The URL can be used to link to this page

PRE 2010 DOCSIII ill Village of Fridley, Mm. BUILDING PERI " N� 's Office of INSPECTOR OF BUHM NGS lwner r; Fridley, Mian., e,-tt-d— i , 19 --d.- LOCATION OF BUILDING Na 7(p : III Street �� Q_�J Part of Lot Lot —/- Block � Addition or Sub -Division DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING Front �' Depti Seight $ Stories ' "'`a Manner of Construgt1on To be used as a To be completed Via* e Estimated Cost l � i i l Permit is hereby gra ted to w __ to —(-Y---'- g` the building described in the above statement. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it is granted, and his agents, employees and workmen, in all the work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordi- nances of Fridley, 3#nn., regarding the construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits, and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said ordinances. W Spector of Buildings. AGREEMENT- AND SWORN STATEMENT In consideration of the issue and delivery to me by the Inspector of Buildings of Fridley of the above permit, III hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth according to the provisions of the ordinances of Fridley, and, being first duly sworn, I hereby s to and say that the facts stated by me and contained in the above permit are true as therein stated. Subscribed andorn to before me at Fridley, Minnesota, A.D. 19,:,:---� .,_.E day A of °:¢..�� SUBJECT PERMIT NO. City ®f Fridley AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r RECEIPT NO. `y _ -_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 1 e NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY � , CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 j 612-571-3450 91 0-F15 5/13/83 10B ADDRESS 4644 - 2nd Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 7�8 12 Plymouth Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTYOWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Steve Trinkle 4644 - 2nd Street N.E. 572-13989 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE x 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 29.5' x 121 Deck 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCYLOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 ISTALLS I GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $21000 $1.00 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SACCHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALY0 SIGNATOR OF CONTRACTOR ORAUTHORI ENT (DATE) WHEN PROPER VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT _Y BLDG 'NSP �AT SIGNATURE OF OWNER IIF OW ER BUILDERI (DATE) CITY OF FRIDLEY Effective Aug. 1, 1961 APPLICATION FOIi RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PEW41TS (New. Alterations. Additioni, or Repairs) OWNER: �' Lfv�e- 7 o c f R r ADDRESS: _ �� °dP° � 4 � s, a TEL MIO: 7c;2 - % 7 'ajor % S71— ' 001 Ex BUILDER:�v „ec ADDRESS: �. ? - J, f TEL 110: Construction Location • STR= NO: qe5 STREET: 2 �K LATS 2, SLODC: ADDITION: I,/ r(e)" L Corner Lot: Inside Lot: /1' _ Setback: Sideyards: Applicant attach to this form two Certificates of Survey of lot and proposed building location drawn on certificates to scale. DESCRIPTION OF MNSTRUCTION p, A Front: Depth: 1 r Height: d U. Square ret: -3 S Cubic Feet: Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet: Cubic feet: 0 n Ems- A- Type of Construction: Qec-k Estimated Costs S 9b Be Onr.-pleted: .� Alt. A Alt. 8 Proposed Driveuay Width If New Opening Is Desired: S $ SEE PZVERSE SIDE OF SHEET Zile undersigned here makes a lication for • by rp permit for the mork herein specified, agreeing to do ,all work Lis strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Delx%ztment of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. P A DINTEt - � � "_� SIGNATURE: Stipulations$ j .0. 1 m d ou 'e dX 10 4 X`1 Posts 1(fl Cenic., .S 3/y' 2,,Ler—' G' i I 1 II r t i � f t I CIL l dX 10 4 X`1 Posts 1(fl Cenic., .S 3/y' 2,,Ler—' oil SUBJECT PER City of Fridley o 180 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. �� t � = CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 ,`j NUMBER REV, DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-571-3450 910-F15 6/4/85 JOB ADDRESS 4644 - 2nd . Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. 7 & 8 BLOCK 12 TRACTOR ADDITION Plymouth Addition SEE ATTACHED SHEET DESCR. 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE Thomas E and Jean L Novak 46.44 - 2nd Street.N.E. 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Self 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING R-1 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW R1 ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Garage -.attached 9 CHANGEOFUSEFROM TO STIPULATIONS TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD -SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, Wood VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION R-1 OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $7,606.56 $3.80 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE _FE RMITFEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $72.30 v WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED THIS IS YOU5 PERMIT T°U"RRE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IDATZ1. �. /_�� 11Jlp� BLDG INSP C� I SATE SIGNATURE OF OWNER II OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) oil NEW [ ] ADDN. [ ] ALTER. [ ] Construction Address: Legal Description: City of Fridley Effective 4/1/84 R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application Owner Name & Address: r 10" c , ► �� __ _ _ Contractor: �)•� C� Tel. # Address LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. Length Length OZ 4 Length DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Width Width e Width Height Height �- Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback Type of Construction: QAC-- Estimated Cost: $ ..l Approx. Completion Date: __ a" QQa4_T 6 Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ See Back Page for Explanation lo Tel # Owner Name & Address: r 10" c , ► �� __ _ _ Contractor: �)•� C� Tel. # Address LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. Length Length OZ 4 Length DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Width Width e Width Height Height �- Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback Type of Construction: QAC-- Estimated Cost: $ ..l Approx. Completion Date: __ a" QQa4_T 6 Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ See Back Page for Explanation lo Tel. # 15'11 L DATE: APPLICANT: ( CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee /r $ �� Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Plan Check $ 25$ of Building Permit Fee State Surcharge $�� $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $425 per SAC Unit Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ _ g� Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL $ STIPULATIONS: 01 .'.. . AGREEMENT PI �L( /9�7 , owner of the property located at 7 �i/ q' , have no objection to the City allowing the construction of a 6- to be located at 7 " "?m as�. ®" c�� without the required certificate of survey that the City ordinarily requires for all new construction. J� S' na e , �.3,7- -?gJ S� ��.. Address Date a , Witness 4 1 . I - Y City of Fridley AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS SUBJECT BUILDING PERMIT PE ®18192 f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. t , R CEIPT ��/� NUMBER 910-F15 REV. DATE 9/6/85 PAGE OF APPROVED BY ` CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 JOB ADDRESS 4644 - 2nd Street N.E. 1 LEGAL DESCR. LOT NO. 7, 8 BLOCK 12 TRACT OR ADDITION Plymouth Addition SEE ATTACHED SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHON Thomas E. Novak 4644 - 2nd Street N.E. 5711840 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 8 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION? ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Replace windows in living room and bedroom 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION ISTALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT VALUATION $600 SURTAX $.50 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $15.00 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $15.50 SIGN TUR„ EOFCONTRACTORORAUTHORIZEDAGENT IDATEI ✓ WHEN PROPERLY A;LI ATED THIS IS YOUR P MIT %E d' ISIGNATURE OF OWNER OF OW ER BUILDER) ,DATE, BLDG INSP NEL' [ ] City of Fridley Effective 4/1/84 Arm;. f l f R-1 AND R-2 ALTER. [ ] Building Permit Application CV I-FR.j�occ� Construction Address: Legal Description: 407 .77*8 16(-Qr-k 1Z- ION *,v,.TwA 'A0 Owner Name t Address: /� e . '�®� Tel. # Contractor:_ SEL Tel. # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: 6—fC.AC4�- Y'-ra g1'le��i��aacrCoy,.l 340'4 y' :as -fit �`/feae�®�-.� Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback Type of Construction: Estimated Cost: $V,4;00 Approx. Completion Date: Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ See Back Page for Explanation DATE: % — 9 — '6 y APPLICANT:ti� -c 1 I Tel. CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ �,� Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Plan Check $ 25% of Building Permit Fee State Surcharge $ o � $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $425 per SAC Unit Park Fee- $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ TOTAL 0 1 ° � � Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ J STIPULATIONS: SUBJECT PEr18 City of Fridley o40 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r RE IPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. J�� c;2 if , i ,,� CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REY. DATE AGE OF APPROVED BY 1 612-571-3450 910-F15 5/22/86 F/// JOB ADDRESS 4644 - 2nd Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 7 � 8 12 Plymouth Addition SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Thomas E. Novak 4644 - 2nd Street N.E. 571-7840 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO, Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. B USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION L1 REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE X 8 DESCRIBE WORK Construct a 32' x 24' Living Area 2nd Story 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Provide at least one egress window in each: bedroom. Provide a fire alarm in basement and hall serving bedroom areas. SEPARATE PERMITS RE'QUIR77D FOR WIRING, HEATING, PLUIViS e",410 AND SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND.ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $34,100 $7.05 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING COW $215.50 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $ 53.88 $286.43 SIGNA URE OFCONTRACTORORAUTHORI DAGENT (DATE) WHEN PROPERLY.,VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT SIGNATURE OF OWNER IIF OWN R BUILDER) (DATE) BLDG )NSP f)ATE 9 X� ?ld9d = t5+�'S -7 9nc?d _7 rj dft � d aft ya/nra� ron „i/ is �o8IT n i 'Y-9aty_at� P, NEW [ ] City of Fridley Effective 4/1/86 ADDN. [i R-1 AND R-2 1 ALTER. [ ] Building Permit Application Construction Address: Legal Description: Owner Name & Address: � OmeQ 1 , A16UAK Tel. # 57/ 795/6 Contractor: �� ' Tel. # Address: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width / Height �P Sq. Ft. 68 GARAGE AREA: Length __ Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd. Setback Side Yard Setback Type of Construction: SCG61v4 5T®F-j_ADDfJ- Estimated Cost: $ 9, �0 Approx. Completion Date: Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: $ $ See Back Page for Explanation DATE: �-�/` APPLICANT. L�/� Tel. CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee Plan Check State Surcharge SAC Charge Park Fee Sewer Main Charge TOTAL Fee Schedule on Reverse Side 25% of Building Permit Fee $.50/$1,000 Valuation $475 per SAC Unit Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] STIPULATIONS '3 41 l 0 too q o oL^ �a 01 SUBJECT P City of Fridley ® 18965 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT _ r PT � `y �_��_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. /� p r PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 4 7 0 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 L 612-571-3450 910-F15 5/27/87 / JOB ADDRESS 4644 ---2nd Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 7, 8 PJYMUth SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Thomas Novak same 571-7840 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS zip PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW CX ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DE CRjBE WO :32 � x living area addition 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND.ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $37,400 $18.70 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. 229.00 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTALFEE 3495 OF CONTRACTOR R AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE) W N PR P LY ID ED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT —4IGNATURE 6 'VIREO N RIFOWNER BUILDER) IDATEI G )NSP aTE 01 NEW [ ] City of Fridley Effective 4/1/86 ADDN. [] R-1 AND R-2 ALTER. [ Building Permit Application Construction Address Legal Description: — Tel. # S 7/- _�_[' `/� Owner Name & Address: � ��S L . ,�•)�,:,� tf(� �1'-t �-°`� Si. _ _ Contractor: yGAml AS A&vtr Tel. # Address: LIVING AREA: GARAGE AREA: DECK AREA: OTHER: Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT Length Width /L Height ` � Sq. Ft. 7( Length Width Height Sq. Ft. Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. 8�6 Ll ) Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot 3�ISide Yard Setback F30. Ft. Yd. Set ack Type of Construction: Estimated Cost: $'e` Approx. Completion Date: Alt. A Alt B Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: See Back Page for Explanation F Tel. # S? t -?hyo DATE: " APPLICANT: CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $��a Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Plan Check $ `' 25% of Building Permit Fee State Surcharge $ I 9,1 $.50/$1,000 Valuation SAC Charge $ $ 525 per SAC Unit Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ ®� Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL $ ��J 0 SAlf - �011 CIA SAlf - �011 R- NEW ( l ADDN (] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER (] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application Construction Address: Effective 1/1/94 9(( Legal Description: Owner Name & Address:Tel. # 6-? l - 'r1. Contractor: MN LICENSE # Address: Tel. # Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMiPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot (] Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks Type of Construction: Estimated Cost: $ Approx. Completion Date: (Cost on Back) _ )Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: �Ft. + � Ft = Ft x $ /3- ��' _ $ % C� DATE: APPLICANT: Tel. # Permit Fee $ Fire Surcharge $ State Surcharge $ SAC Charge $ License Surcharge $ Driveway Escrow $ Erosion Control $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main Charge $ TOTAL $ STIPULATIONS: CITY USE ONLY Fee Schedule on Reverse Side .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $800 per SAC Unit $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above $450.00 Conservation Plan Review Fee Determined by Engineering Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] UAW -FORD LEGAL SERVICES Suite 235 Wright Building 2233 University Avenue Attorneys St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 (612) 641-0647 Anne Bergman FAX: (612) 646-4191 Managing Attorney Bruce L. Valen Jessie Spire Carlson Laura J. Zdychnec May 24, 1994 City Clerk City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Our Client: Donald Frank Address: 4644 2nd Street Fridley, MN 55421 Our File No. 94-241-1061 To Whom It May Concern: PLAN The undersigned has been retained by Donald Frank regarding access to his property via an alley vacated by the City on May 20, 1963. Apparently, the portion of the alley vacated begins at the northwest corner of my client's property. The Franks' neighbor to the north, the Sacketts have erected a sign and have parked a trailer across the alleyway. I am interested in determining whether Ms. Sackett has taken lawful action in blocking the alleyway and whether Mr. Frank is entitled to access to his property through the vacated alley. I would appreciate if you would direct this letter to the appropriate authority and contact me with your answer. Very sincerely yours, l.� Bruce. L. Valen Attorney at Law blv/reb Enclosure cc: Donald Frank I 1 I I I i i I 1 f b' O I C-41 All lying in the N 1/2 of Section 24, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka. County, State of Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated. C-35: ORDINANCE 0224, ADOPTED 12/17/1962. All that part'of the street described as follows: That portion of 67th Avenue N.E. lying between the east and west lines extended northerly of Block 3, Oak Grove Addition, and lying between Arthur Street and Anoka Street. All lying in the N 1/2 of Section 13, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated. C-36: ORDINANCE #227, ADOPTED 2/4/1963. All of the land described as follows: All of the utility and drainage easement described as being the southerly 6 feet of Lots 1 and 2 together with the northerly 6 feet of Lots 11 and 12, Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, lying in Section 11, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated. C-37: ORDINANCE 0234, ADOPTED 5/6/1963. For the vacation of the alley described as follows: All of the alley located in Block 16, Plymouth Addition lying between the north line of Lot 30, Block 16 extended easterly and the south line of Lot 16, Block 16 extended easterly. All lying in the S 1/2 of Section 26, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated, except that the City of Fridley reserves an easement for drainage and utility purposes over the alley herein described and vacated. C-38: ORDINANCE #235, ADOPTED 5/6/1963. The vacation of that part of a drainage and utility easement described as follows: The north 3 feet of the south 6 feet except the east 6 feet of Lot 18, Block 2, Parkview Oaks 1st Addition. All lying in the S 1/2 of Section 24, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated. C-39: ORDINANCE #237, ADOPTED 5/20/1963. The vacation of that part of the alley described as follows: The south 360 feet of the alley in Block 12, Plymouth Addition; located between Main Street and 2nd Street N.E. and between 46th Avenue and 47th Avenue N.E. All lying in the S 1/2 of Section 26, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated, except that the City of Fridley reserves an easement for drainage and utility purposes over the alley herein described and vacated. C-40: ORDINANCE 0244, ADOPTED 8/20/1963. That all of the drainage and utility easement described as the north 6 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Don's 3rd Addition, all lying in the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated. C-41: ORDINANCE #245, ADOPTED 8/20/1963. 1. For the vacation of the streets and alleys described as follows: - 11 - FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER - 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 June 1, 1994 UAW -Ford Legal Services Bruce Valen Suite 235 Wright Building St. Paul, MN 55114 Dear Mr. Valen: I am writing this letter as a follow-up to our phone conversation of May 25, 1994 regarding the partially vacated alley in Block 12 of the Plymouth Addition adjacent to your client's residence at 4644 2nd Street, Fridley. As we discussed, the south 360 feet of the alley was vacated by the City in 1963. The north lot line of your client's property coincides with the 360 feet. North of this, the alley is still held by the City for use by the public as a means of access. The neighbor to the north has impeded your client's access to his property by placing a barricade and trailer in the alley. As the alley is still held by the City, the neighbor does not have the right to use the alley as they wish. The City could request that the neighbor remove the items in the alley. Please refer to the enclosed memo from our City Attorney regarding a similar case. I hope this letter clarifies the City's position in regards to the alley. Please note, however, that it has been the City's policy not to improve or maintain any of its platted alleys. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 572-3595. Sincerely, Michele McPherson, BLA Planning Assistant MM/ C-94-144 FR1)M r V 1 L I •.. _ 1 � � � M E M O R A N D U M TO; Barb Dacy FROM: Virgil Herrick RE: Public and Private Rights in Alley Easements DATE: August 9, 1991 I an writing this memorandum in response to our telephone conversation of August 4, 1991. It is partially in response to questions raised by councilman Fitzpatrick, and also for general information for members of the planning department. The facts, as I understand them, in the proposed alley vacation involving Mr. Meisner are as follows: 1. The alley in question was created by a dedication on a plat. 2. The city has not opened or established or maintained an alloy on the easement. 3. Mr. Meisner has been using the alley easement for access to his property. 4. Other adjacent property owners have used the alley for access to their properties for a number of years, the exact number is not known at this time. 5. The city has a petition of adjacent property owners asking to have the alley vacated. When the City accepts a plat, it obtains an easement for streets, alleys, parks and other public areas that are dedicated in the plat. The City holds the easement in trust for the general public: for the purposes indicated in the plat. in the instant case the plat showed a dedication for a public alley. The City thus holds an easement for the purpose of establishing an alley at that location. The Minnesota Supreme court in the case of JillAgg of M$-dfo dvs. Wilson, 230 N.W.2d 458, stated as follows: "It has set a law in Minnesota that, when a street is dedicated by a plat, a City may choose its own time to occupy, open and use the street. Until the City does so, suah property may be used by the abutting landowner. Such use is not regarded as hostile and 3C -17 612.<:U 1 — �i ht e:NF: t�H GU�', LNbI t4 FL'_ _ .- 1 •-; 1 _ 3: F•. will not operate as an abandonment of a public atrnat by, the city." in the above situation the City has not chosen to open or establish the alley less according to the decision in the Medford case the adjoining property owners can use the alley for private purposes until such as the city determines that it wants to establish, improve and maintain an alley on the easement. As I understand the facts, the City has not yet made a determination to open and establish an alley on the easement in question. There are other methods of establishing streets and alleys that somewhat complicate the question in this case. An alley can be established by common law dedication or as a prescriptive easement. Common law dedication requires (1) an intent on the part of tha owner to dedicate land to public use; (2) an action by the owner indicative of the intention, and; (3) acceptance by the public. In this case it would appear.that the owner of the property, at the; time of filing the plat intended that a part of the.plat be dedicated as an alley and by filing the plat indicated such intartt,ion. Public acceptance of a roadway may be established by a vomparatively small number of persons. See nDauShert_y va. SoWer$, 68 N.w.2d 866. it is,possible that this alley has become a public roadway by common law dedication. From the information that I have it appears that the alley has been accepted and used by various property owners. The right to use an alley may also be created by a prescriptive easement. see Quiet vs. Fuller, 220 N.w.2d 296. The analyses of prescriptive easement is similar to adverse possession but with some difference. Creation of a prescriptive easement must be hostile, under a claim of right, actual, open, continuous, and exclusive. The prescriptive period is 15 years. The use of an alley for over 20 years has been held to give rise to a right-of- way by prescription, pryer vs. Kistler, 136 N.W. 750. It would appear that no single property oviner has acquired a prescriptive right to use the alley in as much as it appears that the general public was using the alley. Therefore the property owners use was not exclusive conclusion. it would be helpful to obtain additional information regarding the extent of use of the alley and the period of time that it was used by adjacent property owners. subject to obtaining that additional information it is my preliminary opinion that an alley has been created by common law dedication. If that remains the conclusion then property owners adjacent to the alley, including Mr. Meisner would be entitled to damages if the alley were vacated. The platting Of property in Minnesota is regulated by statute, Minn. stat. 55o5.01 provides as follows: kTC F�iii•t c:HPNN GU �'I `H�,1 �'F'L'= _ 1?'?1 1"3:: F'. 4 e In ra Maintenanc* of Road Areas, etc. "Plats of land may be made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, and, when so made and recorded, every donation to the public or any person or corporation noted thereon shall operate to convey the fee of all land so donated, for the uses and purposes named or intended, with the same effect, upon the donor and his heirs, and in favor of the donee, as though such land were conveyed by warranty deed. Laird donated for any public use in any municipality shall be held in the corporate name in trust for the purposes set forth or intended. The filing of the plat pursuant to 5505.01 operates as a conveyance to the public of such estate or interest in the streets as is necessary to accomplish the purpose of the dedication and no acceptance by the governing body is necessary. we paint out that the mere platting of the land did not Instantly create an obligation upon the town board to open and maintain the dedicated streets. Our cases have consistently held that the municipality may determine the time it will open a street and assume the maintenance thereof." Minnesota Supreme eburt in the case of Village of Medford v k1j.1son, 230 N.W.2d 456, stated as follows: "It is settled law in Minnesota that, dedicated by plat, a city may choose. open, and use the street. Until the property may be used by the abutting not regarded as hostile and will not abandonment of a public street by the 3E when a street is its own time to occupy, city does so, such landowner. Such use is operate as an city." DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley August 2, 1994 John Flora, Public Works Director Steven Barg, Planning Assistant Request to Move Barricade/4644 - 2nd Street N.E. In 1963, the City vacated the north part of an alley right-of-way located between 46th & 47th Avenues and between Main. and 2nd Streets. It is my understanding that the City placed a barricade denoting the start of this vacation at the north end of 4644 - 2nd Street. (I have attached a copy of the relevant half -section map showing the location of this alley for your review.) Mr. Don Frank, owner of the above -referenced property, has recently requested that the City move this barricade approximately 20 feet to the south. This would enable him to access his rear yard from the unvacated section of this alley right-of-way. Unless you have concerns about this request, please call.Mr. Frank at 571-5607 to make arrangements to move this barricade as soon as possible. Mr. Frank works nights and is available afternoons if you wish to discuss this matter. He would like to be present when the barricade is relocated. V AC_P'FP � Thanks for your assistance! SB: sb �Ucj;A4 �oarvuc4� MovaL CEM -94-73 t' INV i 'j A I . k -moi%_ { y � 1 r. , - ow iL J ,)f b . •� ;af it fl I>); t �' �l� 615 � lJD.1 ry I s 2, • �_� Y a I ��►� , ��.,: , �, A o Cf 1 27 G A I . k -moi%_ { y 9 /6 , - ow iL J ,)f b . •� ;af it fl I>); s 2 l•'� �' �l� 615 � lJD.1 ry I s 2, • �_� Y a I ��►� , ��.,: , �, A o 27 G k14 Z4 --�--- 7 N b 24 7 � � 9 �1i. •1J �> �g ! lJau / T- 3 poo , (9f) l� z , ,►� r a � �� '�) pLYM� I I�'JI 9 ` �� 9 n �R •� I /s T B (M � 7 wl J� � � C• „ N b 3/ -y-SJR J,JI S. N.''CO4ME�—� SEC. 726 I 33 ' ORDINANCE NO. 237 a ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE THE SUUTH '360 FW OF THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 121 PLYMOUTH ADDITION The Cownci`i of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SB�TION 1. The vacation of that part of the alley described as follows: The South Three Hundred Sixty Feet (3600 of the alley in Block 12, Plymouth Addition; located between Main Street and 2nd Street N.E. and Between 46th Avenue and 47th Avenue N.E. All lying in the South one half (Sj) of Section 26,T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota Be and is hereby vacated, except that the City of Fridley reserves an easement for drainage and utility purposes over l the alley herein described and vacated. S'ICTION 2. The said vacation has been made after Notice of Public Hearing in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter, PASSFL BY THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY., THIS 20th DAY OF MAY, 1963. �W am ee ion ATT �;ST : Soto ]614TAEQ--It��.r�unse1 Public Hearing: November 5, 1962 First Reading: May 69 1963 Second Reading: May 209 1963 NE�vS: May 22, 1963 The Record Columbia Heights, Minnesota STATE OF MINNESOTA Ss COUNTY OF ANOKA R. I. Chalmers being duly sworn, on oath says: that he now is and during all the time herainstated has been the general manager of the newspaper known as The Record and that he has full knowledge of the facts herein stated. That for more than one year immediately prior to the publication therein of the printed .... I ................ I ..... O.rdinanoe. No— 237.................... hereto attached, said newspaper was published in the English language from its known office of publication within the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, on Wednesday of each week in column and sheet form equivalent in space to 480 running inches of single column two inches wide; has been Issued from a known office established in said place of publication: THE RECORD has had in its makeup not less than twenty-five percent of its news of interest to said community it purports to serve; has contained general news, comments and miscellany; has not duplicated any other publication; has not been entirely made up of patents, plate matter and advertisements; has been circulated at and near its said place of publication to the extent of .240 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers; has been entered as second class matter In local post office of its said place of publication;, that there has been on file in the office of the County Auditor of said county the affidavit of a person having first hand knowledge of the facts consituting its qualification as a newspaper for publication of legal notices; and that its publishers have complied with all demands of said County Auditor for proofs of its said qualification. A copy of each issue has been filed with the State Historical Society, St. Paul. That the printed Ordinance ..No...:237. .. .................. ............ Clipping not available ................................................. .................... ........ I ................... hereto attached as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper; was published therein in the English language once a week for ....1 .... successive weeks; that it was first so published on the ... 2.2nd..... day of ... 1'Ia.i......................... . 19 .63 and thereafter on Wednesday of each week to and including the ..... .... day of . .... , 19 . ............. : and that the following is a copy of the lower case alphabet which is acknowledged to have been the .size and kind of type used in the publics - Ordinance No 237 tion of said .. . ....................... abcdefghiJklmnopgrstuvwxyz (4_• ......................�..':....... ... General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this ........... 4#........... day of ....Fe.4... , 19 ..65 MARILYN N. REINA Notary PublicIN0tg1, P915fl : ftka �CObn Y.14i 1np, any COMMIwon Expires Feb. 3, 1911 My Commission expires . 19 ..... 2.1-64—SM Attorneys Anne Bergman Managing Attorney Bruce L. Valen Jessie Spire Carlson Laura J. Zdychnec Ms. Dona Sackett 4656 N.E. 2nd St. Fridley, MN 55421 Dear Ms. Sackett: HW -FORD LEGAL SERVICES PLAN Suite 236 Wright Building 2233 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 65114 (612) 641-0647 FAX: (612) 646-4191 June 15, 1994 I have been retained by Donald Frank regarding the use of the partial vacated alley at the rear of your property. I have contacted the City of Fridley in order to determined whether you have the right to park your trailer and erect a barricade across the alley. Enclosed please find a copy of the City's response to my inquiry. There would appear to be no need to further involve the City in this matter. Please remove the trailer and barricade from the alley by June 26; *994, so that this matter can be resolved. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Very sincerely yours, Bruce L. Valen Attorney at Law blv/reb Enclosure cc: Donald Frank UAW -FORD LEGAL SERVICES PLAN Suite 235 Wright Building 2233 University Avenue 7 Attorneys St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 (612) 641-0647 Anne Bergman FAX: (612) 646-4191 Managing Attorney Bruce L. Valen Jessie Spire Carlson Laura J. Zdychnec July 1, 1994 Ms. Michele McPherson City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Our Client - Donald Frank Property Address - 4644 N.E. 2nd Street, Fridley Neighbor: Dona Sackett, 4656 N.E. 2nd Street, Fridley Dear Ms. McPherson: Thank you for your letter dated June 1, 1994 regarding the partially vacated alley affecting the above referenced properties. Enclosed please fmd a copy of my letter to Dona Sackett dated June 15, 1994. My client has advised me that Ms. Sackett has moved the trailer but has left the barricade in place. Pursuant to your recent letter, we would ask that you contact Ms. Sackett and request that she remove the barricade from the alley. Thank you for your continued cooperation regarding this matter. Very sincerely, yours, Bruce L. Valen Attorney at Law BLV/cmm Enclosure cc: Donald Frank r l�Av►ca � d4re1W ,h. V).147TH. 1. 1✓ 21 (A L � 10 .sL, � 1/ •.r � '1 •e L l�'� ► J Z7 �i. 4 tri tZ S 2i rJi1• L �yi tvp, 9 YZI R 9 12 lq�l �•.�si W�: /f. ss 2 1 AVE. N..fl � •1. l,� � 10 .sL, � 1/ •.r � '1 •e L l�'� ► J u AVE. N..fl � •1. l,� � 10 .sL, � 1/ •.r � '1 •e L l�'� ► J Zf � L tvp, �•.�si W�: /f. ss 2 AVE. N..fl � •1. l,� � 10 .sL, � 1/ •.r � '1 •e 1I AVE. N..fl � •1. l,� wc _ •- 6T! 1 \t 8 /6 , y ti /S (-0; Ilk,L l / t t N 41 N cy7/ , ,. Fl) . l10-11 - !C - - - _La •1 1Jo r � yM ovT , �4. i� idl) •d 33� EW f9 E p 1 AM EW i f9 E i p 1 w C -L 57 FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 • (612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 August 18, 1994 Ronald & Patricia Lund 4651 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Re: Concerns Regarding Partial Alley Vacation Dear Mr. & Mrs. Lund: As you may recall, I have spoken with you recently regarding the partial alley vacation adjacent to your residence. I have reviewed this concern with other City staff and would like to provide the following response regarding the City's proposed action and area homeowners' rights/responsibilities. 1. The City will take action as soon as possible to remove the existing barricade which denotes the start of the alley vacation. 2. It is expected that the unvacated alley right-of-way will be kept clear of storage of vehicles and equipment. (The City will take necessary action to remove such storage, if necessary). 3. The homeowners at 4644 2nd Street N.E. shall have clear access from the unvacated portion of alley right-of-way to the six foot portion of their property as deeded in the original alley vacation. (These homeowners shall not use any portion of adjacent private properties in attempting to access their rear yard from the unvacated alley). Hopefully, this clarifies the City's interest and expectations in addressing this matter. Please feel free to call me at 572-3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss this further. Thanks for your cooperation. Sincerely, Steven Barg Planning Assistant SB:ch C-94-208 i Community Development Department P G DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 18, 1994 TO: Paul Lawrence, Public Works Superintendent FROM: .•Steven Barg, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Request to Remove Barricade/4644 - 2nd Street N.E. As you may recall, I requested that Public Works move the -barricade denoting the start of the partially -vacated alley located behind the above -referenced location approximately 20 feet to the south. The purpose for this request was to allow these homeowners to gain adequate access to their rear yard from the unvacated portion of the alley right-of-way. Subsequently, you brought to my attention the reported objection of the homeowners to the west. I contacted these individuals and they informed me that they did not wish to have any part of a City barricade on their property. As determined during our recent discussion with Barb Dacy and Scott Hickok, the appropriate City response appears to be to remove the barricade. I am sending letters advising the affected homeowners of our action and their rights/responsibilities in using this area. Please arrange for removal of this barricade as soon as possible. Feel free to call me at extension 595 if you have questions or wish to discuss this further. Thanks for your assistance! SB:sb CEM -94-89 Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 18, 1994 TO: .1-plaul Lawrence, Public Works Superintendent FROM: Steven Barg, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Request to Remove Barricade/4644 - 2nd Street N.E. As you may recall, I requested that Public Works move the -barricade denoting the start of the partially -vacated alley located behind the above -referenced location approximately 20 feet to the south. The purpose for this request was to allow these homeowners to gain adequate access to their rear yard from the unvacated portion of the alley right-of-way. Subsequently, you brought to my attention the reported objection of the homeowners to the west. I contacted these individuals and they informed me that they did not wish to have any part of a City barricade on their property. As determined during our recent discussion with Barb Dacy and Scott Hickok, the appropriate City response appears to be to remove the barricade. I am sending letters advising the affected homeowners of our action and their rights/responsibilities in using this area. Please arrange for removal of this barricade as soon as possible. Feel free to call me at extension 595 if you have questions or wish to discuss this further. Thanks for your assistance! SB:sb CEM -9 -89 y 6, 4&"dam C, a,ibU4,d tkv cll�- c�.,T,,�G� �/gyp/� _4� city Manager rea3 the notice of hearing. The City Manager stated mpany there is a petition requesting vacation of a portion of the alley ompact 4 =Block 12 signed by 100% of -the people involved in the portion of -the on `.ddjtion and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign same. Seconded by Tomeley Upon a voice vote,*there being no nays, the motion carried unan.i- agon q Ci sly• 'reig `' HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT - 73RD AVENUE NORTHEAST: City Manager read the notice of hearing. Mr. Nee stated that he eMadsen ' should sin a t Mr. g petition for street for this part of . Wolke asked if there were any garages on the property to the north Of � Melody Manor. Mr. Brown, the City Engineer, presented the plans and P.M. � j Several people stepped forward to view ifications for the ob. there were. Mr. Sheridan asked why the City was not vacating the mole 'N_ S{e plans and specifications and Mr. Brown explained the plans to them alleyo People should have access to use the alley at both ends. '• detail. A question was asked if there was any money in escrow for Nee asked if all of the people in the block got a notice of this hearing. 77TH°=iSeussion, s street,. It was stated that there was not. John Miller, Melody The City Engineer stated that they did. There being no further or Addit-_on, asked who was going to be assessed for this improvement. the Mayor declared the hearing closed. Motion by Wolke to 4--m; Manager stated that the benefitted T� e City .property would be assesseds order the ordinance drawn vacating the alley in Block 12, Plymouth Add- ition. it has not been definitely decided -,That the exact amount would be. :gular drpp the property on the north side, it would probably be somewhere in nays, ^ial Co. r e neighborhoos of $30j,000.00. Mr. Wolke stated that he felt that the CLIC HE ON FIVE FOOT STREET EASEMENT VACATION - LOT 16 BLOCK 2 Developer would take care of it. Mr. DeCarbo, who lives in Melody Manor B : ROOK PARK ADDITION HOYT d #iddition, asked if the people pay for half of,the residential street, p xP P P will pay for the other side. It wase explained that the people on lt M C Y anager read the notice of hearing. Mr. Brown explained that to " north side would be assessed for half of the residential street, and DENA lays, .people on the south side of the overall right;; o way for half of an easement vacation request is for Lot 16, and the owner would have a pproximatel dastrial street. Mr. Johanson pointed out that the developer is by y 45 feet frontage if this five foot vacation were granted, add3- ` ,jequired by the platting ordinance to put in the necessary streets and ceptrface s them. There being no further discussion on the matter, the shed. yyor declared the otion r T1s ``TdUld be., if she could. not ret a bu.ildinr- nernit. Mr. Wolke asked Pi1BLIC HEARING- VACATION OF PORTION OF ALLEY - BLOCK 12 PLYMOUTH ITION: city Manager rea3 the notice of hearing. The City Manager stated mpany there is a petition requesting vacation of a portion of the alley ompact 4 =Block 12 signed by 100% of -the people involved in the portion of -the on ey to be vacated. The Planning Commission had recommended that this Tomeley be vacated. Motion by Nee to receive the petition and place it on agon p. dile. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, finds `' t�►e motion carried unanimously. i0 . Wolke asked if there were any garages on the property to the north Of the portion of the alley which would not be vacated. It was stated that there were. Mr. Sheridan asked why the City was not vacating the mole alleyo People should have access to use the alley at both ends. '• t Nee asked if all of the people in the block got a notice of this hearing. 77TH°=iSeussion, The City Engineer stated that they did. There being no further the Mayor declared the hearing closed. Motion by Wolke to 4-Y { order the ordinance drawn vacating the alley in Block 12, Plymouth Add- ition. Seconded by Johanson. Those voting in favor, Greig, Johanson, Nolke, Lrmits Nee. Opposed, Sheridan. The motion carried. ^ial Co. CLIC HE ON FIVE FOOT STREET EASEMENT VACATION - LOT 16 BLOCK 2 ger. B : ROOK PARK ADDITION HOYT $.: lt M C Y anager read the notice of hearing. Mr. Brown explained that to 3 18 through 20 in this block were built on under one ownership. the lays, i.. easement vacation request is for Lot 16, and the owner would have a pproximatel by y 45 feet frontage if this five foot vacation were granted, add3- _v this to the property they would have on Lots 16 and 17. Mr. Ike asked what this would leave for the street. Mr. Prown exnlai.ned this t'TO17ld 1( -ave 65 feet for street. Mr. Johansen asked of what use T1s ``TdUld be., if she could. not ret a bu.ildinr- nernit. Mr. Wolke asked ORDINANCE NO. 237 A,N ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF TH& CITY CHARTER TO VACATE THE SOUTH '360 FEET OF THE ALLEE'Y IN BLOCK 123 PLYMOUTH .ADDITION The Cooncil of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SE�CTION 1. The vacation of that part of the alley described as follows: The South Three Hundred Sixty Feet (3601) of the alley in - Block 12, Plymouth Addition; located between Main Street and 2nd Street N.E. and Between 16th Avenue and 47th Avenue N.E. All lying in the South one half (Sz) of Section 26,T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota Be and is hereby vacated, except that the City of Fridley reserves an easement for drainage and utility purposes over the alley herein described and vacated . - SEvTION 2. The said vacation has been made after Notice of Vublic Hearing in conformance with Minnesota Statutes aria pursuant to Section 12.07' of the City ChairtAi"�;'; rxSS L BY TFli CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY OF FRIDLEY, THIS 20th DAY OF MAY, 1963. ion / 1 ATT PST : Soto C ITY LERK - vn .Bruns ell Public Hearir.p, : November K, 1962 First Reading: May 6, 1963 SecorA Reading: May 20, 1963 N &`vS: May 22, 1963 CITY OF FRIDLEY INSPECTION DIV. Effective On January 1, 1995 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 APPLICATION FOR POWER PLANTS AND HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, 572-3604 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND DEVICES BATE SCHEDULE Residential Furnace Shell and Duct Work, Burner — Also Replacement Furnace (Side Vent — Fill Out Back) Gas Piping (Needed with new furnace) Gas Range Gas Dryer *Air Conditioning — All Sizes All Others/Repairs & Alterations (LIST ON BACK) 1% of Value of Appliance or Work Com mercial/Industrial 1% of Value of Appliance or Work Rate $ 20.00 $ 10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 State Surcharge TOTAL FEE JOB ADDRESS `7 (o ®` 7- ,, The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein TOTAL specified agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Codes ar rulings of the Building Division, and hereby declares that all the facts and $ representations stated in this application are true and correct. 1995 MINIMUM FEE FOR ANY HEATING/COOLINGNENTILATION REFRIGERATION/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT IS $15.00 PLUS THE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE REINSPECTION FEE $30.00 *Air Conditioners can not be placed in a side yard without written permission from adjoining property owner. OWNER. -,b.,,4 4 k -O &I Al A FR ik A kQ BUILDING USED AS ESTIMATED COST 26 00, PERMIT NO. No, of Haikti " Units — Circle One (Steam) (Hot Water) (Warm Air) ra, a lame -'�-�9 —pit- t2 Size No. � BTU 2-Z - r, a 3, HP EDR Fuel Total Connected Load Burner Trade Name Size No. BTU HP EDR HEATING COMPANY ,510a � C�iqv&_w Signed B el No. 4Z? —2, = � Approved By Rough—In Date Final Date FILL OUT BACK SIDE FOR STACK VERIFICATION ON REPLACEMENT FURNACE NOTE: #1 through #8 required when using a side vent furnace. CHIMNEY AND STACKyEg FICATION The undersigned hereby verifies that the existing chimney or stack: 1. Has been carefully examined Yes {) No ( ) 2. Is free from rust or deterioration Yes () No ( ) 3. Has no foreign objects lodged within Yes (} No { j 4. Is securely supported Yes {) No ( ) S. Meets all current Code requirements for size and total BTU's connected Yes ( ) -No ( ) 6 Has tonal heating BTU's of All other BTU's TOTAL BTU's 7. Has a liner been provided for water heater Yes () No ( ) 8. Has combustion air been provided for water heater Yes O No ( ) Remarks: HEATING CO: Signed By: Date: