VAR 07.69TO
�FY Q.a ft ."��.a� �`"mo Po
E. iia � wroe t c n a Ae.
SUBJECT: Public, Hear pg Before the Board of AA eala DATE: ly 11., 1969
FOLD
Please Plxblinh the following
Mr. Oliver Priokeon—Variances Of Section 45.27 and Section. 45.23
PUBLISH: July 16. 1969
PLEASE REPLY TO-----*- SIGNED '
m
DATE SIGNED
SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT PINK COPY IS RETURNED WITH REPLY.
DETACH THIS COPY -RETAIN FOR ANSWER
2. Legal Description of Property (also general location, succi as:-nortn»
east corner of 64th Avenue and 5th Street" or 6415 Fifth Street")
Uk
30 Describe.the variance requested. (Attach Plat or Survey of Property
;showing location of proposed building, etc., also adjoining properties
and ownership within 200'.of said property.)
tVCier 01
4. Comments by administrative official denying original request for building
permit or other permit. (To be completed by administrative official.
Appropriate ordinances and section of ordinances to be cited.):
c
.i
a
R
a
P
A
Notice of Hearing appeared in Official Rewspaper on the following
dates:
-
/ 1
(must.be at Wast 6fice 10 days before meeting copy of notice to be
•
2
■
14
P
Notice of Hearing appeared in Official Rewspaper on the following
dates:
/ 1
(must.be at Wast 6fice 10 days before meeting copy of notice to be
attached).
14
."
Board Members notified of meeting by
& b
(List Members, Date Notified, and "yes"Ur "Ndl
for plana to attend
hearing). .r
,
=3
7r,
NName, Date
Plan to Attend
tv
ao
Person making appeal and the following property
within' 200' not ifled a . ,
owners having property
'awe
By Phone Notified by
Date
or Mail (initial
AA
J
S. The Following Board Members and interested parties were present at the
Hearing:
c�.: BOARD MEMBERS
z
4
t
o-
4
ADDRESS
a
m
EKCO3r ® ®
3231 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. o MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 o STERLING 9-8878
<ti
v �r
EKCO3r ® ®
3231 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. o MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 o STERLING 9-8878
<ti
OFFICIAL NOTICE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF APPEALS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of Appeals of the City of Fridley
will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday,
July 30, 1969 to consider the following matter:
A request for variances of Section 45.27 to
vary the front yard setback requirement on
the average depths of existing buildings
from 37 feet to 45 feet and Section 45.23
to reduce the sideyard requirement from
10 feet to 5 feet to permit the construction
of a dwelling to be located on Lot 4, Block 1,
Moore Lake Hills Addition, the same being
6056 Woody Lane N.E., Fridley, Minnesota.
(Request by Oliver Erickson, 1315 Hillcrest
Drive N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55421.)
.Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be
heard at this meeting.
PUBLISH: July 16, 1969
0
THE OF TRE BOARD OF APPEALS =ZING OF JULY 0-,
The meetim was called to order by Chairman Mittelstadt at 7®34 P.M.
ERS PRESENT'-. Mittelstadt, Minish, Harris
FIBERS ABSENT-. 0°Bannon, Ahonen
OTHERS PRESENT-. Hank Muhich-Building Official
MOTION by Minish to approve the minutes of the July 16, 1969 meeting as.written.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
1. MR. ARTHUR DEYS, 6036-22 STREET N.E., FRIDLEY IS REQUESTING THREE VARIANCES OF
THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW HIM TO SPLIT HIS LOTS AND MAKE TWO BUILDABLE SITES. THE
VARIANCES ARE OF SECTION 45.23 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIRR4ENT ON THE EXISTI
HOUSE FROM 10 FEET TO 2.8 FEET, SECTION 45.27 TO REDUCE THE AVERAGE DEPTH OF
FISTING FRONT YARD SETBACKS FOR THE PROPOSED HOUSE, FROM 48 FEET TO 35 FEET
AND SECTION 1
OF E
SAME
TO PERMIT THE
LOCATED ON LOTS
STREET N.E.
EXISTING GARAGE INTO THE SIDEYARD
BLOCK 7. HYDE PARK ADDITION, THE
Chairman Mittelstadt continued the public hearing from the July 16, 1969 meeting.
This item was tabled from the July 16, 1969 meeting to allow the applicant time
to bring, before the Board, a preliminary sketch , drawn yap by his contractor,
showing the position of the proposed home on the lot. The Board requested this
sketch to find out the exact measurements between structures to determine whether
there could be room for adequate fire control. The sketch showed there will be
24 feet between structures and 18 feet between the garage and the living quarters
of the home. This is above our minimum code requirements. The new garage will
be 5 feet from the new lot line of the proposed lot split and the buildings as
drawn on the sketch would allow the applicant to divine his lot into two 60 foot
frontage lots instead of the angular split he first proposed.
MOTION by Minish to clone the public hearing.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to:
1. Teeny variance No. 1, of Section 45.23, and variance No. 3, of Section 45.35,
as they are now superfluous as a result of the relocation of the proposed
house on the lot.
2. Approve variance No. 2, of Section 45.27, to reduce the average depth of
existing front yard setbacks for proposed house from 48 feet to 30 feet
instead of proposed 35 feet.
3. Recommend to the Planning Commission to Deny the lot split (L.S. X69-15)
before them at the present time.
4. Also recommend to the Planning Commission the following order of events;
a.* ..Applicant to retiicve. existing garage.
b. Applicant to be allowed to build his proposed home on the lot as it is
now drawn on sketch submitted to the Board.
o. Applicant to tear down existing home as soon as possible after proposed
home is built.
d. Applicant to reapply for a lot split to split his lot into 2-60 foot
Minutes of the Board of Appeals Neeting of July 30, 1962 Page 2 -�-
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the mot -ion carried
unanimously.
2. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF SECTION 4-5.27 TO VARY THE FRONT YARD SETBACK R_M�UIRNMNT
CONSTRUCTION OF A
ADDITION. THE SAME
ELUIREP4ENT FROM 10 FEET TO
BE LOCATED ON LOT 42 BLOCK 1
WOODY LANE N.E.. FRIDLEYNII
T DRIVE N.E.. FRIDLEY. tM
Mr. Erickson was present to:present his request. He brought with him a survey of
Lot 4 showing the layout of the house on the lot. The structures on either
adjacent side lot were also shown on the survey for the purpose of denoting how
many feet there would be between the proposed structure and the existing structures.
Mr. Erickson explained that there is a tremendous bank on the back of this lot
and it would require removing a lot of dirt to build back farther on the lot.
To build on the lot as it is now requires the two variances. Without the
variances the lot would be unbuildable.
MOTION by Minish to receive a survey with three property owners signatures on
it stating they know about but do not object to the requested variances. The
signatures are: Ben Douglas, 6054 Woody Lane, T.G. Schnagel, 6053 Central and
Richard Inlow, 6057 Central Avenue.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Harris to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Harris to approve the request for the following reasons:
1. The front yard setback is compatible with the adjacent structures.
2. The building is well situated on the lot to allow a 5 foot sideyard setback.
The structure does abut a drainage and utility easement, which is a ten foot
easement, so there should be no problem with distance between this structure
and any future structures that may be built by the adjacent property owner.
3. In order for the applicant to build on this lot he does need the variances.
This lot would be unbuildable without them.
4. The applicant also maintains the 15 feet between his structure and the structure
on the South.
Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
,�,!N. ,
ANOXIA
...rte .
Minutes of tie Board of AppMeeting of Meetiof .Tule 309 1969 Page 3
Mr. Silker along with his builder and planner Mr. D. Pearson and Mr. R. Hmmu
were present to present his request.
Mr, L. Stanley, 7661 Fast River Road, was present to find out more about the
proposed building. $e had no objections to the building but wanted to make
sure that there would be an adequate parking area planned for the building
and that they would have adequate refuse facilities.
Mr. Silker explained what the building will look like, landscaping and layout
on the lot, drainage, etc., to the Board. He also explained that the building
can't be moved back as they need the room in the back Of the lot for an
adequate parking area. The corner involved could be removed but it would ruin
the aesthetics of the building.
MOTION by Minish to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Minish to approve the request for the following reasons:
1. The variance is for only one corner of the building and to remove that
corner from the building would be a hardship as it would ruin the aesthetic
value.
2. Adjacent property owners had no objections to the building.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Mittelstadt at at 8:41 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
'A M�a— �--
MARY HINTZ
Secretary