Loading...
VAR 96-06STATE OF MINNESOTA ) JTY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS VARIANCE COUNTY OF"'ANOKA ) CITY OF FRIDLEY )1261239 In the Matter of: a variance VAR #96-06 Owner: C. S. Jespersen and J. K. Palmer The above entitled matter came before the City Council of the City of Fridley and was heard on the 8th day of April 119 96 , on a petition for a variance pursuant to the City of Fridley's Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property: To reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet to allow the continued existence of a screened porch located under a deck on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier 1st Addition, generally located at 6496 Riverview Terrace N.E. IT IS ORDERED that a variance be granted as upon the following conditions or reasons: Approval with one stipulation. See City Council meeting minutes of April 8, 1996. l S- 30 �a�•- �a -o o $1 CL STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLEY I, William A. Champa, City Clerk for the City of Fridley, with and in for said City of Fridley, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy and Order granting a variance with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto s bscrihed my hand at the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in the County of Anoka on the // TN day of , 19�. DRAFTED BY: City of Fridley 643.1 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, MN 55432 William A. Champa, City Clerk . -: • �-(SEAL) Variances are valid for a period of one year following approval and shall be considered void if not used `thin ` that period. r FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 8 1996 PAGE 12 Mr. Hickok stated that the Chief Building Offic' 1 has outlined a number of items that need to be addresse and one is the footings which should not be part of th concrete slab. He stated that because a permit was not issued, there was no inspection by the City. Mr. Hickcock stated that because the existing porch, it is difficult to determine how the de was affixed to the home. Ms. Corinne Jespersen, the p itioner, stated that there was a tiny deck on the home when a purchased it. She stated that her son-in-law built the dec without even considering permits or variances. Councilwoman Jorgen n felt that it was an improvement. to the property over what existed. MOTION by Co ilwoman Bolkcom to grant Variance Request, VAR #96-02, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall appl for and receive a building permit; (2) the deck and footings all be inspected; (3) changes shall be made to the deck so hat it complies with the Uniform Building code; and (4) the s reen porch shall be removed. Seconded by Councilwoman Jor nson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared t motion carried unanimously. 15. VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #96-06 BY CORINNE JESPERSEN AND JANET PALMER TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM _27 FEET TO 15 FEET GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6496-98 RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet to bring into compliance a recently constructed screened porch. He stated that this relates to Variance Request, VAR #96- 02. Once the deck was constructed, the petitioners had a screened porch constructed. Mr. Hickok stated that staff is recommending denial of the variance, as the petitioner can construct a detached., screen enclosed gazebo without a variance. He stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval of this variance, as they felt a detached gazebo would be more of an imposition on the neighbors. He stated that the three adjacent neighbors support this variance. Mr. Hickok stated that the screened porch is considered living space and should have the. same setback as the home. He stated that since it protrudes into the rear yard the variance is, therefore, requested. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 8 1996 PAGE 13 MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to grant Variance Request, VAR #96-06, with the stipulation that the porch meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and, if necessary, any modifications, additions, or deletions should be completed in order to meet these requirements. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #96-04. BY JO LOCATED AT 160 - 83RD AVENUE N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that is is a request for a variance to reduce the front yard setba. from 100 feet to 35 feet for the construction of an indusrial building. He stated that in 1987, a site plan was submitted and a variance was granted. He stated that when the sitelan was submitted the petitioner proposed a three phase multitenant development. He stated that in 1987, the first phase was completed with construction of an industrial buildi at 8251 Main Street. In 1989, the second phase was completed with the construction of an industrial building at 100 - 83rd Avenue. He stated that this building would be the third and inal phase. He stated that a five-year time period was place on the variance that was granted and which has expired. He sta ed that the site plan is the same as the plan Council reviewed 'n 1987. Mr. Hickok stated that th Appeals Commission voted four to one to approve the variance. He stated that the request is within previously granted vari ces, and staff has no recommendation. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated it is her understanding that the issue about changin the building raised questions about traffic flow and parking. Mr. Hickok stat d..that there was concern about the petitioner's south building that has an enclosed outdoor storage yard. He stated that t ere was discussion about extending this building or combining t�d buildings. He stated that the petitioner expressed concern ab t that yard area being lost and the inability to get circulatiVn for the uses that exist. Counciloman Bolkcom stated that the issue of landscaping and trash as discussed at the Appeals Commission meeting. Mr. Maertens, the petitioner, stated that the landscaping is to extensive. He felt that the buildings are kept free of .rash. He stated that if they moved the driveway it would cause a traffic problem. He stated that the two buildings constructed are better construction than originally proposed. ARSTPAC'i Receipt # Dale/Time: f moo Doc. Order of ✓ by: Recordability, Filing Fees: ,J`Q Delqs: Pins: ,Z" ❑ Certified Copy C Tax Liens/Releases ❑ Mulli•Co Doc Tax Pd ❑ Transfer New ❑ Desc. ❑ Division ❑ GAC Def. ❑ Slalus ❑ Spec DOCUMENT NO. 1264239.0 ABSTRACT ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT WAS FILED IN THIS OFFICE FOR RECORD ON FEB 13 97 AT5 •0 0 PM AND WAS DULY RECORDED. FEES AND TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF $19.50 PAID. RECEIPT NO. 97010537 EDWARD M. TRESKA ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXADMINISTRATOR/RECORDER)REGISTRAR OF TITLES BY KHJ DEPUTY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRA TORIREC ORDERIREGISTRAR OF TITLES CIiYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 11, 1996 Corinne Jespersen Janet Palmer 6496/98 Riverview i errace NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Jespersen and Ms. Palmer: On April 8, 1996, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #96-06, to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet, on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier 1st Addition, the same being 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. Approval of this variance request is contingent upon the following stipulation: 1. The porch shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and, if necessary, any modifications, additions, or deletions should be completed in order to meet these requirements. You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. !f you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3590. Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 25, 1996. ♦ ••.taken. Mr 1• y COUNC erlckok Sta IL NEETI 0 footi °� ted NG O Ins Ftated g t Wh ch In the t the F APRIL 8 Mr. Pectioh by beCaseld not ho Bu1ld1 2996 di Fri C�kcock the Ci tY. a Perh� t Part odd eSIll e i Ciai PAGE t to state was the d, a has out 1 Ms' c Clete d th not cone nd o 7 tnY C, nne J r�'Ine h0W beca�s Issued' tete sj ism a `3017-- k on esPer the e °� her ab, he variances w bu jl homenwh the Pe deck wasth xistl e was oe Council the dec shUo Pet t1 er flied tog lbor-c lb rope X-ty °oma Jorge k Whese z fiated th the hOhme, it is 906ect Io N bj, What ex • e1t vet Corsi he atthex'e Oo l 2apP�I tho t Ci °ma ted. that I t was dering Permia t het deck 2n9's sI. Z Poli 8olk an i is Or JOr9escr the so to h t bendnseCetve S 1Pe 9'ran tttproVe�ent t the on PorC cO.OP.1 * Pected . a bu . a tl ons - vagi ° the 15. °tion ca poi a shall S be th th h g Pe.Ii t (1)ncth Regues VARz ed Ona ce vote re-MOVe U�icl.f 9es Sha , (2J e Pet t' V EE1ER c TRE UES nl�oslY. all of . e o� ildin be maeded ctkl a AR T o T In tq 9 V 9' ed cod Co d Mr. WARD 3oENERARZLY of Tp 96,06 aYe, Mai Yr Counci hd (4)'licke feet: a pa ok, j'1 LocATED �T YARD S �R1NNE Nee dec are 27 t Ia ann• 649 ET8 JES d to nc In 6, Ac P Por -ch_ bt.a to g coo 98 k �''Ro ERSEN 02. Ile ing intreduCerdinat RIVERVrM 27 F AND s screenednCe stated t0 CofiP, . e rears state EW TETT TO Mr. Porch dec t this ance a Yard d that E N•� thi rla.n ok s CIck ost u0ted c st es to entlY aCk fx. 8 18 a cO i sed ,9'aas the d tha Cted'V ar1anCenstruct, deet e�est He tashey 10.2 recd° With Itiut a ht�-aff is the petit est �cx'AA 7 eked vada teeda eb tho ° lded aPPrVarta1Jn Coll Offend' Hers dg6- at be ova Ce, true In a Aac� jCkok the threInoee °f an this eV stated det�e -Za1 0 the t sial shouated that adJao t Sitioartce,that thed� creche z,e�Ore, t protay e tache scze nei9'h,boj7s the as he?Y A e� t Is )n that oeated. Odes in fide seed poY.0 SuPPo gab°rs. a ranee (County o the back h is this mits on as co She felt rear the nside Yard home, red Ii'v ant. at 35 the Ile Zngr )y ople var ancstat d _k inthate Is, deer. r .e '.1 al tnd ect )man .red .OUNTY Seconu, councilman Billingz, limit has been 50 mph tum recently reduced to 35 mph for :solution. t, the speed time and was ,nue. H -ft 15 .tne ty.ftletOL n ��g alaged 'fo for Cola. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 8 1996 PAGE 13 MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to grant Variance Request, VAR #96-06, with the stipulation that the porch meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and, if necessary, any modifications, additions, or deletions should be completed in order to meet these requirements. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. VARIANCE REOUF.ST _ VAR AqA- LOCATED AT 160 - 83RD AVENUE N.E. (WARD 3): Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that this,,/is a request for a variance to reduce the front yard setback f m 100 feet to 35 feet for the construction of an industria building. He stated that in 1987, a site plan was submitted d a variance was granted. He stated that when the site plan was submitted the petitioner proposed a three phase multi -ten nt development. He stated that in 1987, the fi/Avue. was completed with construction of an industrial bu8251 Main Street. In 1989, the second phase was complhe construction of an industrial building at 100 - 83He stated that this building would be the third andse. He stated that a five-year time period was placediance that was granted and which has expired. He state site plan is the same as the plan Council reviewed in 8987. Mr. Hickok stated that thepeals Commission voted four to one to approve the variance. a stated that the request is within previously granted variances, and staff has no recommendation. Councilwoman Bolkcom ated it is her understanding that the issue about changing e building raised questions about traffic flow and parking. Mr. Hickok statedthat there was concern about the petitioner's south building at has an enclosed outdoor storage yard. He stated that the a was discussion about extending this building or combining the uildings. He stated that the petitioner expressed concern about/that yard area being lost and the inability to get circulation,tor the uses that exist. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that the issue of landscaping and trash wad discussed at the Appeals Commission meeting. Mr. M,Aertens, the petitioner, stated that the landscaping is quit extensive. He felt that the buildings are kept free of tra h. He stated that if they moved the driveway it would cause a traffic problem. He stated that the two buildings constructed are better construction than originally proposed. ,lat 1.9 Of c.ed► 'iiced W�-55ue5 Le i 6496/98 Riverview Terrace Rear Yard Setback Variance Request DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet. If approved, the request would bring into compliance a recently constructed screened porch. This request is related to VAR #96-02, to increase a deck encroachment into the rear yard setback HARDSHIP: 'Deck/screen porch built too close to property line." SUMMARY OF ISSUES: While the porch was constructed without a permit and was completed at the time of the application, the request was analyzed as if no construction had occurred. Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code requires a rear yard setback of not less than 25% of the lot depth with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. Public Purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. The screen porch was constructed without a permit and is located under a recently constructed deck The variance request to reduce the rear yard setback is within previously granted variances. Previous variances granted have different and unique circumstances, and the petitioners have the option of constructing a detached gazebo with no variances required. APPEALS CONDMSION ACTION: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: While the request is within previously granted variances (a variance was granted to 13.8 feet), staff recommends that the City Council deny the request due to the following: 1. The petitioner can construct a detached, screen enclosed, gazebo without a variance. 2. The previously granted variance had substantially different circumstances (windowless side yard). 3. This request visually impacts the front yard of an adjacent property. 15.01 VAR #96-06 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. Page 2 DEVELOPMENT SITE RMe The variance request is to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet (existing condition). If approved, the request would bring into compliance a newly constructed screen porch. 15.02 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. A variance to reduce the side rear yard setback of a dwelling from 27 feet to 15 feet Location of Property: 6496/98 Riverview Terrace Legal Description of Property: Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier 1st Addition Size: 10,368 square feet Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation: Typical suburban, trees, sod, shrubs, etc. Existing Zoning/Platting: R-3, General Multiple Family, Walt Harrier Addition 1978 Availability Of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: Riverview Terrace Pedestrian Access: N/A Engineering Issues: None Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE RMe The variance request is to reduce the required rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet (existing condition). If approved, the request would bring into compliance a newly constructed screen porch. 15.02 VAR #96-06 6496198 Riverview Terrace N.E. Page 3 Parcel Description & history The dwelling on the property, a duplex, was constructed in 1979. The parcel is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling; therefore, the duplex is a permitted use. The duplex measures 25 feet by 40 feet with an attached three -car garage measuring 22 feet by 30 feet. No verifying survey was subbed as required by the budding permit at the time the dwelling was constructed. The petitioner recently processed a variance request, VAR #96-02, to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 26 feet and to increase the encroachment of a deck in the rear yard from 10 feet to 12 feet. Staff was not aware of the porch at the time of that variance application. Section 205.07.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code requires a rear yard setback of not less than 25% of the lot depth with not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. Public Purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. The dwelling was constructed by a previous property owner. The dwelling was constructed with a building permit; however, the bur3der did not submit a verifying survey. The petitioner field verified that the dwelling is located is 26 feet from the rear lot line. Based on the formula to deter tiinne the rear yard setback requirement, the required rear yard is 27 feet. The City has previously granted requests to reduce the rear yard setback for porches to 13.8 feet and 17 feet. In both cases, the lots were unique when compared to this request. In the first request, the proposed porch faced a windowless side yard of the adjacent dwelling. The second request was located on Glen Creek Road and the porch was screened and separated from adjacent properties by the .creek and vegetation In this request, the porch visually impacts the front yard of the adjacent property to the rear (see aerial photograph). The petitioners have the alternative of constructing a detached gazebo without a variance. There are no alternatives for an attached screen porch in the rear yard due to the original placement of the home on this site. Recommendation Whr3e the request is within previously granted variances (a variance was granted to 13.8 feet), staff recommends that the City Council deny the request due to the following: 1. The petitioner can construct a detached, screen enclosed, gazebo without a variance. 2. The previously granted variance had substantially different circumstances (windowless side yard). 3. This request impacts the front yard of an adjacent property. 15.03 y � VAR #96-06 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. Page 4 ADJACENT SITES WEST: Zoning: R-3, General Multiple Family Land Use: Residential SOUTH: Zoning: R-3, General Multiple Family Land Use: Residential EAST: Zoning: R-3, General Multiple Family Land Use: Residential NORTH: Zoning: R-3, General Multiple Family Land Use: Residential Appeals Commission Action: The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The Commission felt that the porch as presented "fit" the dwelling and was the best alternative when compared with the detached gazebo. Comprehensive Planning Issues: The Zoning and Comprehensive Plan are consistent in this location. Public Hearing Comments: No one from the audience spoke regarding the request. 15.®4 APPEALS COMISSION MEETING, MARCH 13, 1996 PAGE 6 M TION by Dr. Vos, secon by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #86-04, by Joe ertens (M. B: Properties) to reduced the front yard setback from 100 feet to 35 feet t allow the construction of a 32,500 square foot multi- . tenant industrial building on Lot 3, locr2, Caba Realty First Addition, generally located east of 8251 Main Street N.E., with following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit a hydraulic calculations. 2. The petitioner shall submit a 1 Industrial District, requirements. grading and drainage plan and the appropriate plan complying with the M-2, Heavy 3. The petitioner shall execute and ecord joint parking and driveway agreements between the subject panel and th parcel to the west. UPON A VOICE VOTE, WITH MS. SAV; E, MS. SMITH AND DR. VOS VOTING AYE AND MR. KUECHLE VOTING NAY, CHAT RSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A MAJORITY VOTE. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council would 8. E BY JANET LEHRKE: Per Section 205.04.05.13 of the Fridley City in the front yard in order to allow the cons c shed in the front yard and to allow placem i front yard on that part of Lot 28, Revised Aud of following described line: Beginning at a feet westerly of southeast comer of said Lo south line to north line of said Lot and the thereof; also except road; subject to easement River Road N.E. this request at their meeting on April 3, to allow two accessory strictures on of a 12 foot by 16 foot detached of a 10 foot by 10 foot shed in the 's Subdivision No. 77, lying easterly int on south line of said Lot 315.64 then north at right angle from said 3 .terminating; except west 90 feet (record, the.same being 7136 East Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner was aware of the meetin but saw attendance as optional and was not at the meeting. The petitioner has asked staff to come out and discuss some alternatives. He asked that this item be continued to *th4 next meeting on March 27. 3. Per Section X 07.01.03.D.(3).(a) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet to allow the continued existence of a screened porch located under a deck on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier First Addition, the same being 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. 15.1.6 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 13, 1996 PAGE -7 MOTION by Mr. Kuschle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:53 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners were before the Appeals Commission at the last meeting with a request to reduce the rear ya setback for living space from 27 feet to 26 feet to correct an existing condition and to i ease the encroachment of a deck from 10 feet to 12 feet into the rear yard. At that time, aff did not have an opportunity to discuss the screened porch which had been constnarf as part of the deck. The petitioners chose to come back through the process asking for a reduction in the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet. The location of the request is 6496/98 Riverview Terrace which is at the intersection of Riverview Terrace and Mississippi Way. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner submitted photos of the newly constructed deck and porch. In reviewing the request, staff looked at whether the City had granted similar requests in the past. The City had granted two similar requests. The first is located on Creek Park Lane -in which the variance request was to reduce the rear yard setback down to 13.8 feet in this situation, the rear yard of the subject parcel was adjacent to the side yard of the house to the north. The circumstances were significantly different in that the house hada screened porch that would not be visible from the adjacent neighbor. The side wall of the adjacent house to the north had no windows and, therefore, there was no visual impact. Ms. McPherson stated the second'similar request is located on Glen Creek Road. In this case, the dwelling was behind two other dwellings which front directly on Glen Creek Road and there is a private access easement which allows these residents to exit onto Glen Creek Road. In this request, the City granted a variance to reduce the rear yard setback to 17 feet. The required setback is approximately 33 feet. Again, this is significantly different in that the porch addition did not visually impact the adjacent properties. Glen Creek is adjacent to the rear yard of the dwelling, and the properties to the north have deep rear yards so the visual impact was mitigated by vegetation and distance. Ms. McPherson stated that while the request is within the two previously variances, staff recommends denial of the request for the following reasons: 1. The petitioner can construct a detached, screen enclosed, gazebo without a variance. 2. The previously granted variances had substantially different circumstances (windowless side yard). 3. This request visually impacts the front yard of an adjacent property. 15.17 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MARCS 13, 1996 PAGE 8 Dr. Vos asked if there were properties to the west. Ms. McPherson stated there are three properties to the west. Dr. Vos asked how many of those properties can visually see this porch. Ms. McPherson stated all three can see the porch. Mr. Kuechle asked the size of the subject parcel. Ms. McPherson stated the lot is 10,368 square feet The minimum size lot for a duplex is 10,000 square feet The minimum size for a residential lot is 9,000 square feet. Dr. Vos asked if any of the three property owners to the west had contacted the City. Ms. McPherson stated, no. Dr. Vos asked if there was a drop in elevation. Ms. McPherson stated, yes, there is a change in elevation. Ms. Savage stated the petitioner could construct a gazebo without a variance. Is there any restriction on the size or placement of a gazebo? Ms. McPherson stated the maximum size is 240 square feet and a gazebo can be placed within three feet of the lot line or the width of an easement. She did not recall if there was an easement on this property. Dr. Vos asked if the porch was the same size as the deck. Ms. McPherson stated, no. The porch is two feet shorter than the deck. Ms. Jespersen stated the property had a tiny deck originally. This deck was constructed when the house was constructed. The wood had rotted and her son-in-law volunteered to rebuild the deck. They did not know they needed permits to replace the deck. Ms. Savage stated the porch was too close to the property line. Ms. Jespersen stated that when they decided to replace the deck, they considered that lumber is 12 feet in length so that is the dimension they used. Ms. Palmer stated they did not know the house was incorrectly positioned on the lot. They assumed it was correct when they purchased the property. Ms. Smith asked if any, of the neighbors had provided feedback 15.18 C. APPEALS COMISSION MEETING, MARCH 13, 1996 PAGE 9 Ms. Jespersen stated the neighbors are very happy with it The other deck was very small. This is in proportion to the house and it does look nice. i Ms. Jespersen stated the house behind theirs has a garage facing their house and one window. That house faces the river. That neighbor has been very supportive of what they have done and has said they would write a letter of support. All three neighbors are very supportive. All had spoken to them when the .first notice came out because they felt it looked much better. The other neighbors have made no comment at all. No one else can see it but the three neighbors. There are also shrubs and trees there so the porch is screened. Ms. Palmer stated she was reading the project summary which speaks about green space and visual impact She thought a detached gazebo close to the property line would have a more visual impact than what they now have. It is also in scale with the back of the house. They have finished the area with rock and landscaping. As far as green space, because of the way the house is sitting, they have limited green space. They have done much enhancement to the other areas of the property. They have planted grass in a former parking area so they have improved the property from what it was before. The neighbors are very happy with them. There are no more junk cars. The neighbors have commented on how nice the property looks. They did not solicit the neighbors comments. The neighbors came to them. Ms. Smith asked if there was much slope from the house to the property line. Ms. Palmer stated the back yard slopes a lot to the back of the lot. If they were to put up a gazebo, it would be on a hill. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON. SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 P.M. Mr. Kuechle recommended approval of the request He realizes it was extending where they have been before; however, he believed a gazebo is not a particularly good alternative. The lot is filled because of a duplex on a 10,000+ square foot .lot. He thought the visual impact of a screened porch where it is now would be less than if separately located. Ms. Smith agreed. The sloping has an impact on putting up a gazebo. While she is not happy about doing something after it has been built, she thought the impact of tearing it out was more destructive. Dr. Vos concurred. 15.19 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 13, 1996 PAGE 10 Ms. Savage agreed. The public purpose is being served. This is an attractive addition and the most sensitive way to have a porch. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #96-06, by Corinne Jespersen and Janet Palmer to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet to allow the continued existence of a screened porch located under a deck on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier First Addition, the same being 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council would review this request at their meeting on April 8. 4. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS Mr. Hickok provided an update on Planning Commission and City ADJOURNMENT. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to adjo the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, AIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE MARC 3, 1996, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:20 P.M. Respectfully Lavonn 15.20 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the kppeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley M inicipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, March 13, 1996, e t 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #96-06, by Corinne Jespersen -and Janet Palmer: Per Section 205.07.01.0 .D.(3).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet to allow the continued existence of a screened porch located nder a deck on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier First Addition, the same beind 6496198 Riverview Terrace N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 Any and all persons desiring to Ibe heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3593. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than March 6, 1996. 1Ev CITY OF FRIDLEY U. ITYOF COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW FRJDLEY File Number ~File Date Meeting Date 7 2/20/96 3/13/96 File Description-., �, Janet-Pa-Ime- - AR' #9646, 649 8 Ri errace, by_Corinne Jespersen & Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department *** Comments *** Barbara Dacy Scott Hickok Michele McPherson Jon Wilczek John Flora Ron Julkowski Leon Madsen Dave Sallman Dick Larson CITY OF FRIDLEY [� 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 U3 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM R YERTY,/I F RMATI - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 10#41# �1&1 Z;'�-OMMF- Property Identification Number (PIN) Legal description: Lot Block Tract/Addition IdAir& Current zoning: S � G Square footagelacreage Re a son for variance and hardship: e.� r Se 'on of City Code: Have you operated a busine s in a city which required a business license? Yes No I If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No 1,t FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract rchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME � , ADDRESS (� °�f,�' Z2— _ DAYTIME PHONE:-1�� 9 = 4? NAME 6220YPe.,- 8 C ADDRESS -DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATU DATE Fee: �$100.00 ~~~~~~~~~~ ~$ 60 M J0 H for residential propeities ~~~� Permit VAR # Receipt # Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: APPLICATION DATE City of Fridley Community Development Variance Process APPEALS COMMISSION DATE CITY COUNCIL DECISION CITY RECORDS ACTION AT ANOKA COUNTY VAR #96-06 Jespersen/Palmer N VAR #96-06 648 Riverview Terrace qt"9CATION MAP - Q -'fir "J"g, oil 18 19 20 : , �� -. (q •� J•} 111. .1• i'�'•e A(d) + $. `"'� �'E'/: I (sol __ .�. i �pti0• S•(s. 3 PSG\ Np. C r ( !m (.) ar :r<> ryoe,� A [ Fero ,� - �,. t 0 Gfj /••�iy � .� Ji G NM � Fc .nom � ov,ao,- 7 - 1 .. wa-- .../// •� ;s cam" or>rmrrq• I,+`° c�� '...✓,; PR� o� / ,,,;. w,a a• i ./ �..�r°r 1 tic. ", eek -r •� F� � t ,b r s zy z �,) 4 � r 1 (+a `� 2 3 �r •ay+ �''�e p. .• i - ssN N')a <L06)t 72B 01 •`. v. ri. � r,. � j t n r ?s j�• t~•••.+•u` , I fu}� 3[t)� +' Gri s /Kj �• s - • rvD �� i ! / j zn es ' S s '661/2 AVE. N.E. s I _ - P,�F., r v (n°)6 w• 20 6 !Aop 5(0) zata) 1 t• d / I , t z (+7 '(RJ .,I Q (v) LL I /✓� !id lY) '.M �DI_T/ON L •'^`u:.. �'. �. t 8z(n) 9(A) L� 2 9 (-1 2 w) I - `p u E �+ .� "".? e. z• o a ofo) /cAV' W9 Qr 2 ho' zo )ii ° zn ` �. W 3 3 I I tib' to ••. V� y , 9 y Y^. '9 ,.2_ ' r /z /Jo .` ip) z 4 r) yL4� <. � a : /-%66 T AYE. N.E. . -• a'3t ° ' : y , L n �^''V�.•' • r rt - •• ,r a `"'" '�.r ' r ) ya 17 10 A7 .'�yl rn y�v) LJ.. 16 14, --6-6 T f I w AYE N E. �- off,, Q`h! `•flat is �a;• ^zeGy z i fr)z9 �cl st:f Yp `r_ sr � P: 1__ :.`��� a� °Lw h;. r QPP•F ..�.S w' 3 b'7_ 3 ('R '� j9 l`�2 � F ,L��Z ^QlT' +CREEK :%++ a z�(p -a to - , a • a/w,J .... `a •I s I DE : • rj''=%.. • ,- _ - � :t..-.•)3 :s•' .6 zba/ _ s_ a s� � . �. •3� 3W�' • 14 �. za 7 a zs vp J z;tF CR K PARK ^LN. _ + r + L <, y .. t �: L. �s . Btfl p Oklaa e 111)c h• - J6 y 5 J oil (V °W��Di rr t :s.• Q v i 2 I (+�> P ?� / , zo tr / tie i . �a 1. Q • nn �i, ��: yT�••15 is 'tt;, lre• /2'I+1? 1•� :� a lu,., W . B .3 , 1 /d .� ,P(N?. .,. .,.. •t+) r) ,, RLS e7) e. W R Iff4rr uo a ' "'1 /7 fr> ►n. a , /v : a ,n i(a) 9- , g v 7 CM .a«. C9� .; e � � .,°<. ° m 1/6 i'r i s. i(n11 /1' c• /f � 1`. c i .. R 15.12 CCC 13314 ROLAND W. ANDERSON :;: 5 1495 CREEK PARK LANE +MOCOt1 YA CDMURrwY,MIA Similar request, previously approved L ®C A T I ®N M A P VAR X696-06 fPJespersen/Palmer 3 T. 3 R. 24 - THIS IS A COMPILATION CF RECORDS AS THEY APPEAR THE ANOKA COUNTY OFFICES AFFECTING THE AREA SHOWN. THIS DRAWING IS TO SE USED ONLY FOR �R/OL EY REFERENCE PURPOSES AND THE COUN. TY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY IN- ACCURACIES HE..EIN CONTAINED. 539/3 3 12 II \ W R /J NAE SEC.MdER - Q -'fir "J"g, oil 18 19 20 : , �� -. (q •� J•} 111. .1• i'�'•e A(d) + $. `"'� �'E'/: I (sol __ .�. i �pti0• S•(s. 3 PSG\ Np. C r ( !m (.) ar :r<> ryoe,� A [ Fero ,� - �,. t 0 Gfj /••�iy � .� Ji G NM � Fc .nom � ov,ao,- 7 - 1 .. wa-- .../// •� ;s cam" or>rmrrq• I,+`° c�� '...✓,; PR� o� / ,,,;. w,a a• i ./ �..�r°r 1 tic. ", eek -r •� F� � t ,b r s zy z �,) 4 � r 1 (+a `� 2 3 �r •ay+ �''�e p. .• i - ssN N')a <L06)t 72B 01 •`. v. ri. � r,. � j t n r ?s j�• t~•••.+•u` , I fu}� 3[t)� +' Gri s /Kj �• s - • rvD �� i ! / j zn es ' S s '661/2 AVE. N.E. s I _ - P,�F., r v (n°)6 w• 20 6 !Aop 5(0) zata) 1 t• d / I , t z (+7 '(RJ .,I Q (v) LL I /✓� !id lY) '.M �DI_T/ON L •'^`u:.. �'. �. t 8z(n) 9(A) L� 2 9 (-1 2 w) I - `p u E �+ .� "".? e. z• o a ofo) /cAV' W9 Qr 2 ho' zo )ii ° zn ` �. W 3 3 I I tib' to ••. V� y , 9 y Y^. '9 ,.2_ ' r /z /Jo .` ip) z 4 r) yL4� <. � a : /-%66 T AYE. N.E. . -• a'3t ° ' : y , L n �^''V�.•' • r rt - •• ,r a `"'" '�.r ' r ) ya 17 10 A7 .'�yl rn y�v) LJ.. 16 14, --6-6 T f I w AYE N E. �- off,, Q`h! `•flat is �a;• ^zeGy z i fr)z9 �cl st:f Yp `r_ sr � P: 1__ :.`��� a� °Lw h;. r QPP•F ..�.S w' 3 b'7_ 3 ('R '� j9 l`�2 � F ,L��Z ^QlT' +CREEK :%++ a z�(p -a to - , a • a/w,J .... `a •I s I DE : • rj''=%.. • ,- _ - � :t..-.•)3 :s•' .6 zba/ _ s_ a s� � . �. •3� 3W�' • 14 �. za 7 a zs vp J z;tF CR K PARK ^LN. _ + r + L <, y .. t �: L. �s . Btfl p Oklaa e 111)c h• - J6 y 5 J oil (V °W��Di rr t :s.• Q v i 2 I (+�> P ?� / , zo tr / tie i . �a 1. Q • nn �i, ��: yT�••15 is 'tt;, lre• /2'I+1? 1•� :� a lu,., W . B .3 , 1 /d .� ,P(N?. .,. .,.. •t+) r) ,, RLS e7) e. W R Iff4rr uo a ' "'1 /7 fr> ►n. a , /v : a ,n i(a) 9- , g v 7 CM .a«. C9� .; e � � .,°<. ° m 1/6 i'r i s. i(n11 /1' c• /f � 1`. c i .. R 15.12 CCC 13314 ROLAND W. ANDERSON :;: 5 1495 CREEK PARK LANE +MOCOt1 YA CDMURrwY,MIA Similar request, previously approved L ®C A T I ®N M A P VAR #996-06_ RONALD F. NIEYER LAND SURVEYOR LAND SURVEYING SUBDIVISION DESIGN . TcLaPMoNe 771-4586 083 JESSIE ST. ST. PAUL. MINN. 35101 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. /' Reg. No. 9051 Date: November 4, 1984 Go c. mer./ /a /986 y Side yard of adjacent house ti 37 3 - 2V-7- 23z I 1 q o � .3 1 H 1 1 r Scales 1" = 30' — l0 I 30 1 G K �yoqR1<0 L 4I MC N, E'. o Indicates iron monument placed 15.13 Lot 11, Block 2, CREEKRIDGE, Anoka Minnesota. 1495 Creek Park Lane Similar request, previously approved ' •-�✓r d I 05.5 soya c 0 2 y.o X1 C ' ' N ID I � I Q� r' o C 1 N 23z I 1 q o � .3 1 H 1 1 r Scales 1" = 30' — l0 I 30 1 G K �yoqR1<0 L 4I MC N, E'. o Indicates iron monument placed 15.13 Lot 11, Block 2, CREEKRIDGE, Anoka Minnesota. 1495 Creek Park Lane Similar request, previously approved J 8 1 A VAR #96-06 Jespersen/Palmer N 1/2 SEC. /O, T. 30, R 2 C/T Y OF FRIDL EY I �81 HIGHWAY R/W PLAT NO. 26 n 45 GLEN CREEK ROAD Similar request, previously approvedLOCATION MAP VAR 496-06 Jespersen/Palmer • � .- . . ..vn.� .... AA jj �r:3112) IVll ..".T+ yUi..� r u� SU+„1. ., I. .'{ 1 a7•Y) `4 4J Yi UG F. :7At4Diil7Fr CIVIL EDIGINEER lC' N •. REG19T£REO UNDER L4W3 OF SCAM OF MINNESOTA/ 4 765s LICENSEO BY Olt O1NANC8 OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS E '•h a: .1 JAMEJ NELSON \ 326 PLYMOUTH BUILDING FEovRAt,. B-8721 SURVEYOR NDU57RIAL - JUDICIAL HENNEPIN AT SIXTH MINNEAPOLIS 3. MINNESOTA PST.a LI6NE0 $022 r METROPOLITAN LAI + s,Na ss - TOPOGRAPHICAL �E6+tirbf oris Certifit.9it C.TY LQ'S - PLATTING C SURVEYORS. Ls..at.lsH[O t 1 4Ud' t1 free� c ria/��l;n~ J 2,,"• � ''• ,• - � � , Y r' 1 i • '""- •i 1 • y ' 1 1 t t n } [; lD U� 115 Glen Creek Road �r .sur/so 4'o. Re r. Add. Svb. yo i7 Zb.0' - I ::eret. certif that this is a true and correct re, -recantation of Y f a surveyof t'�e botndarics of khat part of Lot 3$ Revised huditorls D -'__Idivisicn P; r-bcr 77, Anoka County, �Unnesota.lying Easterly of the exec nsicn Northerly of the East line of Lot 49 Block 11 Calk Creek AdC.'ition Plat 2, and West of a line drawn North at a rigrt anr-le from a point in the Borth line of said Oak Creek Addition Flat 2 distant 216.0 fe&-t'"Test neasur o:i said North line from its intorseetion,with the Westerly line of East River.?, as t:c _. .e is establiched according tc the aforesaid record plat of Cak Creek n l;:ition lat c; ',Orelther with an ea;-ozent for itriveway mu -i cses over the South 1;:.0 foot of said Lot 35, extending Easterly frog the Ea;:t line of above describ tract to ti_e West line of East River Road, all according to the realective plats terec_ cn file and of record in tate office of the Register of Deeds in and for ti:aca :a,rty._Minnesata• ana c1` tiie location of all buildini;s, if Any thereon, a .•+side-neroact:ze ts, if any, front or on said lard. Tois survey is >nade on in ren :e:-zticn with a rnortgaoe: loan new beim; pLaced on the ;.rcperty and no liabi is a:; ter.: e:xcel_t to the holder of such rortgage cr any Ut•ilc.r i::terest aecraired .6 !:n reason of suet: mortgaje. It is understood and agreed no moniments have been lac- +d fcr the purFose of establishin let lines or boundary cornbrs. As�,surve;e --- - - - - - Xu - - - - Similar request, previously approved STATE PLAN i JP w VAR. #96-06 Jespersep/Palmer P Ole C - 4 yr& 15.09 .T� If VAR #96-06 Jespersen%Palmer CX'�°' v - - -2 <II-,; � "), 15.10 L v C-4< m ED 10 aow *41 m 11 SIAC., ptkvA- FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 11, 1996 Corinne Jespersen Janet Palmer 6496/98 Riverview Terrace NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Jespersen and Ms. Palmer: On April 8, 1996, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #96-06, to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 15 feet, on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Harrier 1st Addition, the same being 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. Approval of this variance request is contingent upon the following stipulation: 1. The porch shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and, if necessary, any modifications, additions, or deletions should be completed in order to meet these requirements. You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3590. Sierel , Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 25, 1--- ZI-24 %, 7V7 cvbc 6� ea i4f taken. FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 11, 1996 Corinne Jespersen Janet Palmer 6496/98 Riverview Terrace NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Jespersen and Ms. Palmer: On April 8, 1996, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #96-02, to reduce the rear yard setback from 27 feet to 26 feet, and to increase the encroachment of a deck in the rear yard from 10 feet to 12 feet, on Lot 1, Block 1, Walt Hamer 1st Addition, the same being 6496/98 Riverview Terrace N.E. Approval of this variance request is contingent upon the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a building permit. 2. The deck and footings shall be inspected. 3. Changes shall be made to the deck so that it complies with the Uniform Building Code. 4. S�/hfL.�tly You have one year from the date of City Council action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction in time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. Corinne Jespersen Janet Palmer April 11, 1996 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3590. Dacy, AICP city Development Director BD/dw Please review the above, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 25, 1996. Concur with action taken.