Loading...
PRE 2010 DOCSCity of Fridley, Minae BUILDING PERMIT y No 4898 Date: ............._.__""' _._"°-........._._.......................... _ d°/ 2Owner: ....� .`` �ti..:`� ._....._._._... Builder .. _ Address....._............._............_............._..._,_._._....._ . _ _ __ .._....__._.._ Address .............................................. ........................................... LCAT NOF BUILDING No....._. .._.lr'._...... Street..... ..�:..._ �_..._.....47�'�.... :!............... _.............. Part of Lgt .. z ! ........ ............ .............. _.... Lot ..... ....................... _........ Block ..... _..... .....:. ..................... Addition or Sub-Divisionp.. g .. -°-•---- Corner Lot ..._ ....................._........ Inside Lot ........... . Setback ..._ ..................... Sideyard ..._ p.e........ ..................... I.............. Sewer Elevation...---............._............._......._...._.......--•---............._....................... Foundation Elevation .................... - DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be Used qs t ted, � .,�,. Front ....°�... Depth .. E... _:. Height ,P� ...._.. Sq. Ft /�._-: Cu. Ft. _ 4 ................ ----�.... Fro t Depth ...... eight �........ Sq. Ft.. Cu. Ft...... .. of Construction "" ...- ...4 :.:-- Est. Cos..,E �°"r"".. To be Completed ..... ............... ......................_........ In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with all provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. Js� m In consideration of the payment of a fee of $ ` ...., permit is hereby granted to....._. --_-.:.._............ ___._....._......__.._.._._...._....._. to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom- it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violationo any of the provisions of said ordinances. �' F /,"� Building Inspector NOTICE: This permit does not cover the construction, installation for wiring, plumbing, gas heating, sewer or water. Be sure to see' the Building Inspector for separate permits for these items. CAUTION S PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE VIOLAT- ION ANY P:';l ,ATE LAN GflV€PuANTS AND R. oil( City of Fridley Application for Plumbing and Gas Fitting Permit DESCRIPTION OF WORK Number, Kind and Location of Fixtures G1 pz ^ wj W PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL $1.50 Number Fixtures ...................... x Future Fixture Opening ................ x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. x 1.00 $ 0* O x 3.25 N WATER HTR. GAS ELEG Base x 2.00 $ New Ground Run Old Bldg . ............ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50 $ x .50 $ Zr QP Additional Fixtures .................... Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. 1st $ 2nd _ 3rd 4th • Future Connection Openings New .Fixture, Old Openings Connected withI Sewer [] Cesspool PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL $1.50 Number Fixtures ...................... x Future Fixture Opening ................ x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. x 1.00 $ Catch Basin ............................ x 3.25 $ Water heater (Up to 200,000 BTL) ...... x 2.00 $ New Ground Run Old Bldg . ............ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO. RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures .......................... x $1.50 $ x .50 $ Zr QP Additional Fixtures .................... Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. x 2.00 $ REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code Description ................................................$ TOTAL FEE $ Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SU 4-7470 P City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby .makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fridley, Minn 19 Owner`s . Kind of Building Used as To be completed about e® Estimated Cost, $ Old e . Building Permit No. f!f� ° Permit No. Signe .x By Business Phone No ^ T ROUGH > / - 3- 4 (:) FINAL - 42 2M 7-89 % yes APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT . I't . CITY OF FRIMEYJ, MINNESOTA Builder der,&Z V - Owners Name Address: 19 WkWTIUR - Ur* bu MAU Street'." "L'i. v- Part of Lot,/214t7 Lot Addition or Sub.Div. All Corner Lot Inside Lot 7Z-Set Back Side -Yard SEM - EWA-TIW,-- �_.�OUWDATION ELEVATION ApplicinV attach to this form Certificate of Survey of Lot and proposed building location. - DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be used as: I Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. —Ga. Ft Front Depth Height. Sq. Ft.. Cu. Ft Type of (:&stxuctionEstimated Cost, To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified,, agreeing.tq do all work in strict accordance with the City. Ordinancesand-Xcling of bm the Dqpartment of Buildings.. and hereby declares' t all the facts. ..d repres U" tions- i1a at d int s application are'. true and o ot. DATE. SIGNATURE (;�SohedZe of Fee costs can. be, found the . t : 646-7361 45at 46*&Uttem &0004" FORMERLY OPERATED AS A DEPARTMENT OF TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. OFFICERS CHARLES W. BRITZIUS - President 2440 FRANKLIN AVENUE ROBERT F. WITTMAN - Executive Vice -President NORMAN E. HENNING - Vice -President ST. PAUL, MINN. 5 511 4 CLINTON R. EUE - Secretary JOHN F. GISLASON - Treasurer June 2$, 1965 Western Homes, Inc. 10051 Grouse Street Coon Rapids, Minnesota Attention: Mr. Vernon Johnson Re: Soil Investigation - 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota Gentlemen: On June 25, 1965, we put down one soil test boring to aid in evaluating soil conditions for the rebuilding of the Dr. Erkel residence at 567 Rice Creek Ter- race in Fridley, Minnesota. The boring was put down at the location suggested by you and is shown on the attached sketch. The surface elevation was referenced to the first floor level of the existing house where shown, taken as 100.0' (an assumed elevation). The log of the boring, and a chart showing the method of soil classification (U. S. Bureau of Soils) are attached. The soil was visually classified in accordance with the above method. The boring was put down by hand, and was cleaned and advanced with a 4 inch auger. Soil samples were taken with a 2 inch 0. D. split sampler, and the blows per foot (B P F) as given along the right side of the logs were recorded on this sampler driven by a 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches. The consistency of the cohesive soil was rated by the penetration of the sampler. It may be seen from the log of the boring that fill was found to a depth of 212' ft. Granular soils were found from Zit to 61 and a rather stiff clay was found from 6 ft. to the depth of the boring. Ground water entered the boring and the level and times of recording are given on the log. This level can be expected to vary with the seasons of the year and from one year to the next. We understand that the house was damaged by the recent tornado. The house will be rebuilt and the west wall will be moved 4 ft. out from the existing founda- tion. The new footing will be about 4 ft. below grade. The granular soils Page Z Western Homes, Inca re: 567 Rice Creek Terrace found below 31 ft. would be capable of supporting a normal footing without excessive settlement, 9*e water may be encountered in the excavation. If there are any g, tions regardi=g this report, or if we can be of further service to you, please do not hesitate to contact,us About 50% of the soil samai es wi] 4be held at this office for a period of two months, and. will .then be discardie 'unless we are notified to hold them fora longer period of time. The recommendations and/or SiUi4eirti.ons contained in this report ere our opin- ions based on data which ere asserted to be representative of the site explored; but because the area, of the boringi in relation to the entire area is very, sma". and for other reasons, we do not warrant conditions below the depths of our borings, or that tM*.strata,:logged from our boring are necessarily typical of the entire site. Very truly yours, SOIL, E TLORATION COMPANY Wilfred A. `Wahl, P. E. WAW:mj EnesQ LOG OF. TEST BORINGS SOIL EXPLORATION COMPANY PROJECT: DR. ERKEL RESIDENCE, AT 567 RICE CR=K'TERRACE, FRIDLEY, MINN. LABORATORY NO.: 8098 VERTICAL SCALE$ l" = 2' BORING NO. 7_ BORING NO. ®uAre►as �Lsv. suR►Au s�sv. B P F ®EPTN 61 B P F DtPTN 0 Fill® mostly brown and black clay loam and sandy loam with a few pieces of concrete and grav- el UFRFsh Brown sandy loam wet Gray sandy loam (wet) with some lenses of sand (waterbearing) racoarse san waterbearing some gravel Reddish brown clay rather stiff) with a little gravel Note: Water level at 3' immed- iately after completion and 10 minutes later. 211 3' 5z° 6f 141 35 water level 6 (see note) 12 11 12 U. S. BUREAU OF SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM a, s We use the U. S. Bureau of Soils method of soil classification which is based on the texture of the soil. The texture of a soil is influenced by the amount of the various sizes of soil particles in the soil, The soil particles are grouped into three particle size classifications as follows: Particle -Size Classification Sand Silt Clay Soil is grouped into twelve silt and clay present in the triaxial graph. Diameter of Particles(Millimeters) 2.0 to 0.05 0.05 to 0,005 Smaller than 0.005 U. S. Standard Sieve #10 to #270 (Cannot be separated by sieving) basic classifications according to the percentages of sand, soil. These classifications are shown by the following Sx1VU This same classification system in tabular form is as follows: BASIC SOIL CLASSIFICATION ,SAND SILT CLAY Sand g0 - 100% 0 - 10% 0 - 10% Loamy sand 80 - g0 0 - 20 0 - 20 Sandy loam 50 - 80 0 - 50 0 - 20 Loam 30 - 50 •30 - 50 0 - 20 Silty loam 0 - 50 50 - 80 0 - 20 Silt 0 - 20 80 - 100 0 - 20 Sandy clay loam 50 - 80 0 - 30 20 - 30 Clay loam 20 - 50 20 - 50 20 - 30 Silty clay loam 0 - 30 50 - 80 20 - 30 Clay 0 - 50 0 - 50 30 - 100 Sandy clay 50 - 70 0 - 20 30 - 50 Silty clay 0 - 20 50 - 70 30 - 50 We classify the sand present in a soil as coarse (#10 - #20 sieves.), medium (#20 - #40 sieves), fine (#40 - #100 sieves), very fine (#100 - #270 sieves), or as well graded. Soils with an appreciable amount of gravel present are classified "with a little gravel" (less than 15%), "with some gravel" (15 to 300), "with gravel" (30 to 50%), "and gravel" (over 50%). Material over 3 inches is classified as boulders. Organic soil is classified as"peat" (over 2/3 organic aerial) or "muck" (1/3 to 2/3 anic material). (3-15-61) . ,-?fs- S;,1 City of Fridley, NUnn.• 119 BUILDING M. Date: July 6, 1965 Owner: Dr. Ralph Erkel Builder Westrich Builders's Western Homes, Inc. Address 567 Bice Creek Terrace Address 10051 Grouse Street N. W, Xpls., 55433 LOCATION OF BUILDING No. 567 street - mice Creek Terrace N. E, Part of Lot Lot 12 & 13 Block Addition or Sub -Division Rice Creek Terrace, Plat 7 Corner Lot Inside Lot _ _ setback Sewer Elevation Sideyard Foundation Elevation DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be Used as: Wel —r Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Rebuild, Front Depth Leight Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction — Fr&= Est. Cost (b16, 000 • ( _ To be Completed Storm damage repairs Repair present, plus addition per plan In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and comp with ail provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. � ._____� In consideration of the payment of a fee of $ 10.00 , permit is hereby granted to Western Homes. Inc. the express condition that to hecepensrstron t the whomuilfding or addition as onasdescribed above. and permit kxrbengranted in all woporkri . done in, around and upon said building, or any pari Thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the dty limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. Alen Jensen Building Inspector NOTICE: Ub pwmk dose not ewer the eontruatioa, on for whim plumbing, gn heating, sewer or water. Be ano fm no Phe Building bvomr for separate pmft for these keme. :: < tft DWNERtS NAMd4 4 ADDRESS 8 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA .` Jd T LOCATION OF BUILDING Street ,� Part of Lo LOT _% ,BLOCK _ ADDITION OR SUBDIVISIO eLe-� Corner Lot Inside Loi______getback : .� Side-itard�_ SEWER MVATTON FOUNDATION ELEVATION. Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lo and proposed ilding location drawn on these Certificates. lei DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be used a i r Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction a Estimated Cost�� .% To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. � (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). U 8 RECEIPT W. 30264 City ®f .tri ey, Minn. N? 8406 BURDING Date: AUGUST 26, 1965 Owner: DR, RALPH ERKEL Builder D. L. SCHERER Address 567 Fice Creek Terrace Address 6525 - 2ndqt- N_ P_ Fridley 32, Minnesota Fridiev 32, Minnesota e.,— :. NFU971P KIM : No. 567 Street Rice Creek Terrace part of Lot Lot 12 & 13 Block 2 Addition or Sub.Division Rice Creek Terrace-, Plat_7 Corner Lot , Inside Lot — Setback — Sideyard Sewer Elevation _ __ — Foundation Elevation To be Used as: Type of Construction Front - Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth Freight Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Est, Cost ^ 15 000, 00 .._,. To be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to constru the building described above I agree to do the proposed work In accordance with the description above t fo and in plias with a'll provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. In consideration of the payment of a fee of $ 100 00 , permit is hereby granted to DRFM L S.GHERER to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work. done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. ALLEN G. JENSEN Building Inspector N®110E: M permit don not cover the eondmelion, ftwkMen for wking, phm Bing, gas heating, sower or wafer. Be sore to as the Beading hapeefor for sepame permits for these ftenm 1W ' ' — APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA OWNER'S NAME � BUILDERS � ADDRESS // <�-�'R Jam. , DRESS LOCATION OF BUILDING N0, STREET PART OF LOT�� LOT �q� / BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION , C, CORNER LOT INSIDE LOT. SETBACK SIDE YARD SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. To be used as; DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING -Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction_' m , ,,o, Estimated Cost To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct, DATE SIGNATURE (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). a,. r s-- 117 _ >� RICE CREEK FLOODS -- Dr. R.L. Erkel, 567 Rice Creek Terrace, Fridley, said Rice Creek normally borders his house_ on three sides. But last week,' he was sur rounded briefly as the stream flooded its banks and cut his drive ;way off from the main road, leaving much of his yard under water. DNR -8 SnnTATEE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL 444 Lafayette Road, Space Center Bldg., St. September 25,1978 CERTIFIED Dr. Ralph L. Erke1 a 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley; -Minnesota 55432 Dear Dr. Erkel: RESOURCES Paul, MN 55101 PHONE: (612) 296-4800 ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER, PERMIT APPLICATION 70-1135 The Department of Natural Resources has reviewed your application for a permit to place sand and rocks along Rice Creek and to excavate one foot of material from the bed of Rice Creek, Anoka County, at your property located in Section 11, Township 30N, Range 24W. It has been determined that your application as proposed must be denied. It is the policy of the Department to discourage the excavation of materials from the beds of public waters, in order to preserve the natural character of public waters and their shorelands, and maintain suitable aquatic habitat for fish and wildlife. Bank stabilization alternatives with minimum environmental impacts would include the place- ment of sand and riprap. These projects will not require permits.if constructed within the following restrictions: A. Beach sand blankets 1. clean, inorganic sand and/or gravel free of pollutants and nutrients 2. no more than: 6 inches thick, 50 feet wide along the shore, 10 feet waterward of the ordinary high water mark 3. site is not a posted fish spawning area B. Riprap L natural rock only 2. no more than 5 feet waterward of the ordinary high water mark 3. conforms to natural alignment of shore 4. minimum finished slope no steeper than 3:1 S. permits required to riprap Lake Superior or any designated trout stream AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i^4 �01 3 Dr. Ralph L. Erkel Page 2 September �5 1978 A permit shall be required for any other beach sand blanket or riprap shore protection. Before initiating any project, contact Ron Harnack, Regional Hydrologist, phone 296-7523. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105.45, states in part as follows: "In all permit applications, the applicant has the burden of proving that the proposed project is reasonable, practical, and will adequately protect public safety and promote the public welfare." Our last record of corres- pondence is a March 23, 1978 letter to you from Sarah P. Tufford. She asked you to advise us of your intentions, but we have not heard from you. In view of our observations, we cannot conclude that your proposal is indeed reasonable, practical and will promote the public welfare. There- fore, the proposal presented in the application is in all respects denied. You are advised of your right to demand a hearing. This demand must be received within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this Order and must be accompanied with a bond or equivalent security in the amount of $750.00. If you desire bond forms, notify our office and the appropriate forms will be transmitted to you. COMMISSIONER OF NATURAL RESOURCES By:... .... ..... . .. ...... Larry Se , 'rector Division o a s LS/smf:ls cc: Region VI Administrator Attn: Ron Harnack U.S.C.E. Anoka County SWCD V"City of Fridley - Director of Planning FA J Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: John G. Flora, Public Works Director PW92-046 Mark A. Winson, Ass't Public Works Director FROM. Jon Thompson, Estimator and Construction Inspector DATE: February 19, 1992 SUBJECT:. Additional Informatiorr'Concerning Problems with the 1992 Spring Thaw MISSISSIPPI RIVER The elevation of the top of the flood control dike on the Mississippi River West of Riverview Terrace near 79th Way is 824 feet above sea level. The top of the. road where the 6p" CMP culvert goes under 79th Way between Broad and Riverview Terrace has an el vation of ± 818. Therefore the culvert will have to be sandbagged and.pumped, and toe road built up 6 feet'to keep water from flooding the homes in the surrounding area. j. In order to build a dike across 79th Way, 675 C.Y. of fill would be necessary. The dike wouldbe 100 feet long, 6 feet high and 40 feet wide at the bottom and 20 feet wide at the tp. It would protect the 67 homes listed on page 2. RICEICREEK The homes at 470, 480, 490, 567 and 57 .Rice Creek. Blvd, 6801 Channel Rd, and the home at 580 69th Ave NE seem to be built higher than the 100 year storm line, but their lots tll have extensive flooding from the high water. See attached summation sheet and ap. 52ND AVE NE The spring thaw could also affect the homes at 1280, 1298 and 1300 52nd Ave NE. These properties flood from extensive storm runoff and are potential candidates again this spring. Ip February 19, 1992 Page 2 RIVERVIEW TERRACE 8053 Riverview Terrace 8215 Riverview Terrace 8041 Riverview Terrace 8241 Riverview Terrace 8031 Riverview Terrace 8151 Riverview Terrace 8021 Riverview Terrace 8181 Riverview Terrace 8001 Riverview Terrace 8191 Riverview Terrace 7995 Riverview Terrace 8141 Riverview Terrace 7965 Riverview Terrace 8125 Riverview Terrace 7941 Riverview Terrace 8121 Riverview Terrace 7921 Riverview Terrace 8065 Riverview Terrace 7901 Riverview Terrace 8095 Riverview Terrace BUFFALO STREET 581 Buffalo Street 641 Buffalo Street 611 Buffalo Street 600 Buffalo Street 621 Buffalo Street 630 Buffalo Street 631 Buffalo Street 541 Buffalo Street 639 Buffalo Street 560 Buffalo Street FAIRMONT 645 Fairmont 675 Fairmont - 689 Fairmont 695 Fairmont ELY STREET 600 Ely Street 625 Ely Street 630 Ely Street 635 Ely Street 640 Ely. Street 651 Ely Street 650 Ely Street 655 Ely Street 680 Ely Street 681 Ely Street 684 Ely Street DOVER STREET 625 Dover Street 631 Dover Street 641 Dover. Street 665 Dover Street 681 Dover Street 670 Dover Street CHERYL STREET. 609 Cheryl Street 615 Cheryl Street 657 Cheryl Street 641 Cheryl Street BROAD. STREET 7899 Broad Street 7895 Broad Street 610 Dover Street 620 Dover Street 680 Dover Street 640 Dover Street 680 Dover Street 661 Cheryl Street 600 Cheryl Street 630 Cheryl Street 640 Cheryl Street A C February 20, 1992 Page 3 HOMES THREATENED BY RICE CREEK IN FRIDLEY 470 RICE CREEK BLVD 824.74 823.00 480 RICE CREEK BLVD 824.74 823.00 490 RICE CREEK BLVD 837.50 829.00 580 69TH AVE UNKNOWN 831.00 567 RICE CREEK TERR 830.47 830.30 573 RICE CREEK TERR 831.27 830.27 6801 CHANNEL ROAD 852.70 852.50 N//4 CORNER 21ss- •+� .l.B - 3 'f. - - aft go air 69TH AVE N.E. n• _ ;� / .E J, 3) _ .� � w 58.1= J W13�21 ° l\'. o a z c¢ LIP, tz II Ioodc�6rf °� d�C� W l� S "' r $ �— -•c •!` (y4i / ' � i ' Lhxfb � 7.32 m t\ ¢ •`�� w � 1 � ��0 1 y trot ,r ] . 1 \\ .i 5tl� (1�! OB �o .�_ �of.6e °' °�f1�` �1 .• ��by.s•'� � � 'r�! (r/ =•Qit •'�, %�' ` LU � i \ '� s► i� ego `,, � v �„ -•\ {§3) `° � �. �° ( I$ F- s� s %'. 4�`ii"� ' gid• h 19) .S 3 a`I 4 14? y to. a 15 .: ��aa :j»s SO ` i � p% ; � .r�.IiSsi;-•� v �� ,' { yea � �b' � ��. SSt�(tQc { �ir� `•o,..' :•�iii� t1i � � I 3 e � \ `• '� � ll V ✓..s (�� L'- � I�� ° � 68{0 l• �� �`�� : � n °trpr- R�� s••+3s �� .. "..• _ � "" (�l � 1° l� t•h0 -•- 1h .ylri W 1� q+ I •' a wy �� � IS \ �\-�✓ ` .,do• O I •••.�ti0 �' ill 461D j� �f!) � 976 O.Sa � b f (U% s /' 333 3 iz ,��,sa) w9*r Io I4�4 \\ I \ 3 I L' +Le . • 3 `1 1 ¢ r+� `\ , s�� 0 1 �'� �5 ti °' I� i ���• ceb) ,yah Gj o�� ` �. �4W° a ey 5 9 ��� 60 •''ice � yi�/6 ' « y►.17 1 fo • n 211' 11 3 w N J,��e b ryN T Pike rr ((kD°y 10 • .¢ L�_ (, o g ('� d - 6ti 735 64 LfqD no 7/) a ai I -120erg (g)- re %� ,. ,.�s q3.q ./ 67/ �bf 3 ro l i y� �' 'a. as n.• .o 7 goo f. 6710... 1 4 l� TVa1' VI ° 6o ev•••. so. Z y 11= ire �„ h _ I 7 6 y4S Ntl q1 0 9 517 X61 y91 391 yb CO J . 37 I . .i � �•' •' C� ..�_ 710 1.Y 's /in Ga .t -.i 7.� 6n BJ � nw. O•r M CITY OF FAimmy, SUBJECT 8439 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE. FRIDLEY. MN. 6543E C61M• 5"-3450 ADDRESS 5-C.`r Pia APPEALS COMMISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: REQUIRED: YES CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED STIPULATIONS: VARIANCES DATE DATE DATE 1— 246 — 8 3 NO. NO. NAME Blanche L. Erkel � and Leslie Gerdin) FEE $60.00 RECEIPT NO. J'` O LOT. NO. BLOCK NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: #-1-27713 2 \ 4 CV -w S S� ;k-" A �y TRACT OR ADDITION Rice Creek Terrace 7 VARIANCE REQUEST (S): (Attach plat or survey of property showing building, variances, etc., where applicable) List specific hardship(s) which requires the variances(s): Q jEl- L DATE 1-25-83 SIGNATURE` ADDRESS 567 Rice Creek Terrace TELEPHONE NO. 571-5564 VARIANCES FOR CITY USE ONLY w nuliTleO oT meeting by and "Yes" or "Noll for plans to attend hearing. Name • � V aooru nrumoers date notified, nuliTleO oT meeting by and "Yes" or "Noll for plans to attend hearing. Name L15t trembers, Plan Date To Attend Person making notified: - appeal and the following property owners having property within 200 feet Name 8y Whom Date Phone or Mail Notified I 1 r , / S�7TAATE OF >> DEPARTMENT OF 1200 Warner Road, St. PHONE NO. 296-7523 February 15, 1983 NATURAL RESOURCES Paul, Minnesota 55106 Mr. William Deblon, Associate Planner City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 FILE NO. RE: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ERKEL RESIDENCE, 567 RICE CREEK TERRACE N.E. Dear Mr. Deblon: Based upon my conversations with you, I understand that the City will be hearing testimony regarding a proposed expansion of the Erkel residence and plans to construct a new garage within the CRP -2 Zoning District. It is my understanding that the structure is non -conforming and the expansion proposed is converting an existing attached garage into liveable space. The new garage may be allowed under your ordinance provided that it is elevated on .fill or flood -proofed in accordance with the State Building Code to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE). From a flood plain standpoint, the existing attached garage may be expanded only if it can be protected to the RFPE, and does not increase the non -conformity of the structure (the City may have other specific concerns regarding the ex- pansion of a non -conforming structure). Since it seems unlikely that the existing attached garage could be elevated on fill, flood -proofing in accordance with the State Building Code is the only other apparent option available. The City's ordinance, state regulation, and federal regulation prohibit the.granting of a variance to allow for a lesser degree of flood protection than the RFPE. Should the City grant such a variance, the re- sponsible course of action for this Department would be to pursue legal action against the City for non -enforcement of their ordinance, and recom- mendation to the federal government that the City be suspended from the National Flood Insurance Program. I outlined the above information to help provide guidance to the City and the applicant. The flood plain management act was adopted to reduce flood damage potential among other things. Allowing a use expansion unprotected is contrary to this goal. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i MR. WILLIAM DEBLON February 15, 1983 Page Two If you should have any questions pertaining to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. S' cerel_Iy, ^ David P Leuthe, Area Hydrologist Metro Region Division of Waters DPL/ch cc: Tom Lutgen, LUMS Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 3 MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded 6y Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. Vivian Hoese was present for this matter. Mr. Hill presented the Commission with plans of the proposed addition. 14s. litiese said they would probably put the airconditioning unit on the roof of the building. Ms. Gabel asked if there would be a loss of parking and Ms . Hoese said there would not be and Mr. Hill stated they would still be within the code but they are asking the petitioner to replace the temporary bumper blocks with poured concrete. The additional landscaping suggested in the Staff Report was questioned and Mr. Hill noted thattthe landscaping appeared adequate.. Ms. Hoese stated that the patient and employee parking will be separated and there will be no problems with entrances and exits. Mr. Hill said that Items 3 and 4 on the Staff Report, regarding parking, may not be feasible for this situation. Ms. Gabel noted that all they are doing is just extending what they have done previously and she could not see any problems. Mr. Barna said his only question he had was visibility in the parking lot and he drove through the area and found no problems. Chairperson Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7675 Madison Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.113, 4 (b) requires a minimum of 15 feet for a side yard setback. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around commercial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Existing sideyard setback is 13 feet. New addition would be built even with existing building. Additional space is needed for offices, orthopaedic coverage and physical therapy." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This request is to vary a side yard setback in a CR -1 District from the required 15 feet to 13 feet, to enable construction of a 68 foot by 48 foot (3,264 square feet) addition to an existing structure. This addition will be used for additional office space and patient treatment rooms. On September 13, 1976, two variances were approved by the City Council: a front yard parking setback from 20 feet to 0 feet and a rear yard building setback from 25 feet to 13 feet. However, this request should have been to vary a side yard parking setback from 5 feet to 0 feet and another side yard building setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The actual variances would vary less than the request and since there was no opposition to the variance or construction, the request was not changed. If this variance is approved, the Appeals Commission may want to'consider the following: Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 4 1. upgrade temporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. 2. plant additional landscape/screen along Osborne Road and Madison Street. 3. parking aisles are not 25 feet, but 20 feet 4. parking stalls are not 10 feet by 20 feet, but 10 feet by 15 feet. Items 3 and 4 may not be feaisble to complete, except to the south of the building. MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:17 P.M. Mr. Barna said that this does provide open space around the structure for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes; it is still accessible and the addition will not change anything. Mr. Plemel stated he had no objection to this addition. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, that the Appeals Commission recommend to tie City Council, through the Planning Commission, approval of the variance request to reduce the required side yard setback from 15 feet to 13 feet, to allow the construction of an addition of approximately 3,000 square feet, to be used for additional office and medical space, located on the north 400 feet of the west 217.8 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, the same being 7675 -Madison Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, with the stipulation that the petitioner upgrade the temporary concrete curbing to permanent 6 inch poured concrete. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. OTHER BUSINESS: Ms. Gabel said she has spoken to Mr. Deblon and apparently he had a variance request that he thought was withdrawn and the petitioner thought it was on the agenda and further stated they could discuss this matter but the Commission could take no action on it as there had been no public notices sent out, etc. Mr. Hill explained that Mr. Les Gerdin was purchasing a home from Blanche Erkel and they made a re- quest sometime in the middle of January to vary the code regarding the flood plain. Apparently, Mr. Gerdin was planning to convert the present garage into living quarters and to construct a new garage in front of the present garage. He stated that the City ordinance, the Department of Natural Resources and the federal govern- ment does not allow any building to exist below the flood elevation. He also stated that this situation might require a special use permit rather than a variance and to go through the Planning Commission on March 16th. Ms. Gabel said the City staff is doing some research on this now as this is a non -conforming use. Mr. Hill suggested the petitioner to give some consideration to constructing vertical rather than horizontal; that by building up, they would be outside the flood elevation. Mr. Hill thought it best that the parties involved get together with the Staff to discuss this situation. Mrs. Erkel said she has talked to the neighbors and they have no objections. Ms. Gabel said she could'tiot see any problems either except for the flood plain restrictions. C '%. Appeals Commission Meeting - February 15, 1983 Page 5 Mr. Hill said that any construction done would have to go before the DNR and Rice Creek Watershed for approval. Mrs. Erkel said she bought the house in 1964 and as far as she knew, there have been no problems with flooding for 82 years. Mr. Hill stated that as of January 1, 1983, the State has required the City to file with Anoka County any variances, special use permits and lot splits and they will become part of the deed. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 1983, ADJOURNED AT 8:40.P.M. Respectfully submitted, Deb Niznik, Recording Secretary t M41►• •%� 4' 11 si MEMORANDUM • NASI14 •'J ' S. ' NSI' IW— ' • MW I BMW,BMWMIC DUAMDPMENT S I : S PROPOSED AMITMN • THE SI' 'SSI RESIDENCE AT 567 RM CREEK ' SI' • M MTE: FEB VARY 28, 1983 On February 16, 1983, I met with Blanche Erkel, owner of the above property, Leslie Gerdin, the intended buyer and Jack Young, the realtor handling the transaction. In order to complete the transaction, Mr. Gerdin wished to expand the residence by converting the existing garage into livable area and constructing a new 27 foot by 30 foot garage. In reviewing this request, it was determined that the house was within the CRP -2 zone and any construction was regulated by ordinance number 728 (see memo dated 2-17-83 from the City attorney). The City also received correspondence from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources regarding this matter. (see letter dated 2-15-83 from the MnD M I gave this information to the parties and the suggested vertical construction as an alternative that would require only a special use permit from the City Council and review by the MnENR and Rice Creek Watershed District. The parties said they would review the information and get back to me as 'to the course of action that would be taken. Mrs. Erkel mentioned that she would ask her son-in-law, Gerry Sikorski, for any assistance he might be able to give regarding this matter. On February 25, 1983, I contacted Les Gerdin. He stated that because of the cost involved to be in compliance with the local, state and federal regulations, he was not pursuing the matter further. He gave consideration to vertical construction, but because of the amenities and aesthetics of the building and terrain, felt it was not feasible. I attempted to contact Mrs. Erkel, but she was not at home. If you need additional information regard this matter, please contact me. Thank you. EH/BD 2/1/5%4 M E M 0 R A N D 'U M February 17= 1983 MEMO TO: Mr. Kent E. Hill Economic Development Assistant MEMO FROM: Mr. David P. Newman Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Addition to Erkel Residence You have advised me that the Erkel residence is located in a CRP -2 District and its elevation is below the flood plain. You have also informed me that Ms. Erkel is seeking City approval to use the existing garage as a living space and to build a new garage. Assuming that the home complied with all zoning and building requirements at the time of its initial construction, it now constitutes a non -conforming use since it is below the flood plain. As a general rule, a non -conforming use may expand providing that the expansion and its use conforms with all ordinances. Ordinance No. 728 states that the City must issue a special use permit for a residence in a CRP -2 District unless the City can show that the proposed use is in violation with Section 205.1574(2)(A)(2), Section 205.1574(4) or Section 205.1575. Consequently, it would appear that if the owners wished to make a vertical addition to their home, they could, providing that this addition does not violate the above Sections and conforms with the balance of the Zoning and Building Code. If the owners make a vertical addition, the City should pay particular attention to Section 205.1574(4)(C). If it can be established that a vertical addition increases the danger to the home's residents in the case of flooding, then of course the special use permit should not be issued. The question of whether the existing garage can be converted into a dwelling area is more difficult to answer. Normally, a non -conforming use can utilize all existing space and may alter their use providing that the intensity of the use does not significantly change. As an example, if the non -conformity in the present case was that of set -backs instead, then there is no doubt that the current garage Mr. Kent E. Hill -2- February 17, 1983 could be converted to living space providing that all other ordinances were complied with. However, our present concern Js with flooding. It could be argued that by expanding the ^living area of the home, more people will be able to live in the home with the result that more people are exposed to the danger of flooding. It would be my opinion, however, that the.homeowner is probably entitled to convert the garage into a living area, provided that the proposed addition meets all of the requirements other than that the dwelling is located within a flood plain. The next issue that is then raised is whether the owner may construct a new garage if he converts the existing one into a living area. The only fashion in which such a garage could be constructed would be if it complies with Ordinance No. 728. Constructing a new garage constitutes the expansion or enlargement of a non -conforming use. Such activity is prohibited by Section 205.1578(1) unless the new structure is flood -proofed. You also asked whether the City could grant a variance. Section 205.1577(5) provides that a variance may be granted only if the enforcement of the Ordinance would result in an undue hardship. It is up to the City to determine whether such a hardship exists. In summary, it is the opinion of this office that a vertical addition can be put on the home providing that the addition does not increase the danger to flooding. The homeowner may convert the existing garage to a living area but the new garage must be constructed in conformance with the Ordinance. Finally, a variance can only be granted if the City finds that the enforcement of the Ordinance creates an undue hardship. STATE OF -ii, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 PHONE NO. 296-7523 FILE NO February 15, 1983 Mr. William Deblon, Associate Planner City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 RE: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ERKEL RESIDENCE, 567 RICE CREEK TERRACE N.E. Dear Mr. Deblon: Based upon my conversations with you, I understand that the City will be hearing testimony regarding a proposed expansion of the Erkel residence and plans to construct a new garage within the CRP -2 Zoning District. It is my understanding that the structure is non -conforming and the expansion proposed is converting an existing attached garage into liveable space. The new garage may be allowed under your ordinance provided that it is elevated on fill or flood -proofed in accordance with the State Building Code to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE). From a flood plain standpoint, the existing attached garage may be expanded only if it can be protected to the RFPE, and does not increase the non -conformity of the structure (the City may have other specific concerns regarding the ex- pansion of a non -conforming structure). Since it seems unlikely that the existing attached garage could be elevated on fill, flood -proofing in accordance with the State Building Code is the only other apparent option available. The City's ordinance, state regulation, and federal regulation prohibit the granting of a variance to allow for a lesser degree of flood protection than the RFPE. Should the City grant such a variance, the re- sponsible course of action for this Department would be to pursue legal action against the City for non -enforcement of their ordinance, and recom- mendation to the federal government that the City be suspended from the National Flood Insurance Program. I outlined the above information to help provide guidance to the City and the applicant. The flood plain management act was adopted to reduce flood damage potential among other things. Allowing a use expansion unprotected is contrary to this goal. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER *.c,'.S MR. WILLIAM DEBLON February.l5, 1983 Page Two If you should have any questions pertaining to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. S cerely, David P. Leuthe, Area Hydrologist Metro Region Division of Waters DPL/ch cc: Tom Lutgen, LUMS IL IN _,� a �"7F '� �i � s �C�R� S`" �" +� 7t � �'�4� � `�k 1A� •'. ° v SL -- rte a r`r isNF C 401r, a .r• �. u� Rei',, �� � *. :R. r' t.'_a ... �' .gym � �; ` ��.a '� r c- � '� �• r ��+ ��}:�' �i� ,J� Y .,., ��j.. Yom': �, * .�'.•s-} ' Y r 200.00, all in Mock 2, Rice Creek Terrace Pla r 'VOL, County, Minn". ota . Subject to easements recon unrecorded. • )-7 IC 142 Ct�.� I.. it l 1-' ., jou t�'.i-,1 %�r/12� �,� ri:►t _ �'j � -• � � • 14`x•>,���►k•:� �.��v - ►a�.�• f..;;rL•�-• . MS P"=tea G a E y o l'o..vec� To IA* Vqt` 'pia► it 0 p l+E r finks = � t elm \ job V fhoi WIN 14 n Ar110 ...164 iw.rA:t L r.. M E M O R A N D U M February 17, 1983 MEMO TO: Mr. Kent E. Hill Economic Development Assistant MEMO FROM: Mr. David P. Newman Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Addition to Erkel Residence You have advised me that the Erkel residence is located in a CRP -2 District and its elevation is below the flood plain. You have also informed me that Ms. Erkel is seeking City approval to use the existing garage as a living space and to build a new garage. Assuming that the home complied with all zoning and building requirements at the time of its initial construction, it now constitutes a non -conforming use since it is below the flood plain. As a general rule, a non -conforming use may expand providing that the expansion and its use conforms with all ordinances. Ordinance No. 728 states that the City must issue a special use permit for a residence in a CRP -2 District unless the City can show that the proposed use is in violation with Section 205.1574(2)(A)(2), Section 205.1574(4) or Section 205.1575. Consequently, it would appear that if the owners wished to make a vertical addition to their home, they could, providing that this addition does not violate the above Sections and conforms with the balance of the Zoning and Building Code. If the owners make a vertical addition, the City should pay particular attention to Section 205.1574(4)(C). If it can be established that a vertical addition increases the danger to the home's residents in the case of flooding, then of course the special use permit should not be issued. The question of whether the existing garage can be converted into a dwelling area is more difficult to answer. Normally, a non -conforming use.can utilize all existing space and may alter their use providing that the intensity of the use does not significantly change. As an example, if the non -conformity in the present case was that of set -backs instead, then there is no doubt that the current garage t o Mr. Kent E. Hill -2- February 17, 1983 could be converted to living space providing that all other ordinances were complied with. However, our present concern is with flooding. It could be argued that by expanding the living area of the home, more people will be able to live in the home with the result that more people are exposed to the danger of flooding. It would be my opinion, however, that the homeowner is probably entitled to convert the garage into a living area, provided that the proposed addition meets all of the requirements other than that the dwelling is located within a flood plain. The next issue that is then raised is whether the owner may construct a new garage if he converts the existing one into a living area. The only fashion in which such a garage could be constructed would be if it complies with Ordinance No. 728. Constructing a new garage constitutes the expansion or enlargement of a non -conforming use. Such activity is prohibited by Section 205.1578(1) unless the new structure is flood -proofed. You also asked whether the City could grant a variance. Section 205.1577(5) provides that a variance may be granted only if the enforcement of the Ordinance would result in an undue hardship. It is up to the City to determine whether such a hardship exists. In summary, it is the opinion of this office that a vertical addition can be put on the home providing that the addition does not increase the danger to flooding. The homeowner may convert the existing garage to a living area but the new garage must be constructed in conformance with the Ordinance. Finally, a variance can only be granted if the City finds that.the enforcement of the Ordinance creates an undue hardship. CITY OF FRIDLEY ... ..�..va• any. �• n•,ne APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE .USIDEIiTIAL RATE TOTAL .toe Address Furnace Shell and Duct Mork, Burner (Also replacement furnace) $ 20.00 $ Department of buildings 6431 University Aso. N.C., rridley, NO S5432 City of Fridley Gas Piping $ 10.00 $ Tel. 8571-315o (piping needed with nay furwasel i Gas Range $ 10.00 $ The undersigned hereby waked application for a pewit for the work MreW specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the city Codes Gas Dryer $ 10.00 $ and rulings of the Capartment of buildings, and hereby declares that all the 00 — facts and representations stated in this application re true and correct. 11" a Air Conditioning (all sizes) $ 10.00 $ hq rridley, Minn. All Others/Repairs and Alterations arnaR�� 1• of Value of Appliance or Mork $ RIND Or BUILDING COBIERCIALIINDUSTRIAL USED As 1• of Value of Appliance or Mork $ 7o OR CONFLe a Asan � �! / Z— �-s aSTIRNM COST / �} 0 o State Surcharge $ .SO Fft J OLD - Ila) BUILDING PERMIT W. Pim1IT no. 20m $ Reinspection Fee ($1S.00) $ Rough Insp. DESCRIPTION or PURNACIVOURMER C04 v'q L or Date ORATING at pO11lsR PLUM, Stena, Net Motor, Maw Air- No. Final Inep. �� Trade Mase �/_ �L a sin. Do. C? • e capacity Z 'I1— T oyJ sq. rt. am STU NP Approval for Permit 7btal Connected load Rind of Publ DURNZA - Trade Maces Sire No. capacity sq. rt. EDR s7v Nr MINIIIUII FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $10.00 Company A O/ sN�i PWS $.SO STATE SURCHARGE Signed by Attach stack werifiation%fow with replacosent furnace peewits Tel. No. LT p ar- f _e•3 8 *Air Conditioner+ an not by placed in Kids- yard without written pe -mission frac adlnining ewegheor. 4� �41 C[TYOF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 August 29, 1986 Mr. C. Wade Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Information on Permit Application for Air Conditioning Installation at 567 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. by Neil Heating & Air Conditioning Co. Dear Mr. Savage: This letter is being written in response to your inquiry regarding the above matter. You contacted our office on July 22, 1986 asking for information on a permit application for an air conditioning installation at your home. You also inquired if Neil Heating & Air Conditioning Company was licensed with the City of Fridley to do work in the City. You were informed that this department had not received an application for installation of an air conditioner at your home, nor had we received a license application from Neil Heating & Air Conditioning Co. Mr. Neil Olson, President of Neil Heating & Air Conditioning Co., did apply for both a heating and gas service license with the City on July 28, 1986. We received the required Public Liability insurance certificate on August 21, 1986 and the licenses will go before the City Council on September 15, 1986. We did not receive a permit application for air conditioning installation for your address from Neil Heating & Air Conditioning Company. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions on this matter. Sincerely, WILLIAM H. SANDIN Plumbing/Heating Inspector WHS/mh City of Fridley CivicSight Map 69T VE PARCEL INFORMATION: PIN - 210026 4 V® Inco: Ownerr Info: Name 1 - SAVAGE C WADE & J DIANE Name 2- 1 p. 7 ® `i1J 5 Own erAddreas - 567 RICE CREEK TERR NE OwnerCSZ-FRIDLEY,MN55432 EEKT SRe Address - 567 RICE CREEK TER NE Legal Description: OUTLOT 2 HOLIDAY HILLS, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC MAP LEGEND: 1 566 586 581 CITY LI [1WATE,W R [1PARKS [1 ❑ PARCELS � 51 577 556 45 573 y S � �► v' 546 s �2 61 lt/ 536 561 S` i� 520 /� Reference Map 549 �/^� Map Scale: 1 inch = 136 feet to Map Date. 7/25/2008 Data Date: July 10, 2008 537 Sources: FRIDLEY GIS ANOKA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Disclaimer. Copyright O 2008 -Rivals Edge OIS, LLC. Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: John G. Flora, Public Works Director PW91-404 `Mark A. Winson, Asst Public Works Director FROM: Jon Thompson, Estimator & Construction Inspection DATE: December 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Potential Problems with the 1992 Spring Thaw When the snow melts this spring, several potential drainage problems could occur. Additional late snowfalls and the rate of snow melt will be the deciding factors. At 573 Rice Creek Terrace the floor elevation of 831.27 is 2.73 feet lower than the 500 year storm line elevation of 834.0 and approximately one foot higher than the 100 year line. —� At 567 Rice Creek Terrace the floor elevation of 830.47 is approximately 17 hundredths above the 100 year storm elevation. line. At 6801 Channel Road the floor slab is 0.2 feet higher than the 100 year flood line. In addition, the homes at 7899 and 7895 Broad Street are behind the Mississippi River dike, but will have to have the culvert on 79th sandbagged and pumped in order to keep water from backing up from the Mississippi River and flooding them. ASSESSMENT SA�c -1REEMENT tiiFN gssF ��R ssM _ -- FFM stir / FNS fol \wd d 18 CrP�k �'n9aes de S"�`�►ge ---- - oy�I99� the SPW TP crib F /Y1 ep l a,�Qh eapr°pe to the bya9ree a t s g1 12 the ° j �---- the vt%/ c'ty Of Frtopay�� 1. ?S yS eI °ck 2her°f th i � c e 'ty ty s a/ey ash '�� ' Ri abo� /e�yan yst007 ° to c°`e� $ g11.2s Ric innate share of t e to rise yin )iy gree to have the he 00 ss //e pr No 4t%/%ty ger th `nenta they °'oort% /property described Oe 1Y3 p systema a costo 9azastth "of a9�e natesh mportionate share of cube. rysseabytspro`%aef 11yjl propel to ha�eareOf iSection 2 of Ordinance h a a h 1958 eCo&n sect% °�`%nate escr%b� a �I of the City of Fridley on Of the c' f 2Of 0 %vie Of fa *Caep//? p y o f� trod,V11Nance soh/cga't •er�i%t yob e�y�C e/ SII /�/O. / OWNER'S SIGNATURE e 6 1120 OP, I°�N ehrtyI°wFgs 4,q When �,AP°h d S�GNgT q ;II sse O F / Fn t to tba �,e"S eo t e pr°pspd y/0the ty, bh�ry p4ht ' 9 c'93236 AGREEMENT SANITARY SEWER EJECTION PUMP SYSTEM INSTALLATION AND MAIN TENANCE THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _=day of o& 1992, between C. Wade Savage and J. Diane Savage, Husband and Wife, hereinafter referred to as "owners", fee owners of the below described property; and the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City". Lot 12, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 7 (Except Southeasterly 200 feet of said Lot 12, excepting from exception Southwesterly 15 feet and lot 13, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 7 (Except Southeasterly 200 feet of said Lot 13). All exceptions as measured along Northeasterly line of said Lot 13. WHEREAS, the residence was assessed the normal sanitary sewer costs and these assessments were paid. WHEREAS, any available sewer line does not provide for a normal gravity plumbing service and the owners request the City to correct the problem. THEREFORE, the City will install at no expense to the owners a Sanitary Ejection Pump System under the following conditions: 1. The owners provide the City with permission to enter the property and locate the most beneficial and economic location ( in the building or on the property) as determined by the City. 2. The owners provide all restoration and continued maintenance and repair of the City installed Sanitary Ejection Pump System and shall hold the City harmless of any liability or damages consequent upon, resulting from, growing I ut of, or in any manner connected with the Sanitary' Ejection Pump Installation. 3. The owners release the City of any future obligation regarding sewer hookup for the above property, that owners maintain all facilities out to the City sewer line and realize there will be no future cost to the City for this facility and service. FURTHER, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the parties hereto, their successors and assigns and all subsequent owners of the property herein described. An executed copy of this agreement shall be filed with Anoka County Recorder's Office and made a part of and be binding upon the above-described property. P IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have 'hereunto set their hand this day of ��rr- 1992. Fbis instrument draftezl by: �ity of Fridley 1431 University Avenue, N.E. Zridley, MN 55432 State of Minnesota ) )ss County of Anoka ) Owner C. Owner On this KV day of u s,r- , 1992, before me, a Notary Public within and for the County of Anoka and the State of Minnesota, personally appeared C. Wade Savage and J Diane Savage, husband and wife, to me known to be the same persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the ame as their free act and deed. c rc-LA CLYDE V. MORAVETZ Nota blic NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA AN KA COUNTY MyCOn Exp. Jan. 24, 1W4 r, woo...., !•� it • `a .. yo State of Minnesota ) County of Anoka } William J Nee, rayor City of Fridley William W. Burns, City Manager City of Fridley On this ��ay of 1992, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appear d William J. Nee and William W. Bums to be personally known,. who being each by me duly sworn they did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Fridley, the municipal corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said municipal corporation, and said William J. Nee and William W. Bums acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation. ..;3�u+(&{'�7fi^�a6 q�g'ffPY�p.•�+...i���J� �'' •'���� ;"i.�i✓}vi' FI,4oLIEf - �!!?didEsOTd Ry AMrp, COUNTY No ry ublic ' Py Caamm. Exp. Jul, 28,1997 OOIACRA B-11-92#093 $17.00 d CI YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 November 30, 1992 Mr. Edward A. Matthiesen, P.E. James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers 545 Indian Mound Wayzeta, Mn 55391 Subject: Low Water Entry Elevations Dear Mr. Matthiesen: PW92-207 The low water entry elevations for the properties listed in your November 19, 1992 letter have been checked against our existing data. The elevation for the Savage residence should be 830.47 and the elevation for the Flora residence should be 831.27. The elevation for the Lund residence was not available. We will survey this elevation in the near future and provide you with this information. If you have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, Scott B. Erickson, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director CRITOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (612) 571-3450 - FAX (612) 571-1287 LICENSE AGREEMENT The undersigned Wade Savage and Diane Savage , being the fee owners of certain property located in Fridley, Minnesota, at 567 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley MN 55432 , and legally described as: 14-30-24-21-0062 hereby grant to the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and that the City's employees, a license for the purpose of gaming access across the above-described property to a retaining wall and other structures adjacent to Rice Creek. This license is only for the purpose of allowing the aforementioned persons access for maintenance purposes. This license is intended to last ten (10) years from the date of its execution, and is not transferable or useable by any persons other than those designated herein. By accepting and using this license, licensee hereby agrees to repair any and all damage caused by the City or its employees while using this license on the above-described parcel. Signed: 9/a de, a,, Wade Savage At.� Diane Savage Subscribed and sworn to before me thisoday of � �.Cr , 199. MARY MARGARET SMITH ' NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA , . f ANOKA COUNTY :7. My Corrr..;i:m Expires Jan. 31, 2CCO SUBJECT RMIT NO. City of Fridley 27599 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r EIPT NO. _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. v PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. r NUMBER REV GATE 9-8-98 PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 910-F15 JOB ADDRESS 567 Rice Creek Terrace NE 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 12 & 13 2 Rice Creek Terrace Plat 7 SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE C. Wade Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace NE 55432571-3862 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Owner Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION 6 REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK ke-roof house and garage 38 squares), tear off 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Underlayment must comply with the State Building Code. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO'. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $3256 $1.16 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTA F E Li :@U $91.73 SIGNA�T�jURy�rPOFC NIRA TOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE, P OP A AT HIS I$!ERM q& � ^ • `� t �- 2 BLDG NSA F)ATE 17 SIGNATURE OF OWNER i IF OWN UILDERI IDATEI NEW [ ] ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ConstructionAddress: � 6 Legal Description: Effective 1/1/98 c' LSI LdL. sUv _�>,�.. Tel. # 577) — 5 g 2. Owner Name &Address: � � Contractor:,9 �� y- MN LICENSE # Address: S G P7 -t- Tel. # S o Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF EWPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: R -CIO P.Ir ` j Las,a_Y"a CIAJ rnelrx6r- l �'Sy"eauaareC 1 hf"_'fi® Construction Type: Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Estimated Cost: $ S (� (Fee Schedule dr2 Back) Ft $ DATE: 7 13'lq C APPLICANT: 0- C- & Tel. # ED— 586-2- Permit 86 2. Permit Fee Fire Surcharge State Surcharge SAC Charge License Surcharge Driveway Escrow Erosion Control Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL STIPULATIONS: CITY USE ONLY $ y '/. �S~ Fee Schedule on Reverse Side $ 3- J ,� .