SP 83-02CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
Marie C. Karn
1390 Onondaga Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
TELEPHONE ( 812)571-3450
M
CITY COUNCIL May 24, 1983
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
On May 16, 1983 , the Fridley City Council officially
approved your request for a Special Use Permit. SP #83-02 to construct a storage
with the stipulations listed below: building, a second accessory building.
No stipulations
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the
Community Development Office at 571-3450.
JLB/de
Sincerely,
JERROLD L. BOARDMAN
City Planner
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return
one copy to the City of Fridley.
Concur with action taken.
J1 •
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
In the Matter of allow the construction of a
second accessory building to be used for storage SPECIAL USE PERMIT
'at 1390 Onondaga Street N.E.
Marie C. Karn , Owner
The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley
and was heard on the 16th day of Ma of 1983 , on a petition
for a special use permit pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for
the following described property.
Pin No. 12-30-24-13-0087 Lot 5, Block 1, Walnut Addition
IT IS ORDERED that a special use permit be granted as upon the following conditions
or reasons:
No stipulations
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DATED this 6th day of �june 19_a&.
P
MAYOR,- WILLIAM J. 6EI
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for said City
of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order
grainting a special use permit with the oridinal record thereof perserved in my
office and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole
thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the 8th day of June 19 83
DRAFTED BY:�'
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley,MN 55432 SIDNE . INMAN, CITY,CLgRK
A Special Use Permit shall become void one year after being granted by;be":C:ity4$f �..
Fridley unless or if discontinued for a period of 90 days. rt4 ,i•�.
UhFICE OF COUNTY RECORVD h
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF ANON
hereby certify that the within instr4
went was filed in this office for recon
Dn the, 7
—01A.D., 19_
-�-o'cloc114_M,, and was duly recordag
In book _-� page-_.
ou order
BY
Deputy
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, Minn. 55432
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
In the Matter of allow the construction of -a --
-
second accessory building to be used for storage
at 1390 Onondaga Street N.E.
Marie C. Karn , Owner
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley
and was heard on the firth day of __QW , of 1983 , on a petition
for a special use permit pursuant to the C ty o Fridley s Zoning Ordinance, for
the following described property.
Lot 5, Block 1, Walnut Addition
IT IS ORDERED that a special use permit be granted as upon the following conditions
or reasons:
no Stipulations
STATE OF MINNESOTA }
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss.
CITY OF FRIDLEY }
(To be rerecorded because of faulty legal description)
To correct the Legal description on that document
filed in the Office of the County Recorder on
July 7, 1983 as Doc. #617768.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for said City
of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order
grainting a special use permit with the oridinal record thereof perserved in my
office and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole
thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the -7zX, day of /��' -�-� yy__ /� ' 19�.
DRAFTED BY:
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley,MN 55432 SIDNE INMAN, CI Y G
A Special Use Permit shall become void one year after being gran�ed,,O"tyi'i
Fridley unless or if discontinued for a period of 90 days.°6c: �.q� d E• p�,:a
C. ITS�A�L` )
Numet1oal
Grantor
Grantee
Record
Checked
Margin
Tr. Index
MICE OF COUp4Ty pE-COIdD
67ATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF AGOG
1 hereby certify that the within ingm
Ment was filed in this office for rdCCM
an the, .D., 19,
T'1.i2.o"cloclrr,LM,, and was duly r:
In boo Page---_,
U t
�Ptdt�
44% a4�-&7
i
5
A
MOTION by Councilman,
request for June 6 1
vote, all voting j� e'r
VC f
SPECIAL -USE TERM
hneider to set the pr
183. Seconded by Counc
Mayor Nee declared the
hearing on this rezoning
iHamernik. Upon a voice
on carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this request for a special use
permit is to construct a 20 x 24 foot second accessory building to the rear
of this property in order to provide additional storage space. He stated,
at this paticular time, there are no. plans for a driveway for this
building.
Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission heard this request and has
recommended approval.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recomendation of the
Planning Commission and grant Special Use Permit, SP #83-02. Seconded by
Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Work's,,Director
, fated a variance was granted to the
owner of Raffaele's to keep a res urant food sign on the roof of this
establishment. He stated the owr1r has requested this sign be allowed to
remain.
��
Mr. Flora stated the Appeals,togRmmission felt there was a hardship since the
building is set far off Un iersity and does not have good exposure to the
highway. He stated thessionP:ecommended approval of the variance and
that the variance be marmanent`to the present owner and any subsequent
owner should come beforithe Appeals Commission or a review of the roof
sign.5, 111�1.
Councilman Hamernik/questioned the fact about subsequent owners coming
before the APpeals',tominission, if there is a rmanent hardship at this
establishment.'
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt the Council would`. hardpressed to grant
a variance to the present owner and deny it to a fut' a owner, assuming the
situation hadn't changed.
Mr. Flora felt consideration should be given that the si not be changed,
unless it cams before the Appeals U mission.
NNION by Councilman Hamernik to�concOr with the recommendation of the
Appeals Commission and grant the variance for the roof sign, with the
mU 'IL MEETING OF MAY 16. 1983
stipulation if the sign is to be changed, the owner is
review by the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman;_,
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared tho'-
unanimously.
PAGE 6
,to come in for
Fitzpatrick. Upon
motion carried
Mr. Flora, Public'`{orks Director, stated thA request for construction of a
four-plex includes %.four variances. He,)A° tated, when presented to the
Appeals Commission, they felt that portion of property which was taken for
highway purposes, and s nce turned backi,to the City, might be added to this
parcel to increase the lot size. He,,)pointed out, if this was done, it
would eliminate the need for the var ences of the lot size and the front
yard, theref9re, the Appeais Commission denied these two variances. Mr.
Flora stated the Appeals Co,�ission�did approve the variances for the rear
and side yards, with the understanding the City work with the property
owner to release the property wh h was turned back to the City.
Mr. Flora stated the County is,ttempt
of properties and offering th a pr6pe
He felt it might be appropriate for th
they desire to transfer thi property:
g for the first time a private sale
ies to adjoining property owners.
City to have something similar, if
MDrION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reduce the lot area requirement f rom
15,000 squre feet to 13,7:90 squre feet; tQ reduce the rear yard setback
from 32.5 feet to 5 feeti to reduce the sid ,.yard setback from the required
35 feet to 30 ft. and T feet; and to reduce e front yard setback from the
required 35 feet to 32 feet. Seconded by C%uncilman Barnette. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dec' red the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Herrick, City }Attorney, stated there are a numb of situations where
s;.
there is excess operty that hasn't been used and t-,Kned back to the City.
He stated the *hanics of conveying the property to 4e adjoining owners
is fairly situp''', but felt the Council should take a ok at what policy
they want to tablish.
Mr. Herrick, tated there probably would be sone title wor ,involved and a
check with e Public Works Department to see what propertyNas originally
taken.
Mr. r,�the
i, City Manager, stated he felt what the Appeal' Commission
implies if this property isn't needed by the City, it shoii d be given
back tproperty owner so it can be put back on the tax roles.
{,SA
Mr.,�tiureshi felt, as part of the variance, there should be a s i� ulation
that if the city can legally provide this property to the owners, they
wQ il.d be willing to accept it.
Mr. O'Bannon, the property owner, indicated this wouldn't be a probfm and
the would be willing to accept this property if the City can turn it back.
A ' l