The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR 98-23611y"TI AL619hy,1li:Pl�*011110. COUNTY OF ANOKA *ftwe] a 90 11914:0 In the Matter of: Variance, VAR #98-23 Owner: David J. Wiger and Marcia E. Wiger -:30- a� -;?a _00/pl- APPEALS COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE The above entitled matter came before the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 26th day of August, 1998, on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance for the following described properly: To reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three -season porch on Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace, 2nd Addition, (subject to a 6 foot utility and drainage easement along the northeasterly line), generally located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approved with two stipulations. See Appeals Commission minutes dated August 26, 1998. 61f • AUT llvN*.1J0J�J CITY OF FRIDLEY OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the / day of�tc.� , 19 DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 • ,e • kYa l:�srr ah t��i A. Skogen, City C k `� Jr t� iY �..�t•\�Q Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and shall be considered void if not used within that period. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1998 PAGE 5 Dr. Vos stated the petitioners have existing garage. He did not see any advantage to moving the garage back. The site lin s fro m the comer will not impede the traffic. It is quite a way down Brookview Drive. a petitioner will sell off the lot that was split and whoever buys it must talk to the petitio\er. He did not think they had any right to put on a stipulation about drainage on a lotthanot affected by the variance. He would vote in favor without a stipulation. Ms. Mau agreed. She liked the idea tha they were changing the lot split enough to make a good sized lot. It does create a hardshipso they would need the variance. It would look better with a bigger lot. She would vte in favor of the request. Mr. Jones stated he would vote in favor. has a clear understanding about the drainage issues, and he shares those conc ms. He did not believe that was in the jurisdiction of the Appeals Commission. He Iso believes that a larger lot would make a more appealing building site. Ms. Beaulieu agreed. She hoped Mr. would vote in favor of the request. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Dr. Vos, to ki #98-22, by Cully and Michelle Smutzler, to redu accessory structure on a comer lot from 25 feet t setback for an accessory structure that faces the 22.1 feet to allow an existing garage to remain in feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview 2nd Addition, gE Street. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAI THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. problems are not made worse. She ommend approval Variance Request, the required rear yard setback for an 17 feet; and to reduce the right-of-way ide street of a comer lot from 30 feet to s present location on the south 155 orally located at 1027 Mississippi ERSON KUECHLE DECLARED 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #98- 23. BY DAVID & MARCIA WIGER: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three - season porch on Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace, 2nd Addition, generally located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace. MOTION by Mr. Jones, seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three -season porch. The dimensions of the porch are 22 feet x 14 feet. An uncovered deck currently exists in this location. It is their intent to convert the deck to a three -season porch. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner indicated on their hardship statement that the porch would not infringe on others' rights because there are no houses behind their house.. The APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1998 PAGE property to the north is a county park. The deck was built 10 years ago with sufficic4i footings and timbers to be converted to a porch. Putting a roof over the deck and screens would allow the petitioners to better utilize the deck due to insects and the sd� . They feel a screened porch would be an improvement to their property and the community. Mr. Hickok stated the code requires that a rear yard deck be not less than 25% of the lbt depth. That is where they come up with the dimension of 31.25 feet for the rear yams setback of this property. It should in no case be less than 25 feet and no greater than 40 feet. The City has in the past granted a variance to this dimension. Mr. Hickok stated that because a previous variance has been granted, staff has no recommendation. If the Appeals Commission chooses to approve the variance, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 2. The proposed porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. Dr. Vos asked staff to show the aerial photo of the property. The house to the east is set back less. If the deck is enclosed, it would not affect that house. The petitioner will have a long side to the house on that side. He asked if there is a steep drop off behind the house. Ms. Wiger stated there is a fairly steep Incline. Mr. Wiger stated they plan to put a roof over the deck with screened side walls. They may put in windows at some time. With all the bugs and mosquitoes near the creek, it will make it more functional and useful. Their neighbors are in favor of the request. He did not see a problem. Mr. Jones asked if the petitioner had any problem with the stipulations. Mr. Wiger stated it would meet the building codes and would be architecturally compatible. The stipulations are not a problem. Dr. Vos stated he understood that they will keep the roof line the same but they are just extending it. Mr. Wiger stated this is correct. The old drawing states there was a porch there. That was converted into a kitchen. That roof line will be extended over the porch. Mr. Kuechle asked what kind'of activities take place in the park behind their house. Mr. Wiger stated on their side of the creek there is nothing. There is a path on the other side of the creek. There is no access between the creek and their house. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Jones, to close the public hearing. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1998 PAGE 7 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M. Ms. Beaulieu stated she has no problem with the request. This will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood or the park. It looks like it will look good and be more useful. She would vote in favor of the request. Ms. Mau agreed. It sounds as though the neighbor most affected has no problem with it. She did not see a problem. It has no negative impact. Dr.. Vos stated the staff report indicates they received a letter.from a neighbor in favor of the request.. Ms. Wier stated that neighbor lives across the street. Mr. Kue,chle concurredi as well. He thought the impact will be minimal especially since there no house behind there. Dr. Vos asked that if the petitioner tried to build to the correct setback, how much of an extension would they be allowed? Mr. Hickok stated they could have a deck 10 feet into the rear setback dimension. With a roof over it, they could only have two feet. Dr. Vos 'stated it would 'be impossible to meet the setback unless they have a two -foot porch. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #98-23, by David and Marcia Wiger, to reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to 'allow the construction of an attached three -season porch on Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview.Terrace, 2nd Addition, generally located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace, with the following stipulations: 1. The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 2. The proposed porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. DANIEL BUTTERFIELD: Per Section 205.21.05.0 of the Fridley by the main building and accessory bu construction of anew 900 square foot c Lot 9 lying North of the South 30 feet tl located at 5924 2 1/2 Street. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Jones, to notice and to open the public hearing. ing Code, to increase the lot coverage 3 from 25% to 26.7% to allow the le on all of Lots 7 and 8, and the paa of 3f, Block 10, Hyde Park, generally the reading of the public hearing ABSTRACT Receipt #'56( 85 /( ?05b ❑ Certified Copy ,�j��t� Date/rime:/ -,1) Date Mailed 1:1Tax Liens / Releases Doc. Order of _ ❑ Multi -Co Doc Tax Pd or by: Pins: V0 �j�'� Recordability / Delgs: dO ` ❑ Transfer ❑ New Desc. Filing Fees: C�' SV ❑ Division ❑ GAC Well Certificate ❑ Status ❑ Def. Spec Received this Date: Anoka County Recorder ❑ Other �No Change Notes: DOCUMENTNO. 1429279.0 ABSTRACT ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE FOR RECORD ON MAY 14 1999 AT 5: 00 PM AND WAS DULY RECORDED. FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $19.50 PAID. RECEIPT NO. 1999056685 EDWARD M. TRESKA ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES RP BY DEPUTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE David & Marcia Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Wiger: August 31, 1998 On August 26, 1998, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #98-23, to reduce the reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three -season porch on Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace, 2"d Addition, generally located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace with the following stipulations: 1. The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 2. The porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. You have one year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3599. SHAs ning Coordinator Please review the above action, sign below, and return the original to the City of Fridley Planning Department by September 14, 1998. c Concur with action ta, n. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1998 Dr. Vos stated the petitioners moving the garage back. The quite a way down Brookview D whoever buys it must talk to the stipulation about drainage on a favor without a stipulation. PAGE 5 an existing garage. He did not see any advantage to lines from the comer will not impede the traffic. It is The petitioner will sell off the lot that was split and :titioner. He did not think they had any right to put on a that is not affected by the variance. He would vote in Ms. Mau agreed. She liked the ida that they were changing the lot split enough to make a good sized lot. It does create a h rdship so they would need the variance. It would look better with a bigger lot. She w uld vote in favor of the request. Mr. Jones stated he would vote in fa or. He has a clear understanding about the drainage issues, and he shares thos concerns. He did not believe that was in the jurisdiction of the Appeals Commissio . He also believes that a larger lot would make a more appealing building site. Ms. Beaulieu agreed.. She hoped Mr. would vote in favor of the request. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Dr. #98-22, by Cully and Michelle Smutzler, accessory structure on a comer lot from setback for an accessory structure that 1 22.1 feet to allow an existing garage to i feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Brookview 2nd Ac Street. problems are not made worse. She to recommend approval Variance Request, :duce the required rear yard setback for an ;et to 17 feet; and to reduce the right-of-way the side street of a comer lot from 30 feet to n in its present location on the south 155 generally located at 1027 Mississippi UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PUBLIC -HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR°98= Per Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three - season porch on Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace, 2nd Addition, generally located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace. MOTION by Mr. Jones, seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three -season porch. The dimensions of the porch are 22 feet x 14 feet. An uncovered deck currently exists in this location. It is their intent to convert the deck to a three -season porch. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner indicated on their hardship statement that the porch would not infringe on others' rights because there are no houses behind their house.. The APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1998 PAGE 6 property to the north is a county park. The deck was built 10 years ago with sufficient footings and timbers to be converted to a porch. Putting a roof over the deck and adding screens would allow the petitioners to better utilize the deck due to insects and the sun. They feel a screened porch would be an improvement to their property and the community. Mr. Hickok stated the code requires that a rear yard deck be not less than 25% of the lot depth. That is where they come up with the dimension of 31.25 feet for the rear yard setback of this property. It should in no case be less than 25 feet and no greater than 40 feet. The City has in the past granted a variance to this dimension. Mr. Hickok stated that because a previous variance has been granted, staff has no recommendation. If the Appeals Commission chooses to approve the variance, staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 2. The proposed porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. Dr. Vos asked staff to show the aerial photo of the property. The house to the east is set back less. If the deck is enclosed, it would not affect that house. The petitioner will have a long side to the house on that side. He asked if there is a steep drop off behind the house. Ms. Wiger stated there is a fairly steep Incline. Mr. Wiger stated they plan to put a roof over the deck with screened side walls. They may put in windows at some time. With all the bugs and mosquitoes near the creek, it will make it more functional and useful. Their neighbors are in favor of the request. He did not see a problem. Mr. Jones asked if the petitioner had any problem with the stipulations. Mr. Wiger stated it would meet the building codes and would be architecturally compatible. The stipulations are not a problem. Dr. Vos stated he understood that they will keep the roof line the same but they are just extending it. Mr. Wiger stated this is correct. The old drawing states there was a porch there. That was converted into a kitchen. That roof line will be extended over the porch. Mr. Kuechle asked what kind of activities take place in the park behind their house. Mr. Wiger stated on their side of the creek there is nothing. There is a path on the other side of the creek. There is no access between the creek and their house. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Jones, to close the public hearing. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1998 PAGE 7 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M. Ms. Beaulieu stated she has no problem with the request. This will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood or the park. It looks like it will look good and be more useful. She would vote in favor of the request. Ms. Mau agreed. It sounds as though the neighbor most affected has no problem with it. She did not see a problem. It has no negative impact. Dr. Vos stated the staff report indicates they received a letter from a neighbor in favor of the request. Ms. Wiger stated that neighbor lives across the street. Mr. Kuechle concurred as well. He thought the impact will be minimal especially since there no house behind there. Dr. Vos asked that if the petitioner tried to build to the correct setback, how much of an extension would they be allowed? Mr. Hickok stated they could have a deck 10 feet into the rear setback dimension. With a roof over it, they could only have two feet. Dr. Vos stated it would be impossible to meet the setback unless they have a two -foot porch. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #98-23, by David and Marcia Wiger, to reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached three -season porch on Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace, 2nd Addition, generally located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace, with the following stipulations: 1. The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure. 2. The proposed porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. DANIEL BUTTERFIELD: Per Section 205.21.05.0 of the Fn ley Zoning Code, to increase the lot coverage by the main building and accesso building from 25% to 26.7% to allow the construction of anew 900 square foo garage on all of Lots 7 and 8, and the part of Lot 9 lying North of the South 30 feet hereof, Block 10, Hyde Park, generally located at 5924 2 1/2 Street. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Jones, waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. \ Rear yard Setback Variance, 901 Rice Creek Terrace NE DESCRIPTION. OF REQUEST: Mr. and Mrs. Wiger are requesting a variance to allow the reduction of the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet. The variance will allow the petitioners to construct a covered, three season porch. The dimensions of the porch are 22 feet wide by 14 feet deep. An uncovered deck presently exists at the site. The Wiger property is located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace. HARDSMP STATEMENT: The screened porch would not infringe on other's lights, because there are no houses behind it and the property to the north is the county park. The deck was built ten years ago with sufficient footings and timbers to be converted to a porch. Putting a roof over the deck and adding screens would allow us to better utilized the deck due to insects and the sun. We feel that a screened porch would be an improvement to the property and community. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.07.03.D.(3a) of the Fridley City requires a rear yard with a depth of not less than 25% of the lot depth, with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. The depth of the Wiger property is 125 feet, therefore, the rear yard setback is 31.25 feet. The proposed porch will be 19 feet from the rear property line and will have an area of 308 square feet. Its roof line will match that of the house. The lot coverage by buildings will be 2,420 square feet or 19.4% of the lot. The maximum allowable is 25%. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff has no recommendation due to the fact that this request is within a previously granted dimension. If the variance is approved, it would be appropriate to include the following stipulations: 1) The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure, and 2) The proposed porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. Staff Report: VAR #98-23 901 Rice Creek Terr NE Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A variance to allow the reduction of the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet. The variance will allow the petitioners to construct a covered, three season porch. The dimensions of the porch are 22 feet wide by 14 feet deep. Location of Property: 901 Rice creek Terrace NE Legal Description of Property: Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace 2nd Addition Lot Size: 12,500 square feet Topography: The rear of the lot slopes down toward Rice Creek. Existing Vegetation: Suburban lawn, trees Existing Zoning/Platting: R-1, Single Family / Brookview Terrace 2nd Addition Availability of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: Rice Creek Terrace Pedestrian Access: Rice Creek Terrace Site Planning Issues: Rear yard setback Comprehensive Planning Issues: Zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are consistent in this location. Public Hearing Comments: To be taken 2 Staff Report: VAR #98-23 901 Rice Creek Ten NE Page 3 DEVELOPMENT SITE Mr. and Mrs. Wiger are requesting a variance to allow the reduction of the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet. The variance will allow the petitioners to construct a covered, three season porch. The dimensions of the porch are 22 feet wide by 14 feet deep. An uncovered deck presently exists at the site. The Wiger property is located at 901 Rice Creek Terrace. SITE DESCRIPTIONAMSTORY The original house and attached garage were built in 1962. Since then the house has been added to and repaired due to a tornado and fire. Brookview Terrace 2nd Addition - platted April 1959 Building Permit for House and attached Garage - March 1962 Building Permit, Rebuild due to tornado damage - August 1965 Building Permit, Repairs due to fire damage - May 1979 Building Permit, Addition & Deck - April 1988 Building Permit, Install Fireplace - November 1989 Building Permit, Install Bay Window - August 1997 ADJACENT SITES North: Zoning: P, Public Facilities Land Use: Locke Park (Rice Creek) ast: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Homes South: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Homes es : Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Homes Section 205.07.03.D.(3a) of the Fridley City requires a rear yard with a depth of not less than 25% of the lot depth, with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. The depth of the Wiger property is 125 feet, therefore, the rear yard setback is 31.25 feet. The Wiger's are proposing to cover and add screen walls to an existing deck. The deck is 19 feet from the rear property line. Uncovered decks do not have to meet the same building setbacks as houses or house additions. The covered deck must meet the building setback and, therefore, a variance from the required rear yard setback is required to allow the construction. The area of the proposed porch is 308 square feet. The area of the house is 1628 square feet and the garage is 484 square feet. The total area of all structures is 2420 square feet; this equates to a lot coverage of 19.4%. The maximum allowable lot coverage is 25%. 3 Staff Report: VAR #98-23 901 Rice Creek Terr NE Page 4 The Wiger's have indicated that the roof line of the porch will match that of the adjacent kitchen. They also indicated that cedar would be used on the ceiling and walls. We have received a phone call from a neighbor in regards to this issue. Doris Wuertz, 880 Rice Creek Terrace, has indicated that she has no problem with the variance request. She further stated that the Wiger's take wonderful care of their property. /• •UI'�RIGINUO-M-ECIMANN Stephen Filer, 10 Rice Creek Way - reduce rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 13 to allow a three season porch, May 1998. Corinne Jespersen & Janet Palmer, 6496/98 Riverview Terrace - reduce rear yard setback from 27 to 15 feet to allow a screened porch, April 1996. RECOMMENDATION Staff has no recommendation due to the fact that this request is within a previously granted dimension. If the variance is approved, it would be appropriate to include the following stipulations: 1) The porch shall match the architectural design of the principal structure, and 2) The proposed porch shall meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code. 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: x Residential Commercial/industrial Signs PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site plan required for submittal, see attached Address: 7o/ Rim eew*- rzx-eAcg Property Identification Number R 13 -' .24� al oc12 NNS cc rb7 j? 7F Legal Description: Lot » Block i Tract/Addition y a>7 T.::..-. Current Zoning: Rgrwei=Xwt Square footage/acreage: 119Ss00 Reason for Variance: rt- i r / V 31.751 Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes r No If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type of business? C Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No x yyAy�.y.rArAy�rlr/. A-A-.yyy.y.rnyA..yAyA..AYN�I�.V.Vti^r1V.V.VVM/VtiYti.Vti.ViVM.V.VN/-titiVVw/tiVVtiV.VV.Y FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME: oovio r wAgc'.,4E W/ Gade'e ADDRESS: r-,F 7''xe " DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE: TVA...11/Vr.I�/N.V.VVII.V.YIYA./I/..V tiVtiVA/11�I tiVAI�.V.V� � /V^/ PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: Da ilia 'J MAI" z-d f-Vi �+i ADDRESS:,� ��C�- Y i �V �. DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE: wrw....�..+...w...rwr...�r�.wr.r�r.rw..r�..r...�r�rr�..w.err.wti...r.+.r...r.+.ti..�...1►.+.........�..i.r.�+ rrAr..•... wrr.+r..r�..u�..�. , Section of City Code: FEES Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, or signs: ee: $60. for residential properties: Receipt #: �{ Received By: Ap Hca on Number. �3 Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: $' / 9 Scheduled City Council Date: 25 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: c, l .lit A Fe EL Variance Hardship David and Marcia Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace Screened Porch Variance Request The deck behind our kitchen overlooks Rice Creek and the county park. The bank behind our home is quite steep; there are no homes behind our house; park use is on the other side of the creek. Due to these factors a screened porch would not infringe on other's rights. Because of the position of our home the deck is in full sun in the day and is too hot to use. Since the house is situated in proximity to the creek it is too buggy and mosquitoey to enjoy sitting outside in the evening. Due to these factors we have severe limitations on the use of our deck. We would simply like to put a roof over the deck and add screens to make it useful in the summer. We feel that a screened porch would be an improvement to the property and community. The deck was built ten years ago with sufficient footings and timbers to be converted to a porch. At the time we added the deck we were unaware that building a screened porch would require a variance. The roof line would simply continue with that of the existing kitchen; cedar would be used on the ceiling and walls to allow sceen to be attached. ZonbV Deslipi9cm R.1 - One Family Units 0 1-2 - Tm Fw* Units 0 R,3 - General MA* tkits Q R-4 -14bt O I -b. Perks 0 Pim - Ped Uret oavdu rd Q S1 - Hyde Pak Neighborhood 0 S2 - PadmdWmmt EhIrld 0 C 1 - Local Business 0 C•2 - Gaal Business 0 G3 - Co al Shopping C•R1- Gam al Office M-1 - Light Industrial 0 K2 - Fis" IndusbW 0 M-3 - Qadoar h m" Heavy Ind RR - Railroads 0 P - R kOc FacHilies WATER n RIGHT -0F WAY Rear Yard Setback Variance Petitioners: Dmid & M'cia Riger Variance, VAR #9&23 Zoning .• R-1, Single Family 901 Rice Geek Teff" NE 4mw N CH w-• E D OF Date: 07/24/1998 LES' Compiled and drawn from dffi 'dial recce taad on Ordrom NcL 70 and Zo dng tff%cOw date 127156 tagger wf th aD ar� adn- amass adoprlad ad endive as df 2/1 W. The orUwas l,,rldlIlnrin,,,y W75 Rr9 rV ICS Atf. tai kiSurverly Mnuxoftvlis 1/, tip,ls lesfliry ENGINEERING, INC. 4�inncsOfq (,vr! : Afuna,pa! SUmef 4-e066 f nyrrrec'rn� En9 ineers Sur veyars certiFzcate of sutveT for 4i, 4 lclrll' (- �j� T ►► _.�.,s.�.�! L CLEMRON, INC. GENERAL, Co;;P CTORS 2500 22nd Ave. N. E. Minneapolis 18, Minna ® o f; ,1r"i `� � s LO 'J'JAOCIK i1 11ROOKVtEW +TERRACE. M hV01 }� 1 /hereby cerfiry Mvo 65 is a bw and owyzcf mpresenfaf raj of a -,w ey e& &"W*rres al(& ober dmc, W /and, and o�'lC laoiion o�'al/ bw/din9s , l/rreon ,add/ ris/b/e awnacfimmjs , r 'a►�. vn a' assaid /and. As surveyed by me Iles - dog A.D. SUB URBAN ENGJNE -RING , INC. Engineers fi' S( ✓eyors 6)X? 177, j1d C4 1; ril& IF -9 -tv IN ov ?pw f WIN Doty 9 r 1,1.,Svx? Ono 7cn Ez] omm amm a Variance Hardship David and Marcia Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace Screened Porch Variance Request The deck behind our kitchen overlooks Rice Creek and the county park. The bank behind our home is quite steep; there are no homes behind our house; park use is on the other side of the creek. Due to these factors a screened porch would not infringe on other's rights. Because of the position of our home the deck is in full sun in the day and is too hot to use. Since the house is situated in proximity to the creek it is too buggy and mosquitoey to enjoy sitting outside in the evening. Due to these factors we have severe limitations on the use of our deck. We would simply like to put a roof over the deck and add screens to make it useful in the summer. We feel that a screened porch would be an improvement to the property and community. The deck was built ten years ago with sufficient footings and timbers to be converted to a porch. At the time we added the deck we were unaware that building a screened porch would require a variance. The roof fine would simply continue with that of the existing kitchen; cedar would be used on the ceiling and walls to allow sceen to be attached. Variance Hardship David and Marcia Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace Screened Porch Variance Request The deck behind our kitchen overlooks Rice Creek and the county park. The bank behind our home is quite steep; there are no homes behind our house; park use is on the other side of the creek. Due to these factors a screened porch would not infringe on other's rights. Because of the position of our home the deck is in full sun in the day and is too hot to use. Since the house is situated in proximity to the creek it is too buggy and mosquitoey to enjoy sitting outside in the evening. Due to these factors we have severe limitations on the use of our deck. We would simply like to put a roof over the deck and add screens to make it useful in the summer. We feel that a screened porch would be an improvement to the property and community. The deck was built ten years ago with sufficient footings and timbers to be converted to a porch. At the time we added the deck we were unaware that building a screened porch would require a variance. The roof line would simply continue with that of the existing kitchen; cedar would be used on the ceiling and walls to allow sceen to be attached. land Planrnny 6875 Hlghnny *6S A/E. [mrd SurvPyiny S05 leslmq ENGINEERING, INC. Owl (- Afunlapal SUacel4-6066 1 ymerr, y Engineers Sur vecyors certificate of surve for � . T CLEMRON, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 2500 22nd Ave. N. K Minneapolis IS, Minn. J r -D ^ T` F sol 16LOCK i) i)TEUACE900KVIEW l ,6&yby cerbI y Phot 65 is a bw iwd coarct repesenfofron op sarvey e#je &xv dories 4'/& r obo►r ek5cmArd lmrd, end n)'r /ff4hvn or'ol/ brAdinys , llxreon , ohdeff risible Pncmothmenls , if mj, f v" or w said /and. As surveyed by m+e lhis _ obt, A.D. SUB URBAN ENGINEERING, INC. [ngineer Fi' S,�veyors� s � Lond Planing Lard Surweyirg Soils Testing Clwl b Municipal rflymeenng ENG I NOF.R I N GI Engineers 075-9iyhrmy =Gs NE. Mintreofrn/s 21, 1 N C. Mrnnesofa Sdnsel44066 Sur vectors — cettlificate of sv,tveT For Iwovt elf SS -0 V% CLENRON, INC. . ^r%wvrne-VORS re. N. L 3, Minn. 'PSC \ I LOT to &OCK t U00vVIF-w TERRACE 1 1 / bemby wlirfho% *is is a fi w wd torted repesenfofian ore swwey ellen bwa,,Pies ef& aban Asay ed lid, and locvfinn o�'o/l bur/da�rs , !/aeon , &- doll risible wawcfimenfs , ll'm y. f m or wnwid /ond. As surveyed by me 1h�s - cbtf —' A•D OLV. Su6u.Q6" ENGINEERING , INC. r R Ln 11 etasreyors r ♦ fV b„ C, CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: X' Residential Commercial/Industrial Signs PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site plan required for submittal, see attached Address: To l RBc& CRAFIC r�RleAc4t Property Identification Number. R is &g 4� .22 ed/.2 #A/19 40 'Y&7 ??F - Legal Description: Lot 16 Block Tract/Addition a it Current Zoning: RwoeN -91- Square footage/acreage: t ols'oo Reason for Variance: 'a rz iV V 31,251 SeeE�� r� kel�us, Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes Y No If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type of business? c„u°ri?n-e-7-®R Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No x FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME: ER ADDRESS: 7ol Rz c -,F DAYTIME PHONE: S -7A- 6wYo3 SIGNATURE/DATE: V1VM.VV^/VA/^IV.VVV.VAI/VVIV.V.VN.VVAIA/IWMI.VV,VNNIV.VM�IIV.VAI/Ywr/r.V�IV.VMti ti � ��'�� PETITIONER INFORMATION I'/grmle NAME: Da yet iiioc� / liar F---Wy, ADDRESS: � ewro DAYTIME PHONE: 2- a SIGNATURE/DATE: t9 ° 27 a' N/VVVV.V.II.V.V.VAI.VVVVV.V.VPYV.VNNNVAtr A/.Vti.V.V.VV.VMiVVIVVN V.V.V VN.VAt/IV.VAt/ Section of City Code: //- FEES Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, or signs: ee: $ 0:' for residential properties: Receipt #: `q 19 2 Received By: Ap i ion Number. Pa - ,7:3 Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: la Scheduled City Council Date: 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: 60 Day Date: i In City of FridleyLand U se Application'Process 60 Day Agency Action Law Application Date Planning Commission Meeting City Council Decision 60 Day Window Starts Recommendation to Council Approval or Denial 21-40 Days t 50-60 Days Approved, Action Taken Letter Application Complete 10 Day Notice *Denied bled, 60 More Days Submit Complete Public Hearings: Application and Variance ; Materials Vacations Lot Splits Public Hearings: Plats Rezonings Rezonings Zoning Amendments Zoning Amendments Wetland Replacements Comprehensive Plan Special Use Permits CIIYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (612) 571-3450 - FAX (612) 571-1287 July 27, 1998 David & Marcia Wiger 901 Rice Creek Terrace NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wiger: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 days if their land use applications are complete. We received an application for a rear yard setback variance on July 17, 1998. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete and that the City of Fridley will be processing your application in accordance with Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code. Your application schedule is as follows: Appeals Commission August 12, 1998 City Council August 24, 1998 If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Paul J.. Planning Assistant PJT:jt C-98-139 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO: Property owners within 350 feet of 901 Rice Creek Terrace CASE NUMBER: VAR #98-23 APPLICANT. David and Marcia Wiger Petitioner or representative must attend the Appeals Commission meeting. PURPOSE: To reduce the rear yard setback from 31.25 feet to 19 feet to allow the construction of an attached 3 -season porch LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 901 Rice Creek Terrace LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Block 1, Brookview Terrace, 2nd Addition DATE AND TIME OF Appeals Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, August 12, 1998, 7:30 p.m. The Appeals Commission meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 35. PLACE OF HEARING: Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers, 6431 University Avenue HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, or Paul Tatting, Planning Assistant, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432, or fax at 571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMMODATIONS: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than August 5, 1998. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact either Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 572-3599, or Paul Tatting, Planning Assistant, at 572-3593. Mailing Date: July 31, 1998 FRIDLEY C!T OF FRIDLEY CIFY OF FRIDLEY F 6431 UNI VERS AVE NE 6431 UNIVEWY AVE NE 6431 UNIVWITY AVE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLE MN 55432 FRIDLE MN 55432 FRIDLEY Cl. OF 6431 UNIVER AVE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY C OF 6431 SITY AVE NE FRIDLE MN 55432 HEGGESTAD MARK A & JILL M 841 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 WIGER DAVID J & MARCIA E 901 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 BRENDEN ROBERT S & MARY E 921 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 HAYANO GEORGE J & JANE M 941 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 SWAGGERT RODELL H & TERESA 961 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DOYLE WILLIAM A III & MARY 981 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY CIXY OF 6431 UNIVERWY AVE NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 ONEILL ROBERT D & EUNICE M 861 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 MEWHORTER LORAINE A 871 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 BREMER DARWIN & DORIS H 840 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 HINES ALAN C & LOIS M 870 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 LYNCH MARTY A 890 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 DUPRE OWEN & KATHLEEN M 871 PANDORA DR NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 KOSKINIEMI GERALD S & S L 881 PANDORA DR NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY CI 6431 UNIVE AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SANDBERG CRAIG & NANCY 851 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 BROWN THOMAS A & DONNA M 881 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 BROCKMAN TIMOTHY A & LEE A 860 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 WUERTZ ROBERT P & DORIS M 880 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 HART MICHAEL E & GAY W 861 PANDORA DR NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 WILKEN WILLIAM B & HOLLY A 1001 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 HADDAD CAROLE 910 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 JAHN ELMER E & JOANNE E WEAVER GEORGE B & CARYL G GREENWALDT DONALD R & G M 891 PANDORA DR NE 928 RICE CREEK TER NE 942 RICE CREEK TER NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 MELGREN RAYMOND L & MARY E DOUCETTE RICHARD C & J H 901 PANDORA DR NE 95 8 RICE CREEK TER NE FR DLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 VARCOE BETTY J JOHNSON JERI L S & ERIC L 974 RICE CREEK TER NE 921 PANDORA DR NE FR [)LEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 RICE CREEK WATERSHED DIST SUITE 330 ARDEN PLAZA 3585 LEXINGTON AVE N ARDEN HILLS MN 55126-8056 A f' EUKEL KEVIN J & MARY J 911 PANDORA DR NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 SLATER RONALD L 931 PANDORA DR NE FRIDLEY MN 55432 Kjdp X. W-1101 u -GMpm wWo i i op ! wpc4-dn pw splA 'SUMPBBQPUBP - �w► mm gip: POZ Pue QL *ON O 00 poseq w=ai pow =1 mgo pw pgguoJ 8661/i7ZiLO :OWG S do a El +A% Am =j x gN ,1 Yda-oa-l-W 106 dIAW,4 ap.9uzs 7-Y *gUZU07 F47-96# (VVA `ax" -W11 : vmozluad 33=PBA x;)Taql;)S P.UA JWH AW "IMIH 0 I:Rkw = SBAI BA DHgnd - d gym- as pul AABGH MOLOM MOPu+o- VW D PMNWI AVMH - Z -W Pwipuiwen- m O &gddaS Poiail - Coo D sse pm wmaq -Z-0D swumu m,- v3 o pPPK3- Z -S a MMPMILPPN4wdeP44- VS a we0 uun raid - Old O sM eft ffl Ieieusa - Nd smAlpve j=l- Z- D qM Nwem a o - Lid mwpmal6e0 BJMY