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $ / tl $.50/$1,000 Valuation $ $1000 per SAC Unit $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review $ Fee Determined by Engineering $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] $�' I' _�,/ 7 LIF CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (612) 571-3450 - FAX (612) 571-1287 Dear Property Owner: Effective January 1, 1992, Minnesota Statutes require that most residential building contractors, remodelers, roofers, and manufactured home installers be licensed by the state. Specialty contractors who perform only one special skill (e.g. concrete & masonry, excavation, carpentry, interior finishing) are exempt from state licensing. Contractors who generate less than $15,000 in gross annual receipts are also exempt from state licensing, but must obtain a certificate of exemption from the Minnesota Department of Commerce. The state license number of a residential building contractor must be placed on all building permits and permit applications issued by a city or county. A license number must also appear in a site plan review and all zoning permits. Cities and Counties are prohibited by state law from issuing permits to unlicensed contractors who are not exempt from licensing. In addition, it is a misdemeanor to perform contracting work without a license unless the contractor is exempt from licensing. State licensing is intended to ensure a minimum level of competency and to afford consumer, protection. To accomplish these goals, licensed contractors must pass a two-part examination relating to the construction trades as well as business administration and law. Licensed contractors are also required to take seven hours of approved continuing education each year and provide proof of liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance (if required by law) as well as business ownership documents to the state. Also, licensed contractors and remodelers must contribute to the Contractor's Recovery Fund. This Fund is intended to reimburse homeowners who obtain judgments of up to $50,000 against licensed contractors and are unable to collect on their judgments. Homeowners who use unlicensed contractors will forfeit their rights to access this Fund. Licensed roofers and manufactured home installers do not participate in the recovery fund, but instead are required to hold a surety bond in the amount of $5,000 and $2,500 respectively. Contractors are licensed and regulated by the Minnesota Department Commerce. To determine the licensing status of a particular contractor, call the Department's Licensing Division at (612) 296-6319 or 1-800-657-3978. Complaints against licensed contractors can be directed to the Department of Commerce, Enforcement Division at (612) 296- 2594 or 1-800-657-3602. The license number of a licensed contractor must appear in all advertising, business cards, lien notices and statements, contracts and proposals. FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: HOMEOWNER I understand that the State of Minnesota requires that all residential building contractors, remodelers and roofers obtain a state license unless they qualify for a specific exemption from the licensing requirements. By signing this document, I attest to the fact that I am building or improving this house myself. I hereby claim to be exempt from the state licensing requirements because I am not in the business of building on speculation or for resale and that the house for which I am applying for this permit, located at 511 R ice- Ct-te-j)- i uo �E is the first residential structure I have built or improved in the past twenty four (24) months. I also acknowledge that because I do not have a state license, I forfeit any mechanic's lien rights to which I may otherwise have been entitled under Minn. Stat. 514.01. Furthermore, I acknowledge that I may be hiring independent contractors to perform certain aspects of the construction or improvement of this house and I understand that some of these contractors may be required to be licensed by the State of Minnesota. I understand that unlicensed residential contracting, remodeling, and/or roofing activity is a misdemeanor under Minnesota law, and that I would forfeit my rights to reimbursement from the Contractor's Recovery Fund * in the event that any contractors I hire are unlicensed. C. � ,�L ",% P-.- Ak- Signature of Homeow r Date Licensed residential building contractors and remodelers are covered by the recovery fund. Ucensed residential roofers and manufactured home installers are not covered by the recovery fund but are required to hold a surety bond. To determine whether a particular contractor is required to be licensed, or to check on the licensing status of individual contractors, please call the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Enforcement Division, at (612) 296-2594, or toll-free at 1-800-657-3602. From: 612 822 5408 Page: 2/3 Date: 12151007 10:16:51 AM j tp cc'�� Iv .al �t ° I ,{' � a � d mm I"IHI�� r l7 � v�• � F, se a .� GG11 r � �j 5 w a nu 12 q � 14 � � 3 ' '1 � •d R AN } .�t � c p. q g 9 RAIN �5 AG �y^?c� W fail Kl � �.� From: 612 822 5408 Page: 212 Date: 1/2/2008 9:34:59 AM Building ]ECRANICAL ViiInspections Permit No.4mg RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION Received By763-572-3604 gpee� 20 CIIR Y OF FRII LEY DATE. S7 b / YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS SrM.. AT)DRF,SS '542 ik-e- C'P "'' -- / ic' j'i e� __ _.. • -- .. TIES APPLICANT IS: ❑ OWNER 9LONTRACTOR PROPERTY NAME: 630. A.e-r �v[} OWNER r c/ ADDR1iSS: 6 `l_ iC m� 1 "- ?A _ t TTY F -f 7 c'� 1 E v _STATFM- ZIP5S--q--V- TENANT r PHONE: 7Q 3 -5-71- 324 CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME: 14.1 f' c_ SUBMIT A COPY OF CONTAC f PERSON, e14 YOUR. SWE LiCENSL� WTTH STATE LICENSE 11 Q X 7 1 PA EXP DATE / (M JJ'''' A17DRL55:_.I,LI1a'Z1l '-+ra S -i 1'J GITY Z41 vtyt�.�.�btlo STATFMh'ZiP5C4 I APPLICATION PHONE qS. L- j 3/- 96 7'6 FAX Y . 1- 26 /Z7 PERMIT TYPE ZSINGLR FAMILY 0 TWO FAMILY 13 TOWNHOUSE TYPE OF WORK' Q NEW )X�,EPLAcmmn1 ❑ ALTERATION/RL•MODL••L DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WORK fj t'fYJIW. PER MS 1613.665 the permit fee is a minimum of S15.Q0 or 5% of the total cost up to $500,00, wbicllever is greater, for the iulprovcmcnt, installation or replacement of a residential fixture, excluding the fixtures. (This should reflect only the cost of labor) Labor coat under 5300 - $15.00. Labor cost between $300 to $500 = cost of Iabor x .05 = FOR PROJECTS WHERE LABOR EXCEEDS $500, FEES ARE BASED ON $10.00 PER. FIXTURL. I XCEFT WHERE NOTED. FIXTURES: (INDICATE TOTAL NUMBER OF EACH BELOW) Equipment Installed MFG: MODEL; SIZEIBTU MFG: MODEL: SIZESTU MFG; MODEL: SIZE/BTU _NC $25.00 LACE (GAS) 575.00 _,GAS RANGL/OVL'N $10-00 _AIR TO AIR EXCIM.NGEER $15 _FIREPLACE (WOOD) $35.00 _NEW GAS GRILL $10.00 --BOII.ER $35.00FURNACE $35.00 _GAS UNIT HTR $10.00 _CRIMNL'Y LINER $10.00 GAS DRYER $10.00 FOOL IIEATER $35.00 _DUCT WORK$10.00 GAS PIPING $10,00 _VENTILATOR$15.00 '1` { u Permit lice $ Number of fixtures @ $10.00 _ x $ 10.00 = $ Surcharge SSO Number of frrtures @ $15.00 — x $15.00 = S TOTAL DUE S Number of fixtllres O $25.00 � x $25.00 = $ Number of fixtures @,, $35.00 x $35.00 = $ �S State Surcllar Z5-.50 TIIIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT -NOT VALID UNTIL PROCIISSED I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete sad accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Fridley and with the Minnesota Construction Codes; that I understand this is not a permit but only an application for a permit and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case Iw ri icly rcquires review and approval of plans. 7 jJ�j SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT �10 PIUNTNAM : el City of Fridley Building Inspections Department 6431 University Avenue NE, Fridley, MN 55432 763-572-3604 FAX 763-502-4977