Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PS04-01
I . • + CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (763) 572-3592 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBDIV ION APPLICATION FOR: Plat Lot Split PROPERTY INFORMATION: (site plan re uired for submittal, see attached) Address: neb ertvt Property Identification Number: Legal Description: Lot Block Tract/Addition Current Zoning: ( ( / Square footage/acreage: Reason for Subdivision l 0(4 Have you operated a iness in a city which required a business license? Yes No If Yes, which City? if Yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing.) NAME: $ / 'Mate I1,n-(4,Cr ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE:_ PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: 0 • ti 0. C ADDRESS: A ? 7a: ' i7) 7040 r Cc Nu, /4 c.) 17(hh N s'S'1l dZ DAYTIME PHONE:(6S- yq— Y9a y SIGNATURE/DATE: ,1„,. .• i _ FEES Plat: $500.00 for 20 Lots, $15.00 for each additi9nal lot Total Fee: 500 - 0 Lot Split: $250.00 Receipt#: /Qf Received By: Application Number: p S -D y-0/ D Scheduled Planning Commission Date: Scheduled City Council Date: 2 -2-04/ 10 Day Application Complete Notification Date: I- ?Li-a/ 60 Day Date: 3 -- 15-Oy Application for Nat Attachment 1 Property Information ADDRESS: / 3 y 0 m�'S S ► s$ ff i <i FYr d I� /yjtv Sc X1.3 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: /5 — 3 d Y Y a v O / j LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 15 BLOCK I TRACT/ D116.5-7-11W 5.10/)17 ADDRESS: / 3 / I'S S :00/4 5%. ifda .1'I/"J 5-s Y3 2 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: ) 3 _ 3 0 2,1 — a (A14LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT J on 1 TRACT � DITTI• 5.(117 ADDRESS: V (a0 1 to 1 - 1'✓c / /11/1/4-) 55V3-2 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: /3 - 3 0 ^ f - �;- v a �` I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT / 7 BLOCK / TRACT/ ITTIO 5-(7)1^) Vim''/( 7 ADDRESS: Va(4h r Loy cr) d / /Y7iU 5-5"y12- PROPERTY -s`(3ZPROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1 1 —3 0 - 2-.`j- `f a-- 00 / LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT j $ BLOCK j TRACT DITTIQD n v� `' ADDRESS: 6421 Central Ave Fridley, MN 55432 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 13-30-24-42-0023 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 19 BLOCK 1 TRACT/ADDITTION Spring Valley ADDRESS: y n ► �t ►�.� / 79'1r-t hi" ff /l/u) S.S(13 -2-- PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: / 3 3 D a `j `f 60 y �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT ,�o BLOCK / TRACT�; IO 0, /y� v"' 7 ADDRESS: I 3 1 t �' . /fr."( / c-1 (r �( Mik.) c S 3 2- PROPERTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: / 3 -- 3 0 -` ),1/4-t - `f - - vo LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 2.0 BLOCK / TRACT1ADDITTI r vq'JI ADDRESS: ( 3 c7 Cy (.1), PV 0.11(3 ( 41N Cy.? a PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: / 3 30 ? N 'f d2 60.2 S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT ),0 BLOCK / TRACT/11D TTI• S r,yt //f) Application for Plat Attachment 2 Fee Owner Information NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): ,,,J�rr �x�° A ) SSS II L PI",or Q t ve v1 ? to✓' ADDRESS: 1 3 L/0 rh SSIsSIfl f' S~r, f-vdJf. y .4411) 5S�' Z DAYTIME PHONE: (7 60 5-7 ► - `t 3 `/ / IGNAT /DATE -40?, irf 1"."4-44) 1 y , NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): 4/ -art 0\ 1 de ev-C t f U ADDRESS: 2 '7a l 7 A, 7C VYf c( k) Mk) 16t- 1114441omzr 42 DAYTIME PHONE: (6,/ai 6aZ —73-1 SIGNATURE/DATE: , /({>� f(�([ �,19 1 !S"d' NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): e me 160 rcoi 5 ha r�,ri ADDRESS: e!3 y woo d `� C`� "`� A' SS °� DAYTIME PHONE: , 6 57 - -€ `1 S d W°Y SIGNATURE/DATE: JC I 7/412 // _ _ P X > a' i/s�,�, $ NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): C41ILr `} ADDRESS: ANA.fu, DAYTIME PHONE: � '�- �gt-- q g SIGNATURE/DATE: \/\2/61-i NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): Mattison ADDRESS: 6421 Central Ave Fridley, MN 55432 DAYTIME PHONE: (763) 458-8218jv SIGNATURE/DATE: ../-7/,--;,./7/74: „.(..:L; OP gaJi. //JJ NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): ,3 #27 ./e/e'tei` '`) I ADDRESS: G'��vr �/ �� ���= � 1y//rJ DAYTIME PHONE: 3 /e// l� SIGNATURE/DATE: /64)0 C1� � d�-CcIL NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): .//7/A.) ADDRESS: /3 Y/ -(,c ..l'AvC lV C 7---2> ()Ley / AJ Shy 3 3.- DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE: 69/a -a�. '- 7 s`'` NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON TITLE): l __p ADDRESS: �� DAYTIME PHONE: i" 3, /\�4 s (la-? Al e(Se SIGNATURE/DATE: /g57 �z1je/4/.{, r �itey, 64'1, 76..E-- //5 /' ;.. .. . z/ t CI1YOF • FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 January 26, 2004 Profit Max Inc. Attn: John DeMello 2872 17th Terrace NW New Brighton MN 55112 Dear Mr. DeMello: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 working days if their land use applications are complete. We officially received your applications for a plat and rezoning on January 16, 2004. This letter serves to inform you that your applications are complete. Your Preliminary Plat and Rezoning application hearings and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley Planning Commission Meeting on February 18, 2004 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. The City of Fridley City Council will take final action on your preliminary plat and rezoning on March 8, 2004 at 7:30 P.M. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, Stacy S r•mberg Planner cc: Russell & Beverly Prior Frank&Sharon DeMello Richard Carlson 1340 Mississippi Street 6134 Woody Lane NE 7671 Central Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Mark Mattison Bob Jr. &Jackie Calderon John &Susan Rau 6421 Central Avenue NE 6401 Central Avenue NE 1341 64th Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Joseph & Linda Nelson 1357 64th Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 C-04-11 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, February 18, 2004, at 7 :30 p.m. for the purpose of : Consideration of a preliminary Plat, PS O4-01, by Profitmax Inc . , to replat six parcels into two parcels, for the purpose of constructing a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, legal descriptions are on file and available at Fridley Municipal Center, generally located at 1340, and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421, and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341, and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17, and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place . Any questions related to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg, Planner at 763-572-3595 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than February 11, 2004 . The TDD number is 763-572-3534 . DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: February 5, 2004 c\leo -pap-elS City of Fridley (Official Publication) PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday,.February 18,'2004,at IAD Considerafion Of Pielinfirtary Plat,P80401 by Profitmax Inc.,to replat six parcels into two parcels,for the purpose of constructing a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex,legal descriptions are on file and available at Fridley Municipal Center, generally located at 1340,and 1314 Mississippi Street,6421,and 6401 Central Avenue,1341,and 1357 641n Avenue,and two vacant lots,Lots 17,and 18,Block 1,Spring Valley Addition. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg, Planner at 763-572-3595. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than February 11, 2004. The TDD number is 763-572-3534. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION (February 12,2004) F-2 PROFITMAX#1 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 1340,and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421, and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341, and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17, and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition. CASE NUMBER: Preliminary Plat, PS #04-01 APPLICANT: Profitmax Petitioner or representative must attend the Planning Commission meeting. PURPOSE: To replat six parcels into two parcels, for the purpose of constructing a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex. LOCATION OF 1340,and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421, and 6401 Central PROPERTY AND Avenue, 1341, and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, LEGAL Lots 17, and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition. DESCRIPTION: Legal descriptions are on file and available at Fridley Municipal Center. DATE AND TIME OF Planning Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, February 18, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 17. PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers HEARING: 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 763-571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: Interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than February 11, 2004. The TDD # is 763-572-3534. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 763-572-3599 or Stacy Stromberg, Planner, at 763-572-3595. Publish: February 5, 2004 Cit of City of Fridley Y Fridley Public Hearing Notice 1 1 1 1 1 1 II - L - YE - . 1 � - Mississippi Street III A. Ts Avenue W \ c. Mk Jill 8 1111 1111111 aa _ N111111 JINNI la it111 11111 morn" ONE al ir Rice Creek R.a• ttaftt \ illliVilk 41 101 ill e 'N ( b LEGEND Rezoning Request #04-01 & Plat Request #04-01 AN Fridley Sources: 1314 Mississippi St., 1340 Mississippi St, FridleyGlEnS 6401 Central Ave., 6421 Central Ave., Anoka CountyGISgineering 6441 Central Ave., 6461 Central Ave., 1341 64th Ave., and 1357 64th Ave. Petitioner: Profitmax Inc. Map Date: 2/4/04 \ 1 --------t i w4 1,4 HM Orw S1F J9 ` 9bai ' £ • ..7�S 9� 41 t '.. 9t Ol£. :gip gg c ( 243rd€ 4L 41'W :At '$i ai'. -5r,; �` 444•''','='-''''' t, A� ,vim . 9 ?' ,Itt ,, " Ql 91 t' 8t bt►9 Oil �." � g r OZ�I 6131 wa q� Z3Z►t �[ 0 1 0 1 i 1.94 1(�Si9 6l 1919 T'. L7,1 SyAI l�&l l ,l 919 L b£�i►l t 04 1 0 ?0 6.300 b 1£�9 Z £ p H 0901 S • 081 .7-''''''''' �► Z� B 6�y - q �..9. - 4 l�t l�1 lIJ9b1 11 ( O,t►9 15,L9 S9 Z 1 £ blyQ4 ' b - 9)R9 J — . 0 9,84 tom. $ 6 - _ o�r►1 9/AI z 8 g a a a a 349 0. 6 9.5''`9 s�Z"9 , f V/� L��n.!_ �1l� �1- G Bad Address 12 Bad Address 13 Bad Address 6 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ARCHER-KATH JULIE A AWAIJANE SAMIR& MINDY BARSNESS CURTIS A 1348 HILLCREST DR NE 6588 CENTRAL AVE NE 6581 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BERGLUND ERWIN R&SUZANNE BERGMAN LEONARD E& DORIS L BERQUIST STANLEY J 6565 PIERCE ST NE 6435 PIERCE ST NE 6619 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BJORKLUND ERIC T& HJORDIS L T BLISCHOK THOM &SHARLA TRUSTEE BOGDAN ALLA&POTAPENKO V 1360 CREEK PARK LN NE 4244 E DESERT CREST DR 6532 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PARADISE VALLEY,AZ 85253 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BOHM SHIRLEY B BONA DAVID L&CHARLOTTE C BONDOW BRUCE A&DONNA J 6580 CENTRAL AVE NE 6548 CHANNEL RD NE 6616 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BRICKNER MARGARET A TRUSTEE BRICKNER RICHARD T BUIRGE THOMAS R&LINDA J 6260 HIGHWAY 65 NE#308 1233 12TH AVE NW 6312 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BURDICK ROBERT M&DORA M BURKHOW JON R&ALLISON R BURMIS DELLA M 1316 66TH AVE NE 6300 SHINGLE CR PKWY 6459 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 BURNS DEBORAH J &KING WILLIAM CALDERON BOB JR&JACKIE A C LSON RICHARD S 1371 CREEK PARK LN NE 6401 CENTRAL AVE NE Ba ddress 11 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRID EY,MN 55432 CEBULA DONALD J&SANDELIN R K COGLE MARIE C &GEORGE L R COLLARD JESSE J 1427 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1376 66TH AVE NE 1426 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 COUNTRY HOUSE INC CRANDALL CARRIE M CURRENT RESIDENT PO BOX 818 6411 PIERCE ST NE 1271 E MOORE LAKE DR NE STILLWATER,MN 55082 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1299 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1358 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1376 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55421 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 1380 CREEK PARK LN NE 1476 64TH AVE NE 1490 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN FRIDLEY,MN CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6301 CENTRAL AVE NE 6303 CENTRAL AVE NE 6315 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6325 PIERCE ST NE 6335 PIERCE ST NE 6345 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6352 CENTRAL AVE NE 6361 PIERCE ST NE 6373 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6381 CENTRAL AVE NE 6400 CENTRAL AVE NE 6436 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6441 OLD CENTRAL AVE NE 6461 WOODY LN NE 6490 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6500 CHANNEL RD NE 6501 CENTRAL AVE NE 6501 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6531 CHANNEL RD NE 6533 PIERCE ST NE 6534 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6542 CENTRAL AVE NE 6550 CENTRAL AVE NE 6552 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 6571 CHANNEL RD NE 6572 CENTRAL AVE NE 6600 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432FRIDLEY,MN 55432 • DAHLMEIER BETH A DEMARS ROY H JR&LYNN M DEMARS RUTH H 1358 66TH AVE NE 1464 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1442 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 DEMELLO FRANK&SHARON DUBANOSKI CLARA J EASON JAMES P 6134 WOODY LANE NE 6423 PIERCE ST NE 6360 ARTHUR ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 EAST WEST PROPERTY MGMT LLC EDWARDS DENNIS B&BARBARA J ERICKSON ALLAN T&B ELAINE PO BOX 270262 1403 64TH AVE NE 1400 66TH AVE NE VADNAIS HEIGHTS,MN 55127 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 EVANGELIST PAUL A EYLER INGE FEMRITE ROGER N&FAYE M 6378 PIERCE ST NE 1456 64TH AVE NE 4773 MANITOU ROAD FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 TONKA BAY,MN 55331 FRID CITY OF FRID EY CITY OF FRI EY CITY OF 6431 IVERSITY AVE NE Bad A ress 1 Bad A dress 10 FRIDLE MN 55432 FRIDLE ,MN 55432 FRIDL Y,MN 55432 FRI EY CITY OF FRID CITY OF FRID EY CITY OF Bad A ress 2 Bad A ress 3 Bad A ess 4 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDL ,MN 55432 FRIDLE , N 55432 FRIDLI4 CITY OF FRID CITY OF FRIDIrEY CITY OF Bad Add ss 5 Bad A ress 8 Bad A ress 9 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDL ,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRO'S HRA GADKE CAROL A GARMAN KATHLEEN R 6431 IV AVE NE 6389 PIERCE ST NE 6366 PIERCE ST NE FRIDL ,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GOLUBOWICZ ANNE E GOTTWALD GARY G GOTTWALDT GARY G 1220 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1415 IQ(ISSISSIPPI ST 1415 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDL Y,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 GOULD FLORENCE M &JEAN E GRABOWSKI JAMES M GWIAZDON MITCHELL L&MARY 6448 PIERCE ST NE 6525 CENTRAL AVE NE 6350 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HALL DAVID C& HENRY SUSAN M HALVORSON KIMBERLY J HART HERBERT N &SYLVIA E 1491 RICE CREEK RD NE 6555 CENTRAL AVE NE 1450 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HICKS JANIS K HINZ GREGG C HOLLISTER DOROTHY M 1320 CREEK PARK LN NE 6715 ASHTON AVE NE 1466 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 HOLMGREN ENTERPRISES INC HOLZHEU CAROLINE E HORNER JACQUELYN A 1323 RICE CREEK RD NE 1314 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 2463 17TH AVE NW MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112 HORTON CHARLES L&PHYLLIS HORTON CHARLES L&PHYLLIS HUIE CHOCK S&LAI C 10761 181ST CIRCLE NW 10761 181ST CIRCLE NW 1328 66TH AVE NE ELK RIVER,MN 55330 ELK RIVER,MN 55330 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JAEGER DAVID J &CHEVRE CARYL JOHNSON CHRISTINE R JOHNSON DOUGLAS E 6564 CHANNEL RD NE 1379 CREEK PARK LN NE 6388 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 JOHNSON JON G&MARY JOHNSON RANDOLPH E KELLS ALFRED J &DORIS E 1400 CREEK PARK LN NE 6336 PIERCE ST NE 6400 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 • KIDDER TIMOTHY J &DEBORAH A KITTE F A&SUNDE S L KOCOUREK CHARLES&MARLYS E 1311 CREEK PARK LN NE C/O AD ANCE COMPANIES INC 6330 ARTHUR ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLE ,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KORTE THOMAS G & NANCY B KOZER JACK D &KAREN P KRACL ADAM R&TUSSING M K 6580 CHANNEL RD NE 860 86TH AVE NW 6449 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 COON RAPIDS,MN 55433 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KRAMBER KATHRYN L KRIENS BERNARD J & LORALEE K RUSE CREEK PARK JOAN LNEN TRUSTEE 2013 29TH AVE NW 1362 66TH AVE NE NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 KWONG ANDREW&SELINA LABANDZ FRANK A&VALLIE R LANDRY DONALD J & MARY K 1321 CREEK PARK LN NE 1356 64TH AVE NE 6597 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LARSON GRACE M LARSON WALLACE L&SHIRLEY LEKANG RICHARD E&JOYCE E 1340 66TH AVE NE 6476 ARTHUR ST NE 6517 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LENNOX HERBERT W III LENNOX HERBERT W III &JUDITH LIND LEANN V 1461 RICE CREEK RD NE 1441 RICE CREEK RD NE 1410 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 LUKE KENNETH W&KATHLEEN M MARIHART BERNARD J MARIHART BONNIE J 1341 CREEK PARK LN NE 1373 64TH AVE NE 1443 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MARL ART BONNIE J MARTIN GREGORY D MARTINSON TERRY L&MARY JAN Bad A ress 7 6549 PIERCE ST NE 6568 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDL ,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MASON JOHNNY E&JILL L MATTISON MARK J MCLAIN JAMES L 1361 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6421 CENTRAL AVE NE 6554 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MCNAUGHTON MARVEL MEHTA ROBERT MENTH JOSEPH R&JOAN M 6300 PIERCE ST NE 4113 MONROE ST NE 1388 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS,MN 55421 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MILSTEN ROBERT W&MARY A MIRANDA LARRY B&SKIBA L J MOELLMAN RHONDA R 1487 64TH AVE NE 6581 PIERCE ST NE 6609 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MULROY PATRICIA S NAYMASTER S J&WOLDEN LOIS K NELSON JOSEPH J &LINDA P 1384 64TH AVE NE 6625 CHANNEL RD NE 1357 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 NELSON ROBERT 0&DORIS L NIKOLOV ILIAN S OKESON VIRGIL A&SUSAN M 1439 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6350 ARTHUR ST NE 1423 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 OLSON BRUCE R&AUDREY A OLSON DENISE M OLSON KURT E&ANDREA R 1442 64TH AVE NE 6556 CENTRAL AVE NE 1385 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 OPSAL JON M&BLOOD ANN B OSTLUND ARNOLD F JR& F M OVERMAN ROBERT G&SUSAN K 1405 CREEK PARK LN NE 1453 64TH AVE NE 1340 CREEK PARK LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PALMER LOREN C &SHIRLEY M PARKS CAMILLES R PAULSON MARIAN 6596 CHANNEL RD NE 1341 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1425 RICE CREEK RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PEHL GERALD A&DOROTHY T PETERSON THOMAS R PHILLIPS GARY P&PATRICIA M '1250 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6401 PIERCE ST NE 6519 CENTRAL AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 • PHILLIPS JON S&DIANE M PODVIN RICHARD T&CAROLE E POLHAMUS MARNIE E 1361 CREEK PARK LN NE 1391 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6599 CHANNEL RD NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 PRATT MARGUERITE E PRIOR RUSSELL L&BEVERLY Y RAMSEY SHARYN R 1428 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1340 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1340 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 RANDALL JOE M&VIVIAN M RAU JOHN D&SUSAN M REISNER DONNA M&JAMES W 1210 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1341 64TH AVE NE 6424 PIERCE ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 • RUSINAK JAMES J &RHONDA L SCHAEFER T R&WEATHERBY E V SCHENDEL MARK J 6412 PIERCE ST NE 6391 CENTRAL AVE NE 1489 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SCHMITZ TROY D &BONNIE B B SCHWALBACH RICHARD 0 SCHWARTZ MARK A&JEAN D 6537 CENTRAL AVE NE 6501 PIERCE ST NE 1372 64TH AVE NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SHEA RICHARD J SHIMANSKI ROBERT D &MARY LOU SOLIS TRACY L&KEVIN A 2132 150TH AVE NW 8025 GARFIELD ST NE 1381 MISSISSIPPI ST NE ANDOVER,MN 55304 SPRING LAKE PARK,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 SPAETH WARREN T&SHERRILL STEWART DONALD D STONE THOMAS D 6516 CHANNEL RD NE 1482 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 1400 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 • TAMARISK RESOURCES INC THE WELLSWOOD GROUP LLC THOMAS RICHARD S&JO ANN 1282 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 9637 ANDERSON LAKES PKWY N 1391 CREEK PARK LN NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ULVE GERALDINE US FEDERAL CREDIT UNION VUGTEVEEN CHAD W&SHERYL L 6552 OLD CENTRAL AVE NE 6303 OLD CENTRAL AVE NE 4142 AVONDALE ST FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 MINNETONKA,MN 55345 WILLIAMS JON J WOLF DARYL M&LINDA L YANG JAMES V& EMILY C .6355 PIERCE ST NE 6446 ARTHUR ST NE 6420 ARTHUR ST NE FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 ZERBY D MICHAEL&JUDITH A ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC ZIMMERMAN THOMAS JR&JUDITH 1400 64TH AVE NE 6300 CENTRAL AVE NE 7518 TEMPO TERR FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 FRIDLEY,MN 55432 From: Hickok, Scott Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:35 PM To: Bolin, Paul; Stromberg, Stacy Subject: FW: Traffic counts on Pierce Good afternoon: Here are the traffic counts from Pierce Street. Stacy will you please make sure that we use this information when the Town Center item is next prepared for Council. You may want to print a copy of this e-mail for the project file (How is that for being a micro-manager?). Scott Scott J. Hickok, AICP Community Development Director City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Phone: (763) 572-3590 Fax: (763)571-1287 Original Message From: Haukaas,Jon Sent: Wednesday,December 10, 2003 3:16 PM To: Burns,Bill Cc: Hickok,Scott Subject: Traffic counts on Pierce We tried some traffic counts on Pierce Street on Monday and into Tuesday morning. I say try because of the equipment we have. A slow moving car may register as two cars because there is enough time between each axle crossing it for the counter to reset. We put out two counters and results varied from 210 to 281 cars in the 24 hour period. Below are averaged traffic counts for our reading increments. 9:40am- 12:40pm 25 cars 3 hours 12:40pm - 3:40pm 57 cars 3 hours 3:40pm - 6:40pm 62 cars 3 hours 6:40pm- 9:40pm 41 cars 3 hours 9:40pm -6:40am 25 cars 9 hours 6:40am -9:40am 31 cars 3 hours Ray set the counters and did the readings during the day. I did the 6:40pm reading on my way to the City Council meetng, the 9:40pm reading on my way home from Council and the 6:40am reading on my way to work Tuesday morning. JHH ; ,?_/-Wo • PIZ IA" 00- -row'"-y : i -p. b7 / %y 5ts' / ( J - V-)-0 7)%,17 ._2,y '?1 35 7- lh Ei Qri z z�� �1Y 1A-5 tiro t1c/ i-111-31)- 1 4-; _5)1/ L./6W iPrrlf c21 / F/ 4-- E, ,-- -gY r--)°‘-'7444 -?8 i q- e / c - 1 - -12.x/ -477.7 -/"; j4 100) ra-F-TxAQ I. ! ?1(2 N }- N }� f 3N-.r,5- dd iss/5. -in, ac 2> 7.,v /�-L47 ®CZ' /,>' ,s 9-.? /fr/ a Z77g //(-1—° '♦ `� \). -6-/ Q-` 11 ` s S r s c.(_,r / 6 ;o a2aa 5747S-r n� LQL �j q fr / 3 How will Spring Valley Estates How will - affect traffic? Spring Valley Estates • TDI (Traffic Data Inc.) is currently conducting a thorough traffic analysis of affect ( Spring Valley Estates—results will be Fridley? available in February. Maxfield Research Inc. Tuesday,January 13,2004 f } • Based on preliminary analysis,the impact will not be noticeable(see following ifgrifirld example). • January 1],200{ Ma]flwM RaceercM1 Ina. 2 Current traffic levels at Central Ave Estimated traffic after Spring Valley & Mississippi Street Estates (based on industry standards) ofdcily traffic Vehicles Number f AADthorof occm,chnio8 Evening peak Number of me dun, seconds 010 %ofdnlOoo Ve lcepa I`woost w1• oro,o(4pod, h,m(4Lpm) n®mm,lmmx figs beam, �' seaming 000wl Euvnapoog t3ntaof .rmreaamg AADT mm(4-6,9 ask rare eNam,Bwe mm(4y,m) =Nor.. tede•1- aa7BP� 1•stysoofr) nv000d.08 atmvg�.vk bete® � ] h5asf f �r Bt:e.k W.ofCmml(w0o,d) 6,500 x 15% = 975 / 120 - 8.1 or 7.4 M 48ci� E ore.,(wbnod) 4,700 x 15% = 705 / 120 = 5.9 or 10.2 W.orCX4e1(w73d) 4700 x 15% = 1025 / 120 = 8.4 a 7.2 cwW Ave Eof(b4al(wbowl) 4,90 x 15% = 735 / 131 = 61 a 9.8 N.of Nicc(.-band) 9,000 x 15% = 1350 / 120 = 11.0 or 5.3 S.ofMiss(xbnod) 7,800 x 15% = 1170 / 120 = 9.8 or 6.2 CgohalAw N ofMss(slnocd) 9,210 x 15% = 1380 / 121 = 11.5 or 5.2 •t,J/,00w.mt•talemua,W✓,,ro FcwM1m2001/dfiu owr 5000/eiary.par N alvi(annul) 5/It)x 15% = 130 / 121 = 1(R) or 60 ANN=Awes.AmW 0.8y • TnOic • During the most heavily traveled time of the day(4-6pm),there is Traffic volumes would increase between 2%and 4%. between a 5 and 10 second gap between cars at the intersection. • This translates to a rush-hour gap decreasing by 0.2 to 0.4 seconds • These traffic levels have been consistent for the last 10 years. between cars,which would be unnoticeable. January 1],2004 Mnfl&d RwcnrcM1 Inc. 3 January 18,2004 MaxMltl 0.oa4nrcfl Inc. { If small individual projects do Things to keep in mind about not add noticeable traffic, where Spring Valley Estates and Traffic does it come from? • Residents will be age 55 or older. Thus,most will be retired. • Therefore,most residents will not be traveling during peak travel • Noticeable increases in traffic primarily come from large-scale times(i.e.,7-9am and 4-6pm). growth outside of Fridley. Coon Rapids and Blaine have added more than 42,000 people between 1980 and 2000. • Most residents will choose to get around without driving by: • Noticeable increases in Fridley's future traffic will likely come from: - using mass transit — using the Anoka Traveler — walking — contic — cnued development in Blaine and Lira Lakes(another 17,000 people arppoolol to gg local retail,or between 2000 and 2010),not to mention Ham Lake,Andover,St.Francis,etc. with neighbors — redevelopment of the Twin Cities Armory in Arden Hills Jmuery 1],300{ MexflwM RxnwrcM1 Ine, 0 Jenunry 1],200{ MuflaM RanwarcM1 Inc. 0 1 • • 'St How will Spring Valley Estates Change in property values of affect property values? homes located near senior housing :9196 • The following table displays the resale prices of 1 5x55 1 a ,55Iluaga. YenL.71. 10 residential properties located near similar �n ;0 1 m 12 s'1 39° 54481.4.153.711,1 ninjul 057755051,454 3110 I., IVA 5/3 200 5125 543% 140036 senior housing projects before and after they 5a221,a11adR,ran;,d0, .n�,w.,. 3a 1115k Ise Sm 300 510 4 • 313% ,,. were built. 5317500,a6R, m vs � 3 5w 3,a 5150 39 x3% 3129hlccRSRPoS 035194 11bdx Iw5 550 191 Yo 24ef• 1110 x8l091a 31093Reantrym P®GE9mrvym 99 211340 1 SIM 01q 5116 14^0 X209. ]x010udad143M334, Ran Mu,k May 20310 1100 561 Np 9O G/5% 910/. 43, tl150bva1nly,ad, 0a,myna,ixdaw4 2002 30310 1 364 302 5101x1 46 55111517,,061/5176177.06 0a,vlakxmw. 320 251,371nUN TO 320 $1111 61.96 483% um • All 10 properties increased in price. SomeSaranRgmM @k ORn a053 MN RmM a properties even exceeded the average increase There Is no consiabnt peltern of decreased property values.Alt snper0es increased in value, for the community they were located in. while somelncreaeedgreaterthanOrecltyaveregeendoometauedbkeepupwmmerny average. • Prices are shown in dollars per square foot because some homes were remodeled between sale dates. January 11,2004 Maxfield Research Inc. 0 January 13,2004 Maxfield Reseuch Inc. a How does Fridley's demographics compare to its growing neighbors? The Richfield Experiment • Tsubotalstapntiopulationally. is stagnant,while age 659 population has increased • In 1996 Maxfield Research conducted a This av�eeale Mst seniors aro staying in Meirndm°'y wne11g1n:�ea abi:esio aby so°long thorough analysis of senior housing needs ahema a 10 s wienher get o home values.fere d,which decrees.In Meir homes that maintenanceanca gets deferred,w • The number of households with children declines,while neighboring for the City of Richfield and its Housing communities see significant growth. and Redevelopment Authority. The report - This can be seen in Me lack of new retail development in Fridley,which isan Important component b Me tax base because itbwers the burden on homeowners. concluded that the City would best be =odt`2 cs 2010 , Ain 45.9leti-� I FeWh=w�J/O IAm I served if it developed additional senior 1000 2000 69x0 2000 Frid1ey 30,228 28,005 27,449 27,000 1.374 2,210 13 4.704 3,532 3,421 housing. Coon Rapids 52,9]1 1,620 2433 4.446 0,377 lom 26551 44,942 1.000 2316 6,425 6,093 Id,e1,556,191 6 549 4 66 5192 1 21,x, 152 2,u x ro 1,467 2,295 34e0340. 1,985,1173 2.233,309 2642.056 2064312 150,207 225,133 255,245 224,642 299,734 355,130 1.x01®.:0.a.Census,M5099013en Council Jenuery 13,2000 Max3eld Research Inc. 9 January 13,2004 Maxfield Research Inc. 10 The following benefits were cited as to why What has happened in Richfield Richfield needed more senior housing: since 1996? • It increases the property tax base for all levels of government(city,county,school • Three senior housing projects with over 400 total units. district); • It gives existing senior.residents nate housing options not currently available,thus • Over 400 units of condos,townhomes,and apartments. allowing them to remain in the community,close to friends and relatives; • sSvinices w(somsabaine nommmnaewce)nruehtehhoannoer area,soal • Over 250,000 square feet of retail. adding economic benefit to the community; • Allows single-family homes to become available for younger families desiring to live in • Two hotels with a total of 192 rooms. • ref community(partiwlarly important fnr er -dev Ifped ri tr-Tg suburbs)thus refreshing the Causing stock once younger buyers rypicaly remodel; • Retains senior residents who are a community asset;persons over age 65 have the • 2 Million square feet of office space(including Best Buy highest rate of volunteerism of any age group. world headquarters). Janwry 15,2004 Maxfield Research Inc. 11 January 11,2000 Maxfield Research Inc. 12 2 c� •w. How does Fridley compare to Richfield? • Between 1986 and 2003,the average arks fare Mme n RUM.Maenad 98%.In Fridlw,t increased 88%. • Richfield Is forecasted to add 3,000 person belwasn 2000 and 2010.Fridby k projected to decks saghhy. • The number of persons M Richfield age Bfi+has stabilised around 5,600 Mace ruching a high W fi,000 M 1980. Fridley nparier.M a MI%growth rate from 1990 ta 2000. • Durkg the 1980 the number of households w99 check..declined M bath Richfield(-18%)and Fddley(-27%). Outing rt g the ppyyy 3X Thuse,umber fhouseholds keeprp Idaitthrwkwrb grow row i nccuraell YYby 496,but MYr b rave ne i Meanwh a Fridley k eethg olderyM rwt ebte ta a0ectyounger haneholm. • 1888 pry ptesas faro$108,000 holovnre88%0�yyher n RCMkld 1151,955)thou 78101(51,820).By 2003, progrtyto bra 8160,000 home wen onh 3.7%rigMrin Rcrowld(01,063)th..Fddlry(31,]%)(source:the Etagere laNue). • wTMas26,824 y neciaM0MN1 hb0Rchryld was 3,070.In Fridley,the 2002 serious cros rate 0027;sou eo.. • Beuun RiMwld commllad lo alternative housing...re,Iron homes were made eve005 to yowl, =or= or nnd gtlirn noaeMtlrckga :swtWhw MMupw"Ynew9 P"" students.As mug businesses have upend.,von. Mlpa ncrwa the tax tens and dela crime. Y3 Jay 13,2004 Maxfield Renerch Inc. January 3 /�l i'. RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT • i' 4325 Pheasant Ridge Dr. NE#611 • Blaine,MN 55449-3070 Phone:763-398-3070• Fax:763-398-3088 October 31,2003 Torn Ceasare BKBM 5930 Brooklyn Blvd Minneapolis, MN 55429 Dear Mr. Ceasare, The Spring Valley Estates project located in the southeast quadrant of the junction of Central Avenue and Mississippi Street NE in the City of Fridley will not require a Rice Creek Watershed District Grading Permit. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, . / - V ,--7( , ..:...,. ,•, f., ,..„-- Karl Hammers Permit Coordinator C: City of Fridley BOARD OF ›- A.J.Cardinal,Sr. Roger K.Aiken James A.Leroux Barbara A.Haake Robin C.Doege MANAGERS Anoka County Ramsey County Washington County Ramsey County Anoka County 0 Printed on 100%recycled.10%postconsumer paper using soy-based inks. T0'd WW1 drogNaggaV Nt.t2 CrVirst;yr 4./eGrogur7 QSL 7 stlazpile oo ' 1 O'N4)9$17 4911 " 6,2E - i1 CIIYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 January 12, 2004 SENT VIA FAX TO # 763-786-1219 Richard Carlson 6441 Central Avenue Fridley MN 55432 Dear Mr. Carlson: I have been asked by John DeMello of Profit Max Inc., to explain the replatting and rezoning as part of a master plan process and how it correlates to his proposed development. Mr. Demello has been in contact with city staff regarding the redevelopment of the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Mississippi Street. He is proposing to replat multiple properties into 2 parcels and rezone multiple properties to S-2 Redevelopment District. As part of a rezoning to S-2 Redevelopment District, a master plan for the area needs to be submitted by the petitioner (Mr. DeMello). Ultimately, the City Council must approve both the rezoning and the master plan together in order for development to occur. Though, staff is not in a position to speculate about development outcomes, the development in this case depends on the plat and rezoning being approved prior to the projects commencement. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 763-572-3595. Sincerely, a, Stacy St t mberg Planner C-04-05 Memo to: File From: Stacy Stromberg, Planner February 10, 2004 • Called Jane Rose at the Anoka County Highway Department of 1/20/04, to discuss Spring Valley Estates site plan. • Mailed Ms. Rose a copy of the site plan for her review on 1/20/04. Noted to her that I need to have her comments back by 2/6/04. • Called Ms. Rose on 2/9/04 as I haven't received her comments. She stated that she would "try" to finish that night and fax it to me on 2/10/04. I stated I needed it by 8:30 a.m. on 2/10/04 to review it with the Development Review Committee before Planning Commission packets go out of 2/13/04. • 2/10/04 at 4:00 p.m., haven't received or heard anything from Ms. Rose. Stromberg, Stacy From: T Braman [acorn@iaxs.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:04 PM To: Stromberg, Stacy; acorn@iaxs.net;johnd@acninc.net; tcesare@bkbm.com Subject: John Demello Site located in the SE quadrant of Mississippi St. and Old Central Ave. Wetland Issues Update Dear Stacey, Subject: John Demello Site located in the SE quadrant of Mississippi Street and Old Central Ave. Wetland Issues Thank you for talking with me regarding the wetland issues associated with this site. As you requested, this e-mail is a summary of our conversation. I told you that Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. was retained by Mr. Demello to investigate and report on wetland issues. I have attended one meeting with Carl Hammers at the Rice Creek Watershed District. I also visited the site after looking at several map sources. After the meeting with Carl Hammers, he and I agreed that I would investigate historical aerial photographs of the site. I reviewed aerial photographs from the 1930s through 2003 . The early photos clearly show dark soils consistent with a wetland on the site. In the 1940s through the 1970 the site shows the wetland had been filled. Our observations on the site with snow on the ground support that fill has been placed on the site. There is uneven ground with trees nearly the same size across the site. The snow restricted observation of the ground. This will be done when the ground thaws and the snow melts. If wetlands are observed they will be delineated. I will be updating Carl Hammers regarding the aerial photos. I will send the aerial photos to you in a later email when I put the dates on them. Call with questions, Tom Braman Biologist Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Ave. S. Bloomington, MN 55420 acorn@iaxs.net 952-888-4901 voice/ fax 952-240-6226 1 t City of Fridley Land Use Application ZOA#04-01 & PS #04-01 February 18, 2004 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: 1941 — Lot is platted. Profitmax Inc. House constructed prior to 1949. John DeMello 1951 — Garage built. 2872 17th Terrace NW 1959—Addition to house. New Brighton MN 55112 1975— Detached garage built. Requested Action: 6421 Central Avenue: Rezone property from C-1, C-2, and R-1 to S-2. 1941 — Lot is platted. Replat House and garage built prior to 1949. Location: 6441 Central Avenue: 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Vacant Lot. Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central 1941 — Lot is platted. Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central 1969— Proposal to build a Tastee-Freez. Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, 1357 64th Avenue 1998— Rezoning request from C-1 to R-1, Existing Zoning: withdrawn prior to Planning Commission. 1314 Mississippi St. —C-2, General Business 6461 Central Avenue: 1340 Mississippi St. — R-1, Single Family Vacant Lot 6401 Central Avenue— C-1, Local Business 1941 — Lot is platted. 6421 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1341 64th Avenue: R-1, Single Family 1941 — Lot is platted. 6441 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1974— House and garage are built. R-1 Single Family 1985— SUP issued, second accessory is built. 6461 Central Avenue—C-2, General Business 1994— Deck is built. 1341 64th Avenue— R-1, Single Family 1357 64th Avenue: 1357 64th Avenue—R-1, Single Family 1974— House and garage are built. Size: 1985 - Deck is built. Approximate size of entire area to be rezoned 1988—Side yard setback variance granted, and replatted: garage addition built. 179,348 sq. ft. 4.1 acres Legal Description of Property: 1314 Mississippi Street: Existing Land Use: Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Single Family homes, small commercial building 1340 Mississippi Street: (garage), and vacant land Lot 15, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Surrounding Land Use &Zoning: 6401 Central Avenue: N: Commercial building & C-2 Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition E: Single Family & R-1 6421 Central Avenue: S: Single Family homes & C-1 and R-1 Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6441 Central Avenue: W: Vacant land and Restaurant& S-2 Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Comprehensive Plan Conformance: 6461 Central Avenue: Future Land Use Map designates this area as Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Redevelopment. 1341 64th Avenue: Zoning History: The W 75 ft of E 184 ft of lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, 1314 Mississippi Street: subj to ease of rec 1941 — Lot is platted. 1357 64th Avenue: The W 75 ft of E 109 ft of Lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, 1952— House is built. subj to ease of rec 1959— Detached garage built. 1340 Mississippi Street: Council Action /60 Day Date: City Council— March 8, 2004 1941 — Lot is platted. House and garage constructed pre-1949. 60-Day Date—March 15, 2004 6401 Central Avenue: i 2 Rezoning and Plat SUMMARY OF REQUEST The petitioner, John DeMello, of Profitmax Inc., is requesting to replat and rezone the properties located at 1314 Mississippi St., 1340 Mississippi St., 6401 Central Ave., 6421 Central Ave., 6441 Central Ave., 6461 Central Ave., 1341 64th Ave., and 1357 64th Ave., from C-1, Local Business, C-2 General Business, and R-1 Single Family to S-2 Redevelopment District for the purpose of redevelopment,to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of this plat, rezoning and subsequent master plan request. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg r ZOA#04-01 & PS#04-01 OVERVIEW The requests: John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units and a retail complex on the southwest corner of Central Avenue and Mississippi Street. The two actions being requested are a Plat and a Rezoning, all; with the master plan approval will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. A 13,420 retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of the 71 senior condominiums. The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is at mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking o rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. , �✓.�'r�w x t `,, ! ot 4 .66 t" � $�- p a*0 � '41°1',1:;',4- 1a1 ;y�� 1:k � b � ' a� ;� . " tep y" 1 a a ' ,t ' 6 74 r Y- r a . :4, " er w � ,''- .fi � ,1 m�r 0 � �.2 ' e Z &, y, 't is"- � � ',''. ' ,' s �1'��aqs a- - zn o4 � a r« ,. „a—. , ,t,..r ,. .51'i- s; Proposed Project: John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is proposing to construct a 13,420 square foot retail complex on the north portion of the development. The petitioner has stated that he envisions that this complex will house neighborhood retail businesses, which may include a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an ice cream/sandwich shop and a hair salon. The retail complex will include at least 54, 10 foot wide parking stalls for customers. The petitioner is proposing a 4-story71-unit independent senior condominium complex for the southern portion of the development. The proposed 71 units will be owner- occupied and comprised of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units. There will be four 1-bedroom units that will be 845 square feet in size and eight 1-bedroom units with a den, 1,020 square feet in size. There are fifty-six 2 bedroom and 2-bedroom plus den units 1 1 i planned that will vary in square footage from 1,157-1,515 in size. There will be three 3- bedroom units that will be 1,610 square feet in size. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. The petitioner plans to model the exterior of both projects after an Italian villa. The site will include several ponds, a gazebo, and a trail system with landscaping that surrounds the property. SITE HISTORY The proposed development area is located on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue. The area consists of 2 vacant lots, which are located on Central Avenue and 4 homes that were constructed prior to 1952, 2 of which are located on Mississippi Street and the other 2 are located on Central Avenue. The 2 existing homes on 64th Avenue were constructed in 1974. The petitioners' father, Frank DeMello purchased the vacant parcel located 6461 Central Avenue, 25 years ago. When the property at 1314 Mississippi Street came up for sale over the summer of 2003, the petitioner purchased it with the hope of developing the land. The petitioner then contacted surrounding property owners to see if they would be interested in selling their properties. When the neighboring property owners became interested in selling their properties, the petitioner came forward with this redevelopment project. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #04-01 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning and master plan approval for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting to be rezoned are 1314 Mississippi Street (single family home and garage (welding shop), zoned C-2, General Business), 1340 Mississippi Street (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), 6401 Central Avenue (single family home, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6421 Central Avenue (single family home, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1 , Single Family), 6441 Central Avenue (vacant lot, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant lot, zoned C-2, General Business), 1341 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), and 1347 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family). The petitioner is proposing to redevelop this entire area. ..r.....m. 111 ... _........... 1 1 6421 6401 to In 2 Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. As the properties exist today, 2 of them have split zoning between C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family. While both of the lots are rather large in size, conflicts arise when the zoning is split between a commercial and residential zoning. Rezoning a property to S-2 Redevelopment District, requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. If the rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Council any modification of the site plan would need to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Review of the master plan would also need to be completed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the property is in a Redevelopment District. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a `tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...It is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision" In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed retail complex, senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the properties meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". 3 The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use & the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. • Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Fridley residents. • Create sustainable, self-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to the quality of life and image of Fridley. • Ensure a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the City's housing stock. • Diversify the housing supply to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for "empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. Rezoning these properties helps to achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area. Plat Request#04-01 John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is seeking to replat the properties located at 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the retail complex and the other lot will be used to allow for the construction of a 71-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot #1 and Lot #2, Block 1, Spring Valley Estates. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their intended use. The proposed Lot #1 will accommodate the 13,420 square foot retail complex. Retail complexes like the one proposed are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot #1 is 62,690 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot #1 also meets all the parking requirements for the number of parking stalls required for a retail use. 4 t qtr ..; . 1..„.,,, ,,,,, .1.:,,,,,, ,:,.. k.,..,:... , I-,-,,,,,, ,� , s{': tJ1 :fiF 7P 6�Y`'� � ,.�' :' �� '���I -,�,.�y yup _R` °`,''..: S f k `:t.,-'.:1 te,ei< •* 5„.,t-"�'",-17,,,,;-;.„.„:;;;;;,,,,,,,,;.; €`,,,K k;; 4� 1 r Er? :Lew' frc' [ t,� .i .i I-:., -.4:k';11i.:, * "."-",,,,,,. ..,, ; '`,e, '1117°` =Q ._. ,, -,,,,,,g. —To---,—; At ,,,, '; °. -,„.e ., - 4 „:', - ,,..:: j rt, I 0 Y , ,, , , t+ s S e o n � ?, 1„ '1 i .,?,147A,«�.4,. "T' Z" 4';''A:.`1:14,-11)i tK9 ^ c � J»:`I#a`. ` r7t.: 0. 4 4�+ga- � � S�f , .�` � 4�� � at a F:1 ,q� fp�_`,,;t4� e., t� .::. ,71 ••` Mil#` h Y r ` ',' A'Vv F°a. The proposed Lot #2 is approximately 116,658 square feet (2.68 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 71 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 45 feet at the midspan. Early discussions with Anoka County indicated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessaryturn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, staff assumes that the County will be requesting that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. The petitioner has drawn the site plan to- illustrate right-of way acquisition along both County Roads. Due to necessity of right-of-way acquisition, the parking setback for the retail space will be 2 feet from the north and west property lines. The parking setback on the senior condominium complex will also be 2 feet from the west property line. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. HOUSING STUDY The petitioner hired Maxfield Research Inc., to complete a Market Feasibility Study for Senior Housing in Fridley. The demographic and competitive market analysis done by Maxfield indicates that there is a demand in the Fridley area for 189 for-sale housing units. Maxfield's research pointed out that given the competitive situation in the marketplace, the quality of the subject site, and the lack of for-sale product within three miles of the property, the senior condominium project would be the most marketable product for the site. Their research also showed that the subject site could best support 5 an age-restricted owner-occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 71 senior owner occupied condominium units and the commercial complex may have on the local traffic patterns. Staff consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by TDI, Traffic Date Incorporated. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles / day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT PREPARED BY TDI, INC. Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, which was published in December 2003. The consultants used the Senior Adult Housing Attached category in the ITE manual to determine that the proposed senior complex would generate a total of 247 trips per day. The consultants used the Specialty Retail Center category from the ITE manual and determined that the proposed retail complex would generate a total of 598 trips per day. Trip Generation ITE Description Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Trips Use In Out In Out 252 Senior Adult Housing — 247 3 3 5 3 Attached (71 units) 814 Specialty Retail Center— 598 n/a n/a 16 21 (13,500 sq. ft.) TDI developed traffic forecasts for the following 2005 scenarios: No Build (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) Build Spring Valley Estates (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) The finding of these forecasts show that the level of service at both the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersections and the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue 6 intersections would remain the same in the no-build or build scenarios. The only change seen is during the AM Peak Hour at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue eastbound intersection, where the level of service would change from LOS B to LOS C. Central Avenue/64T" Avenue Westbound & Eastbound Approach LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound 2005 No-Build A B C C 2005 Build A C C C Mississippi Street/Central Avenue Intersection LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2005 No-Build C D 2005 Build C D To complete the traffic study, the consultants also referred to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which governs the use of traffic control devices per Minnesota State Statute. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has eight criteria (called warrants)to consider when determining if a traffic signal should be installed at an intersection or not. These warrants are primarily based on the traffic volumes flowing through the intersection. A warrant analysis was conducted for the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. To complete this analysis, TDI staff performed a turning movement count from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. None of the eight warrants are met under the existing conditions, nor will they be met if the elderly housing and retail buildings are constructed on the proposed site. According to this analysis, a traffic signal should not be installed at the intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue until at least one of the warrants is being met. The conclusions of TDI's analysis state that the stop controlled approaches at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic control. The intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue will operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic controls. A traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection and a traffic signal will not be warranted at the intersection after the proposed development is completed. A complete copy of the traffic study is available upon request. WETLAND The petitioner has been working with the Rice Creek Watershed to determine in the project area has a wetland. The petitioner has hired Tom Bremen, with Acorn Consulting, to delineate the site for any possible wetlands. Currently, both the petitioner and the Rice Creek Watershed are waiting for the delineators report. PHASING PLAN The petitioner has indicated to staff that their intentions are to building the entire 71 unit senior owner-occupied condominium project all in one construction phase. If the bank required unit pre-sales are slower than predicated by the market report, then they plan 7 to phase the project. Phasing the project would involve constructing the senior complex in 2 phases (2 buildings). The first phase would be 35 units and the second phase would be the remaining 36 units. Phase one would commence upon selling the bank required percentage of units in the first half of the building, removal of the existing homes and soil corrections. Phase one would tentatively commence in August 2004. Phase two would commence when the pre-sales are met for the first part of the 2nd half of the building. In the meantime, sod, landscaping, and parking would be installed. Phase 3 involves the retail space. Simultaneously, with the residential property, the retail building would be pre-leased. When the building is completely leased, the building will be constructed. Please see the attached phasing plan in your packet. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS During the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewing history showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of this Rezoning ZOA #04-01 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex, with stipulations. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities in Fridley City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#04-01, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 8 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 9 Narrative for Spring Valley Estates My name is John Demello and I am the developer for Profitmax. I grew up in Fridley where I became a graduate of Fridley High School. My father is Dr. Frank Demello PhD. DDS. . He has owned a parcel of property off of old central for the last 25 years. While the neighborhood enjoyed a view of trees,my father struggled to maintain this piece of property both financially and physically. He would have sold it if anyone would have offered any reasonable amount. When no developers approached him I decided to develop it myself. When the Holzheu family offered the corner property for sale I purchased it with the hope of developing this land. During the analysis of the land, it was disclosed that the parcels were not clearly zoned commercial or residential. I then turned to the neighborhood to see if others in this area would be open to selling their property. A small group agreed to work with me on this project. However, during the survey of the area, it was revealed that not only is the zoning out of alignment but also the lot lines disagree with the monuments in this area. The community has much to gain from rezoning and developing this land. First, all of the problems with the land would be corrected in one action. Second, the area would be redeveloped according to Fridley's Comprehensive plan which has been approved years ago and is still not fully implemented. Third,by creating housing for seniors the existing housing stock will be made available for young families and therefore potentially remodeled. By having more young families in Fridley the tax base increases due to the new tax value of a recently sold house,retail in the area performs better because young families purchase more than an older community, and the school district does better not only from the improved tax base of the project but also from higher attendance within the schools. I love Fridley, and I want it to be the thriving community that easily competes with the best cities in Minnesota. I have a vision for Fridley where senior Italian villas are a place to enjoy the golden years while children play in neighborhoods and people who work for some of the best corporations in the world are as proud to call Fridley home as their companies are today. Our plan to accomplish this vision is to provide an upscale independent living condominium with 71 luxury units fashioned after the most successful floor plans ever used in senior buildings. With the exterior modeled after an Italian Villa, this property is sure to invite the most tasteful seniors. The entire site will have a park like atmosphere with meandering walkways that have views of gazebos, grass and trees both on the ground and from within the units. The Villa will conveniently connect to an upscale retail complex designed to meet the needs of the community it serves with hairdressers, a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an ice cream parlor, a sandwich shop etc. The retail building design will also complement the architecture of the Villa. The entire development will be designed to work together to minimize the need of a vehicle and lend itself to people who may want to go south for the winter and not worry about their home or snowfall. With less time spent on yard work, seniors will also have more time to enjoy with grandchildren, golfing, boating, and traveling. The price of these units will be designed to provide value to those seniors looking to sell their homes and have something left over after their unit is purchased. I ask that you consider making my vision of this site a reality for the community of Fridley. Spring Valley Estates Phasing Plan Our intentions are to build the entire 71 unit independent living condominium project all in one construction phase. If the bank required unit pre-sales are slower then predicted by the market report, then our approach will be to phase the project construction as follows; PHASE 1 After approval of the Spring Valley estates project, our team will begin pre-selling the (phase 1) units. Upon selling the banks required percentage of units in the first half of the building, removal of the existing homes and soil corrections will begin for the entire site, including most of the retail pad. Tentatively, the timeframe for commencing this activity is in August. The Prior family home will be spared until their unit is built so that they may move directly from their house to a unit. This unit is one of the first ones built in the first part of the building. PHASE 2 If there is an interim time period between the phases, sod will be installed on the site where landscaping, parking, or a building will be installed in the future. Also, the elevation will be temporarily finished where the second part of the building will later connect. When the financial institutions pre-sales are met for the first part of the building, (phase 2)pre-sales will begin on the second half of the building. When the required pre-sold unit percentage is met, building will continue or begin on this part of the project PHASE 3 Simultaneously, the retail building will be pre-leased. Once the retail building is completely leased, (phase 3) construction of the building will commence. Depending on market conditions, there may not be a break in the project at all. This is just a conservative approach and will lend itself to our team breaking ground as soon as possible. Projects in the past have proven that once construction begins, there is more marketing excitement and therefore faster sales than pre- construction. Condominium Declaration Spring Valley Estates 7.01 Residential Units. Residential Units are restricted to residential use, and the Garage Space portion of each unit is further restricted to uses described in the following section. The use of a unit by an owner for home office or studio uses which are incidental to the principal residential use of the unit, which comply with applicable zoning, and which do not invite or generate regular or frequent visits by clients, customers, employees, co- workers or the public shall not be considered a violation of this restriction. 7.01.01 Age Requirements. The use and occupancy of Residential Units is restricted to persons age 55 or older. 7.02 Garage Units and Garage Spaces: Use. Garage Units and Garage Spaces are restricted to parking of passenger vehicles owned, leased or in actual use by an owner or lawful oc- cupant of a unit, and other accessory uses permitted from time to time by rules issued by the Board. 7.03 Garage Units: Transfer. It is considered essential to the residential nature of this CIC and to the security of the residents that Garage Units be owned by persons or entities who are also owners of a Residential Unit. Therefore, after the first conveyance of a Garage Unit by Declarant, said Garage Unit shall at all times be appurtenant to the Residential Unit which has common ownership with it, and shall automatically be conveyed with a conveyance of said Residential Unit(or of a partial interest therein),whether or not such conveyance mentions the Garage Unit, and whether such conveyance is voluntary,by op- eration of law,by reason of death, or otherwise. Prior to a conveyance of the Residential Unit to which it is thus appurtenant, the Garage Unit may be conveyed separately to the owner or owners of another Residential Unit, and shall thereupon be appurtenant to such Residential Unit. 8.00 COMMON ELEMENTS FOR EXCLUSIVE USE 8.01 Limited Common Elements. Certain portions of the common elements are allocated for the exclusive use of one or more but fewer than all of the units. In addition to the limited common elements specified in Section 515B.2-102(d) and (f) of the Act, certain front yards, terraces, porches, storage lockers and other areas or facilities are limited common elements, allocated to one (or in some cases, more than one)unit, as depicted in the CIC Plat, or, in the case of storage cabanas, as assigned by the Declarant in the minutes of the Association. Storage lockers,but not other limited common elements, may be reallocated from one unit to another in the manner described in Section 515B.2-109(c) of the Act. 3 C:\I-wordpmtNeq<evrelCvndo-iownMuutCovdotpecknticnelSpdng V.iky&rates s SPRING VALLEY ESTATES 71 unit four story senior condominiums over underground parking Fridley, MN. City Submission for Concept and Rezoning Approval January 13, 2004 Prepared by Architectural Works Villard Inc. CURRENT ZONING; Mixed zoning of R-1 single family residential district and C-1 Local Business district. PROPOSED ZONING; S-2 Redevelopment district HOUSING BUILDING DATA; 1. Under Ground Parking–Garage Level= 30,484 sf. 2. Floors 1 through 4 • First floor Housing= 30,634 sf. • Second floor Housing= 30,484 sf • Third floor Housing= 30,484 sf • Fourth floor Housing= 30,484 sf Total Housing= 122,086 sf. 3. Housing and underground parking total building= 152,570sf. 4. All housing units total sf = 90,058 sf. • Common/Circulation= 32,028 sf. 5. Usable areas= 73.76%Units 26.23% Common/Circulation— 6. Average area per unit; • Housing= 122,086 sf divided by 71 unfits= 1,720 sf per unit. • Housing and parking= 152,570 sf divided by 71 units=2,148 sf. per unit. HOUSING SITE DATA; 1. Housing site area; • Approximately 116,658 sf. or 2.68 acres Fridley City Submission 1-16-03 Page 2 of 3 2. Floor Area=30,634 sf. 3. Lot Coverage=4 story=25 %maximum required. • Fridley City Code chapter 205 (zoning) section 205.14.3.B.(3)provides that the lot coverage can be reduced(increased)by the City if and when there is provision for underground parking within the main structure provided that the lot coverage shall not be more that 30%required. • Lot coverage provided =26.26% 4. Housing average lot area required per unit; • 2500 sf per unit floors 1-3 = 53 x 2,500= 132,500 sf • 950 sf per unit floor 4= 18 x 950= 17,100sf • 132,500+ 17,100= 149,600 total lot area required. • 73 underground spaces x 300=21,900 credit. • 149,600 minus 21,900= 127,700 min. lot area required. • 116,658 sf. provided. ( 11,042s£ difference) 5. Housing Building setbacks. • Front Yard(South—64th street)=35'-0"Required (35'-0" provided) • Side Yard(East)= 15'-0" Required+ 1 additional foot for each 4'-0"of building height over 35'-0" (ground to mid-roof=45'-0")= 18'-0" min. side yard setback required. (35'-0"provided). • Side yard at corner yard(West—Old Central)= 35'-0" required. (35'-0" provided). • Rear yard (North)=25%of lot depth or 25'-0" min. to 40'-0" max. plus 1 foot of depth for each 2'-0" of building height over 35'-0". (45'-0 Building height minus 35'-0"= 10'-0" divided by 2'-0" =5'-0"). 40'-0" + 5'-0"=45'-0" min. setback required. (21'-0" provided). (24'-0" difference) HOUSING PARKING DATA; 1. Independent Living facility • 1 space required per each dwelling unit required with 50%of spaces enclosed = 71 minimum spaces total spaces required with 36 spaces enclosed required. • (73)Enclosed spaces provided plus(30) surface spaces for total of(103) spaces provided). (32 spaces extra) Fridley City Submission 1-16-03 Page 3 of 3 2. Change to Market Rate; 1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit plus '/2 space for each additional bedroom unit per dwelling unit= (12) 1 -beds x 1.5 = 18.0 spaces. (56)2-beds x 2.0= 112.0 spaces (3) 3 -beds x 2.5 = 9.0 spaces Total 139.0 spaces required 103.0 spaces provided 36.0 spaces difference RETAIL BUILDING DATA; 1. Retail= 13,420 sf. RETAIL SITE DATA; 1. Retail site area; • 62,690 sf. (1.44 acres) 2. Proposed Floor Area= 13,420 sf 3. Lot Coverage= 1 story=40%maximum required. • Lot coverage provided=21.4% 4. Retail Minimum Lot area: • Minimum lot area of 20,000 sf is required—62,690 sf provided. 5. Retail Building setbacks; • Front Yard (West—Old Central)=35'-0" Required (75'-0"provided) • Side Yard (South)= 15'-0"Required (50'-0" provided). • Side yard at corner yard(North- Mississippi Street)=35'-0"required. (65'-0" provided). • Rear yard (East)=25'-0"required. (35'-0" provided). RETAIL PARKING DATA; 1. Retail; • 1 space required per each 150 sf of building floor area. 13,420sf divided by 150sf =90parking spaces required. (91 total spaces provided). IJ. 4 ' 1 IN- _ „4..-4_ z ,L IAG,_ r_7! ':-- i: v_ t . , f 4_ ., "r3; ' • 1., \ r. 0") .vill , k.. .z. i''',D ,-Q ,e,' 1 -,..- ....J r-- . Z? , 44 Tit •--'11.• 7.) c2— A— GO -11.. ••• _ 4 t ..._ „A ___ ,ct... prs,,, NI ...— C5:) 41 I' 'e A ..... •14k. 0 - -: I vl, r---- C't — , .. -T\ ,,\ — pk\c.'s ,..1 I . . r------11 k--- . t2.-• ''''''''' A A v.,‘ -.-- ci- N's. A4 1- — '''''"-' ,'„ c)1 I i,----.L.1 7. VI _ ._ Ar:. . — .. .,. ..........P1 ! . 1 ili r9 i f. t•-?,tt 6'--...k‘', % ...._, -t-s :-.. A-,41 k A I \. i P ____ • _1 ,s., _,„ , 4P *low i t ' L3 ,, 01 tl w cn- 0 0 ..1 k„, ,..r. , 1 1.)): - •,, t-,- c.L ‘,4-) c ,. is\ N. -s, t\f"C‘ V4 —1 z 1 g 2$ 1 c „ ,,<:, I__...— v) -- 1 -I= i .1 * cr ...,_ , _______. , ------t Nri .,. • < •---.• -1_ 7,‘,__ t,,•:„:, c,. , (\,) .:, , :N. -.if.N.... cc-I': • . ,:cs ..N, , &-\•114 I__ _. a.. :,-A \:9 \'',.zs -:\-,,e sg s ,,3 , i c-J . r, ' -- II NI II N i I Z'', k k k ,,, ! ,-1\Y— •1••••.."1,..„, __, — 0 o Ns. \-•) 0 ik___:. i ' .• . 2. •-tY, .A C\•) -CS. ‘,1—, ‘.—-\— q '---1-1 ' 4 /I ‘-‘) "4— . : • : • . v\ .0 0:5 ,cc csA ..„4,_ .,,, ,, ,_ ... ..._ ,,,) 3._.-. rift c) ..S) N)- 's----' * I I .-: ks\ '...Z 1 ---• .' ,..„ -i " ..,: -r• ..... —... I \I of•-• t. 4 0 - _ ....... ........ ........ (NA Nic' (-- V'N 7 7-1- Z\ -,...s, cs- 1 „,„,,,,, .1111111181I ..PNIOIV ,...... ---- —0-• I I ,....... . i ! i . . . -\•# j A ........ *mow / 4VP!f A < • irn. 47- 1 t'l A . 1,‘ .g- ... (,,) vs, cf1.,„. s4- ‘.-1 • cs ki-N, , _., _,- i... S4.. (,4 is\ NI kc‘ • kNi (3.-Nis co. - NN :._.) 0 cr3 0 — — -- _7 1 --- ---1 ( ' .'t7; Ic't-'- ...._, t , t ,• ,... Cu ) 0 \...) _ ..* .9t---- — tiTh ,Cr'-fi 4% `•Z — --- ' --..S • • • .,, • S.:7N '''',N ...., -2...,-.)._. .___ 0 \, 0 0 , , ... , _ Q . 1w • , , • --Ti e tp, , .2.4, v.-N.tr. - N 7,6s--0 sakevo .-- . fr,03-- OW*" Vµc1 ' - / ofA tr sib 6 %Ltu'.1 " �p , vf - --tl . ‘. _Iv. , 54s._ 4 ..... "�tN SF:- r :.....____________, ins , 1> topnaL 1 02,0 is, I 1. t 4 4 Do ., C S-5612 Iti91 = I I- ' 1 i Li________ 4. - ; 1 Gi 0 - . - 46,p 1 Zan v 2- ?.. a to 60 S f 5- d I ! , b — 11E1 11111.11111111111111111 4, gct • ITh\4 * o &i'i'1'' - 14; 65t, s' 1'6911.- 1. t 'r - ft, 6 `" %, 1 n foci- 6 c )1 - S . 'jt, 5&,7g CITY OF FRIDLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE Preliminary Building Plan Comments Date: February 6, 2004 Address: Spring Valley Estates Condominium 6300 block Central Av NE Conceptual plan only 1. Construct fire apparatus access roads to permit Fire Department access to within 150 feet of all portions of building exterior first floor wall OR equip the complete structure throughout with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system including truss spaces,parking garages, etc. (MSFC Section 503) 2. Fire apparatus access requires an obstructed width of twenty (20) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. Turning radii along apparatus access route shall be 28'minimum. (MSFC Section 503) 3. Access to building openings and roof shall be provided as required (MSFC Section 504) 4. With respect to required fire sprinkler system installation, the following conditions would apply: a. Locate a fire hydrant not more than 100' from Fire Department connection. b. Fire sprinkler system water supply and domestic water supply must be split outside the building. c. Fire Department Connection shall be a 4" Storz connection. d. Elevator pit and equipment room shall be sprinkled e. Install a power shunt for fire sprinkler system in elevator equipment room f. Establish sprinkler system flow and tamper alarm monitoring through a central station monitor g. City of Fridley FD plan review and permit required for fire sprinkler system installation 5. Dependent upon final plans, standpipes for use by Fire Department may be required in stairwells and parking garage area (MSFC Chapter 9) 6. Fire protection water supplies shall be established as required by MSFC Section 508 7. Install fire extinguishers as required (MSFC Chapter 9) 8. Install exit lighting as required (MSFC 1003.2.10) 9. Install egress illumination along entire exit system (MSFC 1003.2.11) 10. Install an approved fire alarm system throughout building including an annunciator panel at front entry (MSFC Chapter 9 and NFPA 72). Establish alarm zones as approved. 11. Install smoke detection as required in building and dwelling units (MSFC Chapter 9) 12. Provide adequate ventilation throughout parking garage area. 13. Provide Fire Department access to basement parking area from FD vehicle-accessible area 14. Combustible materials may not be stored in boiler, mechanical or electrical equipment rooms 15. Install a Fire Department lock box at an approved location 16. Establish adequate exiting within parameters for travel distance in MSFC Chapter 10 17. Interior finishes in buildings and residential shall meet standards in MSFC Chapter 8 NOTE: Construction materials,methods and measurements are not adequately shown to prepare an accurate or adequate building plan review at this time. Requirements quoted herein may change based on final submittal but are accurate structures as represented by plans reviewed. Ralph W. Messer, Fire Mars Joseph J. Nelson 1357 - 64th Avenue NE, Fridley, MN 55432 763-571-3317 December 29, 2003 Dear City of Fridley Planning Commission, I imagine you are aware of the proposed development of property east of Old Central between Mississippi Street on the north and 64th Avenue on the south and bordered on the east by an existing alley easement located roughly 300 feet to the east of Old Central. Although this proposed development has not been formally announced, preliminary work has begun on behalf of Profit Max and its representative John Demello. This preliminary work consists of working with city staff and current property owners in the area described above. Mr. Demello indicated to me that he has approached and procured purchase agreements with all land owners in the area listed above. To that end, my wife and I have sined a purchase agreement with John Demello for the sale of our property, located at 1357 - 64t Ave., effective January 15th, 2004. Additionally, we have contracted and signed a purchase agreement with a builder for replacement housing that is scheduled to be completed by February 28th, 2004. We have watched with great interest the proceedings that have played out as Town Center Development LLC, has worked with city staff and the community to resolve a proposed senior condominium project on the west side of Old Central, south of Sandee's Restaurant. The project that is proposed by Mr. Demello is presently in flux but does consist of similar details as it too, includes senior condominium space and also some retail development. Obviously, I am not in a position to represent or present to you those details; I mention them only as a general reference as it pertains to my situation regarding the sale of my property. By accepting a purchase offer from Mr. Demello and contracting for replacement housing, I have in essence endorsed his proposed project. Obviously, I stand to profit from the agreement I have entered into, but I do so knowing that the property that I currently own at 1357 - 64th Avenue is not well suited to the RI zoning that it currently holds. We purchased the home when it was built in 1974, knowing full well that it bordered undeveloped land and commercial property. We were fully aware that development could occur around us but accepted that as a consequence of the purchase. We have enjoyed a relatively quiet neighborhood due to the fact that a wooded area exists on the undeveloped property surrounding us. We have, on the other hand, had to deal with problems that are characteristic of the low, poorly drained lots that exist in the proposed building sight. A high water table and poor fill have made our property and those in the proposed construction area less than ideal. As a result of the poor soil conditions, some of the properties do not have basements, as they would be affected by the existing water problems. I would like to respond to the following criticisms that were expressed regarding the Town Center Development project, as they are issues that would undoubtedly be raised regarding the Profit Max proposal: 1. Real estate values will decline: In preparation for negotiating the sale of my property, I compared real estate listings in the immediate area with my property. Houses within eight to ten blocks of my property with similar descriptions and build dates were listing for $289,000 to $325,000. Mortgage appraisals and real estate appraisals projected the sale price of this property at somewhere between $200,000 and $245,000. The reason given was the fact that surrounding buildings, those in the proposed redevelopment area, were built in the 1930s and 1940s, and this made the sale of my property less profitable. My point is that the present neighborhood negatively affects the property values when trying to sell my property. I feel a properly designed redevelopment project would at the very least not devalue the surrounding real estate but would, in fact, increase the value of the existing properties and begin a revitalization of the Old Central corridor. 2. Traffic will increase: I shop at Cub Foods in New Brighton and make several trips weekly past the senior housing unit that is located to the west of Cub Foods. I believe that facility has been in existence for approximately 8 to 10 years and when I think about the times I have passed their driveway, I cannot remember meeting a car coming out of their parking facility. I could be wrong, I may have driven past a car trying to leave that facility but in the unlikely event that I did, it surely would not be described as a traffic jam or traffic problem. Additionally, a larger building was constructed in the back of the New Brighton Cub Foods parking lot. Although this building has only been there for a couple of years, I again have never encountered a car coming out of the parking facility. I feel the traffic flow problem that would result from a senior project on Old Central would not be an increase that the surrounding community needs be concerned with. My guess is, those residents of the new development might need to spend some of their time yielding to the existing traffic. 3. Development of the property will remove existing trees that the community enjoys looking at. Some residents have protested the development of these projects based on the argument that the existing trees provide green space and cover for wildlife. My property has two trees. One is about 12" in diameter and the other is about 4" in diameter. The trees that provide shade and seclusion for my property are on adjoining undeveloped land. Just as it is not my responsibility to provide a wild life sanctuary for my neighbors, I do not feel that a landowner who has invested the ownership of undeveloped property and paid taxes over the years should be expected not to develop his/her land for the pleasure of surrounding properties. 4. I have a duty to hang onto my property and block the development of the entire project. I purchased my property and have improved it and maintained it over the past 30 years with the expected result of increasing its value. My property represents an investment that I have always intended to benefit from. Now that I am within 18 months of retirement, an opportunity exists for me to relocate to a new property that will provide me with a home that is more suited to my retirement needs. The sale of my property will allow me that opportunity. 5. Two bedroom apartments are currently standing with 20% vacancy. This could be true, but there is a waiting list for those seniors wanting to purchase senior condominiums. Apartment rental and condominium ownership are two different things. I recently visited my aunt's new senior condominium located at the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Highway 242 in Coon Rapids. She shared with me her joy in the facility that provides her with meeting and gathering rooms, exercise room, craft room, library, laundry facilities, guest apartment, organized activities and shuttle busses to shopping facilities. She is very independent and pleased with her purchase. 6. A three or four story building does not belong in the community. Correct me if I am wrong but the commercial zoning that exists for those properties facing Old Central would currently allow for such a building without any variance. If you are interested in the potential view from the rear of such a project, drive the back streets that border the senior buildings in New Brighton. I feel the concerns may be overstated. 7. Spot zoning is preferable to rezoning the entire parcel of land described in the Profit Max development. I have lived in a spot zoned parcel for 30 years. The inevitable redevelopment of this parcel can now correct a situation where single-family dwellings share property lines with commercial properties. Making a zoning change from"street to street" (Mississippi to 64th Avenue) includes my property and provides me with an opportunity to relocate. Excluding my property would surround my property with redevelopment and make my property an island amongst redevelopment. 8. The eight properties should all be left as is or developed into single-family properties. Knowing the soil conditions as I do (filled with concrete, asphalt, bed springs, refrigerators, dense trees, and poor drainage) the development cost of a single lot as an R1 property would be prohibitive. Additionally that residence would face Old Central with companion housing built in the 30s and 40s. Given the building costs and the surrounding property values, development would not make sense. By providing an opportunity for redevelopment, the existing property owners can benefit from the sale and development of their investment. Obviously, I have a stake in the outcome of any development in my immediate community. Although no formal proposal from Profit Max has been made, I would expect you would be contacted soon. I feel you, as the Planning Commission, have the opportunity to improve the property values, tax base, and the future of Fridley. Because of this, I encourage you to think about the improvement that the Profit Max project will provide. I have worked with John Demello in the negotiation of the sale of my property and know that he is a hard-working individual who, as a businessman, not only sees an opportunity to increase the property values by developing the properties, but also has a sense of community pride and vision. John has treated me with respect and in a professional manner that is not always seen in today's business world. I would appreciate your open-mindedness and consideration regarding this issue. Thank you for your time consideration. Joe Nelson 1357 64th Avenue Fridley, Minnesota cc: Fridley City Staff Fridley City Council • ! i t\AtiN c-- \ te..., PIRn a i i 0 LE I L Li (... 1 __ ! 1 ) I f Il , I ! . 27 i I E ` I 1 I f ! ! i I ' 11 ( 1 I I I j ! '-'i 1 .Q I N•YO!Y111.COMM eYNOOY 111.11.1t� , , r i ft1 i om ( I I i I i t . i t I ';z I mm 13,420 60 I- �ET,JL ' o T p W 9 6 *6:I'''.?--- I _ ____J I \ . __. 1 � , i 17 �E -¢LTatJ Weltav UM WWII 1 POND s- % we _____L _. •'/.4 , \ \ \ ' t 9 olei _. , ' 8 sanwmeti.ca �� I _ I .9 1 . -,_ „svity) . - j ,j• POND , I I I _ I f 7.„.„.c) { 1 49 I 7 I �m � I 6a 70 • 3 ITa.Lr! �. ( pp I(' 1 °" 7 E uNr-S -\)\ 4 Yt 6 I \,..1, \i„:"I i I -t wane vwnu .--- —,6 14. S I Scale 1"=60' I feb.4th,2004 ______________________ 11 ,.... , . . . iv i ...4 I i if..,,tex a, cs a e C ... Eric ley, Minneso' ARCHITECTURAL WORKS Villard, Inc. 5770 Blackshire Path - Studio A Rick Harrison -- Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076 Site Design Studio 612.801.1555 SHEET A-1 (763)595-0055 .i `.,... "„„„..,... -...„".,^^:.,.. Developer: John Demello 6832 7th Avenue Noah Golan Valley,iN newts 55427 Crnwiott 2104 Rick Harrison Sts flasfm San raw,tzut nNm eat r 1 ; i'. _ I j -4- ~ 1.11 1 L •i , 'Ci /P8111 C:i.° Z il Ili 1 , il 1,....ot._ I! k�. t....4J 1 , y ., ,,l'i lilti1 I :14 1 :il • Zil c� 4: IN 1 li i 1 , it.,41%. '.',..: ,,, - i II <! 1 'mil. ,I ,-- it 1 }I '4,.4_ ! I 1 1 _m ID ■ I -� ` IS _.r.. .1- ..Ail 1 -uktilw o ;; KCS° •) *. �f+iN9 ljig aa{ y t ' e NPR 1 .' ,i-g, II D y iiDDl, 1 dpi ^�1 d_ tail DD7' ��� s INC4 w Wsre 1 Y E � 4 k 4 '� Q �'t.. . t;.014411:!,1 4. . , 4111 1.1 •, I kliklift dela O - z :4Yt& i • • ij {'�' Ya A I1�■I j4 ' t o•. •• i kU ` - .''NI.. l'al:999 -�� I { / , x q�i- ! ' •-'-k; I8 t ..:4 ' : 1 nn 1 i 3i s j f ; it 1 WIN 1 I1 i i 3 I�. �t n�ti;:' ' I ii 1' , , ! • kti.!owl 1 # H ll } • • 1r cwt! ►1!. I n ii:). - ! j4 '3 Immo • y i * i -1 -.OWE. b ° ., ! 1 i 1;44'12 • twp -:- •-•• 2 6(ne c - vi 1 • -I ,,,-1 , ,t( r I; aril! a 4a�1.^`>' - INCE, f s . ; �, ,mo i S mil 1 I1. rel I • .' i 1 winv • 1 �e "I. . a d O— lia�° I ,10-1111“,-0*tea ,i� O . ; _ 1-- 1_.., - I faIlit' •sg��I �.• V : * it mil':';:mill II 1 tgi.MAW, •.f( w tt • ' • • • • • i I •, . • . . . • . . t . . • ' . • • • ' • i. . •• • • • 1- • : . • • ----i'--• i t, I*.::........:. . • • ' i • - .. „I .:':"-dt.-..., • ,. • ' ..,'.... ih..-* ' ' 1 .• • ''''r • ' iiikliTer-Juripy• - • ! . . . • • i • .'.1.,...-;•,.-,, ,,,,,, :.1011.711ii:t 1, •••• ... .: 4 . . • . . .. . • . . .. . . . • ) I•• ••• •••• • Selnagil'• . • ., • • t •. •-•!.-,---, ...--4-r--r--... -4-''`;. ...., 71-%-r-?.--•••••• '9.--1 •••:.•.-. .....• . .• - .. !•••''•-•-•••1 1 - -.. ••,.._-.-.-... NMI t •••-s.-.':•,• • -•r• ..14.•.?...":., --.•• -•.-'"' •.•••••-• ••,. ....-.1.7,4. ! • .. . • - • -I '':- •.-Ni ..-- 00 oft: .all itelf •,. - . • . - . .,..... •• .• ,...• . •. . .,.. _ . ... . •• • ,t- '".. •'. ..,-'... ..'. . :%•• ' • - • . ' .,.f.:. ..... •••:-..1:2-1',.,•74:-.. '3-.-.11-, 11...1t11. . , - " • - • •••,., .. . .. . .: . . . .. -• -• - '. *. • ' 1 , 1 ' : • • .0-',•;:".'"1 4 ' t.:1C-.; 11...si'. %IN 1 , . t;• .'.... . -. • . • • :t ' 1 • I • • . •. I : • : • .4, 41.!••••it ilit.! 1 . ... .. ..11:..s •-•.: • : .. •tAi. i '.• `• • . ... - • . -- . . .1 • AP"-2 : r • •4104.0 't1041' ••, "111 141t •i . ..•-• i 1 ; .' .7-•• •••,, Iv..-,,•1C1, ,01i,''; . .,, ' I• I - •• ' •.•-•.' . ••••••• ••• • ..... .. . , k . • .. . • ., • - • . . .. . • I - a _.. • ..rtv,,,iliiir‘t , . .... %. i . • - .i-• --f--,• •••.:'.-- ‘ . • ••• :,..'-.. ... - • . : • I . • i •• ! -,..„..,.. •••• 014 -..,R fg, ,011.!•• •. .. .' , • ' . ,........, 1 l''•••••;.- t*.,11 111111 'IT' .* •.' ' : .•%''.:*•:;:•• L.. • . 1 . ',. ;•-.., .. • ...?.':.agf„..4.,•itec;' ' 1.1: litt•4",•••,5 f'' " 1 : ''.''' .: '' . Ii .,1tt.. r. . Atli' ,... ' . . . .,...:. .:••• ••• . • • i , . I- - :.1-.7-- Pi -"L-.1.i,t . --,. ..: ,-; ...,,. -, •.'-, • :I ' "' lii-7 • L .1-;.'.11NISIINIIRlil '••••••..-. .. . . 1 , 1 • .-. ,.:. ,,... ,.. .. I i - .-.; -.rill - . SEMISC ''. .. ' • . • iii - ::::::1-7.t13 .7:17.bilk .-. .. . ! 1 ' I: . .-..1:' 'i'• • *'1. "...4, :•:..1.: • . 2 ,, ••••,,, #"-.a' ' 4;•?oi.:',',-.!- •""f- '"'' ••• ' • • • : 4•• ,-111111 -IN rf•-0 i•-•s•t 2',. '1 ••••• ••.... ••••: ijip° ,, L. • .....,4,...• . ...I ' - ;; • 7,Niii-'iir,'*. :-.1•'* -. - • • . IL tt: it.P4. ti,ta it., •,:r::.. . .1 ..i..::.,1,!'s. teA-..-4111r,...i.4:0 kr alik.. ,.,....• . . . • . .• 1 • . ii-i''.-- II* ,, .,,,, t-•+,:;-•.:.-.. •• ;'••: ,'Ili • 1. ,•-•';-....-:,,:;. !,41 ..,;2.0 ,'-fii :-.::_liN ••1 s..,, -1 • 11-•:•••• i II •••=111 s-is-Rt •--110 '•••-li) 1 : ....• +.-... ' .ars • ; -.' 1 ' ' i \ 1 . .1 . i..!11100-:.!.`,1111:::1 ,11"..:1), 1- ] ii4 II 1t.;1.4,,:er,411111Millii I, • ':, ., . t,- . •t'-•:••• • ••• • • • %• 1 _,. • i. . I.TIIIJ: 117 Ink i •••• ,;.. . i. . . . . . :....4e,:-......:..; • .. NO:14 iglil •*:' • 1 '9. 1::•.:-...*::1,-.,,is,;I,411,..i.!.• .::"Clig0....0 al"Zezr4i i, , i It-•• MAN .....i, •.-.0t -.as ......: . I i . • N ••.,-:- 001i)11,-. •-, 4-4 Ile %.."- . •'. ••• • . :., ',,..z,....i.:.•-•N'..:J:,.11•4 ,rvt,- 1.4 e;T.,4t.fr IN . ., ...... .. . .. , '..4 .:.•,-.. • ll' ' 111111S ,',,-it* '::::140 4- ilk ' '- . • P. •'• esiAtito AMINIIIIC,1. :'" ': ', ''''f' •:--••• iltdka '' . ' ' ..'''' 3'04' •... : • II .. , IMIli A44. .Rt nil '.'••••?"`. ' . • 1 • •-•.',:‘ "' 4'. Nicrilaglilit •'•••;:i",'• .,,''-,,'-'..I'. '.1. A . ' . : '. 44-.4, 1 • ..• •. ., .. .. • . ' - j it'431'. '••if..11, -1St 4 . :of ..:. .. .. , : 1 . . . II •' -.'.. 111-m!‘ •••`1•Ati••;••••••i'...4.11,' do• . • • •.1 . .. . • ,,'•• l',.....‘...•::: ,1141.0a:11T' 4..,,.:: .-...., ... -.,-----4..:i..1.....r.-.1....,.A /.......-. ;• .$ _ : - . :••• -AI ---.I. Sig i**A ri4114/11,1 .:. (-),-.. • ' '-'• ' : !`'.:! ii1.4)LAMA2•,) '.,•1,,e• '-..... . . '. . . • Il ..•••'111.1111110111B.1 . -. . •"-1. . - l• • - Pir::9031:1 •• 1.•-••i. • . . - ;', .:..,:; ' •:••'• .).,,i0 .. .•... • . • il ' •• m'ilirjeir 0 42,.‘...••. . • .- . . ortaxii siNtj-toul: • - • IA 47'•'•• ' • • • '.." .• '. ... . Fa ‘.., - 1 .4.11' • • • • •• 1.is•w Iron;omit,Iiipti • 0. •1: . . i. 'i. • ,•,, '•''..! • *"!..... •"":" ,-•••• . • .. . . , •. ••:' v.4.-16#31.4.10101,111,10s, t..i.-fi • '-‘• ••• .. ' I. • •.1111 . •i•11,1114111111allaill • - .. . '" - ' • ' . . •-•.'.. .11 ,•:i.Z.::: iii•-.17144.1.1:14..T...1, . • ,... . ...i ,,s: ..,70 • „.. . . .. II •..:lit.t.,,tiemoilili • .': --. - ' ..• ... ....•... :• ..... ,:•11'..&'•!....:g,iTif•-17, iill.-•4„.; 401,1•: •-. ......i... . . -•-•- ..•$•••• *al k.dc'i..0,'•it•-C'O., IF,0 .. ,,'i"i • . . I • •'' "L'' •;3-. a•71-riiNti! i', ,•i,F..., .1,.....• 1 ••• - ,4-•-••••,J ate' Is '•vt !-I ••-.' .• .' 1:••.. ,„...,.,_efiLtt 416.,,eg• ..r42' 41 ., ... .::• :. . .....:. .........„.:...s1:•:. ; '!;4•Ittaitrii419i'"''. •, ...,....-.•!...4: .r . - • i• ' . " -• 41 ' ''' ;•4;-. ,, •• *“.' • - • • • 14 . .• I. • 'Alt '-.•Al ,14, -.-_,, I. • Iti. . ••• '.•••••'.. ••••:•••.:, ".4;'it:‘,11:41....411tg :...........- ,..." ''•• . '" i ‘.."'1 •1:::'''';I 112-- ii., 211102,'''', t'i-•,;•0:1 . ••'' • • I • • IMO 1111 '' 1. -,110 I : ' •. ;..'-:::-.,,-",. it.: -. 44„j%44,,,,A tic, '4,,,. ,g ...':, ,;.•?:‘,.... ., . ,.....t....11. . • '.. Ir. iiiiii ' Oil :-.4:01 Tliki I ' . . • • • • . • •...",;•• -.-:. -..-.4- •,.. • •,., .„.. .,. „-,,:s.„ ,...---... . .. ••• t• .4.1111/. ./1011 0 110 ' Olt ,.., •. ... '.. II - .•iiiii 77-imi '-'4011 7-70.4 'IA '- ••...*••• . . ..- • .......-,:.....,•. L :....Irk ,.• :ffl It 7 ,'• ..-'- .• ' • • .••: ..... '•,•1 ..•,_•''',••;.:;.).1/414F.,eitriit..ir.i..,..."'.4":' .,:-,.:-...:::',. • • '-. ft. : .."-.. . -=.! 74,...."•'''Zr,..:.t.'111 r. .....,.: •.•. : ......,. . I'..... :.::,..•::.;11'.11:.:-:.:ir,....;:, ,..,,,44......0"1•,.....P4-,,i k.7:1'. ‘..2 . .. ... . '...;... .: •.„.,.•.'1,q•- 1,11;.•.S4'.:-Pt 4'.....H.-_-54 , ii.::::„..-,.-%•..; . . - • -• .. ,.,,T,• lasimpuin ...74 : . ... , .••,. _. ?...Lo-...or', i,.....z, . ... , ' .• •,;!,. -- ••."!... 111.-.,7• ..§)k '. al zo B. .-:,••• .. . ; ... •:. . , ,...:... . ..!,,t pi" NI.i.-- i • •• .• ...,....: „ 1,.‘. , .. alga 1 ...!,;,•,. .: • . -•• • '' f...;.:,.•....4-1t.i.,Air ,,,,t 9pits,IN.4111: , ,,1 ,...,.....--........: • • • • 1,1 ... ,ii:41.-iiii..iiitiii,oiligi• • •: . . . • • •i.i....-,.,,,•:..., ,k,„. . ,......A.,,,, iii, •:. ...• .;:. .,' ... • . , i".•.,•';'..:::.tr,..;,:.•..A 41 t.Illin 1111 •:.•:.•? .,. .... . , II .• 1111111.1'NIIIIrt 11014111111 .. ..... .. ' . .I , 't•h L411111110k:1111.1111141i • . .. -. • ' •i•:•:•.).,..• ,„p. ..,, •,..,.: :.......;..;: .. .: . •.. . ,......0--5 ..2.: ,, t.14111.141I.1..0,1444;i Lip:, w..;,..,. . . ..:',• II'::.••!.••.,i,-•,,,, :„.4, • -•,4,,,1 0. .',.)-...•••• • '..,. . •••• ...,.. ••. -....li • •••st.: , 1,1,,,,,, i‘,.-,Vtoot•;• 1.. ,' .. • 0 •••••,••• .,• • .ii1. . -: .•41es mitsinii:,11fle i. . . . , .*.•.• L' ill:"..-.•::-ii-,6,- r..ii, ' ".;:64. :is, ,... ......,:..,..•....,... . :.: .••,•,:. :.... ..-:,..;-14.-,.,,,:;!- , I snt.....1.,411v: e., ..:. ..,....,.,.. .. .: . - :.B4.c19,11."Blii,i"." I • .11.:',...--iiiire ..* ft 4.- •••••• - •. . . . ...II.:,Is. ,i .. , . . . ' 1 1:,' kiV. 111111p1.00120111191 .. ,. . • .• '..; . ...'''' '1111:11 :110fairil ..' . • :.. ' • ' •.lit01. A ; • '••:-..... &vv.' t 'Pi!-. .. ,Iy... ''''' 1114.00? V...IV, . .-.••• . -. .Al• /1• ....?. •- •' - - ' - I '' .4' :• "'-:''..:...:. :IFF'''--4 T.:'11- . -A 2!Si 1 .'.'• i' •:'•". : • ...- '1 ' - . . • ' .• •.il , ,:1111111 :to '-ip • - .••••,:!. ,.. ; , 1 • • •.• .•• /.4.!-; 4,4 ..... • • ..ililAIW . 14, ' •,,,,00 ' ....,... ...4.„,,, , .. .. ii• .. '1'4'•'.••V 4 r Oi i g...HMV 4' .. pk. ...,. ‘,.. ... .. . . ....i•••ir• '' L'• 1i,"%"111P41111611. ..• •:• .. • . ...• . ... • ... •' I. .• • 1, • .f -• . ' ..:•I :1•''....i: o,:.::iii:.i!lifal t‘' ..I. .....i". ..' 1 1 • •;..:11.. . - 'iv skis isivi tt-11 ,4. .... •4 ". • • ••••• i --, N**is loci am* . • ... . . •V **''- ... • '••• *!..-r• • ik's•.' -F -‘- - ..: • :::‘,'..: • I ..- ..... pc-'4471%-.- .'----7 ., • !II.,i.-•: •.;'.4''•;.....i -.'.•Ajt....t ..... f g 1111111 111 IVO • . "-^ ' I . • -•-•*.••'''1K.-s!,',. "; .0*361110111;..:'',...1 ••' . • ?-- ' • '. 17......•.-- m41 S54 • •si, se , •,..4 -..,. • •• ..."*.i'll'I'•:411 .'''' iisni Ili °ie.".. .: • • ' .' .....‘•- .,'••••;4-.,,2 tti It.' • '4'-! It,f• '': l',...:1..*::::: ,...• ••••.; •,.. ••:'•:- u:.:.•::•••;•! .r,,;••••-i'm•irsoleza,-3 imi .. .,. :. ... • . . ,-.:4•.1 .- .., magi§ NIIP III ^.,;•.',..-• • ..,...... * ,• 1...': A.r III". i to ,NAP ' :. %. : *.• • • - '" i. ..4e:'...;::' airViliAVgin iii•N•-1. ••••••',34- •- - • , . • ''' ' .........' .- iiila p.':.:•.... • E111 • • : , •... ..., ....- ..., ...,. y• ............- . . . :. . • 1..- ...'..,. . . tti . .. '-..-:''. -:•-•-•''''.. : . .• - • . i-':-.-:-.4.i•-•;•:.••••••,.,,,•,..f.e.i*.: i..0.!'illiv..;4 .. '. 1. fl',. =,'*,%1' ),,111 :•4:. l• 4 - • . 'll.:.-i•ili",• 104607.-.11) 7.7.0 :- D .:,.. ' - 1.; '' , i • •- i:r'''.1"-"tr. L. :':'I ei :: 1411,111-1,:;'1.41.`r'''F.T.1•' ••••••.:. ••••-.0.''.•;.•i„,;.. ' ' ':::.'•-'. .•' I lib-I --ii0 716 71 ?,-.:-,.. - • i 41. .. . .. . ... 1-1-1.;:oit*S,•.'.- ,'••••••,.1,•--;.'.:•.'•.•'••'•:•-••.:.. ......;,:. ,' - • Z.. .1.. -. •..t.c.:.;;711:111,::.:1...,': ::-..11:7716.F.I7.0.1)--4:.),4'ii-111.‘...., ..."-..--1;••••:;..: ...5.,6.....z.::. 11.• • ..•.:Pt...-.'II::: IT*IA** 0 :el ..MI •••••‘-r. s". - "'"•*::-----*•" ''-'-i------.----- 47--7-'''''---• .... .•. ... 'Y... :'...**,..:34'.`. '' 1:-.7•:''..2.1-;"4--''''' 1 •. • ' '.:11 . .,lob I •RN :IN :IN •<.',-... •''. • • • J. „.. s•'•-• •••••••• •.% ,rtst4ontindoitramaltra,'i •• .. 4 , ... . ,., • : ' -.- 0.•• ..'..1••,„limits i 1 . . .• . .. : ,. • 1-• •: ... . . ,. . . _ . . . . . • . . • •••••••!•:,•••- --0.;%:71-.7%,Trio71.•. .:';--•-'....',•.:-- • . P • • k2itim, , ti' oif ..- - • 1 . ; ., •- .• . , ..• .: :... ,2 ,,,.,‘„,,,o, , ..,,....1 .. . • • • .11 I aims iirCa.mete' 911,1 ' . . • ••• •-•• - • ., . •: • 41 • ' Ifoilillialiriglit01 * ... '. - • • • •• . • • , . . ......,.; ..,...., . ago . . 011010011.#,...• .. , . . . • • 1.4: •' • . *0 ! •Oa lig 1111 .. • • •.:. . , . 11 1111111111111110101111 : '-'. :' • , 5 • ' • 1 ••••f. • . . • ' . 1- el :'.. 19!, lila- 12.4111111111 ; . .. . • • . .• . • • -; . . . . ' . .. . - 1 .1 - :;. ; It 11111 al vali' ''. li: ..911121, Xit,. • T.., „ ... ': 01... .11,01.1.1..,11. 11..0. I....Mc..., ...7 r.... ._ ,, ir.1 fil 0 lib ,-.-b. ••• -10 1 1..... . i . ; •••4 ,....a:... . .,1,1 , .. I,,i„,i. . . • qi. • ',-;',Ii. •4,, ,. .1,1.!:I'•• • . • !''! ti• 16s 7-1. lit -al I 1 • „•II .2 isals 1-11. -41 ,-,-110 • .- • d 9 ii ,..1, 'i._L.,..f...... . •,.; . ...-. ,I',.."1 '.7:....';.cf :4* ' ,.. ....."...1:-.-_4....:.., :,..,.., . . . •' . II =.pm '.-..IN -.lb :.• NN,-i 1 : ,...1 .,....„ !„....,ii 1 : • :••••• '••,0 . *1 ••• - 11•4'... .; i s• ..a.x,1 .•. •il•.4, ,...1 i.-1,...v..o: ,, :•,.,. ..;,....• • . .1. . :j ti ...:' Vi, tlititSt;''', 1 . ' . . .- 1 . * ', .,...• , ... .:.......... ,......-.... ' ; 03:-.W0.1 • • ...-....i.:::.. 1:-, I'f i ' ... li wittivit!4,-.4 .:',...;.4.7.•.'::::: • . • . 1 i I 1 • p. I • i'111' ;:-. .....4,:' . 0111111111 i' . . 1 -7.- . ::a cts at .. ,i , 7.. • 1 Ilii;• •.• `A..f 41.: ' V; .;•• ' . . 1 '.i` . 1 .lir .'7'.i..•:.-*--••...i.-...•.i•••.-• i 1, .4.-. , • . . Vil • i'l).`• I m •.4:?1;•.4. '''•••. .;' :71.•'.' -,-;" ;•••••..':....:" . 1 :II,,•...•!, sit.3. 1.1, lit\ ', I . ... . • - • 4141 .,. se a a rimourn.mili:i ' I 4, •. !I .11".••. in ,in 41 • -. . • •:•,•.•.•,....: •••,,, • 1 1 4 it _A i. • .--,..- 1iiirijii ... • .. 1.....,.....1 ,. . A iii 20 zfe -6 1...„ . • •it. - 11110g. 1 - 1 •. i ,..: i ._ iitill . .; • 0.-..",..:. uts , 0 •ill Alb . I :• .,. .. ... • ;.• .:0110 !--7111 .fIll -41111 II .. 1•1•,/,:1111111i1 ;21. . .1- 1 _ • i ••••••::-..,.11...':''N',,,..-'' .14. .. , . 1 ;1•1 • •ii.,s'' 'TY''`:•.1.,.7.--r-.1.1.....••••• ,r• • .•-• ' 1 '''' • '...1::'. ''' -.v.-...tis.......,14,. ,...1 r, ,..,;•,..i...:. . . .• I. • ,. .T...rmlip.!.1:11T, .... • .'•1 -1, '.. r. ..•••‘• ' ,1 I. o 1‘ I ori 1 • • , iir • . .. .....-4,. ik, !4 ,fi 1-•.•-• -, • liwri . j .. . , ' .1.•.),•.::.. .li.,-.;:',:r.i. .t.c.-4.2•41.11.EWA Alti ‘.....4*'. '• ..- ii itit!,!..wi 4 Si 111111111i. .Virt..:• •1.:1-.1, ..,.- ••;77: - -"-,-", • ...' '''. li .. r imuir ., - , .. 1 •. ........._, . .:ii, .01 .1qiiiTZ 7-••••• . 1-1. • . .. - •II--r•'` • tti , II ', .1 • • 4 .. . .. '---- ''' . ' ni 0 • j II' ' I i ' • 111''- 5=1"i, i4-1 I'l %''-'- • . • , . i .-- „,:•i•' -1I.1L4y.: ,,l:„.::1;''.:'.:It-.j1if....ii'..:,. ,• • l• .) -•••• / • 1 . i .: k 11 .: 1 • • . • -. .1 ..; -.., i ..:, _.,,,______-. -..- - : . . - • •11...,- Iv •.,.••.:„21%mounforlAlir,, •• " ': • • . ...._. • ..,. • __...• 4 Ili 77;.!-. • r la -II---ei''. ..• ..: .' : s' 1 • • . 1.. .' • • c' • ' ' t ' • ' ', ''' . , .. , •i I . . • -. . -••-..1..-1 . • • . 1 1 • .....• • . . . ,. • ...r„ . • • • !.- - • i .(rA'i..;;I-..:.1. 1.- I .il:Tr; ::. '•..1: • - .. . . . • I 1 ,:to...1...., - • Lt .._ •.• , ,-.;,g •-•;, , -, ';':" it••- .- • '• .• ...• •. . . . • . , „.„ • .. . ..., .. ... .. ... .........2...... ........ ........... ...... . .._. : -... •. • .) . .- . 1 ss'-'r•-,..•kir.Ii•46* 0.' ?iko,uti .. . . . . :•. . . .. . - • :.•,- '••tc •t•-.•..; •., - . • . • • . . . . , . . . . . . . • . .. . . • . • . . . . • •.•• . • - • . . • • • . . • ••••••••• ' • - . • • •••••••••••• . o••••••••••.. • • • • . . . .. . . .. - •• I I . • • - . . . . . i ti • W' t-4 ) I: ig . . - • ' •,.... > i `I 'l im . •••: . 1 1111 i 1E ;J 1 : 1 :.• • - I 00 . . „.•., . . i . . , ..,. • ,,•-•. . . ...1.;,.. 1 . 1 . • i i&I; i ti . • . . • , til . • • . • . 1111 1 ii -.. .-1 I .. - , ' . ...,. . • . • ' • . . . • , - • :.... . • 1 1 i • -Ii 111 1 i ..., , , : • . . . . • i.. . i . 1 - . , ..... .‘ ., . : • .. • ,., I • 14'0' __�_ �1•1/ .....,A0.7 , 1 — - - 1.111,r- — ! ; /F-5712511:1SZCIE= •illir.,„ • Ali i rr ,414% r s' ftmT t. AR 1 a --.,-. -..arirairli a.•aa4",--0104144 -- . lii,- iistittarior • tan= ,Ill'iromagils i-1115.mull=111' 1 • _,c____—Two. - ..-:------- Nr ,frz 04e W 804-aµs tOe'l .. -,1_==4__littdA*41r' " 4_,4.•A';‘_;'' `ate - �r =2, _______-._ i — . , { — ,/ G ,�`!,' ' - -' ` ARCHITECTURAL WORKS et= ��■Ir n �� _ \— _ -`' ''' — _ VILLARD INC. ..4 00 ! I + Im.0..1141,11N 53011 '�'-•��' aim �� near _/J' I ' t ' eo� ra r "F. I 11141 ..... !', ZSE152C-. 4111 WO : I -I--Ili io -,JM;'I•�'----- 1=1=:-:: iori /' 1 S15 's I� / iic. I�iIoSP• Sb41�-e" - • °� �r }i oma.. 41'.0": '/. . 414, am. Amidr ic,„. 1 I r� a:�= . —5� s- ' 1 `•- O41Nb / ,.•�, p---.� �p�� •,a .w • ►I .,6,,t,i. terr. I II v ,r, L1440144 " 1 ! 4 i�lc't lLl ns��: t ... M ---- —_ I' - . • ,mrl 4 ,:_y-_ — t • tato sf. �1b•I b• /1TI o c• ym-1 0).. b•• • 1 -•- . I • i I • —. . .. • • [ ill _ >xiz.c rr�•rr�a�+•..mrrr�s. arc �� y[ �IF1 ", 76.11417.1..1111.711 01.011Nolmall ,n ro...liw�lr�arr ..14y, �' • a ,,. WORKS it• V • N l lllC�� VILLARD, INC. —��, •9 b�s .r"°'.ne 13i.sr ue..amr�ay...u•ocam • Iti, asarsr�_asaua.ure.•z 'Tq: LgY.'C.,t: %'• �' • `-i: ."M , - + •+` .. �.osa.aa•s� iu.ar. ,.oma V. ilb. o" E S(i•3' ' ®/wis: :f AMU,'` 4• - b"as96% 514' ® is �-_-� . . (;, . • ;. 14, . 1 .4 . . i;. - , ' ' /4 . A., • C) -11 . -— No, . V .._± / –41 / , 3 qk . _ •. . . . itl, ifl , • 6.,,,,,r • it ,04„„„,„,,. • ,,,,,,,, . ,1 a .. , .4 0. . . i ..____L ,k..,-; ' • ,„.. il . '• i 4- t.,, IL 10k. , , .i . , P 6. e... • . . . i ; . . . • , ,. a ism &ad While. 101 I {- . , ��T t5 T'; •{I. 1. , , J 1!•1418 •- • Ligr� ' '3 56 • ♦ � • 9f OW p{,..3 w tis 6'K 4�-r • • ;• "Mil/CM.' — ��lii►` IS.00 . A-4 . . , . . . ' 1 , 1 t I inl. .• 1 1 . 1 . i• . . . 1 I 111111 LiZ 'C'''•I " t. • . . . • . 1 j . .!II! 1 . ;1 i • ,... - - c 'fil : • b.1 I II 1 . ;11 `111! : .\ I 1 411 • . a i , a , i • I • . en ...%::. ' I • P I •a . 04 I h 0. ',nil - ill .., i pl• .• ;1 .• , . . .. , ..4e: • 'TA e 1 11 fil ' .1 :44 II • 1.1%, I '.• ,c .,•,t i . 5,', ' . ill ___ 111 1 i r‘ • 0.4 1 '. . • -------— t . ..I I 111 ,1 • • * . I 1 •. I 1 i I A 1 . . . - , - . . . - . . . ,... . .. . .. • . . .. ., . . . . .. .. . :;(•c• . . • . . . . • . . . . • • ••. ,.'..t .. • • . • 1 ' . • I, t9 : , ;—e -,-A' . -;--....- ?-. '',.----a :-.,-.\..... --: , • ,--r- - -•' • ---. ...- • • • . • •• , . : .... .. ,. . • . ...„,.,0.. ,ti,..,,,... ....-if.t, :,,, .-,.;,..•„..........-..._. ,,__-. ';..,::::, .• ...--,;,..f.• •-.-.. • . . . . i • . 4111' . .-f •'. • :r. • ••-. ':•.`.:`.-r:12:i'•* Li4F8.... '-t-4...:-.',;', . '..-s,• 1-,...:. .0(1-,* .. .. -- "--, ,.:•--. . . F •A II, •'-....e p•Tr..,..1/4r''.',., "-;-.:a..... ;Z,,•". -•. . . • .. • . . .0 '.::. ,., . ., ..i.4r,. . I 1 . . 1.,,n- . , .,-„,. .I,• . • 1• 1- , .... ..-•:;.n..*:. .., '.-:',;• '-•.'-t•Tr'''.7,,,,,.....-'., .. • . ,., ..,....- .,• • a .. . . . • 1 •.i,, `;':,--.....4„-cmixfsiquffiwziAbstwomOrp14F.'-A-41 +.114,i1Z-xt '44.,-,:4L-1, 1'.2.7., .1 ; • i . ...II . -.....'''' .::.-`..-:,:.--.,01 .:::.....:' ..-:'. rt.- r:-4-..-.pilli ,., -444:-.-.4*".•-• " . ' •—"K'el - . .. • 11.:: ' • . . I' -... r•4"- 4' -, 1.44 ' :•;••• '1;- ,'# •••••• ,•-iv I'.11'" .1.1. ":, • - ... .. •' , ; -", 'Az', I. . '''' ' ' .. . . . ., . . ..,;•, . .4 ,...,.."..:,:.........,..:4•..,..• •.,„.:4..,-.,.....,‘•ir.._ ... ,c-...r.,...,,,, .. • . , f, ....4.7. 4., , ,. ' .- _,6..,...* ....„ . .. ..........iit•-.. ...... .t.„... __. ..,. ...' • \l: .• •illi ..•. . • .,•;. ,laimail ,,, ,...gook• ,..---.-J,,-.0!si•Atxit..., .1.1 •-• 111k..bir'r,:•,t;-:.,: .....,.,.:,-147,•-_,• ..4,..". - ' • ' • •• .. " 'h'i••• • ?i• ., .:,.T.' ',..,. AN .-!..,,,,mpliAttilii Iti .. g • . . .., . . . . - , . . . •••.- t ,',„„:,,,,rof.4.2 --.-t, -.• -- ......,. :teVe. 1 . - . . . ,. • '..-..*.;01411. - ....; "r" ' -'1' ''''''' ',,,..-.',... ... ,. A4 ' • . 1 - .. • • . . I , t ,?, - • ....... .•. • • 4. . • .. . •1 . • . . .. . .. .• '.•••. 0101041. .. '' 01411 --",•6"-7s" V.::.. '..'1.::.,•: ", .S.4;.‘,,.t::, .1.,..:4 '•'...f 4.:. ''....,A '. -.. • : . . - • .. boo . .. .6 . . . .. . ...4..,, ..4 ....--t. ..., s• . . ., I - - . • - • . • • . . .. . • . , ... . . . . . , • , ...,. . . ; .. . , •. . [ . . • ...,.. • ... • . • . . _ . . - . .. ‘ . . J. . • . . • .. i • ..- • • 14.ic_.••.• t:;,,,,::-,,-..,.... i• •... • . ;; . . • . • , . • •.. -.. • • . . • . 1 . .. ." :....•.. . . . . . • . •. • . . . . • • ... . . ...:.,:. :: - .••,..-:• :.-* . ,:›..4-•,••- • . . .• 2- , • . • , . ...., .„ ... . . . • . • .... ... ..:„ -. - ., , . ••0.....,,, i----...- •-• • 1 -1 . .. . .... .. . i . . • . , .. . • . . . . • .• . 6 - • ' ' 'I. . . .. . • I.. .g. . . . .• . i . .• .. . . . . :e-:'• 1,1* 4, .'-r•• -",-',246-.44. ,f, r'.„. -,;-(4",$: r.. .i .. • . . l; • . W• •a.i•iliti. • - •.. - ' - ' ..., ..,;•..•'. :. • '4,..101b4ti • •''' • '''•.'•-'''''''''•: '•. • • :. • - • . . . . • -:''' ;•. • • . • . . . . • • • • • " • . - .. . , . ., .. • .1:. • , . . . •.. •.... • . •. . . . • • . ! . • '• • . . • . • .. • . . . • . . . . • . .. - , • . .' . . • • • . . . . • . . ... • • .. . . . . • .. • . . • • . • . . . . . • • • . ,-:...; . . • . .. :,. . . . . . • • .. . . . . . . • . • . . . . • . . •- .-. • . ' e - . . • . . • . .. . . • • . • • . • •• • • • • . . . . . "..:-. '••• ' ••.•,- '.-. 144,‘-----litillZ ' • ,. . _. . .....,. . . . =Nei IMME1 ..MON • Iii I= . . . . . • ; . • . .. e . . i • Ili ' • .0 .... Mit • • .. .0it .. : • • . 1 . . . . • I i • . ili tx-i‘ ; ____. .......44g . ' - it..• . F. I sr, • g;.'• , .411444sis . . . I I ' 1111017".'1 • . 4. , . 1 ' . • : . MIMI ' MN • ,VIK 1-- Ir.!: ,,,.....-. -;ar: . . kt A", ' rs •#0,-7.- .1 . i ,' •:!..,...iNC4- .:•'• • % . ,,,. . •••• .,•• • • ., • I . . ...1 . . ' ' • ) 1 i . i i t • , • • . . ' : ..... . •' . I -:f '...• ' • i : ;! • I • . •.•-••••••• ... • •i ' . . .• . ••-..inosi • • -,0•14 • ;...s.=: t-.. ••• ',-. • A' :i• . .,..• . . 1 • . ::. ,. . .-... •-,..• : 41 lif -'..- la 11 • • . li • . . .• • . . . • • 1:4Vi i. :. .',-..t.,?'-' ..- , 4' .•.11' ' 7 . 111 . !, •. • .. ., . . . . • . . * * ' • .. I. . . . . • • '0Dmor-r--. .- *,/,.. ..t'• I; . • - • r••. • 1 1 . . ! • • • " • .• Z . ... 1 1 . .. • . .. - . .. . • 1[ , • : . . i 111'• . .r • * '•• I o• . . 41tP _ 1 i. • • • • • -1 .• / 1 • • . . • • . .. 1 _ • .• . . , . . - . .. ... . . , . • , . I. . • .• • . . '''' . In. I ,,,IA-,,9-.SS .6•• ite-op • . • ' AY` • ••••-:., ... i.Oral • • a.07.efft_ .. . . . • • • • • . . . . •• • . • • , . ..... • • • . . • . . • . . . . • . . . • . . • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . • . . . • • • • • . • . • . • • . . • . • ' . • :* . . .. . • • • . 1 • _- • • t. t Dr�C .....Ste- • .-:. ,wn,- - - impwgigpialaiare,.,-m „.: -la • •i"4 �� � a. 1 id a-,---..• ...: '1A1 - 3!0 b j ,�.,,, e' I .1 111111.=4” 4 ow • Eli 2-f o tt� I. 5',#24 .- 10 Kit fEjl —60, iiii 2-#7 t Zbo y Ma 0 __ .. • • t �r MI�'' r • gni z1 `to6o �.Q � . . • . . . ®( Z-�P I 21 MS 0 •- 11111110��� _ - • t e:.. b . 1111110ig. sf 44,o lb G,4r• i• . IS,tlos'st oft- 35g M,..e_MI* iix4srr�. sf• S . • r �s'pl. • 10� U'I ' , x:,- =. .. . - - - - .r.:.::: :. _. '. ...r4, • •-• PROMINI2011011.4.1 • weglioseang uN►t t7Rth t — ?F° ` _c.,,._ NM WOK MK MU arilliaboarl • •• •';`'.''••'...i.-14 ' �( • , ' ,c amTIbli.. oma<+)a.+.4 _ .� Y_'- 3'.•NX 'NPl• :3 i..o exit • 5 .'N {moi y^•, o�s�mrr�rr�rr 7;a,uvw.„ igia sr • • ��0� — s _ �, �. ARCHITECTURAL WORKS 0 .. .4a ' 4 1 . ®0 4 t ...:::-.,',,....,.:`,:..--.'..;.•..;:54:77:::,-*�{ "" , • ,:;�:_ V L L A R D, INC. z.y w®e 4 t .� .,, .. -`rt t .UV ..`.r • ' 4,,••' I,fw.FyMlIP110W� .• . Es 2.4.61p .1/515. Heiiiiiiiiii now- _____. abo • . • . • • . . • • • • A ma '_. iii' ////// L. • , ... 1017 ...,,,, . .....• j. • , . .. .. .. . ... .•.• • . .,.. ... . __ .....,,.*•••.r., „....., .,.. • . Wrinfiell 1214`] �� •',".. • - • o- ' ,,°MOA L •+1 r,?::'. - s • 's4 ;;. -• , :+, ,c. •�;,j. .. ;xi r`f i.•I .' '- :i Cm( Sv6Mr�fa4 I-Ifrot 6/j' 6. 14 k�S1! 114111-- /196 L04,*wit.0.4. 4.-sp• • • d." 4:-)= •4e .? ,f • i i elf4(I, ff,6�R- • . ` • (l twsr� go� 0,4` 7fCt/' fu. tYG$z • 24 7', 4..04,4 • i•• 7.' ' �'...;_.::' .,•• . i; .k1 :" , kt*) ,- ,, .. � y1,14: , t ��� -tV• ilia, VA_ 5¢ 'r'f t f �d.M K�•••1 '.97a i '. 1.,': 1 �F d•: �.�Y • j� d.Yl I. F • .ql title �( C r F v t .. .. �ad��f� WE non • t�"k f r, 2-ffx"Ott' t Z Z !� l0 Boo •• .' L �`limLi _ - , •. . • .• ,„ 1 ,..,,, , 4.1,;fit .• • 2-Odd I 28o ©� �� :., *r- _ 'r';:+' ' . . • ` ff Z-P�81? ��51S t Q� Ili ITo • AO . • r-• --I ---c� ••U" 2-P617 I 2.1 1 lil 4,80- • - . '�- • ._. .,.. ✓ ,r• 6 ID na,,„,, pax .. `-u m - Sti�Ir�,� q +tc9 Zi NNS�ZrrsnMelD . . • •••• A. a.� V1+tt'k- t-sco = q unrtLa 44I'Kf • Ii Taw+ 14, wat • rp.K b 1-0Q0112rt,aa0.'4N�•I1, S Ill. Cl2e(f�a Ifi,B•lsft 4f;Geer id,9i3{$F • v$05 2,P G,*A 2.sit5 04 5 ucatl'S=LI.07q• !"'f i=a 15 D�t1f 4E� a'$JZafSffPG�._ Of 6Wie W- v----p Z•66Mf.'9'4=6 use's tt. 17_i(t Sb /2Z'iaSt�u.aae . ut.�r E-- 7 66D •3;Mid. 4.iiY� 141. 0+115 1 o,,,tS ti° . 247," a.,,�..d '1P4WW - . !i t 0 Z rill 1 11 pi ca M ,t III �—I �i r:4 NI �eb I •` Cir s� ILF). C7 -moi a Al IN , ill In� ....� 4 di + Z11.4 �y 1 l r r I � i al Ia ..., 1 i CO e.r ! A 1 a g stt'6 g,' _:i ' x..4 g d yy 3 y 9 'i;r`firs K j'� Y B U to q KWN e� lttJJJ idx m r ,, ,I O �- ! UI! rop$ lk og6 u 4 g $ of N .1. ..ak"DQ6 E _o_ _L• V hKNa N..N v . I ~ . �� 0.7,,, 51c mpR .11 - w4s i l g g E I IIIH � qq 2 A p0 -3v.=O 0 O\ C .B.--•.'PN ,d :LI w = dg �n gtg Qw 22_ 1]15--•r ffi� S� R U `� bZF k�o 9 or 3 3,2 arg r-� g., - 5 , Sim t 'j4� g r3h 5 3Y9 ��{{kyr Z a i7 b,1pye i gJ:. .6 fiia Sr 6S 'S5$ w333333 I11662k1M 3333333 33 III2111.1Ef1.6 a c; �a r � Fuaas.� t ...........h cbi.JN �?b . nn ee.° e..e lB ....���, �: b I B a 1 -4 I --e x,„4, , i i l i p r i t ILI 1 pi 1 4 1&1 1 I g its i i4 46E % F i I_ 1 `I l - -—_,.._.< F : a gg o J II b ttl M w liltit = 1 jilt ° I is. $, 2 1 111111! 11 )1 13t tin! iia : "Ii jigti 1 i is11 li ii.:1vPi 1 11)1g v aIiiitpliiii_ n ! ii ,, 1. iy{ i 4 �6 ¢{1, zit # iI �! y , iiiii iii !shill a li- 1,0111 g!Iii . Ilifillif " 1 is I �:j id Y�.i[ �,'S3gSEl '�aie '�lydg�[$[ BE `6g�c� if�t Jr'i�A QQT pill ; J: u �k <-:-/A. lilt a t fl: 4 ,..9' J Z p . e g ri..•—•N u CRA!R� 1 E ^ i,2 ..o(9RnRR8Rit.T7.2 _. 77 ._� _ iii I 1 CTC C (I) (1) (9M =M L. c 0 U,- m� (n Li Q Q (7 J •��-3 ca 2 t0 o IFIN §. 7 „____. .... .... ...._ s4 ii i 10, -) O tq �� ;) O � j Z RR 9i �% \ of o a R 0 i X c in hIM id Ar. i ,,. , —1 IF-N.4‘44:,, ,, O Q"' 5�u =M JQ `.,` ���r■! �'w� ',i. Q c\, - 'Ceil rt "" ' — ! z ILmCt \a t. itir mar,, . t - Ii` .. 3 ( 5 IES'k_ Q M ` � ..,.,..4- V) CL 0) m iliPi i � �� ti lit: _ 't* a 41 tiC5 11 1..41 ' a. iit�r� 77� `zd; r; , ) g � A; "� ^� t g 3 (n co li- ‘1411 UI -,...- es•F C7 M (n ` ��W ) v° .-7 N' ,* �\ 1 .1 , 1 Ii 11; 'Y ark �o °c.,r Q m s a� a s �' I" LC (Q Y 0. 1. , L.,-). t tntfl ,T to ��M ,47.' rr ', -) �,r ���)�� - ! °L- L.`�rj til Ra tan. .' U'.N -> In.-- J �1✓ `�1, i r.-. °°°°°' i- ��{ r7►����j (D ',Ar� tnN .41 QN ate ‘p ! cn b- M1 t \t �-.0- (III '! jul LO 5 J►\ Imo, o ` ... 0 oh° ires 7 / °,.=0,,,,�,�.•,,'��a.�\V/.. _.tt. ,:;:5 �,��j�.. ,,4001.1„' a_a_ ._ ... .... .-! o_ (moi)o \ i _, s (a t PQM,% Ay ` o CDM rm -`, L', r , co lQ c:a ��✓' w* ,10;10. • ;}'4 .. ' ' '':y•.•�'f • •. ;ft:: l.. •'.0 ; • • ! P 'i 1 R.L�l �' � T 1� •1 t. .P - - `JOHN:1?. EM 1 a�emc .1 i: Y1Fr0eF11/ 1. -ii • • !Y.'l•� ... 't:JJ:_..i••::{f..' t'' •4... .. .:1:. I,..;• Ww/r•.WC:w I4.1 r1 • • • • • % • • -4 ' - • , - • mMrwNNS. 1. 401 111/7/18=1 — .,..�•.r.'•'•" �__ t..r� i' t� .� � ;-a1n- _'•_' .', 'r~y."'�e,.. it ',.:. .. i A,fo Qso '• ZPPI 1 $ E 1 xnalmsar>t ' .. John R.5•rnMM _. ,' •' i`1^ - 2372 17th Timer NW � j , I 'o_a...or ' 4.;- Pr -1 „; .� , A `'\ N..arly+rron UN 55112 ••• J ' .. ' ..a- - ARQIRIECT* .Anehl and IIWAs • • �I �-. f(( I L. . % r � b ,:. ._ :: .. C: i �_1 41• ; OCSRNER 5770 rom_s1n10 A :I -./ .: r� - kyr. ] mM,r Grow'Might,.MN SS076 1 :I m l ° 'a 1 yt. JA WO-489-1166 '•\ •►.'a t(' i ` ;I t-:$11 VA �1. , SNRYEYOlb• Yd►.d lend Sorrow, 1 ,,, ri¢Ar. S•\\ • . 7 ' \`\_....'N-I-" r r,._ �.� _,�:-'•,,. 7nAnoka.itn.35303 RA r'e'(78.1)712-8099 • - 1 • a ,x.1..7 „d - ikA Lb Am,.:Q • a I ,,f ELTSrNl9 ZONUNk R=l f C-1 LJ b 1 \ • I PROPOSiSZ00WaF-2,YOIFYE.o?M NTAISi15C/' - Lot I s 1 r mem Z;:�/ 1 .= f 1 6111'4 I I s I T_- . 'r 111...1` (/ :�� r . -/M 2.M bo rnw0.,h•71 UM Condominium MM1_ . ; \ kik;3} =I ° 810• ,69U S 1 F4�/1 e '7. _ -Ma Waft NW&[wwnd by Doe Ne. 967560 ' - . \--( :,1. 1 , ....z, kill....,I 4N t 1 4 / s/ l '1 _ Mw b• YorMe. 'Y \-- ; • tin 1 :1 li 1 1. ..-1--,..: • 1 ::j ... : I I.,, ..f-f '`,�sae.' ,b,,,,11 __J• 111\ '4, : er sr : , w 1 ' =i: • 'I 'i I u \ ✓' �'- 4. .1\-..--, •'- -.1 vaIlt•Tr MAP I • • ;�..::t=y • `\ I 4_6___...,:::.;:._::.:..._...., " ._5— %•'S,,,s;:„... -\\/.--15-1.04,----�•--_ '� 1\\ - • - -I' T: -- PROPERTY sum-Er w I ' ! _ _ �_" r.--.l' s-'.5✓1'" +) - Oro 11 JJ r/a'L..14 Nom *moo -—� - '�-�-____. • - _••_� Lobo IS 'II , ' +1` ' • •+,•tl µ. NMwstt rvMM I.IM til,f' i - 1 • .. 1. R� c'---J .- ..� M•t �' �' "•-C...,, '1. 1 ^ / JF " � � NOT q i I •i._v �.• 1_..J ..1t• _ r__- - •✓sunny i�rd 1-t7-J J...✓,I _ • f isms at*MAMA • ;.ry 1 - ' -1— • -nn 0I.1001.✓YY 10•00/spews r......4 't _ , ,c .P,4 I `1`. f',�� • -no rine=oh....•.e s..,i....r I..,SW �' Ea----f------' ' 1 • v.''.a'�ww6s,.r.rdp�,v, n.•rb.r.,s.. I Icier"" `� ! =Mow•w s7.+t ei•or 010.0.044 w'1 I < j' r ' 1..rM..IL.t.�r,:10`0001 ow easw•60.. I i •d ` a,prp. a...cad.o.r .. II) 41 }, 6,658 .' Ft.- _. _ (? O I 1 d.,w•:,aoeanr..irn,. (, .,,;, ,•. . _ J :L --.A-6wl.n 1g MI 6b/v Mind 1 p _ -- O `y I' - • i ,.a `.,i • `, / ' .:I: c,:' ..p ni.•e:•er.r.,r...r e.rm...r •_J'• r i T" - .^...`- .�'I , _ • • ( . 1Y Most=w.'rya..) - - • ►. Il :,1 -1", _._,--if...' •. _-S. L • _ jl ,581) 9.5.16.4.s! o howdy.wd w1 •1 1-——r--- ._ .: � • . •_ _ _ .Power Poi* I 1 • "'... i �,,. -- -- 1 __•,,— m Dewe.e.e y Ism,11.4,00 • �- 1 � j --- I t. .-----1, . I,; 1 I 1 Deni.Sri . • . 1I' I �! I 15 g .1 _ 1 0 9.a......>a..9.... • ,1 • ::�v r`L; l. 1 .1 _N_.u.✓.teen.•. �\ .,r: , p J'0910"48°- ��pP 6-•/j !i.l:%i 9�iYw IYr.,✓i. • alb � ; - r .' /10 l0 Q1�S :!I� - 1:_• -'°-:11�•I.l�,Mr1� •• 1 �-- '\(r ' I 1 -.---Serr.u.r...,ry••w• • • .1. - I ;� • 1 :J .> 1.., I ,01 Jt ...' -- • • 1 1 .1 1-r1s a w.•10. north an10... IOM& Aum e»✓' m I • ..► rens.reel a lana see..,a w.ew.n1.4. '•� r1.10 1 m l..a..•W. • L ' �rt �: .,,., : 301_5Z "a �t��s, --. .i — ;J ' 4, ..Marr-a �� •�_ _ t 4,...., k: Y w."-= i �.i - 7.- ��-i 1 .103. . - . • `• .--- •a.r:,::.i�. • , t�.1} - • S• .r -i.aS. '•10'.12.J'. `r t��l. ��.��. .�.aJ ^�' .,•' • ,..3:w ��t':pini;.}�'T�' .•r.. ....,. :K'-.S...• .s..•:S. ::-:ti.. .. . • .. .,....!:::,,J1.:::::: „. ..-:. ..;i.1/4:.....-:. ....,.....:,:.;:..0 .':.'.;;-.......'..... •• '......::::::-....-.: •,.,if"..•..':•.;•.1.......:-...f'-'...'.;'.......,..Z'. i.,....'.;.....••••.. ...;".,,....... l'!.:. ..............1:,...;"::,. I.!. ..' I... ' I.'.....::,-:,•:.. -1.-..:•••••'.• •:-:.....!....,,..•..,....,•:;* a .... ...'• .-...'•• •': •:• • • :� • t%- �61y t . I �' Rd+f��.be a••1ei p+1.. '.10..:7; • ,•ile.IYrM.III w•!Wh.e•.M�tJw .••1r M.•1F' Ar. yeµ ✓. oi• .I��, :.NY+ _ r Yt R .M tlM.Ly Aeui. ::t:M1 _ 111+f- 1 - _.. . tie yr•4F11r..' 4.b ��l7YM.�...i" Spring Valley Estates Condominiums • Fridley, MN • City Submission For Concept and Re-zoning January 16, 2004 li ,4,0 S Pring Valley Estates (MfgVALLYrsst&'F1s • Fridley,MN Profit Inc. 71 mit bra Moly mho teadeL _ ascooeeRww/akin . ArctchitrcPriam. uiral Works Whorl,Inc. Civil Engineer&Stencentol Eng. , BICBM Larry 13.2004 Site . Rick=Design 21311213MA13211%0611A-VildiaMMIUS. ■ ado- Survey and Prelitninety Plat ciniallaa.MMUL Profit Max,Inc. Midwest Land Surveyors • hexed ming dA-1•isgle tonify nwdeatul Said Ind C-1[aai&L iom district. 287217th Teeace Lonclocape ArchitectNew Brighton,MN 55112 S-2 Aedevarym.et a&itt Sheet Index 1. Meda Oraad Mdiad-Comma Laved- 36,441 of. t. Amid-13,t20d A.01 Title Sheet • 2 F'°"'F - 303,.,E BITAILIIMILLTid ARC IECIURAL WORKS . - Existing Boundary Topography • , ori-• «4 1. 'tstol X0690 am V I L L A R D, INC. • P 166- 30.4Md • 62,690d(1.44 ems) MOliddi.l I4.iA &Tree Survey „'°''a••''�- "mss = ,�C�li,�areY4aee•�t..%�tla 2 Feapwed Pica ef. aye V iuivi-n 3. Heeebg W ode,..od melds(tool lotelitm•1214764 •irwarur.ve•+r - Prelimin Plats 3. lot Courage-t more 40%Mitawm memo d.'4. AS Maas mks lad d• 90,059 d lu�m ar u cerr°t Camas&CaiMim- 32,023 d. • Licoveap P -11.4% vmvisoaaOM a�ra a• C1.0 Site Demolition Plan 5. arms•7J76%OoM 4. C2.0 Grading, Drainage and Erosion 26.2354,CkmaradCbmdeiea • Mem®lot am of 20,000 st i•sorpind-6769D dorovidad. • 6. Avengemom adt; . Control Plan • !!osis-122,066 d&vlt(ad by 71 tab-1,720 d per mit. 5. 116061.Solidiassadmoia wamaao,s MN i-((d 04 • Flom*aed.porke -152,570 ifdivided by 71 wits.2.146 if For sit C3.0 Site Utility Plan ussanswast • Prom Yard(war-Old ' 3s-0' 'o d(75'4'prodied) • BiYet(6mdi)•15'4&Powird(504provided). • Me yard a mare pad(Nod-hBdadppi blast)-35'4'rerpi.t C4.0 Geometric and Paving Plan .: .1. -•-.20``im 1adrO tte�4. ,� . .. pod °p:25'.rropirod.pr.'pto . ■ km mat C5.0 Water Shed Data Sheet :"00f"5 3 534d -`_' Plan • 3. Las Cnrarage-4 teoey-27%muds®required.. A.1 Architectural Site Plan L ••1 rpm moire!pd)ads 1.10 if of balking&tor ma 13.420d&vidol by • Fri&eyCIyCode ahapee20S(mimg)stoke205.14.3.A3)prodde - 1501:•Sepia moms i• -(91tedmamapro1M426 that slotmanes am ba Wooed ymesad)by tM 2.a if'Moira L.1 Landscape Plan MarsbproclaimIxa pddag Maio ie oda team= 30%rosobod. A.2 Housing Garage Level Floor Plan • pe comma a>ree�~more� • I.a•er•rep pmvldd-ease% and Unit Data Schedules 4. HOMMIUNEIMUMMIIM31001.0111Mt A.3 First and Second Level • zsadd pmit e ooh 0oon 1-3.53x2566-132,500d . Housing : 132,5`00+17,100o149.600ttod lot uta irad. Floor Plans3100 oodit. • 49,600 2oad�•127,700 aio lot me require . • 116,676dpaerlded(/WeAPaam) A.4 Housing Third and Fourth Level 5. samipageamsandra • .thee Floor Plans : Fret Yard(Bei-64•moot)•35'4'Remind(37'4'prodded) . • Sob Yard MK)•15'4'Ae6id+Waited bsfor eeb4'4o elder A.5 Housing Exterior Elevations bdl&ogbd6be orr 35'4'(goad to widower-45'41.-1s41' a side yard armairs.(33'47'provided). • Sapped doom mod(Wast-Old Gooxl)•35'4'midte&(35.-0" A.6 Unit Plan • Roar yard(Nsmb)•25%ala depth or 25'-0'ad.to 40'-0'mos Mo l . A:7 Typical Building Section botar�htbra2'.0'diaei1a,66eigliow35•4r.(45'.0 Whim m®35'-0'-10'4'&aidsl by r-0'-5'd}40'0+ • A.8 Typical Wall Section sem°°>4 ae.etkei ma�d_c21'4 peo �,4 A.9 Retail Floor Plan and Exterior gp113/KG PARKING p a& 111 Je» 1. hdapaadwt11v6KPdI6y Elevation • lapam neared per ma&oiling emit requirel.bb So%aroma sec6ed -71 a6larmo epees tool owes aspdtrsi WM36 spm a=imed remand • (T)Esolo•d mom provided Ad(t)odes'pws twice'40103) moos provided). I NMI mast 2. Orgill,MahatPaq' 13spots par ibedroom oakFits%epasIxmob Wittedbadoom ' twit per dmiliag writ• (12)1-bed x13• 130 ammo . (56)2-be sx2.0.1120apes b313-bed:23• 9_0 am Trial 1311 ups=sw dasd A.01 141.2ti6xextteidad • mimes Mame 7 ... BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY FOR JOHN R. DEMELLO GRAPHIC SCALE e le se me Ir, myv r w-_I eL7. I so. m R • Dolor.Iran p¢c monument fano ....18.-.4•1 Mse and making.as Nekoled r�, 1 .,.,: 0 monument omsDenotes n`/�nue,..iinch by 14 e,peseon fk 1/ r ova hacrBW ILVARD RLS I91II ._ . •, r TREEk1/4 . �mti �= � � m .�M 1 S 1�P P �I s • �y 4. . . ^ `�SB6Y7'IS'E ' .. 2677.47 ___40.• ; - tc _Nqr 15, .i Nag r, I.k, oro • J. _ _ -_ - ' AMY Crete CM I wit I ID _ • -.,.r,r' -' ..OR---' �— +, +! • of. 88'47 1 W' .NF .u: 5 1•1 D '}.,�, fa.o r�r • ..tirTh` I -_..__ r LAed w€-_- _ - ————— La, �1 /on q, ^t '+.d#+1^ 1 — r -'env ,,, n..e.r Ir _ \ t a~ �� �, . 11rrsww •`` '5.,,4 ; i '.Pout e.N I a�� .iEb . II/ ;7,t I ;-- --'___�_� b`j ,` '_^-I3` - y.Itno.-..r \I I 7,l r..' rEy I f i '--- - ,r~ r Yl' [p I 'i 1' it_ e. k ` _LEGEND 1h, , Jen. 1,r. _in,_ MOW y •�IgJj C 'i •1,1 YiY 0 p a OM Denotes Catch flecks • `� IJ.[-snJ , ,%I��IMitI. t i i I 1`1er `. --077--Dnoles 2 root Cent.,intend I . 7777 r i �Q{ L \ ,,s l I '�' N '• , I n L`I "�. , S I --870--Donat.f0 Fool Contour Menet I/ e,/3.N .•'.. ..../ fl orf rL O T 1 6+e, F g 1II 1 m Denote*Ebtlrk Man ob \. /'' ; `.,L,:4.....1 1 1 r • '1'1111 g 1 ecO Denote.Eleclrk ea a r.farm.. N _ tp,r I m .r.,,.. I �.ry, �' , �e tI ,! . t'r Monet.Re erase S �W""i � �,I `' C I T a.a.,.J, PS;' `, < 6r Denotes Cos Mets S 41 ...or OW •v Omelet Cued Poet \78Z L 0 C ,,i( \,',1 :---- 0 , \ . an *'' L 0 T 1 5 Mk Denotes Pani Pole r.. I e 6l _' -Arra,, -7 r 1 i u '- -- '-._ '� /r ® D.nel.Sunday Sewer Ranh.. ' 'I M n,M j,T-- pts 1�.fllr 1 'LLSA.: _-_____.ems>y.�r. - ; -R- Done.S.77 y Seem `�\ ` Obanpanty--' tP33• ii rrrGGGI I• Lw«_ 'n N'v.-._ r,-,, V -'� i I T D.nol Slpn eW .\ 1 r.rc..1 , ' ,--i �"B�i�i �;_ T,/;,,,,f, '+ arse,..,.. !I 5 i ( ® Dmol.scam s....Monnea ` s 'I, t>or .7(r 4. ' 'UF j9F it -n- Denote.storm Sas {', I p. ,CZ3' . ' 7.11 I ;' `e""^' , i `�„' ()C.1-'17 ...L 0 T.r 1 7rr' _ �J �c : v#�•r 1 e. 6..0 Deaf..TOW..floe Opc P ,,,I,,,,, ...'"et ,,LII • I" +v.. •, 1.: -.- Dmoln MblrmaN 11 _ rZ4n+.n `� y1i' IT •.f t.,�~ Y / M Dane.MbIN also Vi al•._t:�sf�LL l� y ti j `` � I �Alir r -�-Omel.Uneerp'n*d Cbefrk 1.17' „ ,ti-----, arse... 1 .' -u-Denote.Underground Ga. ,`tut.. _1 Sar ` /. 5�. ,�f �M ,0 1V .1- �-1 y,";,t 1. `� ', S; ' —. p- seed.. `''~ -\i ,___ re...O '°T"r`^``• D, I r" sow ' • V _ :. ' v '1J -Denotes Underground Telephone "��1 q .�"'iFF.o.;• /.7'�_ o- rT _ "', rL,r_ I _\ .+ '� .,..:`l l`1�... ,11 / -`.!, ,may, \`.rsye1 I�a. W I m "' r c" ' 4... .4.._..., •r„, i� io NOTES `,�'I_,- •7,I I - `� 1-Fr. ,` , `� :.t I -me purpose of Ino sonny I.a boundary and Mk r rfl s I _ l If o rose..aro..nor tor. lou.. ouryt.• _-a3___ ',figd . SB�'5038L M! 33$1 1 t , t`1, '� 8 1� • _me arlmmlio eI Mb hewing aHN.,,b Meumw r`` 4”' I. w .9.. Y'` 't>; ,_ �(ys I, 1 t 334.8,7,:.- }. ,V,4 ; t`,, I . ^y i' • ` iiP Sr ^ F . '�` r... .- „r L`' -Poe...ground WEN.Nem nor been keeled from Rind este'��' I j I t`\`. Itp� / 1I^`^`� ``y caHy Nlamelbn and Meting.1*6 dro.Naf. The.urge Pool. • � , aCI' ....••fff I t```.`�. "'�11 Cr' \^ 1:'•^�. +C_. L no puoron. underground comprise,. ',Its^`y.-; -•T. ,.'. ..•. _, .- t 1 mot l y un ser d uti.•own soon ,_ � s,.. / . :. Such le/fl.h IM e4 either N 11.14[41 a andone4 ver . ..6� I `` 'n e4§7.6$9,0,0, � „- i.,t i;,'1��'- -- ,__ r`!n,�.y '� `- orf M doe.cel/ly Mat rnry are located o!xvvrolNy „� ..1, : i0'4 t • f \- ,..,f ____---1:,&-, 74,4 tidr, I . s Gem N/anwlb ambba rhes. '46L¢..z.. ,e - 1 .ver.... -Pols properly pollens L.74 acres or 73666 SE mm a hiss L<,• e.,,, a .4. i `-,; l ..:, , v.= ,► 4.r0.r. ;,,; II at: •- eF • - ,yD� -667-----., _ r .feici'C . (i'. _-6,b-_.;1 ) i en- 1r ., 1 a▪ rt", L. . i_CY'-_' ___�-_----_i -i+-t / . `1! I. e1 • 1 - r `, I . _ -• ' `. - .'_` 4',12•y',,,� .- V ;k' 1 rl.'k'ori,. ‘,...„.4--,...4 ^^'•n . "� qq��'� JK- 7,,,.r �;;:::"L'6,AN1-,-;151714 ;74r ' -- ' ' �..� I61 _ -- `i313''r„a•1 ' �� Clf;1M � �, y� " � , ''%iPROPERTY SURVEYED Or".G^ L S1SS1"'.d�-- l: - - u row e,7 caeca 1,sPamr:vwurr,Anal.cwnrn j i:: O; u ig4 V' - 'rr�`✓`� i•. .•"" r' .. Minnesota according to me recorded prat mewl r_, ``1:,. �E1',.ii• r ':s0. Pfp aile eYc 0.. . DESCRIPTION TO BE REGISTERED That pot I the Northwest Duarte,of the Soume.t aarfr of 6 ,(,6' 1 G r _� -+em 7�rr i (Q.,/� 1`i [t. 'I Section I;7ownenla 30 Mrlh Rmpe 1 MMl MMo County Minnerofee Moo being port I p I 4Y Ana.Count. s se 1t �. .-1..... /‘".774,111....�) ''' re, -i '-'I. Meme,ole,according.7b4 mSPRrd VN1Lmeroe 0700(N O. F '`,,yrb 1 ton �{�'y.,) ,..1,' . rr Meows 0 War \ I u /1 111 ' ` :, -- O'.-s-:- ---.F • '.. ( Commenebe of me nrtheest corner of sold Northwest W,1 • �` : �` 4, I Cud.'al the Southeast ante: Lineae on on o.,am.e 1, `qtr_ '0 .tin O I I beahg of south 00 dere.e,4 minute.16 S.ccner[.t Vr k seri• • 11i 1G1' O tel/ ':� i Wong the rear line of.id Northwest Quote of rid Jit 'Ins i �'` �� ,� 1F /']�� Soum..l Duarte,o erten. f 256.04 feet thence south ILIL +I ��1�I'� s ' „� l Ii/r sou {7 66 degrees 50 fine par36 swoon.Me[.I o deet oro of 1- ��.EY 30.01 r re a ride parallel wen me SO.Ou r eesl s/ • • I.., p ', /��.r l'L (� ' sold wee 6 and to Ino point of .gin them. ' , `~` �.• C`1 V T 1 yy yy� I o r I emrNuNp save.66.pre.50 mien*.36��p�rmos Ent ' `' q(}'.x V *17'5t � I , awed.a of Mesio thence Ik of 0966 feeldes 14 e qp `D^''P`"l/ I .w„! / I omelet with and 30 feel m of rid noel.the of sad Nerth.sl I7,uorto'of the southeast Duarte;then. 1'�^ I n yys ' S1' 0r. / Nmm 66 dere.4730 fee 1S seconds 11nor Wrp sold i A`.A Q414. [MC�b. ; •t. I INe parNIN wfn and JO I.f•auto of the nal.INr of said Nrmr.el Pratt of the Southeast awls.o Wean. I 410 i ctm.a` ..Wyr.m-. _�. I of 11318/.f to o the pereaN wlfh d 10.00 feel 1 1 e.., �" of gold waw ere;thence south 00 and Ie rbufe fe I I'I h r��,1F /r I w. nmAf.. heomw pa sae/tI11%Mr�tM • II • r ``. Gr- itti a�/s '..:1 i .• --C- �y 1, w 1`' !Qp11 paint e/beginning A.e �. ,: V� 1 •• Ilr Ina -,)'1 tom,M li I *• 16.`. o...., Monuments.) ./o,� O n. 1;111 Los.wit .• :.y • -261 ufs.-rn...... `rte eP `, •Is '• al - u.—...— — —--_ —\ — . L”..e. `.I —O' _ SURVEYOR'S REPORT ' I ..e.,........• ' %• � IA ,i ~i I_ - n app...Mot Lot.15 film 20.Bock 1.SPRING VALLAl 'yf i Asko Coun7,, Ui nnolu,h.be.our by of/our S 11 I i ' ' I NNrenl our .M.block Itself b.b.InUd0y snot 1 pi- ::kyf,ry, I r,01. tr �� i ; I north-south from the petted&Mentes. The moteyet the ser I ver' '{j.� �'.la 88.33 the pinch tap km4 appears to hour eared at the m and i 1.- I�1 44 I o/M.bock and pieced the block shortage h Lots 15 and 14 `1I; 1. ,I" `i t ` I t t I Bock I.7he pinch fop Sans co1coe with coy cnslrvellen I ; elms done h the 1%0'.bur not with the section film The 1 n • • C 11 •. ..e. I 1 1 .L.` t Por surveyor.teem la her.laded off IM intim Ih,s ,r� y are ` ' .V-al�y__ ._._-,'_' I ip May started of Me north end of the bock we-ANg fhek way J h • , .seen 0W InWr Lot 24 groin r,.ren vena block Mao 7M + a 1l L O T 2 O I I - CeoepmN..0.lwe.,Inm method. ed to.urry the creek Is 1.` e'o'n,. yMill roup17 y 6.5 Me north-south and 25 I.1 e.l-..i. w1v 11 ✓ - /t • I I M` r r nil. I I `fit _N de onnieng the boundary to be rpbrred our erne old the 'S Lam„ a 1, I• .,-� I I �� �� I `\ section If..to Meconino me noon and west bounary MK i ,off rennet 6b held lb.manummtaNm d of rn..wm.sl me perm I 1 southeast property demes to determine the roam end east •. 1 ''�' NOM I r 2-eM! I S I bamery Idea By holding the lame monummfa the b/r r�•r sown • w . - 1 I south of me papery to M registered al Weal.Me Portae. 1111 ' ♦ h the north-louts erection. IMO 111; I 9••••10 rl�_ Dom' Y yW,�( _ , ; __ I eu 1 I^Not°found along the..rein and south 11 M- s".� `r•6. �•• I1^ 1 erous Son monument.we.. ``I Nin of 6474 A,rnue Mkn ep-n 1 I ' 1e, ^ -- -- __I_ '- --- •-- •- I x177,each other h a Norm-Swlh I `� ''7•`1iin'L-w.- .g6Y-�'1. `o `... m[� -, ^ 1`t dFeellm—-__-- i gkir �. o_ J.1L�,�•'le . .4 •—r lam t p .r- ..1 !r Marron w gyp„ , eleir ' 1�. `NM .-s. `R`�� 604 T �a,a `��_ a .sown lv _y• r j .Aso 1Mn� 1 Jt/4 dr.e N-. {{ ILr- I' a reser, �,, _ ...1atT tY13av-RN. i I7 I .L` • armlet ' , ...1k—r 13 An*�bG tT / 3 �Y le,no. . has K { e our9• Lt lies BENCHMARK orb 6e, �n BENCHMARK EN...887.45 hems./ ii I 11 Mn-mein W r Ive •OM I1,..:I.1,..:I. '"rom Y Ml .. do I aMtn se t l tfr 4. I r$ E I hereby certify Inst Mb.rex elm r report.. OggOf{{{ prepared by me or under my dime supr,lson and that I am MIDWEST p1dtired Lane Srr ryunder lid b.of the Stag. Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. 1 lie sA Mese Deed a. ULM , 1110-,. tie 76f-7u-6M6 r Ir o. gem ,Met-7.e_EGL Aar me r*m Rea Nn /I0427 Der. 10-24-03 C rem-Who Iced 6m•••••el Oen Zo•oe.a Mr-AM NOM Somrwd 1 N PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS -- f'+- PROPERTY LINE .�w-w..s BLDG Bu*d'TO SM BRnRiI Mork CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CH Coteh Bosh+ ,101111M1111011111Werfir- At—ri-----'-iSibi. , :'_ CONC. Conant. ROCK RUCTICONSN UNICT]TS ENTRANCE '•::::::*:; C.S.A,H. County State Ald Highway �ir©- /� ►� r r, - 9LTAna1 FENCE x x x EELEV x Ductile �alran Pps a rw VALLEY - -y��`I f - w�_ - FFE FMbhed Floor Elw. SPRING ESTATES I"-"� �4i BITUMINOUS REMOVAL Il��rt FRIDLEY,MN '�'wwww ^`MIIRI7O— � .la ow NZ Mmdmum / , • n r: +�r a '�i"� .-a .'"! = MM Minimum �`� 1�. MN Menhole •1� i;,li7 T " 1>` . 'I 4D 2D D 40 6D CONCRETE RF]EOVAL RCP RainfarCW concrete Pipe p m" , R.O.W. Right-oT-Way `' • *m ID .l.: 5`'�:O 3 4'S BUI;DING DEMOLInON '" A i. , TREE REMOVAL n�>�•�;�'�••.:. CLEAR AND GRUB ��lly , ,./e. , mn tea id/�//� "111//// /41/ I II war .; t /14� /A SOIL BORINGS 19 8-1 0� /I SPRING VALLEY ESTATES 0:111girl Y�,T; • ��>♦ I DMO(TION AND FMOV I NO C• m I ---- � __ ' • 1.PROT TO START OT OEYQITICM.ALL MOON AND'REORIENT CONTROL MF.AMMER ARE TO E NSTALLf•C. CONTACT THE DTT or FRI LEY AND ACE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT(163^570-]RR)FOR WIPECnbI _ ,, , , - . •- �:' Or- IPION TO STMT OF oonswaeaoI Are/GR MARINO ANO OW10eBRG R.I�►.I► :11".' C R LL NTE CONT RTO.T$RC9PON9HA7r1'HTO TECT TAN TME L.00 NOT 0 ALL ETGTHAT HAL THE 7FE CONTtA MAP lIAU.YERLR'TE UAm HA,FiEVRT10N AND MAIIf At1 0031[10 ATE AE.!II AT SEFORc I fir 'Cep. r-O ✓ ~• n. ' NeT-4TUC11011 STARTS THE CATR ER.AROTIECT nc bAPER DOES NOT WARAMTEE THAT ALL TXE UO TO ARE MAPPED,at W MAPPED,ARE SHORN CORRECTLY.CCITACT GOPHER STATE ORE CALL AT ,P, ��(� ^. iqn .... 06T-1M-DOG2 F'qt Fm LOGiOo E7DSTN0 ulalE4 C01lTACT uTaTY oMNER i oAMAQ OCQHtO q1E m WM.9TfaCitD,L I MAXI' • .i^ ,I i 3 THERE MAY SE IIOCaWE0U3 ITEMS m E REIIOVW THAT ARE NOT DOOM 011 THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR 1A TO WRY DC SIRE AND MEYER THE OOCIAeafTS m WAN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING E PROFIT'1TAl i ` •-Ir TIE mono=PE OF TORN 0 _� r_. i I � KEYED NOTE$ 1lip, !, _ /!"'�"s; `�-� 1:1' �,9 Au DYED raTm AIQ rER01m STALL 0 ON PLAN: 0 REMOVE DISTMO ORME ENTRANCE/CURD NITS SAM.UT ARID REMOVE THE NECESSARY THTLAIINCA S PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE CURD. COO ONAIE ALL NORM MHN TARE R7TT LTr FROLET.COORDINATE ALL e. •• r 1 WORN WITH ANOKA COUNTY FOR DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES ENTERING CMTO COWRY STATE NO TNQwIAYS REPLACE CURS ANO CUTTER AND DTWINCR PMFAIENT PER CTT AND WARY STANDARDS ARD •1 It it --�__-y. _ r P, + . 7 SPEWTCATIONS MIN STREET RICHT-OF-WAY. I• I11 1 � ..A � • .41 tis Q Rooms corust TE CIVEWAY PAWNOR IN Dawn 11111LL lit LV l V10L11J WORKS p y ,.. *j„' Q3 MNLUT AND REMOVE oAlYNW6 DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT IM ns ENTIRETY. . - I • I q 1E g. -.• •: '�'.. VYI►' ©REMaE KUNIO AND FCRmATgNS COORDINATE warn,STW1OFFS PRIOR m RAMC SUEDNG. V ••� :.li. .O Tpf.. -E<,f-•: ,:.F �" ;_„,,.....---_-4,...;,,. S.ROCK CONSTRUCTOR ENTRANCE ES DEAL 2/CLO. 7 I L L A R D, I N C. L .� .' �- .O- --/•41` ' i.: . , •!i�1j \ lii'.►+._'' ¢l ®NI TAT10N FENCE EE SETAE sitT _ e..Ci�rE{IIIAAAN$ t 6rTdmaFrE ''. .• -•- '...•-•;..;:!.!_: .. e- 1.4:f'. •�� .� - . 1, " i. 1®IOAE Al COORCNMF SE RMINEIL/RFIRCAT011 CT M PENN POLE AND TELEPRONEF R PEDESTALS MHN TO TIC O ER.COORDINATE ELECTRICAL SFRVifY AND TELEPHONE SHUTDOWN WM THE ••'; CONTRACTOR AND PLANS MID AEAlTCA1lONS FOR NEW ERVICE TME YTE. / �r -��•.�"' � !....,..747;:e:r � � nEDTarx oMen.RDnt m aEerAaLII �" ' - i]% !. S ,� .,.LOevlcm.FDusDrt'_ iI OSCCN[LT AMD ROAM ENSTNG SANITARY LIMN SERA=TO WILDING!.asom ANL PAPE w ws warm PFR CRT Or iMCLY STANDARDS MO A710NS IsA�aleoaani NlCmeeCusLmv�` �~ _ 11,,:i7. a� . g NOTE Q AOSCQ11ECT WATFA BFRST PV6 PER CSI Au WATER DERN(Z WUTOFFO N ICCORDANCE PATH 7NE CRY OF FRO 11 STANDARDS AMO 6PECIF CAT CN$ arsauRri.Ca ET1eI sic�ImmCaee�OnL�.1�(• e':'' ®REMOVERETAIIEqWAN.NmTDITRRETY.I�I. a r rr ` +mI, THESURYOFI NEC GAs aATE ALLGR NRH DAs COIPANT.COOROSUTE REIT OAS TERRACE LACATON MM IECNAACAL CDTRACtot �{!�) h:'Pilj` ise +1� /�+ �u r NDICATESL.THOSE +p RDEOLT WDDD FENa N rex ENTnErr (l„, .we 9111,owl �i II�lilil�s! ;.%`fA ! _ n�f 9 1: . +� y TREES 4-INCHES I 7l ®/p 0 REMOVE ALL MRCELLVRfq{A STRUCTURES MON At LAMES tslE TY ii(EISALL N00►OR PCE 12-RICV/CI STEEL RAYL ETC N mow ENIRETI. tg�• j,g g y.4+,y tAN• n il+ 'O4• ; ') "` AND LARGER IN RF07E SEGASSPTAL SI.OER RETAIPw WALL M ITS E7TTSETI'. lFalS �►•.4; s ! arab. r. 1.;. DIAMETER. IE . 'I ; �/� - 0.• �(�14 CONTRACTOR iS. TO ®COORDINATE/ROLL UTTUTY RESgVALS TO EACs P ING NONE MM LOCH.UTLm=O ANRS NCLDNG 0501WG GAS.TELEPHONE AND CABLE TV. i, I _ m"'• n ,. a - - VISIT THE SITE AND aµ STORM!EWER DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE NOT TO BE DIMMED. SEDIMENT FILTERS ARE TO OE WALLED AT ALL STORM EWER INLET A1NUA1WKS PRIOR m START O COFATRUCTION. iwrwelii I�, '•j ` REVIEW CONTRACT .R...A Tsar eILInRIrrrr 1 ;.. �:• " 17 WSrART SEWER SAUCIURS ARE NOT WE DS7URRb. .YsMesi Sra SII��, o g DOCUMENTS TO : =".....4b 4F �"�" OBTAIN A CLEAR © mi PPIFV .A C APPROXIMATELY OTT I*000 MW.WAS NOT 0i sr TrE oeveurol exo THEREFORE PA WILL E®U EN O NAUSS VWARCaED WAs NLTT LNANTm "�1'M. ��'R'SSIV II I I.. o : �r,.r � et � ,_ j UNDERSTANDING OFDE/PRAMUAL/1DX NrFMaq+wAEurrfEr 1 TREE REMOVAL 1 w •-•:. r. EXTENT., C�1TR Q - E -`_ rr,.:. .. - RM14W TV Roar HRH POCK i!•1 POQS MOS MILL E 1"a r V� iEi Ski,W N�.1470 � _ n�/ it U COMM OT(SCM R S R oP O WEmL ,R,R�O4 PRE CW nelPtrelFRaaeo 11 i 31 y w! o Nam NOCK 41=PC • rtwnrm OWL PENCE ROM K13 Ps O�s... ,q� �. U MU MNWY a T PONS PALL E OR M r GYFP OIm ilitit weNa j ,i] �7M `P- ^E'� ® _ �� Y/MEIC SLN TO t eNil Y +�L. NA THE fRI1PD. TSS I RPM ® �I %- �' .�� MOO EnNSOI/_._._.-. --•... .__•.._..._�WIER wf�1100c iD�S�` _i FAMIO Rel - Y. ' L - 7/////.1-r • - o-O FAEx i.rs .*A..rrwdbrolp• PlA.. I .. U;�► f h 1../, .an j 'y;', .I - ����'�����'��� ! 4.4 4.141 W r..INItbA IA...u.wwt rR i i .::'1� n• •F' . tl L i] n n © o /•% ,. • •RiOFLSL rALAc• �Ih► Ii':O. jl �* w ///�/�IYt42..`rIf^ti 1 >/n'N 11 ��/�i i�n • - ' J � s��. -.j tl /%'�ll��� .I ( m'mow - IMS � t�S$1♦,y+ j'/ -111110-$0.%.f:-:;-% jr-�.r eri �T Ups ,ii I "" Gi , MAN 6 e0 MET Mo DDM a u IMT, RML=RN®R CO HNC . I j a'W „i `'41 a RU M NL OTT,bTomeH Dins=AID IRNA STAIOAME Ma T DE1P TRWCM 3 CU M RTREEIS RNA ONLY GAPS eR MME RRWpTaY P N O)DIOIAL ANDWATILY.• �""' C>7 a a e,: i A ICONS=W OTT.WINRSIED coma OR 1101y�J f G ' II STAU=NCH ENTRANCE dl(i,'CA'1 FENCE (ORANGE-COLORED) DEMOLI ION rJ !. -... _al :, �- �.. Yam �.r .; �)A te/ Nst �Ql�"� 1 it .moi , _� `. �•►•-...�� __�II(1 ri -'ry� 0 HOT TO SCALE - 0 OOPPr. ED,ENWE RWD NOW PLAN '•" - •� a ION.E PITN1SO PD 11111 ..11:13 A7 rOK.FETAL -.- IT 0 TN oconualors e .�—... - _ ._ - Ilam a METAL Af6RTA.R TIE=DKA levolaulT TO • • STARE Or ALL IMIRIO WILTED . - ..,..:.. - n AC COIfTRAaratWOWL ..._-- rrootot 1111 O „„,,W!1 R it Wa MNC NL .A.10�������.i ' -- 08.00 COMM NUM a Mill. PP CONONO4 MNSMP POSTS IS WMAN0.11 ARPOIECT ai6 VAT MO YL A'. is Erma POET M OWES N,E NAPPED 41) 4IPLiTION PLAN i YEwARDED OM ON IF 1110POPIL comer win +....e. • w'ER PAW OS CALL AT 65•1AM-COOT RR ? 4 CATCH B SIN SEDIMENT PR¢TECTION FCD LOCATMO DIEM COT=MAY Ci.0 NOT TO cut TOWa7RDRC1 C/M O . • \' rrs =1a1n4 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLSlux AB$REVIA11ONS N .\ ASRR7IS1 THE tJOdIOR lF RT TIE MC I1e11U1 �� Ye Ott PRCPERTY LINE BL Bondi Mark FILYATQ 040 FAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION UNITS CB Catch Bo.ln xiETMOP ae Mel CL CNnter LM4e AR a TIC Poet D costructos SAwGJT LINE(PPPROX) LONG Concrete ARCIPT07 OR _ C.S.A.H. Count State Aid Highway i_® S �, NOT N a°�jNAAT DOES ROCK CONS'iRUCiION ENTRANCE ,PAPP•PP.-. OM Ductile Iron Pipe • 1E MUTES Ale MAPFm, / ♦ � OR F MAPPED,ARE Nem ,. .,. F1EV Elevdtlon / IP' ca0e o%OWN= SLTATON FENCE X X X•• X Emergency ‘\) ��="S.TI �' 5� ©_ �!s"'�l�\ Area mtER STATE Pa ei DRAINAGE FLOW 04401E �' Overflow ��_ tM•-. ��.�y i. �,�„� FFE Finished Floor Elev. ■ �y �►•-- \�1�� ., ' � MM.weer u°Q MINNairr PROPOSED CONTOUR --(M)--- 9.0T - LPL Hyh Wats LOP • swl�.-�� ' omiNX=PS OK n`m CONSTRICTOR SPDr ELEVATION r� mArt L�FVE I Fkwr Eley. 1or � *- �Ir�"" ;` S ' STORM SEWER > ) uAHX 40 ZO 0 40 80 SPRING VALLEY ESTATES �� -- M FLAREEPIO SECTION MIN MNlmum FRIDL7 � 1 �,," ��� - -# NITH RAP RCP Reinforced Concrete PRPP6c ii.wm�E r Q.y ^1 1201124 BA VEcliHOLE •Y j; .,IMM- t il � SOIL.BORINGS 9 B-t 114 � l Jo_ vile 1 GENERAL NOTES I Y� : ® \ ,�, -.y I 1.CONTRACTOR WALL CONTACT'DOPER STATE ME-CAL'ID SUBNE3S OATS PRP TO EXCAVATION NO/011 CONSTRICTION FOR EASING UTILITY LOCATIONS TAN WES METRO AREA:(ail)Aa4-oW2 OR t�262-1106. _ T ']'fl2 THE SHOP LOCATION OF 0481445 WOERORMAC UTU11ES 1E NI APPROA11ME LOCATION ILY AND HAVE NOT BEEN SAMENDEMTLY VFAPE0. DE DM,DT IODATION or ALL UTILISES MUST SE PIPED PRIOR TO CONI ENaNO SPG VALLEY ESTATES _ �,•, WAILO 1/0/40104SHALL 181.0-�EItlPYM Lid04110NMDEtEVAIION OF4011700UTYJTIEOAMD70POO1AP,SCF0A1WEe PPJOR7DSTART OF!7EORAOMN07NE CONTRACIOESNALI.MEDIAIOX MOTF7FD711 OEIEwALii • .1111-/1y _'. . COMiRAC1Ot AMD 11e F 0.400'Ml ENaPFSROFANrD190wFMICk3OR V001*1 MB• • �'-�;"' ,�. ���' 1 S{ATI/IP 0RARNDNAIOON.S4AL 0000041O ALLIOILEMCOMTE CANON THE007E110THEE7(O nonIT TOPEOI..D®RI9,0010000 MATEI0ALAMD07401 UNE0A&EUATEA/1L LI0400140 1*1001A AEILNLEAPPR0IED0Y. t ' ! �Li ' EDLDNOUFFJERPRIORtD 4(*44,117.} ♦41111100E E*0104 10 SHALL E SAUOILED Be®IAT$r 014701 FXCAYATON TO,aP OPF@T MY SIABIl1T1'PROS2MS DUE TO WATFA SEGABE dt 67L1P eLDPES, :FRIG PLACI4B rE'f1 SAI/ACE WiDtIAL AgNCDIT 7D[MSiNe �,,\ Q. �� N�a ,. •• OpM1RA 404 WAI1Ae0TALL ALL 0440401 CON7R0 IEAWY�4 APRIL W 0010411 014 SAD 10 WFO 71�d1 ANO YNNTAM )NTL ML 0000$*.10®DN 711 111E HAVE BEEN RESIDED. �I,RACTOIt WAIL PLACE 11140(o 1, • .''.. maall ,��ar■r� -;r j.7{7.►!I 484044 0041 0.wwREs A/IOIB+O w.urcN BAES� REPSTABIH:M TURP AE 9000 ArTew oRADIN0 AE COI041006 P4410.wTN ED llR s 15400 AND 0000 ANal01EO OIRAW rulal 0.... � \i, t L tOfIRAC104 SHAtt PIID'ADE A 44444,1 FM-NQ OE►lH(G7wAG7m)O 10PDOL ID ALL MEAS 0611A8E0,70 E SOLOED P BELIED. 7licifi I� �����I �� �i#UI7 CONTRACTOR WALL AVATE DRAN FOR RE RES TOTAL ANO'40010).COI100.ONCE a HAf SEDT 0010040000 04 THE PILO Br THE ES. 12gL �; 1 , j . _ `� i/�r S ODMDEA0144 EtL{LL EXCAVATE RiAMl10E TRENOEE TO 1a10W PROPO®STORM ORNN/LLIO/aAOfiS CRADEE AfOAI NQ PPIpm 0400143 CQITPA0104 4(Atl RCJOf OtAOE 7D 841BOa00 OEVATION AND LEAK PAVELENTS READY FOR SUISSASE STAPLE. ` ' ^-A __` � ! n/CMOR PULL EE SOLELY�pEIPOWBIE FOR ATOR SID ALL TES"BM NO MOIRONAL COYPFNSATNRL. Il emPF r�4(r 1a TIE PROUD aMBTY NEMOD 11404 E 14701464 IDR ANL POg1 DNE OP PERNN E74T aN87R,ClIO4l ETAIDAIID a121FAaT1DN WALL BE RFGIMED FP ANY T,]MPMY CON9RDGTKAI PR/'FIT TL4I11.ALL EXPOS MATMNM.COC ETE 4®10,ANY PA CONED UTILITY HENS AND OTHER UNMABI.E MA7M0KS PAIL KOOK 7NE PROPER"?O'TIE CONTRACTOR AAD SHALE DISPOSED IEGAILY OFF 111 CONSTRUCTION WE. llJFT MAX t. _ '! -�� ..... .� �. :!!'_i��1191, `P 117.AU.ESS COOTOMEELEVATIONS MC TO TOP A PARMA A OR ATTER LNG UNLESS OTNWO40E PECKED.11 ARCM MOP cONCRETE CLAD AK PPM AND IMUTANOUS PAVERDIT A ACCORDANCE NTH__ .. I T \f• `,�� I �� \,• 114 CONTRACTOR SHALL*40701.,PISMCT.MNMTAN NA KOOK 1440 40 SSARY SOME FOR LME MONKS. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEM=ANO SOIGNE WALL C0FORY TO 114E WACO.PUMA TKO MANUAL FOR ` �P!- lily`-_ iv, TEACART TRAPC CONTROL 210E LWOW" .•� �IL'�- �Tq�yy , rr �-_r�� ` IL CONTRACTOR DAL NOTIFY THE CITY OF STILLWATER,PIAUC WRNS OWARDE',M 14044E IN MANCE OP PPP NSW TRE 97E. CM OF STDLWATER NSPECTORS MUST 0,306E NPL WORK COMPLETED A SHE,INCLUDING .CURB AND GIMP . ,o v� 1..'.1 ; ..".. I ' a P APS AND/OR CO 6,gJuflbRT OF WATER MAPS 6ANTMT SLYER AID STORM ORNN.CWRECTi0N6 TO CRISPS MIT RME4 BAaFXI110 Agit REPLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAV[YWT,PATEN R rill, • � / �(+'�A•���RIVO� ' A.1�! ff 1B,ALL CPSTRRCRON MUST COMPLY AM CITY OF PCP WAS AMI onapuo E. - .. � �� �� 4 4�,1iiIirf:l ., R7.PRCPMED CONTOURS NE TO FAMED GRADE ( SDPS� . . . .r�� ,..--„IL,,, a1�.r... �/1:il ��' 1a memo mem"(P ORMATION PROWLED BY YOKE WD RAPPERS AM At DAMPS 703-712- CONTRACTOR WALL FOD PRET PRATT TO C IRLETICAL RCP ENO EERL NC SEAL NOT BE NEEPOMME _ 1 �;- ARc �r�crnL WORKS FOR P C ACCURACY a'NFOMATON POM O ST MAMA LAID SURVEYOR R OWL WOINL'ER2 `, �„+<ilNl►\- ..Rl .;t -'� � 1 \ 1{11;11 I n.ALL SOD MEN KIR A SLOPE TREATER 1NAM C{EWA TO k,IND.BE ETANEL . • -AP.jM�I�-.4.�-4... `� a Ae I I#1 T R0.NL Sf SLOPES GEARD W 040140wED Sr CONTRACTOR THAT MILL RA K SODOM WSJ.BE SECOEO AND COVERED TeiH.ROOD FIBER BtAtUET TION RESTORATION. • r.,,..„,.l ,.`�! �' .Alt I+ !. . V I L L A R D INC. 1►at1LrA j(� • �,` /` �a ,:. �``+ir��`�'" FRNISON CO41410 040T11SI ITNBYiiirl9-CARA AMARA ADA A 4. 1 ,.ALL EDOEHDN 440400 rAa LO7EU 1NIAI1 IN9TALIEO PMP 70 ANY 401 PARNo OPERA 00 THE STY 0144 144 MUST E ROTFED UPON 00-10 1aN A iH¢11? 114 tN12 F 11,E REWIRED MRo44DM caH14d FAOLIR 0 ATO rdAJr esr ABP/rB4 �7 11 �� !�\ PRM TO Nr AMM O OPERWAN BEDS COFM01tl0. THE COLTMACTOR E!El CAW TD KKOULE A ME-CONSTRUCTION CMP WEAK 124-1111 AM TRE PM F DAMMED A RAPED WANG COBIRUC IOM.NL MOWN . .. • , IIJ. ��� \ .. t CONTROL F 0044 S TIROL It IES NO REST N PLACE AT 7 TMD O EACH DAY. n, ' •• ,.. - �\11 2. NY ANIT 1 WN P MIND NECESSARY SY 114E tl .WPC,Diet OR AMR NE ORADNC MAMA SHALL K INSTALLED AT SFE REQUEST OF 111E O . �..I �`. �� \.'.+S C S AGM MASON WNL E MME mai 1E ELEVATIONS MOP A TE APPNOYM AMINO PAN.M1INOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FIDE ME CITY. naNar�r wslo eiOM�w��rommer ►A •E `�■ -4 Fat/NES CEATM THOa1 SD AMES N POURED A THE IIS\PONT MOUS01EN1R THE MOO APPLICANT MUST SEW M MOSTA GAPE NBPECION LOG INSPECTION MUST E YALE ONCE EERY SEVEN DAYS AND FAINT Pw4A�a®a4444ADYAIoteff lernaR !!r `\ l I 24 HOURS AFTER DENY RAN MKT. THE* PECTION RAPID MUST E MADE AVANNLE TO IE OTT AND WA10RM1m WAN 24 HOURS OF RE0EST. .f'ATTwI.WwDO>ruvmP+RolaRm4•R.mW� • . •ill `� + e r `�'�t I FUNS FROM PORSOR 0440001 OR PASS 1EPORMT OR P0144WIM/n WA11 E ROUTED TO CdNDRA4ON BASINS OR APPROPRIATE PIMP O✓4C'ATERS 7O PRIVEI4 TRANSPORT O'SSIIREMT 70 0)11410*OR STEN. a���xQWOi®SS _ , ,, �•. �.,`1 `,i�:t 0011YCY'ORB A/O W PI*4440 DDSIOM NO 071011111®1 RUI4OF11 f11M NTO . COIPAiT4 0 ), :i.I ; r.. 6 001E ACCESS ROADS COWL E MOOED OR OIERW1E 1 100 IED WITH 0 T FM481 DAMISOI CHAM46E,OR ORIS ANO PIES TO PUNDIT INATENT FROM EXITING THE 007E NA THE Masa ROADS ATE-ACCESS / . • ' `� ' ,I•� ROoo/.NVEWAM SHALL E MEWED AM AMMO 4004 REM THEY MOON MAW PAVED ROADWAYS. REFER TO STT OF R A EY STAMDND S0.1MM \\\ LEI■ i 5 ..�:�.9I 7. SOLE MAC=FROM 111 SP ST MAAR KM=CR'mamma WNL E CLENCD DAILY FROM PAWS RDAMAT 140 CITY. P NAPE NECENTLY F RMUESTED BY QTY,TINOMHOR THE DURATION OF CONSIRICTAL N . ' i l FTP I.:.,.. 7' / ► /I© a OamaL WOi.4 048 Bc PERPORIm PFIaoO A AND/Q o MTLRTN,EVENTS OAMAa as RIm6EiE NM TUES vROEmN 004410 L MEABUREB. jrJ�C y�� r ., "/ L ALL. 041. 01 OONR4 KAKAS*FALL E USW 00 ARID 007E 12067141 - mLL®Is.FAP A®,aM* 1. ' J` f•: . f y.. ...' • ./4� THEY PALL E RESTORED To SEEK HEIR WEN=*1).00Oi AT THE a0 00 EA04 DAY I N 414 SDP 0 AS FPO CRDIION ALLOW ACCESS. ` •.� �, !` .� to ALL AREAS AMA=DURING G0i1TRU:ION SHAME RESTORED N SOON AS MARBLE. ANY ARE;FRIA ME SCSI PAWED WADED P AREA MAT HAVE BEN DISTURBED AND FOR PICK GRADING at STE LTIA.OP10 / //I■•.' /////' 1 CONS4 1040 CPENATAS ARE NOT ACTIVELY*011)4AT WALL E SEEMS AND MOUSED AS SET FORTH N 114E FOLLOWING PARAPMIB KINN 14 OAP . ��LI.,� t j5 :'1 '*4 •;^. `�� � f� 4 A. THE SEEDMC CONTRACTOR MUSK CONTACT DIE Orr AND PRIOR m APPLICATION OF.044 AMD MOUS. • 1 i>! API ,L 0. AIL IMO ASPS 114044 E EITHER MULCHED AM DISC-010401631 P COVERED BY PPM SACKER 10 PROTECT®S AND LOW FJl09tOd 7E11PORM1 P PWIAENT,ALP 94044 E 0612 ANaHaIffD AND . . - �� ��,� ..J ` 1 .. . / , `1 APED AT A PROP RATE AF NOT LF36 THAN 140 10X4 PER ACK AND NOT{EK NM ERC COTTAGE ' i ,l 4,I4 .-- `'0 -rf . ,/.� • •_J S S.4: 1 a F T1 PACED AREA IS AN1100*1 D 10 K IE-091URSFD/DEIFIDIRD DTP Se 4041145 PROrDE A TEMPORARY ECE7Ai1ME GOER 00/96100 O MNMESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT/MA(10007)4E®MIXTURE �, L l MOB ATA 147E OF 2*PAADS PER ACRE P, El 1 41110,-...// ` `��-/ 1� +•.. II D. F GRADED NEA ALL NOT E ODELOPED FOR A RMOO GREASER THAI MX 140X742 PROWS A PMMANMIT VEETAIK COVER OF SID LANK 48001144 AT A RATE Of 00 POUNCE FAR ROE. ■ O�I� F �\� a f�JI, G QAORW BDIDB OI THE EOOVNDIT BHCIIwTEaSIAL E 1 1*5000 LNm 148 MN 1481444MED AND SIAM A SO-Mr CROAK Pfw00. j I'1 r. ALL AREAS 1NAT Yl tlQI E MOWLD P MAMTARED-N PARI O 7NE tLlIM7E OE11ON FALL E PEAMA4E147LY ASfORED YiP40 itED MCIURC I/O07 Sae AT A ANTE O to*0009 PER ROE. AwtraiM Gis 1'if y■ �. I„ \\ .. +�/��. ,�tl 11. 1EREKR 01ieR 41044044 ND=BE 0011407.P 401100 NE NADEWAIE,I0IORARY OM-CR 0041017 RAINS TMAT 00X1448 70 111 CR4MA F'OR 04-8110 DE1M17TOi BAS440 9IAu E MOWED. JRRFSr11SRl��144S� . '. x'14 _ - _'�-:� ..._. //-I y, 12.-RUNOFF'SCOL E PEV417FD FNOM DIMINO ALL STOMA KP CATON BATAS PROTONS THEY ARE NOT WPM DO/MG CONSTRUCTION. EEE STOP SEWER CATCH BARON ARE KGES4,ARY FOR 441E DRAINAGE AMA 4,4•17N11BM 6RAPBISRFO 1 r'. CONSTRUCTION NOME MDw4NT TRAPS PER BPLa0N%710NL ilit . IID. ■ /....,, LAND NAT 111E WY TILL ALLOW la E OSIINSED AT TOS NNE O YEAR FALL Q SOPPY lAe . ■ ��'..l ,., ..t.4.1r _. �/'.`� �. j 74 AMONG ACIP1113 PROPOSED 70 MP AFRR OCTOBER ID lei N IPPROND NM$414 SO40)LLE. IE AEA OF �• 714E an'RSL ALSO AROUSE APITOTAL40101±BE CONTROL EMO,i.e.,TAMPA'KAYM MEMS,DORMANT MI. no RAt MMES OF APPJGCDP OF BOM KED AND WLUI. i s/ / 4,/ i Pk FilTER ILAN T Ate RPIW SHALL E*STA=OM Tte DOA617CAM SDEI P ALL WM SEMI OUTLET" ALL RIMA OWL E RAPED ND INSTALLED AM A MIETR/ UN&MQ71NO 1K ADOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR �/1 I(, RAMP ND FLIER MATMIAL . _ �� 'I�/14 • •.:•. 1 .. „• ///�!4 ��1 IL EROSION CONTROL FACILITES SHALL E NSTALLED ARD MANTM&D AFDOD 111 PERIMETER O'ALL LANCES,ACOS AID METLN40 PIM P 0044 4T 10 ME MEA TO E FADED)HIL ME AREA P 0104)'TO IE LANG F'OD • . 1I .:e • P IIE'MND X RESTOED. ESBONeeINAIM wwIa / 146 t0 MINM3 ER 9044.AL 3:1 SDPCS 91ALL E COVERED FAM N*1040*.APPROKD SY TIE ONS E 404410 00 OMMP AMO*41481ED DIBIMCR.SUO1 AE FTAl010 RAF*1l4 P 4TAKLD ECO. MYPlwpai4iM6Ai'e4A. I �� ,. H!' `� _M3,� '�A./-'.. ! , E 17. MALL 05 RTF A�N6 Ml 01 SKALD OLr PONDS N PELTED EYR'DA(0 PALL BE 400(40 L MAR N.GREW P Ann COMRLDON OF ammo*0141710 N•nK tFSwMSo� . 1 4 // DE CRY. 1k PgBRMNI e. I , 40*Nola '• E� * ...Q. '/�`► % Rrii�` YED NOTES r>�rrgMrRPeA ,�^ 'i i(F �TIA 1oI w ' ' E 4 11t+E• O ALL KEYED?NM N¢DENOTED By[]P MA/4. OE,F•,�•4 wn w1 w�.r:.W.MeP•1M .r�..�.I. I _ (��`.�\`,` e:-. -1/� ❑ 1 '-9;111,, TATA F • ��/14'.� T1 / -/�4 i 1 ROCK CO41w/CMN QIIiMCE 1IV Ilit,\5-17.: 1 � .'��\ -..� _fir:1ni �,]r�!/ r��� :i#�• ■ L•EP i•R1 AIN•• .t3;� ��\�` O` �11►7��111 S 44LrATroNfEMa T • . \`' T`4_ .,��"-� �"�•' ���I IL. �F R©I WATER CUALITY/MSE 404T44R0.POND. TFE NW MAZER LEES.(11KI 40 mi.4 DIE MOI*IN.wA7M1 LEVAN.t L)IS 475.0 I �'`Aw��►��As.�1�tIEEF/■Ir --- _i�"M'•� ±��R.L • ',yv-/n LTJ MLTMTIP/ANTE GATNRO.Pot& TSC HAN RATER 1k14(HWS.)IS 100.7, ADAR TO PALMATION PSD TATES 04 1WS BEET. ■ hod* _ a�i���ami`-:� + =- - -- • GRADING, L� IJ 41 �- QS FRIL7RATRP RATE CONTROL MOP 711 HIM WADI LOC.P+a)6 eeo0 KM To IP LIRA 0t POND mans OH FIGS SHEET. DRAINAGE,AND IL�'o F- - - ��_ I POD ENEIIQEPIOT OKAE1.Ow re[CIA - / ,,�'�'4 A•�r=ia -- �7 2-iYDT iNOH SA7NW/41'iALNNO WNL - _• EROSION CONTROL • 40014X0.2 O "R E0040 PSBR�'011 fLIBY tam leo(Roo SOON Del SE 2"7 r • PLAN ' 1 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Foot OPAL. 'at A 101W4000.PM°Ro�Haors WENN TOcomellop��1Dt1a Wu AI LOIC a 1114,111•11 I I 122.0 1•-4a + WOO O IfiTK z T± ' i >r r.-y7 tvE oINRiv• oNNrx .7 _ �. n 03448.00 INFILTRATION POND NOTES F�`AM'"`ac �� p11p/neN FA�Mo `jD ' '�B a -2tI II. K e1 IW<[FA MOO AWob NOTE: 1.Nee O•SA7Dr SOBS S MOT MOWED N ME NKTRADON PAP MEAS. IMI §:i�� I • APPROXIMATELY 5.1 2114E CONTRACTOR SHALL Mx PAWL AD SND ATO SPREAD AS TCP PPRING/RCPSOL N THE PI1TMMgN POD ARDS. ACRES DISTURBED. 1T/E R PAO AREAS COAL E PLANTED/SW=AM OOP ROOM MIK 5040(TDH.0014 TO IE 1.4(6!045[ 141Ae ar CTS PLANS. SAWN 4.114E NFlL0M404 PON05 WALL MOT E CONSTRUCTED JS11L FNAL PUCE BTAB6RATO4 HAS=PM N IE CONTRA11410 DRNNA1 b I� HHS�TI OST FENCE WNL E PLACID MAW DE PERPETER OF THE MF0.IRATON PONDS TD PROTECT MSE P009 FRP 4411.7040 5)4040 MAT C pa 4 *001*OI144 m0[12 STC 4'. All POO PCOT KIM F - L RUM Au a1Y.1.Moo WOW H`iup/DAIa MOO/O 12 MCC w Com. EA4 EL X10 C DED 1H7RJ1 1 CEM OEM 01 A SAT Nth 4 YOE 4Ag0ORLT i / _�1 . O-THE N4FRIRAROI MOND AREAS ARC 70 E 741.140 A MMI*O 12-NOES DRIP PNP TO PAe94 ARMS TO 4i1P PROMOTE MATER NO Weil Y®PT6X. UfALY®NT aR,eaaA®047411 4R IPSw. v . NFL1RA5KP X10 SIE SOL.1140 CONTRACTOR GALL MGR=E0).04144.01144 DURING 444TRUCMP IN INFILTRATION POPO MEAS � �ry,� N SEDIMENT FILTER �a4 FENCE (ORANGE-COLORED) EROCISTRUCTION ENTRANCE .% I ' ..as.... OLD CEN TRAL -AVENUE " t a�Aucnar ( COUNTY �gy}n AID HIGHWAY . NO . :. 3 5 ) ad _ _ �� ~� a !! ®za I �© e Ar ,, -111 ;kiiiil tiltlicIa ,.. 1:800004 _ ,1 1, r— Ma, Li) i. .a , .� a 9 s , t�� (� tn rt tn v•111,,is' , f ini le 1 _ 41, 1k. _Aik tn R m;r,,,...,„ 4:7., 941 r- 2 a a. 41%,..., 41115111111 04\ 12 . o ' If!, 1 !I 1111 l N, , ,„ ,, 4. 11 Ap �� \�- .a 1 Q . ` y ....„_____________ 1 . i , I4''i ®i5 L . ._ _ . .. ....__? __ _ _ ' --- $g-=-- .„- .,�......;... I,��. -, L tf i I r ®®®®®®®®®® ® ® I ®o®@®l;Io®1388081:10 0 CI +wnr rr i 11 1 :" a9ff islig : e P � 11111 � PIPP11111;J ui ii 1111 i 11 igi 11 IS 11 IS Ill iiiiiillilig4 44110/11/11 1 A I 4ill 11 1 / 1 " A ' A 2 / ' li liA ki;711 g R 9ilill ; ii 1141 12A111 1 $ . a Rel §R1 R dg Ili Odd 1011 Igill. I ! 1 l , R li III A ❑ T i ll ' Ai 41 aAl C z � ! 0 1 ; P 1 ; ; La RI €i : i I Ag, 1 , 5511g, sig !WA!I - aassaaa aaa a a as a a iii ilk iAi ;X A= i A ;.I $ ! NRP ; :11 R aaa salsa aa8f a �r � Pill 1211R8232i 23 /4223 17 227232T 'S: =s= 5 A * Al 5! 15iiII 111 ! 01 igi kr.1111 1 daa asYs s - 2 s a : c s s r. a s anat. x as s s: :. ar. a I ! ii �0 0 ; 4 4 e s 4 A ; 8 ! ; i !I !! £I 811 ! ! ! ! ii ! 11 111 I ie 2 5 1111 10 iii 1i04 iitrr i ; l it SS I ! ! StIgIST. $lo 1 5 1 ig m 91110044 . 0 14 A ! ! ! ! t! ! Ili ! sl. ! es ! ! sstlf till ! sll'4 11 , 1 _ * g� 1 5I gfiv 11 ? a ig—pArIr0 �n !1�1P PlA.i w�.i Rpt xMnfrn'�wF'pr.),w P !Pd�P - � 1 i ! R5 0 C : 0I ! 1 1 '; 1 6aae. $ 30111 WI P. i 9 ka s a s � 1,32 i _l ill p ii . ig . . 5 I ! i E Si., ' lz s' 1 q 01 ; 1 , , 9 S S „„ S S S S S S S S . S S S G G R $ R 9 9 9 9 �1R9 9 R 9 9 R R R 114 9 R 9 9 9ill L Ft Y ri y K YW Y ti Y '� N '"{ y ti g .41!111 "{ y y11 1 g Ii ! b l00013: 1 i x 0 00000 0 00 000 $ : 43 8 2 001 ll ii 1 1 ! d 8s i i! iIiii!'iii0 R Q R �x • II " 11002CUR59aa g 8 I g: 11 f ii; 11141t g_i LI P4 Iilj 8 g�i113 g."l Ili t r ° 0 it g iti) R;:t i! 5 !I t ii pill /'['I 1 R , Pd 11 a 7 p ___ - • . .. . , • • . . . • • . , PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS N MISSISSIPII STI? EET ,..art. PROPERTY LINE ---- BLDG Building BM Bonet,lAark i' CONSTRUCTOR umns -•-•- EXIST EvJactino . IT ' SiGN -•••- FFE FI:shod Floor Elev.II •I LFE Low Floor Elevation -FF - • CURB AND CUTTER MI4 Manholo ( C b NIT I' S T A TE , .-...... n41 /12 _HIGHW' .--- PER DETAIL 5/04.0 MAX Maximum '''.0 131/41piri 6 ) SAWCUT - - . / ...17.119WIMIP-. .1 a ,,, ancRETE SIDEWALK ;,":': '\)1 4;4, my;,.../raismas........- ---2,0w,.., • itpix &a. • • / RIP• PER DETAIL 4/C4.0 T.."'`..':;.: 1 •,'.1 1 1 ,........?...z.. .........-..-........CEMCLUIE....-...... . -... .. Ilb,....4:}.4 I STALL COUNT I I -1;','''..4 1. -..•':f,..;:'-.7,-,.r-*---:,-; ,F, 6,.; ,„.., .... ..P.. ... ,...-1 .1.:-.-11 . . ,.....„1 40 20 0 40 ao pr. • • BITUMINOUS • o • t'.. 7..''.;.: "'..- . .:i..,•,;.r II '.'', 1.,.."..).i' •I',. ... •.:'....,1.. o...r- ri 1...,„,7', • PER DETAIL 2/C4.0 ••-r..,.,), i SPRING VALLEY ESTATES .) 0 ...,,•:,...4.;,..,..1:....,,......,.,litt.:51.5„.i7,1.1',...t.'t.o.1r4.:/p.?,.,•,,...":'4....S.R.: '...,„,..,••••''...;,,,,q,:*.,,,,..:11,:.•,...". ..1;=. cALT. .... gi ,....,..,...,...,,,,.. .1,1i-:...,,....,3„-.3.:-.„-,r,44,,,,,J,4.2.,,,,:,... .,;., ..../..c..:„..,.....1.71.-,, , ,...,,, r,„„,,,,t 0 ..• 0,... r r-40' FRIDLEY,Mrs1 STANNOUS PARI I ,....g.gy , PP,•I' ' .T.,7>Q1.7.41.''Ar.Itr.'4.A'Ivrer.'I:I.K.7.4.; .I''. i....0..P.TN'PIre‘727.1..1.t.I:?`"'I r.,..... I- 4 PER DETAIL 3/C4.0 '''' '4•-•.'1.410:;.1%. '..••• ..• •••v. r F., .17 7' -'.'.4,•,`:f....;7 --:I. . ,i., ...,,..i....1i•i"T ,:••1-:.•': -.. y•-.."..-1;.'•'''' -• , oc: • '•••••'-':. -.12.•••:- i.:•,),;.- • ofj ••••=11;,;..•-•,,•••••::',..`FT!'.........'....L.-...' -:;.--iI.j.,:......,:.:-.L.:•:•.,-1.-L,......::1-'.-1'''..."e-'-‘••L------.,1"- i'' . • ' I ;,,,•i -•- ' .,• - ,••,, ____. ..,_-_, ...._...,.....,„ ....,.- ,: • , ..-._ ,,,77.,,,-..,:„- .,„„,-. .'f;::•'•-r--,. my rd.-'111115.-7 ..;•;;;;.:::eik7i.-1`.'"11. "411111re01 PROPOSED II, ',.:.,'.. 1 I ,4,,••••••4g-1*..kg- LC- PFE ISLE ••.....-,4:: , „, f . . ._,..:,.,. - . .... :.; E.,-htil. ',ArntirF •• t,'.......'1 ^• " :', . it •,,..,„h A,..., ==,.,-,-.4-.:. • „,-.4,40 _. t.. , SPRING VALLEY ESTATES '' • suv ma slam nr Ft Fel.' ._- . - ..11,•;•.••:4'1,, -. Fr ... vI I . . .• ''1.C4f...,'''• • .- HE 1/11.1.C.0 IRMAL rat ' v•''' .. ,k.et.41,ki--,-i'apiktil ...AESEEIESEMS Vs' '"1 I ... . ' , \I1/41:4•1'.'":;:,...;lliln,tm:stgilig Rk7:I;7.:.ilf;;-:,-,...,7,,,',air ,,,....,... m- . _.„.„,,..;.71116,' .tilzp 6.!,-,2-VI: i''.:.J.:* __A,..'•,'‘..• ' v- ' 0 . 3 . . .....4.-: .. . ...., . - ......,.,,.., 1 uS I:-.,''''..."'"'"-:...,...--,--r.....---..:7-,•...."" 11 I GENERALNOTES I . v‘• ',..-zr-, - '...- c•.:.--).Airi'fq.t.',....f.4: • tf.,,.;..4„.0,:,,c,.-er , I. ALL ONNEXIDONS AK TO FMX OF'OM MILES NOTED OTHRTNIX. a r x e If.W5 Vat '-', .., .' 1.•?r.1*,.. •••11..e... "4.I...?".,.r.f.'nl,••.e.,Vi1- , ;;;.. •:. I • 2 ALL CURB AND OUT-IER IS TO SE 551S CCOCRETE CURS AND MINI MESS NOTED R.L MN GOMM MD PRO . . . . .t..... 1.'T .0 t'• 1,••1 I '1".• ' r •• • ••du •i I 0105151SE A NO SIDELIMIX IS TO NAVE MORE WAN A EX CROSS SLOPE CIN FOX 114AN A.55 MEW COMM MOTT,OM • / 1.,'• .1.:.••:- ,4.-r..••.I.•:.•7 44, ,..•14 __________ .... _Ili,•,... ...,......... ..f.-,..,,,:t:-..•••••• ..•.,... ..r ., ,•,..z.:.,..,......4 ' ,- LONCISIUDITAL SLOPE vaz..;:nro...ANIT01.... . . • ... ---. A, 4- rat PROP0151 BOLEROS LAVUT atm To ANCHRIDDIURAL AND sneuclURAL RANI • ,k4I.., mi NAPE OT 10P .• .4 0 i •I 41111111117'7---77../.... 0. • -----17 II ill, - A I S. FOLLOW ALL CITA OF OTT Cr FROM(RC ANOKA CRAFTY NULES,RECIAATIONS MO .A.. R nom& tononcAnan WEN 11051115 N PUOUC RICHT Cr WAY. .MIRIMINSPB_ PROFIT MAX Et, bi• I . m ' \1...\,...:4::::e.' I•.%••-.• I , 1 • 6. OKI Pawn Ce WAWA TINI.IX KWIC WOE NEW PAYED:DR MATCHES WO . _._ MOM ot WM COMM PATEIABIT. -- 111-1 4-1-r i. I . LI \A.: I ,...' 3 I t c_11:- 54.11,--, 1.014111/1160 EMI ON 7. RIDER TO SIRJCIURAL PLANS FCR 111 STOOP LOCATION& COMCM 0411101U. • .11=4 T III g i. • a• 4 Lan MDK me AT 1 1 ouNr51 ORM TO ON •V I i I. I1 I -rro"'I. •-•s%' '•:. Z•?....•••'•••••.,.•a... .T...tt..?. 1.1... ... 0 I Iry-DI. . ., .:.,.•, ----......._, •-40. .. 4- ,, 4..,..s. win mons/sec MOM AS CI TO DK PTA& -"......,.....;::::....... gp , i AR • . ED POST . ai REPLACE CONCRETE CURD Je CUTTER AND PAVEWNT PER MORA COUNT,STANDARDS @T344b4d1CILliglZZIC21111=Eill affrEcruRAL WORKS - . i ".-:.-•;::-..4...: :I ' N-, • PR°Pclz° AND SPEOFICATIONS COORDINATE UVITS OF REMOVAL STIN VIE DEL/OUTION '.' 110 ..13 Emma ,r ociraucropt. NO MONO Cr WATER DI TR GLFITER 1101 BE PSFDETTELL ', ni ASIA n - ..?•-.....:, , :••••• .•.-. 4 VILLA RD , INC. .• . '4 '-' . - NOP' :'...‘,0..."-.11 ""'' ••• . .P.,- ,,-i PFEB94.0 . gji*nun ant nen=PER 141/541 caw,AND an.OF FRIDLEY s-rmomono , . k !,J.,.:::4 t'...:.:,::,...........,. ...::-.•;d. 7 LFE OM / s I act .... me ILMIWOrPa0,6%164 Vit mu IMIE NT ICIP,MK• T. Ej PQM 551511ouauryAute oarna.noc. Ir.n, .,...: 1,, . • am.NM M.MO laprGemli4iip/IN BOO 0 • . Taphim ifidtA$188 T. El MULL Mc IM PIM ARM CCITIOY pommies. I NEM 1,15N MCOMIN TO 01 MT 2,01 /0 .,T 1. .• RAMC 11111.3.10 Mit WM MD • IE 5TEN1 WAITE INFILTRATION PM ftme conlIOL POO, I 4SP II OMR 011 OLLIO MOROLIO, 111, •1.•• •••• I • i • • I t.., E.., 4.:"I: ' .'4,0 • . ...-- •;11. • . . . adp . 1 0 MAIM DICLOSURE-0051115 ARCIAlICIURAL PLAK im.5.5.55.5.5 AMIN r MP MN ACCOMOLE. rtratzsmasortraensarlunseanc.arrocsuarosr •551550MINDAMNCIIIIIMINNYZANKMUNIMIWN • • * . .4. % 11. •,;: %•, *..'1.."'1.1.;. -7-Mirainir 5.;,.,5.ii'.)5.i I, TRIM IP I MIPI TO ROI IP MPLICOM AMIXITTANAMILYLEMOMPTORMMILMMER 111 PETAPONO POLL 5555 10 ORMAN;MO FOR ELEVATIONS. 4.=........ wetartaaa.inanalraseesuranermou . • 1/4 . "r..:'.:.•;.;.:':,' -.......r: • ,. Ell a 4-it r x me ran.wx,cir, • 1' 4 . - .:'•,:::•:••••,-.' ::-.4:,.,71111111r'''.••• ' ' • .9 / i Oa"WA AKA. NEM TO ANDIDIECTURAL PLANS. I OP TO MN 0.11 MORD/01011 INIOTON 01501) • 1ON MOOR "" •• ""••'••••' III • • 011• 1 4 ..•, • '. . '••• •-•" ..: T.•'•••••:. ' lz.,,e 1 . al •anon REFER TO AROITECTURAI.PLANE r-4f 9/4tiP211441' 41111T..,.t" ,g- .. .1. if PISTALL KATLIC*FAIDONO WOK rElli FOS coo=won AT IIVOI • •01 051 HAUL PAMIOCT MOPES ARE NOT 10 DOTED XXII Mr DIRECDON IP DIE HAITSICAP 4,5 1 r.ilifj(PORNOTI MM. • • . ...,,A,.. ,.., . INEILIMININEIL 5101 RN&Mai AMMO MEAL Ion MR I . Ott , r.t•• i. 1,. i'MONMIEN - / I•I IITTLANNOUS PASI 5 TO RAM POD THE PACK Of CURB ELEVATION. ND ABRUPT I ... • 9 ' a RUM TRANSITION WAS.RE PERMITTED. . . a 1 ,MID RUM 110.0/0 COWIN il.21 S-FOOT STIVIONOUS MN IS NOT TO COXED A ES MOSS SLOPE OR A/TX NM 8'ON MOON • ' • /. J LONDTILKWIAL&OPE AT ANY 7111E NO IS TO BE INSTALLED PER ANOKA COUNTY AND g. OTT Cr FRIDLEY STANDARDS 0100 34E55IO0DOP5. r • • /' I ODICRIE MIC MOMM a ..' , ! 13 6400,etTUIRRouS PATNISNCR 70 EXCLIDAIX CROSS&OPE ORA OX LONCIITUCINAL SLOPE AT ANT ME a •SOINIFF2Bili FAXIIIIINNWINiti • I . tr AIIINISITXXON 05,81/51115/ .. ' PROPOSED . i : /cf.:, I 5 ) • 0 SOMME FENCE-KFIER TO AROITE551104.rum, Jawalli1421,4 Illersluinkadvalliti . DULOING // • •• . . • . .. 1 ,. Lj ( I ) PED SIGN AND POST: GRASS AREA PLACEMENT libmay‘t§04 ellylbalsollil ... " FFE 8114.0 • , LPE POLO / I - • . • . . iimmemod,a:0..1 / B _DI 1,11maiM.101 ra42Prisil , . Pimp CIOTO STFO,T, • .,..,,... ...". KM Paw 0119.48.04E1 1g , I ' ' E3 ! / 1 =minim GAM Parromimporn . ..71.-= • , MT . • '.I•• I fil ti I ' ' 24.15.ans..m. • P- ' / 1 . MOM IMMO . , .. . 1.11.0•14 A•Nolne•O II 1....0 N ITo Tam,.IMO Rex, , - ..................... . -............ .:'11. .,. ... 1 Siomp.op mipt Pi ini ii POSI siMI IOW a 0,=.4. k. • • . \,.••• 41 y .... '' / '---•-- ' /..f•e t.., . X -Y‘ •••••• ••g •:f-•'..' / ''' -4111. i iiiir AMENS Arid MR .. . --• lb '77'• ...4t- , . a . 6 r II • 7 N U E PR7r 1 . etel".41.111.0iftig5k . 41.PLei mono* • • . . ,. I rt.........! - el li MCC Of IMP INK OF CUPP A AWN& war (S.ROM 0'MO 1/1.01 I1.1 PLAN NEW OF RAW :• ,i pm ".:' .• VP=FOR ITTOT INil2T• • • GEOMETRIC 4.. f.,, , .• AND PAVING • TRU' AND PAVING PLAN CD ae4c'..45V lit•(MM.MR a'MU.mini JONIT Cone POPFAMIS , ... 1;t MR A MINAI CV -,/* I: • =VATS*CF RASP . RIM at OA 111 ISEN OFF OF . , • a „,.........„„„„ ...,:.1...........O.".1...,.....O.•,,,....,.. MP OR f,..4.mu -s•me.NW PLAN . , . gr...E.,..-.. ....,,i.....,....,.. !......., ....:;...; We IMMO EOM PM iiiiMt SPA TOM OM PT5 WNW PIPP?MOND) MMIM IIMINI •.1!...*:. ... fi 5.‘" 'MO -\\7.-----------;;;JIMNOLOOMMNINO. • 54:55, 5 ACONMOUr OILIVCa .. 01.4 ' MI'PraltVgitra,.'e•=ia .:.;•:0.-•:•;:•:1 :::: :.:-;; , _,,,,,,,,merena•-. am mind RN 1MOOToak wallv`satem, ,,a''lam E...aa ma1w ,,I.. •. . • rwe me I61V1.'•=•E111R..-NM1,1=1-1E-..fi..-11-l:i-1g1Win.1I1II., `,2.0, own eaUr SPtXili 'gul-1, (T-O- OeN MONNA '•••„•"•,1,I),ta,;1•tk.54•.f41M4..,..1.A)%..:!.:.,7c.A1..13.1t.47,•.;4w1.:'.,..:..;•i.•r:•,n.k.....'-.i-',-.V....••et•P.••.c•o.d.•r,,L••(.twV•.;.•.i...,.-...7.t•:r•1I;• ;•(•.N. ef4PoaQnUaA,c,LmM 55 1. 1.oet SMA TIM 41/ LLfae,r.r411:.. v . .. p * MMR CCM, • ei917.6I2-11V-nywkileffiCIts1c11ot1ft.iba1ALkA.7-t21w4a01ip.t1IM0rir11mI11aN1Mc yImNIMpt• Ofn.1M.f.Oi111gM.1M..I.N.04hZM.T.IR. 1NDO40M121.1..1.W1..-11.O.CC..O4..M.R.-Oi.l 0D 0 e. - C3#44 8.0 -41=11.-41::11=111=11=11=1 If'LAIL . • 1/.0 OT11.:5,117. .11 :--.1.11V11111r=115 - OIM.MI=.Z1I1FIL=L 11 .11ri• 1iiA1 • ‘ OOMMUCT MO we oUT1111 ISN Mt ONMO=I . :ILM111011=1 ' 05555 OIMMIMNMK O MinR WMMMACTaoma ImlIMON.II-.-II-II \ ' 000001W 01500400 KNCM054MrOAKNTN t MNRO.AIGOWHVmEEOTDOoamRlraM MRMOONM IRP O4M0M11A10OMIPlTeO.lNCiOr 0MO=1M 0MOMMNE NTO 6 A soAT 1144'fl 0.44.05 11* R,M OM IC PMMIM acrPacADDDST. .TOMNROM CMIMM AMR • 101013 PPM SRI MI wog../11 MOM=WINNAIN ----- Q44044-,94WTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT C)Aiiietes PATH SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) ORM CURB AND GUTTER gli 7.149,.'llil RAMP FOR THE HANDICAPPEQ Itirm • ...• C4.0 . . . . . . . . . . . - ANHOLE STEPS"WALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE L1Ndi COIR AROUND OFTS T VQECAL'P051011 OF CCM 5 FROND TRENCH W,%i x4•MroC . - DOWbigFla FOR ALL LINES ITP TO W CAW AETER. HS a Y--0'FROM EACH .. R-4910-CX TYPE A �. PUCE STEPS ONALL IUM)DOE O OVER.iAL7F6 END. DOVIdSTitf...tli FOR ALL LO/ES 36 AND OVER. • COY 1X- D HIM �H 554 IA` MI APPROVED HND." wNll coot Fon dew out outer • Anew 68685 Si•nRN 4286w. A Redo 8300 e�orovod .aus c•s PVC doonouN4 411:171 k R 1 5•t om of PVV It01 n• SES MARY PLAN FOR IE77FAA1 . • 'R ' owl°.lead Y trarlRtod to G65UN0 INFORMATION. .` _ g 1[.�� the We Mm. ramerif PLAN 4-H... NS a YARN 6.2,MARIAM OF 4 /\Y\\ /�/,%/�I/�I/` R� flout PON'Mrt .'-., ADJUSTMENT WIGS • /����\:� i/�7/,/i�G\ puff-01112, r e PP(To CATCH BASIN /� \�*�� \�40 �.1 1/r RASTER -' , Wo CdA ll c. COARSE DRAB OR o-„�, MA. ___leiC. ""�' SPRING VALLEY ESTATES CRUSHABOVE R REX 10 6' r a t MN' /3 CTE oaET+t1D T { WIERE SEWER RUOW STRAIGHT =a15�RAIN DETAIL • FRIDLF.Z'.MN 01115 ENE NW 4 1 g w/a2H DF STANDARD SHALL B THEPCLTo d Uwe is 9fOEN WE AFTER COMPLETION. IBM1` yJ� •R i RYAVRCED PRECAST CCHOETE g 'I DAIR COWB 1 1 • SACK OF CUR/3 -J•UNDISOADm MANHOLE SECTIONS SHALL=WORM _ . qq TO ASTR 0478 ST0WAM•• ` • SOL T •Mt.ANTS IN MAW1OLE TIE 1. y 1/6 Bond '0•RIM RUBBER mum HAVE TIE MN.CF TO TEE Ewow TYID/ I "� •.,'•., '7�1 BIDdC �- PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLUSH y N GALVANIZED ....la 1, = aI'j1�' WRI INSIDE FACE a RALE ~��ODO r SPRING VALLEY ESTATES STEEL RODS. ��R& - iiiiGROUT BOTTW W YAMIOE TO 1/2 DIAMETER . Yi*E:!Bi3;Giti:'ttt SnMer . ��,_r. a PPE AND GROPE mow r mow 1 PotACRD AS REWIRED Wn, _', MERL /3 Cu,re r x r x it g1EG64T•••• MAIM SAD THIOCIIESS 14 DEREK OMS 1- , CONCRETE RASE 2'EUlETER BY 3 - SECTION FOR POW OF DEPTH GREATER `-'0 CATCH BASIN CASTING H1WRAMT FFAI.m VCR IN LIME T11N1 14•. 1EENAH 83087 OR - -21,6d-. GRAVEL POR ALL EWA-11111 DL CR OR • NOTE - INSTALL/010K ORATE Y RADIUS ALL HYDRANT LEMS SHALL BE TED WM S/All r TE / STORM SEWER MANHOLE] CARS SOL GRAVE is DE r BELOW CUTTER 800A WO 151 4 FROM VALVE TOAI HYDRANT OR - GRADE.SLOPE GUTTER,0'EACH - •RATE MEGA-l4O 6tUW0 TIRiIFT RETAINER GN05 AT BICE TO CATCH BASH. AGATES(wwoYTA-). - T JN PAVEMENT - CMINIMUM4010,.MAXIMUM 1113 PROFIT MAX 1r= , :• : • ALLD. RAM '�- VAN 411173 INUMNIONNI kyr e I�. f1 • ♦ iia' Fl- 0:ANT DETAIL �Dw DP ���11.A'-/: :,:-**-„-.1.;:-.:r. .l•- CASTING.`O4� '�� S 1• •It1.. RIPRAP REOUIREMEFITS ERRUCT111s. . - r PD POLTSTTNENE •��'� •. r _• •• tY tY t tE CO1Nt pPE�Rµan/gpOT�SPEC 3700 • • a 4.47."..-.0-.1. �' DEPTH DEPTH LNCAeE CASiwO AND Will Q .OF OFE%IST.PIPEOM SIDESb -.•• I. i.. "•1• PROP[ L ASS I ryas al Ni,W miz ak WO s• T /L� '.11..d4:4;:::. • • WRTAR NX(SPEC T T T INCIN • ��i '2 a)Ana)tW.YL�) 2.508.28)SHALL K k, F v40,10 ,'.I 6' VI L L 1�RD I 1V 'I e. "1• � ''_ PIPE _ it 6 2• 4.1 USED FOR COLLA i.`,t {Jr r.:'r L.; t �, t - L Z1 10 L4 0.l SEt:TTt .. .3AOBIrAIMr2Wf1MSoA %,:' • - 1=n'-4 M-n n- GRANULAR MATERIAL PLAN 27 TO 611 a7 NQ1FZ8 L�DiWr2ArMI EBf e»,Sewra II-II 11 I-11=0 11 11 30 14 7.3 10.11 1.RICHT HAND ORATE DROWN 1N PLAN WEE T 11=11=11-I1 38 /8 1.2 13.5 2.RE6r01010 PRECAST COIAETE CATCH BASIN EH01DN9 , 42 18 10.11 16.3 SHALL COWRY TO ASV 0476 STANDARDS. wooaT� -. 0.4 46 2D 12.1 18,4 reasolrWursars.•6/a78 atasteVa' L. O p P OIA SEE ROTE 1 IiY/.�aAamuvACI�RAAFiRf • o ;TELAiION .nxor� � 41i), 4" PRECAST CATCH BASIN '°®�`�e��' ` ORNNUUR FILTER SEE RCM AND . SECTION A-A - listmL i MR GEES MEATIER THAN3U �eB�MI Elm,SON Rip-RAP SEE NOTE.1 2.THE tONIRACTOR AT 1116 OPTION. IMT SUBWIT TE A 0110111%76,0 . - 1• - FIRM 5IA6ET.an/00T SPEC.3801. . - H- _I. -. • 1,1�I-••• i- 3.1741111E a 5N1NULAR FILM i .. { OWeARA F0UEH I.+.A - SHW BE 1/3 185 VOLUME OF • SEE NDT[S Fir AND 3 OF RP-IMP AT ANY SNpI doNwt • • I I I I' I I PPE DRIVEL .:• • . . • SECTION B-B _'- - •_ Ai�/tdrs0e MSr1.hsallri rM1 ' L0J-o I `. i F� T FLARED ENDS (Mn/ OT STD. PLATE 37330) "• I L" - C0 N�TD SCALE �' �;• I i4. I• I 1 +'S 1r D.C. LBD roma,3 „ & LDAG FADTaIl 6{ l,Nlf WWI 0001001BaMd. gtlFJ 'EACH WAY ` eeememiewro' mem WWI elonewolle. • I .. I-1-.rt-..r_,I _ YXrwDE XEYWAT ` �`�.1"�`� `�""`\ ` �1L,:- "° �)� ' �[�� cataenelwldlw • • • �. r 711 \ \ �� Haar 1� /I/ +_3 �e i" Pee°+ On RRowan • INTBAFFLE O mu. w �`,/�/iiii1 \fj1 , ��►r%�/iiii//// `` r 11 �t ®mom re.�r . DRILL 8 GROUT DOWUS %`!� \�/ ` . ■AW rr.a _ - 1 • R4TO \ 4 / Ti w.r Aerar•.+.rr aPm.b.F B®I Bn.Do Lt 1 L i J WALL aN. ✓ / %�\\ CWWII // PLAN-Dv Rvm RAN-72 1/2'RENO � pF /iUPI N4 LL �` /iiOj-` s1 Fa...r.�rMr.ww.Aw..rew.A f!a17.DOWELS `I, �i 501,/.l'\ """ ostige�n. z, -%si,... ,r =Lam CALL r _ ammo=nr CYR�7TTF1F RAFFLE ORIFICE /NFR SECTION CONCRETE RAFFLE NOR/ORIFICE PIAN VIM - O.G �1�RST .".:4'41.1 's•. 7 r1`;1;-,:T'n Ts-,:„.i,, ' aNi.aNwTIM .64;1011110wnl y,,.m! Acid NM 1.11.1 -•T+i .i,, •-a A ii,„&ip-441. • _ CLASS C-1 COME >PEG 84112 • _ ._,. tl 11 NVO aRPkD FROM N q W �..� oL� n/j POND RETAINING WNW- r ,�• 40108c ST ILPS • a - • UC6TRtgD. AJCL_ KW �g�Q - FCAn�69F� `� �' 'I C/�/LOLIMUL 'SC twcSR WitRE 11.CTION A-A PL"AN-•S•KENO DETAILS T - N6FRRE ORIFICE/WEIR . OIENS10N3 ON TABLE ARE BASED ON A WATER PRESSURE OF 160 P,SL ..579.6 .. COPACim GOCDTL L NMOthIEAll 0ARTh1 DIAMOND 811 URE MOWN TOMOM AREAMIE 0 •r //�\�\�\\```�i` =MERFERNIFDM BOL7S�A8 IMiDC A8 I05461C W1MWT . NORMAL WATER ELEV. • ,!W{LJ. W POND_675.0 , INV.EIEV.•87DA 4 SHAPE 0/BACK OF SU771E75 MAT VARY AS ICAO AES PWR 5 AGAINST - JK« R likl.st::!,''''' �a1 ��^ i 'i FnaE.uNDSWG1aD EARn+t 1' .. 1 tx D RCP '..t \// `yr N ¢ d T`//-/ Memo ' TrmIL :ell: I'WwT., DDIC-Ns S� F 0344$.00 PDNO OUTLET ' /ORM r-r r-r 1-r Tf-e'4 r-r r-r a.In4r /' - %t\ r-r rr r-r r.! r� 1•a\‘'....1,4`,,,,,c47/!,,,%!. ��� L '-• rI-V I-.V r-V i r is • _ • //\4//O�r"rI' rte• r rr-rr-rr... r-r5015 a - ' ,.. 4 A • -r/• CURET EL.577. y� _\\\\\\,\ 4-r_sir V-.r V-Ir V-r r-r [/�_ ELEV._575:00 - -"4-001<rPS an=NMEIENielv 5.0 •4, W R1IOF Pit PVT: PIPE BEDURI0.IN YR10Ft 904,S P STRUCTURE PIPE BEDDING RU OCK DETAIL • i�III F LI C: t \iii Oil ec 73 MI! Ou ,41[ E 1 R x 1 ,1111 III 4 lis; i iiip .. . r,, IR 1 5,4 tiljtd1 I I iiii -I-, pit li it; IIF 1 11 ii ;i1 11 n n yJ' 1 it ii 1 If 1 L] cJ iN 1 . _ . _ I i ' -'—' -- \ : ,,• Ye r ✓ K r r' r r r r r r r r Y L r r , r r r C r r C Y r r r r r e- e r r r C r r r r r .e '-1 r r C C , r . ,V . C r r - r e C S" = C C 6. ,9 /r �✓4c r Y C' . r .V\� r r C r r.t • br r C_ r r r •:' r r C r r N r r _ r r ". P. r' r K 4 . e r r r. r r r r > r r e t If r r•4 C r r C r r r r r r 0 e e r r r C r r r K r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r C r r r r r >r r r rr r �). r r r r r M r e r r r r r • - r r r r ✓ r r r e r ' ' r r r r r r rr ~ r r r e ✓ r r r 7 r r . e r r r r . - e r r r r CO r r r r • r r r Ir Y r e en . r r r r . r r ' r r r r r r r r r r z r r r N r e' e �l! , • c Y C r r r - , r. r p�,, C ^ \ r e s (0 r r r(/}) . - e' 1 1 1 err <-4- r P r r .,�j'- , r - O r r r 1 ^ y G� r r r r r r r UI w rrrr _ - rrr CO / r r r r r r r MIQ C r rISI K r C Q - e' r ¢ -0 r r . 1 ✓ r 2j r r r ✓ rIle `g 1 r r EN.) �� r r r ✓ 4 �. r r j ,11. Mr r . l r es, ., _ rrrwr , il r C r r r C r r r r r r r r r , • r r C " r r r r II• V cF P 7-- _____ • T �. ZPTg ' 4 t .� � Fi41a A illi I tp p0 S r 11 n tri rn •7' N H 0. Illy - z 0co rn1 / >> CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 2004 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Barb Johns, Larry Kuechle, Dave Kondrick, Diane Savage, Dean Saba LeRoy Oquist, Brad Dunham Others Present: Stacy Stromberg, Planner Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Rick Harrison, Site Design Studio, 8832 7th Ave. N., Golden Valley Pete Villard, Architectural Works-Villard, 5770 Blackshire Path, Inver Grove Heights Michael Spack, TDI Inc., 1313 5th Street SE, Minneapolis Ken and Pat Christiansen, 7525 4th Street Steve Oltman, 7542 5th Street Gregory Zelenak, 7526 4th Street Barbara Edwards, 1403 64th Avenue Kurt and Andrea Olson, 1385 64th Avenue J & R Rusinak, 6412 Piece Street Jesse Colllard, 1426 64th Avenue Aimee Stanford, 1426 64th Avenue Russell and Beverly Prior, 1340 Mississippi Street Herb and Judy Lennox, 1464 Rice Creek Road Joe and Linda Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue Shanti Van Buren, 7550 4th Street Roland and Karen Evans, 7558 4th Street Virgil and Susan Okeson, 1423 64th Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Frank DeMello, 6134 Woody Lane Robert Tumms, 1346 Hillcrest Drive Harold Johnson, 1334 Hillcrest Drive Garland and Jane Lagesse, 7951 Broad Avenue Tim Byrne, 6053 Woody Lane Mark and Jean Swartz, 1372 64th Avenue Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street Mark Mattison, 6421 Central Avenue Donna Reisner, 6424 Pierce Street Daryl Wolf, 6446 Arthur Street Doreena Aisewski, 7534 4th Street Terry Miller, Vandias Heights Sue Rau, 1341 64th Avenue Inge Eyler, 1456 64th Avenue Kevin and Paulette Holman, 571 79th Way Flo Jackson, Spring Lake Park School District John Zurek, Spring Lake Park School District John Kvidera, 7517 4th Street Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 3 Rezoning Ms. Stromberg stated that the petitioner is requesting a rezoning and master plan approval for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. Ms. Stromberg stated that rezoning a property to S-2 Redevelopment District, requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. If the rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Council any modification of the site plan would need to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Review of the master plan would also need to be completed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the property is in a Redevelopment District. Ms. Stromberg stated the City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...It is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision': In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed retail complex, senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the properties meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified,as an area for future redevelopment. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. Ms. Stromberg stated that the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". Ms. Stromberg stated that the Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". Ms. Stromberg stated that as Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for "empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 5 PJat Ms. Stromberg stated that Mr. DeMello is also seeking to replat the properties located at 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the retail complex and the other lot will be used to allow for the construction of a 71-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. Ms. Stromberg stated that the proposed Lot#1 will accommodate the 13,420 square foot retail complex. Retail complexes like the one proposed are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 62,690 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for the number of parking stalls required for a retail use. Ms. Stromberg stated that the proposed Lot#2 is approximately 116,658 square feet (2.68 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 71 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 45 feet at the midspan. Ms. Stromberg stated early discussions with Anoka County indicated they anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Due to necessity of right-of-way acquisition, the parking setback for the retail space will be 2 feet from the north and west property lines. The parking setback on the senior condominium complex will also be 2 feet from the west property line. Due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. Ms. Stromberg stated that the petitioner hired Maxfield Research Inc., to complete a Market Feasibility Study for Senior Housing in Fridley. The demographic and competitive market analysis done by Maxfield indicates that there is a demand in the Fridley area for 189 for-sale housing units. Maxfield's research pointed out that given the competitive situation in the marketplace, the quality of the subject site, and the lack of for-sale product within three miles of the property, the senior condominium project would be the most marketable product for the site. Their research also showed that the subject site could best support an age-restricted owner- occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. Ms. Stromberg stated the City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles/day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. Ms. Stromberg stated that Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 7 Ms. Stromberg stated that during the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Ms. Stromberg stated that staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewing history showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat number PS#04-01, with the following stipulations. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A-5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 11. Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13. A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16. Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. 17. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 9 landscaping. The existing trees will be removed and a double row of a mixture of evergreen trees will be added along the east property line to serve as screening for the neighborhood and as an attractive background for the senior housing residents. Mr. Villard stated the existing site is comprised of three drainage areas. There are currently no storm water quality treatment measures on the site. The proposed plan indicates a 35% reduction in the amount of storm water runoff on the site as compared to the present conditions. A large majority of storm water runoff is designed to flow to the south versus ponding along the east side of the property. There will be no negative impacts are anticipated for the adjacent property owners to the east. Mr. Saba asked Mr. Villard why they haven't considered completing the path around the structure as part of the site. Mr. Villard stated that initially they didn't want to have path but did put the path in to accommodate people coming from the southwest and not having to come up the roadside and meandering through the site to go to the retail area. It is not a problem to extend the path along the driveway to hook up with Mississippi Street. Mr. Saba urged Mr. Vallard to complete the path around the both structures. Mr. Kondrick stated that a good percentage of the 71 units might have two cars each and asked how the 73 underground stalls and 30 surface parking stalls compare to other senior structures. Mr. Villard stated that they try to achieve between 1-1/4 and 1-1/2 cars per stall in independent living. There are a few one-bedroom and one-bedroom den units and usually people would have one car at that point. The 103 parking stalls averages about 1.45 car stalls per unit. Mr. Kondrick asked about visitor parking. Mr. Villard stated that visitor parking is included and is in front of the main entry way. The plan exceeds the city's district zoning requirements for parking which is 1 to 1. Mr. Villard stated there are nine different types of units from 825 square feet to 1,610 square feet. The unit prices would range from approximately $150,000 for the one bedroom unit to approximately$250,000 for the three bedroom units. Mr. Villard stated the retail building is a single story 13,000 square foot building with between 1- 5 tenants maximum. The interior space will have 14 to 16 foot high spaces. Mr. Harrison stated he was a suburban planner and his firm has done over 400 developments in 32 states and 5 countries. Mr. Harrison stated that all the units have a quality view. The retail building architect wraps around three sides creating a warm view from outside the senior units. Ms. Savage asked if and how the type of business would be controlled. Mr. Villard stated that the price of the retail dictates the level of retail companies that could afford the space. Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 11 putting on the addition. He does not want a tall building looking into his back yard and is not for this project. He stated the residents should have a say in what the comprehensive plan of Fridley should be. Mr. Mark Mattison of 6421 Central owns one of the lots being redeveloped. The property was purchased in 1992 because he knew the area would eventually be redeveloped. He had spoken to the City several times about constructing townhomes and that the city wanted to redevelop that area because it is a differently plotted area. He cannot split his one-acre lot even though the house sets on a C-1 and the back half of the lot is R-1. The house has no basement and does not fit into the building code where every house should have a basement. This is an excellent time for the city to consider redeveloping this area. Mr. Joe Nelson of 1357 64th Avenue stated his home is one which will not be destroyed but moved. He stated he is about 16 months away from retirement and a couple of months away from being old enough to live in this development. Neither the city nor the developer forced me to sell my home but I openly negotiated with the developer for the sale of the home. Ms. Joan Olson of 6320 Van Buren stated this was spot zoning. It is doubtful that the $500 fee for the rezoning application covers the cost of staff time and it is adding insult to injury to expect the taxpayers to pick up the tab for the balance for staff time not covered by the application fee. Ms. Jean Schwartz of 1372 64th Avenue stated prior to purchasing their home 18 years ago, they had looked at other areas but when they checked the zoning around the homes, they chose their property because the homes they preferred had apartment buildings close by. They were OK with the zoning as it currently is. She stated that the Commission is sending out the message that no neighborhood is safe from this happening to them. Ms. Andrea Olson of 1385 64th Avenue stated that they were promised this would not happen. People are not in interested in this happening to their neighborhoods. When are you going to listen to the people of Fridley. Ms. Beverly Prior of 1340 Mississippi Street stated that her husband cannot mow the lawn or shovel anymore and a home like this would be perfect for them. This is a wonderful deal to help the elderly people out. Ms. Susan Okeson of 1423 64th Avenue stated she lives four houses from the proposed project. She agreed the area needed to be spruced up but stated they don't need to exchange residential areas and make them into high density housing and add additional retail space since there is retail space close by that is already struggling. This project is not a good fit for the neighborhood. The neighborhood no longer has trust in their civic government to be comfortable with rezoning the plot and let the City decide what will happen to this area. Mr. Mark Schwartz of 1372 64th Avenue stated when he purchased his property it was zoned R- 1 and had looked at other zoning in the area. He has a passion for hockey and would like to put in a hockey rink on his land, would the rules be changed for that? Probably wouldn't but it is OK to change the rules for this project. That's not right, it is not good for the neighborhood. The core of the city is your neighborhoods and this breaks up that core. Ms. Sue Rau of 1341 64th Avenue stated they have lived in their home for 29 years and their home is one that has been purchased. John has done an excellent job in designing this and would be a great benefit for the area because it is getting run down. There are only two homes Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 13 Ms. Johns stated she also agreed with this project. The petitioner has tried to accommodate some of the issues that the neighborhood brought forward to them. Fridley needs to continue redeveloping areas to not remain stagnate. Ms. Savage stated she also agreed with this project and that it is good for the community. Mr. Dunham stated he liked the project but did not like the size of it. He stated he is not necessarily for the project because of the height and is also concerned about the parking. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kuechle to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning, ZOA#04-01 by Profitmax Inc., to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business, and R-1, Single Family to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, with the following stipulations: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A-5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 11. Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16. Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. 17. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18. Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. .Manning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 15 . 17. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. - 18. Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Conside tion of Special Use Permit SP 04-02, by Kevin & Paulette Holman, to construct a detach garage in their rear yard, which is located in the Flood Fringe District, generally I Gated at 571 79th Way NE. MOTION made by r. Saba, seconded by Ms. Johns, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VO E, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED U ANIMOUSLY, AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 10:12 P.M. Ms. Stromberg stated th t Kevin and Paulette Holman, are seeking a special use permit to construct a detached gar a in their rear yard which is located at 571 79th Way. Their property is located in the CRP-2, Fl od Fringe District. No structures or buildings can be constructed in the CRP-2, Flood Fringe Di trict, without a special use permit. Ms. Stromberg stated the pr erty is located east of the Mississippi River, with the home fronting on 79th Way. The pr erty is zoned, R-1, Single Family as are the properties to the west, north and east. The pro erty to the south of the subject property is a public park. The existing home was constructed 'n 1962. A garage has never existed on this site. Ms. Stromberg stated City Code tates that no buildings or structures can be placed within the CRP-2, Flood Fringe District, unle s a special use permit is granted. The proposed structure must be designed and certified by registered engineer or architect as being in compliance with applicable building codes, including ederal standards for flood proofing. The petitioner has submitted all the necessary informati n needed to meet these requirements, including a certificate of survey, and the elevation and structural notes on the proposed structure Ms. Stromberg stated that on this partic ar property, there can be no living area below 823.8 feet in elevation. The proposed garage s b will be located at 821 feet in elevation. A garage is allowed to be below the required elevation or living area because it's uninhabitable (not living space) space. The foundation, footing and arage slab have all been engineered to meet FEMA requirements. The garage floor is als designed to drain. The garage slab will be located at 821 feet in elevation, the top of the lock elevation will be 823.8 feet, and the wood garage structure will start above the 823.8 feet levation. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed garage meet all setback and lot coverage requirements. The petitioners have also submitted a variance req est to increase the size of a first accessory \ February 11, 2004 titiR 'R i k, To: Fridley City Council From: Residents of the City of Fridley Re: Rezoning and Plat Request for a 71 unit housing development and retail complex by Profitmax We,the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed rezoning and plat request by Profitmax,consisting of a senior high-rise,high density housing development and retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 2 lots on Central Avenue, and 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue NE. We oppose this due to the removal of 6 single family houses, rezoning R-1 single family land,the size and scale of the housing development, a double-sided retail complex with outdoor eating area,the volume of traffic and noise it would produce, drainage issues, and the resulting decrease in property values in the surrounding area. Respectfully submitted: NAME ADDRESS tf::‹. 4-"TkZiarjvi,ST4. ./)/i 2. 6gtA....0.,r_A 3.:og),‘26,4-4,74<.) \-1.--5-,'5(2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 7)(j-D-Q, ///64.1;tif February 20,2004 Mayor Scott Lund; City of Fridley Dear Mr. Mayor: I am writing to you to express my concerns over the proposed"ProfitMax"Develpment located on the east side of Central Ave. between 64th Av and Mississippi. First, I must tell you that the neighborhood is not opposed to redevelopment of the area. However, having said that,the neighborhood is opposed to the type of plat and plan that was passed by the Planning Commission on February 18th. Redevelopment"according to the Fridley Comprehensive Plan" does not mean large multi-storied buildings lining Central Avenue. I believe the sheer height and size(70+units)of the building placed in the area is enough to seriously consider turning down this proposal. A 50+unit apartment type senior building, Town Center Development, located directly across Central Ave., was just recently given the okay by the City. This was after they took off one story. This intersection does not have to hold all the highrise type senior living in the"Fridley Region". 120+units total for this small area is too much. There is not enough green space for that many people and the parking provided is very inadequate for both projects. The only people that gave positive testimonials or comments at the Feb 18th Planning Commission were selling their homes for the project. I think that there are a number of alternatives that would be welcomed by the neighborhood and by the seniors of Fridley.Many "55+" relocators will also be looking for the first step of leaving the family home and that would be a luxury town home or high-end condo situation, not going directly to an"independent living facility". This could be a chance to change a neighborhood for the better. Secondly,we need a developer with the fmancial backing to do the whole project and we should not have to be worried that poor studies and planning could leave this project stranded in a half done situation or worse. If this parcel seriously needs to be redeveloped,have it done with a experienced contractor that can see the whole project through. This would be the very first project done by this developer. Lastly,just because a person comes to the Planning Commission and the City Council to say that this is the only type of building that he can make enough money to make it worthwhile is a huge mistake. The city is not responsible for his making money.Don't let someone from outside of Fridley tell you what is best for this neighborhood or Fridley. Also, Mr Demello and his team, in their first public appearance, left doubts with their name calling and degrading of houses and other commercial buildings in the immediate area. Thank you for listening and for your support. Barbara Edwards 1403 64th Ave NE Fridley,Mn 55432 763-572-3855 at m- ideAriA ' - cc:Fridley City Council members MAR 16441-"e4- March 2,2004 Honorable Scott Lund,Mayor of Fridley On Monday March 8t',you are scheduled to receive a proposal and decide on the future of a portion of the Old Central corridor. Profit Max has done something that no other developer has been able to do in our neighborhood and that is to unite all property owners in one common goal to improve and revitalize a key section of the Fridley community. I have owned and lived at my current address of 1357 64th Ave.NE for thirty years. When my wife and I moved into our home, we knew the condition of the property and neighborhood based on a quick visual check of the immediate neighborhood. The property was low and had potential water problems due to the high water table and no storm water system. The buildings around it,with the exception of two other homes built in 1974,were all built in the 40s and 50s. My property is located three houses East of Old Central and a short block away from Mississippi, two county highways. Undeveloped easements and properties surrounded our property, and we assumed that at some point in the future the properties around us would be upgraded and utilized. My assumption was an apartment building would be built. Although this was not my choice, I did not own the surrounding property and I knew that those property owners may choose to make use of their property in a fashion that best fit their needs. To my surprise and benefit, the properties have not changed in appearance much at all in thirty years time. I say,"to my benefit,"because it has provided me, at the expense of the property owners, a secluded lot. The old homes, low property, land filled lots and unused commercial property has remained the same. The failure of this proposal may, in fact,seal the fate for redevelopment for another 30 years. You now have an opportunity to change this property from what it is, into a redevelopment project with the blessings of all eight property owners. We are all in agreement and dedicated to making a positive change for ourselves and for the City. I doubt you will ever have all players, including the land owners and a well-organized developer with national and international planners and designers on board to carry out a plan such as this, a plan that has been recommended by both the City Staff and the City Planning Commission. My wife and I are selling our property, not because we are being forced out by a developer or by the city. We have freely negotiated the sale and purchase of replacement housing. This allows us an opportunity to sell our undervalued property and move to a retirement home that will provide us an opportunity that I feel I will never have again. We are scheduled to close on the sale of our current home April 1,2004 and scheduled to close on the purchase of our new home April 15,2004. Time is of the essence for us and the failure of this project will leave us in a position where we would lose our earnest money and the new home we have built. When you make your decision this Monday, think of the opportunities it provides the current land owners, the City, County and, school district regarding tax income. Consider the 71 retirement families that will have new maintenance-free housing,and the new families that will move in to fill their vacant homes. I would appreciate your consideration and welcome your thoughts regarding the fate of this project. Please feel free to call me,either at home,763-571-3317,or via my cellular phone after 12:00 Noon at 612-281-4220. Sincerely, Joe Nelson 1357 64th Ave. NE Fridley,MN 55432 b,S/b'/L004 1Z;SCI rytvunn L.0 nw 1 Lr i 7 r OJJ r 11G0 r �•��� ��� COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD.NW, • ANDOVER '•" ,MINNESOTA 55304 763-862-4200 FAX 763-862-4201 ANOKA. j C OJNTY r Al Date: , ' 5-19q- • Number of pages including Header. _j_. DELIVER TO: FROM: NAME: JC-67T 7-hGK,04 NAME: j SE ORGANIZATION: • TITLE L- fil/ D he-I b LE/ � F4 £!J6-. a6-4, FAX NO. 76 5r) - 1 a. 7 l TELEPHONE; 763-862-423 RE: e. _b E 6 16►J — SPA tJ Er VkL-Ly5� TitrE Comments: 17/3/05/4J04 1n:Db HNUKH LU rIWY Uri -, v rbJo r11LC r nu.»C trr�c 1� `1. COUNTY OF ANOKA ,.q ,;,T, ! 'r'; i, ' • Public Services Division • ., ; fir , ' I HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ;�,: 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 ^•.r''' 1,1- ,, ; (763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201 pal.- r, ,0-A,../,,. ,i'r' 4 :..":,.. .i ''',1',, • • • ,.: f ILE C9 '1 January 27 2004 Stacy Stromberg City of Fridley , 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 RE: Redesign -Spring Valley Estates . • Dear Stacy, We have reviewed the redesigned site plan for Spring Valley Estates, to be located on the southeast quadrant of CSAH 35.(Central Ave.) and CR. 106(Mississippi St.)within the City of Fridley, and I offer the following comments. • Additional right of way along CSAR 35 and CR. 106 willbe required for future reconstruction purposes. While other portions of CSAH 35 have been reconstructed within a 100ft. corridor, it is anticipated that a 120f,right of way corridor will be required for the CSAH 35/CR 106 intersection in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for safety and operational purposes, whenever the intersection were to become signalized. At this point, it is assumed that whenever the CSAR 35/CR 106 intersection is reconstructed in the future, it would be centered in the 120ft.right of way corridor. Consequently,the roadway right of way dedication needs for this site are 30ft.adjacent to CR.106,and . . 10ft. adjacent to CSAH 35. The right of access along CSAH 35 and CR 106 (with exceptions for approved access locations)shall be dedicated to Anoka County. It appears that there are severe deficiencies for the Sight Corners for both proposed access locations, and the obstructions include trees/bushes;and exi.stingstructures. It appears that the clearing and the removal of the existing structures associated with this development will eliminate some of the obstructions. However, the obstructions to the east of the proposed access on CR106 are located outside of the limits of this development The City/Developer shall clear and/or grade so that all applicable Intersection Sight Distance Requirements are satisfied to the fullest extent possible for this development. This should include at a minimum, some effort toward negotiations with the adjacent landowners in an attempt to clear obstructions that are. located outside of the limits of this development, The trees and plantings shown on the landscaping plan along CSAH 35 and CR 106 on the site plan that willbe located within the sight corners shall be eliminated and no new sight obstructions (signs, plantings, etc.) shall be introduced at the access points in conjunction with this development Please note that no plantings or business signs will be permitted within the county right of way. Care must be exercised when locating signs/plantings/berms/etc. outside the county right of way,so as not to create sight obstructions. • Affirmative Action!Equal Opportunity Employer 's'+{ la.V I7D/LUU4 1D;DW h'IIVUN•1 l.0 rIW T Yr I 7 f OJ:.J f 11tD f 111.J.D74 tYY.14 • It should be noted that residential land use adjacent to highways will usually result in complaints regarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this Iocation could exceed Noise Standards established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Anoka County policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing county highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures, The City and/or the Developer should assess the noise situation and take any action deemed necessary to minimize associated impacts at this site from any traffic noise. Access permits and permits for work within the county right of way are required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction(Access permit=$150.00 each;Permit for work within the county right of way = 5110.00 for each affected roadway), License Permit Bonding, methods of construction, design details for turn lane construction, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow-up inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator, or Josie Scott, Permit Technician, for further information regarding the permit process. Installation of permanent traffic control devices deemed necessary within the county right-of-way for this proposed development.will be coordinated, installed, and maintained by this department as part of the permit process. • Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely. • � I •I - K.Rose Trac Engineering Manager xp CSAH 35+CR106/PLATSt2004 Mike Kelly,Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Holum,County Surveyor Roger Butler,Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott,Permit Technician Tom Hornsby,Traffic Services Supervisor- Signs "7J/YJJ/G✓.kJ•'1 J.....I•...ICJ r t',j rt l.ii rive I l.+r I -, 7Iv.J.....I iGv1 .— i 4 a t i • • 1 UJ dJ I' .0 t. , r� e 611 ' lil vi o . 1 I ..ril l;l ,„ N i a aEcdni ,;.I up d ca c : � , L, t•' , cr � � ,,,, Ir 111 lt, .q E c PI �� C, Y! 1 to o .- . „: te, . a'a;r ill .. g11) i 7. -• ---_,.---,__._._...,_,..___ ii,2)y_ctfack'.) :.ri 'HH :7;:.. 14 , i 6",,,:t,,, ICC i D., ti I �s II •b I• tu n !4) U .N l.a:' I 1 tif , 1, ,. . City of Fridley,Minnesota Page 1 of 1 R T �� 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 1 (763)571-3450 RAytesehr Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420019 STREET ADDRESS: 1340 MISSISSIPPI ST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 15 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project PID Seq Project Name Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $148.91 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 3000002600 00 W/S 20 10/3/1961 $1,903.37 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $598.75 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPlN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420019 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420020 STREET ADDRESS: 1314 MISSISSIPPI ST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 16 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project PID Seq Project Name Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/5ewer 15 12/31/1960 $192.73 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 3000002600 00 W/S 20 10/3/1961 $3,233.97 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $128.82 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $526.19 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid I Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420020 3/17/2004 _ City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 Fru u6431Fidley,MA55.N2 Fridley,MN 55432 IP /�'./ (763)571-3450 l{LiJ7/tPSi+t�z Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420021 STREET ADDRESS: 6134 WOODY LN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 17 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project PID Seq Project Name Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $148.65 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $128.82 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3300196400 00 W/S-S 15 9/28/1964 $467.82 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 01 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $1,042.62 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 00 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $177.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $115.26 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420021 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 . i„„„, ,,,,v F, D.: ,T 6431 University Ave.NE LD Fridley,MN 55432 N // e (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420022 STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 18 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $339.82 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $142.50 6.00°k $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3300196400 00 W/S-S 15 9/28/1964 $517.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 01 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $1,140.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 00 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $177.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $75.48 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420022 3/17/2004 . City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 rip FEW 6431 University Ave.NE (763)571-3450 �irr� Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420023 STREET ADDRESS: 6421 CENTRAL AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 19 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $341.69 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $142.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3300196400 00 W/S-S 15 9/28/1964 $517.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 01 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $1,140.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 00 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $177.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420023 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 iiiiipAFRDLEy 6431 Universitty Ave.NE Fridley, 55432 -,/{limn,;;;v (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420024 STREET ADDRESS: 6401 CENTRAL AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 20 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Se1er 15 12/31/1960 $213.57 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 3000004800 01 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $551.02 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 00 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $1,177.05 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $142.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196818 00 ST 10 9/15/1969 $172.80 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $900.00 6.50% $300.00 $60.00 $23.40 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420024 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 FRJJJLEY 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 fiihzrtcs'vf�r (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420025 STREET ADDRESS: 1357 6411-1 AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 20 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/5ewer 15 12/31/1960 $106.78 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 01 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $623.20 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 00 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $277.60 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 600019681B 00 ST 10 9/15/1969 $266.40 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.nm.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420025 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 FFRDLEy 6431 Fniversity A5 .N2 Fridley,University MN 55432 (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420026 STREET ADDRESS: 1341 64TH AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 20 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $106.78 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 3000004800 01 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $623.20 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 00 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $277.60 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 600019681B 00 ST 10 9/15/1969 $266.40 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.Fidley.nm.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420026 3/17/2004 f AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2004 CITY OF FRIDLEY Date: March 3, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager fite From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-32 INTRODUCTION John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting a plat to create two new parcels from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. A 13,420 square foot retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of 71 senior condominiums. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for PS #04-01. After receiving public comment and a brief discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of plat request, PS #04-01, with the 22 stipulations as presented. THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 6 TO 1 VOTE. Since the February 18, 2004, the petitioner has submitted a new site plan. The new site plans shows the walking path allow the east side of the property connecting to the walking path along Mississippi Street. It also shows a new parking layout for the commercial complex, which meets the parking requirements and also provides an area for proof of parking, if more parking is ever needed. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION City Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of the preliminary plat request. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. City of Fridley Land Use Application ZOA#04-01 & PS #04-01 February 18, 2004 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: 1941 — Lot is platted. Profitmax Inc. House constructed prior to 1949. John DeMello 1951 —Garage built. 2872 17th Terrace NW 1959—Addition to house. New Brighton MN 55112 1975— Detached garage built. Requested Action: 6421 Central Avenue: Rezone property from C-1, C-2, and R-1 to S-2. 1941 — Lot is platted. Replat House and garage built prior to 1949. Location: 6441 Central Avenue: 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Vacant Lot. Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central 1941 — Lot is platted. Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central 1969— Proposal to build a Tastee-Freez. Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, 1357 64th Avenue 1998—Rezoning request from C-1 to R-1, Existing Zoning: withdrawn prior to Planning Commission. 1314 Mississippi St. —C-2, General Business 6461 Central Avenue: 1340 Mississippi St. — R-1, Single Family Vacant Lot 6401 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business 1941 —Lot is platted. 6421 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1341 64th Avenue: R-1, Single Family 1941 —Lot is platted. 6441 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1974— House and garage are built. R-1 Single Family 1985—SUP issued, second accessory is built. 6461 Central Avenue—C-2, General Business 1994—Deck is built. 1357 64th Avenue: 1341 64thAvenue— R-1, Single Family 1357 64th Avenue— R-1, Single Family 1974—House and garage are built. 1985 - Deck is built. Size: 1988—Side yard setback variance granted, Approximate size of entire area to be rezoned garage addition built. and replatted: Legal Description of Property: 179,348 sq. ft. 4.1 acres 1314 Mississippi Street: Existing Land Use: Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Single Family homes, small commercial 1340 Mississippi Street: building (garage), and vacant land Lot 15, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: 6401 Central Avenue: N: Commercial building & C-2 Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition E: Single Family& R-1 6421 Central Avenue: S: Single Family homes & C-1 and R-1 Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition W: Vacant land and Restaurant& S-2 6441 Central Avenue: Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Comprehensive Plan Conformance: 6461 Central Avenue: Future Land Use Map designates this area as Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Redevelopment. 1341 64th Avenue: Zoning History: The W 75 ft of E 184 ft of lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, 1314 Mississippi Street: subj to ease of rec 1941 — Lot is platted. 1357 64th Avenue: 1952— House is built. The W 75 ft of E 109 ft of Lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, subj to ease of rec 1959— Detached garage built. 1340 Mississippi Street: Council Action /60 Day Date: 1941 —Lot is platted. City Council —March 8, 2004 House and garage constructed pre-1949. 60-Day Date—March 15, 2004 6401 Central Avenue: 2 Rezoning and Plat SUMMARY OF REQUEST The petitioner, John DeMello, of Profitmax Inc., is requesting to replat and rezone the properties located at 1314 Mississippi St., 1340 Mississippi St., 6401 Central Ave., 6421 Central Ave., 6441 Central Ave., 6461 Central Ave., 1341 64th Ave., and 1357 64th Ave., from C-1, Local Business, C-2 General Business, and R-1 Single Family to S-2 Redevelopment District for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of this plat, rezoning and subsequent master plan request. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. • • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. ■ Provides additional job opportunities. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg I ZOA#04-01 & PS#04-01 OVERVIEW The requests: John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units and a retail complex on the southwest corner of Central Avenue and Mississippi Street. The two actions being requested area Plat and a Rezoning, all; with the master plan approval will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. A 13,420 retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of the 71 senior condominiums. rcial and The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of comme residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. Ott, ,c _ {. .., ,, '- ' .. fi ,{ ' F a`. f` "„y,„_ 8* i{ e�4 9 7 � I. 9A }'fy "xgg� :� y} Vi.: •} } lit4 TTN I dJ "r a , x4a61,34.41 ,..:117.4: R�x : i ;R �M . ry ra ':'7 7+sNf 'S y !::*4 Gi :fit'17; � per. , ' z» Proposed Project: John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is proposing to construct a 13,420 square foot retail complex on the north portion of the development. The petitioner has stated that he envisions that this complex will house neighborhood retail businesses, which may include a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an ice cream/sandwich shop and a hair salon. The retail complex will include at least 54, 10 foot wide parking stalls for customers. The petitioner is proposing a 4-story 71-unit independent senior condominium complex for the southern portion of the development. The proposed 71 units will be owner-occupied and comprised of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units. There will be four 1-bedroom units that will be 845 square feet in size and eight 1-bedroom units with a den, 1,020 square feet in size. There are fifty-six 2 bedroom and 2-bedroom plus den units planned that will vary 1 in square footage from 1,157-1,515 in size. There will be three 3-bedroom units that will be 1,610 square feet in size. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. The petitioner plans to model the exterior of both projects after an Italian villa. The site will include several ponds, a gazebo, and a trail system with landscaping that surrounds the property. SITE HISTORY The proposed development area is located on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue. The area consists of 2 vacant lots, which are located on Central Avenue and 4 homes that were constructed prior to 1952, 2 of which are located on Mississippi Street and the other 2 are located on Central Avenue. The 2 existing homes on 64th Avenue were constructed in 1974. The petitioners' father, Frank DeMello purchased the vacant parcel located 6461 Central Avenue, 25 years ago. When the property at 1314 Mississippi Street came up for sale over the summer of 2003, the petitioner purchased it with the hope of developing the land. The petitioner then contacted surrounding property owners to see if they would be interested in selling their properties. When the neighboring property owners became interested in selling their properties, the petitioner came forward with this redevelopment project. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #04-01 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning and master plan approval for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting to be rezoned are 1314 Mississippi Street (single family home and garage (welding shop), zoned C-2, General Business), 1340 Mississippi Street (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), 6401 Central Avenue (single family home, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6421 Central Avenue (single family home, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6441 Central Avenue (vacant lot, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant lot, zoned C-2, General Business), 1341 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), and 1347 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family). The petitioner is proposing to redevelop this entire area. IN I 0 1 6441 ----!r I 6421 I r___ 6401 : 11 wt. its 2 Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. As the properties exist today, 2 of them have split zoning between C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family. While both of the lots are rather large in size, conflicts arise when the zoning is split between a commercial and residential zoning. Rezoning a property to S-2 Redevelopment District, requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. If the rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Council any modification of the site plan would need to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Review of the master plan would also need to be completed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the property is in a Redevelopment District. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...lt is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision". In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed retail complex, senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the properties meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". 3 The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use & the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. • Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Fridley residents. • Create sustainable, self-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to the quality of life and image of Fridley. • Ensure a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the City's housing stock. • Diversify the housing supply to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for"empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. Rezoning these properties helps to achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area. Plat Request#04-01 John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is seeking to replat the properties located at 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the retail complex and the other lot will be used to allow for the construction of a 71-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot#1 and Lot#2, Block 1, Spring Valley Estates. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their intended use. The proposed Lot#1 will accommodate the 13,420 square foot retail complex. Retail complexes like the one proposed are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 62,690 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for the number of parking stalls required for a retail use. 4 .4 _.,, a 44 .. ._, , , , ,,,,,,,,4,:, , .. ..., ,..„,„..,,,,„ ,, , --, , ...„..,.......... -4 r , , c; :e., 1'',,,,„, ' x: �t �� �: 's 'I a' Øj lit, t ''''' iiir - ' I '''1$ ilreL! '. At '7. '-„,t' 04:4!.._ ' f The proposed Lot#2 is approximately 116,658 square feet (2.68 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 71 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 45 feet at the midspan. Early discussions with Anoka County indicated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way.corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersectons in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft..adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, staff assumes that the County will be requestng that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. The petitioner has drawn the site plan to illustrate right-of- way acquisition along both County Roads. Due to necessity of right-of-way acquisition, the parking setback for the retail space will be 2 feet from the north and west property lines. The parking setback on the senior condominium complex will also be 2 feet from the west property line. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. HOUSING STUDY The petitioner hired Maxfield Research Inc., to complete a Market Feasibility Study for Senior Housing in Fridley. The demographic and competitive market analysis done by Maxfield indicates that there is a demand in the Fridley area for 189 for-sale housing units. Maxfield's research pointed out that given the competitive situation in the marketplace, the quality of the subject site, and the lack of for-sale product within three miles of the property, the senior condominium project would be the most marketable product for the site. Their research also showed that the subject site could best support 5 an age-restricted owner-occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 71 senior owner occupied condominium units and the commercial complex may have on the local traffic patterns. Staff consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by TDI, Traffic Date Incorporated. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles /day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT PREPARED BY TDI, INC. Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, which was published in December 2003. The consultants used the Senior Adult Housing Attached category in the ITE manual to determine that the proposed senior complex would generate a total of 247 trips per day. The consultants used the Specialty Retail Center category from the ITE manual and determined that the proposed retail complex would generate a total of 598 trips per day. Trip Generation ITE Description Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Trips Use In Out In Out 252 Senior Adult Housing — 247 3 3 5 3 Attached (71 units) 814 Specialty Retail Center— 598 n/a n/a 16 21 (13,500 sq. ft.) TDI developed traffic forecasts for the following 2005 scenarios: No Build (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) Build Spring Valley Estates (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) The finding of these forecasts show that the level of service at both the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersections and the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue 6 intersections would remain the same in the no-build or build scenarios. The only change seen is during the AM Peak Hour at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue eastbound intersection, where the level of service would change from LOS B to LOS C. Central Avenue/64TH Avenue Westbound & Eastbound Approach LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound 2005 No-Build A B C C 2005 Build A C C C Mississippi Street/Central Avenue Intersection LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2005 No-Build C D 2005 Build C D To complete the traffic study, the consultants also referred to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which governs the use of traffic control devices per Minnesota State Statute. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has eight criteria (called warrants) to consider when determining if a traffic signal should be installed at an intersection or not. These warrants are primarily based on the traffic volumes flowing through the intersection. A warrant analysis was conducted for the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. To complete this analysis, TDI staff performed a turning movement count from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. None of the eight warrants are met under the existing conditions, nor will they be met if the elderly housing and retail buildings are constructed on the proposed site. According to this analysis, a traffic signal should not be installed at the intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue until at least one of the warrants is being met. The conclusions of TDI's analysis state that the stop controlled approaches at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic control. The intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue will operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic controls. A traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection and a traffic signal will not be warranted at the intersection after the proposed development is completed. A complete copy of the traffic study is available upon request. WETLAND The petitioner has been working with the Rice Creek Watershed to determine in the project area has a wetland. The petitioner has hired Tom Bremen, with Acorn Consulting, to delineate the site for any possible wetlands. Currently, both the petitioner and the Rice Creek Watershed are waiting for the delineators report. PHASING PLAN The petitioner has indicated to staff that their intentions are to building the entire 71 unit senior owner-occupied condominium project all in one construction phase. If the bank required unit pre-sales are slower than predicated by the market report, then they plan 7 to phase the project. Phasing the project would involve constructing the senior complex in 2 phases (2 buildings). The first phase would be 35 units and the second phase would be the remaining 36 units. Phase one would commence upon selling the bank required percentage of units in the first half of the building, removal of the existing homes and soil corrections. Phase one would tentatively commence in August 2004. Phase two would commence when the pre-sales are met for the first part of the 2nd half of the building. In the meantime, sod, landscaping, and parking would be installed. Phase 3 involves the retail space. Simultaneously, with the residential property, the retail building would be pre-leased. When the building is completely leased, the building will be constructed. Please see the attached phasing plan in your packet. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS During the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewing history showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of this Rezoning ZOA #04-01 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex, with stipulations. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities in Fridley City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#04-01, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 8 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 9 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 15 PUBLIC HEARING 21.—Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc., to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business, and R-1, Single Family Residential, to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment to allow for a senior housing development and a retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 642 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition (Ward 2). MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to waive the reading and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, stated the petitioner is requesting rezoning to S-2 in order to develop senior owner-occupied condominiums and a retail area on the southeast corner of Old Central and Mississippi Street. A 13,420 square foot retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of 71 senior condominiums. The retail area will take access both from Old Central and Mississippi Street. The 71 unit condominium building will take up approximately two-thirds of the site down to 64th Avenue on the south. This property currently has a mixture of zoning; starting at Mississippi and Old Central there are two parcels that are zoned C-2, General Business. Just to the east of that is a property labeled 1340 Mississippi zoned R-1, Single Family. South of those commercial and single-family sites, there is two properties, 6441 and 6421 Old Central zoned C-1 and R-1. 6401 is C-1 also and the properties to the east are R-1. Rezoning to S-2 states that the site be developed in accordance with a master plan for the site. Once approved, any modifications of the site plan will require Council approval. In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal meets several of the requirements identified in the Comprehensive Plan. This property is approximately 2.68 acres in size. The preliminary plat meets all of the plat requirements and the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority reviewed and concurred with the master plan as submitted at their March 4 meeting. Early discussions with Anoka County indicated that additional right-of-way on Old Central and Mississippi Street would be required in order to obtain a 120 foot wide right-of-way for future expansion. Based on the preliminary Anoka County Highway Department comments, the petitioner has done the following: they have shown the right-of-way dedication needed and moved access points to line up with the development across Old Central. The City sent a copy of the plans to Anoka County Highway Department on January 20. Late last Friday, the City received their comments which include the request to have all access to this development placed on 64th Avenue. They would like to remove access from the retail portion from Old Central. At this time, these are recommendations from Anoka County and not requirements. Staff recommends access remains on Old Central and not on 64th Avenue to minimize traffic impact to the surrounding residential neighborhood. On February 18 the Planning Commission approved both requests on a 6 to 1 vote. Staff recommends that Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, and the accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex be approved with the stipulations as stated. This proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, provides housing opportunities for seniors, provides new retail opportunities in FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 17 building is situated. 64th meets the front setbacks for an R-3 district in that it is over 35 feet back. This is important because Councilmember Billings' question about height has a caveat that says that if a building is going to be 45 feet or less there are no additional setbacks from the property line. At mid-span, the building is 45 feet high. This is an area where some folks have expressed concern, but we have taken this through all the formulas and it is within the qualifying measurements. Councilmember Billings asked if the ground along 64th is relatively the same in height in comparison to the first floor. Mr. Hickok stated there is some grading and ponding south of the building along 64th Avenue, then the earth is bermed up to hold the edge of the pond between the building and the pond and there are contours going down to the base of the building. Councilmember Billings asked if this were in an R-3 district would the setbacks be the same as what they are for the residential structure in the S-2. Mr. Hickok replied yes, with one exception. The side yard on the east side of the building is 18 feet and it could be 15 feet. Also the building pulls away to create a much greater distance between the adjoining properties. The S-2 district allows latitude and flexibility to make variations in the development. It comes closer to its own commercial building than R-3 would typically allow, but all other setbacks are the same as R-3 requirements. Councilmember Billings asked if the developer is unable to finish the project, what financial obligation does the City have to complete the project. Mr. Hickok stated the City would have no obligation. The future developer or the bank would have interest in this property because there has been a master plan approved and the expectation is that the buildings would be built to that master plan. Councilmember Billings asked how the setback requirements on this site compare to the setback requirements on the property immediately west across Old Central. He aside if they were concerned about litigation from that project because something different was being done. Mr. Hickok explained the S-2 zoning on both sides of the road has its own built-in flexibilities. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if any reports had been received from the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding this development. Mr. Hickok said it was determined that this is a wetland site that is less than the minimum threshold necessary for mitigation. What that means is that when a wetland is below a square foot dimension it does not require protection. This site is eligible for an exemption letter based on the wetland that was determined there. We do not yet have the letter of exemption from the State. We have a verbal statement from the consultant and the Rice Creek Watershed District, but not the actual letter of exemption. Based on that determination, no changes will be required in the site plan. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 19 Mr. Hickok stated the objectives that would be met by the proposal are what should be evaluated by the City. We would need to be able to substantiate that this is indeed in the City's best interest or is not based on the objectives spelled out. However, it is incumbent upon the City to articulate how this petition falls short, as the City evaluates whether or not something else would be more appropriate. Councilmember Billings asked if the City Attorney concurs with this discussion. Attorney Knaak stated that a rezoning is a legislative act. As a City Council, there are very few areas where they would have more discretion than the area of rezoning. This is like any other ordinance and the Council is under no obligation to pass or enact it. Councilmember Billings asked if the mere fact that a majority of the neighborhood residents are opposed to such a development is sufficient cause for the Council to deny the matter. Attorney Knaak responded that there is clear case law that neighborhood opposition by itself could not be the basis for an adverse decision by a city council. There would have to be other articulable reasons that relate to the health, safety and welfare of the citizens in a demonstrable way. Councilmember Wolfe said if staff determines that a specific neighborhood is a redevelopment area as a part of the Comprehensive Plan, then such a development could go in that area. Mr. Hickok stated that the staff works for the City Council and such changes would need to be endorsed by the City Council through a public hearing process. Mayor Lund explained that after the Planning Commission meeting, he contacted the petitioner, John DeMello, and discussed the possibility of making changes to lessen the impact and address the concerns of the neighbors. Councilmember Billings asked if the Mayor and the petitioner had reached any conclusions as to changes that should be made that would cause the City Council to endorse the project. Mayor Lund said they did not. Mr. Hickok presented for the record a letter from Jane K. Rose, Traffic Engineering Manager, Anoka County Highway Department, January 27, 2004, and was received by the staff on March 5, 2004. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to receive the letter from Ms. Jane Rose. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette to recess for five minutes. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 21 Rick Harrison stated that he works in 35 states, has done about 420 communities in the last 8 years, and he did 11,000 approved units in the state. He works for over 200 developers and one of the reasons he took on this project was because of personal experience with the need for senior housing. Mr. Harrison also explained that he was impressed with the petitioner, John DeMello. Mr. DeMello has paid his bills on time and has gone out of his way to do everything first class on this development. With 10% of the population over age 65, that's approximately 3,000 seniors in Fridley. As far as the entrances to this site, there are two separate entrances, one for the commercial and one for the residential area. From a planning and livability perspective, he recommended the entrances not be changed per Anoka County's request. It is critical to think about what the seniors will be seeing out their window; they are going to be looking at height and a sense of space. He explained his contribution to the commercial area is a new type of commercial building which dresses up the back of the commercial building to architecturally blend with the courtyard so that loading docks were not seen. Also, the commercial building has been angled to create some interest in the views to and from the senior building. The parking spaces meet or exceed the zoning requirements. He presented photos of other senior developments in the area and pointed out how few vehicles are actually parked on the site. Mr. Harrison added that developments he has been involved with today include senior housing because that was a critical component. He reviewed the existing buildings on this property that would be torn down or moved from the site. He said they were trying to provide senior housing at prices they could afford. Peter Villard stated each individual unit in the residential building will have many upgrade options for the buyers. There will be one, two and three bedroom units available ranging in size from 825 square feet to 1,600 square feet. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the developer has seen the letter from Anoka County. Michael Spack, Traffic Data, Inc., stated he has briefly scanned the letter and they will work with the County and the City to come to a common ground. Yoava Klucsues, 1420 Silver Lake Road, stated he is 85 years old and he would not want to live in this building and have to leave his car outside. He also stated he doesn't want these buildings or all the additional traffic and would not want to have to climb steps to a fourth floor level. Bernard Marihart, 1373 64th Avenue NE, stated his property is on the boundary of this project. He has owned his property since 1993 and is opposed to high density housing in his neighborhood. He believes the residents deserve more substantial benefits than this project is offering. Mark Schwarz, 1372 64th Avenue NE, presented a petition with 330 signatures of Fridley residents opposed to this proposal based on the removal of six houses, the rezoning of single family property, the size and scale of the development, the double-sided retail complex with outdoor eating area, the volume of traffic it would produce, the drainage issues and the decrease in property values in the surrounding area. He also presented a map that shows where each of the signers resides. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 23 Don Anderson, 7304 West Circle N.E., stated he believes this is a good proposal because the bus goes right down Old Central. Donna Reisner, 6424 Pierce Street, stated she has a lot of health problems and would not be able to handle the steps in the proposed four-story building. She also stated the proposal should be styled for the area. Mark Mattison, 6421 Central Avenue, stated he bought his property in 1996 with the knowledge that the area would be redeveloped. He is aware that the property in question has been a problem and there is now an opportunity to do something about it. There will be trees and setback requirements protecting the neighbors. He added this property is not in the middle of a residential area and it was a good location for senior housing. Joe Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue, stated his home is in the redevelopment area. He commented that he respects those residents who signed the petition, but that signing was based on information they had at the time. He hopes that it was also based on correct information. The Comprehensive Plan identified this property as a redevelopment area. That Comprehensive Plan was developed through a series of public forums and those who have voiced objections to the plan did not take the time to participate in the development of the plan. In the 30 years he has lived in this neighborhood, change has come slowly. This proposal is neither low income nor rental. It is affordable, attractive senior housing and he asked Council to approve this request. This proposal will allow seniors the opportunity to move from their home which opens up housing for families. He believed this to be a project that is long overdue for the area. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street, stated the elected council members should do what needs to be done. Beverly Prior, 1340 Mississippi Street, stated she is a 38-year resident and believes this senior housing would be wonderful and would be a wonderful place to live. Kurt Olson, 1385 64th Avenue, stated he lives two lots away from this proposal. He has seen "For Lease" signs on commercial property all over the City. Moore Lake Commons has never been fully occupied. He questioned the need for more retail. If this is passed, it will be punishing the people who live in the neighborhood. He was concerned about parking issues and questioned would happen to the proposed green areas when the County widens Mississippi Street and Old Central. Barb Edwards, 1403 64th Avenue, stated this is a well established neighborhood with a lot of people living there for 25 to 30 years. The homes are kept up and it is a nice area. She expressed concern about the height of the senior building being as much as 64 feet above the level of 64th Avenue. She is also worried about the change in the walking path which will now be wide enough to allow fire trucks to drive on. Linda Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue, questioned how long the Fridley school system can go on without additional tax dollars. This project and the one across the street will allow single family homes to free up so young people can move into the area. She added that they do stand to benefit from the sale of their property, but it is their property and could be sold to anybody. She believes this proposal is a good asset for the City. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 25 neighborhoods to allow for more high density housing of all types. She suggested this matter be tabled until such a time that the developer can come to the Council with definite answers to the questions presented here and at the Planning Commission. She added that it is her understanding that Profitmax was only incorporated a few months ago so there is no track record to refer to. Susan Okeson, 1423 64th Avenue, stated this proposal is different from the Town Center Development project across the street. That property was already zoned commercial and light industrial and there were no single family homes on that property. Half of the land on this proposal is zoned residential single family. The neighborhood, she stated, is not opposed to redevelopment but believes there is enough high density housing in the area. She added that seniors should live in something other than high rises, such as cottage style homes. She believes this project is not compatible with the area and that Council should wait for a more appropriate proposal in the future. Jean Schwarz, 1372 64th Avenue, commented on the height of the building. At the Planning Commission the petitioner admitted that the building would be at least 6 to 8 feet higher on 64th Avenue. She stated she has concerns and issues with many of the setbacks on this site. She suggested that staff look at the height requirements under R-3 which states a maximum of 6 stories but not exceeding 65 feet provided that no building shall be erected to a height exceeding 45 feet within 50 feet of any R-1 or R-2 district without one additional foot of space between the main building and the R-1 or R-2 district for every one foot or portion of building height over 45 feet. With 53 feet in the front, the setback would have to be 58 feet, not 18. Also, the parking is short 36 spaces for the residential building. She added that she has not seen Council approve a development in recent history that was short 36 spaces. The R-3 parking setbacks should be no closer than 20 feet from the right-of-way. This will become an issue when Old Central is expanded. The comment was made that residential overflow parking can use the retail parking, but she did not believe that was an allowable practice. An outdoor eating area is a permitted use with a special use permit. The rear yard setback is very clear for C-2 stating it shall be no closer to the boundary line of any adjacent residential district than 50 feet. This proposal is at 35 feet. Also on the retail, the parking requirements go up if there is a restaurant and this proposal includes an outdoor eating area. Mr. Hickok explained that the outdoor eating area may simply be an area for employees. Ms. Schwarz commented that if there is a restaurant, the parking ratio goes up to one off-street parking space for every 150 square feet of building area. Also all parking and hard surface areas can be no closer than 20 feet from any street right-of-way. In the retail area, the parking along Mississippi and Old Central is not 20 feet away. The driveway for the commercial area appears to be about 5 feet from the rear lot line which does not meet zoning requirements. Where any commercial is close to any public right- of-way, there are requirements that need to be met for parking, a five-foot sidewalk easement along the property line and a fifteen-foot planting strip located behind the required sidewalk that is substantial enough to create a physical separation between the public right-of-way and the commercial property. If Mississippi and Old Central are widened, you would have none of that. As far as S-2 zoning, a special district is a zoning district that is designated on the zoning map created through specific regulations changes necessary to protect the health and general welfare of the public within the designated district. She doesn't believe this project is necessary to protect the people of FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 27 discussions with Anoka County on this matter. He stated that as far as the lot coverage, the maximum increases to 30% if there is underground parking provided. This proposal is below that requirement with only 25.4% coverage. The setbacks on this site are predicated on the underlying zoning districts and meet or exceed all the requirements. They have almost doubled the required enclosed parking spaces plus an additional 32 surface spaces for a total of 103 parking spaces. The retail site data: 40% maximum lot coverage, they have 20%; minimum lot area 20,000 square feet, they have 67,000 square feet; front yard setback, 35 foot required they have 75 feet provided; side yard south, 15 feet required, they have 50 feet provided; side yard at Mississippi Street, 35 feet required they have 65 feet provided; rear yard —east, 25 feet required they have 35 feet provided. Retail parking data: the parking data was developed based on the speculative requirement of the code — one space required for every 200 feet of building which equals 68 parking stalls and they have 69 provided. Mike Spack, TDI, Inc., stated there are 8 warrants under the state statutes regarding traffic signals. If one of those warrants is met, then a signal should be considered. They determined that the traffic generated from this project and the project across the street does not come close to meeting any of the 8 warrants. Safety of a 4 way stop versus a traffic signal is debatable. The stop sign is the safest way for the seniors to use the streets because by law, once they step into the crosswalk, traffic has to stop. Their determinations are based on national statistics that are very well documented, up to date, and published in 2003. He also explained that they actually counted the traffic on this intersection during the peak hours of the day and then added on the traffic they anticipate will be added by this development as well as the Town Center development. Mr. Harrison responded to concerns about the height of the building. He explained that the front of the building is at the front setback, not at the curb, and they meet the height requirements. He stated this is a good development with no municipal dollars involved. Cottage homes on this site would have to be sold for$700,000 to make it possible. Mr. Hickok explained that the market study found that Fridley could support 189 senior units based on an analysis of what the market could absorb. Councilmember Barnette stated Mr. Edwards' concern about the shortage of parking is correct. He asked Mr. Hickok if the proposed parking is adequate. Mr. Hickok responded that the code was revised to anticipate this type of development and this proposal meets those requirements. The formula for parking requirements on this development is the same that was used for Town Center. Mr. Villard stated the parking designed was based on the ordinance that said one car stall per unit. They over-designed this project for more than that. To add more parking would result in more hard surface and require more ponding. Also, the history of such facilities is that the parking lots are not being used. Mr. Hickok stated this project does meet the requirements for an independent living facility. Ms. Schwarz again expressed her concern that the underlying zoning is not being utilized to determine setback requirements. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 29 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 23. Preliminary Plat Request PS #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc. to replat six parcels into two parcels, for the purpose of constructing a senior housing development and a retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 & 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition (Ward 2). MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to table this matter until March 29. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe to table consideration of this item in order to ascertain the necessary information to fully examine and study the request and to extend the review period for City Council an additional 60 days and to notify the petitioner in writing of the 60-day extension as soon as possible. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. Second reading of an ordinance amending Fridley City Code, Chapter 11, Fees. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to table the second eading of an ordinance amending Fridley City Code, Chapter 11, Fees. UPON A OICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED NANIMOUSLY. 2. Second rea•in. of an ordinance amendin• Cha•ter 402 Water and Sewer Administratio of the Fridle Cit Code. MOTION by Cou,cilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to table the second reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 402, Water and Sewer Administration of the- Fridley City Code. UPON A VOICE VO , ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMO SLY. 24. Informal Status Re s o There were no informal stat,s reports. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, s conded by Councilmember Wolfe, to adjourn the City Council meeting at 3:00 a.m. CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 March 12, 2004 Profitmax Inc. 2872 17th Terrace NW New Brighton MN 55112 Attention: John DeMello NOTIFICATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME OF AGENCY ACTION RE: Fridley Rezoning Request ZOA#04-01 Fridley Plat Request PS #04-01 Dear Mr. DeMello: The City Council tabled your Rezoning and Plat request during its regularly scheduled meeting of March 8, 2004 to allow staff additional time to gather additional information as requested by the City Council. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §15.99, Subd. 3(f), the City hereby extends the time for agency action until May 14, 2004 for your Rezoning and Plat requests. Your Rezoning and Plat requests will now go before the City Council for final action on March 29, 2004. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Si erely, Stacy Stro,1 i erg Planner cc: Russell & Beverly Prior Frank&Sharon DeMello Richard Carlson 1340 Mississippi Street 6134 Woody Lane NE 7671 Central Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Mark Mattison Bob Jr. &Jackie Calderon John &Susan Rau 6421 Central Avenue NE 6401 Central Avenue NE 1341 64th Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Joseph & Linda Nelson 1357 64th Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 C-04-25 • 'R." 1313 51'Street SE .44 rMinneapolis,MN 55414 Data Collection •_. �, phone 612.379.3844 Traffic Engineering - • fax 612.379.3845 Transportation Planning � ' www.trafficdatainc.com mspack@trafficdatainc.com Memo To: John Demello, Profit Max From: Mike Spack, P.E. ►v`A Date: 03/19/04 Re: Revisions to Spring Valley Estates Traffic Impact Report cc: Scott Hickok, City of Fridley Planning Director Background Profit Max proposed to construct a 71 unit elderly housing facility and a separate 13,500 square foot retail building on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street NE(C.S.A.H.6)and Central Avenue NE(C.S.A.H. 35) in Fridley, MN. TDI prepared a Traffic Impact Report for the proposed Spring Valley Estates in January 2004. A proposed access on Old Central Avenue and a proposed access on Mississippi Street was to serve the future retail building. The elderly housing facility was to be served by one separate access on Old Central Avenue. Profit Max is submitting a revised plan to the City for approval based on comments from Anoka County and concerns expressed by residents and the City Council at the Public Hearing. The new proposal contains: • One building with 13,500 square feet of retail on the ground floor with 90 owner occupied senior housing units on floors above the retail. The retail square footage remains the same as the previous proposal and 19 senior housing units are added compared to the original proposal. • A parking garage under the building will be served by a driveway access to Mississippi Street and a driveway access to 64th Avenue. • A surface parking lot will be provided for the retail customers and visitors to the senior housing. The lot will have one access to Old Central Avenue directly across from the Town Center Elderly Housing project's driveway. Per your request, I have reviewed the proposed changes and determined if they will cause significant traffic impacts. DBE Certified in Minnesota John Demello Page 2 Spring Valley Estates Findings Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition, 66 daily trips will be added, and 2 trips will be added both in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours by the additional 19 senior housing units. These volumes will not have a material impact on the Old Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection or the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection. Several residents expressed concern about a potential access to the site on 64th Avenue. This new access will have at most 10 vehicles using the driveway during the peak hours. These vehicles will not degrade the level of service at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection nor will they have a significant impact on 64th Avenue. Conclusions The revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. The change in the driveway configurations will improve the traffic flow on Old Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. Pq/24/2004 16: 33 6513891187 AWVI PAGE 02/03 e32422J 4 15:45 ANOKA CO I ti? SPT 4 96513891187 NU. furl vele • COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE @LVO. N.W., ANPOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4006 (763) 862-4200 FAX(763)562.4201 • March 23,2004 • Stacy Sarornberg City of Fridley 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 • RE: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates Dear Stacy, On March 17,2004,we met with City of Fridley gaff as well as the architect and developer for the Spring Valley Estates development, to be located on the southeast quadrant of CSAH 35 (Central Ave.) and CR106(Mississippi St.)within the City of-Fridley. At the meeting,•a revised plan for this development was presented for our consideration that Included an access onto CK 1u6 adjacent to the east property lint of titin Sita,an moms unto CMAII 35 located directly opposite of the planned access point for the redevelopment of the Sandy's Restaurant site,and an access point onto 64a' Avenue N& adjacent to the east property line of this site. We listened to the rationale • presented for this current redesign of the Spring Valley Estates development While we stili stand behind our previous comments for this site development,we are willing to compromise regarding this site plan development and we will permit the access scheme onto the CR 106 and CSAH 35 developed in the additional redeaign of this site. Please'note that there are no immanent plans for the reconstruction of either CR 106 or CSAH 35,nor are there any immanent piens to signalize the CR. 106/t SAH 35 intersection. While there are no county highway plans for the reconstruction of these routes, It is mill important to plan for the future conditions as develsops:uxtt plans are considered for approval. As we noted in our previous review of this site, it is likely that whenever the CSAH 35/CR 106 is rebuilt in the future, it will likely have raised median channelization, and access points within this development are likely to become right in/right outWe lure pleased that the redesign of this site does provide for some site access to occur onto 64 Aveotie NB as we had recommended,as 641°Avenue NE appears to have an adequate degree of separation from CR 106 end could possible serve as a location for a future median break or 11111 access location. We are in agreement on the CR 1.06 access location. And we will allow an access onto CSAH 35 at the location presented at our 3/17/2004 meeting. If the City and the developer wish to revise this CSAH 35 access location somewhat so that it is located at a point where it may provide more access flexibility/potential access options in the future scenario, we would be open looking at a revised location for this CSAH 35 access point.It is our understanding that the developer will provide right turn lanes that meet our approval for the CSAR 3S and CR 106 Aeneas points. Affirmative Action 1 Equal opportunity Employer r03/24/2004 16:33 6513891187 AWVI PAGE 03/03 Tv ' . 03124/2004 15:45 ANOKA CO 1- Y DPT 4 996513891187 •••.,j Stacy Strom berg Re: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates March 23,2004 Pap 2 All other comments pertaining to this site from our previuus review remain unchange.Please ils forturn Andrew Witter,Construction Services Engineer for roadway section information,typ lane construction.and further information regarding our Engineering Plan review process.. Thank you for the opportunity to meet and comment farther on this development. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. S 4, erely. % . / / Jane K.Rose Traffic Engineering Manager xc; CSAH 35 t CR106/PLATS!2004 Mike Kelly,Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Moium,County Surveyor Roger Butler.Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott,Perna Technician Tom Hornsby.Traffic Services Supervisor-Signs Andrew Witter,Construction Services Engineer • • , . ' • . 1 ... , • t . ; ir--......... ? 1 ! , , . I ? ? N.. ci ,, 0. r---• _ -•:•-,1 z17,-- t,, ..),.._ t-,2-. t"•.'• „ i ! , 0 : o ; „ , , :•' c,k -.-- -4, , ----- i : 1 .,9 ---;. . I ' • ' ,1,..-I : I . ! ! Ij 1 , I . ..-... .• 1 1 r j, LI ,j II I I 11 II II II ' j I II I ,44;:ri4II' Sr3C1, 7**. I j I ! I , II III t.11 , ! i • . , -'4H. *tl 'CI.,..,: .-II .I 1-4--• 1 , 1„.I ' ll ' i g.. i I ; ! , ; , • : ; t-4.- N-1 '31 l'sji 4 %S. -I- ; I•^! r, ! • . ! • ! • ? ... I I i! ; ! 1 , ' ',,,; ' ' , II I 74 I j ! ji , I ii ' I ? , I . II' j lj " ' ' 1 • ' ll ' Il . ' j - . j , : i . . ' ' ' I' ' ' HIIIH , : ' , Ij I JI ! I , j II 11 ' I t...3 H • fi . ? , i ' : I '''? : ' HII , i ! ' ' it .•,4;,.. ,/,„ ,i_ 0, ,1 , ! „ i„ i. : , H , , • , , , ,--, , . - • , , • , 1 1 , , , , -,- • , • , ' -C9 i ' • J -. T I- IT , , , , ' : , ....,... • i , , • 1 I. i I I •I 1 j • 1 11 1 ? . 5 ,. , . . . . . il 11 11 1 , i I I i , I lib' t ' . "-Tit L'iifx „LL -- t'l 'It- t- "C‘ 't4! ,f0' tr`l 1 ! • 1 i ; • ; I • 1 • - : : I 1 11 , I 1 ; 1 ! 1 : 11 i , ‘ i : li I , , : 1 i . 1 :, • 1 , , ? , co 1 1 i I I II 1 11 " 11 i 1 ' '' lii, j ; ; ; ; ; It• 42, 1 s ,,,,hi, ; ; 1 1 1 ; , i ; . ; I ! • I , r ; . , 4 I 11 , , r ij 1 Nnelp7 2 --i-r &i: , 1- II 1 , I , , , li ii II ; 1 i . , 1 1 i i i. 1 i 1 11 it 11 II it, iII = II .1 il it ! I, Z tk-4 I II II II I I I - I- •,i .t , ! I 1 I I 'i, ci_ i ,. " : , si, I 1 1 I 1 ? I I I I ! I i ; II II II ll I 1 ! I e o , I I is,.sH•.„ , --7, „ !., i , 1 ii „ f 1 , , „ • - ,__.,,. 'ea i,,,,g, , 1,•• ! • i II , ',1st , . 1 , , (..) cu > 1 1 N '' , , , 1 , I , , •, , , ' 1 • 1 • i : 4-4- ON. 11 i ' 1 I i i I.4. a .., ...,..... ),,IN 0,......„, ..... al • ' 1, i Oi l'`', .k.4 ', i I 'Ai f _ `11 '.,. 1 or4 14.'N `'.....,; ,tEctl‘' 1 t- ' +••• -Lt. .1H,,-- 4,-4, -.14- _,,,,4' 4.-„,,, --...-, ; ; ! , , . 1 ,4 . , . \.14 1 • ; ; , 1 , ii i t 1 , ' 0 ; 1 1 I 'I ' ' i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I; ;; i I 1 ; :k4 ‘•C) 1 td--.. H 1 1 j 1 Ii 1 , -, I 1.-- - ,...slii , ; m i' ',: ; • kr) . INII II !! .C:)`‘ 1 ! ' 1 ; 1.• ! !.....-! . ; i ,-' ....,,'; ? ! ! ; filh" !..1 . I -17 • h • - frlint44TrYtf - i . 4 41 4j I As ' IIIII ! IIII' ll I I 1 ' 4' Iii ! I1C\O". LI ! . I - . - i 1 , ' . i • i : ' 1 . , , , ' • , , , : . 1 i i i , , 2 , • , , , i , „i1 I ! . 1, _ ' _t4' ek, 1 , -1 4 SPRING VALLEY ESTATES 90 unit three and four story senior condominiums over underground parking Fridley, MN. March 24, 2004 March 29, 2004 City Council Meeting Prepared by Architectural Works Villard Inc. CURRENT ZONING; Mixed zoning of R-1 single family residential district, C-1 local business district and C-2 business district. PROPOSED ZONING; S-2 Redevelopment district; SITE DENSITY; The site density is lowered from the 71 unit design density of 26.59 units per acre down to 21.53 units per acre for this 90 unit design. HOUSING BUILDING DATA; 1. Under Ground Parking—Garage Level= 47,700 sf. 2. Residential Housing floors 1 through 4 • First floor Housing= 34,090 sf. =(47,840— 13,750 retail) • Second floor Housing= 47,300 sf. • Third floor Housing= 47,700 sf. • Fourth floor Housing= 19,270 sf. Total Housing= 148,360 sf. 3. Housing and underground parking total building= 196,060 sf. 4. Total Building=Housing 196,060 sf. +Retail 13,750 sf.=209,810 sf. 5. All housing units total sf. = 113,510 sf. Common/Circulation= 34,850 51 6. Usable areas= 76.51%Units 23.49% Common/Circulation 7. Average area per unit; • Housing= 148,360 sf divided by 90 units= 1,648 sf per unit. • Housing and parking= 196,060 sf divided by 90 units=2,178 sf per unit. Fridley 3-24-04 Page 2 of 4 THE HOUSING BUILDING REVIEW IS BASED ON THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICTS. HOUSING SITE DATA; 1. Housing site area; • Approximately 179,348 sf. or 4.18 acres 2. First floor area=47,840 sf. • 3. Lot Coverage=20% lot coverage required with not more than 30%of the lot area covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. • 47,840 first floor sf divided by site area of 179,348 sf. = 26.67% lot coverage provided. 4. Housing average lot area required per unit • 2500 sf per unit on floors 1-3 =78 x 2,500= 195,000 sf lot area required before underground parking credit. • 950 sf per unit on fourth floor= 12 x 950= 11,400 sf • Total lot area required before underground parking credit=206,400 • 114 underground spaces x 300= 34,200 sf underground parking credit. • 206,400 sf. lot area minus 34,200 sf underground parking credit= 172,200 sf minimum total lot area required. 179,348 sf. lot area provided. OK! 5. Housing Building setbacks; • Front Yard(North-Mississippi street)=35'-0"Required 82'-0"front yard building setback provided. OK! • Side Yard (East)= 15'-0" Required+ 1 additional foot for each 4'-0" of building height over 35'-0". Building height=45'-0"or 10'-0" higher. 10'-0" divided by 4'-0" =2.5 or 3 additional feet added to the 15'-0" setback= 18'-0"required side yard setback. 18'-0" minimum side yard building setback provided. OK! • Side yard at corner yard(West—Old Central)=35'-0" required. 35'-0" side yard setback at corner is provided. OK! • Rear yard(South- 64th Street)=25% of lot depth or 25'-0" minimum to 40'-0" maximum plus 1 foot of depth for each 2'-0" of building height over 35'-0". Building height=35'-0"therefore no additional rear yard set back is added and the required rear yard maximum setback=40'-0". 70'-0" rear yard setback is provided. OK! • Fridley 3-24-04 Page 3 of 4 6. Building height; • Maximum 6 stories not to exceed 65'-0" high required, not to exceed 45'-0" high within 50'-0" of any R-1 or R-2 district without 1 additional foot of space between the building and the R-1 or R-2 district for each 1'-0" of building height over 45'-0". • The building is within 50'-0" of an R-1 district. Maximum height requirement is 45'-0" plus 1'-0" of additional setback for each 1'-0" of building over 45'-0". • The building height is 45'-0". No additional setback is required. HOUSING PARKING*DATA; 1. Independent Living facility • 1 space required per each dwelling unit required with 50%of spaces enclosed=90 total spaces with 45 minimum spaces enclosed required. • (114)Enclosed spaces provided plus (30) surface spaces for total of (144) spaces provided). OK! • 41 parking stalls added from previous 71 unit design. • (54 extra spaces provided) • Parking ratio = 1.6 stalls per unit 2. Change to Market Rate; 1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit plus 'h space for each additional bedroom unit per dwelling unit= (26) 1 -beds x 1.5 = 39.0 spaces. (58) 2-beds x 2.0= 116.0 spaces (6)3 -beds x 2.5 = 15.0 spaces Total 170.0 spaces required 144.0 spaces provided THE RETAIL BUILDING REVIEW IS BASED ON THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONING DISTRICTS. RETAIL BUILDING DATA; 1. Retail= 13,750 sf. RETAIL SITE DATA; 1. Retail site area; • Approximately 179,348 sf, or 4.18 acres. 2. Proposed Floor Area= 13,750 sf. . . Fridley 3-24-04 Page 4 of 4 3. Lot Coverage= 1 story=40 % maximum required. • Lot coverage provided= 13,750 sf divided by 179,348 sf. = 7.66% lot coverage provided. OK! 4. Retail Minimum Lot area; • Minimum lot area of 20,000 sf is required. 179,348 sf provided. OK! 5. Retail Building setbacks; • Front Yard(North—Mississippi Street)=35'-0"Required 82'-0" front yard set back provided. OK! • Side Yard at corner(West—Central Ave)=35'-0"Required 35'-0" side yard at corner setback provided. OK! • Side yard (East) = 18'-0" required. 18'-0" side yard set back provided. OK! • Rear yard(South)=25'-0"required. 290'-0" rear yard set back provided. OK! RETAIL PARKING DATA; 1. Retail; • Speculative parking=1 space required per each 200 sf of building floor area. 13,750sf divided by 200sf. = 69 parking spaces required. 73 total spaces provided. OK! Rice Creek Watershed District 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 Office Phone: 763-398-3070 Office Fax: 763-398-3088 NOTICE OF WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT DECISION Name of Applicant: John DeMello Application Number: 04-001 Project Name: Spring Valley Estates Project Location: Fridley Type of Application (check one): X Exemption Decision No Loss Decision Replacement Plan Decision Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: March 25, 2004 Check One: X Approved Approved with conditions Denied List of Addressees: MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, ATTN: Lynda Peterson (w/enclosure) HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Doug Norris (w/enclosure) Metro HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Wayne Barstad (w/enclosure) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Tim Fell (w/enclosure) Anoka Soil and Water Conservation District, ATTN: Becky Wozney (w/enclosure) Applicant City of Fridley RCWD File/Engineer/Inspector You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above-referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn.R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. Date of mailing of this Notice: Rice Creek Watershed District March 25 ,2004 By: Steve Hobbs Title: Administrator .11 Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions The entire site is covered with debris and the topography suggests that large amount of fill have been deposited on the site. There is one depression on the site that could possibly have wetland characteristics. The plant community consists of medium sized green ash trees and very little other vegetation. It is too early in the season to determine if the depression has hydric soils or evidence of wetland hydrology. If the depression does have wetland characteristics it is very poor quality. The applicant presented aerial photos and climatic data for the project. The 1938 aerial photo shows that depression being cultivated in row crops and the climatic data indicates that 1938 had normal rainfall. The 1964 aerial photo clearly shows fill being brought onto site just west of the depression. The topography of the site indicate that the depression was likely filled and re-excavated or had fill placed all around it artificially creating a depression. The aerial photo evidence along with the extensive amount of disturbance that is apparent on the site provide enough evidence that the depression within the project was incidentally created. Please call Karl Hammers at 763-398-3072 for further details. MAR.25'2004 16:55 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.002/005 Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Application Number 04-001 Applicant: John.DeMello Consultant: Joel Maier. Profit Max, Inc. BKBM Engineers 2872 174'Terrace 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard New Brighton, MN 551.12 Minneapolis,MN 55429 Ph: 651-493-3936 Ph: 763-843-0477 Fx: 651-493-0229 Fx: 763-843-0421 johnd@acninc.net jmaier@bkbrn.com Purpose: Final Site Drainage Plan for removal of six existing homes and construction of a 13,5001: SF retail building, a 32,3001 SF senior housing complex and associated parking areas to be known as Spring Valley Estates, 4.6±acres. Location: South of Mississippi Street and.east of Old Central Avenue,Fridley. T-R-S: 30-24-13 ca. Recommendation: Conditional approval pending receipt of changes and.outstanding items related.to: Stormwater Management 1. Revised hydrologic calculations and su.bwatershed. boundary maps for existing and proposed conditions encompassing the entire project site and offsite areas tributary to proposed ponding areas (see second paragraph of. Finding 2 for. discussion). 2. Revised stormwa.ter management plan complying with. District rate control and water quality treatment requirements (if necessary per Pending Item 1.). Floodplain 3. Revised grading plan demonstrating modifications to FES #8 and Outlet #24 blocking hydraulic connections to proposed trench drains (see second paragraph of Finding 4 for discussion). 4. Identification low floor and.low entry of the existing home east and northeast of Ponds 4 & 5, respectively, and identification of pond emergency overflow elevations demonstrating compliance with District freeboard.requirements Emmons&Olivier Resources, Inc. - 1 - 3/25/04 MAR.25'2004 16:56 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.003/005 Pen_iiitA0Jicalion No. 04-001. Profit Max, Inc. Administrative 5. Preliminary Plat or legal document with satisfactory form and. description granting ponding and flowage easements over all onsite ponds and infiltration basins. 6. Letter from the City indicating which stonnwater management features will be maintained by the City and a Draft Declaration. for Maintenance of, Stormwater Management Facilities acceptable to District engineer and attorney for proposed onsite storm.water management features that will not be maintained by the City. 7. Copy of receipt from County Recorder and signed/notarized. legal document(s). Note that legal document(s) are to be submitted by Applicant to County for recording only after, approval by District. 8. Copy of MPCA NPDES permit application.. 9. Cash surety in.the amount of$2,500. Exhibits: 1. Permit Application dated.January 5, 2004,received.January 7, 2004. 2. Infiltration Worksheet prepared. by Applicant, undated, received January 7,2004. 3. Site Location Map prepared. by Applicant, dated January 6, 2004, received.January 7,2004. 4. Summary of Hydrology prepared. by BKI3M Engineers, undated, received January 7,2004. 5. Hydrologic Calculations for existing and proposed conditions prepared by BKBM Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received January 19,2004. 6. Boundary and. Topography Survey prepared. by Midwest Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc., dated October. 24, 2003, received. January 7,2004. 7. Site Demolition Plan prepared. by BKBM Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received.January 19, 2004. 8. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control. Plan prepared. by 13IU3M Emmons &Olivier Resources, Inc. -2- 3/25/04 MAR.25'2004 16:56 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.004/005 Permit Application No. 04-001 Profit Max,inc. Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received January 20, 2004. 9. Site Utility Plan prepared by I3KBM Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received January 19, 2004. 10. Geometric and Paving Plan. prepared by J3KJ3M Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004,received January 19,2004. U. Watershed Data Plan Sheet prepared by BKBM Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004,received January 19, 2004. 12. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review prepared. by American Engineering Testing, dated October 20, 2003, received January 19, 2004. 13. Narrative in response to 1-16-04 Engineer Report prepared by 13KJ3M Engineers, dated January 19, 2004, received January 1.9, 2004. 14. Notice of Wetland Conservation Action Exemption Notice prepared. by RCWD,dated and received March.25,2003. 15. Letter from area resident (Mark Schwartz) expressing flooding concern, undated,received February 27,2004. Findings: 1. The proposed project entails removal of six existing houses and the construction of two buildings and associated parking areas to serve as retail and senior housing on 4.6± acres. The 13,542 SF building in the northern third of the site is proposed for retail space and 1:he 32,285 SF building in the southern two-thirds of the site is proposed to be a senior housing facility. 2. The existing site is comprised of three drainage areas. A small area in the north drains via. sheet flow to the stormsewer network in. Mississippi Street. Runoff generated along the southern border of the site sheet flows south. to 64'' Avenue NE where it enters City stormsewer. Runoff from. the remainder of the site flows to an existing low point located in the central portion.of the site along the east property line. The proposed stormwater management plan includes new storm:sewer network, a. stormwater detention pond on the west- central border of the site, and three infiltration basins located in the southern portion of the site. The hydrologic calculations for both existing and proposed conditions refer to a drainage area that does Emmons &Olivier Resources, Inc. -3 - 3/25/04 MAR.25'2004 16:56 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.005/005 f Permit Application No. 04-001. Profit Max, Inc. not cover the entire project site or areas tributary to the site. Revised. hydrologic calculations and suhwatershed boundary maps for both existing and proposed conditions encompassing the entire tributary area are required to verify compliance with District stormwater management requirements. Based upon th.e geotechnical report submitted, soil borings taken near the proposed locations for the infiltration basins indicate the presence of, sandy soils consistent with Soil Type B and demonstrate at least 3 feet of separation between the proposed. bottom contours for all inf.ltrali.on basins and the water table,thereby meeting District infiltration requirements. 3. NWT.maps indicate the presence of a Type 2 wetland onsite. Based on field inspection of the site and aerial photos and climatic data submitted by the applicant, the District Permit Coordinator has determined that this depression was incidentally created by excavating and grading activities and is not regulated.by the WCA. 4. The regulatory flood elevation of Moore Lake is 879.9. There is no regional floodplain associated with this site and there is no proposed floodplain impact. The TIWL for the proposed Pond 1 is 881.2. The lowest floor elevation of the proposed southern building is 882.0 and the elevations of both proposed trench drains located in front of the lowest floor openings for this building are 881.75. This does not provide adequate freeboard between the HWL for. Pond 1. and the rim.elevations of these trenches. However, if FES#8 and.Outlet: #24 are modified to incorporate fully operational flap doors blocking any back-flow from Ponds 1 and 2 to the trench drains, District freeboard. requirements may be waived.. A revised grading plan is required demonstrating modifications to structures FES #8 and Outlet #24 eliminating all hydraulic connections between proposed trench drains and stormwater management ponds onsite. Further review by District attorney may initiate the requirement of a liability release for potential flooding of the lowest, floor of the proposed southern building. The northern building meets District freeboard requirements. 5. An. erosion control plan has been submitted. including silt fence surrounding the perimeter of the site, seeding, mulching, wood fiber blanket, riprap at st:orm.sewer outfalls, revegetation. specifications and an implementation.schedule. Emmons&Olivier Resources, Inc. -4- 3/25/04 MAR.25'2004 16:55 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.001/005 FAX TRANSMITTAL 0..otmEit E Ot1.RCE5 651 Hale Avenue Oakdale, MN 55128 ¢ Phone:(651) 770-8448 3/7.5)D4 Date: Fax: (651) 770-2552 E-mail:calmerlgeorinc.com To: S'i74aY UPI DG Fax No: 163.5-1• IZsi- From: cAo-L- At.e".11' Total Pages: 5 Subject: 5#Falk VAu1,1 lt. 4,r- a .-oo5 Md. *TOP- 1Lew)El"r, PLbkit 1~i.Jo A1i*LW00 p efort:r R.reGpwi.J4 -1{E pooprr Mi( brrz,L4TJen4 7b 774E 446: Greae.►.)4`reesHG-re nrd vu LT; 'Only copy you will receive. [ ] Original follows by mail.. f AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 29, 2004 CITY OF FRIDLEY Date: March 23, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager N. From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Plat Request, PS #04-01 and First Reading of an ordinance for Rezoning, ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-46 INTRODUCTION John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting a plat to create one new parcel from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. Mr. DeMello is also requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for PS #04-01 and ZOA#04-01. After receiving public comment and having a discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of plat request, PS #04-01 and rezoning request, ZOA#04-01 and subsequent master plan, with the 22 stipulations as presented. THE MOTION CARRIED BY A 6 TO 1 VOTE. PAST COUNCIL ACTION The City Council tabled action on both the plat and rezoning at the March 8, 2004 meeting. The Council directed staff to prepare a finding of fact based on their concerns, to deny the project as proposed. Fritz Knaak, City Attorney's, resolution is available as requested. Since the March 8, 2004, City Council meeting, the petitioner has submitted a revised site plan based on comments received from Anoka County and concerns raised by neighboring property owners and the Council. The new master plan proposal is in your packet and contains: • One lot, with one building. The new building will include 13,750 square feet of retail space on the north side of the ground floor and 90 owner-occupied senior condominium units located above the retail and the remainder of the building. • The building will be comprised of three story wings on the north and south ends and a will be a four story building in the center, where the main entrance of the building is located. The three story wings will be 35 feet in height and the four story center will be 45 feet in height. • The retail portion square footage has been expanded by 330 square feet and there is an addition of 19 senior condominium units. • All setback requirements are being met as if the building was designed to meet the R-3, Multi-Family and C-2, General Business zoning districts requirements. • The petitioner is meeting or exceeding all parking requirements. • The entire development both commercial and residential will be under single ownership. • The parking garage for the complex will receive access from Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Traffic Analysis The petitioner has asked Traffic Data, Inc. to re-evaluate the previously submitted traffic study to include the new access point and the additional condominium units. The consultant determined that the revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. The change in the driveway configuration will improve the traffic flow on Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. Please see letter from TDI Inc., included in your packet. Anoka County City staff and the petitioner met with Anoka County to review the comments and concerns the County had and to review the revised site plan for Spring Valley Estates. The County had concerns regarding too many access points on Central Avenue and commented that they would prefer to see an access on 64th Avenue. To address those concerns, the developer has reduced the number of access points on Central Avenue to one driveway and has redesigned the parking garage, so it receives access from Mississippi Street on the north and 64th Avenue on the south. The County has stated that they are acceptable to this redesigned plan and would permit access on Central Avenue as well as an access on Mississippi Street. The County stated that currently there are no immanent plans for reconstruction of either Central Avenue or Mississippi Street, nor are there any immanent plans to signalize the intersection. However, it is still important to plan for the future conditions as development plans are considered for approval. The County is pleased that this redesign has moved an access to 64th Avenue because it is very likely that that whenever Central Avenue and Mississippi Street are rebuilt, it would become a right in/right out, and 64th Avenue could possibly serve as a location for future median break or full access location. Please see letter from Anoka County included in your packet. Rice Creek Watershed- wetland The petitioner and his consultant met with the Rice Creek Watershed District on March 24, 2004. City staff received a notice of exemption from the Rice Creek Watershed, on March 25, 2004. The exception was approved as it appears that the wetland was incidentally created and is not protected under the Wetland Conservation Act. As a result, stipulation #7 has been removed from both land use requests. A copy of the exception is included in your packet. The developer sent a copy of the revised plan to neighboring property owners as well as people who had shown an interest on the topic. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION Like, the Town Center Development proposal, this master plan has been modified to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission, City Council and the neighborhood. City Staff recommends approval of the new site plan, plat request and the rezoning request, with the subsequent master plan. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan submitted to City staff on March 24, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 3-24-04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue, to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 8. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 9. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 10.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 11.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 12.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 13.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. • 14.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 15.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 16.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 17.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 18.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 19.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 20.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 21. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. ORDINANCE NO. _ ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated, and is hereby subject to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: 1340 Mississippi Street, 1314 Mississippi Street, 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), and 6421 Central Avenue. Lots15-19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, subject to easement of record. 6401 Central Avenue: Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, except East 184 feet thereof, subject to easement of record. 1341 64th Avenue: The West 75 feet of the East 184 feet of Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, subject to easement of record. 1357 64th Avenue: The West 75 feet of the East 109 feet of Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, subject to easement of record. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-2 (Redevelopment District). SE CTION 3.That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business), and R-1 (Single Family) to S-2 (Redevelopment District). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS -- -- DAY OF MARCH, 2004. SCOTT J. LUND — MAYOR ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN — CITY CLERK Public Hearing: March 8, 2004 First Reading: March 8, 2004 Second Reading: Publication: ATTACHMENT 1 Stipulations for Rezoning Request ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc.: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A-5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A- 9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64t" Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 03/24/2004 16:33 6513891187 AWVI PAGE 02/03 83,242014 15:45 ANOKA CO HWY TlPT 4 96513891187 Nu. rot vr�c :t. COUNTY OF ANOKA t Pyb►lc Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT +, 1440 BLINKER LAKE BLVD. N.W.,ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4006 (763) 862-4200 FAX (763)862.4201 • Mardi 23,2004 • Stacy Sttomberg City of Fridley 6431 University Ave.NB Fridley,MN 55432 • RE: Additional Redesign! Spring Valley Estates • Dear Stacy, On March 17,2004,we met with City of Fridley staff as well as the architect and developer for the Spring Valley $states development, to be located on the southeast quadrant of CSAH 35 (Central Ave.) and CR106(Mississippi St.)within the City of Pridley. At the meeting,.a revised plan for this development was presented for our consideration that included an access onto tat 1u6 adjacent to the east property line of this site,en ass unto CMAI135 located directly opposite of the planned access point for the redevelopment of =pass the Sandy's Restaurant site,and an access point onto 641 Avenue NB adjacent to the east property line of this site. We listened to the rationale presented for this current redesign of the Spring Valley Estates development. While we still stand behind • our previous comments for this site development,we are willing to compromise regarding this site plan development and we will permit the access scheme onto the CR 106 and CSAH 35 developed in the additional redesign of this site. Please note that there are no immanent plans for die reconstruction of either CR 106 or CSAR 35,nor are there any immanent piens to signalize the at 106ISAFI 35 intersection..While there art no county highway plans for the reconstruction of these routes, n is still important to plan for the future conditions as development plans are coneidorod for approval. As wo natal in our previous review of this site, it is likely that whenever the CSAR 35/CR 106 is rebuilt in the future, it will likely have raised median channelization,and access points within this development are likely to become right in/right out.We are pleased that the redesign of this site does provide for some site access to occur onto 64111 Avenue NE as we had recommended,as 6411'Avenue NE appears to have an adequate degree of separation from CR 106 and could possible serve as a location for a future median break or 'tit access location. We are in agreement on the CR 106 access location. And we will allow an access onto CSAH 35 at the location presented at our 3/17/2004 meeting. If the City and the developer wish to revise this CSAH 35 access location somewhat so that it is located at a point where it may provide more access flexibility/potential access options in the future scenario, we would be open looking et a revised location for this CSAH 35 access point.It is our understanding that the developer will provide right turn lanes that meet our approval for the CSAR 35 and CR 106 access points. • Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 03/24/2004 16:33 6513891187 AWVI PAGE 03/03 ._0312412004 15:45 FNMA CO HWY DPT 4 95513891187 i.u. , Stacy Stromberg Re: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates March 23,2004 Pa'e 2 All other comments pertaining to this site from our previuus review Tannin unchanged. Please contact Andrew Witter,Construction Services Engineer,for roadway section information,typicalsldetails for turn lane construction.and further information regarding our Engineering Plan review process.. Thank you for the opportunity to meet and comment farther on this development Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. S erely. t,, , Jane K.Rose • Traffic Engineering Manager xc; CSAH 35 t CR106IPI ATSl2004 Mate Kelly,Chief Right Of Way Agent Lorry Holum,County Surveyor Roger Butler.Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Sea;?remit Technician Tom Hornsby.Traffic Services Supervisor-Sips Andrew Witter,Construction Services Engineer 1313 5t'Street SE Minneapolis,MN 55414 Data Collection phone 612.379.3844 Traffic Engineering * fax 612.379.3845 Transportation Planning www.trafficdatainc.com mspack@trafficdatainc.com Memo To: John Demello, Profit Max From: Mike Spack, P.E. Date: 03/19/04 Re: Revisions to Spring Valley Estates Traffic Impact Report cc: Scott Hickok, City of Fridley Planning Director Background Profit Max proposed to construct a 71 unit elderly housing facility and a separate 13,500 square foot retail building on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street NE(C.S.A.H.6)and Central Avenue NE(C.S.A.H.35)in Fridley, MN. TDI prepared a Traffic Impact Report for the proposed Spring Valley Estates in January 2004. A proposed access on Old Central Avenue and a proposed access on Mississippi Street was to serve the future retail building. The elderly housing facility was to be served by one separate access on Old Central Avenue. Profit Max is submitting a revised plan to the City for approval based on comments from Anoka County and concerns expressed by residents and the City Council at the Public Hearing. The new proposal contains: • One building with 13,500 square feet of retail on the ground floor with 90 owner occupied senior housing units on floors above the retail. The retail square footage remains the same as the previous proposal and 19 senior housing units are added compared to the original proposal. • A parking garage under the building will be served by a driveway access to Mississippi Street and a driveway access to 64th Avenue. • A surface parking lot will be provided for the retail customers and visitors to the senior housing. The lot will have one access to Old Central Avenue directly across from the Town Center Elderly Housing project's driveway. Per your request, I have reviewed the proposed changes and determined if they will cause significant traffic impacts. DBE Certified in Minnesota John Demello Page 2 Spring Valley Estates Findings Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, 66 daily trips will be added, and 2 trips will be added both in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours by the additional 19 senior housing units. These volumes will not have a material impact on the Old Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection or the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection. Several residents expressed concern about a potential access to the site on 64th Avenue. This new access will have at most 10 vehicles using the driveway during the peak hours. These vehicles will not degrade the level of service at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection nor will they have a significant impact on 64th Avenue. Conclusions The revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. The change in the driveway configurations will improve the traffic flow on Old Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. t r vv- 111) or n y by V Rice Creek Watershed District 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 Office Phone: 763-398-3070 Office Fax: 763-398-3088 NOTICE OF WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT DECISION Name of Applicant: John DeMello Application Number: 04-001 Project Name: Spring Valley Estates Project Location: Fridley Type of Application(check one): X Exemption Decision No Loss Decision Replacement Plan Decision Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: March 25, 2004 Check One: X Approved Approved with conditions Denied List of Addressees: MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, ATTN: Lynda Peterson (w/enclosure) HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Doug Norris (w/enclosure) Metro HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Wayne Barstad(w/enclosure) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,ATTN: Tim Fell (w/enclosure) Anoka Soil and Water Conservation District, ATTN: Becky Wozney (w/enclosure) Applicant City of Fridley RCWD File/Engineer/Inspector You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above-referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn.R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. Date of mailing of this Notice: Rice Creek Watershed District March 25 ,2004 By: Steve Hobbs Title: Administrator Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions The entire site is covered with debris and the topography suggests that large amount of fill have been deposited on the site. There is one depression on the site that could possibly have wetland characteristics. The plant community consists of medium sized green ash trees and very little other vegetation. It is too early in the season to determine if the depression has hydric soils or evidence of wetland hydrology. If the depression does have wetland characteristics it is very poor quality. The applicant presented aerial photos and climatic data for the project. The 1938 aerial photo shows that depression being cultivated in row crops and the climatic data indicates that 1938 had normal rainfall. The 1964 aerial photo clearly shows fill being brought onto site just west of the depression. The topography of the site indicate that the depression was likely filled and re-excavated or had fill placed all around it artificially creating a depression. The aerial photo evidence along with the extensive amount of disturbance that is apparent on the site provide enough evidence that the depression within the project was incidentally created. Please call Karl Hammers at 763-398-3072 for further details. . ....) _,. A,..4 1 prr2L z — f,--- z_r_:________________ hifit:-.5-... -..._„_., 1 -.... = ,.._ -7 .....„,..„.. t -:-s- ,c. • 41. TA's-AL -117,:„.)141711. I- ,,, 1 -0,5 ,Irt..."'• 35'front yard setback -.. .. , I ' l' E- I 0,'.:, . I i 1 I -R. °, I'i I l'IT'rs,..*.-, - ' .4^.. 1,,,-4,-)... 1 -•, , 1 U I f ' f" r 1 - 1 '- ' Li.,,,,, k --,,,,,- A 1. 1, -- ifiii-...,:r u,..,. , 1: . ,, m.,..„- ., -.,,7f,,,- ,t ...,.,,,_ ,. ,v , 0 ,46. " ..= T:- t , 41.. , : fir- t 1( .; .' I -g.,,,,-,-,-, ,#filk 4 "."- I, t,. - X ....p ,,-,.. IF I 7 •-- • -- .. _ ., r, 10 I ,t- 1 ,..,4,,,, .' - , '••„ ‘ -, • I , v 1 -4%4: • --- ,\ I 6./ • . rlio , Fr- '' ' \ d s\ ti--._- _, _allI11-40 - , ,_,,itvw ?-;;.- ;-=- -- ---.. ,,, ..,...„---172,.......,-.A., ,, -IP -0, ,,,-° • t ' v •v.,.+,1kfl!:, ,A)', — . * -. ,.. t: --,' 1 W._- Ilw , '` ' ''-'.- --4. - ---r a w-- \ •... r/ ir-p.mil :-.1•, . ,t` /el_. ,, I 4111--k-A _ .,,,,,,,.... ki, o,- ‘, ,YAA.i.:!--,,, , .4.,‘,. Alt 1 Z., '54172k.'4,, ...... . _...,... ‘,....7,.-- 41.. " ''''),'- ' ''P. 4, Or - ..k11, - .....-.---.. , 1 r' Scale 1"m30' I 1 ,, -- '1 ' " \ VriVe-•,-..-- . 11.''' -4 1 ..,:-., , I s AS .,•,-- • it 2 s' Rev.14 c' g S rinVa11(e'y Spring L....0 Estates Frictley, Minnesota ARCHITECTURAL WORKS Villard, Inc. 5770 3.1AalraTive Path-Studio A Rick Harrison I Orinnit 11.4.1.ghts,101 35074 612 DOI 1555 Site Design Studio SHEET A-1 R"'"-°e° Developer:John Demello 04.1n..111.Mmes. NAV gr.7111.411..... mo war..0...........M... , March 29.2004 In carefully evaluating Profitmax's proposal dated 3/24/04;I have come across several new areas of inconsistencies. According to the Planning Departments submission the proposal meets all the setback requirements for the R-3 and C-2 districts, and states that the petitioner is meeting or exceeding all parking requirements. Both statements are incorrect. In the interest of saving time at the meeting tonight, I would like to present them to you now, with the hope that you have time to review them before the meeting. • LOT COVERAGE Lot coverage is at 26.67%. Profitmax states that 20% lot coverage is required for R-3. In fact,the R-3 code states that NO more than 20% of the lot should be covered by the main building. Maximum lot coverage for C-2 property is 25% for a four-story building, and 20% for a five- story building which this actually will be. The building has too much lot coverage for either a standard R-3 or C-2 district. This building is still too large for this parcel of land. • RETAIL PARKING The retail space has increased by 330 square feet from the previous proposal. Interestingly, BEFORE the increase in size they needed 90 parking spaces, but claim to only need 69 parking spaces for the larger project. Normal parking ratio for C-2 is 1 stall for every 150 square feet of floor area and increases to 1 for 100 square feet when there is a restaurant. They have based the new parking ratio on the speculative parking ratio of 1 stall for every 200 square feet of floor area. By using S-2 zoning you are specifically approving this exact project with retail space of 13,750 feet, so it cannot be speculative building floor area. Therefore, by normal C-2 parking ratios, even without a restaurant,the new proposal should contain 92 retail-parking spaces, not the 73 provided. The new proposal is SHORT 19 parking stalls for the commercial area. • PARKING AND HARD SURFACE AREAS Both R-3 and C-2 codes state all parking and hard surfaces shall be no closer than 20 feet from any street right of way. The C-2 code also requires a 5-foot sidewalk easement and a 15-foot planting strip behind the required sidewalk easement. ALL of the north row of parking stalls along Mississippi Street and many parking stalls along Old Central are sitting right on or within a few feet of the property line and right of way. If the streets were widened the parking stalls would be sitting right next to the street. The walking path around this ENTIRE project appears to be completely in the right of way, including on the eastside where it is in the alley. The signage and majority of the landscaping appear to be primarily located in the right of ways also. Anoka County expressly prohibited this in their letter dated 1/27/04. If any of these streets were widened there would be nothing left but the ponds, parking, and the building. Again the project is too large for the land. • HOUSING BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE YARD EAST- While the 18-foot side-yard setback for a 45-foot building is technically correct per the R-3 code, it seems to violate the intent of the law. If the building was just ONE foot taller it would need to be set back at least 51 feet from the property line since it adjoins R-1 property. C-2 code states that permitted buildings and uses shall not be closer to the boundary line of any adjacent residential district than 50 feet. s SIDE YARD DRIVEWAY-The R-3 code states that where a driveway is provided in the side yard the minimum required side-yard setback is 25 feet and it increases to 30 feet in a C-2 district. The driveway from Mississippi Street,which runs along the side yard, appears to be within 1-2 feet of the property line. Therefore,the 18- foot setback for the building is incorrect. • HOUSING PARKING DATA While the number of parking stalls provided is adequate if the building is classified as an independent living facility, all of the codes state that IF the building is convertible to market rate the number of parking stalls required increases. It would be difficult to argue this building could not be converted, and if that were to happen,the proposal is 26 parking stalls short of the required number. While we realize that S-2 zoning allows for some latitude in the codes,the S-2 zoning still states that the standards shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. This project seems to deviate in many important areas. The proposal was too large for the land before, and the project is still too dense. It would seem that if this rezoning and plat request were approved you would be setting several new precedents for the substantial parts of Fridley that are listed as redevelopment areas. Thank you for your consideration. Jean Schwartz r'a` MAR 2 6 March 26, 2004 To: Mayor Scott Lund and Fridley City Council Members Re: Profitmax New Design We received the new Profitmax design in the mail. We do not think it responded to the neighborhood concerns at all. It is larger than the first design, going from 71 to 90 units. It is still 47' high on the 64th Ave. side, and taller where the building faces our house and yard. There is very little green space other than in the set backs. Profitmax fails to mention in the bottom sentence of this letter that this building also includes over 13,000 sq feet of Retail space. Once again, the project is just too large for this site. We have new concerns with a driveway that now enters onto 64th Ave., which is all R-1 zoned. Entering onto Central Ave. from 64th often requires a wait already. The letter from the Anoka County Highway Department dated January 27, 2004 and introduced at the last Council meeting and the Profitmax studies have traffic count numbers that vary quite a bit. Anoka county's is 13,000 and Profitmax is 8,000. The Highway Dept letter also states that no plantings will be allowed within the county right of way. The City Planning Department has explained that underlying zoning set backs and traffic counts mean nothing when the Council is approving development in S2 parcels, they only need your approval. All setback requirements cannot be abandoned so that any building will fit any site. Careful research needs to be done to ensure that these new developments in newly created S2 parcels do not encroach on existing homes and neighborhoods. Thank you again for all the time you have spent to keep Fridley a great place to live. Barbara and Dennis Edwards 1372 64th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 March 25, 2004 Dear Mayor and City Council Members, There are several issues with the Profitmax proposal dated March 24, 2004, and the project in general we would like you to consider. As we are sure you know,the new plan has 90 housing units instead of the previous 71, and still contains retail. The 2 buildings were just combined into one even larger building, with an additional 19 condominiums adding even more density on the site This is an increase of 27% in the number of units from the previous plan. A driveway coming out of the complex has now been added on to 64th Avenue. Depending on the pitch and angle of the new driveway,headlights will conceivably be constantly shining on our home and 2 of our bedrooms. This driveway will add hundreds of trips a day compared to the 3 homes that currently have driveways on 64th Avenue, in a quiet single family home neighborhood. The vastly increased traffic flow will affect the health, safety and welfare of our children and neighborhood. The letter that Profitmax sent to us this week is extremely misleading. It is not an adequate representation of the new project. The new driveway emptying onto 64th Avenue is almost completely obscured by trees. In fact many people we have spoken to failed to notice it. Also the letter talks about the number of housing units, but completely fails to mention that there is still a retail complex included. If Profitmax is misrepresenting the new proposal in these areas,one has to question how many other misrepresentations are still undiscovered. It seems very important to note that traffic counts on Central Avenue vary greatly. The traffic counts from Profitmax are vastly different from the traffic counts Anoka County mentions in their letter. Profitmax claims Central Avenue only carries 7,800 to 9,000 cars per day,and claims traffic levels have been consistent for the last 10 years. Anoka County states that over 13,000 vehicles per day are using Central Avenue, and discusses increasing traffic volumes and congestion. Once again, what other misleading information has yet to be uncovered. A new study done by AARP states that 83%of seniors want to stay in their homes until they die. Profitmax claims there is a need for 189 senior condos in the area. If their traffic count numbers are so far off, one has to question this number also. There are still some set backs issues. The parking on the north side and some of the west side still come right up to the property line, instead of the 20 feet they should be set back from any right of way. Profitmax still has most of their trees,plantings,walkway and signage in the right of ways for all streets involved. Anoka County specifically stated this was not permitted. a •- , ` PI201'� INC. 2872 17th Terrace • New Brighton, MN 55112 • Office: (651)493-3936 • Fax: (651)493-0229 Rea/ Estate • Business Cansu/ting ACN Oeve/apment We have responded to the concerns with the following new design:communities --y L _ _ L.. _ . - — --- ---- — i 4 is �. s fi €� r., f kv FTM f. #': . : : 4 _ i S }:` A N S e g l4.. s,0,I , mm 3 �T i f 1 4 d r t „ . %,\FIN f .w4 J: V ;gyp 15 V r, f 4. � r aas _ ( .,, .11”-,7.,-.' -7.',..z,- „.,..., ,---,,, , . ; -- 4 ---'"1, telt, cp W T v. •- �r rz+ asre ,.,;'7rr lic ►� (�=- Please review the proposed site plan with 90 units of senior housing: 3 stories on the north, 4 stories in the middle and 3 stories on the south side. "Creating Synergy between Land and Man" l ! MAR 2 5 RAE Dear Public Officials, March 17, 2004 During the past five months I have been following the Spring Valley Estates senior housing proposal very closely. Even though the outcome affects our neighborhoods directly, I think your decision will have implications for our entire city. The most important point is that this development could not occur if it were not for the housing chapters in the City of Fridley Comprehensive Plan. In my opinion the" Comprehensive Plan is neither." It was meant to have involvement from all the citizens but ended up being a product of the city staff. And if you approve this project before we have a chance to amend the plan it will be too late because you have now established policy, not a plan. The most objectionable part of the plan in my opinion, is who decided where to draw the lines and boxes that surround specific areas on a map in the plan. Which committee or group decided which neighborhoods are worthy of maintenance, reinvestment, and stability and which are not? I guess my Moore Lake Hills home is worthy and maybe I should just be quiet, but apparently my brothers home in the Hyde Park area is not. If you draw areas on a map where "redevelopment is likely to occur," my brother and thousands of other residents may be faced with the same dilemma as the residents on 64th Avenue and on Mississippi Street. Once again, we will pit neighbor vs. neighbor, those selling out supporting the redevelopment and those left behind to stare at a huge high-density building opposing it. This policy 4 r _ whose jobs depend on development dictate the situation, we have lost control as a citizenry. A lot of us moved here to Fridley to have the peace of mind of"what you see is what you get." If you vote yes on Spring Valley Estates then the developers and staff drive events much like they do in a developing city such as Blaine. We are a fully developed city, but are we really in dire need of redevelopment? I would like to invite all Public Officials and the Community Development Staff to join me on a tour of a truly needed redevelopment district where I deliver mail. There is a proposal pending, which will displace two single family homes and one business building for a 71 unit R-3 type structure. The 2500 block of Queen Avenue North will have this structure put right in "their back yard." Neighborhood opposition is not quite as organized because half the homes on that block are vacant. In fact if you were to draw an arc with a one-block radius from the center of the project, you would find thirteen vacant buildings and six empty lots where single family homes once stood. The North Minneapolis sight is a redevelopment area. What we have in Fridley with the Spring Valley Estates proposal is a wooded lot that has never been developed surrounded by modest affordable single family homes on large wooded lots similar to the neighbors to the east. Please consider all these ideas and suggestions prior to making a final suggestion on Spring Valley Estates. Respectfully, Timothy M. Byrne 5 7kkjZ.C.,d6 el/ 2 `71.i eCi zyce,, 161 n /0 4L ,c_e_e_e2-2 2 o54.1) � I / c- C Lt. a/Lea. , a I ' • �. /2 -nom �dy _ i r - L/ 41--‘361 .-�.-e , irf E 71/e4i.Ae_.1 e n-e-e / 14x J� , �L.1 k7A // /Z2A9 S .. Aa. .�. I jtze, e-40 /3/4444:zi,„&,, pzia-64-x-a./ t , 4' . MAR 25 RECO c. t4 LC...L. 171-t477 ,12P-i--- 17 e f 0 e ctL/_, , --meglfz, v1.4.ja. .A.,(_, eb.aA., _E-• r___. tiLd- ae..4L __ cL a/.,A i,*-da,,L,L ,,a,,,, . , s,,, ,..,2._. -v.:IL -- -0)_344--J-rt. , )-161,0 . 8.4w Co -- t,c 5 if ./),L , / isy , - J &(?-. L /" &(1 /a ; sit ' dirf tfriA/L-•• _Ank/CA/1-41/21, A 2 C.-6 -.1 Ilf /. 7 ; 1,1 -o -0-2)4 Wt botalia-C-, • ) _ -, * • tc77. d-ill'h)7VA.-1-1 I t ' , -e. a— 1 i ,2/2s-2 _ , IA" ,ceift_ p * / ' ; A 4/1 144-6- • Iiii I / '-) / - te) /Le4j4Z 44 (Ara Xj // ' # i .0 .,t-e- tA: .e17-1.t.- LAY'd 'd ea '4. 11 . 1 -44L 6 ("If. 4' - 6 .1L/1 rYn4.12 ati (vh1 q0: . / gt' 6.6-7-Li 47.-LLQ. , 'isLAJ -14-tv-i -kis ,, i , 0 - 2)z- U. uao:),:d, ,..,e___..,i____Itna, 4, cc-x_,7\„„v62r-F-tck.. - ) 9/6/7i . Ottdf'° 4 te 3to fiette, 5f-- ii-E. • FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29 2004 PAGE 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A °E, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 22. Ordinance No. 1193 creati • a new chapter of the Fridley City Code setting service charges for emer•ency response calls (tabled February 23, 2004). MOTION by Councilmember olfe, seconded by Councilmember Billings, to remove this matter from the table. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. John Berg, Fire Chief, s ated at the City Council meeting on February 23, 2004, the Finance and Fire Depa ment staff were asked to review two particularly controversial areas of the fee struct e—personal injury accidents and vehicle fires. They contacted the insurance compa y and found out that they do cover personal injury accidents under the liability iss es. They also looked at insurance in terms of comprehensive versus liability and d-termined that in the case of vehicle fires they would probably be creating more staff ' me in terms of vehicle fires. They decided to look at the issue of vehicle fires, but h e pulled it from the ordinance at this time. He also explained they propose to continu- with personal injury accident fees after surveying a number of local fire departments at are currently doing this. The indication is that they can collect. Vehicle owners - e required to carry liability insurance and that most departments are collecting betwe-n 80% to 90% of the fees that are charged. Staff recommends adopting the or. nance with the exception of vehicle fires. MOTION by C•uncilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to waive the second readi • and adopt Ordinance No. 1193 on the second reading and order publication. UPON A VOI E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED U ANIMOUSLY. 23. First reading of an ordinance to amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota by making a change in zoning districts (rezoning request, ZOA #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc. (Ward 2) (Tabled March 8, 2004) 24. Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., to replat six parcels into two parcels for the purpose of constructing a senior housing development and a retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 – 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition (Ward 2) (Tabled March 8, 2004). MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to remove ZOA#04-01 and PS #04-01 from the table. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 13 • The petitioner has asked Traffic Data, Inc. to re-evaluate the previously submitted traffic study to include the new access points and the additional condominium units. • The consultant determined that the revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. • The change in the driveway configuration will improve the traffic flow on Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. • There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Central Avenue and 64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. • City staff and the petitioner met with Anoka County to review the comments and concerns the County had and to review the revised site plan for Spring Valley Estates. The County had concerns regarding too many access points on Central Avenue and commented that they would prefer to see an access on 64th Avenue. • To address those concerns, the developer has reduced the number of access points on Central Avenue to one driveway and has redesigned the parkin garage so it receives access from Mississippi Street on the north and 64t Avenue on the south. • The County has stated that they will accept the redesigned plan and will permit access on Central Avenue as well as Mississippi Street. • The County stated that currently there are no imminent plans for reconstruction of either Central Avenue or Mississippi Street, nor are there any plans to signalize the intersection. • The County is pleased that this redesign has moved an access to 64th Avenue because it is very likely that whenever Central Avenue and Mississippi Street are rebuilt, it would become a right in / right out, and 64th Avenue could possibly serve as a location for future median break or full access location. • The petitioner has a consultant who met with the Rice Creek Watershed District on March 24, 2004. • City staff received a notice of exemption from the Rice Creek Watershed on March 25, 2004. • The exception was approved as it appears that the wetland was incidentally created and is not protected under the Wetland Conservation Act. • Like the Town Center Development proposal, this master plan has been modified to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission, City Council, and the neighborhood. • City staff recommends approval of the new site plan, the plat request, and the rezoning request with the subsequent master plan, with 22 stipulations. Councilmember Billings asked the City Attorney if there should be a motion to substitute the one lot plat for the two lot plat originally submitted. Mr. Knaak responded that would be the appropriate action to take. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 15 is for the mature Fridley residents, their families, and the future families of Fridley. He said they requested approval of the proposal. Councilmember Barnette asked about the building on 5th Street in New Brighton and how it compares to this proposal. Mr. DeMello stated it is very similar with the entryway creating a grand entrance appearance that works very well. That site does not have any commercial and they believe the commercial in their proposal is a convenience for the senior residents. Mayor Lund announced that even though the public hearing has been closed on this matter, he would like to offer those present an opportunity to comment on the revised proposal as long as they limit their remarks to three minutes. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the idea is to hear new comments only. Mayor Lund asked the audience members to stick to the facts and to present new comments only. Dorothy Pejl, 1260 Mississippi Street, stated she has a background in real estate having retired from HUD. She thought a complex like this would be a real benefit to the neighborhood and would increase the value of surrounding properties. Virgil Okeson, 1423 —64th Avenue N.E., stated there is an easement on 64th Avenue for a street that will run north parallel to Old Central Avenue. If a street is proposed through that easement the east wall of the proposed structure would hang over the street. There is another easement off of Arthur Street in the middle of the block going westbound which could not proceed because of this development and would negatively affect property owners. The comprehensive plan states the intent is to preserve the single family units in Fridley. Redevelopment is approaching about 30% of Fridley. This would be setting a dangerous precedent. He did not believe the driveway approach from Mississippi Street complies with the setback requirements. Jeff Saarela, 6190 Heather Circle N.E., stated he lives about a quarter mile south of this proposal. He is in favor of development but he is opposed to the design for this development. He thought it was mediocre and mindless. He thinks it would be much better to turn the whole building facing to the south which would give more green space to the residence. He stated that quality design brings long-term profits. Doug Johnson, 6388 Pierce Street, stated he is not against the development but does have reservations about the density. He would prefer to see 60 units rather than 90. He asked if this type of proposal can proceed with a special use permit rather than rezoning the property. If the developer does not proceed, the zoning would remain. r. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 17 could end up with a whole mix of things. This development is a nice proposal for the whole City. Mark Schwartz, 1372 — 64th Avenue N.E., spoke in opposition to the proposed driveway onto 64th Avenue. This proposal has such a high coverage of the total square footage of the land that the storm run-off is a concern. He understands that the rate of flow has to be controlled from this site, but not the volume. He asked who will be responsible if there are more problems with the storm system. The height of the building is not stated correctly because the garage floor is approximately the same level as the curb on 64th Avenue. He does not believe the developer has met the burden of proof required to rezone this property. This proposal creates spot zoning by placing a high density housing unit next to R-1. He asked the Council to deny this request. Chuck Bullock, 1521 Camelot Lane N.E., stated he has concerns regarding the traffic this will create. He explained that it is already nearly impossible to access Central Avenue from 64th Avenue during peak periods of the day. He feared many of the residents from this complex would seek alternate routes through what are now quiet residential streets. He also questioned the height of the project. Joanne Zmuda, 6051 Fourth Street N.E., questioned if the financing for the whole project is available or if it will be built piece-meal. She stated the main concern is the size of the building and the type of commercial uses going in. Jean Schwartz, 1372 — 64th Avenue N.E., said redevelopment must be compatible with the surrounding area. She believed if this is approved, the City Council will be setting a precedent for the rest of the redevelopment land in Fridley. She could think of any other high density development in the area that sits 18 feet from a residential property line. She thinks the driveway onto 64th Avenue will affect the safety of residents on that road. If the City Council denies this proposal, they are not denying future redevelopment on this site, but denying a building that is too big. This is not an appropriate development for this site. The City Council should leave the door open for a more appropriate proposal. Frank DeMello, 6134 Woody Lane N.E., stated it is hard to come to a consensus about what kind of building the general population will accept on that site. He pointed out his property is already zoned commercial and that he could have put in commercial uses a long time ago. There is a strong demand for this type of housing for seniors and there are other similar developments that are blending in well in their residential settings. The City Council approved a similar project across the street. This is a good project that should be approved. Some of the objections expressed do not take into consideration the good of the community. He also stated seniors prefer to stay in their own environment and in the community they are used to. This project is good. Yoava Klucsar, 1420 Rice Creek Road N.E., stated he has lived in Fridley over 20 years. He asked how the City Council could consider approving two large projects in this area when he cannot even build a double bungalow on his lot. They did not need FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 19 • Ms. Zmuda's concern about the type of retail: Mr. Hickok explained the S-2 zoning is meant to serve a smaller demographic area and is generally geared toward walking traffic. • Ms. Schwartz's comment on lot coverage: Mr. Hickok explained the lot coverage on this proposal is 26.67%. In a R-3 zoning, the maximum lot coverage is 20% or an additional 10% allowed if you park underneath the building. This development does have underground parking so the maximum is 30%. This proposal is under that requirement. As far as her concerns on parking, Mr. Hickok explained it is not at all unusual to use speculative parking ratios on an unknown element. Where we have multi-tenant development, it is not at all unusual to apply speculative ratio and that is what we've done here. That means that there's 1 parking stall for every 200 square feet of parking area. This development exceeds the parking requirements. Mr. Hickok also pointed out that this is a S-2 district which takes into account that there are pieces about redevelopment projects and that are beneficial to the city and that there are trade-offs in allowing setback deviations. This petitioner has dedicated a 30 foot green space area to the county. Anoka County doesn't have immediate plans or in their 10 — 20 year plan to change the current roadway. Other concerns expressed by Ms. Schwartz regarding building setbacks are addressed in the flexibility allowed in the S-2 district. However, this proposal would fit in R-3 zoning and all setbacks would have been met. • Mr. Klucsar's comment about not being able to place a double bungalow on his lot: His property is in a R-1 zoning which is single-family only. Mayor Lund asked Mr. Haukaas to respond to the question regarding the responsibility for any storm water issues that may occur as a result of this development. Mr. Haukaas responded that the development's storm water system has to be designed to handle the storm water on that site and they will be required to file a storm water maintenance agreement with the City. The property owner, essentially the homeowners' association, would have the responsibility for any storm water issues. Mayor Lund asked the petitioner to respond to concerns about the process of this development and whether it will be done in phases or all at once. Mr. DeMello responded they are planning on a phased build-out starting with the commercial and wrapping around so they can ensure the viability of the project. This enables them to minimize the pre-solds and get in the ground as soon as possible. As you look at the proposal from north to south, it will be built with the north section first, then the middle section, and then the south section. Councilmember Wolfe asked if the initial phase will include residential as well as commercial. Mr. DeMello stated it will. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 21 retaining walls are added back in, the height is 35 feet. In addition, they set the building back another 40 feet or so from the centerline of 64th Avenue so the face of the building will now be 100 feet. He said the dimension of the side yard setback on the east is 18 feet, but that 18 feet is to a one story gazebo porch so the building itself is 28 feet back. Taking into consideration the 16 foot easement for the alley, the building is actually 44 feet from the property line on the east. As far as the design of this project, he stated he has designed over 500 projects in the state of Minnesota and this project is a step up from a lot of those projects in terms of the design and the materials they are using. Mr. DeMello responded to concerns of the 64th Avenue access. This was not their idea, but they are working within the constraints of the county which he understood was a priority for the City Council in terms of their approval for this project. That is what drove one of the access points from Central Avenue to 64th Avenue. Councilmember Bolkcom stated she has a huge concern with the 64th Avenue access. She questioned if Anoka County did anything more than recommend an access on 64th Avenue. This access will impact the residents in that neighborhood and she believes this to be way too big of a project. The petitioner has listened to the neighborhood, but she thought he should have met with the neighbors initially and up front to address their concerns. She is not for this project for that reason. The biggest issue is density and the height of the building. She is all for senior condos. If this proposal could be scaled down it may be more acceptable. Counclimember Billings stated the petitioner has done a lot of work and the project is beautiful. We need to recognize the fact that we will need senior housing. By the year 2030, we are going to have half again as many people in the 7 county metro area as we have now. We cannot have 20-acre sites for a single family house and still be able to provide adequate housing. We have to realize that we will have to find ways to do more with the land we have. He stated he likes the idea of a mixed use commercial site with housing. Unfortunately, one of his objections to the plan was that they were trying to do too much with the site and now with this plan more is being done with the site. One of his biggest concerns is along the northern and northwestern property line. In order to accomplish what the petitioner needs to economically, the parking is pushed right up to the property line. There are no provisions for snow storage when everything is to the property line. Should Anoka County need to take that property for right-hand turn lane, there would be even less area. If this were a larger site with more green space buffering to the east, it may be a better proposal. In terms of the access to 64th Avenue, it's not the worst thing in the world and will not add that many cars to 64th Avenue. He does not think this particular site can accommodate this much construction and it is not in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare for the City of Fridley. We need this type of housing, but it needs to be on a larger piece of property. Mr. Harrison stated that reducing the density would result in a per unit cost that would be prohibitive for the people of Fridley unless subsidies were involved. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 23 MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to amend Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, substituting Revision No. 14 dated March 20, 2004. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe to table Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, to the April 12, 2004, City Council meeting and direct staff to provide a list of objections to document into the record. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO TABLE PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #04-01, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSINESS 25. First -ading of an ordinance under Section 12.06 of the City Charter declari s certain real estate to be surplus and authorizing the sale thereof general) located at the northwest corner of Ely Street and Ashton Avenue. MOTION by Coun•'Imember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette to waive the reading and ado at the ordinance on first reading. UPON A VOICE VOT 1 ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU` LY. 26. First reading of a ordinance amending Fridley City Code, Section 205.07, R-1, Single Family 'welling District Regulations, and Section 205.08, R-2, Two Family Dwelling District regulations, and Section 205.09, R-3, General Multiple Dwelling Dis ict Regulations, related to accessory uses (Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA 04-01). MOTION by Councilmember Bolk.•m, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to waive the reading and adopt the ordinance on first reading. UPON A VOICE VOTE COUNCILM BER BARNETTE VOTING AYE AND MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLI GS, COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE, AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTI NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION FAILED ON A 1 TO 4 VOTE. 27. Informal Status Reports. William Burns, City Manager, reported that the n- sletter is now at the printers and will be mailed next week. AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 12, 2004 CfrY OF FRIDLEY Date: April 8, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Plat Request, PS #04-01 and First Reading of an ordinance for Rezoning, ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-55 COUNCIL ACTION At the March 29, 2004, City Council meeting, a motion to deny plat request#04-01 and rezoning request#04-01 was tabled to allow city staff time to prepare a resolution reflecting Council's concerns. The resolution has been attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council remove these items from the table, and vote on each independent item. 37 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 12,2004 PAGE 9 Mr. Pribyl stated that is correct. Councilmember Billings stated, in other words, if we do not raise the fees to cover the cost of water and sewer, we will not be able to provide streets that are drivable. Mr. Nord asked when the street improvements will be completed. Mayor Lund stated they are about 7 to 8 years out for completion of all the street improvement projects. Councilmember Bolkcom stated another method of covering costs would be to charge residents for street improvements as other communities are doing. Fridley is trying to avoid that. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to continue the public hearing to April 26, 2004. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OLD BUSINESS: 9. Motion to remove the first reading of an ordinance to amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by making a change in zoning districts (Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc.,) and Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc., from the Table. and Resolution Nos. 2004-29 and 2004-30 of the City of Fridley denying the application of John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc., by or on behalf of Spring Valley Estates for the rezoning of certain property to S-2 and requesting the replatting of that same property for the creation of a high density condominium development. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to approve the resolutions denying the application of John DeMello (Profitmax, Inc.) on behalf of Spring Valley Estates for the rezoning of certain property to S-2 and requesting the replatting of that same property for the creation of a high density condominium development. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if this matter should be removed from the table before action is taken. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 12,2004 PAGE 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 2004-29 CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. UPON A VOICE VOTE TO SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-29 TO DENY PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #04-01, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to amend the motion to deny Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, by substituting Resolution No. 2004-30. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to amend the last line of Resolution No. 2004-30 to include the words "The application of the Developer (Rezoning Request, ZOA#04-01) is therefore denied." UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 2004-30 CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. UPON A VOICE VOTE TO SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-30 TO DENY REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #04-01, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. NEW BUINESS: 10. Info\mal Status Reports: Mr. Burns, diManager, said a conference meeting was scheduled for April 19, 2004, at which tim' the following issues would be discussed: 2 a.m. bar closing, Comprehensive Plan revisions, redevelopment strategies, replacement of aerial truck, the University Avenue fence, and Parks capital improvement funding level. The meeting will start'at 7:00 p.m. in the lower level of City Hall. The meeting is open to the public. Mayor Lund announ d that on April 24, there will be a fundraiser for Springbrook Nature Center at theutback Steakhouse. All proceeds will go to the Springbrook Nature Center Foundati \n. CI1YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 15, 2004 John Demello Profitmax Inc. 2872-17th Terrace NW New Brighton MN 55112 Dear Mr. Demello: On Monday, April 12, 2004, the Fridley City Council officially denied your request for a Preliminary Plat, PS #04-01, and a Rezoning, ZOA#04-01, to replat property, for the purpose of constructing a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, and to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business, and R-1, Single Family Residential, to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, legally described as, and generally located at: 1314 Mississippi Street Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 1340 Mississippi Street Lot 15, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6401 Central Avenue Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6421 Central Avenue Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6441 Central Avenue Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6461 Central Avenue Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition •, Resolution No. 2004-29 Page 3 9. The height of the proposed structure on the Parcel in the Development plan, particularly in the 4— story portion of the Development, would significantly block sunlight to, and impede the view of adjoining residential development more than what they currently enjoy. 10. The development would adversely affect the quality of life and health of surrounding residents by blocking direct access to sunlight during much of the daylight hours. 11. The screening and plantings proposed in the development would not be sufficient to provide the modest degree of privacy currently enjoyed by adjacent land owners once the Development were to occur. BASED, THEREFORE, UPON THE FOREGOING, THE CITY FURTHER RESOLVES THAT: 1. It concludes the modified development proposal represents a density and intensity of use of such a degree as would adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it would be located. 2. It concludes that the modified development proposal would adversely impact the health and safety of the neighborhood surrounding, as well as the City residents and members of the public that would be using the adjoining highways and roads. The application of the Developer is,therefore, DENIED. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. /rte Scott J. Lund, Mayor ATTEST: Debra A. Skogen, C. Clerk RESOLUTION 2004-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DENYING THE APPLICATION OF JOHN DEMELLO, PROFITMAX INC., BY OR ON BEHALF OF SPRING VALLEY ESTATES FOR THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO S-2 AND REQUESTING THE REPLATTING OF THAT SAME PROPERTY FOR THE CREATION OF A HIGH DENSITY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, John Demello, Profitmax Inc. is the Fee and or Equitable Owner of certain real estate(hereinafter"the Parcel") located in the City of Fridley, Minnesota, located approximately at or near the corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue in that City; and WHEREAS, John Demello,Profitmax Inc., made an application to the City of Fridley for the rezoning of the aforesaid real estate to S-2 for the purpose of developing on the site a condominium complex; and WHEREAS, as part of the application process, John Demello, Profitmax, Inc. (hereinafter, "the Developer") submitted a development plan to the City, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Developer, or its agents and representatives, spent many hours discussing the elements of the plan with the City's staff; and WHEREAS, in addition to requesting a rezoning of the parcel, and as part of its application process,the Developer has requested a replatting of the Parcel; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley conducted a public hearing on the issue of both the rezoning and replatting of the Parcel WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004,the City Council of the City of Fridley conducted a public hearing on the question of the rezoning and replatting of the Parcel; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2004,the City Council of the City of Fridley reviewed the developer's revised 90-unit condominium building with commercial space integrated into that residential building. A plan that the developer prepared in an effort to address concerns voiced by the City Council members, the Anoka County Highway Department, as well as, members of the public at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing conducted by the City Council on March 8, 2004, extensive testimony was given both by and on behalf of the Developer, as well as members of the City staff and numerous members of the public; and 4 • Resolution No. 2004-30 Page 3 9. The height of the proposed structure on the Parcel in the Development plan, particularly in the 4—story portion of the Development, would significantly block sunlight to, and impede the view of adjoining residential development more than what they currently enjoy. 10. The development would adversely affect the quality of life and health of surrounding residents by blocking direct access to sunlight during much of the daylight hours. 11. The screening and plantings proposed in the development would not be sufficient to provide the modest degree of privacy currently enjoyed by adjacent land owners once the Development were to occur. BASED, THEREFORE,UPON THE FOREGOING, THE CITY FURTHER RESOLVES THAT: 1. It concludes the modified development proposal represents a density and intensity of use of such a degree as would adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it would be located. 2. It concludes that the modified development proposal would adversely impact the health and safety of the neighborhood surrounding, as well as the City residents and members of the public that would be using the adjoining highways and roads. The application of the Developer is,therefore, DENIED. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. ;ten;r Scott J. Lund, Mayor ATTEST: 444,4f Debra A. Skogen, Cit Jerk Pcnrif,jic` in lice, -iii riie,, 7 .... Uby co _ c v IL s- A:_ _.. PQ011ITMAX INC. 2872 17th Terrace • New Brighton, MN 55112 • Office: (651)493-3936 • Fax: (651)493-0229 Real Estate • Business Consulting • ACN Development We have responded to the communities concerns with the following new design: b —. 3 1 1 • . : . _.gLip_Clc-:_'-q.44 L.1<,- ---<.<-<-- , ` 'I ' ( (� � k= ( t ' .�• v tri. °�, 3' ! i , 11, . , 1, i � 4 irra,. ir . — i �•. dt; .;,:t.ttiz to, , _,_ t 1 . ,. J' .1 iiii7 1� Vt" �> is BJk ' ... riI; -� a Ti~xr, � ": fix i ski ,4:--, k‘P j71 '1 f 1 -i r Vir I ? sit:, W tqtj.,. Viil;'''''.:14 1. '1 i ij. n . ' 1 %. kat....b.- ' V — * a "" 1-14,_ ..„74..v.4: iietA. Iiit'4':-.'''1 ' • i •E, wa.u•wswwuuar t .., — — �—Al - / { �1 Aim. a j Please review the proposed site plan with 90 units of senior housing: 3 stories on the north, 4 stories in the middle and 3 stories on the south side. "Creating Synergy between Land and Man" it N1 � 1 N V � W W A m oy 3 o N_0o m ao V L / L _ A IN / A 11 r'- -I- A - - IN / I / - -I- r - r - 11 IN / / \ I / A ! r - f 1 / n r ♦ / n r 1 r -I- A -I- r \ / / - -I- r - r - r I'_ r \ UA r 0�1" _W w. w 3 a IAI // w W I M o Q, rt X' " I � C m .d .. A � p l/ IN A A- I r\ r- IN CT l' A hm I :0. A b y a. u4 ., it N1 � 1 N V � W W r 1 �. 73 o n p� 3 \n bti ay jw� w t2� - W Ii W . n W__ - 12° CIPWWatermoin - V L D C E_ N- =1 R A L !A V E 1 / "U E ,' "J ' l '" I v S00'14'18'E . ' A I - /LNW1 4 -SE1,4 /= 2639.23 r' / - \\\ u S00'14'18'E _ — 624. 18 — — / N ' - — — - -` Cw S0074'18'E i l — — — — Sec. i3 -T30� _ — — — — _ - — —, — �--�— — X 8g6 tee' X88 89, 2649.96 may/ y ! 88 8 i \ 893 - vi° 1 ''86 u - ��� _ 1 90 89 a R 3 UV / / T J _ 1 y.. T T-A_ �'� F 5 � - I D j� UT��A� , UT I ® h \ Y �' T, UT - _OO ur OT Curb" » Curb x a ' w D' - Curb Cu Cut CD k G OE 'u OE - - OE - / O � lnl - -..._ .. _ _ ur DE - — OE - OE �O t/ rn ss 8 SS UUT UUr ' o UU. uurT v- r � w, SS /o N.: ) S (n -• '\ O `,y N =tip l A °� 883 _ -'- _ p I. ! o a ° - s >., "' ®, ® (PLAT 601 52) t J' Asa/ \ \` o o co Z SD 0 14 8 E 594.28 N o 0 EN AL A VEN , ti Proposed OL ��� TR UE �,�, s Z6g o O / a - r .Q 3 : n y �' Driveway. o' \ X371.79 i` _ ;) \ vti 'Proposed Drainage & Utility Ease. 192.50 I �6 - m I N 1 O I $ g9 Proposed R W c I. —1 i y i \�. — - -- -- - - - - -- \ —�; --- - -Ia`" o O — 1 --- -- - - -- -1- - - - - - -- -- — —� �-— c 1 \6� +\,i // / \' I / I i- ,e II s` A `s:. X X X I \'\ w -� I ! I ! I ! // �0 I� -28.9 r 'Coo >I` I v o g2 I ` j \+ \` I i Cb V I I !I lr� I in I o Q / _30.00 m "V c� I \ x I t o0 omi I I 60.00 co 0. �\ c - , b, L\> r n J 0 1\ W 1 i tl y ,l A i `_. X\\� 20XWood Fence 18- n �� I J° �� b - � ., 1,� .� �a 2 r T Q in, nous Driveway 0 3 n b N n t ! �` 1- �A, Q •I1 3• ] � n A � Q ! u C 3' c- 1 r- •. o o cp L1 �� \.\ 1 m I f \ I I Ci I I jc __.L__� O I UG j� a'lo II W '� �o ^`' a '+ -- - - `mil\ , �• �1 \_= of A q\ A / N ; ;: f c. C\ I U' U V O - O ; „ '`\ I �• v. Jr,i 1 ' /; ` �d ��1! I 1 1 r; 04 J ' 1 \ , ks '� 11r $$- ` c c .- 1 ` sc I r_ /\ ', `~ I 6 888 N 27.3 O (n J � ut O :y,'- l�� � ,� 2 _ , � � - \ / % } { \_ �'' � � r � m CPS � • ' _- V CO - .. - . t L f / �O `�� O ' op? -- - I /,`.1� --' /' /t / I `.\ \` OJN •`\� T i,��� V -A m 1� ��! m O ( I ` i 111 \:! / \` '� I I ® i C O i `Ct11 \ c ° r, - m - \ . j --N IC a q B umino s Rl o I I I = 0 ivewo 1 c Wood Retaining Wall OE cPa �\• \ ! ;\` \\ CL c� v I ♦ ("!11 ", CP t) •V "5 0 \ - - `� .�\ `1 1 �\ '.` ���ia'--- _-- .._t\± L` �- --- _g87, _ _.I_ _.,•` ~O ,/ 4 o�° - -- zg :`\ I - - N,__ ti I _ i f ,_ _ - 9 9s __._ ._ j�/_l - _T, I ? ,• o , I ) f s- .I. :I- + sement 3 _ be via' ated) N) T East dine of L ``L S�- //- PUBLIC T�LITY EASEME I \ s•� `\ co . \ g rn �, � „�, \ �• i3O � �' v ;- -z + gB � � r �,� _ t„ as Monumented _ PER DOC. N.O. 987860- 0 cA, i A` - - - _ ca Monumen ted I II �. o `+ _..� l!/ . :i '•J. I` ,' �' `\ / _ �� ° Discrepancy- I i - ,Ti ti �. -- ..- ...____- J� \� `('� f' ;• i = t `> ! is Ic.,�sb • (N ��m ,' _ 1 - -�, N K I o• 3' ! 201 1 ,� I c BB.i. I. \ \ I I 10. �?\, �� Iv \ `i. ', � � \\ .,.111.���t..- - -�'.{ _ .. -- - -'- - - - I i \ \',•1• I ��' 1•., j'\ I � j t \ \• a I V I ( t ! i I 1, `�` ;! I c I` O �,. -- �i •� Con retf Driveway rn I i I I `- '+ i ` y p ! r ` I. 7 y •fit 3 , 3. L � n1 _ \ \��1. - ._ .. _ .t , \ ! �(b' f' i 1 6, ELEC. o• ' f/ , I ? f 50.00 ``i O•o�a Itl � /^ - - __ - ', t r ._ � \_ - S 1 T� - f = !! 125.00 _1' �' -SggG! N \\ fJ. ; =y t �1V! `' 4.- NQ 1 s D 14_,2_- !�1! - - -- r �� w m� `"\ \ m� \ I 30.00 ! I T ' �'' .I M1/' �\ Op Bitu inoUS 3 0 1 Drive oy �I ) 00 m Ao RCP I 1 1 1 i rn 10 N v 1, �0�ca�; wee 4`sr — I _ °\ 9-k,,7 ', 193.19 �1 30 f m w —882 -- - OE__ 1 . ; UT a i.._ - is - r —,' 15" RCP § S 15612 -' - UT UT 1ST ST N00 14'32 IN N 1 A r - 470.00 ST - -SS U) O Bituminous Driveway cn I „ c X X72° Wood F§•ace 00, `Is�pt i�pnh� lr. I /I L_ L/_ L_ L_ �/( i _� O UI n IN r- I / r- IN r , , , , r1 r1 / 1 r♦ O \ / V �^1 O 0���� - / r to ,O \ 3; "I- N W ��Z3N (n1 /11 F< r-- it l-- F/ Ff / I'r - \ \ � r- IN A I r -./ -1- / I / I n IN � l r� rqf Gs", o. Cb pq TQ ,. J o mac` ° 'an a�y O y' cn' O n1 Z C t'1 C 'oa� \`n. .I 1;' r J vi'° 4 m m=�cii O O n O owe c o ° ?� o �'m o 4 �'• o hl C Z I i r ° O 1 J n nJ +l rl �•. -- -- Q O N ^I O oy° ) Z Z a O J J y ?zr 0.� ❑ ❑ co co 3 m a y O ~ C n a w (O rt SmO •� J a C%�: „ ' rtO � < r l �m �,p , •� Q ~ Cy r, a �I Stv o te Trunk Highway No. 65 1 �Q O q ^ cp N CD to ?(b I C • I I i\:,`� ` O N ;a "��►vR°�: "1�(71�n '12NL p O .O to O O .O .O O D O p _O O O 4..0.0 O O O. G.`S.QCmy o y`c o I Z y V'r O �1 m O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r x m i t'l. p Old Centro! Ave. O o i I .. la. o� 4 C�i� V o.. w? 0 o t� 'o' a m a u,' ^. v Z cA, —i �, 3 4 N oo c,� n -+ C 3 15 J 7 2 3 3 2 7' a O > > 7 " y C �' ~ v O O lD V V O Oi .O► °O• .Oi rt .O► rOi - - r0+ O• .O.r On .O•/. ,Oy "• ^ .O. .O1 a ~' ( .•► o ! N m n °� a (b ti• `• •C Vj `° O �. N O o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m J Ic w to 2 i r'1 4 W y to y H y y to y eA y to to to y y y y y y tq y 4 m 110 , p O t I a ; ; O n1 R° Q V` O �. ( G� O` 4 I �► C C y cn 1141 U) N r C) zj � =� IV C-) Z N ,. C Q o o :13-Z o \O C C O \O C o 1 m m 0 O o J p O 0T 4 vi N vi �A D I �� 2 y O' n �1 y N? ' (Op �C �i (N ?? O j j �• O ° cx C) m m m m m v 3 m -» Q rt o n boy am ��, I mom. p I o O cQ o ,o ,Q c o _ °o o m coo c 0 3 I o �, z �► b U� :3* C C C O D : O rmr Q rt <<�m N O� -- Rt O O O�; v� O� �y iA �n oo - y m c+ o o �o o 1 0 0 3' m rt O o m ° m y y' N -- '7 C (,� 1 Q m O Oo 1 Q, ;• N m it c? o o ci oo . n a s y o° ,. N 2n o 4�� N k 0 , cD C ; O o. m O (•t p O �i y 4 J `�► y O (a o y o Q� m m o q O (n2 �.a m ? 1 p 3 O rt tnj�TlQ O �-Z1 o n ? O m O Q n O m O m o C51; O N �� 3 0 om��3 o0 3 4 � � ►� ' n a• 3 ,, °� �' n m A m oy 3 o N_0o m ao V L / L _ A IN / A 11 r'- -I- A - - IN / I / - -I- r - r - 11 IN / / \ I / A ! r - f 1 / n r ♦ / n r 1 r -I- A -I- r \ / / - -I- r - r - r I'_ r \ I 3 l \I IAI // r O O Q, rt C Ci Cb l/ IN A A- I r\ r- IN l' I y o SA n I- *00 V r a g � y R rt �3 r 1 �. 73 o n p� 3 \n bti ay jw� w t2� - W Ii W . n W__ - 12° CIPWWatermoin - V L D C E_ N- =1 R A L !A V E 1 / "U E ,' "J ' l '" I v S00'14'18'E . ' A I - /LNW1 4 -SE1,4 /= 2639.23 r' / - \\\ u S00'14'18'E _ — 624. 18 — — / N ' - — — - -` Cw S0074'18'E i l — — — — Sec. i3 -T30� _ — — — — _ - — —, — �--�— — X 8g6 tee' X88 89, 2649.96 may/ y ! 88 8 i \ 893 - vi° 1 ''86 u - ��� _ 1 90 89 a R 3 UV / / T J _ 1 y.. T T-A_ �'� F 5 � - I D j� UT��A� , UT I ® h \ Y �' T, UT - _OO ur OT Curb" » Curb x a ' w D' - Curb Cu Cut CD k G OE 'u OE - - OE - / O � lnl - -..._ .. _ _ ur DE - — OE - OE �O t/ rn ss 8 SS UUT UUr ' o UU. uurT v- r � w, SS /o N.: ) S (n -• '\ O `,y N =tip l A °� 883 _ -'- _ p I. ! o a ° - s >., "' ®, ® (PLAT 601 52) t J' Asa/ \ \` o o co Z SD 0 14 8 E 594.28 N o 0 EN AL A VEN , ti Proposed OL ��� TR UE �,�, s Z6g o O / a - r .Q 3 : n y �' Driveway. o' \ X371.79 i` _ ;) \ vti 'Proposed Drainage & Utility Ease. 192.50 I �6 - m I N 1 O I $ g9 Proposed R W c I. —1 i y i \�. — - -- -- - - - - -- \ —�; --- - -Ia`" o O — 1 --- -- - - -- -1- - - - - - -- -- — —� �-— c 1 \6� +\,i // / \' I / I i- ,e II s` A `s:. X X X I \'\ w -� I ! I ! I ! // �0 I� -28.9 r 'Coo >I` I v o g2 I ` j \+ \` I i Cb V I I !I lr� I in I o Q / _30.00 m "V c� I \ x I t o0 omi I I 60.00 co 0. �\ c - , b, L\> r n J 0 1\ W 1 i tl y ,l A i `_. X\\� 20XWood Fence 18- n �� I J° �� b - � ., 1,� .� �a 2 r T Q in, nous Driveway 0 3 n b N n t ! �` 1- �A, Q •I1 3• ] � n A � Q ! u C 3' c- 1 r- •. o o cp L1 �� \.\ 1 m I f \ I I Ci I I jc __.L__� O I UG j� a'lo II W '� �o ^`' a '+ -- - - `mil\ , �• �1 \_= of A q\ A / N ; ;: f c. C\ I U' U V O - O ; „ '`\ I �• v. Jr,i 1 ' /; ` �d ��1! I 1 1 r; 04 J ' 1 \ , ks '� 11r $$- ` c c .- 1 ` sc I r_ /\ ', `~ I 6 888 N 27.3 O (n J � ut O :y,'- l�� � ,� 2 _ , � � - \ / % } { \_ �'' � � r � m CPS � • ' _- V CO - .. - . t L f / �O `�� O ' op? -- - I /,`.1� --' /' /t / I `.\ \` OJN •`\� T i,��� V -A m 1� ��! m O ( I ` i 111 \:! / \` '� I I ® i C O i `Ct11 \ c ° r, - m - \ . j --N IC a q B umino s Rl o I I I = 0 ivewo 1 c Wood Retaining Wall OE cPa �\• \ ! ;\` \\ CL c� v I ♦ ("!11 ", CP t) •V "5 0 \ - - `� .�\ `1 1 �\ '.` ���ia'--- _-- .._t\± L` �- --- _g87, _ _.I_ _.,•` ~O ,/ 4 o�° - -- zg :`\ I - - N,__ ti I _ i f ,_ _ - 9 9s __._ ._ j�/_l - _T, I ? ,• o , I ) f s- .I. :I- + sement 3 _ be via' ated) N) T East dine of L ``L S�- //- PUBLIC T�LITY EASEME I \ s•� `\ co . \ g rn �, � „�, \ �• i3O � �' v ;- -z + gB � � r �,� _ t„ as Monumented _ PER DOC. N.O. 987860- 0 cA, i A` - - - _ ca Monumen ted I II �. o `+ _..� l!/ . :i '•J. I` ,' �' `\ / _ �� ° Discrepancy- I i - ,Ti ti �. -- ..- ...____- J� \� `('� f' ;• i = t `> ! is Ic.,�sb • (N ��m ,' _ 1 - -�, N K I o• 3' ! 201 1 ,� I c BB.i. I. \ \ I I 10. �?\, �� Iv \ `i. ', � � \\ .,.111.���t..- - -�'.{ _ .. -- - -'- - - - I i \ \',•1• I ��' 1•., j'\ I � j t \ \• a I V I ( t ! i I 1, `�` ;! I c I` O �,. -- �i •� Con retf Driveway rn I i I I `- '+ i ` y p ! r ` I. 7 y •fit 3 , 3. L � n1 _ \ \��1. - ._ .. _ .t , \ ! �(b' f' i 1 6, ELEC. o• ' f/ , I ? f 50.00 ``i O•o�a Itl � /^ - - __ - ', t r ._ � \_ - S 1 T� - f = !! 125.00 _1' �' -SggG! N \\ fJ. ; =y t �1V! `' 4.- NQ 1 s D 14_,2_- !�1! - - -- r �� w m� `"\ \ m� \ I 30.00 ! I T ' �'' .I M1/' �\ Op Bitu inoUS 3 0 1 Drive oy �I ) 00 m Ao RCP I 1 1 1 i rn 10 N v 1, �0�ca�; wee 4`sr — I _ °\ 9-k,,7 ', 193.19 �1 30 f m w —882 -- - OE__ 1 . ; UT a i.._ - is - r —,' 15" RCP § S 15612 -' - UT UT 1ST ST N00 14'32 IN N 1 A r - 470.00 ST - -SS U) O Bituminous Driveway cn I „ c X X72° Wood F§•ace 00, `Is�pt i�pnh� lr. I /I L_ L/_ L_ L_ �/( i _� O UI n IN r- I / r- IN r , , , , r1 r1 / 1 r♦ O \ / V �^1 O 0���� - / r to ,O \ 3; "I- N W ��Z3N (n1 /11 F< r-- it l-- F/ Ff / I'r - \ \ � r- IN A I r -./ -1- / I / I n IN � l r� rqf Gs", o. Cb pq TQ ,. J o mac` ° 'an a�y O y' cn' O n1 Z C t'1 C 'oa� \`n. .I 1;' r J vi'° 4 m m=�cii O O n O owe c o ° ?� o �'m o 4 �'• o hl C Z I i r ° O 1 J n nJ +l rl �•. -- -- Q O N ^I O oy° ) Z Z a O J J y ?zr 0.� ❑ ❑ co co 3 m a y O ~ C n a w (O rt SmO •� J a C%�: „ ' rtO � < r l �m �,p , •� Q ~ Cy r, a �I Stv o te Trunk Highway No. 65 1 �Q O q ^ cp N CD to ?(b I C • I I i\:,`� ` O N ;a "��►vR°�: "1�(71�n '12NL p O .O to O O .O .O O D O p _O O O 4..0.0 O O O. G.`S.QCmy o y`c o I Z y V'r O �1 m O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r x m i t'l. p Old Centro! Ave. O o i I .. la. o� 4 C�i� V o.. w? 0 o t� 'o' a m a u,' ^. v Z cA, —i �, 3 4 N oo c,� n -+ C 3 15 J 7 2 3 3 2 7' a O > > 7 " y C �' ~ v O O lD V V O Oi .O► °O• .Oi rt .O► rOi - - r0+ O• .O.r On .O•/. ,Oy "• ^ .O. .O1 a ~' ( .•► o ! N m n °� a (b ti• `• •C Vj `° O �. N O o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m J Ic w to 2 i r'1 4 W y to y H y y to y eA y to to to y y y y y y tq y 4 m 110 , p O t I a ; ; O n1 R° Q V` O �. ( G� O` 4 I �► C C y cn 1141 U) N r C) zj � =� IV C-) Z N ,. C Q o o :13-Z o \O C C O \O C o 1 m m 0 O o J p O 0T 4 vi N vi �A D I �� 2 y O' n �1 y N? ' (Op �C �i (N ?? O j j �• O ° cx C) m m m m m v 3 m -» Q rt o n boy am ��, I mom. p I o O cQ o ,o ,Q c o _ °o o m coo c 0 3 I o �, z �► b U� :3* C C C O D : O rmr Q rt <<�m N O� -- Rt O O O�; v� O� �y iA �n oo - y m c+ o o �o o 1 0 0 3' m rt O o m ° m y y' N -- '7 C (,� 1 Q m O Oo 1 Q, ;• N m it c? o o ci oo . n a s y o° ,. N 2n o 4�� N k 0 , cD C ; O o. m O (•t p O �i y 4 J `�► y O (a o y o Q� m m o q O (n2 �.a m ? 1 p 3 O rt tnj�TlQ O �-Z1 o n ? O m O Q n O m O m o C51; O N �� 3 0 om��3 o0 3 4 � � ►� ' n a• 3 ,, °� �' n m m oy 3 o N_0o m ao V L / L _ A IN / A 11 r'- -I- A - - IN / I / - -I- r - r - 11 IN / / \ I / A ! r - f 1 / n r ♦ / n r 1 r -I- A -I- r \ / / - -I- r - r - r I'_ r \ I 3 l \I IAI // r n' (b' / \ l/ IN A A- I r\ r- IN n I- *00 V r a g � y r 1 �. 73 o n p� 3 \n bti ay jw� w t2� - W Ii W . n W__ - 12° CIPWWatermoin - V L D C E_ N- =1 R A L !A V E 1 / "U E ,' "J ' l '" I v S00'14'18'E . ' A I - /LNW1 4 -SE1,4 /= 2639.23 r' / - \\\ u S00'14'18'E _ — 624. 18 — — / N ' - — — - -` Cw S0074'18'E i l — — — — Sec. i3 -T30� _ — — — — _ - — —, — �--�— — X 8g6 tee' X88 89, 2649.96 may/ y ! 88 8 i \ 893 - vi° 1 ''86 u - ��� _ 1 90 89 a R 3 UV / / T J _ 1 y.. T T-A_ �'� F 5 � - I D j� UT��A� , UT I ® h \ Y �' T, UT - _OO ur OT Curb" » Curb x a ' w D' - Curb Cu Cut CD k G OE 'u OE - - OE - / O � lnl - -..._ .. _ _ ur DE - — OE - OE �O t/ rn ss 8 SS UUT UUr ' o UU. uurT v- r � w, SS /o N.: ) S (n -• '\ O `,y N =tip l A °� 883 _ -'- _ p I. ! o a ° - s >., "' ®, ® (PLAT 601 52) t J' Asa/ \ \` o o co Z SD 0 14 8 E 594.28 N o 0 EN AL A VEN , ti Proposed OL ��� TR UE �,�, s Z6g o O / a - r .Q 3 : n y �' Driveway. o' \ X371.79 i` _ ;) \ vti 'Proposed Drainage & Utility Ease. 192.50 I �6 - m I N 1 O I $ g9 Proposed R W c I. —1 i y i \�. — - -- -- - - - - -- \ —�; --- - -Ia`" o O — 1 --- -- - - -- -1- - - - - - -- -- — —� �-— c 1 \6� +\,i // / \' I / I i- ,e II s` A `s:. X X X I \'\ w -� I ! I ! I ! // �0 I� -28.9 r 'Coo >I` I v o g2 I ` j \+ \` I i Cb V I I !I lr� I in I o Q / _30.00 m "V c� I \ x I t o0 omi I I 60.00 co 0. �\ c - , b, L\> r n J 0 1\ W 1 i tl y ,l A i `_. X\\� 20XWood Fence 18- n �� I J° �� b - � ., 1,� .� �a 2 r T Q in, nous Driveway 0 3 n b N n t ! �` 1- �A, Q •I1 3• ] � n A � Q ! u C 3' c- 1 r- •. o o cp L1 �� \.\ 1 m I f \ I I Ci I I jc __.L__� O I UG j� a'lo II W '� �o ^`' a '+ -- - - `mil\ , �• �1 \_= of A q\ A / N ; ;: f c. C\ I U' U V O - O ; „ '`\ I �• v. Jr,i 1 ' /; ` �d ��1! I 1 1 r; 04 J ' 1 \ , ks '� 11r $$- ` c c .- 1 ` sc I r_ /\ ', `~ I 6 888 N 27.3 O (n J � ut O :y,'- l�� � ,� 2 _ , � � - \ / % } { \_ �'' � � r � m CPS � • ' _- V CO - .. - . t L f / �O `�� O ' op? -- - I /,`.1� --' /' /t / I `.\ \` OJN •`\� T i,��� V -A m 1� ��! m O ( I ` i 111 \:! / \` '� I I ® i C O i `Ct11 \ c ° r, - m - \ . j --N IC a q B umino s Rl o I I I = 0 ivewo 1 c Wood Retaining Wall OE cPa �\• \ ! ;\` \\ CL c� v I ♦ ("!11 ", CP t) •V "5 0 \ - - `� .�\ `1 1 �\ '.` ���ia'--- _-- .._t\± L` �- --- _g87, _ _.I_ _.,•` ~O ,/ 4 o�° - -- zg :`\ I - - N,__ ti I _ i f ,_ _ - 9 9s __._ ._ j�/_l - _T, I ? ,• o , I ) f s- .I. :I- + sement 3 _ be via' ated) N) T East dine of L ``L S�- //- PUBLIC T�LITY EASEME I \ s•� `\ co . \ g rn �, � „�, \ �• i3O � �' v ;- -z + gB � � r �,� _ t„ as Monumented _ PER DOC. N.O. 987860- 0 cA, i A` - - - _ ca Monumen ted I II �. o `+ _..� l!/ . :i '•J. I` ,' �' `\ / _ �� ° Discrepancy- I i - ,Ti ti �. -- ..- ...____- J� \� `('� f' ;• i = t `> ! is Ic.,�sb • (N ��m ,' _ 1 - -�, N K I o• 3' ! 201 1 ,� I c BB.i. I. \ \ I I 10. �?\, �� Iv \ `i. ', � � \\ .,.111.���t..- - -�'.{ _ .. -- - -'- - - - I i \ \',•1• I ��' 1•., j'\ I � j t \ \• a I V I ( t ! i I 1, `�` ;! I c I` O �,. -- �i •� Con retf Driveway rn I i I I `- '+ i ` y p ! r ` I. 7 y •fit 3 , 3. L � n1 _ \ \��1. - ._ .. _ .t , \ ! �(b' f' i 1 6, ELEC. o• ' f/ , I ? f 50.00 ``i O•o�a Itl � /^ - - __ - ', t r ._ � \_ - S 1 T� - f = !! 125.00 _1' �' -SggG! N \\ fJ. ; =y t �1V! `' 4.- NQ 1 s D 14_,2_- !�1! - - -- r �� w m� `"\ \ m� \ I 30.00 ! I T ' �'' .I M1/' �\ Op Bitu inoUS 3 0 1 Drive oy �I ) 00 m Ao RCP I 1 1 1 i rn 10 N v 1, �0�ca�; wee 4`sr — I _ °\ 9-k,,7 ', 193.19 �1 30 f m w —882 -- - OE__ 1 . ; UT a i.._ - is - r —,' 15" RCP § S 15612 -' - UT UT 1ST ST N00 14'32 IN N 1 A r - 470.00 ST - -SS U) O Bituminous Driveway cn I „ c X X72° Wood F§•ace 00, `Is�pt i�pnh� lr. I /I L_ L/_ L_ L_ �/( i _� O UI n IN r- I / r- IN r , , , , r1 r1 / 1 r♦ O \ / V �^1 O 0���� - / r to ,O \ 3; "I- N W ��Z3N (n1 /11 F< r-- it l-- F/ Ff / I'r - \ \ � r- IN A I r -./ -1- / I / I n IN � l r� rqf Gs", o. Cb pq TQ ,. J o mac` ° 'an a�y O y' cn' O n1 Z C t'1 C 'oa� \`n. .I 1;' r J vi'° 4 m m=�cii O O n O owe c o ° ?� o �'m o 4 �'• o hl C Z I i r ° O 1 J n nJ +l rl �•. -- -- Q O N ^I O oy° ) Z Z a O J J y ?zr 0.� ❑ ❑ co co 3 m a y O ~ C n a w (O rt SmO •� J a C%�: „ ' rtO � < r l �m �,p , •� Q ~ Cy r, a �I Stv o te Trunk Highway No. 65 1 �Q O q ^ cp N CD to ?(b I C • I I i\:,`� ` O N ;a "��►vR°�: "1�(71�n '12NL p O .O to O O .O .O O D O p _O O O 4..0.0 O O O. G.`S.QCmy o y`c o I Z y V'r O �1 m O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r x m i t'l. p Old Centro! Ave. O o i I .. la. o� 4 C�i� V o.. w? 0 o t� 'o' a m a u,' ^. v Z cA, —i �, 3 4 N oo c,� n -+ C 3 15 J 7 2 3 3 2 7' a O > > 7 " y C �' ~ v O O lD V V O Oi .O► °O• .Oi rt .O► rOi - - r0+ O• .O.r On .O•/. ,Oy "• ^ .O. .O1 a ~' ( .•► o ! N m n °� a (b ti• `• •C Vj `° O �. N O o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m J Ic w to 2 i r'1 4 W y to y H y y to y eA y to to to y y y y y y tq y 4 m 110 , p O t I a ; ; O n1 R° Q V` O �. ( G� O` 4 I �► C C y cn 1141 U) N r C) zj � =� IV C-) Z N ,. C Q o o :13-Z o \O C C O \O C o 1 m m 0 O o J p O 0T 4 vi N vi �A D I �� 2 y O' n �1 y N? ' (Op �C �i (N ?? O j j �• O ° cx C) m m m m m v 3 m -» Q rt o n boy am ��, I mom. p I o O cQ o ,o ,Q c o _ °o o m coo c 0 3 I o �, z �► b U� :3* C C C O D : O rmr Q rt <<�m N O� -- Rt O O O�; v� O� �y iA �n oo - y m c+ o o �o o 1 0 0 3' m rt O o m ° m y y' N -- '7 C (,� 1 Q m O Oo 1 Q, ;• N m it c? o o ci oo . n a s y o° ,. N 2n o 4�� N k 0 , cD C ; O o. m O (•t p O �i y 4 J `�► y O (a o y o Q� m m o q O (n2 �.a m ? 1 p 3 O rt tnj�TlQ O �-Z1 o n ? O m O Q n O m O m o C51; O N �� 3 0 om��3 o0 3 4 � � ►� ' n a• 3 ,, °� �' n m m oy 3 o N_0o m ao 3 r n' (b' vvw� rvv� WW- t project ARCHITECTURAL Wow VI L L INC. 5770 Blackshire Path Studio A Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076 Telephone 612801.1559 ® 2073 AwA&%ywd Wanks Yl&rdl&a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. x PBT R VIf1 AED flLl AEGMXWoxxtamm 248M DATA issue record drawn checked sheet title