 (�O � .� 6� p -• (' �lai �t`.�>Y/.� b� /�R.i,•�i P � � � 4% G+ '� \ '^' �.� '� . \ }lbe���o P�� �V��1 J l� '�.r�, ori - %Vr �/4r.,J� �.. t AS aj n .0'V7Q. ' lo gY � / dye o (3.+q�\ ee � l 8 •1 Zk 49 Li%' as w<s- ok 0 /i_.,/ �R 'ti !N-.r�'''bs•'.•,�riY @- I� Cr it :�_•s�x�:szz _oma s 14 15 i NOTION by Councilman Fitzpatridk to reapprove the plat for Brottlund's t `" 1st Addition with the same stipulations when originally approved. Seconded by Councilman Barnette, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ' CONSIDERATION OF ENCROACHMENT INTO DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON LOT 3, BLOCK 2, INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION:. z Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this is a request from Nr. R.M. Swanson for a seven foot en_c_r_oachm_ent into the drains a easement on Lot 3, Block 2, Innsbruck North Addition. Mr. Sobiech stated it should be pointed out that the City does have a total of 80 feet for drainage easement, generally in this location, along the rear lot lines. 164 REGULAR 14EETING OF MAY 21, 1979 PAGE 4 Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director,..stated staff felt this was a minimal type of encroachment and would not impact the drainage flow. �> Mr. Sobiech stated the stain consideration is that the fill.doesn't block " drainage into the main pipe, and to follow the policy to insure maintenance of the drainage system. Mr. Swanson stated at the corner of his lot. there is an inlet pipe and the = basement elevation would be higher .than. -the pipe. Mr. Sobiech Jfelt, 'if the house was properly constructed in- the lot, there shouldn't be any problems with drainage. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant permission to encroach seven feet • _ ± 1 into the easemen on Lot 3, Block 2, Innsbruck North, as requested by' Mr. Swanson, for purposes of constructing a single family.residence. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared -the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LARGE FAMILY HOME 014HERSHIP PROGRAM: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated several months ago. Council discussed the bonus money that was available from HUD pertaining to implementation of the large family ownership program. He stated the City made application for this money and the program would consist of acquisition of substandard homes, relocation of the people to other homes and appropriate write down of various costs for a new structure. He stated the new homes would be available to applicants that meet the criteria that is set up.. Mr.-Sobiech-stated a preliminary application was submitted to HUD and in - :,this particular case, HUD felt prelimimary application was all that was necessary, although there was some problem with the application since it didn't include the process involved. Once the process.was discussed, HUD felt comfortable with the application and will issue the money once the Council requests they released the funds. Mr. Sobiech reviewed the qualifications for participation in this program, as outlined in a letter to Mary Youle of the HUD Office from Jerry Boardman, City Planner. . Mr. Sobiech stated the City would receive about $130-$132,000 which would allow for approximately three or four acquisitions and relocation of existing families. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked, in these acquisitions, if there would 1 be a new house on each of the acquired properties. Mr. Sobiech stated there would be where it is possible, however, they have one parcel in mind that is 120 feet and this ma involve 5 littin it into two 60 f .4+-. • CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE GRAVITY WARS! AIR: RATE Furnace Shell & Duct Work $12.00 'Replacement of Furnace 7.00 Repairs & Alterations -up to $500.00 7.00 Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 4.00 MECHANICAL WARM AIR: Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 100,000 BTU $12.00 each add. 50,000 BTU 4.00 *Replacement of Furnace 7.00 Repairs & Alterations -up to $500.00 7.00 Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 4.00 STEAM OR HOT WATER SYSTEM: Boiler & Lines up to 100,000 BTU $12.00 each addn. 50,000 BTU 4.00 Boiler only up to 100,000 BTU 7.00 each addn. 50,000 BTU 6.00 OIL BURNER- to 3 gal. per hour $10.00 each add. 3 gal. per hour 10.00 GAS BURNER- from 100,000 BTU to 199,999 BTU $10.00 (over 199,999 BTU see Fee Schedule) GAS FITTING FEES: 1st 3 Fixtures x $ 3.00 Additional Fixtures x $ 1.00 Gas Range to 199,000 BTU X. $10.00 AIR CONDITIONING FAN HEATING SYSTEMS See Fee Schedule VENTILATING SYSTEMS ALTERATIONS 4 REPAIRS State Surcharge TOTAL FEE ROUGH INSP. REINSPECTION F&E Date ($10,00) FINAL INSP. " (2 Date APPROVAL FOR PERMIT TOTAL $ 02,00 $ h°.00 VIM $ $ .50 MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCiA= *Attached stack verification form Job Address 1 V 6® &0,. 2d6j U&F_r EDD Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fridley, Minn. 9 - /,Y. , 19 7Q OWNER 13.0a S A" -5 ® ,/ KIND OF BUILDING o®dada C®,is ! . USED AS SX,g P - 4m, d��y®ES�P.