Loading...
VAR 95-25I FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE September 14, 1995 Paul Litwinczuk 6291 Central Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Litwinczuk: -On September 12, 1995,rthe Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request -for a variance, VAR #95-25, to reduce a side yard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce a side yard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet, to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to private sewer and water easement, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E. You have one year from the date of Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Michele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant MM/dw Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by September 28, 1995. Concur with action taken. `STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) APPEA COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS I 3 - 30 + 9 3 - ©0e7y QQ3-- In the Matter of: a variance request, VAR #95-25 Owner: Paul Litwinczuk VARIANCE The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and . was heard on the 12th day of September , 19 95 , on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, except the South 55.00 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approval is contingent upon one stipulation. See Appeals Commission meeting minutes of September 12, 1995. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, William A. Champa, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridly Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the day of ( ' cil , 19 -5 . DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Q P William A. Champa, City rle � �® aam 1, , � \, ;,cif n i ;.•mQ,7 Variances are valid for a period of one year following approv4!,',4 id, shall be considered void if not used within that period. '' APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 9 Dr. Vos stated he remembered the original request. The to is odd shaped. He would have a hard time putting the garage ached to the back of the house. On the east is the walkway. ne the --west side is a pie shape. On the north side is a c de sac. He thought this is a case of a hardship that is the a but the spirit of the code is being met. He would recommend pproval. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The fact that the petitioner will be taking down the existing garage will result in a/bigger back yard which is also a plus. / . Mr. Kuechle concurred. The encroachment in terms of the square feet in minor. The goal of limit' g the coverage on the lot is to have green space. In the backy d, the petitioner would have more green space than he has now. a would recommend approval. Ms. Savage stated she woulrecommend approval. The purpose of the code is being met by hav' g more green space. MOTION by Dr. Vos, se nded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend approval of Variance Request, #95-24, by Kenneth Anderson, to.reduce the required rear yar setback from 25 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of porch and garage on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge < Addition, the same being 132 River Edge Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 554 , with the following -stipulations: 1. The etitioner shall provide a hardsurface driveway by October 1, 1996. r 2. a existing garage shall be removed within 60 days of the proposed garage's final inspection. A VOICE VOTE,'. ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95- 25,.BY PAUL LITWINCZUK: Pursuant to Section 205.07,03.-D. (2)-. (a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to private sewer and water easement, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 10:, MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing_.. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL NOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:40 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Rice Creek Road and Old Central Avenue. The request is a two part variance. The first is to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet to correct an existing encroachment. The second is to) reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of an addition. Ms. McPherson stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. Located on the parcel is an existing single family dwelling unit which is 1 1/2 stories and measures 20 feet x 24 feet and an 18 foot x 20 foot 1 1/2 car garage. Because part of. the new addition also- contains garage space and because the garage exceeds 240 square feet, the .petitioner is also processing a special use permit request. The petitioner proposes to construct an 8 -foot addition onto the existing dwelling unit, a breezeway, and then a 24 foot x 22 foot garage with.a master bedroom on the upper level. The.garage does not,need a variance, because the accessory structure can be as close as 5 feet. Because there is living space above, the.petitioner needs to process,a variance. Ms. McPherson stated to ask the petitioner to correct the existing encroachment would require total relocation of the existing dwelling. There is 23 feet between this existing dwelling and the dwelling to the south so the intent of the code is met. However, in terms of -theaddition, the addition could potentially be redesigned and moved 3 feet to .meet the 10 foot :.setback requirement. Ms. McPherson stated both requests are within previously-granted requests. Therefore, staff has no recommendation regarding this request. Staff has, no. stipulations for the variance. If the Commission chooses to...recommend approval of the request, she thought the special use permit..will include a stipulation for a hardsurface driveway. Dr. Vos stated it appeared that the house is set back 80 feet. Ms. McPherson stated this was. correct.,. The lot is an old auditor's subdivision. The City --has no record of when.. the house was APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 11 constructed. According to the petitioner, the house was built in 1934. Mr. Litwinczuk stated he bought the house in 1987. The existing house is only about 600 square feet, which is smaller than his previous apartment. The existing structure is 1 1/2 stories. He wants to make it a full two stories to increase the living space. He wanted an attached garage. He likes the area. He has a large lot. There was no other way to design this that was practical. The garage cannot be moved that much forward to the street. His neighbor has seen the plans and has no objection. He wrote a letter indicating his approval. The petitioner showed the front elevation of the proposed structure. The house now faces Old Central but will face Rice Creek. Mr. Kuechle asked why the petitioner could not move the garage forward 3 feet. Mr. Litwinczuk stated the elevation of the lot has an incline. If the garage were moved forward, it would be a steep incline and there would be no place to park a car in the front of the garage. Mr. Kuechle asked how much space is there to the property -line. Ms. McPherson stated there is approximately 40 feet from the property line to the proposed garage. Dr. Vos asked if the house to the south was also set back in the same manner. Ms. McPherson stated yes. The neighbor to the south is located on the opposite side of this lot. Dr. Vos asked if the petitioner's existing driveway was off of Rice Creek. Mr. Litwinczuk stated yes. The neighbor's driveway is off of Old Central. Ms. McPherson stated there is a bit of a topography change between Rice Creek and where the house sits. Rice Creek Road is lower. Dr. Vos asked if there was a slope from Old Central. Mr. Litwinczuk stated the lot slopes down from Old Central. The front half of the lot slopes down and in the spring has water..in it. He presented the letter from his neighbor, who does not object $'S and feels this will raise his property values. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 12 C", MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive in the record the letter from Mr. Stenhoff dated September 12, 1995. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Commission members reviewed the elevation drawing as presented by the petitioner. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:53 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend approval of both requests. While he did not recall the. details of the grade, he felt the 7 feet is minor because the house.behind is offset and 23 feet away. The petitioner also has a narrow lot. He would add a stipulation that the petitioner provide a hardsurface driveway. Dr. Vos agreed. The lot is narrow. The houses were constructed and the streets put in later. The proposed plan will enhance the property and the neighbor to the south has no objections. He would'�>'` recommend approval. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The hardship is a 67 foot wide lot. One variance request is for an existing condition.. She would vote to approve. Ms. Savage agreed and asked for a motion. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded�by Dr. Vos, to recommend approval ; of Var;.ance Request, . VAR #95-25,-;. by. Paul Litwinczukto reduce :the _ sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce 'the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of'an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision - 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to.private:. sewer and water easement, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.55432, with the following stipulation: The petitioner shall provide a hardsurface driveway by October 1, . 1995. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION -CARRIED, UNANIMOUSLY: DOCUMENT N(.. Cy 9 S C.rlill•d Copy, ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA A•c.ial � SDO 0 Tax Llano I A•la.r•f I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IOFFICE FOR RECORD ON dC . Od• Tlma+ �0 % 6 • Mulll•Co. Doc. Tax P11d AT 3o 7 • YY) AND WAS DULY RECORDED. FEES AND TAXES IN / Doc. Clyd•r C of 0 Tianrl.► ❑ N•w THE AMOUNT OF 7 `4� 19. `-'PAID. Ch.cl.d bit fillna � � t.•r+ jq 001c. Olrl.lon C] GAC RECEIPT NO. ��5%,f—> —� / EDWARD A.cord.biiilr Pln.`�i� [� Slalua C] Dal. M.TRESKA ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF77TLES Odlnqu.nit Spec. BY l.> DEPUTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE September 14, 1995 Paul Litwinczuk 6291 Central Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Litwinczuk: On September 12, 1995, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #95-25, to reduce a side yard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce a side yard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet, to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to private sewer and water easement, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E. You have one year from the date of Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Michele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant MM/dw Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by September 28, 1995. Concur with action taken. • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 9 Dr. Vos stated he remembered the original request. The lot is; -odd shaped. He would have a hard time putting the garage atta ed to the back of the house. On the east is the walkway. One he west side is a pie shape. On the north side is a cul d sac. He thought this is a case of a hardship that is there b the spirit of the code is being met. He would recommend appr al. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The fact that the petit' ner will be taking down the existing garage will result in a big er back yard which is also a plus. Mr. Kuechle concurred. The encroac nt in terms of the square feet in minor. The goal of limiting a coverage on the lot is to have green space. In the backyard, he petitioner would have more green space than he has now. He ould recommend approval. Ms. Savage stated she would r ommend approval. The purpose of the code is being met by having ore green space. MOTION by Dr. Vos, secon d by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend approval of Variance Request, #95-24, by Kenneth Anderson, to reduce the required rear yard s ack from 25 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of a p rch and garage on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Addition, the s e being 132 River Edge Way N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, ith the following stipulations: 1. The pet'tioner shall provide a hardsurface driveway by Octobe 1, 1996. 2. /Thexisting garage shall be removed within 60 days of the d garage's final inspection. 9 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE ION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95- 25, BY PAUL LITWINCZUK: I Pursuant to Section 205.07,03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to private sewer and water easement, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432. • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 10 MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:40 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Rice Creek Road and Old Central Avenue. The request is a two part variance. The first is to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet to correct an existing encroachment. The second is to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of an addition. Ms. McPherson stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. Located on the parcel is an existing single family dwelling unit which is 1 1/2 stories and measures 20 feet x 24 feet and an 18 foot x 20 foot 1 1/2 car garage. Because part of.the new addition also contains. garage space and because the garage exceeds 240 square feet, the petitioner is also processing a special use permit request. The petitioner proposes to construct an 8 -foot addition onto the existing dwelling unit, a breezeway, and then a 24 foot x 22 foot garage with a master bedroom on the upper level. The garage does not need a variance because the accessory structure can be as close as 5 feet. Because there is living space above, the petitioner needs to process a variance. Ms. McPherson stated to ask the petit oner to-6orrect the existing encroachment would require total relocation of the existing dwelling. There is 23 feet between this existing dwelling and the dwelling to the south so the intent of the code is met. However, in terms of the addition, the addition could potentially be redesigned and moved 3 feet to meet the 10 foot setback requirement. Ms. McPherson stated both requests are within previously granted requests. Therefore, staff has no recommendation regarding this request. Staff has no stipulations for the variance. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of the request, she thought the special use permit will include a stipulation for a hardsurface driveway. Dr. Vos stated it appeared that the house is set back 80 feet. Ms. McPherson stated this was correct. The lot is an old auditor's subdivision. The ,City has no record of when, the house was APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 11' constructed. According to the petitioner, the house was built in 1934. Mr. Litwinczuk stated he bought the house in 1987. The existing house is only about 600 square feet, which is smaller than his previous apartment. The existing structure is 1 1/2 stories. He wants to make it a full two stories to increase the living space. He wanted an attached garage. He likes the area. He has a large lot. There was no other way to design this that was practical. The garage cannot be moved that much forward to the street. His neighbor has seen the plans and has no objection. He wrote a letter indicating his approval. The petitioner showed the front elevation of the proposed structure. The house now faces Old Central but will face Rice Creek. Mr. Kuechle asked why the petitioner could not move the garage forward 3 feet. Mr. Litwinczuk stated the elevation of the lot has an incline. If the garage were moved forward, it would be a steep incline and there.would be no place to park a car in the front of the garage. Mr. Kuechle asked how much space is there to the property line. Ms. McPherson stated there is approximately 40 feet from the property line to the proposed garage. Dr. Vos asked if the house to the south_ was also set back in the same manner. "— Ms. McPherson stated yes. The neighbor to the south is located on the opposite side of this lot. Dr. Vos asked if the petitioner's existing. driveway was off of Rice Creek. Mr. Litwinczuk stated yes. The neighbor's driveway is off of Old Central. Ms. McPherson stated there is a bit of a topography change between Rice Creek and where the house sits. Rice Creek Road is lower. Dr. Vos asked if there was a slope from Old Central. Mr. Litwinczuk stated the lot slopes down from .Old Central. The front half of the lot slopes down and.in thespringhas water in it. He presented the letter from his neighbor, who does not object and feels this will raise his property values. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 PAGE 12 MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive in the record the letter from Mr. Stenhoff dated September 12, 1995. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Commission members reviewed the elevation drawing as presented by the petitioner. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:53 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would recommend approval of both requests. While he did not recall the details of the grade, he felt the 7 feet is minor because the house behind is offset and 23 feet away. The petitioner also has a narrow lot. He would add a stipulation that the petitioner provide a hardsurface driveway. Dr. Vos agreed. The lot is narrow. The houses were constructed and the streets put in later. The proposed plan will enhance the property and the neighbor to the south has no objections. He would recommend approval. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The hardship is a 67 foot wide lot. One variance request is for an existing, condition. She would vote to approve. Ms. Savage agreed and asked for a motion. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #95-25, by Paul Litwinczuk to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3.6 feet and to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to private sewer and water easement, generally located at 6291 Central Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, with the following stipulation: The petitioner shall provide a hardsurface driveway by October 1, 1995. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6291 CENTRAL AVENUE SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback in two instances: 1. To 3.6 feet to correct the existing encroachment of the single family dwelling. 2. To 7 feet to allow construction of an addition to the existing single family dwelling. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The petitioner is proposing to construct an S' X 24' addition on the north side of the existing single family dwelling, plus a breezeway and 22' X 24' garage and master bedroom addition to the west, (toward Central Ave.) The home on the property south of this parcel is located approximately 20' from the property line. At its closest point, the Litwinczuk home will be approximately 22' from the dwelling portion of the home to the south. The existing dwelling would need to be completely relocated in order to correct the existing encroachment. The addition however, could be redesigned to meet the setback requirement. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The request is within previously granted requests. Staff has no recommendation regarding the request. PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to reduce the side yard setback from 10' to 3.6 and from 10' to T to correct an existing encroachment and to allow construction of an addition. Location of Property: 6291 Central Avenue Legal Description of Property: Part of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No.22 Size: 16,694 sq. ft. Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation: Typical suburban, sod, trees Existing Zoning/Platting: R-1, Single Family, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, 1939 Availability of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: Rice Creek Road Pedestrian Access: N/A Engineering Issues: N/A Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the City code requires a side yard setback of 10 fat between any living area and side property line. 2 Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas and adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages, living areas and adjacent structures to reduce the possibility of fire, and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. Description of Parcel & HistorX Subject parcel is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Central Avenue and Rice Creek Road. The parcel measures 67 x 247. As it is a comer lot, the shortest of the two street frontages is technically the front yard. Located on the parcel is a single family dwelling unit measuring 20' x 24'. The City has no record of when this dwelling was constructed. Also located on the parcel is an 18' x 20' detached garage, for which a permit was issued in 1973. Rmest The petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the 10' side yard setback in two instances: 1. To 3.6 feet to correct the existing encroachment of the single family dwelling. 2. To 7 feet to allow construction of an addition to the existing single family dwelling. The petitioner is proposing to construct an 8' X 24' addition on the north side of the existing single family dwelling, plus a breezeway and 22' x 24' garage and master bedroom addition to the west, towards Central Ave. The master bedroom will be located above the garage. As the petitioner intends on maintaining the existing detached garage, a special use permit is required for accessory structures in excess of 240 square feet. Petitioner's special use permit request will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 20, 1995 meeting. Analysis Both requests are within previously granted variances. There is approximately 22 feet between the dwelling on the subject parcel and the dwelling to the south. To require the petitioner to correct the encroachment of the existing dwelling would require relocation of the dwelling. The petitioner's new addition, however, could be redesigned to meet the 10 foot requirement with no hardship other than a slight redesign of the proposed addition. As the requests are within previously granted approvals, staff has no recommendation regarding this variance. ADJACENT SITES WEST: Zoning: C-3, General Shopping Center Land Use: Strip Mall SOUTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential EAST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential NORTH: Zoning: C-1, Local Business Land Use: Office Mall Comprehensive NA Planning Issues: Public Hearing To be taken Comments: SP #95-09 Mailing List Mailed: Paul Litwinczuk Paul Litwinczuk 6291 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Mark and Mary Bue or Current Resident 6229 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Caleb Spooner or Current Resident 6271 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Ida Kassow or Current Resident 1400 Rice Creek Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Ziebart 6300 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 1252 E. Moore Lk Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 City Council Members Quality Growth Ltd. 804 Black Building PO Box 2561 Fargo, ND 58102 Brickner Builders 6249 Ben More Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Current Resident 1250 E. Moore Lk Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Inc. Harold/Norma Morgan NE or Current Resident 6245 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Gregory Stenhoff or Current Resident 6283 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Yoava Klucsar or Current Resident NE 1420 Rice Creek Rd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Erickson 4611 - 36th St. E Minneapolis, MN 55406 Mark & Jean Schwartz or Current Resident 1372 - 64th Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dorothy Miles or Current Resident 1370 Rice Creek Rd. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Greenville College 315 E. College Avenue Greenville, IL 62246 Current Resident 6301 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 r Dav Nqurman PlanniComm. Chair 7635 A den ay NE Fridle , MN 55432 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, September 12, 1995, at 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of: Considerationlof variance request, VAR #95- 25, by Paul L�twinczuk, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the sideyard setback from 10 feet to 3 feet and to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet.to allow construction of an addition to an existing dwelling on Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except the south 55 feet of said Lot 17, subject to private sewer and water easement, generally located at 62P1 Central Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN $5432 Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related t� this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3592. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other pesons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should c=act Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than September 5, 1995. File Number File Date Meeting Date VAR# 95-25 8/24/95 9/12/95 File Description: Petitioner: Paul Litwinczuk. 6291 CEntral Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department *** Comments *** Barbara Dacy Scott Hickok Michele McPherson John Flora John Palacio Clyde Moravetz Leon Madsen Dave Sallman Dick Larson CITY OF FRIDLEY L� 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PR®PERTI' INI+'®RMATI®N - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 6 Z9/ CgI71A,46 $y1', /V% 15:7 , Property Identification Number (PIN) Legal description: tD7-/7 "c,&pfW L Sacci S�•O e� r tyi.xia�►''��Z- Lot Block Tract/Addition Current zoning? -7 Square footage/acreage 16.,33? Reason for variance and hardship: u a' daa ` - -f-� Secti n of City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No X If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes - No ivivivNNN.vNNN NN�'NN�/NNNNNNNivNNivti N � NN.vNN� /�NNNNNtiN/�.`�NNNi�N � N NNNNNN� EEE ®WNER INF®RMATIO.N (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME AU k4 w' %. ADDRESS 1 --?h -16 ® 7 DAYTIME PHONE 99$- 556 O SIGNATURE%c,�k,�...,. ,(. DATE 8 /� PETITIQNER INFORM NAME -TJf 6i i45 46M ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATUREE�c DATE NNNN N NNNNNN�'N�/NNNtiNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NivNNN NN NNNNNiv/v.NNtiN NNNNNNNNNNNn Fee: $100.00 60.00. for residential pro erties Permit VAR # Re ei t# A A '3"7-'& Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: d I •�-•� � '� x •:gat �� �,.,� �_., .#•`►� - _ a- � is , l x S 1/2 SEC. /3, T. 30, R. 24 OM TNS THIS C/TY OF FR/DL EY WE TY l Ml HARRIS PONG COUNT A060" CC