Loading...
SP 75-04CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 4, 1975 Page 1 At 8:00 P.M. only Chairman Harris and Mr. Lindblad were present so there wasn't a quorum to begin the meeting. Mr. Peterson was expected for this meeting, but he had informed administration that he would be tardy due to a previous commitment. At 8:40 P.M. Chairman Harris said they would start the discussion on the first item on the agenda. 1. PUBLIC NEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #75-04, THOMAS MILES: To allow construction of a 20 ft. x 30 ft. greenhouse, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.051, 3,A, to be located on Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, zoned R-1 (single family dwelling areas), the same being 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E. Mr. Thomas Miles was present. Chairman Harris explained that the Public Hearing couldn't be opened until they had a quorum. Mr. Clark explained that on Friday; May 2, 1975, Mr. Miles was in our office, as he was previous to that date, asking about building a greenhouse. We never discussed that location or the size of the greenhouse. Mr. Clark continued that he improperly assumed that Mr. Miles was talking about a typical greenhouse that you see in the rear yard of some residences in Fridley. On May 5, which was a Monday, someone from our City staff drove by 1370 Rice Creek Road and called it to our attention where this greenhouse was being constructed, which was in the front yard at 1370 Rice Creek Road. Mr. Clark said that when he researched the records, he realized it was the greenhouse which Mr. Miles had obtained a building permit for on May 2nd. Mr. Clark said he then went out and put a step work order on this construction, and informed Mr. Miles that he would need to request a varia,ride for the location of this greenhouse which would be 33 feet from the street right of way, and a request -for a Special Use Permit, because this was a second accessory building that was over 240 square feet. Mr. Miles made both these requests, and - the variance was recoinmended for approval by the Board of Appeals subject to the Special Use being approved. Mr. Clark said that Mr. Miles had originally asked if he could grow planting stock and sell it. fair. Clark said he told him that he could not. Once Mr. Miles was delayed, he decided he might as well ask for the Special Use Permit that would allow him to do this, and that was what the Planning Commission was hearing at this meeting. Mr. Miles was asking to construct this greenhouse and then be allowed to sell planting stock from this greenhouse. He said that there were no neighbors at the Board of Appeals meeting objecting to this request, and there was no one present at this meeting with anyobjections. Mr. Clark said.that if Mr. Miles was granted this Special Use Permit, he though .it should be stipulated that no one outside his immed- iate family could be hired to help Mr. Miles grow this stock, and he shouldn't be allowed to bring stock from other location to sell from this greenhouse. He should just be able to sell what he grows himself. Chairman Harris said this should be operated as a typical home occupation. ' yPae2 Planning Commission Meeting - June 4, 1975 9 Mr. Miles said he thought Mr. Clark had explained his position quite well, but in regard to the stock, he would have to purchase the parent stock to get this greenhouse going. He said he would like to get this Special Use Permit as soon as possible, because he already had invested over $1,000 in this project. He said he already had most of the structure up. He said he had drawn a rough sketch to obtain the building permit, and it had been issued, so he had started construction right away. He said this sketch did show that it would be in the front yard. Mr. Clark said the staff did make the error. Mr. Miles was granted a building permit, and he did get permission to go ahead, which he did in good faith. Mr. Clark said part of the reason the error was made was that both times Mr. Miles came into the office at City Hall, there were about five people at the counter, and we were trying to help all of them at the•same time. He said that if more time had,been given to Mr. Miles, and the location had been discussed, we would have known right away what he needed before the building permit was issued. Mr. Clank, said that when he was given the building permit to sign, he did look up the roof design, and sti,ulated that the roof load had to be 10 pounds per square foot. Mr. Miles left City Hall on Friday with the building permit, and on Monday, a,stop work notice was posted. Mr. Clark said that he didn't think the Planning Commission and Council should grant this Special Use Permit, just because the staff made an error. We made an error, and we just have to accept that. He said that legally, Mr. Miles has stated that he already has an $1,000 -investment in this construc'�n, and it was already half up, so we might have some responsibility there, if i; was denied. Mr. Clark said this Special Use Permit should be considered as if the construction hadn't been started. Mr. Miles said he had discussed this with the neighbors on both sides of this property and they had no objection. Mr. Clark said they have a written, agreemen-.from one neighbor. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Miles how he proposed to sell stock _from this greenhouse? Mr. Miles said heintended to sell from the site, and he worked for a wholesale florist and thought he could sell some of his stock there. Mr. Harris asked how he would get people to come to this location? Mr. Miles said he thought he would put up a small sign on the greenhouse. He said he didn't think parking would be any problem'because they have a large lot with two horse shoe driveways. Mr. Clark said they had between 400 feet to 500 feet of driveway oil this property. Mr. Miles said he would be propagating his own stock from parent plants. Mr. Clark said the house at 1370 Rice Creek Road sits a long way back from the road, as does the house on Lot 15. He said the house on Lot 17 faces Central Avenue and was quite close to Rice Creek Road. Mr. Clark said the reason for the location of this greenhouse was because the lot was heavily wooded. There was a row of evergreens between the greenhouse location and the street. Just beyond the greenhouse, there were a lot more trees which makes a very shaded area. Where Mr. Miles wants to locate this greenhouse was the only open space where this structure could get the sun. Mr. Wyman Smith, who was present on another request, pardoned himself for butting into this request, but he said as far as he knew, there should still be a statute on the books that permits anyone raising farm produce to sell it most Planninq Commission Meetin��1u_ne 4, 1975 Page 3 any place, and he thought that still applied. He said he knew the present zoning codes may have had some modification, but our original zoning codes, and the original zoning codes for all communities, did have greenhouses as an allowed use in a residential district. Mr. Harris said it was the size of this greenhouse that required a Special Use Permit. It was over 240 square feet, and it was a second accessory building. Mr. Richard Wallin, 6761 Madison Street N.E., a friend of Mr. Miles, said that this was just a temporary building that would only be up about five years. Mr. Harris asked if this would be anchored down. Mr. Clark said it would. Mr. Miles showed the plans for .the greenhouse. There were posts that would be anchored in the ground. The building had uretal hoops that would be draped with a special plastic for greenhouses. Mr. Clark said the definition in the City Code doesn't differentiate between a temporary and a permanant building. Mr. Peterson came to the meeting at 9:00 P.M. and Mr. Harris said they could now follow normal procedure, as they had a quorum. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the meeting to order~ officially at 9AO P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Harris, Lindblad, Peterson Members Absent: Drigans, Meissner Others Present: Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator James Langenfeld, Ex-offidio Member MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use.Permit, SP #75-05, by Thomas Miles. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris opened the Public Hearing officially at 9:02 P.M. Chairman Harris brough Mr. Peterson up to date on -the discussion. Mr. Peterson asked if there was any objection from the neighbors on this request. Mr. Harris said no. Mr. Clark said Mr.. Miles was a student at Anoka Ramsay studying horticulture, and he wants to practice this at home. Mr. Miles said he intended to transfer to the University of Minnesota to continue his education in this field. Mr. Langenfeld said he had one question for curiosity's sake. He asked Mr. Miles if he had insured this greenhouse? He said he was an insurance underwriter and he thought this would have to be insured as a commercial venture. Mr. Miles said he thought it was covered under homeowners insurance, and he thanked Mr. Langenfeld for calling this to his attention, and he said he would check on this because it would be,qui-L6 a large investment for him to lose. Mr. Lindblad asked Mr. Miles if he would agree to dismantld this greenhouse planning Commission'Meeting - Jure 4, 1975 Page 4 4 and dispose of it, if he should quit this business, and not use it for any other use than as a greenhouse. Mr. Miles said that was all he intended to use this building for, and if he went out of business, he would sell this greenhouse. MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-04, by Thomas Miles. Upon a*voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing closed at 9:10 P.M. MOTION by Petersbn, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approval of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-04, by Thomas Miles, to allow construction of a 20 ft. by 35 ft. greenhouse, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.051, 3, A, to be located on Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision No. .22, zoned R-1 (single family dwelling ar&as) the same being 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E. with the following stipulations: 1. No on -street parking be allowed an Rice Creek Road for this operation. 2. When this is no longer used as a greenhouse, it must be removed. 3. The greenhouse be propertly maintained. 4. Petitioner only be allowed to sell products he propagates in this greenhouse. 0 5. This be considered as a home occupation, and no one outside the immediate family be allowed to work in this greenhouse. UPON A voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #75-O5,_BY V1IN STEPHENS DATSUN NORTH: To permit the sale of new and used cars, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.101, (3,B) and (3,G) in a C-2 zone (general business areas) to be located on the North 126.01 feet of the East 200 Feet of Lot 3, Block 2, and the South 173.99 feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, all in East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, the same being 7810 University Avenue N.E. Mr. Wyman Smith, Mr. Roland Benjamin, Mr. Bob Schroer and Mr. Tim Hol were present. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-05, by Win Stephens Datsun North. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the Public Hearing open at 9:12 P.M. Mr. Clark said that basically this was the same operation that they had been discussing for some time that was to have been located at 7701 East River Road, but now it was going to be a completely different location. The petitioner has withdrawn his request for the old location, and this new location was going to be just north of the Town Crier Pancake House. He said there were a couple of items that the petitioner would have to take care of before they could start construction, if this Special Use Permit was approved. One was, that they have to appear before Building Standards which was was scheduled"far June 5th, and the other was, that they would have to apply for, and get approval for, a lot split or a plat. The Planning Commission have previously approved lot splits for both the pancake house and Capp Homes, and this location fits that plan which Mr. Schroer had shown us, and which might go into effect at some future date. R1l 0 LO 11*M N M Ln Ln Q H- 0 to W z z_ W J cc LL t- LU 1 - cc O z LU z W Q f.. cc W z LU z W U _U V Mr. Thomas Miles 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 City Council Planning Commission ACTION TAKEN NOTICE June 20, 1975 on June 16, 1975 , the Fridley City Council officially approved the recommendation (s) of thePlannin Commission on your request for a Special Use, SP # 4 with the stipulations listed below. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Community Development Office at 571-3450. Sincerely, Jerrold L. Boardman Planning Assistant STIPULATIONS: 1. No on -street parking be allowed on Rice Creek Road for,this operation. 2. When this is no longer used as a greehouse, it must be removed. 3. The greenhouse be properly maintained 4. Petitioner only be allowed to sell products'he propagates in this greenhouse. 5. This be considered as a home occupation, and no one outside the immediate -family be allowed to work in this greenhouse. City 0 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE June 26, 1975 rIr- Thomas Miles 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Miles ANOKA COUNTY 560-3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55425 Re: City Council -Board of Appeals Action Taken Notice On June 16,1975 the Fridley City Council officially affirmed the recommendation of the Board of Appeals that your variance request{s} be approvedwith the stipulations listed below. Copies of the approved minutes of the June 16th Council meeting will be available after July 14th Approved variances are valid for one year from the date of Council approval and may be renewed prior to expiration. Variances that have expired must be re -requested, If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Office at 560-3450, Ext. 41. Sinc rely, vy H WARD G. MATTSON Community Development Office HGM/mh 1 255 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 16, 1975 PAGE 14 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1975: The Public Works Director said the location was on Rice Creek Road east of Old Central. He'said this is a large lot and the green house would be located in the front of the house so they would not have to remove any trees. He said the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request with a number of stipulations. He read the stipu- lations from the minutes of the June 4, 1975 meeting. The Public Works Director said Mr. Miles was present to answer the Council's questions. Councilman Starva.1 t said he had looked at the area and questioned what would happen with the drainage of the area. Mr. Miles explained that there would be adequate drainage with the sand in the area and during the winter months he would be heating the greenhouse with a 200,000 B.T.U. furnace and there would be no ice build up. He said he had checked with the manufacturer of the greenhouse and had conformed this. Councilman Starwalt questioned the driveway system which is shared with the abutting property owners. Mr. Miles said there would be no problem, there is room for 10 cars in the driveway. He said he did not plan to have so much business that this would not be adequate parking. Councilman Starwalt explained -that when the applicant had come to City Hall to get the permit, it was issued without realizing the construction would be in the front yard. Mayor Nee said he did.not feel the greenhouse was very obvious because of the wooded nature of the area. Councilman Starwalt indicated that the applicant did not plan to bring in items to sell, they only would sell those items grown in the greenhouse. Mr. Miles said he would have to buy stock plants. Mayor Nee questioned if this was to be a temporary structure. Mr. Miles said this would not be any problem. He said 'to move the structure, they would just have to pull .up the stakes. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the Special Use Permit for the construction of the greenhouse at 1370 ,Rice Creek Road as requested by Mr. Thomas Miles with the stipulations recommended by the'Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of June 4, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF MAY 27, 1975: VARIANCES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE AS FOLLOWS: (1) SECTION 205.103 There -was no action needed at the current meeting on this item. 6`9 ARE REQUEST ACCESS R BUI YARD AS Wn FROM 77 FEET CE OF SECTION 205.154, 1, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW AN AUD DLEY.-IIINNESOTA): 254 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 16, 1975 PAGE 13 Councilman Starwalt said he felt his fence was hazardous but it is constructed in accor-. dance with the City Code. He suggested several changes in the distances that the fencing should be placedfrom the street in this kind of case and said this case is not as bad as some in the City. He said he was not aware that this had been brought up before and ftujht that this consideration should be taken care of for a revision in the ordinance of the City as soon as possible. Mr. Richard Harris, Planning Commission Chairman, indicated that this consideration had not been lost, it was within a large zoning•code change consideration that the Planning Commission had currently been working on. Councilman Fitzpatrick said this got into a large revision of the zoning ordinance. Mayor Nee questioned if it would be possible for the City staff or the Council to solve the problem. Mr. Richard Kok, 6517 McKinley Street N. E., addressed the Council and said it was his child that had been hit by a car recently in this area and this is something he did not want anyone else to experience. He said he wanted the ordinance changed to cover this type of regulation. He said all of the people in the area feel that this is a problem and they wc,ild like some help in solving this hazard. He added, the people of the area had talked_,o the owner of 0e fence and they had not reached an agreement for a solution to the problem. Mayor Nee asked if Mr. Kok would be willing to pay for the change in the fencing. Mr. Kok said he would be willing and he had told the people who own the fence this. The City Manager said the amendment of the ordinance in this case would not help the situation because if the- ordinance or code is changed at this time, the fence would still be allowable because it would have been in existance before the Taw.was passed. He commented that the use would be grandfathered in. Mrs. Kok said she had tried to negotiate some solution but the property owner said they would wait. for some recommendation from the Council. She said the property owners feel that this is a hazard. Mayor Nee said he had talked to the property owner and they had indicated that the fence is not against the law. Councilman Fitzpatrick said he had also talked to the property owner and he indicated that he would have to say the usage is not against the law. Mayor Nee said he would supporta change in the ordinance, but this would not help in this instance.. He -said this would have to be negotiated. He questioned what would constitute a safety hazard. The City Attoney said the judge would determine this in court after hearing the testimony of those involved. Mayor Nee pointed out that the property owner had asked the City before the installation of the fencing and they said it was lawful and now, the man has made an investment on this premis. He said all of the Council would say that this ordinance 'needs to be changed, but he could not see where in this instance they were in a position to proceed with any action. He said he thought the citizens of the area could file a complaint, this is provided for in the fence ordinance. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to direct the Administration to work with those involved for a satisfactory.solution and/or compromise. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Councilman Starwalt suggested that the Administration be given a two week dead line. Mr. Kok said the people were looking for approval in their theory that this is a hazard. He said if this would be possible, he would appreciate it. Councilman Starwalt indicated that the current position is as strong as the Council could get at the present time. Mr. Kok informed the Council of the schedule of the property owner for the next two weeks and advised th•e Administration to make rapid contact with him. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive -the Petition regarding the safety hazard on McKinley Street. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE MOTION TO DIRECT THE ADMINISTRATION, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 256 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 16, 1975. PAGE 15 The Public Works Director said the Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the request for the variances to construct the greenhouse. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt.to approve the requests for the variances as requested by Mr. Thomas Miles for 1370 Rice Creek Road to construct a greenhouse. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Public Works Director said this request was acted on at the previous meeting of the Council. Mayor Nee asked if the plat is ready to file on the residential property. Mr. Wall answered tht the plat is ready to file but he was a little reluctant to file it until approval of the funding for the apartment complex. Mr. Wall mentioned he had talked to the people at F. H. A. that day and they had indicated that the process would only be a few more days. He said they said the firm commitment would be available in a short period of time and he did not know vhpit the commitment would be. He said he should be ready to determine within the next few weeks. MOTION by Councilman Breider to continue the approval of the variances as requested by the Wall Corporation. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee meeting of May 27, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1975: A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.053,^4A, FRIDLEY^CITY �CODE'TO"REDU�E��HF FA�RAGE The Public Works Director explained that the Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the request. He indicated Mr. O'Bannon was present to answer any questions. MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the variance for 1410 Kerry Circle as requested by Mr. Mike O'Bannon. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Public Works Director explained the location of the proposed construction in relation to the lot and existing dwelling. He said there is a drawing of the proposed construction on Page 14-F of the Council agenda. He indicated Mr. Miller was present. 257 PAGE 16 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 16, 1975 Councilman Starwalt said he was not able to get out and look at the property and he really could not pass judgement on the request. Mrs. Marlen Miller explained the home to be a rambler and they were planning to construct the addition that would make the dwelling an "L" shape rambler. She explained that this would be the only way that a double garage could be constructed on the property. She further commented that the area property owners had no objections to the request. Mayor Nee asked if the applicants could place the construction in the back of the existing home. Mr. Miller said there is only 40 feet in the back at the present time. He said there would be room for only one driveway unless the existing garage would be removed. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to continue the request for the variance by Mr. Marlen Miller until the July 7, 1975 meeting of the Council. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick Mayor Nee said as it apprear.-s to him, there h -d not been any objections to the cons- struction from the neighborhood. He explaineu that he would not support this in his area and questioned if some agreement should not be obtained in writting from the abutting property owners. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. A REOUEST FOR VARIANCES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 205. OF TEN DOUBLE GA -l447, /'+I/-/417, /'+U 1-1,+U0, !017-/JOI, touu-i�tvi, 315. 7301-7303. ABLE STREET N. E., REQUEST BY PORTFOLIO The Public Works Director said the Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the request. He called the Council's attention to page 14-G of the agenda booklet.. A representative of Portfolio Realty indicated that he was trying to organize the area and there was no place set aside for garages. Councilman Breider asked if there was a request for fencing between the garages. The representative explained that he would go along with the three foot setback. He explained there was some concern that trash would gather in between the two cons- tructions. Councilman Breider said he believed the construction of the garages would make a real difference to the area. Councilman Breider suggested checking of the area to insure that there is no garbage in between the garages. MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur with the recommendation of the Board of Appeals and approve the.request for the variances as requested by Portfolio Realty. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting ti of June 10, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 27, 1975: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality Commission meeting of May 27, 1975. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL GARAGE IN EXISITNG COMMERCIAL ZONED PROPERTY BY ALBERT CAMPBELL, 5840.3RD STREET: The Public Works Director explained that this item had been brought to the Council to indicate acknowledgement on the part of the property owner that this is a non conforming and inconsistant use in relation to the way the property is zoned. He said if the Council \, accepts Mr. Campbell's acknowledgement, the building permit can be granted. Councilman Fitzpatrick said he had no questions if this was the wish of the property owner. I City ®f Fridley AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS • _____ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 � � CITY HALL FRIDLEY - 55432 ���__.!`: �•� 612-560-3450 SUBJECT ' APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS NUMBER 910-F23 REV, 1 DATE 3/21/75 PAGE OF :l 2 APPROVED BY 800 Name Address .>�C �-, L C, -f -Ce -V Phone -co Cl - Legal Description Lot No. Block No. Tract or Addn. vu a � Variance Request(s); including stated hardships (attach plat showing building, variances, etc., where applicable) or survey of property P i G_.➢ (.B .l a��it f�f�� 191i 1[Y R lUi\�a` �� DV'A �6 .Y�Y {t' 0 •�. C,.,�o'4.. l /11./4._. 8 z Date Meeting Date Fee Receipt No. ql Signatur Comments & Recommendations by the Board of Appeals City.Council Action and Date y City ®f Fridley SUBJECT APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS ' � • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. L------ (Staff Report) � PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. i •--1 . CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV.DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 812-580-3450 910-F23 1 -, 3/21/.5 2 2 800 Staff Comments Board members notified of meeting by List members, date notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans to attend hearing. Plan Date To Attend c� Name i r2 i � i�Ar1 L.��Ce Pearson making appeal and the following property owners having property within 200 feet notified: By Whom Name Date Phone or Mail Notified J JA�c o2 �3 a o ` , -z .2 _ (4- arab (3 .?_ 0) (2ev �- 16 1 14 � ; --- - -- -- •�a9—._._..-bag - .''.a?_- '� � 9k `,, , " / ti N ate!+ N p\�+a4y i 4 (Zo bnJ o a f M ` :-20 MOORE . Bids n N ia • ° (TOO 8 v ' ......... lee .... (zea` L. ►-- - --MI 219 64 4 DA o �3.: � 0 it Ao I Y' /3B 67 I i)T 3s I Z w° 2 3 z o�i� —_ 3s��•a—L• , (4- arab (3 .?_ 0) (2ev �- 16 1 14 � ; --- - -- -- •�a9—._._..-bag - .''.a?_- '� � 9k `,, , " / ti N ate!+ N p\�+a4y i 4 (Zo bnJ o a f M ` :-20 MOORE . Bids n N ia • ° (TOO 8 v ' ......... lee .... (zea` L. ►-- - --MI 64 4 DA o �3.: � 0 it Ao I Y' /3B 67 I i)T 3s I Z w° 2 3 z o�i� —_ 3s��•a—L• , _ /7 m q M -ra '• � �•...ds NOR>F1�6. b ma., �,e'e/-•f. /y�'tf• ur/ri or /•q- O 335.97 v 1 ab °° o 4 • RICE Uv{/e't oPf/of A" s� 7 a I n •� _ X39 • ,Re3� ----- • �� /r:%derso:7 (4- arab (3 .?_ 0) (2ev �- 16 1 14 � ; --- - -- -- •�a9—._._..-bag - .''.a?_- '� � 9k `,, , " / ti N ate!+ N p\�+a4y i 4 (Zo bnJ o a f M ` :-20 MOORE . Bids n N ia • ° (TOO 8 v ' ......... lee .... (zea` L. ►-- - --MI I Y' /3B 67 I i)T 3s I Z w° 2 3 z -ra '• � �•...ds NOR>F1�6. b ma., �,e'e/-•f. i v ab °° o 4 • Uv{/e't oPf/of A" s� 7 a ,Re3� �Boo� 23 OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, May 27, 1975 to consider the following matter: A request for a variance of Section 205.154, 1, Fridley City Code, to allow an accessory building (greenhouse) to be built in the front yard instead of the rear or side yard as required, and, Section 205.153, 2, to reduce the average front yard setback from 77 feet to 32 feet, to allow the construction of an accessory building (20 feet x 35 feet) to be located on Lot 16, Auditor's Subdivision #22, the same being 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E., Fridley, Minn. (Request by Mr. Thomas Miles, 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.) Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. WILLIAM A. DRIGANS CHAIRMAN BOARD OF APPEALS