�E�e�-� TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT Dar, ® 9 ESTIMATED COST r, OLD - NEW BUILDING PERMIT NO. I.5 3 7 �/ / PERMIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE/BURNER HEATING or POWER PLANTS, Steam, Hot Water, Warm Air- No. Trade Name B eA /q -r- Size No. D ® , ® 0 Capacity ®S®, 0 �bo Sq. Ft. EDR BTU HP Total Connected Load Kind of Fuel ALAI 6-42 BURNER - Trade Name Se yet Adm Size No. ® $ 40, 0 Capacity Bq, Ft, 9DR BTU HP Company Comre - T �/ Signed By Tel. No. ToTAt- L€prc-K t-L.o uvs b 1L•/ 11id r to HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS Weatherstrips A•S.l1.V. Construction No. Guide WindowsI Doors Reference Out. Wall Int. Wall Ceiling Roof Floor Yes—No Yes—No 19_ Cl.1 AZT Icoom I Lengin -w wlutn 45 7 ficignt U _ Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area 20 lab l� 12 Width Height No. of No. of pane of pane lights Lineal ft. Area of crack sq, ft. 3 1-3 / 2'.0 Ve 2, 17 is 2. 20 160 2.. 29 21 Exp. wall I Coef. Btu Infiltration 708 ,3 ® YO 12-00 Glass 23 ,S® r r S Exp, wall 2 0 L Glass 225 Net exp. wall ? Q i /2S3 Int. wall so A 1 0 ' Ceiling `j r Floor % $ g 3 1477 Total Btu. 1 5193 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area fL4 Fl.j PR'04 Room I Length /P db" Width q =04 Height 19 Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area 20 lab l� 12 Width No. • of pane Height No. of ofpane lights Lineal ft. Area of crack eq. M Infiltration I.So too t 17 is 2. 20 160 2.. 29 21 Exp. wall I u'2550 Net exp. wall Exp. wall 708 Int. wall Coef. Btu Infiltration 0) $I to Floor yo j8q0 Glass 225 c Q so jqS0 Exp. wall 70 so A 1 0 Net exp. wall `j r 2.87 Int. wall Ceiling 90 ? 3 0 Floor 90 3 2 %O Total Btu. I qq 77 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area I t FL1 i_ --A. n u Room I Length 1-916" Width 1j.'b 11 Height PS' Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area - Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of Dane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. 71 d) 20 lab l� 12 Glass Coef.1 Btu Infiltration I.So y0 2000 Glass ,S Z $ ® 2 (As o Exp. wall I u'2550 Net exp. wall Exp. wall 708 Int. wall Ise .,3 Net exp. wall Ceiling In 0) 9 a. Floor 9 tp Total Btu. 225 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area _ 1. r"1 * r e I 1 &m D —rda 4L = 9 2.20'2 MINNEAPOLIS, NEAPOLIS, MINN. Insulation Kind How.' Applied - ---- -- Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area - -- - Width Height No. or Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. 3- L42 S/ Glass Coef. Btu Infiltration Net exp. wall La °/ 2 - Glass I u'2550 Ceiling Exp. wall 80 Floor Ise .,3 Net exp. wall SO 17 S& U Int. wall Ceiling %0. 7 'Y ,, — Floor 70 3 A 1 0 Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area U F1.1 rSA-r t 0 t Room ! Length 8 43 Width ?.'go Height Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area lfidlh Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane It to I of crack_ I sq. ft. I r FI.I Pian 0 1 Room I Length /4x40 Width 1 .?�D" Height 6 Windows and Doors--Crackage and Area Coef. Btu Infiltration 3- L42 S/ Glass Exp. wail Btu Infiltration Net exp. wall La °/ 2 - Int. wall I u'2550 Ceiling 5 17 #4 D 6 Floor Ise .,3 17 N Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. iris. W.A. Leader area - I r FI.I Pian 0 1 Room I Length /4x40 Width 1 .?�D" Height 6 Windows and Doors--Crackage and Area Width Height Nu. of Lineal ft. Area No. of Dane of pane Ilghta of crack eq. ft. 3- L42 S/ Coef.1 Btu Infiltration `/ g. y 11060 Glass I u'2550 Exp. wall 21 to Net exp. wall Int. wall Ceiling Floor 162- .3 $ q f® Total Btu. 17205 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area ass HEAT LOSS CALCULAfiIONS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.. Weatherstrips A.S.ELV.I;. Construction No. Insulation Guide Windows Doors Reference Out. Wall Int. Wall Ceiling Roof Floor Kind NowrApplied Yea— 'o Yes—No 19_. Ij FI.1 RED Room I Length /S-3 Width /®=D Height U F1.1 S ri4Z J?. Room Length 2 = ` Width G -*& I-leight 8 Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. tYldth ilelght No. of Lineal (t. Area Coef.1 NO. nt Dane or Dane Ilghta of crack eq. its Y® 1 I 7t-10 1 2 S1 r0 Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. cf pane of Dane lights of crack sq. ft. 3d10 (,-13 3 LID 4.9 .R 2- Coef.1 Btu Infiltration y Y® O Glass St r0 2S 3 O Exp. wall so S O i/0 Net exp. wall Glass Exp. wall .3 Int. wall s') SO 7 2. S O Ceiling IS 2. ira Floor I S2,S2,S .3' Y 7. S Total Btu. (m .3 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area '? // F1.1 L=11. Room ) Length I RWidth 19.0 Height S Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. cf pane of Dane lights of crack sq. ft. 3d10 (,-13 3 LID 4.9 .R 2- 3%4 3`{ y3 9117 &S6 Net exp. wall Coef.1 Btu Coef.1 Btu Infiltration /boo ► S S I S O i/0 6.000 Glass Exp. wall 10 5 s') SO 7 2. S O Exp. wall IS 2. ira I S ?- Q Net Net exp. wall Floor (m .3 1 '? 4 9 Int. wall Ceiling 33/.S i :LNIoO•� Floor 13SIA 3 1 10 sy. S Total Btu. I I S. 814 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area U Fl.1 flT.e Room 1 Lenszth I s3 LD Width 17=D Height Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack ea. (t. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane_ of pane lights of crack sq. ft. a Y 2 S( Exp, wall 9117 &S6 Net exp. wall Coef.1 Btu Infiltration Y 2 yo /boo Glass S I S O 2„$ S O Exp. wall 2 05 Exp. wall Net exp. wall s') 1 1 09e% Int. wall IS 2. ira Ceiling Q 1183 Floor (m .3 501 Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack ea. (t. 20 8o 3 SO 3 Exp, wall 9117 &S6 Net exp. wall coef.1 Btu Infiltration I so Net exp. wall YO 180 Glass Floor 3q SO1700 Total Btu. Exp. wall 92 - 2Net PI -1 Room I Leneh Net exp. wall Height IS 2. ira Int. wall Ceiling I Floor Total Btu. I Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W./j. Leader area Fl.l pp, per. Room I Length =1 Width Height Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area width Height No. of Lineal (t. Area No. of pane of pane lights o1 crack eq. ft. Infiltration Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. Glass Exp, wall 9117 &S6 Net exp. wall 9 Int. wall Net exp. wall Ceiling Io 1 -7 143 y Floor f B 1-7 Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area PI -1 Room I Leneh Width Height Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane Ilghta of crack sq. ft. Coef. Btu Infiltration Glass Exp. wall Net exp. wall Int. wall Ceiling Floor ' Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area D36 t.,►�71e.t HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. Weatherstrips A.5.1-I.V.E.. Construction No. Insulation Guide WindowsI Doors Reference Out. Wall Int. Wall Ceiling Roof Floor Kind How, Applied Yes.—No Yes—No 19— _ s rl I R..,... I t e...,1. i A-'/% M.tih c_ 7 NP;oht Q II F1 I Rr nm I Length Width Height e, • •i I.N►tt p ---.... Windows and Doors—Crackage -- -v- - v ----- and Area — — — Width Ilelght No. of Lineal it. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area ro. of pane of pane Ilghte of crack sq. ft. Coef.1 Btu Infiltration Infiltration Glass Glass Btu Infiltration SD Exp. wall O 100 0 Glass Net exp. wall O Sb 5160 Int. wall 5 Ceiling Net exp. wall ;L O Floor S:t•S Int, wall 0 Total Btu. I (. (. S Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area d. F1.1 N4rit_ Roorn I Length -3 Width 9--3 Height 8 Windows and Doors--Crackage and Area 1VIdth He16ht No. o[ Lineal ft Area Na • of pane of pane 1lghto of crack sq. ft. Coef.1 Btu Infiltration Glass Exp. wall go Net exp, wall O (0 3 O Int. wall Ceiling Floor jOq 2 .209 Total Btu. 3 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area o' h a 1.1 a1 MrJ—f . .a-- l a....g... —%I .. a..... S' t ..g.. Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area ro. of pane of pane Ilghte of crack sq. ft. ao So 3 So 3N Coef. Btu Infiltration Glass Coef. Btu Infiltration SD 40 100 0 Glass 3q Sb 7 O O Exp, wall 5 Net exp. wall ;L O 1 Int, wall Ceiling Floor 8 If 0 (O 8 Total Btu. 1 t4 00 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area Windows and Doors--Crackage and Area No. Width Ilelght No. of Linen) ft. Area of pane or pane It to of crack sq. ft. Coef. Btu Infiltration Glass Exp. wall Net exp. wall Int. wall Ceiling Floor Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins.-W.A. Leader area F1.1 Room I Length Width Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Nfdth Helght No. o[ Lineal ft. Area No* of pane o[ pane lights I of crack_- sq. ft. Infiltration Glass Exp. wall Net exp. wall Int, wall Ceiling Floor Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area F1.1 Room I Length Width Height Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Jlelght No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of Fane lights of crack sq. ft. Coef.) Btu Infiltration Glass Exp. wall Net exp. wall Int. wall Ceiling Floor Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area r Tp7l4L I.o W EIZ F'L o 31-01 HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS Weatherstrips A.S.H.V.L. Construction No. Guide Windows Doors Reference Out. Wall Int. Wall Ceiling Roof Floor Yes—No I Yes—No 19— I >+11 rl a L Rnnm l.enath /2'-3"Width /l:le" Heiaht A II L FHAmiscan Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height Nc. of Lineal It. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. fl. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of erack sq. it.— 'V10 G=8 N a S I Coef. Btu Infiltration Glass — Glass Infiltration Net exp. wall Exp. wall 190 Int. wall NO Net exp. wall 190 Glass 1330 Int. wall 102 50 Ceiling Exp. wall Floor / Y / 2, 92 - 292 - Total Btu. Total (m 1 x Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area I_ FI.I wAPY CuaP Room I Length )O -'v, Width /I=/ " Heiaht b Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. it. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of erack sq. it.— 'V10 G=8 N a S I Coef.1 Btu Infiltration Glass Coef.1 Glass Infiltration Net exp. wall Exp. wall 9 O Int. wall NO Net exp, wall 9 0 Glass 13:7 0 Int. wall 102 50 Ceiling Exp. wall Floor / 280 282 - 82 - Total Btu. Total H.0 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area I_ Fl.l I .,..-. Room ILenath/Width /Y-0 Heiaht P Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of erack sq. it.— 'V10 G=8 N a S I Btu -LCoef.1 Infiltration Infiltration Glass Coef.1 Exp. wall 2 Infiltration Net exp. wall 'y 0 Int. wall NO Ceiling Glass Floor I 7;Z Z3 `( Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R, or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area , MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. . Insulation Kind Howt Applied Rnnm I l-enuth 1 q Width 19 Height 8 Windows andYDoors--Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of erack sq. it.