The URL can be used to link to this page

PRE 2010 DOCSCity of _ Fridley, Minn. BiJILI)ING PERMIT Date:"".. Owner: Builder Address ___ _ _ __ _ Address N° 5'7'77 LO TION F BUILDING No. Street Part . Lot Lot _ _ .__ Block Addition or Sub -Division _` Corner Lot —__ _. _ _ _ Inside Lot _ _'"" Setback 4_2 'a Sideyard Sewer Elevation Foundation Elevation DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To. Used r` Front DepthHeight Sq. Ft. 1-Y1 Cu. FJ Front_ Depth _ Height _ Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft.k. Via - Type o Cons truction-'& �'' '- Est.I:k "'"� To be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with all provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. A In consideration of the payment of a fee of permit is hereby granted to to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that, the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon of any of the provisions of said ordinances. -..-n ,�!Vi,r Building Inspector NOTICE: This permit does not cover the construction, installation for wiring, plumbing, gas heating, sewer or water. Be sure to am the Building inspector for separate permits for these items. 4 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PST CITY OF FRIDiEY, MINNESOTA Owner's Nsme_.2 Builder CLEMRO , 11-4ce -ACTORS 2500 22.ud Ave. 1 - Address -Address -. dpo ls 18, , Ave. Eo LOCATION OF BUILDING No.. 2: ��rStreetPart of Lot Lot -.Block _ Addition or Subdivision— Corner Lot __,,,_Inside Lot //�� Setback = �i Side -Yard SMM ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Certificate of Survey of Lot and proposed building location. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be used as: 5q. rz. i 7 We 2,i. ont_ i .P De Hsi Sq. Ft. �` Cu. Ft. ti Type of Construction'/ __- Estimated Cos To be Completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all tie facts and representat stated in this applioation,s�e true and correct. DATE SIGNATURE (A Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side.) Ci 'Fridley City of Application for Plumbing and Gas Fitting Permit DepL of Bldgs. Phone SII 4-7470 DESCRIPTION OF WORK Number, Kind and Location of Fixtures Locals , c @ �� • PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL Number Fixtures ...................... x $1.50 $--&-, J e3 Future Fixture Opening ................ x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. Z o Z � � S 55QQ 2 63 *0°d $ 60 �O F N WATER HTR. GAS ELEC. Base f 1st 2nd 3rd 4th • Future Connection Openings I New Fixture, Old Openings Connected with Sewer Cesspool • PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL Number Fixtures ...................... x $1.50 $--&-, J e3 Future Fixture Opening ................ x 1.20 $ New Fixture Old Opening .............. x 1.00 $ Catch Basin ............................ x 3.25 $ Water Heater (Up to 200,000 BTU) ...... x 2.00 $ New Ground Run Old Bldg . ............ x 3.25 $ GAS FITTING FEES: 1st 3 Fixtures ......................... Additional Fixtures .................... Gas Range to 200,000 BTU .............. REPAIRS & ALTERATIONS—Refer to Code NO. RATE TOTAL 1— x $1.50 $ 1, X .50 $ x 2.00 $ City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fridley, Aflnn.'e / 19 Owner F.. 19— Kind of Building i� �7e Ae 19 Used as To be completed about Estimated Cost, $ Old—New. Building Permit No ,.,'`7 7 Signe d K,/ GC _ �'a�aeerr G � By e Business Phone No_ �%�2�� - •�/� Z Description.................................................$ TOTAL, FEE $ ' n �'i (� 11 POST IM -12-58 Q. Application for Power Pkmts and;: Ho�utg, Cooting, Ventikdon..Refric, meson and Air Conditioning Systems and Devices PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL, Furnace Shell & Duct Work .......................... 8.00 $ Replacement of Furnace 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 .................. 5.00 $— R epairs Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............... 2.50 $ NECK WARM AIR Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 120,000 BTU ............ 8.00 $ .each add. 60,000 BTU 2.00 $ Replacement of Furnace #.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 5.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 .............. 2.50 $ STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM • Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam....... 8.00 $ w. Furnace Shell & Line—to 640 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water ... 8.00 $ Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...................... 2.50 $ Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water .................. 2.50 $ OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour ........................ 5.00 $ over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule GAS BURNER (up to 400,000 BTU) ....................... 5.00 $ GAS FITTING FEES: NO RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures x $1.50 $ e� Additional Fixtures ................. x .50 $ Gas Range to 200,000 BTU ........... x 2.00 $ AIR CONDITIONING $ FAN HEATING SYSTEM See Fee Schedule VENTILATING SYSTEM $$��'�-- ALTERATIONS & REPAIRS TOTAL FF3E ROUGH FINAL Dept. of Bldgs. Phone SU. 4-7470 /1 . City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. �/ 6�f�`* "ey, Minn r / 19 Owner e - % `-'�vt Kind of Building Sy 4 Used as To be completed about vv F Estimated Cost, $ Old New Building Permit o. Permit No. DESCRIPTION QF WORK HEATING or POYER. PZ.ANTS—Ste Hot Wa , Warm Air o % Trade Name ��% Size No Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.ft- H.P. Total Connected Load A Kind of Fue BURNER — Trade Name Size No Capacity Sq. It. E.D.R_ BTU H.P. (REMARKS—OVER] Signed CATI N,G Cl MINNJAPOLIS 7, MINNESOTA 442 2M 7-59 Business Phone o k f -7 11167.4MW9 e HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS u' AUNNEAWIMM. MINN. Weatherstrips A.S. .V.E. Construction No. Insulation Guide Wi dows Doors Reference Out. Wall Rnr WaM Ceiling Roof Floor Kind How. Applied 4A—No 7�No 19— Fl.Room I Length �2 � Width Height F1.1 I f oom I Length Y Width Height ` Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft, Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. Btu Infiltration Infiltration �y - ` TO ® 9 Glass Glass Net exp. wall I q Int. wall Exp. wall Exp. wall j' acL ef. Btu Infiltration Net exp. wall Net exp. wall` k—e 5- 1P Glass / /000 Int. wall Int. wall Exp. wall C Net exp, wall Int. wall Ceiling / el Floor Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area FIT,7� , 9t'7• Room I Length /9-0 Width 's eight Windows and, Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. off pane of pane ligghts of crack sq. ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights ' of crack sq. ft. T Coef. Btu Infiltration" Coef. Btu Infiltration Infiltration �y - ` TO ® 9 Glass Glass Net exp. wall I q Int. wall Exp. wall Exp. wall j' acL Ceiling 5- y 1, I q C r-77-0 Net exp. wall Net exp. wall` Ceiling 43 y ,'atm' t t2 / /000 Int. wall Int. wall 0 5 Ceiling Zgr y /0 (1: �' s Floor s" Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area Fl. �" ® -r , Room I Length . Width Windows and' oors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. 2 Btu Infiltration / GlassAi --c Exp. wall P 0 adS x If Net exp. wall 16 _ 49 Int. wall Ceiling / ,.5 .r o 0 G4.g Floor Total Btu. 0" 100 Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area Windows and oors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq... ft. Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights ' of crack sq. ft. T Coef. Btu Infiltration" Coef. Btu Infiltration �y - ` £� $ : f 14 Glass Net exp. wall Int. wall Exp. wall j' acL Ceiling 5- y 1, Int. wall r-77-0 Floor Net exp. wall` Ceiling 43 y ,'atm' t t Floor Int. wall 0 5 Ceiling FloorRr s" / Total Btu. 21f Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area I F1 -1 f Room I Length r Width ` Height 1 Windows and Doors—Crackage and Area Width Height No. of Lineal ft. Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq... ft. Coef. Btu Infiltration" Infiltration Glass �y Glass ` Exp. wall ,„ --'K Exp. wall' Net exp. wall Int. wall I 6G Ceiling 5- y 1, Int. wall r-77-0 Floor Ceiling 43 y ,'atm' Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area I Fl. ,> 't Room I Length& X Width - Heittht 7r "� Windows and Doors-Crackage' and Area Width Height No. ofLineal ft: Area No. of pane of pane lights of crack sq. ft. Coef. Btu Infiltration �y Glass Exp. wall' Net exp. wall I 6G 6^ 6 fes" Int. wall Ceiling 43 y ,'atm' /-1 Floor 0 5 Total Btu. Required sq. ft. E.D.R. or sq. ins. W.A. Leader area City, of Fridley, Bibm. N? 829-6 BU11DING PERMIT ( Date: Owner: Builder Address Address LOCATION OF BUILDING NO. street Part Of 14t Lot J'CIL Block Addition or Sub -Division Corner Lot __ Inside Lot Setback Sideyard Sewer Elevation Foundation Elevation To be Used as: I DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING Front — Depth — height — Sq FL — Cu. Ft Front — Depth Height — Sq. Ft. — Cu. Ft Type of Construction Est. Cost --To be Completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with. 21 provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. In consideration of the payment of a fee of permit Is hereby granted to— to constmet,the building or addition as described above. This permit Is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom It is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work. done In, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Mitmesotang location, construction, alteration, maintenance repair and moving of buildings within the city limitshis permit may be revoked at any time upon ;idWtG2 of any of the Provisions of said ordinances. Building Inspector` NOTICE: M pw" don no cover the construction, InstallWan for wking, phnnhing, gas heating, nwer or water. Be acre to en the Building hopeftr for separate perwift for then Baum APPLICATION FOR I ING PFORMIT - CITY OF, FRIDL9Yt'M=SOTA OWNUI S MM David G. Canfield BUILDER Cobb Inc* ADDRESS 901 Rice 'Creek TerraceRESSP Box 2647,,, New Brighton- . sk LOCATION OF BI Ii No, 901 .Stte'e- t Rice Creek Terrace Part of Lot: Lot .10 Block', .1 Additiow br SubdIvibion B"rookview Terrace Corner Lot inside Lotk Side -Yard SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION El"AITON Applicant attach to thia.form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and.proposed'b"pip-,* ing location ftWn on, theseCattificates. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING I;* be used as: 26x 64 HomeDepth' Height 941., Ft. Cu. Ft. Garage �ont 20 22Depth - 1 Height _ S't CU. Ft. Rebuild horns a? 4615, des bi 0yed i* Type of Construction Tornado Estimated Cost $20 000.00 September 30,9 1965 The undersigned'herdby makes application for a permit for.the work herein specified, agreeing to do all Work ift strict accordance with the City of Fridley -Ordinances and rulings Of the DePartment"of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated inthisapplication are true and correct. ,jtSche*41e.of Fee Costs can be found on the WIMAlf WA M Side). FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTION ASSESSING SUBJECT: FIRE DAMAGED STRUCTURE FIRE HAS OCCURRED AT DATE: May 23, 1979 901 NE Rice Creek Terrace, Donald 0. Jacobson (ADDRESS) May 23, 1979 (DATE 5F FIRE (Stack should be bxaXKKX examined Ufoper installation. Electrical in area should also be checked.) W000 qS-Tiou% . FPB -6 f SUBJECT PERMIT NO. City of Fridley 15.2 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERM I r RECEIPT NO. • _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910-F15 TREv 5/29/79 JOB ADDRESS 901 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR: 10 1 Brookview Terrace 2nd SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE D. Jacobson 901 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Scott Construction 7415 Wayzata Boulevard, Mpl-q 546-4528 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION CXl REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK RU Fire Repair 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Call for inspection before starting to cover work SEPERATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WIRING, . HEATMG, PLUMBING AND SIGNS. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, Wood Frame VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $1,000 50 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT . DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- TR CTIO R THE PERFORMANCE OF 0PNSTRUCTION. yS•7e50 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE �t `_ lr $8.00 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE) _� WHEN PROPERLY V (DATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT ... aim d �-/ _JL CL- e SIGNATURE OF OWNER IIF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) BLDG INSP DAT f CITY OF FRIDLEY , APPLICATION FOR RE:SID1:NTIAL BUILDING PEIMITS • NEW., ALTERATIns.. ADDITIONS, OR REPAIRS) OWNER: C ,1113s o iZ r.UZLDER: Address: To I. No. No. a f Street: d/ LOT: - O BLOCK: Zi ADDITION: COWOM LOT: INSIDE LOT: SETBACK: SIDEXARDS: " Applicant attach to this form Tv.ro Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates. To Be Used As: DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING Front: Depth: . . Height: Square Feet: Cubic Feet: Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet*'Cubic Feet: /5F.4=�,49y - Estimated Cost: $ /_ d Gid Type of construction: /J ��Ni�� Q c- �'/� ��r-.-T-- To Be Completed: - 7 Alt. A Alit. B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired $ $ (SEE Y2EVERSE SIDE OF SHEET) Tlie.undersi.gned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. 'See reverse side for additional information. J� DATE: S-- 9 - 9 SIGNATURE: _ � ` -✓ Stipulations: twin city C stinq lU'� wov4ar ® CO 3On3t1Or1 r d 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ��,,��. j,, •4 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 ��•�� ENGINEERING CONSUffafdw sol RESIDENCE PROJECT: 901 RICE CREEK TERRACE April 30, 1986 REPORTEO TO:FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mr 8 Mrs Lynn Peterson 901 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1448 This report concerns our recent observations of basement floor slab distress at the Peterson Residence in Fridley, Minnesota. Cracking and subsidence, apparently related to soil settlement, has been observed in portions of the basement slab. We were authorized to observe the distress, perform appropriate testing, offer our opinion regarding the cause of the distress, and provide suggestions for remedial action. Our work was done in accordance with our proposal to you dated April 23, 1986. We visited the site on April 25, 1986, to perform our observations. We met with you at the site to discuss the history of distress. We were told that you recently purchased the single-family home. The house lies on a sloping lot with a walk -out lower level to the rear. You indicated the house was built in 1962. You indicated that you recently began a remodelling program in the basement. This included placement of new flooring. Upon removal of the old basement slab the surface, you encountered a concrete leveling course of variable thickness. In addition, certain portions of the slab were sloping down at a rate greater than might normally be expected. Subsequent to this, portions of the concrete floor slab were removed, exposing significant voids below the bottom of the slab, above the soil subgrade. Our observations indicated that the area of slab subsidence extends north and south through the approximate center of the basement area. The apparent western extent of the settlement and void zone is about 161 east of the west wall. The apparent eastern boundary of the problem area is about 341 east of the west wall. In the north and south direction, the problem area extends from the back or north wall southward into the furnace room and bathroom area. The problem area is rather easily Identifiable by the settled or sloping nature of the top surface of the silab, and the results of hammer soundings which identify hollow zones below the slab. AAA MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIANTA, TNM PUI}1t.... uC OURSSLVSS. ALL REPORTS ARM SUAMITTEO AS THE CONPICENTIAL PROPERTY OP CLIENTS. ANO AUTNORI- ZATMN PON PUSLICATION OP STATSMMNTA. CONCLU®IONO OR MZTRACTS PROM 014 REGARDING OUR IMPORTS IA RESERVED PMNOINO OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL April 23, 1986 s)Lynn Peterson errace 32 '3' tumn city es k corporation Dear Mr. and Mrs. Peterson: Subj: Proposal for Engineering Consultation Residential Floor Slab Distress Fridley, MN 0� 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 This letter is in response to your recent request for information con- cerning the consulting services our firm provides with respect to dis- tress of residential structures. We understand you recently purchased a single-family home in Fridley. The house is on a sloping lot, with a walkout lower level to the rear. The house was built in the early to mid -1960's. During recent remodeling activities, you discovered evidence which sug- gests that the lower floor slab had settled in the past and had been releveled with an additional concrete surfacing course. You also dis- covered a 7" or 8" air void below the slab at two locations where test holes were cut through the slab construction. A test pit has also been excavated outside the house to expose the footings. The footings ap- pear to be resting on competent soil, since no distress of the building superstructure has been detected. You have requested we provide you an engineering opinion regarding the cause of the slab distress, and recommendations for corrective pro- cedures you could implement. Our typical approach for problems of this type is to send an experi- enced civil engineer to visit the structure at a time convenient to you. The engineer will discuss the history of the distress with you, and observe the distressed areas and the test pits you have prepared. On the initial trip, the engineer will take some measurements and pho- tographs of the distressed areas. Plumb or possibly string line mea- surements may be obtained. Shallow hand auger borings will be extended into the fill exposed below the slab and the soils exposed in the bot- tom of the test pit outside the house. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER April 23, 1986 Proposal for Engineering Consultation Page Two Upon completion of the field work, we will prepare a written report for you. This report will present our opinions regarding the most prob- able causes of the distress, as well as recommendations for corrective action or additional investigative work, if it is necessary. Our work will be done on a unit price basis, in accordance with our current fee schedule. The unit rates applicable for the services dis- cussed above are as follows: Senior Engineer's Time Vehicle Mileage $65.00 per hour 0.32 per mile Based on the amount of work described above, we estimate the costs of a single trip to your home may be in the range of $300 to $400. This includes the reporting costs. Depending on the results of our initial trip to your home, it may become necessary to perform additional ex- ploration, testing or measurement work, beyond the scope discussed above, to fully evaluate the problem. After our initial trip, the need for any additional work will be discussed with you. We will not exceed the maximum estimated fee of $400 without your authorization. The terms under which our work will be performed are outlined on the attached entitled "General Conditions for Review of Distress". On work of this type, our company policy requires we receive a prepayment of at least $200. Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing the attached copy and returning it to us, together with a check for $200. Upon re- ceipt of the signed proposal and your prepayment check, we will have an engineer contact you and set up an appointment to visit your home. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact us. V uly yours, Thomas B. Flick, PE Coord:', TBF/dmh Encs. 4 Zri %R"tMb A:iD q{ 7,3 If �• �, ACCEPTED: tient Authorized Signature Typed Name Title Date IV LAIi 1tJIIIV1✓ tLUK1'UKAIILJN • • } GENERA, ONDITIONS FOR REVIEW OF DISTRESS SECTION 1: PROJECT INFORMATION SECTION 6: STANDARD OF CARE 1.1 Client will make available to TCT all known information re. garding existing and proposed requirements which affect the work to be performed. The information will include, but not be limited to, specifications, contracts, recommendations, plans and change orders. 1.2 Client will immediately transmit to TCT any new information which becomes available to it or its subcontractors, so that recommended actions can be reviewed. 1.3 Client will provide a representative to answer questions about the project when required by TCT upon 24 hours notice. 1.4 TCT will not be liable for any incorrect advice, judgement, or decision based on any inaccurate information furnished by Client, and Client will indemnify TCT against liability arising out of or contributed to by such information. SECTION 2: SAMPLES 2.1 TCT will retain representative samples for 30 days after submis- sion of TCT report. Upon request by Client, samples can be shipped, charges collect, to destination selected by Client; or TCT can store them for an agreed storage charge. SECTION 3: FEE PAYMENT 3.1 TCT will submit invoices to client monthly, and a final invoice upon completion of services. Invoices will show charges based on current TCT Fee Schedule or other agreed upon basis. A detailed separation of charges and backup data will be pro- vided at Client's request. 3.2 The Client will pay the balance stated on the invoice unless Client notifies TCT in writing of the particular item that is al- leged to be incorrect within fifteen (15) days from the invoice date. 3.3 Payment is due upon receipt of invoice and is past due thirty (30) days from invoice date. On past due accounts, Client will pay interest of 1.5% per month, or the maximum allowed by law. In the event of litigation, Client will pay TCT interest on all past due balances. 3.4 In the event Client fails to pay TCT within sixty (60) days follow- ing invoice date, TCT may consider the default a total breach of this agreement and all duties of TCT under this agreement terminated. SECTION 4: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 4.1 All documents prepared by TCT as instruments of services will remain the property of TCT. 4.2 Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which are not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose. 4.3 TCT will retain all pertinent records concerning services per- formed for a period of two (2) years after the report is sent; during that time, the records will be made available to the Client dur- ing TCT's normal business hours. SECTION 5: DISPUTES 5.1 Client will pay all reasonable litigation expenses or collection expenses including attorney fees that TCT incurs in collecting any delinquent amount Client owes under this Agreement. 5.2 If the Client institutes a suit against TCT which is dismissed or for which judgement is rendered for TCT, Client agrees to pay TCT for all costs of defense, including attorney fees, expert witness fees and court costs. 6-132 10/85 6.1 TCT will perform consistent with that level of carr and %kill or. dinarily exercised by members of the profession currently prac- ticing under similar conditions. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. 6.2 TCT will be responsible for its data, interpretations and recom- mendations, but will not be responsible for interpretation by others. SECTION 7: LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 7.1 Client will defend and hold harmless TCT and its employees from any claims or liability for damages to property, or personal injury or death arising out of the distress which is the subject of these services, or arising out of claims that the services per. formed caused or increased damages to the structure or property. 7.2 TCT's liability to the Client and all contractors and subcontrctors on the project, for damages due to professional negligence, negligence or breach of any other obligations to Client or others, will be limited to an amount not to exceed $50,000 or the TCT fee, whichever is greater. In the event Client does not wish to limit TCT's liability, TCT will waive this limitation on written notice from the Client received within 10 days after this agree- ment is fully executed or before the work is commenced, whichever is earlier, and Client will pay additional considera- tion equal to 10% of the total fee as a charge for a Waiver of Limitation on liability. This charge is not a charge for insurance but is an increase in consideration for the greater risk involved where work is performed with no limitation of liability. 7.3 Client will notify any contractor or subcontractor who performs work in connection with any work done by TCT of the limita- tion of liability for design defects, errors, omissions or profes- sional negligence, and to require as a condition precedent to their performing their work, a like indemnity and limitation of liability on their part as against TCT. In the event the Client fails to obtain a like limitation and indemnity, Client agrees to in- demnify TCT for any liability to any third party. SECTION 8: INSURANCE 8.1 TCT will carry workers compensation insurance and public liability and property damage insurance policies which TCT con- siders adequate. Certificates of insurance will be provided to Client upon request. Within the limits and conditions of the in- surance, TCT agrees to indemnify Client against any loss. TCT will not be responsible for liability beyond the limits and con- ditions of the insurance. TCT will not be responsible for any loss or liability arising from negligence by client or by other con- sultants employed by client. SECTION 9: TERMINATION 9.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice if there is substantial failure by the other party to perform. Termination will not be effective if substan. tial failure is remedied before expiration of the seven days. Upon termination, TCT will be paid for services, plus reasonable ter- mination expenses. 9.2 If the contract is terminated priouto completion of all reports contemplated by this Agreement, or suspended for more than three months, TCT may complete analyses and records as are necessary to complete its files and may also complete a report on the services performed. Termination or suspension expenses will include direct cost of completing analyses, records and reports. SECTION 10: ASSIGNS 10.1 Neither party may assign duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. twin city testinq corporation 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 6121645-3601 ENGINEERING CONSULTATION LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1448 April 30, 1986 2 We attempted hand auger borings and one compaction test at the two areas which had been opened up, exposing the soil below. The first such test location was 271 east and 121 south of the northwest corner of the basement. The void depth at this location appeared to be about 211. The slab thickness was between 311 and 411. It appeared that the slab had settled between 111-211, above the elevation of the top of the slab surface. The soils below any debris at the very surface of the subgrade consisted of very dry fine grained sands in a loose condition. Due to the dry nature of the sand material, we could not penetrate more than about 21 below bottom of slab. A compaction test, using the Sand Cone Method (ASTM:D1556) was attempted at this location at an elevation about 611 below the bottom of the slab. The test result, attached, indicated a compaction value of 91% of the Standard Proctor. For proper floor support, a compaction value of at least 95% is normally recommended. The other test pit location was 301 east of the west wall and just south of the back or north wall (walk -out wall). At this location, we observed that the edge of the slab was resting on the top of the concrete block foundation wall. The slab thickness was observed to be about 411 at this location. The underlying void was on the order of 611-811. Again, our hand auger borings suggested the presence of very loose, brown fine grained sands. At this location, the concrete topping or leveling course was the minimum thickness. The leveling course thickness gradually increased to the south. You had provided for us a narrow test pit on the outside of the north or rear walk -out foundation wall down to about top of footing elevation. This test pit was provided just a couple feet east of the test pit 12 inside the structure, or about 321-331 east of the west wall. At this location, the foundation blockwork was exposed and we could see no distress to the blockwork: It appeared that the top of footing was slightly deeper than ,necessary, about 4811 below the finished grade surface outside. Our hand auger borings indicated the presence of medium dense fine grained sands below the footing. Much of the lower level walls exposed on the back and west side of the house are concrete unit masonry. We could detect no distress to the masonry along the back wall. Along the west wall, a scratch coat (or stucco coat) has been applied to the outside face of the blockwork. At several locations, step cracking of the blockwork was noted, but the step cracking was judged to be rather minor, hairline to 1/1611 width. Based on measurements made with a carpenter's level, we documented that the walls particularly at and near the corners are virtually true and plumb. A. A MUTUAL PPOTECTION TO OLIENTY. TI -8 r. `+UROEL VER, ALL REPORTS ARE ®U®MITTEO AO TME CONFIOENTIAL PROPEPTV OF CLIENTS, ANO AUTMORI- RATION ROA PUM&WAT400 GF mTATEMENTG, aR ®MTRAC-: " EMM OR REGARDING OUR PEPORTP IS REiERVEO PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. a o, ye qPtuaan catertestinq corooratdon 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/6453601 ENGINEERING CONSULTATION LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1448 April 30, 1986 3 We made certain observations inside to check for possible settlement manifestations, particularly along the back wall. The back wall features a large picture window at first floor level which is a weak point in such a wall and would concentrate stresses at corners. However, very little distress was observed at either the basement, or first floor levels to exposed sheetrock