Loading...
VAR 10.73e Citi, of Fridley AT THE TOP DIV THE TWINS r a 9 m�- j L-- --� CORsRdVNliY OEVBl.SENT DIV. 1 i rR0T9CTIVC 0MVtCTOCN MPT, CITY HA41. FRIRI13Y (35Q$ �,.. JI�^fid®—iC SUDOECT APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS Wfi I 910-F23 RAY. pAT� 1 7 Pd6E 1 2 d1FT�F3Q1/Eb 0Y 800 Name�Ago� A17 GOZ Address .-- Phone �I Dpa � EEK le- 6. Legal Desc. Lot No. Blod No. Tract or Addition ' uta uewa Variance Requested (Attach plat or survey of property showing location of proposed building, etc., including adjoining properties and ownership within 200 feet of said property.) Si 1JAd C' 4i a X61. Meeting Date � ' n Al a / 9 z3 Pee Receipt No. Opinions and Recommendation p� by the Board of Appeals �L) Cu� o _ �> /> 1•y �J f1 r�J..� II-O.�Llt�� � �� �� �/1 ,� 1fJ ,,sP ����� J " For Above Recommendation f� Against Recommendations Y) i City Council Action and Date i0 -29- '73 oo-t o ATTR Fridley ;" - AT THE TOP OF; THE T�'Iia& f 9 b-------, G064WHITYDEVELOPMENT DIV, PROTEGTIV4 WVftCTt0N IJE'T, CITY HALL FRIPL(iV D902 Fj ¢9$-1300-3460 ��JEGT APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS (Staff Report) 10-F23 0 PATE 2/15/73 PAGE OF 2 2 APPROVED BY 800 Comments by administrative official denying original request for building permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative official. Appropriate Ordinances and sections of Ordinance to be cited.) Board members notified of meeting by 17, J List members,, date notified, and "Yes" or "No" for plans to attend hearing. .Name Date Plan to Attend cs��)c9 0 A/0 �s CL Jto Person making appeal and the f flowing property owners having property within 200 feet notified: Phone Notified B Name Date or Mail (Initial) -f7ga I /y r�^pll'o 06A - 9W Pan/ d M d ✓ lo -,n - s ® 0 ( (9o31 r/ d -v 814 I rC/� �XXL�I.J • ,s—/ e e e e t 0 OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley will meet in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, October 23, 1973 to consider the following matter: A request for a variance of Section 45.053, 4, B4, Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard requirement for an attached garage from 5 feet to 2 feet to allow the construction of a 6 foot addition onto an existing structure, located on Lot 8, Block 4, Brookview Terrace 3rd, the same being 810 Rice Creek Terrace N.E., Fridley, Minn. (Request by Carol Ann Guzy, 810 Rice Creek Terrace N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432) Anyone who desires to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. WILLIAM DRIGANS CHAIRMAN BOARD OF APPEALS THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1973 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Drigans at 7:38 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Drigans, Gabel, Plemel MEMBERS ABSENT:. Crowder, Wahlberg OTHERS PRESENT: Howard Mattson, Engineering Aide MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Gabel, to approve the minutes of the October 9, 1973 meeting as written. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried.. 1. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.053, 4, B4, FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FROM 5 FEET TO 2 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 6 FOOT ADDITION ONTO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, LOCATED ON LOT 8, BLOCK 4, BROOKVIEW TERRACE 3rd, THE SAME BEING 810 RICE CREEK TERRACE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY CAROL ANN GUZY, 810 RICE CREEK TERRACE N.E., FRIDLEY MINNESOTA.) MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Gabel, to waive reading the public hearing notice. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. Mrs. Guzy was present to present her request. She explained that she had bought her house about two years ago. She said she was a widow and didn't need a two car garage at the time, but that now she is getting married again and it will be a two car family. Mrs. Guzy also said that from the appearance of the side yard she maintained, plus an existing fence, it looked as if they had about 11 feet to the lot line. Upon having a survey done it was found that the existing wall line was only 8 feet from the lot line leaving only 2 feet of setback with a 6 foot addition. Mrs. Guzy said that her neighbor had no objection as long as the garage overhang was shortened and the rain spouts were redirected to the front and back. Chairman Drigans asked what the distance was between the two houses and Mrs. Guzy answered that it was about 20 or 21 feet. Mr. Plemel asked if the near end of the neighbors.house was garage area or living quarters and Mrs. Guzy answered that it was the neighbors bedroom. Chairman Drigans asked what size the addition would be and Mrs. Guzy answered it would be 6 feet wide by the depth of the garage. Mr. Plemel asked what the estimated cost of the addition.was going to be and Mrs. Guzy answered about $1,800.00. Mr. Plemel asked whether it would be worth the expense since they would probably not get the money back out of the property. Mrs. Guzy said that with so many people having 2 and 3 cars, she had been told that her house would be much more valuable. The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meetins of October 23, 1973 Page 2 The question was asked if there would be any fill used and Mrs. Guzy said that very little if any fill would be needed since they weren't going that far. The subject of the outside wall of the addition being a firewall was explained to Mrs. Guzy. She replied that she was sure the contractor would know what to do about that. MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Plemel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. MOTION by Gabel to recommend approval of the variance to Council with the following stipulations; That the outside wall of the addition be a firewall; That.the roof overhang be cut back so that it did not jut out past the lot line; and, That the drainage flow be redirected to the front and back rather than to the side. Seconded by Plemel. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Drigans adjourned the meeting at 8;00 P.M. Res ctfully submitted, 1 1;.0e JEiOWARD MATTSON Acting Secretary 175 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 29, 1973 PAGE 10 7860 Main St. N. E., Fridley. Seconded by Councilman Utter.. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carriedunanimously. MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of October 9, 1973. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 1973: A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.053, 4; B4, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE LKttK ItKKA,t N. t., tK1ULtY, MINNtSUTA): The City Engineer pointed out the variance request was to reduce the required 5 foot side yard setback to 2 feet and the Board had recommended approval with stipulations.' MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve the variance as recommended'by the Board of Appeals with the stipulations of the Board. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Utter to receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of October 23, 1973. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF OCTOBER 18, 1973: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITIONAL THIRD STORY TO CIRCULAR MOTION by -Councilman Breider to approve the request for an additional floor by Medtronics, Inc. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERI 'ION OF A REQUEST TO XONSTRUCT A NEW SPECULATIVE BUILDING LOCATED �., �n�rluc�217ii of u. w* nnn.3inu IIVJ nlunrvni iig N F C.'D TIII'CV MTAI AIC Cf1T� CCA - .The City Engineer said this was a request for a new structure on Main Street, and the Board had recommended approval of the request with stipulations. The City Engineer said.he would recommend an additional stipulation of the developer being -required to pave the alley or require the developer to petition the -City to do the paving of the alley. The City Engineer pointed out on a plan the access to building and said this would be the main access and it should be paved. Councilman Breider asked about the block to be used on the construction. The City Engineer advised the Council that basically, the same block -would be used as is used on the other structure. Councilman Breider asked if the plans would.call for a front loading area and the City Engineer said yes. He indicated this would be the only way the area could be developed. He said there is some screening, but all the buildings in the area did load from the front. MOTION by Councilman Breider to concur with the recommendation of the Building Standards Design Control Subcommittee and approve the request for the construction of a structure at 7860 Main St. N. E., with the stipulations as recommended, by the Committee and adding the sixth stipulation that the developer pave the S 174 REGULULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 29, 1973 PAGE 9 Mayor Liebl asked Mr. Kremer if he had showed the pictures of the proposed and alternative antenna to the Board of Appeals. Mr. Kremer said he did not. Mayor Leibl said the members of the Board had told him that Mr. Kremer planned on putting up a monstrosity of an antenna. He indicated the antenna would not cause any interference to the area property owners, in the technical standpoint. Councilman Breider voiced concern at the antenna being similar to the ladder which would be easily accessable to small children for climbing. Mr. Kremer said there would be mesh installed over the steel and this would be to the height of the eaves of his home and the antenna would be 22 inches and difficult for small children to shimmy. He said if any child could climb up the antenna, it would have to be a larger child and he would be able to jump down or call for help. Mr. Kremer indicated the protective measures would protect the small children. He said he is very aware of the small children in the area and he dial not think there was one tree they had not climbed. Councilman Breider said he would also like some determination on the safety of the antenna with respect to wind velocity and what was indicated in the applicants insurance for coverage of the area property. Mr. Kemer said the antenna had been tested to withstand wind up to 80 miles per hour and it would probably stand a greater force. He said this is the speed at which the tests are stopped. He said with the use of guide wires to the house, the antenna would be even more stable. Councilman Breider questioned Mr. Kremer if it would be possible for him to furnish the City proof that the structure would be insured against liability. Mr. Kremer asked if a letter from his insurance agent would satisfy this request. Councilman Breider indicated this would be appropriate. Councilman Breider said he would also like som assurance that the area children would not climb the antenna. MOTION by Councilman'Breider that the antenna be covered with mesh to make it impossible for -small children of the area to climb the antenna, and that Mr. Kremer furnish the City with a letter from his insurance agent as proof on insurance for liability and that the variance be granted to Mr. Kremer for the installation of the radio and television antenna. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.134, 6. PARAGRAPH 3, TO REDUCE THE IVISI I ULL LI\I MY PILI I! .) •, � � �� Mayor Liebl said it would be his recommendation to approve the request. Councilman nee asked if everyone on the street had been notified of -the request. The City Engineer said yes, the normal process had been followed. MOTION by Councilman Nee to grant the variance as requested by Fullerton Metals Company if there were no objections of the area businesses. Seconded by Councilman Utter. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.134, 3B, FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE M`DE_Y RD Sr7 BACK FROM 20 FEET TO ZERO FEET, SECTION 45.134, 4C, IU KtuUl:t It1t REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 24.5 FEET, AND, SECTION 45.135, 1E, PAKAURAPFr EDUCE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN PARKING R 0 IN ZERO FEET, ALL TOA THE CONSTRUCTION F A BUILDIRGO BE LOCATEDS 5, 6, AND 7, BLOCK 1, ONAWAY ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7860 MAIN STREET N. E., RIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY U.—W. HARSTAD COMPANY, I C., 7101 HIGHWAY 5, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA): MOTION by Counciman Breider to concur with the recommendations of the Board of Appeals and grant the variances as requested by D. W. Harstad Company for SEC. /4 50 lot C ONiT g31 gy/N �j •o "Al s9' 7o f f 9J BT S �P " B9..f a o Jp r•�s• CREEK , TERRACE 8o Bo Ba 80- 8e Be Be 69:5196 __ � e►� �� ,rn.�z ,g. 97 � , '710 �.?Q IM 1711® 0 Seo $1® S ® .��ra¢a3- d° 127 4 Bic ga... B� ' 90. Be. ao Bs a '..Ba �833 �79•j � 4 �Q ;. Z4- �f 007 •" 5 /7�d' i Te41 ■ T�N®®RA. B9°9I.3S`t•Y. ®RIV`C.. 891 . 6760 71 A6 7G 7i 76 7N 70 76oz 3a1, ?l0 op 1Jh14 ?Se ggl� r«*�- ,. Bf 76 f3%93 " 7 aZ pB. logy in 72 r1 ? 801 x 17 fB /. 2/ ZZ 23 Z¢ s 1 ar �a ` 5 ^Ice. (fp"h -rx*p...4cp- 9 'i.