— 'V10 G=8 N a S I Coef. Btu Infiltration Coef. Coef.1 Btu Infiltration SO 25s o 'y 0 1&80 NO 3 3 G O Glass so 2530 102 50 5100 Exp. wall Net exp. wall 280 2, b 3 G Net exp. wall Int. wall %$ 1 24 40 Int. wall Floor Ceiling 1130 2 2160 Floor (0 84 Total Btu. I lo3qjD Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. -W.A. Leader area 1 M 1 r2 =r. MLI Rnnm I Length I'7t-/) Width 10=n Heiaht A Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lighta of crack sq. ft. 3-/0 C-8 2 142 5 Coef. Btu Infiltration Coef. Btu Infiltration it 2 SO 25s o 'y 0 1&80 Glass Net exp. wall 51 so 2530 Exp. wall $ O Net exp. wall 318 2, b 3 G 20.3 Int. wall Ceiling Floor 1130 2 2160 Total Btu. I A/ (* 9 3 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. itis. W.A. Leader area - I FI.I rz n sk -z Rnnm I Length 3 1--0 Width 12'-.3 Height > e Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. 3 10 (j —8 2, 'A42q. . �7 / Coef. Btu Infiltration '10 (1680 Glass 51 SO 25s o Exp. wall 30(a Net exp. wall 255 17 178S Inc. wall Ceiling Floor 318 2, b 3 G Total Btu. (6 6 5 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING PERMIT Job Address / % 9 [ Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application %are true and correct Fridley, Mn. ��-� J% 19 OWNER KIND OF BUING z,2-� USED AS fix / \ 6 0 TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT P4 0y� v ' 0 water d1 0 +� m .i A TOTAL OLD �ILDING PERMIT NO. H E 0 4 i6 W %� Q V W w Future Fixture Opening x Heater 4 Company New Fixture, Old Opening r $2.00 $ Signed By., N C C ECJ a N Water Heater - to 99,000 BTU �- x $5.00 ^1 5 W C 0-M $10.00 O N N $7.00 $ O0 ++ co r+ U $4 D b W a iA -.i <y b $ 0 $4 O O W .0 to O .i W N.8 to b U M '� rt 3 N b -A U z N roro C7 .0 *' O ds lea r •.� $3.00 $ 3-m Date Additional Fixtures x $1.00 $ Gas Range to 199,000 BTU x $x:0.00 $ 1st REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS First $100.00 .$5.00 $ each add. $100.00 or fraction $2.00 2nd MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE State Surcharge TOTAL FEE + $ REINSPECTION FEE 3rd 0- ($10.00) 4th (R) = Future Connection Opening Connected with Sewer M - New Fixture, Old Opening Water Job Address / % 9 [ Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application %are true and correct Fridley, Mn. ��-� J% 19 OWNER KIND OF BUING z,2-� USED AS fix / \ 6 TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE ESTIMATED COST PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: N0. RATE TOTAL OLD �ILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT NO.. Number Fixtures �sJx $3.00 Future Fixture Opening x $2.00S Company New Fixture, Old Opening x $2.00 $ Signed By., Catch Basin x $5.00 $ Water Heater - to 99,000 BTU �- x $5.00 $ (fU Tel. No. / 100,000 BTU to 199,000 BTU x $10.00 $ Water Softener x $7.00 $ New Ground Run Old Building x $5.00 $ ROUGH INSP. Electric Water Heater xDate $5.00 $ GAS FITTING FEES: FINAL INSP. 1st 3 fixtures x $3.00 $ 3-m Date Additional Fixtures x $1.00 $ Gas Range to 199,000 BTU x $x:0.00 $ APPROVAL FOR PERMIT REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS First $100.00 .$5.00 $ each add. $100.00 or fraction $2.00 $ MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE State Surcharge TOTAL FEE $ REINSPECTION FEE 0- ($10.00) City of Fridley SUBJECT PERMI 153T7 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING P E R M I T114 �q 4EE IPy � `______ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. y r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 3� 1 i i L ,'J CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910-F15 7/19/79 JOB ADDRESS 1480 North Danube Road N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 3 2 Innsbruck North SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE R. M. Swanson 2509 - 118th Lane N.W., Coon Rapids, MN 55433 755-5640 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same W. 786-9800 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESSSEPERRI'� PERMITS REQEIIRED F ONE LICENSE NO. VARIMM 6 USE OF BUILDING HEATING. PLUMBING AND SIGNS. Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK JJ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 27' x 63.67' & 8' x 21.67' Dwelling and a 23.67' x 27' Garage 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS provide a hard surface driveway. Provide sod in the front and side yards. Provide City with.copy of verifying survey before capping. SEWER LOCATION: 157' S.E. of M.H. (Inv. 941.30) WYE ELEV: 942.09 TOP OF FOOTING: 945.09 Minimum with 35' setback WATER LOCATION: Approx. 10' E. of Sewer Service %as DRIVEWAY DEPRESSION COST: N/A {moi! utilities edondI�EL��C OWcd To OT � mit: � 7EI.EPNON-GAS Etc. A MUCT Qt, t LOCATIQl1S TAM DATA rW M WOtWNI" MRPOW cur Aril REQUIRED BY LAW pUSOM UWO a MQMvee w�o�w►no� ON THE 01 TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. Wood Frame THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION 1892 639 25,463+6390 OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT + ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $65,550 $32.78 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $127.41 $425.00 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE ;� 'I $ 31.85 $617.04 NTRACTORORAUTMORIZEDAGENT (DATE) WHEN PROPERLY V IDAATED THIS IS YOUR PERMT ZW&441a��r (DDATEI r SIGNATUREOFOWNERUF OWNERBUILDERI I BLDG WSP DAT I �'- CITY OF FRIDLEY .0100 AFPLIC/1TIOf1 FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PEN14ITS I ' (IVEI�t, ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS,' OR REPAIRS) OWNER:/C : �'% �us�1�► ��r�� BUILDrR: Address: Z:S'v'?'W La; -A,#, LA1. Address: & tx_1 Tel. No. 7 S' = SZ 4 d4_z 7F� Street: IVIOR77-1 ��.°ext A b LOT: BLOCK: Z ADDITION: 11VA;,5tdCk COMWER LOT: INSIDE LOT: to'� SETBACK: 5 ® SIDEXARDS: Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To Be Used As: �S K 21.69 400-GZ1n1Cj Front: X17y Depth: %J'. WI Height: ® Square Feet: ,��Zi Cubic Feet: ?gS rtn -C # Co Front: �� _ (Ai Depth: :;L Height:: /Q Square Feet: &p3l. Cubic Feet: &P Type of Con struc tion : IFR A N+I. Estimated Cost: $ &ps. %%0 To Be Completed: Alt. A Alt. B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired $ $ (SEE REVERSE SIDE OF SHEET) The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings•of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that.all the facts and representations - ted in this application are true and correct. See reverse side for/9 it'onal information. DATE: ! �I9� SIGNATURE: Stipulations: .S1,1.4n x 4.00 P.0 (®sown x •�d���•. 7$ qi4 o a V sAC, • r V • �@Poi �' 6�l I,��l a CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIV. 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 572-3604 RATE SCHEDULE APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES A'� JOB ADDRESSLffi IV Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner — Also Replacement Furnace (Side Vent — Fill Out Back) Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace) Gas Range Gas Dryer *Air Conditioning — All Sizes All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK) I% of Value of Appliance or Work Commercial/I ndustrial 1.25% of Value of Appliance or Work Rate TOTAL $ 30.00 $ $ 10.00 $ $ 10.00 $ State Surcharge TOTAL FEE MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLINGNENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $25.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $42.00/Hr *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without written permission from adjoining property owner. Effective On August 1, 1995 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this applicati n are t ue and correct. 1111�,"iW 00 DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND OR BURNER No. of Heating Units Circle One (Steam) (Hot Wate arm Ai Trade Name&knda Size No.� BTUHP EDR Fuel — Total Connected Load Burner Trade Name BTU HP Size No EDR i Signed Tel No. '257 i 6 Approved By Rough—In Date Final Date FILL OUT BACK SIDE4R STACK VERIFICATION ON REPLACEMENT FURNACE C0 Remarks: List ALTERATIONS Being Done: HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: CHIMNEY AND STACK VERIFICATION The undersigned hereby verifies that the existing chimney or stack: 1. Has been carefully examined Yes ( ) No ( ) 2. Is free from rust or deterioration Yes () No ( ) 3. Has no foreign objects lodged within Yes ( ) No ( ) 4. Is securely supported Yes ( } No ( ) 5. Meets all current Code requirements for size and total BTU's connected Yes ( ) No ( ) 6 Has total heating BTU's of All other BTU's TOTAL BTU's 7. Has a liner been provided for water heater Yes ( ) No ( ) 8. Has combustion air been provided for water heater Yes () No ( ) Remarks: List ALTERATIONS Being Done: HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: IV Ail MIIMWNMMMMW�� C) go C p ►a` 0 LU' J C� 48/01/00 TUE 07:50 FAX 651 646 1597 HOME TAILORS BLDG & REND 11001 a oco HOLD HARM ESS AGREEMENT 1511139 This agreement dated this A e 5- day of _ 2000, by and between Patrick J. Hess, (herVinafter referred to as "the owner'l and the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred to as "the City'l. WHEREAS, the owner owns residential real estate in the City 1(icated at 1480 North Danube Road, and is legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 2, Innsbruck North WHEREAS, said property is adjacent to a drainage & utility ea: ement along the south and west property line; and W14EREAS, a small portion of said easement has been utilized :o accommodate a portion of a deck placed within the easement; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to allow the encroachment on ;aid easement to remain upon certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of allowing use of said , ;asement Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns hereby covenant and agree as follows: Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns shill hold the City harmless for any injuries or damages to property by reason of their construction of a deck within the City's easement. In addition, he sht 11 be liable for any and all costs associated with removal of all or any part of tl a deck in the event that the City, in its discretion determines that it must use all or part of the easement and the presence of the deck interferes with that use 2. Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns sh ill defend the City against any and all claims arising as a result of construction within the drainage and utility easement. The City may defend and charge tl .e costs of such defense against Patrick J. Hers, his heirs, successors, and as ,igns, and assess such costs against the subject property if adequate and th rely defense is not commenced on the City's behalf. 3. Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns A X11 agree to promptly pay any sums due under this agreement. The City may pursue judgements to collect the amounts ownin 3 under this agreement, and if said sums are not promptly paid, the City may assess the costs against the subject property. 08/01/00 TUE 07:50 FAX 651 646 1597 HOME TAILORS BLDG & REMD Ia002 CITY OF FRIDLEY By �- Wi liam W. Burns Its City Manager By Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoi g instrument was acknowledged before me the day of 2000, by PATRICK J. HESS. WAKAMAAN 14)NANCY J. HERUBIN NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY My con= Exom Jan. 31, 2005 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the day of 2000, by William W. Burns, City Me nager of the City of Fridley. J M. iOSa wN f COM MISSION EXPIFES By JANUARY 37,M5 Notary Public ABSTRACT Receipt # !° 3 fig• 5-0 ❑ Certified Copy d � � r,tll� Date Mailed Date/Time: / � ❑ Tax Liens / Releases Doc. Order of ❑ Multi -Co Doc Tax Pd ✓ by: Pins: - Recordability / Delgs: ry ❑ Transfer ❑ New Desc. Filing Fees: >1 .� ❑ Division ❑ GAC Well Certificate ❑ Status ❑ Def. Spec Received this Date: Anoka County Recorder ❑ Other 12 -No Change Notes: Nj S f . . . DOCUMENT N0. 151713 9 . 0 ABSTRACT ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE FOR RECORD ON AUG 10 2000 AT 5:00 PM AND WAS DULY RECORDED. FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $29.50 PAID. RECEIPT NO. 2000064371 EDWARD M. TRESKA ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES JAR BY DEPUTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES 01 SUBJECT City of Fridley 312NO.8 8 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT ' R . _____ . , LV INSPECTION SEC. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV ®7 r � � PROTECTIVE -51 I . , i A ;"' �'� CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV OTE PAGE OF APPROVED By •-_. L J` 612-571-3450 910-F15 8/8/00 JOB ADDRESS 1480 North Danube Rd NE I LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 3 Z Innsbruck North SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Pat Hess 1480 North Danube Rd NE 586-0956 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO Home Tailors, Inc 1625 Wynne Ave St Paul, M 55108 651-646-6436 3700 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK O NEW 0 ADDITION CIC ALTERATION 0 REPAIR 0 MOVE 0 REMOVE B DESCRIBE WORK Construct new deck area in 4 sections (cedar wood) 753 SQ FT Remove existing deck 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Need "Hold Harmless Agreement" signed and recorded with Anoka Co. for building in an easement. Submitted 8/1/00. Survey submitted. For stipulations, see attached plans. WARNING Before digging call for SEPARATE PERMITS Utility locations REQUIRED FOR; On. 4540002 HEAnNG REQUIRED BY LAM/ PLWIRING SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR EL RICAL, PLUMBING. HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT CU FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $7,078.80 $3.54 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIO S OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON• STR CTIO OR THE PERFORMANCE $153.25 FirEV SC $7.08 CONSTRUCTION ^^��, PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL E ° �8 ®V Lic e SC 5. $ 8.87 SIGNA OF CON'RACTOR OR Au IDATE. EN O E LIpAT IS IS UR P IT r SIGNATURE OF OWNER IIF OWNER BUILDER, IDATEI 'NSP/)A IE.., 01 JUL-31-2000 10:58 FROM CITY OF FRIDLEY TO 6516461597 P.03iO4 ND1N [] Effective 1/1/2000 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY (763) 572-3604 Bldg Insp ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 ( q? BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION gP 3/ Construction Address: \ 480 S6M 1:)pa!AUE Rl>- F •( SS4�2 Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: SV E + fW Net5S Aioeejs IgE el. # XI-Lg — 0 q <I Contractor n E�'a.� no 1aC -� MN LICENSE # 3'lD Address: \lo Z. s Al t3>JE NqE . "SIA i�pt_ 4j51 O Tel. # _COSI— to ' �4!_ Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the �J lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to s Ni/� DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMEN LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft G REA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Groun Sq. Ft o S ° 7s3X � = 7oT8. ao Construction Type: ►� Estimated Cost: $� Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft + 6 Ft = Ft x $ =$ DATE: 1 J3` APPLICANT: K�1.�E �A\Lp��j kQ C.. Tel. # 14Sk— l04lQ -14%ko CITY USE ONLY - Call (763) 572-3604 for Permit Fees if mailing in application �- Permit Fee $ ..Zvi" Fee Schedule on Reverse Side , Fire Surcharge $ .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge$ 7 $1100 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $s�_$5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ AI#. °'A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] �sLl1 .r fs�2EFFNr� TOTAL $ �.�� dab J 69Fo2 9C." c.ov,X STIPULATIONS: /Q�Z���IIIi _ M< A(zo 08/01/00 TUE 07:50 FAX 651 646 1597 HONE TAILORS BLDG & REND Q001 a`. HOLD HARM ESS AGREEMENT This agreement dated this Af�mafter day of .2 _ 2000, by and between Patrick J. Hess, (hereferred to as "the owner's and the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred to as "the City'). WBEREAS, the owner owns residential real estate in the City 14 icated at 1480 North Danube Road, and is legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 2, Innsbruck North WHEREAS, said property is adjacent to a drainage & utility ea: ement along the south and west property line; and WHEREAS, a small portion of said easement has been utilized :o accommodate a portion of a deck placed within the easement; and - WHEREAS, the City has agreed to allow the encroachment on ;aid easement to remain upon certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of allowing use of said i .asement Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns sh, ill hold the City harmless for any injuries or damages to property by reason of their construction of a deck within the City's easement. In addition, he shf 11 be liable for any and all costs associated with removal of all or any part of tt a deck in the event that the City, in its discretion determines that it must use all or part of the easement and the presence of the deck interferes with that use 2. Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns sh ill defend the City against any and all claims arising as a result of construction within the drainage and utility easement. The City may defend and charge tl .e costs of such defense against Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and as ,igns, and assess such costs against the subject property if adequate and to rely defense is not commenced on the City's behalf. 3. Patrick J. Hess, his heirs, successors, and assigns A ill agree to promptly pay any sums due under this agreement. The City may pursue judgements to collect the amounts ownin g under this agreement, and if said sums are not promptly paid, the City may assess the costs against the subject property. 04/01/00 TUE 07:50 FAX 651 646 1587 ROME TAILORS BLDG & REND 1@002 CITY OF FRIDLEY By / v Wi liam W. Burns Its city Manager By ,"v - Property Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The forego/ g instrument was acknowledged before me the /1-A day of 2000, by PATRICK J. HESS. NANCY J. HERUBIN NOTARY PUBLIC— MINNESOTA ANOKA COUNTY My Corren. F�lt� Jan. 31, 2005EIRAMMA STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the �_ day of 2000, by William W. Burns, City Me eager of the City of Fridley. allAW M. TCSTENSON .1! r#JrWF1J8Lr.--kjN0a2 =m 'Iff COMMISSION EXPIRES By — �' 3i� Notary Public or I5/U1/1JU TUR US:Ub YA3 Ubl U45 1697 HUM TAILORS BLDG & REND 19001 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: DEL- B CONSTRucrjoN / I,. M. SuWAgSON 0 �° "`4 •�s X0 �8S9. Qo�'Pa � e . • � . 9 3r0-^ N 4,SBb'S� �'' LEGAL DESCRIP'T'ION Lo19l ung+ Inns bruck North Ana k {y, Miltnesofq o Denotes iron monument Proposed lowest floor elev. = ,o Denotes offset stake Proposed top of foundation elev. x 000.tl Denotes existing elev. (000.o ) Denotes Proposed elev. BENCH MARK: —.- Denotes surface drainage Proposed garage floor elev.= Rm'str1 Auer. Z2 1979 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of File No. the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, A DEMARS - GABRIEL if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if .any, f am or on said land. z � 3—A LAND SURVEYORS, INC. Book —Page As surveyed by m this �i2%10 f 19_ 3030 Harbor Lane No. / S7 ,. �7 Plymouth MN 55441 Phone: (612) 559-0908 Seale Minn. Reg. No. CITY OF FRIDLEY BUILDING INSPECTION 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 763-572-3604 FAX 763-5711287 RATE SCHEDULE Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner & also Replacement Furnace Gas Piping (New Furnace, Fireplace, Insert) Gas Range Gas Dryer *Air Conditioning -All Sizes All Other Repairs or Alterations (List on Back) 1% of Value of Appliance or Work Minimum Fee $15.00 for Residential or 5% of cost of Improvement whichever is greater Aoo�-- 0133y Effective 4/1/2004 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION REFRIGERATION TION AND AIR COQ - - -- - - - ---- -- Fee Total $35.00 $10.00 JOB A[ Owner Building Used As MS 14 m As ESTIMATED COST w PERMIT NO $10.00 $ DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND BURNER $10.00 $ # of Heating Units Circle One (Steam) (Hot Water) (Warm Air) Trade Name Size No. $25.00 $ � —v BTU HP EDR Fuel Total Connected Load Com mercial/Industrial/Institutiona I 1.25% of Value of Appliance or Work (List on Back) Minimum Fee $35.00 for Commercial/IndustriaVinstitutional State Surcharge TOTAL FEE REINSPECTION FEE $50.00/HOUR Burner Trade Name BTU HP Size No. EDR The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes $ and rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. $ . Go EATING CO S N TINA & IR CONDITIONING CO. 410 WEST LAKE STREET �� MINNEAPOLIS, X55408-2 612-824-266 FAX # ` Date (' 1 *Air Conditioners can not be placed in side yard without written approval. from adjoining property owner - copy to City FILL OUT BACK SIDE FOR STACK VERIFICATION ON REPLACEMSNT FURNACE Approved by Rough -in Date Final Date FILL IN COMPLETELY FOR REPLACEMENT FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE PERMITS COMMON VENT, VENT CONNECTOR AND COMBUSTION AIR VERIFICATION When replacing an existing furnace, the undersigned hereby verifies that the venting has been examined and is free from rust, deterioration, obstructions, and is securely supported and firestopped where required. Yes () No( ) The venting system is plastic/PVC and meets all current codes and manufacturer specifications including sizing, length, number of elbows and termination. Yes () No( ) The undersigned also verifies that the replacement unit is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes () No ( ) The existing combustion air is sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. Yes () No ( ) When required to install a new combustion air, it will be sized and installed to meet the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. Yes O No When in. t-allind a new venting system, the undersigned hereby verifies that it is a listed assembly and meets the current codes and manufacturer's specifications. This does include AGA-GAMA Category I Central Furnace Venting Tables for fan assisted and natural draft appliances. Yes () No ( ) Is the common vent and vent connectors sized and installed correctly after an appliance has been removed from the common vent and vented separately as per current codes. Yes () No( ) Appliance Type and Size/Common Vent and Vent Connector Information Appliance #1 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #2 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Appliance #3 Type BTU Input Fan Assisted or Nat Total Appliances Total Btu Input Common Vent Type Vent Height Diameter inches Appliance #1 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #2 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter in Type Appliance #3 Vent Connector Height ft Length ft Diameter jn Type ALTERATIONS: (Describe) HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: 3uilding $ BUILDING Permit No.• A -- 9, nspections $ RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION Received By: 763-572-3604 $ CITY OF FRIDLEY Date Rec'd: )ATE / Y/"?,bE-MAIL ADDRESS $ ITE ADDRESS � � �� l � Park Fee 'HIS APPLICANT IS: ❑ OWNER ACONTRACTOR $ PROPERTY OWNER/ NAy ,m: y�v Y S ,, l / ADDRESS: % 7 ComAPO ` v e CITY ,c STATE T TENANT PHONE: 76,3 t-206 — 02/ S CONTRACTOR NAME: ods 1 .tee e STATE LICENSE # 120, % 3 EXP DATE A x/17 SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR STATE LICENSE ADDRESS: �� �'I CTfYZ (2174104 STATE/RZIP WITH APPLICATION PHONE X76-7 FAX 65-/- '9 e PROPERTY TYPE ❑ SINGLE FAMILY1NEW CONSTRUCTION SIZE ❑ TWO FAMILY/NEW CONSTRUCTION STORIES PERMIT TYPE ❑ ADDITION ❑ GARAGE/SHED ❑ WINDOWS ❑ BASEMENT FINISH , ROOF ❑ DRAW TILE ❑ DECK ❑ SIDING ❑ OTHER ❑ SWIMMING POOL TYPE OF WORK: ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ MAINTENANCE/REPAIR ❑ REMODELING DESCRIBE WORK BEING DONE: aT — �e SIZE OF IMPROVEMENT LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT Sq. Ft. kOOFING ❑ HOUSE ONLY NUMBER OF SQUARES ❑ HOUSE & GARAGE BASEMENT REMODELING SUBMIT: 3ARAGES ❑ ATTACHED GARAGE 1. Existing Floor Plan 2. Proposed floor plan ?ROPOSED SIZE: ❑ DETACHED GARAGE i" 3. List of structural members to be used 'ROPOSED HEIGHT: iIDIIVG 3 Vinyl ❑Soffit �' q40 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING DECKS, ADDONS. & PORCHES SUBMIT:7 ITI Aluminum ❑ Trim/ % 1. Site Plan/Survey showing the existing structures Z) Other and proposed project Two sets of construction plans WINDOWS2. " 3. Energy Calculations N EXISTING OPENINGS ❑Yes ❑No LOCATIO F WINDOWS OR FOR NEW OPENINGS -DESCRIBE SIZE OF OPENING CHANGES & TYPE OF WINDOW TO BE INSTALLED NUMBER OF WINDOWS ALL FEES ARE BASED ON VALUATION, INCLUDING THE COST OF LABOR AND MATERIALS: (USING THE 1997 U.B.0 FEE SCHEDULE) TOTAL JOB VALUATION $ 9, 300.00 OCCUPANCY TYPE Permit Fee $ Plan Review $ Surcharge $ Fire Surcharge $ License Surcharge $ SAC Charge $ Curb Cut Escrow $ Erosion Control $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main Charge $ Total Due $ a . See Back Page for Fee Schedule 65% of Building Permit Fee (.0005) times the total job valuation — Minimum $.50 .001 x Permit Valuation (1/10%) $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) $1450 per SAC Unit (Plans to MWCC for determination) ft+6ft= ftx$20=$ $450 Conservation Plan Review Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement necessary ( ) Non Necessary ( ) Make checks savable to: City of Fridley Attach THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT -NOT VALID UNTIL PROCESSED I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Fridley and with the Minnesota Construction Codes; that I understand this is not a permit but only an application for a permit and work is not to start without a p it; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of all work 'ch requires review and approval of plans. (fj _321ileri SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PRINT NAME DATE �Fa) 0