The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR 86-13n May , 1988 8(18635 Page 1 of 2 This instrment drafted by: City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Fridley, M 55432 ]Re: Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park I. Leroy S. Anderson. agree to waive the variances which are attached hereto. (VAR #86-13; Appeals Commission Meeting, June 24, 1986; City Council Meeting July 21, 1986) Approved variances with stipulations. PfITACH : 1 Riverwood Associates STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Anoka ) On this 0/ day of 1474 1_ . 1988, before me, a Notary Public within and or the Count of tam and the State of Minnesota, personally appeared , to me known to be the same person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC ® MINNESOTT7 FIENNEPIN COUNTY My commission expires August 21,1990 My Commission Expires: r f s • r Page 2 of 2 CITYOF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 LeRoy Anderson Riverwood Associates 430 Oak Grove Loring Park Office Building Suite 404 Minneapolis, MPS 55403 July 22, 1986 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE On July 21, 1986 , the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #86-13, to reduce the front yard setback (easterly side of lot) from 35 feet to 17.5 feet; to reduce the rear yard setback (westerly side of lot) from 30 feet to 17.5 feet on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park with the following stipulations: 1. The house on the adjoining lot (Lot 14) owned by the present owner be 20 feet from the south lot line. 2. If the work has not commenced within 1 (one) year after granting this variance then the variance shall become null and void. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, `ta��YJyL/ ,�: ames L. Robinson Planning Coordinator JLR/dm Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department, by August 5, 1986. � e RECEIVED JUL 25 1986 Concur with action taken 808635 Numerical Grantor Grantee Recorded Ciiack:)d 0"IM OF COMITYRECORPER ffATC OF OF Mj)KA I hereby canify th,,t ft within insim- ment was filed in t,,,',js office for record on the _MAY 2 4 1988 80 '01,2s dUJY recorded COUAW �ia=der V By —&I Ala— Do" City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dept: Community Development X if r CITYOF FRIDLE.Y - CIVIC CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 - PHONE (612) 571-3450 LeRoy Anderson Riverwood Associates 430 Oak Grove Loring Park Office Building Suite 404 Minneapolis, MPJ 55403 July 22, 1986 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE On July 21, 1986 , the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #86-13, to reduce the front yard setback (easterly side of lot) from 35 feet to 17.5 feet; to reduce the rear yard setback (westerly side of lot) from 30 feet to 17.5 feet on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park with the following stipulations: 1. The house on the adjoining lot (Lot 14) owned by the present owner be 20 feet from the south lot line. 2. If the work has not commenced within 1 (one) year after granting this variance then the variance shall become null and void. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, A Jere%h'LE� ames L. Robinson Planning Coordinator JLR/dm Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department, by August 5, 1986. RECEIVED JUL 25 1986 Concur with action taken improvement. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, suggested it may be helpful to have a neighborhood meeting with the City staff and interested Council members to present this idea for improvement of -the park. He stated St ff would a r range for such a meeting. E. Mr. Ne4m�an, Assistant City Attorney, stated this dinance doesn't provide a great deal of protection other than 1 imi ti ng t size and number of signs. Councilman Schneider asked if, by adopti this change, it creates a problem in enforcing the ordinance. Mr. N stated it is a weak ordinance and an area that is extremely difficult t9 egislate. DDIOTION by Councilman Schne' er to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first readi to recodify Chapter 214 of the City Code to regular freedom of s ch signs by adding Sections 214.02, 214.05 and 214.15. Seconded by uncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee de red the motion carried unanimously. POTION by Gilman Schneider to direct Staff that, at the time of second reading, is ordinance is to include the recommendations of the Planning Comm' ion as found on Page 9 of the Planning Conunission_aminutes of July 9, 19 Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed. Upon a v vote, all voting aye, vor Nee declared the motion carried unanimo . F. DISCUSSIOULX-rc01. nw M1'iION by Councilman Fi rick to direct Staff to advertise for bids for curbside recycling authorize requests for proposals for the S.O.R.T. site. Seconde Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee aced the motion carried unanimously. PECEIVING THE MINU`MS OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEE = OF JUNE 24, 1986• G-1. TI E 86-13 gWMn Amy LOCATED ONILT 15, BLOCK 2, � D PARK. BY LEROY ANDERSON; Mr. Robertson, Community Developne ' rector, stated this is a request for j variances to reduce the front setback from 35 to 17.5 feet and reduce the rear yara setback f ram to 5 feet to allow the construction of a house on Lot 15, Block 2, Ri ood Park. He stated the site is located on a new plat and the hards is the corner lot location for a home 82 feet long on a lot 120 feet epa Mr. Robertson stated frontage is on Riverwood Drive and solar s are located on the south so more roam is needed. Mr. rtson stated the Appeals Commission recommended approval of this -18- • CCKWII, MEETIM CE J"'Y 21, 1986 variance try a 2 to 1 vote. Mr. Anderson, the petitioner, presented a drawing of the proposed home and showed how it would be located on the lot. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he agrees with the reasons for the variance, but it bothers him that a new home on a new plat needs a variance. He stated in the case of this particular hane, it is only technically the front yard, as it really fronts on 71st. He stated the petitioner is minimizing the effect by moving the have to the north. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve variance, VAR #86-13, to reduce the front yard setback (easterly side of the lot) from 35 feet to 17-1/2 feet and to reduce the rear yard setback (westerly side of the lot) from 30 feet to 17-1/2 feet, with the stipulation the house on the adjoining lot (Lot 14) owned by the present owner be 20 feet from the south lot line. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. G-2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #86-14, Mr. Robertson, Cbmunity Development Director, stateZthisa uest for a variance to reduce the required frontyard setback ffeet. He stated Mr. Harris is requesting a rezoning in ordere the need for the variance, however, in order to expedite conthe first building, it is requested this variance be approvedrezoning. Mr. Harris stated the property has been soldan ey wish to close on it so construction can begin as soon as possible. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to appr a the variance, VAR #86-14, to reduce the front yard setback from 80 t 35 feet off Osborne Road to allow construction of an office building, w' the stipulation that the petitioner work with City staff in trying to ' ntain a 35 foot westerly setback off the proposed Viron Road. Secon by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor N declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Sch eider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission mee]f0F 9,. 1986. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RECEIVING THEHE CABLE TELEVISION CXomISSIoN OF JUNE 25 1986: MOTION by Co cilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Cable Television mmission meeting of June 25, 1986. Seconded by Councilman Goodspeed Upon Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. —19- ~ s COUNCIL MEETING I JLY 21, 1986 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a letter was sent to Orfei and Son, the law bidder on this project, requesting an extension of their bid to July 28. He stated a phone call was received and Orfei and Son was not willing to extend the bid to this date. Mr. Flora stated, based on the time that has expired since the bids were opened, he would recommend they all be rejected and authorize staff to r eadverti se for bids for this project. 1MDTION by Councilman Goodspeed to reject the bids received for Water and Sanitary Sewer Project No. 162 and authorize staff to re -advertise for new bids for this project. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE GRADING PROJECT NO. 163 (WOODBRIDGE/LAKE POINTE DEVELOPMENT): Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Staff had reviewed the bids and determined the new bids were $250,000.00 more, due to the priority of work scheduled in the fall of this year. It may be possible to reduce these costs by rescheduling the work and changing the priorities. He would recommend that the bids be rejected and staff be authorized to re -advertise for bids for this project. Mr. Newman stated the reason for re -bidding is to address the rescheduling of the work. MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to reject the bids received for the Demolition and Site Grading Project No. 163 and authorize staff to re -advertise for new bids for this project, with some modifications in the bid specifications. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING BIDS AND A'aRDING PROJECT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST 1986-3• Mr. Flora, Public Work Director, stated bids were opened for Street Improvement Project ST 1986-3 and the law bidder was H & S Asphalt in the amount of $98,606. He stated Staff would recommend the Council accept the low bid f rcm H &S Asphalt. NOTION by Councilman Barnette to receive the following bids for ST 1986-3: • ki Ilk'�; a�• H & S ASPHALT 700 Industry Ave. W Anoka, M 55303 $ 98,606.00 C. S. McCrossan Box 247 Maple Grove, M 55369-0247 $104,565.35 -20- r • CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 24, 1986 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold called the June 24, 1986, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Donald Betzold, Alex Barna, Diane Savage Members