Loading...
PRE 2010 DOCSs P GEnTECHNILAL 1925 Oakcrest Avenue 26 - 7th Avenue North PROJECT: (Direct written correspondence to the Roseville office.) REPORT OF FOUNDATION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATI PROPOSED RESIDENCE SOUTH & WEST OF SIEVERTS LANE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA GEC JOB NO: 1972 INTRODUCTION REPORTED TO: MR. BURTON SMITH 1365 OSBORNE ROAD, NORTHEAST SPRING LAKE PARK, MINNESOTA DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1978 During the period of December 13, 1978, we drilled two (numbered B-1 and B-2) test borings for the referenced project. Based on the results of the borings, we have provided recommendations for design and construction of the floor slab and foundation with respect to the subsurface conditions. An investigation for soils suitable for an on-site sewage treatment system was also conducted at the site, and the results reported under a separate cover (GEC#1972A, dated 1.2/15/78). TEST BORINGS The boring locations are shown on the attached sketch. The borings were made using the standard penetration - split spoon method. Refer to the attached sheet, "Test Boring and Sampling Procedures" for additional information regarding the test boring and sampling procedures. HYDROLOGY a SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • TEST BORINGS MATERIALS TESTING s PERCOLATION TESTING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION GEC #1972 - Page 2 The soils were classified in accordance with the ASTM Visual -Manual Method (ASTM D 2488). Refer to the attached sheet, "Unified Soil Classification System" for a description of the classification method. The elevation of the ground surface at the borings was determined in reference to the top rim of a manhole at centerlines of 69th Avenue Northeast & Sieverts Lane. An assumed benchmark elevation of 100.0' was used there. RESULTS OF THE BORINGS General Refer, to the attached logs for a description of the sursurface conditions en- countered in the borings. The logs show: the depths to the boundaries between the soil layers; the description, classification, and geologic identification of the soils; the surface elevation at the boring; water level measurements; stand- ard penetration resistance (N column); and other information. Refer to the at- tached sheet, "Drilling, Sampling and Testing" for a description of terminology used on '-he logs. Subsurface conditions can vary from that encountered in the borings at other locations, depths, and times. Depending on the degree of variability, this could: 1) necessitate altering our conclusions and recommendations for design and construction procedures, and 2) affect the cost of design and construction. The degree of variability could be evaluated by additional exploration, Soils The general soil profile encountered in the borings, from the top down, is slope wash over coarse alluvium over fine alluvium and glacial till. Refer to the attached sheet for a description.of geologic terminology. The depths to, and elevation of, the contact between the slope wash and the coarse alluvium bearing stratum in the borings are as follows: Geotechnical Engineering Corporation GEC #1972 - Page 3 Boring: 1 2 Depth: 4 62 Elevation: 82 822 Groundwater The groundwater table was encountered in the borings at a depth of about 8' in Boring #1 (elevation 78) and 9' in Boring #2 (elevation 80). Refer to the attached sheet for general information regarding groundwater conditions and observations. DESIGN INFORMATION We understand that the proposed building: 1) will be located approximately at the location shown on the attached sketch; 2) will be one story in height; with the lowest floor level at about elevation 82; 3) will have the finished grade outside about at elevation 90 on the north side of the house, and sloping down to elevation 82 at the south side of the house; 4) will have normal tolerance to settlement; 5) will be of conventional design and con- struction; and 6) will be constructed in accordance with applicable building code requirements. Deviations from the above design information could nec- essitate altering our conclusions and recommendations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the borings and on the design information, subsurface conditions are suitable for normal slab -on -grade, spread footing type construc- tion at approximate elevation 82. Footings along the west and east sides of the foundation should be stepped down such that the plane drawn from the lower corner of the high footing, at 30 degrees from the horizontal will not intersect the lower footing. Consideratfon should be given to installing drain tile below the floor slab. A design bearing pressure of up to 2000 psf is recommended for footings. hnical Engineering Corporation GEC #1972 - Page 4 All organic topsoil and other vegetative material should be removed from below the proposed building. Any fill placed below the proposed building should be inorganic and compacted to at least 95% of maximum Standard Proctor density. Report Prepared By: Edward M. Keating CLOSURE Under the Supervision Of: R Bert E. Pende Bast, P.E. Minn. Reg. No. 8450 Geotechnical Engineering Corporation GEOTECHNICAL ENGINE RI G CGRPGRATI N GEC JOB NO: 1972 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' LOG OF BORING NO, 1 PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE, SOUTH & WEST OF SIEVERTS LANE, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA DEPTH, In SURFACE ELEVATION: 26 a S FIELD P, LALIORAIONY 1E�515 FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION GEOLOGY N WB TnYVEE RE.G. MC DEN L L. P. L. SAND, fine grained, slightly 3 N SS 6 1 -SILTY organic, dark brown, plastic-SM) SLOPE __(non WASH 3 N SS 14 SAND, fine grained, slightly 3 -SILTY organic, orange, (nonplastic -SM)' 4 - s _ 9 ? SS 12 SILTY SAND, fine grained, light brown, mottled'reddish brown, 6- 7- 9 Y SS 6 e_ COARSE SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, ALLUVIUM (slightly plastic -SM)' 9_ to_ 11 Y SS 12 11 — 12- 9 Y SS it 13- 14- 16- CLAYEY SILT, with some laminations. 10 Y SS 18 gray, (ML -CL) FINE 1B_ ALLUVIUM 17 14 ? SS 8 CLAY, with some sand, with a trace 18- of gravel, gray, (CL) 19- GLACIAL TILL 20- 17 ? SS 18 21 - END OF BORING DEPTH DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NATE: REFER TO 0-92 HSA DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH DRILLING MUD LEVEL WATER LEVEL THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN 9-12-1-9-12 HSA+PAP+ 12/13 A. C. 210 9.5 8.1 EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG BORING COMPLETED: 12/13/'78;1:25 ,c: LB D1r : DJ Rig: Bomb GEC JOB NO: 1972 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=3' LOG OF BORING NO 2 PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE, SOUTH & WEST OF SIEVERTS LANE, FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA DEPTH, i� SURFACE ELEVATION: 89.1 TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH DRILLING MUD LEVEL WATER LEVEL SAMPLE 12/13 F IELD Y. LABORATORY JESTS FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION GEOLOGY N WB TYPE Rtc MC DEN L L. _ P.L. SILTY SAND, fine grained, slightly 1 N organic, dark brown,(nonplastic-SM) SS 6 SLOPE 2 WASH 2 SILTY SAND, fine grained,, slightly 3- r organic,brown,(nonplastic-SM) N SS 17 4- SILTY SAND, fine grained, lamin- ations, brown, (nonplastic=SM)' 5- 3 N SS 17 6- ,- SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, mottled reddish brown, (nonplastic- 6 ? SM) SS 17 8- COARSE ALLUVIUM 3 - SILTY SAND, fine grained, brown, 10- (nonplastic -SM) 7 Y SS 3 1, 12- 8 Y SS 9 13- 3-14— 14- 15- 10 Y SS 9 END OF BORING 1s- 1i- 18- 8- 19- 19- 20- 20-21 21— DEPTH DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 0-9 HSA DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH DRILLING MUD LEVEL WATER LEVEL 9-14 HSA+PAP+WAT. 12/13 2:25 11 9%4.