surfaces. The cracking observed was typical of the sheetrock distress which commonly occurs to homes of this age, usually as a result of volume expansion and contraction of the framing to which the sheetrock is attached, a seasonal and yearly fluctuation. Based on our observations and other available information, we have no reason to believe that the foundation of the house is undergoing detrimental settlement. Available geological information indicates that the fine grained brown sands encountered both inside and outside the building are a common soil type for the area, and these soils are normally more than adequate to support house foundation loadings. Our hand auger borings and observations indicate that the fill soil type between the bottom of the rear wall footings and the top of the floor subgrade are similar fine grained sandy soils. We could detect no signs of detrimental soils (such as organic materials) in the test pit outside or in our hand auger borings on the inside of the basement. The fill soils below the. interior slab were found to be in a very loose condition# particularly near the surface. In our opinion, this is a relatively uncommon condition. Normally, some compactive effort is applied to densify either fill soils or loose natural soils, prior to concrete slab placement. Based on our observations- and the available information, it is our opinion that the most probable cause of the distress is gradual consolidation settlement of the very loose sands, which in turn was probably due to placement of the sands in an uncompacted manner. It may also be that the sands were placed in the winter time, in a frozen condition. After undergoing a volume reduction after thawing, the soils would occupy -less space. This could account for at least part of the void observed below the slab. A® A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, TW' ^LIC ANO OURSELVES, ALL REPORTO ARE OU/MITT`S AO THE CONPIOENTIAL PROPERTY OP CLIENTS, ANO AUTHORI- ZATION POR PUSLICATION OP STATEMON ' . -. :LUSIONE OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS to RESSRVEO PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. ® twin city testae 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 ENGINEERING CONSULTATION LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1448 April 30, 1986 3 We made certain observations inside to check for possible settlement manifestations, particularly along the back wall. The back wall features a large picture window at first floor level which is a weak point in such a wall and would concentrate stresses at corners. However, very little distress was observed at either the basement, or first floor levels to exposed sheetrock surfaces. The cracking observed was typical of the sheetrock distress which commonly occurs to homes of this age, usually as a result of volume expansion and contraction of the framing to which the sheetrock is attached, a seasonal and yearly fluctuation. Based on our observations and other available information, we have no reason to believe that the foundation of the house is undergoing detrimental settlement. Available geological information indicates that the fine grained brown sands encountered both inside and outside the building are a common soil type for the area, and these soils are normally more than adequate to support house foundation loadings. Our hand auger borings and 'observations indicate that the fill soil type between the bottom of the rear wall footings and the top of the floor subgrade are similar fine grained sandy soils. We could detect no signs of detrimental soils (such as organic materials) in the test pit outside or in our hand auger borings on the inside of the basement. The fill soils below the interior slab were found to be in a very loose condition, particularly near the surface. In our opinion, this is a relatively uncommon condition. Normally, some compactive effort is applied to densify either fill soils or loose natural soils, prior to concrete slab placement. Based on our observations- and the available information, it is our opinion that the most probable cause of the distress is gradual consolidation settlement of the very loose sands, which in turn was probably due to placement of the sands in an uncompacted manner. It may also be that the sands were placed in the winter time, in a frozen condition. After undergoing a volume reduction after thawing, the soils would occupy less space. This could account for at least part of the void observed below the slab. ASA MUTUAL PROT2CTIOIN TO CLI2NT0, TM0 PUSLIC AND OUR02LV2S, ALL R2PORT0 AAE SU8MITT20 A0 TH2 CONPIO26NTIAL PROP2ATY OP CLI2NT0, ANO AUTMOM— ZATW N POA PUOLICATION OP STAT0M2NT0, CONCLUSIONS OR ®%TRACTS FROM OR A2OAROINO OUR A0PORT0 IS 8400264 V20 PONOINO OU64 W.0TT2N APPROVAL. twin City testinq corporation r� 662 CROMWELL AVENUE d i1 b ST. PAUL, MN 55114 ,P PHONE 6121645.3601 ENGINEERING CONSULTATIO April 30, 1986 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1448 4 For a newer structure, where the fill soils below the slab have not been in - place for a long time, we might suggest as the best alternative intrusion grouting of the fill, to fill any voids or densify extremely loose layers below the slab. Using this method, a watery concrete slurry is pressure injected through holes in the floor slab or directly into the top of the subgrade. If the floor slab is intact, pressure injection through holes in the slab both fills the hollow areas and voids, and can also raise the floor back to level. Considering the cracked nature of much of this slab, it is unlikely the mud jacking technique would be practical in this case. In order to provide the remedial construction, we recommend the existing concrete floor be removed from all areas where a void is observed between the subgrade and the floor system. Considering the length of time which has occurred since construction, it is our judgement that the majority of the settlement of the inside fill soils has already occurred. Long-term settlement is normally associated only with deposits of swampy or very soft and wet clay soils, but not to granular soil deposits. In this subject case, therefore, it would probably be sufficient to surface densify the exposed sands after removal of the concrete slab. This preferably should be done with a "turtle - type" compactor and the very dry subgrade should first be watered down to about 8-10% moisture content in order to aid compaction. Additional compacted granular fill could then be placed up to design subgrade elevation, and a new slab cast. TWIN CITY T ING CORPORATION Leonard A Rasmussen, P.E. LAR/rjr AA A MUTUAL PAOTBCT10N TO CUENTS, -USLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUSMITTEO AO THE CONPIOENT/AL PROPERTY OP CLIENTS, ANO AUTNCRI- SATION POR PUSUCATIINV OP STATSMSNTG, 299tONS OR SXTRArTS PROM 001 RSOARDINe OUR REPORTS IS RESERVES WINDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Mann city testinq a " ® corPomtIo l 662 CROMWELL AVENUE k ST. PAUL, MN 55114 • i c,t` PHONE 6121645.3601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL RESIDENCE PROJECT: 901 RICE CREEK TERRACE DATE: April 25, 1986 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA COPIES TO: REPORTED TO: Mr & Mrs Lynn Peterson 901 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1448 TEST NUMBER: DATE TAKEN: UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: (Moisture -Density Sample Number) LOCATION: ELEVATION OF TEST : 1 4/24/86 Sand with silt, and a little gravel, mostly fine grained, brown (SP -SM) -1 271 E & 121 S of NW corner of basement FFG -12" DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 4" FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Density in Place by Sand -Cone Method, ASTM:D755&82 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 95 Moisture Content (%) 1.5 Plus #4 Material (%) 8 LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-78, Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density, (pcf) 104.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 14.2 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 91 Specified Compaction (%) 95 ATTENTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. These tests were performed by Len Rasmussen. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO 2ATION FOR PUBLICATION OF 60.225 (eros) PUBLIC, AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR Twin City To ng By. LTi PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTNORI- PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. LOontory, Inc. ♦ �. twin city testmnq ano er"neennQ uwcrntory,mc. 66. (110V*1LL AV( Wit �,,,,.,•o +• ST PAUL MN 55114 PHONE 617:6453601 MOISTURE -DENSITY CURVE s►Mputio. 1 PROJECT: RESIDENCE -901 RICE CREEK TERRACE DATE: April 25, 1986 REPORT® TO: Mr & Mrs Lynn Peterson COPIES TO: LABORATORY NO. 4131 86-1448 METHOD OF TEST: Standard (ASTM:D698-78), Method "A" TYPE OF MATERIAL: Sand with silt, mostly fine grained, brown (SP -SM) MAXIMUM DENSITY: 104.4 11b. /cu. ft. OPTIMUM MOISTURE 14.2 g4, 10E 10, G-232(2/84) .� �...i•..=r..: .{._... ..t� t�.,:»} .; ....tf.r t t 4._ _41-1-4-... .4 �...._i...:_ �:--;...:.. .j»f..�.»:•.Z...i,..e-.....:.. _t. «..;.� `...i..i ..� ..3...:.»��..j_� ...t .T,.i- •.:•»L. -i. • + i... .-+-}' '.i...L«"G•i ..:...r.. *.�i..•i-••='-•� 7 ,; T� Trl 4- w.�.Y•••i'..�r fM..-}.. _�..:...:...�-•t-.l..-!„'±'�.. ..�. ..:..�• .�y�. ff}IN.TT�... ♦••1••:_Z..i..:...�.t'•••• �...l,,.ti.. •...:...':_r.-_.1?♦..j. ...�. •.�..a..:....•..{.»t.. i- •...{......•j...T..�••.•-�.�... •:•_t•-�.Y'•'i'•.• { ..f•. O�,}"'b_y'„1 "*•'i-+-��4-t..i. -•rI ..}y...P��Y.. .. '•..j'rf...j•_,}jam: .Ii...�h•}•1 .•I-....{._ ..:-•{'..1..}..i,•.�-{._....j.., »T..........�..r.. -T i ...1..1-.�.»�..�__.1»{ I. ...4.....i.. 4..�.......L..{.... i ._ :..M•�-..• { ! t{...ii_1• .y... 41 ..� .:...}..jam.}..•'.»''�.. ...t ..i..�_...- �.• •...i.-. '...i..i....:.»..i•.;.. `... y ...f..f +—�•1•.-t { ` T.' ..«.}. `..i,..i.j-....... .,.."'.}'.-r'j—t-�•.._ . ..j..T..' •� .i . .. »r-�..}. ...{...l...e- ..?...�.. .e•»�t.•.i_.a. i .. o ..{.. i»i....: ` r .i.,�-.i r , 471 = .7-T..*,•.1,. T -1. ..i.. i.�,.�.-•..«.a,.l.•.E...*. •. :...�...J...e».«..•-:•..Z.w- •...i...�. _ ...{_.•. t i .�..'.. 1 TT 11 r,`•r :t : i + • •YET"} : 1 t .7-177 p_•.'«.�.�.P"•-*"'}.:.. _�-.}..r.i.�.i..-i•-{.. .-.i�..�.{» �.�..� .*..1_!•.j--:..,=r...�°.� 'e-'+•'.�.4...�.�..i. ..�-•L•rt•••i»•!.' � ...i, •.i..«T.«-._. • _ • t -rT"' •r.. f • ` }} { 7 1 7 t :+ ! j { f_ } i i ; .y :i -.f»�»•1r••i. . : . _ �.T•.i»i...}w..}..L. .w•..�..� •..�•. y...i.. « •!••-r i ..i--. •r_�...;. •.»:.•.e-T+•� �•• ±�£�..i-. •.�.•if�•= •T.��w• •j +••r•{••i.-�r••'.:..�-i•. - i �L .�..i.y .,....1...�...:.. ...��.-1-•••3�-.•�-� �••' f 'r'.!_r+-•'• .'t i-TTT^-_( �' ..:.-}..f•w.� .4 .. .e.-..-•-.». ..•.}..L.: '...i..i••i-•.}•.. �.. i...;... .T...t...:._j....:...1•-t•.�......;.�..:...;--•-'s......: t. r..•...,�...L.►. fflj_L. M'!-.•_.I.—�+�' ,:..' }..`-.�{'-••t•.i�• ......F,,, _T ;'••i••7 -}„j.. � ,•r j.w..r.i .....:.�,_ ..}..},..:.�_;..�•,.� ' s....•i•_i•_�...{j.�' .Z. .i...• -•i.{...E,.}..4 »� j.ti...F••��»i •�•• t-:...:...}.-1... ... r. t...i.}..1..1-!_�-.��. ..�l}.-w••+♦}.•.••{¢}»j{j... -�. .1••y_�!••• ! •�..•�• � �._.� j � .1•...... __-� t•,.e { r'T ..j...�..r�...j.»,�x T �T,y,.�i..:••T .. .Y _•...l..N..=,..�:••.{..-♦--� ?•.,t...j.�..�...�..l..i-.•.. ..:-y,_-»:..;.A..p.•.1�....:....}._:...1,..:.»�•..y«.i-.y. ..}.}..-i_l...L..i�• T.. »{...t..}_r••�.«i.•i••T'•t � t 1 •»f_•i-r+• •{•-!_!moi...... i ..i••.{..y'_�.»Z.-f�...�.. '_.�.•:••.�jT.j....:...1..�_} .:. _L•y}..l..l.•.I..y..T.. Iii ..•;.. y.r«�•.�•'.-j».•,. %}'.. I .�_•.•a• • t :•.._, ..0. .:•�...:..�T.•'.'.. •(� •.•:•�•«L•.M••L•:•Y.•.L•.M. .w.:,«! .•...�••.�•T..'.. ..•..{._L• '...r }..4«I ..�.•1..�...�.. �,.L»:_•!-T.. K-H..F•w•.{».�.t... ♦...�... ..'_..r.'i» ;-�..�I- �..; .• ' �•T'_ {'_�'i•..:...It_�1^,1 1 • :...�•i-1...r f ti.T•M•�•L..�.•._...}y_. —�' T' ' •y �. .y'..y..�. � i:•••r0..1..�.. . ...�...�p.i..,••T_i•.�».L �._1-..j...4.. �...1... ;..'�L...;[« �.. ...i.•N»fir..` .,{._1.T—�., j.!_T. i •—•j♦.»i _•J��•..l..r ' t..�..•:.••�•�•. i• i : : i ..t...•..7.. .•»••_.•-....�.. .3•..�..• "•, .}.,H1 i t"'!" T..�. ..L: -'}_s. '..•i•.r �.. --':••j•.r•}^'{'— ..:».�.-F. e..:. ti.�*..•_♦..•..i _C.«Z.. = •?�.•-_•e•• _ _ •i..,F..f..t..e . E_M..'...: • .»� .}.}w:.•.L:..•{• ti• _ : -j_.•,.•..'.. •»w4...:... y...�••i- ',•"�'y ,T f i .' ..: { i � t•. .�..r. - t N-} _�• 'ri .. { : i •• : »e•+-•:-•e•»i..7.«i..--: H.T..i..�.�..�.-♦-."!„'!_'!'_?'�'_:...{....•....j_. �. .. ..:�h.. .rhi.•�,..i ..l. s ..t._:..�...i... I c-.' { .. _.�» _{ { .+..;.. ..i...j.i. .. jam:.. • t s . 12 13 14 15 16 17 MOISTURE CONTENT Twin City T ng a al En e eering Laboratory, Inc. By "CO3 twin cit%o testing d•,�o,.� ,� , corporation a LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 This report concerns our most recent observation and review of foundation wall distress and basement seepage at your house. We had previously observed and reviewed a floor subsidence problem at the house and documented our findings in our report, dated April 30, 1986 (4131 86- 1448). At your request, we recently again visited your residence to observe or discuss other manifestations of potential problems with the structure. SITE OBSERVATIONS Our most recent visit to your house was on June 28, 1986. Interior walls and various wall coverings such as sheetrock had been removed from the subject area of the basement since the time of our last visit. You indicated that, after removal of sheetrock and other wall covering from the central portion of the front or south basement wall, .you observed the blockwork was severely cracked. Your probing below the footings suggested to you that the footing bearing soils may be unusually loose. You had also dug a test pit outside, along the distressed wall, exposing both wall and footing over a length of about 101. In the way of additional background information, you then indicated to us that the house superstructure had undergone damage years ago (during previous ownership), as a result of a tornado, and that at that time the superstructure had undergone twisting or torsional action and had been replaced. The foundation wall, however, had not been replaced as a result of that damage. Our observations confirmed the presence of wide step cracking in the central portion of the front foundation wall. An old patched joint was observed in the bed joint between the lower block course and the course above. Additionally, the upper course of block was displaced inward by a fraction of an inch, with respect to the above wall section. At higher elevations on the wall, similar but more minor relative inward movement of adjacent cracked block units was noted. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CUENTS, TME PUBLIC ANO OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE /UUMITTUO AS TMS CONPICENTIAL PROPERTY OP CUENTS, AND ^LrrwmI- EATWN POR PLEtUCAT10N OP STATEMENTED CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS PROM OA RESAROINB OUR REPORTS IB RESERVED PENOINS OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL 662 CROMWELL AVENUE 3 c� ST. PAUL, MN 55114 °$ ENGINEERING CONSUEUffbia5-3601 EXISTING RESIDENCE PROJECT: 901 RICE CREEK TERRACE July 1, 1986 FRIDLEY, REPORTED TOsMr 8 Mrs MINNESOTA Lynn Peterson 901 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 This report concerns our most recent observation and review of foundation wall distress and basement seepage at your house. We had previously observed and reviewed a floor subsidence problem at the house and documented our findings in our report, dated April 30, 1986 (4131 86- 1448). At your request, we recently again visited your residence to observe or discuss other manifestations of potential problems with the structure. SITE OBSERVATIONS Our most recent visit to your house was on June 28, 1986. Interior walls and various wall coverings such as sheetrock had been removed from the subject area of the basement since the time of our last visit. You indicated that, after removal of sheetrock and other wall covering from the central portion of the front or south basement wall, .you observed the blockwork was severely cracked. Your probing below the footings suggested to you that the footing bearing soils may be unusually loose. You had also dug a test pit outside, along the distressed wall, exposing both wall and footing over a length of about 101. In the way of additional background information, you then indicated to us that the house superstructure had undergone damage years ago (during previous ownership), as a result of a tornado, and that at that time the superstructure had undergone twisting or torsional action and had been replaced. The foundation wall, however, had not been replaced as a result of that damage. Our observations confirmed the presence of wide step cracking in the central portion of the front foundation wall. An old patched joint was observed in the bed joint between the lower block course and the course above. Additionally, the upper course of block was displaced inward by a fraction of an inch, with respect to the above wall section. At higher elevations on the wall, similar but more minor relative inward movement of adjacent cracked block units was noted. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CUENTS, TME PUBLIC ANO OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE /UUMITTUO AS TMS CONPICENTIAL PROPERTY OP CUENTS, AND ^LrrwmI- EATWN POR PLEtUCAT10N OP STATEMENTED CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS PROM OA RESAROINB OUR REPORTS IB RESERVED PENOINS OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL twin city testinq corporation a* 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 ENGINEERING CONSULTATION July 1, 1986 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 2 We put a hand auger boring down into the footing subgrade soils directly below the window, within the distress zone described above. The boring was extended to a depth of 61. Granular fill was encountered throughout the boring. The fill was mostly dark brown silty sand in a moist and loose condition. The soil seemed unusually loose (i.e., not well compacted) in the 18"-24" zone immediately beneath the footing. You also pointed out that the front stoop, which is located just east of the problem area, had undergone noticeable displacement away from the foundation wall. Our observations and measurements indicated approximate outward movement of 1.7" and settlement of possibly 1", values which are somewhat excessive. It is not unusual to see some lateral and downward movement of such a stoop. when supported by loose backfill but we would not anticipate these magnitudes of movement. During a recent very severe rainstorm, you indicated that minor seepage occurred through the west side wall and inquired as to the proper remedial action. The west side yard slopes down to the rear or north to accommodate the walkout configuration. There is no roof save along this wall since the roof gable runs east to west. However, the lawn grade adjacent to the wall could be characterized as neutral to negative and does not promote positive drainage away from the wall. It appears the distress to the floor and front foundation wall is related to a narrow, north to south extending uncontrolled fill system. It appears that this may also be affecting the front stoop construction. This fill system was probably in-place at the time of construction and was not corrected at that time (by removal and replacement with compacted fill). As the native sand soils were used as fill, there may have been no simple way for the excavator to determine 'that a problem existed to the extent that soil improvement was required. Due to the age of the structure, it is likely that most of the detrimental settlement related to the uncompacted fill system has occurred. In this case, it is possible that the wall was originally cracked due to consolidation settlement but that the cracking worsened as a result of (1) exertion of excess lateral pressures due to wet backfill soils against the wall or (2) lateral or twisting forces exerted during the tornado. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO OUENTS, THE PUSUC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE EUSMITTEO AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OP CUSNTE, AND AUTNORI- iATiON POR PWLICATION OP STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REOAROINO OUR REPORTS 10 RESERVEO PENDINO OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. twin city testinq a ;'•"�., corporation 662 CROMWELL AVENUE y,ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE ENGINEERING CONSUL TATION6453601 July 1, 1986 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 3 We understand that another party has suggested that remedial action under the front foundation wall should include intrusion grouting of the relatively loose sand soils. This involves pumping grout through pipes inserted into the .loose soils. Ideally, the result of the compaction grouting process is densification and strengthening of the foundation soils. A reputable intrusion grouting contractor should be permitted to review the available information in order to determine the feasibility and cost of such a scheme in this particular case. As indicated to you at the time of our site visit, we believe that a less costly but perhaps equally effective correction would be to underpin the footing to a depth of about 21 below the existing footing. This involves manual excavation of the very loose sand soils and should extend laterally at least. 6" on either side of the existing footing, thus creating a new footing about 11 wider than the old member. This underpinning normally is done only below the area where distress is visible to the wall. To prevent further damage to the wall during construction, the underpin pockets are normally limited to lengths of about 41-51. The new concrete must be placed such that continuous contact with the old footing above is assured, after curing and drying shrinkage of the concrete is completed. After either underpinning or intrusion grouting, the wall should be repaired. Your contractor has proposed to not only repoint the wall joints that have cracked but also provide internal reinforcing by inserting vertical reinforcing bars into the block cells and then refilling the cells with grout. This would be beneficial in that it would offer better resistance to lateral earth pressures which can develop during unusually wet weather or sometimes during severe winters fin frost zone due to ice lens formation and expansion). For your information, we are attaching a sheet which indicates recommended detailing of internal reinforcement systems for a wall such as yours. As previously indicated, your surface grades along the west wall are marginal with respect to potential basement seepage considerations. We would strongly suggest raising the grades along the walls such that the surface falls 4" to 6" In the first 8 1 to 101 away from the house. As discussed with you, some improvement along the front wall would be desired as well, especially adjacent to the southwest corner. TWIN CITY T NG CORPORATION Leonard A Rasmussen, P.E. LAR/ rjr AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUSLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL AEPORTS ARE SUSMITTEO AE TME CONFIDENTIAL PAOPEATV OF CUENTS, ANO AUTMOAI- ZATION POA PUSUCATMXII OF STATEMENTSI CONOLUMONS OR EXTRACTS PROM OR AEOAAOINO OUP REPORTS IS RESERVE® PENOWO OUR VVMrMN APPROVAL FIRsc p flood o tuuin city testing corporation ONE STORY 1Nb�aD FIZAM f- ME SAND bACkFILL CLW-%T4a 107#PA55 ;,Leo ZOO SIEVE) F -V. VATUES .'J --eels IN C PAMT WALL PLAN o , ru. EEK. - u.b. C. bid .7.4.4 &TADS N IMoRTA2 TVP& M em 5 TAr`:C - - -;� ` ••, �• • %4—A V Ia1R.�1k► nti�� av TYPICAL WALL SELi1DN A -A N RECOtMMENDEDREINFORCI" ANGIO►? (;o>•=/SPACINA A,8.4 EMSP. $' *-"7 is 52" OR* 504S' 1' X0032' OR.e 7048 1'4)OS=G' 5 -G" s/g" 44" 5'4L 4 &32'' oR s 5048"4- Z! -a, 0L Ps l04•` Z" 4r • i g�o,4�� r �� DIAHETEO& REIIJFPICC.ING BAR. sTaCEo 4S" oa GE.•1TErC • SAM VIA"9.rr. to yg IN US *4s'� A � I A sty+ IM � i � � i�...�-�... � � i �♦� � � � I � L '� �L'�vrlcAt. cot.uM� � I I ZTYPICAL ToOrSOM. • I I .DETJt�r.rE 51LE 1 �PAGN•Y+OF �EI��u�wgE�,Ti • trzoM TI►� aeo�E. I • I A TYP 1 CALL t:L00It FOU UDATI 00 PLAN_. JOE N0. KALE: h10►. S DPAIM gv CNECR[o mr�SQ 0 0...... July 30, 1986 WR 2 El "M EA =__ On January 31, 1986, we closed on a home at 901 Rice Creek Terrace, Fridley, Minnesota 55432. The listing price was $89,900.00 and our offer of $87,000.00 was accepted. Enclosed is a copy of the Statement of Condition that we were furnished by Coldwell Banker. We were concerned about whether or not this property had been damaged during a severe tornado in 1965, since this property was in the immediate area of damage. We were told by a Coldwell Banker agent, Bob Lorence, who had sold our home for us, that it hadn't and referred to the Statement of Condition. After a week in our new home our neighbor offered to show us pictures of our home "when it was destroyed by the tornado". The house had been,so badly damaged that the first level of the walk -out home had to be rebuilt. This was a situation I wanted to particularly avoid because I am familiar with the extensive damage and chaos as inspectors were over- worked and people were throwing homes back together as quickly as possible. I did not trust building that took place then and I feel that was my privilege in getting a truthful answer. After seeing,,tho photos, I discovered that both thepprevious „ ;owner and toe oldwell, Banker listing 'ageht, Dave Ryan, were � Daiwa' a o£ tl�i�sl '� ru � iQnand,,Ihave' admitted this to its' and oth; compa��nyj,re;resentat�iveL. On April 12,11,9$6, while repla6ing carpeting and linoleum,in the walkout k'itchen',we discovered that the floor had sunk j and the previous owner had leveled it out with 20 bags of "sacrete". The settling undeir''the slab ran from 2-8inohes covering 800 square'feet, an;d'must be hammered out and replaced. in the process of hammering out the slab, we also found that the footings had slipped on the block wall and the support beam was sagging. The estimate for repairs are $29,500.00 There are no kitchen facilities in the home at present, and my wife lost her licensed day care business due to this sit- uation. Page 2 Coldwell Banker has said they have no responsibility and have offered and/or done nothing to help us. The agents also acknowledge that when I ask them about the slope of the walk -out level floor, they said it was because the "floor sloped toward the drain". In reality it was the settling. If the agent had disclosed what he knew about the tornado damage, I would not be in this mess as I would not have bought the house! However, they have said the agent was under no obligation to inform me of this. We have also found other items on the Statement of Conditions to be false and fraudulent. We are continuing to make payments of $1,400.00 per month on a house that is uninhabitable, and another home for our family to live in at this time is out of the question financially. Any help would be appreciated. Sincerely, Lynn. Peterson 901 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 612-572-9019 ep.p rw V M4 r.1u[w tl ruoro. SELLERS) STATEMENT OR CONDITION qyW I- /iMISI141.+RIf Ne the e t Seller(s) of the property describedbelow. completed hicompletel and statement ectiveBuye(s) of property regarding the condition ofe poperty.I agree that his form may be furnished toany Buyer(s) or pro. active Buyer(s) of the property.C� ^ ` operty Address: k ► e Date of Purchase: ( Period of Occugency: ®v� ollows (state what happened The property as ne been destroyed or damaged by fire, flood, w other cause, except as w 4 � id when): ISIS w Age of Roof:4,�QA r, Condition:�� I/We have not experienced water ' asemenZ, c sy knowledge that such a problem existed prior to my(ou o or through the foundation wF°" Of f VOG hW rQ ) hitt=e property, except as follows, p' I/We have not experienced water seepage through the roof of the premises, or damage to the roof or the interior of the premilses frorn e build-up, nor do I/we have any knowledge that such a problem existed prior to my(our) ownership of the property, except as follows: I/1Wo have not. experienced any problems with any of the structural elements of the home located on the pr errtty,, not do I/we have AMC sy knowledge that any such problems existed prior to mylour) uners o p o t a property, except as follows: I/We have not experienced any problems of any nature with the utility systems (electrical, lumbin Jaeating, ventilating or air con• tioning) serving the property during the period I/we have owned the property. Mydo 1/we he wledge that any probl ms wi h ,e utility systemp existed prior to my/(our) ownership of the property, exert as follows: N .1 ` `_�1 /f w 1®'Dl� ie _• – .li..r.,..9•a To the best of mylour), ;ses, except as follows: GINNERIP "M none of the trees on the property are of cted with Oak Leat Wilt, Hutch Elm Disease, or similar dis• All the buildings and improvements on the property aro located entirely within the boundary lines'of the property, except as follows: , There are no Buildings, fences, driveways or, other improvements. constructed or installed by adjoining land owners, which encroach son the property, except as foilowli: The Insulation Installed In the property does not contain on, company installing and location. If unknown, so state.)_. formaldehyde, except as follows: (if so, state the date of installa- The following are in working order and shall be at time of closing union otherwise stated In comments glow: (Delete all items not cluded in the sale of the property.) YES Igo YES No RangeST 13GP lG.-*' ❑ r— ❑ [3Oven 0 � Hood � O Water Softener AIF F1111-181" Dishwasherlectmnle Central Heating System V ❑ Garage Door Opstner ❑ L3 Ventilating Fens/f=ixtures r W;J#" , Air Conditioners ❑ 0 t Ll _Surop.psamp_. Plumbing System 0 ❑ � O Electrical System & Wiring L3 Water System [J C3Garbage Hot Water Heaterls� Elelf-^ !"s'�r C7 ❑ ❑ Disposal onlments: �! 1e� - �.nl' war.. � e •.�.��/ ---- ,�— ate: BUYER (S) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned Buyer(s) do hereby acknowledge receipt of the foregoing Disclosure Statement of Condition and further state that o representations regarding the condition of he property, other than as set forth above, have been made. except as follows: ate (Buyer ) (Buyer) 'V84) CLOSING DEPT. N?54880 Building Job Repan ADDRESS OWNER BSJILDEFt ^ r' T , • t DATE v PERMI7 NO. DESCRI ONPQ�� INSPECTION RECORD DATE REPORT y Building J®b tGIIViV 19C�.vnv N Building Job Report ADDRESS �)- tu,gr sPvc.r Ic 82523 OWNER BUILDER DATE /�--�f v PERMIT NO DESCRIPTIONS-/ INSPECTION RECORD A• Building Job Report ADDRESS BUILDER DATE ,�,,, - �� PERMIT NO DESCRIP ' d if •� ` i INSPECTION RECORD DATE REPORT OWNER - REP INSPECTOR DATE REPORT ..S��(j V uuJti�... �,1 A� R� w►ou¢� L,U IUO&ru L., erck A43oL•r Ea? 666 Rte' LAJV�r(.. - `�- -- r.Ci� � �.� M.pVL 4. GQ- Hlocas � 3L)a, f Q nxjk CJR C iL � \ �� ul iti `�► i SPUT 0395 !�-� LA A�f (j¢a4 CoosC CVL 'P+. o � Z Z 11 3 Fr. C -r -02 c, s it OWNER - REP INSPECTOR �.,,�► �e /�-Oozy C' Building Job Report ADDRESS BUILDER DATE ,�,,, - �� PERMIT NO DESCRIP ' d if •� ` i INSPECTION RECORD DATE REPORT OWNER - REP INSPECTOR MEMS M: File MEN.CJ FROM: Darrel Clark, Chief Building Official NM DATE: August 8, 1986 REGARDING: 901 Rice Creek Terrace N. E. On April 14, 1986, our office was requested to inspect a possible floor settlement problem at 901 Rice Greek Terrace. An on site inspection was conducted on that day and the following situation was recorded: Ms. Rhonda Peterson (owner) stated that they had started to remove the carpet from the basement floor in preparation for installing new carpeting. The area where the carpet had been removed revealed that an overlay of concrete had been placed over the original floor to make the floor level. the Petersons had removed part of the overlay as thick as 2 or more inches. I took a sounding on the floor with a hard instrument and suspected that there was a void under the old floor. I told then to remove the old concrete floor in at least two locations so I could examine the ground under the floor. They were told to also excavate a hole on the outside of the foundation (outside the north wall) so I could get down to the footing to examine it. On April 17, 1986 the Petersons' called to report that the floor had been removed and was ready for my reinspection. On April 17, 1986 I returned to the hone for more evaluation. The owner had removed the floor slab in two locations; one near the back wall, about 12 feet west of the east wall; and one near the middle of the house, just north of the center of the basement. There was an air void between the underside of the slab and the underlying soil in both locations. A hand auger boring was done and at the f irst location there was about 4 feet of uncompacted soil (sand): the other boring near the middle of the house had 2 to 3 feet of uncompacted soil (sand). More soundings were taken on the existing floor and it appeared that about the east half sounded hollow. In the hole on the outside, which was not dug as deep as the footing elevation, a hand auger hole was dug and it indicated that the footing was about 6 feet below the basement floor elevation. No visible cracks were noted in the rear foundation wall at that location. The owner was advised to contact a qualified soils testing company to perform further tests to determine the probable cause and solution to the situation. The owner did contract with Win City Testing to examim the problem and in the Twin City Testing Report Lab Number 4131-86-1448, dated April 30, 1986, it states the probable cause and method of correction. In May and June the owner made plans to accomplish the repair and was told that they should keep us informed and that the contractor who was to perform the corrections would need a building permit and that he would have to follow Twin City Testing's recommendations. Memo to File August 8, 1986 Re: 901 -Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Page 2 She owner decided that they could save money by at least doing their own removal (removing floor and walls in the area of correction). It was during this operation that it was discovered that the front wall and footing had some cracks. On June 26, 1986, our office was called to examine the wall and footing. Mark Burch made the inspection, in my absence, and in his report stated that he advised the owner to have Twin City Testing come back to inspect and evaluate the front wall and footing. Turin City Testing Report. Number 4131-86-1752 is on file in our office documenting their inspection of June 28, 1986. The City received this report on August 7, 1986. I have talked to Mr. Leonard Rasmussen of Twin City Testing and inquired if he thought the house was in any danger of collapse. He stated in his opinion it was not, however the repair should be completed as soon as possible, before any more displacement occurs. She home is presently vacant; the Peterson' have moved out because of the removal of the only kitchen which occupied the lower level. 7%e permit for the original house was issued March 16, 1962 to Clemron, Inc. for owner David Canfield. Apparently the house was destroyed by the May, 1965 tornado as a permit to repair storm damage was issued to Cobb, Inc. for owner David Canfield on July 1, 1965; a note on the permit application indicates that some foundation repair was necessary. r1here is one other building permit issued in 1979 to repair some fire damage which occurred when a wood stove overheated. Our inspection records only go back to 1967s, therefore there are no records of any City inspection prior to that date on any construction in the City. DGC/mh CC: City Manager OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER February 2, 1987 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ST. PAUL 55101 Representative Wayne Simoneau �r 465 NE 57th Place Fridley, Minnesota 55432 c Dear Representative Simoneau: 500 METRO SQUARE BUILDING ST. PAUL. MN SSIOI This is to advise you that we have concluded our investigation concerning the com- plaint filed by Lynn R. Peterson. As a result of our findings David Ryans' real estate license was censured for allegedly failing to disclose a material fact pertaining to property which was the subject of a real estate transaction. Ryan neither admitted nor denied these allegations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the number below. Very truly/youts, MI HA CH PftmissiooeW Department of Commerce PATRICIAW S'TA.W I Commerce nvestigator Enforcement Division (612) 297-4633 PJS:tme AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER New owners- found hou s -9 didn By chmi John Staff Writer Huge chunks of foundation in the basement of 901 Rice Creek Terrace symbolize the rubble that Rhonda and Lynn 1?pterson find their lives in today. After only five and a half months in the house they bought last January, the Peterson moved out because they found its structural problems financially insurmountable. The dis- covery that the house had been dam- aged in the 1965 Fridley tornado only made their predicament more unbelievable. The house is In foreclosure. The Pe• tersons are suing their real estate agency and the house's former own- ers to District Court. Rhonda Peterson believes that she woulda't be going W court if Fridley had a truth -in -housing ordinance W require home sellers W inform pro- spective buyers about problems. She is pressing Fridley officials W adopt such an ordinance, and the City Council Is expected W consider the issue in January or February. Minneapolis, St. Paul, St. Louis Park and South St. Paul have truth-Itt- housing ordinances. The Petersons can't believe that they had three Inspections of the property' and still made a bad $87,000 Invest- ment. They also can't believe that no one told them the house had been severely damaged In the 1965 torna- do. "Most people don't have (three) In- spections.- I thought we protected ourselves," she said. "If it could hap- pen to us. it could happen to any- one." The Petersons closed on the house Jan. 31 and moved in the next day. They loved It because the upper level provided ideal 1:ving space for them and their three children — Amy, 13; Andy, 9, and Ann Marie, 7 — while the lower, walkout level with a kitchen and laundry room would be perfect for her licensed day care center, Rhonda's House. {F , Y-4 Minneapolis Star and Tribunes � Mwmday = N . December 4/1988 1 Y, Rhonda Peterson stood among pieces of concrete in the basoment of her house at 901 Rice Creek Terrace, Fridley. The house was inspected three times discovered that they were broken It well Banker agents and the previous to make sure It would meet state was then he noticed serious founda- owners made false and fraudulent requirements for day care homes tion cracks. statements when asked if the proper- ty had ever been damaged in any They got a $13,000 loan and began Lynn gave up then. He returned the way or whether there were any making cosmetic improvements up- second loan because he said he knew problems with the foundation walls stairs with paint, wallpaper and car- it wouldn't be enough to pay for the or floor. pet, repairs. The attorney for Coldwell Banker, Then they began work in the base- In mid-July the family moved out. Timothy Hassett. said, "The property ment. When they lifted the linoleum had been destroyed, virtually, in flooring they found problems with The city tagged the house as unin- 1965 during the Fridley tornado. The the foundation. They obtained anoth- habitable, until the repairs — includ- fact of the tornado was never made er $15.000 loan to make the repairs. Ing reinstalling water service and a known to the Petersons. Other peo- kitchen — were completed. ple who looked at the property were Then Lynn Peterson decided to told but these people were not check the foundation footings and The Peterson`suit claims that Cold - "That wasn't through any intentional misconduct but rather through inad- vertence," said Hassett. He said the real estate agents were unaware of the foundation problem, which he said predated the tornado. Hassett said an examination of the soil by Twin City Testing Corp. showed that the house was built on a ravine. He said the testing also showed that "Basically in 1962 when the house was built originally the fill underneath the foundation wasn't property compacted. As a result the soil settled leaving a cavelike effect under the foundation." As far as Hassett Is concerned, the Petersoid claim is not with the -real estate company but the previous owners, the Rev. Donald and Donna Jacobson, now of Madison, win Donald Jacofsn said In an Inter- _ view tbat he and his fatherrepaired the basement foundation. "we j took care of the sloping toviards the - drain to level it up (with C0neru'[8). That was an haprovement. If it was a problem I suppose we wouldhave mentioned it (W.the Petersons).R. • , As for why the tornado wasn t -mem tinned, Jacobson said the turn" - never touched thb house. "Tire tor- nado wiped out the house (4"�r," 1962). All that was left was the base- ment aymeat floor. It was rebuilt on the old tel" Rhonda Peterson said, "I really doa'j care whether the problem comes from. That house was represented tb me as never having been touched by the tornado. whether the dam* was pretornado, post -tornado, fn for nado or out -of -tornado doesn't make any difference. I'm saying I, didn'j want a house damaged by a-torna-- do." Since add -July the Petetsous haysi lived in three homes. Peterson acknowledged that a hift- In-housing ordinance might not have identified the house's problems, but said she believes that the ordinance would be helpful W othem City officials who are working with Peterson on her presentation W the city doubt that a truth -in -housing or- dinance would have helped her case. They said the flaws in this house were well hidden. Moreover, Fridley Mayor Bill' -Nes isn't Jumping at the opportunity W follow the lead of Minneapolfs, St. Louis Paris, St. Paul and South St. Paul. "We are going to study it," said Nee. "I am not sure we do need it. Most of our housing stock is quite new and this is kind of an exception that she ran into." OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ST. PAUL d it January 12, 1988 Mr. Daryl Clark City Building Inspector 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Clark: SOO METRO SQUAME BUILDING ST. PAUL, MN S5101 This is to advise you that the dispute between Rhonda and Lynn Peterson and Coldwell Banker has been resolved. The Peterson's complained that Coldwell Banker, through an agent, had failed to advise them that the home they were purchasing had been rebuilt after sustaining substantial damage. Coldwell Banker states that its employees were not aware of any existing problem with the home. The matter has been brought to a satisfactory conclusion. As a result, the Petersons have dismissed their lawsuit against Coldwell Banker. The cooperation evidenced by all the parties in this dispute in obtaining a resolution is greatly appreciated. MAH: te Very truly yours, *�*Alvjopo*" Michael A. Hatch Commissioner of Commerce AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SUBJECT PERMIT NO. City of Fridley ® 19413 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT - " RECEIPT NO. U. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. �R, r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 . � 1 CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY L J\ 612-571-3450 910-F15 4/26/88 JOB ADDRESS 9O1 Rice Creek Terrace N. E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION' SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 10 1 BrookvieW Terrace 2nd SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE David Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. 572-8403 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW OX ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 221 x 121.Addition and a 22' x 12' Attached Deck 9 CHANGEOFUSEFROM TO STIPULATIONS Wall repair to be done as per, Twin City Testing report dated 7/1/86. Correct post footing that has settled. Recompact all earth under floor as per Twin City Testing report dated 4/30/86 SEPARATE WARM PERMITS REQUIRE FOR + �efp�e digging Cali ltlCal W11R1tfP EATING® PLUMBING AND SlIGN nt►�r IF9EPHONE4t(C ICRE-Qm SIRED Sy LAW SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $8X250 $4.13 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $74.50 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $18.63 $97.26 AC7 ORA7THOR12EDAGENT DATEIROPERL VVALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT'X��I17tSIGNATRE �110 BLDG INSP DATE F OWNER I IF OWNE UILDERI (DATEI NEW [ ] City of Fridley Effective 4/1/86 ADDN.[ R-1 AND R-2 ALTER. [ Building Permit Application Construction Address: r 6/ 9 1 C_ c ~ Legal Description. fir /�. a/f!i �.f Doeill, -rJ Owner Name & Address: 1//b IV166R 9y/ eicr7��'E�P Contractor: -SAAW, Tel. # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width_ Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: LA W.-AL69 4 01 Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ �Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback �® Type of Construction: ,� x� �IZ�� Tioa ( �'� Estimated Cost • $ ��°�i roc Approx. Completion Date: Alt. A It B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ See Back Page for Explanation DATE: awql APPLICANT: Tel. # CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee Plan Check State Surcharge SAC Charge Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL Fee Schedule on Reverse Side 25% of Building Permit Fee $.50/$1,000 Valuation $ 5.5Q per SAC Unit Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] ttunn city testinq 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 ENGINEERING CONSUEf7 5'3601 EXISTING RESIDENCE PROJECTS 901 RICE CREEK TERRACE July 1, 1986 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO:Mr It Mrs Lynn Peterson 901 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 This report concerns our most recent observation and review of foundation wall distress and* basement seepage at your house. We had previously observed and reviewed a floor subsidence problem at the house and documented our findings in our report, dated April 30, 1986 (14131 86- 1448). At your request, we recently again visited your residence to observe or discuss other manifestations of potential problems with the structure. SITE OBSERVATIONS Our most recent visit to your house was on June 28, 1986. Interior walls and various wall coverings such as sheetrock had been removed from the subject area of the basement since the time of our last visit. You Indicated that, after removal of sheetrock and other wall covering from the central portion of the front or south basement wall, you observed the blockwork was severely cracked. Your probing below the footings suggested to you that the footing bearing soils may be unusually loose. You had also dug a test pit outside, along the distressed wall, exposing both wall and footing over a length of about 101. In the way of additional background information, you then indicated to us that the house superstructure had undergone damage years ago. (during previous ownership), as a result of a tornado, and that at that time the superstructure had undergone twisting or torsional action and had been replaced. The foundation wall, however, had not been replaced as a result of that damage. Our observations confirmed the presence of wide step cracking in the central portion of the front foundation wall. An old patched joint was observed in the bed joint between the lower block course and the course above. Additionally, the upper course of block was displaced inward by a fraction of an inch, with respect to the above wall section. At higher elevations on the wall, similar but more minor relative inward movement of adjacent cracked.block units was noted. AO A &MMIAL AOTtCT10M TO CL=M %I M BUM= AMO OUBSS IVN. ALL AM/i1hYMT1f0 AO TFIt CONRMNTIAL QTY Oi CYfN7f, ANO AYTM0IY- ETON Own �RATLICATTON O� fTA7fMVN70. COMOLLALONA 011 <117AAOT8 O■ O\ NNIOAgOp.O OLAR "BOOMS 0 MM11Vf0 A{NOIMO OH11 VAUr UN AOMIOV AL. o tusin city testinq �••�r�t':�j, 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645.3601 ENGINEERING CONSULTATION LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 July 1, 1986 2 We put a hand auger boring down into the footing subgrade soils directly below the window, within the distress zone described above. The boring was extended to a depth of 61. Granular fill was encountered throughout the boring. The fill was mostly dark brown silty sand in a moist and loose condition.* The soil seemed unusually loose (i.e., not well compacted) in the 18"-24" zone immediately beneath the footing. You also pointed out that the front stoop, which is located just east of the problem area, had undergone noticeable displacement away from the foundation wall. Our observations and measurements indicated approximate outward movement of 1.7" and settlement of possibly 1", values which are somewhat excessive. It is not•unusual to see some lateral and downward movement of such a stoop• when supported by loose backfill but we would not anticipate these magnitudes of movement. During a recent very severe rainstorm, you indicated that minor seepage occurred through the west side wall and inquired as to the proper remedial action. The west side yard slopes down to the rear or north to accommodate the walkout configuration. There is no roof save along this wall since the roof gable runs east to west. However, the lawn grade adjacent to the wall could be characterized as neutral to negative and does not promote positive drainage away from the wall. It appears the distress to the floor and front foundation wall is related to a narrow, north to south extending uncontrolled fill system. It appears that this may also be affecting the front stoop construction. This fill system was probably in-place at the time of construction and was not corrected at that time (by removal and replacement with compacted fill). As the native sand soils were used as fill, there may have been no simple way for the excavator to determine that a problem existed to the extent that soil improvement was required. Lu e__ —tha...ag--of- the sticture, it is 1 kelt' khat most of the detrimental__settleme�t_ related to t`h®�nc�m�arad fill �s�rstam^_h•asr�.�c_uCred. In this case, it is Pd3 b-Te~That the wall was originally cracked due to consolidation settlement but that the cracking worsened as a result of (1) exertion of excess lateral pressures due to wet backfill soils against the wall or (2) lateral or twisting forces exerted during the tornado. �r l A/ A MNK/AL PRAM "ON TO CLUMM tMf MALIC AND ONMSLV80, ALL WbRTf AM hJOM""O AA Tbm CONitOaimAL MOMRTT OR =m%r /, ANO AUT►bR1- M"CW4 - M/OLMATU M OP 8TATahmehr /. CONCLU!KWM OR SxTRACTO iROw OR nuaAmm .O OUR Mpoors M I wvm MNotNO OUR wmrrntd APPROVAL. a tunn city reffxjm 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 FNGINFERING CONSULTATION LABORATORY No. 4131 86-1752 July 1, 1986 3 We understand that another party has suggested that remedial action under the front foundation wall should include intrusion grouting of the relatively loose sand soils. This involves pumping grout through pipes inserted into the loose soils. Ideally, the result of the compaction grouting process is densification and strengthening of the foundation soils. A reputable intrusion grouting contractor should be permitted to review the available information in order to determine the feasibility and cost of such a scheme in this particular case. As indicated to you at the time of our site visit, we believe that a less costly but perhaps equally effective correction would he to underpin the footing to a depth of about 21 below the existing footing. This involves manual excavation of the very loose sand soils and should extend laterally at least 6" on either side of the existing footing, thus creating a new footing about 11 wider than the old member. This underpinning normally is done only below the area where distress is visible to the wall. To prevent further damage to the wall during construction, the underpin pockets are normally limited to lengths of about 41-51. The new concrete must be placed such that continuous contact with the old footing above is assured, after curing and drying shrinkage of the concrete is completed. After either undesR1Zning or intrusion grouting, the wall should be repaired. Your contractor has proposed to not only repoint the wall joints that have cracked but also provide internal reinforcing by Inserting vertical reinforcing bars into the block cells and then refilling the cells with grout. This would be beneficial in that it would offer better resistance to -lateral earth pressures which can develop during unusually wet weather or sometimes during severe winters (in frost zone due to ice lens formation and expansion). For your information, we are attaching a sheet which indicates recommended detailing of internal reinforcement systems for a wall such as yours. As previously indicated, your surface grades along the west wall are marginal with respect to potential basement seepage considerations. We would strongly suggest raising the grades along the walls such that the surface falls 4" to 6" in the first 81 to 101 away from the house. As discussed with you, some improvement along the front wall would be desired as well, especially adjacent to the southwest corner. THIN CITY T NG CORPORATION Leonard A Rasmussen, P.E. LAR/rj r M A MNTUAL PAOTICTION TO CLMNTA, T.N pUMUC AND OLMIMLVAA, ALL AtPONTA AAA MMftWrrRO AA TNi CONNOtN ^L PSMPtPTV OF CU/NT1, ANO AUTMOf11- =ATION POA PtAMMATM]N OP ATATK.HNT/. C0NCLLM=W40 ON aXTRAC" MOM 00 PEDAAOWNA OUP /NPCWrU IA WE"OV60 PAM MNA OUR WPITTMN APPROVAL twin city testinq . corporation ' ONE STORY vA= MIviA HOUSE. �1RST - SANb 1WKFILL CLf-%T4A0 Id1,P*$ F LaoQ Aar., #c SOLT CULL Ta06t) d Loo SIE VL) . /. ELEV. Vp►RtlS .iAW. W • L00117 re�INF tN LL �Eo _ 4� ccau. _ C s ' fART WALL PLAN "gfeK. -U.S.C. A4 -t GLADA N Cq�c. b� tRd MORTAR TY�fc M �� S�Ti4a:C No ► TYPICAL wALL sEgma4 A -A s - H IDWvAaTSfL RECOMMEWPEDREINFORCI" ANCRcW eOI'-T/sPACIN( A,B.� EI'^Ba• a' ;•7A32" eRa 8o4` 1' Coo32' oRo7048 1'�OS=G'ocd4 �E'3'-4 �4 •5•• G' 1W 5,237.11 o R o"� �/b=ec-Fig *-(0 z" ,�• ILIV70194-11JO SAM ZrACEO 440" OW CWTVie- I�L. $Art DMWETIc!r IN y6 IVL* *4a.1L"��rs'�S� *6s�M��%s�g�-0 rI PACT V A A- A � • ' NAWL I I t• �A1CeET! d�GK' 11VA�LCT'fr1c�) A I A t i ` Z:TYPICAPL� V ln&Acb ' � .DET'1viMr.�E ftLE � tPwGM�.OF REt�+�-��.!'M�c�Ti I A TIP I CIL FLOOR Fouopmcj 91AOs_. .. ice 110. =Aa: kow . ow►ww IT cMtcRt� rgS CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING PERMIT RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL New m Fixtures b 5.00 U Future Fixtures k a $ Water $ 1.50 $ Beer Dispenser $ 4.00 E Blow Off Basin $ C1 m k pa, �" $ Rain Water Leader Heater 5.00 $ b $ ni m Sump or Receiving Tank X111 'q 3 N Water Treating Appliance Ero a $ u: $ 5.00 $ w omi r $ 10.00 $ Q Gas Dryer x 9 $ 10.00 ALL OTHERS AND/OR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS v 1 R x 1% of Value of Fixture or u ani State Surcharge $ .50 Reinspection Fee $ D y 3 Q w g U a 3 U � U o s lec aeq to o% let t 2nd 3rd 4th (R) = Future Connection Opening Connected with Sewer (*) = New Fixture, Old Opening Water RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: NO. RATE TOTAL New 'T S -e Do Fixtures _� $ 5.00 $ Future Fixtures $ 3.50 $ Old Opening, New Fixture $ 1.50 $ Beer Dispenser $ 4.00 $ Blow Off Basin $ 5.00 $ Catch Basin $ 5.00 $ Rain Water Leader $ 5.00 $ Hydraulic Valve $ 5.00 $ Sump or Receiving Tank $ 5.00 $ Water Treating Appliance $ 7.00 $ Hot Water Heater $ 5.00 $ Gas Range r $ 10.00 $ Q Gas Dryer �_ $ 10.00 $ 10.00 ALL OTHERS AND/OR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS 1% of Value of Fixture or Appliance $ State Surcharge $ .50 Reinspection Fee $ ($15.00) TOTAL FEE $ Job Address '961 Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 Effective Aug. 1, 1981 ?/ C'r 4iC i{ / �F fW/%--,r The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct :. 1 --- //ice - I - 8 91, KIND OF BUILDING USED AS Ile" TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT 471 ESTIMATED COST }� �j�i© / y� OLD NEW BUILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT NO. ` v, Company Signed By Tel. No. ROUGH INSP. Date FINAL INSP. Date APPROVAL FOR PERMIT M� MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING PERMIT IS $10.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE CITY OF FRIDLEY Effective Aug. 1, 1981 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE 4ESIDEIVTIAL RATE TOTAL Job Address Furnace Shell d Duct Work,. Burner (Also replace ce) $ 20.00 $ Department of Buildings, 6431 University Ave. N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 City of Fridley Gas Piping $ 10.00 $ Tel. #571-3450 (piping needed with new furnace) Gas Range $ 10.00 $. The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes Gas Dryer $ 10.00 $ and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. * Air Conditioning (all sizes) $ 10.00 $ Fridley, Minn. Igo U - All Others/Repairs and Alterations OWNER O&(%/0 14)IaR 1% of Value of Appliance or Work $` KIND OF BUILDING ��J /) / &ev omo ��j 4) • f�C COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL USED AS V/ N 1% of Value of Appliance or Work $ TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT 6-0 ESTIMATED COST State Surcharge $ .50 OLD - NEW BUILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT NO. TOTAL FEE $ Reinspection Fee ($15.00) $ DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE/BURNER % Rough Insp. HEATING or POWER PLANTS, Steam, Hot Water, W Air- N . Date - - -- - --- bo'gR ay - firade Final Insp. - Name Size No. Date Capacity Sq. Ft. EDR HP BTU ��` ®.J iGO,G� Approval for Permit T" ) Total Connected Load Kind of Fuel M ®,r IT eBURNER - Trade Name •s �� / �Capacity MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $10.00 .00 J' PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE Attach stack verification form with replacement furnace permits *Air Conditioners can not be placed in side yard without written permission from adjoining neighbor. Size No. Sq. Ft. EDR BTU HP omp any r Signed By Tel. No. �� z �� SUBJECT P IT NO. City of Fridley 20191 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT - r RECEIP � 1, •rrCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. � ......,� r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. L /"'1,� CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. BATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY •-_•� L 612--571-3450 910-F15 11/9/89 JOB ADDRESS 901 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 10 1 Hrook_view Terrace 2nd Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE David Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. 5728403 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION C:k ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Install Heat N Glo Fireplace., Model 40.34 ATa TCSO #.3454 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Fireplace to be installed per manufacturer's specifications. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND.ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $1f200 $.60 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $29.0.0 STRUCTIO R THEE FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALFEEC�1/C7 / I '$29.60 SIGNATURE OF MONTRACTORO AUTMORIZEDAGENT (DATE) W EN PRO E YA D ED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT 4-TBLDG SIGNATURE OF OWNER OF OWNER BUILDER) (DA )NSP NEW [ ] ADDN [ ] ALTER [ ] R-1 AND 1-2 Building Peimit Application Effective 5/1/88 construction Address: % / �C/ems eleeQr - %1F%lRe Legal Description: L®T e- i3��c� � I 06 Owner Name & Address: D4 Uf/) Contractor: Attach to this application, a certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn an it to scale. LIVING AREA: length Width Height Sq. Ft. GMAGE AREA: length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: lengthWidth Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. 07HER: f1WE 117deF --/0- 626, 117,4AC4' ods %37- L;P-ss M 7/C 60 &3,Krx Corner Lot [ ] Inside lot [ ] Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks 7Ype of Construction: Estimated Cost: $ f o� Approx. Completion Date: Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: Ft. $ $ Width + 6' See Back Page DATE: %/ % 5T APPLICANT: U� IN I ��•C' mel. # Permit Fee $ rQI 0 0 State Surcharge $ 60 SAC Change $ Driveway Escrow $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main Qaxxp- $ $ 9,6 0 STIP31ATIONS: Fee Schedule on Reverse Side $.50/$1,000 valuation $575 per SAC Unit Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Fee Deten ; red by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] HH OF U �1 U �J EEZ � UL.-=,� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES r 4)HONENO. METRO REGION WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 FiLENO. 296-7523 DNR PROTECTED WATERS PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER V ©! REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENTS DATE: TO: FROM: TOM HOVEY, AREA HYDROLOGIST A WATERS AFFECTED: PROJECT SPONSOR: /' re-e'L Wc,��r-5k,�f bt NATURE OF WORK: COMMENTS DUE BY: -30 J000 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER DEPARTMENT OF��/ NA=02870-OS nMli tESPIrA 4®®l® Rev. 3/88 {� NATURAL RESOURCES LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT COMMENTS PART B Section I (To be completed by applicant) Name of Applicant - Address (Street, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code) ,RICEiCREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 3585 Lexington Ave. Suite 374 Arden Hills . -MN 55126. Quarter Sections) Section(s) ]Township(s) Range(s) County(ies) PROJECT LOCATION NEW NE4 14 30N I 23W I Anoka Project will affect: (name and number` of lake, wetland, or watercourse) Rice Creek I hereby submit this application for permit to: Signatu Applica Date (mark proper box)Ce Q appropriate water ® work in protected waters X Section II (To be completed by local unit of government) — The following local unit of government comments and/or recommendations are submitted for consideration by the Department of Natural Resources -In the disposition of the referenced permit application. (YOUR RESPONSE MUST BE. SUBMITTED TO THE DNR WITHK 30 DAYS.) Water Appropriation Permit Applications and Protected Waters Permit Applications are to be sent to the DNR Regional Office. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES). Was the proposed project field inspected by this local unit of government? []NO AYES (if Yes, give vievver5 name) Authorized Signature Title Date Telephone No. (Area Code)• Name of responding Soil and Water Conservation District, Watershed District, City or County Address (of the above named local unit of government) (DNR — Division of Waters addresses on back) REGION 1(& EEMIDJI Area) Regional Hydrologist*. DNR -Division of Waters 2115 Birchmont Beach Road N.E. Bemidji, MN 56601 (218) 755-3973 Detroit Lakes Area Area.Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters P.O. Box 823 Detroit Lakes, MN. 56501 (218) 847-1579 Fergus Falls Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters �0 1221 Fir Avenue East Ferg�s.Falls, MN 56537 (218) 739-7576 Thief River Falls Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters 123 Main Ave. N. Thief River Falls, MN 56701 (218) 681-7789 REGION 2 (&GRAND RAPIDS Regional Hydrologist Area) DNR -Division of Waters 1201 East Highway 2 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 (218) 327-4416 Duluth Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters French River Hatchery 10029 North Shore Drive Duluth, MN 55804 (218) 723-4786 ` REGION 3 (&BRAINERD Area) Regional Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters 1661 Minnesota Drive Brainerd, MN 56401 "(218) 828-2605 Cambridge Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters 915 South Highway 65 Cambridge, MN 55008 (612) 689-2832 St.Cloud Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters 3725 12th St. North P.O. Box 370 St. Cloud, MN 56302 (612) 255-4278 REGION 4 (& NEW ULM Area) Regional Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters Box 756, Highway 15 South New Ulm,.MN 56073 (507) 354-2196 Spicer Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters P.O. Box 457 232 Lake Ave. South Spicer, MN 56288 (612) 231-5435 DIVISION OF WATERS ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS AND AREAS mom Mal Wknon -_ E[we -- - a.dam wom Thlef River Falls eBEMIDJI GRAND ®RAPIDS CW Detroit ®Lakes.MW Qftn Duluth Fergus Falls a BRAINERD ® Regional Office Regional Boundary � ftt E Area Office St.Cloud ® ®Cambridge Area Boundary Spicer . ST. PAUL a� y0b� a a„ ^ MWIM LakeCity Marshall a NEW ULM Mankato blwe a ROCHESTER REGION 4 Cont'd REGION 5 Cont'd Mankato Area Lake City Area. Area Hydrologist Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters DNR -Division of Waters Nichols Office Center Route 2,, Box 230 Suite 180, 410 Jackson St. Lake City, MN 55401 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 389-2151 REGION Marshall Regional Hydrologist Area hydrologist DNR -Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road DNR -Division of Waters - Paul, MN 55106 Box 111, 1400 E. Lyon (61 (612) 296-7523 Marshall, MN 56258 ,; (507) 537-7258 CENTRAL OFFICE REGION 5 DNR -Division of Waters Regional Hydrologist 500 Lafayette Road DNR Building - Box 32 DNR -Division of haters St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 P.O. Box 6247 (612) 296-4800 Rochester, MN 55903 (507) 285-7430 - N,A-02622-03 Rev. 12/85 PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT oll' TO WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS ORVETIANOS IrMINATURAL HIM50,TA f, (IN110N6 oANFa$AFETY) RESOYRCES (`Y loo. read instructions before attempting to complete this application. V. VII VIR. Ix XI x OFFICE USE ONLY. i',P.A. NO. [ SWCD Q C/C Q W.D. ❑USCOE Applicant's Name (Last, First, M.{;) Authorized Agent (if applicable) 'Tel epho(ie Number&areacode MCE MEK HATERWO DISTRICT X94 UMSULTINGENGD&ERSti, TEV )' 47344224 Address (Street, RFD, B x Number, City, State, Zip Code) N. Laxlagtoo Ave. Suite 374 Arden Hillstif. 55126 LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (BE SURE TO INCLUDE SKETCH SHOWING HOW TO GET', TO THE SITE) Government Lot(s) Quarter Section(s) Section(s)'No. Township(s) No. Range(s) No. Lot, Block, Subdivision -: —1 30 214 Fire No., Box No. or Pro ect Address County Project will affect p Lake. OWetland orWatercourse (name & number. Arxft if known) ctoffk TYPE OF WORK PROPOSED (CHECK ONE) IV. TYPE OF PROJECT (CHECK ONE) ❑ excavate < ❑ repair ❑ shoreline ❑ shore -protection ❑ obstruction ❑ dam • fill ,, ❑ remove ❑ channel ❑ harbor ❑ bridge other O drain �' ❑abandon ❑other (specify) ❑sand blanket ❑permanent dock ❑culvert (specify) cons C10 riprap ❑wharf °� pE`�a �C inst;1` U' .. EST�II�A PROJECT COST] $ VI LENGTH OP SHORELINE AFFECTED (IN FEET). V_UME OF MATE41AL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS) RIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJECT: (EXPLAIN WHAT PROJECT CONS I Sff OF AND HOW WO � WILL BE DONE) ion W l l� l�, be'constructW per attadmd plaas ala%the swU bank of Rice fxee i y f5fi. Gabtoos tu be set into ex stile ,sl t jierit- ll f ff�tC per f II d late a 1 I CrooknOWS it i t f ,PURPOSE OF PRO. ECT: (Explain thy this, project is needed) Stabilize badly,eroding '$l ii landwithin theAiwkaCumty Regional Trail ril or idor. keduce debris &W sedimn'tin Rice. rxwk Welch diminishes capacity of coaveyaace!structures til an'd use of the ReoiWal i rail and C&ioe routAa. The project will also improve the water E I iclpa e c anges o e water and rela a &fan resources, lnc u ng una oidable but detrimental effects) ej will eltaiiiate severe bank erosion into Rice Creek, reduci nq seOIrnewt l .. During h 19_;P06%o_0ePtfVe VOSOtOtim- 0" C=M- :4i e XII. I hereby make application water(s) in accordance wil concerning this applicatic STATE OF antMinnesota Statutes Chapter 105.42 and all supporting rules for a permit to work in or affecttne aoove rfameo protecreo up of g maps, plans, and other information submitted with this application The information submitted and statements made true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature 41 Owner or Authoryt ed� t Date �P Signature of Leasee f Date r COUNTY OF Subscribed and sworn to ifore r e this day of v 19 My commission expires Signature of Notary " Distribution: White: DNR Blue: SWCD';'; Green: Watershed District Goldenrod City orj;,County z Pink:: Army Corps of Engineers Canary: Applicant G7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 July 23, 1991 PW91-160 Tom Hovey State of Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 SUBJECT: Rice Creek Watershed District Project Permit No. 92-6010 Dear Mr. Hovey: We have received the Rice Creek Watershed District plans for the installation of gabians to reduce erosion on approximately 300 feet of Rice Creek in the vicinity of 901 Rice Creek Terrace in the City of Fridley, DNR Permit No. 92-6010. The City requests that a detail be incorporated in the plans which tie the gabian and filter fabric at the ends into the existing bank to insure that the creek does not enter and erode the bank behind the proposed construction. We are totally in support of the project and recommend the permit be issued. Sincerely, /✓..John G. Flora, P.E. Director of Public Works JGF/ts cc: Steve Woods JMM 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 EF CIlYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 July 24, 1991 PW91-161 Mr. Kevin C. Larson Rice Creek Watershed District 3585 Lexington Ave., N. Suite 374 Arden Hills, MN 55126-8016 SUBJECT: RCWD Bank Repair Project (Fridley) Dear Mr. Larson: We are in receipt of the plans and specifications for the bank repair project located on Rice Creek in the vicinity of 901 Rice Creek Terrace. The City supports this project and commends the district for initiating this action of installing gabions along the south bank of the creek in order to stabilize the hill mass. In reviewing the plans, we would suggest that a detail be provided indicating the end detail for tying the filter fabric and gabions into the bank walls to insure that the creek does not erode behind the gabian construction. Request that the City be notified of the construction meeting once the contractor has been selected so that we may participate in the planning and informing the Council of the proposed action. Sincerely, John G. Flora, P.E. Director of Public Works JGF/trs R1Ce Cl'eeiC 3585 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 374 ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 55126-8016 TELEPHONE (612) 483-0634 July 30, 1991 Mr. John Flora City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Bank stabilization project (Station 190+00) Pre-bid meeting Dear Mr. Flora: go/ Re! Board of Managers Regular Meetings: 2nd and 4th Wednesdays at Shoreview City Hall BONITA TORPE, Admin. Ass't,. The Rice Creek Watershed District is preparing to stabilize an eroding meander of Rice Creek located downstream of STH 65 in Fridley. A pre-bid meeting will be held at the site of the work on August 14, 1991 at 10:00 am. All participants wishing to attend this meeting will meet atthe east end of the 71st Ave. NE parking lot and proceed to the site of the work. Sealed bids will be received at the office of the Rice Creek Watershed District until 10:00 am August 27 1991 for this project. Questions regarding this project should be directed to Kevvin arson (Project Engineer) or me at 473-4224. Sincerely, JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Engineers for the District Steven C. Woods, P.E. District Engineer bt attachments cc: District Office SLR file BOARD OF MANAGERS A. J. CARDINAL, SR. G. A. SANDE C. T. KING RMLANCAffM WADE SAVAGE ANOKA COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY WASHINGTON COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY ANOKA COUNTY JAMES M. MONTGOMERY Consulting Engineers 473.4224 • FRANK J. MURRAY Attorney 222-5549 I r z 2 Z O Q Q o U Wd� 0 ¢. . Q- ' d]]AIS • Is W �d �^ > ¢� ¢ u ~ U anH , ad; w a A C- W I Q C > U C d ¢ ZZ�C Co CD > cc °3 °N RD. •and W ? z W SEL LU > Q � Q LL z Q 3OSId y m . d iS E0217- Iol z ~ ,v7 d I Ong DOOM1�30 coo CD • as M3 I nAooaa 6O�,�dl Q. Q ° 2lo �137>ido • �1 `• j �^ U`° �J( l.7 Q3' Ive ~ N DR Y�, C -0•1S 13-l8di m m 4 •1S N38n8 N, IV ° Y LU o z > w ` LIC NOS >iOd(' W V Y CoC . CL 1S � o .ION I nO wm 1S 30�JNOW m n 308NOW NOS I odW °- ' Z w NOSI OdW NOS6 t� 2N Iy 3� �3r . . z w NOS 3dd3r z � �jI I/S S w dM> Q Co NO1 ON I HSdM b > ¢ 9 Q RICE 0/,. co co b 1� .......... .. .. . ......... ...................... ...... I HEREBY CERT. F.Y..THAT THS pl.JK' SPECIFICATION OR REPGRT- VAS -PREPARED BY ME OR- - UNDER: Wr DIWT SUPERVISION AND* IMT.:I:AM: A:DULY*':REGI PROFESSIONAL: ENGPEFFt �1NOEft THE LAYYS E:. % .................. ;........ :................................................:. V :.:.. ZN.':::.::::... ......... ....... ..... .............. :. .. .... ... ....... ............................................::.......................................:............... ...;....................... ........IZ.... ::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::: ......................:........:_...............................:..........:........................... ..............::::::: ...::..::.:.......................12..0... ....... ................................. ............ .............A ................. :::::: :::::: ::::::..............................::::......................................... . :::::::f :::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: ::::::: :::::::::: :.: :: ............... ........ ........ �:........... ......... :..............:.......:......................:.......:............:........... :....:..........`� �r:....::.::....... /.�5........ ;...:....:::.::::::......... :.: ::: Q ...... .. :::::::::::::::::::: ................................................. BRNK ...51 �,P .......................... ;. ................ ......... _ . ...:...- . .................. ...._........: ........ . :::... �... ......................................................:..::::.::........::::.. :.::::...........::::::.: ..... :..:............... ::::....... .......... . .... ..... .. ............ .......... :: .:r:%::.::::. ::::::....... ............. .. .... r ... ....... .. . ....... ....... ...... .. .. ................. -..... ...... ...................... ......................... ........ :� :. «::: JJ).. ....... ... :L:tt:4:rli ..... •"oi/4�'7M.............................................. ................. .... .... -......... o0 ............ .... .. .......... ...... ..... '... .. ........... ... .. ...... .........1............... ::./:: ............ ..... .................... .... ...... I............ ... .... ...... ........... .. .............. .:..... ..... is ti: ::,; : .....I............. .................... .............. .:: ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... q�....... :;:: ::;:;: ; ;;; ::: ..................... .............. :::-.:�-- _ ,::;:.:.::i:: :::: :................. :.::........... alz,.. ::::.:::.:. ::::::.: :...:::............ .:::::::::::::::: :::................ :................... ......................... ......................... :::::.::::::...::::::. :;::.:.::::.::::::: 4.0.......... ............. ......... .......: .................... n ............ ............................. ........ -1EfJ D/STi�/CT -LF AT STA. /90.00 Sheet No. 2 of 3 Sheets ' 8M38 888.81 � r _ b/U 1160 i - s NSP 1 ` To_ i f — EXISTI C WOOD CHIP RAIL RDS10�V \T�L 'wee �n Un.. DETAIL ea Cj3M21 842.48 wi ffvrMMMAk drWU M W. EXISTING WOOD ire CHIP TRAIL - P, IL 0, � Ail "TIP 7--7� ,\ M _ i\DER RiceCreek 3585 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 374 ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 55126-8016 TELEPHONE (612) 483-0634 August 16, 1991 _Resident— _ _ s, 901 Rice Creek Terrace---,-.. Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Proposed Rice Creek bank stabilization project Dear Sir/Madam: Board of Managers Regular Meetings: 2nd and 4th Wednesdays at Shoreview City Hall BONITA TORPE, Admin. Ass%. The Rice Creek Watershed District has obtained a grant through the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources and Anoka Soil and Water Conservation District to stabilize the eroding streambank behind your residence. Although the Watershed District has historically refrained from attempting to control the natural meandering process of the creek, the large amounts of sediment and deadfall entering the creek along this reach was found to be unacceptable and would eventually impact private residences along Rice Creek Terrace. The portion of the costs not covered by the grant will be borne by the Rice Creek Watershed District. In addition, all work will be performed from the north side of the creek and therefore will not impact your properties. As the project manager for this stabilization project, I would like to hold an informational meeting on August 27, 1991 at 6:30 pm to answer any questions you may have concerning the scope of the project, construction schedule, or related matters. The meeting will be held on the deck of the Wiger residence at 901 Rice Creek Terrace NE. If you have any questions, please contact our District Engineer, Steve Woods, at 473-4224 or me at 571-3862. Sincerely, RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Wade Savage, Secretary Board of Managers bt cc: District Office John Flora, City of Fridley Pat Rudolph, ASWCD SLR file BOARD OF MANAGERS A. J. CARDINAL, SR. G. A. SANDE C. T. KING %LANCASTER ANOKA COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY WASHINGTON COUNTY SEY COUNTY JAMES M. MONTGOMERY Consulting Engineers 473-4224 • FRANK I. MURRAY Attorney 222-5549 WADE SAVAGE ANOKA COUNTY NA -02733-04 PA.Number (Rev.3/90) .�NESmA PROTECTED WATERS 92-6010 DEPARTMENT OF NATUM RESOURCES DIVISION OF ATERS P ' Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105, and on the basis of statements and information contained in the permit application, letters, maps, and plans submitted by the applicant and others supporting data, all of which are made a part hereof by reference, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED to the applicant named below to change the course, current or cross section of the following: Protected Water County Rice Creek Anoka Name of Applicant Rice Creek Watershed District Telephone Number (include Area Code) Attn: J. M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers 612 473-4224 Address (No. & Street, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code) 3585 N. Lexington Avenue, Suite 374, Arden Hills, MN 55126 Authorized to: construct a gabion wall along approximately 306 feet of the south bank of Rice Creek (downstream of Highway 65); all as shown and described in the plans received June 17, 1991 and addendum No. 1 received August 22, 1991 and the special provisions of this permit. Purpose of Permit: Expiration Date of Permit Stabilize Streambank November 30, 1991 Property Described as: County NEi NEi Section 14, T30N, R23W Anoka As Indicated: (8) As Indicated: (11) Does not apply the ordinary high water mark This permit is granted subject to the following GENERAL and SPECIAL PROVISIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This permit is permissive only and shall not release the permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Federal Law or local ordinances relating thereto and shall remain In force subject to all conditions and limitations now or hereafter Imposed by law. 2. This permit is not assignable except with the written consent of the Commissioner of Natural Resources. 3. The Regional Hydrologist shall be notified at least five days in advance of the commencement of the work authorized hereunder and shall be notified of its completion within five days thereafter. The Notice of Permit issued by the Commissioner shall be kept securely posted in a conspicuous place at the site of operations. 4. No change shall be made, without written permission previously obtained from the Commissioner of Natural Resources, in the dimensions, capacity or location of any items of work authorized hereunder. 5. The permittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable times during and after construction to authorized representatives of the Commissioner of Natural Resources for Inspection of the work authorized hereunder. 6. This Permit may be terminated by the Commissioner of Natural Resources at any time he deems it necessary for the conservation of water resources of the state, or in the Interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this permit, unless otherwise provided in the Special Provisions. 7. Construction work authorized under this permit shall be completed on or before date specked above. Upon written request to the Commissioner by the Permittee, stating the reason therefore, an extension of time may be' obtained. 8. The excavation of soil authorized herein shall not be construed to include the removal of organic matter (as indicated above) unless the area from which such organic matter is removed, Is impervious, or Is sealed by the application of bentonite after excavation. 9. In all cases where the doing by the permittee of anything authorized by this permit shall involve the taking, using, or damaging of any property rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly owned lands or improvements thereon or interests therein, the permittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of all persons, agencies, or authorities concerned, and shall acquire all property, rights and interests necessary therefore. 10. This permit is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed by the State of Minnesota or any of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting hereof or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or any of its agents, employees, or contractors relating to any matter hereunder. This permit shall not be construed as estopping or limiting any legal claims or right of action of any person other than the state against the permittee, its agents,employees, or contractors, for any damage or injury resulting from any such act or omission, or as estopping or limiting any legal claim or right of action of the state against the permittee, its agents, employees, or contractors for violation of or failure to comply with the permit or applicable provisions of law. 11. No material excavated by authority of this permit nor material from any other source, except as specified herein, shall be placed on any portion of the bed of said waters which lies below (as indicated above). 12. Any extension of the surface. of said waters resulting from work authorized by this permit shall become protected waters and left open and unobstructed for use by the public. 13. This permit does not obviate any requirement for federal assent from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1421 U.S. Post Office and Custom House, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-9808. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 14. The permittee shall comply with all rules, regulations, requirements, or standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and other applicable federal, state, or local agencies. 15. Permittee shall ensure that the contractor has received and thoroughly understands all conditions of this permit. 16. Erosion control measures shall be adequately designed for the site characteristics. They may include staked haybales, diversion channels, sediment ponds, or sediment fences. They shall be installed prior to commencement and maintained., throughout project. All exposed soil shall be restored (by seeding and mulching or sodding and staking) within 72 hours of completion of project. 17. Permittee shall use a floating silt curtain or silt fence in the channel downstream of the project to minimize floating debris and sediment transport during construction. 18. Permittee shall plant a vegetative screen using native vines to provide a more natural appearance of the wall. cc: USCOE, T. Fell Anoka -SWCD_,__P __Rudolph -City of Fridley, -J Flora --- - Conservation Officer C. Brehm T. Wallace, DNR Wildlife B. Gilbertson, DNR Fisheries R. Anderson, St. Paul Waters Authorized Signature Title Date John Linc Stine Regional Hydrologist 9 Ap/ SUBJECT P City of Fridley 25347 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING P E R M I T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. o� NUMBERATE REV G PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 8/4/97 910-F15 JOB ADDRESS 901 Rice Creek Terrace NE 1 LEGALLOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. lO 1 Brookview Terrace 2nd SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Dave/Marcia Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace NE 572-8403 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑x ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Install bay window in bedroom 9 CHANGEOFUSEFROM TO STIPULATIONS TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCYLOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $400 $.50 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROV NS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $21.00 Fire SC $.40 STR CTI NOR THE RFORMf� CTbOF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE (( F7 $21.90 SIGNATURE UV CON TRACTOROR THORIZEDAGENT IDAT I HEN PROPERLY w "" SR DATEP THIS IS YOUR PERMIT TOA TE SIGNATURE OF OWNER I IF OWNER BUILDERI MATEI I NEW i ) Effective 1/1/97 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ConstructionAddress: Legal Description: 9E51 'e;;yp Owner Name & Address: Tel. Tel. # Contractor: MN LICENSE # Address: - Tel. # S 2 9VO-3� Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width H Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: W Z kMOl.-i l eA-) Construction Type:t "V06 t.c_j 129 ��dWe� e Cost: $ 'Yo� (Fee Schedule on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft !x $ = $ DATE: y9 u6 '.� APPLICANT: 6 '4011 �' Tel. # L1W ` 65'�® .3 TOTAL STIPULATIONS: $ �i.96 CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ f . 00 Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) Qe State Surcharge SAC Charge $ !�-O $.50/$1,000 Valuation 4(41 $ $950 per SAC Unit -- License Surcharge $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ -$450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [) Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL STIPULATIONS: $ �i.96 CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIVISION Effective On January 1; 1998 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, 572-3604 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES RATE SCHEDULE Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner - Also Replacement Furnace (Side Vent - Fill Out Back) Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace) Gas Range r19Z )0L 1�3� Gas Dryer *Air Conditioning - All Sizes All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK 1 % of Value of Appliance or Work Commercial/Industrial 1.25% of Value of Appliance or Work JOB ADDRESS '?eJ- % lelc 01?e9A' 7elee ce The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein Rate TOTAL specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes and rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and $ 30.00 $ representations stated in -this application are true and correct. $10.00 $ 4 11US '�l� /Jo a C14� ,1998 OWNER $10.00 $ BUILDING USED AS c5;FA5Q N f hC1Y c} N t?,4!T $10.00 $ � ESTIMATED COST S`C PERMIT NO./_ $ 25.00 $ DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE AND OR BURNER State Surcharge TOTAL FEE $ .50 No. of Heating Units Trade Name BTU Fuel Burner Trade Name BTU HEATING COMPANY MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLINGNENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $25.00 Signed By PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $42.00/Hr Approved *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without FILL OUT BACK SIDE written permission from adjoining property owner. REPLACEMENT FURL -Circle One (Steam) (Hot Water) (Warm Air) Size No. HP EDR Total Connected Load HP Size No. EDR Tel No. 6_>'o? - 9�-�6.3 I Rough -In Date Final Date STACK VERIFICATION ON and total BTU's connected Yes () No ( ) 6 Has total heating BTU's of All other BTU's TOTAL BTU's 7. CHEMMY AND STACK VERIFICATION Yes ( The undersigned hereby verifies that the existing chimney or stack: ( ) 1. . Has been carefully examined Yes (') No ( ) 2. Is free from rust or deterioration Yes () No ( ) 3. Has no foreign objects lodged within Yes () No ( ) 4. Is securely supported . Yes () No ( ) 5. Meets all current Code requirements for size and total BTU's connected Yes () No ( ) 6 Has total heating BTU's of All other BTU's TOTAL BTU's 7. Has a liner been provided for water heater Yes ( ) No ( ) 8. Has combustion air been provided for water heater Yes ( ) No ( ) Remarks: 6 ellllm"ev C& List ALTERATIONS Being_Done: HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: SUBJECTRMIT NO. City of Fridley 27490 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT RECEI � NO. '_____ i teCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. �� _ r r,: PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 . � NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 910-F15f' 9198 f' JOB ADDRESS 901 Rice Creek Terrace NE 1 LEGALLOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 10 1 Brookview Terrace 2nd SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE David & Marcia Wi er 572-8403 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO Owner 8392 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK O NEW ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 22' x 14' porch on existing deck roof & walls only) 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS See notations on plan. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT 2500 $1.25 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PFFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. 11 ]l}. 75 Fire SC $2.50 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALFEE $78.50 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOROR UTHO EDAGENT (DATti WHEN PROPERLY CJ BLDG INSP LIDA ED THIS IS Y P RMIT —75 GATE SIGNATURE OF OWNER) IF OWNER BUILDER) IDATEI NEW ' [ ] Effective 1/1/98 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FANDLY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ConstructionAddress: '7,!�% eF"� 7�i•�'�'%�c� Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: Tel. # J 7 3 Contractor: L91 -')F l") / �� 49Ls6 MN LICENSE # Address: Fo % /?I C,F cee Z -f `5"/ele Tel. #Attach to to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. ®/Vc/� GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: 0424 y Construction Type: Estimated Cost: $ �j -1--&6 (Fee Schedule on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Ft x $ _ $ DATE: `P APPLICANT: Tel. # CITY USE ONLY d Permit Fee Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $1000 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] & iz TOTAL $ STIPULATIONS: