The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR 89-27STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY In the Matter of a variance, VAR #89-27 Kenneth Anderson , Owner l 7S i 12 CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 13th day of November , 19 89 , on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet, on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Addition, the same being 132 River Edge Way N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: See City Council minutes of November 13, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk for the City of Fridley with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand at the City of Fri ey, Minnesota, in t e County of Anoka on the day of 19_L DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 / xL4 SHIRLEY A. H APALA, CITY 6LERK Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and -,-shall be considered void if not used within that period. (SE d,) 1, FRZDLEY CITY COIIMCIL MS8TZ_XG OF �TOVSMSER 13. 1989 PAG$ 9 to allow the construction of an addition. Se cirman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice v ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion c animously. B. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE VAR #69-27. TO REDUCE THE RE UIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 27 FEET TO 21 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH ON LOT 20, BLOCK 1. RIVER EDGE ADDITION THE SAME BEING 132 RIVER EDGE WAY N.E BY KENNETH ANDERSON: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request for a variance to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of a three -season porch. She stated this home is located in an R-3 zoning district with R-1 zoning to the west and north and R-3 zoning to the east. She stated the parcel abuts Stevenson Elementary School to the south. She stated the petitioner is also proposing to construct a new garage and demolish the existing garage. Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of this variance as the parcel has a unique shape and a severe cul-de-sac radius along the north of the lot. She stated the lot abuts school property to the south and the Commission felt there were no practical alternatives to construct the porch and new garage in order to conform with the requirements of the ordinance. She stated the petitioner has indicated, as far as the garage, it could not be located any closer to the street and the size of the porch would have to be reduced significantly in order to meet the setback requirements. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the unanimous recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant variance, VAR #89-27 to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 to 21 feet. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. RASMUSSEN FOR WILDLIFE USE OF CITY LAND: Mr.. Flora, Public Works Director/City Enginee stated Mr. Rasmussen. has requested the Council to cer leasing City property to him along Springbrook Creek on order to improve the natural habitat for wildlife. He s ed an agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney's fice and requested that the Council consider this agreem Councilman Fitzpatr' stated it should be noted that Buffalo and Broad Streets not through streets, as shown on the map. Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the Mayor to enter lease agreement with Walter Rasmussen. Seconded by Numericaf, Grantor ----- Grantee ----- Recorded Checked Margin-- OME OF CONTY REMO" STATE OF EMA, CO WM OF AN= I hereby ceitty that the won I*", oat JAN fm mcwd ftd flftlM on the MW wn duly mmod By CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 P FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Kenneth Anderson 132 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Anderson: November 15, 1989 On November 13, 1989, the Fridley City Council approved your request for a variance, VAR #89-27, to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet, to allow the construction of 10 a porch on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Way, the same being 132 River Edge Way N.E. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. sincerely, Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator BD/dn Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by November 29, 1989. Concur with action taken. STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE October to , 1989 CITY OF PLANNING COMMISSION DATE FRI DLEY CITY COUNCIL DATE November 13, 19 89 AUTHOR M/I-S REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONING UTILITIES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES & ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION VAR #89-27 Kenneth Anderson Reduce rear yard setback fran 27 feet to 21 feet 132 River Edge Way N. E. N/A N/A R-3, General Multiple Duelling W, N,: R-1, Single Fancily Dwelling; E: R-3, General Multiple Dwelling; S: Robert Louis Stevenson School On site N/A None Yes Yes None Denial Approval 5N r Staff Report VAR #89-27, 132 River Edge Way Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.03.D.(3) requires a rear yard setback of not less than 25% of the lot depth, with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required, from the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas to enhance the neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "We would like to utilize the space in our back yard by removing the old garage and building a new attached garage and porch. Due to the odd configuration of our lot, we will need a 4 ft. variance on the southwest corner of the proposed porch." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request Kenneth Anderson is requesting that the rear yard setback be reduced from 25 feet to 21 feet on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Addition, the same being 132 River Edge Way. Site The site is in an R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, zoning district with adjacent R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to the west and north, and additional R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to the east. The parcel abuts the Robert Louis Stevenson Elementary School to the south. The variance is needed in order to construct a three -season porch to the rear of the structure adjacent to the dining and kitchen areas. Analysis The petitioner is proposing to construct a three -season porch in order to fully utilize the parcel throughout the seasons. In addition to the proposed screened -in porch, the petitioner is also removing his existing garage and constructing a 24 ft. x 34 ft. attached garage. This will allow the petitioner to maximize the open green area in the rear of the yard. The petitioner has three alternatives other than the proposed porch which would allow him to utilize the green space. The petitioner could build a smaller porch that would not encroach into the setback; the porch could also be extended to the 50 Staff Report VAR #89-27, 132 River Edge Way N.E. page 3 northeast along the bedrooms of the house. An unenclosed deck would be allowed by code to encroach into the setback. The petitioner could also construct a gazebo in the rear yard, not attached to the structure. Although the proposed porch would not directly impact any structure, just the ballfield of the elementary school, other options exist to meet the ordinance. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request, VAR #89-27, by Kenneth Anderson, on the basis that other options exist that would not require a variance. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the City Council approval of the variance request. The Appeals Commission recommended that the variance apply both to the porch and the new attached garage. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request on the basis that the petitioner has other options which would meet Code. o FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1989 PAGE 9 to allow the construction of an addit conded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice , 1 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carri n-mously. B. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE. VAR #89-27. TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 27 FEET TO 21 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH ON LOT 20, BLACK 1. RIVER EDGE ADDITION. THE SAME BEING 132 RIVER EDGE WAY N.E., BY KENNETH ANDERSON: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request for a variance to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of a three -season porch. She stated this home is located in an R-3 zoning district with R-1 zoning to the west and north and R-3 zoning to the east. She stated the parcel abuts Stevenson Elementary School to the south. She stated the petitioner is also proposing to construct a new garage and demolish the existing garage. Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of this variance as the parcel has a unique shape and a severe cul-de-sac radius along the north of the lot. She stated the lot abuts school property to the south and the Commission felt there were no practical alternatives to construct the porch and new garage in order to conform with the requirements of the ordinance. She stated the petitioner has indicated, as far as the garage, it could not be located any closer to the street and the size of the porch would have to be reduced significantly in order to meet the setback requirements. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the unanimous recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant variance, VAR #89-27 to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 to 21 feet. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH WALTER RASMUSSEN FOR WILDLIFE USE OF CITY LAND: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director/City Engine , stated Mr. Rasmussen. has requested the Council to c -der leasing City property to him along Springbrook Creek order to improve the natural habitat for wildlife. He s ed an agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney's ffice and requested that the Council consider this agreeme . Councilman Fitzpatrick throated it should be noted that Buffalo and Broad Streets are through streets, as shown on the map. MOTION by C ncilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the Mayor to enter into t lease agreement with Walter Rasmussen. Seconded by I FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1989 PAGE 10 Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP (ACCW) AGREEMENT: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, statedthe oka County Communications Workshop has submitted an agreem nt for the Council's consideration to provide for public acciss services. He stated this proposal is virtually identical to thyear's in that they are requesting that one-half of the funds f om the franchise fee, amounting to about $34,000, be allocated to the ACCW for their operating budget. Mr. Hunt stated the franchis fee is their major source of income. Mr. Hunt stated staff has no objection to this agreement and requests the Council consider this r quest. He stated this agreement would not bind the Council any subsequent funds for other years. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into this ag Bement with the Anoka County Communications Workshop. Second by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ma or Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Paul Kaspszak, Chairper on for the ACCW, thanked the Council for the funds and stated they will continue to work with the Council and other organi ations in Fridley to provide community access. 8. Mr. Flora, Public orks Director, stated at the June 19, 1989 Council meeting, a Council approved Change Order No. 1 to Street Improvement Proj t No. ST. 1989 - 1 & 2 for an amount of $23,420. He stated in rev ewing the records, the change order processed was for an amount of $23,595, an increase of $175 from what was approved by t e Council. He stated it appears an error occurred in identifyi g the costs of relocating the hydrant for the Northco project as 't showed $1,550 and the actual cost was $1,725. Mr. Flora /requested that the Council consider amending Change Order No. 1 f r this project by changing the dollar figure from $23,420 to $237595. MOTI N by Councilman Schneider to approve amended Change Order No. 1 f r Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1 & 2 with Gammon Brothers, by changing the dollar amount from $23,420 to $23,595. � CONMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5 DEPARTMENT anroF FraD1-ff MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 1989 k TO: William Burns, City Manager4- FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #89-27, by Kenneth Anderson, 132 River Edge Way N.E. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet. They recommended that the request apply to both the proposed porch and the proposed attached garage. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request on the basis that the petitioner has other options which would meet Code. MM:ls M-89-619 1. Pursuant to ction 205.17.03.C. (1) . (a) of the Fridley City Code to i crease the required lot coverage from 40% to 41.5%; 2. Pursuant to Sec ion 205.17.05.D.(5).(d) of the Fridley City Code to re uce the hard surface setback from a building from 5 et to 3.5 feet; With the recommendation that the curb be made as close to 5 feet as possible and still mainta n the 18 ft. stall depth allowed by City Code, to allow the const ction of an addition at 980 and 990 Osborne Road N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. \ Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on November 13, 1989. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #89-27. BY KENNETH ANDERSON: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of a porch on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Addition, the same being 132 River Edge Way N.E. MOTION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:10 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this property is currently zoned R-3, General Multiple Family. To the south is the Robert Louis Stevenson Elementary School. Currently, the petitioner's existing garage is set away from the house, and the petitioner is proposing to construct a new garage, 24 ft. x 34 ft. in dimension and to construct a three -season porch. Ms. McPherson stated if the variance is granted, it would also have to address the garage unless the petitioner wishes to move the garage forward or shorten the length of the garage. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has other alternatives to utilize the green space in the back yard. There is ample room to construct an separate gazebo that could be screened -in. The petitioner could also stretch the porch more to the east, or the petitioner could construct an unenclosed deck off the rear of the house. Staff is cognizant of the fact that the only property the porch would be impacting is the ballfield of the adjacent school property; however, because there are other alternatives, staff is recommending denial of the variance. 50 5R APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 10, 1989 PAGE 6 Mr. Kenneth Anderson, 132 River Edge Way N.E., stated that in square footage, they are only asking for 25 square feet. Otherwise, he would have a porch that is only 5 feet wide. He cannot expand to the east because he has two windows (a kitchen window and bathroom window), and because of the walkway to the elementary school. He stated the School District took almost 300 ft., of his lot for a walkway. Dr. Vos stated this is a fairly narrow lot which means the house had to be set back quite far. The biggest part of the lot is in the southwest corner where they cannot build. Then, the walkway took more off the lot on the east side. Mr. Anderson stated the way the house and garage is laid out now, they have only bits and pieces of green space. He could move the garage forward a little bit, but the porch is the problem. If he does not get that extra 25 sq. ft., the porch will only be 5 ft. wide. Mr. Anderson stated a gazebo is not at all the same thing as an attached porch. Mr. Anderson stated if he moved the garage forward, he would not be able to have a door from the garage into the porch. There is a jog in the house now, so that he could go from the garage into the porch. Otherwise, he would have to put a door into the living room. MOTION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYES CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:25 P.M. Mr. Sherek stated part of the public purpose for this part of the Code is to preserve green space. Because of the lack of neighbors to the rear, the fact that this plan will increase the green space, and the fact that a door will be covered which will stop some energy loss, he would be in favor of recommending approval of this variance. Dr. Vos stated that in looking at the constraint on this lot, there is a small radius in the front, which made it difficult to put a house on the lot. Part of the hardship is the configuration of the lot and the walkway easement which was not part of the lot originally. He would be in favor of recommending the rear yard variance from 27 ft. to 21 ft. that would affect both the garage and the porch. He did not think it was a very good idea to move the garage forward. 5S APPEALS_ COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 10, 1989 PAGE 7 Ms. Savage stated she is in favor of the variance. It is clear that the public purpose is being served by providing more green areas. It seems to be a good plan for the property aesthetically and it makes good sense for the living situation. Mr. Kuechle concurred. He thought the intent of the Code is being met. The green space will be increased, and the driveway will be reduced. Mr. Barna agreed. There will be more green space by the, removal of the existing garage and driveway, and he is in favor of enclosing the rear door of the garage to preserve energy loss. NOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #89-27, by Kenneth Anderson pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of a porch on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Addition, the same being 132 River Edge Way N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Dacy stated this will go to City Council on November 13, 1989. ADJOURNMENT; MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Savage, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Barna declared the October 10, 1989, Appeals Commission meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m. Res ectfully s witted, Lyri#e Saba Recording Secretary Mailing Date: 9/29/89 MAILING LIST FOR VAR #89-27 132 River Edge Way City Council Meribers City Manager Alex Barna, Chairperson Appeals Cmmission Jean Johnson 560 Hugo Street N.E. 140 River Edge. TAW Fridley, MQ Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth Anderson Joseph Mertens 132 River Edge Way 144 River Edge Way Fridley, M[Q 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 School District 14 Robert Holt 6000 West Moore Lake. Drive 148 River Edge Way Fridley, ASV 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Stevenson School Wilfred Otxer.ba 6080 East River Road N.E. 121 River Edge Way Fridley, M 55432 Fridley, lei 55432 Catherine Mikulak Sylvester Bonine 120 River Edge Way 125 River Edge Way Fridley, MLV 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Raymond Rucinski Helen Mikulak 124 River Edge Way 129 River Edge Way Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, M 55432 Bert Slater Jerry Byzewski. 128 River Edge Way 164 River Edge Way Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, M 55432 Thomas. Olin Gerald Nugent 136 River Edge Way 168 River Edge Way Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MST 55432 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, October 10, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a variance request, VAR #89- 27, by Kenneth Anderson: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(3) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the required rear yard setback from 25 feet to 21 feet to allow the construction of a porch on Lot 20, Block 1, River Edge Addition, t e same being 132 River Edge Way N.E., F idley, Minnesota, 55432. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. ALEX BARNA CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Note: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on this request unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors, the City Staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision.- If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council through the Planning Commission with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. Fri it Mj�_ yy i t rjAw COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW m R FIX Dm muTm DATE (BILE DESCRIPTION VAR #89-27 CITYOF 56 9/22/89 10/10/89 132 River Edge Tway N.E. - rear yard FRIDLEY COWLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST AND RETURN TO PLANNING DEPT. ® BARB D. F ARICR�IGA HN yot" PU(R-REL C. OCLYDE M. �5 El LEON M. 9 -ter ❑ JIM H. p Bob A. COMMENTS ra %�;, CITY OF FRIDLY ..$4311NNVERSITY mr, N.E. FRIDLEY,. MN 54432 (612) 671-3450 PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS VARIANO REQUEST FORM VARIANCE # Ac C ' �� VARIANCE FEE / RECEIPT #_Z 9 SCHEDULED APPEALS MEETING DATE IL L> LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 50 LOT 2,® BLOCK TRACT/ADDITION r PRESENT ZONING I -- VARIANCE REQUEST(S): Attach a plat or survey of the property showing building, variance(s). where applicable. List specific hardship(s) which require the variance(s): FEE OWNER INFORMATION NAME (please print)—''n V) � � PHONE � ADDRESS 132- �1 cl�d SIGNATURE -T?�DATE Note ## if# ##!## #f��#'#f###� �f# #jg#i#* c iii########## PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME(please print) PHONE ADDRESS SIGNATURE APPEALS COMMISSION: APPROVED DENIED DATE CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DENIED DATE STIPULATIONS: DATE The petitioner hereby understands that: 1. The City will notify all residents and owners of property within 200 feet of said property. 2. `This application must be signed by all owners o`f the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. 3. Materaial for submission of a variance include: Scaled plan showing proposed property and/or buildings if applicable. Three full suzed copies and legible 8 1/2" x 11" reduction. * Scaled preliminary (or final) landscape plan showing location of existing vegetation to be saved and locations of new plant material. Species, species name (common or botanical), and condition of root (i.e. bared, balled and burlapped, etc). Three full size copies and legible 8 1/2" x 11" reduction. * Scaled preliminary (or final) grading and drainage plan showing existing and propoed contours, detention/retention ponds, drainage swales, weirs, weir details, and run off quantities. Three full size copies and legible 8 1/2" x 11" reduction. * Floor plans, full size and 8 1/2" x 11" reduction. * Building elevations, full size and 8 1/2" x 11" reduction. Perspective shwoing how the proposal potentially looks in the surrounding area, full size and 8 1/2" x ll" reduction. L VAR #89-27 Kenneth Anderson R1V E Robert ZONING MAP VT A" .110n /lam �J 01 1 G r'I.Mi11 - ---------------- �. -41 71 14 C4 (366 90 az zo '�A ellcorlo S6 74) .00 c h. 7 -75.v --cr- Jr. asp M fzl Ar? ay.. "w), zw. lire m '12 t7 CA a an "VV LT AV" 'r - IL SIM -8r, ... .............. O aye o alb-�S' uo vrt�tnyS 2y/00f� gaiaU / , Zs'sozr! / ,ours S*p4,t)y .ono -/ass . ,OROS ../aiJ'D lire tir P�//o,� sr�i sa �/ i/�J�� 1(9 "� n/o� f �tt�Uoo �ga.�ay op ,v4/vNO/ _//�1�6' _��O � c3'.�/1/c3� • s� ,ra.,t-/n/� puts ,o��-�� .r., 0 1/ r��nsa��i/y �,tli�ro� o�o��d2" 0/V vols �. .,� o�ouy �o ��i�a� ,orin r'/osaUv� v ai.a��S �/� .i�oa� ,ora s r �u� a 4i ��fry/ 'sOr.��/� �• a �o��] puo saute/� J �'✓n/!i/ ,�`r... o • z6> '01V uors�� /,gn_S s�o�c �P� d ,oasis as OF bo ��f\ . 6/ i •oma.. ooa-1 ��4• �,6 �� 048 !i o• o2'.-/°7 m O JOc