Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PRE 2010 DOCS
CIW -'9 .t D. Owner • • ff d a Village ®f Fridley, Minn. HUM 1737 Builder.............................................. Address............................................. LOCATION OF BUILDING No. ... Street ...... ........................ Part of Lot ... ..... ................. Lot .....�. Block ... / ............ Addition or Sub-Divisi-k4—A ?. �•. •/ • r• a � Corner Lot ........... Inside Lot .... ... Setback ... s ... Sideyard ..J ovv: ................ . DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING ne. Used as: f Front ... Depth Height Sq. Ft. ........ Cu. Ft. ........ ....... ..... Front ...... Depth Height .... ... Sq. Ft. ........ Cu. Ft. ........ Type of Construction Est. CoTo be Completed .................. In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to construct the building described above, I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the description above set forth and in compliance with all provisions of ,ordinances of the village of Fridley. V..t........ .�........... In onsideration of the payment of a fee of $19Z ., permit is hereby granted totpet1gra:ed ..to construct the building or addition as described above. This upon the express coon that the person to whom it is granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley; Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings with- in the village limits and this permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of any of the provisions of said nrriinanrnc. .*''r ...... Building Inspector NOTICE: This permit does not cover the construction, installation or alteration for wiring, plumbing, gas heating, sewer or water. Be sure to see the Building Inspector for separate permits for these items. � L�"N'FF BUILDING No. ����Street P Lot ,at Addition or Su - corner Lot Inside Lot — z_—_—___ ._ Beack _ Sideyard Sewer Elevation F dation Elevation DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To�,.� Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. , CI. Ft� Depth eight Sq. Ft. cu. Ft. Type of Constructici Est. To be completed In consideration of the issuance to me of a permit to coeran bedabove, I agree todo theproposed work in accordance with the description above dreg om ce with//1 provisions of ordinances of the city of Fridley. In consideration of the payment of a fee of $ , permit is hereby granted to._._.. to construct the building or addition as described above. This permit is granted upon the express condition that the person to whom it its granted and his agents, employees and workmen, in all work done in, around and upon said building, or any part thereof, shall conform in all respects to the ordinances of Fridley, Minnesota regarding location, construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and moving of buildings within the city limits and this permit may be revoked at any time uon of any of the provisions of said ordinance& n n NOTICE This psnah does not cover the construction, hwtallation for whing, ph nhing, gas heating, sower or water. Be sore to we the Building Inspector for Separate permits for these bans. APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEYi MINNESOTA Is � OWNLIi S NAME /% �UiLDLR '�� d , l � ' �F 44 t710, YV_4j ADDRESS / � %2 � No ADDRESS, h jf�C® 4k- j 1, & •& LOCATION OF BUILDING No. 3;4 Sj_1 Street t r Part of Lot Lot i Block % Add ion or Subdivisio Corner Lot Inside Lot Setback Side- and SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed build- ing location drawn on these Certificates. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To be used as• �- [® Front +Depth of �% Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction A-�v�, Estimated Cost / ? a � To be Completed A T The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares th all.the facts and representation ' stated in this application are tae and corre DATE S IGNATttRE eAU (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). e", Application for Power Plants and Heating, Cooling. Ventilation, ReMgeration and Air Conditioning Systems and Devices PARTIAL RATE SCHEDULE GRAVITY WARM AIR: RATE TOTAL Furnace Shell & Duct Work ........................... $10.00 $ Replacement of Furnace ............................. 6.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 .................. 6.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 ............... 3.00 $ MECH, WARM AIR Furnace Shell & Duct Work to 120,000 BTU ............ $10.00 $ each add. 60,000 BTU ....................... 3.00 $ Replacement of Furnace ............................. 6.00 $ Repairs & Alterations—up to $500.00 ................. 6.00 $ Repairs & Alterations each add. $500.00 .............. 3.00 $ STEAM or HOT WATER SYSTEM Furnace Shell & Lines—to 400 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...... $10.00 $ Furnace Shell & Lure—to 640 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water ... 10.00 $ Each add. 200 sq. ft. EDR Steam ...................... 3.00 $ Each add. 320 sq. ft. EDR Hot Water .................. 3.00 $ OIL BURNER—to 3 gal. per hour ........................ 6.00 $ over 3 gal. per hour—See Fee Schedule GAS BURNER (up to 199,000 BTU) .............. I ........ 5.00 $ '5- 06 over 199,000 BTU See Fee Schedule GAS FITTING FEES: NO RATE TOTAL 1st 3 Fixtures ...................... x$ 2.00 $ Additional Fixtures ................. x .75 $ Gas Range to 199,000 ........... x$ 5.00 $ AIR CONDITIONING FAN HEATING SYSTEM VENTILATING SYSTEM ALTERATIONS & REPAIRS ROUGH FINAL, $ See Fee Schedule $ TOTAL FEE $ Dept. of Bldgs. Phone 860-3450 City of Fridley: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work hereir. specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and ruling of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Fri ley, Minn- 1 Owner Kind of Used as To be completed about v • Estimated Cost, $ Q2L4,44kew. Building Permit No. Permit No. -�60 HEATING or POWER PLANTS -team, Hot Water, Warm Air—No Trade Names°sv� li�� Size No /0 V/4 a Capacity Sq. Ft. E.D.R.BTU®AP. Total Connected Load Kind of Fue 40" BURNER — Trade Name Size No Capacity. Sq. Ft. E.D.R BTU H.P. (REMARKS-OVER) F r 44f�%42 Business Phone No 9— iZ f'e� 4"/4/.y/Ila1V;� i�/%/y t f �s' 1Lir -, tv w. :, ,-�•1, _;-- _ � �, f �i cit ' -S,og 3 � ; 01st-',;; ` `t - too" e SUBJECT - City of Fridley 2184 ;7. AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS D I III DING D[ D A A I T PERMIT r BUILDING L I V R'v' I RECbRZhLO. • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. ( j PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. i I 1 & 44 . ( CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-560-3450 910-F15 6/18/73 JOB ADDRESS 4551 2A Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 12 1 SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE Mx. Robert Nobler 4551 - 2- Street N.E. 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. II= Western Remodelers 2529 Nicollet Avenue 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION Cg REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Trim and Windows 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. Alumi ' THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT R-1 ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION ISTALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED. 85 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $1,700 .2n • DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $12.00 �P1 7 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE $12.85 SIGNATU EOF ONT,RRA`CCyyTORORAUTHORIZED AGENT WHEN P O'h 1yply}p�� VALIDATED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT /Q((DATE) Ad A I BLDG INSP eY DATE SIGNA RE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) / )®`ATE) APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL, ALTERATION, OR ADDITION BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA OWNER'S NAME : /U 69LIf BUILDER: ADDRESS: > I %z _ �• ADDRESS: 2 j "y % !; (_6 NO:. STREET: LOT: BLOCK: ADDITION: CORNER LOT: INSIDE LOT:__k__SETBACK: SIDEYARD: Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building location drawn on these Certificates• DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING To Be Used As: (�-{� ���k'ront • Depth • Height: Square Feet: Cubic Feet. Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet, Cubic Feet: Type of Construct i n: ��'�.,� Estimated Cost: $ 176ZSd 0 d To Be Completed: 3 d The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in sttict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE: _ ��/�^�? SIGNATURE: W::, � 6: La. (See Reverse Side For Additional Information.) �/�z z Z___� Fd'U0 U 'S� / d SOIL&MATERIALS ENGINEERS, INC. 0 September 26, 1973 Mr. Robert Noble 4551 21 Street Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Attention: Mr. Robert Noble S.M.E. Job No. 90250A Re: Subsurface Investigation for Single Family Residence 4551 2J Street Northeast Fridley, Minnesota Gentlemen: We are submitting herewith the results of the subsurface investigation for the above project. If there are any questions with regard to this report, or if we can be of further service to you in any way, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours very truly, SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS, INC. Dennis M. Anderson, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Michael L. Larson, P.E. Chief Engineer I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, C:° REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY '.',;_CT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ?2':riSTME PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. .A o . ® —/ DATED Ad- t- REG. NO.14 -L 9 Dist: 3 cc: Mr. Robert Noble 1 cc: S.T.S., Inc., Northbrook 1 cc: Files /cab uy,), ';k SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 7900 77TH AVENUE NORTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55445 ■ (612) 425-6478 DENNIS M. ANDERSON, P. E. JAMES H.OVERTOOM Affiliate of MICHAEL L.LARSON, P.E. JOHN P.GNAEDINGER P.E. STS CONSULTANTS, LTD. DARRELL F. SCHNEIDER, P. E. CLYDE N. BAKER, JR., P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIVERSIFIED INC. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 4551 21 STREET NORTHEAST FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA We were retained by Mr. Robert Noble to conduct a soil investigation for this project. The purposes of the work were to determine the soil and ground water conditions at the existing building site, and to report thereon making recommendations for remedial construction measures of the existing building foundation. PROCEDURE A total of 4 (four) soil test holes were drilled on September 6, 1973• Two of the holes (borings 1 and 3) were drilled by using a truck mounted auger drill unit, whereas two other holes (borings 2 and 4) inside the base- ment were hand augered. All borings were advanced without casing and with- out use of wash water, by drilling with 6 inch diameter continuous flight augers. At 2 foot intervals of depth in the top 10 feet and at 5 foot or less intervals thereafter in borings 1 and 3, soil samples were obtained by the standard split barrel sampling procedure and by the Shelby tube sampling procedure. In the split barrel procedure, a standard 2 inch o.d. split barrel sampling spoon was driven into the ground with a 140 pound weight free falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the spoon one foot is termed the Standard Penetration Resistance and may be taken as an indication of the relative density in-place of granular soils, and a very approximate indication of the consistency in-place of cohesive soils. The procedure is in accordance with A.S.T.M. D 1586-64T (see Appendix 1). In the Shelby tube sampling procedure, thin wall steel seamless tubes with sharp cutting edges are pushed hydraulically into the soil and relatively undisturbed samples are taken. The Shelby tube sampling procedure is in accordance with A.S.T.M. D 1587-63T (see Appendix 2). At the location of borings 2 and 4, soil samples were obtained by a modification of the Shelby sampling procedure where the steel seamless tubes were manually pushed or driven into the soil. Shelby tube samples were obtained at 2 foot intervals in borings 2 and 4 in conjunction with intermediate hand auger samples. In addition, at an offset location near borings 2 and 4, the S.M.E. dynamic cone hammer was driven continuously to detect any very soft of very loose soil zones. In this method, a cone pointed probe is driven into the soil by a 10 pound hammer free falling a distance of 24 inches; and the number of hammer blows required for each foot of probe penetration was recorded and plotted on the log sheets of borings 2 and 4. All soil samples were brought to our laboratory for examination, classi- fication and testing. They will be retained for a period of at least 90 days from date of issue of this report after which they will be discarded unless we are otherwise notified. Drawing No. 1 is a site plan showing the soil test hole locations in relation to the outline of the existing building. Detailed soil descriptions together with a plot of the laboratory test data are shown on the log sheets. Following the regular written soil descriptions are capital letters in paren- theses which represent the appropriate group symbols of the Unified Soil Classification System. A chart explaining this system is also appended. All shown elevations were obtained by using the bench mark as shown.on the attached Drawing No. 1. LABORATORY TESTING The testing program consisted of performing water content, unconfined compressive strength and density tests on samples of cohesive or semi -cohesive 3 materials optained from the Shelby tubes. In the unconfined compression test, the shear strength of the soil is determined by axially loading a soil sample under a slow constant strain rate until failure is obtained. The failure stress is defined as a maximum stress but not greater than the stress at 20% axial strain. When the amount of soil recovered was small or when cohesive soil was recovered from a split spoon sample, water content and the penetro- meter test were performed. In the penetrometer test, the unconfined compres- sive strength of the soil is estimated by noting its resistance to penetration of a small spring calibrated plunger. In addition, Atterberg Limit tests were conducted on a specific cohesive soil sample and included determination of the liquid limit and plastic limit. By comparing the natural moisture content of the same sample with its Atterberg Limits, it is possible to qualitatively estimate the compressibility of the clay soils and the state of consistency. A loss -on -ignition test was also performed on four samples. In this test the sample is burned at several hundred degrees Centigrade for several hours to determine the organic matter content of the soil. SITE AND GEOLOGY The existing residence site is within the city limits of Fridley, Minnesota bounded on the west by 21 Street Northeast. A visual inspection of the site revealed the house to be located close to the bottom of a gently sloping hill leading to a depression in a residential neighborhood. The lot is covered by a growth of grass and a number of trees are located on the site, including one tree located just west of the south- west house corner.. An asphalt covered driveway is located just south of the existing house, an:d the front yard slopes toward the street with a vertical 4 difference in elevation of perhaps 5 or 6 feet. Other houses are located on the surrounding property and are of similar construction, consisting of con - trete block basement wa.11s and one story wood frame structures. We understand this residence was built in 1956 and that the present ownershave occupied the house for the last 10 years (since 1963). We under- stand no apparent cracks in the foundation concrete block walls were observed in the house until one year ago. We also understand that cracking of the exterior basement walls, particularly in the southwest corner, apparently increased during August, 1973. Other block and mortar cracking was observed on the interior south wall which was not covered by paneling. Some type of differential settlement (p:robably sagging) was also observed near the center of the west wall in the wood frame and some cracking at the bottom of a basement window just north of the front steps. Some hairline cracks were also observed on the exterior north basement wall. Some cracking and move- ment, apparently settlement, was also observed in the interior of the base- ment walls in the southwest corner and also in the basement floor slab. At the time of our investigation, another house was investigated located immediately south of this residence Similar settlement cracks were also observed in the north wall of that house. We understand that a water main in the street just south of the site broke in July, 1973• Based on the two inside borings taken during our inves- tigation, the thickness of the footing is about 7 inches and the footing width is estimated to be approximately 14 to 18 inches. The measured thickness of the concrete floor slab was 4 inches. Natural soils at the site are predominantly valley train sand and gravel deposits related to the Des Moines Ice Lobe and the subsidiary Grantsburg 5 Sublobe (glacier) of the Wisconsin glaciation. Till is deposited directly by glacier ice. According to information published by the State of Minnesota Geological Survey, bedrock under the property is believed to be white fine to medium grained well sorted friable sandstone of the St. Peter Sandstone formation and it probably occurs at a depth of about 60 to 80 feet below existing ground surface. SOIL CONDITIONS Inside the basement at the location of borings 2 and 4, underlying the concrete floor slab, is a 2 inch thick layer of fine to medium sand fill. Underlying the sand fill is a two to three inch thick layer of slightly organic silty clay, classified as possible fill. It is very tough in con- sistency. Occurring directly below the possible clay fill are layers of highly plastic silty clay which was mottled in the upper portion and varved in the lower portion. The varved condition clay indicated the geological origin of this material to be a lake deposit. The moisture content of the plastic clay increases from about 20% (based on the dry weight) with respect to depth to over 50% at the bottom of the clay layer. It is tough to soft in consistency and decreases in strength with an increase in \the depth. A loss -on -ignition test performed on the plastic clay sample number 5 in boring 4 indicates the organic content is 12%, based on the dry weight of the sample. This indicates the sample was slightly organic. At the location of borings 1 and 3 located outside of the structure, numerous layers of sand fill, medium dense to very loose in density, and very tough to stiff clay fill or possible fill extended to depths of 7 and 11.3 feet below present ground surface, respectively.in borings 1 and 3. Occurring directly, below the filll in boring 1 are layers of varved silty 0 clay which extended to a depth of 121 feet below present ground surface in boring 1. It is very tough in consistency. Underlying the layers of plastic silty clay was a layer of possible decomposed wood encountered at elevations 83.9, 83.3, 84.5 and 83.3 feet in borings 1 through 4, respectively. This layer of possible decomposed wood varied in thickness from 6 inches at boring 1 to a minimum thickness of 21 inches at boring 3. The moisture content varied from 30 to 77% and the organic content of this layer was 18% in boring 2, 8% in boring 3, and 6% in boring 4. This indicates the samples were slightly organic. Underlying the layer of possible decomposed wood is a layer of fine to medium sand which extended to the terminal depth of all four borings varying in depth from 9.7 to 25 feet below present ground surface. It is medium dense in density since standard penetration test resistances were in the range of 10 to 17 blows per foot. Specific soil conditions encountered at the boring locations are in- dicated on the boring logs. The boring logs show subsurface conditions at the dates and locations indicated, and it is not warranted that they are representative of.subsurfsce conditions at other locations and times. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Water level readings were taken in the borings both during and after the drilling operations. The readings obtained are shown on the boring logs. As can be seen, all holes were dry while drilling and immediately upon com- pletion. Based on examination of the soil samples and the above data, it is our opinion the water level at the site was located at an elevation below the depth of the borings. Seasonal fluctuations in ground water level should be anticipated. 7 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION We understand the existing.single family residence is one story in height with a basement floor slab measured elevation of 91.3 feet. The exterior basement walls are constructed of concrete block placed on footings that were measured to be 7 inches thick at the location of borings 2 and 4. We assume that the floor and wall loads are relatively light, which is typical of the house of this size. Typical wall loads of the house may be in the order of 1.5 to 2 kips (1 kip is 1,000 pounds) per lineal foot. Therefore if the footings width is about 1.5 feet, the estimated footing pressure is about 1,000 to 1,500 pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). The approximate dimensions of the existing .building are 46 by 22 feet in plan. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Soil conditions at this si=te are somewhat uniform, and the footings are situated on highly plastic silty clay at elevation 90.2 feet. For footings so situated, a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 p.s.f. (pounds per square foot) is recommended. Therefore, the actual bearing pressure is apparently less than the allowable bearing pressure, and would indicate an adequate foundation soil to support the footing with respect to shear failure. However, settlement of the footing and walls is another consideration. The apparent settlement has been caused by one or a combina- tion of several reasons as discussed below. The moisture content of the plastic clay generally increases from about 20% at the footing level to 50% in the lower portions. Therefore.it is our opinion that the upper portions of the clay layer have dryed out, known as desiccation. One of the primary causes of desiccation is the proximity of the tree root system to the foundation. For example, one large tree was loca- ted close to the southwest corner of the existing house along with several smaller trees. The large quantities of water required by trees are obtained through their root systems. Negative pore pressures are created within the root system by physiological means within the tree system. In the process of obtaining water in the soil, the root system of the tree extends laterally and vertically into the soil. Traces of roots were observed in some of the silty clay soil encountered underneath the footings. It is usually accepted that losses of soil moisture will cause soil shrinkage as a result of the pulling together of the soils particles, caused by the negative pore pressures. Such large negative pore pressures will cause consolidation of the soil, with the root itself acting as a convenient drainage layer. Periods of low rain- fall may also create soil moisture deficiencies such that the tree will tran- spire more water than is restored to the soil, thus causing a loss in moisture. According to published U.S. Department of Commerce climatological data obtained at the Minneapolis International Airport, the precipitation at various times in 1973 was as follows. Period Rainfall - Inches Departure - Inches Month of June, 1973 1.06 -2.94 Month of July, 1973 2.90 -0.37 Month of August, 1973 3.05 -0.13 Jan. 1 to Sept. 25, 1973 15.72 -4.89 Therefore, the rainfall for the month of June, 1973 was almost"3 inches less than the average rainfall; and to date for 1973 was almost 5 inches less than the average. The months of July and August were close to.normal but the dry month of June possibly had a time delay effect of drying.out the Z upper portions of clay to date. Therefore, it is our opinion that a portion of the settlement recently observed was due to accelerated dessication caused by low rainfall in June and for the year to date. At the location of boring 2, Atterberg Limit tests were conducted on sample number 4 with a natural moisture content of about 36%, and a Liquid limit of 73% and a Plastic limit of 26%. Although shrinkage limit tests were not conducted on the sample, it would be less than the Plastic limit of 26%. It is obvious that the shrinkage limit has not been reached in this case, and further desiccation would result in further settlement. One possible way of minimizing the settlement due to desiccation is to restore water to the soil and the tree root system to the extent that the soil moisture is not reduced. The Judicious work of the owner is important to insure that water is being made available to the root systems, especially during periods of high trans- piration rate which coincides with hot dry days. Another method of minimiz- ing desiccation is to completly remove the trees. As a rule of thumb, it has been found that the minimum lateral distance between the footing and the tree should equal the height of the tree, to prevent desiccation. For example, if the tree was 20 feet in height, a minimum distance of 20 feet laterally from the foundat i on-:wa 11. shoul d: be maintained. Another cause of settlement, besides desiccation as discussed above, is from compression of the silty plastic clay materials encountered below the footings. This compression of the clay was caused by an increase in loading from the outside fill and the footing load. For example, if the actual footing pressure is about ,1,200 p.s.f. on the existing footings, it is our opinion that the total settlement for a footing 11 feet wide would be approximately 3 to 4 inches, assuming a compression index Cc -=0.3 for the plastic clay layers. 10 The settlement is based on a very approximate relationship. If the settle- ment and rate is to be determined more accurately, additional samples will have to be obtained and an actual laboratory consolidation test be conducted. Furthermore, due to the slow rate of compression of fat slightly organic clays (with a measured organic content of 12%), the settlement of the structure would probably occur over a number of years, in our opinion. A third source of possible settlement is the compression of the underlying layer of possible decomposed wood just below the plastic clay. Based on the laboratory tests, it is our opinion that settlement from this would not be as significant as the desiccation and compression of the plastic clays. In summary, the settlement has been caused mostly by the dessiccation , and compression of the plastic clays, with perhaps a minor cause by the com- pression of the thin layer of possible decomposed wood. In our opinion, if complete remedial measures are not taken, additional settlement will occur. It is assumed, if a water table does occur below the depth of the borings, that the water table has not been lowered in the area. This could also be a potential cause of settlement, but would probably affect many houses in the area if the drop in water level was over a large area. If this is to be considered, a minimum of one deep boring and piezometer would have to be installed and long term water level readings taken and reviewed. Based on the available information and depending upon economic and other considerations, it will be necessary to extend the wal:l that has settled into the underlying medium dense fine to medium sands encountered below the clay layers. In order to extend the footings to this depth it may be desirable to underpin the existing wall footings. In this procedure, a.wali footing is replaced by another footing at greater depth. A pit is first excavated and lagged beneath the existing footing for a length of say 4 to 5 feet, and to 11 construct a short section of the new footing in this space. After this sec- tion is complete, another section can be done. The spacing and construction of this system will depend on the temporary tolerable bridging of the existing footing, and should be checked by a Structural Engineer. The transfer of load from the existing foundation to the new foundation may cause settlement of the new foundation which may crack the structure. This will be minimized by dry packing the last (upper) 2 inches or so of the new foundation with dry cement. In our opinion, the footings are only 7 inches thick, and indicate a very flexible footing, and for that reason it will be rather difficult to underpin the existing wall without some additional wall cracking. These and existing cracks may be tuck pointed. Consideration may be given to underpinning and then replace the existing wall with a poured reinforced concrete footing wall with minimum continuous horizontal reinforcing steel at both top and bottom of the wall. The use of reinforced concrete as opposed to a block wall, will greatly improve the walls ability to withstand any minor soft or loose areas which could cause major differential settlement. For underpinned footings situated on the medium dense fine to medium sand, a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 p.s.f. is recommended. It is important that the underpinned footings not be placed on the thin layer of possible decomposed wood encountered just below the fat clay. Regarding the distance of footings for which the underpinning is to be made, this will depend on the soil conditions in the remainder of the structure which could be determined with additional borings and analysis. Regarding the support of the floor slab in the existing structure, additional future settlement is also anticipated. If this condition is not tolerable by the owner, it is recommended that the floor be designed and reconstructed with reinforced concrete so that floor loads are transmitted to the new underpinned footing walls. 12 CONSTRUCTION DIFFICULTIES .Serious problems arising from ground water infiltration are not antici- pated with the construction of the proposed underpinned footing foundation since the water table is at a depth below the bottom of the excavations. Any surface water that may accumulate at the bottom of the excavation could easily be removed by means of standard sump pit and pump procedures. Some sloughing of the excavation sides may occur in the deposits.encountered. This condition may necessitate sloping back the excavation sides to maintain stability. All loose materials resulting from sloughing or wind blown accumulation or disturbance due to normal construction activity should be removed prior to placement of concrete for the footings. One possible solution considered was the installation of transload piles, which are piles installed downward through the compressible soil into the underlying sandy materials. By jacking the transload pile against a wall section, the structural support is transmitted from the house into the under- lying sandy materials. In this case, this is not feasible since a stiff structural unit in the wall is not available. SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION In accordance with generally accepted construction practices the Contrac- tor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job site, including safety of all persons and property during the performance of the work. This requirement will apply continuously and will not be limited to normal working hours. The duty of the Soil Engineer to conduct construction review of the Contractor's performance is not intended to include review of the adequacy of the Contractor's safety measures, in, on or near the construction site. 13 GENERAL It is recommended that the stripping operation and the placement of all fill be inspected by a Soil Engineer in order to ensure sufficient removal of all unsuitable materials in conformance to the above recommendations. Analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon avail- able information derived from the soil borings performed at the indicated locations. Since it is possible that variations in soil conditions may exist between boring locations, it is recommended that the material at the base of each of the foundation excavations be inspected by an experienced Soil Engineer in order to observe that the foundations are placed upon suitable material as anticipated in this design. If you wish, we would welcome the opportunity to perform any of the' herein recommended inspection services for you during construction. In addition, we would be please to review any of the plans and specifications after they have been prepared for the project, so that we might have an opportunity of commenting upon the effects of the soil conditions of the design and specifications. This report has been prepared in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the Architect and Engineer in the design of the project, based on our understanding of the basic assumptions regarding the design and utilization of the structure as outlined therein. It is intended for use with regard to the specific project, as discussed herein and any changes in the conception of the project should be brought to our attention so that we may determine how these changes may affect our recommendations. /cab NOTE: E3. 1\A.= S W. CORNER -_Or. 46 AVE. N.E'. _AN- 17- Zl� S% ---- COIL � M U?)ALS. _. E. N l N -E -s_ REVIGIONG S®ILS I NVESTIGAT ION N No. OATG ®r - HOUSE AT 4-55 Q 2-11g ST. fel. E. --- fV INNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA - s -'or: MR. 'FZOBERT E. NOBLE -- ' DRAWN ®11 ®1 A,u1 SCALE Ill . 1®1 1:�i N'D-'O°.'+C'�A' 4 CMK'D 1i P1 rt DAT[ DRAWING NO. M.L.L. �.�►,°'73 S TRACED APP'D LOG OF ZQ"RiNG NO. B-1 OWNER Mr. Robert E. Noble ARCHITECT- ENGINEER SITE 4551 21 Street N.E. Fridley, Minnesota W9 O ® zn W DESCRIPT16N OF IBiATERIAL yy -W+ O pp. W g W g w GURFACa ELEVATION -1, 96.4' PROJECT Single 3 n 0 0 NAME Family Residence UNCONFINED COMPRIZSSIVE STRUNGITN TONS/rr. Y n 3 4 PLASTIC WATER LIQUID LIMIT 96 CONTENT LIMIT 96 STANDARD "N" PENETRATION (BLOWS/FT.) 10 rso so sY I 1 SS Fine to medium sand with pkts. of dark to reddish brown silty sand, thin black seams fibers at 1' depth, trace silt and f.gravel. Bn..with blk.pockets at 4'depth. (SP- Fill).Dry to moist.Med.dense.. -- 1� 13 16 -- 2 SS 11111of ** 13 5 6 SS SS Varved silty clay with thin seams of white silt,j" thick varved seam of rust to'gray clay at 8' depth. Gray. (CH). Very tough. 12 X 7 SS a.si ty c ay,tr. . n. ep . 0 8 SS F.to medium sand, trace silt. Tan.(SP).Moist. Medium dense. ►z End of Boring *0'-0.5' Sl.org.silty sand.Dk.i l bn. (SM-OL-Fl)..Dry.Med..dens **5.5-6' Silty f:.:to med.sand tr. rts. & med..,.gv:.-:.Dark brown. -(SM-F! 1 1) . Mo i st.."Med. dense. ***6-6.5' SI.org.clayey sand mottled with l't.bn.f.to med. sand.Bk.(SC-OL-Fill). Very tough. ****6.5-7' Sandy clay with V thick seam of bk.clayey sand. Lt.gr.mottled with rust. (CL -Possible Fill).Very toug *****12.5-13' Va.to mottled possibly depd.wood fibers with 1" thick seams of bk.va.silt pro.compressible.Tan.(OL-Woo . clay, ).Moi t. Calibrated jPeetro ter WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS W.L. Dry OM.YA W. D. INC. W•L- B.C.R. 7900 77th Avenue North W L. Dry AB Minneapolis, Minnesota BORING STARTED - - BORING COMPLETED 9-6-73 BIG VD FOREMAN DB DRAWN RAH APPROVM MLL IOII a 90250A SHEET No.8The stratification lanes represent the approximate boundary between soil types; in si` u l the transition may �o gradual. 1 - HA —� 2 - HA-- ;I— LOG OF BORING NO. B-2 OWNER Mr. Robert E. Noble ARCHITECT- ENGINEER SITE 4551 21 Street N.E. Fridley. Minnesota W W C 0.H >„ C Z g o w DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL W Q ppS ; N 0 kj W N >-y awa SURFACK ELEVATION--- 91.3' PROJECT NAME Single Family Residence UMe 110INED COMPRIIr6fiIVE GTRENOTN TONS/FT. a -0— 1 23 4 , PLASTIC WATER LIQUID 0 q LIMIT 96 CONTENT LIMIT fe ? SME Hammer PENETRATION (BLOWS/FT.) 1030 40 S® 3 ST M Concrete floor slab.._ k*K 90. D 4 5 6 ST ST ST Varved silty clay with thin seams of white silt, trace roots. Gray mottled with light brown. (CH). Tough to hard. 85'� 7&.4 1 ® % 5a 7 ST I ne to me I um sand, trace silt. Light brown. (SP). Probably ium dense.— e seEnd 1 .0 Endof Boring *411-6" - Fine to medium sand. trace fine gravel. Brown. (SP -Fill). Moist. **611-8" - Slightly organic silty clay, trace sand.Black to gray. (CL-OH).Very tough. ***811-25' - Silty clay with thin seams of white silt at 2 depth, trace sand. Light gray mottled with light brown and a few black pocket. (CH). Very tough. Estimated depth to bottom of footing= ****7.9''-8.31 - Varved to mottled possibly decomposed.' wood fibers, trace sand, probably compressible. Rust to tan. (OL -Wood). Qx Calibrated Pe etrom �If ter WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED -6- SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS W. L. Dry MXXBAI W.D. INC. BORING COMPLETED 9-6-73 W.L. B.C.R. 7900 77th Avenue North BIG HA FOREMAN JES W.L. Dry AB Minneapolis, Minnesota DRAWN RAH APPROVED MLL JOB # 0 5O SHE No. 8 LJAV .7Vi06Wi-..vcn.......... soil types; in situ, the transition may a gradual. ►3l• ly en LOG OF BORING NO. B-3 OWNER Mr. Robert E. Noble SITE 4551 21 Street N.E. Fridle Minnesota W z ® Z o W DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL P W a W a > d N a u D W B Y 'A � In r DURRACE ELEVATIDN'� 95.81t ARCHITECT- ENGINEER PROJECT NAME Single Family Residence UNCONFINED COMPRICS»IVL" 9TRENG9TN TON®/FT. • /L 1 g 3 4 3 ^ PLASTIC WATER LIQUID o LIMIT CONVENT _1^ LIMIT QI+ 5� STANDARD "N" PENETRATION (BLOW$/FT.) ao .ao so 1 2 SS SS F.to med.sand with pockets o reddish bn.silty sand,tr.silt, tr.rts.at 1'depth and f.to med.gv.at 3' depth.Bn.(SP-Fill).. Moist. Very loose to loose. y' % 3 4 r,zT Siltoy . to Bd. Snd fir. ts. E Moist. Loose. �t _ 5 6 ST TT Silty clay with occassional irregular seams & pkts.of bn. f.to med.sand,thin white searr of silt at 6.4'&8.8'depth,tr. of rts.&green leaf at8'to 11.3' depth,tr.of small bk.org.pkts. Gr.mottled with I.bn.(CH-OL- Fill), Very tough to,stiff. 82.5 ,_ '-�• i 8 -ISS 1W, 1 1 1 I y 1 I 1 J J J ; 010 . 14 17 i - Fine to medium sand, trace silt. (SP). Moist. Medium dense. 9 SS SS ill��ro.COMD.-Tantb.rust.(OL-Wood i 4.51-6.0' Slightly organic silty clay with' pockets and seams of tan to rust silty and and -brown fine to mediu and, thin seam of white silt, trace roots and fine t coarse gravel. Black mottled ith gray and brown. CL -CH -OL -Fill). Ver tough. mott e possibly decomposed wood fibers faith thin seam of gr.va.silty lay,tr.bn.f.to med.sand,odo 410 End of Boring .JC V Calibrated P netro eter WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SOIL 6 MATERIALS ENGINEERS BORING STARTED 9-6-73 W. L. D ry XOMXDR W.D.I NC BORING COMPLETED 9-6-73 W.L. B.C.R. A 7900 77th Avenue North ' G B-50 FOREA4 DB W , Dry AB Minneapolis, Minnesota DRAWN RAH APPROVED ML•L .Io® o 90250A SHEEP No. 8 Tne strazilloaulVll i"Gb Tvpl"rs-jGuu uuG ayNiv-di.y—CL VG vvuuucuJr $oi.l types; in situ, the transition may be gradual. between 1 - HA L OWNER Mr. Robert E. Noble ARCHITECT- ENGINEER - SITE 455.1 21 Street N.E. Fridley, Minnesota Wz _j Z IL U1F 2 a DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL P W R 7 a.. to d U �. SURFACU CLEVATION—� 91-3't PROJECT NAME Single Family Residence UNCONFINUD COMPI 96SIVE OTRUNGTH TONG/FT. rl n 1 3 3 4 H a ii PLASTIC WATER LIQUID LIMIT 56 CONTENT 56 LIMIT � F a SME Hammer PENETRATION (BLOWS/FT.) 10 20 2 am �® Concrete floor slab. .to me sand trtsll S - Dr �` 2 3 ST ST 108.7. 73.7 U 29 4 ST Varved silty clay,trace black13®„ organic clay. Gray partially mottled with brown. (CH). Soft to tough. �O7`® 38 SO_ 5 ST 6 ST End of Boring *0.5'-0.8' Varved silty clay with black organic clay seams and P thick seam of fine ".- sand. Gray to brown mottled. (CL -OL). Very tough. **0.8'-5' Silty clay with thin seams of white silt at 3' depth, trace sand, roots and few black organic pockets. Gra mottled with brown. (M . Tough to very tough. ***-8-8.3' Varved possibly decomposed wood fibers, 'trace sand, probably compressible, odor. Rust to tan. (OL -Wood). ****8.3-9'.7' -Fine to medium sand, trace silt. Light brown. (SP). Moist. Probably medium dense. alibr ted P petro eter a WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS SORING STARTED 9- -73 SOIL a MATERIALS ENGINEERS W.L. Dry cgxcw.D. INC. BORING COMPLETED 9-6-73 JES W.L. B.C.R. A.C.R.7900 77th Avenue North G HA FOREMAb W L. Dry AB Minneapolis, Minnesota DRAwN RAH APPROVED MLL ,Oa 90250A sIIEET No.8 The stratification lines represent the approximate Dounaary Detween *aU typo_%; in altuo the transition may be gradual. 774- GENERAL NOTES 1950 Chicago Building Code Soil Classifications are Used Except Where Noted_ DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS SS e Split -Spoon —1'/s" I. D., 2" O. D., except where noted ST o Shelby Tube — 2" O. D., except where noted PA t Power Auger Sample D B r Diamond Bit — NXI BXs AX, CS a Carbolay Bit —NXI BX AX& CIS I Osterberg Sampler —3" Shelby Tube KS I House) Sampler WS I Wash Sample FT I Fish Tail RB t Rock Bit WO i Wash Out Standard "N" Penotrationi Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon, except where noted WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS WL I Water Level WCI , Wet Cave In DCI I Dry Cave In WS I While Sampling WD i While Drilling BCR s Before Casing Removal ACR I After Casing Removal AB I After Boring Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In pervious soils, the indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence on ground water eleva- tions must be sought. CLASSIFICATION COHESIONLESS SOILS "Trace" I 1 % to 10% "Trace to some" : 10% to 20% "Some$# I 20% to 35% "And" s 35% to 50% Loose I 0 to 9 Blows Medium Dense : 10 to 29 Blows oP I Dense I 30 to 59 Blows equivalent Very Dense I B 60 Blows 51 'MOAZ? .:, COHESIVE SOILS If clay content is sufficient to that clay dominates soil properties, then clay becomes the principle noun with the other major soil constituent as modifier; i.e., silty clay. Other minor soil con- stituents may be added according to classifica- tion breakdown for cohesionless soils; i.e., silty clay, trace to some send, trace gravel. Soft s 0.00 — 0.59 tons/ft:' Stiff s 0.60 — 0.99 tons/ft-' Tough I 1.00 — 1.99 tons/h= Very tough I 3.00 — 3.99 tons/h= Hord I is 4.00 tons/fts SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEE INC. 7900 77th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota APPENDIX Y Tentative Method for PENETRATION TEST AND SPLIT -BARREL SAMPLING OF SOILS' 0 ASTM Designations D 1586 - 64 T Issmm, 1958; Rrvisr% 1963' This Tentative Method has been approved by the sponsoring committee and accepted by the Society in accordance with established procedures, for use Bending adoption as standard. Suggestions for revisions should he addressed to the Society at IQ16 Race St., Philadelphia 3, Pa. Scope 1. This method describes a procedure for making soil borings with a split - barrel sampler in order to obtain repre- sentative samples of soil for identification purposes and other laboratory tests and to obtain a record of the resistance of the soil to penetration of the sampler. Apparatus 2. (a) Drilling Equipment.—Any equip- ment shall be acceptable that provides a reasonably clean hole before insertion of the sampler to insure that the penetration test is performed on undisturbed soil, and that will permit the driving of the sampler to obtain the sample and penetration rec- ord in accordance with the procedure de- scribed in Section 3. The stiffness of the drill rod used during sampling is'believed to have a relationship to the 'V value obtained, especially because a light drill rod "whips" under the blows of the hammer. It is suggested that the drill rod have a stiffness equal to or greater than the A -rod. A stiffer drill rod is sug- gested for holes deeper than 50 ft. When drilling in sand or in soft clay or other material that will not allow a hole to stay open, casing or drilling mud shall be used. If caving occurs with drilling mud, casing shall be used. The hole shall be limited in diameter to between 21and 6ins I Under the standardisation procedure of the Society, this method is under the jurisdiction of the ASTM Committee D-18 on Soils for En- gineering Purposes. 2 Revision Accepted by the Society at the Annual Meeting, June, 1983. Published first as information, in the compila- tion of "Procedures for Testing Soils," April, 1988. A1. J. Hvorslev, "Subsurface Exploration and Sampling of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes, • The Engineer•ina Fmindatioa, 345 East 47th Street, New York 17, New York. (b) Split -Barrel Sampler.—The sampler shall be constructed with the dimensions indicated in Fig. 1. The drive shoe shall be of hardened steel and shall be replaced or repaired when it becomes dented or distorted. The coupling head shall have four J -in. (minimum diam- eter) vent ports or shall contain a ball check valve and no ports. Substitution of a split -barrel sampler other than 2 -in. OD shall be made only with the permis- sion of the engineer in charge. If other sizes are permitted, the size shall be conspicuously noted on all penetration records. (c) Drive Weight Assembly, consisting of a 140-1b weight with a 30 -in. free fall and a driving head. Special. precaution shall be taken to insure that the energy of the falling weight is not reduced by friction between the drive weight and the guides. For driving the casing, a heavier hammer is permitted. (d) Accessary Equipment.—Labels data sheets, sample jars, and other necessary supplies. Procedure 3. (a) Preparipig Hale.—Clean out the hnle to sampling elevation using what- ever equipment is preferred that will in- sure that the material to be sampled is not disturbed by the operation. In satu- rated sands and silts withdraw the drill hit slnwh• to prevent loosening of the soil around the hole. In no case shall a bottom -discharge fish- tail bit be permitted. (Side -discharge fish- tail bits are permissible.) The process of jetting through an open -tube sampler and then sampling when the desired depth is reached shall not be permitted. Take samples at every change in stratum and at intervals not greater than 5 ft (or less if specified). Where casing is used, it shall not be driven below the sam- pling elevation. Any loss of circula- tion in drilling fluid during advancing of hole shall be noted for recording on the log. (b) Obtaining Samples.—With the sampler' resting on the bottom of the hole, seat the sampler 6 in. with blows from the 140-1b hammer falling 30 in. Proceed with driving the sampler until. Couolmq Avpm • s endia (min) , 24"(min,Open) -I Nov 1.—A c•,mpling head with it theek v.the and a mminn"n of 41.6 sq, i,,. v, -sting to nutsule ahnve cheek valva chill hr to—d to imprnve %:mine nK+,ern aln•n there ,% eater in the hole. NOTE 2.—Split harn•I mac I- 1I, in. 11) and mim rnntaw a liner. NOTE 3.—A spring -typo cvve catcher in the driving ch,w to precrnt I.— of .amt,1e I% Iwrmithvl. NorE 4.-03more at A ntow hr slighth nbmidet1. ft. 1.—Standwd Split -Barrel Sampler Assembly. it has been driven an additional 12 in., or until 100 blocs have been applied. Record the number of blocs required to effect each 6 in. of penetration. The first 6 in. of drive is considered to be a seat- ing drive. The total number of blows required for the second and third 6 in. of penetration shall he termed the pene- tration resistance, X. If the sampler is driven less than 18 in. total, the pene- tration resistance shall be for the last foot of penetration (if less than 1 ft is penetrated, the logs shall state the num- ber of blows and the fraction of a foot penetrated). If specified, more than 100 blows may be used for specific types of work. Refusal shall be considered to have been reached when the rate of advance is less than 1 in. for 50 blows. (e) Removal and Labeling.—Raise the sampler to the surface and open it. Place typical sample or samples of soils from the opened split barrel into jars without ramming. Note on the jar the origin of the sample, and store the jars in suitable containers for shipment to the laboratory or the client. The jars shall have a self-sealing top or shall be sealed with wax to prevent evaporation of the soil moisture. Labels shall be affixed to the jar or notations shall be scratched on the covers (or both) bearing job designation, boring number, sample number, depth, penetration record, and length of recovery. Samples shall be pro- tected from freezing and shall not be placed in the sun. (d) Field Observations.—Record water table information on the field logs, in- cluding ground water level, elevations at which the drilling water was lost, or elevations at which water under excess pressure was encountered. Measure ground -water levels before and after pulling the casing, where used. In sands, determine the level as the cas- ing is pulled and then measure at least 30 min after the casing is pulled; in silts, at least 24 hr after the casing is pulled; in clays, no accurate nater level determination is possible unless per- vious seams are present. However, the 24 -hr level shall he recorded for clays. When drilling mud is used -and the water level is desired, casing perforated at the lower end shall be lowered into the hole and the hole hailed down. Determine ground -eater levels after bailing at time intervals of 30 min and 24 hr after all traces of drillinz mud are removed from inside the casing. Report 4. 6fl Data obtained in borings shall he recorded in the field and shall include the following: (1) Date of boring, (2) Reference datum, (.i) Job identification, (4) Boring number, (5) frilling method, (n) Sample elevations, (7) Limits of strata, (R) Water data, (0) Soil identification, (10) Penetration records, and (11) Casing used. (b)The data thus obtained shall be prepared in final form as a soil profile to show the nature and extent of the soil strata over the area under consideration. APPENDIX 2 Tentative Method for THIN-WALLED TUBE SAMPLING OF SOILS' 9 ASTM Designation: D 1557 - 63 T Issuim, 1958; REv1sED, 1963' This Tentative Method has been approved by the sponsoring committee and accepted by the Society in accordance with established procedures, for use pending adoption as standard. Suggestions for revisions should be addressed to the Society at 1916 Race St., Philadelphia 3, Pa. Scope 1. (a) This method of sampling of foundation soils is designed to secure rela- tively undisturbed samples suitable for laboratory tests. It is intended as a guide to more complete specifications to meet the needs of a particular job. It is not implied that if this method is followed, the samples are necessarily sufficiently undisturbed to be suitable for all types of laboratory tests under all field condi- tions. (b) There are in general two types of samplers that use thin-walled tubes for sampling, namely, open -tube samplers, and piston samplers. In general, fixed - piston samplers are better and can be used in almost all soils. However, open - tube samplers are satisfactory for many soils. Since the thin-walled tube require- ments are the same for both types of samplers, the method described applies equally to both.' Apparatus 2. (a) Drilling Equipment.—Any equip- ment may be used that provides a reasonably clean hole before insertion of the thin-walled tube, and does not dis- turb the soil to be sampled, and that can effect continuous and rapid penetration of the tube into the sampled soil. Noxa.—Where casing is used, the equipment must be capable of driving and removing casing, and must include a pressure pump for clean-out operations. Where drilling fluid is used, a suit- able mud pump is required. Where augers are 1 Under the standardization procedure of the Society, this method is under the jurisdiction of the ASTM Committee D-18 on Soils for Engi- neering Purposes. 2 Revision accepted by the Society at the Annual Meeting, June, 1963. Published first as information in the compila- tion of "Procedures for Testing Soils," April, 1958. 2 M J. Hvorslev, "Subsurface Exploration and Sampling of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes," The Hngineering Foundation, 33 W. 39th St.. New York 18, N. Y. used for clean-out purposes, no special equipment other than that for sampling is generally re- quired. (b) Thin -Walled Tubes.—Tubes 2 to 5 in. in outside diameter and made of any materials having adequate strength and resistance to corrosion will be satis- factory (Fig. 1). Adequate resistance to corrosion can be provided by a suitable coating. Sizes other than these shall be used only by order of the person respon- sible for the boring program. Though these sizes do not necessarily insure un- disturbed samples, tubes smaller than 2 in. are considered unsatisfactory for obtaining specimens for compression tests. Tubes shall be of such a length that between five and ten times the diameter is available for penetration into sands and between ten and fifteen diameters is available for penetration into clays. Tubes shall be reasonably round and smooth, without bumps, dents, or scratches. Seamless or welded tubes are permissible, but welds must not project at the seam. The tubes shall have a thickness not greater than No. 16 gage for tubes 3 in. and under in diameter, not greater than No. 14 gage for tubes 3 to 4-,% in. in diameter, and not greater than No. 11 gage for tubes 5 in. in diameter. The cutting edge shall be machined as shown in Fig. 1. The inside clearance ratio shall be between 0.5 and 3 per cent. Small clearances are as desirable in sands; and clearances up to 3 per cent are required for good recovery in clays depending on the soil type, tube length and method of driving. Unless otherwise specified, an inside clearance ratio of 1.0 per cent shall be supplied Two vent holes (g in. minimum) shall be provided in the sampler head. A cou- pling head with a check valve and a TABLE I.—STANDARD TITIN -WALLED STEEL SAMPLE TUBES.°• b. c, d Outside diameter, in..... 2 3 5 Wall thickness: Bwg................ 18 16 11 In.; 0.049 0.065 0.120 Tube length, in......... 36 36 54 Clearance ratio, per cent. 1 1 1 a Tubes are designed to fit either open or piston standard thin-wall sampler heads of the Diamond Core Drill Manufacturers Assoc. b Alternate materials, sizes, lengths, and clearances are available. Intermediate diameters should utilize intermediate thicknesses and tube lengths. The 2 -in. OD tubes have not been standard- ized by the Diamond Core Drill Manufacturers Assoc., but are in such common use that they are considered standard. The 2 -in. OD tubes are considered a minimum acceptable diameter for sampling, using this method. The DCDMA has standardized the 21% -in. OD, 18 -gage tubing, which is considered fully acceptable for sampling using this method. d The three diameters recommended in Table I are indicated for purposes of standardization, and are not intended to indicate that sampling tubes of intermediate or larger diameters are not acceptable. Frequently 2ys-in. OD, and. 23J -in. OD samplers are used. It should be pointed out that the larger diameters give the least sample disturbance and provide the better samples. as Specified In Method Inside Clearance Ratio = -�� L� dia (min) Oe Mountina Holes NOTE.—Minimum of 2 mounting holes on opposite sides for 2- to 3i -in. samples. Minimum of 4 mounting holes spaced at 90 deg for samplers 4 in. and larger. Tube held with hardened screws. no. 1.—Thin-Walled Tube for Sampling. minimum of 0.6 sq in. venting to out- side above check valve can be used to improve sample recovery. Tubes shall be clean, smooth, and free of rust and dirt. The cutting edges shall be sharp and free from nicks. Coating the tubes with lacquer or suitable plastic by dipping after thorough cleaning is recommended for obtaining the best possible samples. Table I shows the dimensions of suitable thin-wall sample tubes 4 (c) Sealing Material..—Any wax that does not have appreciable shrinkage, or does not permit evaporation from the sample, shall be permitted. Microcrys- talline waxes are preferable to paraffin. Thin discs of steel or brass that are slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the tube are desirable for plugging both rids before sealing with wax. Cheeseclothe and tape are needed. Suitable expanding packers may be used. (d) Accessory Equipment.—Labels, data sheets, shipping containers, and other necessary supplies. Procedure 3. (a) Preparing Hole.—Clean out the hole to sampling elevation using what- ever method is preferred that will insure that the material to be sampled is not disturbed by the operation. In saturated sands and silts withdraw the drill bit slowly to prevent loosening of the soil around the hole. Where casing is used, clean out the hole to the bottom or just below. (A clean-out auger shall be used to clean the bottom of the hole when necessary.) (b) Obtaining Sample.—With the sampling tube resting on the bottom of the hole and the water level in the boring at the ground -water level or above, push the tube into the soil by a continuous and rapid motion, without impact or twisting, a distance not greater than 15 diameters for cohesive soils, 10 diam- eters for cohesionless soils and 5 diam- eters in very loose soils such as loess. In 4 The dimensions have been adopted as standard by the Diamond Core Drill Manu- facturers Asaw. no case shall the tube be pushed further than the length provided for the soil sam- ple. Allow about 3 in. in the tube for cut- tings and sludge. The time and pressure, whenever measured, required to obtain penetration shall be noted. When the soils are so hard that a pushing motion will not penetrate the sampler sufficiently for recovery, and where recovery by pushing in sands is poor, a heavy weight may be used to drive the sampler. In such a case, the weight, height, and number of blows shall be recorded. Before pulling the tube turn it at least two revolutions to shear the sample off at the bottom. In very loose saturated sands and silts, the use of a piston sampler is often necessary to secure a suitable undisturbed sample. In intermittent sampling, the soil shall be sampled at every change in stratum and at intervals no larger than 5 ft. within continuous strata. (c) Preparation for Shipment.—Upon removal of the sampler tube, measure and record the length of sample in the tube and also the length penetrated. Completely remove the disturbed ma- terial in the upper end of the tube before applying wax, and record the length of disturbed soil removed. Ream the lower end to a depth of at least 1 in. and insert an impervipus disc. Seal both ends with wax applied in a way that will prevent wax from entering the sample. Where tubes are to be shipped some distance, tape the ends to prevent breakage of the seals. It is advisable tc place cheesecloth around the ends after sealing and dip the ends several times in the melted wax. (d) Labeling and Shipping.—Tubes shall be labelled as to job designation,bor- ing number, sample number, depth, date, and description of the soil. Du- plicate marking of the tube and boring number shall be required. Tubes shall not be permitted to freeze and shall be stored in a cool place out of the sun at all times. Tubes shall be shipped in such a way as not -to cause shock and vibration or to disturb the sample in any other way. Samples shall be shipped protected with suitable re- silient packing material to reduce shock. On sands and silts it may be neces- sary to make volume and weight deter- minations in the field or to arrange for delivery by other than public carriers, since these soils are sometimes very sen- sitive to vibration. (e) Field Observations.—Record type and size of sampler and water table in- formation on the field logs, including ground -water level, elevations at which the drilling water was lost, or eleva- tions at which water under excess pressure was encountered. Measure ground -water levels before and after pulling the casing, where used. In sands, determine the level as the casing is pulled and then measure at least 30 min after the casing is pulled; in silts at least 24 hr after the casing is pulled; in clays, no accurate level de- termination is possible unless pervious seams are present. However, the 24 -hr level shall be recorded for clays. When drilling mud is used, and the water level is desired, casing perforated at the lower end shall be lowered into the hole and the hole bailed down. Determine ground- water levels after bailing at time in- tervals of 30 min and 24 hr after all traces of drilling mud are removed from inside the casing. Record additional water -table information where encount- ered. Report 4. (a) Data obtained in borings shall be recorded in the field and shall include the following: (1) Depth of top and bottom of sample, (2) Drilling methods, (3) Method of advancing sampler, (4) Water data, (5) Casing used, and (6) Date. (b) The data thus obtained shall be prepared in final form to show the nature and extent of the soil strata -over the area under consideration. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Major divisionsI sym Gro ppls I Typical names I Laboratory classification criteria EI E M-0 H J Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clay - ML ey fine sands or clayey silts 60 with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to me- dium plasticity, gravelly clays, 50 sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Organic silts and organic silty 4C OL clays of low plasticity e 4' 3C Inorganic silts, micaceous or 2 MH diatomaceous fine sandy or I silty soils, elastic silts o 2( CH OH Pt Dfi0 030) 2 Cu -greater than 4; C� Dt OXD60 between 1 and 3 Dio Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW Atterberg limits below "A" line or P.I. less than 4 Above "A" line with P.I. between 4 and 7 are bor- derline cases requiring use Atterberg limits above "A" of dual symbols line with P.I. greater than 7 D60 (D30)2 Cu oto greater than 6; Cc==DiOXD60 between 1 and 3 Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW Atterberg limits below "A" line or P.I. less than 4 Limits plotting in hatched zone with P.I. between 4 and 7 are borderline cases requiring use of dual sym- Atterberg limits above "A" bols. line with P.I. greater than 7 _:�� �For classification of fine-grained soils and fine fraction of coarse- grained soils. Atterborg Limits plotting in hatched area are borderline class[- IIC•I:l• Illllllllilillit! — lllllll_ —fications requiring use of dual A�- ��� of _ Inorganic clays of high plas- ticity, fat clays �Ifl�l�l�ft•/��i��� IIIIM M Organic clays of medium to I Peat and other highly organic soils 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Liquid Limit Plasticity Chart Well -graded gravels, gravel -sand W ;c GW mixtures, little or no fines O - y W C a W v r W O 01 d V GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel- $ y •y J sand mixtures, little or no fines Cr N .01 N ° Z IL }yam N ja �.+ m L. W C d Silty gravels, gravel sandsilt D W L i c o "- �,y� G M mixtures O N y c 2c a0 0 �c ,jJ N W N u � 1 1 b N W W Z O �n $ Z O .� W ° GC Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay t7 U' y r C 0.Co mixtures c S Q pb1 EW ° y Y) at y 2 SW Weil -graded sands, gravelly c . c� '- o wc- sands, little or no fines . c ° rn i E m v Poorly graded sands, gravelly W a J SP sands; little or no fines o ' W N $ -••' - 00 0 ' 41 ' C C o c c E SM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures 8 r U 5 t — _c w W.• t L w in C d o E p lc N g = y'uy ° m ° Clayey sands, sand clay mix- E`E c in c y o +� QSC tures QQ•�J2� E M-0 H J Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clay - ML ey fine sands or clayey silts 60 with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to me- dium plasticity, gravelly clays, 50 sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Organic silts and organic silty 4C OL clays of low plasticity e 4' 3C Inorganic silts, micaceous or 2 MH diatomaceous fine sandy or I silty soils, elastic silts o 2( CH OH Pt Dfi0 030) 2 Cu -greater than 4; C� Dt OXD60 between 1 and 3 Dio Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW Atterberg limits below "A" line or P.I. less than 4 Above "A" line with P.I. between 4 and 7 are bor- derline cases requiring use Atterberg limits above "A" of dual symbols line with P.I. greater than 7 D60 (D30)2 Cu oto greater than 6; Cc==DiOXD60 between 1 and 3 Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW Atterberg limits below "A" line or P.I. less than 4 Limits plotting in hatched zone with P.I. between 4 and 7 are borderline cases requiring use of dual sym- Atterberg limits above "A" bols. line with P.I. greater than 7 _:�� �For classification of fine-grained soils and fine fraction of coarse- grained soils. Atterborg Limits plotting in hatched area are borderline class[- IIC•I:l• Illllllllilillit! — lllllll_ —fications requiring use of dual A�- ��� of _ Inorganic clays of high plas- ticity, fat clays �Ifl�l�l�ft•/��i��� IIIIM M Organic clays of medium to I Peat and other highly organic soils 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Liquid Limit Plasticity Chart SUBJECT PERM[ City of Fridley 2422 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. INSPECTION r PROTECTIVE SEC. 1 i CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY 612-560-3450 910-F15 12/31/73. JOB ADDRESS 4551 - 22 Street N.E. 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 12 1 Rearrangement of Plymouth Addn. Bl. 13,14;��T 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE Robert Noble 4551 - 2z Street N.E. 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Boda Construction Company, Inc. 11260 Buchanan Road N.E. 757=3470 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW CX ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Repair Foundation of Dwelling 9 CHANGE QF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Construction to follow the recommendations of the report by the Soils Engineers dated September 26, 1973 FOR �+iIRtN, PER Ni1TS rREQv1�ED SEPERATE AND SIGNS- HEATING, PLUMBING TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED. $4, 600 2.30 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- 30.00 STRUCTION OR T PERFOANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. ° PLAN CHECK FEE a TO 32E ✓ 3r %3 $2.E30 � ^SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE) EN PRO ROMER ED THIS IS YOUR PERMIT. t :DG INSP DATE SIGNATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) APPLICATION FOR RLSIDENTIAL, ALTERATION, OR ADDITION BUILDINC PERMIT CITY OF I -RI DLLY , MINNESOTA OWNER'S NAME: 6D$z2i' BUILDER: BC)DR C©Ns i . Co TSG ADDRESS: �'4��f - Z's 'S T_ )V E ADDRESS: 11 )-too %UC,14-(}N A N fan ISI No... 4,S',9 --STREET: `7 r2- '97 -- LOT,,- T'• LOT,, 1.2- BLOCK: ADDITION:�C�/71GY (��Z> ��CQ�i� • Cp/1, CORNER LOT: INSIDE ,LOT: __' SETBACK: SIDEYARD. Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed buildiaig location drawn on these Certificates. To Be Used As: .DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet: Cubic Feet: Front: Depth: Height: Square Feet; Cubic Feet: -4 q to ®o Type of Construction: TeIw_1 unvDA_Titlty Estimated Cost: To Be Completed: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in st7ticL accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that ,all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and corrt•ct. DATE: _7 3 SIGNATURE: (Sea Reverse Side For Additional Information.) U UQ 30 Mr. Robert Noble 4551 - 2 1/2 Street Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS, INC. January 29, 1974 S.M.E. Job No. 90314 Re: Inspection of Footing Excavation at 4551 - 2 1/2 Street Northeast Fridley, Minnesota Dear Mr. Noble: In accordance with the specific request of Mr. Tom Boda for inspection of footing excavation at the above site, we have provided such inspection and are submitting herewith, our observations and recommenda- tions. These observations and recommendations were also communicated to Mr. Clarence Beliosle, Building Inspector for the City of Fridley, on the afternoon of January 7, 1974. The subject site inspected at the above address is a modification of the single family residence, which was investi- gated and reported in our soils report dated September 26, 1973, under S.M.E. Job No. 90250-A. The inspection was performed on January 7, 1974, by performing probes and hammer penetrations at two locations as indicated on the attached report and drawings. Materials encountered at these probe locations consisted of clean fine to medium sand. At that time the contractor had excavated through approximately 9 feet of clay and through approximately 4 to 6 inches SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 7900 77TH AVENUE NORTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55445 N (612) 425-6478 DARRELL F. SCHNEIDER. P.E. KEITH R. CASWELL,JR.. P.E. Affiliate of MICHAEL L. LARSON.P.E. JOHN P. GNAEDINGER, P. E. STS CONSULTANTS, LTD. JAMES H.OVERTOOM, P. E. CLYDE N.BAKER.JR. .RE. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIVERSIFIED INC. - 2 - of a fibrous wood material, which may possibly be a very loose silt. The approximate relative density of the sand material was also measured every 6 inches with the S.M.E. dynamic cone hammer. Based on these results, we recommend that the upper 6 inches of the sand material near C.P. No. 1, which is near the north end of the exca- vation in the front of the house, be excavated or the footing placed at that depth, or the sand be recompacted. Furthermore, at the time of our inspection, the approximate south 11 feet of the west wall excavation had not been completely cleaned out and the approximate 8 foot of length on the south wall had not been excavated either. It is recommended that all fibrous wood or silt anticipated in these areas be removed as verified by further inspection. We have not been requested to return to the site in the mean- time, for further inspection. Based on this inspection and the results of our borings, the base of the excavation is approved for a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot, if procedures recommended are followed. We assume this would be adequate for the footing width to be used. However, no information has been made regarding the actual design footing pressure, and it is assumed that the pressure is 1,500 p.s.f. If there are any questions with regard to this report, or if we can be of further service to you in any way, please do not hesitate to contact us. HEREW CER71i Y T: AT THIS PUN, VECIFiCATi ;.: ,i, t,R REPORT VVAS N11PARED BY ME OR UNDEP MY Yours very truly, DMECT 5��; Er.'ia :'"�N AND ThAT I AM A DULY °%EGiSTERF^ PIVOFE3SIONAL ENI i; 41E.:R UNDER THE SOIL & MATERIALS ENGINEERS, INC. :LAWS OF IhE STATE OF MiNt4ESOPA. ,FATED - 7 REG. NO. Michael L. Larson, P.E. Chief Engineer Dist: 3 cc: Mr. Robert Noble cc: City of Fridley, Building Inspection Department 1 cc: S.T.S., Inc., Northbrook 1 cc: File Job Name Date 0 .i - -\ SME Job No.9 013 '4— 4 --•Job Job Location 4:'50 �S lient Contractor,��� Arrive Job 0 Mileage 2 Depart Job (::) .44Y :TimTotal Charg9able Travel Time 4rC Hours Z— Hours On Job �°'```� Expenses Summary of technical and/or engineering, services performed, including field test data Locations and depths are estimated. Z�Qvo..�,a 6%3--C—��.�..� �y�J'�iR,�C..''�R_..+____ "•'4©_ ��Ks- 'T�2�3tt.�,.ts._ 4.PP� O� c,`. Q� . ,__ rt E lQcr�b�s baa -•� a (moi' !c� �i"� � SVAO -4> � c-a--.cVL- (� r� J v �Q , la c-eaw.ryj,�-�t� �CcL�p :`c !`a 7 3 O���L+c (1 - Na S GO 00(ZL 6 , 1c- z C� . Attested To Position Company *[3 FIELD DATA IS ESTIMATED PENDING FINAL LABORATORY TEST RESULTS e SOIL & MATERIALS qlmrENGINEERS, INC. 7900 77TH AVENUE NORTH. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55445 , ----'----'-----' `-'-- ----�| ido ----'—---n�� -----' ---�----------'--�~ » � 1-16 OW 00 --_-__-_-- ' �- -- - --- -----���'---- --- -------- --n�~� �� � -» ~ -------�`�-- — —�^ --- e---tj. -- -----_'---- ---- ----'----'-----' `-'-- ----�| ido ----'—---n�� -----' ---�----------'--�~ » � 1-16 OW 00 --_-__-_-- ' �- -- - --- -----���'---- --- -------- --n�~� �� 01 SUBJECT P City of Fridley � ®�!"! 9 8 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r RECEIPT N _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV. PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC. 0 p r � �1 � CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 NUMBER REV. DATE OF APPROVED BY � ---- s �`� 612-571-3450 910-F15 6/28/91 FPAGE JOB ADDRESS 4551 - 21-2 Street' NE 1 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 12 1 Rearrangement of Blocks 13,14,15, PlyMoUt]fHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Paul Carberry 4551 -- 21 Street NE 571-6435 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Same 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 8 DESCRIBE WORK Reroof Dwelling (16 Squares.) 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS Roof can be 2nd layer but not 3rd, TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ZONING SO. FT. CU. FT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 STALLS GARAGES VALUATION SURTAX AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $832 $,50 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- $23.00 Fire SC $.83 STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLAN CH C FEE TOTALFEE $4.33 SI NATURE/OFCOyCTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT IDATEI - WHEN PR PERLY AL, THI OUR PERMIT � iGNATURE OF OWNER dF OWNE LDERI IDATEI Q P DATE 01 NEW [ ] Effective 1/1/91 ADEN [ ] R-1 AND R-2 ALTER [ ] /Building Permit Application Construction Address: "/ 2% 5— A Iegal o,: Ler rte- Flo c k l keav( �� eL Owner Name & Address: contractor: Tel. ddrans: Attach to this applicatian, a certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed onnstructian drawn an it to scale. Width Width Width •1' Hyl*'.�j'/:ryl:r+��y Height Height Hat/Ground Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. corner Lot [ ] Inside Int [ ] Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks Type of Construction: Estimated cost: $ 1a - Approx. Completion Date: Proposed Driveway Width If New Opening Is I Desired: Ft. $ S �y /� Width + 6' See Back Page DATE: - Z O " �( APPLICANT: VO-Ul l wEf-e Y Tel. # a *?1 40 tll� Permit Fee $ - -� no Fire Studarge $ o State Surcharge SAC Charge $ Driveway Escrow $ Park Fee $ Sewer Main mange $ STIPUTATIONS: IL CITY USE CHLY Fee Schedule an Reverse Side .001 x Permit Valuation (1/10th �) $.50/$1,000 Valuation $650 per SAC Unit Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Fee Determined by &qinee rrs Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Nuri' [ ] SUBJECT P - City of Fridley 5 AT THE TOP OF THE TWINS BUILDING PERMIT r ` RECEIPT NO. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIV v PROTECTIVE INSPECTION SEC I r , NUMBER REV DATE PAGE OF APPROVED BY CITY HALL FRIDLEY 55432 612-571-3450 910-F15 8/31/95 JOB ADDRESS 4551 2 1/2 Street NE I LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACTOR ADDITION SEE ATTACHED DESCR. 12 1 Rearrangement of Plymouth Blocks 13-15 SHEET 2 PROPERTY OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE Joseph/Aimee Bushey 4551 2 1/2 Street NE 571-3147 3 CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. Custom Remodelers Inc 8729 Central Avenue, Blaine 55434 784-2646 1748 4 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO 5 ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE LICENSE NO. 6 USE OF BUILDING Residential 7 CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION Cj ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ REMOVE 6 DESCRIBE WORK Reside Dwelling 9 CHANGE OF USE FROM TO STIPULATIONS TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ZONING SQ. FT. CU. FT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. NO. DWLG. UNITS OFFSTREET PARKING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION 1 1 STALLS GARAGES AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS VALUATION SURTAX AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED $2.70 WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT $5,400 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PERMIT FEE SAC CHARGE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- Fire SC $5.40 STRYCS,ION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. $112.25 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEE G icense SC $5.00 $125.35 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AU HORIZED AGEN WHEN PROPE Y VALIDATED THIS IS Y UR PERMIT BL G iNSP F)A Trf S,GNATUREOF OWNER0F OWNER BUILDER, (DATE, .. .........:..:. ..:.:.:...:....»:.:............,.,..,.., NEW [ ] Effective 8/1/95 ADDN [ ] CITY OF FRIDLEY ALTER [ ] SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEXES R-1 AND R-2 Building Permit Application 33 51 ConstructionAddress: �ol 575- Legal Description: 7-t;� sp/L O T/71*' -'o �� . `c�• W c !� �D�i9 c E ,v r/ �` .-vim i Owner Name &Address: g --/L, �.,� e A,rW & Tel. # ; 2/- 3/ _ Contractor: e4, s 7o!6,.,, le ed e./ems° ,, e , _ MN LICENSE # / Address: c� e ,..• 7, - Ay � Tel. # ') l5' % - Attach to this application, a Certificate of Survey of the lot, with the proposed construction drawn on it to scale. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT LIVING AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. GARAGE AREA: Length Width Height Sq. Ft. DECK AREA: Length Width Hgt/Ground Sq. Ft. OTHER: Corner Lot [ ] Inside Lot [ ] Ft. Yd Setback Side Yard Setbacks Type of Construction: ke- YA4, i. Estimated Cost: $ Va e 11 10T Approx. Completion Date: ��5--- (Cost on Back) Driveway Curb Cut Width Needed: F + 6 Ft = Ft x $ _ $ DATE: "APPLICANT: 7el. # '9 e y' CITY USE ONLY Permit Fee $ f.2 • Fee Schedule on Reverse Side Fire Surcharge $ . y( .001 of Permit Valuation (1/10th%) State Surcharge $ . '76 $,50/$1,00 Valuation SAC Charge $ $850 per SAC Unit License Surcharge $ $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) Driveway Escrow $ Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above Erosion Control $ $450.00 Conservation .Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement Necessary [ ] Not Necessary [ ] TOTAL STIPULATIONS: CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MN55432- // ISSUED:08042006 (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2006-01487 4551 2 1/2 ST NE ADDRESS: PIN:263024330097 LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH :LOT 12 BLOCK 1 PERMIT TYPE:ELECTRICAL PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ELEC SERVICES, NEW NOTE: CALL FOR ROUGH IN AND FINAL INSPECTION H.O. PHONE #763-571-3147 CONT: 763-757-6202 ELECTRIC PERMIT BECOMES VOID 12 MONTHS AFTER PERMIT ISSUE DATE FURNACE A/C RECONNECT ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE20.00 APPLICANT STATE SURCHARGE, ELEC FLAT0.50 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO TOTAL 20.50 13562 CENTRAL AVE NE Payment(s) BLAINE, MN 55304- CHECK82102396820.50 (763) 757-6202 Minnesota State License #: CA01796 OWNER ARMSTRONG DIANNE 4551 2 1/2 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. Applicant____________________________Date________ Bldg Insp____________________________Date ________ SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ISSUED:08/04/2006 FRIDLEY, MN55432- (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2006-01487 4551 2 1/2 ST NE : ADDRESSPERMIT APPLICANT: PIN:263024330097CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH13562 CENTRAL AVE NE :LOT 12 BLOCK 1BLAINE, MN 55304- PERMIT TYPE:ELECTRICAL PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL(763) 757-6202 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ELEC SERVICES, NEW BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS. CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKDAYS: 8 AM TO 4:30 PM INSPECTION TYPEDATEINSPECTORCOMMENTS ELECTRICAL FINAL04/17/07PBOBC INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE, NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY REMODELED BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL ALL WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL WORK IS COMPLETE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MN55432- // ISSUED:08042006 (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2006-01486 4551 2 1/2 ST NE ADDRESS: PIN:263024330097 LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH :LOT 12 BLOCK 1 PERMIT TYPE:HEATING - FIXTURE BASED PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:FURNACE - AIR CONDITIONING NOTE: H/O:763-571-3147 CONT: 763-757-6202 REPLACE/INSTALL FURNACE AND A/C AIR CONDITIONING FEE25.00 APPLICANT FURNACE FEE35.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY STATE SURCHARGE, MECH FLAT0.50 13562 CENTRAL AVENUE NE TOTAL 60.50 ANOKA, MN 55303 Payment(s) (763) 757-6202 CHECK82102396860.50 OWNER ARMSTRONG DIANNE 4551 2 1/2 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. Applicant____________________________Date________ 8/4/06 Bldg Insp____________________________Date ________ SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ISSUED:08/04/2006 FRIDLEY, MN55432- (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2006-01486 4551 2 1/2 ST NE : ADDRESSPERMIT APPLICANT: PIN:263024330097CENTERPOINT ENERGY LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH13562 CENTRAL AVENUE NE :LOT 12 BLOCK 1ANOKA, MN 55303 PERMIT TYPE:HEATING - FIXTURE BASED PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL(763) 757-6202 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:FURNACE - AIR CONDITIONING BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS. CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKDAYS: 8 AM TO 4:30 PM INSPECTION TYPEDATEINSPECTORCOMMENTS AIR CONDITIONING FINAL08/29/06PDAVE FURNACE FINAL08/30/06PDAVE INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE, NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY REMODELED BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL ALL WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL WORK IS COMPLETE. Building 0\,,%9\0 Inspections 7.63-572-3604 DATE 3 - —k— C) �__ SITE ADDRESS .� THIS APPLICANT IS: PROPERTY OWNER/ TENANT MECHANICAL RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY E-MAIL ADDRESS ❑ OWNER CONTRACTOR PHONE: -Z(- 3- 5 D 1- 3 l L" CONTRACTOR I COMPANY SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR STATE LICENSE WITH APPLICATION CONTACT PERSON: Tf%A'KTIU 7T113VVV Pennit No. " , Received By: Date Rec'd: ATE IP�_ I STATE LICENSE # EXP DATE ADDRESS: 13562 CEI Ad, AVE WE CITY ANOKA STATE NNZIP 55304 PHONE_ 763-757-6202 FAX 763-757-6701 _ PERMIT TYPE 'SINGLE FAMILY ❑ TWO FAMILY ❑ TOWNHOUSE TYPE OF WORK: [3 NEW REPLACEMENT ❑ ALTERATION/REMODEL DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WORK PER MS 16B.665 the permit fee is a minimum of $15.00 or 5% of the total cost up to $500.00, whichever is greater, for the improvement, installation or replacement of a residential fixture, excluding the fixtures. (This should reflect only the cost of labor ) Labor cost under $300 = $15.00. Labor cost between $300 to $500 =cost of labor—x.05 = FOR PROJECTS WHERE LABOR EXCEEDS $500, FEES ARE BASED ON $10.00 PER FIXTURE, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. FIXTURES: (INDICATE TOTAL NUMBER OF EACH BELOW)()' O SIZE/BTU `I ®r0O d Equipment Installed MFG: to �f l MODEL: SIZE/BTU—rte— l y Seer - MFG: C� Y Y e MODEL: bay SIZE/BTU MFG: MODEL: A/C $25.00 ____FIREPLACE (GAS) $15.00 GAS RANGE/OVEN $10.00 _AIR TO AIR EXCHANGEER $15 FIREPLACE (WOOD) $35.00 NEW GAS GRILL $10.00 BOILER $35.00 FURNACE $35.00 GAS UNIT HTR $10.00 CHIMNEY LINER $10.00 _GAS DRYER $10.00 POOL HEATER $35.00 _DUCT WORK $10.00 GAS PIPING $10.00 -- ,�/'�y).y��[v� VENTILATOR $15.00 .... Ji �'oMMI .. Permit Fee 4 $ Number of fixtures @ $10.00 x $10.00 = $ Surcharge $ .50 Number of fixtures @ $15.00 x $15.00 = $ TOTAL DUE $ Number of fixtures @ $25.00 x $25.00 = Number of fixtures @ $35.00 i x $35.00 = $_a!1a0 State Surcharge = $50 Total = $ O.� THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT NOT VALID UNTIL PROCESSED I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Fridley and with the Minnesota Construction Codes; that I understand this is not a permit but only an application for a permit and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of all work which requires review and approval of plans. f SIGNATURE OF APPLIC a r�� PRINT NAME ROGER HOFFHETN DATE City of Fridley Building Inspections Department 6431 University Avenue NE, Fridley, MN 55432 REQUIRED INFORMATION NEEDED TO PROCESS PERMIT RESIDENTIAL PERMIT APPLICATION HVAC ❑ NEW HOMES/ADDITIONS /] EXISTING HOME ❑ MAKE-UP AIR REQUIRED FOR NEW/EXISTING HOMES 1. Combustion Air (See note below) a. Coil or solid fuel IMC Chapter 7 with MN Amendments b. Natural Gas or PropaneUGC Chapter 3 with MN Amendments 2. Make-up Air (See note below) a. TMC Chapter 5 with MN Amendments 3. Venting a_ Gas appliances IFGC Chapter 5 with MN Amendments b. Fuel other than gas IMC Chapter 8 with MN Amendments REQUIRED FOR NEW HOMES 4. Heat loss & cooling load per room a. Required on new construction IMC 1346.0312 5. Ventilation . a. Per UNT Energy Code 7670 or 7672 6. Duct Design Per TMC 1346. 0603.2 .a. ACCA Manual D NOTE: Centerpoint Energy Mechanical Code Guidelines software may be used for combustion and make up air calculations CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MN55432- // ISSUED:10062006 (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2006-02060 4551 2 1/2 ST NE ADDRESS: PIN:263024330097 LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH :LOT 12 BLOCK 1 PERMIT TYPE:BUILDING PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ROOFING VALUATION:$3,193.00 NOTE: UNDERLAYMENT AS PER STATE BUILDING CODE. CONSTRUCTION IN THE CITY IS UNLAWFUL EXCEPT BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM AND 9:00 PM, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AND BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 9:00 AM AND 9:00 PM ON SATURDAYS. NO WORK IS ALLOWED ON SUNDAYS OR ANY LEGAL HOLIDAY UNLESS AN ALTERNATE WORK HOUR PERMIT HAS FIRST BEEN ISSUED. BUILDING PERMIT FEE97.25 APPLICANT FIRE SURCHARGE3.19 H AND H RESTORATION SERVICES INC STATE SURCHARGE, BLDG VALUE1.60 6935 2ND AVE LICENSE SURCHARGE5.00 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 TOTAL 107.04 (612) 251-5116 Payment(s) Minnesota State License #: 20404388 CHECK567434917107.04 OWNER ARMSTRONG DIANNE 4551 2 1/2 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. Applicant____________________________Date________ 10/6/06 Bldg Insp____________________________Date ________ SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ISSUED:10/06/2006 FRIDLEY, MN55432- (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2006-02060 4551 2 1/2 ST NE : ADDRESSPERMIT APPLICANT: PIN:263024330097H AND H RESTORATION SERVICES INC LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH6935 2ND AVE :LOT 12 BLOCK 1LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PERMIT TYPE:BUILDING PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL(612) 251-5116 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ROOFING : VALUATION$3,193.00 BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS. CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKDAYS: 8 AM TO 4:30 PM INSPECTION TYPEDATEINSPECTORCOMMENTS ICE & WATER BARRIER10/11/06PDAVE FINAL10/11/06PDAVE INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE, NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY REMODELED BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL ALL WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL WORK IS COMPLETE. Building Q: 5: BUH DING Permit No.: Inspections 65% of Building Permit Fee RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION Received By: 763-572-3604 Surcharge CITY OF FRIDLEY nate Rec'd: 1 ®� DATE Yr' ® YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS e -s+ a. �Irl SITE ADDRESS 4-5-G! 2-72 St. NF— $1550 per SAC Unit (Plans to MWCC for determination) TRIS APPLICANT IS: p OWNER °CONTRACTOR ft + 6 ft = ft x $21 = $ PROPERTY OWNER/ Nig; $450 Conservation Plan Review TENANT ADDRESS:.N Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge PHONE: "7(e �- 2371-31f7 55�E 21 CONTRACTOR NAME: `o v l c eS Make checks ble to: of Fri Attach SH Mations r�e,�S-�E�o LICENSE ii G.LJ' 04 -?>M EXPDATE t3E-10-1 1 q35 �� Ave CITY Lin o KeS STATEf 9ZIP.65� l!>_' SUBSTATE T A COPY NS YOUR STATE LICENSE OUR S ADDRESS: WITH APPLICATION PHONE 1012 —2 51 — 5110 FAX 5 l — 4 — 3 PROPERTY TYPE SINGLE FAMILY/NEW CONSTRUCTION SIZE (— 0 TWO FAMILYINEW CONSTRUCTION STORIES PERMIT TYPE p ADDITION 13 GARAGF/SHED p WINDOWS p BASEMENT FINISH ROOF p DRAIN TILE p DECK p SIDING p OTHER E3 SWIMMING POOL TYPE OF WORK p NEW p ADDITION p MAINTENANCE/REPAIR WREMODELING DESCRIBE WORK BEING DONE: s" ynove p6v late SIZE OF IMPROVEMENT LENGTH DTH HEIGHT Ft. ROOFING /' p HOUSE ONLY /,MOUSE & GARAGE BASEMENT REMODELING SUBMIT - NUMBER OF SQUARES l! o n 1. Effitised GARAGES p ATTACHED GARAGE r plan floor P� fl PROPOSED SIZE: p DETACHED GARAGE 3. List of structural members to be used 3. PROPOSED HEIGHT - SIDING FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING DECKS, p Vinyl psoffit ADDTIIONS & PORCHES SUMMIT: 0 Aluminum p Trim 1. Site PlanlSu vey showing the existing structures p Other p Fascia and Pied P%1ect- z Two sets of construction plans WINDOWS 3. Energy Calculations IN EXISTING OPENINGS OYes pNo LOCATION OF WINDOWS OR FOR NEW OPENINGS -DESCRIBE, SIZE OF OPENING CHANGES & TYPE OF WINDOW TO BE INSTALLED NUMBER OF WINDOWS ALL FEES ARE BASED VALUATION, INCLUDING THE COST OF L,AHUX AND MX1-rcrctA1a: / (USING THE 19�U B.0 FEE SCHEDULE) TOT JO� VALUATION S a .0o OCC[7PAI�ICY TYPE Permit Fee Q: 5: See Back Page for Fee Schedule Plan Review �- $ �. 65% of Building Permit Fee Fire Surcharge $ 3,17 .001 times the total job valuation Surcharge $ .0005 x Permit Valuation Minimum $.50 License Surcharge $ <;,00 $5.00 (State Licensed Residential Contractors) SAC Charge $ $1550 per SAC Unit (Plans to MWCC for determination) Curb Cut Escrow $ ft + 6 ft = ft x $21 = $ Erosion Control $ $450 Conservation Plan Review Park Fee $ Fee Determined by Engineering Sewer Main Charge $ Agreement necessary ( ) Non Necessary ( ) Total Due $ .0A1 Make checks ble to: of Fri Attach SH Mations THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT -NOT VALID UNTIL PROCESSED I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate, that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and odes of the City of Fridley and with the Minnesota Conshuction Codes; that I understand this is not a permit but only an application for a permit and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of all work h r ew and approval of plant. `' / SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT .� 11/v�f%/L.yPRINT NAME, �i°beCcattt? Y IYlGurISDY? DATE I 1('— CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MN55432- // ISSUED:06152007 (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2007-01012 4551 2 1/2 ST NE ADDRESS: PIN:263024330097 LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH :LOT 12 BLOCK 1 PERMIT TYPE:ELECTRICAL PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ENERGY SAVER SWITCH NOTE: XCEL ENERGY SAVER SWITCH ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE20.00 APPLICANT STATE SURCHARGE, ELEC FLAT0.50 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION TOTAL 20.50 2300 TERRITORIAL RD Payment(s) ST PAUL, MN 55114- CHECK13995920.50 OWNER ARMSTRONG DIANNE 4551 2 1/2 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. Applicant____________________________Date________ Bldg Insp____________________________Date ________ SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ISSUED:06/15/2007 FRIDLEY, MN55432- (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2007-01012 4551 2 1/2 ST NE : ADDRESSPERMIT APPLICANT: PIN:263024330097HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH2300 TERRITORIAL RD :LOT 12 BLOCK 1ST PAUL, MN 55114- PERMIT TYPE:ELECTRICAL PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ENERGY SAVER SWITCH BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS. CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKDAYS: 8 AM TO 4:30 PM INSPECTION TYPEDATEINSPECTORCOMMENTS ELECTRICAL FINAL06/18/07PBOBC INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE, NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY REMODELED BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL ALL WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL WORK IS COMPLETE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MN55432- // ISSUED:06082010 (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2010-00882 4551 2 1/2 ST NE ADDRESS: PIN:263024330097 LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH :LOT 12 BLOCK 1 PERMIT TYPE:ELECTRICAL PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ELEC MAINTENANCE NOTE: WIRE REPLACEMENT FURNACE AND AC. ELEC MAINTENANCE FEE35.00 APPLICANT STATE SURCHARGE, ELEC FLAT0.50 ELECTRICAL VISIONS TOTAL 35.50 8667 JEFFERSON HWY Payment(s) OSSEO, MN 55369 CHECK1286635.50 (763) 425-1153 Minnesota State License #: CA04232 OWNER ARMSTRONG DIANNE 4551 2 1/2 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. Applicant____________________________Date________ Bldg Insp____________________________Date ________ SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ISSUED:06/08/2010 FRIDLEY, MN55432- (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2010-00882 4551 2 1/2 ST NE : ADDRESSPERMIT APPLICANT: PIN:263024330097ELECTRICAL VISIONS LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH8667 JEFFERSON HWY :LOT 12 BLOCK 1OSSEO, MN 55369 PERMIT TYPE:ELECTRICAL PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL(763) 425-1153 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:ELEC MAINTENANCE BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS. CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKDAYS: 8 AM TO 4:30 PM INSPECTION TYPEDATEINSPECTORCOMMENTS ELECTRICAL FINAL06/09/10PBOBC INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE, NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY REMODELED BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL ALL WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL WORK IS COMPLETE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MN55432- // ISSUED:06152010 (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2010-00933 4551 2 1/2 ST NE ADDRESS: PIN:263024330097 LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH :LOT 12 BLOCK 1 PERMIT TYPE:HEATING - FIXTURE BASED PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE:FURNACE - AIR CONDITIONING NOTE: AIR CONDITIONER CAN NOT BE PLACED IN A SIDE YARD WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER. FURNACE AND AIR. CARRIER 58HDX060 60,000 CARRIER 24A88024 2TON AIR CONDITIONING FEE25.00 APPLICANT FURNACE FEE35.00 FLARE HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING STATE SURCHARGE, MECH FLAT0.50 9303 PLYMOUTH AVE N TOTAL 60.50 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427- Payment(s) (763) 542-1166 CHECK5376360.50 OWNER ARMSTRONG DIANNE 4551 2 1/2 ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced witin 180 days or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. Applicant____________________________Date________ 6/15/10 Bldg Insp____________________________Date ________ SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. CITY OF FRIDLEY 7071UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE ISSUED:06/15/2010 FRIDLEY, MN55432- (763)572-3604FAX: (763)502-4977 Permit #2010-00933 4551 2 1/2 ST NE : ADDRESSPERMIT APPLICANT: PIN:263024330097FLARE HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING LEGAL DESC:REAR BL 13,14 & 15 PLYMOUTH9303 PLYMOUTH AVE N :LOT 12 BLOCK 1GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427- PERMIT TYPE:HEATING - FIXTURE BASED PROPERTY TYPE:RESIDENTIAL(763) 542-1166 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:FURNACE - AIR CONDITIONING BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS. CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKDAYS: 8 AM TO 4:30 PM INSPECTION TYPEDATEINSPECTORCOMMENTS FURNACE FINAL AIR CONDITIONING FINAL EXPIRED. NO REQUEST FOR INSPECTIONS. EXPIRED PERMIT06/13/12RONJ INSPECTION COMMENTS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE, NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY REMODELED BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL ALL WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES UNTIL WORK IS COMPLETE.