The URL can be used to link to this page

ZOA04-01 _ - — — --- -- =-- -, :a}ea /cea 09 i :aged uo!;e3!J!4ON a;aldwoa uos;eollddy /CBE] 01, 1.2v_ g- :a;ea Ilounoa AlmpalnpaIloS --- /70- g/_ :a;ea uo!ss!wwoa 6u!uueld pe npa43S - :A8 pan!aoaj ,412/ :## ;d!eoau 01 :JagwnN uogeo!Iddy ;uawpuawy;.xal 6uluoZ 00'00E$ 6u!uoze I .7 00'009$ :aa3 5333 1-07(F c/— :31ya/32ifljVN9IS A L%/ - ( A SIS :3NOHHd 3WIiAVa -S CM r 1,iV �N '77a� �t •SS32iaay ��`�S /�/ J "4f LAI t_} QJ :3LAIVN NO{1.VIN21OdN1 2i3NO1111Ud :31Va/32jf11VNO1S :3NOHd 31A1IIAVa _._____.------- :SS32:100V i )-AA r :3 W\/N 1 (•6u!sseooJd 04 .100 d wioj s!q4 u6ls ;snw s aunno ae3 :siasegaxnd peJ4uo0)i (aI;!; ic;Jadoid ay; uo sjeedde ;! se) NO{lvW210JNI 233NMO 33d ON seA (:,pa>IoAeJ Jo paluap Jana esuaa!1 ;ecn semi __-------_--_-- ____-- 6sseu!snq }o edc; leynn `saA JI I ---- --___-__ 01c4!9 yo!gnn `saA JIoN saA {,esueo!I ssau!snq e paJ!nbeJ yo!gm Alpa u! ssau!s a pa;eiedo noA aneH :e6ueya Jo; uoseau (a6en6uel pe;senbei goe;ly),i ----- :pa6uega eq 0; epoa 6u!uoz Jo u0!;90 :JO t�- 6uluozeu Jo; uoseeJ e S :6uluoZ pa;sanba? •—' /a/ ' e :6u!uoZ ;uaJJnal --� :a6eaJoe/a6e;ooh aaenbS — ----- uol;lppy/3oeJl )Ioo18 401 :uogdposaa Ie6a] ---- - :JagwnN uogeo!J!;uapi 1( iedoJd :sseippy a oe a Jas ` e;;!w ns Jo eJlnbei ueid al!s :NOI1VW21OJNI Al2�3dO2fd (p g" �3 { q � P I ) luewpueWV 4xe j. Bu!uoz Buiuoza� :210d NOLLV3IIddV 1N31Al121vd3a 1N31Nd013A13a ,�111N[1WW03 Z69£-ZLS (£9L) Z£17S9, NW ATIC111:1711 3f1N3AY A.LIS2i3AINf i.11791 A31012H JO .A.113! / c 4-x4w) ✓ ?IDO'Ig n LO I NOI LdRI�SgQ IVD I NOLL LIQ 116 WILL '0 Q -- 10, -- A e- o £ _ Et : ffl If1N NOI.LV3IdI.LNKQI A E1d02Id Z E A Ss (WA/ 't ;I r )Jl6i v.., I, C. $ E ) :ssamacw 1/ 44 5 LV 7$ 1011111 !�-/.L3VaLL I )1301C1)1301C14 r 1,0'I :N .Ld OIRIDSaQ 1VOR1 / :10$11�1f1N NOLLVDIUILN3QI A1'Igd02Id - h �' - � � � �ssa2IQQ� Z h S 5 n/w' ).) �,r.%a �,r y \f„,, ti 9 1 I .1///..,4 lJ)$ I.L.LIQ !MITI / NIDO'Ii of ,L0,I :NOLI.dRIDS1Q'WDWrI /I t Q O _ r �� _`, q £ � �� 2IggL�i�N�,I.V�13I.LNgQI A,L2igd02Id Z. A.5 s niw ;11 l u U 9 10 f, :ssaxUQy AaIluA uudS 4I1IIQ5/1.DVILL 1 )I30'Ig 61 1.0'I :NOI1411InSUQ IVDr'I £ZOO-Z17-17Z-O£-£I NOI.LVDIdI.LNKQI A,LUIgd02Id Z£VSS N"I `"IPPd anV fe11u33 IZ179 :SSMIQQV 4/17,1 lit(1,4 OI 1..LIQQV9aDvx1 / ?I3O'Ig J,. I 10'I :NOI amps1Q'Idoai 2IggY�If1N NOI LV�Id LNaUI AL2igd02Id `� L' 4 - - h ' O �` 07 J L,b,bA •SSg2IU V 4,y/1,0 (,d5 LOII1.IQdy1.Dv2I1. �ggY�fll�I rI00Is1v'NOLIlIIIQI As?laDSHU do d £ / -z� tiSS n/14/(..v4 NOLL LIQ• ' 3V211 / T>IDO1H / 1,0,1 :NOI.LdDIOSaQ 1VD1'I Wig) 4 Y Q 0 - Y - 0E _ F i : J flAIf1N NOI.LV3IJI.LNaCI AJ JIad021d A 55 n/vv 1, 4 c /...4 s1,t) E :ssauQQa' �)/�wi 4tvols . OI.I..LIQQY .3VII1 / )IDOZH S r 1,01 :NOI1.dDIlsaU 1VD 1'I , too - ‘0, _ At- _ / F _ / :11HERA1I1N NOLLVDIdI.LN1QI A.LUIgd02Id z [ASS n/lto G, ,q1,9 :sSMIGCRT not v uao;nl.adoad j luauuga1UV 2uiuoza}J Jo' uopeagddy -s)-/ c- '' ;:/ /4,_(7 --).-400--i--7-- , /, - /1 L1 -/G5 - 1-9 2,5-43-_-5, .N(,G1 " /P ;Jam/ :IIVQJaIInIVNOIs ''e )a NI _�,4/ ' '9'P/ ))/7 9 6.s ) :HNOH(1 HIAIIIAVQ :SSMIQQV )-✓7U'1 P" - -(c' N �, Y- ='56)._._ :(T'IIII NO S2IVEddV.I.I SV) MANN /-, - '/° :�.LVQJJf11.VNDIS /is5 1->/ a C Z-1 lV �n {�h�. �' l :3NOHd �JA LLAVQ -,� yZl le)/ �v srt.s �t/� �+ />'f! '�' :SSMIQQV Ar7-G -/ �"7;eA /--41-P-7271' ---1V ' g /10 :( IIII NO S2IVaddV II sv) alvN. o�L. /P :3IF�Q/�2IIlIVNIJIS � / .fie i 5 6 :INOHd alAIIIAVQ i /�/� .� fa/-r :SS�2IQQV /76/ '�''--� �, 9� :(aTIII NO S2IVTddV II sv) �IVN (v46( ,A3/"," ,.2, 7v- �r -�;/ ` 7 :aIVQJDJIf1IVNDIS �`��`�U ,/67-`.'. 8IZ8-8Ct�(£ 9L) :INOHd 1IAIIIAVQ Z£j7cc NNI `"IPI .13AV F.zlu3D IZti9 :SSMICKIV uosrn J :(gjIII NO SIIVaddV II SV) ainIVN t-rLa RA/ k �� :aIVG/HIIflIVNOIS c,`i 1-• ; L,- .q l., : INOHd'3NIIIAVQ -1.," , ''%,r) a LL L :SsfxUQV co'S VVA , s CARVA, \ :(al II No S2IV1ddV II sv) INIVN X x 1i; i ; v ' X :gIVQmfIVNDIS ,05040 ---Xid V' l 144161 i w :�NOHd�iIIAVQ S1, t°9 - ILS (E-9CJ :SSa2 uuv 00/•4 AS /9 .,n0/+0 -6 21 v t'.A-1 O// wf ap :( [IIII NO S2fV1ddV II SV) HIAiVN /s//2 ' ', )-)0-S)1_ ,) ''j// 1 iii :gLVa/ nzVNOIS t S 4 E L — YL 9 ( I v :RNOHd SII LAVA r/�.sS (41J `iq`f cf/s' ch.k/V 01/V 22 �`M )1. . I $ 8 :SSU2IQQV /J / o P1�b'a►- :(TIIII NO SIIV1ddV II S 1 AVN P 0/1/, -'-,,,--y GI ''244 2. 1 er. �2r'°''r�/ Ly(I U :aivain2IIljVNDIs 17, ~ 1 C s (�9 Lj :aNOHd 1IIIAVQ 12I hss (VW 4}1 r ZS ,'dd: $SI S S�� oh E. :ssaxQQV .AO/ ` vl)4aq /Q�ycJ 7 11 SSS" J :(�'IIII NO RP/addV II sv) �IVN J �ylo -N 1 L'�.►off not;vwaojuj ammo aaa z 3uaunpunv - • , 1 2uiuozaj .ioj uo9U3iiddV . b ri = 7 _..,..■c-rte ILII-Wi ,1 of 1/2 '1'1.1.1(7, " r ,i 3. 4r)11L".'TA 1"°7-''';17111;40/itz:'': + -‘."'i''' '310,.;‘Al.' Ill 1111 sA u Ffr & A a � i IA,.....,`„1;:''''' 4-''-'S'''''''4:11r4' "164 ,.,iii---,-,_,,- 10 , . ,_ :'..f1/44,.4. V# ft ..' 10,-, --,--:- ..,,>,. * l , I' a1 . 1"j_ �` �4.'A �£ .Lt I z`• FKd t.: • .,,,,I,,,' il. a 1 1 ': '''''''''tikit''''‘''''',rit'\:. .' ..7""''' ,,,,,,,, t.:4-4-:.".1111 4'47, iiii'4. ' \/:/ /C/ ''''''''*'' 1 .,,,,.' ',tit! 1 ..,..:..,•( t",t 1 I __.,:'$,.. '. : g'.1- ' .',..- ', Le8•,..., 1 'I'l-1 ,At=w,. .0.46 :4,1: ItA,),,,I.k ,4;‘,.ilk ....,...,. ., a • L 1 , iii ;. �" ori >IIII13) C O N_ �.�� 01. �rj iwill >11111 s._ Cli) CD CL) (73 rim' > milma ci:s 0) 011 tCD c v --, ,:t co v‘ a) -1-0 y-- ■I. T3 s„ a)O .ECflcLL X c C/) 1 N t. th O co a) a. 4-. cn a), E gS '"u5 -LJ --- cm valla (I) >% r---- 03) C >% To § _c .—w C co (/) Cli o >% 0.. 2 —' .... can O � L V � V L5 . in ›N mom .!mil 0 2 2 To a) daS 4:: C (1)> g$ 6 CI) I CD (4 1 L401 ) ICD U, cg 6 � � -c, /) Clcic�■ L +J • co — L 4� Cl 0 (i) ki El Q. 4.. W W •....CD - CO lido I): o _ CM _ r a .7— Ill -I c w .---a) c a) ,.. T. "--r, > yD- 0 -cD ___,(1) I--- = P.. c6 7:5 _ 0 E 0 — c c- ai 0 o 0- > u) — co C%1 I 1-- o CO cO CO § 4) c ca S • �1\ 1 § t ,_., to „, .., > • o 0 0 o O O < 1.ti bn 4 a) N ..... 6 "c, ta 4 --" c"CO v . = od vi - • Q) >+ E c O -�■-� ►► ►i ►► ►► Cfl L V a) d' -- (a .4_,.4_,OO OO > C6 a) — (0 co _c U0 a) 1 1,4 —0LCZ L -1—+ (1) C( -1—J 10 '0 U -F-r t �� }1 O M r-r ► E a) u) d �' s0'. -1-+ O N ■ � W 0 0. „. O� 'O O. U ,o i► ►► H a N CO ( Ld-- 0 cin . . a) x ■ � .5 o CO c .0 2 ♦' � �U UI !t � n � � > o I) 4-- 2 o o cn U $ u) c -4-0 06 S �, goo H O (� N .}. in 9 J E Q (I) 0 22gS 1 a) N a ' -9 -9 #0-) tin S cED) ,..; 1 1 ' 0A F (13 — = V u9 ° O st O O co 1.• i • ccS 1 O >, N oo N O .e' b t � � 0 -0 4) � a kr) O U) -0 0 To c° Illi > C ;g 1 U ;or. 7:i > . j ,... ,__, .1- � II it (f) OI II c N o ' O 0.. 'L 55 as (I) *-je IN w CO 0 CV c 6 n, P41 N CD '— .6 g ikN P. t ) R 8 W CD .�.:+ 0 CCS m C4 U H.-— 0 ..E a E 'Ds II U U II a) -r—-II,,ia 4 1 .g.: -- g g cc, ,:c, L S. 0 -10 CO O Cn CO o � CO 1 II ti g A g .2 1. C cTi cn a) o • — _ > _ o E 2 ca -I J II �L N W O M w a " " .- C:11- ,4> �0 -TE 2 Po - W o �, oo In a) E a) p 2 �, u 4� °' o .� iliC w "Ci U � a) %-• v� 0 au- (i) a > U oU) imil (1) ii, (%I. co -c CD U E o.� = o .(� o Q O y- 0 m a, -0 o =Y Lea s . E t c JCD 0. L y.. (13 u) L.. L INIMIll a) >, _0 00 c)c "i; 1 C13 CI) E 2.1 c 0 c--IT 1-- cC r:NC 4- J O at O N 2 _ c a) cn 'a c IND ca O O N cn cD > a) Co•NEN (1) 0 0 U I 7.: m c U 2 I limi 0 .711.1 _ IL C_ iv ..- V) a) o a) C (1) en .17.. a) 0 CD a 4) ■ a) coco 4-- O 2 o 13 0Elm= O 0 0 N > o c ■ — V O O 0 a) o a) t13 13 Iti �c :_Eh � C _ O Q N E -cifti CD a CO O CO .«- N c -0 cTi V♦ U O V t) .0 ai 4110L ` I I p 0 0 O I 0 Z 0) E z . C • c • co co 0 ta tri. ■ a) = *IA El N >+ O L =a immi '-'47a 22 al Q 0) CU a) a) '> V _a C •L V C �= - 03 . r � 0 • E g), E TD C 'Wm - a) 0 ■— .0 Co H 0 LL ww 0 •.,- TDx 0 0 -u) a) a) g NEV th>1 LO -4--d Oo `- cn Tu sa O o E'2 WI cm ' Ala 03 a) E '-§ u) 1- c _ (i) >cr) .� -tha coN - 0a) � .o . 3 o E r- ccnn Q p a, C D) 0.}, N N s CM E o ■— a O rnm2 0 ■= a) 4) c 'u 'N co 0 inC 611 •� N 0 3 U N I''' a a) Fes- 2 1 I 1 1 , CO • • • c c O ^^♦♦ ti W (i) u) Co CD (i) ,... ›. 2 a) CU a) ‘1•0 C.) . ,..c a) 2ai irs, •C E . -1-1 E •— 4,-A % --• ca. .0 CA Fri a) a) = o 0 (i) a) •— W (1) ca c . co E2 -o _>, ..... U) o O CD c c 0 > a Oil G) (1),..... "0 CDa) O O —, .... ..c .... L Ca O a> t ›N 0 (1) c r 0 d Co "0 73 a)O a) .5., a) a) a ((ID) C i) cn No CO w > C0._ 0 a) .._ 0" rim a) CI 2 c v 12 1E 0 2 a)>< i a— a) .›N LaMi Om-' 70 2 a_ (na) c c (n co a *a -4-• a) ---e a) — v c� ._ c > E _. ) a) a) c .— •— a) a_ (,) E — c = • tig a) o = osi-o_ 00 _9. -0 .c 5 _ 00 Crg O O D O 0 n' ce; — O ... r I (V - �. I.- v-co Qom ° . • 14) 44gggg4gFigi co 0) 8 I To C AP 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ o \ \° \ N co 4 .4 M M M 4 M 4 g M a c la' y� _� • — o\ ., N M M M !I; 01 M 4 > () O •- O O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'D +�+ Cl) cn 0 c N N "• g °° 4 &II 7rj CD• :I-, -0 CI3 a) Ua O -• 74 i7.4 i74 74 .=_ fl. 0 E TO O �'I OCCUFAM CD 0 CI-- O . — — OV > C sq I a E i8 Q— . E Cr g6 o O V a) S. L. >• c N = a ,. ,.. ..w 4 A A 9 >, U ... co cia 0- (13 . 7 � � � Z a) C)) = a) CO in 0 92 N '"" '""' '"' ^ NNNMN O• �co U cui� . r., rr N N N .-i ,-1 .--i N N v >, d I t= CIa C.0 o x g rg N N CCD E 1 i A I 0 9c0- u)• _ .4,...• I 0, 0, 11 NN Q as gAg . gg 1 L "coV � Lct IIIIIuiii �-v' O O .4C'10 c C — 8 N CO cn J1 • L c 0 mc (I) Iy U. (.i) 1111125-111g, '9 .0 CON co N aa �iMc N0a3 NN r� r� � ' "E "Ec � g5a _ � .L-' O � ba pII cov_ co ii4440- iiA • • -7 O N M n O 0 7r,, M 01 00 6• N M O� VO N vi CCD tr) ) ■ tq O C A O N v1 I� O Ln � N •o C 3 � � � ■� O 0 C.) p" = a- >, N E ,� 'C p ■� E ~ 000 OO N ON O rN} N to 7 Q O, l� M N 00 `t C i/i Q CO INC C12 6 _ (I) L > Gw _Ci — N IIIIM C:7) _ (-p do E = U C — ..... 0 v, N Q -C 0 - .0 vD a, L., 00 0, 00 d' eLcL O O N M N 0 >>Q N M i Ntri coO,� CI) N N � N E ii_ M CD co ITCd,0. �� N �= L C 0 0_ M o, M QOLN V LL O 001 Cl, d1 N N ' a) 0) CZ �D ++ N Lc-) N N N MO C L+ N O U 'a C'0 �o to N—f O E ) ..: 0bb 00 NNM o ■ O'L j Q a, M 0, V1 - N a L p - N L 0000 0 Irk (13 _ > cu al 0 0 :c) �, co .0 .� C- V - +, 0 0 0 0 0Et L s 0.Q = O � O o 0000F o "o a) _Q- • c Q N C• N N VD N ' d ID A _cu OC) +.I N = 4'4 N a, ■ CU N L U CO 4- U 01 N N ,--i VO LIN Ana O moi' 01 �/'� C t� C V �� O 4 S, 01 lz O • co L rin Q C N N U ■� 0ta O= C GD Q� o Cl) N U o a) w O Q o 0.N N o0 00 00 _ C ■L C Q P•r N V1 M N 75 O . cn coa 0 N co O o N C �U O W .Q C 01 N. 000 L C 0000 � cf) 4 �• �� Q) _ C N O vi oo 00 Cli L N C M M N 0�1 E O C � c'� ten. _ — � O .NN O = .NE o 0 (5 V) i-75•S i 0 O = 1 .cO i t'' °' 8 F- to H V �, u 3 ,, o .0 c C 0 (I) -t -0 iia cD O 8- E .15 0) (7) O 1:1 E E = -c -c ria) a) I Elm 73 8 I— a) cn s.. c = .0 To a) 8 2 2, 5N -0 c a L 5 . 2 X E.) .LJ c 2 0 --A-6- W co -ci co 45 -0 2 a) co -0 Q -� VTDc, .- -0 31 ',.. 2 O Li= 'mj 0 a) a, w LA_ co c a) a) 0- ..� .- U 2 1 m y— 75 •- E c NBC TD >01- CI 4-• 't.) 0 If< -6 Lla -9- 2 a) c a) A-a -0 ■— W 2 cD 4-I (U 73 :1-= _c 0 -a ocp i__, . (I) CO DCD = -0 . aD O .c 70 o +� -0 c =LE O L N c .c O 2 0 0 0 -�-� 4 C'6 U V) .� • N N > _C. . O - � � •oU) Q) 0) 0 N •N = C)= (d O ■ > RS 0 a) 'c j L() ♦^ • ci) 42 > N a CO •N N A O CU > O %-- ,_ �CD _C) co +� - O cn V NN •ECO >O ^� L ++ �L. � COLO U) W O •— L L C ♦2 i-+ cn Q c N L.. >1 0 (� c� .ccs � � � N No (I' }' oo •n. CL >0 a) o4 o a) �o o Q = � oa' iN C W ^ o 0 a) CL CoO cn cO Ccn .� a 0 N •.� U ON (� �.fl Cu O > •N = L : N _a_2‘ /) a) ri � C 'mo � Ernrx }� E ,„ Co _c N cn Oma- O •v 0 CO Ti W N EO fio U -tU NCvs W NU ENU NOC � CO CD x NL 8 -0 o - Y o 0 o a) U) C_ CD CU a) o cin 0) cW >' 192:c— C cn E E . 'l o CSN o � � C N C N O C •U C N . mill c76 N Q. •� Co >,.E" • C 2 cno E � -g Ego a o N �o c� •- CO�--� L > _O 4- c 1174map 7/5 E 150 ' 00 {-' O 0 0 cn O x � � `-U Cern Ncv N C �- o Li.. CO C) cn u) N • 3 co — 0 X11 .— 2U N•C LNC � � t CN N W I U•C > § O•UC � 0 � 'cu- _ca) ri '.0 -- La �� co cooco Q Ws Cu I— c c Cu • • . I • -, N MO 6 c(i5 >1 w •E o cc � = E a Co m 0 co c ■— O Ce 0 "Cic CO — c �• > — ..� O Cll 6 o "Do 0)0) ; _cco 3 o co ct5 2 Vim -� 2 N a) CD O v �' C2. CD O 61" Cll `o OO. (1) Q .. 9 4- CC C•... O) O a 0 • •cn c) g - I ..c u) 0Co`� O (I) O O - CI) co CU co o C o = 0 .0 •� = O U � � co (0 N .0r o .04343 =O . L N > 0 r I— 0 0 I— N Ws• Cl) M co O r O o— — ca O a0 >' o a) A a) O -a) s c hc2i mm E c �3 a) rn Nva) • 0 U o = c coComime N O moo— N cn >'>•,.0 O cu c ao > COM o 00.3.._ ,~ •L� 0 N--h-_ °� � E— U o LLE �� , _0:�� ,_ L ---c (6 ' -O L OHO >1"---' N COc- N N� rn c— O >. o cu E O al -75 , :c cV� 2 -a� O > coa-a Co a — a) a) O c'ci c CIL cE ...„,; IL c O = ORI C c�- t6� N0 Q Co -_v c a) a� Co cn 2 O =O LC)^ a)•-• X v v v�0)N rnoo v3i�,� O0 C — � O �a) - E CO- ZIP n. �� CO 00 0 O• o ,a� r•- a) O C� c-C UC c,-1 0 '- '- C7 N -o.� a) � U_ Ea) °� _c c — "0 = •C a) a) �� 3 V)..c y 0 co U �L = � C a 0- 8 221i Ci p O "OvCto >. L O N co.c CO w■� C p OO c 0+��' 0� U� (n1:300 moo iiimo .- •- 0CU O L, O O N =N N'a0 � �� OE �� Ce 'V = E• O co �� to �o ._c-44 0) 3 "O 3 In O U o O•N.. y r C >,a) a a1 lla c a) '7).o c a) tr.im C.) L_ a) .0, 2 � N,E � cnOc x O c- - 3cno� Oc a) o .c =9- Co 2 LI_ ■.. O c � E �-� cv 3o a O�� a Q o cot -oo'Et E ` o ° •+, �� axi Ire O Oa O c•vL > O IS a) 3 a) 0 3 0 (/) c a miu gii = o >, -c �N '- 0) 0ca > O �• .cONO 00 OC oO.L- CA • 'O 0 Co M UO D �op 00 Ct.t06 QC'3N O "-' Co C .oEU co, ._ Cr$Om-•tn NO t5 -- O 1.0 cri• 0 —03o c� = c� o0 O • v E c CD o Ota cOvi _� `��} E p L4.' O - i s.r t•>, 0 Ca U Qj U E'v O C Coco a) 9CL C "'' cn- a) NpN Co N a)) O 0 OO - +, 0 = ;0) C CO p 0— mma li >'C O = 0 -C U N S 4- ,... i(-15 O .-�M N x N Nom'' VL�Q O O .� .2 X- a) a) >,a o-Lj N~ r 3-0 0 a10 E a) .,.r-0s O C 0)09+3 0.t C O- C 0=C M I L _ CC C (.0 (1) N N-00 r a)a) U N2 •L'`='OO 0)(7) 13-20- Oto U m Q I-u OOw2 A- o.O I- 3 COZ275 co = C co I.6-b0-a Z£17S9 NW AelP!u3 3N anuany 4,179 LS£I• uos!aN epu!-! ' gdesor Z£1799 NW "alP!a3 Z£1799 NW AOIP!J3 Z£17S9 NW AelP!-I3 3N anuany 41179 617£ 3N anuany!eq;uaa 60179 3N anuany!equaa LZb9 net{ uesns uyor uoiepiea°!ioer'8 Jr qog uos!feyj veAJ 3£b99 NW AelPud Z£bSS NW IceIPud Z£1799 NW A°IP!Jd 3N anuany'aqua° 6L9L 3N eue-!ApooM 17£69 ;aaJ;s!dd!ss!ss! WOb£6 uos!Jea pJeyoN opawaa uoieys '9 MueJd J0pd AIJOA98 '8 Ilessn ! :oo • raauueid 6aagw•a S AoeiS / I , e ( fik `AIeJeou!S '9690-ZL9-E9L le au pewoo ea li lee; eseeid `sseoojd an.Io Jalial s!q 6u!pJe6oJ suogsenb Aue envy noA�I Wd OE:L le 1700Z '8 uaJeW uo 6u!uozaJ pue mid tieu!w!leJd .inoA uo uogoe pug awl il!M I!ounoa A1!� A°IP!ad to A4!a ayl 'anuany Allslan!un 6Ej79 4e siegweya I!ounoa Apo 8q4 u! 'W'd OE:L le t00Z `86 Aaerugaduo 6ugam uo!ss!wwoa 6u!uueid Aalp!ad Jo Apo 8q4 4e aoeid 9)191 II!nn uo!ssnos!p pue s6uueey uo!4eo!ldde 6u!uoze pue }eid tieu!w!leid inoA .a4aldwoo aje suogeo!idde.inoA 481.0 noA wioju! o4 senses Jegel s!41 1700Z `96 tienuer uo 6u!uozeJ pue Heid e Joh suogeoildde inoA pan!aoej i(Iie!dglo em •eleidwoo ale suogeo!ldde esn puel i!ayl J! sAep 6uppom 06 u!y4lM s4ueo!Idde esn pue! A.pgou 01 pannbeJ ex spun 4uewwano6 pool `66'9 6 ajn4e4s e#oseuu!igl sad :olleWea %iW Jeea Z 6 699 NW uo4y61-18 MON MN eoenel 441.1- ZL8Z ollaWaa uyoP :u}}y •0U1 xeW plaid i7O0Z `9Z tienuer L8ZI-ILS(E9L)Xd3.OSb£-ILS(£9L)•Z£bSS NY1i`ATIQIN.d'TN'3AvAIISJIaAINf1 I£f9.2I3.LNHD 1VdIDINf1Y1I A3ICI I3 JOAL D f/00Z 'S Aapnaga3 :usTIgnd NOISSIWWOO ONINN`drld •dIYHD e`n'ds ENVIa T7ESE-ZLS-E9L sT aaquznu aai aus ' T700Z 'TT Aapnaga3 UL[ as;PT ou OOSE-ZLS-E9L su?TToD pgaagoj qoP.quoo pInous SPTP AaxTITxne alTnbaa oqM saTgTTzgestp q rM suosaad aatigo ao as;aadaa;uz UP paau otiM puagq.P o; 6uzuuPTd suosaad paaTPdmT 6uTIIaH ' S6SE-ZLS-E9L '4P aauuPTd '6aagwoags AoPqs o; paaaagaa act Aui wagT STIP o3 pagPTaa SuoT;sanb Auy • aoaid pup atuTg page;s azoqP auk qa JcTungaoddo UP u3Az6 aq TTptis papaq act oq 6uzazsap suosaad TIP pup Auv •uoT;TP V A IIA 6uTads 'T NooTg '8T puP 'LT sgoa 'S O{ qU DPA oM; pup 'anuaAV T9 LSET puP 'Tt'ET 'anuaAv TPaquaD TOI79 puP 'TZT79 'gaaagS TddTSSTSSTW I7TET puP 'OvvET PGqPD0T ATTPaaua6 'aawap TPdToTunN IC Tpza3 iP aTgPITP'P puP aTTg uo aaP suoTgdTaosap TP6aT 'xaTdwo3 TTPgGE P puP quauzdoTanaa 6uTsnoH aoTuaS P JOJ MoTTP o� ';uawdoTanapaa go asodand au: ao; 'goza;sza quawdoTanapaH ' Z-S oq 'TPTquapzsaj TTM10.7 PT5UTS 'T-2l pug ssauzsng TPaauaO ' Z-D 'ssauzsng TPooa 'T-O moa; saTgaadoad aTdT Inw auozaa o� ' • ou] xpwmgoad Aq 'TO-170 'KOZ '6uTuozaH P go uoT;paapTsuop : 4o asodand atiq ao; .mrd 0£: G qv 'ir00Z '8T :arnIgaa 'AepsaupaM uo • H'N anuaAV ATTSt ATun TET7,9 'aaqua0 TpdTozunN 1Tpza3 atiq Jp uOTSSTwUOD 6uzuUPTd AaTpza3 au; go 6uTaIaq oTTgnd P aq TTTM aaaup Teuf uaAT6 Agaaaq sT aozpoN NOISSIWWOO ONINN`d'1d HHI H2dO3HH ONINVHH DIrIEfld XVNILI302Id Z-3(tOOZ`9!CJenagak NOISSININIOO OHIH1d 3JVAVS (ICU°qy 'POOZ 'T I Slumiq 3 u®q JE e; Og s`ZLL9-E9G W sucno0 s;1egog;osuoopomp saS alpha/ogm saapq3 m uope o; a;aadaalul us paeu oqmpuas ol guuusd ou snowed paJledurf 8uusaH '969E-ZL9E9L;e Juaned `2Jagcuoj;S Sams o; parasol Arm rum! sup 0;.pa7siaj suoasanb.SuV .93e1 d,pus amp palms pigs eq;;e A;pm;,roddo ue ueiu aq begs p.eatl aq o;2uulsap suosaad Iis pus,Suv •uoalppy'SeIIeA Euud8.I ylooig PI Puu L9EII 9107`s'1oi;ueoen 0,44 pus`anuany Puu P I6EI `anuan et ue0 IOp9 epa;eao9a�;S Iddlsslss1Q 1,IEI Pue`OIrEI I Suaraua8'Ja;uaa redrorm IPI id ;e algsilsns pus apj uo are suoadua sp ludo' uu a peneg s pus;uewdoranaq 2uIsnoH Jod age s 3 II oa`;uacudoianapaJ3o esodznd er 3 `;otk;sra ;uautdoleAepag 'Z-S o; `I .;ueprsag dpr11133 a 2ul5'I-R pus sseulsng IeJauaO g-a `ssauging Isoo ' 3 luau s I;JadoJd aidalnca euozar o;'oui rcemluard g`Io-10 Voz`8utuozaa a 3o uogsraplsag7 loj OWL 18 jo esodmd upa duo `fi00Z`ST LIVnage .'JaS uaO lsd an a•H anuany,S;IsJanlun IEfi9 e°i rer .falpr am.To uolsspucuo0. g II. aaaSaimaa eq; jo 2uueeq oggnd s a Im q;;eq;uanl2 SgaJaq sr asaou NOISSflncoo DNIINNV'Id ALL g`llo3'3g (UQp "qnd[nf c�uJo). i700Z `g Aaenagad :gs!Ignd '969£-ZL9-£9L le `Jeuueld `6aagwaats AoelS JO 669£-ZL9-£9L le `aoteu!paooa 6uluueld `u!108 Ined Toetuoa :SNOI1S3110 ANV 17£9E-ZL9-E9L s! # aal all 17OOZ '1.L Aaenagad uegl aam ou 009£-ZL9-E9L le su!Iloa etaagopewoo moils sp!e tiell!xne aa!nbaa oqm se 1pgeslp suosaad aaw ao aalaadaalul :SNO/1VOOW000V ue paeu Oqm 6u!uueld suosied paaledw! 6uueeH 7V103dS 'L9Z1--I.L9-E9L le XV I ao ZEi799 NW `Aelp!J I `•3•N anuany A4!saan!un 1.£j79 `aoteu!paooa 6uluueld `u!lo8 Ined o; 6upeag eq; eiooeq aattal a pues Aew n0A •Z :31Vd10/12Ivd "Alpe; pue s6u!aeag pane Aew noA •1, 01 MOH NW `AeIP!ad "D'N anuany Apian!un 6£j79 :9NlelV3H saagwega I!ounoa At!a `Jo}uea led!o!uniN Aelpud dO 33V7d •L Ieuue40 uo 6u!iaaw ag}to 446!u ag} en!i pas!nala; ale s6uweiAl uo!ss!wwo0 6u!uueld ell 'w'd OS:L le 'Poo `91. /Genage j `AepseupaM :9NIdV3H :6ul�aalN UOISSIwwo3 Buluueld dO 3I4111 ONv 31V0 •Jeluaa ledp!unW Aalp!ad le algel!ene pue O !4 uo aae suo!jduosep le60i :NOI1dId0S30 •uo!;!ppb'AalleA 6u!ads `1, )10018 `8 6 PUB `LI. sTol 7V937 `s;ol lueoen 0M4 pue `anuany y,j79 L9E l pue `147£1. `anuany ONV A1213dOdd IeatUOO 1.019 pue `17'09 `TaaJTS !dd!ss!ss!lAl t71•£6 PUe`017£6 dO NOl1V307 •xaldwoa a pue Tuewdolanea 6u!snoH ao!uas a ao4 mo11e o� `;uewdolanepaa }o esodand OUT ao} `louTsla tuawdoIeAemj `z-s 01 `le!tuap!saj Al!wed 916u!S `1,-y pue ssauisn8 league `Z-a `sseulsn8 ieOo1 `I•-a wog. se!taadoad eid!iinw auozaa o; :3SOdd/1d •6ugoew uoissiwwo3 6uiuueId eql puene}snw anp;uesaadaa JO aauom}ad xeWT!40ad :1NVOI7ddV 40-170# VOZ `6u!uozael :d39W11N 3SVO uo!l!PPV AelleA 6uuds `4 )10018 `8 4 pue `L 1, s4ol `stol Tueoen OM pue `anuany 4,1'9 L9E I. pUe '1.17£1. `anuany leatuaa 1,0179 pUe `I•Zt79 `leaat8 !dd!ss!ssgAl 174£4 pUe`0.17E4 le pateOol A11eJeue6 Apedoad 401084 09£ u!gt!M stuap!saysaaunno Apadoad IIy :Ol NOISSIWWOO ONINNYId 3H132IOd38 30110N ONI IV3H Onafld A3lal d 10 A110 bo/�/Z :a�aa deW ouI xeua}road :Jeuo!illed .env 141.179 L901' pUe `'anti u1179 I.17°I. any Iealua� 1.9179 `'any Iealua0 L�179 SIO ;unoO e�ouyV `.any IeJ}u9O 1Z17g `'any Iealua� 1.0t'9SIO AaIP!�J `}s idd!SS!SS!•W OSE i. `'1S S idd!SS!S9iW 17 i,e 1. 6uuaau!6u saoJinog N Sanba sanbe 6u!uoza 0-ti0# 1 1 Id '8 1.0-170# 1 b 2� a N 3 9 3 , H Bill 11.6. �- — Ili il,r li 0, 1111. „, II IN ilk Si **St/ ilw P-' _ )183-10 93,'el if ,ail aii wan mg' ix= WIN iiii111 111 1%1 - , . ,,,,,,,,,,, C7MIMI enueny q}},9'OMv D CD D C CD IIIj 1aaalg Idd!SS!SS IJ i e3!loN 6U!JBeH �i�gnd �Calpij d . Aalpl�d 10 Alio 4o '4!O .... , , —II* i 4i ..,a c-4 fern 14' (1-4. ter' .1_, QOf .r U1 IM I Fl at,..„4(..\4c) �� 5 t 00E9 l 141 t 10 ,,,sq 1949 © l L 'k Z L Ian1,0 o ill' sv os9 e.9 o 4111 t• l 9 1 O t lL89 19 9 99 9 19 t"0 4t z 97 t 09u Z l MII £ EW O Y4t 994- - 1 st bit 95 1 ,,,,,AL t 6 9 onto of 6 gq 6 41; £sit £ L ltr l l( 9 LC-1:9" l £fit ` CLL , °,9119 lzs £z9 z sl 9 — t 09 9 4t Z , 8 oft 9 g5* 1-5t49 654 9t b o o t l9 L IPL r l 66 ! 10 9 tt Stt ; t6t It 919 � � of 0 OZ 6' 9 � - 4-/ t 08 08£t S gyp 61' 914 ve 0:3.9 5 9Z9. t9, .'lti 1 lZ l 1 1 .._�_. 4^� -6 , X5.9. 0859 l 3549 z z „ 5t3 tl 9 L $ t o7 9 91 1 t g9 9 609 I Oft. 9l0Cl."Z .8S t- 0 6,!-S9 ` g 4 IIIIIIIP 4 53,9 9III C \ \ .. i Z£1799 NIN 1a12id 3£1799 NvI'A31aI2id 28099 NIN'?d31VM11I1S 3N 2ia 3NV1 321001.1.Z4 3N 1S 302i3Id 4 4179 868 XO8 Od ASO IN3aIS311N3 2if10 IN 3I2i2IV011VaMd2i0 ONI 3Sf1OH A2i1Nl00 321799 NW`A31a12id 321799 NW'A31012id 321799 NIN`A31a12id 3N 3M H1179 93171. 3N 3AV H199 9L21. 3N IS IddISSISSIIN LZ171. r 3SS3f a2i'd1100 2i 1 3021030'9 0 3I IWJ 31000 N 21 NI13aNVS '9 is aivN0a'd1l830 Z21799 NIN`A3 alba 221799 NW`A31a121d 221799 NIN'A31a12id 1.1. ssaapp e8 3N 3M 1`MIN30 40179 3N Ni>121Vd N33230 1.L24 S a2]VH0I21 NOSI 0 V 31>i0Vf'9 2if 808 NOel3C11VO INVI11IM ONIN '9 r HVI0830 SNIfl 321799 NIN`A31012id 021799 NW0131 0 Jll>I002i8 321799 NW`A31012id 3N IS 302i3Id 69179 (Nal AMNd 210 0NIHS 0029 3N 3AV H199 91.21. IN`d113a SIW2if19 2i NOSI11V'2 2I NO MOHN2il8 IN`d2i0a '9 IN 12138021 >i01a2ine 2£1799 NIN`A31aI2id 36 499 NWNOIH012i8 M3N 321799 NW'A31aI Jd 3N IS 3013Id 31.29 MN 3AV HJZ6 2234 80C#3N 99 AVMHOIH 0929 r VaNl1 '9 2i SVINOHI 3J2iIl8 I a2iVH3I2i 213NN3I2i8 331Sfl II`d 132IV0 IVIN 213NN01218 321799 NW`A31al2id 321799 NW`131aI2id 321799 NIN`A31al2id 3N 3AV 1V2i1N30 91.99 3N GU 13NNVHO 81799 3N 3M 1V?:11N30 0899 r VNNOa '9`d 30l2i8 MOaN08 0 31101IVH0'91 alnb'a VN08 8 A312iIHS INHOB 321799 NW'A31aI2id 29399 ZV'A311` A 3SICIVUVd 321799 NW`A31a12id 3N C12:1 13NNVHO 3299 Zia 1S32i012i3S3a 3 1717317 3N N1)1 IVd >13310 0924 A ONN3dVIOd '2 VTIV NVaO08 331Sf12i1`d12IVHS'9 INOHI NOHOSI18 11 SIa2iof H '9101213 aNfl1N2i0f8 ZE1799 NW'A31a12id 321799 NIN`A31aI2id 321799 NIN`A31aI d 3N a2i 13NNVHO 61.99 3N IS 30131d 92179 3N IS 302i3Id 9999 r A31NVIS ISIflO2i38 1 S12iOa '9 3 C] VN031 N'd1NJ2i38 3NNVZf1S '9 2i NIM2i3 aNf1102i38 321799 NIN`A31aI2id s tci799 NvTATial2id 321799 NW'A31aI2id 3N 3AV 1V IN30 1.899 N 3AV-ivw_ N;O 8899 3N 2:1a IS31011IH 817E6 V SI121l0 SS3NS2IV AaNIW '9 2i11NVS 3NdfIVMV V 31-nr HIVN-2i3H02iV ZE1799 NW`A31a12id 9 sSGJPP`d Pee 24 SsaJPP'd Pee 34 ssaapPV Peg Z£1799 NW`A31al21d ZE1799 NW'A310I21d ZE1799 NW`A310121d 3N 3AV 1` 2:11N30 Z999 3N 3AV 1V2i1N30 0999 3N 3AV 1V211N30 21799 1N301S3211N32121f10 1N301S3211N32121f10 IN3a1S311N32i21l0 ZEb99 NWA31a121d 2£1799 NW`A31a121d 3E1799 NW`A31al Id 3N 3AV 1vaLN3017£99 3N 1S 30213Id ££99 3N a21 13NNVH0 4£99 1N3a1S3211N32121l0 1N30IS32I 1N32121l0 1N301S321 1N32121f10 3£1799 NW'A31a121d 1,60e£1799 NW` 31aI H ZEP99 NW`A31a121d 3N a2113NNVH0 1.099 JN 3AV 1V1 • 0 4099 3N a21 13NNVH0 0099 1N301S3211N32121110 1N301S3 1N32121l0 1N3a1S321 1N32121f10 Z£1799 NW`A31aI d J ZE1799 NW' 1al2Jd N614 3E1799 N 'A310121d 3N 3AV 1`d211N30 06179 ($13N Ni AC1 49179 3N 3j\V 1`d211N3 a1O 417179 1N3aIS3211N32121f10 1N3aIS3211N32121l0 1N301S3 NE 3212110 Z£1799 NW'A31C1121d 2£1799 NW'A31a121d5O ZEb99 W`A31a121d 3N IS 30213Id 9£179 3N 3AV1�ILN30 00179 V.3N 3AV 1V�30 48£9 IN301S3211N32121f10 IN3aIS3211N32121f10 IN3a1S321 N32121f10 2£1799 NW`A310121d ZE1799 NW'A310121d NZ£b99 3101214 3N IS 302131d £LE9 3N IS 30213Id 49£9 N 3AV 1 N30 29£9 IN3a1S3211N32121110 IN3a1932i 1N321 fl3 IN3aIS 1N32121l0 ZEb99 NIN'A31a121d 2£1799 NW'A31a121d Z£1799 NW'A31a121d 3N IS 302131d 917£9 3N IS 302131d 9££9 3N IS 30213Id 9Z£9 1N3a1S321 IN32121f10 IN3a1S321 1N32121l0 IN3a18321 IN32121f10 2£1799 NW'A31aI2Id Z£'099 NW'A31a121d Z£1799 NW`A31a! d 3N IS 30213Id 94£9 3N 3AV 1`d211N30 £0£9 3N 3AV 1`d211N30 1.0E9 IN3a1S321 IN32i2Jf10 1N3a16321 "N32121110 IN3a163211N32121l0 NW'A31a11d NW`A31aI2Id catZ£1799 `A31a12�d 3N 3AVHlb9 06'04 3N 3AV H1179 9L174 3N Ni>121Vd 3210 09£1. 1N3aIS3211N32121l0 IN301S32i 1N32i21f10 IN301 2i 1N32121f10 ZE1799 NW`A310121d121799 NW`A31a121d Z£1799 NW`A31aI21d 3N IS IddISSISSIW 9LE4 tflN 1S IddIS SIW 89E1. 3N IS IddISSISSIW 6624 IN301S3211N3212Jf10 IN3aIS 11N32121f10 IN3O1S3211N32I fl3 ZE1799 NW'A31aI2Jd 3£1799 NW'1114I21d ZE1799 NW'A310Nd 3N IS IddISSISSIW 91171 IS IddISSISSI496171 3N IS IddISSISSIW OZZI• 0 J1bvo 101YM11O0 0 A2dV0 alvM11OJ 3 3NN`d Z3IMO8l1O0 3£1799 NW`131aI d ZE1799 NIN'A31aI d ZE1799 NW' 31 II Id 3N IS 3O131d 99£9 3N IS 3O2�3Id 68E9 3N 3AV Al 1£179 2I N331HIV>1 NVV N0 `d 1O2�V0 3>i0V0 V IH A3 NJ ZE1799 NW'A31al2Id 3E1799 NW' 31aI2�d 3Eb99 NW'A31aIJd 6 ssaa y Pe8 9 ssaa y Pe8 9 s ppb'Pe8 d0111O A3laI d dO A11O A af1d A01110�1 1012jd ZE1799 NW` 31aI2jd 3£1799 NW' 31a12�d ZEbW 99 N 'A31aftH b ssa)y Pe8 E ssaa y pe8 Z ssaa `d pe8 dO�ll 10 A3'IaI d dO A110 A lalId dO 1110 A 011d ZE1799 NW'A310I2Id ZEb99 NIN'121aI2ld ZE1799 NW 31aIId 01 ssa.iPN f pe8 1. ssaa'y Pe8 3N 3AV AllS13A1 fl 1£179 J01110 A3l�fll2�d J01110 A31al Id dO 1110�l al2jd 1££99 NW'AV8 b'>INOI ZE1799 NIArA31aIJd ZE1799 NW'131aI Id avOb f1O1INVW ELL17 3N 3AV H1179 99171 3N IS 3O2j3Id 9LE9 W 3AVd '8 N 2i30O21 31R:1W3d 30NI M31.13 V lfl`dd 1S113ONVA3 Z£1799 NW'A31aI d ZE1799 NW'A31aI2jd LZ199 NW'SIHOI3H SIVNOVA 3N 3AV H199 00171 3N 3AV H1179 £0171 Z9Z0LZ XO8 Od 3N1`d13 8 '81 NVTIV NOS>I3I I2 r`o2IV82IV8 '9 8 SINN3a Sa2NMa3 011!NON Al l3dO21d IS3M ISV3 391799 NIN`A31a121d ZE1799 NW'A31aI2dd 3£1799 NW'131aI2jd 3N IS 2jflHmV 09E9 3N IS 302f3Id £3179 3N 3NV1 AaOOM 17E1.9 d S31A1`df NOSV3 r VIV10 I>ISONV8fla NO2IVHS'9>INMd O1131A130 391799 NW'A31aI2dd ZE1799 NW'131a12Id ZE1799 NIArA31aNd 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 317171. 3N IS IddISSISSIW 179171 3N 3AV H199 9991- H 991H Hlfl2I S2IV1413a W NNA1 '8 If H 1021 SMVW30 V H138 21313W1HVa 391799 NW'A31a12:1d 321799 NW'1131aI Id 321799 NW'131aNd 3N 3AV 1d?:11N3O 0099 3N 3AV 1`d2:I1N3O ZL99 3N a2I 13NNVH0 1199 1N30IS3b IN3212:1f1O 1N30IS3b IN32jbf1O 1N30IS3211N32I?1fO 381799 NW'A31aI2Id 3£1799 NW`A31aIad 21199 NW'NOIH012J8 M3N >1332� 0 E8E 6 3N 3M H199 398 6 MN 3M H163£103 S33ISf12�1 3N NVOfN1'8>i2�a2uVdVH>103 3Sf12�>1 33-1V01 '8 r a2:1VN2I38 SN312:1>1 1 NA2IHIV>121381A1VM>1 ZE1799 NW'A31a121d ££1799 NW`SaldV21 N000 3E1799 NW`A31a1ad 3N IS 30213Id 617179 MN 3AV H198 098 3N ai 13NNVHO 0899 N W ONISSll'8 2l WVaV 10VIN d N31V>1 '8 a N3Vf 2j3ZON 8 AONVN '8 0 SVWOHI 3110N 281799 NW`A310121d 3£1799 NIA � 12� 1ad ZE1799 NW`A31a12Hd 3N IS 2HfH12iV 08E9 OMS3INVd1N00 30NV1i�OV 0/0 3N Ni N2IVd N332/0 61£6 3 SA121VW '8 S312IVH0 N32If1000N 1 S 3aNf1S 18 V d NVW 311IN V HV2IO830 '8 r AHIOWI1213aal>1 ZE1799 NW'A31aI2Id ZE1799 NW'A31aI21d ZE1799 NW`A31aI21d 3N IS 30131d 00179 3N IS 302131d 98E9 3N N1 NMVd N33210 00176 3 S12:100 I' f a3Md1V S113>1 3 Hd1OONVI NOSNHOf A2IVW '8 0 NOf NOSNHOf ZE1799 NW`A31aI2:1d 2£1799 NW'A31a12:Id 2£1799 NW`A31aI Id 3N IS 302j3Id 9889 3N N1>121Vd N33I3 6LE6 3N CII 13NNVHO 17999 3 SVionoa NOSNHOf 2:1 3NIISI21H0 NOSNHOf 1AIVO J IA3H0'8 f alwVa 2I303Vf 281799 NW`A310121d 0£899 NW`213AI2:1 >113 0£899 NW' JJAI J >113 3N 3/W H199 8386 MN 3102:110/S686 69L01. MN 3102:110 15191. 69L06 0 IV1'8 S>100HO 3IfH SI11AHd '8 1 S3121VH0 NOIUGH SI11AHd '81 S312]VHO NO1210H 31199 NWNOIH0I218 M3N 3E1799 NW`A31Ol d 3E1799 NW`S110dV3NNIW MN 3AV HIL6 £9172 3N IS IddISSISSIW 171£6 3N a1 N332:10 3012] MI. V NA13f100Vf 2I3NMOH 3 3N1102IV0 f13HZ1OH ONI S3S12Id2131N3 N3101/1110H 2£1799 NW`A31a12:1d ZE1799 NW'A31aI2Jd 3£1799 NW'A31anld 3N 3AV HI179 99176 3N 3AV NOIHSV 9119 3N N1>121Vd>133210 0386 W AHI0210a 2.131SI110H 0 003230 ZNIH N SINVf S>1OIH 381799 NW`A31012:1d 321799 NW'A31012id 381799 NW`A31012Id 3N 3AV H1179 0914 3N 3AV 1V211N30 9999 3N a21>1332:10 3012 66176 3 VIA1AS 18 N .thl3a13H 121VH r A1M38WIN NOS2:10A1VH W NVSfS A2.1N3H '8 0 alio 11VH 321799 NW`A31aI d 3£1799 NW`A31a1Md 321799 NW`A31aI Id 3N IS 302131d 0989 3N 3AV 1V2IIN30 9399 3N IS 30213Id 917179 A2IVW '81113H01IW NOOZVIM0 W S3WVf INSM08V2I0 3 NV3f'8 W 30N32I01d aif10J ZE1799 NW`A31aI ±J ZE1799 NW`A31a121d ZE1799 NW`A31cII d 3N 3AV Hlb9 EZ174 3N IS 2IfH12Iv 09C9 3N IS IddISSISSIW 6£174 W NVSfS'2 V 1IO2iIA NOS3NO S NV11I AO1O>IIN 1 SI21Oa '2 01213802=1 NOS13N ZE1799 NW'A31aI2id Z£1799 NW`A31a121d 3£1799 NW`A31aI ld 3N 3AV H1179 L9E4 3N a2i 13NNVH0 9299 3N 3AV H1179178EI- d VaNI1 '8 r Hd3SOf NOS13N N SIO1 N3a1OM'2 r S 2131S` INAVN S VIOI21IVd AOH1f11N 3E1799 NW`A31aI21d 3E1799 NWA31aI Jd Z£1799 NW`A31aI21d 3N a2i 13NNVH0 6099 3N IS 30213Id 4899 3N 3AV H1179 L8174 21 VaNOH21 NVW113O1N r 1 V9INS'2 8 A2i21'd1` CINV 1W V AUV1N '2 M 12139021 N31S1IW ZE1799 NW`A31aI d 431799 NW`SIHOI3H V18Wl1O0 Z£1799 NW`A31aI21d 3N 3AV HI99 88C 4 3N IS 3O21NOW C4 417 3N IS 302i3Id 00£9 W NVOf'9 21 Hd3SOf HIN3W 12138021 b'1H3W 13AHVW NO1HOfVNOW 3E1799 NW`A31aI21d ZE1799 NW`A31aI21d 3£1799 NW`A31aI Jd 3N 3AV 1VIIN3017999 3N 3AV 1VHIN30 42179 3N IS IddISSISSIW 49£4 1 SWAT NIV10W f>12IWJ NOSIllVW 111If'9 3 ANNHOC NOSVW 2£1799 NW'A31aI21d 281799 NW`A31aI2Id ZE1799 NW` 1a121d 3N 3AV 1'd211N30 8999 3N IS 302i3Id 61799 L ssei y peg 3NVf A21t1W'81 A2i131 NOSNI12iVW a A21003210 NIJ IWJ f 3INNO8121VHI2JV1N ZE1799 NW`A310I21d ZE1799 NW`A31QI21d ZE1799 NW'A310I21d 3N 3AV H1179 £17174 3N 3AV H1179 ELE4 3N N1>12JVd N33210 417£4 f 3INNO8121VHI21b'W f a2 IVN2138121VHI2If/W W N331HIVN '2 M H13NN3N 3Nil1 ZE1799 NW`A31a121d ZEb99 NW`A31al2id ZE1799 NW`A31a121d 3N 3AV HI99 04174 3N a2i N33210 30121 417174 3N a2I N33210 30121 49174 A NNV31 aNI1 Hllanr'8 III M 1H382i3H XONN31 III M 12139233H XONN31 ZE1799 NW'A310I21d ZE1799 NW'A31aI2id ZE1799 NW`A31a121d 3N IS 30213Id L499 3N IS 2IfH12iV 9L179 3N 3AV HI99 017£4 3 30AOf'8 3 OHVHOI2i ON'd>131 A312IIHS '8130V11VM NOS2IV1 W 2 V O NOSHV1 Z£i99 NW`A31aI21d ZEb99 NW`A310121d 3E1799 NW`A31a121d 3N IS 30213Id L699 3N 3AV 1-11179 99E4 3N N1>i21Vd>133HO 4ZE4 >1 A2JWJ '2 f aivNOa A2IaNv1 2i 3111VA'2 V NNV d ZaNVEIV1 VNI13S'2 M32I NV ONOMN 3£1799 NW`A310I21d ZE1799 NI/0121Vd 3>1V1 ONI2IdS 170£99 N11213AOaN`d 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 68£1. 3N IS a131d2iVO 9Z08 MN 3AV HI096 Z£I,Z V NIA3>1 '81 A0VMI SI1OS f101 A2IVIN '8 a 12138021 I>ISNVINIHS r a2ivHoI V3HS 3£1799 NW`A31aI2Id Z£1799 NIN'A31aI Id 3£1799 NW`A31aI21d 3N 3AV H1179 ZLE6 3N IS 302J3Id 1.099 3N 3AV 1VMIN30 LE99 a NV3f'8 V>121VIN Z121`dMHOS 0 02IVHOI21 HOV81VMHOS 8 8 3INN08 '8 a AO211 ZIWIHOS ZE1799 NW'A31aI21d ZE1799 NW`A31aI21d 3£1799 NIN`A31aI d 3N 3AV H1179 69176 3N 3AV 1`d2IIN30 66£9 3N IS 30213Id Z1479 f>12JVIN 130N3HOS A 3 A8213HIV3M'2 2l I M3d3VHOS 1 VINOH2i '8 f S31N'df NVNISfl2I ZEb99 NIN`A31aI21d 3£1799 NW`A31aI21d Z£1799 NIN'A31aI Id 3N IS 30213Id PZ179 3N 3AV H1179 617£6 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 0126 M S3Wvf'8 W VNNOO 213NS1321 IN NVSI1S'8 0 NHOf fltg2i IN NVIAIn'8 IN 3or 11VONt I ZE1799 NIN'A31aI2Id ZE1799 NIVA3101Md ZE1799 NW`A31a12:Id 3N 3AV H1179 017£6 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 017£6 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 8Z176 2I NA2JVHS A3SINVM A A1213A38 '8'1113SSfl2i 21OR1d 3 31R13f1J1VIN IIV Id 3£1799 NW`A31a121d Z£1799 NW`A31aI2Id 3£1799 NW`A31aI Id 3N a2i 13NNVH0 6699 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 66£6 3N Ni>1MVd>133210 69£6 3 31N2IVIN Sf1WVH1Od 3 3102i'd0'8I a2JVH012i NIACIOd IN 3NVIa12 S Nor SdI11IHd Z£1799 NW'A31a121d 3£1799 NIN`A31a1Md Z£1799 NW`A31aI 1d 3N 3AV 1V211N30 6699 3N IS 30213Id 60179 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 0926 W VIOI211Vd '8 d AVO SdI11IHd 2J SVINOHI NOS21313d I AH±O2IO0 '2 V 01V2139 1H3d ZEb99 NIN'A31aI d Z£1799 NIN'A31OIaJ 3£1799 NIN`A310121d 3N a21 >133210 3081 93176 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 117£6 3N a2i 13NNVH0 9699 NVI21VIN NOS1flVd 21 S311IIN'd0 S>12J'dd IN A3121IHS '2 0 N321012131N1Vd ZEb99 NW0.31a121d ZEb99 NIVA3lalad ZE1799 NW'A31aI d 3N N1>121Vd>133210 017E1 3N 3AV H1179 £9176 3N N1>12IVd>1332J0 9014 >1 NVSfS'8 012i38O21 NVW213AO IN d '8 Mr d 01ON21V aNlhlSO 8 NNV x0018 '8 IN NOf 1VSdO ZE1799 NW`A31aI21d 3£1799 NW'A31aI21d Z£1799 NIN`A31aIa 3N 3AV H1179 98£6 3N 3AV 1V2IIN30 9999 3N 3AV H1179 Z17b6 21 V321aMd'? 3 121f1>I NOS1O IN 3SIN30 NOS1O V A321afV'8 21 30f1218 NOS1O Z£1799 NIN`A31aI d ZE1799 NIN`A31aI dJ ZE1799 NIN'A31aI2Jd 2i?:131 OdW31869L 3N 3AV 1'd2:I1N3O OOE9 3N 3AV H1179 00176 IN Hllaflf'8 2:If SVINOH1NVIADJ3ININIZ ONI VIOS3NNIIN JO DAV83IZ V Hllaflf'813VH011A1 a A81:13Z ZE1799 NW'A31a12:Id Z£1799 NIN`A31afJd Z£1799 NW'A31aMd 3N IS 2Af1H1:iv OZ179 3N IS 2If1H1eiV 917179 3N IS 3O213Id 99E9 0 AlIIN3 '13 A S3INVf ONVA 1 VaNl1 '13 IN 1AIVCI d1OM f NOf SIN'dI11IM 917£99 NIN'`d>INO13NNIIN ZE1799 NW`A31a121d ZE1799 NW'A31aI2Id IS 31`daNOAV Z17617 3N 3AV 1V2:11N30 a1O £0E9 3N 3AV-PM1N30 aiO 2999 1 1A13HS'I?M aVHO N33A310f A NOINf1 11a32:10 1`d213a3d Sfl 3NIa1V2J30 3A1n ZEb99 NW'A31a12Id 1717£99 NW`3Iab'Z:Id N3a3 Z£1799 NW`A31aI2Id 3N N1>I2=1Vd>1332:10 l6EI• N AMNd S3>NV1 NOS2I3aNV LE96 3N IS IddISSISSIW Z8ZI. NNV Of'2 S a2JVH0I2:1 SVINOH1 011 dfm:iJ aOOMS113M 3H1 ONI S302Jf1OSal >ISI JVI'WI ZE1799 NIN`A31a12Jd ZE1799 NIN'A31afId ZE1799 NW'A31aMd 3N IS IddISSISSIIN 00171• 3N 1S IddISSISSIIN Z8176 3N CII 13NNVHO 9699 a SVINOHI 3NO1S a alvNOa 12JVM31S 111e1 13HS VI N32:2JVM H13VdS 72-,(7/E./ Qom --rock Zj C a Li (C:117/ /(-)4 %j'54s -s c; j 4 A/ -0" 1/i c RrY)74 __7/y -,46 ,5 2-rA r/ - '- ?/. -t2,-40C,.., `,.,1 ? iril l 4-: A % ,5),2/ La5), �i.y hr -`''ra/Sit' t//S 9 1 -y p7r sh -b o �N t/�, 97 - C7/�/ v _ E0-2-07-4) -/--fkcV 7) 'if -).1-. '''''7/7i-z/ - -V)A ‘°7 (--) hr>, GI -7 gi --,c-?(--- -- 1717,--- --g&Th/ -Y-'°'-- --7a', r--) i?'".?-2(--?*/ 2( ° 9- E.0 / G _ , ^alp; 4 311 my 14.4.+Jo iv 1'fr ci . GrioN A 1\--a- 4-17-rifirid Q, 34/- 'dd 15s/5Si1s/ ooJ 21 7.1.• /(f,/1oP�' /(44-, r1 � � ��- "Win' s 15G«�- 6/ a s p 77� '< •� c 7 -�`',�,-- n'_/O 7,7)9 7 a � / .'A. rag, ,/.�p-Srb f/nA- a-244v© rye __11 tx / ssrssr /, ( -»-- - �) 6o 'aNY 0y3� . - i/ _40 -3 D y-34/ e p F , O'i cz/74/,-y).2b/ rii ) / ---7/,F( 4y-7,47/ c 2c75,S,. ../ •/.?_y .v f a� ` -7527,- - zrarYsra, --S-1c -,c S-,,(- 9 P / "s L'� R7 S l /4114/ f 9 .5.9 Or QA*0/ V Jedoldw3 Ilunuoddp lenba uy S2133NI9N3 W8N9 wall PagioadS liwgns liwgnsoN pus asinag paloN suoiloauoO aIeyq uaxss uofdaoxg oN asn an°A a°d X luauw[OO pus Mainag ao,I palsanbag SV s $ug y�Igxg-aaieyAI Iaof IsnoaddV ao� aaaut X11,4 RA JuaS '31.11`PreIIIA s)IioM Isanlaaligoad—NEM MA aalad :AdOO :poppusueal aae°sou aatP0 aalla"J x oresop wos s2u!MeJQ3o Mop `igaaaouis au1Ms1Q dogs •luaugeo.wo sa JalsM umps ssnasip use OM Imp os ow JO aatsyq Iao f Ileo aseald suoileomoods aousgo a ansa no.S uauM •(uepd alis Mau lad pasinaa lou)laodaa Ieoiugoaloa s5upe.t I, pagomlls aql Nowa.'°seaid .p ofoad sigl ssnosip of awrl Supiel io;no t Mama :swab&IMottoJ 9UZ :uof :SMIIVIAlalI sated :xe3 Am lsag aaimo3 IIVIAI:siA JOAOD alnledaS aapun £OOZ pagoelld x laodag Isoiugoaloop `pZ .iagopo0 I NOI1dfIOSgQ ( UWI S]TdOO :;Iuipuas are am I0.81717£0 :'ON ID3fONd salelsg Mall A 2uuds :J3 JfONd £00Z`I£109430 :diva 4j 'a-d`aaesop•f SewogI :IAI0113 LBZI-ILS(£9L) :xnd OSb£-ILS(£9L) :auogd Z£iSS slosauuryv`itoipud am anuany A4Isaaniufl I£b9 s3I.1°M oilgnd Jo aoloanQ XoIPRiJo AI3 .g.d` )EH uof. :0.1. 'IVI,LIIAISNVILL AO ua La'I woo-wqmq@wqmq :view-3 1.Z170-£178 (£9L) xe.i OZ170-£V8(£9L) s S#33NION3 865Z-6Z1755 NIN ` Hodeaum yinnia penainog ul ppal 0£65 --=---- a. -s5iul peseq-Aos 6wsn laded Je unsuoo-lsod%O 'Pahki%00l uo Paluud 0 huno)elouy dwno)(asweb a(wno)uoawyseM hunoo Xasweb huno)elouy S213DVNV W aSaoa 0uigob a),eeH•y eaeg.leg xnoaai•y saw% ua�!y-I ia2ob '.iS'leU1Pae)-f-V JO o21vO9 haippljo/CID :D 1oluuipJooD lIuuad SJOW11U H I-Tu}I „,.,.....--,..., 12 '. 2 -1;•27 `icialaotus •suor sanb XCuu anug noX 3i OW louluoo asuaid •lruuad utpu.JO loulsIQ pags1aluM)iaa.JD aotji u ailnbai lou ipm Aaip!.zd Jo iClij agl ut gN palls iddtsstssm puu anuand iuJlua3 jo uopounf ay jo luuipunb lsuaglnos aril ui paluooj haloid sons AaiiuA 5uuds mu `aresua3 •.ryg luaU 6ZbSS NI�i `siioduauurys.i PATH UXIxooJg 0£6S INHDIg oii sua3 tuoi EON'I£.iadol0O `�7. \\I 880E-86£-£9L:Xe j •OLO£-86£-£9L:auoyd , N\2 OLOE-644SS NW'auie19 • L L `te 9#3N 'ad a2PRI aueseayd SZ£�i SII \ t`• 1,7') bra Isij®31�S�31LVM, 31131311113 31311 ----- A))} TErd 1U101 • ilSY,Vitt4V 'I N412 Crl 1"P.E.0-011"64,062.0097 øprt _kw:6 ) -9f J09 14 4-)a. oco4prz,13 4491 y Z.)-(4407 '719• a.Li5, Q.sci sovvy Ct447 "07S- al.)9. °C7rCL. 39LailAY -11V-Aft \jale.L1113- 5-DAJOW-45; Lnv1/07reVe)co, "143 C101-i•VAN.2/9 igtd CA-VmSer7) tow — b2E i)$* TO/TO'd LTL8 808 ES6 samling 3NOISGOOM POET P00E-9T-NUf HHr .6u!wow Aepsanl)JOM o;AeM Aw uo 6uipeal wept:9 eq} pue liounoa wojj awoy AeM Aw uo 6uipeoi wdOj7:6 ay} `6uleaw iiounoa APO ay; o;I M Aw uo 6u!peal wdOj:g aql P!P I "icep ay} 6uunp s6uipeai ay} pip pue sJelunoo ay} savoy £ saeo 6£ we0t7:6- w9017:9 savoy 6 saeo gZ we0p:9- wd Oti:6 savoy £ saeo lb wdOj7:6 - wd savoy c saeo Ob:9 sono Z9 wd0i,.g -wdOti�E y £ saeo L9 wdOp:£- wdOV:Zl savoy £ s.ieo gZ wd017:ZI. - 11190t7:6 .101 s;unoo o! ea; pa6eaane ale Mo •sluawaaoui 6uipeai ono 1a9 •pouad anoy pZ ay; ui saeo 1,8Z o} OlZ woa4 pauen s;lnsaa pue sJelunoo oM;Ino Ind am •;asaa o;Ja;unoo au;Joj l! 6uissoao eixe pee ueaM}aq awl; q6noue s! away; asneoaq saeo ON se Ja}si6aj Aew.180 6u!now Mols y -aneq am}uawdinba ay}jo asneoaq ices l •6u!wow i(epsanl ow! pue AepuoL uo;Gaa;S aoaald uo s;unoo°wail awns pau}am aoaald uo slunop of eal :pa[gns pops'"lo)PP!H :a3 III9 'suing :0j Wd 9T:££00?'Cir Jagwaoaa 'AepsaupaM :was uo£'see>lneH :woa4 a6essaW leul6uO L8Z1.-I•L9 (£9L) :xe-j 069C-ZLg (£9L) :auoyd Z£V'g9 NW '/(alp!ad 3N anuany Alisaan!un L£tig Aaipud 4o Jo}oa.na luawdolanaa Allunwwoa dOIV `>I0)101H T};ooS s .(,aa6euew-oaoiw e 6ula ao a si Mo a! oafoid a J0 iew-a s! }}poo q �} yl H) I�� yl d I. y;do Moo e;ulad o}}ueM i(ew noA l!ounoa aoj paaedaad}xau 5! wall Ja}uaa uMol ay; uayM uo!lewJo}ui sly}asn am Tan ems aNew aseald no,c p!M Aoe}S ;aaa;S aoaald woad s}unoo o!JjeJl ay; aae aaaH :uoowa;je poo9 aoaald uo s;unoo°!}weal :Md :;0efgng Aoe;S '6aegwoa}S 'fined 'u!lo9 :01 Wd g£:£ £OOZ `O6 Jegwaoaa `AepsaupaM was 1100S `>10)0!H :woa3 SO-170-0 Jauupid ( 1 — - , 2.1aqui xiS rfomS ,,,,/n/hr, kith")),;:p ',//11r*buls alaou `rfits •S6S£-ZLS-£9L Tp iipa p aun aAl2 aspaid `suot sanb /Cup anptl norf.II • uauzaouauiuioo spafoid oq GT ioud panoJddp 2uiaq 2uTuoza1 pup 1pid am uo spuadap aspo stti. uT luauzdoianap ate `sauzoo4no luauidoianap 4nogp aipinoads of uogisod p LIT }ou sT jjpis Vnou i, •.zn000 oi. }uauzdolanap .zoJ .zap.To ut q o o1 upid ia1spw am pup 2utuoza.i am mpg ano.Iddp 4snui ItounoO ATO auk `rfiaTeurpi11 •(olIay\pa ...qN) iauoiit od oq Aq pawuzgns aq of spaau pars alp ioj upid .1a1ssw p `13T.z4STQ 1.uauzdoianapa21 Z-S oa. 2utuozai p Jo 4.rsd sy •ppuisTQ 4uauidopnapag Z-s oi. sapJadoid aidiiinuz auozai pup spared Z mu! saq.zadoid aidginuz ppida I oi. 2utsodoid ST aH •baa'S Tddississmi pup anuany [p.z1.ua3 jo iau.zoo 4spatpnos auk Jo 4uauzdoianapa1 auk 2uip.re2a l JJpis AAto mtm popluoo LIT uaaq sptl ollouzma •.TyAJ •ivauzdoianap pasodoid sp.' of salpia uoo 4! moil pup ssaoo.zd upid .101.ssui p jo 4.zpd sp 2uTuoza i pup tut sjdai aria. ursjdxa of "Dui xpyv lTJold Jo oiiampa uqop rfq pa)isp uaaq anptl I :uospp3 •.zym .zpaU Z£7SS NW rfaIpt.' I anuanV J8 fua3 I H'9 uosIi8o pIB JOR2l 6T Z I-98L-£9L # O.L XV.I VIAJJN2S t00Z `ZI ATpnupr L8Z I-T LS(£9L)Xdd•oSb£-ILS(£9L)•Z£17SS NIA AT'IQRIU'TN'HAV A.LISIMAINI1 1E179•IIHINHD TIVdIDINI1N A flUI'ad / MUNI AO ALD 'OSO 'sW Way. 6u1q ,cue Neap .10 panlaoeJ T,ueney `-w'd 00:p le 170/0I./Z • 170/£I-/Z 10 1n0 o6 smoed uo!ss!wwoa 6uluueld a ojaq eo pwwoa nnalnaj Tuawdolanaa Gill 1-111m 1l nnalnaJ o} i70/01,/Z uo •w•e o£:g Aq 1! papaau l panels 1170/0 6/Z uo ow OTT! xej. pue 1y6lu ley' ys!ul4 of „AJI„ pinonn eqs Tey pale}s eqs •sTuawwoo Jay penlaoaJ T,uaney l se it0/6/Z uo eso�l •slj palled • '170/9/Z /Cq >Peq sTuawwoo Jay aney oi. peau l lag Jay 01 10010N 't70/0Z/6 uo MalnaJ Jay JoJ ueid alis all jo Adoo e eso:l 'SIN paliew • •ueld ails sajeTsB �(allen 6ulJds ssnoslp 01 `170/0Z/l 4o Tuewpedaa Aenny6iH ATunoa ejouy an le esoQj auep Pelle° • 1700Z `0i. £ienJgad Jauueld `6Jegwojjs i(oels :woj j alit :o} owaw :anuany lea}uaa 1.0179 17002 `51 yoaeW -a}ea �(ea-09 '61761-aad pa}ona}suoo a6eae6 pue asnoH 17002 '8 yoaeW - Ilounoa �C}!o •pa}}eld s! }01 - 11761 :a}ea �(ea 09/ uogoy l!ounoa :}aaa}S !dd!ss!sslW 017E 1 o} '}I!nq a6eae6 payoe}aa -6561. oaa 40 esee fqns 'AG!IBA lung s! asnoH -Z961 II n Bund S 1. �I18 OZ 10140}I 601. 3 4014 9L M a41 'pa}}eld s! 101 - 1461. :anuany 40179 L92 idd!ss!ss! oaa 40 esee o} fgns } }S . W 171E 1. `Ael!eA 6u!JdS '4 3118 0Z 10140 14 1791 3 40 14 9L M a41 :/Go}s!H 6u!uoZ :anuany 41179 1.1721. luewdoIenepe uo!}!ppy Ael!en 6u!adS '1 N0018 `L 1. }01 se eaae se eu6!sep dell esn pue einlnd :anuany lea}uaa 49179 :eouewaoJuoa ueld enlsuegeidwoa uo!}!PPV Hellen BuudS '1. )10018 `81. 101 Z-S }ueane1sapue puel }ueoen :M :anuany lea}uaa 117179 ue sawo �(iwe a 6u! uo!}!PPV�ellen 6u!adS `1. X10018 '61. 101 1-SI P 1-a '8 y I. I S S :anuany lea}uaa 12179 1-2 '8 AI!wed el6u!S :3 uo!}!PPb'Aallen 6uudS `1. X10018 `OZ 101 Z-3 '9 6u!pHnq lelaawwOO :N :anuany leJlueo 1.0179 :6uluoZ '9 asa puel 6u!punoaanS uo!}!ppy Aa!len 6uudS `1 >10018 '91. }ol pue 1Ueoen pue `(a6eae6) :}aaa}g !ad!ss!ss!W 01721. 6u!pllnq lelaawwoo Hews `sewoy AIlwed al6u!S uo!}!PPV Aellen 6uudg `1 >{0ole `91, 10-1 :esn pue-1 6u!}s!x3 :}aa}g !dd!ss!ss! j 171.21. :/(}aadoad Jo uo!}duosea 1e6ei same 1'17 }� 'Ps 917C'6/1. '}Hnq uog!ppe ebeieb :pa}}eldaa pue `pa}uea6 aoue!aen�Ioeq}es NBAap!S -8861 peuozaa eq o} ewe aa!}ue}o ez!s a1ew!xaddy :ez! '11!110 s! )109C1 - 5861 S •}Hnq ale a6eae6 pue asnoH -17L61 AI!wed eI6u!S `1.-fid -anuany 43179 LSE 1. :anuany 43179 LSE 1 AIlwed el6u!S `1.-s{ -anuany 41179 117E 1. '}l!nq s! ){oaa -17661 sseuisne leJeueD `Z-a -anuany lea}uaa 1.9179 '}I!nq s! fuosseooe pumas `penss! df1S-9861 Al!wed al6u!S 1-�l }Hnq aae e6eie6 pue asnoH -17L61 '8 sseu!sn8 pool `1.-a -anuany Iea}uaa 117179 pa}}eld s! 101 - 11761 AI!wed el6u!S :anuany 41179 11721 '8 sseu!sn8 leool `1-a -anuany leawa° 12179 pa}}eld s! 101 11761 sseu!sn8 leool `1.-a -anuany lea}uaa 10179 101 }ueoen /(Ilwed a 6u!S `1-b - '1S !dd!ss!ss!W 017C1. :anuany lea}uaa 1.9179 sseu!sn8 Iaaueo `Z-a - •15 !dd!ss!sslW 17121. 'uo!ss!wwoa 6u!uueld 01 ao!ad unneapy}!nn :6u!uoZ 6u!1.s!x3 01 1.-0 wall lsenbaa 6u!uoze -8661 anuany 43179 LSE 1 `anuany 41179 11721 `anuany 'zaaad-eeisel a pl!nq 01 lesodoad -6961. lea}uaa 1.9179 `anuany lea}uaa 117179 `anuany pa}}eld s! 101 - 11761 Iea}uaa 12179 `anuany Iaague° 10179 `100J1S 1011ueoen !dd!ss!ss!IAl ()tel. `100J1S !dd!ss!ss!1N 171.2L :anuany lea}uaa 117178 :uo!}eool '61761 01 mud }Ilnq a6eae6 pue asnoH }elde i 'pa}}eld s! 10-1 - 11761 'Z-S 01 1.- I PUe `Z-a '1.-0 woad A}aadoad euoze :anuany lea}uaa 1,Z179 :uo!}oy pelsenba�l '11!nq a6eae6 payoelea -9L61 Z1.1.99 NW uo}y6u8 MON 'esnoy 01 uo!l!ppy-6961 MN aoeaaal 44L1. ZL8Z '11!nq e6eaee - 1961 olleWaa uyof '61761 01 ao!ad pa}ona}suoo asnoH 'out xew}!}oad 'Pelleld s! 101 - 11761 :}ueogddy NOIIVWfOJNI 1VIO3dS NOI1VINNOJNI 1V J3N3O P00Z `8 6 Lien.igad 1.0-P0# Sd ' 1.01P0# VOZ UO!;eo!Iddd aSn pue- AeippA 10 AH3 6aagwcuiS Aoe}s :Aq paaedeid iJodeH ie1S •sa!1!unpoddo qof Ieuo!T!ppe sep!naad • .Ae pud u! sag!unpoddo HeTeJ IeuoMppe sep!noad • •saoiues Aelpud aoJ sag!unpoddo 6u!snoq sep!naad • •ue!d an!sualaadwoa alb gp!nn weis1Suoo s! 6u!uozei pesodoid • •isenbei ueid.iojsew juenbesqns pue 6uiuozei lead sigj p lenoadde spuewwooei i}els Akio SISA1YNV JO A2iVWWfS •xeidwoa I!eieu a pue Tuewdolenea 6u!snoH ao!ues a aoJ mope of luewdo!enepaa }o esodand eqi aoj puls!a luewdo!anepe i Z-s 'DT AI!we1 e16u!s 1,--:! pue `sseu!sne lames Z-a `sseu!sne pool '1,-0 wall "any 09 L9£6 pue `.any U,ti9 6b£6 `•any Iealuaa X9.9 `•eny Iealue3 I,i7i79 "any Iealueo 2179 "any Iea}uaa 60179 'is !dd!ss!ss!W OKI. `•1S !dd!ss!ss!(AI 171.£1, Te P318301 Seq edaad eql euozaa pue le!deJ of 6u!isenbeJ s! "ail xewWWaad Jo `olleiAlea ugop `Jeuo!}gad all 1S3f10313 d0 A2IVWWf1S ;eld pue 6uiuozej z I. spun uap sn�d woo.1peq-Z pue woo.1peq Zxis-4444 0.1e a.1agl •azis Li! 4004 a.1enbs 030' `uap a Hum s}iun woo.1peq-� }g6ia PUB Ozis Li! 4004• aaenbs 5t,g eq IUM}ego s}iun woo.1peq-� Ji, eq ��IM a.1agl s}iun woo.1paq E pue `z `� 4o pesi.1dwoo pue pe!dn000 -.1OUMO eq IIinn spun 6L pesodo.1d eqj •4uewdoleAep eq4 4o uoi4.1od wag}nos eq4 .104 xeidwoo wniuiwopuoo .1oivas }uepuedapui 4iun-�L iGo4s-t, e 6uisodo.1d Si iauoi}i}ad eqj •s.1awo4sno .104 site}s 6uij.1ed apron 4004 0 `j79 }seal }e apnpui ��inn xeidwoo vele.' oql uoIes aieq e pue dogs goinnpues/we0.10 00! us `dogs 004400 e `�(oewaegd a epnpui �(ew goignn `sasseuisnq die}a.1 pooq.1ogg6iau es 40 IIinn xeidwoo sig} 4eg4 saki nu0 eq }eq} p04e45 seg .10uoi4i4ad eql •}uawdolanep Oq} uoit.1od g}.1ou eq} uo xeidwoo �ie4a.1 }004 aaenbs pZt,`E� a 4on.1}SUOo o} 6uisodo.1d Si ' 0Ut xew}i}oad `ollaw0a ugor :Joe. pasodoad 40 „ '= yea v '� '''' ''4 :r:„Apvile,°17,$,P4te` � ` pk At }e # - AI Ike!' , j 3,-.:J• 0: '-'11Vk, ,•1•,r,`41,;;I::-,` ,C ''t'a t s 3 It .o, rs, ,..,„,_•-,-7 ' t 5 ;_��».:..,�.,,.,.. :� .... .......,gam... . e r » 401.14sla }uawdoIanOpaH Z-S 04 loolq a.1i4ua 0q4 aUOZa.1 04 6ui�{ees Si .1auol}i}ad eq4 pue s6uiuoz �ei4uapisa.1 pue hep.1awwoo 40 a.1n4Xlw a si a.1aq} `�(I}uaaan� •anuany y;179 pue Tea iddississiW UaaM}aq anuany �e.14u0� 4o apis }sea 0114 J04 6UIUOZa.1 a 6ui}senba.1 osIB si .1auoi}i}ad aql •swniuiwopuoo .1oivas IL eg44o uoi}on.1}SUoo aq}.104 pasn eq ��IM dao.1ed u.1ag}nos 0q4 pue dao.1ed u.1agt.1ou eq} �(dn000 ��inn xeidwoo Ile. 0317 CI-‘ y anuany y,�9 L9 J pue anuany y,t,9 L.17 `(}ueoen) anuany Iea}uap �9t,9 `(4ueoen) anuany �e.1}u03 �t,t,9 `anuany le �Zt,9 `anuany �e.14u0O .0179 `400.145 iddississ!W 017 `400.1}S iddississ!W 1,I-£ wo.14 `s�ao.1ed MOU 0M} a4ea.10 o} pa4senba.1 6uiaq 5! }eld y t.1oda.1 sig4 Hi �(��enpinipui pauiwexa eq Him Zeno.1dde ue�d .1a}sew ag} q}inn :��e `6uiuoz0d a pue }BId a a.1e Pols up 6uieq suoi}oe 0M4 aql 400.1}S iddississiW pue anuany �e.14u0� 40 .1au.1oo 4sanng}nos ago uo xa�dwoo die}a.1 e pue s}iun • wniuiwopuoo paidn000-.1aunno.1oivas �L }on.1}SUOo o}.1ap.10 ui �(a�pi.1� 40 �(}i� 0q4 wo.14 suo!Toe as pue a}e.1edas 0M4 6ui4sanba.1 si ` out `xew4i4o.1d 40 o��8 0Q ugoi ;s.;senbar eqj M3IA?IJAO I.01' '8 40-PO#VOZ viZ C, 1 \ I.Ora r 1 ' 'ewe aai}ua sly} doleAepe� o} 6uisodoad si aauoi}l}ad all (�(liwed al6uls '1-�1 pauoz `awoy �llwe} al6uls) anuany 4;fig L�£ pue `(�(I!wsd al6ulS ` -� pauoz `awoy �(liwe} al ' 10179 anuany y,{�g �}�£ `(ssaulsn8 leaauoo `Z-� pauoz `}ol }ueoen) anuany lea}uaa �g�g `(�(liwed eI6uls `�-� pue ssauisn8 pool ` -� pauoz `6uiuoz }ilds `}ol }ueoen) anuany lea}uaa l�i�g `(�(liwed al-LI. '1.-H pue ssauisn8 1500:1-01.` -O pauoz '6uiuoz }ilds `awoy AIlwe} al6uls) anuany lea}uaa 1Z17g `(ssaulsn8 leoo� pauoz `awoy AIlwe} al6uls) anuany lea}ua� �0�g `(�(liwsd al6uls `�-� pauoz `awoy �Cliwe} al6uls) }aaa}S Iddississiw 0�£( `(sseulsn8 leaauaO `Z-0 pauoz `(dogs 6uipIann) a6eae6 pue awoy �(Iiwe} al6uls) }aaa}S iddississlW ��£� aye pauozaj eq o} 6ul}senbaa sal}aadoad all }oia}sia }uewdoleAepeH Z-S 04�loolq aal}ua et'} euozaa o} 6uijeos si aauoi}i}ad ay} pue s6uiuoz lei}uapisaa pue leioaawwoo 40 aan}xiw e s! away} `�(l}uaaana •anuany y,i7g pue }aaa}S iddlsslss!W uaann}aq anuany lea}uaa 4o apis }sea ay}J04 leno,�dde ueld ae sew pue 6uiuozeJ a 6ui}sanbeJ si aauoi}i}ad all �o-Po# doz�senbad Bu►uozed SISAlVNV }oafoad ilia, sly} y}inn paennao� eweo aauoi}i}ad ay} `sal}aadoad clay} bullies ui pa}saaa}ul eweoeq sJlauMO snd 6uiaogy6leu ay} uay/� sal}aadoad aiay} Bullies in pa}saga}ul eq mom �(ay}}i oes 04 S IauMO Ape 6uipunoaans pa}oe}uoo uay} ieuoi}i}ed ayl •puel ay} 6uidolanap}o adoy ay} Lid }l peseyoand Jeuol}i}ad ay} `coo }o aawwns ay} Ian0 ales ao} do aweo }aaa}S lddlssissiW {,�£� is � pedoad an uoq •o6e saeeA 5Z `anuany lea}ua� �g�g pa}eoo1 laoaed }Ueoen all paseyoind ollaWaa �luea� `aay}e} ,saauoi}i}ad all 17L6 ul pa}ona}SUO0 aJOM anuany u,},g uo savoy 6ul}slxa Z ayl anuany lea}uaa uo pa}eool we Z -1--"--._- ay}o an pue lea-11- lddlssissll^l uo Pal!, aae yoiynn}o Z `Z561. o}aoud pa}ona}suoo OJOM }eq} savoy 17 pue anuany lea}uaa uo peleool aae yolynn `s}ol }ueoen Z}o s}slsuoo eaae ell anuany lea}uaa pus }aaa}S lddississWJ 40 aewoo }seat'}nos ay} uo Pal Si ewe }uawdolanap pesodo.id ayl AHO1SIH 311S �pedoad ay} spunoaans }et'} 6uldeospuel y}inn wa}s�(s Ilea} a pus `ogeze6 • e `spuod leaanaS apnloui !um oils ayl •shin ueile}I us aa}}e s}oafaid y}oq }o Joiaa}xa ay} lapow o} sue' aauoi}i}ad eq slle}s 6ui�{aed eoe�ns 0£ pue slle}s 6ui�{aed punoa6aapun £L apnlou! II. }uawdolanap 'NI •azls LI! 4004 aaenbs 01.g` aq Minn}et'} s}lun wooapaq -� aaay} eq IIIM aaayl ails ul 91,9` -LC�` wail a6e}oo} aaenbs ul iGen Minn}et'} pauueld „sueld juewdojenepea pue enisuegardwoo s,A#o eqj Jo seniJoefgo pue sjeofi eqj spew joafoid pasodoad auJ J! euiwiejep o1 Apiogine Mama' ueid eps gjiM Akio auk ep!nord o} Si pouosip eqj jo juejui eqj •ioefoid Juewdolenepei eqi aoy jueweldw! of pow fiuiuoZ ejeudoidde eqj eq pinoM„ uol}eu6lsep 6uluoz z-S eq} leg} 6uluozaa 6uulnbaa seen }uewdolanapaa aseq} ul speioad ao} }eq} sees osIe ueld anlsuagaadwoa eql •„fiuisnoq dn-enow icy uogeoolle►Juep!saa enijoerjje ue se gimes Aew gnpo tweeq eqj qj!M JoglefioJ Jew juewdolenep leijuepcsei Apsuep iog6 q L/J!M sesn lepiewwoo pue lequepiseJ Allwej-e/fiu!s jo xiw juauno eqi fiu►oe/der of epew eq pinogs uoiJeiep!suoo„ lea}uaa pip}o uoq od sig}a04 }gig} sa}e}s AIieol}loads ueid anlsuagaadwoa eql •sai}aadoad eseq}}o 6uluozaa ag} q}inn law 6u!eq }o lel}ua}od eq} aneq }uewdoleAopaa }o sesodand anoge eq} IIy •se/punpoddo qo[ leuoi}ippe sejeaao pue 'eseq xeq Mau sejeero 'Ape eqj p serisep pue spuewep je)pew muaaano oat/ `secppoeJ Mau ppnq of yfpunjioddo ue epinoid ueo juewdolenepea 'waled pezygn iepun pue sesn pue juepyjeu! eleu.w!Ie pue sesn pue!Juepyje wow Jo]Ajiunpoddo eqj epinord of si,uewdolenepei jo esodind eqj •}uewdoianapaa aan}n} ao} ewe ue se pal}l}uapl sem peo�i )iaaaa aoN pue ;Gags lddlsslss!W ueeM}aq iea}uaa pip }o ewe eqj •ueid anlsuagaadw3 eq}a04 suolsses 6uluolsln eq} ul pal}i}uapi Aaipud }o s}uaplsaa aq} seArpa[go aq}}o Ieaanas }aaw SepOdoad aq}}0 6uiuozaa pue xaldwoo wn!u!wopuoo paldn000-aauMo ao!uas `xaldwoo ile}aa pasodoad eql ueid anlsuegaadwoa eq} ul no plel uo!s!A s,A}la aq} q}lM euli LI! eq }snw }l `Algeaone} peMaln eq o} 6uluozaa e ao}aapao ul ;„uo!s/n ep!M Apunwwoo a fiuine!goe spreMo1 fiuppoM pue aanrny ow 01 fiumoo! `Jegjefioj )/aoM jegj seifiejeijs pue sa►oijod `sleofi suiejuoo p esneoeq ueld e s!p—Apunwwoo oqj Jo ,iuewdolenep pue yJMoifi einJnJ ep!nfi dray 01 pepueju!/ooJ, a s! pue 000 pue 866 uaan aq Rag s6ui} aw !wanes Wall ua a} }ndu! }ua isaa g} adoIana p seen ueid anlsuagaadwoa eql -ueld anlsuagaadwoa aq} q}lnn aouewao}uoo ul s! 6uluoz eq} se 6uol os `aaq}oue o} asn pa}eu6lsep auo wOa} Apedoad „euozaa„ o} k}uoq}ne eq} �(}la eq} senl6 a}n}e}S awls *ueld anlsuegaadwoa eq} ul ;no plel uolsln aq} analgoe A}la eq} dleq }eq} swsluegoew eq} aae deW 6uluoz pogo pue eoueulpap 6uluoz s,40 eql }ola}sla }uewdoianapa8 e ul s! Apedoad ail se A}uoq}ny }uewdoianamj pue 6ulsnoH eq} Aq pa}aidwoo eq o} paau osIe pinoM ueid as}sew aq}10 Malnazi •Ienoadde pue Malnaa a04 Ilounoa eq} o} req o6 o} paau mom ueid a}ls eq}40 uol}eal}lpow cue Ilounoa '}la eq} Aq panoadde ejeM ueid as}sew pue 6uluozaa eq}}I •a}ls eq}ao} ueld aeisew eq} awooaq ueid a}ls 6u!Auedw000e eq}}eq} saainbaa `}ola}sla }uewdolanapaz-S o} Alaadad e 6uluoza�i '6u!uoz Iel}uapsaa pue Ieloaawwoo e uee ioq }lids sl 6uluoz eq} uegnn aslae s}oiI}uoo `azls Li! a6ael Jaq}ea em s}oi eq}}o wog allgM ./Ilwe,d ai6uls pue sseu!sn8 pool '1,-0 uaann}aq 6uluoz }lids anal wag}}o Z `Aepo} }slxe sepadoad eq} sv .pauozaa pue pa}}eIdaa aq of sapadoad pue 6uluoz Jo xiva smogs—deW 6uluoz j7 •asn Kemal a ao4 paalnbaa sllels 6ui ped 4o aagwnu age ao4 sluawaalnbaa 6up{aed NT He spew ow 1,# }oi pesodoad ioia}s!G sseulsn8 IeaauaD 'Z-3 age a041uawaalnbaa Bale 101 wnwlulw age spaaoxa golgM `azls u! Taal aaenbs 069`Z9 s! 1,# pasodoad •ssau!sn8 leJOUOD `z-3 pauoz AIleo!dAk ale pasodoad auo ail sexeldwoo IleTa�l •xaldwoo Ilelaa Took aaenbs 0Zi`E I. age alepoww000e lu1M I.# pesodoad eql •asn pepua}ul J!aqi. o1 ael!wls isow sepoo uo!Teol4isselo 6uluoz eqil Taaw of £4 o1 loafoad aiagn u6!sap 01 aauoiT!led pajse}}els 4O `aanaMoq :poa(oad luawdolanapaa a ao4 Amixalt. wnwixew aq}ao4 sM011e 1o!JTsid 1uawdolanapa `Z-s o} Apadoad a 6uiuozeH •se1e1s3 Aalle/\ 6uuds `. )10018 `Z# 101 pue 6# 101 `s1ol oM1401slsuoo IIIM leldaa pesodoad aql •Tuawdolanap wnlulwopuoo _lopes paldn000 JOUMO 1Iun-LL a 4o uoFIonJTsuoo age ao4 Molle o1 pasn eq II!M To' aaglo age pue xaldwoo vela] ag} aiepoww000e IIIM slot pa1eaao AIMau ag}4o aup sol aleaedes 0M1 wan o} anuany 43179 L9E 6 pue anuany 41179 Lte i, `anuany Iaque3 I.9t79 `anuany Ieaqua° 1,t7t79 `anuany IBJTuaO (,Zj'9 `anuany leaqua° 1,0t,9 '1a0JTs Iddlsslssmi 0t,EL. `halts ldd!sslss!W pa15001 salpadoad 6u1){aas s! `•oui xew}I4oad 'o11a1Aaa ugor LO-170#Jsenbad Heid 'ewe s!q1 a04 leo6 s,ueld anlsuagaadwo3 age anaigoe oT sdlaq sapadaad asap. 6uluozaI •adAl 6ulsnoq wuaaan° anew 01 sanitewelle 6u!Naas slop es °sow aoi puewap wuaaano ag1 4o awns }aaw IIIM `s}lun wnlulwopuoo paldn000-aauMo aoluas LL `1oafoad pasodoad eqj •saiTilioe4 bum paTs!sse pue `sawoq uMo4/wn!uiwopuoo pawn()_lopes IeTuaa aquas ao4 puewap peseaaoui us eq !pm aaagl •6ulsnoq _lopes pus „aalsau A4dwa„ ao4 eseaaoul IIIM puewap 'aft o4 anul4uoo s4uaplsaa s,Aalpud sy •fiuisnog peldn000 JeuMo pue Sequa! p wioj °q) ui wog 6ulsnoq do °now epnpui of Aiddns 6ulsnoq oqj ifjisJenia • wools fiuisnoq ss4Q eqj jo Amenb eqj uodn anoldw!pue spoogiogg6ieu uegjfivaljs • •epAo ej eqj jo sefiejs ale ui eidoed ioj sedAj fiuisnoq jo Ajepen e alnsu3 • •ifeipld Jo efiewl pue ail!jo Alllsnb ow 04 Alen!psod ejngpjuoo Jew spooglogq6ieu ewooul-pexiw pue asn-pexicu `juellei-jles `0/geuie)sns °Jeal° • -sJuepisa!Ae/pud Jo speeu epAo-eJy eq) jeew of fiuisnoq woo gfiiq pue ejeiepow-Moi `Mo! fiuipnpui scene/A /!geploJJe jo °flue! e ie sedAj 6uisnog joAlepen e jo juewdojenep et.11!oy jsixe seipun.poddo ejenbepe Jew eJnsu3 • •Molaq pals!' sIBo6 4o aagwnu a Li! sadA4 6ulsnoq 4o A1alaen a J04 aaisap aq4 sessaappe `saa1dego 6ulsnoH aye vg asn pue1 aanTnd aq4 q}oq uI `veld anlsuagaadwo3 eqi 9 poddns lsaq pinoo eps Toefgns ail; iegl pannogs ow goaeasaa alagl 'ells eql aol Tonpoid algela>aew 150W aq1 aq mom poafoad wnluiwopuoo aoluas eql `Apadoad aql jo saliw aaagl uiglinn }onpoad ares-J0440 joel aq4 pue `alis loafgns egl4o ATIlenb aq1 `aoeldlajaew eql ui uo!Ten}is anNadwoo aqi uanl6 legl lno paiulod goaeasaa s,ple!4xen .shun 6u!snoq eles-..104 6111, aol ewe Aalpud all ul puewap a sl aaagl legl sa}eolpul pla4xeW Aq auop slsAIeue Ta)Iaew anlliladwoo pue olgdea60wap eql 7feippd ui 5u.isnoH aquas Joj ifpnjs Apllgisee JaafaeW a aialdwoo 01 "our goaeasad pla4xeW paalq aauol}I}ad 0111 Aaf11S ONIS(lOH •Ienoadde ueld Jelsew 6uluozaa s!qi.aapun paz!u600aa eq ueo sloeq}as pagsiuiwip ail' `To!Tsip 1uawdolanapal `Z-S et-11 uI paM011e AT!I!q!xell °LIT 01 anp `anoge paTels sy 'au!! Apaadoad Isom eq1 woa41aal Z eq osie Minn xeidwoo wniuiwopuoo aoluas eql uo joegles 6upped eql .scud Apedoad Isom pue qpou ail'. woa41004 Z eq IIIM coeds lieTaa ag1 J04 joegies 6upped aq} `uo!i!slnboe Aeon-40-1g6la 40 Apseoau 01 ono •speoH A4uno3 qioq 6uole uoi}islnboe Aeon -40-1g6ia alealsnlli of ueld alis aq1 unneap seq aauolliTad aql •peTeo!pep eq sAenn-4o-lg6u ail 4o gloq `ew4 slgi le leg; 6uiisanbaa eq Minn i(luno3 aq1 legl sawnsse}}els `aaolaaagl •anuany IeJTuaC 01 iueoefpe 14 01, pus }cams !ddlsslss!W o} luooefpe •14 OE-LZ ale Otis slgT ao4 spaau uolieoipap Aeon-40-1g6u Aennpeoa `Aguanbesuoo •aoplaaoo Aeon-4o-1L6la 14 OZ I. 0111 uI paaaluao eq pinonn TI `pa}onJTsuooaa sI uol1oasaa1ul TaaJTS IddlsslssRAvanueAV lSJTueo aq1 uegnn sawnsse ATunoO 0111 •sasodand Ieuo!leaado pue Asales aanln4 Jo; sauel uanT Aaessooau 0111 apinoad o1 aapao LI! suol}oesaalui TOaJTs iddlsslss!N/anueAV IeJTua3 q}oq ao4 paalnbeJ eq rpm aopuaoo Aeon-to-1g6ia 14 0Z 1 e Teg} aled!o!Tue Aegl •sesodand uo!Ton.gsuooaa aanTn4 ao4 pei!nboa eq Minn T°° Ts ddrssrssllAj pue anuany IeJTueo uo Aenn-4o-lg6la leuo!T!Ppe let-11 PeTeo!pu! ATunoC e)Iouy LTInn suolssnoslp Ape •uedsplw aq1 le 1004 917 eq IIIM 6ulplinq aqf 4010laq ail'. `eaae slg1 ui algel aaTeM 116111 aq1 pue 6upped punoa6aapun ag140 asneoeg •sile1s 6ui)aed aoejans pE pus slleTs 6uNJed punoa6aapun EL apnloul IIlnn }uawdolanap au •s1iun wn!uiwopuoo paldn000 a0UMO aoluas LL TonJTsuoo 016ulsodoad Si aauopad 0111 •azis u! (seJoe 89•Z) Teel eJenbs 899`91- 1- Ale1ewlxoadde s! Z# 1o1 pesodoad oq 0 % „A: ' 4 ' `° ' - ''',[,, , ,4.-., , ,,°,4,--* . , 4, := ',p,'` Irla. an r 3' '= i x 'S j ; , Edi ° fir. ` •ate' 4 r� , .�� 1,' r = ' .7 +1, ', :',1,.,!:" '''' ::fm, '.11'71 „"14,7il.: -r 4 ., . . 4-* ik : , - „.„.:, , 1 1„f s ,--- __ rte- r^� '# 3 ,. s,;... :.. «.,.... .NW;.'`--4.,,.,,-15.1.'2f1,`,7: -urE. an age-restricted owner-occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 71 senior owner occupied condominium units and the commercial complex may have on the local traffic patterns. Staff consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by TDI, Traffic Date Incorporated. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles / day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT PREPARED BY TDI, INC. Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, which was published in December 2003. The consultants used the Senior Adult Housing Attached category in the ITE manual to determine that the proposed senior complex would generate a total of 247 trips per day. The consultants used the Specialty Retail Center category from the ITE manual and determined that the proposed retail complex would generate a total of 598 trips per day. Trip Generation ITE Description Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Trips Use In Out In Out 252 Senior Adult Housing — 247 3 3 5 3 Attached (71 units) 814 Specialty Retail Center— 598 n/a n/a 16 21 (13,500 sq. ft.) TDI developed traffic forecasts for the following 2005 scenarios: No Build (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) Build Spring Valley Estates (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) The finding of these forecasts show that the level of service at both the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersections and the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue 6 intersections would remain the same in the no-build or build scenarios. The only change seen is during the AM Peak Hour at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue eastbound intersection, where the level of service would change from LOS B to LOS C. Central Avenue/64T" Avenue Westbound & Eastbound Approach LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound 2005 No-Build A B C C 2005 Build A C C C Mississippi Street/Central Avenue Intersection LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2005 No-Build C D 2005 Build C D To complete the traffic study, the consultants also referred to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which governs the use of traffic control devices per Minnesota State Statute. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has eight criteria (called warrants) to consider when determining if a traffic signal should be installed at an intersection or not. These warrants are primarily based on the traffic volumes flowing through the intersection. A warrant analysis was conducted for the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. To complete this analysis, TDI staff performed a turning movement count from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. None of the eight warrants are met under the existing conditions, nor will they be met if the elderly housing and retail buildings are constructed on the proposed site. According to this analysis, a traffic signal should not be installed at the intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue until at least one of the warrants is being met. The conclusions of TDI's analysis state that the stop controlled approaches at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic control. The intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue will operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic controls. A traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection and a traffic signal will not be warranted at the intersection after the proposed development is completed. A complete copy of the traffic study is available upon request. WETLAND The petitioner has been working with the Rice Creek Watershed to determine in the project area has a wetland. The petitioner has hired Tom Bremen, with Acorn Consulting, to delineate the site for any possible wetlands. Currently, both the petitioner and the Rice Creek Watershed are waiting for the delineators report. PHASING PLAN The petitioner has indicated to staff that their intentions are to building the entire 71 unit senior owner-occupied condominium project all in one construction phase. If the bank required unit pre-sales are slower than predicated by the market report, then they plan 7 to phase the project. Phasing the project would involve constructing the senior complex in 2 phases (2 buildings). The first phase would be 35 units and the second phase would be the remaining 36 units. Phase one would commence upon selling the bank required percentage of units in the first half of the building, removal of the existing homes and soil corrections. Phase one would tentatively commence in August 2004. Phase two would commence when the pre-sales are met for the first part of the 2"d half of the building. In the meantime, sod, landscaping, and parking would be installed. Phase 3 involves the retail space. Simultaneously, with the residential property, the retail building would be pre-leased. When the building is completely leased, the building will be constructed. Please see the attached phasing plan in your packet. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS During the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewing history showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of this Rezoning ZOA #04-01 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex, with stipulations. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities in Fridley City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#04-01, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 8 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 9 Narrative for Spring Valley Estates My name is John Demello and I am the developer for Profitmax. I grew up in Fridley where I became a graduate of Fridley High School. My father is Dr. Frank Demello PhD. DDS. . He has owned a parcel of property off of old central for the last 25 years. While the neighborhood enjoyed a view of trees, my father struggled to maintain this piece of property both financially and physically. He would have sold it if anyone would have offered any reasonable amount. When no developers approached him I decided to develop it myself. When the Holzheu family offered the corner property for sale I purchased it with the hope of developing this land. During the analysis of the land, it was disclosed that the parcels were not clearly zoned commercial or residential. I then turned to the neighborhood to see if others in this area would be open to selling their property. A small group agreed to work with me on this project. However, during the survey of the area, it was revealed that not only is the zoning out of alignment but also the lot lines disagree with the monuments in this area. The community has much to gain from rezoning and developing this land. First, all of the problems with the land would be corrected in one action. Second, the area would be redeveloped according to Fridley's Comprehensive plan which has been approved years ago and is still not fully implemented. Third,by creating housing for seniors the existing housing stock will be made available for young families and therefore potentially remodeled. By having more young families in Fridley the tax base increases due to the new tax value of a recently sold house,retail in the area performs better because young families purchase more than an older community, and the school district does better not only from the improved tax base of the project but also from higher attendance within the schools. I love Fridley, and I want it to be the thriving community that easily competes with the best cities in Minnesota. I have a vision for Fridley where senior Italian villas are a place to enjoy the golden years while children play in neighborhoods and people who work for some of the best corporations in the world are as proud to call Fridley home as their companies are today. Our plan to accomplish this vision is to provide an upscale independent living condominium with 71 luxury units fashioned after the most successful floor plans ever used in senior buildings. With the exterior modeled after an Italian Villa, this property is sure to invite the most tasteful seniors. The entire site will have a park like atmosphere with meandering walkways that have views of gazebos, grass and trees both on the ground and from within the units. The Villa will conveniently connect to an upscale retail complex designed to meet the needs of the community it serves with hairdressers, a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an ice cream parlor, a sandwich shop etc. The retail building design will also complement the architecture of the Villa. The entire development will be designed to work together to minimize the need of a vehicle and lend itself to people who may want to go south for the winter and not worry about their home or snowfall. With less time spent on yard work, seniors will also have more time to enjoy with grandchildren, golfing,boating, and traveling. The price of these units will be designed to provide value to those seniors looking to sell their homes and have something left over after their unit is purchased. I ask that you consider making my vision of this site a reality for the community of Fridley. condominium Declaration Spring Valley Estates 7.01 Residential Units. Residential Units are restricted to residential use, and the Garage Space portion of each unit is further restricted to uses described in the following section. The use of a unit by an owner for home office or studio uses which are incidental to the principal residential use of the unit,which comply with applicable zoning, and which do not invite or generate regular or frequent visits by clients, customers, employees, co- workers or the public shall not be considered a violation of this restriction. 7.01.01 Age Requirements. The use and occupancy of Residential Units is restricted to persons age 55 or older. 7.02 Garage Units and Garage Spaces: Use. Garage Units and Garage Spaces are restricted to parking of passenger vehicles owned, leased or in actual use by an owner or lawful oc- cupant of a unit, and other accessory uses permitted from time to time by rules issued by the Board. 7.03 Garage Units: Transfer. It is considered essential to the residential nature of this CIC and to the security of the residents that Garage Units be owned by persons or entities who are also owners of a Residential Unit. Therefore, after the first conveyance of a Garage Unit by Declarant, said Garage Unit shall at all times be appurtenant to the Residential Unit which has common ownership with it, and shall automatically be conveyed with a conveyance of said Residential Unit (or of a partial interest therein), whether or not such conveyance mentions the Garage Unit, and whether such conveyance is voluntary,by op- eration of law,by reason of death, or otherwise. Prior to a conveyance of the Residential Unit to which it is thus appurtenant, the Garage Unit may be conveyed separately to the owner or owners of another Residential Unit, and shall thereupon be appurtenant to such Residential Unit. 8.00 COMMON ELEMENTS FOR EXCLUSIVE USE 8.01 Limited Common Elements. Certain portions of the common elements are allocated for the exclusive use of one or more but fewer than all of the units. In addition to the limited common elements specified in Section 515B.2-102(d) and (f) of the Act, certain front yards, terraces, porches, storage lockers and other areas or facilities are limited common elements, allocated to one (or in some cases, more than one)unit, as depicted in the CIC Plat, or, in the case of storage cabanas, as assigned by the Declarant in the minutes of the Association. Storage lockers,but not other limited common elements,may be reallocated from one unit to another in the manner described in Section 515B.2-109(c) of the Act. 3 C:\I.wonlpnUWFamk\Condo-Townhouw\Cnodo\Dxlmtionn,SPring V.IkY Fnlw Fridley City Submission 1-16-03 Page 2 of 3 2. Floor Area= 30,634 sf. 3. Lot Coverage=4 story=25 %maximum required. • Fridley City Code chapter 205 (zoning) section 205.14.3.B.(3)provides that the lot coverage can be reduced(increased)by the City if and when there is provision for underground parking within the main structure provided that the lot coverage shall not be more that 30%required. • Lot coverage provided =26.26% 4. Housing average lot area required per unit; • 2500 sf per unit floors 1-3 = 53 x 2,500= 132,500 sf • 950 sf. per unit floor 4= 18 x 950 = 17,100sf • 132,500+ 17,100= 149,600 total lot area required. • 73 underground spaces x 300=21,900 credit. • 149,600 minus 21,900= 127,700 min. lot area required. • 116,658 sf. provided. ( 11,042sf. difference) 5. Housing Building setbacks; • Front Yard(South—64th street)=35'-0"Required (35'-0" provided) • Side Yard(East)= 15'-0" Required+ 1 additional foot for each 4'-0" of building height over 35'-0" (ground to mid-roof=45'-0")= 18'-0" min. side yard setback required. (35'-0" provided). • Side yard at corner yard(West—Old Central)= 35'-0" required. (35'-0" provided). • Rear yard (North)=25%of lot depth or 25'-0" min. to 40'-0" max. plus 1 foot of depth for each 2'-0" of building height over 35'-0". (45'-0 Building height minus 35'-0" = 10'-0" divided by 2'-0" = 5'-0"). 40'-0" + 5'-O" =45'-0" min. setback required. (21'-0" provided). (24'-0" difference) HOUSING PARKING DATA; 1. Independent Living facility • 1 space required per each dwelling unit required with 50%of spaces enclosed =71 minimum spaces total spaces required with 36 spaces enclosed required. • (73)Enclosed spaces provided plus(30) surface spaces for total of(103) spaces provided). (32 spaces extra) 4 T 4 4-. 7 -1 .- , ____A. ‘I\ -1 __ 1 . . • , . \ -TA ..„,4,........i. _ i .,. 1 ., ..‘ .,-,-",. -----, `;" - A•1_:\ vs-e71 Q ----4-----,r- .._, 1 (7.' cN' s..\, K.:it! --i- • NZ) .„,, ,..., „ v)4 _ 41. 1, > i —1. or- .---- • _ — — -- 0 CP VI c-... --- — --ft c„,,y r.S.1 c .._2;15, ;--• \l”) `',3 -4, iC. ... .' 'X' 7 .7._:1 . C-- — —„..„ -S-,, •( 0 0 C.r) —4 .-•-4 ‘ Le% \it4 - -1 (d) 0 .... V% • C. ti .4 4• --- 1- • 1- .,‘.,„,,3 , 1---. ._..N ...? • -4...14 -- 1 ti" ‘i,,.1, --1?- ( V \''' Y1 " ---I k... r.,4*••••4 1‘., ..... • A9...._ . . _ . . • „... , . ',4 ‘,..2 1'4' VN1 --ts' --7- 1'4 r t1/4-7-‘ -'-- , -,'5?ri--;tIt4 N CIA =•6 z---- '1 •‘,. .. _ \.._ 4 i 1-1-- vs - • - it _ \• W ----1 yo,,,,3 ---37 )."°,. !,•;-; . , ,.: . -4-- ril -- — - _– CP — t i\-.1 \.t4 --IS` 1`.3 Vs1 \ t% ..- . ,.., L, c's' k.,: it+ • -...N --• -7. J lk Fik C w. t..., , --i ., ,. (1 1, , 0 viA k ‘ __N>._.... — e ...... '0 V.,N IS—"s'.....0 '`...• 11- C3 C \IN — C --- ak-lot' L4z-I.`4 1-• --S\ CP r, c) is,„, C) 0 -.--,-,4 . / i I i 1._----) . et....::: . . . . - \ 1 , 1 (; ., . c --;---): A.,,,‘ .:_'5 c. . C____.\ 1 -•-• -Al cA\ "C-3 (..* Krh -3?"- 7 -Z. r\ i ztgZZgglA -,%— . - • --Q .,, Av.-- - -.--- Oss,, trs, ON G........ cs) . .._,......„-- . .-- --), I. -N-i1 6---- `'`‘ f4 --PC6 co I. --5' • .4.' V -. 1.1 (1) 0 C) i . , 8 ci- .. i 1 , ..... ( ..... . 4 _ I ...._, ....... 1 _ v_s le I ,moraror A.... .....--''''- ..: I ..... --- \ —. -7-- -r- — i tr 0 4 0? rx .......... --- _. I _, ‘.......m Irs .t _ _ J‘I\ ; 30p 1 ...% i4 I ,— --v.- 4-- ( , Tc. ,.(3s 6-• 4 1% • . tr., i . ., c:R> -.--, ZS: .-:--5- - I> -- .- ,..„. --I 0 I -. -7 17 1 z :t '.11, 1 ,s-- ,.. v-1 CY C) D S' cs:$ cs • , • Joseph J. Nelson 1357 — 64th Avenue NE, Fridley, MN 55432 763-571-3317 December 29, 2003 Dear City of Fridley Planning Commission, I imagine you are aware of the proposed development of property east of Old Central between Mississippi Street on the north and 64th Avenue on the south and bordered on the east by an existing alley easement located roughly 300 feet to the east of Old Central. Although this proposed development has not been formally announced, preliminary work has begun on behalf of Profit Max and its representative John Demello. This preliminary work consists of working with city staff and current property owners in the area described above. Mr. Demello indicated to me that he has approached and procured purchase agreements with all land owners in the area listed above. To that end, my wife and I have sig.ned a purchase agreement with John Demello for the sale of our property, located at 1357 - 64m Ave., effective January 15th, 2004. Additionally, we have contracted and signed a purchase agreement with a builder for replacement housing that is scheduled to be completed by February 28th, 2004. We have watched with great interest the proceedings that have played out as Town Center Development LLC, has worked with city staff and the community to resolve a proposed senior condominium project on the west side of Old Central, south of Sandee's Restaurant. The project that is proposed by Mr. Demello is presently in flux but does consist of similar details as it too, includes senior condominium space and also some retail development. Obviously, I am not in a position to represent or present to you those details; I mention them only as a general reference as it pertains to my situation regarding the sale of my property. By accepting a purchase offer from Mr. Demello and contracting for replacement housing, I have in essence endorsed his proposed project. Obviously, I stand to profit from the agreement I have entered into,but I do so knowing that the property that I currently own at 1357 - 64th Avenue is not well suited to the R1 zoning that it currently holds. We purchased the home when it was built in 1974, knowing full well that it bordered undeveloped land and commercial property. We were fully aware that development could occur around us but accepted that as a consequence of the purchase. We have enjoyed a relatively quiet neighborhood due to the fact that a wooded area exists on the undeveloped property surrounding us. We have, on the other hand, had to deal with problems that are characteristic of the low, poorly drained lots that exist in the proposed building sight. A high water table and poor fill have made our property and those in the proposed construction area less than ideal. As a result of the poor soil conditions, some of the properties do not have basements, as they would be affected by the existing water problems. I would like to respond to the following criticisms that were expressed regarding the Town Center Development project, as they are issues that would undoubtedly be raised regarding the Profit Max proposal: laundry facilities, guest apartment, organized activities and shuttle busses to shopping facilities. She is very independent and pleased with her purchase. 6. A three or four story building does not belong in the community. Correct me if I am wrong but the commercial zoning that exists for those properties facing Old Central would currently allow for such a building without any variance. If you are interested in the potential view from the rear of such a project, drive the back streets that border the senior buildings in New Brighton. I feel the concerns may be overstated. 7. Spot zoning is preferable to rezoning the entire parcel of land described in the Profit Max development. I have lived in a spot zoned parcel for 30 years. The inevitable redevelopment of this parcel can now correct a situation where single-family dwellings share property lines with commercial properties. Making a zoning change from"street to street" (Mississippi to 64th Avenue) includes my property and provides me with an opportunity to relocate. Excluding my property would surround my property with redevelopment and make my property an island amongst redevelopment. 8. The eight properties should all be left as is or developed into single-family properties. Knowing the soil conditions as I do (filled with concrete, asphalt, bed springs, refrigerators, dense trees, and poor drainage)the development cost of a single lot as an R1 property would be prohibitive. Additionally that residence would face Old Central with companion housing built in the 30s and 40s. Given the building costs and the surrounding property values, development would not make sense. By providing an opportunity for redevelopment,the existing property owners can benefit from the sale and development of their investment. Obviously, I have a stake in the outcome of any development in my immediate community. Although no formal proposal from Profit Max has been made, I would expect you would be contacted soon. I feel you, as the Planning Commission, have the opportunity to improve the property values, tax base, and the future of Fridley. Because of this, I encourage you to think about the improvement that the Profit Max project will provide. I have worked with John Demello in the negotiation of the sale of my property and know that he is a hard-working individual who, as a businessman, not only sees an opportunity to increase the property values by developing the properties, but also has a sense of community pride and vision. John has treated me with respect and in a professional manner that is not always seen in today's business world. I would appreciate your open-mindedness and consideration regarding this issue. Thank you for your time consideration. Joe Nelson 1357 64th Avenue Fridley, Minnesota cc: Fridley City Staff Fridley City Council Stromberg, Stacy From: T Braman [acorn@iaxs.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:04 PM To: Stromberg, Stacy; acorn@iaxs.net;johnd@acninc.net; tcesare@bkbm.com Subject: John Demello Site located in the SE quadrant of Mississippi St. and Old Central Ave. Wetland Issues Update Dear Stacey, Subject: John Demello Site located in the SE quadrant of Mississippi Street and Old Central Ave. Wetland Issues Thank you for talking with me regarding the wetland issues associated with this site. As you requested, this e-mail is a summary of our conversation. I told you that Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. was retained by Mr. Demello to investigate and report on wetland issues. I have attended one meeting with Carl Hammers at the Rice Creek Watershed District. I also visited the site after looking at several map sources. After the meeting with Carl Hammers, he and I agreed that I would investigate historical aerial photographs of the site. I reviewed aerial photographs from the 1930s through 2003 . The early photos clearly show dark soils consistent with a wetland on the site. In the 1940s through the 1970 the site shows the wetland had been filled. Our observations on the site with snow on the ground support that fill has been placed on the site. There is uneven ground with trees nearly the same size across the site. The snow restricted observation of the ground. This will be done when the ground thaws and the snow melts. If wetlands are observed they will be delineated. I will be updating Carl Hammers regarding the aerial photos. I will send the aerial photos to you in a later email when I put the dates on them. Call with questions, Tom Braman Biologist Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8040 Stevens Ave. S. Bloomington, MN 55420 acorn@iaxs.net 952-888-4901 voice/ fax 952-240-6226 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FeJtvaij Ig/ RDOV Name Address/Business -_, ;%Y em, e`3 z �� .�. i1 , c2,42,2„,(1,01.7 �- o , W6:' r . i _ LL, ) a G 76 1?C)i /)C4 iAL" 1 6i. -, - pc-inCG6..v J_ ( /\ 4eN 17 q/P5 „ ;-14 ,-`, , j,4, fr, '/i rk/6- ' ` �' 76 a 5= y ` -1` -1K ci/ . Yvlit,€) at-uvY? 5 ill ,-5-`'-'- , , Jh Tr,`dI /61f n f X s.' 00 1 L,J...4 A \ZP<)h„,c, , 1-0(.°71L 6 4-- -t i v-e. w..., r r I 1 ){ % . 4 • LIv ' x„...:-.7Ze',..,-). -4-2---)-2- e'fL /47:/ / c- -lejt---, /-7,i__‘7(2,Z...--/ Y:I/e17-42.1,7 zr,.7 __.-- k) tf :5;' �`e7- / 'w( /t e (i . 'c r'r ' h E--. -tee-' ix' /36- 7- - - k j' ''Cr--(1167, N41'-'7(i/-r--el ,>.,e4_,,)-,, -. i 3\57-- 6,4 Ye_ .z.2,,,,e, >(c T - �� .7/- -//7 -27a///i � ,7e7/ 75 5 / . - AL, ,4- /tCf/C cy I' 1 )(- ' ti '' ad..1/1-1_- ?)-) 4" ,-,7 4/4-= .ivy . . CITY OF FRIDLEY SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FeJ9rturi le/ Root/ Name Address/Business m.....;moramilinefrallsoiL. . E iii .49/1„,mr, / /5 e-/r! /I / A/ /;:;i-- _)--•>--1-/,.3-- - /?±? -,/ )4{,iy:7-(i (0 ckLk iiial_ztF,,,z, 605-3 iiv/vtit zm At,c . roji.e) cs-cf7a .1-.;.).., ..f_evr. - '* wr '4 - 1 • ---/e, . Li-T.4-k Ate IV friP9a-. -s_C_:ck,_ ( li /,`' ,er----, :4111r,2 -1\,_ 'w "I "SAfiZIRION - )( DOirtaU eiqtAll'AL 1 -1;- +- 4-1",= 61-K-12ei- i\ro . -----ri _ AA fi t i.e-rr inyve--(2-- frixti‘c, )1-4-i5A / MA.-- CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 2004 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the February 18, 2004, Planning C. mission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Barb Johns, Larry Kuechle, Dave 'ondrick, Diane Savage, Dean Saba LeRoy Oquist, Brad Dunham Others Present: Stacy Stromberg, Planner Paul Bolin, Planning Coordin,.tor Rick Harrison, Site Design udio, 8832 7th Ave. N., Golden Valley Pete Villard, Architectural orks-Villard, 5770 Blackshire Path, Inver Grove Heights Michael Spack, TDI Inc. 1313 5th Street SE, Minneapolis Ken and Pat Christian -n, 7525 4th Street Steve Oltman, 7542 5 Street Gregory Zelenak, 75'6 4th Street Barbara Edwards, 403 64th Avenue Kurt and Andrea • son, 1385 64th Avenue J & R Rusinak, 6. 12 Piece Street Jesse Colllard, 426 64th Avenue Aimee Stanfor4, 1426 64th Avenue Russell and o everly Prior, 1340 Mississippi Street Herb and J .y Lennox, 1464 Rice Creek Road Joe and Li,da Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue Shanti V. Buren, 7550 4th Street Roland . nd Karen Evans, 7558 4th Street Virgil a d Susan Okeson, 1423 64th Avenue Mr. a d Mrs. Frank DeMello, 6134 Woody Lane Rob rt Tumms, 1346 Hillcrest Drive Ha,.Id Johnson, 1334 Hillcrest Drive G;rland and Jane Lagesse, 7951 Broad Avenue m Byrne, 6053 Woody Lane ark and Jean Swartz, 1372 64th Avenue Joan Olson, 6320 Van Buren Street Mark Mattison, 6421 Central Avenue Donna Reisner, 6424 Pierce Street Daryl Wolf, 6446 Arthur Street Doreena Aisewski, 7534 4th Street Terry Miller, Vandias Heights Sue Rau, 1341 64th Avenue Inge Eyler, 1456 64th Avenue Kevin and Paulette Holman, 571 79th Way Flo Jackson, Spring Lake Park School District John Zurek, Spring Lake Park School District John Kvidera, 7517 4th Street • Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 3 Rezoning Ms. Stromberg stated that the petitioner is requesting a rezoning and master plan approval for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. Ms. Stromberg stated that rezoning a property to S-2 Redevelopment District, requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. If the rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Council any modification of the site plan would need to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Review of the master plan would also need to be completed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the property is in a Redevelopment District. Ms. Stromberg stated the City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...lt is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision': In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed retail complex, senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the properties meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. Ms. Stromberg stated that the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". Ms. Stromberg stated that the Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". Ms. Stromberg stated that as Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for "empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 5 Plat Ms. Stromberg stated that Mr. DeMello is also seeking to replat the properties located at 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the retail complex and the other lot will be used to allow for the construction of a 71-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. Ms. Stromberg stated that the proposed Lot#1 will accommodate the 13,420 square foot retail complex. Retail complexes like the one proposed are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 62,690 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for the number of parking stalls required for a retail use. Ms. Stromberg stated that the proposed Lot#2 is approximately 116,658 square feet(2.68 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 71 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 45 feet at the midspan. Ms. Stromberg stated early discussions with Anoka County indicated they anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Due to necessity of right-of-way acquisition, the parking setback for the retail space will be 2 feet from the north and west property lines. The parking setback on the senior condominium complex will also be 2 feet from the west property line. Due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. Ms. Stromberg stated that the petitioner hired Maxfield Research Inc., to complete a Market Feasibility Study for Senior Housing in Fridley. The demographic and competitive market analysis done by Maxfield indicates that there is a demand in the Fridley area for 189 for-sale housing units. Maxfield's research pointed out that given the competitive situation in the marketplace, the quality of the subject site, and the lack of for-sale product within three miles of the property, the senior condominium project would be the most marketable product for the site. Their research also showed that the subject site could best support an age-restricted owner- occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. Ms. Stromberg stated the City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles/day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. Ms. Stromberg stated that Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 7 Ms. Stromberg stated that during the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Ms. Stromberg stated that staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewinhistory showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat number PS#04-01, with the following stipulations. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A-5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 11. Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13. A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16. Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. 17. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 9 landscaping. The existing trees will be removed and a double row of a mixture of evergreen trees will be added along the east property line to serve as screening for the neighborhood and as an attractive background for the senior housing residents. Mr. Villard stated the existing site is comprised of three drainage areas. There are currently no storm water quality treatment measures on the site. The proposed plan indicates a 35% reduction in the amount of storm water runoff on the site as compared to the present conditions. A large majority of storm water runoff is designed to flow to the south versus ponding along the east side of the property. There will be no negative impacts are anticipated for the adjacent property owners to the east. Mr. Saba asked Mr. Villard why they haven't considered completing the path around the structure as part of the site. Mr. Villard stated that initially they didn't want to have path but did put the path in to accommodate people coming from the southwest and not having to come up the roadside and meandering through the site to go to the retail area. It is not a problem to extend the path along the driveway to hook up with Mississippi Street. Mr. Saba urged Mr. Vallard to complete the path around the both structures. Mr. Kondrick stated that a good percentage of the 71 units might have two cars each and asked how the 73 underground stalls and 30 surface parking stalls compare to other senior structures. Mr. Villard stated that they try to achieve between 1-%and 1-'/2 cars per stall in independent living. There are a few one-bedroom and one-bedroom den units and usually people would have one car at that point. The 103 parking stalls averages about 1.45 car stalls per unit. Mr. Kondrick asked about visitor parking. Mr. Villard stated that visitor parking is included and is in front of the main entry way. The plan exceeds the city's district zoning requirements for parking which is 1 to 1. Mr. Villard stated there are nine different types of units from 825 square feet to 1,610 square feet. The unit prices would range from approximately $150,000 for the one bedroom unit to approximately $250,000 for the three bedroom units. Mr. Villard stated the retail building is a single story 13,000 square foot building with between 1- 5 tenants maximum. The interior space will have 14 to 16 foot high spaces. Mr. Harrison stated he was a suburban planner and his firm has done over 400 developments in 32 states and 5 countries. Mr. Harrison stated that all the units have a quality view. The retail building architect wraps around three sides creating a warm view from outside the senior units. Ms. Savage asked if and how the type of business would be controlled. Mr. Villard stated that the price of the retail dictates the level of retail companies that could afford the space. Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 11 putting on the addition. He does not want a tall building looking into his back yard and is not for this project. He stated the residents should have a say in what the comprehensive plan of Fridley should be. Mr. Mark Mattison of 6421 Central owns one of the lots being redeveloped. The property was purchased in 1992 because he knew the area would eventually be redeveloped. He had spoken to the City several times about constructing townhomes and that the city wanted to redevelop that area because it is a differently plotted area. He cannot split his one-acre lot even though the house sets on a C-1 and the back half of the lot is R-1. The house has no basement and does not fit into the building code where every house should have a basement. This is an excellent time for the city to consider redeveloping this area. Mr. Joe Nelson of 1357 64th Avenue stated his home is one which will not be destroyed but moved. He stated he is about 16 months away from retirement and a couple of months away from being old enough to live in this development. Neither the city nor the developer forced me to sell my home but I openly negotiated with the developer for the sale of the home. Ms. Joan Olson of 6320 Van Buren stated this was spot zoning. It is doubtful that the $500 fee for the rezoning application covers the cost of staff time and it is adding insult to injury to expect the taxpayers to pick up the tab for the balance for staff time not covered by the application fee. Ms. Jean Schwartz of 1372 64th Avenue stated prior to purchasing their home 18 years ago, they had looked at other areas but when they checked the zoning around the homes, they chose their property because the homes they preferred had apartment buildings close by. They were OK with the zoning as it currently is. She stated that the Commission is sending out the message that no neighborhood is safe from this happening to them. Ms. Andrea Olson of 1385 64th Avenue stated that they were promised this would not happen. People are not in interested in this happening to their neighborhoods. When are you going to listen to the people of Fridley. Ms. Beverly Prior of 1340 Mississippi Street stated that her husband cannot mow the lawn or shovel anymore and a home like this would be perfect for them. This is a wonderful deal to help the elderly people out. Ms. Susan Okeson of 1423 64th Avenue stated she lives four houses from the proposed project. She agreed the area needed to be spruced up but stated they don't need to exchange residential areas and make them into high density housing and add additional retail space since there is retail space close by that is already struggling. This project is not a good fit for the neighborhood. The neighborhood no longer has trust in their civic government to be comfortable with rezoning the plot and let the City decide what will happen to this area. Mr. Mark Schwartz of 1372 64th Avenue stated when he purchased his property it was zoned R- 1 and had looked at other zoning in the area. He has a passion for hockey and would like to put in a hockey rink on his land, would the rules be changed for that? Probably wouldn't but it is OK to change the rules for this project. That's not right, it is not good for the neighborhood. The core of the city is your neighborhoods and this breaks up that core. Ms. Sue Rau of 1341 64th Avenue stated they have lived in their home for 29 years and their home is one that has been purchased. John has done an excellent job in designing this and would be a great benefit for the area because it is getting run down. There are only two homes Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 13 Ms. Johns stated she also agreed with this project. The petitioner has tried to accommodate some of the issues that the neighborhood brought forward to them. Fridley needs to continue redeveloping areas to not remain stagnate. Ms. Savage stated she also agreed with this project and that it is good for the community. Mr. Dunham stated he liked the project but did not like the size of it. He stated he is not necessarily for the project because of the height and is also concerned about the parking. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kuechle to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning, ZOA#04-01 by Profitmax Inc., to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business, and R-1, Single Family to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, with the following stipulations: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A-5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 11. Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12. Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13. A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14. City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16. Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. 17. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18. Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. • Planning Commission Meeting, February 18, 2004 Page 15 17. Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18. Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19. Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20. Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 3. PUBLIC,!-IEARING: Considera.'on of Special Use Permit SP 04-02, by Kevin & Paulette Holman, to construct a detached •-rage in their rear yard, which is located in the Flood Fringe District, generally loca -d at 571 79th Way NE. MOTION made by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Johns, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, A L VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANI OUSLY, AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 10:12 P.M. Ms. Stromberg stated that Ke 'n and Paulette Holman, are seeking a special use permit to construct a detached garage in heir rear yard which is located at 571 79th Way. Their property is located in the CRP-2, Flood F 'nge District. No structures or buildings can be constructed in the CRP-2, Flood Fringe District, ithout a special use permit. Ms. Strombergstated the property i• located east of the Mississippi River, with the home fronting on 79th Way. The property i zoned, R-1, Single Family as are the properties to the west, north and east. The property to he south of the subject property is a public park. The existing home was constructed in 1962 A garage has never existed on this site. Ms. Stromberg stated City Code states t .t no buildings or structures can be placed within the CRP-2, Flood Fringe District, unless a spe ial use permit is granted. The proposed structure must be designed and certified by a registe ed engineer or architect as being in compliance with applicable building codes, including federal - andards for flood proofing. The petitioner has submitted all the necessary information need=d to meet these requirements, including a certificate of survey, and the elevations and st ctural notes on the proposed structure Ms. Stromberg stated that on this particular prope y, there can be no living area below 823.8 feet in elevation. The proposed garage slab will be ocated at 821 feet in elevation. A garage is allowed to be below the required elevation for living . ea because it's uninhabitable (not living space) space. The foundation, footing and garage slag have all been engineered to meet FEMA requirements. The garage floor is also designed o drain. The garage slab will be located at 821 feet in elevation, the top of the block eleva 'on will be 823.8 feet, and the wood garage structure will start above the 823.8 feet elevation. Ms. Stromberg stated the proposed garage meets all setback :nd lot coverage requirements. The petitioners have also submitted a variance request to incre:se the size of a first accessory 4 • February 11, 2004 MAR t To: Fridley City Council From: Residents of the City of Fridley Re: Rezoning and Plat Request for a 71 unit housing development and retail complex by Profitmax We,the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed rezoning and plat request by Profitmax,consisting of a senior high-rise,high density housing development and retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 2 lots on Central Avenue, and 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue NE. We oppose this due to the removal of 6 single family houses,rezoning R-1 single family land,the size and scale of the housing development, a double-sided retail complex with outdoor eating area,the volume of traffic and noise it would produce, drainage issues, and the resulting decrease in property values in the surrounding area. Respectfully submitted: NAME ADDRESS fzJc 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Pait--Q- February 20,2004 Mayor Scott Lund; City of Fridley Dear Mr. Mayor: I am writing to you to express my concerns over the proposed"ProfitMax"Develpment located on the east side of Central Ave. between 64th Av and Mississippi. First, I must tell you that the neighborhood is not opposed to redevelopment of the area. However, having said that,the neighborhood is opposed to the type of plat and plan that was passed by the Planning Commission on February 18th. Redevelopment"according to the Fridley Comprehensive Plan" does not mean large multi-storied buildings lining Central Avenue. I believe the sheer height and size(70+units)of the building placed in the area is enough to seriously consider turning down this proposal. A 50+unit apartment type senior building, Town Center Development, located directly across Central Ave., was just recently given the okay by the City. This was after they took off one story. This intersection does not have to hold all the highrise type senior living in the"Fridley Region". 120+units total for this small area is too much. There is not enough green space for that many people and the parking provided is very inadequate for both projects. The only people that gave positive testimonials or comments at the Feb 18th Planning Commission were selling their homes for the project. I think that there are a number of alternatives that would be welcomed by the neighborhood and by the seniors of Fridley. Many "55+" relocators will also be looking for the first step of leaving the family home and that would be a luxury town home or high-end condo situation, not going directly to an"independent living facility". This could be a chance to change a neighborhood for the better. Secondly,we need a developer with the financial backing to do the whole project and we should not have to be worried that poor studies and planning could leave this project stranded in a half done situation or worse. If this parcel seriously needs to be redeveloped, have it done with a experienced contractor that can see the whole project through. This would be the very first project done by this developer. Lastly,just because a person comes to the Planning Commission and the City Council to say that this is the only type of building that he can make enough money to make it worthwhile is a huge mistake. The city is not responsible for his making money. Don't let someone from outside of Fridley tell you what is best for this neighborhood or Fridley.Also, Mr Demello and his team, in their first public appearance, left doubts with their name calling and degrading of houses and other commercial buildings in the immediate area. Thank you for listening and for your support. Barbara Edwards 1403 64th Ave NE Fridley,Mn 55432 763-572-3855 cc:Fridley City Council members 4;.s-tt ` HA 14 .; firfi`, March 2,2004 Honorable Scott Lund,Mayor of Fridley On Monday March 8th,you are scheduled to receive a proposal and decide on the future of a portion of the Old Central corridor. Profit Max has done something that no other developer has been able to do in our neighborhood and that is to unite all property owners in one common goal to improve and revitalize a key section of the Fridley community. I have owned and lived at my current address of 1357 64th Ave. NE for thirty years. When my wife and I moved into our home, we knew the condition of the property and neighborhood based on a quick visual check of the immediate neighborhood. The property was low and had potential water problems due to the high water table and no storm water system. The buildings around it,with the exception of two other homes built in 1974,were all built in the 40s and 50s. My property is located three houses East of Old Central and a short block away from Mississippi, two county highways. Undeveloped easements and properties surrounded our property, and we assumed that at some point in the future the properties around us would be upgraded and utilized. My assumption was an apartment building would be built. Although this was not my choice, I did not own the surrounding property and I knew that those property owners may choose to make use of their property in a fashion that best fit their needs. To my surprise and benefit, the properties have not changed in appearance much at all in thirty years time. I say,"to my benefit," because it has provided me, at the expense of the property owners, a secluded lot. The old homes, low property, land filled lots and unused commercial property has remained the same. The failure of this proposal may, in fact,seal the fate for redevelopment for another 30 years. You now have an opportunity to change this property from what it is, into a redevelopment project with the blessings of all eight property owners. We are all in agreement and dedicated to making a positive change for ourselves and for the City. I doubt you will ever have all players, including the land owners and a well-organized developer with national and international planners and designers on board to carry out a plan such as this, a plan that has been recommended by both the City Staff and the City Planning Commission. My wife and I are selling our property, not because we are being forced out by a developer or by the city. We have freely negotiated the sale and purchase of replacement housing. This allows us an opportunity to sell our undervalued property and move to a retirement home that will provide us an opportunity that I feel I will never have again. We are scheduled to close on the sale of our current home April 1,2004 and scheduled to close on the purchase of our new home April 15,2004. Time is of the essence for us and the failure of this project will leave us in a position where we would lose our earnest money and the new home we have built. When you make your decision this Monday, think of the opportunities it provides the current land owners, the City, County and, school district regarding tax income. Consider the 71 retirement families that will have new maintenance-free housing,and the new families that will move in to fill their vacant homes. I would appreciate your consideration and welcome your thoughts regarding the fate of this project. Please feel free to call me,either at home,763-571-3317,or via my cellular phone after 12:00 Noon at 612-281-4220. Sincerely, Joe Nelson 1357 64th Ave.NE Fridley, MN 55432 • €ity of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 rt ,, FIQIJJJfJI 6431 (763)571-3450 �tr/Afz4 et`.r Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420019 STREET ADDRESS: 1340 MISSISSIPPI ST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 15 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Se1e1 15 12/31/1960 $148.91 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 3000002600 00 W/S 20 10/3/1961 $1,903.37 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $598.75 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420019 3/17/2004 • 'City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 FRJJDLFY 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 ,, ioz,,r,�,'rfi (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420020 STREET ADDRESS: 1314 MISSISSIPPI ST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 16 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $192.73 5.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Mains) 3000002600 00 W/S 20 10/3/1961 $3,233.97 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $128.82 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $526.19 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.Fidley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420020 3/17/2004 ' ' City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ' ► F'RJJJLEY 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 .1 _Irress0,- rr (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420021 STREET ADDRESS: 6134 WOODY LN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 17 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $148.65 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $128.82 6.00% $0.00 $0.00, $0.00 3300196400 00 W/S-S 15 9/28/1964 $467.82 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 01 W/S/SS 20 _10/5/1964 $1,042.62 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 00 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $177.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 , $115.26 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420021 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 I Li 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 (763)571-3450 //(iratese/r Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420022 STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 18 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $339.82 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $142.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3300196400 00 W/S-S 15 9/28/1964 $517.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 01 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $1,140.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 00 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $177.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000197404 00 ST 10 3/17/1975 $75.48 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420022 3/17/2004 ' City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 Ff? DJjJ3'( 6431 University Ave.NE . Fridley,MN 55432 iehm..wir, (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420023 STREET ADDRESS: 6421 CENTRAL AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 19 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $341.69 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $142.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3300196400 00 W/S-S 15 9/28/1964 $517.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 01 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $1,140.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5000005865 00 W/S/SS 20 10/5/1964 $177.30 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420023 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 r 1-4 6431 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420024 STREET ADDRESS: 6401 CENTRAL AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 20 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $213.57 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 01 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $551.02 6.00%_ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 00 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $1,177.05 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6000196200 00 ST 10 6/2/1964 $142.50 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 600019681B 00 ST 10 9/15/1969 $172.80 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $900.00 6.50% $300.00 $60.00, $23.40 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420024 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 fi, LlJ1,‘,7 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 (763)571-3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420025 STREET ADDRESS: 1357 64TH AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 20 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $106.78 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 01 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $623.20 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 00 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $277.60 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 600019681B 00 ST 10 9/15/1969 $266.40 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420025 3/17/2004 City of Fridley, Minnesota Page 1 of 1 1J16431 University Ave.NE ; Fridley,MN 55432 f.(irur<seia. (763)571 3450 Special Assessments Search Web Database updated: 3/5/2004 2:49:30 PM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DATA RELATING TO THE PROPERTY 133024420026 STREET ADDRESS: 1341 64TH AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot: 20 Block: 1 SPRING VALLEY LEVIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The following paid and/or unpaid special assessments appear with respect to the above-described parcel of land: Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number PID Seq Project Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest 9100000000 00 REG SA(Water/Sewer 15 12/31/1960 $106.78 5.00% Mains) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 01 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $623.20 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3000004800 00 W/S 20 10/1/1962 $277.60 6.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 600019681B 00 ST 10 9/15/1969 $266.40 7.50% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4000026000 00 SS 15 11/30/1994 $1,000.00 6.50% $333.35 $66.67 $26.00 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The City of Fridley has determined that an assessment is considered pending after the City Council passes a resolution ordering the improvement,the approval of plans and the advertising for bids. This is prior to the City Council adopting the final assessment roll. If you seek further information, you should do so upon your own independent inquiry. Any amount given as to pending assessments is informational only and may or may not be the amount ultimately assessed. Project PID Project Term Certified Initial Interest Remaining Current Current Number Seq Name (Years) Date Amount Rate Balance Principal Interest No Pending Special Assessments Found. MISCELLANEOUS FEES Fee Description Fee Status Date Paid Fee Amount No Miscellaneous Fees Found. THE ABOVE RECORDS ARE PUBLIC AND MAY BE INSPECTED BY ANYONE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BELIEVES THE DATA PRESENTED HERE TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE AND TIME THE WEB DATABASE WAS UPDATED,HOWEVER THE CITY IN NO WAY GUARANTEES THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS DATA. UPON REQUEST, THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES PROVIDES CERTIFIED SEARCHES FOR A FEE. THE DATA SHOWN HERE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH A CERTIFIED SEARCH BY CITY OF FRIDLEY STAFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION PRESENTED HERE,OR WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A CERTIFIED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FINANCE DEPARTMENT AT 763-571-3450. http://www2.ci.fridley.mn.us/SA/PrintSearchByPIN.asp?ParcelNo=133024420026 3/17/2004 03/05/2004 15:50 ANOKA CO HWY DPT -4 97635711287 NO.592 D01 l - �► I COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY OEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. NW, ,,: ANDOVER,MINNESOTA 55304 763-862-4200 FAX 763-862-4201 ANOKA COUNTY Zit 3 la e sam Date: , ' 5—0 si Number of pages including Header. _l____ DELIVER TO: FROM: NAME, SeirT7- 4cv_o 4 NAME.' a le°S6 ORGANIZATION: 11/ O f}�i�J T�L� TITLE: .- FIG £ . IU.� ., FAX NO. �t TELEPHONE: 783-862-4231 793 -51) 1 - J04? RE: efQ rr 5167 S VAL-Ly5� Tii-ree Comments: P.3/05/2004 15:50 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 4 97635711287 NO.592 D02 COUNTY OF ANOKA ,." +' ;r Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W- ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 I ' ,/))) (763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201 .): ILE C9 '1 January 27,2004 Stacy Stromberg City of Fridley • 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 RE: Redesign - Spring Valley Estates • Dear Stacy, We have reviewed the redesigned site plan for Spring Valley Estates, to be located on the southeast quadrant of CSAHH 35.(Central 06 Ave.)) and.CR (Mississippi St.)within the City of Fridley, and I offer the following comments. Additional right of way along CSAH 35 and CR 106 willbe required for future reconstruction purposes. While other portions of CSAR 35 have been reconstructed within a 100ft. corridor, it is anticipated that a 1201,right of way corridor will be required for the CSAR 35/CR 106 intersection in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for safety and operational purposes, whenever the intersection were to become signalized. At this point, it is assumed that whenever the CSAH 35/CR 106 intersection is reconstructed in the future, it would be centered in the 120ft.right of way corridor. Consequently,the roadway right of way dedication needs for this site are 30f3.adjacent to CR 106,and loft. adjacent to CSAH 35. The right of access along CSAH 35 and CR 106 (with exceptions for approved access locations)shall be dedicated.to Anoka County, It appears that there are severe deficiencies for the Sight Corners for both proposed access locations, and the obstructions include trees/bushes;and existing structures. It appears that the clearing and the removal of the existing structures associated with this development will eliminate some of the obstructions. However, the obstructions to the east of the proposed access on CR106 are located outside of the limits of this development. The City/Developer shall clear and/or grade so that all applicable Intersection Sight Distance Requirements are satisfied to the fullest extent possible for this development. This should include at a minimum, some effort toward negotiations with the adjacent landowners in an attempt to clear obstructions that are. located outside of the limits of this development. The trees and plantings shown on the landscaping plan along CSAH 35 and CR 106 on the site plan that willbe located within the sight corners shall be eliminated and no new sight obstructions (signs, plantings, etc.) shall be introduced at the access points in conjunction with this development. Please note that no plantings or business signs will be permitted within the county right of way. Care must be exercised when locating signs/plantings/berms/etc. outside the county right of way,so as not to create sight obstructions. • • Affirmative Action !Equal Opportunity Employer 03/05/2004 15:50 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 4 97635711287 NO.592 D04 • • It should be noted that residential land use adjacent to highways will usually result in complaints regarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this location could exceed Noise Standards established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. • Anoka County policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing county highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures, The City and/or the Developer should assess the noise situation and take any action deemed necessary to minimize associated impacts at this site from any traffic noise. Access permits and permits for work within the county right of way are required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction(Access permit=$150.00 each;Permit for work within the county right of way = $110.00 for each affected roadway), License Permit Bonding, methods of construction, design details for turn lane construction, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow-up inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator, or Josie Scott, Permit Technician, for further information regarding the permit process. Installation of permanent traffic control devices deemed necessary within the county right-of-way for 'this proposed development will be coordinated, installed, and maintained by this department as part of the permit process. • Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely. • 11111 ne K. Rose • Traffic Engineering Manager • xe: CSAH 35+CR106/PLATS/2004 Mike Kelly,Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Hoium,County Surveyor Roger Butler,Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott,Permit Technician Torn Hornsby, Traffic Services Supervisor- Signs 03/05/2004 15:50 ANOKA CO HIV DPT -> 97635711287 NO.592 006 a ' I. i . I I' w al j; r" 4 I 111 . +1•. 41 1 •,1 (1 , 111 4044 1 • 5 I .6 + 1. 0 J IS L! VI I r. In � d ,� ,i I J 4 E c as A,1 :,�� .; ,,,, 73 4) I `•' � �I i' 1 ,I,, E i 11 i1,;:i y u I1 I '1 1. L: C P i ,h 1 E in O y a:1 l II , t1 p m ' ill w '' •'' '1, ;#: vW1.1 u0 ��`, ' 1. Lk • ... _ ', Q y Ti . . ,..-. ... ry_, _y.__._.__.._....--'_• (je');'_aP 2.1!1 ;5''H:11a:j:� pi s'' I I, sb YlN -. , 111 r. .,Y. odi I s X90 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E . on Monday, March 8, 2004 , at 7 :30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning, ZOA, 04-01, by Profitmax Inc. , to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business and R-1, Single Family Residential, to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, legal descriptions are on file and available at Fridley Municipal Center, generally located at 1340, and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421, and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341, and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17, and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place . Any questions related to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg, Planner at 763-572-3595 . Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than March 5, 2004 . The TDD number is 763-572-3534 . SCOTT J. LUND MAYOR Publish: March 4, 2004 )' aPLp 1/5 3- (11� City of Fridley (Official Publication) PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center,6431 University Avenue N.E.on Monday,March 8,2004,at 7:30 p.m.for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning, ZOA, 04-01, by Profitmax Inc.,to rezone multiple proper- ties from C-1,Local Business,C-2,General Business and R-t, Single Family Residential,to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment,to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex,legal descriptions are on file and available at Fridley Municipal Center, generally located at 1340,and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421, and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341, and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17,and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions relat- ed to this item may be referred to Stacy Stromberg,Planner at 763-572-3595. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572- 3500 no later than March 5,2004. The TDD number is 763-572-3534. SCOTT J.LUND MAYOR (March 4,2004)F2/rezone profitmax AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2004 CITY OF FRIDLEY Date: March 3, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager r� From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Public Hearing for Rezoning Request, ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-33 INTRODUCTION John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZOA#04-01. After receiving public comment and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning request, ZOA#04-01, with the 22 stipulations as presented. THE MOTION CARRIED BY A 6 TO 1 VOTE. Since the February 18, 2004, the petitioner has submitted a new site plan. The new site plans shows the walking path allow the east side of the property connecting to the walking path along Mississippi Street. It also shows a new parking layout for the commercial complex, which meets the parking requirements and also provides an area for proof of parking, if more parking is ever needed. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION City Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet). 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. City of Fridley Land Use Application ZOA#04-01 & PS #04-01 February 18, 2004 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: 1941 — Lot is platted. Profitmax Inc. House constructed prior to 1949. John DeMello 1951 —Garage built. 2872 17th Terrace NW 1959—Addition to house. New Brighton MN 55112 1975—Detached garage built. Requested Action: 6421 Central Avenue: Rezone property from C-1, C-2, and R-1 to S-2. 1941 —Lot is platted. Replat House and garage built prior to 1949. Location: 6441 Central Avenue: 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Vacant Lot. Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central 1941 —Lot is platted. Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central 1969— Proposal to build a Tastee-Freez. Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, 1357 64th Avenue 1998— Rezoning request from C-1 to R-1, Existing Zoning: withdrawn prior to Planning Commission. 1314 Mississippi St. —C-2, General Business 6461 Central Avenue: 1340 Mississippi St. — R-1, Single Family Vacant Lot 6401 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business 1941 — Lot is platted. 6421 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1341 64th Avenue: 1941 — Lot is platted. R-1, Single Family 6441 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1974— House and garage are built. 1985—SUP issued, second accessory is built. R-1 Single Family 6461 Central Avenue—C-2, General Business 1994— Deck is built. 1341 64th Avenue— R-1, Single Family 1357 64th Avenue: 1357 64th Avenue— R-1, Single Family 1974— House and garage are built. 1985 - Deck is built. Size: 1988—Side yard setback variance granted, Approximate size of entire area to be rezoned garage addition built. and replatted: Legal Description of Property: 179,348 sq. ft. 4.1 acres 1314 Mississippi Street: Existing Land Use: Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Single Family homes, small commercial 1340 Mississippi Street: building (garage), and vacant land Lot 15, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Surrounding Land Use &Zoning: 6401 Central Avenue: N: Commercial building & C-2 Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition E: Single Family& R-1 6421 Central Avenue: S: Single Family homes & C-1 and R-1 Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition W: Vacant land and Restaurant& S-2 6441 Central Avenue: Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Comprehensive Plan Conformance: 6461 Central Avenue: Future Land Use Map designates this area as Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Redevelopment. 1341 64th Avenue: Zoning History: The W 75 ft of E 184 ft of lot 20 BIk 1, Spring Valley, 1314 Mississippi Street: subj to ease of rec 1941 — Lot is platted. 1357 64th Avenue: 1952—House is built. The W 75 ft of E 109 ft of Lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, subj to ease of rec 1959— Detached garage built. Council Action /60 Day Date: 1340 Mississippi Street: City Council — March 8, 2004 1941 — Lot is platted. 60-Day Date—March 15, 2004 House and garage constructed pre-1949. 6401 Central Avenue: 2 Rezoning and Plat SUMMARY OF REQUEST The petitioner, John DeMello, of Profitmax Inc., is requesting to replat and rezone the properties located at 1314 Mississippi St., 1340 Mississippi St., 6401 Central Ave., 6421 Central Ave., 6441 Central Ave., 6461 Central Ave., 1341 64th Ave., and 1357 64th Ave., from C-1, Local Business, C-2 General Business, and R-1 Single Family to S-2 Redevelopment District for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of this plat, rezoning and subsequent master plan request. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg ZOA#04-01 & PS#04-01 OVERVIEW The requests: John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units and a retail complex on the southwest corner of Central Avenue and Mississippi Street. The two actions being requested are a Plat and a Rezoning, all; with the master plan approval will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. A 13,420 retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of the 71 senior condominiums. The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. air r A4;4. 1 t- .. t' :: ',x1 . "' - 4, ; ` M -: ' ,fr - ,, . ,, ,,,, -,, ,,, 1,, -,. A , ,,, , 1111;,,, . k Y� Y { fi$ {'fir° .,S •X ,., - p ... Proposed Project: John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is proposing to construct a 13,420 square foot retail complex on the north portion of the development. The petitioner has stated that he envisions that this complex will house neighborhood retail businesses, which may include a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an ice cream/sandwich shop and a hair salon. The retail complex will include at least 54, 10 foot wide parking stalls for customers. The petitioner is proposing a 4-story 71-unit independent senior condominium complex for the southern portion of the development. The proposed 71 units will be owner-occupied and comprised of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units. There will be four 1-bedroom units that will be 845 square feet in size and eight 1-bedroom units with a den, 1,020 square feet in size. There are fifty-six 2 bedroom and 2-bedroom plus den units planned that will vary 1 J in square footage from 1,157-1,515 in size. There will be three 3-bedroom units that will be 1,610 square feet in size. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. The petitioner plans to model the exterior of both projects after an Italian villa. The site will include several ponds, a gazebo, and a trail system with landscaping that surrounds the property. SITE HISTORY The proposed development area is located on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue. The area consists of 2 vacant lots, which are located on Central Avenue and 4 homes that were constructed prior to 1952, 2 of which are located on Mississippi Street and the other 2 are located on Central Avenue. The 2 existing homes on 64th Avenue were constructed in 1974. The petitioners' father, Frank DeMello purchased the vacant parcel located 6461 Central Avenue, 25 years ago. When the property at 1314 Mississippi Street came up for sale over the summer of 2003, the petitioner purchased it with the hope of developing the land. The petitioner then contacted surrounding property owners to see if they would be interested in selling their properties. When the neighboring property owners became interested in selling their properties, the petitioner came forward with this redevelopment project. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #04-01 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning and master plan approval for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64tn Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting to be rezoned are 1314 Mississippi Street (single family home and garage (welding shop), zoned C-2, General Business), 1340 Mississippi Street (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), 6401 Central Avenue (single family home, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6421 Central Avenue (single family home, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6441 Central Avenue (vacant lot, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant lot, zoned C-2, General Business), 1341 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), and 1347 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family). The petitioner is proposing to redevelop this entire area. it... w :461 i6441 6421 3 6401 v l\, to tri, 2 Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. As the properties exist today, 2 of them have split zoning between C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family. While both of the lots are rather large in size, conflicts arise when the zoning is split between a commercial and residential zoning. Rezoning a property to S-2 Redevelopment District, requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. If the rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Council any modification of the site plan would need to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Review of the master plan would also need to be completed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the property is in a Redevelopment District. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...It is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision". In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed retail complex, senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the properties meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". 3 The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use & the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. • Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Fridley residents. • Create sustainable, self-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to the quality of life and image of Fridley. • Ensure a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the City's housing stock. • Diversify the housing supply to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for"empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. Rezoning these properties helps to achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area. Plat Request#04-01 John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is seeking to replat the properties located at 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the retail complex and the other lot will be used to allow for the construction of a 71-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot#1 and Lot#2, Block 1, Spring Valley Estates. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their intended use. The proposed Lot#1 will accommodate the 13,420 square foot retail complex. Retail complexes like the one proposed are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 62,690 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for the number of parking stalls required for a retail use. 4 {Y 5 fix'* j re-41 ,' fr ' 4414i*:71!:-'"•• '',II 7 -, s,,,,,,,.,.., . ,,f,..„*, ' .._: ii;,:r , . . . I, lier i r , %; .. ','i 711' ** 4 ''-z--ei ',- ',,t..: ' im-411: )-;'' 101 „,..0 , '1.. , :.:::'.: ` ..;�.�.. s , .._...:-- v�us# ,W, a .rock, T 3 ' The proposed Lot#2 is approximately 116,658 square feet (2.68 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 71 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 45 feet at the midspan. Early discussions with Anoka County indicated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, staff assumes that the County will be requesting that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. The petitioner has drawn the site plan to illustrate right-of- way acquisition along both County Roads. Due to necessity of right-of-way acquisition, the parking setback for the retail space will be 2 feet from the north and west property lines. The parking setback on the senior condominium complex will also be 2 feet from the west property line. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. HOUSING STUDY The petitioner hired Maxfield Research Inc., to complete a Market Feasibility Study for Senior Housing in Fridley. The demographic and competitive market analysis done by Maxfield indicates that there is a demand in the Fridley area for 189 for-sale housing units. Maxfield's research pointed out that given the competitive situation in the marketplace, the quality of the subject site, and the lack of for-sale product within three miles of the property, the senior condominium project would be the most marketable product for the site. Their research also showed that the subject site could best support 5 an age-restricted owner-occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 71 senior owner occupied condominium units and the commercial complex may have on the local traffic patterns. Staff consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by TDI, Traffic Date Incorporated. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles / day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT PREPARED BY TDI, INC. Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, which was published in December 2003. The consultants used the Senior Adult Housing Attached category in the ITE manual to determine that the proposed senior complex would generate a total of 247 trips per day. The consultants used the Specialty Retail Center category from the ITE manual and determined that the proposed retail complex would generate a total of 598 trips per day. Trip Generation ITE Description Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Trips Use In Out In Out 252 Senior Adult Housing — 247 3 3 5 3 Attached (71 units) 814 Specialty Retail Center— 598 n/a n/a 16 21 (13,500 sq. ft.) TDI developed traffic forecasts for the following 2005 scenarios: No Build (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) Build Spring Valley Estates (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) The finding of these forecasts show that the level of service at both the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersections and the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue 6 intersections would remain the same in the no-build or build scenarios. The only change seen is during the AM Peak Hour at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue eastbound intersection, where the level of service would change from LOS B to LOS C. Central Avenue/64TH Avenue Westbound & Eastbound Approach LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound 2005 No-Build A B C C 2005 Build A C C C Mississippi Street/Central Avenue Intersection LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2005 No-Build C D 2005 Build C D To complete the traffic study, the consultants also referred to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which governs the use of traffic control devices per Minnesota State Statute. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has eight criteria (called warrants) to consider when determining if a traffic signal should be installed at an intersection or not. These warrants are primarily based on the traffic volumes flowing through the intersection. A warrant analysis was conducted for the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. To complete this analysis, TDI staff performed a turning movement count from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. None of the eight warrants are met under the existing conditions, nor will they be met if the elderly housing and retail buildings are constructed on the proposed site. According to this analysis, a traffic signal should not be installed at the intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue until at least one of the warrants is being met. The conclusions of TDI's analysis state that the stop controlled approaches at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic control. The intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue will operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic controls. A traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection and a traffic signal will not be warranted at the intersection after the proposed development is completed. A complete copy of the traffic study is available upon request. WETLAND The petitioner has been working with the Rice Creek Watershed to determine in the project area has a wetland. The petitioner has hired Tom Bremen, with Acorn Consulting, to delineate the site for any possible wetlands. Currently, both the petitioner and the Rice Creek Watershed are waiting for the delineators report. PHASING PLAN The petitioner has indicated to staff that their intentions are to building the entire 71 unit senior owner-occupied condominium project all in one construction phase. If the bank required unit pre-sales are slower than predicated by the market report, then they plan 7 • to phase the project. Phasing the project would involve constructing the senior complex in 2 phases (2 buildings). The first phase would be 35 units and the second phase would be the remaining 36 units. Phase one would commence upon selling the bank required percentage of units in the first half of the building, removal of the existing homes and soil corrections. Phase one would tentatively commence in August 2004. Phase two would commence when the pre-sales are met for the first part of the 2nd half of the building. In the meantime, sod, landscaping, and parking would be installed. Phase 3 involves the retail space. Simultaneously, with the residential property, the retail building would be pre-leased. When the building is completely leased, the building will be constructed. Please see the attached phasing plan in your packet. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS During the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewing history showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of this Rezoning ZOA #04-01 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex, with stipulations. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities in Fridley City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#04-01, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 8 • . ie 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 9 1W AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2004 CRY OF FRIDLEY Date: March 3, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager ill From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: First Reading for Rezoning Request, ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-34 INTRODUCTION John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for ZOA#04-01. After receiving public comment and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning request, ZOA#04-01, with the 22 stipulations as presented. THE MOTION CARRIED BY A 6 TO 1 VOTE. Since the February 18, 2004, the petitioner has submitted a new site plan. The new site plans shows the walking path allow the east side of the property connecting to the walking path along Mississippi Street. It also shows a new parking layout for the commercial complex, which meets the parking requirements and also provides an area for proof of parking, if more parking is ever needed. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION City Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests, above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. City of Fridley Land Use Application ZOA#04-01 & PS #04-01 February 18, 2004 GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: 1941 —Lot is platted. Profitmax Inc. House constructed prior to 1949. John DeMello 1951 —Garage built. 2872 17th Terrace NW 1959—Addition to house. New Brighton MN 55112 1975— Detached garage built. Requested Action: 6421 Central Avenue: Rezone property from C-1, C-2, and R-1 to S-2. 1941 —Lot is platted. Replat House and garage built prior to 1949. Location: 6441 Central Avenue: 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Vacant Lot. Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central 1941 — Lot is platted. Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central 1969— Proposal to build a Tastee-Freez. Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, 1357 64th Avenue 1998— Rezoning request from C-1 to R-1, Existing Zoning: withdrawn prior to Planning Commission. 1314 Mississippi St. —C-2, General Business 6461 Central Avenue: 1340 Mississippi St. — R-1, Single Family Vacant Lot 6401 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business 1941 — Lot is platted. 6421 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1341 64th Avenue: R-1, Single Family 1941 —Lot is platted. 6441 Central Avenue—C-1, Local Business & 1974— House and garage are built. R-1 Single Family 1985—SUP issued, second accessory is built. 6461 Central Avenue—C-2, General Business 1994— Deck is built. 1341 64th Avenue— R-1, Single Family 1357 64th Avenue: 1357 64th Avenue— R-1, Single Family 1974—House and garage are built. 1985 - Deck is built. Size: 1988—Side yard setback variance granted, Approximate size of entire area to be rezoned garage addition built. and replatted: Legal Description of Property: 179,348 sq. ft. 4.1 acres 1314 Mississippi Street: Existing Land Use: Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Single Family homes, small commercial 1340 Mississippi Street: building (garage), and vacant land Lot 15, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Surrounding Land Use &Zoning: 6401 Central Avenue: N: Commercial building & C-2 Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition E: Single Family & R-1 6421 Central Avenue: S: Single Family homes & C-1 and R-1 Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition W: Vacant land and Restaurant& S-2 6441 Central Avenue: Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Comprehensive Plan Conformance: 6461 Central Avenue: Future Land Use Map designates this area as Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition Redevelopment. 1341 64th Avenue: Zoning History: The W 75 ft of E 184 ft of lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, 1314 Mississippi Street: subj to ease of rec 1941 — Lot is platted. 1357 64th Avenue: The W 75 ft of E 109 ft of Lot 20 Blk 1, Spring Valley, 1952— House is built. subj to ease of rec 1959— Detached garage built. 1340 Mississippi Street: Council Action /60 Day Date: City Council — March 8, 2004 1941 — Lot is platted. House and garage constructed pre-1949. 60-Day Date— March 15, 2004 6401 Central Avenue: s , 2 Rezoning and Plat SUMMARY OF REQUEST The petitioner, John DeMello, of Profitmax Inc., is requesting to replat and rezone the properties located at 1314 Mississippi St., 1340 Mississippi St., 6401 Central Ave., 6421 Central Ave., 6441 Central Ave., 6461 Central Ave., 1341 64th Ave., and 1357 64th Ave., from C-1, Local Business, C-2 General Business, and R-1 Single Family to S-2 Redevelopment District for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of this plat, rezoning and subsequent master plan request. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for Fridley seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities. Staff Report Prepared by: Stacy Stromberg , ZOA#04-01 & PS#04-01 OVERVIEW The requests: John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting two separate land use actions from the City of Fridley in order to construct 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units and a retail complex on the southwest corner of Central Avenue and Mississippi Street. The two actions being requested are a Plat and a Rezoning, all; with the master plan approval will be examined individually in this report. A Plat is being requested to create two new parcels, from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. A 13,420 retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of the 71 senior condominiums. The petitioner is also requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. t: , - rYY°° 4 n .lj.'1. ,,, ).: tIte.1 . . 'At. ''',4, ,rt ,i , - . :t �` ea § !� fag . ' '} . i *:°4144,,,o V. ,,,t. , ', . ; .., ^fic , ''' ''' :4% -i—E- r,.- ,* ,-. .',!''',.,:tP*"-, ? •foi,41‘. '. "'_ ,:se. *, )4 r r- F r e :s�: i 3�'' f a n '� x i; ». . w � b ,. a ), `, „ *w f g� fl.r Proposed Project: John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is proposing to construct a 13,420 square foot retail complex on the northportion of the development. The petitioner has stated that he envisions that this complex will house neighborhood retail businesses, which may include a pharmacy, a coffee shop, an ice cream/sandwich shop and a hair salon. The retail complex will include at least 54, 10 foot wide parking stalls for customers. The petitioner is proposing a 4-story 71-unit independent senior condominium complex for the southern portion of the development. The proposed 71 units will be owner-occupied and comprised of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units. There will be four 1-bedroom units that will be 845 square feet in size and eight 1-bedroom units with a den, 1,020 square feet in size. There are fifty-six 2 bedroom and 2-bedroom plus den units planned that will vary 1 in square footage from 1,157-1,515 in size. There will be three 3-bedroom units that will be 1,610 square feet in size. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. The petitioner plans to model the exterior of both projects after an Italian villa. The site will include several ponds, a gazebo, and a trail system with landscaping that surrounds the property. SITE HISTORY The proposed development area is located on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue. The area consists of 2 vacant lots, which are located on Central Avenue and 4 homes that were constructed prior to 1952, 2 of which are located on Mississippi Street and the other 2 are located on Central Avenue. The 2 existing homes on 64th Avenue were constructed in 1974. The petitioners' father, Frank DeMello purchased the vacant parcel located 6461 Central Avenue, 25 years ago. When the property at 1314 Mississippi Street came up for sale over the summer of 2003, the petitioner purchased it with the hope of developing the land. The petitioner then contacted surrounding property owners to see if they would be interested in selling their properties. When the neighboring property owners became interested in selling their properties, the petitioner came forward with this redevelopment project. ANALYSIS Rezoning Request ZOA #04-01 The petitioner is requesting a rezoning and master plan approval for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. The properties requesting to be rezoned are 1314 Mississippi Street (single family home and garage (welding shop), zoned C-2, General Business), 1340 Mississippi Street (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), 6401 Central Avenue (single family home, zoned C-1, Local Business), 6421 Central Avenue (single family home, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6441 Central Avenue (vacant lot, split zoning, zoned C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant lot, zoned C-2, General Business), 1341 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family), and 1347 64th Avenue (single family home, zoned R-1, Single Family). The petitioner is proposing to redevelop this entire area. 1314 =x : w 6461 1 6441 6421 1 y 6401 s u3 a 2 Zoning Map—Shows mix of zoning and properties to be replatted and rezoned. As the properties exist today, 2 of them have split zoning between C-1, Local Business and R-1, Single Family. While both of the lots are rather large in size, conflicts arise when the zoning is split between a commercial and residential zoning. Rezoning a property to S-2 Redevelopment District, requires that the accompanying site plan become the master plan for the site. If the rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Council any modification of the site plan would need to go back to the City Council for review and approval. Review of the master plan would also need to be completed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the property is in a Redevelopment District. The City's Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. State Statute gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was developed with resident input taken from several meetings held between 1998 and 2000 and is a "tool intended to help guide future growth and development of the community...It is a plan because it contains goals, policies and strategies that all work together, looking to the future and working towards achieving a community wide vision". In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed retail complex, senior owner-occupied condominium complex and rezoning of the properties meet several of the objectives the residents of Fridley identified in the visioning sessions for the Comprehensive Plan. The area of Old Central between Mississippi Street and Rice Creek Road was identified as an area for future redevelopment. The purpose of redevelopment is to provide the opportunity for more efficient land uses and eliminate inefficient land uses and under utilized parcels. Redevelopment can also provide an opportunity to build new facilities, meet current market demands and desires of the City, creates new tax base, and creates additional job opportunities. All the above purposes of redevelopment have the potential of being met with the rezoning of these properties. The Comprehensive Plan specifically states that for this portion of Old Central, "consideration should be made to replacing the current mix of single-family residential and commercial uses with higher density residential development that together with the health club may serve as an attractive residential location for move-up housing". The Comprehensive Plan also states that for projects in these redevelopment areas requiring rezoning that the S-2 zoning designation "would be the appropriate Zoning district to implement for the redevelopment project. The intent of the district is to provide the City with site plan review authority to determine if the proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive and Redevelopment Plans". 3 The Comprehensive Plan, in both the Future Land Use & the Housing chapters, addresses the desire for a variety of housing types in a number of goals listed below. • Ensure that adequate opportunities exist for the development of a variety of housing types at a range of affordability levels including low, low-moderate and high cost housing to meet the life-cycle needs of Fridley residents. • Create sustainable, self-reliant, mixed-use and mixed-income neighborhoods that contribute positively to the quality of life and image of Fridley. • Ensure a variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Strengthen neighborhoods and improve upon the quality of the City's housing stock. • Diversify the housing supply to include move up housing both in the form of rental and owner occupied housing. As Fridley's residents continue to age, demand will increase for"empty nester" and senior housing. There will be an increased demand for senior rental, senior owned condominium/town homes, and assisted living facilities. The proposed project, 71 senior owner-occupied condominium units, will meet some of the current demand for those seniors seeking alternatives to their current housing type. Rezoning these properties helps to achieve the Comprehensive Plan's goal for this area. Plat Request#04-01 John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., is seeking to replat the properties located at 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue, 6461 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue to create two separate lots. One of the newly created lots will accommodate the retail complex and the other lot will be used to allow for the construction of a 71-unit owner occupied senior condominium development. The proposed replat will consist of two lots; Lot#1 and Lot#2, Block 1, Spring Valley Estates. Rezoning a property to S-2, Redevelopment District allows for the maximum flexibility for a redevelopment project; however, City staff asked the petitioner to design their project to try to meet the zoning classification codes most similar to their intended use. The proposed Lot#1 will accommodate the 13,420 square foot retail complex. Retail complexes like the one proposed are typically zoned C-2, General Business. Proposed Lot#1 is 62,690 square feet in size, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirement for the C-2, General Business District. Proposed Lot#1 also meets all the parking requirements for the number of parking stalls required for a retail use. 4 ' ':711,,.,.!,14,.4 .t,, MV): °.)44*. ' _ ,,,,,,, 7,-.1 t : G ,tt.* .....t1c4: '`',Ve At;. 3 g � :v y ,,f%r,i,tsk4v-1,;":,4,11,:..':i,'" ;t44''.'„1'..l.:r'1•Ltt ,.:‘''':I"''.% . t i , :: 4`_ ?*.7,„t4—i4,l..,;: 1!:,„",'7-,!-,e1,,‘'.'„ '01„',':7: ! .ire * { lt J , - � yr' z et 7c b".* :k* Is The proposed Lot#2 is approximately 116,658 square feet (2.68 acres) in size. The petitioner is proposing to construct 71 senior owner occupied condominium units. The development will include 73 underground parking stalls and 30 surface parking stalls. Because of the underground parking and the high water table in this area, the height of the building will be 45 feet at the midspan. Early discussions with Anoka County indicated that additional right-of-way on Central Avenue and Mississippi Street will be required for future reconstruction purposes. They anticipate that a 120 ft. right-of-way corridor will be required for both Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersections in order to provide the necessary turn lanes for future safety and operational purposes. The County assumes when the Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection is reconstructed, it would be centered in the 120 ft. right-of-way corridor. Consequently, roadway right-of-way dedication needs for this site are 27-30 ft. adjacent to Mississippi Street and 10 ft. adjacent to Central Avenue. Therefore, staff assumes that the County will be requesting that at this time, both of the right-of-ways be dedicated. The petitioner has drawn the site plan to illustrate right-of- way acquisition along both County Roads. Due to necessity of right-of-way acquisition, the parking setback for the retail space will be 2 feet from the north and west property lines. The parking setback on the senior condominium complex will also be 2 feet from the west property line. As stated above, due to the flexibility allowed in the S-2, Redevelopment district, the diminished setbacks can be recognized under this rezoning master plan approval. HOUSING STUDY The petitioner hired Maxfield Research Inc., to complete a Market Feasibility Study for Senior Housing in Fridley. The demographic and competitive market analysis done by Maxfield indicates that there is a demand in the Fridley area for 189 for-sale housing units. Maxfield's research pointed out that given the competitive situation in the marketplace, the quality of the subject site, and the lack of for-sale product within three miles of the property, the senior condominium project would be the most marketable product for the site. Their research also showed that the subject site could best support 5 an age-restricted owner-occupied development such as a condominium or cooperative of around 70 units. TRAFFIC Staff utilized a number of sources to determine the possible impacts that 71 senior owner occupied condominium units and the commercial complex may have on the local traffic patterns. Staff consulted the Transportation chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and reviewed the traffic study supplied by TDI, Traffic Date Incorporated. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER The City's Comprehensive Plan indicated that in 2001, the portion of Old Central adjacent to the proposed senior condominiums carried 8,000 vehicles per day and, at this traffic level, was only carrying 57% of the traffic for which the roadway was designed and constructed to function at a Level of Service (LOS) D. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates Old Central carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day by the year 2020, based upon increases in population for Fridley & surrounding communities, as well as redevelopment and reinvestment within Fridley. At 10,000 vehicles / day, Old Central will be carrying 71% if the maximum amount of traffic for which the roadway was designed. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT PREPARED BY TDI, INC. Profitmax Inc., hired TDI, Traffic Data Incorporated, a Data Collection, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning firm to perform a traffic analysis. The consultants performed a trip generation analysis based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, which was published in December 2003. The consultants used the Senior Adult Housing Attached category in the ITE manual to determine that the proposed senior complex would generate a total of 247 trips per day. The consultants used the Specialty Retail Center category from the ITE manual and determined that the proposed retail complex would generate a total of 598 trips per day. Trip Generation ITE Description Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Trips Use In Out In Out 252 Senior Adult Housing — 247 3 3 5 3 Attached (71 units) 814 Specialty Retail Center— 598 n/a n/a 16 21 (13,500 sq. ft.) TDI developed traffic forecasts for the following 2005 scenarios: No Build (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) Build Spring Valley Estates (with traffic forecasted from the Town Center Elderly Housing project approved across from the site on Central Avenue) The finding of these forecasts show that the level of service at both the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersections and the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue 6 intersections would remain the same in the no-build or build scenarios. The only change seen is during the AM Peak Hour at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue eastbound intersection, where the level of service would change from LOS B to LOS C. Central Avenue/64TH Avenue Westbound & Eastbound Approach LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound 2005 No-Build A B C C 2005 Build A C C C Mississippi Street/Central Avenue Intersection LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2005 No-Build C D 2005 Build C D To complete the traffic study, the consultants also referred to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which governs the use of traffic control devices per Minnesota State Statute. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has eight criteria (called warrants) to consider when determining if a traffic signal should be installed at an intersection or not. These warrants are primarily based on the traffic volumes flowing through the intersection. A warrant analysis was conducted for the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. To complete this analysis, TDI staff performed a turning movement count from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Mississippi Street/Central Avenue intersection. None of the eight warrants are met under the existing conditions, nor will they be met if the elderly housing and retail buildings are constructed on the proposed site. According to this analysis, a traffic signal should not be installed at the intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue until at least one of the warrants is being met. The conclusions of TDI's analysis state that the stop controlled approaches at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic control. The intersection of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue will operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios with the existing lane configurations and traffic controls. A traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection and a traffic signal will not be warranted at the intersection after the proposed development is completed. A complete copy of the traffic study is available upon request. WETLAND The petitioner has been working with the Rice Creek Watershed to determine in the project area has a wetland. The petitioner has hired Tom Bremen, with Acorn Consulting, to delineate the site for any possible wetlands. Currently, both the petitioner and the Rice Creek Watershed are waiting for the delineators report. PHASING PLAN The petitioner has indicated to staff that their intentions are to building the entire 71 unit senior owner-occupied condominium project all in one construction phase. If the bank required unit pre-sales are slower than predicated by the market report, then they plan 7 to phase the project. Phasing the project would involve constructing the senior complex in 2 phases (2 buildings). The first phase would be 35 units and the second phase would be the remaining 36 units. Phase one would commence upon selling the bank required percentage of units in the first half of the building, removal of the existing homes and soil corrections. Phase one would tentatively commence in August 2004. Phase two would commence when the pre-sales are met for the first part of the 2nd half of the building. In the meantime, sod, landscaping, and parking would be installed. Phase 3 involves the retail space. Simultaneously, with the residential property, the retail building would be pre-leased. When the building is completely leased, the building will be constructed. Please see the attached phasing plan in your packet. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS During the public hearings for the senior condominiums for Town Center Development, City staff heard many comments from neighboring property owners. Some of the concerns raised were regarding traffic and a guarantee that the tenants of the complex would be 55 or older. To alleviate those concerns ahead of time, the petitioner has provided city staff with a traffic study and a copy of the proposed association documents upon submittal of the rezoning and plat request. Staff also heard a concern regarding a drainage issue on properties south of 64th Avenue. Reviewing history showed that improvements have been made to the storm sewer system north of 64th Avenue and that all the storm water from the north is diverted west to the much larger storm sewer system in Central Avenue. There is no connection between the storm sewer system north and the problem identified from the resident south of 64th Avenue. STAFF RECOMMEDATION City Staff recommends approval of this Rezoning ZOA #04-01 and accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex, with stipulations. • Proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Provides housing opportunities for seniors. • Provides additional retail opportunities in Fridley. • Provides additional job opportunities in Fridley City Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for PS#04-01, with stipulations. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above. 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A-9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 8 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 9 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the Fridley City Code is amended hereinafter as indicated, and is hereby subject to the stipulations as shown in Attachment 1. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: 1340 Mississippi Street, 1314 Mississippi Street, 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), and 6421 Central Avenue. Lots15-19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, subject to easement of record. 6401 Central Avenue: Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, except East 184 feet thereof, subject to easement of record. 1341 64th Avenue: The West 75 feet of the East 184 feet of Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, subject to easement of record. 1357 64th Avenue: The West 75 feet of the East 109 feet of Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, subject to easement of record. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-2 (Redevelopment District). SE CTION 3.That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-1 (Local Business), C-2 (General Business), and R-1 (Single Family) to S-2 (Redevelopment District). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS -- -- DAY OF MARCH, 2004. ATTEST: DEBRA A. SKOGEN — CITY CLERK Public Hearing: March 8, 2004 First Reading: March 8, 2004 SCOTT J. LUND — MAYOR Second Reading: Publication: ATTACHMENT 1 Stipulations for Rezoning Request ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc.: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan to be submitted prior to the City Council meeting of March 8, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A-5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04 and architectural plan A- 9, titled Retail Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations, dated 2/6/04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. Petitioner to provide Certificate of Exemption for wetland or mitigate the wetland to meet the Rice Creek Watershed Districts regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 9. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 10.Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run-off and management. 11.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 12.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 13.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 14.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. 15.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 16.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of $4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 17.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 18.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 19.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 20.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. r 21.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 22. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. t �./ CITY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2004 7:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers Attendance Sheet Please print name, address and item number you are interested in. Print Name (Clearly) Address Item No. # ry '7 za lq. aive rz Ili /L.,' .Th.,:,,,,,, /5-d/ C.,,,,R, 4/ ix/, to b3-1 ,u .c . y . - •w i re etenak 75)6 97$ . ,vr as T2hnz (p ate ibk z -i-_ 10,' r p � . ' - i. ' 13 W' ,J4 Srk:. ex ( C'0 i I'.e- 7 851 (AAn-�v2 Aoe. It-).F.41;95 8 .p.1X P4 a o t /L44.4 j- a , 0J40.431 ._ _1 Y ya. - (v1 -'-' ( .11 r oZ i a-3 4 lip -Ail / 6S/2(1- V (I,,•<._ /'1 g2/ • taig7,_c_iztr--, !r► _ f 6�� -( of 4)6 zl 0� iiiy P L L,06iL/H-0 v 636-6 �i ,s1-4.< z( e4-.9-L___ CJs 7 4i7.._.e.//--ea 06 4 chvesr .e.41/41,46 ,, . .i/p/ 4/1.R.A.( ,al - e a. i a(4) (o(1 ` 111 siti aoel eEJ / A , /3Vi� sisbta ,�i� : - - ' '�►'; 6(' -t F '(t £4- - . IF CITY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2004 7:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers Attendance Sheet Please •rin name address and item numb-r ou are interested in. Print Name(Clearly) Address Item No. , ` / PAk SS i 5 5 if t S;" "-.3 c--( 43 S/4tievtfr7/- ilii _ - tet.-4,s tf1: D K 05 2e J(Q' / / ' • ? g — tdit,“. 1 // S • lcruthAa.Al d - a c- 1 /11A ,Ci L , iO — . .'c)/-e r T . moi, 5) rA _ Ittvi„:„(..4% goo,di . ,..“, .-- suo _ 4/9, ,k rP' 44( çZ.,7 17ezce idedGs ,mak" . i /4 r 1--. c-2( .0,-k. /3 fo' 6q)-A 4-Q-- zlic e/ 'c44e 7/si- ' /3 Co eF/A e i A 41/4„) '‘.3 15-Te q Al Q---. r 'P VLUA/ L/ IGV/x) t ,____.. -G --- --e.._.Avo fwi----(. )-s I z- 6 cir--4- Rix, nF__ z-4. t CY?^ 01401A 13kgm , .c-, cc3o Bw1L(,. lticl (3,,mcsi. CZ ,.AA Pk (*)\.0 s ,I G4t2_ ?sat. St ki L Z f 9LA-A-6(--)/1,,,,l__.c7de,36 / i(oo-6 4 4,,.(A,,, Svc- a LIJ CITY OF c FRIDLEY i ' `t FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING 17 OF MARCH 8, 2004 1/'' ?:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers 1 �7 l Attendance Sheet Please print name, address and item number you are interested in. Print Name (Clearly) Address Item No. )4212;--:i Q{ We((o 0Zr22 / ),X777N` - 44/0 /li_f 2,a, IA c‘' M\\ E- 4ctJi 4 c. �Ac-t 1, /enc I iSh se- -i 759.3- 4- si' ,,4/� , -2,0 Rad- /140.5-rma 75-33 k57-4j zv . 1--1-l-r /Ve--7A(7. „0-N- _ 6,1;2/ (---_,Le,it-vi cee....„ 2.-/ • _ , ..76 ( cAw,0ee_2. -- `'" '4 Q �i 1376 t,4 q_Sj(Nfi 11 42 �er� #`' / fv N f it ii /I I A/ % 1/ 17__C--/e/ 4 -y - ��' z- t '" N t/u(0 i-2- 5t f-46 /372 69;t`� f hei(048`l y Pi FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 15 PUBLIC HEARING 21. Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc., to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business, and R-1, Single Family Residential, to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment to allow for a senior housing development and a retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 642 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition (Ward 2). MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to waive the reading and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Hickok, Community Development Director, stated the petitioner is requesting rezoning to S-2 in order to develop senior owner-occupied condominiums and a retail area on the southeast corner of Old Central and Mississippi Street. A 13,420 square foot retail complex will occupy the northern parcel and the southern parcel will be used for the construction of 71 senior condominiums. The retail area will take access both from Old Central and Mississippi Street. The 71 unit condominium building will take up approximately two-thirds of the site down to 64th Avenue on the south. This property currently has a mixture of zoning; starting at Mississippi and Old Central there are two parcels that are zoned C-2, General Business. Just to the east of that is a property labeled 1340 Mississippi zoned R-1, Single Family. South of those commercial and single-family sites, there is two properties, 6441 and 6421 Old Central zoned C-1 and R-1. 6401 is C-1 also and the properties to the east are R-1. Rezoning to S-2 states that the site be developed in accordance with a master plan for the site. Once approved, any modifications of the site plan will require Council approval. In order for a rezoning to be viewed favorably, it must be in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal meets several of the requirements identified in the Comprehensive Plan. This property is approximately 2.68 acres in size. The preliminary plat meets all of the plat requirements and the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority reviewed and concurred with the master plan as submitted at their March 4 meeting. Early discussions with Anoka County indicated that additional right-of-way on Old Central and Mississippi Street would be required in order to obtain a 120 foot wide right-of-way for future expansion. Based on the preliminary Anoka County Highway Department comments, the petitioner has done the following: they have shown the right-of-way dedication needed and moved access points to line up with the development across Old Central. The City sent a copy of the plans to Anoka County Highway Department on January 20. Late last Friday, the City received their comments which include the request to have all access to this development placed on 64th Avenue. They would like to remove access from the retail portion from Old Central. At this time, these are recommendations from Anoka County and not requirements. Staff recommends access remains on Old Central and not on 64th Avenue to minimize traffic impact to the surrounding residential neighborhood. On February 18 the Planning Commission approved both requests on a 6 to 1 vote. Staff recommends that Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, and the accompanying site plan for the senior building and retail complex be approved with the stipulations as stated. This proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, provides housing opportunities for seniors, provides new retail opportunities in FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 17 building is situated. 64th meets the front setbacks for an R-3 district in that it is over 35 feet back. This is important because Councilmember Billings' question about height has a caveat that says that if a building is going to be 45 feet or less there are no additional setbacks from the property line. At mid-span, the building is 45 feet high. This is an area where some folks have expressed concern, but we have taken this through all the formulas and it is within the qualifying measurements. Councilmember Billings asked if the ground along 64th is relatively the same in height in comparison to the first floor. Mr. Hickok stated there is some grading and ponding south of the building along 64th Avenue, then the earth is bermed up to hold the edge of the pond between the building and the pond and there are contours going down to the base of the building. Councilmember Billings asked if this were in an R-3 district would the setbacks be the same as what they are for the residential structure in the S-2. Mr. Hickok replied yes, with one exception. The side yard on the east side of the building is 18 feet and it could be 15 feet. Also the building pulls away to create a much greater distance between the adjoining properties. The S-2 district allows latitude and flexibility to make variations in the development. It comes closer to its own commercial building than R-3 would typically allow, but all other setbacks are the same as R-3 requirements. Councilmember Billings asked if the developer is unable to finish the project, what financial obligation does the City have to complete the project. Mr. Hickok stated the City would have no obligation. The future developer or the bank would have interest in this property because there has been a master plan approved and the expectation is that the buildings would be built to that master plan. Councilmember Billings asked how the setback requirements on this site compare to the setback requirements on the property immediately west across Old Central. He aside if they were concerned about litigation from that project because something different was being done. Mr. Hickok explained the S-2 zoning on both sides of the road has its own built-in flexibilities. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if any reports had been received from the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding this development. Mr. Hickok said it was determined that this is a wetland site that is less than the minimum threshold necessary for mitigation. What that means is that when a wetland is below a square foot dimension it does not require protection. This site is eligible for an exemption letter based on the wetland that was determined there. We do not yet have the letter of exemption from the State. We have a verbal statement from the consultant and the Rice Creek Watershed District, but not the actual letter of exemption. Based on that determination, no changes will be required in the site plan. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 19 Mr. Hickok stated the objectives that would be met by the proposal are what should be evaluated by the City. We would need to be able to substantiate that this is indeed in the City's best interest or is not based on the objectives spelled out. However, it is incumbent upon the City to articulate how this petition falls short, as the City evaluates whether or not something else would be more appropriate. Councilmember Billings asked if the City Attorney concurs with this discussion. Attorney Knaak stated that a rezoning is a legislative act. As a City Council, there are very few areas where they would have more discretion than the area of rezoning. This is like any other ordinance and the Council is under no obligation to pass or enact it. Councilmember Billings asked if the mere fact that a majority of the neighborhood residents are opposed to such a development is sufficient cause for the Council to deny the matter. Attorney Knaak responded that there is clear case law that neighborhood opposition by itself could not be the basis for an adverse decision by a city council. There would have to be other articulable reasons that relate to the health, safety and welfare of the citizens in a demonstrable way. Councilmember Wolfe said if staff determines that a specific neighborhood is a redevelopment area as a part of the Comprehensive Plan, then such a development could go in that area. Mr. Hickok stated that the staff works for the City Council and such changes would need to be endorsed by the City Council through a public hearing process. Mayor Lund explained that after the Planning Commission meeting, he contacted the petitioner, John DeMello, and discussed the possibility of making changes to lessen the impact and address the concerns of the neighbors. Councilmember Billings asked if the Mayor and the petitioner had reached any conclusions as to changes that should be made that would cause the City Council to endorse the project. Mayor Lund said they did not. Mr. Hickok presented for the record a letter from Jane K. Rose, Traffic Engineering Manager, Anoka County Highway Department, January 27, 2004, and was received by the staff on March 5, 2004. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to receive the letter from Ms. Jane Rose. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette to recess for five minutes. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 21 Rick Harrison stated that he works in 35 states, has done about 420 communities in the last 8 years, and he did 11,000 approved units in the state. He works for over 200 developers and one of the reasons he took on this project was because of personal experience with the need for senior housing. Mr. Harrison also explained that he was impressed with the petitioner, John DeMello. Mr. DeMello has paid his bills on time and has gone out of his way to do everything first class on this development. With 10% of the population over age 65, that's approximately 3,000 seniors in Fridley. As far as the entrances to this site, there are two separate entrances, one for the commercial and one for the residential area. From a planning and livability perspective, he recommended the entrances not be changed per Anoka County's request. It is critical to think about what the seniors will be seeing out their window; they are going to be looking at height and a sense of space. He explained his contribution to the commercial area is a new type of commercial building which dresses up the back of the commercial building to architecturally blend with the courtyard so that loading docks were not seen. Also, the commercial building has been angled to create some interest in the views to and from the senior building. The parking spaces meet or exceed the zoning requirements. He presented photos of other senior developments in the area and pointed out how few vehicles are actually parked on the site. Mr. Harrison added that developments he has been involved with today include senior housing because that was a critical component. He reviewed the existing buildings on this property that would be torn down or moved from the site. He said they were trying to provide senior housing at prices they could afford. Peter Villard stated each individual unit in the residential building will have many upgrade options for the buyers. There will be one, two and three bedroom units available ranging in size from 825 square feet to 1,600 square feet. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the developer has seen the letter from Anoka County. Michael Spack, Traffic Data, Inc., stated he has briefly scanned the letter and they will work with the County and the City to come to a common ground. Yoava Klucsues, 1420 Silver Lake Road, stated he is 85 years old and he would not want to live in this building and have to leave his car outside. He also stated he doesn't want these buildings or all the additional traffic and would not want to have to climb steps to a fourth floor level. Bernard Marihart, 1373 64th Avenue NE, stated his property is on the boundary of this project. He has owned his property since 1993 and is opposed to high density housing in his neighborhood. He believes the residents deserve more substantial benefits than this project is offering. Mark Schwarz, 1372 64th Avenue NE, presented a petition with 330 signatures of Fridley residents opposed to this proposal based on the removal of six houses, the rezoning of single family property, the size and scale of the development, the double-sided retail complex with outdoor eating area, the volume of traffic it would produce, the drainage issues and the decrease in property values in the surrounding area. He also presented a map that shows where each of the signers resides. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 23 Don Anderson, 7304 West Circle N.E., stated he believes this is a good proposal because the bus goes right down Old Central. Donna Reisner, 6424 Pierce Street, stated she has a lot of health problems and would not be able to handle the steps in the proposed four-story building. She also stated the proposal should be styled for the area. Mark Mattison, 6421 Central Avenue, stated he bought his property in 1996 with the knowledge that the area would be redeveloped. He is aware that the property in question has been a problem and there is now an opportunity to do something about it. There will be trees and setback requirements protecting the neighbors. He added this property is not in the middle of a residential area and it was a good location for senior housing. Joe Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue, stated his home is in the redevelopment area. He commented that he respects those residents who signed the petition, but that signing was based on information they had at the time. He hopes that it was also based on correct information. The Comprehensive Plan identified this property as a redevelopment area. That Comprehensive Plan was developed through a series of public forums and those who have voiced objections to the plan did not take the time to participate in the development of the plan. In the 30 years he has lived in this neighborhood, change has come slowly. This proposal is neither low income nor rental. It is affordable, attractive senior housing and he asked Council to approve this request. This proposal will allow seniors the opportunity to move from their home which opens up housing for families. He believed this to be a project that is long overdue for the area. Tom Myhra, 6360 Able Street, stated the elected council members should do what needs to be done. Beverly Prior, 1340 Mississippi Street, stated she is a 38-year resident and believes this senior housing would be wonderful and would be a wonderful place to live. Kurt Olson, 1385 64th Avenue, stated he lives two lots away from this proposal. He has seen "For Lease" signs on commercial property all over the City. Moore Lake Commons has never been fully occupied. He questioned the need for more retail. If this is passed, it will be punishing the people who live in the neighborhood. He was concerned about parking issues and questioned would happen to the proposed green areas when the County widens Mississippi Street and Old Central. Barb Edwards, 1403 64th Avenue, stated this is a well established neighborhood with a lot of people living there for 25 to 30 years. The homes are kept up and it is a nice area. She expressed concern about the height of the senior building being as much as 64 feet above the level of 64th Avenue. She is also worried about the change in the walking path which will now be wide enough to allow fire trucks to drive on. Linda Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue, questioned how long the Fridley school system can go on without additional tax dollars. This project and the one across the street will allow single family homes to free up so young people can move into the area. She added that they do stand to benefit from the sale of their property, but it is their property and could be sold to anybody. She believes this proposal is a good asset for the City. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 25 neighborhoods to allow for more high density housing of all types. She suggested this matter be tabled until such a time that the developer can come to the Council with definite answers to the questions presented here and at the Planning Commission. She added that it is her understanding that Profitmax was only incorporated a few months ago so there is no track record to refer to. Susan Okeson, 1423 64th Avenue, stated this proposal is different from the Town Center Development project across the street. That property was already zoned commercial and light industrial and there were no single family homes on that property. Half of the land on this proposal is zoned residential single family. The neighborhood, she stated, is not opposed to redevelopment but believes there is enough high density housing in the area. She added that seniors should live in something other than high rises, such as cottage style homes. She believes this project is not compatible with the area and that Council should wait for a more appropriate proposal in the future. Jean Schwarz, 1372 64th Avenue, commented on the height of the building. At the Planning Commission the petitioner admitted that the building would be at least 6 to 8 feet higher on 64th Avenue. She stated she has concerns and issues with many of the setbacks on this site. She suggested that staff look at the height requirements under R-3 which states a maximum of 6 stories but not exceeding 65 feet provided that no building shall be erected to a height exceeding 45 feet within 50 feet of any R-1 or R-2 district without one additional foot of space between the main building and the R-1 or R-2 district for every one foot or portion of building height over 45 feet. With 53 feet in the front, the setback would have to be 58 feet, not 18. Also, the parking is short 36 spaces for the residential building. She added that she has not seen Council approve a development in recent history that was short 36 spaces. The R-3 parking setbacks should be no closer than 20 feet from the right-of-way. This will become an issue when Old Central is expanded. The comment was made that residential overflow parking can use the retail parking, but she did not believe that was an allowable practice. An outdoor eating area is a permitted use with a special use permit. The rear yard setback is very clear for C-2 stating it shall be no closer to the boundary line of any adjacent residential district than 50 feet. This proposal is at 35 feet. Also on the retail, the parking requirements go up if there is a restaurant and this proposal includes an outdoor eating area. Mr. Hickok explained that the outdoor eating area may simply be an area for employees. Ms. Schwarz commented that if there is a restaurant, the parking ratio goes up to one off-street parking space for every 150 square feet of building area. Also all parking and hard surface areas can be no closer than 20 feet from any street right-of-way. In the retail area, the parking along Mississippi and Old Central is not 20 feet away. The driveway for the commercial area appears to be about 5 feet from the rear lot line which does not meet zoning requirements. Where any commercial is close to any public right- of-way, there are requirements that need to be met for parking, a five-foot sidewalk easement along the property line and a fifteen-foot planting strip located behind the required sidewalk that is substantial enough to create a physical separation between the public right-of-way and the commercial property. If Mississippi and Old Central are widened, you would have none of that. As far as S-2 zoning, a special district is a zoning district that is designated on the zoning map created through specific regulations changes necessary to protect the health and general welfare of the public within the designated district. She doesn't believe this project is necessary to protect the people of r t. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 27 discussions with Anoka County on this matter. He stated that as far as the lot coverage, the maximum increases to 30% if there is underground parking provided. This proposal is below that requirement with only 25.4% coverage. The setbacks on this site are predicated on the underlying zoning districts and meet or exceed all the requirements. They have almost doubled the required enclosed parking spaces plus an additional 32 surface spaces for a total of 103 parking spaces. The retail site data: 40% maximum lot coverage, they have 20%; minimum lot area 20,000 square feet, they have 67,000 square feet; front yard setback, 35 foot required they have 75 feet provided; side yard south, 15 feet required, they have 50 feet provided; side yard at Mississippi Street, 35 feet required they have 65 feet provided; rear yard — east, 25 feet required they have 35 feet provided. Retail parking data: the parking data was developed based on the speculative requirement of the code — one space required for every 200 feet of building which equals 68 parking stalls and they have 69 provided. Mike Spack, TDI, Inc., stated there are 8 warrants under the state statutes regarding traffic signals. If one of those warrants is met, then a signal should be considered. They determined that the traffic generated from this project and the project across the street does not come close to meeting any of the 8 warrants. Safety of a 4 way stop versus a traffic signal is debatable. The stop sign is the safest way for the seniors to use the streets because by law, once they step into the crosswalk, traffic has to stop. Their determinations are based on national statistics that are very well documented, up to date, and published in 2003. He also explained that they actually counted the traffic on this intersection during the peak hours of the day and then added on the traffic they anticipate will be added by this development as well as the Town Center development. Mr. Harrison responded to concerns about the height of the building. He explained that the front of the building is at the front setback, not at the curb, and they meet the height requirements. He stated this is a good development with no municipal dollars involved. Cottage homes on this site would have to be sold for$700,000 to make it possible. Mr. Hickok explained that the market study found that Fridley could support 189 senior units based on an analysis of what the market could absorb. Councilmember Barnette stated Mr. Edwards' concern about the shortage of parking is correct. He asked Mr. Hickok if the proposed parking is adequate. Mr. Hickok responded that the code was revised to anticipate this type of development and this proposal meets those requirements. The formula for parking requirements on this development is the same that was used for Town Center. Mr. Villard stated the parking designed was based on the ordinance that said one car stall per unit. They over-designed this project for more than that. To add more parking would result in more hard surface and require more ponding. Also, the history of such facilities is that the parking lots are not being used. Mr. Hickok stated this project does meet the requirements for an independent living facility. Ms. Schwarz again expressed her concern that the underlying zoning is not being utilized to determine setback requirements. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 2004 PAGE 29 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 23. Preliminary Plat Request PS #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc. to replat six parcels into two parcels, for the purpose of constructing a senior housing development and a retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 & 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition (Ward 2). MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to table this matter until March 29. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe to table consideration of this item in order to ascertain the necessary information to fully examine and study the request and to extend the review period for City Council an additional 60 days and to notify the petitioner in writing of the 60-day extension as soon as possible. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. Second reading of an ordin.nce amending Fridley City Code, Chapter 11, Fees. MOTION by Councilmember B• kcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to table the second reading of an ordinance . ending Fridley City Code, Chapter 11, Fees. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTI G AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. Second reading of an ordinance :mending Chapter 402, Water and Sewer Administration of the Fridley City Cod- MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, sec. ded by Councilmember Wolfe, to table the second reading of an ordinance amen.ing Chapter 402, Water and Sewer Administration of the Fridley City Code. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MA OR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 24. Informal Status Reports. There were no informal status reports. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilmember Barnette, seconded by Councilmember ' olfe, to adjourn the City Council meeting at 3:00 a.m. 11111 1 CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 March 12, 2004 Profitmax Inc. 2872 17th Terrace NW New Brighton MN 55112 Attention: John DeMello NOTIFICATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME OF AGENCY ACTION RE: Fridley Rezoning Request ZOA#04-01 Fridley Plat Request PS #04-01 Dear Mr. DeMello: The City Council tabled your Rezoning and Plat request during its regularly scheduled meeting of March 8, 2004 to allow staff additional time to gather additional information as requested by the City Council. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §15.99, Subd. 3(f), the City hereby extends the time for agency action until May 14, 2004 for your Rezoning and Plat requests. Your Rezoning and Plat requests will now go before the City Council for final action on March 29, 2004. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 763-572-3595. Si erely, i / . 4 P I 1 tr I 4 Stacy Stro berg Planner cc: Russell & Beverly Prior Frank& Sharon DeMello Richard Carlson 1340 Mississippi Street 6134 Woody Lane NE 7671 Central Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Mark Mattison Bob Jr. &Jackie Calderon John &Susan Rau 6421 Central Avenue NE 6401 Central Avenue NE 1341 64th Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Fridley MN 55432 Joseph & Linda Nelson 1357 64th Avenue NE Fridley MN 55432 C-04-25 1313 51"Street SE Minneapolis,MN 55414 Data Collection Traffic Engineering * phone 612.379.3844 • fax 612.379.3845 Transportation Planning www.trafficdatainc.com mspack@trafficdatainc.com Memo To: John Demello, Profit Max From: Mike Spack, P.E. ►"` Date: 03/19/04 Re: Revisions to Spring Valley Estates Traffic Impact Report cc: Scott Hickok, City of Fridley Planning Director Background Profit Max proposed to construct a 71 unit elderly housing facility and a separate 13,500 square foot retail building on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street NE(C.S.A.H.6)and Central Avenue NE(C.S.A.H. 35)in Fridley, MN. TDI prepared a Traffic Impact Report for the proposed Spring Valley Estates in January 2004. A proposed access on Old Central Avenue and a proposed access on Mississippi Street was to serve the future retail building. The elderly housing facility was to be served by one separate access on Old Central Avenue. Profit Max is submitting a revised plan to the City for approval based on comments from Anoka County and concerns expressed by residents and the City Council at the Public Hearing. The new proposal contains: • One building with 13,500 square feet of retail on the ground floor with 90 owner occupied senior housing units on floors above the retail. The retail square footage remains the same as the previous proposal and 19 senior housing units are added compared to the original proposal. • A parking garage under the building will be served by a driveway access to Mississippi Street and a driveway access to 64th Avenue. • A surface parking lot will be provided for the retail customers and visitors to the senior housing. The lot will have one access to Old Central Avenue directly across from the Town Center Elderly Housing project's driveway. Per your request, I have reviewed the proposed changes and determined if they will cause significant traffic impacts. DBE Certified in Minnesota r r- John Demello Page 2 Spring Valley Estates Findings Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, T"' Edition, 66 daily trips will be added, and 2 trips will be added both in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours by the additional 19 senior housing units. These volumes will not have a material impact on the Old Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection or the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection. Several residents expressed concern about a potential access to the site on 64th Avenue. This new access will have at most 10 vehicles using the driveway during the peak hours. These vehicles will not degrade the level of service at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection nor will they have a significant impact on 64th Avenue. Conclusions The revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. The change in the driveway configurations will improve the traffic flow on Old Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the .. Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. iI ! • i r1 i i ti - u t COUNTY OF A N O K A Public Services Division \�v HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4005 (763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201 March 23,2004 Stacy Stromberg City of Fridley 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates Dear Stacy, On March 17,2004,we met with City of Fridley staff as well as the architect and developer for the Spring Valley Estates development, to be located on the southeast quadrant of CSAH 35 (Central Ave.) and CR106(Mississippi St.)within the City of Fridley. At the meeting, a revised plan for this development was presented for our consideration that included an access onto CR 106 adjacent to the east property line of this site, an access onto CSAH 35 located directly opposite of the planned access point for the redevelopment of the Sandy's Restaurant site, and an access point onto 64th Avenue NE adjacent to the east property line of this site. We listened to the rationale presented for this current redesign of the Spring Valley Estates development. While we still stand behind our previous comments for this site development, we are willing to compromise regarding this site plan development and we will permit the access scheme onto the CR 106 and CSAH 35 developed in the additional redesign of this site. Please note that there are no immanent plans for the reconstruction of either CR 106 or CSAH 35,nor are there any immanent plans to signalize the CR 106/CSAH 35 intersection. While there are no county highway plans for the reconstruction of these routes, it is still important to plan for the future conditions as development plans are considered for approval. As we noted in our previous review of this site, it is likely that whenever the CSAH 35/CR 106 is rebuilt in the future, it will likely have raised median channelization, and access points within this development are likely to become right in/right out.We are pleased that the redesign of this site does provide for some site access to occur onto 64th Avenue NE as we had recommended, as 64`"Avenue NE appears to have an adequate degree of separation from CR 106 and could possible serve as a location for a future median break or full access location. We are in agreement on the CR 106 access location. And we will allow an access onto CSAH 35 at the location presented at our 3/17/2004 meeting. If the City and the developer wish to revise this CSAH 35 access location somewhat so that it is located at a point where it may provide more access flexibility/potential access options in the future scenario, we would be open looking at a revised location for this CSAH 35 access point. It is our understanding that the developer will provide right turn lanes that meet our approval for the CSAH 35 and CR 106 access points. Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer A ). Stacy Stromberg Re: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates March 23,2004 Page 2 All other comments pertaining to this site from our previous review remain unchanged. Please contact Andrew Witter, Construction Services Engineer, for roadway section information,typicals/details for turn lane construction, and further information regarding our Engineering Plan review process.. Thank you for the opportunity to meet and comment further on this development. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sin erely. 4 Jane K.Rose Traffic Engineering Manager xc: CSAH 35 +CR106/PLATS/2004 Mike Kelly, Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Hoium, County Surveyor Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott,Permit Technician Tom Hornsby, Traffic Services Supervisor- Signs Andrew Witter,Construction Services Engineer 4 Oaf; k� h-1 (3= ' § { . I i i � I j I i i i II ! --` �` `moi I• I I I I I j ` ! I j rt Ir `y ,,4 - Iig: t• 1 1 I 1 1 11 R - 1.., 1 ,J I i r ci__ •,-.. er N.11 N I. , ; I ; I : ' ; ril q` 11 ! • I II i ' I I • i ` I I I ! I I , II ' ! ' i ! I I s l I ' 1 ' •• I ! : 1 • I i ' I I l ' i e ( 1 1 I I , 1 . , . . i I i I I i ; I 1 I ! I , I f I I 1 1 I i 1 - ,H I I I 1 I , i 1 i trik , i, ( I �. III II l If ; II I ! 1• I I ' ' j I i I 1 i I M • g Trt• 9\ 1 f ii I , r l ji I 1 ,, ! I 1 Hli j 14 � 2 jr i I 'i i. 1 i t 1 I I ail ' r„frtsd Iry z‘ ; ; SPRING VALLEY ESTATES 90 unit three and four story senior condominiums over underground parking Fridley, MN. March 24, 2004 March 29, 2004 City Council Meeting Prepared by Architectural Works Villard Inc. CURRENT ZONING; Mixed zoning of R-1 single family residential district, C-1 local business district and C-2 business district. PROPOSED ZONING; S-2 Redevelopment district; SITE DENSITY; The site density is lowered from the 71 unit design density of 26.59 units per acre down to 21.53 units per acre for this 90 unit design. HOUSING BUILDING DATA; 1. Under Ground Parking—Garage Level= 47,700 O. 2. Residential Housing floors 1 through 4 • First floor Housing= 34,090 sf. =(47,840— 13,750 retail) • Second floor Housing= 47,300 sf. • Third floor Housing= 47,700 sf. • Fourth floor Housing= 19,270 sf. Total Housing= 148,360 sf. 3. Housing and underground parking total building= 196,060 sf. 4. Total Building=Housing 196,060 sf. +Retail 13,750 sf.=209,810 sf. 5. All housing units total sf. = 113,510 sf. Common/Circulation= 34,850 sf. 6. Usable areas=76.51%Units 23.49% Common/Circulation 7. Average area per unit; • Housing= 148,360 sf divided by 90 units= 1,648 sf per unit. • Housing and parking= 196,060 sf divided by 90 units=2,178 sf per unit. Fridley ► 3-24-04 Page 2 of 4 THE HOUSING BUILDING REVIEW IS BASED ON THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICTS. HOUSING SITE DATA; 1. Housing site area; • Approximately 179,348 sf. or 4.18 acres 2. First floor area=47,840 sf. • 3. Lot Coverage= 20%lot coverage required with not more than 30%of the lot area covered by the main building and all accessory buildings. • 47,840 first floor sf divided by site area of 179,348 sf. = 26.67% lot coverage provided. 4. Housing average lot area required per unit; • 2500 sf per unit on floors 1-3 =78 x 2,500= 195,000 sf lot area required before underground parking credit. • 950 sf per unit on fourth floor= 12 x 950= 11,400 sf • Total lot area required before underground parking credit=206,400 • 114 underground spaces x 300=34,200 sf underground parking credit. • 206,400 sf lot area minus 34,200 sf underground parking credit= 172,200 sf minimum total lot area required. 179,348 sf.lot area provided. OK! 5. Housing Building setbacks; • Front Yard(North-Mississippi street)=35'-0"Required 82'-0" front yard building setback provided. OK! • Side Yard(East)= 15'-0"Required+ 1 additional foot for each 4'-0" of building height over 35'-0". Building height=45'-0"or 10'-0" higher. 10'-0" divided by 4'-0" =2.5 or 3 additional feet added to the 15'-0" setback= 18'-0"required side yard setback. 18'-0" minimum side yard building setback provided. OK! • Side yard at corner yard(West—Old Central)=35'-0" required. 35'-0" side yard setback at corner is provided. OK! • Rear yard(South- 64th Street)=25%of lot depth or 25'-0" minimum to 40'-0" maximum plus 1 foot of depth for each 2'-0" of building height over 35'-0". Building height=35'-0"therefore no additional rear yard set back is added and the required rear yard maximum setback=40'-0". 70'-0" rear yard setback is provided. OK! Fridley 3-24-04 Page 3 of 4 6. Building height; • Maximum 6 stories not to exceed 65'-0" high required, not to exceed 45'-0" high within 50'-0" of any R-1 or R-2 district without 1 additional foot of space between the building and the R-1 or R-2 district for each 1'-0" of building height over 45'-0". • The building is within 50'-0" of an R-1 district. Maximum height requirement is 45'-0" plus 1'-0" of additional setback for each 1'-0" of building over 45'-0". • The building height is 45'-0".No additional setback is required. HOUSING PARKING DATA: 1. Independent Living facility • 1 space required per each dwelling unit required with 50 % of spaces enclosed=90 total spaces with 45 minimum spaces enclosed required. • (114)Enclosed spaces provided plus (30) surface spaces for total of (144) spaces provided). OK! • 41 parking stalls added from previous 71 unit design. • (54 extra spaces provided) • Parking ratio = 1.6 stalls per unit 2. Change to Market Rate; 1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit plus ' space for each additional bedroom unit per dwelling unit= (26) 1 -beds x 1.5 = 39.0 spaces. (58)2-beds x 2.0= 116.0 spaces (6)3 -beds x 2.5 = 15.0 spaces Total 170.0 spaces required 144.0 spaces provided THE RETAIL BUILDING REVIEW IS BASED ON THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONING DISTRICTS. RETAIL BUILDING DATA; 1. Retail= 13,750 sf. RETAIL SITE DATA; 1. Retail site area; • Approximately 179,348 sf. or 4.18 acres. 2. Proposed Floor Area= 13,750 sf. Fridley 3-24-04 Page 4 of 4 3. Lot Coverage= 1 story=40% maximum required. • Lot coverage provided= 13,750 sf divided by 179,348 sf. = 7.66% lot coverage provided. OK! 4. Retail Minimum Lot area; • Minimum lot area of 20,000 sf is required. 179,348 sf provided. OK! 5. Retail Building setbacks; • Front Yard(North—Mississippi Street)=35'-0"Required 82'-0" front yard set back provided. OK! • Side Yard at corner(West—Central Ave)=35'-0" Required 35'-0" side yard at corner setback provided. OK! • Side yard (East)= 18'-0" required. 18'-0" side yard set back provided. OK! • Rear yard(South) =25'-0"required. 290'-0" rear yard set back provided. OK! RETAIL PARKING DATA; 1. Retail; • Speculative parking=1 space required per each 200 sf of building floor area. 13,750sf. divided by 200sf. =69 parking spaces required. 73 total spaces provided. OK! R Rice Creek Watershed District 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 Office Phone: 763-398-3070 Office Fax: 763-398-3088 NOTICE OF WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT DECISION Name of Applicant: John DeMello Application Number: 04-001 Project Name: Spring Valley Estates Project Location: Fridley Type of Application (check one): X Exemption Decision No Loss Decision Replacement Plan Decision Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: March 25, 2004 Check One: X Approved Approved with conditions Denied List of Addressees: MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, ATTN: Lynda Peterson (w/enclosure) HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Doug Norris (w/enclosure) Metro HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources,ATTN: Wayne Barstad (w/enclosure) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Tim Fell (w/enclosure) Anoka Soil and Water Conservation District, ATTN: Becky Wozney (w/enclosure) Applicant City of Fridley RCWD File/Engineer/Inspector You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above-referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn.R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. Date of mailing of this Notice: Rice Creek Watershed District March 25 ,2004 By: Steve Hobbs Title: Administrator Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions The entire site is covered with debris and the topography suggests that large amount of fill have been deposited on the site. There is one depression on the site that could possibly have wetland characteristics. The plant community consists of medium sized green ash trees and very little other vegetation. It is too early in the season to determine if the depression has hydric soils or evidence of wetland hydrology. If the depression does have wetland characteristics it is very poor quality. The applicant presented aerial photos and climatic data for the project. The 1938 aerial photo shows that depression being cultivated in row crops and the climatic data indicates that 1938 had normal rainfall. The 1964 aerial photo clearly shows fill being brought onto site just west of the depression. The topography of the site indicate that the depression was likely filled and re-excavated or had fill placed all around it artificially creating a depression. The aerial photo evidence along with the extensive amount of disturbance that is apparent on the site provide enough evidence that the depression within the project was incidentally created. Please call Karl Hammers at 763-398-3072 for further details. MItR.25'2004 16:55 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.002/005 Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Application Number 04-001 Applicant: John,DeMello Consultant: Joel.Maier Profit Max, Inc. J3KJ3M Engineers 2872 17th Terrace 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard, New Brighton, MN 55112 Minneapolis,MN 55429 Ph.: 651-493-3936 Ph: 763-843-0477 Fx: 651-493-0229 Fx: 763-843-0421 johnd@acninc.n,et jmaier@bkbrn.com Purpose: Final Site Drainage Plan for removal. of six existing homes and construction of a 13,500± SF retail building, a 32,300± SF senior housing complex and associated parking areas to be known as Spring Valley Estates,4.6±acres. Location: South.of Mississippi. Street and east of Old Central Avenue,Fridley. T-R-S: 30-24-13 ca. Recommendation: Conditional approval pending receipt: of changes and. outstanding items related to: Stormwater Management 1. Revised hydrologic calculations and subwa.tershed. boundary maps for existing and proposed conditions encompassing the entire project site and offsite areas tributary to proposed ponding areas (see second paragraph of. Finding 2 for. discussion). 2. Revised stormwater management plan complying with District rate control, and water quality treatment requirements (if necessary per Pending Item 1). Floodplain 3. Revised. grading plan demonstrating modifications to FES 48 and Outlet #24 blocking hydraulic connections to proposed trench drains (see second. paragraph of Finding 4 for discussion). 4. Identification low floor and. low entry of th.e existing home east and northeast of Ponds 4 & 5, respectively, and identification of pond emergency overflow elevations demonstrating compliance with District freeboard.requirements Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. - 1 - 3/25/04 r MAR.25'2004 16:56 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES # 0944 P.003/005 Penxti.: l.xcaxion No. 0401 Profit Max, Inc. Administrative 5. Preliminary Plat or legal document with satisfactory form and, description granting ponding and flowage easements over all onsite ponds an.d infiltration basins. 6. Letter from the City indicating which storrnwater management features will be maintained by the City and a Draft Declaration. for Maintenance of St:ormwater Management Facilities acceptable to District engineer and attorney for proposed onsite storm.water management features that will not be maintained by the City. 7. Copy of receipt from County Recorder and signed/notarized. legal. document(s). Note that legal. document(s) are to be submitted by Applicant to County for recording only after approval by District. 8. Copy of MPCA NPDES permit application. 9. Cash surety in.the amount of. $2,500. Exhibits: 1. Permit Application dated.January 5, 2004, received.January 7, 2004. 2. Infiltration Worksheet prepared by Applicant, undated, received January 7,2004. 3. Site Location Map prepared. by Applicant, dated January 6, 2004, received.January 7,2004. 4. Summary of Hydrology prepared by BKBM Engineers, undated, received January 7,2004. 5. Hydrologic Calculations for existing and proposed. conditions prepared by T3ICBM Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received January 19,2004. 6. Boundary and. Topography Survey prepared. by Midwest Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc., dated October. 24., 2003, received January 7, 2004. 7. Site Demolition Plan prepared by BKBM Engineers, last revised. January 1.9, 2004, received.January 19, 2004. 8. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan prepared by 13KJ3M Emmons &Olivier Resources, Inc. -2- 3/25/04 MAR.25'2004 16:56 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.004/005 Permit Application No. 04-001 Profit Max,Inc. Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received January 20, 2004. 9. Site Utility Plan prepared by J3KBM Engineers, last revised January 19, 2004, received January 19, 2004. 1.0. Geometric and Paving Plan, prepared by 13KBM Engineers, last revised.January 19, 2004,received January 19,2004. 1.1. Watershed Data Plan Sheet prepared by BKBM Engineers, last revised.January 19, 2004,received January 19, 2004. 12. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review prepared by American Engineering Testing, dated October 20, 2003, received January 19, 2004. 13. Narrative in response to 1-16-04 Engineer Report prepared by BJU3M Engineers, dated January 19, 2004, received January 19, 2004. 14. Notice of Wetland Conservation Action, Exemption. Notice prepared. by RCWD,dated and received March 25,2003. 15. Letter from area resident (Mark Schwartz) expressing flooding concern, undated,received February 27,2004. Findings: 1. The proposed project entails removal of six existing houses and the construction of two buildings and associated parking areas to serve as retail and senior housing on 4.6± acres. The 13,542 SF building in the northern third. of the site is proposed for retail space and 1:he 32,285 SF building in the southern two-thirds of the site is proposed to be a senior housing facility. 2. The existing site is comprised of three drainage areas. A small area in the north drains via sheet flow to the storrnsewer network in Mississippi Street. Runoff generated along the southern border of the site sheet flows south. to 64rJ' Avenue NE where it enters City stormsewer. Runoff from the rema.i.nder of the site flows to an existing low point located in the central portion.of the site along the east property line. The proposed storm.water management plan includes new storm.sewer network, a stormwater detention pond on the west- central border of the site, and three infiltration basins located in the southern portion of the site. The hydrologic calculations for both existing and proposed conditions refer to a drainage area that does Emmons&Olivier Resources, Inc. -3 - 3/25/04 MAR.25 '2004 16:56 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.005/005 • Permit Application No. 04-001. Profit Max, Inc. not cover the entire project site or areas tributary to the site. Revised. hydrologic calculations and subwatershed boundary maps for both existing and proposed conditions encompassing the entire tributary area are required to verify compliance with District stormwater management requirements. Based upon the geotechnical report submitted, soil borings taken near the proposed locations for the infiltration basins indicate the presence of sandy soils consistent with Soil Type 13 and demonstrate at least 3 feet of separation between the proposed bottom contours for all infiltration basins and the water table,thereby meeting District infiltration requirements. 3. NWI maps indicate the presence of a?`ype 2 wetland onsite. Based on. field. inspection of the site and aerial photos and. climatic data submitted by the applicant, the District Permit Coordinator has determined that this depression was incidentally created by excavating and grading activities and is not regulated.by the WCA. 4. The regulatory flood elevation of Moore Lake is 879.9. There is no regional floodplain associated with this site and there is no proposed floodplain impact. The HWL for the proposed. Pond 1 is 881.2. The lowest floor elevation. of the proposed southern building is 882.0 and the elevations of both proposed trench drains located in front of the lowest floor openings for this building are 881.75. This does not provide adequate freeboard between the HWJ, for. Pond 1 and. the rim elevations of these trenches. However, if FES #8 and.Outlet: #24 are modified to incorporate fully operational flap doors blocking any back-flow from Ponds I and 2 to the trench drains, District freeboard. requirements may be waived.. A revised grading plan is required demonstrating modifications to structures FES #8 and. Outlet #24 eliminating all hydraulic connections between proposed trench drains and. stormwater management ponds onsite. Further review by District attorney may initiate the requirement of a liability release for potential flooding of the lowest. floor of the proposed southern building. The northern building meets District freeboard requirements. 5. An erosion control plan has been submitted. including silt fence surrounding the perimeter of the site, seeding, mulching., wood fiber blanket, riprap at storrn.sewer outfalls, revegetation. specifications and an implementation schedule. Emmons &Olivier Resources, Inc. -4. 3/25/04 MAR.25'2004 16:55 651 770 2552 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES #0944 P.001/005 4 FAX TRANSMITTAL O s' 11171 P44 OtIVIER E OURCES•• 651 Hale Avenue Oakdale, MN 55128 3/7.5)04 Phone:(651) 770-8448 Date: Fax: (651) 770-2552 E-mail:calmer@eorinc.corn To: 57*-y G'r i of- FFt/n Fax No: ab3.5g1• j- From: chbL. Total Pages: 55 Subject: 59 PHA VAu.bf esTAZS CQGuov P ,rr 04-bot 6'Ert. yb'P. 4ec*rf, furlue A1T*tj4&o RrePeti'r^ M 6,P1.i.J4 "fl4E PQbr-i-r hmue477am lb -rim 4r66: Gre-6/e,worm-es/46e, V/J 17uc Only copy you will receive. [ Original follows by mail. , . fir, AGENDA ITEM __ CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 29, 2004 CRY OF FRIDLEY Date: March 23, 2004 AP To: William Burns, City Managerfi4` From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Plat Request, PS #04-01 and First Reading of an ordinance for Rezoning, ZOA#04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-46 INTRODUCTION John DeMello of Profitmax, Inc., is requesting a plat to create one new parcel from 1314 Mississippi Street, 1340 Mississippi Street, 6401 Central Avenue, 6421 Central Avenue, 6441 Central Avenue (vacant), 6461 Central Avenue (vacant), 1341 64th Avenue and 1357 64th Avenue. Mr. DeMello is also requesting a rezoning for the east side of Central Avenue between Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Currently, there is a mixture of commercial and residential zonings and the petitioner is seeking to rezone the entire block to S-2 Redevelopment District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for PS #04-01 and ZOA#04-01. After receiving public comment and having a discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of plat request, PS #04-01 and rezoning request, ZOA#04-01 and subsequent master plan, with the 22 stipulations as presented. THE MOTION CARRIED BY A 6 TO 1 VOTE. PAST COUNCIL ACTION The City Council tabled action on both the plat and rezoning at the March 8, 2004 meeting. The Council directed staff to prepare a finding of fact based on their concerns, to deny the project as proposed. Fritz Knaak, City Attorney's, resolution is available as requested. Since the March 8, 2004, City Council meeting, the petitioner has submitted a revised site plan based on comments received from Anoka County and concerns raised by neighboring property owners and the Council. The new master plan proposal is in your packet and contains: • One lot, with one building. The new building will include 13,750 square feet of retail space on the north side of the ground floor and 90 owner-occupied senior condominium units located above the retail and the remainder of the building. • The building will be comprised of three story wings on the north and south ends and a will be a four story building in the center, where the main entrance of the building is located. The three story wings will be 35 feet in height and the four story center will be 45 feet in height. • The retail portion square footage has been expanded by 330 square feet and there is an addition of 19 senior condominium units. • All setback requirements are being met as if the building was designed to meet the R-3, Multi-Family and C-2, General Business zoning districts requirements. • The petitioner is meeting or exceeding all parking requirements. • The entire development both commercial and residential will be under single ownership. • The parking garage for the complex will receive access from Mississippi Street and 64th Avenue. Traffic Analysis The petitioner has asked Traffic Data, Inc. to re-evaluate the previously submitted traffic study to include the new access point and the additional condominium units. The consultant determined that the revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. The change in the driveway configuration will improve the traffic flow on Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. Please see letter from TDI Inc., included in your packet. Anoka County City staff and the petitioner met with Anoka County to review the comments and concerns the County had and to review the revised site plan for Spring Valley Estates. The County had concerns regarding too many access points on Central Avenue and commented that they would prefer to see an access on 64th Avenue. To address those concerns, the developer has reduced the number of access points on Central Avenue to one driveway and has redesigned the parking garage, so it receives access from Mississippi Street on the north and 64t Avenue on the south. The County has stated that they are acceptable to this redesigned plan and would permit access on Central Avenue as well as an access on Mississippi Street. The County stated that currently there are no immanent plans for reconstruction of either Central Avenue or Mississippi Street, nor are there any immanent plans to signalize the intersection. However, it is still important to plan for the future conditions as development plans are considered for approval. The County is pleased that this redesign has moved an access to 64th Avenue because it is very likely that that whenever Central Avenue and Mississippi Street are rebuilt, it would become a right 1. in/right out, and 64t" Avenue could possibly serve as a location for future median break or full access location. Please see letter from Anoka County included in your packet. Rice Creek Watershed- wetland The petitioner and his consultant met with the Rice Creek Watershed District on March 24, 2004. City staff received a notice of exemption from the Rice Creek Watershed, on March 25, 2004. The exception was approved as it appears that the wetland was incidentally created and is not protected under the Wetland Conservation Act. As a result, stipulation #7 has been removed from both land use requests. A copy of the exception is included in your packet. The developer sent a copy of the revised plan to neighboring property owners as well as people who had shown an interest on the topic. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMNEDATION Like, the Town Center Development proposal, this master plan has been modified to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission, City Council and the neighborhood. City Staff recommends approval of the new site plan, plat request and the rezoning request, with the subsequent master plan. STIPULATIONS Staff recommends the following stipulations be attached to the approval of all land use requests above: 1. Property to be developed in accordance with master plan submitted to City staff on March 24, 2004. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed in accordance with architectural plan A- 5, titled Exterior Elevations, dated 3-24-04. 3. Petitioner to obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 4. Petitioner to meet the attached comments from the Fire Marshall. 5. Petitioner to meet all building and ADA requirements. 6. Buildings at 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 Central Avenue, 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 64th Avenue, and 1357 64th Avenue, to be removed prior to issuance of condominium building permits. 7. No business signs shall be located within the County right-of-way. Any planting within the right-of-way to be approved by the County prior to planting. 8. Petitioner to obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work done within the county right-of-way. 9. Petitioner shall identify ponding area and provide easements for stormwater run- off and management. 10.Storm pond maintenance agreement for both platted lots must be filed prior to issuance of building permits. 11.Petitioner shall obtain any required NPDES Permit and provide NURP ponding for entire site. 12.A perpetual cross-pond agreement to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits to assure continued pond access. 13.City Engineering staff to review and approve grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of building permits. Y. 14.Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of building permit. 15.Petitioner to pay required Park Dedication Fee of$4,486.06. (195,046.02 square feet of land times .023 per square feet) 16.Petitioner to provide City with a copy of the buildings' association documents prior to issuance of a building permit. 17.Building to be restricted to seniors and policies to do such shall be outlined in association documents and filed with the County with final plat. 18.Provide proof that any existing wells or individual sewage treatment systems located on the site are properly capped or removed. 19.Property owner of record at time of building permit application, to pay all water and sewer connection fees prior to issuance of a building permit. 20.The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of any traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic generated by the development including signalization or other improvements, if determined necessary by Anoka County. 21. A Development Agreement outlining the Developer's obligation to install utilities, etc., will be prepared by the City and shall be signed by the Petitioner prior to final plat approval. 03/24/2004 16: 33 6513891187 AWVI PAGE 02/03 03/2422104 15:45 ANOKA CO HWY [PT 4 96513891187 Nu. not Vere COUNTY of ANOKA Pubic Services DiVislOn HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT / 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W.,AMPOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4005 (763) 862-4200 FAX(763)862-4201 March 23,2004 • Stacy St-ambers City of Fridley 6431 University Ave.NE Fridley,MN 55432 RII: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates Deer Stacy, On March 17,2004,we met with City of Fridley staff as well as the architect and developer for the Spring Valley Estates development, to be located on the southeast quadrant of CSAE 35 (Central Ave.) and CR106(Mississippi St.)within the City of Fridley. At the meeting,.a revised plan for this development was presented for our consideration that included an access onto CK 106 adjacent to the east property lint of this site,en uveae onto CMAI135 located directly opposite of the planned access point for the redevelopment of the Sandy's Restaurant site,and an access point onto 64'k Avenue NB adjacent to the east property line of this site. We liatoned to the rationale presented for this current redesign of the Spring Valley Estates development While we still stand behind • our previous comments for this site development,we are willing to compromise regarding this site plan development and we will permit the access scheme onto the CR 106 and CSAH 35.developed in the additional redesign of this site. Please note that there are no immanent plans for the reoonstruction of either CR.106 or CSAR 35,nor are there any immanent plans to signalize the CR 1064SAH 35 intersection..While there are no county highway plans for the reconstruction of these routes, tt is still important to plan for the future conditions as development plans are considered for approval. Aa we noted in our previous review of this site, it is likely that whenever the CSAH 35/CR 106 is rebuilt in the future, it will likely have raised median chaanelization, and access points within this development are likely to become right inlright out We are pleased that the redesign or this site does provide for some site access to occur onto 64th Avenue NB as we had recommended,as 6e Avenue NE appears to have an adequate degree of separation from CR 106 and could possible serve as a location for a future median break or fall access location. We are in agreement on the CR 1.06 access location. And we will allow an access onto CSAH 35 at the location presented at our 3/1712004 meeting, If the City and the developer wish to revise this CSAH 35 access location somewhat so that it is located at a point where it may provide more access flexibility/potential access options in the future scenario, we would be open looking at a revised Ioaatic n for this CSAH 35 access point.It is our understanding that the developer will provide right turn lanes that meet our approval for the CSAR 35 and CR 106 peaesa points. Affirmative Action 1 Equal opportunity Employer 03/24/2004 16: 33 651389118/ AWVI PAGE 03/03 .,03/24'2004 15:45 ANOKA CO 144? DPT 4 96513@91181 "u. 'w+ Stacy Stromberg Rc: Additional Redesign: Spring Valley Estates March 23,2004 Pap 2 All other comments pertaining to this site from our previous cteviuw remain unchanged.Please contact Andre*Witter,Construction Services Engineer,for roadway section information,typicalsldetails for turn lane construction.and further information regarding our Engineering Plan review process.. Thank you for the opportunity to meet and comment further on this development. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. S y erely. f 4,F Jane K.Rose Traffic Engineering Manager xc: CSAH 35+CR1OoIPLATS/2.004 M1lte Kelly,Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Holum,County Surveyor Roger Butler.Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott,Permit Technician Toni Hornsby.Traffic Servioes Supervisor-Signs Andrew Witter,Construction Services Engineer } • . ~ 1313 5°1 Street SE Minneapolis,MN 55414 Data Collection . phone 612.379.3844 Traffic Engineering fax 612.379.3845 Transportation Planning www.trafficdatainc.com mspack@trafficdatainc.com Memo To: John Demello, Profit Max From: Mike Spack, P.E. Date: 03/19/04 Re: Revisions to Spring Valley Estates Traffic Impact Report cc: Scott Hickok, City of Fridley Planning Director Background Profit Max proposed to construct a 71 unit elderly housing facility and a separate 13,500 square foot retail building on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street NE(C.S.A.H.6)and Central Avenue NE(C.S.A.H.35)in Fridley, MN. TDI prepared a Traffic Impact Report for the proposed Spring Valley Estates in January 2004. A proposed access on Old Central Avenue and a proposed access on Mississippi Street was to serve the future retail building. The elderly housing facility was to be served by one separate access on Old Central Avenue. Profit Max is submitting a revised plan to the City for approval based on comments from Anoka County and concerns expressed by residents and the City Council at the Public Hearing. The new proposal contains: • One building with 13,500 square feet of retail on the ground floor with 90 owner occupied senior housing units on floors above the retail. The retail square footage remains the same as the previous proposal and 19 senior housing units are added compared to the original proposal. • A parking garage under the building will be served by a driveway access to Mississippi Street and a driveway access to 64th Avenue. • A surface parking lot will be provided for the retail customers and visitors to the senior housing. The lot will have one access to Old Central Avenue directly across from the Town Center Elderly Housing project's driveway. Per your request, I have reviewed the proposed changes and determined if they will cause significant traffic impacts. DBE Certified in Minnesota • John Demello Page 2 Spring Valley Estates Findings Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition, 66 daily trips will be added, and 2 trips will be added both in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours by the additional 19 senior housing units. These volumes will not have a material impact on the Old Central Avenue/Mississippi Street intersection or the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection. Several residents expressed concern about a potential access to the site on 64th Avenue. This new access will have at most 10 vehicles using the driveway during the peak hours. These vehicles will not degrade the level of service at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection nor will they have a significant impact on 64th Avenue. Conclusions The revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. The change in the driveway configurations will improve the traffic flow on Old Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Old Central Avenue/64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. DIFc Vt.: • 001 ny'j \V\ \Oh' • • Rice Creek Watershed District 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 Office Phone: 763-398-3070 Office Fax: 763-398-3088 NOTICE OF WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT DECISION Name of Applicant: John DeMello Application Number: 04-001 Project Name: Spring Valley Estates Project Location: Fridley Type of Application (check one): X Exemption Decision No Loss Decision Replacement Plan Decision Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: March 25, 2004 Check One: X Approved Approved with conditions Denied List of Addressees: MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, ATTN: Lynda Peterson (w/enclosure) HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Doug Norris (w/enclosure) Metro HQ, MN/Department of Natural Resources, ATTN: Wayne Barstad (w/enclosure) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Tim Fell (w/enclosure) Anoka Soil and Water Conservation District, ATTN: Becky Wozney (w/enclosure) Applicant City of Fridley RCWD File/Engineer/Inspector You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above-referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn.R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. Date of mailing of this Notice: Rice Creek Watershed District March 25 ,2004 By: Steve Hobbs Title: Administrator Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions The entire site is covered with debris and the topography suggests that large amount of fill have been deposited on the site. There is one depression on the site that could possibly have wetland characteristics. The plant community consists of medium sized green ash trees and very little other vegetation. It is too early in the season to determine if the depression has hydric soils or evidence of wetland hydrology. If the depression does have wetland characteristics it is very poor quality. The applicant presented aerial photos and climatic data for the project. The 1938 aerial photo shows that depression being cultivated in row crops and the climatic data indicates that 1938 had normal rainfall. The 1964 aerial photo clearly shows fill being brought onto site just west of the depression. The topography of the site indicate that the depression was likely filled and re-excavated or had fill placed all around it artificially creating a depression. The aerial photo evidence along with the extensive amount of disturbance that is apparent on the site provide enough evidence that the depression within the project was incidentally created. Please call Karl Hammers at 763-398-3072 for further details. J M. 1r --.4.',,'',14-1,:,?'-, N Z Z r ' i`63Yro&@CTJ9`— +�°'k%a YJ'#" _" fes. II " , .7 .. 35'front yard setback ",•7.:, -7,,--4` ,sp � �i: F I4 Iii I 1 �� ,c7 ' 4.1:4•07-,- � .:. '''''. 1 '''-'''' ' ''-' A...._1 7,:ll''' ' , - ew:ifir a ,,,,, ,t4, 1 tr_---4L4ostr.,-:.----.-:,L, iii ' 10; --ip ;� '' r h—r— '\� _ 1 -'4 \ \ d,, ,. r.-1 -7:;- „ i ,, , "':f�Ol�1C> soi Mil Iiip.., ��--; -,yam s ,.. i. i , — 40- __•71 - -1' 1 r _ } lir _d 4.'3, - ..-'-'''',?-"'' ' -- - �` , 1 4+- VT - ivi4,',.;.,1 ",.'4:"..,„';_,,, ,. \ w� d7! S , ,4,,,,,.. , _ 4 R.- :',Ns-ii...„-°›, ..,,, , ...,,iii,4,4",,,4k ..) ,,,,, 0 r R A ��a 40' \I'Pard setbackk�C ✓ '� 1 q j 4 '$1.V - mu ,(.' A Scale 20 h, T..f.'4....- '-- s.a�. - - - Y `„ Rev. 20th,2004 `� .. '_A-onRl_."-- Rev.14 ' — - --- ------ - .41-11* ......_ 0 spring d ....01 iiPN, Estates Fridley, 1,Ainnesota ARCHITECTURAL WORKS - Villard, Inc. 5770 KA .Path•St u s A Harrison ;;66 P�,.,, 1. Zetas move Neigh.,651 55076 Site Design Studio 612.503.155f n6�26sam6 SHEET A-1 �,w.«1.6.. 66''' Developer:John Demello ea.vow.1 .1w 66121 March 29.2004 In carefully evaluating Profitmax's proposal dated 3/24/04;I have come across several new areas of inconsistencies. According to the Planning Departments submission the proposal meets all the setback requirements for the R-3 and C-2 districts, and states that the petitioner is meeting or exceeding all parking requirements. Both statements are incorrect. In the interest of saving time at the meeting tonight,I would like to present them to you now, with the hope that you have time to review them before the meeting. • LOT COVERAGE Lot coverage is at 26.67%.Profitmax states that 20% lot coverage is required for R-3. In fact,the R-3 code states that NO more than 20% of the lot should be covered by the main building. Maximum lot coverage for C-2 property is 25% for a four-story building, and 20%for a five- story building which this actually will be. The building has too much lot coverage for either a standard R-3 or C-2 district. This building is still too large for this parcel of land. • RETAIL PARKING The retail space has increased by 330 square feet from the previous proposal. Interestingly, BEFORE the increase in size they needed 90 parking spaces,but claim to only need 69 parking spaces for the larger project. Normal parking ratio for C-2 is 1 stall for every 150 square feet of floor area and increases to 1 for 100 square feet when there is a restaurant. They have based the new parking ratio on the speculative parking ratio of 1 stall for every 200 square feet of floor area. By using S-2 zoning you are specifically approving this exact project with retail space of 13,750 feet, so it cannot be speculative building floor area. Therefore,by normal C-2 parking ratios, even without a restaurant,the new proposal should contain 92 retail-parking spaces, not the 73 provided. The new proposal is SHORT 19 parking stalls for the commercial area. • PARKING AND HARD SURFACE AREAS Both R-3 and C-2 codes state all parking and hard surfaces shall be no closer than 20 feet from any street right of way. The C-2 code also requires a 5-foot sidewalk easement and a 15-foot planting strip behind the required sidewalk easement. ALL of the north row of parking stalls along Mississippi Street and many parking stalls along Old Central are sitting right on or within a few feet of the property line and right of way. If the streets were widened the parking stalls would be sitting right next to the street. The walking path around this ENTIRE project appears to be completely in the right of way, including on the eastside where it is in the alley. The signage and majority of the landscaping appear to be primarily located in the right of ways also. Anoka County expressly prohibited this in their letter dated 1/27/04. If any of these streets were widened there would be nothing left but the ponds, parking, and the building. Again the project is too large for the land. • HOUSING BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE YARD EAST- While the 18-foot side-yard setback for a 45-foot building is technically correct per the R-3 code,it seems to violate the intent of the law. If the building was just ONE foot taller it would need to be set back at least 51 feet from the property line since it adjoins R-1 property. C-2 code states that permitted buildings and uses shall not be closer to the boundary line of any adjacent residential district than 50 feet. SIDE YARD DRIVEWAY- The R-3 code states that where a driveway is provided in the side yard the minimum required side-yard setback is 25 feet and it increases to 30 feet in a C-2 district. The driveway from Mississippi Street,which runs along the side yard, appears to be within 1-2 feet of the property line. Therefore,the 18- foot setback for the building is incorrect. • HOUSING PARKING DATA While the number of parking stalls provided is adequate if the building is classified as an independent living facility, all of the codes state that IF the building is convertible to market rate the number of parking stalls required increases. It would be difficult to argue this building could not be converted, and if that were to happen,the proposal is 26 parking stalls short of the required number. While we realize that S-2 zoning allows for some latitude in the codes,the S-2 zoning still states that the standards shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. This project seems to deviate in many important areas. The proposal was too large for the land before, and the project is still too dense. It would seem that if this rezoning and plat request were approved you would be setting several new precedents for the substantial parts of Fridley that are listed as redevelopment areas. Thank you for your consideration. Jean Schwartz `:'• MAR 2 6 March 26, 2004 To: Mayor Scott Lund and Fridley City Council Members Re: Profitmax New Design We received the new Profitmax design in the mail. We do not think it responded to the neighborhood concerns at all. It is larger than the first design, going from 71 to 90 units. It is still 47' high on the 64th Ave. side, and taller where the building faces our house and yard. There is very little green space other than in the set backs. Profitmax fails to mention in the bottom sentence of this letter that this building also includes over 13,000 sq feet of Retail space. Once again, the project is just too large for this site. We have new concerns with a driveway that now enters onto 64th Ave., which is all R-1 zoned. Entering onto Central Ave. from 64th often requires a wait already. The letter from the Anoka County Highway Department dated January 27, 2004 and introduced at the last Council meeting and the Profitmax studies have traffic count numbers that vary quite a bit. Anoka county's is 13,000 and Profitmax is 8,000. The Highway Dept letter also states that no plantings will be allowed within the county right of way. The City Planning Department has explained that underlying zoning set backs and traffic counts mean nothing when the Council is approving development in S2 parcels, they only need your approval. All setback requirements cannot be abandoned so that any building will fit any site. Careful research needs to be done to ensure that these new developments in newly created S2 parcels do not encroach on existing homes and neighborhoods. Thank you again for all the time you have spent to keep Fridley a great place to live. Barbara and Dennis Edwards 1372 64th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 March 25, 2004 Dear Mayor and City Council Members, There are several issues with the Profitmax proposal dated March 24, 2004, and the project in general we would like you to consider. As we are sure you know,the new plan has 90 housing units instead of the previous 71, and still contains retail. The 2 buildings were just combined into one even larger building, with an additional 19 condominiums adding even more density on the site This is an increase of 27% in the number of units from the previous plan. A driveway coming out of the complex has now been added on to 64th Avenue. Depending on the pitch and angle of the new driveway, headlights will conceivably be constantly shining on our home and 2 of our bedrooms. This driveway will add hundreds of trips a day compared to the 3 homes that currently have driveways on 64th Avenue, in a quiet single family home neighborhood. The vastly increased traffic flow will affect the health, safety and welfare of our children and neighborhood. The letter that Profitmax sent to us this week is extremely misleading. It is not an adequate representation of the new project. The new driveway emptying onto 64th Avenue is almost completely obscured by trees. In fact many people we have spoken to failed to notice it. Also the letter talks about the number of housing units,but completely fails to mention that there is still a retail complex included. If Profitmax is misrepresenting the new proposal in these areas,one has to question how many other misrepresentations are still undiscovered. It seems very important to note that traffic counts on Central Avenue vary greatly. The traffic counts from Profitmax are vastly different from the traffic counts Anoka County mentions in their letter. Profitmax claims Central Avenue only carries 7,800 to 9,000 cars per day, and claims traffic levels have been consistent for the last 10 years. Anoka County states that over 13,000 vehicles per day are using Central Avenue, and discusses increasing traffic volumes and congestion. Once again,what other misleading information has yet to be uncovered. A new study done by AARP states that 83%of seniors want to stay in their homes until they die. Profitmax claims there is a need for 189 senior condos in the area. If their traffic count numbers are so far off,one has to question this number also. There are still some set backs issues. The parking on the north side and some of the west side still come right up to the property line, instead of the 20 feet they should be set back from any right of way. Profitmax still has most of their trees,plantings,walkway and signage in the right of ways for all streets involved. Anoka County specifically stated this was not permitted. The site densities for both the residential and retail are each figured as though they were sitting on separate 4-acre parcels of land, but this would not be an 8-acre site. The lot coverage for the housing portion is still above the normal 20%allowed on R-3 land. If the building were changed to market rate after approval,there still would not be enough parking. The height of the proposed project remains a major concern. The new proposal has lowered the building to 3 stories on part of the north and south sides. It still remains at 4 stories on the side that directly adjoins R-1 land and has the closest setback anywhere on the property of only 18 feet to the property line there. Profitmax states the height of the 3 story portions are 35 feet and 45 feet for the 4 story portion. The water table for this land is at 877 feet. The street sits at approximately 882 feet. The floor of the"underground" garage is going to be approximately level with 64th Avenue or slightly above it. In reality the height of the building on 64th Avenue will be 50 feet from the bottom to the roof's peak,and 60 feet on the eastside next to the R-1 property. There would need to be at least a 10-foot berm to mitigate this. While we realize this is not how height is actually measured,we don't think this logically follows the intent of the code. As evidenced by the petition presented at the last council meeting, citizens through out Fridley are opposed to high-density housing and more retail on this site. Profitmax's new proposed plan has just combined the 2 buildings into 1 and increased the high-density housing units by another 27%. The Comprehensive Plan talks about not changing the characteristics of a neighborhood and keeping housing stock. This proposed plan seems to do just the opposite,since half of this land is currently zoned R-1, and contains 6 single- family existing homes. Finally,we feel that neither of the 2 plats presented by Profitmax have met the burden of proof required to rezone this land. Rezoning is not a right. In order for rezoning to occur it should be considered only when the project is compatible with the surrounding area. This is in fact creating spot zoning by placing a very high-density housing unit and retail in the midst of single family homes. We ask for your serious consideration in rightfully denying this rezoning and plat requests. Sincerely, Mark Schwartz Jean Schwartz c =� ; , PI2OFITM X INC. 2872 17th Terrace • New Brighton, MN 55112 • Office: (651)493-3936 • Fax: (651)493-0229 Real Estate • Business Consulting • ACN Development We have responded to the communities concerns with the following new design: v. --s } ' „51 —.�.— — �� c_a'. � � t ,� c �' ', '�a�,�%i4 r+� „a�1tr.. ,w vt Via[t ''`p,,,, - ,',4_", 4 c Sri ---77- rs`� � x Wy� � �'' -»K s r. —2:E-10----,,,--74147-1 ,E i�, ��v. � a �,� /`f i I A fA :tpt i 4l tr X .. '.Y ,,:� } r '--- - ,i.s,filk-`, A' ,--- if4.„=,,. ,;,,',,:t0;:, ,,,.,.,it-,44"0 6,10, z - ,,,406._ ,lig_ ,,., .11 a C�i c " �; pis',may ttr a "�� j4tCx .. ..' ^R q 4, 4 k>k 1 • ,, ( IF t ig ,,"40 , eg;,..4,,,,- ,- ;4?...„: -,,,e,.z,..--..-.. , , , ..--.7,74,14-.1, ,,,,, ,,. ,-., 1' ,+,zz, , .. '�C'•��briF tw`� �fo�,��s.. ,� r�-�': AIST,..�W Y .� .i� F,� j I `` G � µ ' Or` .,,.y 3 73 x✓f eu r �[, i. s � Rd P° ,r `" e ,...4-,k-,-- -„•---,...,,s ‘''''- ,,,'',',.: f'-,,,,',, . , i• .4a. es..'�, wY" a -ter•- -+ , _ ,-7,,,,:i,„:7'-- s _ '- I S - r �� 11011111111111.11 .-- � -- Please review the proposed site plan with 90 units of senior housing: 3 stories on the north, 4 stories in the middle and 3 stories on the south side. "Creating Synergy between Land and Man" MAR 2 5 Rive Dear Public Officials, March 17, 2004 During the past five months I have been following the Spring Valley Estates senior housing proposal very closely. Even though the outcome affects our neighborhoods directly, I think your decision will have implications for our entire city. The most important point is that this development could not occur if it were not for the housing chapters in the City of Fridley Comprehensive Plan. In my opinion the" Comprehensive Plan is neither." It was meant to have involvement from all the citizens but ended up being a product of the city staff. And if you approve this project before we have a chance to amend the plan it will be too late because you have now established policy, not a plan. The most objectionable part of the plan in my opinion, is who decided where to draw the lines and boxes that surround specific areas on a map in the plan. Which committee or group decided which neighborhoods are worthy of maintenance, reinvestment, and stability and which are not? I guess my Moore Lake Hills home is worthy and maybe I should just be quiet, but apparently my brothers home in the Hyde Park area is not. If you draw areas on a map where "redevelopment is likely to occur," my brother and thousands of other residents may be faced with the same dilemma as the residents on 64th Avenue and on Mississippi Street. Once again, we will pit neighbor vs. neighbor, those selling out supporting the redevelopment and those left behind to stare at a huge high-density building opposing it. This policy whose jobs depend on development dictate the situation, we have lost control as a citizenry. A lot of us moved here to Fridley to have the peace of mind of"what you see is what you get." If you vote yes on Spring Valley Estates then the developers and staff drive events much like they do in a developing city such as Blaine. We are a fully developed city, but are we really in dire need of redevelopment? I would like to invite all Public Officials and the Community Development Staff to join me on a tour of a truly needed redevelopment district where I deliver mail. There is a proposal pending, which will displace two single family homes and one business building for a 71 unit R-3 type structure. The 2500 block of Queen Avenue North will have this structure put right in "their back yard." Neighborhood opposition is not quite as organized because half the homes on that block are vacant. In fact if you were to draw an arc with a one-block radius from the center of the project, you would find thirteen vacant buildings and six empty lots where single family homes once stood. The North Minneapolis sight is a redevelopment area. What we have in Fridley with the Spring Valley Estates proposal is a wooded lot that has never been developed surrounded by modest affordable single family homes on large wooded lots similar to the neighbors to the east. Please consider all these ideas and suggestions prior to making a final suggestion on Spring Valley Estates. Respectfully, Timothy M. Byrne Iva 5 Ak/L c_JJ .24 7,/ � e 2-k v �"0 - i 241, aV , ?, -y, 42/ Jt c , ,[ J , / (/Ce_of C-124z,t " /56-e-G ..z. x_c_: Z1-46 Coe `` 54. il' (e)h a-1-4:-) 602- ' - . j;1 ‘&1-6- i," Ltd c'' . 1 • . . } 2,G I t- ', Crpad_i xlijotAiy\ , 7-he_ 4 Q? , Jo,u /1 iV9s . Aar .4 Pr' • eze± a}7e€A_Q. .6,6 - 72214, ej �c 4 7 ,t-'-Zd cL J; "tele - . ate. a/ + f' 6 Z - 1.ce ` 72f MAR 25 BS es : P4A71.144 i..-61_, ' , , ec) d_ clii-r, I. c - 4-d <_L_ eLa A oiti--- 6 9t-t 4-1, I 0 W-d4-7---elt- 1 hA ii0 ' III C4 - facLti --/Yl_ //a./rN-- .1-Z7L PI. 446 /2. a/21AL,-, I 41,/u4... ...-, ; - I / riAA-- 1 2 (,6 ••• dr 7 * , - , -, i d-()ii vvt-L41. I t I ,, . 141 46ric_. t . ' , • ., .e. 1.,„ (KzA4 1 , •d ./1.}1A,4,o- -z • ii't / / „ ct_ edi ,,„ / (AraTviLQ, XIA_LJ , . ,•1 so sr . r jr....43...L. ipw)z_,,e_fi-l_... . -tiz--k-/f--e,v)_-e--1-71. g ell pl' i. i - 4 17-e-, 47? avtio) IT , , -,tk<z. ' CA-4-M -6.-r-xl '7e, 6-ed-A/L 1-)1 V9 ° Iii . i .' I .1 • 4N' '• a r 1 i-- RA- - 6A 47,a tkii.L? ' 9,-rizif # ,a /..# 411 4? .__-VLA ' . 4s; ( - .1- . ,e2_ ..:7-‘40 Li _,..6-0-L,Ykij 0' 11- ILL a - / / ,::; n-10-42--14_,LdEcat" 4 • • . 17 - --------' )0- , &O 1 ' i Pe13(3- eiV431 .*---- 6 3O fiake, 5E- 11.E. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MIN TES OF MARCH 29 2004 PAGE 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING E, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 22. Ordinance No. 1193 creati • a new chapter of the Fridley City Code setting service charges for emer• ncy response calls (tabled February 23, 2004). MOTION by Councilmember olfe, seconded by Councilmember Billings, to remove this matter from the table. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. John Berg, Fire Chief, s ated at the City Council meeting on February 23, 2004, the Finance and Fire Depa ment staff were asked to review two particularly controversial areas of the fee struct e—personal injury accidents and vehicle fires. They contacted the insurance compa y and found out that they do cover personal injury accidents under the liability iss es. They also looked at insurance in terms of comprehensive versus liability and d-termined that in the case of vehicle fires they would probably be creating more staff me in terms of vehicle fires. They decided to look at the issue of vehicle fires, but h. e pulled it from the ordinance at this time. He also explained they propose to continu- with personal injury accident fees after surveying a number of local fire departments at are currently doing this. The indication is that they can collect. Vehicle owners - e required to carry liability insurance and that most departments are collecting betwe n 80% to 90% of the fees that are charged. Staff recommends adopting the or• nance with the exception of vehicle fires. MOTION by C•uncilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to waive the second readi • and adopt Ordinance No. 1193 on the second reading and order publication. UPON A VOI E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED U ANIMOUSLY. 23. First reading of an ordinance to amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota by making a change in zoning districts (rezoning request, ZOA #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc. (Ward 2) (Tabled March 8, 2004) 24. Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax Inc., to replat six parcels into two parcels for the purpose of constructing a senior housing development and a retail complex, generally located at 1340 and 1314 Mississippi Street, 6421 and 6401 Central Avenue, 1341 and 1357 – 64th Avenue, and two vacant lots, Lots 17 and 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition (Ward 2) (Tabled March 8, 2004). MOTION by Councilmember Wolfe, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to remove ZOA#04-01 and PS #04-01 from the table. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 13 • The petitioner has asked Traffic Data, Inc. to re-evaluate the previously submitted traffic study to include the new access points and the additional condominium units. • The consultant determined that the revised plan will add minimal traffic beyond the initial proposal. • The change in the driveway configuration will improve the traffic flow on Central Avenue by reducing the number of conflict points. • There is enough capacity on both 64th Avenue and at the Central Avenue and 64th Avenue intersection to accommodate traffic from the proposed driveway on 64th Avenue. • City staff and the petitioner met with Anoka County to review the comments and concerns the County had and to review the revised site plan for Spring Valley Estates. The County had concerns regarding too many access points on Central Avenue and commented that they would prefer to see an access on 64th Avenue. • To address those concerns, the developer has reduced the number of access points on Central Avenue to one driveway and has redesigned the parking garage so it receives access from Mississippi Street on the north and 64t Avenue on the south. • The County has stated that they will accept the redesigned plan and will permit access on Central Avenue as well as Mississippi Street. • The County stated that currently there are no imminent plans for reconstruction of either Central Avenue or Mississippi Street, nor are there any plans to signalize the intersection. • The County is pleased that this redesign has moved an access to 64th Avenue because it is very likely that whenever Central Avenue and Mississippi Street are rebuilt, it would become a right in / right out, and 64th Avenue could possibly serve as a location for future median break or full access location. • The petitioner has a consultant who met with the Rice Creek Watershed District on March 24, 2004. • City staff received a notice of exemption from the Rice Creek Watershed on March 25, 2004. • The exception was approved as it appears that the wetland was incidentally created and is not protected under the Wetland Conservation Act. • Like the Town Center Development proposal, this master plan has been modified to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission, City Council, and the neighborhood. • City staff recommends approval of the new site plan, the plat request, and the rezoning request with the subsequent master plan, with 22 stipulations. Councilmember Billings asked the City Attorney if there should be a motion to substitute the one lot plat for the two lot plat originally submitted. Mr. Knaak responded that would be the appropriate action to take. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 15 is for the mature Fridley residents, their families, and the future families of Fridley. He said they requested approval of the proposal. Councilmember Barnette asked about the building on 5th Street in New Brighton and how it compares to this proposal. Mr. DeMello stated it is very similar with the entryway creating a grand entrance appearance that works very well. That site does not have any commercial and they believe the commercial in their proposal is a convenience for the senior residents. Mayor Lund announced that even though the public hearing has been closed on this matter, he would like to offer those present an opportunity to comment on the revised proposal as long as they limit their remarks to three minutes. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if the idea is to hear new comments only. Mayor Lund asked the audience members to stick to the facts and to present new comments only. Dorothy Pejl, 1260 Mississippi Street, stated she has a background in real estate having retired from HUD. She thought a complex like this would be a real benefit to the neighborhood and would increase the value of surrounding properties. Virgil Okeson, 1423 — 64th Avenue N.E., stated there is an easement on 64th Avenue for a street that will run north parallel to Old Central Avenue. If a street is proposed through that easement the east wall of the proposed structure would hang over the street. There is another easement off of Arthur Street in the middle of the block going westbound which could not proceed because of this development and would negatively affect property owners. The comprehensive plan states the intent is to preserve the single family units in Fridley. Redevelopment is approaching about 30% of Fridley. This would be setting a dangerous precedent. He did not believe the driveway approach from Mississippi Street complies with the setback requirements. Jeff Saarela, 6190 Heather Circle N.E., stated he lives about a quarter mile south of this proposal. He is in favor of development but he is opposed to the design for this development. He thought it was mediocre and mindless. He thinks it would be much better to turn the whole building facing to the south which would give more green space to the residence. He stated that quality design brings long-term profits. Doug Johnson, 6388 Pierce Street, stated he is not against the development but does have reservations about the density. He would prefer to see 60 units rather than 90. He asked if this type of proposal can proceed with a special use permit rather than rezoning the property. If the developer does not proceed, the zoning would remain. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 17 could end up with a whole mix of things. This development is a nice proposal for the whole City. Mark Schwartz, 1372 — 64th Avenue N.E., spoke in opposition to the proposed driveway onto 64th Avenue. This proposal has such a high coverage of the total square footage of the land that the storm run-off is a concern. He understands that the rate of flow has to be controlled from this site, but not the volume. He asked who will be responsible if there are more problems with the storm system. The height of the building is not stated correctly because the garage floor is approximately the same level as the curb on 64th Avenue. He does not believe the developer has met the burden of proof required to rezone this property. This proposal creates spot zoning by placing a high density housing unit next to R-1. He asked the Council to deny this request. Chuck Bullock, 1521 Camelot Lane N.E., stated he has concerns regarding the traffic this will create. He explained that it is already nearly impossible to access Central Avenue from 64th Avenue during peak periods of the day. He feared many of the residents from this complex would seek alternate routes through what are now quiet residential streets. He also questioned the height of the project. Joanne Zmuda, 6051 Fourth Street N.E., questioned if the financing for the whole project is available or if it will be built piece-meal. She stated the main concern is the size of the building and the type of commercial uses going in. Jean Schwartz, 1372 — 64th Avenue N.E., said redevelopment must be compatible with the surrounding area. She believed if this is approved, the City Council will be setting a precedent for the rest of the redevelopment land in Fridley. She could think of any other high density development in the area that sits 18 feet from a residential property line. She thinks the driveway onto 64th Avenue will affect the safety of residents on that road. If the City Council denies this proposal, they are not denying future redevelopment on this site, but denying a building that is too big. This is not an appropriate development for this site. The City Council should leave the door open for a more appropriate proposal. Frank DeMello, 6134 Woody Lane N.E., stated it is hard to come to a consensus about what kind of building the general population will accept on that site. He pointed out his property is already zoned commercial and that he could have put in commercial uses a long time ago. There is a strong demand for this type of housing for seniors and there are other similar developments that are blending in well in their residential settings. The City Council approved a similar project across the street. This is a good project that should be approved. Some of the objections expressed do not take into consideration the good of the community. He also stated seniors prefer to stay in their own environment and in the community they are used to. This project is good. Yoava Klucsar, 1420 Rice Creek Road N.E., stated he has lived in Fridley over 20 years. He asked how the City Council could consider approving two large projects in this area when he cannot even build a double bungalow on his lot. They did not need FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29,2004 PAGE 19 • Ms. Zmuda's concern about the type of retail: Mr. Hickok explained the S-2 zoning is meant to serve a smaller demographic area and is generally geared toward walking traffic. • Ms. Schwartz's comment on lot coverage: Mr. Hickok explained the lot coverage on this proposal is 26.67%. In a R-3 zoning, the maximum lot coverage is 20% or an additional 10% allowed if you park underneath the building. This development does have underground parking so the maximum is 30%. This proposal is under that requirement. As far as her concerns on parking, Mr. Hickok explained it is not at all unusual to use speculative parking ratios on an unknown element. Where we have multi-tenant development, it is not at all unusual to apply speculative ratio and that is what we've done here. That means that there's 1 parking stall for every 200 square feet of parking area. This development exceeds the parking requirements. Mr. Hickok also pointed out that this is a S-2 district which takes into account that there are pieces about redevelopment projects and that are beneficial to the city and that there are trade-offs in allowing setback deviations. This petitioner has dedicated a 30 foot green space area to the county. Anoka County doesn't have immediate plans or in their 10 — 20 year plan to change the current roadway. Other concerns expressed by Ms. Schwartz regarding building setbacks are addressed in the flexibility allowed in the S-2 district. However, this proposal would fit in R-3 zoning and all setbacks would have been met. • Mr. Klucsar's comment about not being able to place a double bungalow on his lot: His property is in a R-1 zoning which is single-family only. Mayor Lund asked Mr. Haukaas to respond to the question regarding the responsibility for any storm water issues that may occur as a result of this development. Mr. Haukaas responded that the development's storm water system has to be designed to handle the storm water on that site and they will be required to file a storm water maintenance agreement with the City. The property owner, essentially the homeowners' association, would have the responsibility for any storm water issues. Mayor Lund asked the petitioner to respond to concerns about the process of this development and whether it will be done in phases or all at once. Mr. DeMello responded they are planning on a phased build-out starting with the commercial and wrapping around so they can ensure the viability of the project. This enables them to minimize the pre-solds and get in the ground as soon as possible. As you look at the proposal from north to south, it will be built with the north section first, then the middle section, and then the south section. Councilmember Wolfe asked if the initial phase will include residential as well as commercial. Mr. DeMello stated it will. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29,2004 PAGE 21 retaining walls are added back in, the height is 35 feet. In addition, they set the building back another 40 feet or so from the centerline of 64th Avenue so the face of the building will now be 100 feet. He said the dimension of the side yard setback on the east is 18 feet, but that 18 feet is to a one story gazebo porch so the building itself is 28 feet back. Taking into consideration the 16 foot easement for the alley, the building is actually 44 feet from the property line on the east. As far as the design of this project, he stated he has designed over 500 projects in the state of Minnesota and this project is a step up from a lot of those projects in terms of the design and the materials they are using. Mr. DeMello responded to concerns of the 64th Avenue access. This was not their idea, but they are working within the constraints of the county which he understood was a priority for the City Council in terms of their approval for this project. That is what drove one of the access points from Central Avenue to 64th Avenue. Councilmember Bolkcom stated she has a huge concern with the 64th Avenue access. She questioned if Anoka County did anything more than recommend an access on 64th Avenue. This access will impact the residents in that neighborhood and she believes this to be way too big of a project. The petitioner has listened to the neighborhood, but she thought he should have met with the neighbors initially and up front to address their concerns. She is not for this project for that reason. The biggest issue is density and the height of the building. She is all for senior condos. If this proposal could be scaled down it may be more acceptable. Counclimember Billings stated the petitioner has done a lot of work and the project is beautiful. We need to recognize the fact that we will need senior housing. By the year 2030, we are going to have half again as many people in the 7 county metro area as we have now. We cannot have 20-acre sites for a single family house and still be able to provide adequate housing. We have to realize that we will have to find ways to do more with the land we have. He stated he likes the idea of a mixed use commercial site with housing. Unfortunately, one of his objections to the plan was that they were trying to do too much with the site and now with this plan more is being done with the site. One of his biggest concerns is along the northern and northwestern property line. In order to accomplish what the petitioner needs to economically, the parking is pushed right up to the property line. There are no provisions for snow storage when everything is to the property line. Should Anoka County need to take that property for right-hand turn lane, there would be even less area. If this were a larger site with more green space buffering to the east, it may be a better proposal. In terms of the access to 64th Avenue, it's not the worst thing in the world and will not add that many cars to 64th Avenue. He does not think this particular site can accommodate this much construction and it is not in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare for the City of Fridley. We need this type of housing, but it needs to be on a larger piece of property. Mr. Harrison stated that reducing the density would result in a per unit cost that would be prohibitive for the people of Fridley unless subsidies were involved. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 29, 2004 PAGE 23 MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to amend Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, substituting Revision No. 14 dated March 20, 2004. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe to table Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, to the April 12, 2004, City Council meeting and direct staff to provide a list of objections to document into the record. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO TABLE PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #04-01, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSI ESS 25. First -ading of an ordinance under Section 12.06 of the City Charter declari ! certain real estate to be surplus and authorizing the sale thereof general) located at the northwest corner of Ely Street and Ashton Avenue. MOTION by Count (member Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette to waive the reading and ado At the ordinance on first reading. UPON A VOICE VOT= ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU' LY. 26. First reading of a ordinance amending Fridley City Code, Section 205.07, R-1, Single Family 'welling District Regulations, and Section 205.08, R-2, Two Family Dwellin• District regulations, and Section 205.09, R-3, General Multiple Dwelling Dis, ict Regulations, related to accessory uses (Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA •04-01). MOTION by Councilmember Bolk.•m, seconded by Councilmember Wolfe, to waive the reading and adopt the ordinance on first reading. UPON A VOICE VOTE COUNCILM BER BARNETTE VOTING AYE AND MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLI GS, COUNCILMEMBER WOLFE, AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTI NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION FAILED ON A 1 TO 4 VOTE. 27. Informal Status Reports. William Burns, City Manager, reported that the n- sletter is now at the printers and will be mailed next week. AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 12, 2004 QTY OF FRIDLEY Date: April 8, 2004 To: William Burns, City Manager bk From: Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator Stacy Stromberg, Planner Subject: Plat Request, PS #04-01 and First Reading of an ordinance for Rezoning, ZOA #04-01, John DeMello, Profitmax Inc. M-04-55 COUNCIL ACTION At the March 29, 2004, City Council meeting, a motion to deny plat request #04-01 and rezoning request#04-01 was tabled to allow city staff time to prepare a resolution reflecting Council's concerns. The resolution has been attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council remove these items from the table, and vote on each independent item. 37 }, FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 12,2004 PAGE 9 Mr. Pribyl stated that is correct. Councilmember Billings stated, in other words, if we do not raise the fees to cover the cost of water and sewer, we will not be able to provide streets that are drivable. Mr. Nord asked when the street improvements will be completed. Mayor Lund stated they are about 7 to 8 years out for completion of all the street improvement projects. Councilmember Bolkcom stated another method of covering costs would be to charge residents for street improvements as other communities are doing. Fridley is trying to avoid that. MOTION by Councilmember Bolkcom, seconded by Councilmember Barnette, to continue the public hearing to April 26, 2004. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OLD BUSINESS: 9. Motion to remove the first reading of an ordinance to amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, by making a change in zoning districts (Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc.,) and Preliminary Plat Request, PS #04-01, by John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc., from the Table. and Resolution Nos. 2004-29 and 2004-30 of the City of Fridley denying the application of John DeMello, Profitmax, Inc., by or on behalf of Spring Valley Estates for the rezoning of certain property to S-2 and requesting the replatting of that same property for the creation of a high density condominium development. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to approve the resolutions denying the application of John DeMello (Profitmax, Inc.) on behalf of Spring Valley Estates for the rezoning of certain property to S-2 and requesting the replatting of that same property for the creation of a high density condominium development. Councilmember Bolkcom asked if this matter should be removed from the table before action is taken. hi'; FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 12,2004 PAGE 11 UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 2004-29 CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. UPON A VOICE VOTE TO SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-29 TO DENY PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUEST, PS #04-01, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to amend the motion to deny Rezoning Request, ZOA #04-01, by substituting Resolution No. 2004-30. MOTION by Councilmember Billings, seconded by Councilmember Bolkcom, to amend the last line of Resolution No. 2004-30 to include the words "The application of the Developer (Rezoning Request, ZOA#04-01) is therefore denied." UPON A VOICE VOTE, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER BOLKCOM VOTING AYE AND COUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MAYOR LUND DECLARED THE MOTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 2004-30 CARRIED ON A 3 TO 1 VOTE. UPON A VOICE VOTE TO SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-30 TO DENY REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #04-01, MAYOR LUND, COUNCILMEMBER BILLINGS AND COUNCILMEMBER MAYOROM VOTING LUND DECLAREDETHENCOUNCILMEMBER BARNETTE VOTING NAY, MOTION CARRIED A 3 TO 1 VOTE. NEW BUST SS: 10. Informal tatus Reports: Mr. Burns, City Ma ager, said a conference meeting was scheduled for April 19, 2004, at which time the following issues would be discussed: 2 a.m. bar closing, Comprehensive Plan visions, redevelopment strategies, replacement of aerial truck, the University Avenue fence, and Parks capital improvement funding level. The meeting will start at 7:00 .m. in the lower level of City Hall. The meeting is open to the public. Mayor Lund announced tha on April 24, there will be a fundraiser for Springbrook Nature Center at the Outbac Steakhouse. All proceeds will go to the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation. CITYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER•6431 UNIVERSITY AVE.N.E.FRIDLEY,MN 55432•(763)571-3450•FAX(763)571-1287 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE April 15, 2004 John Demello Profitmax Inc. 2872-17th Terrace NW New Brighton MN 55112 Dear Mr. Demello: On Monday, April 12, 2004, the Fridley City Council officially denied your request for a Preliminary Plat, PS #04-01, and a Rezoning, ZOA#04-01, to replat property, for the purpose of constructing a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, and to rezone multiple properties from C-1, Local Business, C-2, General Business, and R-1, Single Family Residential, to S-2, Redevelopment District, for the purpose of redevelopment, to allow for a Senior Housing Development and a Retail Complex, legally described as, and generally located at: 1314 Mississippi Street Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 1340 Mississippi Street Lot 15, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6401 Central Avenue Lot 20, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6421 Central Avenue Lot 19, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6441 Central Avenue Lot 18, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition 6461 Central Avenue Lot 17, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition RESOLUTION 2004-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DENYING THE APPLICATION OF JOHN DEMELLO, PROFITMAX INC., BY OR ON BEHALF OF SPRING VALLEY ESTATES FOR THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO S-2 AND REQUESTING THE REPLATTING OF THAT SAME PROPERTY FOR THE CREATION OF A HIGH DENSITY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, John Demello, Profitmax Inc. is the Fee and or Equitable Owner of certain real estate(hereinafter"the Parcel") located in the City of Fridley, Minnesota, located approximately at or near the corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue in that City; and WHEREAS, John Demello,Profitmax Inc., made an application to the City of Fridley for the rezoning of the aforesaid real estate to S-2 for the purpose of developing on the site a condominium complex; and WHEREAS, as part of the application process, John Demello, Profitmax, Inc. (hereinafter, "the Developer") submitted a development plan to the City, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS,the Developer, or its agents and representatives, spent many hours discussing the elements of the plan with the City's staff; and WHEREAS, in addition to requesting a rezoning of the parcel, and as part of its application process, the Developer has requested a replatting of the Parcel; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2004,the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley conducted a public hearing on the issue of both the rezoning and replatting of the Parcel WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004,the City Council of the City of Fridley conducted a public hearing on the question of the rezoning and replatting of the Parcel; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2004,the City Council of the City of Fridley reviewed the developer's revised 90-unit condominium building with commercial space integrated into that residential building. A plan that the developer prepared in an effort to address concerns voiced by the City Council members,the Anoka County Highway Department, as well as, members of the public at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing conducted by the City Council on March 8, 2004, extensive testimony was given both by and on behalf of the Developer, as well as members of the City staff and numerous members of the public; and Resolution No. 2004-29 Page 3 9. The height of the proposed structure on the Parcel in the Development plan, particularly in the 4—story portion of the Development, would significantly block sunlight to, and impede the view of adjoining residential development more than what they currently enjoy. 10. The development would adversely affect the quality of life and health of surrounding residents by blocking direct access to sunlight during much of the daylight hours. 11. The screening and plantings proposed in the development would not be sufficient to provide the modest degree of privacy currently enjoyed by adjacent land owners once the Development were to occur. BASED, THEREFORE, UPON THE FOREGOING, THE CITY FURTHER RESOLVES THAT: 1. It concludes the modified development proposal represents a density and intensity of use of such a degree as would adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it would be located. 2. It concludes that the modified development proposal would adversely impact the health and safety of the neighborhood surrounding, as well as the City residents and members of the public that would be using the adjoining highways and roads. The application of the Developer is, therefore, DENIED. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. er Scott J. Lund, Mayor ATTEST: 4-4444 Debra A. Skogen, C. Clerk N RESOLUTION 2004-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DENYING THE APPLICATION OF JOHN DEMELLO, PROFITMAX INC., BY OR ON BEHALF OF SPRING VALLEY ESTATES FOR THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO S-2 AND REQUESTING THE REPLATTING OF THAT SAME PROPERTY FOR THE CREATION OF A HIGH DENSITY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, John Demello, Profitmax Inc. is the Fee and or Equitable Owner of certain real estate(hereinafter"the Parcel") located in the City of Fridley, Minnesota, located approximately at or near the corner of Mississippi Street and Central Avenue in that City; and WHEREAS, John Demello, Profitmax Inc., made an application to the City of Fridley for the rezoning of the aforesaid real estate to S-2 for the purpose of developing on the site a condominium complex; and WHEREAS, as part of the application process, John Demello, Profitmax, Inc. (hereinafter, "the Developer") submitted a development plan to the City, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS,the Developer, or its agents and representatives, spent many hours discussing the elements of the plan with the City's staff; and WHEREAS, in addition to requesting a rezoning of the parcel, and as part of its application process,the Developer has requested a replatting of the Parcel; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2004,the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley conducted a public hearing on the issue of both the rezoning and replatting of the Parcel WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004,the City Council of the City of Fridley conducted a public hearing on the question of the rezoning and replatting of the Parcel; and WHEREAS, on March 29, 2004,the City Council of the City of Fridley reviewed the developer's revised 90-unit condominium building with commercial space integrated into that residential building. A plan that the developer prepared in an effort to address concerns voiced by the City Council members, the Anoka County Highway Department, as well as, members of the public at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing conducted by the City Council on March 8, 2004, extensive testimony was given both by and on behalf of the Developer, as well as members of the City staff and numerous members of the public; and A Resolution No. 2004-30 Page 3 9. The height of the proposed structure on the Parcel in the Development plan, particularly in the 4—story portion of the Development, would significantly block sunlight to, and impede the view of adjoining residential development more than what they currently enjoy. 10. The development would adversely affect the quality of life and health of surrounding residents by blocking direct access to sunlight during much of the daylight hours. 11. The screening and plantings proposed in the development would not be sufficient to provide the modest degree of privacy currently enjoyed by adjacent land owners once the Development were to occur. BASED, THEREFORE, UPON THE FOREGOING, THE CITY FURTHER RESOLVES THAT: 1. It concludes the modified development proposal represents a density and intensity of use of such a degree as would adversely impact the character of the neighborhood in which it would be located. 2. It concludes that the modified development proposal would adversely impact the health and safety of the neighborhood surrounding, as well as the City residents and members of the public that would be using the adjoining highways and roads. The application of the Developer is,therefore, DENIED. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2004. 'err/ "Plefegit Scott J. Lund, Mayor ATTEST: ,a4.67,, Debra A. Skogen, Ci Jerk Aci 0)11'0°.'I(v L 00 4 I�� j ;_ PQOFITMAX INC. 2872 17th Terrace • New Brighton, MN 55112 • Office: (651)493-3936 • Fax: (651)493-0229 Rea/ Estate • Business Consu/t/ng • AEN Oeve/opment We have responded to the communities concerns with the following new design: .ty I✓' - .3 y t __ 9 _ ' ' :'k :-. ' .,"" -:E'• '7"` '.7_ _.--., - \-7: - 1. IX„ !!L v Ll tYJ6 `� f cI ma.- . -U • *-,,T6' M. "Zy - , 0-y � ��, im a� cy^ E4�yit� �� :5it .. a�' T� � fi1,N, er' }. , -r `.jSw e:i, - � _A, cz.-, Et .:e- ,,yi r^ -,:-..,-ZP -- '' hey 00.1Q- '"......t,;t' *ii' y+�a'v.�'" '401 tw r¢As -- 1 ,i\ 1 ifr _iii ri f - .. • fir F ,,,,,vp,,,i7,41-.,- .-:- i .,- ; i. > ... 'aa1 d T.. ^... - - i C<"w:-:ccs ._ z�. ' "may. � '_ � %�' � _ - P A�ecrY7fw""&L7 : T ',Al. — -7-3. 1 Please review the proposed site plan with 90 units of senior housing: 3 stories on the north, 4 stories in the middle and 3 stories on the south side. "Creating Synergy between Land and Man" I L i ` s oG: .n >� 1p y.. ILI t :vn ti O �q`0 to 1 e � I IM V I h i N F J e u 'Q y� I b 1 f FE �ip W i 71 O EM tir aci m i O � ( }.i••( � � I m a O A � i v ! ! a � 0 h e .fi y. W . ; h i� S o fl k - � v i r r ul (' 4 {,.yam � • % .. CYr -IE+ i k��1 F- t ♦{ ! i C9[\ Z i ; 0 _ `' i ►` may. `w� � i ; • rt ; s i P '3 1 ..i O C� n i � I � 1 F m � o �ip W i 71 O EM tir aci m i O � ( }.i••( � � I m a O A � i v ! ! a � 0 h e .fi y. W . ; h i� S o fl k - � v i r r ul (' 4 {,.yam � • % .. CYr -IE+ i k��1 F- t ♦{ ! i C9[\ Z i ; 0 _ `' i ►` may. `w� � i ; • rt ; s i P '3 1 ..i O C� n i �2 )l rift fi ilk 11 ;off �� , InH a,- � Q � 0 ZIP lb o + Z- I;kM IN to Iv N'll O VL vl� N'll i ■ ■ ry COW yin 5� oao z >> N 0, a 0 (� N i So =z WW U W W O Z Z. LZLjQ �mQo }0�3 Ii WQ ZO f< Q� UWQ mad oe Lli Z L A C4 lull J s e 4 hc, 1� .�o q�f .0 N 0 V � h ry COW yin 5� oao z >> N 0, a 0 (� N i So =z WW U W W O Z Z. LZLjQ �mQo }0�3 Ii WQ ZO f< Q� UWQ mad oe Lli Z L A C4 lull J O¢ G co NN m �I W CL C9 O 0) CO i W T T T @ i co � Lg 1 'I fn N Q p V w j i I �a C i tit all � d i V N ^ a Z _ t a e ° z � o � `1 ►rf �(i}�,7� Div p � � C� .,C i •�~ I ww�OW o ' � "• A+L��d'Z s ;_ ti s i s IA f �L P` � f ° f,�— qZ cu Moro OIL CM 0) 0 ir C3 W C4 LO p o _ �' co —Sac) z 3 Its I c W a a 65 HE LL 0 -e MR Fn 0 di Cc LA on Jg CL Z z C3 )m 41 F-I VIA �h R R � h b f 7d `__ 9— y' C h e !Z. AA 4 a o v q � O N 0 ;v • r b 0 z > m k �Nm W �m� o m r —D� D m� Nr. °-C 0> r r^�o�i A Cu z OOMZ to M; z �^ z2 m MOM D o z�Z z "O �M� s;0 mz0 o v q � O N 0 ;v • r b 0 -31 �g Da: co 0) t W CO ClJ r- 'C? C, 't CL seem c LU tv .. r_ ca (D LC c Fj-) LU a: Qq -13 Ai dw C%l M3 Lf) C3 tM Un It CY z 44, 7f $711 %k Irv, 6 Alf VR a A o- If 0-1 17ry 4ill Nun I N4 Ll CA Q - mg Zr