Loading...
VAR 95-17A CI"IYOF FRIDLEY; CITY OF FRIDLEY COMMISSION APPLICATION REVIEW File Number File Date Meeting Date VAR 495-17 6-28-95 7/18/95 File Description: Petitioner: Michael & Linda Wiltfang 5885 Tennison Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Complete Review Checklist; Return to The Community Development Department *** Comments *** Barbara Dac Scott Hickok CA -V, 4D �•� Michele McPherson L.L T«� 1... a7 V U l�L'TgtrJ`c..r�� ,Jcvi Uj,`i c z -C A( John Flora John Palacio Clyde Moravetz Leon Madsen Dave Sallman Dick Larson y i (� f ��%�' ��) 1 �� 6/ S✓ To 9" all e LA 71— AW--- ;AP �� (�) l��) (0) u¢:e.~ � 6o Aaa° ) �.;4 h ,vei ri qvw Yj I i .va'• (fit)( / CAS ac io .i9 90 4/ 42 43 au ) 9s I� Wo E06o 1070 Polo to4o rtoo ttrp d/*W � ��°� a 1S 7J _ 7s >.c Q n n D C�� D ?W I I r' j (0'9nC�D''� p� )'' I Its V C I +' Qi- � o e % o Q i I ,g � cw CE • !tip �/�) �) �Y' �L� �) �b 4�:;0 ` e,, -r • yf G 1> 45 } � ! v 5f33 '° �. �,ij• �I �3y) n � \ S�� 0 +�Zh • i i . IF 27 0 f��+ T`' yo. (;) - �CIi_ �" ,Oi 3.. I�� �^. �'� {e�1 n ' '1 6 • __ i�'I•.} f � I A -14 SCHOOL I ' to3f � � � � � � ' ;fBDi •� � t t: F e$i rsv �ea7i �i/tis ires� _ ��,��,•• '� �� h t 14 SEC.24 , ems.. �f..0 -; o•Y �. - _ CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savag called the July 18, 1995, Appeals Commission meeting to order a 7:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dane Savage, Larry Kuechle, Cathy Smith Members Absent: Ke Vos, Carol Beaulieu Others Present: Mich le McPherson, Planning Assistant Jim & Nancy Lambert, 389 Rice Creek Terrace Rober & Karen Fournier, 8095 Riverview Terrace APPROVAL OF JUNE 20. 1995. APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, second by Ms. Smith, to approve the June 20, 1995, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING Aid , CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING:CONSIDERATIO--OFA_VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR $y5-151 by JAMBS "U NANUX Mlc Pursuant to Section 205.07.03. .(2).(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the rear yard se back from 10 feet to 4.5 feet to allow construction ofa ree season porch on Lot 7, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace, gene ally located at 389 Rice Creek Terrace N.E., Fridley, Minn ota. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kue�hle, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and �o open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER99N SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at, 389 Rice Creek Terrace which is north of Mississippi Street anjust south of Rice Creek. The property is zoned R-1, Single F ily, as are all the surrounding parcels. The petitioners are re esting a variance to reduce the side yard setback for livin space from 10 feet to 4.5 feet to allow construction of a porch oto the rear of the existing dwelling. The existing dwelling is single story rambler with a walkout basement. The petitioner did not have a verifying survey; however, it does indicate on the available drawing that there is approximately 6 feet from the existing dwelling to the side lot line. Ms. McPher6pn stated in the location of the proposed porch is an open deck w ich is allowed to encroach into rear and side yard setbacks. The dimensions of the deck and the subsequent proposed porch is 12 f et x 24 feet. The alternative that staff pointed out is that th petitioners could construct a smaller porch more in the middle A th a deck to the side; however, the request as submitted is wit in previously granted requests. Therefore, staff has no reco endation. If the Appeals Commission chooses to approve the re est, staff recommends the following stipulation: 1. The petitioner 4all submit a property survey verifying the setback of the a sting structure and the proposed addition. Ms. McPherson stated, if�the Appeals Commission chooses to deny the request as submitted`y the petitioner, staff recommends that the Commission approve at�riance to correct the existing encroachment by the existing dwelling unit. Ms. Savage asked if staff had,�heard any objections from the neighbors. Ms. McPherson stated she did notk,receive any calls regarding this request. The proposed addition would be to the rear of the dwelling to the east and would havq,no impact to that neighbor. Ms. Smith asked how close the neighbor to the east was to the property line. Mr. McPherson stated she did not know. Mr. Lambert stated their house sits back an the lot and the neighbor's house sits approximately 15 feet,,,to 20 feet in front of their current deck. Mr. Lambert stated they want to build a 12 foot.x 24 foot enclosed screened porch. They now have a 12 foot x 16 foot deck. Their neighbor does not object. The current deck is approximately 4.5 feet from the lot line. The lot itself is pie shaped., Ms. Savage asked if the petitioner was planning to bxi*ld a porch where the deck is currently located. Mr. Lambert stated yes. Mainly, what they want to do is screen it in to keep out the mosquitoes, etc. Mr. Kuechle asked when the house was built and if there was a survey. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 18, 1995 PAGE 3 Mr. Lambert stated the house was built in 1962. They did not have R survey but did have a plot plan. Ms. MCPIierson stated the file does not have an as -built survey. What is eing presented is a drawing of the lot with the house but it i not a survey. It is possible the measurements are not accurate. Mr. Kuechle �4sked if the petitioner had looked for the corner stakes. 1�1 Mr. Lambert staged he was not sure where the stakes were. Mr. Kuechle state his concern is, if the commission approves the 4.5 feet and after\getting a survey the measurement ends up being something else, thele what happens. Ms. McPherson stated,'f the variance is approved to 4.5 feet, the petitioner would nob need to come back as long as the measurement from the lot\.line is 4.5 feet or greater. If then measurement is less tha5 feet, the petitioner would need to come back with another retest. Mr. Kuechle asked if the petitioner had thought about setting this back another foot. �.. Mr. Lambert stated this would b`,\hard to do because there is a room in that location with window4 It may be possible to move it somewhat and that might help the�roof line. Ms. Smith asked if the neighbor to tl� east had a garage facing the shared lot line. Mr. Lambert stated there are bedrooms on\that side. Their house sets about 15 or 20 feet closer to the street. The back of the neighbor's house is in front of the rear oiNtheir house. The corner of the porch would be at least 20 feet away from the neighbor's house. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to°'\close the public hearing. 44 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7`l„45 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he would be in favor of recommending`` pproval of the variance request. The request comes within the s''rit of the code since it is setting back far enough so that it is not adjacent. He would require the stipulation of an as -built property survey. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 18, 1995 PAGE 4 Ms. Savage agreed. The lot is unique in being pie shaped. She did not think there would anything unfavorable to the spirit of the ode in granting this request. MOTIO by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approv of Variance Request, VAR #95-15, by James and Nancy Lambert to reduce the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet to allow he construction of a three season porch on Lot 7, Block 1, Rice C ek Terrace, generally located at 389 Rice Creek Terrace N. , Fridley, Minnesota, with the following stipulation: 1. The petitioner shall submit a property survey verifying the setback o the existing structure and the proposed addition. UPON A VOICE VO I,# ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIE, UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Lambert asked if the City did these surveys or if they would need to have this done themselves. Ms. McPherson stated th`'petitioner must do this themselves. She would provide the names%f several qualified persons. 2. $25-1b, JJY xUtiWCE B. & JSA N M. YOUKNIER: Pursuant to Section 205.`07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 25 feet to allow construction of a three season porch on Lots 30, 31 and 32, Block T, Riverview Heights, generally located at 8095 Riverview Terrace N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr.`".Kuechle, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:48 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located"4t the intersection of Riverview Terrace and Glencoe Street. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the surrounding parcels. The petitioners are requesting a variance to reduce the front yard- setback ardsetback from 35 feet to 25 feet. The petitioners"desire to build a 10 foot x 14 foot screened porch on the front of the existing dwelling. The subject parcel is also located in the`flood protection district so the petitioners are also processing a special use permit which will be reviewed by the Planniita Commission in August. Ms. McPherson stated the three season porch would be a typi&A1 porch addition normally found to the rear of a dwelling. It APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JULY 18 1995 PAGE 5 would be on stilts and adjacent to the front living room on the upper level of the split level home. Some alternatives proposed bys ff included adding a bay or bow window to provide additnal light into the room and expand the views toward the river. rWhile this would not be a room addition, it would possibly\,,serve to meet the needs of the petitioners. \,, Ms. McPherson stated there is concern with the design of the addition. Jt will look like an addition typically found off the rear or the -ide of a dwelling. There is an aesthetic concern with the granting of a variance for this type of addition to the ing to the south of this property is in front of front. The dw4 k� the petitioner's' dwelling. It was built earlier than the petitioner's dwel`ing; however, the remaining houses on the street do line up.'\ Ms. McPherson stated�kthere are four mature pine trees which separates the petition'er's property from the property to the south so, visually in tarms of line of sight, there would really be no impact between the\.,two dwellings as the trees block the line of site. Ms. McPherson stated the request is within previously granted variances; therefore, staff fins no recommendation. Staff does have a concern regarding the ziosthetic impact of the addition design. r` Ms. Savage asked if there were ank,,objections to the request. Ms. McPherson stated she had not re86ived any calls regarding this request. Ms. Savage asked the petitioners their reaction to the alternatives suggested and what their ha'Ophip was. Ms. Fournier stated they have a beautiful view of the river. Both she and her husband have a number of physical problems. Her si husband has recently had to retire with disabr�ities and he has anxiety attacks from being indoors. He needs open space and with more space the better he is. She has diabetes And high blood pressure. They need space and light. Mr. Fournier stated they cannot see the river from their living room. Ms. Savage asked how long they had lived in the house. Mr. Fournier stated they have lived their since 1979. \�• Ms. Fournier stated they have talked to their neighbors and they support the plan. The porch would still be back from the APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 18, 1995 PAGE 6 neighbors. M Fournier stated the house to the south would not see the p ch and the neighbor to the north faces the other way. Ms. `Fournier stated this would not be blocking anyone's view. Ms. Swage stated one concern was the aesthetic consideration that this is an addition not usually on the front. Ms. Fournier stated the addition would blend in with the house. The addition would be brown as is the house, and the roof line would be the',,same. It would look nice. Mr. Fournier stated below the addition would be a slab. It would look nice. �. Ms. Fournier stated,they have one of the best views of the river in that area. This`xs something they have wanted to do for years and they can now affotd to do it. MOTION by Ms. Smith, sed,9nded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINIG AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE Pi -PLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. Ms. Smith stated she would be inclined to vote for denial. As she drove down the street, the houses were for the most part right in line. She did not see ail ardship that there is not an option to put an addition to the horse. If she were to say yes for this request, it would be difficualt saying no to anyone else. As much as it would be wonderful, she ``would be inclined to vote to deny the request. ` Mr. Kuechle concurred. It is a bit too much. The house is already at the setback line and to put an a"ddition out to the front is more than what he can be comfortable with. He cannot see a hardship except wanting a good view of the river and he can sympathize with that. However, there has to be:hardship and they have to stay within their constraints. He would recommend denial. � Ms. Savage stated she knew how important it is to see ,the water and can understand the petitioner wanting to have the`�view. She can see this as an important part of the property and agreed that a bay window would not do the same thing. She sympathize -d with the petitioner's position because she feels for the petit1pner to really enjoy their property it is important to have that. fin any event, because there are two no votes, the request will go to the City Council for a final decision. She has mixed feelings. She agrees with the othe` commissioners but she also feels, for the petitioners to complet ly enjoy their property, they should be able to have the porch. She would say the hardship would be the health problems as indica ed. MOTION by Ms. Smith, second by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend denial of Variance Request, VAR #95- 6, by Robert E. & Karen M. Fournier, to reduce the front and setback from 35 feet to 25 feet to allow construction of a hree season porch on Lots 30, 31 and 32, Block T, Riverview Height , generally located at 8095 Riverview Terrace N.E., Fridley, M1 nesota. UPON A VOICE VOTE, WITH MR. KUECHLE AND MS. SMITH VOTING AYE AND MS. SAVAGE ABSTAINING., CHAIRPERSON SAVA E DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A MAJORITY VOTE. Ms. McPherson stated this request would be considered by the City Council on August 14. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST VAR 495-17, BY MICHAEL & LINDA WILTFANG: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 18 feet to allow construction of a second garage Lot 2, Block 1, Parkview Manor, generally located at 5885 Tennison Drive N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has requested this request be tabled so that they make consider other options. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to table consideration of Variance Request, VAR #95-17, by Michael & Linda Wiltfang to the next meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS: Ms. McPherson provided an update on Planning Commission and City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JULY 18, 1995, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:04 P.M. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 18, 1995 PAGE 8 Respectfully submitted, �J Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The petitioner requests that a variance be granted to reduce the front yard setback from 35' to 20'. ff approved, the variance would allow construction of a IT x 20' garage addition attached to, but entirely in front of the existing building. SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The variance request, if approved, would interrupt site lines established by the existing structures (see attached aerial). tions: The petitioner could expand the existing garage to a two car garage, reducing the side yard setback to 3' without a variance. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the request. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of the request, staff recommends the following stipulation: 1. The petitioner shall submit a Certificate of Survey verifying the location of the structure. PROJECT DETAILS Petition For: To reduce the front yard setback from 35' to 20'. Location of Property: 5885 Tennison Drive Legal Description of Property: Lot 2, Block 1, Parkview Manor Size: 10,125 sq. ft. Topography: Slopes to the west. Existing Vegetation: Typical suburban, sod and trees Existing Zoning/Platting: Parkview Manor Availability of Municipal Utilities: Connected Vehicular Access: Tennison Drive Pedestrian Access: N/A Engineering Issues: N/A Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Public ose: Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code requires a front yard setback of 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right-of- way, and also for aesthetic consideration, to reduce the building line of sight encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. The petitioner requests that a variance be granted to reduce the front yard setback from 35' to 20' to allow construction of a 12' x 20' garage addition on the front of the existing dwelling. Located on the subject parcel is a 2 single family dwelling unit with a tuck -under single car attached garage. The petitioner is proposing to construct a second garage south of the existing garage and in front of the existing dwelling. In reviewing the request, the petitioner has an alternative which would not require a variance. The petitioner could expand the existing single car garage and have the setback along the north property line reduced to 3' without a variance. From visiting the site, it appears that the existing single car garage is approximately 12' wide. An addition to the existing garage of T would allow for a 19' x 24' garage. While this alternative provides a garage smaller than what is being requested by petitioner, it does eliminate the need for a variance. The adjacent dwellings are in line with the subject dwelling. An addition to the front of the subject dwelling would break the existing building lines as established by all of the dwellings on the street. In addition there are aesthetic considerations regarding the architectural compatibility of such an addition on the front of the dwelling. The proposed addition would also limit vehicle parkmg in front of the proposed garage. The setback would be reduced to 20' which is just large enough to accommodate most vehicles. The City did grant a similar variance in 1991; however, the requested variance was for 29.5' from the front property line. Recommendation: As this variance request is outside of previously granted requests, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the variance request to the City Council. If the Commission should choose to recommend approval of the request, staff recommends that the following stipulation be a condition of approval: 1. The Petitioner shall submit a Certificate of Survey verifying the location of the structure. ADJACENT SITES WEST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential Dwelling SOUTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential Dwelling EAST: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential Dwelling NORTH: Zoning: R-1, Single Family Land Use: Residential Dwelling Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hearing Comments: 3 } t) (37 (1M iI) iw) I ) t1z47) (i) Gardena Avenue M0 10(3T} 00 () I) (+�) i) i) i 3 } SB65 t+) 5806 5914 5822 79) i 78) 5w i 71 5946 5860 5S is} Hachnan Avenue 5w5899 5856 t 599} t°1) ()5817 i°s} (�} i) 5812 r t ) (°450 } I�) ( 4 a� 5841 (33} t ) ��+ A ice) t +�) I�) 5824 () SezS wx i) i 3341 I 5w i07) ( i ( 5V i 1080 (41) Mi (51�) ( ) 15809) 10?x (37 4°j .. i 13 1 (�) t ) I (5) (5) I579 N ( ) ( ) I5) The applicant requests that the required distance from the front property line be reduced from 35' to 18' to allow construction of a new garage. } ���LOCATION MAP Id << R T DRIVE ® - e • I 7 s r 4 � z' / /9 -9 y 1e 1 O /1 �p _ HILLCRES7 0 zr £M POR t.: / .o • d. AK E Ar a+ s a >ry REAC lk �A x Pa ' g EL t L A D 1 Al 4s f ` 4 10 1 101 'MY :11 /41 F 7 Ie N 1 ' / I 20II 29 41 40, R' P I GRACE HIGH 6'� •' 6 f' , ,� 2 / I 5 a _ 3 T2 * J3 Z 4 : 8 SCHOOL ADDITION W s si . .. /O 17 9c ?9 28:17 ? i r,' AAD �• 40 .41 YZ ./• z 3 .¢ S f 7 87 4 .7 2 /1/ z49 7 z3 z4 P6 .1 ^ 12' 0 3. L :. • s DRIVE ro /3 p ? Ij 14 T n I ;• • Atli �Y� a ' 4 z� 817 /t ; IS 9 5 �- 1 L i 4 Se�CR � li • • 3 B � b I i NOOTM 11 �•� �Q4 3 2dON s� ro •. B7 s% 9 z ,,, a e 4 5 f q}� FARR' • WE • -I 11 9 q J1 �•• 1013 LAIKELO Ds — - 5 GR q BHEIGH6T4 a C DISTRICT LEGEND R-1 ONE FAMILY DING'S ❑3 M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL R-2 TWO FAMILY DWG'S I�;1 M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ®1 R-3 GEN. MULTIPLE DWO'S ❑ PUD PLANNED UNIT DEV. El 0. R-4 MOBILE HOME PARK IR S-1 HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD P PUBLIC FACILITIES © 8-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ® 0-1 CREEK & RIVER PRESERVATION ,i • T�.. j • S 4 C-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ® 0-2 CRITICAL AREA ❑ .� .7 C-S GENERAL SHOPPING o ••/�• /O 9 7 D 4 C-R1 GENERAL OFFICE Ia VACATED STREETS 0% MAP ZuNtNu .r SITE PLA PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE APPEALS COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, July 18, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of variance request, VAR #95- 17, by Michael & Linda Wiltfang, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(1)of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35' to 18' to allow construction of a second garage on Lot 2, Block 1, Parkview Manor, generally located at 5885 Tennison Drive N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the above stated time and place. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIRPERSON APPEALS COMMISSION Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 572-3592. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than July 11, 1995. i .. CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address:' 96i3� �'0 <4 e �`" a� �, .2 �d Property Identification Number (PIN) Legal description: _ Lot P, Block I Tract/Addition Current zoning: Re — I Square footagetacreage Reason for variance and hardship: 5 - C, y 2— S,,�ction of &'ity Cod Have you operated a business in a city which requ�ir busme Yes No If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No 0 FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) NAME ADDRESS Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) DAYTIME PHONE SIGNATURE DATE PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME f, DAYTIMEPHONE�'�`1 SIGNATURE / DATE 12- Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 for residential properties Permit VAR #R i t # a gL/2 Application received by: r - Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: CITY OF FRIDLBY PLAN RBVIBN CRBCRLIST Applicants for vacations must submit the legal description of the B. site Plan: parcel (easement, street, etc.) to be vacated. 1. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and Complete site p plans, signed by a registered architect, civil proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions and engineer, landscape architect, or other design professional, to include the following: floor elevations A. General: 2. Grading and drainage plan showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands vegetation, etc.) as well 1. Name and address of project as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and storm water retention ponds. Calculations for storm water 2. Legal description (certificate of survey may be required) detention/retention areas. 3. Name., address, and telephone number of applicant pp ' 3. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths of property lines, turning radii abutting engineer, and owner of record rights-of-way with indicated center line, paving width, 4. Date proposed, north arrow, scale, number of sheets, name existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways of drawer 5. Description of intended use of site, buildings, and 4. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimensions for all driveways, parking spaces, lot structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load parking aisles, service roads, loading* areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private 6. Existing zoning and land use streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic Plow, and traffic -control devices 7. Tabulation box indicating: 5. Landscaping Plan (i) Size of parcel in sq. ft. 6. Location, access, and screening detail of trash (ii) Gross floor area of buildings enclosures (iii). Percent of site covered by building 7. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment (iv) Percent of site ,.covered by impervious surface 8. Building elevations from all directions (v) Percent of site covered by green area 9. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of (vi) Projected number of employees hydrant to proposed building (vii) Number of seats if intended use is,a restaurant or place of assembly (viii) Number of parking -spaces required (ix) Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped (x) Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories VAR #95-17 MAII,ING LIST MAILED: 6/28/95 Michael & Linda Wiltfang City Council (6) Diane Savage 5885 Tennison Dr. N.E. 567 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Roselen Halvorson Bradley & Leslie Geving Joyce Anderson 1250 Gardena Ave. N.E. 5880 Matterhorn Dr. 7270 Woodland Trail Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Rockford, MN 55373 Resident William & Joyce Graffunder Robert & Geraldine Schei 5860 Matterhorn Drive 5840 Matterhorn Dr. N.E. 5812 Matterhorn Dr. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 James T. McShane, Jr. Vaughn & Mary Vesall Laura R. Wallach 5800 Matterhorn Dr. 5790 Matterhorn Dr. N.E. 5.849 Tennison Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Bruce & Ila Beierman James P. & C.M. Soderberg Duane & Anna McGonigle 5895 Tennison Dr. N.E. 5875 Tennison Dr. N.E. 5865 Tennison Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 David & Theresa Fuhrmann Charles H. Swanson Dianne C. Swanson 5855 Tennison Dr. N.E. 5945 Hackmann Ave. N.E. 5945 Hackmann Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Mchael & Kirsten Avraamides William & Barbara Tonco Thomas & Lynn Lasser 5933 Hackmann Ave. 5925 Hackmann N.E. 5840 Tennison Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Evelyn G. Hildebrandt Robert & Joyce Christie Rodney Prahl 5946 Hackmann AVe. N.E. 5930 Hackmann Ave. N.E. Cynthia Ness Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 5922 Hackmann Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Carolyn J. Miller Jeanne M. Whitehill Richard & Anne Otley 5914 Hackmann Ave. N.E. 1080 Gardena Ave. 1090 Gardena Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Curt & Myrna Carlson ' Robert & Meixian Gunville Diane E. Nielsen 1106 Gardena Ave. N.E. 1110 Gardena Ave. N.E. 1120 Gardena Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Edwin & Martha Grabowski Jeffrey & Sandra Hagen Lewis & Mary Johnson 5980 Gardena Lane N.E. 5980 Gardena Lane N.E. 6030 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Gregory & Olga Lywyn Han Ki Hyun Joseph & Nicole Solomon 6010 Gardena Lane N.E. 1251 Gardena. Ave. N.E. 1211 Gardena Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Edward A. Miller Joseph & Judith Anderson Robert & Marsha Berg 1207 Gardena Ave. N.E. 1085 Gardena Ave. N.E. 1221 Gardena Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Barbara Sroka Richard & P.L. Alexander Spencer & Gay Mmear 1243 Gardena Ave. N.E. 1281 Garden Ave. N.E. 1291 Gardena Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Lonita L. Kilber Linda Peterson Bernard J. & M.J. Bissonette 5951 Gardena Lane Patty Scott 6001 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 1247 Garden Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 David F. Joseph, Jr. & Darla Joseph Hubert & Ibis Lindblad Eleanor Caputa 6015 Woody Lane N.E. 6021 Woody LAne N.E. 5841 Tennison Dr. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Arthur P. Moore, Jr. & Helen Moore Jean Quenomoen 5833 Tennison Dr. N.E. 1227 Gardena Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF LSSUES: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: TITLE: �^ PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. yp ViJc2�•-Jl t� 3E�'��1 Location of Property:?�i� J'Grndus�pyi.v�� Legal Description Z` of Property: Size: Topography: S -4b W Existingr,�.c�O�Jv-�c,�._ �)4yws Existing Vegetation: Zoning/Platting:,a✓.- Availability of Municipal C Utilities: Vehicular -� Access: YTMv1A`l • �2 Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: V% Site Planning Issues: DEVELOPMENT SITE Comprehensive Planning Issues: ADJACENT SITES WEST: �v�.��. 12�"�' �;✓��.�.� SOUTH: EAST: NORTH: 2 Ose.r: 4U-Je-�a-j Public Hearing Comments: i(z& tveJ te-vvwve4- 40 I�0 6411 vet 'I VI v� N6 "tz TVIII�9 3 b' 3 r �7"eI t '�Jrsi �n0_S-t N a .. r I I I � n� fff b:�z ` 1 _ 1• I iA V _ f - -- - -: -s