Loading...
VAR 98-05FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 ,APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Roger and Marilyn Roelofs March 27, 1998 150 Talmadge Way Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Roelofs: On March 25, 1998, the Fridley Appeals Commission officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #98-05, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 4.4 feet to allow the reconstruction of existing walls and to allow a 5 foot addition on Lot 7, Block 2, Elwell's Riverside Heights, the same being 150 Talmadge Way. You have one year from the date of the Appeals Commission action to initiate construction. If you cannot begin construction during this time, you must submit a letter requesting an extension at least three weeks prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call me at 572-3599. Sir erel , Jtt�H!C,�k Planning Coordinator SH:Is Please review the above action, sign below, and return the original to the City of Fridley Planning Department by April 10, 1998. e Con r with action to NEIGHBOR'S CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: SHAr\JN JOHNS 4O 0 m� S 1 INCH = 40 FEET O DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENT 9► DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT V <0 o: .� ^ry �S9 >/rCro ------------- SdtrU2'O7'E 140.00' IA g �r A 0 C IV IV Lot Six (6), Block Two (2). Elwell s Riverside Heights, according to the plat thereof on file and or record in the office of the Registrar of Titles. Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Commencing at a point on o One between Lots Six (6), and Seven (7), distant 276.7 feel southwesterly from the northwest comer of sold Lot six (6), thane South and parallel with the East One of Lot One (1), Block Two (2). said subdMaln, to the center or Oak Glen Creek, thence westerly along said creek to the line between Late S& (6) and Seven (7), sold Subdivision thence northeasterly along sold line to the pointe of beginning. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the Laws of the state of Minnesota. 01t Signed the °� day of —1 Bim A D., X1]9 � Mark A. Peterson Minnesota License No. 15232 For Bolton do Monk, Inc. BOLTON & MENK, INC. Aiterottons to this drawing oro prohibited without the CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS express written permission of Bolton & Monk Im 1516 DIRE NOW 15. Ml= IN DOW (9110 W-01109 Copyright 1991. Bolton & Monk. Im. Or," aFMM IN rAro ", Fel • SLEM IVF• U7. • MANUTO, Fel • A/ES, N JOB #TS95.0075 FILE N1756 N W E 4O 0 m� S 1 INCH = 40 FEET O DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENT 9► DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT V <0 o: .� ^ry �S9 >/rCro ------------- SdtrU2'O7'E 140.00' IA g �r A 0 C IV IV Lot Six (6), Block Two (2). Elwell s Riverside Heights, according to the plat thereof on file and or record in the office of the Registrar of Titles. Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Commencing at a point on o One between Lots Six (6), and Seven (7), distant 276.7 feel southwesterly from the northwest comer of sold Lot six (6), thane South and parallel with the East One of Lot One (1), Block Two (2). said subdMaln, to the center or Oak Glen Creek, thence westerly along said creek to the line between Late S& (6) and Seven (7), sold Subdivision thence northeasterly along sold line to the pointe of beginning. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the Laws of the state of Minnesota. 01t Signed the °� day of —1 Bim A D., X1]9 � Mark A. Peterson Minnesota License No. 15232 For Bolton do Monk, Inc. BOLTON & MENK, INC. Aiterottons to this drawing oro prohibited without the CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS express written permission of Bolton & Monk Im 1516 DIRE NOW 15. Ml= IN DOW (9110 W-01109 Copyright 1991. Bolton & Monk. Im. Or," aFMM IN rAro ", Fel • SLEM IVF• U7. • MANUTO, Fel • A/ES, N JOB #TS95.0075 FILE N1756 CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 25,1998 ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kuechle called the March 25, 1998, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Kuechle, Carol Beaulieu, Terrie Mau, Blaine Jones Members Absent: Ken Vos Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Roger Roelofs, 150 Talmadge Way APPROVAL OF MARCH 11 1998 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Jones, to approve the March 11, 1998, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #98- 05. BY ROGER & MARILYN ROELOFS: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 4.4 feet to allow the reconstruction of existing walls and to allow a 5 -foot addition on Lot 7, Block 2, Elwell's Riverside Heights, the same being 150 Talmadge Way. MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the property is zoned R-1, single family dwelling, as are the surrounding properties. The property is located west of East River Road at Osborne Road. The west edge of the property is at the Mississippi River and to the south is Glen Creek. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner is requesting a 6 foot side yard variance to allow the reconstruction of the existing east wall which is 4.4 feet from the east property line. The first phase of the dwelling was built in 1947. The first phase was constructed of concrete block and was eventually to become the garage as the home was expanded. In 1951, a permit was issued for a detached garage. The original intent of the concrete structure had changed and the first phase of the dwelling was now living space. The home was eventually expanded toward the river. In 1991, the petitioners received a permit to construct a porch addition. Mr. Hickok stated the code requires that a home in the R-1 district maintain a side yard setback of 10 feet for living area. The purpose is to maintain adequate separation PPEAL_S COMMISSION MEETLNG-APRIL25.1998 PAGE between the dwellings for light, air, privacy and aesthetics. This is an existing condition. The petitioners are hoping to improve the home as it exists on the lot. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner's hardship is because the cinder block walls that currently exist were never insulated. As a result, heat escapes up the wall, melts snow on the roof and forms ice dams. They are now experiencing wall and ceiling damage in the home as a result. The petitioners wish to improve what currently exists and add a 5 foot x 24 foot area to the back. This would not be any closer to the lot line than what currently exists. The roof line would also be changed from a 4:12 pitch to a 8:12 pitch. This change will increase the height of the home and may magnify the reduced setback. If the neighbors to the east choose to build closer to their westerly property line, the higher elevation may magnify the fact that they are closer together. Mr. Hickok stated staff suggested a narrower footprint to the property line. The proposed floor plan and the staffs sample floor plan were provided and reviewed. The petitioner has indicated that the alternative floor plan is not efficient and does not match the plan of the existing home. Staff believes that with more information, a narrower design is possible. The City has approved a variance to three feet at 6291 Central Avenue. Mr. Hickok stated staff has no recommendation to the Planning Commission because this request is within previously granted variances. Ms. Beaulieu asked what the circumstances were for the three-foot variance. Mr. Hickok stated the home is an older farm house at the comer of old Central Avenue and Rice Creek. At the time of the request, the owner believed he could keep the original structure and remodel it. The variance was granted. Ms. Mau asked if staff had received any comments from the neighbors. Mr. Hickok stated he had no comments from the neighbors. The building inspector spoke with the neighbor to the east who gave a favorable response. Ms. Mau asked if the neighbor to the east had expressed an interest in enlarging their home. Mr. Hickok stated the neighbor wanted to understand the ramifications of the addition they are planning. As Mr. Hickok understands, their plans involve expanding to the front of their home. Mr. Roelofs provided drawings showing their plans. Mr. Jones asked if the addition would go across what appears to be a cistern in the back. Mr. Roelofs stated there is an old step where they had the previous well in the back. That is a full basement now. The bedroom area is currently on a slab. There is a basement under the living area. Mr. Jones asked if the petitioners intended to come out to approximately the site of that well. PPEALS COMMISSION_ MEETING. APRIL 25. 1998 PAGE 3 Mr. Roelofs stated that is correct. That comes out 5 feet 4 inches and has a full foundation. He wants to enclose that and add a 5 foot x 5 foot comer. That is the part that he wants to add on to square it. The front comer is 4 feet 4 inches from the property line, the back comer is 4 feet 7 inches from the property line. Ms. Beaulieu asked why the staff alternative would not work. Mr. Roelofs stated that alternative would cover up the kitchen window and increases the hallway. In order to get to the back bedroom and/or bathroom, you would have to go down a 21 foot hallway. The area on the alternative plan marked kitchen would actually be a laundry room. Mr. Kuechle asked the petitioner if he planned to put in a new foundation. Mr. Roelofs stated everything would stay on the same slab. They would take down the cinder block walls and rebuild it with 2 x 6 walls. The floor is in good condition. Mr. Kuechle asked if an architect had worked with the petitioner on the plan. Mr. Roelofs stated the construction company has a remodelling contractor. He sent them the dimensions and a preliminary idea. They made a few changes, and this is what they came back with. He and his wife are happy with what they have seen so far, but they may make some additional changes. Mr. Jones asked if it was the petitioners' intent to take down those block walls and rebuild them. Mr. Roelofs stated, yes. The most damage is in the comer where the front gable comes down. They have ceiling damage in the second bedroom. They have added insulation. That is another reason he would like to go with the 8:12 pitch roof. He would like to get more insulation by that wall, and it would make the home look taller rather than flat. The bedroom area has a two -foot overhang whereas the living area currently has a four -foot overhang which would be brought down to two feet. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:50 P.M. Ms. Beaulieu stated the current side yard setback is existing and the petitioner is just going to do the same thing with improvements. It would have been nice if the work could be done without a variance. If the overall plan is less efficient and they would lose windows, she can see that hardship. It seems the neighbors do not mind. She would vote in favor of the request. Mr. Jones stated he likes the idea that it covers up that old well there as well. He agreed about the option for the plans are not infinite. If they narrowed the area, they would lose a bedroom and/or lose window space. Ms. Mau stated she could see where the hardship exists. The increased pitch to the roof line would add to the looks of the property. It is unfortunate that this is that close to the FlIag :L i property line, but she did not think there was much choice. Mr. Jones stated there is about a five-foot area that is a change. Mr. Kuechle stated that is a change from existing. The Appeals Commission does have the opportunity to say, since there is so much reconstruction, that the petitioner could bring it into compliance. Ms. Beaulieu stated the Appeals Commission could say, no, and the petitioner could leave it as it is. Mr. Kuechle concurred with recommending approval. He thought it would be an undue hardship to have the petitioner cut the concrete floor up and move the wall in five feet. That would be considerably more expensive. The plan put forth by staff is not a very efficient plan. However, staff does not have access to all the data. He did not know what someone might come up with if they were forced to come in saying 19 feet is all there is and what is the best you can do. That is why he asked the question about whether the petitioner had architectural services looking at it. He thought the impact is minimized or reduced because the lots in this area are long and the houses are set back. In this case, the setbacks are staggered so the impact is less. He would recommend approval. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Mau, to recommend approval of variance request, VAR #98-05, by Roger and Marilyn Roelofs, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 4.4 feet to allow the reconstruction of existing walls and to allow a 5 -foot addition on Lot 7, Block 2, Elwell's Riverside Heights, the same being 150 Talmadge Way. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. Per Section 205.14.05.C.(1) oX the Fridley City Code, to reduce the number of parking stalls as required by C code to allow an expansion with the existing building footprint on Lot 1, Bloc 1, Caba Realty First Addition, generally located at 8290 University Avenue. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioners, after recommendation, asked if the project ( staff to meet with the surgeons to see MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Ms. E request, VAR #98-06, by Northwestern O 1998. ving the report and understanding the be tabled for two weeks to provide time for they would come up with. lieu, to table consideration of variance )aedic Surgeons Partnership to April 8, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, HAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 0 Mr. Hickok provided an update on Planning Co*ission and City Council actions. Side Yard Setback Variances Request, 150 Talmadge Way DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Roger and Marilyn Roelofs are requesting a 6 foot side yard setback variance to allow the reconstruction of their existing east wall, which is 4.4 feet from their east property line. The Roelofs would also like to construct a five foot addition to follow that same setback dimension. The Roelofs' home is at 150 Talmadge Way. The variance would recognize and allow the continuation of a substandard side yard setback of 4.4 feet, rather than requiring a standard 10 foot setback. HARDSHIP STATEMENT: The main reason for this remodeling job is because of the cinder block walls that are currently on the property. They were never insulated and so much heat escapes up the wall cavities and melts the snow on the roof and forms ice dams and now we are experiencing continued wall and ceiling damage in our home..... Currently this bedroom area is located too close to the property line. This part of this home was built in 1948 before Fridley was a city. It was built with the intention that at a later date it would be a garage. This never came about. In 1958 the owner added what is now considered the main living area and kept what was the original house as their bedroom area..... All that I want to do is improve what is in existence and add a 5' x 24' area to the back and this will not be any closer to the lot line... PREVIOUS SIMILAR VARIANCES GRANTED: This request is similar to a previously granted variance for Paul Litwinczuk, 6291 Central Avenue. Mr. Litwinczuk was granted a side yard variance to 3'. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff has no recommendation due to the fact that this request is within a previously granted dimension. Staff Report VAR #98-04, 6210 Highway 65 NE Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: A side yard variance to allow reconstruction and an addition to a portion of their home that is currently 4.4' from their property line. Location of Property: 150 Talmadge Way Availability of Municipal Utilities: Utility available in Talmadge Way Vehicular Access: Via Talmadge Way Pedestrian Access: Via Talmadge Way Engineering Issues: There are no easements or utility issues along this property line Comprehensive Planning Issues: The zoning and use of this site is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Public Hearing Comments: To be taken Site Planning Issues: Adjacent Sites WEST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family, SOUTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family EAST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family NORTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Single Family Land Use: Single Family Land Use: Single Family Land Use: Single Family Staff Report VAR #98-04,6210 Highway 65 NE Page 3 Request Site Description/ History Analysis DEVELOPMENT SITE Roger and Marilyn Roelofs are requesting a 6 feet side yard setback variance to allow the reconstruction of their existing east wall, which is 4.4 feet from their east property line. The Roelofs would also like to construct a five foot addition to follow that same setback dimension. The Roelofs' home is at 150 Talmadge Way. The variance would recognize and allow the continuation of a substandard side yard setback of 4.4 feet, rather than requiring a standard 10 foot setback. The Roelof property was platted as part of Elwell's Riverside Heights in March of 1947. A year later, construction on the home (now owned by Roelofs), began. Originally, according to Mr. Roelofs, a concrete block garage was constructed and the owners lived in that garage as if it were their house. We believe the idea was that once the house was expanded, they would then convert the garage back to its original intended use for storage of cars, lawnmowers, etc. The conversion back to a garage did not happen. In 1951 a garage permit was issued for a detached garage in the front yard. Five years later a more typical living space expansion occurred. The original garage was not converted back to a garage, however. In 1991 the Roelofs received a permit to construct a porch addition. Code Section 205. 07.03.D(2), requires that a home in an R-1, Single Family Residential zoning district maintain a side yard of 10 feet between any living area and side property line. The history of this site's development is truly the root of the current owner's variance dilemma. The current proposal is to tear down and reconstruct the 28 foot by 24 foot (original garage/living) portion of the house that was built with concrete block. This area of the house was built only 4.4 feet from the property. New modern, energy efficient walls would then be reconstructed in that same location. The petitioners are also proposing to build a 5 foot by 24 foot addition onto this portion of their house. The addition would increase the size 3 Staff Report VAR #98-04, 6210 Highway 65 NE Page 4 of the bedroom wing of the house to 33 feet by 24 feet. As part of the project, the entire dwelling would be re -roofed, the current 4/12 pitch roof would be replaced with a 8/12 pitch hip roof. Staff believes the portion of the house to be reconstructed could be done in a manner that would not require a variance. The width would be reduced from 24 feet to approximately 19.5 feet. The length of the structure could be increased, because the topography of the back yard is flat. The proposed roofline could also be modified with relative ease since the entire home will be getting a new roof and all new trusses as part of this remodeling project. Staff has provided an alternative floor plan that would provide the same number of rooms, of a similar dimension, and the plan has no variance requirements. To the east of the Roelofs' property is a house with an attached garage. The garage is the closest structure to the Roelofs' house. There is over 20 feet between the two structures. Drainage from the site would change very little. The proposed addition would replace an existing concrete stoop.. PREVIOUS SIMILAR VARIANCES GRANTED: This request is similar to a previously granted variance for Paul Litwinczuk, 6291 Central Avenue. Mr. Litwinczuk was granted a side yard variance to 3' RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff has no recommendation due to the fact that this request is within a previously granted dimension. H Proposed Remodeling and Addition at 150 Talmadge Way > Remove all Cinder block walls that are currently in bedroom area of existing property. > Replace these walls with 2 X 6 framed construction grade. > Remove the current 4/12 pitch roof and replace it with a 8/12 pitch roof with the same 2' and 4' soffits that are on the existing property. This roof shall be hand framed with 2 x 6 rafters, 1/2" oxboard sheathing. > Reroof entire new roof with 6' of weather guard, 15 lb felt and 3 in 1 fiberglass shingles. > On the bedroom area of existing home add 5' to the back end of area to include concrete stoop that is currently there. The main reason for this remodeling job is because of the cinder block walls that are currently on the property. They were never insulated and so much heat escapes up the wall cavities and melts the snow on the roof and forms ice dams and now we are experiencing continued wall and ceiling damage in our home. I feel the work that I would lice to have completed on this home would remedy that problem. Currently this bedroom area is located to close to the property line. This part of this home was built in 1948 before Fridley was a city. It was built with the intention that at a later date it would be a garage. This never came about. In 1958 the owner added what is now considered the main living area and kept what was the original house as their bedroom area. I bought this home in 1982 with the idea that someday I would remodel. All that I want to do is improve what is in existence and add 5'x 24' area to the back and this will not be any closer to the lot line. I also want to remove the entry, kitchen and formal dining room floors and put in hardwood flooring. I plan to remove all the siding and soffits and replace these with vinyl. This I feel would greatly improve the quality of the property. Thank You; Roger & Marilyn Roelofs s CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR: Residential Commercial/Industrial _ Signs PROPERTY INFORMATION: - site plan required for submittal, see attached Address: 1,5o Property Identification Number. Legal Description: Lot Block 2 Tract/Addition i-1, . Its . t' C? 1-d. ',PAS'_ ® f G0 Current Zoning: i, Square footage/acreage: Reason for Variance: _ ® m e We 1 -0—x ®°s t, °r Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No X If Yes, which city? If Yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract purchasers: Fee owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME: o a e o cs ADDRESS: .m t�L f .a W *- id &. DAYTIME PHONE: 7S'S=/3 a o SIGN URE/DATE. PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: SIGNATURE/DATE: Section of City Code: FEES Fee: $100.00 for commercial, industrial, o signs: Fee: $60.00 for residential properties: Receipt it. Received By' Application Num���� Scheduled Appeals Commission Date: -� Scheduled City Council Date: t G 10 Day Application Complete Notification ate: B4rza4 l q 9 60 Day Date: C f City of Fridley Land Use Application Process 60 Day Agency Action Law Application Date Planning Commission Meeting 60 Day Window Starts Recommendation t C Submit Complete Application and Materials 0 ouncil 21-40 Days. Application Complete i 10 Day Notice Public Hearings: Variance Vacations Lot Splits . Plats Rezonings Zoning Amendments Wetland Replacements Comprehensive Plan Special Use Permits City Council Decision Approval or Denial 50-60 Days Approved, Action Taken Letter i i Tabled, 60 More Days i i ' Denied Public Hearings: Rezonings Zoning Amendments CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION TO: Property owners within 350 feet of 150 Talmadge Way CASE NUMBER: VAR #98-05 APPLICANT: Roger & Marilyn Roelofs PURPOSE: To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 4.4 feet to allow the reconstruction of existing walls and to allow a 5 foot addition LOCATION OF PROPERTY. 150 Talmadge Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 2, Elwell's Riverside Heights DATE AND TIME OF Appeals Commission Meeting: HEARING: Wednesday, March 25, 1998, 7:30 p.m. The Appeals Commission meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 35. PLACE OF HEARING: Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers, 6431 University Avenue HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, or Paul Tatting, Planning Assistant, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or fax at 571-1287. SPECIAL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMMODATIONS: interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than March 18, 1998. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact either Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator, at 572-3599, or Paul Tatting, Planning Assistant, at 572-3593. Mailing Date: March 13, 1998 VAR #98-05 ROGER & MARILYN ROELOFS 150 TALMADGE WAY ROGER & MARILYN ROELOFS CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 150 TALMADGE WAY 115 TALMADGE WAY 123 TALMADGE WAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT KENNETH BRENNAN CURRENT RESIDENT 137 TALMADGE WAY OR CURRENT RESIDENT 175 LOGAN PARKWAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 160 TALMADGE WAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT ARNOLD GILBERTSON ST PAUL BRD OF WATER COMM 235 LOGAN PARKWAY OR CURRENT RESIDENT 25 W 4'H ST FRIDLEY MN 55432 181 TALMADGE WAY ST PAUL MN 55102 FRIDLEY MN 55432 MARK & JEAN HAINEY MARK JOHNS JUDITH BEINE 7495 NEW HORIZON WAY 300 COMMERCE DRIVE OR CURRENT RESIDENT FREDERICK MD 21703 CRYSTAL LAKE IL 60014 180 TALMADGE WAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 RAYMOND & JANICE SCHMIDT ORVIN & ANNA HENNEMAN KEN & SHARON LEHR OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 161 TALMADGE WAY 170 TALMADGE WAY 168 TALMADGE WAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 CELEST & JOSEPHINE KAM DANIEL & KELLY HALONEN MARC & SANDRA NELSEN OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 120 TALMADGE WAY 130 TALMADGE WAY 235 LOGAN PARKWAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 KENNETH & AGNES KRAVIK ETHEL RATFIELD SHARON JOHNS OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 140 TALMADGE WAY 144 TALMADGE WAY 148 TALMADGE WAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 HERBERT & BETTY BACON JAMES BROMENSCHENKEL ROBERT LANGE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 159 LOGAN PARKWAY 175 LOGAN PARKWAY 189 LOGAN PARKWAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 BENJAMIN RASMUSSEN WILLIAM & KAY NEE ROBERT & AGNES SHAW OR CURRENT RESIDENT 219 LOGAN PARKWAY 309 LOGAN PARKWAY 211 LOGAN PARKWAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 FRIDLEY MN 55432 WILLIAM & MARIE NELSEN OR CURRENT RESIDENT 323 LOGAN PARKWAY FRIDLEY MN 55432 119 15 X -f 0/ tc 4 RXA /-f SNALY5,7 N. c 2-wm- KIT�KN kAAL.L' pjimn 0 0 11 rL- (*4 KIT�KN kAAL.L' pjimn 0 0 11 poc t, .a I/ rk MN 49 e y -�- r � i! ,y I, ......... - 7 IL _ T/LAAPM iAM1YNE S� 1 r_��ftllft�L ZcrdiV DesVid= o R-1 - one Ferny Units VAR #98-05 Variance Request R-2 - Tt%* Fx* Units 0 R-3 - ramal MWWe Units 150 Talmadge Way Q R-4 - Mote Fiume Perks PUD - Pared DmApirnent S-1 - � Park �i. Fee Owner & Petitioner. 0 S-2 - Reftmkp� Ddft Roger & Marilyn Roelofs G1 - Laal Business Q G2 - Cental Business o Gs - cmwd Supping Variance Request: Allow house o G4;H- Gerd Mice reconstruction and addition to within 0 nAWW M2 - � Inckstrial 4.4 feet of east pr%m tylnie. Required ma - OAdow Intensive F b" Incl sideyard setback is 10 feet. RR - Pallmads Q P - Public Facilities !6j wAMR Zoe: R-1, Residential Q RIgiT-0FWAY 73 AYE NEI 27 -OCT -1997 13:08:54 =__ ________________________. _ #1 ANOKA COUNTY COMPLETE TAX REPORT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ PID # : 103024130042 PROPERTY TYPE: RES HOMESTEAD +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ PROPERTY INFORMATION +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ADDRESS : 150 TALMADGE WAY CITY/TWN : FRIDLEY ZIP 55432-3052 SUBDIV LEGAL DESC: ALL OF LOT 7 BLK 2 ELWELLS RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS, TOG/W THAT PRT OF LOT 6 BLK 2 SD ADD DESC AS ACRES 0.00 LIVING AREA: 1815 TOTAL AREA : 1815 YEAR BUILT : 1948 STRUCTURE : RAMBLER BASEMENT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ OWNER/TAXPAYER INFORMATION +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ OWNER NAME: ROELOFS ROGER L & MARILYN A ADDRESS : 150 TALMADGE WAY NE : FRIDLEY MN 55432-3052 TAXPAYER : ROELOFS ROGER L & MARILYN A +----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ MARKET VALUES I TAXES - EFFECTIVE 1997 +----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ LAND : 60600 BASE TAX 2754.83 BLDG : 86700 TAX W/ASSMT 2754.83 TOTAL: 147300 ------------------ -----+-------------------------------------------------------+ SALES +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ IRECENT DATE : PREVIOUS DATE : RECENT PRICE: PREVIOUS PRICE: +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ INFORMATION DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED. 27 -OCT -1997 13:11:12 __________________________________ #1 ANOKA COUNTY COMPLETE TAX REPORT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ PID # : 103024130042 PROPERTY TYPE: RES HOMESTEAD +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ PROPERTY INFORMATION +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ADDRESS : 150 TALMADGE WAY CITY/TWN : FRIDLEY ZIP 55432-3052 SUBDIV LEGAL DESC: ALL OF LOT 7 ELK 2 ELWELLS RIVERSIDE HEIGHTS, TOG/W THAT PRT OF LOT 6 BLK 2 SD ADD DESC AS ACRES 0.00 LIVING AREA: 1815 TOTAL AREA : 1815 YEAR BUILT : 1948 STRUCTURE : RAMBLER BASEMENT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ OWNER/TAXPAYER INFORMATION +------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----+ OWNER NAME: ROELOFS ROGER L & MARILYN A ADDRESS : 150 TALMADGE WAY NE : FRIDLEY MN 55432-3052 TAXPAYER : ROELOFS ROGER L & MARILYN A +----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ ef X f- ..s /go R ` /l p P"f O V `! 4,0 v ,0v �a t .2)r i'S*iN9 Se�/'Ng T ct� i% d/ Ivy S e W .' w q S d! T✓ f 3 /'y I //' 1-e , q I. s s s X , �� �•e x e .1 -A 1't o 0 /' a � 71-a . q !C e S ! o' N ,9 CA1 et. tk ..a ex /1 .a C/.4 eel ^1 S/A -1 @ In- n. /'a�t w� �/s Sia /l d.c /A rs �NS k la l�.'o k o% y C o N J 7 lr --t a -eAlp (/ f s A J .c rt. 0 C. 1` s�.� �'�.A l ,, a Tj Li s,.s -r ' a y ., d C- el X elX its j o.-' coft, 5 /, till, L4J a. II-, � ..Q ,V 4 / 7D d .a f, ..t M I .1y ca.'s �e d� l^.��,,�/r,.. - 6-1 ff .'ry ©.tIaA/i'zP-c 51- y /- C o u /! -t v .t eeh N� t �t yC L a !� �'N `e / S d. 13 a. rX da 6 C- / -e , 'laDalt. C.- C, G L46 Alf VARIANCE APPLICATION SUBMISSION CHECKLIST The following shall be the minimum submission requirements to the Appeals Commission. Applications will not be accepted if the following is not. submitted: RESIDENTIAL: ITEM SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS/DATE Completed application, with fee INV kj` '\°\ (Application is considered complete if all blanks are completed, and both fee owner and petitioner have signed) Scaled site plan of property showing north arrow, existing and proposed structures, lot and block number, adjacent street names, and buildings on adjacent lots within 10 feet of the common lot lines. Elevation of building and description of materials. Narrative of proposed building. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL: ITEM SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS Completed application, with fee (Application is considered complete if all blanks are completed, and both fee owner and petitioner have signed) Scaled site plan of property showing north arrow, existing and proposed structures, lot and block number, adjacent street names, and buildings on adjacent lots within 10 feet of the common lot lines. Elevation of building and description of materials. Landscape plan for all projects requiring a parking lot expansion of four (4) or mores aces. -Grading and drains e, Ian. Erosion control plan. Calculations for stormwater runoff: VARIANCE APPLICATION --- -SUBMISSION:CHECKLIST; PAGE 2 - : 'ITEM SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS a. undeveloped condition b. existing condition c. proposed condition Calculations for excavation and/or fill. Utility Map: (If item is nonexistent, note on plan) Water size and type of a. existing mains b. existing services c. proposed services d. hydrants e. valves f. fire services Sewer: size and type of a. existing mains b. existing services c. proposed services d. manholes and lampholes e. elevations (inverts and top of castings) Storm: size and type of a. existing mains b. existing services c. proposed services d. manholes and lampholes e. elevations (inverts and top of castings f. existing catch basins g. proposed catch basins _SIGNS: - ITEM SUBMITTED RECEIVER'S COMPLETE REVIEWER'S INITIALS INITIALS/DATE Completed application, with fee (Application is considered complete if all blanks are completed, and both fee owner and petitioner have signed) Drawing of proposed sign. Scaled site plan showing location of si n, or building elevation if wall sign. Written response to Section 214.21.02 of the Sign Code. G7YOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 - (612) 571-3450 - FAX (612) 571-1287 March 9, 1998 Roger and Marilyn Roelofs 150 Talmadge Way Fridley, MN 55342 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Roelofs: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local government units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 days if their land use applications are complete. We received an application for a variance on February 27, 1998. This letter serves to inform you that your application is complete and that the City of Fridley will be processing your application in accordance with Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code. Your application schedule is as follows: Appeals Commission March 25, 1998 City Council April 6, 1998 If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 572-3593. Sincerely, Paul Tatting Planning Assistant PT:Is M-98-37