Absent: Jerry Sherek Others Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley LeRoy Anderson, Minneapolis David Harris,420 Rice Creek Blvd. David and Susan Arneson, 953 68th Ave. N.E. Peter and JoAnn Rech, 8161 Ruth Circle Dennis Lanz, Coon Rapids Marc Putman, Rochester Yvonne Hermanson, 180 71st Way N.E. Sandra Swanson 184 71st Way N.E. Dennis Anderson, 124 71st Way N.E. Dennis Scheller, 7121 Riverview Terrace Corinne Albay, 7105 Riverview Terrace Quent Watts, 491 Overton Dr. N.E. APPROVAL OF JUNE 10, 1986, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. BARNA,SBCONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO APPROVE THE JUNE, 10, 1986, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PRESENTATION OF AWARD OF APPRECIATION TO PATRICIA GABEL: Since 11s. Gabel was unable to be at the meeting, Mr. Betzold stated he would personally deliver the award to Ms. Gabel. 2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE RE BY LEROY ANDERSON, PURSUANT -NOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEAPING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 249 1986 PAGE 2 Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT LOT 15, BLOCK 2, RIVERWOOD PARK YAR 186-13 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3D.1 requires a front yard with a depth of not less than thirty-five (35) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking with encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroach- ment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.3a requires a rear yard with a depth of not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the lot depth. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: Site is located on a new plat and is also on a corner lot. House is 82 ft. long and lot is 120 ft. deep. Frontage is on Riverwood Drive. Solar panels would be located on the south so therefore would need more room on the south. C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This size house would not fit on this lot no matter what way it faces. If the Board feels this house could be built on this lot,some consideration could be given to moving it further to the west (rear lot line). This would put the east end of the house more in line with the required 35 foot setback for the vacant lot to the north. The existing house to the west faces Riverview Terrace and its rear yard is adjacent to this lot. Its rear yard is about 35 feet deep. If the Board approves this request, the Staff has no stipulations to recommend. Mr. Clark stated the public hearing' notice was sent out with some flexibility as far as the movement of the house. The plot plan in the agenda showed 172 ft. setback in the rear yard. The public hearing notice stated that the year yard setback could be reduced down as far as 5 ft. This gave the Commission some flexibility in moving the house if they chose to approve the variances. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 Mr. Clark showed the Commission a photo of the lot taken at.the rear lot line showing the adjoining house next door. He also showed the Commission an aerial photo of the property. Mr. Clark stated there was an inaccuracy in the staff report. The builder was not intending to put solar panels in the house at all. There would be solar ge;n through solar glazing on the south side of the house. Mr. Clark stated the reason Staff was suggesting that the house be pushed to the west was because the house on the lot to the north would be 35 ft. from the property line, and the proposed house on the lot in question would be 171z ft. in front of it. Mr. Clark stated he had received a telephone call from the resident at 158 71st Way whose main concern was over the solar panels. Since there were not going to be any solar panels, he assumed her concern would be satisfied. Mr. Dennis Lanz, the prospective home owner, showed the Commission the house plans. He stated there were no solar panels on the house. It was a series of five French doors on the front of the house intended for passive solar heat gain during the winter and a massive fireplace and court tile inside the house for heat gain in the winter. This type of house also required trees in front for blockage of solar gain in the summer. He stated the front of the house faced what was platted as the "side yard" and the side of the house faced what was platted as the"front yard". He stated there would be very few windows in the house which faced other than to the south. He stated the house was quite long (the living area was 60 ft. long) and, as such, really only fit on this one lot. Mr. Marc Putman, the landscape architect, showed slides of the site. He stated the points they attempted to pay attention to in preparing the plan was if the side yard became the front yard (which according to city ordinance, the shortest side was the front yard on a corner lot), then they had to meet a 172 ft. setback. They could go to 5 ft. or 10 ft. and 25% of the lot depth or 25 ft., whichever was less, and pay attention to the front setback of 35 ft. They keep the front setback and they end up saving a lot of trees. He stated this was a very nice house designed to fit on this site. Mr. Betzold stated that in order to grant the hardship, the law required there had to be something that was unique about the land that would make it difficult to use the property. The Staff had said in the staff report that "this size house would not fit on the lot no matter what way it faces". His question was: Was the builder overbuilding on the lot and trying to put in a house that was too big on a lot that was going to require a variance? Mr. Putman stated this house fit on a long narrow lot. It was a typical rambler house set on a rambler lot. From that viewpoint, the only variance, if the front of the house was facing the "front yard" would be a narrowed rear yard, but the fact that they were maintaining a tree buffer mitigated APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 that circumstance, in that they control the adjacent lot and the likelihood of being able to control that blank wall. Mr. Betzold stated the fact that they control the adjacent lot could not be a major concern in this case, because those lots are going to be sold. The Commission faces situations all the time where someone builds far too close to a lot line, and then they are stuck with what is there. There was also no guarantee that those trees would stay there either. Mr. LeRoy Anderson, the developer, stated one of the functions of siting homes within any housing area regardless of the lot size dealt with the livability of the home. The way the property was platted, if the house was situated facing the "front yard",every time the traffic turned right, theoretically, the front of the house would get nothing but headlights. That was not appro- priate siting, because they would then have to design all the living area to the rear, and that did not make the house livable. Mr. Anderson stated that in an in -fill project where so far the average sale price has been $140,000 and this house was in the $160,000 range, they are looking at trying to set a character that supports and improves the surrounding housing to maximize the values. He did not look at it as trying to overbuild within the strict zoning aspect. Mr. Putman stated the house did cover less than 25% of the lot. Mr. Anderson stated this lot was the entry point of the development in setting architectural characteristics. This project provided an opportunity for step- up housing for people who still want to stay within the Fridley area. Mr. Barna stated that as the house was designed, he could not see anything that would justify a hardship. The house could be changed very slightly and be made suitable for the lot. Mr. Lanz stated there were many ways they could build on this lot. Obviously, they could build a smaller house and facd the house east, but he could guarantee that house would not be anywhere as nice as the proposed house. Mr. Putman stated this was a very unusual site; and if they want to use trade words, that created hardships in design. If there was a special corner lot vdth grade, with trees, it warranted value. If it was in the corner of a development, from the city standpoint, from being proud of the community to designing a good project that holds its value well in initial sales and follow- up sales, it made sense to try to do something well. Now someone has come forward willing to spend $20-30,000 more than the average for the rest of the houses in the area and build a custom house that required one setback variance and changed the definition of the "front yard". From that standpoint, the lot was difficult to build on. Mr. Barna stated he agreed with the petitioner regarding the front yard versus side yard issue. 01 APPEALS C0141ISSION MEETING, JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 5 Ms. Yvonne Hermanson, 180 71st Way, stated she lived directly across from the proposed house. She stated she loved the trees, and she hoped the builder would save as many trees as possible. She would be concerned about the neighbors to the west that their back yard would not have a house sitting too close,.and.she would object if the variance was granted to reduce the rear yard setback to 5 ft. That would be too close to the neighbor's property line. Mr. Putman stated that if he lived across the street, he would want this house built compared to what might be built there. Given the front yard setback, the required side yard setback would be 172 ft. If they changed the definition of the front yard to what the ordinance required, this house then moved forward. If the neighbors want more trees, it was better to have a house that was long and narrow and set back 35 ft. from 71st Way. Mr. Anderson stated the reason to stay at 172 ft. on the rear yard was to keep the house further away from the neighbor to the west and not disturb the tree buffer on the west side. Ms. Corinne Albay, 7105 Riverview Terrace, stated she lived on the lot to the west. Her main objection was if the setback was reduced to 5 ft. If the setback was 172 ft, and with the tree buffer, she would not object to the variances. She stated the house as planned made sense to her. Mr. Betzold stated that if the city code had said that 71st Way was the front Of the lot, then the only variance that would be needed by the petitioner would be the rear lot line (north). Mr. Clark stated the house as proposed was ll.ft. from the property line at the closest point. The requirement was 25 ft. He stated one thing they might want to consider was that if the house on the lot to the north was iaoved to the north, then the houses would be farther apart. Mr. Anderson stated he would agree to that if the Commission approved the variance with a stipulation to offset the house on the lot to the north. He could agree to a house 46-47 ft. in length on lot 14 to the north. That would give about 30 ft. between the two structures. Mr. Bill May, 7110 Riverview Terrace, stated that if the house was going to sit on the lot the way it was proposed, he would ask that the Appeals Commission vote "yes" for the variances. He stated he thouqht the house would look good in the neighborhood. Mr. Dennis Scheller, 7121 Riverview Terrace, stated he appreciated the aesthetics with the way the house was proposed. He would like to see the variance granted. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:42 P.M. APPEALS CRIMISSION MEETING, JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 6 Mr. Barna stated the hardship was still hard to define. They were talking about a solar house frontage, not solar panels. According to state guide- lines, solar was one of the things they can look at in allowing variances. So, he would rationalize the hardship as the double frontage of the lot, the desire to have a solar aspect to the house, the maintaining of the front yard to the south which was legally the side yard, and then requiring an aesthetic maintenance of a rear yard which, if the frontage of the lot to the north was added, would not require a variance. Ms. Savage stated she had some concerns mainly because it just seemed that the house was too big for the lot. However, it appeared that with the stipu- lation assuggested by Staff, it would aesthetically enlarge the lot so the spirit of the code would be met. So, she did not disapprove of the variance as long as they make that stipulation. Mr. Betzold stated he did agree with the developer that it made more sense on this particular lot to have the house facing 71st Way. He did not think this particular house should be facing Riverwood Drive. However, that did create some problems and needs and they have to look at the whole situation. Corner lots have also been quite troublesome. He stated the hardship was a little bit thin, but he thought they had found a way that should be able to keep everything within the spirit of the code. They have been told this is a key development corner and that this is a very important development. Since they have spent about 1 hr. 15 min. discussing this, he felt that, even if the Commission does agree to grant the variances, that maybe the City Council should take a look at this too. Mr. Dennis Lanz stated that if this had to go on to the City Council on July 21, he would not wait that long. He would build a house elsewhere. He stated this would be another delay, and then there were no guarantees that the pity Council would approve the variance. He stated he would not go on with this to City Council. Mr. Betzold stated he still felt strongly that the City Council should loot; at this variance request. Whatever is built on this lot will be there a long time. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL SAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTS, VAR #86-13, BY LEROY ANDERSON, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK (EASTERLY SIDE OF THE LOT) FROM 35 FT. TO 17� FT.I TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK (WESTERLY SIDE OF THE LOT) FROM 30 FT. TO 17-� FT.,WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE ROUSE ON THE ADJOINING LOT (LOT 14) OWNED BY THE PRESENT OWNER BE 20 FT. FROM THE SOUTH LOT LINE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, BARNA AND SAVAGE VOTING AYE, BETZOLD VOTING NAY, CHAIR- PERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Betzold stated this item would go to City Council on July 21. Item #2., 24, 1986 KA I. I Y'J4U 10 kil R24V41 Qi� � • �� VAR #86-13 Section 205.07.3D.1, requires a front yard with a depth of not less than thirty -five -(35) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right of way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. Section 205.07.3D.3a, requires a rear yard with a depth of not less than twenty-five percent (250) of the lot depth. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood. Site is located on a new plat and is also on a corner lot. House is 82' long and lot is 120' deep. Frontage is on Riverwood Drive. Solar panels would be located on the south so therefore would need more room on the south. C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This size house would not fit on this lot no matter what way it faces. If the Board feels this house could be built on this lot some consideration could be given to moving it further to the west (rear lot line). Uhis would put the east end of house more in line with the required 35 foot setback for the vacant lot to the north. The existing house to the west faces Riverview Terrace and its rear yard is adjacent to this lot. Its rear yard is about 30 feet deep. If the Board approves this request the Staff has no stipulations to recc mend. MAILING LIST Variance #86-13 Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park Independent . School District #14 6000 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Donald J. Weeding 7153 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Trygve Olson 7145 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Jon R. Dahl 7131 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Dennis M. Scheller 7121 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 5.5432 Pepito C. Albay 7105 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 John L. Bass 7132 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Conrad D. Rowe 7138 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Roger G. Claesgens 7130 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Larry Johnson 7120 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas K. Swanson 184 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Allen I Rolland 188 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Howard M. Crabtree 7100 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 William V. May 7110 Riverview Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 gals June 4, 1986 Girl Scout Council of Minneapolis 6900 East River Road Fridley, MN 55432 Douglas E. Hermanson 180 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Bruce I. Nelson 168 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Nita A. Robbin 158 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Leo J. Bender 146 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Rodney W. Salo 136 - 71st Way Fridley, MN 55432 Riverwood Associates 430 Oak Grove Loring Park Office Building Suite 404 Minneapolis, MN 55403 e CITYOF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue Northeast at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 24 , 1986 in regard to the following matter: Consideration of variance requests, VAR #86-.13, pursuant to Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 3.5 feet to 17.5 feet; to reduce the rear yard setback from 30 feet to '5 feet to allow the construction of a house on Lot 15, Block 2, Riverwood Park. Notice is hereby given that all persons having an interest therein will be given the opportunity to be heard at the above time and place. DONALD BETZOLD CHAIRMAN APPEALS COMMISSION Note: The Appeals Commission will have the final action on this request, unless there are objections from surrounding neighbors, the City Staff, or the petitioner does not agree with the Commission's decision. If any of these events occur, the request will continue to the City Council through the Planning Commission with only a recommendation from the Appeals Commission. COML_�SION APPLICAT10tv REVIEW Department Number File Date Meeting Data CITYOF Community Development 32 May 29, 1986 June 24, 1986 FRJDLEY File Address / D escrIptionVariance #86-13 COMPLETE REVIEW CHECKLIST Lot 15; Black 2, Riverwood Park;reduce-front yard setback from 351 to 17.51;rear yard from RETURN TO PLANNING 5 10 DARYL COMMENTS . EBBIE 16p, MDL kqzf) J&�.,Qj_ IM �J�� DEBBIE Fl j 0 H N 11/�e —DEBBIE IDDARREL I - —DEB131E-----.l CLYDE 7 -DEBBIE MARK --DEBBIE — EON DEBBIE CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 WIVERS1TY AVF N.E. e FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS VARIANSE REQUEST FORM, VARIANCE # 16 -/-% VARIANCE FEE RECEIPT # PO D -- SCHEDULED APPEALS MEETING DATE CJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK �� TRACT/ADDITION RJVCL:LA� PRESENT ZONING h4-1 _ VARIANCE M UEST(S): Attach a. plat or survey of the property showing building, variance(s), where applicable. f '3J ' ,�;Cz 5' U Section of the Code: List specific`hardship(s) which require the variance(s): OWNER INFORMATION NAME ( please print) �6'1 �` � 11�5C � 0) ABS til' PHONE ?1' �LJ . ADDRESS SIGNATUF #######1 PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME (pleas print) P',�C r � �11L5,9,0- LaI"A PHONE Lt-° ADDRESS 76 Zda SIGNATURE �g DATE ####ffff###f#ff##f##f##fff##f##ff##############ff#ff#f############f#####f#f#ff#### APPEALS COMMISSION: APPROVED ✓ DENIED DATE CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DENIED DATEd'Z& STIPULATIONS: J V-16"«, 0AJ L6 e'�/ &-- _ao-' 'Sg' ref (.fJodLG�✓ 7-6 6,-- 6 -,,)mm Ajce dl c i -w ,j 1 r Mu•1.- tt 1 ASS U • 111.5 nL.S 30 t� v y+. L C1RTIFICAT E ----121.14---- 35 c112b ;�Iat13.b •3\ 19$3:-. I. � • MrOsED' - . AVIATION rw , rj� �r � � o . pT�.1VOTES 12,:;x; I.10lJUMEIIT 'e � 6>=t�icHM A2K - l y V. S A2�•l. `•SERV i^R 1"1.K. - ASS V M c -D F—% -V-A/, 10 0.0 0 1 S.3 6AG1�C OP CUR® 117.1 -T I S`T I hereby certify that this is a true and correct represenlw-at'ion of a survey 'of the boundaries. of : Lot 7,, Block 1, Riverwood.Manor, ,'nd of the location of all buildings, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 2nd day of November, 1972. Land Surve or, Minn. Reg. No. 9066 RE-VISE,D 1/2"0/73 TO S1ao'N ASBuiL75 Rt_V I S t.0 I%./z7/-7z 7 —` :•.4c000MBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ►';; TING MIA UAE O LAND EDNYETDNE ■ SITE FLANMENE \ Y.ANCA►OLI%. MUTCMIMEOM W MAAtMALL. MAIMI{OTA SCALE 1" • 30' PRE -PARED AOR BOOK PAGE 51 3s DAVID a. F a'P -' .ts M D FILE NO. • -� a