$ we 12/.13 A.C. 14% 10.6 BORING COMPLETED: 12/13/78;4:00 12/13 4:15 0 10.2 'C: LB D1r e Dj Rig: Bomb NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG TEST BORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES STANDARD PENETRATION - SPLIT SPOON (ASTM D 1586) A 1-3/8" ID, 2" OD steel sampling tube is driven into the soil with a 140 pound weight falling 30". The number of hammer blows required to drive the sampler 1',after an initial set of i', is the standard pene- tration test ("N" value). The "N" value is an indication of the strength and compressibility of soil. Split spoon samples normally are taken at intervals of 2i' or 5'. At 2i' intervals, the depth to contacts between soil layers can be determined to an accuracy of about 1'. At 5' intervals, the depth to contacts between soil layers is determined approximately, and the type of material present between sampling intervals is inferred based on the action.of drilling tools. The bore hole is advanced between sampling intervals with a flite auger, or a hollow stem auger, or by rotary drilling. Methods used to stabilize the bore hole include: hollow stem auger, casing, drilling mud, Revert drilling fluid, or a plug of paper at the bottom of the hollow stem auger/casing. AUGER BORINGS An auger is drilled into the soil. The auger is then spun or retracted, and samples are taken at the ground surface or off the auger. Using this method, determination of the depth to contacts between layers normally is approximate only. THIN WALL TUBE SAMPLES (ASTM D 1587) Comparatively undisturbed samples are taken with thin wall tubes which are pushed hydraulically into soil. STATIC CONE TESTS The static cone test entails measuring the force required to push a steel cone penetrometer into soil. Cone.diameters are 1-3/4",2q",and 3". The apex angle is 600. The cone is pushed hydraulically at a rate of l" per second. The static cone bearing pressure, qc, is the total load divided by the projected end area of the cone. The static cone bearing pressure is an indication of the strength and compressibility of soil. CORING (ASTM D 2113) Coring is done with a diamond or carbide bit on a double tubed barrel. 6/77 TERMINOLOGY ON BORING LOGS: DRILLING, SAMPLING, AND TESTING A,B,N: A, B, or N size casing or core. AC: At completion of boring. 4 cas: 4" inside diameter casing. CONS: One dimensional consolidation test. DEN: Dry density, pounds/cubic ft. DM: Drilling mud. FA: 6" diameter flite auger, motor driven. HYD: Hydrometer grain size analysis test. HA: Hand auger. HSA: 3%" inside diameter hollow stem auger. LL: Liquid Limit. MC: Moisture content, percent of dry weight. N: Standard penetration test, penetration resistance, or N value, blows/foot ORG: Organic content, percent. PAP: Paper plug. PERC: Percolation rate, minutes per inch. PERM: Permeability test. PL: Plastic limit. qc: Static cone bearing pressure, tons/sq. ft. qu: Unconfined compressive strength, pounds/sq. ft. RD: Rotary drilling. REC: In split spoon sampling, the length of sample recovered, in inches. In rock coring, the length of core recovered as a percentage of the total core run. REV: Revert drilling fluid. SA: Sieve grain size analysis test. SG: Specific gravity. SS: Standard Split Spoon Sampler. Steel, 1-3/8" inside diameter, 2" outside diameter. 3TW: 3" diameter thin wall tube sampler. WASH: Sample recovered from circulating drilling fluid. WAT: Water. WB: Describes whether the sample appears to be waterbearing. (See attached sheet for additional information.) WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod & 140 lb. hammer. WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of AW size drill rod. -200: Amount of material finer than #200 sieve, percent. Water level symbol. (See attached sheet for additional informa- tion.) GEOTECHMAL M CCFMNMTMN MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS SYMBOL SYMBOL �' ''•• WELL GRAVEL - •� GW -GRADED GRAVELS, SAND MIXTURES. LITTLE OR GRAVEL vy� ••••"••• AND CLEAN GRAVELS •: :::�iC :;::, NO FINES GRAVELLY (LITTLE OR NO j ••�•;!�•;R SOILS FINES) �• POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS,GRAVEL- �•�••• G P SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR COARSE GRAINED NO FINES SOILS GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND - MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE GRAVELS WITH FINES SILT MIXTURES FRAC- TION RETAINER (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT ON N0.4 SIEVE OF FINES) CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL -SAND - IS C CLAY MIXTURES SWWELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLV SAND SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES AND CLEAN SAND (LITTLESANDY OR NO FINES)SOILS sp POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY MORE THAN 50% SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES OF MATERIAL IS THAN NO, SIEVE SIZE i Cj M SILTY SANDS, SAND -SILT MIXTURES MORE THAN 50% SANDS WITH FINES OF COARSE FRAC- (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT TION PASSINQ OF FINES) NO. 4 SIEVE S(°' CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY FINE SILTS INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM GSLIQUID LIMIT `. L PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS. SOILS CLAYS LF�S THAN SO SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS I llillll I I I OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC I I I I i l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR MH DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS MORE THAN 50% SILTS OF MATERIAL IS AND LIQUID LIMIT C H INORGANIC CLAYS OF N16H WSIEL THAN NO. CLAYS GREATER THAN SO PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS VE SIZE OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS P T PEAT. HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS. SOIL CLASSIFICATIO19 CHAIM GEOLOGIC TERMINOLOGY The geologic description indicates the apparent depositional origin or stratigraphic name. Geologic identification is interpretive and subject to error. General categories of geologic deposits and descriptive information is as follows: BEDROCK Often a hard, dense, consolidated rock formation. Can also be soft, compressible, and unconsolidated. COARSE ALLUVIUM Sandy (and gravelly) soil. Stratified. Deposited SLOPEWASH from fast moving waters in streams, rivers and deltas. CONTROLLED FILL Compact, uniform material. Inorganic. No debris. SWAMP DEPOSIT Engineered fill. FINE ALLUVIUM Clayey and/or silty soil. Stratified. Deposited TOPSOIL from slow moving waters in streams, rivers, and lakes. GLACIAL TILL Inorganic soil. Normally contains a wide range of grain sizes, from clay through boulders. Non- TUMBLEROCK stratified. Deposited directly from glaciers. LAKE DEPOSIT Clayey soil. Laminated. Deposited from very slow UNCONTROLLED FILL moving waters in ponds and lakes. LOESS Silty soil. Non -stratified. Upper layer. Deposited from wind. OUTWASH Coarse alluvium deposited from glacial meltwaters. SLOPEWASH Organic and/or inorganic material. Washed from slopes and deposited in depressions. SWAMP DEPOSIT Peat, muck, and marl. Formed through accumulation of organic material under water. TOPSOIL Contains both inorganic and organic material. Upper, black layer or soil. Formed by weathering of in- organic soil and accumulation of organic material. TUMBLEROCK Dominantly gravel, boulders and rock slabs. Deposited from gravity flow down hills or cliffs. UNCONTROLLED FILL Loose. Non-uniform. Organic materials. Debris. WEATHERED BEDROCK Bedrock which has been substantially weathered through disintegration or decomposition. WEATHERED SOIL Texture and composition is transitional between topsoil and underlying non -weathered soil. Geotechnical Engineering Corporation TERMINOLOGY ON BORING LOGS GROUNDWATER Groundwater information is shown in two places on logs: 1) under "Water Level Measurements" and 2) in the "WB" column. Information under Water Level Measurements includes: 1) The depth to the water level (or drilling mud, if used) and the depth to the bottom of the hole (cave-in). Water level and cave-in measurements are taken with a weighted measuring tape. If free-standing water is not en- countered in the hole, the term wet, or dry, is indicated under water level. This means that the soil recovered on the end of the measuring tape did, or did not, respectively, appear to be saturated. 2) The depth sampled and the depth of casing (or hollow -stem auger) for measurements made during the progress of the boring. 3) Date and time of measurements. Notation in the WB column describes whether soil samples appear to be waterbearing or saturated. Y means yes, N means no, and ? means questionable or indefinite. Im The water level symbol in the WB column indicates the apparent depth to the groundwater table at the bore hole. Determination of the depth to the groundwater table is an interpretive process. The de- termination is based on various factors, including: water level measurements, the appearance of samples, overall subsurface conditions, site conditions and weather conditions. The accuracy of the indicated depth to the groundwater table can be quite variable. The water level symbol with an arrow pointed downward (or upward) indicates that the water level is at or below (or above) the level indicated. Absence of the water level symbol does not necessarily mean groundwater was not encountered, or the water table or piezometric surface was not penetrated. The presence of groundwater in the soil and the level of the ground- water table can change with time. The information in the WB column is based on observations and measurements made at the time the boring was drilled and water level measurements were taken. Topographic Contours Shown•on'Site.Plan Propert Corner Proposed Residence South & West of Sieverts Lane Fridley, Minnesota corner �operty Corner perty Corner x- �a 7 From the desk•of YU NASIN Q11R�.s.iI CI1'1i MANAGER'S OFFICE i MEMORANDUM DS -534 DATE: February 7, 1979 TO ACTTON IP1F0 SUBJECT: Dick SobieCh Proposed Easement Encroachment Request on Sieverts Lane by Burton Smith Through W-vman Smith Please see the attached'request, review and take appropriate action. Thank you for your assistance. NMQ/ms Enc. Original and only copy of letter 1!!;4t' b 2/22/79 - Please be advised ,that Mr. Smith has requested that the item noted in the correspondence be postponed. Apparently, he is having difficulty with a private system. He will get back to us if and when he wishes to proceed further. DS/jm WYMAN SMITH LEONARD T. JUSTER HENRY H. FEIKE.MA ALVIN S. MALMON RONALD L. HASKVIT2 CARL J. NEWOUIST MARK E. HAGGERTY LAW OFFICES SMITH, LJUSTER, FEI$EMA, MALMOI3 & HASSVITZ CHARTERED SUITE 1250 BUILDERS EXCHANGE BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402 TELEPHONE (612) 339-1481 ASSOCIATES February 2, 1979 JAMES R. CASSERLY ALLEN H. GIBAS JOHN M. GIBLIN Mr. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 FRIDLEY OFFICE 6441 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE (612) S71-6670 Re: Proposed residence south and west of Sieverts Lane by Burton Smith of 1333 Osborne Road, N.E., Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432 Dear Nasim: Burton Smith has asked me to help him proceed with his plan to build a residence on Sieverts Lane south and west of same. The first week of January I left with Darrell Clark of the Inspection Department a copy of his report of Percolation and Soil Boring tests. Darrell indicated to me at the time that the City Council had approved the use of a septic system on the lot that Burton Smith is purchasing. I now discover that additionally Burton needs permission from the City to encroach upon a City easement which is contiguous to his parcel where he would like to place the septic system or a portion of it. Mr. Clark suggested that I send a letter to the City requesting Council action to approve such encroachment. I do not know whether or not the easement (which is a portion of a vacated street) was retained only for future utility services or whether it is a traveled roadway to the dam on Rice Creek. At any rate, would you please process this request with the staff. At the appropriate time I wish that you would place it on the City Council agenda and notify Burton Smith so that he might be present to meet with the City Council. Obviously whatever use he would make of the easement he would return the surface to its present condition. Yours truly, Wyman Smith WS/av cc: Burton Smith RILL CRL'EK WA'T'LRS11EL) DISTRICT SUITE 177, ARDEN PLAZA 3585 NORTH LEXING'T'ON AVENUE ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 55112 cc: City of Fridley M. Panzer (I)o not fill in. ) PERMIT APPLICATION # Received Notice Sent Agenda i9 Inspected PERMIT APPLICATION To be comg!leted,by the applicant Date % Owner: yor''��a_ Phone Address : % 3QV,4tiQ- J< �-�-Av-1."", City; - � .. �.. -'.4-Signature of ow r) (Zip Code) Permit Application For Approval of Remarks ELarid Development Plans Grading, Sed iment-Erosion Control Plan ❑ Stormwater Management Plan []Final Site Drainage Plan []Flood Plain Development Ouse and/or Appropriation of Public Waters []Bridge or Culvert construction [:]Wetland Alteration C1Riparian Improvement -Shoreline Setback (] Private Drainage System "Other (explain in R Name o$ Project: -, Purpose of Project: Location of Project Municipality or Township: of Section Township Range Call 483-0634 if assistance in completing this form is required. Please attach drawings, plans and other data as outlined in "Rice Creek Watershed District Rules and Regulations".Mail or deliver this form along with a $10.00 administrative fee and appropriate exhibits to the above address. "A field inspection fee on this permit shall be charged to cover actual costs related to a field inspection including the investigation of the area affected by the proposed activity, analysis of the proposed activity, services of a consultant and in addition, a fee will be charged for any required subsequent monitoring of the proposed activity." M.S.A. 112.88, Subd. 2. Applying for this permit to RCWD does not preclude your applying for any necessary permits that may be required from other governmental agencies. A8-78 i f JJ dice Creekwer CIO CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, 1450 W. HWY 96, ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 55112 TELEPHONE (612) 633-5676 March 15, 1979 Mr. Burton Smith 1365 Osborne Road Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432 Please reply to: Administrative Office: Suite 177 Arden Plaza 3585 Lexington Ave. No. Arden Hills, MN 55112 (612) 483-0634 BARBARA BLUME Admin. Asst Re: Permit Application No. 79-26: Burton Smith Location: Southwest quadrant of the intersection of Siverts Lane and County Road H, Fridley (0-3) Purpose: Approval of on-site sanitary sewer system for a proposed single family residence. Dear Mr. Smith: The above -referenced permit application has been received along with the following exhibits: A. Legal description of the site. B. Letter dated March 2, 1979, prepared by the applicant. C. Reports of percolation tests and soil borings prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Corporation dated December 22, 1978. The project has been reviewed with the following findings: 1. Any fill placed on the site to accommodate construction of a drainfield must settle for a period of 12 months prior to installation of the system. In addition, the bottom of the drainfield trench must be at a minimum, 3.0 feet above the highest known water table. 2. A site plan showing the following information should be submitted: a. Drainfield setback from the well north of the site. b. Drainfield setback from Rice Creek. BOARD OF MANAGERS A. CARDINAL, SR. G. V. DIMKE W. L. GOYER R. R. HAMILTON E. A. PETRANGELO ANOKA COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY WASHINGTON CO RAMSEY COUNTY ANOKA COUNTY E A. HICKOK & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers 473-4224 • FRANK J. MURRAY Attorney 222-5549 Mr. Burton Smith March 15, 1979 Page Two C. Dimensions and location of the drainfield. d. Elevations of the grade at the locations of the soil borings and percolation tests reduced to Mean Sea Level datum. 3. The results of the percolation tests show that the rates may be too high to meet the criteria set forth by the Rice Creek Watershed District. According to current District Guidelines, test results must show rates in the 4 minutes/inch to 60 minutes/inch range. Upon receipt of a plan showing the proposed drainfield the information outlined above, we will be in position the project and make our recommendations to the Board Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, E. A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for theDistrict Michael A. Panzer Geological Engineer MAP/jel cc: Board F. Murray, RCWD B. Blume, RCWD D. Eklin, RCWD J.,, -Grose, CAC t_,eity of Fridley design and to evaluate of Managers. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1925 Oakcrest Avenue Roseville, Minnesota 55113 (612) 636-7744 26 - 7th Avenue North St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 (612) 253-3451 (Direct written correspondence to the Roseville office.) REPORT OF DRAINFIELD DESIGN PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE SOUTH AND WEST OF SIEVERTS LANE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA GEC JOB NO: 2236 INTRODUCTION REPORTED TO: MR. BURTON SMITH 1365 OSBORNE ROAD NE SPRING LAKE PARK, MINNESOTA 55432 DATE: AUGUST 2, 1979 This report covers the design of an on-site sewage treatment system for the above referenced project. The system will consist of "standard-, type" drainfield trenches placed in controlled fill. Fill must be added to the site to obtain a 3' separation between the bottom of the drainfield trenches and the seasonally high groundwater elevation. DESIGN INFORMATION 1) Site: Refer to attached site plan. 2) Wastewater load: 450 gallons per day for a three bedroom house. 3) Trench bottom area: 456 square feet using twelve inches of gravel. This figure is based on the texture of the fill material to be used (sandy loam). Sandy loam textured soil has a percolation rate of about ten to fifteen mpi. 4) Depth to seasonally high groundwater: refer to the attached cross-section. The high groundwater elevations shown on the cross-section were determined using the first occurance of mottling and water levels taken on April 16, 1979. 5) Slope: existing slope is approximately eleven percent. 6) Existing soils: existing soils are fine sand with percolation rate of approximately four mpi. HYDROLOGY • SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • TEST BORINGS MATERIALS TESTING • PERCOLATION TESTING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 9 CONSTR�CTION INSPECTION GEC Job No. 2236 Page 2 7) Lowest floor elevation of proposed house: 867. 8) Septic tank capacity: one thousand gallons. SPECIFICATIONS 1. Stake out the area to be filled for the drain field. Reference stakes are recommended. 2. Effluent will be delivered to the drain field by a pumping station. The supply pipe may be placed before or after placing fill. The pipe must slope uniformly back to the pumping chamber. Backfill should be compacted. Refer to the attached sheet for pumping station details. 3. Cut trees to ground level. Remove surface vegetation. 4. The fill material shall be a sandy loam, with little or no gravel. 5. The fill should be placed over the site in six to eight inch lifts and given moderate compaction. Care should be taken to insure the fill is uniformly compacted to final grade. 6. After placement of fill is complete, trenches may be installed in the normal manner. Trenches should be dug to the elevations shown on the cross-section. Trenches should be three feet wide and thirty eight feet long. 7. Distribution will be by drop boxes. Refer to the attached sheets for details. 8. Twelve inches of 3/4" to 22" diameter clean durable gravel should be placed below the distribution pipes. Two inches of gravel should be placed over the distribution pipes. , 9. The gravel should be covered with three to four inches of hay or straw and covered with untreated building paper before backfilling. 10. A grass cover should be established over the drainfield. Report Prepared By: UWAVOI fdward M. Keating otechnical Engineering Corporati N 150' from oronarty rnrnar MA ®ootechnlcal Enginewlng Corpontbn GEC Job No. 2236 erty Pin ev. 874.3 ---15' 25.5' 73 72.2 �? I Compacted Sandy Loa - — o 3 Trenches 3' wide 9. 1� with 12" of gravel I` Trench Bottom Elevation i , -- - --- � - -- -- - - - - - •North Property Line -- I-10' Driveway 875 73. i Existing ground Surface 3, 870 Seasonal High Water level CROSS-SECTION OF PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM Vertical Scale: 1"=5' Horizontal Scale: 1"=10' GEC Job No. 2236 -- —r t---- - - -- - , I i ---15' 25.5' 73 72.2 �? I Compacted Sandy Loa - — o 3 Trenches 3' wide 9. 1� with 12" of gravel I` Trench Bottom Elevation i , -- - --- � - -- -- - - - - - •North Property Line -- I-10' Driveway 875 73. i Existing ground Surface 3, 870 Seasonal High Water level CROSS-SECTION OF PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM Vertical Scale: 1"=5' Horizontal Scale: 1"=10' GEC Job No. 2236 -- —r t---- - - -- - , I HORELAY IN WEATHER PROOF MANHOLE CE - LOCATE OVER�V�N USE BASEMENTT 1��� \UNIT ORIZEO EIYTR1rT 24" MANHOLE FROM Is HANGER PIPE FOR PUMP - ft SEPTIC - - ELECTRODE HANGER i1 REMOVAL TANK WARNING ELECTRODE-- iI DISCONNECT 94.0 RESERVE CAPACITY ' tL COUPLER 6.0 AFTER ALARM SOUNDS —ATO DISCHARGE a CIA TO 5 WHEREVER POSSIBLE MAIN- SOIL - START LEVEL _' -- 1 ----- ----- �_ L �i_ TRAREAENT PIPE 6' START ELECTRODE" � 3" REQUIRED SOIL TREATMENT AREA WHEN SNOW COVER IS LIGHT. IN SQUARE FEET PER BEDROOM CHECK VALVE ' SHUT-OFF LEVE_lMAY BE - - d - - - - - - - - -I - INSTALLED TO BEDS DISTRIBUTION PIPE, IN INCHES STOP PREVENT /I 12"-18" MINIMUM ELECTRODE- � DRAIN BACK 31 TO 45 t DEPTH nu p 300 PUMPABLE CAPACITY- AT LEAST 75 GALLONS PUMPING RATE SHOULD NOT EXCEED DROP BOX OUTFLOW CAPACITY OR 45 GALLONS PER MINUTE (2700 GALLONS PER HOUR). PUMP DISCHARGE HEAD MUST BE ADEQUATE TO OVERCOME ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PUMP AND DISTRIBUTION BOX PLUS FRICTION LOSS IN DISCHARGE PIPE. LIQUID CAPACITIES OF VERTICAL CIRCULAR TANKS INSIDE DIAMETER OF TANK IN FEET GALLONS PER FOOT OF DEPTH 1.5 13.0 2.0 23.5 2.5 37.0 3.0 53.0 4.0 94.0 5.0 147.0 6.0 213.0 FOR EXAMPLE, A CIRCULAR TANK WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF 4 FEET HAS 94 GALLONS OF LIQUID CAPACITY PER FOOT OF DEPTH. TO PUMP 200 GALLONS PER CYCLE. THE PUMP CONTROL SWITCHES WOULD NEED TO BE SET 2.1 (200/94) FEET APART. FROSTPROOFING THE DROP BOX DISCHARGE PIPE12` SOLCOVER ' PLACE A ROCK ENVELOPE 3/4 - Z'/2 DIA ROCK LFRoM'PtUJJtAP AROUND DISCHARGE PIPE. DRAIN TILE OR RIGID ROCK SHOULD BE 3/4 TO 2 %Z PERFORATED PLASTIC PIPE INCHES IN DIAMETER, WITH _,y. 3' MIN. FROM BOTTOM OF TRENCH TO NO SAND. COVER WITH A 2 WATER TABLE OR CLAY OR ROCK �_ LAYER — INCH THICK SHEET OF — EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE. DISCHARGE a CIA TO 5 WHEREVER POSSIBLE MAIN- 125 TAIN A GRASS COVER OVER SOIL TREATMENT AREAS FOR TYPE I HOMES° TOP OF TRENCH AND ALLOW PIPE 6' SNOW TO REMAIN IN PLACE. REQUIRED SOIL TREATMENT AREA WHEN SNOW COVER IS LIGHT. IN SQUARE FEET PER BEDROOM PLACE A 6 INCH HAY OR PERCOLATION STRAW LAYER ON GROUND RTTRENCHES ABOVE PIPE. MINUTES PER INCH SEEPAGE DEPTH OF ROCK BELOW 1 1 5 BEDS DISTRIBUTION PIPE, IN INCHES BACKFILL EXPANDED \r- FASTER 6 1 12 18 1 24 POLYSTYRENE � 6. THAN 0.1 b — — — — — DISCHARGE a CIA TO 5 125 125 100 65 75 PIPE 6' ROCK 3/4'- 2'/z" DIA. - 6 TO 15 190 190 150 125 1 1 5 16 TO 30 250 250• 200 165 150 31 TO 45 300 300 240 200 ISO 46 TO 60 330 330 265 220 200 SLOWER THAN 60b _ _ _ _ _ 0 SEWAGE FLOW • 150 GPO PER BEDROOM TO DETERMINE THE LIQUID SPECIAL DESIGN SHOULD BE USED TO PROVIDE ADEOuATE TREATMENT AND ABSORPTION OF EFFLUENT CAPACITY OF ANY TANK, FIRST DETERMINE THE SURFACE AREA OF THE LIQUID. MULTIPLY THIS VALUE BY 7.5 (GALLONS RECOMMENDED AMOUNT OF EFFLUENT TO PUMP PER CUBIC FOOT) TO DETER- PER CYCLE IS 25 PERCENT OF DAILY SEWAGE FLOW. MINE THE TANK LIQUID MINIMUM AMOUNT OF EFFLUENT TO PUMP PER CAPACITY IN GALLONS PER CYCLE IS 75 GALLONS. FOOT OF DEPTH. UNIVERSITY OF DROP - B .. NOTESt.,,rOUTLET TO1, TRENCH FOR PUMPING EFFLUENT �. � �� • :� • I. ALL PIPES OTHER THAN PRESSURE PIPE SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4 — INCH DIAMETER. ' 2. ELEVATION OF INLET AND SUPPLY LINE TO NEXT DROP BOX MAY BE ADJUSTED UP OR DOWN FOR DESIRED EFFLUENT LEVEL IN TRENCH. 3. SUGGESTED TRENCH LIQUID LEVEL IS 2" ABOVE TOP OF OUTLET PIPES. 4. INVERT OF PIPE FROM PUMP MUST BE AT LEAST ONE INCH HIGHER THAN INVERT OF SUPPLY PIPE TO NEXT DROP BOX. 5. TRENCHES MAY OUTLET ONE SIDE OR BOTH SIDES OF DROP BOX. I 'Ie OR e PLASTIC m-- DSDI7 C70n 4 01 -IR -40 -- e of OUTLET TO NOTES TRENCH 1. ALL PIPES SHOULD BE AT LEAST INLET FROM 4 - INCH DIAMETER SEPTIC TANK OR PREVIOUS 2. ELEVATION OF INLET AND SUPPLY DROP BOX SUPPLY LINE LINE TO NEXT DROP BOX MAY BE TO NEXT ADJUSTED UP OR DOWN FOR DESIRED DROP BOX EFFLUENT LEVEL IN TRENCH ._.�. 3. SUGGESTED TRENCH LIQUID LEVEL _ IS 2 ABOVE TOP OF OUTLET PIPE 4. INVERT OF INLET MUST BE AT LEAST ..::.:: ONE INCH HIGHER THAN INVERT OF SUPPLY PIPE TO NEXT DROP BOX OUTLET TO 5. TRENCHES MAY OUTLET ONE SIDE OR TRENCH BOTH SIDES OF DROP BOX ' I INLET -i--1 i SUPPLY I • INLET i '- - _ LINE , I SUPPLY LINE 2" I I I I I I I OUTLETS I OUTLET TO TO TRENCH j I TRENCH DROP ---- - -- IN D-26 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY January, 1979 MATERIALS FOR DISTRIBUTION PIPES IN SOIL TREATMENT SYSTEMS The following is a list of materials that are acceptable for use as distribution pipes in soil absorption sewage treatment systems. This is not intended as a complete list of acceptable materials but should be used as a guide for specifying the listed materials and as general criteria for those not listed. TYPE OF MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE CLASS Clay Drain Tile ASTM C-4 Standard Clay Pipe Standard and Extra Strength ASTM C-700 Standard Perforated Clay Pipe Bituminized Fiber Pioe (1) Homogeneous Perforated ASTM D-2312 Bituminized Fiber Pipe for Septic Tank Disposal Fields (2) Laminated -Wall Perforated ASTM D-2313 Bituminized Fiber Pipe for Septic Tank Disposal Fields Concrete Pipe and Drain Tile Perforated Concrete Pipe ASTM C-444 Concrete Drain Tile ASTM C-412 Plastic (1) Acrylonitrile -Butadiene- ASTM D-2661* Styrene (ABS) Sewer Pipe and ASTM D-2751* Fittings (2) Poly (Vinyl Cloride) ASTM D-2729* (PVC) Sewer Pipe and Fittings ASTM D-3033* ASTM D-3034* (3) Sytrene-Rubber Plastic ASTM D-2852* Drain and Building Sewer Pipe Fittings (4) Polyethylene Sewer Pipe ASTM F-405 and Fittings Type I Special Quality *Note: These specifications are material specifications and do not give the location or shape of perforations. Perforated pipe used for drain fields should have one or more rows of holes on the bottom with hole sizes of 3/8 to 5/8 inch diameter. Holes should be spaced to prevent failure due to loads and to provide approximately 1 square inch of vopen area per lineal foot of pipe. Rice Creekwatersh C/O CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, 1450 W. HWY 96, ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA 55112 TELEPHONE (612) 633-5676 August 31 1979 Mr. Burton Smith 1365 Osborne Road, Northeast Spring Lake.Park, Minnesota 55432 01,1110 1 / F MIUIVrl rldGd 3585 Lexington Ave. No. Arden Hills, MN 55112 (612) 483-0634 BARBARA BLUME Admin. Asst. Re: Permit Application No. 79-26 Location: Southwest quadrant of the intersection.of, Siverts Lane and County Road H, Fridley (0-3) Purpose: Approval of: on-site sanitary sewer system for a proposed single'f amily residence Dear Mr. Burton: Receipt is acknowledged for the Report of Prainfield.Design prepared by the Geotechnical, -Engineering C9rporAtiQz1 dated. August 2, 1979. The project, as submitted under Permit Application No. 79-53, now shows compliance with the Rules, Regulations and Guidelines of the District. Therefore, the District Englueer'issues administrative approval of the project subject to, .3.;4 cation by the Board of Managers at their meeting on August 22, 1979• Very truly yours, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers fortheDistrict Peter R. Willenbring Civil Engineer PRW/car cc: Board of Managers F. Murray, RCWD RCWD Office D. Eklin, RCWD J. Grose, CAC City of Fridley BOARD OF MANAGERS A. CARDINAL, SR. G. V. DIMKE W. L. GOYER R. R. HAMILTON ANOKA COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY WASHINGTON CO. RAMSEY COUNTY E. A. HICKOK & ASSOCIATES Conspiling Engineers 473-4224 • FRANK J MURRAY Attorney 222.5549 E. A. PETRANGELO ANOKA COUNTY Purpose: Approval of on-site sanitary sewer system for a proposed single family residence. At their meeting on August 22 1979 , the Board of Managers,,of the Ripe Creek Watershed D str ct`rev ewe your perm it :application and the reCir ommendati.on of the District Engineer together with the "following exhibits: Report of Drainfield Design cc: 'Engineer City of Fridley File A followup inspection will be conducted at the project site to assure compl- ance with all agreements, terms and/or stipulations to this permit. Failure. to comply with the foregoing may result in rescission of the.permIt, and is in violation of Chapter 112.89 MSA, a misdemeanor. This document is not transferable and is valid for one (1) year after the date of issuance. If no construction activity has occurred after the (1) year time -period, this permit must be renewed. if construction is underway,, .,,,,... ­ a time extension may be granted. Please contact us at 483 -0634 -when the Spector may view the work in progress. must be forwarded within 10 days of pro Date of Issue: September 5, 1979 ----- re project. 'is about to commence so an inr The enclosed Owner's Certification 'ect c pletion. ,� City of Fridley SUBJECT 1554 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING r P E R M I" CEIPT •RE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. e 1 •• 1 = --I • CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APP ,. D r 612-5T 1-345Q 910-F15 110/30/79 JOB ADDRESS 6840 Siverts Lane 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEEATTACHED DESCR. Par. 260 R. L. S. # 3 SHEET 2 PROPERTYOWNER MAILADDRESS IIP PHONE Burton A. gaL_th 136 Osborne Rd. 780-2401 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS IIP - PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK M NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION �❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE B DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 30' x 44' and a 24' x 32' house and garage. 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS On-site septic system must be installed and inspected in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Anoka County Haalth Department. - Provide a hard surface driveway. Provide sod in the front and side yards. Provide the City with a copy of the verifying survey before capping. F C Ci� 5� ��_ �2 1 nl V41�11f5 TRn(,>/4 r I s� jrp= 50, cr- /I/'I N . - s tt�� Y— Q �,i, . r� L c. 7 *Balance of sewer main= $134.00 SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING .Wood Frame THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CO`JSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT_ AUTHORIZED 1S NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CC:NSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OA 120 DAYS AT R-1 29,670'house ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS. OFFSTRE'ET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TRIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $64,400.00 $32.20 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAV! REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $152.90 $425.00 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE 38.22 7 $782.32 SI A RE OF NTRACTOR RAU N RIZAA11 IDATEI, d WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED THIS YOUR PcRrAIT 13 �o �""'_ X02 �o S• NA U4E OF OWNER OF OWNER ERI IDATE SUBJECT P City of Fridley �55 ATTHE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PER BVI I. r RECEIPT . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. INSPECTION SEC. r PROTECTIVE "1 CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER DATE PAGE OF APP 0 D V 612-571-3450 910-F15 JREV. 10/30/79 JOB ADDRESS 6840 Siverts. Lane 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. Par. 260 R.L.S. #3 SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Burton A. Smith 1365 Osborne Rd. 780-2401 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK X NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 30' x 44' and a 24' x 32' house and garage. 8 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS On-site septic system must be installed and inspected in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Anoka County Health Department. Provide a hard surface driveway. Provide sod in the front and side yards. Provide the City with a copy of the verifying survey before capping. t s: l *Balance of sewer main= $134.00 TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. Wood Frame THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION 29, 670' house OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT R-1 ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $64,400.00 $32.20 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $152.90 $425.00 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE sk 38.22 $782..32 7 SI A RE OF ONTRACTOR RAU H RIZNA N '\ t, WH PR,.gOPERLK//VALIDATED THIS YOUR PERMIT 0/IDATEt/�h `1 ' �� y � l.C'l' .�' X ' �% L�.ldc� l ELDG I N S P DOTE S N URE OF OWNER (IF( R ERt (DATE CITY OF. FRIDLEY a APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS g (New, Alterations, Additions, or Repairs) OWNER: w l'�� BUILDER: •�� ADDRESS: l� ADDRESS: TEL NO: e sem, �( TEL NO: • Construction Location °� i - STREET NO: �1 � STREET: � j � �� �S r LOT: BLOCK: ADDITION:. Corner Lot: Inside Lot: Setback: Sideyards: Applicant attach to this form two Certificates of Survey of lot and proposed building location drawn on certificates to scale. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION lJ[ Front: �� Depth: e Height: e Squane. Feet: `'s Cubic Feet: Q9 1 v Front: Depth: Height: • Square - Feet: 1C� Cubic Feet: 0 Type of Construction: `W 0i --�VCX� Estimated Cost: $= _ sib Be (bmpleted: ®);-7 ` • .. 1 V®V Alt. A Alt. B Proposed Driveway Width OIf New Opening Is Desired: SEE REVERSE SIDE OF SHEET .7he undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the.work'herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: SIGNATURE:. � Stipulations: 3-�.- r t r � l 14 u .. 4-L o )c 30 fP®® --r god q t to 2 X �. 270. Sb G7� L 4. q, goo a to a = 1 cz. 90 Qe SIO ?- % 7L- aO COUNTY OF ANOKA j Comprehensive Health Department COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICE DAYTIME ACTIVITY CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6633 ARTHUR ST. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINN. 55432 571-0790 October 25, 1979 Mr, Benton Smith 1365 Osborn Road N.E. Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Smith: Reference is made.to the plans submitted by you covering the pro- posed construction of an on-site sewage treatment system for your new residence in Fridley, Our review of these plans indi- cate the following: 11 Septic tank design and/or manufacturer not specified. 21 Proposed soil treatment unit is located less than 100 feet from shallow well. 31 Soil treatment bottom separation is only 3 feet instead of 4 feet required by the City of Fridley Ordinance, 41 Lift station size and construction should be specified. 51. Well location for residence must be indicated. 6). On-site system size is adequate providing fill, natural percolation rates are faster than 15 minutes per inch. If you have any questions, please call me at 4214760, extension 1624. Ve truly our ebeet M. ruison Director, -Environmental Services RMH:pkp cc; City of Fridley Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer CER79FECATE 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 55421 788-9789 q('=V c-"RVBPSJ TmAT Irma ounv(rv. PLAN, OR RZPORT WAD PMPAMD GY MIZ OR UNDLTR "V ®OM= OUPGRVBOBON AND TEJAT D A A W&V M-OU07=aD L=0 ©URV=on U6i9gan TELT LA= OP VM[Z GTAVa OP l"7O6LNECOVA. DATE "1'21 e W SCALE 1"= 5o° V �6`�9C�1 ®5t' RE Sc IS7RATOON NO. 5332 ©= 0RON M®NUMENT Foutd> t1�M CO SC�� =RECORD DeS-1A V Sul( $�.t....S-0 i5 NOS�iPtJ'CEJ AIaSAi�b�_ I.-S� :. o4� a � s ° v No pt ga 00 s� J tr1 0 10 77, — r � a '�•� 1' J © L(� Ld DESCRIPTION e9 4 u1 Ux Tract C, Registered Land Survey Number 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, except that part lying norhterly of the following described line; Beginning at a point on the easterly line of'said Tract C, distant 200 feet southerly of %���,C) (v k) the most southerly corner of Tract E, said Registered C SLX Land.Survey.Thence northwesterly to it's intersection L s a with the westerly line of said Tract C, said point of intersection being a distance of 217.79 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said' Tract C. and there tdrminating.According to the survey on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County. ENERGY CONSERVATION SUPPLEMENT TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA This supplement is provided to assist the applicant in computing EXTERIOR ENVELOPE AVERAGE "U" FACTOR INFOR11ATION. This information is required so the BUILDING OFFICIAL can determine that submitted plans comply with. the ENERGY CONSERVATION DESIG14 CRITERIA of the STATE BUILDING CODE (Section 6000). it is the APPLICA14T'S responsibility to accurately compute the data; reflect the proper DESIGN CRITERIA in the plans; submit product specifications, if needed to support the "R" and "U" factors used; and to assure construction is per approved plans. JOB LOCATION: OWNER/CONTRACT/ ADDRESS: r N rJ it ���P PHONE: A. Determine the Total Exposed Wall Area as follows: 1. Total wall window area 2. Total door area 3. Total sliding glass door area 4. Total fireplace wall area 5. Total wall framing area (average .10%) 6. Total net wall area above floor(average 90%) 7. Total rim joist area Subtotal: Total exposed wall area above floor 8. Total foundation window area/&Oor CXV -'a- 9. Total net foundation area above grade Subtotal: Total exposed foundation area GRAND TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA B. Multiply the GRAND TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA X .17 r �10W%ql iz®vk -71 -741 Item I C.• Determine the Total Exposed Roof/Ceiling Area as follows: 10. Total skylight area 11. Total roof/ceiling framing area (10%) 12. Total net insulated roof/ceiling area GRAND TOTAL EXPOSED ROOF/CEILING AREA 1 -R! s a D. Multiply the GRAND TOTAL EXPOSED ROOF/CEILING AREA X .05 - Item II ��® E. Determine the "U" value of each segment (1-9) and multiply by the area as follows: A--- X stun _ _ • J � • 2. -�.l�..3I- X IOUs _ + . r o p ➢ = 3 3 X fluff 4—�F• _ 77L- O 5. _ __� ' — x flu$$6. e v Pv'' 7. 1 r fluff_� s_ 1 3' LA 4a 0 6 z 9 • nU,r J��� ®' 1W co w-�vn� v� ADD 1- 9 FOR TOTAL WALL SEGMENTS � " _ ITEM III � 2 F. Determine the "U" value of each segment (10-12) and multiply by the area as tt follows: . !. t. 10. _ X fluff �� ^� X ffurt Nat. ^' I't' `' 12. tl ,guts ADD 10-12 FOR TOTALy x. b'/CEILING SEGhIEN"66 _ ITEM IV G. If Item III is the same as, or less than Item I, you have meet the intent of State Building Code 6006 (c)' 2. H. If Item IV is the same as, or less than Item II, you have met the intent of State Building Code 6006 (c) 1. I. Add Itenl I —T z)jrw + Item II �p• 0 _ LJ� � 0G J. Add Item III®Y Item IV ®_ �5 D K. If,the sum of Items III and IV are less than Items I and II, you have met the intent of the Code for total envelope system. The undersigned, as applicant for a building permit, hereby affirms the above information has been prepared and submitted by himself or under his direction, hereby acknowledges the information to be correct and accurate;, and hereby presents the information with required plans in support of the building permit application. 1-7 By DATE: C _.� ;��--�---o , ,o ,oma «;_ x�,:'..��._, o�� • _ _ ,__�s ��y °� 11 B i 1310 13zo 1330 1340 � `� 1360 �1�0 Woo e 1350 1370 1 0 �.. � L v . ,�► ¢/� (ZZ9o) ("T, p o (.2360) o (,Z4001 16 1? 19 19 2C� .— 3iBJo tad b �.. $ 686�a • r Stree r--& Wa-�er :Imprc�veme� KJ' a • 27 I29 30 6850 i 31 37 f 6840 +1' }• �2,i/� � /j 3s �(5 po) - �Od) (/3 pp) .,. � 33 � •iG� �• A ?`�/iJ'� `\ Stasi oiM.�,,�:/tv�f ` F/oyd F. ;�.,�i'�r C•i1 omot �t ` �t A:7l9'9Y71N! 411) • :6Zo) eify of Frio'r�y - tP JA A 080 __ �°°•� �C' a� ✓ 3e ' �a tin9%, {,�9 t 1C Ce � �'/ �,�s -.. =6 ,q .._ �y of ,�� •r�/.y, � e Cr /� �• � o - ep,,o ---" 6679 Zt 8A3d q,LH 41.7 oat sz✓ -- r ` !� r A 663 � 3 , 6 .�� k1 ¢ O tki•.- .. 6 17 - /��q�■s oo /Jr�i�Plj fl�. f roif Z2 9 Q tY! �`► .°� s %T1 19 .'O ., • 660 �; . � "_ o :. � �� _ • � i� Y r > � ;. � � ` � - .-20'-. // 1313 I13�r 13:39 {351' ► r 89 . { B63 375 {Wr 1399 _' 4. .: - = 66118. pw 6 6 T� AV E E. N. E �e �� .� 8l —.eea_ _ ¢ice --�. _ z t . z�l '� `j y; -s •:'r .;I� 135$ O ." • e-< Mon, ''�.�"�� �'".>�,�v°��:�F1+.'�'3:: ,°� t vs� Q . n.t376°o►• dZ`>�' '4 °'�`�", ,.`�- �--"�N :��. �•.,�- H �b=������ -'g+r_; •ar •L�JJsa�4/Jdkr"� k.�Q�� "hr.- �.v , -� �,.s-�.���. � • 3_ 3-�s.�x; h ns rda�.a :.�a .FY '"1 ��:. � °s •� V.: � '.rc±� � q ¢, _ .�. �E+ _ s: ' lei+'• s Y 3m v. V� Lcj -rpt. ?,Zen. S'® 1%t Loo -®a SIIn, so si 8I I. so Slso.co w Z'Ao 2 su u Sbo o ova I7, i'aS k I�S� ICS x 11.S4 tom► �78z.Sa �1 �d t$712.So -rpt. ?,Zen. S'® 1%t Loo -®a SIIn, so si 8I I. so Slso.co w Z'Ao 2 su u Sbo o ova I7, N_o C v t%. v,.- %---j� 2 `LRsd— 3277 a'o tom► �78z.Sa Moe t$712.So N_o C v t%. v,.- %---j� 2 `LRsd— SANITARY SEWER and WATER ESTIMATE SIEVERT'S LANE Water 600' - 6" D.I.P. @ 0-10' depth @ $15.00/lin. ft. , . . . . . . $ 93,000.00 1 - 6" gatevalve @ $400.00 each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400.00 Install 6" hydrant @ $1,000.00 each . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000.00 1" copper service pipe @ $15.50/lin. ft. - 150' . . . . . . . . 2,325.00 Service connections - 4 @ $55.00 each . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220.00 Sewer Total . $12,945.00 XI1-1/ (". %?I.s5 8" P.V.C. @ 10-12' - depth - 600' @ $9.00/lir:. ft. . . $ 5,400.00 Construct manhole 10-12' depth - 2 @ $800.00 each . . . . . . . 1,600.00 4" P.V.C. service line - 100' @ $10.00/lin. ft. . . . . . . . _ 11000.00 Total . . $ 8,000.00 I0,®o d Total Water . $12,945.00 Total Sewer . . 8,000.00 Total Miscellaneous . . 1,600.00 (Grading, Tree Removal) GRAND TOTAL . . $22,545.00 1(0006 I�,ov 10/25/79 rt,. S& -7r Y t ;yv-\�,�� CD CC) V�- C- V-ek c elk /ap*vzl-, I 4 A '- ?WIN tv v --- A- Q (n\A ckt LcLv-%-o CQ �Q C) cco\01%1.c W" -QV- I CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING PERMIT PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: Number Fixtures Future Fixture Opening New Fixture, Old Opening Catch Basin Water Heater - to 99,000 BTU 100,000 BTU to 199,000 BTU Water Softener New Ground Run Old Building Electric Water Heater GAS FITTING FEES: lst 3 fixtures Additional Fixtures Gas Range to 199,000 BTU REPAIRS % ALTERATIONS First $100.00 each add. $100.00 or traction x x l x x X State Surcharge TOTAL FEE REINSPECTION FEE 1810.00) RATE $3.00 $2.00 $2.00 $5.00 MOO $10.00 $7.00 $5.00 $5.00 $3.00 $1.00 $x:0.00 $S.00 $2.00 TOTAL S S Job Address �=� Ln �/ C L) C— am "t Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein �- specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes erJJaC,C:and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all ,,,.,,the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct .-DiSCtJ�•��G FridieY. Mn. 4� V 9 J. ��i� 19� OWNER 10 t�- 12 7-,j IJ t %` AV KIND OF BUILDING USED At C: '-e TO BE COLLETED ABOUT 4zle ESTIMATED COST OLD ANEW ILDING PERMIT N0. PERMIT NO., Company' 1+� x Signed By Tel. No. ,5 7 - 7.7 -3- ROUGH INSP. Data FINAL INSP. 7— Date APPROVAL FOR PERMIT�� MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURC&1RGE N Water v i« 9 m H �.xro m M 01 54 w w 5 Heater w m OC M ay q w o NN Oc+ 4j rt ro U 0 N is a; y -4 U w a 0 c� .4 y ro o w .00 N .-i w u ca 3 c7 c o as lec yS 1st 2nd + 3rd 4- (R) a Future Connection Opening Connected with Sewer (*) a New Fixture, Old Opening Water PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE PLUMBING FIXTURE RATES: Number Fixtures Future Fixture Opening New Fixture, Old Opening Catch Basin Water Heater - to 99,000 BTU 100,000 BTU to 199,000 BTU Water Softener New Ground Run Old Building Electric Water Heater GAS FITTING FEES: lst 3 fixtures Additional Fixtures Gas Range to 199,000 BTU REPAIRS % ALTERATIONS First $100.00 each add. $100.00 or traction x x l x x X State Surcharge TOTAL FEE REINSPECTION FEE 1810.00) RATE $3.00 $2.00 $2.00 $5.00 MOO $10.00 $7.00 $5.00 $5.00 $3.00 $1.00 $x:0.00 $S.00 $2.00 TOTAL S S Job Address �=� Ln �/ C L) C— am "t Department of Buildings City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein �- specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes erJJaC,C:and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all ,,,.,,the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct .-DiSCtJ�•��G FridieY. Mn. 4� V 9 J. ��i� 19� OWNER 10 t�- 12 7-,j IJ t %` AV KIND OF BUILDING USED At C: '-e TO BE COLLETED ABOUT 4zle ESTIMATED COST OLD ANEW ILDING PERMIT N0. PERMIT NO., Company' 1+� x Signed By Tel. No. ,5 7 - 7.7 -3- ROUGH INSP. Data FINAL INSP. 7— Date APPROVAL FOR PERMIT�� MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY PLUMBING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURC&1RGE CITY OF FRIDLEY APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION AND .AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL .1 1 Job Address Furnace Shell & Duct Work $12.00 $ Replacement of Furnace 7.00 $ Repairs & Alterations -up to $500.00 7.00 $ Department of Buildings Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 4.00 $ City of Fridley Tel. #571-3450 MECHANICAL WARM AIR: ,tThe a. D undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 100,000 BTU $12.00 $ / specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes each add. 50,000 BTU 4.00 $ and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the Replacement of Furnace 7.00 $ facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Repairs & Alterations -up to $500.00 7.00 4.00 $ $ Fridley, Minn. , 199 Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 C STEAM OR HOT WATER SYSTEM: OWNER ��� LA Boiler & Lines up to 100,000 BTU $12.00 $ KIND OF BUILDING each addn. 50,000 BTU 4.00 $ q Boiler only up to 100,000 BTU 7.00 $ USED AS F each addn. 50,000 BTU 6.00 $ ' -7!2 TO BE COMPLETED ABOUT 2 -_ OIL BURNER- to 3 gal. per hour $10.00 $ I each add. 3 gal. per hour 10.00 $ ESTIMATED COST j GAS BURNER- from 100,000 BTU to 199,999 BTU $10.00 $�•®® OLD - NEW BUILDING PERMIT NO. PERMIT NO. (over 199,999 BTU see Fee Schedule) $ GAS FITTING FEES: d 1st 3 Fixtures x $ 3.00 $3 �. DESCRIPTION OF FURNACE/BURNER Additional Fixtures X $ 1.00 $ Gas Range to 199,000 BTU x $10.00 $ HEATING or POWER PLANTS, Steam, Hot Water, Warm Aii'- No. AIR CONDITIONING $ Trade Name I f) -� size No. 39 (a I FAN HEATING SYSTEMS see Fee Schedule $ VENTILATING SYSTEMS ALTERATIONS REPAIRS $ Capacity 0vo _ Sq. Ft. EDR BTU HP $ State Surcharge $ $ .50 Total Connected Load 1,�0�7 f37A— Kind of Fuel L TOTAL FEE $. .50.�j 39 BURNER - Trade Name \ o Size No. �� ROUGH INSP. REINSPECTION FEE Capacity Sq. Ft. EDR BTU HP Date ($10.00) FINAL INSP. - � 0 -Ff� Company Date Signed By APPROVAL FOR PERMIT f` Tel. No. ��� 00 MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING PERMIT IS $7.50 PLUS $.50 STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application No. 79-26 a Date April 8, 1980 Applicant Burbon. Smith I,00O gal - S;eoeAs RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTICE OF PERMIT APPLICATION STATUS At their meeting on 4-2-30 , the Board of Managers of the Rice Creek Watershed District took the following action on your permit application: ODenied n Tab 1 e d by recut of applicant. []Tabled with authorization for administrative action !C]Pending receipt of Co., City of Fridley E.F. Lickcok & Assoc. FCM Pile If you have any questions, please call 483-0634 Bonnie Torpe Administrative Assistant 'FORM Ell -78 SUBJE& , City of Fridley 28264 - AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. ` >t: ------ r i PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 ' 612-571-3450 910415 10/15/98 IDB ADDRESS 6840 Siverts Lane NE I LEGAL LOT N0. Par' 260' BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. Tract C SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Dan Bernard 74-7247 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO Ideal Roofing 1680 McAndrews Rd. Bur435-3061 20147919 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW 0 ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION a REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Reroof house and garage (33 S Tear -off 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Underlayment must comply with the State Building Code. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING. TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT CU FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANQONEO FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ` NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL EE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $2828 $1.41 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTI N OR;T' FOR ANCE OF CONSTRUCTION $]�L. ]5 Fire S $2.83 / PLAN CHECK FEE Licen C 5.0 TOTAL F $83.99 SI NATURE FCONr A TOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IOATEI N P OP I R T D SIS YOUR PERMIT 611, 0Gf11NSP �Y / gAtE S.GNATURE OF OWNEROF OWNER BUILDERI IDATEI r NEW [ J ADDN [ ] ALTER [ ] ConstructionAddress: Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: Contractor:,®% / Address: LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: Construction Type: S CITY OF FRIDLEY SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 01 Effective 1/1/98 Tel. # ,17 Zy- MN LICENSE # Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Length Width Height Sq. Ft. Length Width Height Sq. Ft. Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: Ft. + 6 Ft = Estimated Cost: $ �0a0 (Fee Schedule on Back) Ft x $ = $ DATE: j8q5-_ff APPLICANT: a `� +��� Tel. # CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ S" Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ 83 .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $1000 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ y® $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL $ 63,9Z STIPULATIONS: