Loading...
SP 05.65APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND CITY COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE IN REQUIREMENTS OF CERTAIN ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (Applicant to complete items 1, 2, 3) 1. Name and Address of Applicantrl,_� il'i x •!-tet- ' � � 2. Legal Description of Property (also general location, such as:"north- east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Street°' or 6415 Fifth Street") 3. Describe the variance requested. (Attach Plat or Survey of Property showing location of proposed building, etc., also adjoining properties and ownership within 200' of said property.) 4. Comments by_administrative official denying original request for building permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative official. Appropriate ordinances and section of ordinances to be cited.) Request for Double Bungalows on above mentioned lots under Ordinance No. 267 (An Ordinance Amending Section 45.19" of the City Code to Allow Double Bungalows in An R-1 District by a Use Permit) -2 - 5. Notice of Hearing appeared in Official Newspaper on the following dates: February 10 1965 and Febru 17 1965 (must be at least once 10 days before meeting -- copy of notice to be attached). 6: Board Members notified. df meeting by mailing of notice - 2-5-65 (List Members, Date Notified, and "Yes" or "Not' for plans to attend hearing)& .A Name Date Plan to Attend _ 1 All members notified by mailing of notice - 2-5-65 79 Person making appeal and the following property owners having property within 2001 notified: By Phone Notified by Name Date or Mail (Initial) G. A. Gunderson,Route 5, Anoka, Minnesota M DYKE OF Robert Carlson, 1382 Onondaga Street N.E. PUBLIC NEARING (Official Publication) i, Vernon R_ T.arSOri. 7453 Citral Avenge N. E . M OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE Paul Olson, 1381 Onondaga Street N.E . M BOARD OF APPEALS, „— TO WHOM IT MAY CONCER NOTICE IS HEREBY G', 8. -?avid Carlson, 1395 Onondaga Street.N.E The FollowingBoard Members and interested parties were Hearings Fbruary 24, 1965 BOARD MRIBERS Chairman Nawrocki Member Goodrich Member Fitzpatricic ��1dPrnl�sr� -I%v- 4 elle Member Saunders of the City Hai, or a Special Us, construct double a an R-1 District east, and on Lot 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace, same be. Ing 1365 Onondaga S t r e e t Northeast, A n o k a County. Minnesota. (Request by G. A. Gunderson, Route 5, Anoka, Minnesota). Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above .nat- ter will be HARRY tNAWROCKI (Feb. 10, 17, 1888)=TC-1 Mrs. David Carlson - 1395_ Ononda—q- meet N_E _ 9, Opinions and recommendations by BOARD OF APPEALS: There was no one present in favor of the request for a Special use Permit. Mrs. David Carlson, 1395 Onondaga Street Northeast, and Mrs. Lorraine Malich, 1425 Onondaga Street Northeast. were presen and stated that they objected to putting double bungalows in that nrp-a Mnf inn 'hy Vitzi +-yJck, seconded by Qanndexa to nra-I—Inte this hearing to Wednesday, March 24, 1965 at 7:30 P.M., and that Mr. -th-G- two lots showing the locations of the proposed double bungalows, and that -aIso He must be present at Efie mee ng. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the motion carried. 10. For Above Recommendations Unanimous 11. Action by city council and Date: except Sheridan.) aiast^Recommendations March 1, 1965,(all members present BOARD OF APPEALS MEEq-7NG PkliVUI%S - FEBRUARY The Mayor 'and Councilman Kirkham stated that Mr. Nygaard, a property ownar co Gunderson Terrace has complained abaut the lack of drainage to his property. The culvart =which had been insta$lLid in Gimderson. Terrace had either been blocked or acorn out by someone., ,'he: City Engineer stated that Fireside Dive on which the property is loa:ated and Hayes Street which is adjacent to the property are both in Streak Projects 1965-1. Mayor Near stated that a drainage problem did exist for the lots ars the area, that a dirt road or a roadway of some kind that was in use had been filled in and th4: t �--rhans the culvert had been filled in in the process of masking this dirk; r®ad in any event the lot dial not drain properly. Councilman Wright asked if tha City removed the culvert below the road, The City Engineer stated that t hz City did not tae out the culvert. Motion by Thompsonto receive and file the Board of Appeals tketin.g Mira of February 24, 1965, Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voles vote,, there be -i a no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 11 THC t1I DIES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL, MEETING OF MAY 3, 1965 gage 1. A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order by tbyor Hee at 8:28 P,,H, A,OR3�CA�o Y9embers present: Nee, Kirkham. Sheridan, Wright, Thompson 11m*ers Absent: None AMOM OF MMS m ItBGM ARISESTING ® APRIL, 19, 19651 I?otion by Wright to accept the minutes of the Regular Council ting of April 198 1965, as received. Seconded by Sheridano Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. AMO AL OF 2 a S IAL Z TING - APRIL „2x62 1965s X0ti@& by Kirkham to accept as minutes of the Special Hecting of April 26g 1965 as received. Seconded by Tbampson. Upon a voice vote,, there being no neysethe wtiam carried unanimmely. PUBLIC HEARINGS.* ASSESS110T LOLL m ST. 1963-2: The City Iianaaar e.:&plalned that Project St. 1963-2 was paid one-half by the County., Tho City°s one-half is by special assessments. A hearing had been held on the project on Davember 8, 1963. The purpose of this hearing is to provide property omera with an opportunity to present objections to the assessment. Objections rust be presented in writing and state grounds that benefits derived from the project are not equal to the asseQQ"nts against the property. The Mayor stated that the figures the Council has now are more precise than. the previous figures which were given in November of 1963. The present figures are based on the actual cost of construction, and amount to a charge of $1,15 per front foot. This charge may be spread over a period of la years with intertest on the unpaid balance at 6%, The ifayor told the visitors present at the Council tinting, that the Council. VW'ld give the property owners the mount of the special assessments against the property If the people would state the legal description of the property. No one present at the Council Meeting spoke for or against the Special Assessment Roll. Mayor Not declared the hearing closed, , , Notlou by Sheridan Lo approve Resolution No, 66®1965. Seconded by Wright, Upon a jo ce vase, share being no nays, the motion carried unanimously, The City Managar read the notice of hearing. He stated that the application for N Page 2. a Spacial Use Peadt h" boon considered by llamsishg Coudesies and recommended by oe' Board of Appeali. Us Mqov stated. tha 'tba gegwst ' is for a Special 988 Pandt to ' pe=itc amettuctim- of 2 doable bungelon its an t-1 sone. No one prompt at the Council gating spoke for O'T against the reeq"st tot a Specipl Use Pemit:. Hamm mat declared tbq hearing doted. Uption by XUW= to grout tho requ9st for a Special Use Pend t to G. A. aft.ftreas for the coanstrugtiou of a double bungalm on L®tl, and on Lot 2, Slosh 3, Qmdetrson Tonace, with the stipulation that these be a eloglee *at gavage for each matt plus paved ofd otrept parking, for one ad4itiool' aft fon each =It* Sec=Aed by ost s. Upon a roil 'call vote, there being •sir -nays, the mottos cdtriaed unaniansly.. •!�_i:.:.: •`Eei;. Kl � ' Lit 7 he City 11anageatr read the notice of hewing. The Ngor asked if there to anyow past solo is interested iA this plat* W. Owl" Johanson was pstosaesgt at the. . Council actio* and stated that he tis interipsted in having the final plat ` sWaved. Comnailmagt Warasked the statue of the pwi ft on. 69th • Avemn. Us My Merger east that this. I"= had % resolved and Maeles jah aoson has pave$ 69th o Co�aL Wright asked whether mine pfd width of 69th' drag* mast oslly� pl by Charles a City awl Yea r. ed, " s e" Coundi law tisigat ash eters the tiwaatouad Is . 1'9 Johansen 40siptatodg "At the cd;6ds+sac." Mr. 46honoox stated fhSt°C, that the application Sot ' the final plat of VaUday Bills to a dostimation of the ogigloal plata Mayor We declared the hearing closest, adtion 'by arkhm to Approve the final plat o2 G+oliday Sills: Seaa3aded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there beim so sus, the Mitift carried unanisoeeita 8eras, financial donsultant to tbe. City, vae prosect at tete Coaadcii otings Se stated that the would 'open bldsa sant read tbam tee the C�mcftll rind atter ;Z ii; bids to -deet®amine► tech of the bids wtuld bring the Tweet qet iotes�et I O"t etl she list not rate to t� Feil, bel. vmAd slake- a ran ions fes' cite rinsed of ' ' bids. MGyOT now stated thatt' for the 4100 a atioae of the public dw fide as:o for the sale of ssifticipal bomb totaallft 2 millUm 491larea 2he bomb we Sequed,for the purpose 4 6100 g IproJects paid by Special Asseasstots, for Che o0ostrugtion of the Civic Cestter, find' heir water works ceaestsnctfcao Mr.. 'Woro the bide and aid then to the City ,C,rrm.01.la d713e0ti OPSCUL AIWAI.MT "M POS ,AUT OF nol"a Coag 3.202 1968 thxafth 1975 3.30% 1976. *tb qA .1$78 3.60'& . .1979 tbrObO 1$81- 30SOZ 1982 th"q* 1986 picas additiw4 lOtOM 4t the rate of 1 JUX per amm. an all bonds 9Xft Augssat- 1. 1%59 to 8 1, 1386, OUe000e00 Set motes -3.429181 10p ETC ttirc ql :SauauA so-si mE-TO'd ISs z, - met vi oa=eis7 o3 ,Paei nLI 1- J ,- n 10p Yr ETC ttirc ql :SauauA so-si mE-TO'd ISs z, - met vi oa=eis7 o3 ,Paei Yr PLANNING C0141ISSION MEETING MDTUTES m APRIL 22, 1965 Page to The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kravik at 7045 P.M. ROLh Members Present., Johanson, Bandel, Rravik, Bergman, E�sghes Others Present.. Engineering Assistant, Clark 1. CONSIDERATION Of RE -SU REZONING REQUEST FOR POSSIBU PUBLIC HEARINGS ZOA 64®11, GORDON GRANAMs. Lots 13 t9r—u 16, Biock 13, Hamilton s Addition to Mechanicsville. Rezone from R-3, general multiple family dwelling, to C,R1, local business area. Mr. and Mrs. Graham were present. A review was made of the stand that.the. Planning Commission had taken at the last meeting.. The conclusion reached was to consider a specific plan for rezoning in this area, that part of the stipulation, would be the presentation by Mr. Graham of how they plan to use this piece of property, the purpose being that this information, along with other studies conducted at this time would be used in arriving at a recommendation to the Council. Mr. Graham explained the property was purchased in 1948 and although It is in a zoning category.which permits apartments, be did not feel that an apartment building would be the proper structure on this property because of the traffic hazard. Mr. Graham stated there were several types of businesses he would like to get in, but until the property was zoned for such, he felt his hands were tied. The Commission asked Mr - Graham if he'had considered applying for a Special Use Permit in order to get the type of business that he had in mind. Mr. Graham replied that he realized he could got a Special Use Permit but if, after the initial permit were issued, the business was not successful -then in order to try something else, therm could be several months delay getting a new Special Use Permit. Mr. Graham felt Haat the land should be used in order to ease the tax burden. It was decided that the work which is going to be done on University Avenue would probably reflect in tate Increased value of the property. The C, mission felt that Mr. Graham's proposed plan could be accomplished by use of a Special Use Permit and asked him to reconsider his request. MMON by Hughes, seconded by Bergman, that, on the basis that the Application has not offered any indication of the proposed rezoning benefiting or improving the use of the land as far -as the City is concerned,the Commission recommend to the Council for rezoning (ZOA #64-11, Gordon Graham) Lots 23 tbru 30, Block 13, R=ilton®s Addition to Mechanicsville from Rm3, general multiple f0mily dwelling to Cml, local business area, be denied. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Mr. Graham was informed that the Council would be oting on this matter on May 3, 1965. SPECIAL USE 1�RlU : E ., G. A. ONs Tote 1 end 2 ���c .�.. �..�. � ,Block 3, Gunderson Terrace. Mr. and Mrs. Gunderson were present. i FUMING COIMSSZMI tZETING MMS ® APRIL 22, 1965 Page 2. HOUGH by Johanson, seconded by Sandal, that the Planning Commission recommend to the Council tho approval of tho Special Use Permit for a double bungalow by G. A. Gunderson, on pots 1 and 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 3. STOW OF MDDTtl M RR AND SLOW ASS MUM BY CIT'X ATTORTBYs Mrs. Bary Schreiner and Mrs. Lowell 4 oid)Hullin, representing the League of Woman Voters, were present. MOTION by Hughes, seconded by Bandel, that the Planning Commission will, at the May 13th meeting, be prepared to comment in particulate on the Ordinance and to make a state at or recommendation to the Council pertaining to the matters of signs and billboards in the City of Fridley. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. MOTION by Hashes, seconded by B=,Iel, that the City Manager be requested to send a copy of the proposod Ordinance Regulating Billboards and Signs in the City of Fridley, to Mr. Hodne asking for his comments and recommendations and returning his opinion to the Planning Commission at the next tweeting of May 13th. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. After discussing the additions and deletions the CummUsion felt should be made, it was decided to continue the study of the application fog. 5. MUJUT ION TO jWjjM NAITM 6112MAUGHt Fifth Annual State -Wide community Planning Conference. the Commission was asked to look over the program and if they felt it would be of value to them and could arrange to attend, they should complete: the reservation and return to Mr. Wagner0a office. Mr. Hughes brought up the question of %bother or not • Mr. Rodup could be sabred to give the Planning Commission zoning ordinances he has dram up for other cities. Be stated its .may be able to get nor Maas of changing a ming category or a neat category that would be more restricted. No formal action was taken. There being no further business, Chaimman Kravik adjourned the muting at 10000 P.M. Respectfully sutmitteds Hats Oe Brian Recording Secretary . 10 Special Use Permit - Double Bungalow - G. A. Gunderson (Official Publication) OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY V PUBLIC HEARING h BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Fridley will meet in the Coun- oil Chambers of the City Hall at 8:00 o'clock p.m., Monday, May 3, 1985, to consider the following j matter: A request for a Special Use Permit to permit construction of double bungalows in an R-1 District as per Section 45.19 MAL Minnesoottaa 1963, on ty CodLot 1 Fridley, 3, Gunderson Terrace, same being 1360 Fireside Drive Northeast and on Lot 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace, same beim 1365 Onondaga Street Northeast, Anoka County, Min. nesota. (Request by G. A. Gun- derson, Route 5, Anoka; Min nesota). with yreference tog the abe bove heard ter will be heard -at this meetin, WILLIAM J. NE1. (April 14, 21, 1985) TC payor r 11 A request for , a Special Use Permit to permit construction of double bungalows in an R-1 District as per Section 48.19 (Mitnnesota 196C ,, on Lot Fridley. llok 3, Gunderson Terrace, same beingg 1360 Fireside Drive Northeast and on Lot 2, Block 3, Gqqunderson' Terrace, same being 1365 Onondaga (request by G. A. Gun- derson, Route 5, Anoka, =Min• nesota). gone desiring to be heard ^eference to the above mat- y be heard at this meeting. WILLIAM T. NEE Mayor ,tfrll 14, 21, 1983)—TC-2A \ 1965 Page 6. of the Karl Dedolph Construction Company. The Mayor stated that the Council was aware of the close bid of the Lakeland kick and Stone Company. and that the Lakeland Brick and Stone Company was a Fridley firm. Councilman Wright stated that the Council could not charge the tax payer an extra amount for using a local firm. The Mayor stated further that the low bidder would have cause to bring suit against the City of Fridley for awarding the bid to a local firm when the other bidder had the low bid. Motion by Kirkham to concur with the recommendation of the Consulting Engineer and award the bid to the Karl Dedolph Construction Co. for the amount of $16,150.00. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. .MING TING . S p. MASCB 24, 1965: Ear. Schlesinger, representing the White Investment Coffipany and Phillips 66, was present at the Council Meeting. The City Manager stated that the Phillips 66 Station driveways had not beeaapproved by the Safety Committee in its new location. Mr. Schlesinger shorted the Council drawings of the proposed Phillips 66 Station in its new location. Motion by Wright to approve construction of a Phillips 66 Station at the location of 5755 University Avenue Northeast, contingent upon compliance with the change in driveways as directed by the Safety Commission. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SPEa.� BgggG BOARD =TING 14XNUTES • MARCH 30, 1965: The City Manager explained that.& Special Meeting of the Building Board had - been held to consider a Building Permit for the Gulf Oil Corporation -to -construct a service station at 5300 Central Avenue Northeast, the service station to be constructed of cement and steel at an estimated cost of $30,000.00. Councilman ]right asked whether the Safety Committee had taken action on the application for a Building Permit at this tine. The City Manager answered, "Wo." motion by Sheridan to approve the application by the Gulf Oil Corporation for a service station to be located at 5300 Central Avenue Northeast, contingent upon approval of the Safety Committee. Seconded by Wright. Upon as voice vote, there being. no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS MT1NGS v MMCR 24, 1965: Neither Me. nor Mrs. Gunderson were present at the Council Meeting. The City r explained the action of the Board of Appeals granting the Special Use Permit for -the construction of Double Bungalows with a stipulation that there be a single car garage for each unit, plus paved off *street parking for one car _ 6J— + Page 7. per unit, and requiring stucco instead of shakes siding. The Mayor asked the City Manager if he could explain the requirement for stucco instead of shakes siding. The City Manager answered that'he didn't know the reason for the requirement but the Council could change this stipulation if it saw fit to do so. The City Manager explained further that under the Ordinance to grant Special Use Permits the Council could make any stipulations contingent upon granting the Special Use Permit. Motion by Wright to set a public hearing on the Special Use Permit. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Ron Johnson, representing Clemron, Inc., was present at the Council Meeting. The City Manager explained that the right-of-way on Jackson Street had been increased from 60 feet to 66 feet and this was a contributing factor to the request for the reduced setback of the houses on.Jackson Street. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Johnson if approval were granted for a variance from the setback requirement to 30 feet, did Clemron, Inc. plan to build all houses along Jackson Street at the saw setback. Mr. Johnson answered, no, that buyers had requested that the various setbacks of 30 feet to 35 feet be used on the street. The City Attorney asked Mr. Johnson what cove -ants Clemron, Inc. had with the buyers concerning the setback. Mr. Johnson stated that covenants require a 30 foot minimsm setback. Notion by Wright to approve and grant the request for variance on Lots 1 through 15, Block 1, Melody Mannor, Third Addition to a 30 foot minimum setback. Seconded' by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Norberg was present at the Council Meeting. He explained that in order to locate a garage on the yard and provide space for a car to park in the driveway of the garage without taking all of the yard it was necessary to move the garage within 10 feet of the street, There is a hams located on the lot immediately behind this lot which would probably be condemned and removed and the next home would be built, as Nr. Norberg described it, back to back with this proposed residence and would not be facing the side street as the present home now does. Councilman Kirkham stated that most homes in this area along Board Street face Broad Street rather than the side streets. Special Use Permit for Double Bungalow -- G. A. Gunderson NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING Of a Special UR- mst'.% double an R•1 Distriet east; ane 'n Lot 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace, same be- ing 1385 Onondaga Street Northeast, Anoka County Minnesota. (Request by G. A. j Gunderson, Route 5, Anoka, Minnesota). Uyone desiring to be heard th reference to the above mat- ' will be heard at this meeAg. HARRY NAWROCKI (Feb. 10, NOTICE OF Pueuc HEARING of the City Ho), m., Wednesday, to consider the, a Special Ua- mstruct double an R-1 District .. Aa 10 10A% of Jog 1360 Fireside Drive North- east, and on Lot 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace, same be. ing 1385 Onondaga S t r e e t Northeast. A n o k a County. Minnesota. (Request by G. A. Gunderson, Route 5, Anoka, Minnesota). myon desiring to be heard h reference to the above mat- . will be heard at this meetingg. HARRY NAWROCKI Chairman Board of Apppeals (Feb. 10, 17, 19&5)—TC•2A 'IV r Ii xOTICE is HUMY GrM that the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 700 o°clock P®lam a Wednesdaya February 24a 19650 to consider the following aattert A request for a Special Use Pamit to construct doable bungalows in an R-1 District as per Sec=tion 45.19 (2A' e City Cods of Fridley, Minnesota 1963o on Lot le Block 3e Gunderson Terrace, same being 1360 Fireside Drive xortheast, and on Lot 29 Block 3e Gunderson Terracee same being 1365 Onondaga Meet Northmsto Anoka County o Minnesota. (Retest by Gm A. Gmdetrson, Rohe 5, Anokae Flinnesota) Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above: ranter will be heard at this meeting, Publishe February 10, 1965 February 17, 1965 PLUM= COSSION M1MTING MINVIES - APRIL 8, 1965 Page 6. commission would recommend that the lot split be granted and suggested the owners apply for a two unit building. llow the lot Split L.S. p65 -U4, Ronald S. Smith, Lot 3, AUd1tor-8 Subdivision h39, to be split down the middle mekia� approximatedt�a� 0 57, footlots. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 8. SPECIAL USE PEST: DOUBLE BUNGALOW - G. A. GUNDERSON: Lots 1 and 2. Block 3, Gunderson Terrace. Mr. Gunderson was present. It was noted there were objectors to the Special Use Permit for double bungalows at the February 24th meeting, but the objectors were not present at the March 24th meeting. The lots, concerned in this request, are back to back, one facing Onondaga and the other Fireside Drive. At the March 24th meeting Mr. Gunderson returned with a certificate of survey showing the location of the double bungalows and was informed that, something besides stucco should be used as a siding. In answer to a question from the Commission, Mr. Gunderson stated houses were built on either sides of these lots. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that the Planning Commission concur with the Board of Appeals and recommend approval of the Special Use Permit for a double bungalow on Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace, be granted. Vote not taken. MOON by Johanson, that his first motion be withdrawn and that the Special Use Permit for G. A. Gunderson be tabled until April 22nd to give the members of the Planning Commission an opportunity to inspect the site. Mr. Bergman seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 9. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IN HOSPITAL AREA: Mr. Johanson stated that no one has come up yet with any definite plan for this area. Mr. Wagner reported that Mayor Nee asked him to arrange a meeting a,: the hospital with people interested in the land use for the hospital area. It is understood that there are some doctors who would like to see a building in what has always been considered a good place for a clinic. It was suggested that the meeting would include the Administrator of the hospital, Plw,niag Commission Chairman, Consultant, and the Doctors who are interested in the area. 10. PARR PL NG: PARKS & PLAYGROUNDS MINIMS OF MARCH 15, 1962 - Page 2s Mr. Hughes, on behalf of the Parks and Playgrounds Committee, stated the committee would like to obtain the services of Mr. Hodne to start them on a program for planning at Locke Park and one of the othenr small parks. I L/ BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING-1FEBRUARY 24, 1965 The meting was called to order by Chairman Nawrocki, at 7:35 P.M. Members Present: Nawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Gabrick, Saunders Member Absents Goodrich There was no one present in favor of the request for a special use permit. Mrs. David Carlson, 1395 Onondaga Street Northeast, and Mrs. Lorraine Malich, 1425 Onondaga Street, were present, and stated that they objected to putting double bungalows in that area. Motion by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Saunders, to continue this hearing to Wednesday. March 24, 1965 at 7130 P.M.. and that Mr. Gunderson be notified that he must present a plot plan of the two lots showing the locations of the proposed double bungalows, and also that he must be present at the meeting. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki delcared the motion carried. ADJO T: There being no further business, Chairman Nawrocki delcared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted: L.-, er C/'4 /7 Z " � Earl P. Wagner Secretary to the Board BOARD CF APPEALS - MARCH 24, 1965 o The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Nawrocki. Members Present: Nawrocki, Gabrick, Fritzpatrick Members Absent: Goodrich and Saunders 1. CONT111WEtIBLIC„®G ON A QST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT M CONSTRUCT 56T -J B tots 8i1 AN R-1 DISTRICT AS PER BEC710119 45.19 C2A . CITY CODE OF gm-aya 1+0` I1963. ON LOT 1. BLOCK 3 GUNDERSLE TERRACE. SAM BEIM 1360 FIRESIDE DRIVE TI AND ON LOT 29 BLOCK 3 GMMERSON TERRACE SAM BENG1365�TUMT TORTHUSToAHOKACONMLNES70 C DTD Bi O A. /pIDMIOCMI ROUTS 5. AOU, MYQO A2. 2. 3. Mr. and Mrs. Orson were present, there mega no others present either for or against this request. Motion by Gabricke seconded by Fritat:atrick. to recommend ap oval ©f the S cial Use Permit sti nlati that there be a single car garage for each unit, Alas paved off street parking for one car rva>r E sin re rim stucco nstead o s kes e L _g. you a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman khmrocki declared the motion carried. Mr. Ronald Johnson was present representing Clemron, Inc. Motion bI Fritz . trick, seconded by Gabrick, to reeomzand that the variance s or radac tha set ack from 35 feet to 30 feet be abaroved. Upon a vol vote, there bsJAg no aays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the menti ear�iad. Mr. Norberg was pra:sent. There were no others present for or against the request. Motion by Fritggtrick6 seconded by Gabrick® to recommend that time a. Upon a voice vote,. there being no nays. the motion carried. ADJOtyRNMP.1NT: There Ding no further”. business, Chairman Nawrocki declared the meeting adjourned at 7:588 P.M. Respectfully /submitted: Aarl P. Wagner Secretary to the Board 51A Kle"(J'